Next Article in Journal
A Fatal Case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Community-Acquired Pneumonia in an Immunocompetent Patient: Clinical and Molecular Characterization and Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Inside Current Winemaking Challenges: Exploiting the Potential of Conventional and Unconventional Yeasts
Previous Article in Journal
Polyhydroxybutyrate Production from Methane and Carbon Dioxide by a Syntrophic Consortium of Methanotrophs with Oxygenic Photogranules without an External Oxygen Supply
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fresh Produce as a Potential Vector and Reservoir for Human Bacterial Pathogens: Revealing the Ambiguity of Interaction and Transmission
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms11051111
Review Report
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Review of Modern Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens

Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1111; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051111
by Mohammed Aladhadh
Reviewer 1:
Salam Ibrahim
Reviewer 2:
Raffaella Cocco
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1111; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051111
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 9 April 2023 / Accepted: 10 April 2023 / Published: 24 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Review Papers in Food Microbiology 2023)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an excellent review and should be considered for publication.  I suggest adding 2-3 more tables and can provide a summary related to current methods, advantages, and disadv.  

 

it should be a good idea to add one paragraph related to sampling for microbial analysis and standard methods for testing.  AOAC or ASM. 

the conclusion is very limited and does not describe some limitations and future needs.  overall excellent job. thank you for the effort. SAI

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is interesting and addresses an important public health topic. The work is well organized and described in an understandable way. The work is scientifically valid and not misleading. The bibliography is adeguate and relevant.

Author Response

I am very grateful for the reviewers' comments.

Reviewer 3 Report

The review is well conducted and I have proposed some questions that I think should be addressed.

- Delete the examples in lines 9, 15, 17 and 18 because I think it is more important improving the conclusion in the abstract, explaining the impact of your review and the main discoveries.

-Line48 delete (nisin).

-Conclusion and future directions: I believe that future trends and directions should be included. Authors can discuss, for example, the latest technology and alternatives to preservatives.
-References provided should be well formatted and I suggest avoiding articles older than 10 years whenever possible.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop