Next Article in Journal
Use of Shotgun Metagenomics to Assess the Microbial Diversity and Hydrocarbons Degrading Functions of Auto-Mechanic Workshops Soils Polluted with Gasoline and Diesel Fuel
Previous Article in Journal
Zoonotic Parasites in Playgrounds in Southern Spain: A One Health Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/microorganisms11030720
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microbial Composition on Abandoned and Reclaimed Mining Sites in the Komi Republic (North Russia)

by
Aleksei O. Zverev
1,2,*,
Grigory V. Gladkov
1,3,
Anastasiia K. Kimeklis
1,3,
Arina A. Kichko
1,3,
Evgeny E. Andronov
1,2 and
Evgeny V. Abakumov
1,3,*
1
All-Russian Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology (ARRIAM), 3 Podbelsky Chaussee, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Pyzhyovskiy Lane 7, 119017 Moscow, Russia
3
Applied Ecology Department, St. Petersburg University (SPbU), 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(3), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030720
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Restoration of anthropogenically disturbed soils is an urgent problem in modern ecology and soil biology. Restoration processes in northern environments are especially important, due to the small amounts of fertile land and low levels of natural succession. We analyzed the soil microbiota, which is one of the indicators of the succession process is the soil. Samples were obtained from three disturbed soils (self-overgrown and reclaimed quarries), and two undisturbed soils (primary and secondary forests). Primary Forest soil had a well-developed soil profile, and a low pH and TOC (total organic carbon) amount. The microbial community of this soil had low richness, formed a clear remote cluster in the beta-diversity analysis, and showed an overrepresentation of Geobacter (Desulfobacteriota). Soil formation in clay and limestone abandoned quarries was at the initial stage, and was caused by both a low rate of mineral profile formation and severe climatic conditions in the region. Microbial communities of these soils did not have specific abundant taxa, and included a high amount of sparse taxa. Differences in taxa composition were correlated with abiotic factors (ammonium concentration), which, in turn, can be explained by the parent rock properties. Limestone quarry reclaimed by topsoil coverage resulted in an adaptation of the top soil microbiota to a novel parent rock. According to the CCA analysis, the microbial composition of samples was connected with pH, TOC and ammonium nitrogen concentration. Changes in pH and TOC were connected with ASVs from Chloroflexota, Gemmatimonadota and Patescibacteria. ASVs from Gemmatimonadota also were correlated with a high ammonium concentration.

1. Introduction

The Republic of Komi is one of the largest regions in Russia, and the largest one in the European part of the country. There are eight natural zones within the republic’s territory [1]. Ukhta city is located on the border of the middle and the northern taiga. The topography, lithology and bioclimatic conditions there are quite heterogeneous. In the last 70 years, soils of the republic have been investigated by numerous scientists in terms of their biology [2], soil organic chemistry [3] and classic cryopedology [4]. Although the region is large and has preserved many natural ecosystems, anthropogenic activity has led to an intensive transformation of the environment [5,6]. One of the significant factors involved in transforming the natural environment is open and shaft mining. Numerous quarries are located near Ukhta city. They are used for the mining of different resources, mainly construction materials (clays, sand and gravel, limestone, etc.).
The restoration of post-mining soils is a complex process that includes the management of all types of physical, chemical and biological disturbances of soils, such as the soil pH, fertility, microbial community, and various soil nutrient cycles [7]. Post-mining abandoned soils are normally characterized by undeveloped soil profiles, with an early stage of biogenic–abiogenic interactions occurring on the surface. The microbial composition of these soils is highly connected with abiotic factors. Many post-mining soils also contain significant amounts of toxic elements, or unnatural amounts of different chemical variables. Microbial communities of the soils are highly connected with soil properties. Alongside classical agrochemical analysis, they can be used for the description of restoration processes in soils. Unlike natural soils, the soil microbiota of post-mining soils shows a unique microbial composition. In terms of richness and evenness, the soil microbiota varies from rich to poor, mostly with hyper-variation in an abundance of different taxa [8].
The northern soils of Russia are relatively poorly studied. They are associated with both the severe climatic conditions of the region, as well as the weak development of the region. Despite this, the restoration of post-mining soils is an important problem. Due to climatic conditions, the restoration processes are relatively slow. This knowledge can be used for the greater understanding of soil restoration processes. The agrochemical data on primary soils formed in the quarries around Ukhta were published previously [9]. The microbiome of primary and natural soils around Ukhta city has not been studied enough, and only a few articles on soil biota have been published recently [10,11]. Single studies of the microbiome of soils and dumps in the cryolithozone of Russia include those investigating locations in Yamal [12,13] and central Yakutia [14]. In this regard, the study of the microbiome of post-anthropogenic soils and soils of the background (reference) ecosystems of the Komi Republic allows us to obtain more data regarding the microbial communities and processes occurring in complex northern soils. This work aimed to study the microbiome of soils of open pit dump complexes, as well as reference background soils—north taiga ecosystems—using modern methods of next-generation sequencing. The following objectives were set: (i) to evaluate the microbial diversity of soils, (ii) to identify microbial taxa, connected with differences in soil microbiota, and (iii) to measure abiotic factors and their influence on microbial biodiversity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

Soils were described and sampled at different post-mining locations around Ukhta city, the Komi Republic, Russia (see Figure 1 and Table 1). Abandoned post-mining locations were presented by clay and limestone quarries (Dumped Limestone and Quarry Clay locations). Other locations were a limestone quarry, reclaimed by the top soil cover (Reclaimed Limestone), and a secondary forest nearby (Secondary Forest), which presumably was used as a topsoil source for the reclamation of the Reclaimed Limestone site. As a reference, the nearby location with the non-disturbed primary forest was selected (Primary Forest).
Samples were collected in five locations, with three replicas (sampled in 100 m proximities) in each location, for a total of fifteen samples. In every spot, the soil cut was set. The soil profile was described and the soil type was identified. Soil naming has been conducted according to WRB 2022 [15]. From the top soil (0–5 cm depth) of every spot, 500 g of soil mass was collected for the agrochemical analysis; 2 g of topsoil was sampled for the microbiological analysis (in 4 technical replicas). All soil samples were transported at +4 °C and stored at −20 °C. Information about sampling areas is provided in Table 1.
Despite the cold climate, there is no effect of permafrost on soil formation in the Ukhta region (in this region the permafrost zone is deeper than 1 m below the soil sampling level). The annual mean temperature is −1.05 °C, the mean July temperature is 15.9 °C, and the mean January temperature is −17.2 °C, with a total of 85 days having temperatures above 10 °C. The annual precipitation is 540 mm.

2.2. Agrochemical Analysis and DNA Extraction

The samples were air-dried, ground and passed through a 2 mm sieve. Soil solution was prepared in a ratio of 1:2.5 with water or 1M calcium chloride (CaCl2) [16]. The pH of the soil solution was measured by the pH meter pH-150MA (Belarus) [17]. Total organic carbon (TOC) content was determined by the Tyurin method, based on the oxidation of soil organic matter with a mixture of potassium dichromate and concentrated sulfuric acid [16]. The content of available forms of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) was determined using a potassium chloride solution. The amount of free potassium and phosphorus was determined by the Kirsanov method [18].
The total soil DNA was isolated by using the MN NucleoSpin Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Germany), using a Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quality control was carried out by PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. The sequencing of the V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed on the Illumina MiSEQ sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), using the primers 515f (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and 806r (GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT) [19].

2.3. Bioinformatic Analysis

The general processing of sequences was carried out in R 4.0 [20], using dada2 (v. 1.14.1) [21] and phyloseq (v. 1.30.0) [22] packages, according to the authors’ recommendations. The 16S rDNA amplicon sequences were processed according to the dada2 pipeline. Sequences were trimmed by length (minimum 220 bp for forward and 180 bp for reverse reads) and quality (absence of N, maximum error rates maxEE were 2 for both forward and reverse reads). ASVs were determined according to the dada2 algorithm, and chimeric ASVs were removed by the “consensus” method. The taxonomic annotation was performed by the naive Bayesian classifier (provided in the dada2 package, default settings), with the SILVA 138 database [23] used as the training set; phyla names were corrected according to LPSN [24].
The alpha (observed ASV and Simpson indices)- and beta-diversity (Bray-Curtis distance) metrics were calculated using phyloseq and vegan [25] packages. The PCoA ordination of Bray–Curtis distances was drawn using the phyloseq package. The PERMANOVA analysis was carried out using the vegan package. The top 1000 most abundant ASVs were used for the CCA analysis in the vegan package [25]. The chemical variables used in the analysis were TOC, pH, P, K, N–ammonium and N–nitrate.
The differential abundance analysis was used for the determination of significant differences in the abundances of taxa between sites. This analysis was performed by the DeSEQ2 package [26]; the filters used were abs(log2FoldChange) ≥ 2 and baseMean ≥ 10.

3. Results

3.1. General Soil Characteristics

The mature soil was represented by a zone of Podzol, with a well-developed soil profile and signs of superficial humus (AY) and iron (BF horizon) illuviation. Podzol in the Ukhta city region had a full profile with clear eluvial–illuvial differentiation. Soils of the mines were represented by Leptosols (Clay Quarry samples), Leptosols with signs of gleyification (Secondary Forest samples) and Rendzic Leptosols (Limestone samples). Due to biogenic processes, the topsoil of the primary forest soil was characterized by an acidic pH and a relatively small amount of TOC.
According to primitive soil structure profiles, the soil development rate in the post-mining zones was relatively slow. It was caused by severe climatic conditions and a short period of biological activity. The mature soil was represented by a Podzol, with the feature of iron illuviation (in the BF horizon). Disturbed soils were represented by the initial soils that had formed on the mining heaps, of various genesis. Data on the chemical analysis of upper horizons are in Supplementary Table S1. All soils had a small percentage of humus. The level of soil acidity was higher in mature Podzols than in primary soils of the mining areas, due to the long impact of weathering and leaching in mature soils. The content of available forms of nitrogen was increased in humus and organogenic soil horizons when compared with other soil types. The results are presented in Table 2.

3.2. Soil Microbiota

After the bioinformatic processing was completed, 16,154 ASVs from 60 samples were obtained; the depth of sequencing ranged from 11,507 to 28,938 sequences per sample (11,507 after rarefaction for alpha-diversity analysis).
The alpha-diversity of samples is presented in Figure 2. According to the one-way ANOVA, for both observed ASVs (Df1 = 4, Df2 = 55, F = 13.59, p < 0.01) and Simpson (Df1 = 4, Df2 = 55, F = 9.93, p < 0.01) indices, the location was a significant predictor. The results of Tukey’s post-hoc tests are in Table 3.
The Primary Forest samples had the lowest value of richness, according to the observed ASVs index. It was significantly lower than the ones obtained for all other quarries’ samples, but not for the Secondary Forest. The richness of Secondary Forest samples was presumably higher than in Primary Forest samples and lower than in samples of quarries.
A significant difference in evenness (according to the Simpson index) had been discovered between the Primary Forest and Secondary Forest, as well as the Dumped Limestone and Quarry Clay, samples. Additionally, the evenness in Dumped Limestone samples was significantly higher than in Reclaimed Limestone samples. In general, the highest evenness was characterized for the disturbed quarry samples, whereas the more-developed soils had moderate values.
The results of the PCoA (beta-diversity, calculated using Bray–Curtis distances) are presented in Figure 3A. Due to the relatively high distances between the Primary Forest and other samples, the resolution of the PCoA plot for quarry samples was limited. The same plot was repeated without Primary Forest samples (Figure 2B). According to this data, the Primary Forest samples had a unique microbial composition, clustered in PCoA, in their own far cluster. Samples from the Reclaimed Limestone and Clay Quarry were also grouped in clear clusters, whereas Dumped Limestone and Secondary Forest samples had high inter-replica variation. According to the PERMANOVA, the sampling location was a significant factor (Df1 = 4, Df2 = 55, F = 16.38, p = 0.01) for the Bray–Curtis distances.
The taxonomic composition at the phyla level was typical for soils. Major phyla that were observed were Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Acidobacteriota, and Actinomycetota, followed by Chloroflexota, Myxococcota and Verrucomicrobiota. There was no significant difference in the abundance of different phyla. According to the differential abundance analysis at the genus level, 128 ASVs were determined as variable taxa. Their relative abundances (in log transformation) are shown in Figure 4. ASVs are labeled at the genus level—in case of any absence of information, the lowest possible rank is provided.
The most abundant taxa from the soil microbiota of Primary Forest were Paraphilimonas (Bacteroidota), Bradyrhizobium (Pseudomonadota) and Geobacter (Desulfobacteriota). In Clay Quarry samples, the most abundant genera were Niastella (Bacteroidota) and Variovorax (Pseudomonadota), and in Dumped Limestone it was Pseudarthrobacter (Actinomycetota). Taxa from Secondary Forest and Reclaimed Limestone samples were not overrepresented.
The CCA revealed a connection between soil chemical variables and microbial ASV abundance (Df1 = 3, Df2 = 11, F = 2.55, p < 0.01). Significant predictors in the model were pH, total organic carbon (TOC) and ammonium concentration (N–ammonium). Using this model in the ordination of ASVs and samples, it was possible to determine how different ASVs or samples were affected by chemical factors. The ordination of ASVs is presented in Figure 5A. ASVs were annotated with different taxa levels, in search of a connection between the abundance of an ASV and the soil chemical factors. Three phyla-level taxa—Chloroflexota, Gemmatimonadota, and Patescibacteria—were estimated as being dependent on chemical factors. ASVs from Chloroflexota and Patescibacteria were connected with a high amount of TOC and a high pH, whereas ASVs from Gemmatimonadota were also connected with a low amount of ammonium nitrogen (Figure 4A). The sample ordination (Figure 5B) was determined by low TOC amount in the acidic soil of Primary Forest samples. Alongside this, the amount of ammonium nitrogen was also an important factor—Dumped Limestone soils had a low amount of nitrogen, whereas Quarry Clay samples had a high amount of it (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

4.1. Primary Forest Soil Was Distinct from All Other Samples

Unlike all other soils in the dataset, the mature soil of Primary Forest samples was represented by Podzol, with a well-developed soil profile. The topsoil was characterized by an acidic pH and a relatively small amount of TOC. Microbial communities from the Primary Forest topsoil had their own specific structure (according to Bray distances) as well as a low richness. Such a specific microbial structure is typical for undisturbed primary forests, whereas a low richness is not [27]. Differential taxa analysis revealed several highly abundant taxa, associated with distinct microbial compositions. Paraphilimonas was previously reported as a novel strain from the rhizosphere of tomatoes [28], and was found in greenhouse soil in Korea [29]. A remarkably high amount of Geobacter suggests the specific role of this taxa in soil processes. Geobacter is known for its aerobic metal ion reduction in subsurface environments [30], so it is reasonable to suggest it being an intermediary in oxidation–reduction processes within soil. For instance, a significant amount of iron illuviation in the BF soil horizon can be associated with the metabolic activity of Geobacter. The other important taxa were Puia (Bacteroidota)—an aerobic bacteria located in broad-leaved forest soil in China, with an optimum pH of 4 [31]; Bradyrhizobium (Pseudomonadota); Candidatus Udaeobacter (Verrucomicrobiota), which is a widespread dominant group in acidic (pH ~ 5.1) soils [32]. A small amount of TOC can be explained by mostly copiotrophic communities, which are also typical in well-formed soils [33]

4.2. Secondary Forest Samples Were More Diverse Than the Primary Ones

The soil profile of the Secondary Forest sites was less developed than the one in the Primary Forest. Alongside a more neutral pH and increasing TOC amount, the microbial communities of the soil had a greater variation in both richness and the abundance of microorganisms. This is evidence of broader microbiological processes, associated primarily with local environment properties rather than with a specific role in soil metabolism. Significant taxa in this site were not overrepresented, and were generally associated with plants. For example, Niastella (Bacteroidota) was isolated from the rhizospheric soil of a persimmon tree [34]; Skermanella (Pseudomonadota) was previously found in meadow soil [35].

4.3. Abandoned Quarries Were Poor, but Different, Due to Their Soil Properties

Both Clay Quarry and Dumped Limestone samples were characterized by similar alpha-diversity—relatively high richness, followed by high evenness. Thus, the communities did not have specific abundant taxa, and were instead represented by a high number of sparse taxa. This is typical for disturbed, undeveloped soils, especially those in cold climates [14]. In contrast, the composition of taxa was different—according to beta-diversity, samples were separated into distinct clusters. According to CCA, this separation was highly correlated with abiotic factors (ammonium concentration in particular). This can be explained by parent rock properties. Clay soil resists water drainage and can accumulate different nutrition components, while limestone is easily drained.
Another difference was associated with the variation in replicas. Clay Quarries’ samples had the same microbial composition (which forms a clear cluster in beta-diversity), but varied in their richness. In contrast, Dumped Limestone samples had similar richness and evenness indices, but significant variations in terms of their taxa composition.

4.4. Limestone Recultivated Soils Had Their Unique Microbiome

Top soil is often used to supplement areas with poor substrate levels and to provide improved growth conditions [7]. The placement of a top soil cover (same as in the Secondary Forest site) over limestone parent rock led to a specific microbial community, distinct from both the Secondary Forest and Clay Quarry samples. These changes were the result of a well-developed topsoil microbial community adaptation to a novel parent rock. In spite of their high richness, the evenness in Limestone Recultivated samples was lower and closer to that from developed soils.
The relative abundant taxa analysis revealed taxa, previously known, from both the Secondary Forest (Niastella) and Dumped Limestone (Pseudarthrobacter) sites. Additionally, we identified Bradyrhizobium and Rizobialis (Pseudomonadota) taxa, having a range of ecological roles, including nitrogen fixation and bioremediation, as well as acting as plant pathogens [36].

4.5. pH, TOC and Ammonium Concentration Were Significant Abiotic Factors

According to the CCA analysis, pH, TOC and ammonium concentration were significant factors in the association of soil chemical variables with microbial ASV abundance. According to CCA, TOC and pH are environmental conditions that are associated with the unique composition of the Primary Forest samples, whereas the ammonium concentration factor had a more complicated effect. Alongside the unique composition of the Primary Forest samples, a low amount of ammonium was connected with Dumped Limestone Quarry samples, whereas a high amount was associated with the Clay Quarry. This is presumably linked to the substrate properties: clay soil resists water drainage and accumulates nutrition components (which boosts soil formation processes), while limestone is easily drained.
The CCA also revealed microbial taxa that are associated with these abiotic factors. Changes in pH and TOC were associated with ASVs from Chloroflexota, Gemmatimonadota and Patescibacteria phyla. Additionally, the presence of ASVs from Gemmatimonadota was correlated with high ammonium concentration. One of the Gemmatimonadota features is an adaptation to low soil moisture [37]. This supports the earlier hypothesis surrounding the connection between the water regime and ammonium concentration.

5. Conclusions

Soil formation in the abandoned quarries demonstrated a low mineral profile formation rate. This has been caused by both severe climatic conditions in the region and the poor nutritional content of materials exposed on the surfaces of the mines. The soil formation in these sites is in the initial stage.
Non-disturbed primary forest soil had a well-developed soil profile. It also was unique both in terms of is abiotic factors and microbial communities. Both a low pH and TOC were associated with a specific composition of the microbiota. The overrepresentation of Geobacter (Desulfobacteriota) was presumably connected with active oxidation–reduction processes in the soil. Secondary forest soils were less developed and had more variation in replicas.
Abandoned limestone and clay quarries were, primarily, undeveloped, primary soils. Microbial communities of these soils did not have specific abundant taxa, and instead included a high amount of sparse taxa. Differences in taxa composition were also connected with abiotic factors (ammonium concentration), which, in turn, can be explained by parent rock properties (in particular, the levels of the substrate). Recultivation of the limestone quarry by top soil coverage led to an adaptation of top soil microbiota to this novel parent rock, and to the creation of its own distinct microbiota.
The microbial composition of samples was hinged on three abiotic factors—pH, TOC (total organic carbon) and ammonium nitrogen concentration. Changes in pH and TOC were connected with ASVs from Chloroflexota, Gemmatimonadota and Patescibacteria. The presence of ASVs from Gemmatimonadota was also correlated with a high ammonium concentration.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11030720/s1, Table S1: Nutrition parameters of disturbed and reference soils.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V.A.; methodology, G.V.G. and A.K.K.; formal analysis, A.O.Z.; investigation, A.O.Z. and E.V.A.; resources, A.K.K. and A.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.O.Z. and A.K.K.; supervision, E.E.A.; funding acquisition, E.V.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in accordance with agreement № 075-15-2022-322 date 22.04.2022 on providing a grant in the form of subsidies from the Federal budget of Russian Federation. The grant was provided for state support for the creation and development of a World-class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Laboratory of Soil Carbon and Microbial Ecology, Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, for supporting this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Evgeny, L. Soil Atlas of the Komi Republic; LC “Komi Republician Publishing House”: Syktyvkar, Russia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Iliushin, V.; Kirtsideli, I. Dynamics of complexes of microfungi in the process of overgrowing spoil tips of coal mines in the southern tundra zone (komi republic). Micol. Phytopatology 2021, 55, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pengerud, A.; Dignac, M.-F.; Certini, G.; Strand, L.; Forte, C.; Rasse, D. Soil Organic Matter Molecular Composition and State of Decomposition in Three Locations of the European Arctic. Biogeochemistry 2017, 135, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pastukhov, A.; Marchenko-Vagapova, T.; Loiko, S.; Kaverin, D. Vulnerability of the Ancient Peat Plateaus in Western Siberia. Plants 2021, 10, 2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Walker, T.; Young, S.; Crittenden, P.; Zhang, H. Anthropogenic Metal Enrichment of Snow and Soil in North-Eastern European Russia. Environ. Pollut. Barking Essex 1987 2003, 121, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zemlyanskiy, V.; Kurta, I.; Pasynkov, A. Technological Researches of Coal Mining Waste with Its Processing and Utilization to Build-up Production of Constructional Concrete in the North. In Proceedings of the XVIII International Coal Preparation Congress, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 28 June–1 July 2016; pp. 477–482, ISBN 978-3-319-40942-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheoran, V.; Sheoran, A.; Poonia, P. Soil Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Land by Revegetation: A Review. Int. J. Soil Sediment Water 2010, 3, 13. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zverev, A.; Kimeklis, A.; Kichko, A.; Gladkov, G.; Andronov, E.; Abakumov, E. Microbial Features of Mature and Abandoned Soils in Refractory Clay Deposits. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abakumov, E.; Maksimova, E.; Lagoda, A.; Koptseva, E. Soil Formation in the Quarries for Limestone and Clay Production in the Ukhta Region. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2011, 44, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Archegova, I. Thermal Regime of Tundra Soils under Reclamation and Restoration of Natural Vegetation. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2007, 40, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Likhanova, I.; Archegova, I. Soil Formation under Progressive Accelerated Succession of Forest Ecosystems in the North of Russia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2009, 2, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pershina, E.; Ivanova, E.; Kineklis, A.; Zverev, A.; Kichko, A.; Aksenova, T.; Evgeny, A.; Abakumov, E. Soil Microbiomes of Reclaimed and Abandoned Mines of the Yamal Region. Pol. Polar Res. 2020, 41, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abakumov, E.; Zverev, A.; Morgun, E.; Alekseev, I. Microbiome of Abandoned Agricultural and Mature Tundra Soils in Southern Yamal Region, Russian Arctic. Open Agric. 2020, 5, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zverev, A.; Petrov, A.; Kimeklis, A.; Kichko, A.; Andronov, E.; Petrov, A.; Abakumov, E. Microbiomes of the Initial Soils of Mining Areas of Yakutsk City (Eastern Siberia, Russia). Czech Polar Rep. 2020, 10, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, 4th ed.; International Union of Soil Sciences: Vienna, Austria, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and A Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. FAQ. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil PH Determination; FAQ: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  18. FAQ. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Available Phosphorus-Olsen Method; FAQ: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. Caporaso, J.; Lauber, C.; Walters, W.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Lozupone, C.; Turnbaugh, P.; Fierer, N.; Knight, R. Global Patterns of 16S RRNA Diversity at a Depth of Millions of Sequences per Sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. Callahan, B.; Mcmurdie, P.; Rosen, M.; Han, A.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mcmurdie, P.; Holmes, S. Phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F. The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web-Based Tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parte, A.C.; Sardà Carbasse, J.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Reimer, L.C.; Göker, M. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) Moves to the DSMZ. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5607–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.; O’Hara, B.; Simpson, G.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, H.; Wagner, H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 22-1 2015, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  26. Love, M.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cai, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, S. Land-Use Type Strongly Shapes Community Composition, but Not Always Diversity of Soil Microbes in Tropical China. Catena 2018, 165, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cho, H.; Ahn, J.-H.; Weon, H.-Y.; Joa, J.-H.; Hong, S.-B.; Seok, S.-J.; Kim, J.-S.; Kwon, S.-W.; Kim, S.-J. Parafilimonas Rhizosphaerae Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Tomato Plant (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2279–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, S.-J.; Park, J.-H.; Lim, J.-M.; Ahn, J.-H.; Anandham, R.; Weon, H.-Y.; Kwon, S.-W. Parafilimonas Terrae Gen. Nov., Sp Nov., Isolated from Greenhouse Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3040–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Methé, B.A.; Nelson, K.E.; Eisen, J.A.; Paulsen, I.T.; Nelson, W.; Heidelberg, J.F.; Wu, D.; Wu, M.; Ward, N.; Beanan, M.J.; et al. Genome of Geobacter Sulfurreducens: Metal Reduction in Subsurface Environments. Science 2003, 302, 1967–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lv, Y.; Gao, Z.; Xia, F.; Maman, A.; Qiu, L. Puia Dinghuensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Monsoon Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4639–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Spyridonov, I.; Krafft, L.; Schöning, I.; Schrumpf, M.; Nacke, H. The Ubiquitous Soil Verrucomicrobial Clade ‘Candidatus Udaeobacter’ Shows Preferences for Acidic PH. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2021, 13, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liang, Y.; Fujing, P.; Ma, J.; Yang, Z.; Yan, P. Long-Term Forest Restoration Influences Succession Patterns of Soil Bacterial Communities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 20598–20607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Akter, S.; Park, J.-H.; Rahman, M.M.; Huq, M.A. Niastella Soli Sp. Nov., Isolated from Rhizospheric Soil of a Persimmon Tree. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 004870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, M.; Wang, B.; Lin, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, X. Skermanella Pratensis Sp. Nov., Isolated from Meadow Soil, and Emended Description of the Genus Skermanella. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1605–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Carvalho, F.M.; Souza, R.C.; Barcellos, F.G.; Hungria, M.; Vasconcelos, A.T.R. Genomic and Evolutionary Comparisons of Diazotrophic and Pathogenic Bacteria of the Order Rhizobiales. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. DeBruyn, J.M.; Nixon, L.T.; Fawaz, M.N.; Johnson, A.M.; Radosevich, M. Global Biogeography and Quantitative Seasonal Dynamics of Gemmatimonadetes in Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6295–6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 11 00720 g001 550
Figure 1. Large-scale depiction of the region utilized for sampling.
Figure 1. Large-scale depiction of the region utilized for sampling.
Microorganisms 11 00720 g001
Microorganisms 11 00720 g002 550
Figure 2. Alpha-diversity indices (observed ASVs and Simpson indices) of all samples. Different biological replicas are marked by color.
Figure 2. Alpha-diversity indices (observed ASVs and Simpson indices) of all samples. Different biological replicas are marked by color.
Microorganisms 11 00720 g002
Microorganisms 11 00720 g003 550
Figure 3. PCoA of Bray–Curtis distances between samples and replicas ((A)—all samples in the dataset; (B)—“Forest Global” samples are excluded). Different shape indicates different replicas.
Figure 3. PCoA of Bray–Curtis distances between samples and replicas ((A)—all samples in the dataset; (B)—“Forest Global” samples are excluded). Different shape indicates different replicas.
Microorganisms 11 00720 g003
Microorganisms 11 00720 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative abundances of significantly variable taxa (colored by log of abundance).
Figure 4. Relative abundances of significantly variable taxa (colored by log of abundance).
Microorganisms 11 00720 g004
Microorganisms 11 00720 g005 550
Figure 5. Visualization of the CCA analysis ((A)—ASVs and their total abundance, valuable phyla are highlighted by color (others are masked by grey colour), (B)—samples).
Figure 5. Visualization of the CCA analysis ((A)—ASVs and their total abundance, valuable phyla are highlighted by color (others are masked by grey colour), (B)—samples).
Microorganisms 11 00720 g005
Table
Table 1. Description of sampling locations.
Table 1. Description of sampling locations.
VegetationReplica DetailsReplicaSoil ProfileLocation DetailsLocation
Clover, coltsfoot, cereals, St. John’s wort, mossBottom of the quarry uphill from waterIW *
C		Abandoned clay quarry near a road. Herbs overgrown on the bottom of the quarryQuarry Clay
N 63.54852, E 53.757625
Willow, sparse herbs, litterBottom of the quarry near the slopeII
Grass cover, dotted spruce and pineBottom of the quarry near the water pondIII
Pine, birch, rowan, moss, blueberry, wild rose, lingonberry, oxalis, legumesForest, forest litterIAY *
E
BF
C		Primary pine forest with well-developed underwoodPrimary Forest
N 63.542693, E 53.776319
Pine, birch, club mossForest, forest litter and mossII
Birch, rowanForest, forest litter and grassIII
Sedge, cereals, coltsfoot, legumesBottom of the quarryIW *
AC
Cc		Bottom of abandoned limestone quarry, broken stones with herbsDumped Limestone
N 63.599297, E 53.776415
Birch, pine, willow, spruce, coltsfoot, Ivan-tea, crushed stone on the surface, mossBottom of the quarry, young forestII
Burdock, cereals, legumes, coltsfootTop of the local hill in the quarryIII
Willow, pine, birch, cereals, legumes, Ivan-teaSlope of dumpIW *
ACca
Cg		Bottom of limestone quarry recultivated by topsoil cover, broken stonesReclaimed Limestone
N 63.589972, E 53.796547
Ivan-tea, moss, peas, willow, pine, birchSlope with rocksII
Aspen, undergrowth of larch and pine, birchEdge of quarryIII
Undergrowth of pine, birch, willow. herbs, coltsfoot, clover, A moss, legumes, Ivan-teaEdge of the forestIAU *
AC
Cca		Young secondary forest (pine, birch, willow)Secondary Forest
N 63.596806, E 53.782191
Birch, pine, moss, clover, legumes, dandelion, coltsfootForestII
Pine, birch, willow, clover, legumes, Ivan-teaForestIII
* marks the horizon of sampling.
Table
Table 2. Measured soil chemical variables.
Table 2. Measured soil chemical variables.
NO3−
mg/100 g		NH4+
mg/100 g		K,
mg/100 g		P,
mg/100 g		pHTOC
%		ReplicaLocation
15.298.6369426.81.45IQuarry Clay
1.5944.33377.371.56II
12.493885366.91.21III
2.57.6259466.40.66IPrimary Forest
2.2410.3188525.90.87II
0.7719.2296675.50.55III
0.733.767854.77.31.22IDumped Limestone
1.389.361186.87.51.34II
4.654.262402.17.41.12III
10.613.42053.47.31.45ISecondary Forest
1.0817.51881.37.21.65II
1.0815.71813.47.21.45III
8.5219770.97.21.65IReclaimed Limestone
7.8644.31464.77.11.66II
5.2437.92163.47.11.7III
Table
Table 3. Alpha-diversity: p-values for the Tukey’s post-hoc tests for the ANOVA results (upper triangle—observed ASVs, lower triangle—Simpson indices).
Table 3. Alpha-diversity: p-values for the Tukey’s post-hoc tests for the ANOVA results (upper triangle—observed ASVs, lower triangle—Simpson indices).
Quarry ClayReclaimed LimestoneDumped LimestoneSecondary ForestPrimary Forest
<0.01<0.01<0.010.137 Primary Forest
0.0860.060.05 0.034Secondary Forest
0.8221 0.094<00.1Dumped Limestone
0.852 0.0380.9950.087Reclaimed Limestone
0.0860.9970.193<0.01Quarry Clay
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zverev, A.O.; Gladkov, G.V.; Kimeklis, A.K.; Kichko, A.A.; Andronov, E.E.; Abakumov, E.V. Microbial Composition on Abandoned and Reclaimed Mining Sites in the Komi Republic (North Russia). Microorganisms 2023, 11, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030720

AMA Style

Zverev AO, Gladkov GV, Kimeklis AK, Kichko AA, Andronov EE, Abakumov EV. Microbial Composition on Abandoned and Reclaimed Mining Sites in the Komi Republic (North Russia). Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zverev, Aleksei O., Grigory V. Gladkov, Anastasiia K. Kimeklis, Arina A. Kichko, Evgeny E. Andronov, and Evgeny V. Abakumov. 2023. "Microbial Composition on Abandoned and Reclaimed Mining Sites in the Komi Republic (North Russia)" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop