Next Article in Journal
Mapping Genetic Variation in Arabidopsis in Response to Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Azoarcus olearius DQS-4T
Next Article in Special Issue
Succession Patterns of Microbial Composition and Activity following the Diesel Spill in an Urban River
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Screen of Lactobacilli Strains for Gastrointestinal and Vaginal Benefits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Hydrocarbon-Oxidizing Dibenzothiophene-Desulfurizing Gordonia Strains
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Interaction between Illite and a Pseudomonas stutzeri-Heavy Oil Biodegradation Complex

Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020330
by Lei Li, Yun Yang Wan *, Hong Mei Mu, Sheng Bao Shi and Jian Fa Chen
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020330
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Petroleum Microbiology 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Pollution of the environment by crude oil and oil products will be of high interest for a long time. Therefore, in-depth studies of biodegradation and interaction of oil-degrading bacteria with the environment are undoubtedly important.

Minor comments:

- The introduction provides a sufficient background for understanding the problem. But I noticed that Table summarizes references published up to 2018. Have there been no studies in the past 4 years? Why is that?

- Line 63: I propose to include a description and physical properties of illite in the section 2.1.1.

- Table 2: How did you choose the optimal volume of biomass (2 mL) to be applied?

- Table S1: Searching for the necessary abbreviation in Supplementary materials is not convenient for the reader. I suggest moving the list of abbreviations to the manuscript. I also recommend deciphering abbreviations in figure captions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments are given in the paper. It is necessary to refine the experimental part. The authors do not explain the experimental setup or culture adaptation, which is necessary.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper can be accepted in this form.

Author Response

Please see the attachment file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop