Next Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on Uro-Oncological Patients: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes in the Rhizosphere Prokaryotic Community Structure of Halodule wrightii Monospecific Stands Associated to Submarine Groundwater Discharges in a Karstic Costal Area
Previous Article in Journal
Klebsiella pneumoniae Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Protect Artemia salina from Fish Pathogen Aeromonas sp.: A Combined In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Investigation of Desert Streptomyces huasconensis D23 Reveals Its Environmental Adaptability and Antimicrobial Activity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Combining Flow Cytometry and Metagenomics Improves Recovery of Metagenome-Assembled Genomes in a Cell Culture from Activated Sludge

Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010175
by Nafi’u Abdulkadir 1,2,†, Joao Pedro Saraiva 1,†, Florian Schattenberg 1, Rodolfo Brizola Toscan 1, Felipe Borim Correa 1, Hauke Harms 1,2, Susann Müller 1 and Ulisses Nunes da Rocha 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Microorganisms 2023, 11(1), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010175
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome Analysis of Microbial Communities in Environments)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very interesting and important study, although the approach implemented by the authors is unlikely to be widely used in routine metagenomic researches due to its complexity. The article should certainly be published in the Microorganisms.

A small technical note: the full generic names of bacteria or their two-letter abbreviations should be used in the text, since the names of some genera begin with the same letters.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his comments. We have reviewed the entire manuscript and, for the exception of Acinetobacter bacteria, all others were replaced with their full names to avoid confusion.

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting, clearly written and the topic of the paper is very topical. Considering the use of a large number of abbreviations, it is necessary to include a list of the abbreviations used at the end of the paper to make it easier to follow. Given the number of analyses, it would be good to make a schematic diagram of the experiment and indicate the end point of the analysis. The genus and species of microorganisms are sometimes not written in italics, this should be corrected.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his comments. We have included a list of abbreviations at the end of the manuscript. We have also added a scheme showing the entire process and resulting analyses at each endpoint. This scheme was combined with Supplementary Figure 1. Supplementary Figure 1 is now comprised of Figure 1A and 1B, and its legend was updated to reflect the changes. The manuscript's main text was also updated in Lines 87-90 to include the mention of this scheme.

Back to TopTop