Next Article in Journal
A Method for Isolation Bacteriophage Particles-Free Genomic DNA, Exemplified by TP-84, Infecting Thermophilic Geobacillus
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Industrial Bacillus Species as Potential Probiotics for Dietary Supplements
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Stage Oxidative Leaching of Low-Grade Copper–Zinc Sulfide Concentrate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus Strains Isolated from Baby Wipes

1
Office of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, USA
2
Office of Cosmetics and Color, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
3
Office of Regulatory Affairs, San Francisco Laboratory, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Alameda, CA 94502, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091779
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 3 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue An Update on Bacillus)

Abstract

:
Bacillus cereus, a ubiquitous environmental microorganism known to cause foodborne illness, was isolated from samples taken from imported baby wipes from two different countries. These strains were characterized using a comprehensive molecular approach involving endpoint PCR, whole genome sequencing (WGS), comparative genomics, and biochemical analyses. A multiplex endpoint PCR assay was used to identify the enterotoxins: hemolysin BL, nonhemolytic enterotoxin, cytotoxin K, and enterotoxin FM toxin genes. Phylogenetically, the strains clustered into two major groups according to sequence type (ST) and singleton. We used the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) GalaxyTrakr BTyper computational tool to characterize the strains further. As an additional means of characterization, we investigated the possible role of carbohydrate transport systems and their role in nutrient uptake by performing a BLAST analysis of the 40 B. cereus genomes recovered from baby wipes. This study outlines a multifaceted workflow that uses the analysis of enterotoxigenic potential, bioinformatics, genomic diversity, genotype, phenotype, and carbohydrate utilization as a comprehensive strategy to characterize these B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes and further our understanding of the phylogenetic relatedness of strains associated with baby wipe production facilities that could potentially pose an infection risk to a vulnerable infant population.

1. Introduction

During routine surveillance, the San Francisco U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lab identified 40 Bacillus cereus strains from samples taken from imported baby wipes. These wipes originated from two different manufacturing facilities in two different countries. B. cereus is a Gram-positive bacterium found in several categories of food products and is characterized as a widespread human pathogen associated with intoxication, diarrhea, and systemic clinical infections [1]. This spore-forming bacterium, known to cause a variety of diseases in humans [2], is ubiquitous in the natural environment and known to be pervasive in soil, dust, and eukaryotic plants. B. cereus displays a high diversity of lifestyles and ecological niches and includes beneficial as well as pathogenic strains. These strains are found on inert as well as on living surfaces, principally associated with biofilms [3]. Biofilms are complex communities that have also been mentioned to be a key element in the ability of B. cereus to colonize different environments and are suspected of playing a key role in the organism’s ubiquitous distribution and persistency [3]. The saprophytic life cycle of this organism has resulted in the contamination of irrigation water, vegetables, and many other foods [4].
Recognizing the ever-increasing prevalence and phylogenetic diversity found within the genus Bacillus, we advanced a previously described strategy used to characterize food-associated enterotoxigenic B. cereus strains with strains recovered from baby wipes. This approach, described by Carter et al. [5], detected the presence of hemolysin BL (hbl) hblDAC, nonhemolytic enterotoxin (nhe) nheBAC, cytotoxin K (cytK), and enterotoxin FM (entFM) toxin genes. In the current study, we used phylogenetic analyses, comparative genomics, several biochemical tests, and bioinformatics tools to characterize B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipes. This study aims to understand better the genomic diversity of B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes and to increase the number of publicly available B. cereus genomes so that future phylogenomic studies can be performed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of B. cereus Strains from Baby Wipes and Cosmetics Products

B. cereus strains were recovered from samples collected under a baby wipes surveillance sampling assignment conducted by the FDA. The FDA San Francisco Laboratory (SFL) used the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) protocols in Chapters 23 and 14 [6,7] to analyze the baby wipes samples. The samples collected from 10/2015 thru 11/2015 included two brands of wipes produced by two manufacturers in two separate countries (Table 1). Ten B. cereus strains were isolated from each brand. A total of 40 baby wipe strains were studied, along with nine strains obtained from cosmetics products such as liquid eyeliner and eye shadow samples. Nutrient agar slants inoculated with each isolate were received from SFL. Sterile loops were then used to inoculate the isolates from the slants onto BACARA chromogenic agar plates (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA), followed by incubation overnight (o/n, 18–20 h) at 30 °C. Isolates with typical colony morphologies were confirmed as B. cereus by plating onto 5% sheep blood agar (TSAB, Remel, KS, USA) for demonstration of hemolytic activity. For quality control purposes, B. cereus type strain ATCC 14579 was used as a positive control for all plating and PCR experiments; Bacillus thuringiensis ATCC 29730 was used as a negative control to differentiate B. cereus from B. thuringiensis. Frozen stocks were maintained in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (BBL, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 50% glycerol and stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Extraction of DNA from Bacterial Strains

Samples from frozen stocks were plated onto 5% sheep blood agar and grown o/n at 30 °C. Single colonies from these plates were added to 6 mL of TSB and incubated with shaking (180 rpm) at 30 °C o/n. Two mL aliquots of these cultures were pelleted (5000× g for 10 min., 4 °C) and the supernatants were discarded. Genomic DNA from each strain was isolated from the pellets using an UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA, eluted to concentrations of approximately 30–260 ng/μL, was recovered in certified DNA-free Tris buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8) and stored at −20 °C until needed.

2.3. PCR Amplification of Enterotoxin Genes

Enterotoxin gene profiles were determined using an endpoint PCR assay with primers specific for hblDAC, nheBAC, cytK, and entFM. Primer sequences used were those described by Ngamwongsatit et al. [8] and Thaenthanee et al. [9] and PCR assay parameters as described by Carter et al. [5] (Supplemental Table S1). The amplification reactions were carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal cycler (AB, Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA).
Amplicons were separated in a 1.5% agarose gel using a 1 Kb DNA molecular size standard (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to estimate amplicon sizes.

2.4. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of B. cereus Strains from Baby Wipes and Cosmetics

A total of 49 B. cereus genomes were used for comparative genomic analyses. This included 40 genomes of B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes samples and nine genomes from strains obtained from liquid eyeliner and eye shadow samples. Library preparations and WGS were completed for all strains using a Nextera XT Library Kit and MiSeq sequencer platform, respectively (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as described by Carter et al. [5]. Raw sequence reads (FASTQ datasets) from Illumina sequencing were trimmed for removal of adaptor sequences and quality control purposes and de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 9.0 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). For annotation, FASTA files of the assemblies were uploaded onto the Rapid Annotation Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (online annotation; http://rast.theseed.org; accessed on 8 April 2020) [10], and for routine prokaryotic genome annotation using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [11], at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

2.5. Comparative Genomics Analyses of B. cereus Strains Isolated from Baby Wipes

The CFSAN BTyper tool (GalaxyTrakr Version 2.0.3), a B. cereus subtyping tool for characterization of B. cereus genomes for genomic signatures of virulence genes, sequence types (STs), and pantoate-beta-alanine ligase gene panC clade determinations, was used to characterize the B. cereus strains using FASTA files as input [12,13]. Using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis, a phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) was developed based on SNP profiles of 410 core genes from the baby wipes and cosmetics B. cereus strains [14].

2.6. Carbohydrate Utilization Studies

2.6.1. Vitek® 2 Compact System

Carbohydrate utilization measurements using the Vitek® 2 Compact system (software version 5.0) (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA) were performed by SFL as part of the routine identification of the isolates.
Bionumbers were generated according to the utilization of each substrate contained within a VITEK 2 Bacillus Identification Card by an isolate from a baby wipe, liquid eyeliner, or eye shadow sample. The Vitek® automation system uses a colorimetric reagent card (BCL) to identify spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli (i.e., Bacillus and related genera) (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA).

2.6.2. API® 50CH

API® 50CH test strips (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA) combined with API® 50 CHB/E medium [Ref 50 430 in kit brochure] for the identification of Bacillus and related genera were used for the determination of carbohydrate utilization. This kit is based on a growth-dependent test to determine the utilization of specific carbohydrates (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA). The kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA). A cell suspension with a turbidity equivalent to a McFarland 2 standard or approximately 6 × 108 CFU/mL was made in the medium with the B. cereus organisms after an initial overnight growth period at 30 °C on BACARA plates. The cell suspensions were made up of a pure culture of B. cereus after the isolates were grown on BACARA chromogenic agar plates (specific for the enumeration of Bacillus cereus), identified by the typical B. cereus colony morphologies, and plated on 5% sheep blood agar for confirmation.
The inoculation medium was API® 50 CHB/E (tryptone 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L, K2HPO4 0.25 g/L, MnSO4 0.05 g/L, and bromocresol purple 0.17 g/L). API® 50CH samples were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C. Only one sugar was present in each well. If the sugar was fermented by the strain, a lowering of the pH caused a color change from purple to yellow.

2.7. Biochemical Carbohydrate Utilization Tests

A carbohydrate utilization assay was used to determine whether the B. cereus strains could utilize specific carbohydrates and produce acid and gas. We analyzed D-ribose, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (unit of cyclodextrin), methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin), cyclodextrin, and N-Acetyl-glucosamine. Phenol Red broth medium (Ramel, Lenexa, KS, USA) was supplemented with 1.8 g of each individual carbohydrate to a final concentration of 1%. The broth solution was then sterilized using a Nalgene filter unit (Nalgene Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) pore size of 0.22 µm. An inverted Durham tube 6 × 50 mm (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) was added to a 16 × 100 mm tube to capture gas production. These tubes were then sterilized by autoclaving. Six mL of the filter-sterilized carbohydrate medium was subsequently added to each tube. Two to three B. cereus colonies were added to a 12 × 75 mm tube containing 3 mL of saline to achieve an OD600 reading of 0.3, which equals ~108 CFU/mL. A 100 µL aliquot of this cell suspension was then added to the culture tubes containing the phenol red broth, sugar, and Durham tube and incubated at 30 °C. The tubes were monitored for seven consecutive days to observe phenotypic results (red to yellow color change in the media).

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence and Distribution of B. cereus Enterotoxin Genes in Baby Wipes Strains

All the strains were hemolytic and possessed lecithinase activity and were PCR-negative for the B. thuringiensis insecticidal crystal toxin, cry gene, as expected. The prevalence and distribution of enterotoxin genes such as hemolysin BL(hbl) hblDAC, nonhemolytic enterotoxin (nhe) nheBAC, cytotoxin K (cytK), and enterotoxin FM (entFM) genes found in the 40-baby wipe strains are shown in (Table 2). Six different enterotoxin gene profiles among the strains were identified. Profile 1 consisted of strains that were PCR-positive for: nheB, cytK, and entFM. Strains PCR-positive for nheB and entFM were grouped into profile 2. All four strains identified in profile 3 were PCR-positive for all toxin genes except cytK. Seven strains were included in profile 4. The most prevalent enterotoxigenic gene profile, profile 5, was detected in 20 strains; these strains were PCR-positive for nheBAC and entFM genes. The difference between profiles 4 and 5 was the presence of cytK in profile 4. The one strain in profile 6 was PCR-positive for nheBC, cytK, and entFM. Thirty-one strains out of forty were PCR-positive for nheBAC genes. All strains were positive for nheB and entFM. The presence of all the hbl genes (hblDAC) was found in only four strains. Interesting to note that seven of nine ST1295 strains were categorized under profile 4. From our previous characterization studies of B. cereus strains that were associated with contamination of foods, the hemolysin hbl was the most prevalent toxin gene observed [5].
We compared our PCR analysis results to the BTyper CFSAN GalaxyTrakr BTyper computational tool. The results obtained from the PCR analysis matched 100% for the presence of entFM and nheB virulence genes as determined by the BTyper analysis. With the BTyper computational tool, there was a 100% match for nheABC genes but only a 31% agreement with nheA alone. There were 11 strains that were identified as positive for the presence of the cytK toxin gene in the PCR assay, but only 10 were found to be positive with the BTyper tool.
Isolates from Manufacturer A, Europe (pure baby wipes) had toxin genes with profile #s 1, 2, and 3. Manufacturer A, from Europe, gentle baby wipes had toxin gene profiles that were predominately under profile #5, with a few exceptions falling under profile #4. The manufacturer of scented baby wipes, Manufacturer B, from Asia, also had a majority of isolates falling under profile #5, two under profile #4 and one under profile #3. Isolates from Manufacturer A from Europe were found to have toxin profiles that were decidedly different not only from the other manufacturers of baby wipes and other countries but also from the same manufacturer in the same country, differing only by the particular brand, which was the pure baby wipes. Whether a particular manufacturer and or the brand being produced is responsible for the differences observed in the toxin gene profile is a question that remains to be answered.

3.2. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of B. cereus Strains from Baby Wipes and Cosmetics

A total of 49 B. cereus genomes were used for comparative genomic analyses. This included 40 genomes of B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipe samples and nine genomes from strains obtained from liquid eyeliner and eye shadow samples. Library preparations and WGS were completed for all strains using a Nextera XT Library Kit and MiSeq sequencer platform, respectively (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as described by Carter et al. [5]. Raw sequence reads (FASTQ datasets) from Illumina sequencing were trimmed for removal of adaptor sequences and quality control purposes and de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 9.0 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). For annotation, FASTA files of the assemblies were uploaded onto the Rapid Annotation Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (online annotation; http://rast.theseed.org; accessed on 13 July 2022) [10], and for routine prokaryotic genome annotation using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [11], at NCBI. WGS assembly and genomic characterization of B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipes are shown in (Table 3). Nucleotide sequences of these strains were deposited into NCBI’s GenBank and released to the public by submission to NCBI under B. cereus GenomeTrakr Project, CFSAN BioProject number PRJNA326742, which is part of the CFSAN umbrella foodborne pathogen research Bioproject (PRJNA186875).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis/Comparative Genomics

Using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis, a phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) was developed based on SNP profiles of 410 core genes from the baby wipes and cosmetics B. cereus strains. [14]. The tree showed that the baby wipes B. cereus genomes clustered into phylogenetically related groups according to ST. Two major clusters and a singleton were found and involved strains possessing ST266 and ST1295 and an ST2103 strain. The phylogenetically related isolates from cosmetics sources, i.e., liquid eyeliners and eye shadows, along with B. cereus reference genomes, were also added to the tree for comparison. Additionally, several cosmetics samples of unspecified origin were included in the tree. The detection of B. cereus in baby wipes and cosmetics products occurred concomitantly using surveillance samples under CFSAN’s Cosmetics Program. Therefore, we decided to include all these strains in the phylogenetic analysis to compare phylogenetic relatedness among the strains. The baby wipe strains, however, were only included in WGS analyses. Manually overlaying each strain (cluster) with ST data obtained from BTyper and PubMLST analyses showed that the baby wipes strains in each cluster grouped according to ST. The largest cluster, shown in Figure 1, revealed strains that were identified as ST266. Another cluster of baby wipe strains possessing the ST1295 designation was also grouped near a smaller cluster of four ST90 B. cereus strains isolated from liquid eyeliner samples along with one B. cereus reference strain. Moreover, MLST analysis showed that there are two allelic profile differences between ST90 and ST1295 (ST90: ilv: 41 versus 270 and pyc: 46 versus 6) strains, respectively.
CFSAN’s GalaxyTrakr BTyper computational tool identified virulence genes associated with each baby wipe strain, panC Clade typing, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes shown in Figure 2 along with their ST designations. This tool demonstrated that all strains possessed nheBAC, entAFM, bpsEFH, cerAB, clo, plcABR, and inhA1A2. ST1295 strains possessed an additional virulence factor, cytK2. The ST2103 strain carried cytK2, hblDABC, and bceT as additional virulence factors. All but one strain was found to have the panC Clade 3 determinants. ST2103, Bc57 was identified as possessing a panC Clade 4 determinant.
The AMR genes found in ST266 strains were (Gly) VanR-M and Bla-1. ST1295 strains had the same AMR profile with one additional gene, (Gly) VanZF-Pp. ST2103 strain Bc57 possessed several AMR genes, including (Gly) VanR-M, Bla-1, (Gly) VanY-Pt2, (Gly) VanYF-Pp, (MLS) LsaB, (Gly) VanS-Pt2, and (Gly) VanR-Pt and grouped under panC Clade 4 determinant. VanR genes are involved in antibiotic resistance to glycopeptides. Bla and MLS genes are β-lactamase and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance genes, respectively.
There were no plasmids present in these genomes (https://bio.tools/PlasmidFinder, last accessed on 19 August 2022). All strains were fosfomycin resistant except for Bc57, which shows resistance to doxycycline and tetracycline.

3.4. Annotation of Loci Involved in Carbohydrate Metabolism in the Strains Used in the Current Study

Four hundred and ten genes encoding for proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism in the reference strain B. cereus ATCC 14579 were obtained from the ‘SEED’ viewer server at (https://rast.theseed.org; last accessed on 13 July 2022). A local database containing 40 genome assemblies from this study, along with the reference genome, was formatted for BLAST analysis following the instructions from the NCBI Blast suite. An 80% cutoff parameter was used to differentiate protein homology across different clusters. Data was generated based on the presence/absence of these shared homologous loci. Around 300 unique loci were included in this analysis and were used to correlate strain phenotypic carbohydrate utilization profiles with genotype.

3.5. Carbohydrate Utilization Studies

Three different technologies, Vitek® 2 Compact protocol, API® 50CH, and biochemical analyses, were used to identify carbohydrates utilized by the strains. All three tests demonstrated the ability to utilize several common carbohydrates.
The results of the API® 50CH test showed that the strains were able to utilize the following carbohydrates: D-fructose, maltose, D-mannose, D-trehalose, D-glucose, N-acetyl D-glucosamine, and ribose. A biochemical carbohydrate fermentation test was used to manually test several carbohydrate substrates, which included: D-ribose, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (unit of cyclodextrin), methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin), cyclodextrin, and N-acetyl-glucosamine. All baby wipe strains could utilize D-ribose and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine within 24 h. In contrast, cyclodextrin utilization occurred between four and five days for most of the strains. Strains Bc57 and Bc179 needed 7 days to utilize cyclodextrin completely. Methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin) was used in only six strains and developed within 96 h (Supplemental Table S2). The capacity to use methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin) occurred within 48 h for Bc186. For Bc64, Bc195, Bc198, and Bc201, methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin) was used within a 72-h period. Ninety-six hours of incubation was needed for methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin) utilization to occur in strain Bc194. Methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (an isomer of cyclodextrin) was the only carbohydrate not used by any of the strains. The results comparing all three carbohydrate utilization studies are shown in (Figure 3). Not all the same carbohydrates were included in each of the three different carbohydrate utilization protocols. N-acetyl-glucosamine, D-glucose, trehalose, maltose, and maltotriose are compounds known to support the growth of B. cereus [18]. These carbohydrates had nearly identical positive results regardless of the test protocol used. A comparison of the different carbohydrate tests also revealed a different utilization capacity for the same carbohydrate.
The heatmap is based on three different carbohydrate testing protocols, VITEK (#), API® 50CH (*), and Biochemical Fermentation tests (†) (BF). Growth or utilization is shown in blue, and no growth or utilization is depicted in orange. The three different STs are illustrated along with the identification of the isolates. Not all the same carbohydrates were included in each of the three different carbohydrate test panels. (i) Substrates N-acetyl-glucosamine and D-ribose were included in all three testing protocols, and D-glucose was included in two of the protocols. All the isolates were able to utilize these carbohydrates; (ii) carbohydrates with similar results, either positive or negative (with the exception of one or two isolates) using the different protocols, included cyclodextrin (#, †), glycogen (#, *), maltotriose (#), maltose (*), and D-trehalose (#, *); (iii) α -galactosidase (#) and amidon (*) only appear to be utilized by ST2103, Bc57; (iv) the carbohydrates appearing in the VITEK (#) protocol and were negative for substrate utilization in all the isolates included inulin, β-galactosidase, D-galactose, myo-inositol, methyl-D-xyloside, α -mannosidase, D-mannitol, D-melezitose, L-rhamnose, β-xylosidase, and palatinose. β-mannosidase and D-tagatose; (v) the carbohydrates in the API® 50CH protocol (*), negative for utilization in all the isolates, included glycerol and D-lactose; (vi) esculin (*) and esculin hydrolysis (#) gave conflicting results. There were 20 isolates that were positive for utilization of esculin (*) and 12 isolates able to utilize esculin hydrolysis (#). ST1295 had four isolates positive for both esculin (*) and esculin hydrolysis, while ST266 only had one isolate positive for utilization of both carbohydrates; (vii) methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside acidification (#) and methyl α-D-glucopyroside (unite of cyclodextrin) (†) were the only two carbohydrate protocols tested that showed completely opposite results for utilization capabilities.
There were only six carbohydrate utilization-related genes that demonstrated a correlation between the presence/absence of genes and ST (Figure 4). These included the 5-methylthioribose ABC transporter permease protein gene, which was absent in ST2103 Bc57 and all ST1295 strains and present in all ST266 strains except for Bc65, Bc188, and Bc192. In contrast, the cellobiose phosphotransferase system YdjC-like protein gene was present in ST2103 Bc57 and all ST1295 except Bc201 but only present in three of the thirty ST266 strains, Bc59, Bc62, and Bc202. A 5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase gene (EC_6.3.3.2) was present in ST2103 Bc57, two ST1295 strains, and 28 out of a total of thirty ST266 strains. The 5-methylthioribose ABC transporter, ATP binding protein gene, was absent from the strain Bc57, ST2103, and from all strains, except Bc210, within the ST1295 cluster; the transporter was present in all but four strains within the ST266 cluster. Likewise, with respect to genes encoding the carbohydrate phosphoglycolate phosphatase and lactoylglutathione lyase and related lyases, a parallel could be drawn between presence/absence patterns and ST designations.
Pearson correlation was used to measure the linear correlation between the pattern of presence and absence of each pair of genes. The output value is between −1 and 1, where values near −1 show a strong negative correlation, 0 is no correlation, and values near 1 show a strong positive correlation. The formula uses numbers as input, so presence was assigned a value of 1, and absence was assigned a value of 0. Statistical analysis of the Pearson correlation coefficient (Supplemental Table S3) shows that A and D are highly correlated (5-methylthioribose_ABC transporter, permease and 5-methylthioribose ABC transporter, ATP-binding). Moreover, B, E, and F are highly correlated Cellobiose phosphotransferase system YdjC-like protein, Phosphoglycolate phosphatase, Lactoylglutathione lyase_and related_lyases).
The biochemical carbohydrate utilization assay was used to determine whether the B. cereus strains could utilize and produce acid and gas. The specific carbohydrates tested were, D-ribose, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (unit of cyclodextrin), methyl β-D-glucopyroside (arbutin), cyclodextrin, and N-acetyl-glucosamine. Gas production occurred in all the sample tubes.

3.6. Genome Annotation Using RAST (Rapid Annotation Using Subsystem Technology)

Our investigation uncovered approximately 34 subsystems (equivalent to discrete pathways) that were involved in carbohydrate utilization in the baby wipe strains using B. cereus ATCC 14579 as the reference strain. More than 410 genes were annotated and determined to be involved in carbohydrate utilization. Two hundred ninety-seven unique genes from this set were used to query a local BLAST database. Genetic features encoding carbohydrate presence differed between the 40 baby wipe strains and within the two major STs, ST266 and ST1295, and the one singleton ST2103.
The carbohydrate utilization genes resulting from the BLAST analysis revealed a total of 99 genes with non-redundant presence/absence profiles among the strains (Supplemental Table S4). Only 22 of these carbohydrate utilization-related genes were present in ST266 Bc65. Ninety-three of these genes related to carbohydrate utilization were present in ST2103 Bc57. However, there were 16 carbohydrate utilization-related genes present in ST2103 Bc57 that were either present or absent in an inconsistent manner among all the other strains and STs. These 16 genes related to carbohydrate utilization, their function, and enzyme pathways (Table 4) are characterized using a combination of sequence databases (NCBI-BLAST), enzyme databases [19], and pathway databases [20]. Variation in the presence/absence of genes related to carbohydrate utilization between different STs was observed in most of the strains. A few examples of this include the gluconate transporter family protein gene, present in the ST2103 strain Bc57, all the ST1295 strains except Bc201, and only present in ST266 strains Bc59, Bc62, Bc63, and Bc202. Likewise, the glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (EC3.1.4.46) gene (periplasmically secreted in Gram Positives) was absent in Bc64 and Bc201 within ST1295 strains and absent in all ST266 except for Bc 59, Bc62, Bc63, and Bc202. The results of the presence/absence of genes in all the strains are shown in (Supplemental Table S4).

4. Discussion

Bacillus cereus, known to be ubiquitous across many environmental niches, possesses pathogenic traits that have not only been found in foods but in cosmetics as well. B. cereus is a microbial contaminant that could adversely affect the product safety of cosmetics and facial toiletries and pose a threat to the user if other key risk factors are also present [21]. There have also been several studies over the years that have confirmed the impact of B. cereus commonality affecting vulnerable infant populations and neonates [22,23]. A recent study outlining B. cereus infection in neonates reported a suspected source of infection coming from packs of diapers and linen [24]. The potential pathogenicity that this organism may cause, found in these baby wipes, raises the question of what commonalities might exist that can be used to characterize these strains from two different manufacturers and to different geographically distant facilities.
B. cereus has been predominantly associated with foodborne illnesses [25]. Routine analysis of food samples for the presence of B. cereus is part of the food safety surveillance program at the FDA. As the result of a sampling assignment from the Office of Cosmetics and Colors (OCAC) at FDA/CFSAN, the SFL discovered the presence of this organism in imported baby wipes. The sources of this contamination are yet unknown. Even though Good Manufacturing Practices [26] were followed, contamination of end products may have occurred at any time during the manufacturing process, including raw materials, from the processing environment and the manufacturing process itself. There have been reports implicating B. cereus contamination in hospitals citing environmental reservoirs, including air filtration/ventilation equipment and linens [1]. Bacillus spores have been implicated in the contamination of raw materials, synthetic materials, and dry powders coming into manufacturing facilities [27].
Stewart et al. reported key microbial contaminants of personal care products (PCP). They described Bacillus cereus as ubiquitous in nature (soil, dust, cereal crops, plants, animal hair, fresh water, and sediments) and occurring naturally in a wide range of raw materials and foodstuffs. They describe its occurrence in PCPs as likely due to its presence in raw materials used in manufacture. [28]. Microorganisms are known to survive and grow in many different environments, sometimes under extreme growth conditions. Physiological responses to environmental change may include cellular metabolism and mechanisms of adaptation and resistance [4].
Whole genome sequencing, which has become a routine technique for food safety surveillance, was used for the analysis of these strains recovered from baby wipes. Genomic data can now be extended to the identification of microorganisms found in numerous different habitats. A comprehensive approach involving phenotypic and genotypic analyses was undertaken to establish a platform to characterize B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipes.
In this study, we generated a phylogenetic tree based on SNP profiles of 410 core genes from 40 baby wipes B. cereus strains and compared these genes to 61 whole genome sequences downloaded from NCBI. The strains clustered into two major groups according to sequence type (ST), ST266 and ST1295, and a singleton, ST2103. Most of the strains belonged to ST266. The closest reference strain, BcQ1, was isolated from a deep-subsurface oil reservoir in the Daqing oil field in northeastern China. This strain is described as being able to produce biosurfactants and survive in extreme environments [29]. The whole-genome comparison showed that Q1 has extensive similarity to the genomes of other members of the B. cereus group and the greatest similarity to nonpathogenic strain B. cereus ATCC 10987. Genomic analysis revealed that B. cereus Q1 contains several genes related to niche-specific adaptations. [29]. The second largest cluster of strains, ST1295, was grouped near a smaller cluster with a designation of ST90, which had been isolated from liquid eyeliner samples. There were nine strains that were designated ST1295. We found several differences in the two major STs when comparing them to each other. ST1295 had one additional virulence gene, cytK2, that was absent from ST266 and one additional AMR gene, (Gly) VanZF-Pp. In the carbohydrate utilization studies, we found that there were four isolates with ST1295 designation that were positive for both esculin and esculin hydrolysis. In ST266, only one isolate was positive for the utilization of both carbohydrates.
We analyzed enterotoxin gene prevalence and distribution. A genotyping strategy confirmed the presence of enterotoxin genes. Virulence/enterotoxin gene patterns have been compiled for B. cereus, which has been mainly isolated from foods but also from clinical, soil, and environmental samples worldwide [30]. One study reported that the food matrix might influence the virulence expression of B. cereus [31]. In some studies, a connection has been established between toxin gene patterns and the geographical location of isolates. [30]. A more recent study reported strains possessing nhe, hblA, and cytK were predominant in regions with a hot arid climate and only comparable rare in cold continental climates. [32] The most prevalent toxin genes isolated from Chinese food were the entFM and the nheBAC genes [30]. The most prevalent profile was found in the baby wipes (nheBAC and entFM), profile #5, compared to the profile seen with dietary supplements and medicated fish food in a study conducted by Carter et al. [5]. Four strains under profile #3 (positive for all the toxin genes except cytK) correlated with the profile reported for powdered infant formula (PIF), also in a study by Carter et al. [5]. Cytotoxin K genes have been found in numerous strains of B. cereus and other members of the B. cereus group; however, this feature is strain rather than species-specific. [33]. These findings hold true for all of the other virulence genes as well. The cytK toxin gene was found to be present in 11 of our strains tested by the PCR assay method (Table 2).
As part of our strategy to better understand the persistence of this organism, we incorporated BTyper as a tool for bioinformatics analysis. BTyper is a genomic computational tool for the analysis of B. cereus [12]. The BTyper pipeline has now been incorporated into the CFSAN GalaxyTrakr platform (https://galaxytrakr.org/root/login?redirect=%2F; accessed on 6 May 2022). This computational tool enabled us to understand better how these strains found in this niche could be characterized by identifying virulence genes, assigning panC Clade designations, and determining the antimicrobial resistance genes present in each isolate. The virulence genes identified in each strain corresponded with the assigned ST (Figure 2).
B. cereus ST1295 was found in two of the strains described as Pure (P) produced by Manufacturer A and three strains from the same manufacturer but identified as Gentle Cleansing (G). Manufacturer B had a total of four B. cereus ST1295 strains, two each from Scented (S) and Unscented (U) products. The single strain, ST2103, was found in baby wipes described as Pure (P) from Manufacture A. We examined the ST phylogenetic relatedness of our cosmetics strains with our baby wipe strains. We found most of the cosmetics eyeliner strains belonged to ST90 (Figure 1) and clustered between the two major baby wipe strains, ST266 and ST1295. There was one Bacillus reference strain, FRI-35, that belonged to ST90. There was also one cosmetics eyeliner strain that belonged to ST1985. Two strains from cosmetics eye shadows and one ST ND (not determined) appear to be closely related according to the alignment displayed in the phylogenetic tree. One strain from cosmetics eye shadow, ST1317, clustered with reference strain HBL-AI ST1436, a Bacillus strain with biotransformation capabilities. We did not find, however, a correlation between the ST, the wipe formula, and geographical origin. Strains of both major STs (ST266 and ST1295) were associated with products from both manufacturers.
The ability of an organism to adapt and survive in various environments is dependent on an assortment of factors, one being the use of carbohydrates as viable resources. To this end, we initiated a study to analyze the carbohydrate utilization of these strains, as recent evidence suggests there is a link between carbohydrate utilization and microbial contamination [18]. Cell surface carbohydrates play a pivotal role in various bacterial functions and activities, including providing defense mechanisms to guard against unfavorable environmental conditions [34]. Carbohydrates, which serve as major energy sources for bacterial growth and metabolic activity, are involved in a variety of cellular processes and are thought to be linked to the evolution of B. cereus [35]. Carbohydrates, which serve as major energy sources for bacterial growth and metabolic activity, are involved in a variety of cellular processes and are thought to be linked to the evolution of B. cereus [35]. One study described carbohydrate utilization as an important component of maintaining B. cereus cell surfaces, such as its capsule and cell wall. Genes for carbohydrate utilization may help to elucidate the molecular basis for bacterial virulence and pathogenicity [34]. The importance of the role carbohydrate utilization plays in the proliferation of B. cereus in the environment has only recently been investigated [18].
We decided to analyze the carbohydrate genes found in the B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipes in hopes of identifying specific genomic components that facilitate the carbohydrate utilizing abilities and as part of an overall strategy to define a genetic basis of adaptation. The results of the biochemical fermentation assay revealed methyl β-D- glucopyranoside (arbutin), a carbohydrate that utilizes the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS), was detected in Bc64, Bc186, Bc194, Bc195, Bc198, and Bc201. N-acetyl-glucosamine, D-glucose, trehalose, maltose, and maltotriose are compounds known to support the growth of B. cereus [18]. The Cellobiose phosphotransferase system YdjC-like protein gene involved in carbohydrate metabolism was found in ST2103 Bc57 and all ST1295 strains except strain Bc201. In contrast, this gene was only present in three ST266 strains. Clearly, more investigative work should be undertaken to learn about the genetic factors that influence the environmental adaptability of this organism. A part of the overall characterization was to determine if there was an intricate link between the genomic analysis of B. cereus recovered from baby wipes and carbohydrate utilization/transport systems identified among these strains.
At the conclusion of our investigation and the carbohydrate studies, we could not find a direct correlation between the presence/absence of certain carbohydrate genes found in these baby wipes strains and the other molecular and biochemical findings. Our investigations revealed that B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipe sheets of the same brand can be diverse, yet B. cereus strains obtained from different countries may share a similarity in some genetic information and biochemical functions. However, we did find a difference in enterotoxin gene profiles from the same manufacturer within the same country.
Our data present a multifaceted approach characterizing B. cereus strains recovered from baby wipes with the application of WGS, biochemical tests, and bioinformatic tools. The utility of a comprehensive approach to helping to differentiate factors that may play a significant role in microbe survival in this environmental niche is essential to our understanding of this organism.
It is critical to note that studies characterizing B. cereus strains obtained from several unique sample sources are increasing, and future surveillance studies are warranted to understand the extent of the global prevalence of organisms, especially those found associated with the “built environment.” Future predictions of where an organism can persist and elucidation of its mechanisms of survival remains a complicated story that will require improved detection methods, WGS, and microbiological metadata and potentially contribute to the development of prevention strategies to control this organism’s survival in unwanted environments where it could prove to be harmful to public safety.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10091779/s1, Supplemental Table S1. PCR primers used for multiplex PCR detection of enterotoxin genes in B. cereus isolates. Supplemental Table S2. Biochemical carbohydrate fermentation test. Supplemental Table S3. Pearson Analysis. Supplemental Table S4. The presence/ absence of all nonredundant carbohydrate genes found in baby wipe isolates as determined by BLAST analysis.

Author Contributions

L.C. and B.D.T., designed the study and finalized the submission; L.C. and B.D.T. wrote the initial and final drafts; L.C., M.-C.J.H. and J.Y., analyzed and characterized the baby wipe isolates; L.C. and K.H., generated the data; L.C., H.R.C., K.H. and F.N., carried out genome sequencing data submission and the assembly and annotations; L.C. and J.G., analyzed the BTyper data; L.C., F.N., J.G. and M.-C.J.H. carried out the illustrations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are contained within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Hediye Cinar for her valuable contributions to the final manuscript. The authors also wish to thank Mark Mammel for his expertise bioinformatics contributions to the final document.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Glasset, B.; Herbin, S.; Granier, S.A.; Cavalié, L.; Lafeuille, E.; Guérin, C.; Ruimy, R.; Casagrande-Magne, F.; Levast, M.; Chautemps, N.; et al. Bacillus cereus, a serious cause of nosocomial. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Omer, H.; Alpha-Bazin, B.; Brunet, J.; Armengaud, J.; Duport, C. Proteomics identifies Bacillus cereus EntD as a pivotal protein for the production of numerous virulence factors. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Majed, R.; Faille, C.; Kalassy, M.; Gohar, M. Bacillus cereus Biofilms—Same, Only Different. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duport, C.; Jobin, M.; Schmitt, P. Adaptation in Bacillus cereus: From Stress to Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carter, L.; Chase, H.R.; Gieseker, C.M.; Hasbrouck, N.R.; Stine, C.B.; Khan, A.; Ewing-Peeples, L.J.; Tall, B.D.; Gopinath, G.R. Analysis of enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus strains from dried foods using whole genome sequencing, multi-locus sequence analysis and toxin gene prevalence and distribution using endpoint PCR analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 284, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, M.; Hitchins, A.; Tran, T.; McCarron, J. Chapter 23: Methods for Cosmetics. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual; Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2016. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-23-methods-cosmetics (accessed on 13 February 2018).
  7. Talent, S.M.; Rhodehamel, E.J.; Harmon, S.M.; Bennett, R.W. Chapter 14: Bacillus cereus. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual; Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2012. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm070875.htm (accessed on 13 February 2018).
  8. Ngamwongsatit, P.; Buasri, W.; Pianariyanon, P.; Pulsrikarn, C.; Ohba, M.; Assavanig, A.; Panbangred, W. Broad distribution of enterotoxin genes (hblCDA, nehABC, cytK and entFM) among Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus as shown by novel primers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 121, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Thaenthanee, S.; Wong, A.; Panbangred, W. Phenotypic and genotypic comparisons reveal a broad distribution and heterogeneity of hemolysin BL genes among Bacillus cereus isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Stevens, R. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carroll, L.M.; Kovac, J.; Miller, R.A.; Wiedmann, M. Rapid, high-throughput identification of anthrax-causing and emetic Bacillus cereus group genome assemblies via BTyper, a computational tool for virulence-based classification of Bacillus cereus group isolates by using nucleotide sequencing data. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01096-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gangiredla, J.; Rand, H.; Benisatto, D.; Payne, J.; Strittmatter, C.; Sanders, J.; Wolfgang, W.J.; Libuit, K.; Herrick, J.B.; Prarat, M.; et al. GalaxyTrakr: A distributed analysis tool for public health whole genome sequence data accessible to non-bioinformaticians. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Davis, S.; Pettengill, J.; Luo, Y.; Payne, J.; Shpuntoff, A.; Rand, H.; Strain, E. CFSAN SNP Pipeline: An automated method for constructing SNP matrices from next-generation sequence data. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2015, 1, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenic Trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; p. 333. ISBN 0-19-513584-9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Warda, A.K.; Siezen, R.J.; Boekhorst, J.; Wells-Bennik, M.H.; de Jong, A.; Kuipers, O.P.; Abee, T. Linking Bacillus cereus genotypes and carbohydrate utilization capacity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schomburg, I.; Chang, A.; Ebeling, C.; Gremse, M.; Heldt, C.; Huhn, G.; Schomburg, D. BRENDA, the enzyme database: Updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D431–D433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pitt, T.; McClure, J.; Parker, M.; Amezquita, A.; McClure, P. Bacillus cereus in personal care products: Risk to consumers. Inter. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2015, 35, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pei, X.; Yang, S.; Zhan, L.; Zhu, J.; Song, X.; Hu, X.; Yang, D. Prevalence of Bacillus cereus in powdered infant and powdered follow-up formula in China. Food Control 2018, 93, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hilliard, N.; Schelonka, R.; Waites, K. Bacillus cereus Bacteremia in a preterm neonate. J. Clin. Micro. 2003, 41, 3441–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cormontagne, D.; Rigourd, V.; Vidic, J.; Rizzotto, F.; Bille, E.; Ramarao, N. Bacillus cereus Induces Severe Infections in Preterm Neonates: Implication at the Hospital and Human Milk Bank Level. Toxins 2021, 13, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ramarao, N.; Tran Seav-Ly Marin, M.; Vidic, J. Advanced methods for detection of Bacillus cereus and its pathogenic factors. Sensors 2020, 20, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Title 21 Part 117 Subpart B: Current Good Manufacturing Practices. Available online: https://ecfr.federalregister.gov (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  27. Sandle, T. The Risk of Bacillus cereus to Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. Am. Pharm. Rev. 2014, 17, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Stewart, H.; Parker, M.; Amezquita, A.; Pitt, T. Microbiological risk assessment for personal care products. Inter. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2016, 38, 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiong, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Qi, D.; Lu, H.; Yang, F.; Yang, J.; Chen, L.; Sun, L.; Xu, X.; Xue, Y.; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of the Extremophilic Bacillus cereus Strain Q1 with Industrial Applications. J. Bact. 2009, 191, 1120–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dietrich, R.; Jessberger, N.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Märtlbauer, E.; Granum, P. The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus cereus. Toxins 2021, 13, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, L.; Sheng, Z.; Pei, Y.; Baoqing, Z.; Lijun, W.; Chengwei, L.; Hua, W.; Hengyi, X. Distribution and expression of the enterotoxin genes of Bacillus cereus in food products from Jiangxi Province, China. Food Control 2016, 67, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Drewnowska, J.; Stefanska, N.; Czerniecka, M.; Zambrowski, G.; Swiecickaa, I. Potential Enterotoxicity of Phylogenetically Diverse Bacillus cereus Sensu Lato Soil Isolates from Different Geographical Locations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e03032-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Messelhäusser, U. Bacillus “next generation” diagnostics: Moving from detection toward subtyping and risk-related strain profiling. Front. Microbiol 2013, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, C.; Ehrhardt, C.; Yadavalli, V. Single cell profiling of surface carbohydrates on Bacillus cereus. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 20141109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaznadzey, K.; Shelyakin, P.; Gelfand, M. Sugar Lego: Gene composition of bacterial carbohydrate metabolism genomic loci. Biol. Direct 2017, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and evolutionary history among 55 B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes and other cosmetics products in comparison with NCBI reference genomes was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [15]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 1.41269531 is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method [16] and are in the units of the number of base differences per sequence. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There was a total of 431,768 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X 10.0 [17]. The scale bar represents a 0.050 base substitution per site. The baby wipe B. cereus strains clustered into two distinct phylogenetically related groups according to ST. For example, the ST266 strains clustered with ST266 reference strain BcQ1 and the ST1295 strains clustered separately in a related but distinct clade with the ST90 strains, which grouped with the ST90 reference strain Bc FRI-35. The baby wipe and cosmetic product isolates are identified by red circles. The green circles represent the closest Bc reference strains.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and evolutionary history among 55 B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes and other cosmetics products in comparison with NCBI reference genomes was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [15]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 1.41269531 is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method [16] and are in the units of the number of base differences per sequence. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There was a total of 431,768 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X 10.0 [17]. The scale bar represents a 0.050 base substitution per site. The baby wipe B. cereus strains clustered into two distinct phylogenetically related groups according to ST. For example, the ST266 strains clustered with ST266 reference strain BcQ1 and the ST1295 strains clustered separately in a related but distinct clade with the ST90 strains, which grouped with the ST90 reference strain Bc FRI-35. The baby wipe and cosmetic product isolates are identified by red circles. The green circles represent the closest Bc reference strains.
Microorganisms 10 01779 g001
Figure 2. The heatmap represents the presence/absence of B. cereus virulence, antimicrobial resistance genes (AMR), panC phylogenic typing genes, and ST designations identified in baby wipe strains using BTyper. All the baby wipes strains possessed nheBAC, entAFM, bpsEFH, cerAB, clo, plcABR, and inhA1A2. ST1295 strains possessed the additional virulence factor, cytK2. The lone ST2103 strain carried cytK2, hblDAC, bceT, and hblB as additional virulence factors. There were seven AMR genes which included (GLY) VanY-Pt2, (GLY) VanYF-Pp, (MLS)LsaB, (GLY) VanS-Pt2, and (GLY) VanR-Pt, along with (GLY) VanR-M and (Bla) BLA-1 found in all the strains. All strains except for Bc57 ST2103 were identified as panC-positive. Bc57 ST2013 was identified as a panD-positive strain. The presence of the gene is indicated in blue, and the absence is indicated in gray. The measured parameters were consistent with the ST of the strains.
Figure 2. The heatmap represents the presence/absence of B. cereus virulence, antimicrobial resistance genes (AMR), panC phylogenic typing genes, and ST designations identified in baby wipe strains using BTyper. All the baby wipes strains possessed nheBAC, entAFM, bpsEFH, cerAB, clo, plcABR, and inhA1A2. ST1295 strains possessed the additional virulence factor, cytK2. The lone ST2103 strain carried cytK2, hblDAC, bceT, and hblB as additional virulence factors. There were seven AMR genes which included (GLY) VanY-Pt2, (GLY) VanYF-Pp, (MLS)LsaB, (GLY) VanS-Pt2, and (GLY) VanR-Pt, along with (GLY) VanR-M and (Bla) BLA-1 found in all the strains. All strains except for Bc57 ST2103 were identified as panC-positive. Bc57 ST2013 was identified as a panD-positive strain. The presence of the gene is indicated in blue, and the absence is indicated in gray. The measured parameters were consistent with the ST of the strains.
Microorganisms 10 01779 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of carbohydrate utilization capabilities of the 40 B. cereus isolates from baby wipes.
Figure 3. Comparison of carbohydrate utilization capabilities of the 40 B. cereus isolates from baby wipes.
Microorganisms 10 01779 g003
Figure 4. The presence/absence of genes related to carbohydrate utilization shows the closest agreement to ST found in all the strains showing differences in gene composition. P = presence of a gene; A = absence of a gene; Bc14579 is B. cereus ATCC 14579; ST57 is highlighted in light blue, ST1295 is highlighted in gray, ST266 is highlighted in yellow.
Figure 4. The presence/absence of genes related to carbohydrate utilization shows the closest agreement to ST found in all the strains showing differences in gene composition. P = presence of a gene; A = absence of a gene; Bc14579 is B. cereus ATCC 14579; ST57 is highlighted in light blue, ST1295 is highlighted in gray, ST266 is highlighted in yellow.
Microorganisms 10 01779 g004
Table 1. Isolates from baby wipes and cosmetics, manufacturer source, product information, isolation date, and corresponding metadata of strains used in this study.
Table 1. Isolates from baby wipes and cosmetics, manufacturer source, product information, isolation date, and corresponding metadata of strains used in this study.
Isolates IDSourceProduct Type/BrandDate of IsolationCountry/OriginNumber of Isolates
subA-JManufacturer ABaby wipes P (Pure)August 2015Europe10
subK-TManufacturer ABaby wipes G (Gentle Cleansing)August 2015Europe10
subU-DDManufacturer BBaby wipes S (Scented)August 2015Asia10
subEE-NNManufacturer BBaby wipes U (Unscented)August 2015Asia10
subO2-R2Manufacturer CEyeshadowNovember 2015America4
subS2-V2Manufacturer DLiquid EyelinerNovember 2015Asia4
Note that subW is one additional cosmetics isolate that was removed from the table due to the lack of sufficient metadata.
Table 2. Enterotoxin gene profiles of B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes as identified using PCR.
Table 2. Enterotoxin gene profiles of B. cereus strains isolated from baby wipes as identified using PCR.
Isolate Name Assembly Name Target Gene Profile
hblDhblAhblCnheBnheAnheCcytKentFM
subABc54 +++P-1
subBBc55 +++P-1
subCBc56 ++P-2
subDBc57 +++++++P-3
subEBc58 +++P-1
subFBc59 ++P-2
subGBc60 +++++++P-3
subHBc61 ++P-2
subIBc62 ++P-2
subJBc63 +++++++P-3
subKBc64 +++++P-4
subLBc65 ++P-2
subMBc177 +++++P-4
subNBc178 ++++P-5
subOBc179 ++++P-5
subPBc180 ++++P-5
subQBc181 ++++P-5
subRBc182 ++++P-5
subSBc183 ++++P-5
subTBc184 +++++P-4
subUBc185 ++++P-5
subVBc186 ++++P-5
subWBc187 +++++P-4
subXBc188 ++++P-5
subYBc189 ++++P-5
subZBc190 +++++P-4
subAABc191 ++++P-5
subBBBc192 ++++P-5
subCCBc193 ++++P-5
subDDBc194 +++++++P-3
subEEBc195 ++++P-5
subFFBc196 ++++P-5
subGGBc197 ++++P-5
subHHBc198 ++++P-5
subIIBc199 ++++P-5
subJJBc200 +++++P-4
subKKBc201 ++++P-5
subLLBc202 +++++P-4
subMMBc210 ++++P-5
subNNBc204 ++++P-6
(+) = positive by PCR; (−) = negative by PCR.
Table 3. WGS assembly, genomic information, and GenBank accession numbers of B. cereus isolates used in this study.
Table 3. WGS assembly, genomic information, and GenBank accession numbers of B. cereus isolates used in this study.
Isolate IDStrainNCBI Accession Number BioSample Number of CDS aGeneST b
subBMOD1_Bc55MIFH00000000SAMN05608072500053541295
subCMOD1_Bc56NHTX00000000SAMN0716333052795611266
subDMOD1_Bc57NHTY00000000SAMN07163329565760562103
subEMOD1_Bc58NHTZ00000000SAMN0716332852615620266
subFMOD1_Bc59NHUA00000000SAMN0716332752935628266
subGMOD1_Bc60NHUB00000000SAMN0716332652995598266
subHMOD1_Bc61NHUC00000000SAMN0716332553165611266
subIMOD1_Bc62NHUD00000000SAMN0716332452355534266
subJMOD1_Bc63NHUE00000000SAMN0716332353015597266
subKMOD1_Bc64NHUF01000000SAMN07163322504153921295
subLMOD1_Bc65NHUG00000000SAMN0716332152925581266
subMMOD1_Bc177NHUH00000000SAMN07163320504353771295
subNMOD1_Bc178NHUI00000000SAMN0716331952945598266
subOMOD1_Bc179NHUJ00000000SAMN0716331853105622266
subPMOD1_Bc180NHUK00000000SAMN0716331753055617266
subQMOD1_Bc181NHUL00000000SAMN0716331652275551266
subRMOD1_Bc182NHUM00000000SAMN0716329353035615266
subSMOD1_Bc183NHUN00000000SAMN0716329253055597266
subTMOD1_Bc184NHUO00000000SAMN0716329150755409266
subUMOD1_Bc185NHUP00000000SAMN0716329052315560266
subVMOD1_Bc186NHUQ00000000SAMN0716327753055631266
subWMOD1_Bc187NHUR00000000SAMN07163276505754051295
subXMOD1_Bc188NHUS00000000SAMN0716327552995609266
subYMOD1_Bc189NHUT00000000SAMN0716327453035622266
subZMOD1_Bc190NHUU00000000SAMN07163273506053681295
subAAMOD1_Bc191NHUV00000000SAMN0716327253175615266
subBBMOD1_Bc192NHUW00000000SAMN0716327153055599266
subCCMOD1_Bc193NHUX00000000SAMN0716327052915598266
subDDMOD1_Bc194NINF00000000SAMN0716326952155541266
subEEMOD1_Bc195NHUY00000000SAMN0716326853035613266
subFFMOD1_Bc196NING00000000SAMN0716326753045624266
subGGMOD1_Bc197NINH00000000SAMN0716326652905619266
subHHMOD1_Bc198NHUZ00000000SAMN0716326553015589266
subIIMOD1_Bc199NHVA00000000SAMN0716326452985590266
subJJMOD1_Bc200NHVB00000000SAMN0716326352975596266
subKKMOD1_Bc201NHVC00000000SAMN07163262506053801295
subLLMOD1_Bc202NHVD00000000SAMN0716326152345522266
subMMMOD1_Bc210NHVE00000000SAMN07163260529655921295
subNNMOD1_Bc204NHVF00000000SAMN0716325950585383266
denotes NCBI GenBank accession number and Bionumber; a Number of CDS represent CDS Coding DNA Sequences and b denotes Sequence Types (ST), MLST. subA was inadvertently not submitted to NCBI.
Table 4. Carbohydrate utilization-related genes that are present in B. cereus strain (Bc57) ST 2103.
Table 4. Carbohydrate utilization-related genes that are present in B. cereus strain (Bc57) ST 2103.
Carbohydrate GeneMolecular/Enzyme Function
Transcriptional activator of acetoin dehydrogenase operon AcoRATP binding a
Sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase (EC 3.2.1.26) BMetabolism of disaccharides b, Galactose metabolism, Starch, and sucrose metabolism c
Glycerate_kinase_ (EC 2.7.1.31)Glycolate and glyoxylate
degradation b, Biosynthesis of
antibiotics c
sucrose operon repressor ScrR, LacI familyDNA Binding a
Fructokinase (EC 2.7.1.4)Metabolism of disaccharides b, Amino sugar, and nucleotide sugar metabolism c
1-phosphofructokinase (EC 2.7.1.56)Degradation of hexoses b, Fructose, and mannose metabolism c
2-hydroxy-3-oxopropionate reductase (EC 1.1.1.6A)Degradation of sugar acids b, Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate
metabolism c
3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.3A)Butanoate metabolism c
Phosphoglycolate phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.18)Degradation of pentoses b, Biosynthesis of antibiotics c
Possible glyoxylase family protein (Lactoylglutathione lyase) (EC 4.4.1.5)Methylglyoxal degradation b,
Pyruvate metabolism c
Lactoylglutathione lyaseA methylglyoxal degradation b,
Pyruvate metabolism c
Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase of acetoin dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4)Acetyl CoA biosynthesis b
Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis c
Dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase component (E2) of acetoin dehydrogenase complex (EC 2.3.1.12)Acetyl CoA biosynthesis b,
Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis c
D-alanine aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.21)Alanine metabolism b, D-alanine c
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.3) in 4-hydroxyproline_catabolic_gene_clusterAlanine metabolism b, Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, Carbohydrate
metabolism c
D-glycero-beta-D-manno-heptose-1,7-bisphosphate 7-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.82); possible Histidinol-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.15) CDSLipopolysaccharide biosynthesis c
SOURCES of information: a UniProKB-KW Ref Bacillus Subtilis, b Brenda enzyme database, c KEGG a genome annotation database.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carter, L.; Huang, M.-C.J.; Han, K.; Gangiredla, J.; Yee, J.; Chase, H.R.; Negrete, F.; Tall, B.D. Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus Strains Isolated from Baby Wipes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091779

AMA Style

Carter L, Huang M-CJ, Han K, Gangiredla J, Yee J, Chase HR, Negrete F, Tall BD. Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus Strains Isolated from Baby Wipes. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9):1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091779

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carter, Laurenda, Mei-Chiung J. Huang, Kyuyoung Han, Jayanthi Gangiredla, Jenny Yee, Hannah R. Chase, Flavia Negrete, and Ben D. Tall. 2022. "Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus Strains Isolated from Baby Wipes" Microorganisms 10, no. 9: 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091779

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop