Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Interactions in the Context of Chronic Wound Biofilm: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
On-Farm Practices Associated with Multi-Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli and Vibrio parahaemolyticus Derived from Cultured Fish
Previous Article in Journal
Aspergillus Hydrophobins: Physicochemical Properties, Biochemical Properties, and Functions in Solid Polymer Degradation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms10081499
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epidemiology and Traits of Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Gene-Bearing Organisms from Horses

by
Madubuike Umunna Anyanwu
1,*,
Ishmael Festus Jaja
2,*,
Obichukwu Chisom Nwobi
3,
Anthony Christian Mgbeahuruike
1,
Chinaza Nnenna Ikpendu
4,
Nnenna Audrey Okafor
5 and
James Wabwire Oguttu
2
1
Microbiology Unit, Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 400001, Nigeria
2
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, Florida Campus, University of South Africa, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
3
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 400001, Nigeria
4
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike 440101, Nigeria
5
Department of Microbiology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 400001, Nigeria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1499; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081499
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 20 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance Transfer from Animal to Environment)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10) threaten the efficacy of colistin (COL), a polymyxin antibiotic that is used as a last-line agent for the treatment of deadly infections caused by multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacteria in humans and animals. COL has been used for more than 60 years for the prophylactic control and treatment of infections in livestock husbandry but not in horses. Polymyxin B is used for the prophylactic control and empirical treatment of infections in horses without conducting sensitivity tests. The lack of sensitivity testing exerts selection pressure for the acquisition of the mcr gene. By horizontal transfer, mcr-1, mcr-5, and mcr-9 have disseminated among horse populations globally and are harbored by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Salmonella species. Conjugative plasmids, insertion sequences, and transposons are the backbone of mcr genes in the isolates, which co-express genes conferring multi- to extensive-drug resistance, including genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamase, ampicillinase C, fosfomycin, and fluoroquinolone resistance, and virulence genes. The transmission of mcr genes to/among bacterial strains of equine origin is non-clonal. Contact with horses, horse manure, feed/drinking water, farmers, farmers’ clothing/farm equipment, the consumption of contaminated horse meat and its associated products, and the trading of horses, horse meat, and their associated products are routes for the transmission of mcr-gene-bearing bacteria in, to, and from the equine industry.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) that are resistant to virtually all available antimicrobial agents, continues to be a growing global public and animal health threat, impacting negatively on the socioeconomic development of nations irrespective of their income level. Terrifyingly, 127 million human deaths were directly attributed to resistant infections in 2019 [1]. There is no need to reiterate the outrageous economic impact that AMRs have on national, regional, and global economies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Chromosome-borne and non-conjugative plasmid-encoded resistance genes are mutationally acquired and vertically transferred to bacterial progenies within a clone, and thus by their very nature are self-limiting. However, conjugative plasmid-encoded resistance genes rapidly spread horizontally/laterally among bacterial populations without clonal restriction, leading to the rapid loss of the therapeutic/clinical efficacy of antimicrobial agents [7,8,9]. Plasmids are self-replicating extrachromosomal genetic materials in bacteria that drive acquired resistance. They are mobile genetic elements (MGEs) with the capacity to carry other genetic elements, such as insertion sequences, transposons, integrons, and gene cassettes that readily capture/transfer genes from/to other organisms by mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), namely conjugation, transduction, and transformation [8,9,10]. Indeed, plasmid movement between different bacterial species and lineages represents a major source of AMR [8,9].
Colistin (COL), a polycationic peptide belonging to the polymyxin class of antibiotics (including polymyxin B), is one of the few last-line antibiotics used for the treatment of deadly infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains of bacteria in humans and animals [11,12,13,14]. COL was largely abandoned soon after its production due to its nephrotoxic and neurotoxic potential, which is related to its dosage and pharmacokinetics, alongside the availability of other effective and safe antibiotics [11,15,16]. However, with restrictions in a few developed countries, COL has been used for more than six decades in livestock for growth promotion and the prophylactic control and treatment of infections caused by GNB. In humans, COL has been used mostly for the treatment of topical infections and cystic fibrosis, and for selective decontamination of the gut [11,15]. The emergence and rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant organisms forced clinicians to resort to COL for human therapeutic management [15,16]. In 2015, it was discovered that a plasmid-encoded COL determinant (the mobile COL resistance (mcr-1) gene) emerged, threatening the clinical utility of COL [17]. Currently, ten mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10), with many variants and subvariants, have been detected in isolates/samples from humans, animals, and the environment in more than 65 countries on all seven continents [12,18,19]. The mcr genes encode transmembrane enzymes, including phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) transferase, which mediates COL resistance by attaching a pEtN moiety to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of lipid A in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacilli, thereby eliminating the negative charge on the LPS to which cationic COL/polymyxins have an affinity [20]. There has been extensive discourse on the methods used in the detection of these genes and their specific characteristics [14,21,22,23,24,25]. Although the transmission of chromosome-borne and non-conjugative plasmid-encoded mcr genes is clonally restricted [7,11], conjugative plasmid-borne mcr genes are rapidly transferred to other organisms (i.e., inter/intraspecies and genera transmission) as these plasmids are highly promiscuous, thus jeopardizing antimicrobial/COL therapy [7,11,25]. Therefore, there is a need to understand the magnitude, genetic context, and epidemiological relationships of mcr-gene-bearing organisms that have been isolated from different ecological niches. Reports on mcr-gene-mediated COL resistance in animals, especially in food-producing animals (FPAs), are more abundant than those in humans and the environment [13,16,20,23,26,27,28,29,30,31], indicating that animals are a huge reservoir for plasmid-mediated COL resistance (PMCR) and warrants increased surveillance of animal sources as part of a process to reduce the spread of COL resistance. However, horses appear to be an underestimated reservoir of mcr-gene-bearing organisms.
Horses are highly prized animals that are used for various purposes in different parts of the world, including sports (such as polo games), transportation (as a beast of burden), festivals, security (as mountain troops), pets and companions, and as a source of meat and other products such as hide [32,33,34]. The annual economic impact of the global equine industry is estimated at $300 billion dollars, creating employment for about 1.6 million people, and generating a gross domestic product of over $100 billion in North America alone [35]. Annually, the size of the horseback-riding industry is rapidly increasing, and the estimated number of horse riders is congruently increasing worldwide [36,37]. Thus, there is an increased chance of transmission of zoonotic resistant pathogens from horses to humans and vice versa due to increased contact with horses [36]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate this risk due to this potential public health threat. Antimicrobials, including critically important ones such as polymyxin B and ceftiofur, are used for the treatment of infections and prophylaxis in horses, but the latter mode of use (prophylactic control) is widely criticized [38,39,40]. Globally, empirical treatment (without conducting the sensitivity test) for horses is allowed [41,42,43]. This practice potentially exerts selection pressure, stimulating the development of AMR and the acquisition of plasmid-encoded transmissible mcr genes in exposed bacteria. Most worrisome is the acquisition/co-expression of mcr genes with plasmid-encoded genes, conferring resistance to other high-priority and highest priority last-resort antimicrobials, such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins (mediated by the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and plasmidic Ampicillinase C (pAmpC)), carbapenems (mediated by carbapenemase production), glycylines (mediated by the production of tetracycline/tigecycline destructatses/flavin monooxygenases and resistance-nodulation-division efflux pumps), and fosfomycin (mediated by the production of glutathione S transferases) [13,44]. The potential for companion animals, including horses, as reservoirs for ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing organisms has been extensively reviewed [42,43,44,45,46], as have mcr genes in dogs and cats [27,45]. Information on COL resistance in horses would be helpful in selecting therapy based on local sensitivity data for treatment in equine practice and to curb the spread of mcr-gene-bearing bacteria (MGBB). Moreover, understanding the epidemiology and traits of mcr-bearing bacteria from horses regarding phenotypic resistance, the genetic context of the mcr gene, population structure, and genotypic features creates the impetus to tackle the problem of AMR [13]. This mini-review discusses the potential sources, transmission routes, impacts, occurrence, and phenotypic and genotypic traits of mcr-bearing isolates from horses.

2. Possible Sources, Transmission Routes, and Impacts of mcr-Gene-Bearing Organisms in Horses

Horses are herbivores; they only feed on plant material. Thus, forages contaminated with COL-r organisms, originating from human or animal ejections/manure and even biocides that led to the development of AMR, constitute a route for the colonization of horses by these organisms [16,46]. Rainfall run-off from an environment contaminated with anthropogenic/agricultural wastes, such as sewage and wastewaters from homes, hospitals, laboratories, pharmaceutical industries, livestock farms, slaughterhouses, and aquafarms, potentially carry COL-r organisms to vegetations/grasslands [13,47,48]. Wild animals, such as birds, flies, and rodents, that often interact with anthropogenic/agricultural wastes can acquire MGBB from these wastes and deposit them on forages or stored feed (hay)/feedstuff used to supplement the diets of horses [13]. Access to drinking water that is sourced from the surface, or underground water contaminated by anthropogenic/agricultural wastes (sewage and wastewater from homes, hospitals, pharmaceutical industries, laboratories, and livestock farms) could result in the colonization of animals by COL-r organisms [47,48,49]. Individuals (such as horse groomers, hoof-farriers, jockeys, owners, and caretakers) with poor hand hygiene may directly contact horses and potentially contaminate forages, feed, or gears (straps, brushes, saddles, etc., used in riding/restraining horse mouths) with COL-r organisms.
In most countries, antibiotics belonging to several classes, including polypeptides (polymyxin B), macrolides, aminoglycosides, ansamycins, penicillin, cephalosporins, quinolones, sulphonamides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and metronidazoles, are used for the prophylactic control and empirical treatment of bacterial infections without conducting sensitivity tests, especially in situations where mortality rates are high, e.g., sepsis in foals [40,41,43,50]. Polymyxin B is used for the management of endotoxemia in horses and, at an anti-endotoxic dose (which is lower than the antimicrobial dose), for the treatment of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [40,51]. The use of polymyxin B in subtherapeutic concentrations potentially exerts selection pressure for the development of AMR. However, the use of the highest priority CIAs (HP-CIAs) without a sensitivity test in horses is not allowed in some countries, such as Sweden [40]. The use of antibiotics in undiagnosed or misdiagnosed cases and for an unrecommended duration in horses also leads to the development of AMR [40]. In most developing countries, antimicrobial use is not strictly controlled, and non-professionals/animal owners use critically important drugs without the supervision of a veterinarian [34]. Thus, in these nations, it is possible to manage infections in horses with COL. The administration of COL by untrained individuals potentially results in the development of COL resistance. Veterinary healthcare workers (VHWs) are known to have been colonized by COL-r and MGBB [52], and the role of the veterinary hospital environment as a reservoir for COL-r organisms is recognized [53]. Therefore, the nosocomial infection of horses by resistant organisms could occur following visitation to veterinary hospitals through the hands of unhygienic VHWs, horse caretakers, and/or the hospital environment [54]. The crowding of horses during shows, races, and sales is a putative risk for the exchange of resistant organisms between animals. The exchange of organisms could occur through the inhalation of respiratory droplets since these organisms have been isolated from the respiratory tract (trachea and lungs) of horses [55,56].
A horse infected/colonized by COL-r organisms is a putative source for spreading these organisms to the community through individuals who make direct and indirect contact with them [54,57]. The trade of racehorses is a potential route for the dissemination of MGBB from one place to another [13,58]. The cross-contamination of horse meat by COL-r organisms during slaughter, especially in unhygienic slaughterhouses, is a risk for further transmission of MGBB through the local or international horse meat trade [16,26,34,59]. Slaughterhouse personnel handling horse carcasses/meat, especially those with poor infection prevention control (such as poor hand hygiene and personal hygiene) and those who fail to wear personal protective equipment, are at risk of infection by COL-r organisms [26]. These individuals serve as vehicles, spreading the microorganisms to the public [26]. In developing countries, slaughterhouse wastes, such as the internal organs of slaughtered animals, constitute an important source of animal protein for dogs, and horse meat is a potential source of protein in pet foods. The handling and consumption of contaminated raw and undercooked horse meat by humans and possibly carnivores (following the consumption of horse meat that may be used in pet foods) is also a putative risk for the acquisition of MGBB [16,59,60].
The rearing of horses generates huge amounts of forage residuals and horse manure. Stalling a horse for a month could create approximately one ton of stall residuals [35]. The inadequate/improper disposal of stall residuals/horse manure into the environment constitutes a potential health risk [49]. Flies that feed on/breed in animal manure could carry MGBB from the manure and may transport it to humans and animals by contaminating food, water, and wounds [13]. The discharge of COL-r organisms through feces by horses on fields during horse races and the use of insufficiently composted/anaerobically digested horse manure as organic fertilizer in crop farms are potential means through which these organisms spread to the environment, potentially contaminating soil and plants [34]. Rainfall runoff may carry these organisms from manure in the environment/on farmland to other places, contaminating water bodies that may be sources of sustenance to other organisms (such as habitats for reptiles/aquatic animals and drinking water for free-range animals) [13,48]. The groomers, caretakers, riders, and jockeys of horses colonized by COL-r organisms could easily become infected from contaminated horse gears/bodies, especially following direct contact with the oral/anal region of the animal [34]. These individuals may subsequently transfer these organisms to their households and to the public [61,61]. Through local and international travel, colonized individuals may transport MGBB from horses to other locations, thus increasing the spread of these organisms [62]. Indeed, MGBB in the equine industry has one health ramification: they may disseminate to human environmental settings through diverse routes (Figure 1). Unfortunately, the treatment of infections associated with MGBB is often difficult or impossible due to limited therapy options; thus, such infections are usually fatal.

3. Epidemiology and Traits of mcr-Gene-Bearing Bacteria Isolated from Horses in Different World Regions

3.1. Africa

An ESBL-producing and COL-r ST405 E. coli that was isolated between 2014–2015 from horse manure in Algeria harbored transferrable mcr-1 [57], suggesting that a pandemic high-risk extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (HiR-ExPEC) clone [63] has been present among the equine population in Africa since 2014 at least. Horse manure is a potential source for the dissemination of MGBB into human and environmental settings following human–animal contact with horse manure and the improper disposal of untreated/inadequately treated manure, respectively. The organism also co-expressed blaTEM-12 encoding resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, suggesting that COL selection pressure could have emanated from the use of other antimicrobials, especially β-lactams. The presence of ST405 mcr-1-positive E. coli in horses is of public health concern because this E. coli clone is associated with the global dissemination of ESBL genes [16]. ST405 mcr-1-positive E. coli is widely spread throughout human–animal–environment ecosystems in Algeria, has been detected in bovine manure [57] and in a wild monkey [64], and is associated with infertility and urinary tract infections in humans [65,66]. COL is used as a metaphylactic treatment and feed additive to promote growth in the Algerian livestock industry [67]. Thus, there is a possibility that horses acquired the organism from persons such as groomers, caretakers, and jockeys, or through the consumption of herbage/drinking water contaminated by anthropogenic/agricultural wastes. Furthermore, it is possible that garbage flies picked up the organisms from another place and deposited them on horse manure during feeding/breeding.

3.2. Europe

The mcr-9 gene was detected in various plasmids, particularly in IncHI2 and IncHI2A (Table 1), in 30 clinical ESBL-producing strains (in 15 Enterobacter cloacae complex, 10 E. coli, 4 Klebsiella oxytoca, and 1 Citrobacter freundii) recovered from various clinical samples from horses in Sweden [56], suggesting that various promiscuous plasmids evolved mcr-9 in diverse Enterobacterales that were circulating among the equine population in the Nordic region of Europe and that the IncHI2 plasmid is the commonest MGE driving mcr-9 among the equine population in Europe. This finding also suggests that Enterobacter is the major trafficker of mcr-9 in horses. IncHI2 has been reported as the predominant plasmid spreading mcr-9 [68], and Enterobacter species (spp.) have been associated with mcr-9 dissemination in humans, animals, and the environment more than any other organism [69,70,71,72,73]. The mcr-9-bearing isolates were extensively diverse, belonging to different STs (E. coli, six STs; Enterobacter spp., seven STs; and Klebsiella spp., three STs), including HiR pathogenic epidemic clones, indicating that the spread of mcr-9 among enterobacteria in horses is not clonally restricted. Among the STs of the isolates, E. coli ST1861 is associated with carriage of the ESBL gene in horses in the Netherlands [54]. The isolates co-expressed 24 additional resistance genes (including ESBL—blaSHV-12, pAmpC—blaCMY-82, fosfomycin—fosA, and PMQR—qnrA1, qnrB2, and qnrB10 genes) conferring resistance to nine antimicrobial classes (Table 1). This suggests that horses in Europe are reservoirs for organisms harboring a cocktail of multiple resistant genes with the potential to cause difficult-to-treat diseases in humans and animals. Even more worrisome is that these genes encode resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones that are recommended as off-label options for equine medicine in Sweden [40], suggesting that the use of these drugs has exerted selection pressure and has prompted acquisition of the mcr-9 gene by the strains. COL is used in humans and during the postweaning time on pig farms in Sweden [74], suggesting that these settings may be sources for the emergence of mcr-9-bearing organisms. However, none of the mcr-9-bearing strains possessed qseB-/qseC-like genes, which are the regulatory genes that are speculated to be responsible for inducing the acquisition of mcr-9 and the expression of COL resistance [75,75]. This implies that mcr-9 might not actually be induced, as has been speculated, and warrants further investigation. Furthermore, some of the mcr-9-bearing isolates exhibited levels of COL MIC that were less than the recommended joint CLSI-EUCAST Ecological cut-off value (≥2mg/L), meaning that the use of the current breakpoints as criteria for assessing isolates for mcr genes leads to underestimation of the magnitude of PMCR globally as mcr-9 is silently disseminating. This highlights that, irrespective of the COL MIC exhibited, screening of all GNB isolated from horses for mcr genes should be performed in order to determine the genes’ actual prevalence in the equine population. There is a need for greater use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in the surveillance of PMCR, or at least using polymerase chain reaction methods that target all the currently known mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-10).
In the UK, mcr-9 and blaSHV were detected on different plasmids in ESBL-producing E. coli that were isolated from several equine hospitals [40], suggesting that the genes possibly originated from different sources and that horses are sources for the dissemination of MGBB in veterinary hospitals. This also indicated that mcr-9 is trafficked by the diversity of Enterobacterales (E. coli and Enterobacter spp.) in the European equine industry. COL has been used more in patients residing in the UK than in patients residing in other European countries [77]. Therefore, COL selective pressure for the acquisition of the mcr-9 could have emanated from human settings and is possibly also due to the use of cephalosporins in horses. It is worth noting that neither of the two Aeromonas that were isolated from horses in Germany harbored mcr-1, mcr-2, or mcr-3 genes [78]. Furthermore, none of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from horses in France harbored mcr-1, mcr-2, or mcr-3 genes [79].

3.3. South America

An MDR and ESBL-producing ST711 E. coli carrying a new mcr-5 variant, named mcr-5.3 on a novel 5361 bp plasmid, was isolated from the lung tissue of a horse that never received COL and died of pneumonia in 2012 in Brazil [55], suggesting that E. coli that co-produces MCR-5 and ESBL has been present in South America for at least almost a decade and is associated with difficult-to-treat diseases in horses. The mcr-5 gene has been detected in E. coli isolates from poultry birds in Brazil [80]. The livestock sector could be the source of mcr-5 in the Brazilian equine sector since massive amounts (up to 10 g/ton of feed) of polymyxins/COL was used in livestock feed as a growth enhancer in Brazil [81]. However, this practice was banned in Brazil in November 2016 [81]. Tn3-type transposon and eight other resistance genes (including ESBL gene blaCTX-M-8), conferring resistance to three antimicrobial classes and VAGs, existed in the E. coli strain of equine origin (Table 1), suggesting that diverse MGEs (transposons and plasmids) drive COL resistance in the Brazilian equine industry and that horses are potential reservoirs for organisms that carry multi-resistant genes and are capable of causing hard-to-treat diseases, thus posing a risk for the health of animals and infected individuals. However, the strain remained susceptible to cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem, suggesting that these HP-CIAs could be useful for the management of mcr-gene-associated infections in horses in Brazil. Moreover, the E. coli strain was susceptible to COL (MIC 2 mg/L), further showing that COL-susceptible isolates are evading screening for mcr and are silently disseminating plasmid-mediated COL resistance [13]. This further supports the need to screen isolates irrespective of the COL MIC exhibited.

3.4. North America

In the USA, the mcr-9 gene, flanked upstream and downstream by insertion sequences (ISs) IS26 and IS903B, respectively, was detected on the IncHI2 plasmid in an ST45 MDR and ESBL-producing Salmonella Newport that was isolated from an equine veterinary clinic during an outbreak among horses during 2003–2004 [76]. This suggests that Enterbacterales that co-produce MCR-9 and ESBL have been circulating in North America for at least almost two decades. This also suggests that diverse genetic elements (plasmids and ISs) are involved in the capture and transfer of mcr-9, and further indicates that IncHI2 is the commonest plasmid disseminating mcr-9 in the equine sector. The isolate possessed qseB/qseC genes with ygiW on the chromosome, but these genes were not associated with the mcr-9 gene. However, qseBC was downstream of mcr-9 in the IncHI2 plasmids of some COL-susceptible (MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L) Salmonella enterica Saintpaul that were isolated from retail meat samples in the US, further suggesting that the induction of mcr-9 by qseBC expression is context-dependent and differs among isolates with different strain backgrounds [82]. The USA Food and Drug Administration approved the use of COL in FPAs, but not as a growth promoter in animal feed, suggesting that the livestock industry could be a source of mcr genes in the equine sector in the USA [20,23]. Nonetheless, the equine Salmonella strain also possessed genes encoding virulence factors (Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPI) I and II, and fimbriae for adhesion) and co-expressed 21 other resistance determinants, including genes encoding ESBL (blaSHV-12) and pAmpC (blaCMY-2), and the PMQR gene qnrB2 (Table 1). This indicates that the isolate is highly virulent and capable of causing difficult-to-treat disease outbreaks, thus posing a threat to public health. The salmonellosis outbreak caused by this virulent strain and others resulted in the closure of a veterinary teaching hospital, affected all the institution’s missions, and had a substantial financial impact of USA $4.12 million [83]. However, the isolate remained susceptible to meropenem, imipenem, and tigecycline, highlighting the need for AST and antimicrobial stewardship in order to preserve the efficacy of these critically important last-resort agents.

4. Conclusions

This review showed that a diversity of organisms, such as E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., and Salmonella spp., have disseminated various mcr genes in the equine industry (Table 1). Similar to isolates from humans, the environment, and other animal species [13,15,18,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], E. coli is the predominant organism spreading mcr genes among the horse population. Although COL use appears to be disallowed in horses (although its use is possible in countries with lax antibiotic controls), polymyxin B is used in the management of endotoxaemia and at a subtherapeutic (below antiendotoxic) concentration in horses for the treatment of SIRS. Thus, selection pressure for the acquisition of the mcr gene in the equine industry is exerted by the inappropriate use of polymyxin B and other antibiotics often used empirically without conducting sensitivity tests. Sources of MGBB in the equine sector include grasses/herbages and drinking water, vectors (i.e., flies), horse handlers (i.e., caretakers, groomers, and VHWs contaminated by anthropogenic/agricultural wastes), animal vectors, and contaminated fomites. Hospital visitation/admission and crowding during horse races, shows, and sales increase the risk of colonization of horses by COL-r organisms. Sanitation by the regular removal of bedding litter from horse stables, vector screening, vaccination, the use of non-antibiotic alternatives (such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and antimicrobial peptides), prompt accurate laboratory diagnosis whenever possible, and preventing the misdiagnosis of bacterial infection by assessing procalcitonin [40,84] could help to reduce the rate of colonization of horses by COL-r organisms/MGBB. The banning of nontherapeutic uses of COL in FPAs will also influence the equine industry as it will reduce the rate of contamination of grasses/drinking water and of humans by MGBB emanating from anthropogenic/agricultural settings. The screening of archived isolates from horses by WGS is important in order to understand the magnitude and time of emergence of MGBB in the equine industry.
The conjugative plasmids of different replicons and the incompatibility, insertion sequences, and transposons drive COL resistance in the equine industry. The IncF, IncA/C, and IncHI2 plasmids seem to be the predominant plasmid types in the strains isolated from horses. Transmission of the mcr gene among horse strains is non-clonal and diverse highly virulent zoonotic pandemic/epidemic and commensal clones of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., and Salmonella spp. are circulating among the equine industry in these regions. Isolates from horses co-express mcr genes together with virulence and resistance genes, including genes conferring resistance to last-resort antimicrobials such as those encoding ESBL, pAmpC, and plasmid-mediated quinolone and fosfomycin resistance. Thus, they are potential superbugs that may cause difficult-to-treat disease outbreaks with pandemic potential in the equine population, and may potentially result in morbidities, mortality, reduced production, and huge economic losses.
Contact with horses, horse manure, flies that feed on/breed in horse manure, and horse stable workers/their clothing and equipment, are potential routes for the acquisition of COL-r organisms/MGBB. The consumption and handling of undercooked or raw horse meat and its associated products are putative routes for colonization by COL-r organisms/MGBB. Horse meat can be contaminated at the slaughterhouse, packaging, and/or selling/retail points by handlers (slaughterhouse personnel, meat sellers, or buyers/consumers) of these meats and flies in open-air markets found in developing countries. The trade of horses and horse meat and its associated products is a route for spreading MGBB from the equine sector to other places. Insufficiently treated/untreated horse manure and slaughterhouse sewage are potential sources for the dissemination of COL-r organisms/mcr genes into human, soil, botanical, and aquatic environments, especially when used as organic fertilizer in farmlands. Anaerobic digestion and the composting of animal manure before use as an organic fertilizer eliminates the risk of acquiring COL-r organisms/mcr genes from animal manure [85].
Indeed, by horizontal/lateral and vertical transfer, the mcr-1, mcr-5, and mcr-9 genes have disseminated in the global equine industry (Table 1). However, more studies are needed worldwide (especially in Gulf countries with a high population of horses) to estimate the prevalence of MGBB in this industry. There would be an increased transmission of MGBB in the global equine industry, alongside the consequent potential stable-to-plate and stable-to-environmental transmission of superbugs, if efforts to curtail COL resistance in the horse supply chain are not enhanced. This further highlights the need for a One Health approach.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.U.A. and I.F.J.; methodology, M.U.A.; software, I.F.J.; validation, A.C.M., N.A.O. and J.W.O.; formal analysis, M.U.A.; investigation, M.U.A.; resources, I.F.J.; data curation, M.U.A. and C.N.I.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U.A.; writing—review and editing, M.U.A. and I.F.J.; visualization, O.C.N.; supervision, J.W.O.; funding acquisition, I.F.J. and J.W.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kakoullis, L.; Papachristodoulou, E.; Chra, P.; Panos, G. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Important Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens and Novel Antibiotic Solutions. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barriere, S.L. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Clinical, Economic and Societal Impact of Antibiotic Resistance. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2015, 16, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhen, X.; Lundborg, C.S.; Sun, X.; Hu, X.; Dong, H. The Clinical and Economic Impact of Antibiotic Resistance in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Founou, R.C.; Founou, L.L.; Essack, S.Y. Clinical and Economic Impact of Antibiotic Resistance in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189621. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmad, M.; Khan, A.U. Global Economic Impact of Antibiotic Resistance: A Review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 19, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anyanwu, M.U.; Anyogu, D.C.; Chah, K.F.; Shoyinka, V.S. Mobile Colistin Resistance (Mcr-1) Gene-Positive Escherichia coli from Chickens in Nigeria Is Potentially Pathogenic and Transfers Colistin Resistance to Other Organisms. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2022, 31, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vrancianu, C.O.; Popa, L.I.; Bleotu, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Targeting Plasmids to Limit Acquisition and Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J. Plasmids Carrying Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmanna, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 557–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Binsker, U.; Käsbohrer, A.; Hammerl, J.A. Global Colistin Use: A Review of the Emergence of Resistant Enterobacterales and the Impact on Their Genetic Basis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuab049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Nwobi, O.C. Occurrence and Characteristics of Mobile Colistin Resistance (Mcr) Gene-Containing Isolates from the Environment: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Khuntayaporn, P.; Thirapanmethee, K.; Chomnawang, M.T. An Update of Mobile Colistin Resistance in Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 882236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Sayed Ahmed, M.A.E.G.; Zhong, L.L.; Shen, C.; Yang, Y.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.B. Colistin and Its Role in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: An Extended Review (2000–2019). Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 868–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Anyanwu, M.U.; Okpala, C.O.R.; Chah, K.F.; Shoyinka, V.S. Prevalence and Traits of Mobile Colistin Resistance Gene Harbouring Isolates from Different Ecosystems in Africa. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6630379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Mechanism MCR-1 in Animals and Human Beings in China: A Microbiological and Molecular Biological Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elbediwi, M.; Li, Y.; Paudyal, N.; Pan, H.; Li, X.; Xie, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Feng, Y.; Fang, W.; Rankin, S.C.; et al. Global Burden of Colistin-Resistant Bacteria: Mobilized Colistin Resistance Genes Study (1980–2018). Microorganisms 2019, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Martiny, H.-M.; Munk, P.; Brinch, C.; Szarvas, J.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Petersen, T.N. Global Distribution of Mcr Gene Variants in 214K Metagenomic Samples. mSystems 2022, 7, e00105-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Okpala, C.O.R.; Jaja, C.J.I.; Oguttu, J.W.; Chah, K.F.; Shoyinka, V.S. Potential Sources and Characteristic Occurrence of Mobile Colistin Resistance (Mcr) Gene-Harbouring Bacteria Recovered from the Poultry Sector: A Literature Synthesis Specific to High-Income Countries. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leshaba, T.M.S.; Mbelle, N.M.; Osei Sekyere, J. Current and Emerging Polymyxin Resistance Diagnostics: A Systematic Review of Established and Novel Detection Methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 8–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bardet, L.; Rolain, J.M. Development of New Tools to Detect Colistin-Resistance among Enterobacteriaceae Strains. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 3095249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ling, Z.; Yin, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R. Epidemiology of Mobile Colistin Resistance Genes Mcr-1 to Mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3087–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shedko, E.D.; Timoshina, O.Y.; Azyzov, I.S. Molecular Epidemiology of Mcr Gene Group. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 22, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.H.; Feng, Y. Towards Understanding MCR-like Colistin Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Oguttu, J.W.; Jaja, C.J.; Chah, K.F.; Shodeinde Shoyinka, V. Is Africa Ready for Mobile Colistin Resistance Threat? Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2021, 11, 1962781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S. Global Impact of Mcr-1-Positive Enterobacteriaceae Bacteria on “One Health”. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 565–577. [Google Scholar]
  28. Valiakos, G.; Kapna, I. Colistin Resistant Mcr Genes Prevalence in Livestock Animals (Swine, Bovine, Poultry) from a Multinational Perspective. a Systematic Review. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bastidas-Caldes, C.; de Waard, J.H.; Salgado, M.S.; Villacís, M.J.; Coral-Almeida, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Calvopiña, M. Worldwide Prevalence of mcr-mediated Colistin-Resistance Escherichia coli in Isolates of Clinical Samples, Healthy Humans, and Livestock—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, J.; Zeng, X.; Li, X.P.; Liao, X.P.; Liu, Y.H.; Lin, J. Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Animals: Current Status and Future Directions. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2017, 18, 136–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nang, S.C.; Li, J.; Velkov, T. The Rise and Spread of mcr Plasmid-Mediated Polymyxin Resistance. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 131–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Agina, O.A.; Ihedioha, J.I. Occurrence of Wounds in Nigerian Horses. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2017, 20, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Belaunzaran, X.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Lavín, P.; Mantecón, A.R.; Kramer, J.K.G.; Aldai, N. Horse-Meat for Human Consumption-Current Research and Future Opportunities. Meat Sci. 2015, 108, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anyanwu, M.U.; Ugwu, I.C.; Onah, C.U. Occurrence and Antibiogram of Generic Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteria in Horses. Maced. Vet. Rev. 2018, 41, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cross, P. Global Horse Statistics Internal 02 2019; HiPoint Agro Bedding Corp.: Guelph, ON, Canada, 2019; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chung, Y.S.; Song, J.W.; Kim, D.H.; Shin, S.; Park, Y.K.; Yang, S.J.; Lim, S.K.; Park, K.T.; Park, Y.H. Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli from National Horse Racetracks and Private Horse-Riding Courses in Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2016, 17, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, J.-Y. The Horse Industry in Korea: Its Present Condition and Prospect. Adv Sci Technol Lett. 2015, 99, 256–260. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hardefeldt, L.Y.; Bailey, K.E.; Slater, J. Overview of the Use of Antimicrobial Drugs for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections in Horses. Equine Vet. Educ. 2021, 33, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Isgren, C. Antimicrobial Resistance in Horses. Vet. Rec. 2018, 183, 316–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Isgren, C.M. Improving Clinical Outcomes via Responsible Antimicrobial Use in Horses. Equine Vet. Educ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Álvarez–Narváez, S.; Berghaus, L.J.; Morris, E.R.A.; Willingham-Lane, J.M.; Slovis, N.M.; Giguere, S.; Cohen, N.D. A Common Practice of Widespread Antimicrobial Use in Horse Production Promotes Multi-Drug Resistance. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 911–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nielsen, S.S.; Bicout, D.J.; Calistri, P.; Canali, E.; Drewe, J.A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J.L.; Gortazar Schmidt, C.; Herskin, M.; Michel, V.; et al. Assessment of Animal Diseases Caused by Bacteria Resistant to Antimicrobials: Horses. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schnepf, A.; Bienert-Zeit, A.; Ertugrul, H.; Wagels, R.; Werner, N.; Hartmann, M.; Feige, K.; Kreienbrock, L. Antimicrobial Usage in Horses: The Use of Electronic Data, Data Curation, and First Results. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sultan, I.; Rahman, S.; Jan, A.T.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Mondal, A.H.; Haq, Q.M.R. Antibiotics, Resistome and Resistance Mechanisms: A Bacterial Perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hamame, A.; Davoust, B.; Cherak, Z.; Rolain, J.-M.; Diene, S.M. Mobile Colistin Resistance (Mcr) Genes in Cats and Dogs and Their Zoonotic Transmission Risks. Pathogens 2022, 11, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tyrrell, C.; Burgess, C.M.; Brennan, F.P.; Walsh, F. Antibiotic Resistance in Grass and Soil. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cherak, Z.; Loucif, L.; Moussi, A.; Rolain, J.M. Epidemiology of Mobile Colistin Resistance (Mcr) Genes in Aquatic Environments. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 27, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fletcher, S. Understanding the Contribution of Environmental Factors in the Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2015, 20, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. He, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Mathieu, J.; Stadler, L.; Senehi, N.; Sun, R.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Livestock Waste: Occurrence, Dissemination, and Treatment. NPJ Clean Water 2020, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Steinman, A.; Navon-Venezia, S. Antimicrobial Resistance in Horses. Animals 2020, 10, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sykes, B.W.; Furr, M.O. Equine Endotoxaemia-A State-of-the-Art Review of Therapy. Aust. Vet. J. 2005, 83, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dierikx, C.M.; Meijs, A.P.; Hengeveld, P.D.; van der Klis, F.R.M.; van Vliet, J.; Gijsbers, E.F.; Rozwandowicz, M.; van Hoek, A.H.A.M.; Hendrickx, A.P.A.; Hordijk, J.; et al. Colistin-Resistant Enterobacterales among Veterinary Healthcare Workers and in the Dutch Population. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 4, dlac041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Moreira Soares de Souza, M.; Marcos Rocha-de-Souza, C.; Araújo de Melo, D.; Couto da Motta, C.; Loureiro Pimenta, R.; da Silva Coelho, I.; de Mattos de Oliveira Coelho, S. Of Animal and Men: The Importance of Animal Environment to Antimicrobial Resistance: A One Health Approach. In Antimicrobial Resistance-A One Health Perspective; Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  54. Apostolakos, I.; Franz, E.; van Hoek, A.H.A.M.; Florijn, A.; Veenman, C.; Sloet-van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, M.M.; Dierikx, C.; van Duijkeren, E. Occurrence and Molecular Characteristics of ESBL/AmpC-Producing Escherichia coli in Faecal Samples from Horses in an Equine Clinic. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1915–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fernandes, M.R.; Cerdeira, L.; Silva, M.M.; Sellera, F.P.; Muñoz, M.; Junior, F.G.; Azevedo, S.S.; Power, P.; Gutkind, G.; Lincopan, N. Novel Mcr-5.3 Variant in a CTX-M-8-Producing Escherichia coli ST711 Isolated from an Infected Horse. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 3520–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Börjesson, S.; Greko, C.; Myrenås, M.; Landén, A.; Nilsson, O.; Pedersen, K. A Link between the Newly Described Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-9 and Clinical Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Carrying BlaSHV-12 from Horses in Sweden. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 20, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Touati, M.; Hadjadj, L.; Berrazeg, M.; Baron, S.A.; Rolain, J.M. Emergence of Escherichia coli Harbouring Mcr-1 and Mcr-3 Genes in North West Algerian Farmlands. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 21, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Avraam, C.; Lambrou, A.S.; Jiang, W.; Siddiqui, S. Antimicrobial Resistance and Livestock Trade for Low and Middle Income Countries: Regional Analysis of Global Coordination Policies. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 650315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Furuhata, K.; Ishizaki, N.; Sugi, Y.; Fukuyama, M. Isolation and Identification of Enterobacteriaceae from Raw Horsemeat Intended for Human Consumption (Basashi). Biocontrol Sci. 2014, 19, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stanciu, S. Horse Meat Consumption—Between Scandal and Reality. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 23, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wolny-Koładka, K.; Lenart-Boroń, A. Antimicrobial Resistance and the Presence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from the Environment of Horse Riding Centers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 21789–21800, Correction on: Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31790–31791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hassan, J.; Kassem, I.I. Audacious Hitchhikers: The Role of Travel and the International Food Trade in the Global Dissemination of Mobile Colistin-Resistance (Mcr) Genes. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Manges, A.R.; Geum, H.M.; Guo, A.; Edens, T.J.; Fibke, C.D.; Pitout, J.D.D. Global Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli (Expec) Lineages. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00135-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bachiri, T.; Lalaoui, R.; Bakour, S.; Allouache, M.; Belkebla, N.; Rolain, J.M.; Touati, A. First Report of the Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-1 in Escherichia coli ST405 Isolated from Wildlife in Bejaia, Algeria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Berrazeg, M.; Hadjadj, L.; Ayad, A.; Drissi, M.; Rolain, J.M. First Detected Human Case in Algeria of mcr-1 Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance in a 2011 Escherichia coli Isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6996–6997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Yanat, B.; Machuca, J.; Yahia, R.D.; Touati, A.; Pascual, Á.; Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M. First Report of the Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-1 in a Clinical Escherichia coli Isolate in Algeria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 760–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chaalal, N.; Touati, A.; Yahiaoui-Martinez, A.; Aissa, M.A.; Sotto, A.; Lavigne, J.P.; Pantel, A. Colistin-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from Chicken Meat in Western Algeria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, Y.; Dai, X.; Zeng, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. Characterization of the Global Distribution and Diversified Plasmid Reservoirs of the Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-9. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ha, V.T.T.; Tran, L.D.; Mai, N.T.T.; Hirabayashi, A.; Nguyen, S.T.; Tran, H.H.; Shibayama, K.; Suzuki, M. Potential Spread of mcr-9-Carrying IncHI2 Plasmids in Enterobacter hormaechei in Vietnam. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 27, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liao, W.; Cui, Y.; Quan, J.; Zhao, D.; Han, X.; Shi, Q.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Du, X.; Li, X.; et al. High Prevalence of Colistin Resistance and Mcr-9/10 Genes in Enterobacter spp. in a Tertiary Hospital over a Decade. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 59, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sadek, M.; Nariya, H.; Shimamoto, T.; Kayama, S.; Yu, L.; Hisatsune, J.; Sugai, M.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L.; Shimamoto, T. First Genomic Characterization of blaVIM-1 and mcr-9-Coharbouring Enterobacter hormaechei Isolated from Food of Animal Origin. Pathogens 2020, 9, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fuentes-Castillo, D.; Sellera, F.P.; Goldberg, D.W.; Fontana, H.; Esposito, F.; Cardoso, B.; Ikeda, J.; Kyllar, A.; Catão-Dias, J.L.; Lincopan, N. Colistin-Resistant Enterobacter kobei Carrying mcr-9.1 and blaCTX-M-15 infecting a critically endangered franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei), Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 3048–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Umeda, K.; Nakamura, H.; Fukuda, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Motooka, D.; Nakamura, S.; Yasui, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Kawahara, R. Genomic Characterization of Clinical Enterobacter roggenkampii Co-Harbouring BlaIMP-1- and BlaGES-5-Encoding IncP6 and Mcr-9-Encoding IncHI2 Plasmids Isolated in Japan. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 24, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gogry, F.A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Sultan, I.; Haq, Q.M.R. Current Update on Intrinsic and Acquired Colistin Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 677720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kieffer, N.; Royer, G.; Decousser, J.W.; Bourrel, A.S.; Palmieri, M.; de La Rosa, J.M.O.; Jacquier, H.; Denamur, E.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L. Mcr-9, an Inducible Gene Encoding an Acquired Phosphoethanolamine Transferase in Escherichia coli, and Its Origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00965-19, Erratum on: Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01866-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Elbediwi, M.; Pan, H.; Zhou, X.; Rankin, S.C.; Schifferli, D.M.; Yue, M. Detection of Mcr-9-Harbouring ESBL-Producing Salmonella Newport Isolated from an Outbreak in a Large-Animal Teaching Hospital in the USA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1107–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Doumith, M.; Godbole, G.; Ashton, P.; Larkin, L.; Dallman, T.; Day, M.; Day, M.; Muller-Pebody, B.; Ellington, M.J.; de Pinna, E.; et al. Detection of the Plasmid-Mediated Mcr-1 Gene Conferring Colistin Resistance in Human and Food Isolates of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli in England and Wales. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2300–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Eichhorn, I.; Feudi, C.; Wang, Y.; Kaspar, H.; Feßler, A.T.; Lübke-Becker, A.; Michael, G.B.; Shen, J.; Schwarz, S. Identification of Novel Variants of the Colistin Resistance Gene Mcr-3 in Aeromonas spp. from the National Resistance Monitoring Programme GERM-Vet and from Diagnostic Submissions. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lupo, A.; Saras, E.; Madec, J.Y.; Haenni, M. Emergence of Bla CTX-M-55 Associated with FosA, RmtB and Mcr Gene Variants in Escherichia coli from Various Animal Species in France. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Barbieri, N.L.; Pimenta, R.L.; de Melo, D.A.; Nolan, L.K.; de Souza, M.M.S.; Logue, C.M. Mcr-1 Identified in Fecal Escherichia coli and Avian pathogenic e. coli (APEC) From Brazil. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rabello, R.F.; Bonelli, R.R.; Penna, B.A.; Albuquerque, J.P.; Souza, R.M.; Cerqueira, A.M.F. Antimicrobial Resistance in Farm Animals in Brazil: An Update Overview. Animals 2020, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Tyso, G.H.; Li, C.; Hsu, C.H.; Ayers, S.; Borenstein, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Tran, T.T.; McDermot, P.F.; Zhao, S. The Mcr-9 Gene of Salmonella and Escherichia coli Is Not Associated with Colistin Resistance in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00573-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dallap Schaer, B.L.; Aceto, H.; Rankin, S.C. Outbreak of Salmonellosis Caused by Salmonella Enterica Serovar Newport MDR-AmpC in a Large Animal Veterinary Teaching Hospital. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Marco-Fuertes, A.; Marin, C.; Lorenzo-Rebenaque, L.; Vega, S.; Montoro-Dasi, L. Antimicrobial Resistance in Companion Animals: A New Challenge for the One Health Approach in the European Union. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gao, Y.; Lu, C.; Shen, D.; Liu, J.; Ma, Z.; Yang, B.; Ling, W.; Waigi, M.G. Elimination of the Risks of Colistin Resistance Gene (Mcr-1) in Livestock Manure during Composting. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 10 01499 g001 550
Figure 1. Possible sources of mcr-gene-bearing organisms in horses and their routes of transmission in the One Health triad.
Figure 1. Possible sources of mcr-gene-bearing organisms in horses and their routes of transmission in the One Health triad.
Microorganisms 10 01499 g001
Table
Table 1. Studies reporting on plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in horses.
Table 1. Studies reporting on plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in horses.
CountrySource of IsolatesDate of
Isolation (mcr Gene
Assayed)		Number of
Isolates Tested for mcr		Identified Gene/Variant (Number of
Organisms)		Sequence Type and/or Phylogroup (Virulence Genes)Plasmid
(Associated
Insertion
Sequence)		Additional
Resistance Traits		Reference
AlgeriaHorse manure2016–2018 (mcr-1-mcr-5)-mcr-1 (1 E. coli)--blaTEM-12[57]
SwedenUterus, wound,
trachea, skin biopsy, urine, and
thrombophlebitis		2015–2018 (mcr-1 to
mcr-10)		56Mcr-9
(15 Enterobacter cloacae complex, 10 E. coli, 4 Klebsiella oxytoca, and 1 Citrobacter freundii)		E. coli: ST1861, ST2557, ST9329, ST1252, ST1423, and ST4398;IncFIB, IncFII, IncFIC, IncFI, IncP, IncA/C, and Col (MG828)blaSHV-12, blaTEM-1B, blaACT, blaCMY-82, blaOXY, blaSCO-1, aac(6′)-Ib, aadA2, ant(3″)-Ia,
aph(3′)-Ia, aph(3″)-Ib, aadA1, catA2, dfrA19, qnrB2, qnrA1, qnrB10, tet(D), fosA, mdf(A), ere(A), sul1, and sul2		[56]
Enterobacter clocae
complex: ST113, ST116, ST1021, ST51, ST102, ST88, and ST254;
Klebsiella oxytoca: ST238, ST37, and ST2;
Citrobacter freundii: ST233
USAHorse veterinary clinic environment2003–2004 (mcr-1 to
mcr-10)		31mcr-9
(1 Salmonella Newport)		ST45 (SPI-I and II,
fim and other fimbrial colonization factors)		IncHI2 (IS26 and IS903B)blaCMY-2, blaSHV-12, blaTEM-1B, aph(4)-Ia, aac(6’)-Iaa, aadA2, aac(3)-IV, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ia,
aph(3″)-Ib, mdf(A), catA2, floR, fexA, sul1, sul2, dfrA19, tet(A), tet(D), qnrB2, and
mutation in parC		[76]
BrazilLungs of dead horse2012 (mcr-1 to mcr-10)1mcr-5.3
(1 E. coli)		ST711 (gad, lpfA, and iss) -blaCTX-M-8, blaTEM-1B, aac(3)-IId, aadA2, strA, strB, sul2, and dfrA12[55]
mcr, mobile colistin resistance gene; -, no data; Additional resistance traits, resistance factors identified in one mcr-positive isolate or pooled factors in more than one mcr-bearing isolate; Virulence genes, genes from mcr-bearing E. coli isolates except otherwise stated; Sequence type, Warwick multilocus sequence type of mcr-bearing isolates; Plasmid, plasmid types identified in one or pooled mcr-bearing isolates; Inc., incompatibility.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Nwobi, O.C.; Mgbeahuruike, A.C.; Ikpendu, C.N.; Okafor, N.A.; Oguttu, J.W. Epidemiology and Traits of Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Gene-Bearing Organisms from Horses. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081499

AMA Style

Anyanwu MU, Jaja IF, Nwobi OC, Mgbeahuruike AC, Ikpendu CN, Okafor NA, Oguttu JW. Epidemiology and Traits of Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Gene-Bearing Organisms from Horses. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anyanwu, Madubuike Umunna, Ishmael Festus Jaja, Obichukwu Chisom Nwobi, Anthony Christian Mgbeahuruike, Chinaza Nnenna Ikpendu, Nnenna Audrey Okafor, and James Wabwire Oguttu. 2022. "Epidemiology and Traits of Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Gene-Bearing Organisms from Horses" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop