Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing the Production of Extracellular Polysaccharides by the Green Algae Dictyosphaerium chlorelloides and Their Isolation, Purification, and Composition
Previous Article in Journal
iChip-Inspired Isolation, Bioactivities and Dereplication of Actinomycetota from Portuguese Beach Sediments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid and Accurate Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Directly from Positive Primary MGIT Cultures by MALDI-TOF MS
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms10071472
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discrimination and Characterization of Escherichia coli Originating from Clinical Cases of Femoral Head Necrosis in Broilers by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Confirms Great Heterogeneity of Isolates

by
Marina Nees
,
Michael Hess
and
Claudia Hess
*
Clinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(7), 1472; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071472
Submission received: 17 June 2022 / Revised: 14 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the Identification of Pathogenic Microorganisms)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Escherichia coli, a major pathogen in poultry production, is involved in femoral head necrosis (FHN) in broiler birds. So far, the characterization and relationship of isolates in context with this disease are mainly based on phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. Previously, an involvement of diverse E. coli isolates was reported. MALDI-TOF MS has been successfully applied investigating the clonality of different bacteria. Therefore, its application to characterize a well-defined selection of E. coli isolates beyond the species level was tested. The isolates were derived from clinical cases of FHN as well as from healthy birds. Reproducibility studies to perform a standardized protocol were done, and LB agar as well as the usage of fresh bacterial cultures proved most appropriate. No distinct clustering in context with the origin of isolates, association with lesions, serotype, or PFGE profile was found. Most of the isolates belonging to phylogroup B2 revealed a characteristic peak shift at 9716 m/z and could be attributed to the same MALDI-TOF MS cluster. The present study confirmed the previously found pheno- and genotypic heterogeneity of E. coli involved in FHN on the proteomic level. The study also highlights the need for standardized protocols when using MALDI-TOF MS for bacterial typing, especially beyond species level.

1. Introduction

Lameness or leg weakness is one of the most common and important issues in modern meat-type poultry production worldwide [1,2]. In association with pain and critically impaired motility, birds are unable to reach drinkers and feeders, which has to be seen as a welfare issue, with negative effects on the health and production parameters [3]. In most cases, the long bones of the hindlimbs are affected, with a focus on femoral heads. Here, gross pathological pictures range from degeneration characterized by separation of the cartilage up to necrosis and/or rupture of one or both femoral heads [4]. Escherichia coli is reported as one of the major agents causing femoral head necrosis—also known as bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis—in broilers [5]. So far, the characterization of E. coli isolates in context with disease outbreaks is mainly based on phenotypic characteristics like serotype and antimicrobial resistance profiles and genotypic characteristics like the presence/absence of virulence-associated genes or the determination of relatedness by phylo-grouping, PFGE or MLST [6]. In accordance with this, recent studies reported the presence of heterogeneous pheno- and genotypes of E. coli indicating the involvement of diverse isolates [4,6,7,8]. For microbiological identification but also characterization, proteomic phenotyping by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is widely used due to its broad applicability for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as for fungi [9]. It was shown that the accuracy of this method can be influenced by the culture conditions applied, e.g., media, incubation temperature, atmosphere and time, and storage parameters, with certain effects on the quality of spectra [10,11]. This is of special importance for investigations beyond species identification levels, as the validity of peak patterns which may lead to taxonomic markers can be negatively affected [12]. So far, MALDI-TOF MS has been successfully applied to investigate the clonality of different bacterial species like Streptococcus pyogenes [13], Staphylococcus aureus [14] and Klebsiella pneumonia [15]. In regard to E. coli, MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated a reliable determination of human relevant pathotypes [16] and a good discriminatory potential in regard to differentiate high-risk clones belonging to different phylogenetic groups [12]. Furthermore, it was shown that this method was able to correctly assign E. coli isolates derived from faecal contaminated surface water to specific source groups [17].
The aim of the present study was to apply MALDI-TOF MS in order to characterize E. coli isolates derived from clinical cases of femoral head necrosis in broilers as well as from healthy broilers. For this purpose, the first step comprised reproducibility studies using different growth media, storage conditions and age of cultured bacteria to implement a standardized protocol for processing the E. coli isolates. By determining their phylogenetic relationship, we wanted to reveal if isolates cluster based on their epidemiological data, namely the origin of isolate (flock, farm), if lesions—femoral head necrosis—are present, the serotype, the PFGE profile and the phylogenetic group.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

In total, 208 E. coli isolates from broilers were investigated. These strains were derived within a previous study from 21 farms, of which birds were investigated for the presence of femoral head necrosis at different ages and in which the E. coli isolates were pheno- and genotypically analysed [4]. Briefly, the isolates originated from 21 broiler farms. From farms 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 16, all samples were derived from a single flock. From the remaining farms the samples originated from two flocks, except for farm 21, where samples from 3 flocks were included in the present study. The isolation of E. coli was performed from femoral bone marrow by aseptically cutting left and/or right femoral heads in half. The material of the bone marrow was streaked directly on MacConkey agar (Scharlau, Vienna, Austria). The agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. A total of 107 isolates were derived from birds at the age of one to two weeks, and 101 isolates were derived from birds at four to five weeks of age. Labeling of isolates was done based on year of isolation/running diagnostic number-number of bird with isolation site (KnoLi: bone marrow of left femur; KnoRe: bone marrow of right femur) and clone number. 148 isolates originated from birds with femoral head necrosis, and 60 isolates originated from not affected femora. The isolates were classified based on their lesions, serotype, PFGE profile and phylogroup (Table S1). All isolates were stored at −80 °C by adding 2 mL of 40% glycerol/10 mL Brain Heart Infusion Broth (Oxoid, ThermoFisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria).

2.2. MALDI-TOF MS

2.2.1. Reproducibility, Influence of Media and Age of Bacterial Culture

Elucidating the most suitable solid media to perform MALDI-TOF MS analysis on E. coli isolates beyond species level, four different agars were tested: blood agar (Columbia agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood, BioMeriéux, Vienna, Austria), MacConkey agar (Neogen, LabM, Heywood, UK), Chromocult® Coliform agar (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and Luria Broth (LB) agar (Oxoid, ThermoFisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria). The consistency and reproducibility of spectra were used as parameters with three E. coli isolates each being selected from farms 1, 15, 20 and 21, resulting in a total number of 12 isolates for the test setting. These isolates displayed an identical serotype and phylogenetic group based on their farm origin. The same identical patterns were also found with regard to the PFGE profile, except for one isolate from farm 15 (Table 1). Independent of the agar, isolates were thawed for cultivation, and cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under aerobic conditions.
During this investigation, we found that the isolates from farms 15 and 20 exhibited specific peaks: isolates from farm 15 at 7400 m/z and 7560 m/z, and those from farm 20 at 6725 m/z and 6860 m/z (Table 1). Therefore, these isolates were selected to investigate the influence of sub-culturing, which was performed for three consecutive days. Besides this, these isolates were also used to test the influence of the age of bacterial cultures by storing them for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h at fridge temperature (4 °C ± 1.5 °C). For both test settings, each culture was analysed daily by MALDI-TOF MS. The spectra gained were compared to the spectra from fresh cultures received after thawing and incubation for 24 h at 37 °C.
To test the technical reproducibility of the spectra, the quality obtained for each strain was measured three times.
Finally, after implementing a standardized protocol for processing the E. coli isolates, all 208 strains were investigated.

2.2.2. Sample Preparation, Proteomic Phenotyping

Sample preparation as well as parameters and data visualization and analysis using a Microflex LT instrument (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) were performed as previously described [18], including minor modifications. Briefly, sample preparation for MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed according to the standard protocol from the manufacturer (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany). After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, two or three colonies were removed from the LB agar plate using an inoculating loop. The bacteria were suspended in 300 μL ultra purified water in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. To inactivate the bacteria, 900 μL absolute ethanol was added to the suspension. After centrifugation for 2 min at 13,000× g the supernatant was discarded. Subsequently, the residual ethanol was removed with a second centrifugation step. To disrupt the cell wall, 50 μL formic acid (70%) was added to the pellet and mixed. Afterwards, 50 μL acetonitrile was added for protein extraction. After the last centrifugation step at 13,000× g for 2 min, 1 μL supernatant was spotted on the steel MALDI target plate and left to dry at room temperature. For database construction, each sample was spotted eight times on the MALDI target plate and each spot was measured three times to get 24 spectra for each strain. The sample spots were overlaid with 1μL matrix (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile/47.5% water/2.5% trifluoroacetic acid) and dried. All steps were performed at room temperature. For calibration and optimization of the MALDI-TOF MS measurements and the efficiency control for sample identification, BTS (Bruker Bacterial Test Standard) was included in each measurement. The parameter settings for the Microflex LT instrument were as follows: IS1, 20.00 kV; IS2, 16.60 kV; lens, 7.00 kV; detector gain, 2974 V.
Two hundred and forty laser shots in 40 shot steps (in the linear, positive ion mode with 60 Hz nitrogen laser from different positions of the target spot) were summarized automatically with the AutoXecute (MBT AutoX method) acquisition control software (Flex control 4; Bruker Daltonics). For automated data analysis, raw spectra were processed using MALDI Biotyper software (Bruker Daltonics) with the default settings. The software performs smoothing, normalization, baseline subtraction, and peak picking, thereby creating a list of the most significant peaks (m/z values) of the spectrum. For species identification, the MALDI Biotyper output is a log (score) in the range of 0.00 to 3.00, computed by comparison of the peak list for an unknown isolate with the reference Main Spectra (MSP) in the reference database. A MALDI score between 2.00 and 3.00 represents identification on a species level, a MALDI score between 1.70 and 1.99 represents identification at genus evel, and anything less 1.69 is given as non-identifiable by the software. For the construction of the E. coli database and MSP creation used for the actual investigations, from each strain acid-soluble proteins were spotted on the MALDI target plate eight times. Each spot was measured tree times resulting in 24 spectra for each strain. FlexAnalysis (v.4) software (Bruker Daltonics) was used or visual inspection of the mass spectra and atypical spectra were excluded from further analysis (e.g., flat line spectra, spectra containing high matrix background signals). Twenty to 24 mass spectra were processed for each strain. The spectral peak lists were transferred into MSPs containing information on average peak masses, average peak intensities and peak frequencies. Similar MSPs result in a high matching score value. Each MSP was compared with all MSPs of the analyzed set. The list of score values was used to calculate normalized distance values between the analyzed strains resulting in a matrix of matching scores. The visualization of the respective relationship between mass spectrum profiles (MSP) is displayed in a dendrogram using the following settings of the MALDI Biotyper 4.1 software: distance measure was set to correlation, linkage to average and score threshold value for a single organism at 700. Based on Sauer et al. [19], clusters of strains with distance levels < 500 were classified as species. For strain relationship visualization, a dendrogram was formed based on MSP.

3. Results

3.1. Reproducibility, Influence of Media and Storage Conditions

All 12 isolates used for reproducibility testing were correctly identified as E. coli by MALDI-TOF MS independent of the solid media used with log(score) values above >2.0. Despite this, a clear negative influence on the quality of spectra in regard to their intensity and consistency was found when isolates were cultured on blood, MacConkey and Chromocult® Coliform agar characterized by the low-resolution of spectra with overlapping peaks. Additionally, in the case of MacConkey agar, some proteins were not expressed, resulting in less peaks present in the spectra. Based on these findings, blood, MacConkey and Chromocult® Coliform agar proved unsuitable for characterization of E. coli beyond species level and only cultures grown on LB agar provided reproducible and good-quality spectra (Figure 1). Therefore, this agar was subsequently used for all further investigations.
The negative influence of culture refreshment on the quality of spectra by preparing sub-cultures was demonstrated on six selected E. coli isolates. We were able to show that with every sub-cultivation step the intensity of characteristic peaks decreased. Additionally, peaks in the range 2000 to 6000 m/z were also affected displaying reduced quality (Figure 2).
When storing fresh E. coli cultures at fridge temperature up to 24 h, no differences in the quality of spectra were found. But a clear decrease of spectra quality was found when cultures were stored >24 h. Interestingly, an additional peak at 6535 m/z was found when cultures were stored at 4 °C independent of the time period (Figure 3). Based on this, only fresh cultures without any storing period were used for further investigations.

3.2. Proteomic Phenotyping

Using the above mentioned MALDI database and the standardized protocol for culturing the 208 E. coli isolates, all were identified to species level by MALDI-TOF MS with log(score) values above > 2.0. The score oriented MSP dendrogram of all isolates revealed four distinct clusters at the arbitrary distance level of 500. Cluster 1 comprised the lowest number of isolates, containing only seven strains. Seventy isolates were allocated into cluster 2, and 26 were allocated into cluster 3. The majority of isolates (n = 105) were grouped into cluster 4 (Table S1; Figure 4).
No distinct clustering was noticed in context with the origin of isolates. Independent from the farm or flock, the isolates were distributed in all four clusters. Similarly, isolates did not group based on the appearance of clinical lesion. Isolates derived from femoral head necrosis shared the same clusters with isolates from healthy birds. It was also not possible to detect a certain arrangement of isolates based on their serotypes as isolates grouped independently from this phenotypic characteristic. In the same way, MALDI-TOF MS did not reveal a grouping of E. coli isolates based on their PFGE profiles. Furthermore, when setting the cut-off at distance levels lower than 500, we were not able to determine phylogenetic relationships or clonal lineages between isolates based on the mentioned characteristics.
Interestingly, the correlation between phylogenetic groups and MALDI-TOF MS was found as a result of a peak shift distinctive for the majority of isolates (47/53) belonging to the phylogenetic group B2 at 9716 m/z. Additionally, we also found six isolates from this group, revealing a peak at 9741 m/z. This peak was shared by all isolates belonging to phylogroups A, B1 and D. However, all E. coli isolates with the characteristic peak at 9741 m/z were distributed in different clusters. In Figure 5A–E we show the clustering of 50 isolates randomly selected from eight farms based on their origin, the presence of femoral head necrosis, their serotypes, their PFGE profiles and their phylogrouping.

4. Discussion

Previous studies have shown that lameness in broilers due to femoral head necrosis is very often related to E. coli infections [5,8,20]. However, in contrast to the assumption that certain types of avian pathogenic E. coli might be predominantly responsible for the disease pheno- and genotypic studies proved a great heterogeneity among these isolates [5,8]. In recent years, proteomics became popular not only in regard to bacterial identification but also for the characterization beyond species level and the determination of isolates relatedness. With this, the method also became more attractive to veterinary diagnostic laboratories, facilitating better knowledge of epidemiological data. Therefore, the present study intended to investigate the discrimination potential of MALDI-TOF MS to characterize a selection of 208 well-defined E. coli isolates originating from a previous study on femoral head necrosis in broilers [4]. For this, the application of a standardized sample preparation protocol is presupposed. Former studies clearly showed that the media used for growing the bacteria may alter the quality of spectra obtained from MALDI analysis [10,21,22]. Therefore, in a first step, the applicability of different media for MALDI-TOF MS analysis of E. coli was investigated. We were able to show that Columbia blood agar clearly decreased the quality of protein spectral profiles obtained for E. coli in a similar way as was previously shown for S. aureus [23]. The authors of that study were able to show that additional peaks were derived from breakdown products of the blood, hindering identification and further characterization. Furthermore, the use of MacConkey agar was reported to have a negative effect on MALDI results for a variety of bacteria [24,25]. This is in agreement with our findings, and was also seen when culturing E. coli on Chromocult® Coliform agar. A possible explanation for the actual poor quality of spectra obtained in our study when using these media might be due to the inhibitory effects caused by the diverse agar components leading to metabolic influences on the bacteria. This may result in a decreased amount of ribosomal proteins which leads to less intense proteomic peaks. In contrast, LB agar contains only a few components, and proved superior for the analysis of E. coli in gaining reproducible and high quality spectra. This finding is in agreement with previous studies on different bacteria [26]. The quality of spectra was also negatively influenced by the age of the bacterial culture, by sub-cultivation and by the storage conditions, a finding also reported for other bacteria [11,27,28]. However, not only the quality of spectra was affected by the storage conditions, as an alteration of spectra by the appearance of an additional peak was found when isolates were stored prior to their investigation at 4 °C. As no analysis of proteins was performed, the nature of this additional peak remains unclear. However, stresses such as cold are known to induce a variety of bacterial adaptive techniques, like stress protein production, which have an influence on the phenotypic and genotypic level as shown for E. coli [29]. The reported findings are of general interest and highlight the importance of using a standardized protocol when applying MALDI-TOF MS for relationship determination of isolates or comparing outcomes from different studies. We were able to confirm previous data that the growth medium does not primarily disturb identification on species level but strongly affects the potential to differentiate strains beyond that level [30].
Previous studies demonstrated the applicability of MALDI-TOF MS to define clonal lineages of bacterial isolates according to their epidemiological origin [17,18,31]. This could not be confirmed for E. coli isolates investigated in the actual study. A phylogenetic analysis based on MSPs dendrograms revealed the origin-independent allocation of isolates in four clusters, confirming the assumption that broiler chicken harbor a very heterogeneous population of E. coli which are also involved in femoral head necrosis [4]. The determination of E. coli serotypes is widely used to confirm the presence of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). Serotypes O1:K1, O2:K1 and O78:K80 are predominantly attributed as the cause of diseases in poultry [32]. Therefore, we investigated whether MALDI-TOF MS mass spectra of E. coli cluster with serotyping. In agreement with studies on S. pneumonia and O. rhinotracheale, no reliable correlation was found [33,34]. Ojima-Kato et al. [35] reported the successful discrimination of certain enterohemorrhagic E. coli from other E. coli serovars, which is in contrast to our findings. Approximately half of the isolates in our study could be assigned clinically as APEC, but MALDI-TOF MS analysis did not reveal a phylogenetic difference to non-APEC isolates. PFGE is widely used for the typing of bacteria [36]. However, similar to previous studies, we were not able to find a clustering of identical PFGE profiles from E. coli when applying MALDI-TOF MS [12,37]. It has to mentioned that no other computational methods were applied in the present study which might have an effect on the formation of strain clusters, as shown for S. aureus [38].
A good discriminatory potential of MALDI-TOF MS was previously reported with regard to the E. coli phylogenetic group B2 from those of groups A, B1 and D [12,39]. In agreement with this, a distinct peak shift at 9716 m/z was found in the majority of the actual B2 isolates, and all isolates belonging to phylo-groups A, B1 and D revealed a known peak shift at 9741 m/z. However, we also detected B2 isolates which exhibited a peak shift at 9741 m/z, a feature previously unreported. So far, investigations on phylogroups with MALDI-TOF MS were only performed on human isolates. Consequently, our study is the first investigating E. coli phylogroups from broiler chickens. Based on our findings, it can be hypothesized that B2 isolates from broilers may comprise a wider range of MALDI types compared to humans. It would be interesting to confirm this finding in additional studies with different clinical backgrounds, keeping in mind that the use of different growth and sample preparation protocols, different instrumental settings and even instrumental variations can cause differences in gained mass spectra of the same bacteria, hindering the comparison of independent data sets [40,41].
The present study confirmed the previously found pheno- and genotypic heterogeneity of E. coli isolated from broiler chickens on a proteomic level. The study highlights the need to set up standardized protocols when using MALDI-TOF MS for bacterial typing beyond the species level. By this the improvement of spectra quality and reliable and reproducible results can be assured and robust relationships can be determined.

5. Conclusions

In the present study we demonstrated the importance of applying standardized protocols for E. coli typing by MALDI-TOF MS beyond the species level. By including several parameters in reproducibility tests we were able to show the influence on the quality and consistency of spectra by (i) the agar media, (ii) the influence of sub-cultivation, and (iii) different storage conditions. We were able to confirm a certain discriminatory power of MALDI-TOF MS in regard to the E. coli phylogroup B2 in broiler isolates, revealing a peak shift at 9716 m/z, known from human isolates. However, we also present data on phylogroup B2 isolates which exhibit the same peak shift as shown for A, B1, and D at 9741 m/z, a feature which needs to be investigated in detail in future studies. Investigating the relationship of 208 well-defined E. coli isolates a lack to differentiate isolates based on origin, lesions, serotypes or PFGE types was revealed, questioning the assignment of strains as APEC based on MALDI-TOF MS.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10071472/s1, Table S1: E. coli isolates listed according their farm origin (farm no.), their naming (prot.no.), occurrence of femoral head necrosis (yes/no), serotype, PFGE profile, phylogroup. The attribution to the found MALDI-TOF MS clusters is included.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.; methodology, C.H. and M.N.; software, M.N.; validation, C.H. and M.N.; investigation C.H., M.N.; resources, C.H., M.N. and M.H.; data curation, C.H. and M.N.; writing—original draft, C.H., M.N.; writing—review and editing, C.H., M.N. and M.H.; visualization, C.H. and M.N.; supervision, C.H. and M.H.; project administration, C.H. and M.H., funding acquisition, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CEPI—CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR POULTRY INNOVATION by the cooperation program of the European Union—European Regional Development Fund Interreg V-A Austria-Hungary 2016–2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Merima Alispahic for her support on methodology and Delfina Jandreski-Cvetkovic for her excellent technical assistance. Open access funding by the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wideman, R.F. Bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis and lameness in broilers: A review. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McNamee, P.T.; Smyth, J.A. Bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis (“femoral head necrosis”) of broiler chickens: A review. Avian Pathol. 2000, 29, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Szafraniec, G.M.; Szeleszczuk, P.; Dolka, B. Review on skeletal disorders caused by Stapyhlococcus spp. in poultry. Vet. Q. 2022, 42, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gaußmann, B.; Hess, C.; Grafl, B.; Kovacs, M.; Troxler, S.; Stessl, B.; Hess, M.; Paudel, S. Escherichia coli isolates from femoral bone marrow of broilers exhibit diverse pheno- and genotypic characteristics that do not correlate with macroscopic lesions of bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis. Avian Pathol. 2018, 47, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nolan, L.K.; Vaillancourt, J.P.; Barbieri, N.L.; Logue, C.M. Colibacillosis. In Diseases of Poutlry, 14th ed.; Swayne, D.E., Boulianne, M., Logue, C.M., McDougald, L.R., Nair, V., Suarez, D.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, NH, USA, 2020; pp. 770–830. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gomis, S.M.; Riddell, C.; Potter, A.A.; Allan, B.J. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of virulence factors of Escherichia coli isolates from broiler chickens with simultaneous occurrence of cellulitis and other colibacillosis lesions. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2001, 65, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Fortes, J.; Braga, V.; Chanteloup, N.K.; Trotereau, A.; Baucheron, S.; Guabiraba, R.; Ecco, R.; Schouler, C. Diversity of Escherichia coli strains involved in vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis in broilers in Brazil. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wijesurendra, D.S.; Chamings, A.N.; Bushell, R.N.; O’Rourke, D.; Stevenson, M.; Marenda, M.S.; Noormohammadi, A.H.; Stent, A. Pathological and microbiological investigations into cases of bacterial chondronecrosis and osteomyelitis in broiler poultry. Avian Pathol. 2017, 46, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wieser, A.; Schubert, S. MALDI-TOF MS entering the microbiological diagnostic laboratory—From fast identification to resistance testing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 8, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alispahic, M.; Hummel, K.; Jandreski-Cvetkovic, D.; Nöbauer, K.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Hess, M.; Hess, C. Species-specific identification and differentiation of Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Campylobacter by full-spectral matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry analysis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alispahic, M.; Christensen, H.; Hess, C.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bisgaard, M.; Hess, M. Identification of Gallibacterium species by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry evaluated by multilocus sequence analysis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novais, A.; Sousa, C.; de Dios Caballero, J.; Fernandez-Olmos, A.; Lopes, J.; Ramos, H.; Coque, T.M.; Canton, R.; Peixe, L.M. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a tool for the discrimination of high-risk Escherichia coli clones from phylogenetic groups B2 (ST131) and D (ST69, ST405, ST393). Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, J.; Zhou, N.; Xu, B.; Hao, H.; Kang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, H. Identification and Cluster Analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Josten, M.; Reif, M.; Szekat, C.; Al-Sabti, N.; Roemer, T.; Sparbier, K.; Kostrzewa, M.; Rohde, H.; Sahl, H.G.; Bierbaum, G. Analysis of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrum of Staphylococcus aureus identifies mutations that allow differentiation of the main clonal lineages. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 1809–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Berrazeg, M.; Diene, S.M.; Drissi, M.; Kempf, M.; Richet, H.; Landraud, L.; Rolain, J.M. Biotyping of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from France and Algeria Using MALDI-TOF MS. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Clark, C.G.; Kruczkiewicz, P.; Guan, C.; McCorrister, S.J.; Chong, P.; Wylie, J.; van Caeseele, P.; Tabor, H.A.; Snarr, P.; Gilmour, M.W.; et al. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy methods for determination of Escherichia coli pathotypes. J. Microbiol. Methods 2013, 94, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Siegrist, T.J.; Anderson, P.D.; Huen, W.H.; Kleinheinz, G.T.; McDermott, C.M.; Sandrin, T.R. Discrimination and characterization of environmental strains of Escherichia coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 68, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alispahic, M.; Christensen, H.; Hess, C.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bisgaard, M.; Hess, M. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry confirms clonal lineages of Gallibacterium anatis between chicken flocks. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 160, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sauer, S.; Freiwald, A.; Maier, T.; Kube, M.; Reinhardt, R.; Kostrzewa, M.; Geider, K. Classification and identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry and computational Analysis. PLoS ONE 2008, 30, e2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dinev, I. Clinical and morphological investigations on the prevalence of lameness associated with femoral head necrosis in broilers. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2009, 50, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valentine, N.; Wunschel, S.; Wunschel, D.; Petersen, C.; Wahl, K. Effect of culture conditions on microorganism identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Santos, T.; Capelo, J.L.; Santos, H.M.; Oliveira, I.; Marinho, C.; Goncalves, A.; Araujo, J.E.; Poeta, P.; Igrejas, G. Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry fingerprinting to characterize Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli isolates. J. Proteom. 2015, 127, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Walker, J.; Fox, A.J.; Edwards-Jones, V.; Gordon, D.B. Intact cell mass spectrometry (ICMS) used to type methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Media effects and inter-laboratory reproducibility. J. Microbiol. Methods 2002, 48, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anderson, N.W.; Buchan, B.W.; Riebe, K.M.; Parsons, L.N.; Gnacinski, S.; Ledeboer, N.A. Effects of solid-medium type on routine identification of bacterial isolates by use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization—Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ramos, A.C.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Cordeiro-Moura, J.R.; Rockstroh, A.C.; MacHado, A.M.O.; Gales, A.C. Influence of culture media on detection of carbapenem hydrolysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 1896–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Takahashi, N.; Nagai, S.; Fujita, A.; Ido, Y.; Kato, K.; Saito, A.; Moriya, Y.; Tomimatsu, Y.; Kaneta, N.; Tsujimoto, Y.; et al. Discrimination of psychrotolerant Bacillus cereus group based on MALDI-TOF MS analysis of ribosomal subunit proteins. Food Microbiol. 2020, 91, 103542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balážová, T.; Makovcová, J.; Šedo, O.; Slaný, M.; Faldyna, M.; Zdráhal, Z. The influence of culture conditions on the identification of Mycobacterium species by MALDI-TOF MS profiling. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 353, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cuenod, A.; Foucault, F.; Pflüber, V.; Egli, A. Factors associated with MALDI-TOF mass spectral quality of species identification in clinical routine diagnostics. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 646648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marmion, M.; Macori, G.; Ferone, M.; Whyte, P.; Scannell, A.G.M. Survive and thrive: Control mechanisms that facilitate bacterial adaptation to survive manufacturing-related stress. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 368, 109612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wieme, A.D.; Spitaels, F.; Aerts, M.; de Bruyne, K.; van Landschoot, A.; Vandamme, P. Effects of growth medium on Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry: A case study of acetic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 50, 1528–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dubois, D.; Leyssene, D.; Chacornac, J.P.; Kostrzewa, M.; Schmit, P.O.; Talon, R.; Bonnet, R.; Delmas, J. Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ewers, C.; Janssen, T.; Wieler, L.H. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Berl. Und Münchener Tieraerztliche Wochenschr. 2003, 116, 381–395. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kann, S.; Sao, S.; Phoeung, C.; By, Y.; Bryant, J.; Komurian-Pradel, F.; Saphonn, V.; Chou, M.; Tumer, P. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for subtyping of Streptococcus pneumonia. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alispahic, M.; Endler, L.; Hess, M.; Hess, C. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: MALDI-TOF MS and whole genome sequencing confirm that seroypes K, L and M diviate from well-known reference strains and numerous field isolates. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ojima-Kato, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Suzuki, M.; Fukunago, T.; Tamura, H. Discrimination of Escherichia coli O157, O26 and O111 from other serovars by MALDI-TOF MS based on the S10-GERMS method. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Neoh, H.M.; Tan, X.E.; Sapri, F.H.; Tan, T.L. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): A review of the “gold standard” for bacteria typing and current alternatives. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 74, 103935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lasch, P.; Fleige, C.; Stammler, M.; Layer, F.; Nubel, U.; Witte, W.; Werner, G. Insufficient discriminatory power of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for typing of Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 100, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zloch, M.; Pomastowski, P.; Maslak, E.; Monedeiro, F.; Buszewski, B. Study on molecular profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains: Spectrometric approach. Molecules 2020, 25, 4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sauget, M.; Nicolas, M.; Cabrolier, N. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry assigns Escherichia coli to the phylogroups. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wunschel, S.C.; Jarman, K.H.; Petersen, C.E.; Valentine, N.B.; Wahl, K.L. Bacterial analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An inter-laboratory comparison. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mellmann, A.; Bimet, F.; Borovskaya, A.D.; Drake, R.R.; Eigner, U.; Fahr, A.M.; He, Y.; Ilina, E.N.; Kostrzewa, M.; Maier, T.; et al. High interlaboratory reproducibility of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based species identification of nonfermenting bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 3732–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 10 01472 g001 550
Figure 1. Reproducibility of spectra on different solid agars shown for E. coli isolate 16/01363-1 KnoLi 2 (LB: Luria Broth agar; COS: Columbia agar with sheep blood; COLI: Coliformen agar; MCK: MacConkey agar). Differences in intensity and quantity of peaks are shown within the range of 4000–6000 m/z.
Figure 1. Reproducibility of spectra on different solid agars shown for E. coli isolate 16/01363-1 KnoLi 2 (LB: Luria Broth agar; COS: Columbia agar with sheep blood; COLI: Coliformen agar; MCK: MacConkey agar). Differences in intensity and quantity of peaks are shown within the range of 4000–6000 m/z.
Microorganisms 10 01472 g001
Microorganisms 10 01472 g002a 550Microorganisms 10 01472 g002b 550Microorganisms 10 01472 g002c 550
Figure 2. Influence of sub-cultivation (fresh culture vs. sub-cultivation step 3) on spectra quality with a decrease of peak intensity. Shown for E. coli isolate 16/1523-3 KnoRe 2 (n = 20 spectra). (A) Within the range of 4000–6000 m/z; (B) Within the range of 6000–8000 m/z; (C) Within the range of 8000–10000 m/z.
Figure 2. Influence of sub-cultivation (fresh culture vs. sub-cultivation step 3) on spectra quality with a decrease of peak intensity. Shown for E. coli isolate 16/1523-3 KnoRe 2 (n = 20 spectra). (A) Within the range of 4000–6000 m/z; (B) Within the range of 6000–8000 m/z; (C) Within the range of 8000–10000 m/z.
Microorganisms 10 01472 g002aMicroorganisms 10 01472 g002bMicroorganisms 10 01472 g002c
Microorganisms 10 01472 g003 550
Figure 3. Additional peak (6535 m/z) detected in all E. coli strains when stored at 4 °C (24 h: green lines, 48 h: orange lines, 72 h: violet lines) compared to the fresh culture (black).
Figure 3. Additional peak (6535 m/z) detected in all E. coli strains when stored at 4 °C (24 h: green lines, 48 h: orange lines, 72 h: violet lines) compared to the fresh culture (black).
Microorganisms 10 01472 g003
Microorganisms 10 01472 g004 550
Figure 4. Score oriented MSP dendrogram based on 107 E. coli isolates revealing four distinct clusters (distance level 500).
Figure 4. Score oriented MSP dendrogram based on 107 E. coli isolates revealing four distinct clusters (distance level 500).
Microorganisms 10 01472 g004
Microorganisms 10 01472 g005a 550Microorganisms 10 01472 g005b 550Microorganisms 10 01472 g005c 550
Figure 5. Clustering of 50 randomly selected E. coli isolates from eight farms based on their farm origin (A), the presence of femoral head necrosis (B), their serotype (C), their PFGE profile (D), and their phylogroup (E).
Figure 5. Clustering of 50 randomly selected E. coli isolates from eight farms based on their farm origin (A), the presence of femoral head necrosis (B), their serotype (C), their PFGE profile (D), and their phylogroup (E).
Microorganisms 10 01472 g005aMicroorganisms 10 01472 g005bMicroorganisms 10 01472 g005c
Table
Table 1. E. coli isolates selected for standardization process of the protocol, based on their farm origin, serotype, PFGE profile and phylogroup. The presence/absence of specific peaks is given on which isolates from farms 15 and 20 were selected for testing the influence of sub-culturing, age of bacteria and storage condition.
Table 1. E. coli isolates selected for standardization process of the protocol, based on their farm origin, serotype, PFGE profile and phylogroup. The presence/absence of specific peaks is given on which isolates from farms 15 and 20 were selected for testing the influence of sub-culturing, age of bacteria and storage condition.
FarmIsolateSerotypePFGE ProfilePhylogroupSpecific MALDI Peaks
116/02297-2 KnoLi 1O2:K1BR14B2not detected
16/02297-2 KnoLi 2O2:K1BR14B2
16/02297-2 KnoLi 3O2:K1BR14B2
1516/01523-3 KnoRe 1negBR8D7400 m/z and 7560 m/z
16/01523-3 KnoRe 2negBR8D
16/01523-3 KnoRe 3negBR1ST1D
2016/01363-1 KnoLi 1negBR15B26725 m/z and 6860 m/z
16/01363-1 KnoLi 2negBR15B2
16/01363-1 KnoLi 3negBR15B2
2115/25396-3 KnoRe 1O78:K80BR32Dnot detected
15/25396-3 KnoRe 2O78:K80BR32D
15/25396-3 KnoRe 2O78:K80BR32D
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nees, M.; Hess, M.; Hess, C. Discrimination and Characterization of Escherichia coli Originating from Clinical Cases of Femoral Head Necrosis in Broilers by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Confirms Great Heterogeneity of Isolates. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071472

AMA Style

Nees M, Hess M, Hess C. Discrimination and Characterization of Escherichia coli Originating from Clinical Cases of Femoral Head Necrosis in Broilers by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Confirms Great Heterogeneity of Isolates. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(7):1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nees, Marina, Michael Hess, and Claudia Hess. 2022. "Discrimination and Characterization of Escherichia coli Originating from Clinical Cases of Femoral Head Necrosis in Broilers by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Confirms Great Heterogeneity of Isolates" Microorganisms 10, no. 7: 1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop