Next Article in Journal
Prioritisation of Provinces for African Swine Fever Intervention in South Africa through Decision Matrix Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor Has a Short Half-Life in Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
RT-PCR Testing of Organ Culture Medium for Corneal Storage Fails to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Infection Due to Lack of Viral Replication
Previous Article in Special Issue
The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ATL9 Affects Expression of Defense Related Genes, Cell Death and Callose Deposition in Response to Fungal Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens11020134
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Relevance of TLR8 in Viral Infections

by
Iván Martínez-Espinoza
and
Antonieta Guerrero-Plata
*
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(2), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020134
Submission received: 17 December 2021 / Revised: 19 January 2022 / Accepted: 20 January 2022 / Published: 22 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Pathogens—Feature Papers)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the largest pattern recognition receptors responsible for activating the innate and adaptive immune response against viruses through the release of inflammatory cytokines and antiviral mediators. Viruses are recognized by several TLRs, including TLR8, which is known to bind ssRNA structures. However, the similarities between TLR8 and TLR7 have obscured the distinctive characteristics of TLR8 activation and its importance in the immune system. Here we discuss the activation and regulation of TLR8 by viruses and its importance in therapeutical options such as vaccine adjuvants and antiviral stimulators.

1. Introduction

A critical component of innate immunity in the defense against invading pathogens are the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [1], which are germ-line encoded proteins with a refined ability to distinguish pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) present in several types of microorganisms.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are the largest class of PRRs that initiate and regulate host immunity by activating the innate and subsequent adaptive immune responses [2]. Currently, 10 human TLRs have been identified at different cell locations and are widely distributed among different cell types. TLRs are type I membrane glycoproteins that can be divided into two groups based on their location and capability of recognition, and they can also be homo- or heterodimers [3]. TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10 are located on the cell membrane, whereas TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 are found in the endosomes [3,4,5].
There are multiple PAMPs identified as the specific ligands for each human TLR. Therefore, TLR1, TLR2, and TLR6 recognize lipoproteins on microbial cell walls; TLR5 recognizes flagellin, while TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and other microbial structures. In addition, TLR10 can recognize bacterial and viral proteins [3,6,7]. Finally, endosomal TLRs bind nucleic acids, where TLR3 recognizes dsRNA, TLR9 recognizes bacterial and viral DNA, and TLR7 and TLR8 are reported to bind ssRNA. However, more recent evidence highlights critical differences between TLR7 and TLR8 by indicating that their activation triggers distinct signaling pathways and induces differential cytokine profiles [8]. Nonetheless, the study of TLR8 has not been as robust as that of TLR7.

2. Activation and Regulation of TLR8

Human TLR8 is expressed in monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, myeloid dendritic cells [3,6,8,9,10], and regulatory T (Treg) cells [11] (Figure 1a). TLR8 is a type I transmembrane receptor characterized by three structural components: an extracellular domain-containing leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic Toll-interleukin 1 receptor (TIR) domain [12]. Its extracellular domain is integrated by approximately 800 amino acids and 26 LRR modules and allows TLR8 to recognize ssRNA. In the absence of a ligand, TLR8 forms a dimer that suffers a conformational change upon activation by recognition of its target [13]. Different from other TLRs, TLR8 forms a ring-shaped structure [12], which requires proteolytic cleavage at the Z-loop region [14]. Between species, the ectodomain (LRRs) determines whether signaling is initiated in response to a ligand stimulation, and within the ectodomain the RQSYA motif has shown to be essential for the TLR8 activation [15]. Although the sequence-specific recognition of RNA by TLR8 has not been fully established, it is known that TLR8 senses ssRNA throughout its ability to form secondary structures [16] and by recognizing ssRNA AU- and GU-rich sequences [17]. That differentiates it from TLR7, which is activated by GU-rich sequences [18]. In both cases, TLR7 and TLR8 use the same ligand-binding site, but with different amino acid composition [12]. Apparently, TLR8 is able to distinguish the host RNA by nucleoside modifications and only activates the signaling response when a non-modified RNA enters the cell [19]. TLR8 is also suggested to be a vita-PAMP receptor that is able to recognize microbial structures from viable microbes [20], poly(A)/T sequences [21] or even small antiviral molecules [12]. Overall, there are several agonists identified to specifically activate TLR8 or TLR7, and those that can activate both receptors (Table 1).
Activation of TLR8 can be triggered by multiple known ligands such as viral ssRNA [4], miRNAs [16,22,23] and some agonists included in Table 1. That activation can promote co-stimulation and MHC class II expression to induce proliferation of naïve CD4 T cells [24] and Th1 differentiation [25]. In human regulatory T cells (Treg), TLR8 agonists can mediate the reversal of the suppressive function of Treg cells through the TLR8-MyD88-IRAK4 signaling pathway [11]. Additionally, TLR8 has proven to be an important driver of T follicular helper (Tfh) cell differentiation [20]. Interestingly, experimental evidence suggests that TLR8 may also have a regulatory effect on other endosomal TLRs. In fact, TLR8 is able to inhibit both TLR7 and TLR9 in in vitro cells [26]. This observation was reproduced in Tlr8−/− mice, where the absence of TLR8 led to higher levels of expression of TLR7 and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), an effect that may account for an increased antiviral immunity in the infected mice [27].
However, whether the inhibition of TLR7 and TLR9 by TLR8 is through direct or indirect physical contact is still unknown. Furthermore, the regulation of TLR8 by other TLRs has also been suggested. In THP1 cells, a human monocyte cell line, the addition of both TLR7 and TLR8 ligands has shown an apparent inhibition of TLR8-induced cytokine expression, suggesting that TLR7 could have a modulatory effect on TLR8 responsiveness [28]. The impact of other TLRs on TLR8 expression and activation is not yet well defined, as some contradictions exist. Studies in HEK cells suggest that TLR9 inhibits TLR7, but neither TLR7 nor TLR9 inhibit TLR8 [26,29]. However, studies in mice indicate that TLR7 may negatively regulate TLR8, where the absence of TLR7 led to an upregulation of TLR8 expression, suggesting a compensatory mechanism in the immune response [30]. Future research will define the contribution of other endosomal TLRs on TLR8 function.

3. TLR8 and Viral Infections

Several reports have emerged to demonstrate the importance of TLR8 in viral infections, summarized in Table 2. The strategic localization of TLR8 in the endosomes allows for the recognition of several viruses, mainly because it recognizes ssRNAs. Viral ssRNA entering the cell would colocalize into early endosomes around 15 to 20 min after infection, where the RNA could bind to TLR8 [31].
Nevertheless, in the case of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the protein SNAPIN inhibits the colocalization of TLR8 with HIV[32]. Interestingly, studies with vaccinia virus (VV) infection in murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) indicate that poly(A)/T-rich DNA could also be recognized by TLR8, upregulating the expression of IFN-α and IFN-β [21]. Another example of TLR8 activation by viruses is provided by Coxsackie B virus (CBV), which induced an inflammatory response mediated mostly through TLR8 and, to a lesser extent, through TLR7 [4], similar effect is observed in Influenza A Virus (H3N2) [33]. In West Nile virus (WNV)-infected bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells from tlr8−/− mice, the lack of TLR8 resulted in an improved antiviral response due to an increase of TLR7 expression, likely as a result of a compensatory effect [27].
Table
Table 1. TLR8 and TLR7 agonists.
Table 1. TLR8 and TLR7 agonists.
TLRNameStructureClassRef.
TLR7Imiquimod Pathogens 11 00134 i001Imidazoquinoline amine analog to guanosine[34,35]
Gardiquimod Pathogens 11 00134 i002Imidazoquinoline compound[13,36,37]
Loxoribine Pathogens 11 00134 i003Guanosine analogue[38,39,40,41]
Isatoribine Pathogens 11 00134 i004Nucleoside analogue[42]
TLR8TL8-506 Pathogens 11 00134 i005Benzoazepine compound[43]
Selgantolimod Pathogens 11 00134 i006Nucleotide analogue[44,45]
TLR7/TLR8Resiquimod Pathogens 11 00134 i007Imidazoquinoline compound derivative[24,38,40]
CL075 Pathogens 11 00134 i008Thiazoloquinolone derivative[29,46,47,48]
CL097 Pathogens 11 00134 i009Imidazoquinoline compound derivative[48]
TLR8 expression has been documented to increase around 2 to 6 h after some viral infections such as human parechovirus 1 (HPEV-1) [31] and influenza virus (H5N1) [49]. However, the response against viral infection after TLR8 activation highly depends on the type of cell infected. For instance, in human primary CD4+ T cells, human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) is endocytosed by CD4 T cells and activates TLR8. This response triggers a cytokine response that helps the viral replication and reactivates latent HIV-1 through pro-inflammatory stimuli [50]. However, in human monocytes, HIV-1 exposure initially induces autophagy through a TLR8- and BECN1-dependent mechanism, an event that is eventually modulated by the productive infection of the virus [51].
Table
Table 2. Effect of viruses on TLR8 response.
Table 2. Effect of viruses on TLR8 response.
DNA Virus
VirusEffect on TLR8 ActivationCells
DNA Viruses
Vaccinia virusInduces the expression of IFN-α, IFN-βpDCs, HEK cells [21]
Hepatitis B virusHBV infection inhibits innate immunity by decreasing TLR8 levelsPBMC [52]
RNA Viruses
Influenza A virus (H3N2)Induces the expression of
IL-8		HEK cells, neutrophils [33]
Coxsackie B virusInduces the expression of IFN-β, IL-6Human cardiac cells [4]
HIV-1Induces the expression of
IL-6 and IL-1β		Human primary CD4+ T cells [50]
Colocalization of HIV and TLR8 is decreasedDendritic cells [32]
West Nile virusTLR8 favors the infection in infected miceBone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) [27]
Zika virusTLR8 and MyD88 expression decreasesPeripheral blood [53]
Studies in patients infected with viruses also suggest a critical role of TLR8 in the disease progression and immune response. In human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV)-infected infants, low levels of TLR8 were linked to a decreased amount of TNF-α synthesis, while convalescent patients had increased to normal levels of TLR8 and increased expression of TNF-α [1]. In patients infected with Zika virus (ZV), the expression of TLR8 and MyD88 is very low in comparison to non-infected patients, which may suggest that ZV blocks, by an unknown mechanism, the expression of TLR8 [53]. A similar effect was found in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, where the expression of TLR8 in PBMCs was decreased, causing a poor cytokine and interferon expression, which could facilitate the viral replication [52]. Furthermore, mutations in TLR8 have also been reported to influence the severity of some viral diseases. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in TLR8 has shown to impair immune response and functional effects during HCV, which suggests that individuals with SNPs respond differently to viral infections [29]. Conversely, TLR8 SNPs confer a protective effect against HIV by modulating the cytokine response [54]. However, when exploring the effect of TLR8 SNP on SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with COVID-19, there was no correlation between TLR8 mutations and disease severity [55]. Overall, these correlative observations in patients might suggest that some viruses have developed an evasion mechanism that impairs the innate immune response via TLR8 inhibition and highlights the importance of TLR8 in viral infections. However, further research is warranted to define the effect of viruses on TLR8 expression and activation.

4. Signaling Pathways Associated with TLR8 and Its Differences with TLR7

Although both TLR7 and TLR8 recognize ssRNA, they activate different signaling pathways to promote the expression of inflammatory cytokines and interferons used in the defense against viruses (Figure 1b). Both TLR7 and TLR8 signaling pathways are mediated by the adaptor molecule MyD88, which is expressed ubiquitously in the cell cytoplasm. After a viral infection, there is a rapid redistribution of MyD88 to the endosomal compartment, where the TIR domains of TLR8 phosphorylate MyD88 [4,12]. Activation of MyD88 pathway elicits a robust inflammatory and interferon induction by the activation of TRAF6, NF-kB, IRF-7, IRF-3, AP-1, and p38 MAPK [4,25].
Pathogens 11 00134 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Cells that are reported to express TLR8 under basal conditions; (b) TLR7 and TLR8 signaling pathways have the common adaptor protein MyD88. IFN-α expression after TLR7 can be achieved by forming the complex MyD88-IRF7 or by the activation of IRF7 via TRAF6. TRAF6 also activates AP-1 and weakly NF-kB, promoting inflammatory cytokine expression. TLR8 induces a more potent inflammatory cytokine response than TLR7 via the activation of TRAF6-NF-kB pathway, while the induction of IFN-b by TLR8 is achieved through the activation of the IRF3/7 pathway. Created with BioRender.com. (Accessed on 17 December 2021.)
Figure 1. (a) Cells that are reported to express TLR8 under basal conditions; (b) TLR7 and TLR8 signaling pathways have the common adaptor protein MyD88. IFN-α expression after TLR7 can be achieved by forming the complex MyD88-IRF7 or by the activation of IRF7 via TRAF6. TRAF6 also activates AP-1 and weakly NF-kB, promoting inflammatory cytokine expression. TLR8 induces a more potent inflammatory cytokine response than TLR7 via the activation of TRAF6-NF-kB pathway, while the induction of IFN-b by TLR8 is achieved through the activation of the IRF3/7 pathway. Created with BioRender.com. (Accessed on 17 December 2021.)
Pathogens 11 00134 g001
Although MyD88 has been seen as a common adaptor molecule to TLR7 and TLR8, the activation of this protein in monocytes and macrophages modulates different immune responses with different signature profiles of pro-inflammatory cytokines and type I interferon in a cell-dependent fashion [8,9,25]. In the case of pro-inflammatory cytokines, TLR7 induces more IL-1β, IL-6, IP-10 and IL-23, whereas TLR8 agonists induce more IL-1α/β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, IL-12β, IL-27 and MIP-1α in myeloid dendritic cells [25,48,56]. Moreover, TLR7 agonist stimulation in monocytes fails to induce a robust NF-kB. However, it induces the activation of AP-1, which may explain the differential cytokine profile elicited by TLR8 and TLR7 agonists [25]. A similar phenomenon is observed in the production of IFN by the activation of these two receptors. While TLR7 activation induces the expression of IFN-α1 and IFN-α2 in monocytes and pDCs [56,57], TLR8 activation in monocytes and myeloid DCs expresses more IFN-β1 [8,9,25,56]. After TLR7 ligand activation, the adaptor molecule MyD88 can stimulate IRF through two different mechanisms. First, MyD88 can phosphorylate IRF7, forming a complex that promotes the IFN response. Second, MyD88 activates TRAF6, which binds to IRF7, inducing the expression of IFN-α [58]. This experimental evidence illustrates the unique characteristics of TLR8 in triggering the inflammatory and antiviral host responses.

5. Future Perspectives for Therapeutics with TLR8 Agonist for Viral Infections

Commercially available TLR8 agonists have demonstrated the capability to selectively activate TLR8. There are many properties of these molecules that make them attractive candidates for use as vaccine adjuvants or antiviral activity [6,59]. These molecules can be administered through multiple methods including intravenously, oral [44], inhaled, or topically applied, which make them good candidates as therapeutical options for the future. Currently, TLR8 agonists are being investigated as vaccine adjuvants and in some other ailments such as allergy or asthma [60]. One example is that of HIV Gag protein, which was conjugated to TLR7/8 agonists as an effective way to elicit a broad-based adaptive immunity in nonhuman primates [61]. Moreover, recent work has demonstrated that the TLR7/8 agonist imidazoquinoline coupled to a novel amphiphilic carrier enhances vaccine efficiency by inducing a robust Th1 skewed antibody response in mice treated with a single shot with spike protein for SARS-CoV-2 or seasonal quadrivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine [62]. Selgantolimod (GS-9688), also known as oral (R)-7, is a TLR8 agonist that has a good absorption properties, and is currently in phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04891770) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [44]. Some progress has also been done on the use of TLR8 agonists in HIV infection, where it is shown that T CD4+ TLR8 promoted Tfh differentiation towards Tfh1 and Tfh17 during HIV infection. Such differentiation and the cytokine secretion from TCD4+ via TLR8 could be exploited as a potential therapeutic target and vaccine development [50].
TLR8 agonists in combination with other ligands such as fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt3L) have demonstrated to prime Ag-specific CD8+ T cells, suggesting that TLR8 ligands could also be used as potent adjuvants to prime functionally superior Ag-specific human CD8+ T cells and improve the response to viral infections [63].

6. Concluding Remarks

The experimental evidence reported on TLR8 highlights the relevance of this receptor in the activation of the host immunity in response to viruses. More importantly, it opens new avenues of opportunity to improve the design of current treatments for viral infections and other diseases. The use of TLR8 agonists as vaccine adjuvants, immunomodulatory therapeutics, and antiviral components represent a few excellent examples of the application of TLR8 research. However, further work is warranted to better understand the specific mechanisms that govern the expression, activation, and regulation of TLR8 by viral infections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.-P.; research, I.M.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M.-E. and A.G.-P.; writing—review and editing, A.G.-P. and I.M.-E.; supervision, A.G.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine Competitive Research Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Robert Allison for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bendelja, K.; Vojvoda, V.; Aberle, N.; Cepin-Bogovic, J.; Gagro, A.; Mlinaric-Galinovic, G.; Rabatic, S. Decreased Toll-like Receptor 8 Expression and Lower TNF-α Synthesis in Infants with Acute RSV Infection. Respir. Res. 2010, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Leulier, F.; Lemaitre, B. Toll-like Receptors--Taking an Evolutionary Approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kolli, D.; Velayutham, T.S.; Casola, A. Host-Viral Interactions: Role of Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) in Human Pneumovirus Infections. Pathogens 2013, 2, 232–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Triantafilou, K.; Orthopoulos, G.; Vakakis, E.; Ahmed, M.A.E.; Golenbock, D.T.; Lepper, P.M.; Triantafilou, M. Human Cardiac Inflammatory Responses Triggered by Coxsackie B Viruses Are Mainly Toll-like Receptor (TLR) 8-Dependent. Cell. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.-T.; Verma, A.; Hodgkinson, C.P. Toll-Like Receptors and Human Disease: Lessons from Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. Curr. Genom. 2012, 13, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tomai, M.A.; Vasilakos, J.P. Chapter 8 - Toll-Like Receptor 7 and 8 Agonists for Vaccine Adjuvant Use. In Immunopotentiators in Modern Vaccines, 2nd ed.; Schijns, V.E.J.C., O’Hagan, D.T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Chapter 8; pp. 149–162. ISBN 978-0-12-804019-5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fore, F.; Indriputri, C.; Mamutse, J.; Nugraha, J. TLR10 and Its Unique Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Potential Use as a Target in Therapeutics. Immune Netw. 2020, 20, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bender, A.T.; Tzvetkov, E.; Pereira, A.; Wu, Y.; Kasar, S.; Przetak, M.M.; Vlach, J.; Niewold, T.B.; Jensen, M.A.; Okitsu, S.L. TLR7 and TLR8 Differentially Activate the IRF and NF-ΚB Pathways in Specific Cell Types to Promote Inflammation. ImmunoHorizons 2020, 4, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Eng, H.-L.; Hsu, Y.-Y.; Lin, T.-M. Differences in TLR7/8 Activation between Monocytes and Macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 497, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maris, N.A.; Dessing, M.C.; de Vos, A.F.; Bresser, P.; van der Zee, J.S.; Jansen, H.M.; Spek, C.A.; Poll, T. van der Toll-like Receptor MRNA Levels in Alveolar Macrophages after Inhalation of Endotoxin. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 28, 622–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, G.; Guo, Z.; Kiniwa, Y.; Voo, K.S.; Peng, W.; Fu, T.; Wang, D.Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, R.-F. Toll-Like Receptor 8-Mediated Reversal of CD4+ Regulatory T Cell Function. Science 2005, 309, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ohto, U.; Tanji, H.; Shimizu, T. Structure and Function of Toll-like Receptor 8. Microbes Infect. 2014, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhu, J.; Brownlie, R.; Liu, Q.; Babiuk, L.A.; Potter, A.; Mutwiri, G.K. Characterization of Bovine Toll-like Receptor 8: Ligand Specificity, Signaling Essential Sites and Dimerization. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 978–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tanji, H.; Ohto, U.; Motoi, Y.; Shibata, T.; Miyake, K.; Shimizu, T. Autoinhibition and Relief Mechanism by the Proteolytic Processing of Toll-like Receptor 8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3012–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, J.; Xu, C.; Hsu, L.-C.; Luo, Y.; Xiang, R.; Chuang, T.-H. A Five-Amino-Acid Motif in the Undefined Region of the TLR8 Ectodomain Is Required for Species-Specific Ligand Recognition. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pluta, L.; Yousefi, B.; Damania, B.; Khan, A.A. Endosomal TLR-8 Senses MicroRNA-1294 Resulting in the Production of NFḱB Dependent Cytokines. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; El-Far, M.; Dupuy, F.P.; Abdel-Hakeem, M.S.; He, Z.; Procopio, F.A.; Shi, Y.; Haddad, E.K.; Ancuta, P.; Sekaly, R.-P.; et al. HCV RNA Activates APCs via TLR7/TLR8 While Virus Selectively Stimulates Macrophages Without Inducing Antiviral Responses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Forsbach, A.; Nemorin, J.-G.; Montino, C.; Müller, C.; Samulowitz, U.; Vicari, A.P.; Jurk, M.; Mutwiri, G.K.; Krieg, A.M.; Lipford, G.B.; et al. Identification of RNA Sequence Motifs Stimulating Sequence-Specific TLR8-Dependent Immune Responses. J Immunol. 2008, 180, 3729–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karikó, K.; Buckstein, M.; Ni, H.; Weissman, D. Suppression of RNA Recognition by Toll-like Receptors: The Impact of Nucleoside Modification and the Evolutionary Origin of RNA. Immunity 2005, 23, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ugolini, M.; Gerhard, J.; Burkert, S.; Jensen, K.J.; Georg, P.; Ebner, F.; Volkers, S.M.; Thada, S.; Dietert, K.; Bauer, L.; et al. Recognition of Microbial Viability via TLR8 Drives TFH Cell Differentiation and Vaccine Responses. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martinez, J.; Huang, X.; Yang, Y. Toll-like Receptor 8-Mediated Activation of Murine Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells by Vaccinia Viral DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6442–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fabbri, M.; Paone, A.; Calore, F.; Galli, R.; Gaudio, E.; Santhanam, R.; Lovat, F.; Fadda, P.; Mao, C.; Nuovo, G.J.; et al. MicroRNAs Bind to Toll-like Receptors to Induce Prometastatic Inflammatory Response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109, E2110–E2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bernard, M.A.; Han, X.; Inderbitzin, S.; Agbim, I.; Zhao, H.; Koziel, H.; Tachado, S.D. HIV-Derived SsRNA Binds to TLR8 to Induce Inflammation-Driven Macrophage Foam Cell Formation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hackstein, H.; Knoche, A.; Nockher, A.; Poeling, J.; Kubin, T.; Jurk, M.; Vollmer, J.; Bein, G. The TLR7/8 Ligand Resiquimod Targets Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cell Differentiation via TLR8 and Augments Functional Dendritic Cell Generation. Cell. Immunol. 2011, 271, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. de Marcken, M.; Dhaliwal, K.; Danielsen, A.C.; Gautron, A.S.; Dominguez-Villar, M. TLR7 and TLR8 Activate Distinct Pathways in Monocytes during RNA Virus Infection. Sci. Signal. 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Shao, Y.; Bennett, T.A.; Shankar, R.A.; Wightman, P.D.; Reddy, L.G. The Functional Effects of Physical Interactions among Toll-like Receptors 7, 8, and 9*. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 37427–37434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Paul, A.M.; Acharya, D.; Le, L.; Wang, P.; Stokic, D.S.; Leis, A.A.; Alexopoulou, L.; Town, T.; Flavell, R.A.; Fikrig, E.; et al. TLR8 Couples SOCS-1 and Restrains TLR7-Mediated Antiviral Immunity, Exacerbating West Nile Virus Infection in Mice. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 4425–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Odoardi, N.; Kourko, O.; Petes, C.; Basta, S.; Gee, K. TLR7 Ligation Inhibits TLR8 Responsiveness in IL-27-Primed Human THP-1 Monocytes and Macrophages. J. Innate Immun. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, C.-H.; Eng, H.-L.; Lin, K.-H.; Chang, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-A.; Lin, Y.-L.; Lin, T.-M. TLR7 and TLR8 Gene Variations and Susceptibility to Hepatitis C Virus Infection. PLOS ONE 2011, 6, e26235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Awais, M.; Wang, K.; Lin, X.; Qian, W.; Zhang, N.; Wang, C.; Wang, K.; Zhao, L.; Fu, Z.F.; Cui, M. TLR7 Deficiency Leads to TLR8 Compensative Regulation of Immune Response against JEV in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Triantafilou, K.; Vakakis, E.; Orthopoulos, G.; Ahmed, M.A.E.; Schumann, C.; Lepper, P.M.; Triantafilou, M. TLR8 and TLR7 Are Involved in the Host’s Immune Response to Human Parechovirus 1. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 2416–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khatamzas, E.; Hipp, M.M.; Gaughan, D.; Pichulik, T.; Leslie, A.; Fernandes, R.A.; Muraro, D.; Booth, S.; Zausmer, K.; Sun, M.; et al. Snapin Promotes HIV-1 Transmission from Dendritic Cells by Dampening TLR8 Signaling. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 2998–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, J.P.; Bowen, G.N.; Padden, C.; Cerny, A.; Finberg, R.W.; Newburger, P.E.; Kurt-Jones, E.A. Toll-like Receptor–Mediated Activation of Neutrophils by Influenza A Virus. Blood 2008, 112, 2028–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Larangé, A.; Antonios, D.; Pallardy, M.; Kerdine-Römer, S. TLR7 and TLR8 Agonists Trigger Different Signaling Pathways for Human Dendritic Cell Maturation. J. of Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 85, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Craft, N.; Bruhn, K.W.; Nguyen, B.D.; Prins, R.; Lin, J.W.; Liau, L.M.; Miller, J.F. The TLR7 Agonist Imiquimod Enhances the Anti-Melanoma Effects of a Recombinant Listeria Monocytogenes Vaccine. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 1983–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Buitendijk, M.; Eszterhas, S.K.; Howell, A.L. Gardiquimod: A Toll-Like Receptor-7 Agonist That Inhibits HIV Type 1 Infection of Human Macrophages and Activated T Cells. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2013, 29, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Enosi Tuipulotu, D.; Netzler, N.E.; Lun, J.H.; Mackenzie, J.M.; White, P.A. TLR7 Agonists Display Potent Antiviral Effects against Norovirus Infection via Innate Stimulation. Antimicrob. Agents and Chemother. 2018, 62, e02417-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jurk, M.; Kritzler, A.; Schulte, B.; Tluk, S.; Schetter, C.; Krieg, A.M.; Vollmer, J. Modulating Responsiveness of Human TLR7 and 8 to Small Molecule Ligands with T-Rich Phosphorothiate Oligodeoxynucleotides. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 1815–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dzopalic, T.; Dragicevic, A.; Vasilijic, S.; Vucevic, D.; Majstorovic, I.; Bozic, B.; Balint, B.; Colic, M. Loxoribine, a Selective Toll-like Receptor 7 Agonist, Induces Maturation of Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Stimulates Their Th-1- and Th-17-Polarizing Capability. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 1428–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Heil, F.; Ahmad-Nejad, P.; Hemmi, H.; Hochrein, H.; Ampenberger, F.; Gellert, T.; Dietrich, H.; Lipford, G.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S.; et al. The Toll-like Receptor 7 (TLR7)-Specific Stimulus Loxoribine Uncovers a Strong Relationship within the TLR7, 8 and 9 Subfamily. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 2987–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, N.; Yao, H.-P.; Lv, G.-C.; Chen, Z. Downregulation of TLR7/9 Leads to Deficient Production of IFN-α from Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Chronic Hepatitis B. Inflamm. Res. 2012, 61, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Horsmans, Y.; Berg, T.; Desager, J.-P.; Mueller, T.; Schott, E.; Fletcher, S.P.; Steffy, K.R.; Bauman, L.A.; Kerr, B.M.; Averett, D.R. Isatoribine, an Agonist of TLR7, Reduces Plasma Virus Concentration in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection. Hepatology 2005, 42, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Serrano, R.; Wesch, D.; Kabelitz, D. Activation of Human Γδ T Cells: Modulation by Toll-Like Receptor 8 Ligands and Role of Monocytes. Cells 2020, 9, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mackman, R.L.; Mish, M.; Chin, G.; Perry, J.K.; Appleby, T.; Aktoudianakis, V.; Metobo, S.; Pyun, P.; Niu, C.; Daffis, S.; et al. Discovery of GS-9688 (Selgantolimod) as a Potent and Selective Oral Toll-Like Receptor 8 Agonist for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 10188–10203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Amin, O.E.; Colbeck, E.J.; Daffis, S.; Khan, S.; Ramakrishnan, D.; Pattabiraman, D.; Chu, R.; Micolochick Steuer, H.; Lehar, S.; Peiser, L.; et al. Therapeutic Potential of TLR8 Agonist GS-9688 (Selgantolimod) in Chronic Hepatitis B: Remodeling of Antiviral and Regulatory Mediators. Hepatology 2021, 74, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Du, J.; Wu, Z.; Ren, S.; Wei, Y.; Gao, M.; Randolph, G.J.; Qu, C. TLR8 Agonists Stimulate Newly Recruited Monocyte-Derived Cells into Potent APCs That Enhance HBsAg Immunogenicity. Vaccine 2010, 28, 6273–6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chatillon, J.-F.; Hamieh, M.; Bayeux, F.; Abasq, C.; Fauquembergue, E.; Drouet, A.; Guisier, F.; Latouche, J.-B.; Musette, P. Direct Toll-Like Receptor 8 Signaling Increases the Functional Avidity of Human CD8+ T Lymphocytes Generated for Adoptive T Cell Therapy Strategies. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2015, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wu, J.; Li, S.; Li, T.; Lv, X.; Zhang, M.; Zang, G.; Qi, C.; Liu, Y.-J.; Xu, L.; Chen, J. PDC Activation by TLR7/8 Ligand CL097 Compared to TLR7 Ligand IMQ or TLR9 Ligand CpG. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 1749803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Song, B.M.; Kang, Y.M.; Kim, H.S.; Seo, S.H. Induction of Inflammatory Cytokines and Toll-like Receptors in Human Normal Respiratory Epithelial Cells Infected with Seasonal H1N1, 2009 Pandemic H1N1, Seasonal H3N2, and Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus. Viral Immunol. 2011, 24, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meås, H.Z.; Haug, M.; Beckwith, M.S.; Louet, C.; Ryan, L.; Hu, Z.; Landskron, J.; Nordbø, S.A.; Taskén, K.; Yin, H.; et al. Sensing of HIV-1 by TLR8 Activates Human T Cells and Reverses Latency. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Campbell, G.R.; Rawat, P.; Bruckman, R.S.; Spector, S.A. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Inhibits Autophagy through Transcription Factor EB Sequestration. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Deng, G.; Ge, J.; Liu, C.; Pang, J.; Huang, Z.; Peng, J.; Sun, J.; Hou, J.; Zhang, X. Impaired Expression and Function of TLR8 in Chronic HBV Infection and Its Association with Treatment Responses during Peg-IFN-α-2a Antiviral Therapy. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2017, 41, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. da Silva, M.H.M.; Moises, R.N.C.; Alves, B.E.B.; Pereira, H.W.B.; de Paiva, A.A.P.; Morais, I.C.; Nascimento, Y.M.; Monteiro, J.D.; de Souto, J.T.; Nascimento, M.S.L.; et al. Innate Immune Response in Patients with Acute Zika Virus Infection. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 208, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Oh, D.-Y.; Taube, S.; Hamouda, O.; Kücherer, C.; Poggensee, G.; Jessen, H.; Eckert, J.K.; Neumann, K.; Storek, A.; Pouliot, M.; et al. A Functional Toll-Like Receptor 8 Variant Is Associated with HIV Disease Restriction. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Mahallawi, W.H.; Suliman, B.A. TLR8 Is Highly Conserved among the Saudi Population and Its Mutations Have No Effect on the Severity of COVID-19 Symptoms. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2021, 10, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Gorden, K.B.; Gorski, K.S.; Gibson, S.J.; Kedl, R.M.; Kieper, W.C.; Qiu, X.; Tomai, M.A.; Alkan, S.S.; Vasilakos, J.P. Synthetic TLR Agonists Reveal Functional Differences between Human TLR7 and TLR8. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hornung, V.; Guenthner-Biller, M.; Bourquin, C.; Ablasser, A.; Schlee, M.; Uematsu, S.; Noronha, A.; Manoharan, M.; Akira, S.; de Fougerolles, A.; et al. Sequence-Specific Potent Induction of IFN-α by Short Interfering RNA in Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells through TLR7. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kawai, T.; Sato, S.; Ishii, K.J.; Coban, C.; Hemmi, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Terai, K.; Matsuda, M.; Inoue, J.; Uematsu, S.; et al. Interferon-α Induction through Toll-like Receptors Involves a Direct Interaction of IRF7 with MyD88 and TRAF6. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Diebold, S.S.; Kaisho, T.; Hemmi, H.; Akira, S.; Sousa, C.R. e Innate Antiviral Responses by Means of TLR7-Mediated Recognition of Single-Stranded RNA. Science 2004, 303, 1529–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aryan, Z.; Holgate, S.T.; Radzioch, D.; Rezaei, N. A New Era of Targeting the Ancient Gatekeepers of the Immune System: Toll-Like Agonists in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2014, 164, 46–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wille-Reece, U.; Flynn, B.J.; Loré, K.; Koup, R.A.; Kedl, R.M.; Mattapallil, J.J.; Weiss, W.R.; Roederer, M.; Seder, R.A. HIV Gag Protein Conjugated to a Toll-like Receptor 7/8 Agonist Improves the Magnitude and Quality of Th1 and CD8+ T Cell Responses in Nonhuman Primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15190–15194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jangra, S.; De Vrieze, J.; Choi, A.; Rathnasinghe, R.; Laghlali, G.; Uvyn, A.; Van Herck, S.; Nuhn, L.; Deswarte, K.; Zhong, Z.; et al. Sterilizing Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mice by a Single-Shot and Lipid Amphiphile Imidazoquinoline TLR7/8 Agonist-Adjuvanted Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine**. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9467–9473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lissina, A.; Briceño, O.; Afonso, G.; Larsen, M.; Gostick, E.; Price, D.A.; Mallone, R.; Appay, V. Priming of Qualitatively Superior Human Effector CD8+ T Cells Using TLR8 Ligand Combined with FLT3 Ligand. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Espinoza, I.; Guerrero-Plata, A. The Relevance of TLR8 in Viral Infections. Pathogens 2022, 11, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020134

AMA Style

Martínez-Espinoza I, Guerrero-Plata A. The Relevance of TLR8 in Viral Infections. Pathogens. 2022; 11(2):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Espinoza, Iván, and Antonieta Guerrero-Plata. 2022. "The Relevance of TLR8 in Viral Infections" Pathogens 11, no. 2: 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop