Next Article in Journal
Impact of Individual Viral Gene Segments from Influenza A/H5N8 Virus on the Protective Efficacy of Inactivated Subtype-Specific Influenza Vaccine
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Colloidal Gold Immunochromatographic Assay for Duck Enteritis Virus Detection Using Monoclonal Antibodies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/pathogens10030366
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differentiation of Gastric Helicobacter Species Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

by
Helena Berlamont
1,*,
Chloë De Witte
1,
Sofie De Bruyckere
1,
James G. Fox
2,
Steffen Backert
3,
Annemieke Smet
4,
Filip Boyen
1,*,† and
Freddy Haesebrouck
1,*,†
1
Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
2
Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
3
Department Biology, Division Microbiology, University Erlangen Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
4
Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Shared Senior Authorship.
Pathogens 2021, 10(3), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030366
Submission received: 4 March 2021 / Revised: 15 March 2021 / Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published: 18 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastric helicobacters (Helicobacter (H.) pylori and non-H. pylori Helicobacter species (NHPHs)) colonize the stomach of humans and/or animals. Helicobacter species identification is essential since many of them are recognized as human and/or animal pathogens. Currently, Helicobacter species can only be differentiated using molecular methods. Differentiation between NHPHs using MALDI-TOF MS has not been described before, probably because these species are poorly represented in current MALDI-TOF MS databases. Therefore, we identified 93 gastric Helicobacter isolates of 10 different Helicobacter species using MALDI-TOF MS in order to establish a more elaborate Helicobacter reference database. While the MALDI Biotyper database was not able to correctly identify any of the isolates, the in-house database correctly identified all individual mass spectra and resulted in 82% correct species identification based on the two highest log score matches (with log scores ≥2). In addition, a dendrogram was constructed using all newly created main spectrum profiles. Nine main clusters were formed, with some phylogenetically closely related Helicobacter species clustering closely together and well-defined subclusters being observed in specific species. Current results suggest that MALDI-TOF MS allows rapid differentiation between gastric Helicobacter species, provided that an extensive database is at hand and variation due to growth conditions and agar-medium-related peaks are taken into account.

1. Introduction

Helicobacters are Gram-negative bacteria that naturally colonize the gastrointestinal tract of humans and various animal species [1,2]. The Helicobacter genus can roughly be divided into two major groups: gastric species colonizing the stomach and enterohepatic species colonizing the intestinal tract and/or liver of their host [3,4,5,6]. Helicobacter (H.) pylori is the best studied and most prevalent Helicobacter species colonizing the human stomach, with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 44.3% [7]. Infections with this microorganism have been associated with gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT-) lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma [8]. Gastric disease in humans has also been associated with other, spiral-shaped non-H. pylori Helicobacter species (NHPHs) naturally colonizing the stomach of various animals [2,9]. So far, detected zoonotic NHPHs are H. suis from pigs, H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, H. salomonis, and H. heilmannii from cats and dogs, and possibly H. cetorum from marine mammals, and “Candidatus H. bovis” from cattle [2,10,11,12,13]. The prevalence of NHPHs in human patients with gastric complaints is estimated to range from 0.2% to 6% [2]. Nevertheless, due to difficulties in the diagnosis of NHPH infections, these numbers are most probably an underestimation of their true prevalence. Other animal-associated gastric Helicobacter species, for which a zoonotic potential has not yet been described, are H. baculiformis and H. ailurogastricus (cats), H. cynogastricus (dogs), H. mustelae (ferrets), H. suncus (house musk shrews), H. acinonychis (wild large felines), H. labacensis, H. mehlei, and H. vulpis (red foxes) and “Candidatus H. homininae” (gorilla, chimpanzee) [13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, the zoonotic potential of H. suis isolated from non-human primates has not been described so far. Animals can be subclinically infected with these gastric Helicobacter species or may develop gastric pathologies [2].
Identification to the species level of Helicobacter infections has become increasingly important, since many of them are recognized as important human and/or animal pathogens [2,13]. Correct species identification is also important to better estimate the true prevalence of NHPH infections in humans, to allow identification of the source of infection (e.g., in pets), and hence, allow implementation of correct measurements to avoid reinfection (e.g., treatment of infected pets). Finally, as antimicrobial resistance in NHPHs has already been described and since antimicrobial susceptibility can differ between Helicobacter species, species identification may guide antimicrobial therapy as well [17,18]. So far, however, no ideal diagnostic tool exists to identify Helicobacter infections to the species level. The feasibility of biochemical methods for Helicobacter identification and differentiation has been hampered because of the low metabolic activity of these bacteria and the limited number of available test characteristics [2,19]. Although the spiral-shaped NHPHs may be distinguished from the curve-shaped H. pylori by high-resolution microscopy, further species differentiation based on morphology is not reliable due to overlapping phenotypic characteristics [20]. Nowadays, Helicobacter species can only be differentiated using molecular methods, such as (q)PCR and sequencing of the 16S rRNA, ureAB, gyrB and/or hsp60 genes [21]. These diagnostic tools, however, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive.
In recent years, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been introduced as an accurate, rapid, and inexpensive tool for microbial identification and diagnosis [22,23,24]. This technique is based on the generation of complex fingerprints of specific biomarker molecules by measuring the exact mass/charge ratio of peptides and proteins and might be an alternative method to identify and differentiate Helicobacter species [25]. MALDI-TOF MS is also increasingly used in polyphasic taxonomic approaches when describing new bacterial species [26]. Recently, three novel Helicobacter species (i.e., H. labacensis, H. mehlei, and H. vulpis) from the gastric mucosa of red foxes were described using this approach [16]. Inadequate MALDI-TOF MS identification may occur due to the incompleteness of mass spectrometry databases [27]. For example, the current MALDI Biotyper reference database library (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) only contains 24 Helicobacter entries, most of which are enterohepatic Helicobacter species (i.e., H. canadensis (1), H. canis (2), H. cholecystus (1), H. cinaedi (2), H. fennelliae (1), H. pullorum (9)) and only a few are gastric species (i.e., H. mustelae (1) and H. pylori (7)). In order to establish a more accurate Helicobacter species identification by MALDI-TOF MS, we generated main spectrum profiles from all available gastric Helicobacter species in our lab, resulting in an in-house Helicobacter database. The presence of a robust MALDI-TOF MS database, as provided by this research, is a prerequisite for future MALDI-TOF MS analysis on clinical samples, enabling rapid diagnosis of gastric Helicobacter infections.

2. Results

In general, MSPs belonging to the same isolate created at different timepoints generated high log scores (Table S1) and clustered closely together (Figures S1–S3), indicating good reproducibility of gastric Helicobacter MALDI-TOF MS spectra. Log differences between MSPs belonging to the same isolate ranged from 0.01 to 0.76, whereby log scores ≥2 were seen for all MSPs, except for one: H. suis HS5 MSP (Table S1).
In total, 93 isolates of 10 gastric Helicobacter species were analyzed using MALDI-TOF MS. Additionally, MSPs after both dry and biphasic cultivation were created for 23 isolates, resulting in an in-house Helicobacter database containing 116 MSPs. A representative peak spectrum for each gastric Helicobacter species used in this study is given in Figure S4. After completion of the in-house Helicobacter database, all individual spectra used to create each MSP (20–24 spectra per MSP) were matched to the MALDI Biotyper and in-house database. When comparing the 20–24 individual spectra with the MALDI Biotyper database, no logarithmic identification scores ≥1.70 were generated. When comparing the individual spectra with the newly created in-house database, correct species identification was seen for all isolates, with maximum log scores varying between 2.22 and 2.88 (Table 1). Log scores for the best incorrect species match varied between 1.96 and 2.61. When comparing the best incorrect match per species with the best correct match of that isolate, the log difference varied from 0.05 to 0.80 (Table 1). As expected, the majority (i.e., 97%) of the 20–24 individual spectra generated a first match with their own isolate’s MSP. Therefore, we also investigated whether correct species identification was seen for the second-best match (i.e., the isolate with the second highest log score). For the 20–24 individual spectra of 102 MSPs, the second-best match also belonged to the correct Helicobacter species, of which 95 had log scores ≥2. For the individual spectra of 14 MSPs, the second-best match did not belong to the correct Helicobacter species, with 8/14 (i.e., 3 H. bizzozeronii, 3 H. felis, 1 H. cetorum, and 1 H. salomonis) having a log score ≥2, 4/14 (i.e., 1 H. ailurogastricus, 1 H. bizzozeronii, 1 H. cetorum, and 1 H. felis) having a log score <2 and ≥1.70, and 2/14 (i.e., 1 H. cetorum and 1 H. felis) having a log score <1.70 (Table 2).
When comparing the individual spectra of the 23 isolate MSPs grown at biphasic conditions to the corresponding isolate MSP grown at dry conditions, and vice versa, log scores varied from <0 to 2.45 (Table 3). For 1 H. baculiformis, 1 H. cynogastricus, and 4 H. felis isolates, log scores were ≥2 for both comparisons. Conversely, for 1 H. acinonychis, 3 H. felis, and 1 H. salomonis isolate, log scores were <1.70 for both comparisons.
Additionally, unseeded culture media were analyzed and compared to the in-house Helicobacter database. Only brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar yielded MALDI-TOF MS peaks that matched to 1 H. bizzozeronii, 1 H. cetorum, 2 H. felis, and 1 H. salomonis isolates with log scores ≥2. Furthermore, log scores <2 and ≥1.70 were shown for 1 H. bizzozeronii, 2 H. felis, and 1 H. salomonis isolate (Table S2). Ten out of 12 peaks from BHI agar showed similar m/z [Da] values in H. salomonis Inkinen, H. bizzozeronii 12A, H. cetorum MIT 01-6096, H. felis M38, and/or H. felis M42 MSP (Table S3). All isolates showing similar peaks to those of BHI agar were grown at dry conditions using BHI agar.
Species differentiation and diversity of spectra within a species were also assessed by constructing dendrograms based on a similarity matrix incorporated in the MBT Compass Explorer 4.1 software. Not all isolates within one species formed a cluster clearly distinct from other species (Figure 1a,b). Nine main clusters were generated: 2 H. suis clusters; 1 cluster with H. heilmannii and H. ailurogastricus; 1 cluster with H. felis and H. cynogastricus; 1 H. baculiformis cluster; 1 cluster containing H. felis, H. cetorum, and some H. salomonis, H. bizzozeronii, and H. acinonychis isolates; 1 H. salomonis cluster; 1 H. acinonychis cluster; and 1 H. bizzozeronii cluster with some H. felis isolates. Additionally, 1 H. felis isolate (16937), 1 H. cetorum isolate (MIT 01-6202), and 1 H. suis isolate (HS6) were found separated from the main clusters. Remarkably, one H. ailurogastricus isolate (ASB 21.1) clustered in one of the H. suis clusters. Except for H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1, all H. ailurogastricus and H. heilmannii isolates clustered together, with H. ailurogastricus ASB 7.1 and ASB 23 clustering closer to H. heilmannii than to other H. ailurogastricus isolates. Although H. felis and H. cynogastricus clustered together, H. cynogastricus was situated rather distinctly from most H. felis isolates, except from the biphasically cultivated H. felis M39. Most H. bizzozeronii isolates clustered together, except for 2 isolates (10 and 12A), which clustered in one of the H. felis groups. Four H. salomonis isolates (M45, Kok III dry, Elvira II dry, and Inkinen dry) clustered in one of the H. felis groups, whereas isolates Kok III, Elvira II, and Inkinen after biphasic cultivation did belong to the main H. salomonis cluster. Similarly, two H. acinonychis isolates (Hacino3 dry and 1L dry) clustered in one of the H. felis groups, whereas both isolates grown at biphasic conditions did belong to the main H. acinonychis cluster.

3. Discussion

In order to accurately identify bacterial strains using MALDI-TOF MS, a complete and representative database should be present [28]. As the current commercial MALDI Biotyper database is far from complete for Helicobacter species, we aimed at extending it with 93 isolates of 10 different gastric Helicobacter species to facilitate future MALDI-TOF MS identification. While most gastric Helicobacter species were included, there are still some species lacking, such as H. suncus, “Candidatus H. bovis”, and “Candidatus H. hominae”. Furthermore, as the number of isolates available for some species is currently limited, additional isolation and completion of the database is warranted. However, obtaining additional isolates is not evident due to the fastidious nature of these Helicobacter species [2]. Indeed, the collection of isolates used in this study was a process that took almost 20 years [29]. Therefore, validation of the newly created in-house Helicobacter database was performed with isolates available in our lab. It was decided not to include H. mustelae in our study as this species is phylogenetically more related to enterohepatic Helicobacter species than to the gastric ones [29,30,31].
Although the reproducibility of the created spectra in our study was shown to be good, some isolate MSPs deviated from the other MSPs of the same isolate. This divergence is most likely due to spotting of suboptimal bacterial concentrations, further emphasizing the need of sufficient and standardized bacterial concentrations for MALDI-TOF MS identification, especially for fastidiously growing bacterial species [32,33].
According to Bruker recommendations, no reliable identification at genus level (log score ≥1.70) or species level (log score ≥2) was possible with the most recent MALDI Biotyper database. However, after completion of the in-house Helicobacter database, correct species identification was seen for 100% of the individual mass spectra. Correct species identification based on the second-best match was observed for 82% (95/116) of the individual mass spectra with log scores ≥2 and 6% (7/116) of the individual mass spectra with log scores <2, whereas incorrect species identification occurred for 7% (8/116) of the individual mass spectra with log scores ≥2 and for 5% (6/116) with log scores <2. The dendrogram also showed separate clustering of most (i.e., 9/14) of these latter incorrectly identified isolates from other isolates of that species. This indicates that variation between isolates of the same Helicobacter species might occur, underlining the need to establish an elaborate reference database containing as many isolates as possible. Hence, correct Helicobacter species identification, even with more aberrant isolates, should be possible. Overall, MALDI-TOF MS may correctly identify most Helicobacter species, although caution remains warranted.
While MALDI-TOF MS is considered a rapid and accurate tool for microbial identification, certain drawbacks must be considered [28,34]. One of the major limitations is that bacteria must be cultured prior to analysis, which decelerates the identification process. Indeed, due to their fastidious nature, gastric Helicobacter species are extremely difficult to isolate and cultivate in vitro [2,8]. The time needed for cultivation depends on the Helicobacter species and can vary between 24 and 72 h. Nevertheless, whenever an isolate is at hand, identification can be obtained within 10–30 min. While MALDI-TOF MS identification protocols without any or only limited prior cultivation have already been developed for body fluids such as blood; urine; and peritoneal, synovial, broncho-alveolar lavage; and cerebrospinal fluid [35,36,37,38], this is not the case for stomach fluids and mucosa. Development of a direct protocol is most likely hampered due to the difficulty of obtaining pure bacterial samples with sufficient concentrations (106–108 CFU/mL for certain fastidiously growing bacteria) and due to the presence of host (human/animal) material contamination, such as mucus proteins [33,39,40]. Nevertheless, development of a direct MALDI-TOF MS identification protocol is still of interest, as it would allow fast diagnosis in clinical practice, thereby providing more accurate prevalence data concerning gastric NHPH infections in human patients and animal hosts. The development of a protocol enabling MALDI-TOF MS identification on clinical gastric samples, even with prior cultivation, will take several months or even years and requires several critical steps, i.e., the search of different animal patients suspected to carry gastric Helicobacter spp., the collection of stomach samples of these animals (either alive or when recently died), and, most importantly, the optimization of culture conditions enabling growth of the bacteria in a liquid phase and simultaneously suppressing the growth of contaminants.
Another drawback is that culture conditions might affect the microbial physiology and protein expression profile of bacteria, causing alterations in the MALDI-TOF MS fingerprint [41]. The impact of cultivation medium on the quality (i.e., intensity and number of peaks) of MALDI-TOF MS spectra has already been reported for different bacterial species, including enterohepatic Helicobacter species [42,43,44,45,46]. Indeed, in our study, great spectral differences were revealed for 17 of 23 isolates cultured under both dry and biphasic conditions, while similar spectra were observed for the other 6 isolates (Table 3). Despite the impact on MSPs, the second-best match of the majority of the isolates cultured dry and biphasically did belong to the correct Helicobacter species. This was, however, not the case for several dry-cultured H. felis isolates and one dry-cultured H. salomonis isolate. In our study, 2 different types of medium (i.e., Brucella agar ± broth and BHI agar ± broth) were used for cultivation of gastric Helicobacter isolates. Only BHI agar generated MALDI-TOF peaks, of which the majority could also be demonstrated in the peak spectra of some Helicobacter isolates grown under dry conditions using BHI agar (Table S2). The earlier mentioned incorrect second-best match identifications of dry-cultured H. felis and H. salomonis isolates could thus be attributed to overlap in medium-specific peaks with other dry-cultured Helicobacter isolates. Indeed, the BHI agar-related peaks resulted in false-positive H. bizzozeronii, H. cetorum, H. felis and H. salomonis identifications. Recently, this phenomenon has also been described for MALDI-TOF MS identification of certain Mycoplasma species [47,48]. Gastric Helicobacter MALDI-TOF MS spectra of isolates grown under dry conditions using BHI agar might thus be contaminated with irrelevant medium-specific peaks, which might lead to incorrect identifications and great spectral differences between isolates grown under dry or biphasic conditions. Therefore, contamination with agar should be avoided as much as possible when spotting the bacteria onto the MALDI-TOF target plate, and, if feasible, cultivation under biphasic conditions should be considered.
Cultivation duration has also been shown to affect MALDI-TOF MS spectrum quality [25,44,49]. In general, it is advised to use fresh colonies for analysis (i.e., less than 48 h old) as spectra become weaker with increasing cultivation time, most likely due to ribosomal protein degradation [25]. However, cultivation length is mainly species dependent and for some bacteria, such as Listeria species, it has already been shown that extended periods of growth do not affect MALDI-TOF MS spectrum quality [50]. Because of the relatively slow growth and formation of small colonies, all gastric Helicobacter isolates were grown for 48–72 h to ensure sufficient material for MALDI-TOF MS identification. The yielded spectra were shown to be good, even after 72 h of incubation, further indicating that longer cultivation times can be feasible for MALDI-TOF analyses in certain bacterial species.
Unlike the phylogenetic tree based on the core genome of gastric Helicobacter species (Figure S5), no strict clustering of the different species was seen in the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram. While two separate H. suis clusters were visible, both contained mixed isolates from pigs and from non-human primates, indicating that the host species of origin does not play a major role in the formation of the MALDI-TOF subclusters. Furthermore, H. suis HS6 did not belong to either cluster, although H. suis HS1 to HS10 were all isolated from the gastric mucosa of sows using the same method [51,52]. The reason for the separate H. suis clusters remains, thus, unclear. The clustering of H. ailurogastricus with H. heilmannii is not a surprise as both species are phylogenetically very similar [53]. Subtyping within H. ailurogastricus has already been proposed, with H. ailurogastricus ASB 7.1, 21.1, and 23 showing more DNA overlap with H. heilmannii compared to H. ailurogastricus ASB 9.4, 11.2, and 13.2 [29,53]. This could thus explain the closer clustering of H. ailurogastricus ASB 7.1 and 23 to H. heilmannii compared to the other H. ailurogastricus isolates. H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1 was, unlike all other H. ailurogastricus isolates, grown under dry culture conditions, which might explain its distinct position in the dendrogram. The phylogenetically closely related H. cynogastricus and H. felis clustered together as well [29]. The clustering of some H. salomonis, H. bizzozeronii, and H. acinonychis isolates after dry cultivation within the main H. felis group could possibly be explained by the elimination of species-specific peaks when cultivated under dry conditions, leading to a peak pattern more similar to that of H. felis. Furthermore, the presence of medium-specific peaks might play an important role here as well, as discussed above. Similarly, H. felis JKM3 seems to lose H. felis–specific peaks when cultivated biphasically. The 3 H. cetorum isolates did not cluster together, which could possibly be explained by the difference in host species of isolation and/or living area of that host. MIT 01-5903 was isolated from a Pacific white-sided dolphin in Chicago (USA), whereas MIT 6096 and MIT 01-6202 originated an Atlantic bottle nose dolphin isolated in respectively Florida (USA) and Oahu (Hawaï) [54,55]. Finally, for some isolates, namely H. felis CS8 and 16937, there are no obvious reasons for the unusual localization in the dendrogram.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Helicobacter Isolates and Growth Conditions

To generate main spectrum profiles (MSPs), 35 H. suis isolates, 20 H. felis isolates, 9 H. bizzozeronii isolates, 7 H. salomonis isolates, 7 H. heilmannii isolates, 6 H. ailurogastricus isolates, 4 H. acinonychis isolates, 3 H. cetorum isolates, 1 H. cynogastricus isolate, and 1 H. baculiformis isolate were used. Genomes are available for 20 H. suis isolates, 19 H. felis isolates, 7 H. bizzozeronii isolates, 7 H. heilmannii isolates, 6 H. ailurogastricus isolates, 5 H. salomonis isolates, 4 H. acinonychis isolates, 2 H. cetorum isolates, 1 H. cynogastricus isolate, and 1 H. baculiformis isolate used in our study. All isolates together with their culture conditions, host of isolation, in vitro passage, and genome accession number (if available) are listed in Table S4.
The H. ailurogastricus, H. heilmannii, and H. suis isolates were cultivated according to the method described earlier [17]. In brief, bacteria were grown on Brucella agar (Becton-Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) supplemented with 20% inactivated fetal calf serum (Hyclone, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 5 mg/L amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), Campylobacter selective supplement (Skirrow, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK; containing 10 mg/L vancomycin, 5 mg/L trimethoprim lactate, and 2500 U/L Polymyxin B), and Vitox supplement (Oxoid). For all H. ailurogastricus (except H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1), H. heilmannii, and H. suis isolates, Brucella broth (Oxoid) was added on top of the agar to obtain biphasic culture conditions. The pH of both agar and broth was adjusted to 5 by adding HCl to a final concentration of 0.05%.
The H. acinonychis, H. baculiformis, H. bizzozeronii, H. cetorum, H. cynogastricus, H. felis, and H. salomonis isolates were grown on either brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% defibrinated horse blood (bioTRADING, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands), or Campylobacter selective supplement (Skirrow, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK; containing 10 mg/L vancomycin, 5 mg/L trimethoprim lactate, and 2500 U/L Polymyxin B), and Vitox supplement (Oxoid), or BHI broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added on top of the agar to obtain biphasic culture conditions. Two H. acinonychis isolates, 1 H. baculiformis isolate, 2 H. bizzozeronii isolates, 1 H. cynogastricus isolate, 13 H. felis isolates, and 4 H. salomonis isolates were grown at both dry and biphasic conditions.
All isolates were grown for 48–72 h under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2) at 37 °C and were passaged at least twice to ensure reliable growth.

4.2. Sample Preparation for MALDI-TOF MS Analysis

Similar to the methods described earlier [39,48], a single colony of the dry cultures was removed from the agar plates using a toothpick, after which it was deposited on an MSP 384 target polished steel BC plate (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in 8 replicates and overlaid with 1 µL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
From the biphasic cultures, 500–700 µL was placed in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifugated at 2400× g for 5 min. Supernatants were decanted, and pellets were washed twice with 500 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifugated for 5 min at 2400× g. Pellets were then resuspended in 20–100 µL PBS, after which 1 µL was spotted onto an MSP 384 target polished steel BC plate (Bruker Daltonics) in eight replicates, air dried and overlaid with 1 µL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution (Bruker Daltonics).
No prior extraction protocol was performed as earlier tests revealed lower spectra quality (i.e., more variance and more dispersion of the peaks) compared to direct spotting.

4.3. Generation of (Reference) Spectra

Mass spectra were generated using Autoflex III smartbeam MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and flexControl 1.4 software, version 3.4 (Bruker Daltonics). A bacterial test standard (BTS, Bruker Daltonics) was used in each run for calibration purposes and as a quality control. To generate the MSPs of the different Helicobacter isolates, the method described by Spergser et al. [39] was used. In short, 24 individual mass spectra from each isolate were obtained, consisting of 3 replicate measurements of the 8 wells described earlier. The quality of raw spectra was then evaluated using flexAnalysis 3.4 software (Bruker Daltonics), whereby flatline spectra, spectra diverging from the cohort core, and spectra displaying high background noise were deleted. After smoothing and baseline subtraction, a minimum of 20 spectra of high quality were selected for MSP creation using standard settings of the automated MSP creation functionality in MBT Compass Explorer 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics). Resulting MSPs were consecutively added to the in-house Helicobacter project database using Compass Explorer software.
A dendrogram of all the in-house Helicobacter MSPs was then generated using MBT Compass Explorer 4.1. Using BIONUMERICS 7 software (Applied Maths), we tried to further investigate the MALDI-TOF MS peak spectra. The raw spectra were curated, and cluster analysis was performed (Figure S6). Although minor differences in clusters could be detected, in general, similar results as those obtained with flexAnalysis 3.4 and MBT Compass Explorer 4.1 software were acquired.

4.4. Testing of Reproducibility

To confirm the reproducibility of the generated MALDI-TOF MS spectra, several H. ailurogastricus, H. heilmannii, and H. suis isolates were kept in culture for a longer period of time (with passing them every 48–72 h) and were analyzed at different timepoints. New MSPs were then created and log scores as well as dendrograms of these gastric Helicobacter MSPs were subsequently produced (Table S1, Figures S1–S3).

4.5. Testing of Culture Conditions

To identify whether culture conditions influence Helicobacter MALDI-TOF MS peak spectra, MSPs of 23 isolates were created after both dry and biphasic cultivation. Log scores of corresponding spectra of the same isolate were recorded (Table 3). Additionally, unseeded culture media (Brucella agar, Brucella broth, BHI agar, and BHI broth) were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS and resulting spectra were compared to those in the in-house Helicobacter database (Tables S2 and S3). Using the direct transfer method, a small amount (using a toothpick) of Brucella agar and BHI agar, and 1 µL of Brucella broth and BHI broth were spotted on a polished steel BC target plate (Bruker Daltonics) in 4 replicates. Spotted samples were covered with 1 µL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution and processed as described earlier.

5. Conclusions

Even though gastric NHPHs are fastidiously growing organisms, MALDI-TOF MS allows rapid differentiation between gastric NHPH isolates, provided that an extensive database is at hand. In current research, a database consisting of 93 isolates representing 10 NHPHs was constructed. While correct species identification could not be achieved using the commercial database, the in-house database correctly identified all individual mass spectra and resulted in 82% correct species identification based on the two highest log score matches (with log scores ≥2). However, spectra obtained under different growing conditions, for example dry versus biphasic growing conditions, may differ, and agar-medium-related peaks may influence reliability of the obtained results, as observed for 4 NHPHs (i.e., H. bizzozeronii, H. cetorum, H. felis, and H. salomonis). Although current results suggest that subtyping below the species level might also be possible for certain species, such as H. suis, this should be confirmed in future investigations. The presence of a robust MALDI-TOF MS database, as provided by this research, is a prerequisite for future MALDI-TOF MS analysis on clinical samples. However, further research enabling (direct) MALDI-TOF MS identification on gastric samples is needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/3/366/s1, Figure S1: Dendrogram of H. ailurogastricus isolates identified with MALDI-TOF MS at different timepoints, Figure S2: Dendrogram of H. heilmannii isolates identified with MALDI-TOF MS at different timepoints, Figure S3: Dendrogram of H. suis isolates identified with MALDI-TOF MS at different timepoints, Figure S4: A representative peak spectrum for each gastric Helicobacter species included in this study, Figure S5: Phylogenetic tree based on available core genomes of gastric Helicobacter isolates included in the MALDI-TOF MS analyses, Figure S6: BioNumerics dendrogram of 116 main spectrum profiles (MSPs) from gastric Helicobacter isolates used to create the in-house Helicobacter database, Table S1: Log scores of isolates with main spectrum profiles (MSPs) created at different timepoints, Table S2: Logarithmic identification score matches of brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar with the in-house Helicobacter database, Table S3: Overview of spectra (m/z)[Da] showing peaks of brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar similar to H. salomonis Inkinen, H. bizzozeronii 12A, H. cetorum MIT 01-6069, and H. felis M38 and M42 (within a deviation range of 10 Da), Table S4: Helicobacter isolates used in the current study to construct the in-house Helicobacter main spectrum profile (MSP) database.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B., C.D.W., F.B., and F.H.; data curation, H.B.; formal analysis, H.B. and C.D.W.; funding acquisition, F.B. and F.H.; investigation, H.B. and S.D.B.; methodology, H.B., F.B., and F.H.; project administration, H.B., F.B., and F.H.; resources, J.G.F., S.B., A.S., F.B., and F.H.; supervision, F.B. and F.H.; validation, H.B., S.D.B., and F.B.; visualization, H.B. and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B.; writing—review and editing, H.B., C.D.W., J.G.F., S.B., A.S., F.B., and F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Fund of Ghent University (BOF GOA 01G01014). The MALDI-TOF MS was financed by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) as a Hercules project [G0H2516N, AUGE/15/05].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and the supplemental material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mirko Rossi for providing H. bizzozeronii and H. salomonis isolates and Katleen Vranckx for her skilled assistance with the BIONUMERICS analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Solnick, J.V. Clinical significance of Helicobacter species other than Helicobacter pylori. Clin. Inf. Dis. 2003, 36, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Haesebrouck, F.; Pasmans, F.; Flahou, B.; Chiers, K.; Baele, M.; Meyns, T.; Decostere, A.; Ducatelle, R. Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 202–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Labigne, A.; Cussac, V.; Courcoux, P. Shuttle cloning and nucleotide sequences of Helicobacter pylori genes responsible for urease activity. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 1920–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Weeks, D.L.; Eskandari, S.; Scott, D.R.; Sachs, G. A H+-gated urea channel: The link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization. Science 2000, 287, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Solnick, J.V.; Schauer, D.B. Emergence of diverse Helicobacter species in the pathogenesis of gastric and enterohepatic diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 59–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sterzenbach, T.; Lee, S.K.; Brenneke, B.; von Goetz, F.; Schauer, D.B.; Fox, J.G.; Suerbaum, S.; Josenhans, C. Inhibitory effect of enterohepatic Helicobacter hepaticus on innate immune responses of mouse intestinal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 2717–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Zamani, M.; Ebrahimtabar, F.; Zamani, V.; Miller, W.H.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Shokri-Shirvani, J.; Derakhshan, M.H. Systemic review with meta-analysis: The worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 47, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kusters, J.G.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Øverby, A.; Murayama, S.Y.; Michimae, H.; Suzuki, H.; Suzuki, M.; Serizawa, H.; Tamura, R.; Nakamura, S.; Takahashi, S.; Nakamura, M. Prevalence of gastric non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters in Japanese patients with gastric disease. Digestion 2017, 95, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Groote, D.; van Doorn, L.J.; Ducatelle, R.; Verschuuren, A.; Tilmant, K.; Quint, W.H.; Haesebrouck, F.; Vandamme, P. Phylogenetic characterization of ‘Candidatus Helicobacter bovis’, a new gastric helicobacter in cattle. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999, 49, 1707–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Groote, D.; van Doorn, L.J.; Van den Bulck, K.; Vandamme, P.; Vieth, M.; Stolte, M.; Debongnie, J.C.; Burette, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. Detection of non-pylori Helicobacter species in "Helicobacter heilmannii"-infected humans. Helicobacter 2005, 10, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. García-Amado, M.A.; Al-Soud, W.A.; Borges-Landaéz, P.; Contreras, M.; Cedeño, S.; Baéz-Ramírez, E.; Domínguez-Bello, M.G.; Wadström, T.; Gueneau, P. Non-pylori helicobacteraceae in the upper digestive tract of asymptomatic Venezuelan subjects: Detection of Helicobacter cetorum-like and Candidatus Wolinella africanus-like DNA. Helicobacter 2007, 12, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Flahou, B.; Haesebrouck, F.; Smet, A. Non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacter infections in humans and animals. In Helicobacter Pylori Research, from Bench to bedside; Backert, S., Yamaoka, Y., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; pp. 233–269. [Google Scholar]
  14. Goto, K.; Ohashi, H.; Ebukuro, S.; Itoh, K.; Tohma, Y.; Takakura, A.; Wakana, S.; Ito, M.; Itoh, T. Isolation and characterization of Helicobacter species from the stomach of the house musk shrew (Suncus murinus) with chronic gastritis. Curr. Microbiol. 1998, 37, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Flahou, B.; Modrý, D.; Pomajbíková, K.; Petrželková, K.J.; Smet, A.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F.; Sá, R.M.; Todd, A.; Hashimoto, C.; et al. Diversity of zoonotic enterohepatic Helicobacter species and detection of a putative novel gastric Helicobacter species in wild and wild-born captive chimpanzees and western lowland gorillas. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 174, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Gruntar, I.; Papić, B.; Pate, M.; Zajc, U.; Ocepek, M.; Kušar, D. Helicobacter labacensis sp. nov., Helicobacter mehlei sp. nov., and Helicobacter vulpis sp. nov., isolated from gastric mucosa of red foxes (Vulpes Vulpes). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2395–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berlamont, H.; Smet, A.; De Bruyckere, S.; Boyen, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F.; De Witte, C. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Helicobacter suis isolates from pigs and macaques. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 239, 108459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Matos, R.; De Witte, C.; Smet, A.; Berlamont, H.; De Bruyckere, S.; Amorim, I.; Gärtner, F.; Haesebrouck, F. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Helicobacter heilmannii and Helicobacter ailurogastricus isolates. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Owen, R.J. Helicobacter-species classification and identification. Br. Med. Bull. 1998, 54, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bento-Miranda, M.; Figueiredo, C. Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato: An overview of the infection in humans. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 17779–17787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Blaecher, C.; Bauwens, E.; Tay, A.; Peters, F.; Dobbs, S.; Dobbs, J.; Charlett, A.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F.; Smet, A. A novel isolation protocol and probe-based RT-PCR for diagnosis of gastric infections with the zoonotic pathogen Helicobacter suis. Helicobacter 2016, 22, e12369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Anhalt, J.P.; Fenselau, C. Identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cain, T.; Lubman, D.M.; Weber, W.J. Differentiation of bacteria using protein profiles from matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 8, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wieser, A.; Schneider, L.; Jung, J.; Schubert, S. MALDI-TOF MS in microbiological diagnostics-identification of microorganisms and beyond (mini review). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Das, S.; Dash, H.R.; Mangwani, N.; Chakraborty, J.; Kumari, S. Understanding molecular identification and polyphasic taxonomic approaches for genetic relatedness and phylogenetic relationships of microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 103, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Murray, P.R. What is new in clinical microbiology-microbial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: A paper from the 2011 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on molecular pathology. J. Mol. Diagn. 2012, 14, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Seng, P.; Drancourt, M.; Gouriet, F.; La Scola, B.; Fournier, P.E.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: Routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smet, A.; Yahara, K.; Rossi, M.; Tay, A.; Backert, S.; Armin, E.; Fox, J.G.; Flahou, B.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F.; et al. Macroevolution of gastric Helicobacter species unveils interspecies admixture and time of divergence. ISME J. 2018, 12, 2518–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fox, J.G.; Correa, P.; Taylor, N.S.; Lee, A.; Otto, G.; Murphy, J.C.; Rose, R. Helicobacter mustelae-associated gastritis in ferrets: An animal model of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in humans. Gastroenterology 1990, 99, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fox, J.G.; Marin, R.P. Helicobacter mustelae infection in ferrets: Pathogenesis, epizootiology, diagnosis and treatment. Sem. Avian Exot. Pet Med. 2001, 10, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Croxatto, A.; Prod’hom, G.; Greub, G. Applications of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 380–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mörtelmaier, C.; Panda, S.; Robertson, I.; Krell, M.; Christodoulou, M.; Reichardt, N.; Mulder, I. Identification performance of MALDI-ToF-MS upon mono- and bi-microbial cultures is cell number and culture proportion dependent. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 7027–7038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jang, K.S.; Kim, Y.H. Rapid and robust MALDI-TOF MS techniques for microbial identification: A brief overview of their diverse applications. J. Micriobiol. 2018, 56, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, J.H.; Ho, P.L.; Kwan, G.S.W.; She, K.K.K.; Siu, G.K.H.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Yuen, K.Y.; Yam, W.C. Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kitagawa, K.; Shigemura, K.; Onuma, K.I.; Nishida, M.; Fujiwara, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Yamasaki, M.; Nakamura, T.; Yamamichi, F.; Shirakawa, T.; et al. Improved bacterial identification directly from urine samples with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32, e22301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Oviaño, M.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, B.; Gómara, M.; Alcalá, L.; Zvezdanova, E.; Ruíz, A.; Velasco, D.; Gude, M.J.; Bouza, E.; Bou, G. Direct identification of clinical pathogens from liquid culture media by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bokma, J.; Van Driessche, L.; Deprez, P.; Haesebrouck, F.; Vahl, M.; Weesendorp, E.; Deurenberg, R.H.; Pardon, B.; Boyen, F. Rapid identification of Mycoplasma bovis strains from bovine bronchoalveolar lavage fluid with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry after enrichment procedure. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00004-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Spergser, J.; Hess, C.; Loncaric, I.; Ramírez, A.S. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry is a superior diagnostic tool for the identification and differentiation of mycoplasmas isolated from animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e00316-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Van Driessche, L.; Bokma, J.; Deprez, P.; Haesebrouck, F.; Boyen, F.; Pardon, B. Rapid identification of respiratory bacterial pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in cattle by MALDI-TOF MS. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Welker, M. Proteomics for routine identification of microorganisms. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3143–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Valentine, N.; Wunschel, S.; Wunschel, D.; Petersen, C.; Wahl, K. Effect of culture conditions on microorganism identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wunschel, D.S.; Hill, E.A.; McLean, J.S.; Jarman, K.; Gorby, Y.A.; Valentine, N.; Wahl, K. Effects of varied pH, growth rate and temperature using controlled fermentation and batch culture on matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization whole cell protein fingerprints. J. Microbiol. Methods 2005, 62, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mazzeo, M.F.; Sorrentino, A.; Gaita, M.; Cacace, G.; Di Stasio, M.; Facchiano, A.; Comi, G.; Malorni, A.; Siciliano, R.A. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry for the discrimination of food-borne microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1180–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Alispahic, M.; Hummel, K.; Jandreski-Cvetkovic, D.; Nöbauer, K.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Hess, M.; Hess, C. Species-specific identification and differentiation of Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Campylobacter by full-spectral matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry analysis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Balážová, T.; Makovcová, J.; Šedo, O.; Slaný, M.; Faldyna, M.; Zdráhal, Z. The influence of culture conditions on the identification of Mycobacterium species by MALDI-TOF MS profiling. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 353, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lagacé-Wiens, P.R.S.; Abbott, A.A.; Karlowsky, J.A. CHROMagarTM orientation urine culture medium produces matrix-assisted laser desorption-time-of-flight mass spectrometry spectra misidentified as Mycoplasma arginini and Mycoplasma alkalescens. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 94, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bokma, J.; Pardon, B.; Deprez, P.; Haesebrouck, F.; Boyen, F. Non-specific, agar medium-related peaks can result in false positive Mycoplasma alkalescens and Mycoplasma arginini identification by MALDI-TOF MS. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 130, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Parisi, D.; Magliulo, M.; Nanni, P.; Casale, M.; Forina, M.; Roda, A. Analysis and classification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and a chemometric approach. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 2127–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barbuddhe, S.B.; Maier, T.; Schwarz, G.; Kostrzewa, M.; Hof, H.; Domann, E.; Chakraborty, T.; Hain, T. Rapid identification and typing of Listeria species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5402–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Baele, M.; Decostere, A.; Vandamme, P.; Ceelen, L.; Hellemans, A.; Mast, J.; Chiers, K.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Isolation and characterization of Helicobacter suis sp. nov. from pig stomachs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Liang, J.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F.; Smet, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Flahou, B. Multilocus sequence typing of the porcine and human gastric pathogen Helicobacter suis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Joosten, M.; Lindén, S.; Rossi, M.; Tay, A.C.Y.; Skoog, E.; Padra, M.; Peters, F.; Perkins, T.; Vandamme, P.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; et al. Divergence between the highly virulent zoonotic pathogen Helicobacter heilmannii and its closest relative, the low-virulence “Helicobacter ailurogastricus” sp. nov. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Harper, C.G.; Feng, Y.; Xu, S.; Taylor, N.S.; Kinsel, M.; Dewhirst, F.E.; Paster, B.J.; Greenwell, M.; Levine, G.; Rogers, A.; et al. Helicobacter cetorum sp. nov., a urease-positive Helicobacter species isolated from dolphins and whales. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 4536–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Harper, C.G.; Whary, M.T.; Feng, Y.; Rhinehart, H.L.; Wells, R.S.; Xu, S.; Taylor, N.S.; Fox, J.G. Comparison of diagnostic techniques for Helicobacter cetorum infection in Wild Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncates). J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2842–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 10 00366 g001a 550Pathogens 10 00366 g001b 550
Figure 1. Dendrogram of 116 main spectrum profiles (MSPs) from gastric Helicobacter isolates used to create the in-house Helicobacter database. The dendrogram created with MBT Compass Explorer 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics) of 116 Helicobacter isolate MSPs showed 9 main clusters, with (a) 1 H. suis cluster and 1 cluster with H. heilmannii and H. ailurogastricus and (b) a second H. suis cluster, 1 cluster with H. felis and H. cynogastricus; 1 H. baculiformis cluster; 1 cluster containing H. felis, H. cetorum, some H. salomonis, H. bizzozeronii, and H. acinonychis isolates; 1 H. salomonis cluster; 1 H. acinonychis cluster; and 1 H. bizzozeronii cluster with some H. felis isolates. All H. ailurogastricus (except H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1), H. heilmannii, and H. suis isolates were grown under biphasic culture conditions on Brucella agar + Brucella broth. H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1 was grown under dry culture conditions on Brucella agar. All H. acinonychis, H. baculiformis, H. bizzozeronii, H. cetorum, H. cynogastricus, H. felis, and H. salomonis isolates were grown under dry and/or biphasic (‘B’ mentioned behind isolate name) conditions on brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar ± BHI broth.
Figure 1. Dendrogram of 116 main spectrum profiles (MSPs) from gastric Helicobacter isolates used to create the in-house Helicobacter database. The dendrogram created with MBT Compass Explorer 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics) of 116 Helicobacter isolate MSPs showed 9 main clusters, with (a) 1 H. suis cluster and 1 cluster with H. heilmannii and H. ailurogastricus and (b) a second H. suis cluster, 1 cluster with H. felis and H. cynogastricus; 1 H. baculiformis cluster; 1 cluster containing H. felis, H. cetorum, some H. salomonis, H. bizzozeronii, and H. acinonychis isolates; 1 H. salomonis cluster; 1 H. acinonychis cluster; and 1 H. bizzozeronii cluster with some H. felis isolates. All H. ailurogastricus (except H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1), H. heilmannii, and H. suis isolates were grown under biphasic culture conditions on Brucella agar + Brucella broth. H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1 was grown under dry culture conditions on Brucella agar. All H. acinonychis, H. baculiformis, H. bizzozeronii, H. cetorum, H. cynogastricus, H. felis, and H. salomonis isolates were grown under dry and/or biphasic (‘B’ mentioned behind isolate name) conditions on brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar ± BHI broth.
Pathogens 10 00366 g001aPathogens 10 00366 g001b
Table
Table 1. Validation of the in-house Helicobacter database with the 20–24 individual spectra of 116 main spectrum profiles (MSPs).
Table 1. Validation of the in-house Helicobacter database with the 20–24 individual spectra of 116 main spectrum profiles (MSPs).
SpeciesNumber of
Isolates		Amount of
MSPs
Created		Hosts of IsolationMALDI-TOF log Score Best
Correct Match
Range		Best
Incorrect Match
(Maximum log Score)		Log difference Best Correct Match − Best Incorrect Match
H. acinonychis46Wild
felines		2.58–2.793rd match 0.12
H. salomonis (2.42)
H. ailurogastricus66Cat2.49–2.827th match 0.80
H. heilmannii (2.02)
H. baculiformis12Cat2.69–2.753rd match 0.67
H. cetorum (2.02)
H. bizzozeronii911Dog, cat,
human		2.40–2.814th match
H. felis (2.46) 		0.08
H. cetorum33Dolphin2.22–2.742nd match
H. bizzozeronii (2.16)		0.06
H. cynogastricus12Dog2.67–2.853rd match
H. felis (2.23)		0.62
H. felis2033Dog, cat2.32–2.812nd match
H. bizzozeronii (2.45)		0.14
H. heilmannii77Cat2.56–2.826th match
H. ailurogastricus (1.96)		0.64
H. salomonis711Dog2.48–2.812nd match
H. acinonychis (2.61)		0.05
H. suis3535Pigs, non-human primates2.45–2.885th match
H. felis (2.08)		0.66
Total93116 2.22–2.881.96–2.610.05–0.80
Table
Table 2. Individual spectra of isolate main spectrum profiles (MSPs) with second-best match not belonging to the correct Helicobacter species.
Table 2. Individual spectra of isolate main spectrum profiles (MSPs) with second-best match not belonging to the correct Helicobacter species.
Individual Spectra of Isolate Log Score
Best MSP Match 		Second-Best MatchLog Score
Second-Best MSP Match *		Log
Difference
H. ailurogastricus ASB 21.1 D2.49H. heilmannii ASB1.4 kol B1.910.58
H. bizzozeronii 10 D2.46H. felis JKM3 D2.340.12
H. bizzozeronii 12A D2.40H. cetorum MIT 01-6096 D2.220.18
H. bizzozeronii Heydar B2.78H. felis CS8 B1.870.91
H. bizzozeronii R1051 D2.60H. felis CS8 D2.420.18
H. cetorum MIT 01-5903 D2.74H. felis M29 kol D1.900.84
H. cetorum MIT 01-6096 D2.22H. bizzozeronii 12A D2.160.06
H. felis CS8 D2.59H. bizzozeronii R1051 D2.450.14
H. felis JKM3 D2.57H. cetorum MIT 01-6096 D2.410.16
H. felis M38 D2.45H. acinonychis Hacino3 D1.800.65
H. felis M39 D2.54H. cetorum MIT 01-6096 D2.190.35
H. salomonis Inkinen D2.66H. acinonychis 1L D2.610.05
* Second-best MSP matches with log scores <1.70 are not listed; D: dry cultivation; B: biphasic cultivation.
Table
Table 3. Logarithmic identification scores of isolates at different culture conditions.
Table 3. Logarithmic identification scores of isolates at different culture conditions.
SpeciesIsolateLog Score B to DLog Score D to B
H. acinonychis1L0.761.48
Hacino31.101.79
H. baculiformisM502.452.44
H. bizzozeroniiM201.972.13
ASB 22 kol 151.722.16
H. cynogastricusJKM42.342.43
H. felisCS1 2.222.06
CS61.831.65
CS82.311.92
DS12.122.30
Dog71.971.97
JKM31.671.02
M292.092.31
M381.761.31
M39 < 01.04
M421.561.66
1-1602 kol21.781.30
1-1602 kol32.052.00
1-1602 kol42.161.75
H. salomonisKokIII1.901.56
Alma05952.101.51
Inkinen0.69<0
Elvira II 1.981.90
<0–2.45<0–2.44
Log score B to D: correspondence of the 20–24 individual spectra of the isolate grown at biphasic conditions compared to the isolate main spectrum profile (MSP) grown at dry conditions. Log score D to B: correspondence of the 20–24 individual spectra of the isolate grown at dry conditions compared to the isolate MSP grown at biphasic conditions. Green log score values: ≥2 acceptable for identification at species level; orange log score values: ≥1.70 acceptable for identification at genus level; red log score values <1.70 (Bruker recommendations).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berlamont, H.; De Witte, C.; De Bruyckere, S.; Fox, J.G.; Backert, S.; Smet, A.; Boyen, F.; Haesebrouck, F. Differentiation of Gastric Helicobacter Species Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Pathogens 2021, 10, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030366

AMA Style

Berlamont H, De Witte C, De Bruyckere S, Fox JG, Backert S, Smet A, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F. Differentiation of Gastric Helicobacter Species Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Pathogens. 2021; 10(3):366. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berlamont, Helena, Chloë De Witte, Sofie De Bruyckere, James G. Fox, Steffen Backert, Annemieke Smet, Filip Boyen, and Freddy Haesebrouck. 2021. "Differentiation of Gastric Helicobacter Species Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry" Pathogens 10, no. 3: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10030366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop