Next Article in Journal
Inhibition Effect of Non-Host Plant Volatile Extracts on Reproductive Behaviors in the Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus)
Next Article in Special Issue
Response of Chironomids (Diptera, Chironomidae) to Environmental Factors at Different Spatial Scales
Previous Article in Journal
Control Potential of Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV) Isolated from Fall Armyworm in Nigeria (West Africa)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Odonata Assemblages in Urban Semi-Natural Wetlands
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/insects15040226
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Emergence of the Family Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Lotic Karst Habitats: A Case Study over 15 Years

by
Ana Klarin
1,
Marija Ivković
2 and
Vlatka Mičetić Stanković
3,*
1
Lojenov prilaz 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(4), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040226
Submission received: 6 February 2024 / Revised: 18 March 2024 / Accepted: 22 March 2024 / Published: 26 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aquatic Insects: Diversity, Ecology and Evolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study is a case study on the diversity patterns, population aspects, emergence and ecological drivers of the so-far poorly studied water beetle family Scirtidae. Although they can be very abundant in karstic lotic freshwater habitats, there are still insufficient data on their biology and ecology. The family was studied over a period of 15 years in specific lotic habitats of springs and tufa barriers in the karst freshwater ecosystem of Plitvice Lakes NP, Croatia. Scirtidae showed a longitudinal gradient, as the genus Elodes was recorded only in the spring area, while the genus Hydrocyphon was found only in downstream sites with tufa barriers. Their emergence showed a seasonal character, with males dominating earlier in the season and females appearing later. The type of substrate determined their distribution, with a preference for bryophytes. Their abundance and emergence were primarily determined according to the parameters that showed the greatest fluctuations over the 15-year period: water discharge, water temperature and oxygen saturation. Compared to previous results from similar studies on other insect groups, our results clearly show the high potential of the family Scirtidae as indicators of habitat quality.

Abstract

Due to ongoing changes and a decline in biodiversity, science today should rely on long-term species-based ecological studies. We have conducted a long-term ecological dynamics study on the water beetle family Scirtidae, which, although it is very abundant in benthic communities, is still poorly studied. The main objective of this study was to investigate the population aspects (composition, diversity, sex ratio) and ecological aspects (emergence patterns, seasonal dynamics and preferences for environmental factors) of the family Scirtidae over 15 years in Plitvice Lakes NP, Croatia. The study was conducted at three sites and in five different substrate types. A total of three taxa with different distributions were recorded in the study area: Hydrocyphon novaki and H. deflexicollis on the tufa barriers and the Elodes sp. in the spring area. The sex ratio was in favour of males in spring and early summer, while it shifted in favour of females towards the end of autumn. The abundance and emergence of the family were primarily determined by the environmental parameters which showed the greatest fluctuations over a period of 15 years: water temperature, water discharge and oxygen saturation. Our results clearly show that Scirtidae can be used as indicators of stream zonation and habitat quality. Based on the methodology and the results of this study, we conclude that Scirtidae should be used in future monitoring and protection measures in karst freshwater habitats in southeastern Europe.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Water beetles are an ecological group of Coleoptera that is connected with water in at least one stage of their development [1]. They have colonised numerous types of aquatic habitats, with the exception of marine ones [2]. More than 13,000 species of water beetles have been described worldwide so far [2,3]. The families with the highest species richness are Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae, followed by Elmidae, Hydraenidae, Gyrinidae and Scirtidae. They are used as indicators of water quality and the ecological functionality of water ecosystems [4], regional biodiversity [5,6] and ongoing climate change [7].
The family Scirtidae is one of the most species-rich families of water beetles, with more than 1800 species described worldwide to date [8]. Jäch [1] defines them as false water beetles, as the adult stage emerges on land. Scirtids are distributed in all zoogeographical regions, with the greatest diversity found in tropical and temperate regions in the Northern Hemisphere [9]. Although they can dominate benthic invertebrate communities [10,11], data on their biology and ecology are very scarce. Recently, the family came into focus when Nadein et al. [12] presented their detailed study on the distinct jumping mechanism of the marsh beetle Scirtes hemisphaericus (Linnaeus). The distinctiveness of the family is also highlighted by the copulation of the genera Contacyphon and Hydrocyphon, in which females penetrate males with a unique structure (prehensor) to extract spermatophores, which is very rare in the animal world [13,14,15].
Southeastern Europe is considered a hotspot of biodiversity [16,17], especially the Dinaric karst region. This region extends from northeastern Italy to Albania [18,19], where many endemic species have been recorded so far [20,21,22]. Karst freshwater habitats are particularly affected nowadays, as climate change, water use and spring water diversion seriously alter their morphology and hydrology (e.g., [19,23]). Plitvice Lakes NP is one such sensitive ecosystem, known for numerous springs, a barrage lake system and tufa barriers. Tufa formation depends strongly on the stability of self-biodynamic processes, which are extremely sensitive to anthropogenic pressure [24].
In Croatia, 7 genera and 15 species of scirtids have been discovered so far [11,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Mičetić Stanković et al. [11,31] studied them as part of the water beetle community in karst lotic habitats and provided the first data on the biology and ecology of the family in these habitats. They have found that scirtids are very abundant in tufa barriers and indicate the zonation of the stream, with its distribution defined by the current velocity and canopy cover. Many studies have focused on the emergence of aquatic insects in karst freshwater habitats in southeastern Europe so far: Diptera (e.g., [32,33]), Trichoptera (e.g., [34]), Ephemeroptera (e.g., [35]) and Plecoptera (e.g., [36]). The latter studies have found that water temperature and photoperiod are key factors in the emergence patterns of aquatic insects. On the contrary, the emergence of the family Scirtidae has never been studied before. Studies that focus on long-term data are scarce, with only a handful undertaken on aquatic insects [37], with just a few in karstic habitats [35,38,39,40]. Long-term studies are the only type of studies that can tackle the influence of climate change on these communities, especially when it comes to pristine habitats, such as Plitvice Lakes NP [37,38].
The present study in a lotic karst freshwater system aimed to fill the knowledge gap on the population and emergence patterns and ecological drivers of the family Scirtidae. The objectives of the present study were to analyse its (i) diversity and composition; (ii) sex ratio; (iii) and emergence patterns and (iv) the impact of environmental characteristics on Scirtidae. This study will contribute not only to our overall knowledge on freshwater biodiversity but also to the conservation of exceptional karst habitats.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Plitvice Lakes National Park is world-famous for its cascade system of 16 lakes connected by beautiful waterfalls and tufa barriers. It was designated as a national park back in 1949 and internationally recognised as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1979 [24]. An area of 295 km2 is located in the Dinaric continental sub-ecoregion with a moderately warm, rainy and snowy climate [24] (Figure 1). The greatest precipitation falls in the autumn and winter months. The air temperature varies greatly and can drop to −25 °C in winter, while it can exceed 30 °C in summer [41,42,43]. The lakes are mainly fed by the Matica River, which was formed by the confluence of two mountain rivers, the Bijela rijeka river and the Crna rijeka river [24]. The geological bedrock consists of carbonates and dolomites, which form a cavernous, shallow karst rich in springs and streams [44]. The unique hydrogeological characteristics of the park result in a cascade system where the lower lakes are buried in limestone, while the upper lakes are elevated by tufa barriers. The water in the catchment area is rich in calcium salts and is limited in organic matter with a pH of around 8. These conditions, combined with the presence of algae and bryophytes, favour the formation of tufa [44,45]. Tufa barriers are geological formations characterised by a porous and layered structure. These barriers can vary in size and shape, ranging from small dams to extensive formations, and they play crucial roles in shaping aquatic ecosystems by influencing the water flow and sediment deposition and providing habitats for various plant and animal species [24].
To investigate the emergence patterns of the family Scirtidae, both the spring area and the tufa barriers of the lake system were investigated in the present study: the Spring of the Bijela rijeka river (SBR), the Labudovac tufa barrier (TBL) and the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier (TKM). The characteristics of the sites and the defined substrate types are listed in Table 1.

2.2. Sampling and Identification

The emergence patterns and biological and ecological characteristics of Scirtidae were studied over 15 years—from February 2007 to December 2022. The samples from 2015 were unfortunately lost in a terrible earthquake that struck Zagreb in 2020. Emergence traps in the form of four-sided pyramid structures were used, which were set up at three study sites. At the spring of the Bijela rijeka river and the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier, six traps were set throughout the study period. At the Labudovac tufa barrier, six traps were initially set between 2007 and 2011, and in 2012, an additional trap was set, making a total of seven traps. The traps were placed in different microhabitats, depending on the type of substrate and the current velocity (Table 1). Each emergence trap had a height of 50 cm and a base area of 45 cm × 45 cm. The side frames of the traps were covered with a 1 mm thick mesh net, which was securely fixed in the streambed but still allowed the benthos to move freely. Collecting containers were placed at the apex of each trap, filled with a preservative solution of 2% formaldehyde with detergent. Sampling was undertaken monthly, and the collected material was preserved and treated with 80% ethanol. The specimens were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level following Klausnitzer [45]. Within the family Scirtidae, the genera can be easily distinguished by their external morphological characters, including their antennae, legs, elytra and pronotum. However, identification of the species requires dissection and examination of the genital structures. While most representatives of Scirtidae as well as other beetles can be identified according to the morphology of the male genitalia, the females of the genus Hydrocyphon can be successfully distinguished at the species level according to the structure of their reproductive system—the prehensor. This structure is missing in the females of the genus Elodes. The voucher specimens are housed in the Croatian Natural History Museum (HPM) in Zagreb.

2.3. Abiotic and Biotic Environmental Parameters

The following physical and chemical properties of the water were measured at each sampling site: water temperature and oxygen saturation (using a WTW Oxi 330/SET oximeter, Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany)), pH (using a WTW pH 340i, Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany), conductivity (using a WTW Cond 340i, Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany) and alkalinity (through titration with 0.1 M HCl). Daily average discharge values were provided by the Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service. The data on ammonia, orthophosphate and nitrogen were provided by the Plitvice Lakes National Park Public Institution. The current velocity and water temperature were measured at each microhabitat, where emergence traps were placed using a current velocity meter (a P-670-M series, Dostmann electronic, Wertheim, Germany)and a HOBO Pendant Temperature Data Logger (#Part UA-001-XX, Bourne, MA, USA), respectively. Depth was measured using a hand meter on a metal stick.

2.4. Data Analysis

Various biological and ecological aspects of the family Scirtidae in the Plitvice Lakes NP were analysed. This included diversity patterns (number of species, abundance and longitudinal distribution), population aspects (the sex ratio), emergence patterns (which refer to the timing and frequency of emergence and its seasonal dynamics) and the impact of environmental characteristics on Scirtidae (including preferences for current velocity, water depth, temperature, pH, alkalinity, oxygen levels, nutrient availability, conductivity and substrate type). The sex ratio (♂:♀) was defined according to the scirtids’ abundance on a monthly and annual basis [46]. Sex ratio differences were tested using Friedman’s Two-way Analysis of Variance by Rank with Bonferroni correction. The variation in the sex ratio due to substrate type and season was tested using a General Linear Model (GLM). Month was used as a random factor due to temporal pseudo-replication [47]. Prior to the analysis, the biological data were log-transformed.
All the data were tested for normality using D’Agostino’s K-squared test and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test. ANOSIM analysis [48,49] was used to test for differences in the scirtids’ abundance between sampling sites. The influence of the physical and chemical water properties on the scirtids’ emergence was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) at both the microhabitat and site levels. All the analyses were conducted separately for males and females. The site-level analysis included three taxa and nine physical and chemical parameters (water temperature, pH, alkalinity, oxygen, nutrients, conductivity) for three sites. The microhabitat-level analysis included three taxa and two physical parameters (current velocity and water depth) for a total of 19 microhabitats. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the complete faunal and environmental data for all three sites. The biological data were log-transformed before analysis, while the physical and chemical data were normalised; a full draftsman’s plot was created for interrelation analysis. Ten physical and chemical parameters were used (water temperature, pH, conductivity, oxygen saturation, alkalinity, nitrates, nitrites, orthophosphates, ammonium, water discharge) at three study sites from 2007 to 2022. The analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 [50] and the software package Canoco for Windows ver. 5.0 [51,52]. Graphs and illustrations were created using Adobe® Illustrator® CS6 [53] and Grapher ™20 [54].

3. Results

3.1. Faunal Assemblage and Distribution

During the study period of 15 years, a total of 5845 specimens of scirtids were collected and included in the analyses, representing two genera, Hydrocyphon and Elodes, and three species: Hydrocyphon deflexicollis (Müller), Hydrocyphon novaki Nyholm and the Elodes sp. When comparing the species abundance between the years of the study, 2013 was singled out as the year with the highest total abundance, with 1669 specimens. The lowest abundance was recorded in 2008, with a total of only 137 specimens altogether. The distribution of the scirtids showed a zonal character, as the genus Elodes was only recorded in the spring area, while Hydrocyphon was only found at the tufa barriers. The highest abundance was recorded at the Labudovac tufa barrier, with a total of 5230 specimens. At the other tufa barrier, Kozjak–Milanovac, a total of 566 specimens were recorded, while at the spring of the Bijela rijeka river, only 48 specimens were collected (Figure 2). H. novaki was more abundant than H. deflexicollis throughout the study period, except in 2013, when it was the other way around. H. deflexicollis then contributed 845 specimens to the highest total abundance reported for the Labudovac tufa barrier. At the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier, scirtids reached the highest abundance in 2019 with 103 specimens, of which 96 were H. novaki. No H. deflexicollis specimens were recorded at the same site in 2012. At the spring of the Bijela rijeka river, the abundance of the genus Elodes was generally low, as the highest abundance was 20 specimens (in 2020). Moreover, the genus was not recorded at all for a period of eight years (from 2008 to 2016). Thus, due to its very low abundance, Elodes was omitted from Figure 2.
The ANOSIM analysis of the studied sites revealed significant differences in the scirtid abundance (R = 0.635, p = 0.01, p < 0.05). Cluster analysis of the studied sites at the temporal and spatial scales showed the highest similarity between the years 2009 and 2012 at the Labudovac tufa barrier and the years 2007 and 2010 at the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier. The highest similarity between the tufa barriers was found for the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier in 2013 and the Labudovac tufa barrier in 2010 (Figure 3).

3.2. Sex Ratio and Emergence Patterns

Only the genus Hydrocyphon was included in the sex ratio analysis, as, surprisingly, only females of the genus Elodes were recorded during the whole study period (Figure 2). The sex ratios of the two Hydrocyphon species differed at the spatial and temporal scales. The abundance of females and males differed between sites (Hydrocyphon novaki, female: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; male: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; H. deflexicollis, female: p = 0.028, p < 0.05; male p = 0.001, p < 0.05). Male specimens of H. novaki were more numerous than females, except in 2014 and 2018 at the Labudovac tufa barrier and in 2016 and 2018 at the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier. It is noteworthy that only females were recorded in 2016. The sex ratio was also in favour of males for H. deflexicollis at both tufa barriers, except in 2021 (Labudovac tufa barrier) and 2017 (Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier), when females were more numerous. Moreover, the sex ratio differed according to the season, so the highest sex ratio value was reported in June, when males were considerably more abundant than females. On the other hand, females were more abundant in the summer months of July and August (Hydrocyphon novaki, female: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; male: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; H. deflexicollis, female: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; male p = 0.001, p < 0.05). Water discharge also proved to be an important factor in determining the differences between the abundance of females and males at the study sites (Hydrocyphon novaki, female: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; male: p = 0.001, p < 0.05; H. deflexicollis, female: p = 0.029, p < 0.05; male p = 0.002, p < 0.05).
The highest abundance of emerged scirtids was recorded In summer. At the spring of the Bijela rijeka river, the earliest time of emergence for the Elodes sp. was recorded in June in 2007, 2017, 2020 and 2021. The latest time of emergence was found to be in September in 2007 and 2020. In 2017 and 2021, their emergence had ended already in July. At the tufa barriers, the earliest time of emergence for Hydrocyphon novaki was recorded in May, and the highest abundance was reached in June. At the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier, the emergence of the species ended before July in 2009, 2012, 2018 and 2021. The latest time of emergence was in August, except in 2010 and 2012, when the species was also recorded in September. The emergence of H. deflexicollis mostly started in June, except in 2010, 2011 and 2014, when the species was recorded in July. The month when the species reached the highest abundance varied during the study period—June, July or August. The emergence of the species mostly ended in September, except in 2007, 2011, 2012 and 2016, when it was over in August. Exceptionally, in 2017 and 2018, a specimen was also recorded in October and even in November in 2021 (Figure 4).

3.3. Environmental Characteristics and Scirtids

The environmental characteristics of the study area are presented in Table 1. The parameters measured in the spring area showed less variation compared to those at the tufa barriers. Thus, both the highest and lowest water temperatures were measured at the Kozjak–Milanovac barrier (22.95 °C and 1.66 °C, respectively). The water alkalinity and conductivity decreased downstream, while pH and oxygen saturation were highest at the downstream Kozjak–Milanovac site. The nutrient concentrations were mostly low at all the study sites (Table 1).
When analysed at the microhabitat level, Spearman’s coefficient showed that the abundance of the two Hydrocyphon species correlated with the current velocity (H. novaki: ρ = 0.228, ρ = 0.197, p < 0.001; H. deflexicollis: ρ = 0.152, p < 0.05). At the Labudovac tufa barrier, for example, the highest abundance of beetles was recorded in 2013 (especially in microhabitat P7) when the current velocity was low. In contrast, scirtids were less abundant in the gravel and sand substrate when the water velocity was higher, as was the case at both barriers in 2014. The Elodes sp. showed a preference for lower water velocities (ρ = −0.123, p < 0.05). The principal component analysis at the microhabitat level, which included three taxa and two parameters (water depth and current velocity), confirmed these results with eigenvalues for the first two axes of 0.7764 and 0.0992 and a cumulative explanation for the variation of 87.56% (Figure 5).
At the Labudovac tufa barrier, the bryophyte substrate enabled a higher abundance of scirtids compared to the gravel and sand substrates. At the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier, where three main substrate types were defined, byropyhtes again proved to be the prefered substrate type for both Hydrocyphon species. Angiosperms, on the other hand, encountered the lowest abundance of scirtids. At the spring of the Bijela river, the Elodes sp. was most frequently found in the bryophytes, while it was absent in gravel and sand (Figure 6).
Based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient for scirtids and the site-level environmental characteristics, both sexes of both Hydrocyphon species were positively correlated with water temperature (H. novaki: male ρ = 0.385, female ρ = 0.325; H. deflexicollis: ρ = 0.358, ρ = 0.393, p < 0.01). Both sexes of H. novaki and males of H. deflexicollis were also positively correlated with pH (H. novaki male ρ = 0.326, female ρ = 0.389; H. deflexicollis male ρ = 0.319, ρ = −0.783, p < 0.001). On the contrary, a strong negative correlation was recorded for both species with water discharge (H. novaki male ρ = −0.886, female ρ = −0.891; H. deflexicollis male ρ = −0.842, ρ = −0.783, p < 0.001) and with nutrients—i.e., nitrates (H. novaki male ρ = −0.512, female ρ = −0.613; H. deflexicollis male ρ = −0.519, ρ = −0.522, p < 0.001). Additionally, the genus Elodes showed no significant correlation with the environmental parameters.
Three taxa and ten physico-chemical parameters in 19 microhabitats were included in the principal component analysis. On the F1 × F2 ordination plot (Figure 5), the eigenvalues for the first two axes were 0.9171 and 0.0481 with a cumulative explanation for the variation of 96.52%. Both axes showed the strongest correlation with water temperature (R = −0.3345; R = −0.3389). Based on ordination, the Elodes sp. showed the strongest positive correlation with alkalinity, orthophosphates and oxygen saturation and a negative one with water temperature. Water temperature was the most important factor for both sexes of H. deflexicollis. Females and males of H. novaki showed a positive correlation with conductivity and pH.

4. Discussion

4.1. Faunal Asemblage and Distribution

The family Scirtidae has been studied from the perspective of taxonomy [55,56] and specific ecological traits [57,58,59], but its emergence patterns and environmental drivers have been poorly studied. Therefore, the present study is the first ever comprehensive long-term study of the biological and ecological data and diversity patterns, as well as the emergence aspects, of this family.
Matoničkin et al. [60] and Mičetić Stanković et al. [11,61] reported the occurrence of the species Hydrocyphon deflexicollis and genus Elodes in Plitvice Lakes NP, which is consistent with our study.
In the present study, another species for this area, Hydrocyphon novaki, was also reported. The longitudinal zonation of the family is confirmed [11], as the genus Elodes inhabits only the spring area, while Hydrocyphon lives in the downstream sections. A high abundance of scirtids at the tufa barriers is also confirmed, with the highest numbers not at the Kozjak–Milanovac tufa barrier but at the Labudovac tufa barrier. These high abundances can be explained by the presence of various microhabitats typical of tufa barriers that constitute “freshwater coral reefs” [62,63,64]. Moreover, organically enriched water pours over these barriers, allowing the development of a rich phytobenthic layer (see more in [65]) and the accumulation of detritus, which is the preferred food for Hydrocyphon species [66,67]. Bryophytes proved to be the preferred substrate type for both genera of scirtids, which is consistent with previous studies [2,11,68].

4.2. Sex Ratio and Emergence Patterns

The sex ratio of water beetles is generally poorly known and studied [69]. The low number of Elodes representatives could have been caused by an inadequate sampling method. In particular, Klausnitzer [66] noted that their pupation takes place above the water surface. It is noteworthy that the authors carried out additional sampling of male adults at the spring of the Bijela rijeka river, but without success. The sex ratio of Hydrocyphon varied greatly during the study period, with males predominating, which was also suggested by Cuppen [57]. Juliano [70] studied dytiscids and reported that males emerge first to secure copulation with females, who emerge later. The same pattern was observed in our study.
Our results are consistent with the idea that representatives of Hydrocyphon are univoltine [66]. Emergence occurs in the summer months [57], with water temperature being the limiting factor [71].

4.3. Environmental Characteristics and Scirtids

The abiotic parameters showed a longitudinal change in their values, as has been already confirmed in various studies (e.g., [11,32,33,40,72]). Furthermore, the water is an oligotrophic hydrosystem rich in carbonates [24]. Water temperature proved to be the most important environmental factor for the emergence of the family Scirtidae in the studied area. This is already known for many other aquatic insects groups inhabiting Plitvice Lakes NP [32,33,35,36,40,72,73,74]. The water temperature influences the individual growth rate, metabolism and thus the timing of emergence of aquatic insects [75,76,77]. In 2013, a considerably higher abundance was reported at the Labudovac tufa barrier, possibly due to the warm winter of 2012/2013, when the minimum water temperatures were quite high [72]. Since Hydrocyphon overwinters in the larval stage [66], higher temperatures affected their growth and reproductive success, as well as their timing and emergence patterns, in the coming year. Furthermore, this high increase in their abundance can be explained by the recovery of the population after the great drought of 2011/2012 [39]. The heavy loss of precipitation with significantly reduced water discharge was accompanied by the absence of differences in water temperature, as this ecosystem is predominantly fed by groundwater. Moreover, water discharge proved to be one of the most important factors in determining the abundance of scirtids, as already confirmed in previous studies for other aquatic insects in the same habitats [38]. The latter study showed that the duration of precipitation and snow cover changes in the area led to strong seasonal fluctuations in water discharge, which of course strongly affects benthic organisms. The current velocity apparently plays an important role in the assemblage and composition of scirtids, which was already suggested by Mičetić Stanković et al. [11] in the same area. These results are in accordance with studies on scirtids in other freshwater habitats [31,57,78]. Moreover, scirtids were less abundant during the years when the current velocities were higher in the microhabitats with gravel and sand than during the years when the velocity was lower.
In conclusion, our study represents the first comprehensive study of the emergence patterns of the still-overlooked water beetles of the family Scirtidae. Many of its results are the first to be reported for scirtids and thus contribute to our overall knowledge on water beetle biodiversity in this part of Europe. The family proved its potential to be used as an indicator of stream zonation. The sex ratio is in favour of males in the spring and early summer, while it shifts in favour of females towards the end of their emergence. Their emergence shows a seasonal character, as the highest intensity is recorded in summer. Primarily water temperature, secondarily current velocity and oxygen saturation played an important role in the abundance and distribution of scirtids. This study is not only a basis for further studies on the emergence of water beetles but also for monitoring today’s vulnerable karst freshwater ecosystems in the light of ongoing climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.I. and V.M.S.; methodology, A.K., M.I. and V.M.S.; validation, V.M.S.; formal analysis, A.K. and V.M.S.; investigation, A.K. and M.I.; data curation, A.K., M.I. and V.M.S.; writing—original draft, V.M.S.; writing—review and editing, A.K., M.I. and V.M.S.; visualisation, V.M.S.; supervision, M.I. and V.M.S.; funding acquisition, M.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a project with Plitvice Lakes (FEN-PLI 106-F19-00081) and the Ministry of Science and Education of Croatia (MZOS-119-1193080-3076).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the reported results can be provided upon contacting the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express special thanks to Miljenko Ivković for help in the field, to Mladen Kerovec and Zlatko Mihaljević for the financial support, to many students for their help with the sample isolations and to Igor Stanković for help with the graphic work and illustrations. We thank the anonymous reviewers who substantially improved our work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jäch, M.A. Annotated Check List of Aquatic and Riparian/Littoral Beetle Families of the World. In Water Beetles of China; Jäch, M.A., Ji, L., Eds.; Zoologisch-Botanische Gesellschaft in Österreich und Wiener Koleopterologen Verein: Wien, Austria, 1998; pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jäch, M.A.; Balke, M. Global Diversity of Water Beetles (Coleoptera) in Freshwater. Hydrobiologia 2008, 595, 419–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Short, A.E.Z. Systematics of Aquatic Beetles (Coleoptera): Current State and Future Directions. Syst. Entomol. 2018, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brojer, M.; Jäch, M.; Kodada, J.; Moog, O. Coleoptera: Water Beetles Sl. In Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes; Moog, O., Hartmann, A., Eds.; Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft: Wien, Austria, 2017; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sánchez-Fernández, D.; Abellán, P.; Velasco, J.; Millán, A. Selecting Areas to Protect the Biodiversity of Aquatic Ecosystems in a Semiarid Mediterranean Region Using Water Beetles. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. 2004, 14, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abellán, P.; Sánchez-Fernández, D.; Velasco, J.; Millán, A. Assessing Conservation Priorities for Insects: Status of Water Beetles in Southeast Spain. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 121, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elliott, J.M. The Ecology of Riffle Beetles (Coleoptera: Elmidae). Freshw. Rev. 2008, 1, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Libonatti, M.L.; Ruta, R. Family Scirtidae. In Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 599–603. ISBN 978-0-12-804223-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruta, R.; Klausnitzer, B.; Prokin, A. South American Terrestrial Larva of Scirtidae (Coleoptera: Scirtoidea): The Adaptation of Scirtidae Larvae to Saproxylic Habitat Is More Common than Expected: Terrestrial Scirtidae Larvae. Austral Entomol. 2017, 57, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Klečka, J. The Structure and Dynamics of a Water Beetle Community in a Semipermanent Wetland (Vrbenské Rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia). Master’s Thesis, The University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mičetić Stanković, V.; Jäch, M.A.; Ivković, M.; Stanković, I.; Kružić, P.; Kučinić, M. Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Species Traits of Water Beetles along an Oligotrophic Hydrosystem: A Case Study. Ann. Limnol.-Int. J. Lim. 2019, 55, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nadein, K.; Kovalev, A.; Gorb, S. Jumping Mechanism in the Marsh Beetles (Coleoptera: Scirtidae). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nyholm, T. Zur Morphologie und Funktion des Helodiden-Aedoeagus (Col.). Insect Syst. Evol. 1972, 3, 81–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jolivet, P. Inverted Copulation. In Encyclopedia of Entomology; Capinera, J.L., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 2014–2044. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zwick, P.; Klausnitzer, B.; Ruta, R. Contacyphon Gozis, 1886 Removed from Synonymy (Coleoptera: Scirtidae) to Accommodate Species so Far Combined with the Invalid Name, Cyphon Paykull, 1799. Entomol. Bl. Coleopt. 2013, 109, 337–353. [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Da Fonseca, G.A.; Kent, J. Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ivković, M.; Plant, A. Aquatic Insects in the Dinarides: Identifying Hotspots of Endemism and Species Richness Shaped by Geological and Hydrological History Using Empididae (Diptera). Insect Conserv. Divers. 2015, 8, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bonacci, O. Karst Hydrology and Water Resources—Past, Present and Future. In Water for the Future: Hydrology in Perspective; Rodda, J.C., Matalas, N.C., Eds.; International Association of Hydrological Sciences: Rome, Italy, 1987; pp. 205–213. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonacci, O.; Pipan, T.; Culver, D.C. A Framework for Karst Ecohydrology. Environ. Geol. 2009, 56, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giłka, W.; Zakrzewska, M.; Baranov, V.A.; Dominiak, P. Diagnostic Clues for Identification of Selected Species of the Micropsectra Atrofasciata Group, with Description of M. Uva Sp. Nov. from Croatia (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini). Zootaxa 2013, 3702, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kvifte, G.M.; Ivković, M. New Species and Records of the Pericoma Trifasciata Group from Croatia (Diptera: Psychodidae). Zootaxa 2018, 4486, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Andersen, T.; Baranov, V.; Hagenlund, L.K.; Ivković, M.; Kvifte, G.M.; Pavlek, M. Blind Flight? A New Troglobiotic Orthoclad (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Lukina Jama–Trojama Cave in Croatia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reed, J.M.; Kryštufek, B.; Eastwood, W.J. The Physical Geography of the Balkans and Nomenclature of Place Names. In Balkan Biodiversity: Pattern and Process in the European Hotspot; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Miliša, M.; Ivković, M. Plitvice Lakes; Springer Water; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; ISBN 978-3-031-20377-0. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlosser, J.K. Fauna Kornjaśah Trojedne Kraljevine; Jugoslavenska Akademija Znanosti i Umjetnosti: Zagreb, Croatia, 1878; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  26. Koča, G. Popis Tvrdokrilaca (Kornjaša) Vinkovačke Okolice. Glas. Hrvat. Naravosl. Druš. 1905, 17, 119–212. [Google Scholar]
  27. Matoničkin, I.; Pavletić, Z. Hidrologija Protočnog Sistema Plitvičkih Jezera i Njegove Ekološko-Biocenološke Značajke. Carsus Iugosl. 1967, 5, 83–126. [Google Scholar]
  28. Habdija, I.; Primc-Habdija, B.; Belinić, I. Functional Community Organization of Macroinvertebrates in Lotic Habitats of the Plitvice Lakes. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 1994, 22, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Novak, P. Kornjaši Jadranskog Primorja; Jugoslavenska Akademija Znanosti i Umjetnosti: Zagreb, Croatia, 1952. [Google Scholar]
  30. Klausnitzer, B. Scirtidae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera; Löbl, I., Smetana, A., Eds.; Apollo Books: Stenstrup, Denmark, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mičetić Stanković, V.; Jäch, M.A.; Vučković, I.; Popijač, A.; Kerovec, M.; Kučinić, M. Ecological Traits of Water Beetles in a Karstic River from the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Limnologica 2018, 71, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivković, M.; Mičetić Stanković, V.; Mihaljević, Z. Emergence Patterns and Microhabitat Preference of Aquatic Dance Flies (Empididae; Clinocerinae and Hemerodromiinae) on a Longitudinal Gradient of Barrage Lake System. Limnologica 2012, 42, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ivković, M.; Kesić, M.; Mihaljević, Z.; Kúdela, M. Emergence Patterns and Ecological Associations of Some Haematophagous Blackfly Species along an Oligotrophic Hydrosystem: Emergence and Ecology of Blackflies. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2014, 28, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kučinić, M.; Previšić, A.; Vajdić, M.; Tunjić, M.; Mihoci, I.; Žalac, S.; Sviben, S.; Vućković, I.; Trupković, M.; Habdija, I. First systematic investigation of adults and second checklist of caddisflies of the Plitvice Lakes National Park with notes on research history, biodiversity, distribution and ecology. Nat. Croat. 2017, 26, 225–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vilenica, M.; Ivković, M. A Decade-Long Study on Mayfly Emergence Patterns. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2021, 72, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ridl, A.; Vilenica, M.; Ivković, M.; Popijač, A.; Sivec, I.; Miliša, M.; Mihaljević, Z. Environmental Drivers Influencing Stonefly Assemblages along a Longitudinal Gradient in Karst Lotic Habitats. J. Limnol. 2018, 77, 412–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baranov, V.; Jourdan, J.; Pilotto, F.; Wagner, R.; Haase, P. Complex and Nonlinear Climate-driven Changes in Freshwater Insect Communities over 42 Years. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dorić, V.; Ivković, M.; Baranov, V.; Pozojević, I.; Mihaljević, Z. Extreme Freshwater Discharge Events Exacerbated by Climate Change Influence the Structure and Functional Response of the Chironomid Community in a Biodiversity Hotspot. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 879, 163110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pozojević, I.; Dorić, V.; Miliša, M.; Ternjej, I.; Ivković, M. Defining Patterns and Rates of Natural vs. Drought Driven Aquatic Community Variability Indicates the Ongoing Need for Long Term Ecological Research. Biology 2023, 12, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ivanković, L.; Ivković, M.; Stanković, I. Perennial Phenology Patterns and Ecological Traits of Dixidae (Insecta, Diptera) in Lotic Habitats of a Barrage Lake System. Limnologica 2019, 76, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Makjanić, B. O Klimi Užeg Područja Plitvičkih Jezera. Hrvat. Geogr. Glas. 1971, 33, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
  42. Šegota, T.; Filipčić, A. Köppenova Podjela Klima i Hrvatsko Nazivlje. Geoadria 2003, 8, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Poje, D. Pregled Klimatskih Karakteristika Nacionalnog Parka Plitvička Jezera. Plitvički Bilt. 1989, 2, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bočić, N.; Barudžija, U.; Pahernik, M. Geomorphological and Geological Properties of Plitvice Lakes Area. In Plitvice Lakes; Miliša, M., Ivković, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  45. Matoničkin Kepčija, R.; Miliša, M. Recent Tufa Deposition. In Plitvice Lakes; Miliša, M., Ivković, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 123–144. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tabashnik, B.E. Population Structure of Pierid Butterflies: III. Pest Populations of Colias Philodice Eriphyle. Oecologia 1980, 47, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hurlbert, S.H. Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 1984, 54, 187–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clarke, K.R. Detecting Change in Benthic Community Structure. In Proceedings of the Invited Papers, 14th International Biometric Conference; Oger, R., Ed.; Société Adolphe Quetelet: Namour, Belgium, 1988; pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  49. Clarke, K.R. Non-parametric Multivariate Analyses of Changes in Community Structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 1993, 18, 117–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. SPSS Inc. SPSS Statistics, 17.0. Windows; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Šmilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0; Microcomputer Power: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ter Braak, C.; Šmilauer, P. CANOCO 5, version 5.0. Windows; Biometrics Plant Research International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  53. Adobe Systems Incorporated. Adobe® Illustrator®, CS6. Windows; Adobe Systems Incorporated: San Jose, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  54. Golden Software, LLC. GrapherTM20. Windows; Golden Software, LLC.: Golden, CO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cooper, S.J.; Watts, C.H.; Saint, K.M.; Leijs, R. Phylogenetic Relationships of Australian Scirtidae (Coleoptera) Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear Sequences. Invertebr. Syst. 2014, 28, 628–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Watts, C.; Bradford, T.; Cooper, S. A New Genus, Perplexacara, and New Generic Placements of Species of Australian Marsh Beetles (Coleoptera: Scirtidae) Based on Morphology and Molecular Genetic Data. Zootaxa 2021, 4927, zootaxa.4927.4.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cuppen, J. Flight Periods of Scirtidae (Coleoptera) Based on Weekly Samples from a Malaise Trap. Entomol. Ber. 1993, 53, 137–142. [Google Scholar]
  58. Paradise, C.J.; Kuhn, K.L. Interactive Effects of pH and Leaf Litter on a Shredder, the Scirtid Beetle, Helodes Pulchella, Inhabiting Tree-holes. Freshw. Biol. 1999, 41, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Daugherty, M.P.; Juliano, S.A. Factors Affecting the Abundance of Scirtid Beetles in Container Habitats. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2001, 20, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Matoničkin, I.; Pavletić, Z.; Tavčar, V.; Krkač, N. Limnološka Istraživanja Reikotopa i Fenomena Protočne Travertinizacije u Plitvičkim Jezerima. Acta Biol. 1971, 7, 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mičetić Stanković, V. Vodeni Kornjaši (Insecta:Coleoptera) u Mikrostaništima Krških Izvora i Tekućica. Doktorska Disertacija, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Prirodoslovno, Matematički Fakultet, Zagreb, Croatia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Miliša, M.; Habdija, I.; Primc-Habdija, B.; Radanović, I.; Kepčija, R.M. The Role of Flow Velocity in the Vertical Distribution of Particulate Organic Matter on Moss-Covered Travertine Barriers of the Plitvice Lakes (Croatia). Hydrobiologia 2006, 553, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sertić Perić, M.; Matoničkin Kepčija, R.; Radanović, I.; Primc, B.; Habdija, I. Freshwater Reefs as Mesohabitats for the Assessment of Diel Invertebrate Drift Patterns. Nat. Croat. 2020, 29, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Habdija, I.; Primc Habdija, B.; Matonickin, R.; Kucinic, M.; Radanovic, I.; Milisa, M.; Mihaljevic, Z. Current Velocity and Food Supply as Factors Affecting the Composition of Macroinvertebrates in Bryophyte Habitats in Karst Running Water. Biologia 2004, 59, 577–594. [Google Scholar]
  65. Plenkovic-Moraj, A.; Horvatincic, N.; Primc-Habdija, B. Periphyton and Its Role in Tufa Deposition in Karstic Waters (Plitvice Lakes, Croatia). Biologia 2002, 57, 423–431. [Google Scholar]
  66. Klausnitzer, B. Insecta: Coleoptera: Scirtidae; Spektrum Akademischer Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; ISBN 978-3-8274-1074-0. [Google Scholar]
  67. Moog, O.; Hartmann, A. Fauna Aquatica Austriaca, 3rd Edition 2017. A Comprehensive Species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes; Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land-und Forstwirtschaft: Wien, Austria, 2017; ISBN 978-3-85174-074-5. [Google Scholar]
  68. Minshall, G.W. Aquatic Insect-Substratum Relationships. In The Ecology of Aquatic Insects; Resh, V.H., Rosenberg, D.M., Eds.; Praeger Scientific: New York, NY, USA, 1984; pp. 358–400. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mičetić Stanković, V.; Bruvo Mađarić, B.; Kučinić, M. Ubiquitous but Ignored? A Case of Water Beetle in Southeastern Europe. Diversity 2022, 14, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Juliano, S.A. Quantitative Analysis of Sexual Dimorphism and Sex Ratio in Hyphydrus Ovatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Ecography 1992, 15, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Corbet, P.S. Temporal Patterns of Emergence in Aquatic Insects. Can. Entomol. 1964, 96, 264–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ivković, M.; Pont, A.C. Long-Time Emergence Patterns of Limnophora Species (Diptera, Muscidae) in Specific Karst Habitats: Tufa Barriers. Limnologica 2016, 61, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vilenica, M. Ecological Traits of Dragonfly (Odonata) Assemblages along an Oligotrophic Dinaric Karst Hydrosystem. Ann. Limnol.-Int. J. Lim. 2017, 53, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pozojević, I.; Ivković, M.; Cetinić, K.A.; Previšić, A. Peeling the Layers of Caddisfly Diversity on a Longitudinal Gradient in Karst Freshwater Habitats Reveals Community Dynamics and Stability. Insects 2021, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hogg, I.D.; Williams, D.D. Response of Stream Invertebrates to a Global-warming Thermal Regime: An Ecosystem-level Manipulation. Ecology 1996, 77, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sweeney, B.W.; Vannote, R.L. Ephemerella Mayflies of White Clay Creek: Bioenergetic and Ecological Relationships among Six Coexisting Species. Ecology 1981, 62, 1353–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sweeney, B.W. Factors Influencing Life-History Patterns of Aquatic Insects. In The Ecology of Aquatic Insects; Resh, V.H., Rosenberg, D.M., Eds.; Praeger Scientific: New York, NY, USA, 1984; pp. 56–100. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bournaud, M.; Richoux, P.; Usseglio-Polatera, P. An Approach to the Synthesis of Qualitative Ecological Information from Aquatic Coleoptera Communities. Regul. Rivers Res. Manag. 1992, 7, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 15 00226 g001
Figure 1. Map of the study area: (a) position of Plitvice Lakes NP (indicated with arrow); (b) three sampling sites (shown with black dots) in Plitvice Lakes NP; (c) some of the emergence traps (from left to right): spring of the Bijela river—tufa barrier Labudovac—tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac. Tufa barriers are also shown in the lateral profile (b), as they are located between adjacent lakes.
Figure 1. Map of the study area: (a) position of Plitvice Lakes NP (indicated with arrow); (b) three sampling sites (shown with black dots) in Plitvice Lakes NP; (c) some of the emergence traps (from left to right): spring of the Bijela river—tufa barrier Labudovac—tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac. Tufa barriers are also shown in the lateral profile (b), as they are located between adjacent lakes.
Insects 15 00226 g001
Insects 15 00226 g002
Figure 2. Species abundance and sex ratio of two Hydrocyphon species at the tufa barrier Labudovac (up) and the tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac (down) from 2007 to 2022.
Figure 2. Species abundance and sex ratio of two Hydrocyphon species at the tufa barrier Labudovac (up) and the tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac (down) from 2007 to 2022.
Insects 15 00226 g002
Insects 15 00226 g003
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of microhabitats from 2007 to 2022. Abbreviations: SBR: spring of the Bijela rijeka river; TBL: tufa barrier Labudovac; TKM: tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac.
Figure 3. Cluster analysis of microhabitats from 2007 to 2022. Abbreviations: SBR: spring of the Bijela rijeka river; TBL: tufa barrier Labudovac; TKM: tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac.
Insects 15 00226 g003
Insects 15 00226 g004
Figure 4. Seasonal dynamic in scirtids’ emergence in Plitvice Lakes NP during 15 years at three study sites. Abbreviations of the sites as in Table 1. Y-axis: the number of individuals. Only the months in which scirtids were recorded are shown.
Figure 4. Seasonal dynamic in scirtids’ emergence in Plitvice Lakes NP during 15 years at three study sites. Abbreviations of the sites as in Table 1. Y-axis: the number of individuals. Only the months in which scirtids were recorded are shown.
Insects 15 00226 g004
Insects 15 00226 g005
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of scirtids in Plitvice Lakes NP: (a) at three study sites; (b) at microhabitats. Abbreviations: Temp: temperature, Disch: water discharge, Cond: conductivity, Alk: alkalinity; abbreviations of other parameters and sites as in Table 1.
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of scirtids in Plitvice Lakes NP: (a) at three study sites; (b) at microhabitats. Abbreviations: Temp: temperature, Disch: water discharge, Cond: conductivity, Alk: alkalinity; abbreviations of other parameters and sites as in Table 1.
Insects 15 00226 g005
Insects 15 00226 g006
Figure 6. Box-whisker plots of the abundance of family Scirtidae during 15 years in Plitvice Lakes NP on different substrate types. The box edges show the confidence level (95%), the centre line the median value and the whiskers the standard deviation.
Figure 6. Box-whisker plots of the abundance of family Scirtidae during 15 years in Plitvice Lakes NP on different substrate types. The box edges show the confidence level (95%), the centre line the median value and the whiskers the standard deviation.
Insects 15 00226 g006
Table 1. Characteristic of study sites in Plitvice Lakes NP. Abbreviations: SBR: spring of the Bijela rijeka river, TBL: tufa barrier Labudovac, TKM: tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac.
Table 1. Characteristic of study sites in Plitvice Lakes NP. Abbreviations: SBR: spring of the Bijela rijeka river, TBL: tufa barrier Labudovac, TKM: tufa barrier Kozjak–Milanovac.
SiteSBRTBLTKM
Latitude N 44°50′05″N 44°52′17″N 44°53′39″
Longitude E 15°33′43″E 15°35′59″E 15°36′32″
Altitude (m)720630546
Water temperature (°C)
min7.21.6631.67
max8.420.6322.95
O2 (%)
min65.2159.772.04
max106.3139.2130.5
pH
min 6.87.957.98
max8.98.638.52
Alkalinity (mg CaCO3 L−1)
min242.2180.94159.5
max302.3270.5226.5
Conductivity (µS cm−1)
min 384348323
max528445415
NO3 (mg N L−1)
min00.010.01
max1.581.061.14
NO2 (mg N L−1)
min000
max0.0020.0080.01
NH4+ (mg L−1)
min000
max0.20.220.103
PO4− (mg L−1)
min000
max0.0490.070.255
Water discharge (m3 s−1)
min0.151.741.4
max1.075.584.22
Emergence trap/substrate type
P1gravel and sandpebblespebbles
P2gravel and sandpebblesfine silt and sand
P3bryophytesbryophytespebbles
P4angiospermspebblesbryophytes
P5bryophytesbryophytesbryophytes
P6angiospermsbryophytesfine silt and sand
P7-bryophytes-
Current velocity (m3 s−1)
min01.20
max3750.5648.66
Depth (m)
min0.060.080.08
max0.250.450.48
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klarin, A.; Ivković, M.; Mičetić Stanković, V. The Emergence of the Family Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Lotic Karst Habitats: A Case Study over 15 Years. Insects 2024, 15, 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040226

AMA Style

Klarin A, Ivković M, Mičetić Stanković V. The Emergence of the Family Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Lotic Karst Habitats: A Case Study over 15 Years. Insects. 2024; 15(4):226. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klarin, Ana, Marija Ivković, and Vlatka Mičetić Stanković. 2024. "The Emergence of the Family Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Lotic Karst Habitats: A Case Study over 15 Years" Insects 15, no. 4: 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop