Next Article in Journal
Maize-YOLO: A New High-Precision and Real-Time Method for Maize Pest Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Every Vein a Real Vein? Cross-Section of the Wing of Matsucoccus Pini (Insecta, Hemiptera, Coccoidea: Matsucoccidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Functional Analysis of Toll Receptor Genes during Antibacterial Immunity in the Green Peach Aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenological Features of the Spongy Moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), in the Northernmost Portions of Its Eurasian Range

by
Vasiliy I. Ponomarev
1,
Georgiy I. Klobukov
1,
Viktoria V. Napalkova
1,
Yuriy B. Akhanaev
2,
Sergey V. Pavlushin
2,
Maria E. Yakimova
2,3,
Anna O. Subbotina
2,3,
Sandrine Picq
4,
Michel Cusson
4 and
Vyacheslav V. Martemyanov
2,5,*
1
Institute Botanic Garden UB RAS, 8 Marta Str., 202a, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia
2
Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology SB RAS, Frunze Str. 11, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia
3
Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
4
Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC G1V 4C7, Canada
5
Biological Institute, National Research Tomsk State University, Lenina Str. 36, 63450 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(3), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030276
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Revised: 6 March 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Globalization accelerates the mixing of populations, including those of humans, animals and plants. Consequently, some species invade new natural communities and alter them. One illustrative example is the spongy moth, which was accidentally introduced into North America, where it became a major forest pest after its establishment there. In its native Eurasian environment, the spongy moth’s range has recently shown significant northward expansion, presumably as a consequence of global warming. In its North American range, a similar northward advance is yet to be fully documented. Eurasian populations of the spongy moth show significant developmental plasticity, which allows them to establish themselves in the much colder northern regions due to an acceleration of larval development. The mechanism responsible for this acceleration is not well understood, but our earlier studies point to genetic and epigenetic factors as playing a role. This plasticity indicates that new introductions of Eurasian spongy moths from the northernmost populations pose a more significant threat to North America than previously expected.

Abstract

The spongy moth, Lymatria dispar, is a classic example of an invasive pest accidentally introduced from Europe to North America, where it has become one of the most serious forest defoliators, as in its native range. The present study was aimed at (i) identifying the current northern limit of L. dispar’s Eurasian range and exploring its northward expansion in Canada using pheromone trap data, and (ii) comparing northern Eurasian populations with those from central and southern regions with respect to male flight phenology, the sums of effective temperatures (SETs) above the 7 °C threshold necessary for development to the adult stage, and heat availability. We show that the range of L. dispar in Eurasia now reaches the 61st parallel, and comparisons with historical data identify the average speed of spread as 50 km/year. We also document the northern progression of L. dispar in southern Canada, where the actual northern boundary of its range remains to be identified. We show that the median date of male flight does not vary greatly between northern and southern regions of the spongy moth range in Eurasia despite climate differences. Synchronization of flight at different latitudes of the range is associated with an acceleration of larval development in northern Eurasian populations. Similar changes in developmental rate along a latitudinal gradient have not been documented for North American populations. Thus, we argue that this feature of spongy moths from northern Eurasia poses a significant invasive threat to North America in terms of enhanced risks for rapid northward range expansion.

1. Introduction

Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) is an important forest defoliator that can feed on more than 300 species of woody plants [1]. Populations of this irruptive species periodically reach outbreak proportions over vast areas [2,3,4,5], owing in part to this insect’s high ecological flexibility [6]. As a result, L. dispar is prominent on the list of the 100 most serious invasive species in the world [7]. The story of European spongy moths accidentally escaping from the laboratory of Leopold Trouvelot, in Massachusetts, followed by their permanent establishment in North America, has become a classic example of a successful invasion of a species from one continent to another [8].
The native range of the spongy moth is considered to extend latitudinally from ~20° N to ~58° N [9]. Although this univoltine species can develop under a wide variety of climatic conditions, individuals must undergo a winter diapause to complete their life cycle, and they do so as fully formed, pre-hatching 1st instar larvae. Thus, eggs are laid towards the end of the summer, but hatch only in the following spring, when tree leaves start expanding and are ready for consumption by the young larvae.
Most authors have reported April–May as the period during which spongy moth eggs hatch, irrespective of the study location’s latitude. Examples include Algeria (36° N), where eggs hatch in April [10]; Iran (36° N), in the last third of May [11]; the south of Kyrgyzstan (40° N), in the second third of April [12]; Hungary (47° N), in April [13]; Khabarovsk krai (48° N; Russian Far East), also from the end of April to the beginning of May [14]; and Kharkiv, Ukraine (50° N) and European Russia, from the end of April to the beginning of May [15,16]. In the northern portion of the spongy moth’s North American range, eggs hatch in mid-May in New Brunswick (46° N) and between the end of April and the middle of May in British Columbia (48° N), where populations are not yet permanently established [17]. Further south, egg hatch occurs in April in Virginia (37° N) [18]. According to a spongy moth life-stage model [19], egg hatch in US southern states could occur as early as March. Based on the aforementioned field records, however, we can say that spongy moth egg hatch typically takes place within a ~60-day time window spanning April and May, at least in the southern and central portions of the species’ range.
An examination of pheromone trap (males) and visual observation records shows that the L. dispar flight period displays variation similar to that described above for egg hatch in the southern and central latitudes of the range. For example, there is a tendency for flight to occur throughout June and July in some locations (Algeria: [10]; south of Kyrgyzstan: [12]), while it occurs later (end of July to mid-August) in other locations, such as Iran [11] and Ukraine [15]. Within Hungary, a country characterized by a complex relief, the spongy moth flight period varies as a function of the sampling location and year of observation, extending from June–July until the beginning of September [13], whereas in both European Russia and the Russian Far East, the flight period occurs during the months of July and August [14,16]. The situation is similar in North America, where flight occurs in June–July in the southern locations of the spongy moth range [18], whereas the period is shifted towards August and early September at higher latitudes [20,21]. In summary, adult flight tends to occur from June to the end of August or early September, depending on the latitude.
The above data show a general trend for a shift in egg hatch and flight phenology towards later dates with increasing latitude. Spongy moths from Iran, however, seem to be an exception to this pattern, perhaps because of the significant divergence reported for Middle Eastern and Caucasian spongy moths relative to other L. dispar populations [22,23]. Thus, notwithstanding the above observation about the Middle Eastern populations, one might predict a significant shift towards later phenology for L. dispar development in regions near the northern boundary of its Eurasian range. In spite of all the research attention this insect has received, there are very limited data about its phenology in the northernmost parts of its range. The most relevant observations were made near Ekaterinburg (56°50′ N) [24], where egg hatch usually occurs in early to mid-May and male flight takes place in July–August; similar observations were made in Udmurtia (56°49′ N) [25]. These observations point to a very limited phenological shift (only one to two weeks), relative to dates recorded at the center of L. dispar’s range, despite a very significant latitudinal shift northward (i.e., >10°).
Owing to global climate change, heat availability in northern regions is likely to increase, which is predicted to positively affect the northward expansion of L. dispar’s range [26]. This prediction is supported by recent records documenting a northward shift of 200 km in the Asian spongy moth’s range [27]. Thus, spongy moth phenological data in the northernmost portions of its range are essential to assessing the possibility of outbreak spread following an expansion of its range. We do not consider photoperiodic conditions as playing an important role in the phenology of spongy moths because this species has an obligate diapause, and its development does not depend on daylength [28].
The aim of this study was to compare the phenology of male flight in parts of the spongy moth’s Eurasian and North American ranges. As part of this aim, (i) we assessed the current position of the northern boundary of L. dispar’s Eurasian range and examined its northward expansion in North America, using pheromone trap data; (ii) we compared the male flight phenology of populations in northern Eurasia with populations from central and southern regions of Eurasia and sums of effective temperatures (SETs) above the 7 °C threshold required for development to the adult stage in all three regions with corresponding data on heat availability.

2. Materials and Methods

To monitor male flight, we used milk carton traps, each equipped with a pheromone dispenser loaded with 500 µg of (+)-disparlure (Scentry Biological, Inc., Billings, MT, USA), and an insecticidal strip containing 2.2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate (Hercon Environmental, Emigsville, PA, USA). We used slightly different methods for monitoring the presence of male moths, depending on the research question being addressed (i.e., estimating of northern boundary vs. phenology of flight).
To estimate the current position of the northern boundary of the spongy moth’s range in Asia, pheromone traps were secured onto host trees at a height of 1.5–2 m at the end of June and removed at the beginning of August in 2020 and 2021. We used one trap per sampling location. Traps were not left in the field for the entire flight season to avoid DNA degradation of captured moths, which we intended to use for subsequent population genomics analyses (in the context of a distinct study). Thus, the total number of adults caught in a given trap should not be taken as an accurate indicator of moth density in that study area (Figure 1); however, it provides qualitative data about the presence of moths in that area and still shows trends in the status of populations. Indeed, at the time traps were taken down from the trees, male flight had already reached its declining phase, suggesting that our trapping activity had covered most of the flight period. It is unlikely that the presence of female moths significantly affected captures of males by pheromone traps due to competition between females and pheromone lures when population levels are high; the latter is suggested by the fact that pheromone traps caught very high numbers of males in an independent study of spongy moth flight phenology [29]. In Canada, the traps were secured to host trees in a manner similar to that described above. Monitoring was conducted in 2017 and 2021, from the end of June to the end of September, a period that encompasses the entire flight season. We used two traps per location, each separated by 15 m. The use of a second trap was meant to prevent loss of monitoring data for a given site in the event of accidental damage to a trap. The total number of moths per site was calculated at the end of the flight season. For detailed trap locations, see Figure 1 and Figure 2.
To assess seasonal male flight dynamics, pheromone-based monitoring in the northern portion of the spongy moth’s Eurasian range was carried out in the following localities: Ekaterinburg and surroundings (Sverdlovsk oblast, 56°51′ N, 60°36′ E) from 2010 to 2021 (last outbreak: 2005–2011); Tobolsk (Tyumen oblast, 58°11′ N, 68°15′ E) in 2020 and 2021 (last outbreak: 2016–2018); Kyshtovka (Novosibirsk oblast, 56°33′ N, 76°37′ E) from 2019 to 2022 (last outbreak: 2018–2020). For comparative purposes, monitoring was also conducted in the central and southern portions of the range, using the same protocol. The central locations were: Karasuk (Novosibirsk oblast, 53°74′ N, 78°00′ E) in 2013 and 2022; Astrakhan oblast (46°20′ N, 48°02′ E) in 2011, 2013 and 2014 in Volgograd, Volgograd oblast (48°43′ N, 44°30′ E), from 2010 to 2012, and in 2014. The southern locations were: Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (42°52′ N, 74°35′ E) in 2009, 2012 and 2013; Jalal-Abad, Kyrgyzstan (40°56′ N, 73°00′ E) in 2004, 2005 and 2017; Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (43°15′ N, 76°55′ E) in 2007 (for the positions of these locations on a map, see Figure 3). With the exception of Tobolsk (Tyumen oblast), Kyshtovka (Novosibirsk oblast) and Jalal-Abad (Kyrgyzstan, in 2004 and 2005), where only one trap was deployed per location, 3 to 10 traps were used to monitor seasonal flight dynamics at each location. At any given location, the distance between traps varied between 200 m and 2 km. In all cases, the traps were hung to host trees in mid-June (before the start of male flight) and taken down at the end of September. Captured males were counted at a minimum frequency of every four days.
To compare male flight dynamics among different trapping locations, we used the median date of male flight, which is taken here to coincide with the emergence of ~50% of adults at a given location.
The attraction range of the L. dispar pheromone is considered to vary between 300 m and 15 km [30]. However, it has been suggested that atmospheric transport of male moths could increase the apparent attraction range of the pheromone beyond 15 km [31]. There has been only one report of a long-range spongy moth flight (100 km), but substantiating evidence for this claim is lacking [32]. All of the above considered, the geographic scale of our study (Figure 3) makes movement of male moths between sample locations highly unlikely.
Figure 3. Map of localities where flight data were recorded for calculating the median date of L. dispar male flight.
Figure 3. Map of localities where flight data were recorded for calculating the median date of L. dispar male flight.
Insects 14 00276 g003
Taking into account the fact that the curve of the dynamics of male flight is nonparametric, which is confirmed by calculations carried out by us using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov criterion to characterize the flight of imago and calculate the SET of their development, the median date of male flight was taken to represent the departure of about 50% of adults in a given locality.
We used the median date of male flight as a checkpoint to calculate the sum of effective temperatures (SET) needed for development to the adult stage. Since insects are poikilothermic animals and their development is affected by temperature, a lower development threshold (LDT) is required to calculate both the SET for individual development and the heat availability of the growing season in the region where monitoring is being carried out. Different LDTs have been reported in the literature for the spongy moth, varying as a function of life stage and geographic population. While different thresholds for pre-hatching spring development of embryos have been reported (3 °C to 7 °C; [15,33,34]), larval development thresholds are considered to vary between 6 °C and 10 °C [15,34,35,36,37]. Pupal LDT, on the other hand, has been estimated to be 10 °C [38], whereas that of early embryo development in late summer has been assessed to be 6.8 °C [38] or 7 °C [16,34]. Estimation of the latter threshold for the North American “NJSS” laboratory line yielded a slightly higher value (10 °C), based on the duration of early embryonic development measured at 15 °C and 25 °C [39]. It can be seen from the foregoing that the choice of a unified criterion for validly comparing the phenology of different stages of development and different populations is not a straightforward task. For this reason, we opted to rely on the work of Kozhanchikov [38] and Ilyinsky et al. [16], who assessed average SET values for Eurasian spongy moth populations (i.e., from the present study area) using an LDT of 7 °C. They estimated the SET for full development from late embryos (in spring) to imago (in mid-summer) to be 990 and 930 degree-days for females and males, respectively, while the summer–autumn development of embryos required 300–310 degree-days, resulting in a SET of 1230–1300 degree-days for the entire life cycle.
For calculation of the SET, we used the 25 °C value whenever average daily temperatures were >25 °C but <32 °C, as temperatures > 25 °C have been shown to have no significant effect on the developmental rate of the spongy moth [37,38]. However, temperatures exceeding the upper developmental threshold for this species (32 °C; point at which thermal dormancy is induced) were excluded from the SET calculation [36,38]. Such corrections were applied to only a limited number of southern monitoring locations, namely, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (42°52′ N, 74°35′ E), and Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan (43°15′ N, 76°55′ E), where (as shown in the present work) the SET is significantly higher than in other parts of the species’ range. This procedure avoided overestimation of the SET in these monitoring locations, while in locations further north, the average daily temperature never exceeded 25 °C. We calculated the early-embryonic SET using the median date of male flight as starting date and the date marking sustained transition below the temperature threshold of development as end date. This was done for each trapping locality to estimate the potential conditions available for early embryo development before overwintering. In addition, our previous work revealed a drop in late embryonic and larval developmental rates in response to an increase in early-embryonic SET [24].
To assess the suitability of weather conditions for the maintenance of a population in a given study area, we calculated the heat availability of the growing season (also with a 7 °C threshold), starting in the spring, following the stable transition of temperatures to a point above the threshold for at least a week, and ending in the autumn, when temperatures fell below the threshold. This was done for each trapping locality to estimate the potential conditions available for early embryo development before overwintering. Average long-term heat availability was calculated for the last 11 years from 2010 to 2021. We calculated the SET and heat availability using temperature data from weather stations for Eurasian localities [40,41]. For North American localities, we only assessed heat availability using data from the Government of Canada’s National Weather Service [40,42,43].

3. Results

3.1. Northern Limit of L. dispar in Eurasia and North America

We estimated the position of the northern boundary of the spongy moth’s Asian range by monitoring adult males, using pheromone traps placed along south-to-north transects in Siberia. Trap catches recorded in 2021 (Figure 1) indicate that the northern edge of the range lies between 61° N and 62° N, which is considerably further north than the boundary reported earlier for the same longitude (see Figure 4, produced using data from Ilyinykh and Krivets [27]). This difference represents a northward expansion of 5° in 10 years. Comparisons with other early estimations of the northern boundary of this species’ range likewise point to a significant northward expansion [9,38]. Thus, earlier predictions regarding the northward expansion of the spongy moth’s range in Eurasia [26] appear to be verified by the present work. Although contours of this species’ range are known to be unstable and could pulse over long periods of observations [21], the use of several transects in our study and the comparability of our data with those of Ilyinykh and Krivets (similar trapping methods and locations) indicate that the northward expansion of L. dispar’s range is truly an ongoing process, in parallel with climate change [20]. Whereas the spongy moth’s northward expansion front seems to lie between the 61st and 62nd parallels (see above), the latitude beyond which populations can no longer realize their full biological potential and develop outbreaks lies further south, between the 57th and 58th parallels [5].
Pheromone-based monitoring in North America did not allow us to reach the northern edge of the spongy moth’s range in eastern Canada; indeed, traps as far north as 48.7° were still catching moths (Figure 2). However, when considering data from the two sampling years presented here (Figure 2) and range maps published earlier [44], it is clear that the spongy moth is undergoing a northward range expansion in southern Canada. Importantly, one of the northernmost traps (#11) caught a very significant number of moths (100 moths per season; Figure 2), suggesting that the northern boundary of the North American range could be significantly further north. However, it is not yet clear whether the moths we caught there were from locally established populations or developed from eggs accidentally transported to this location in 2021.

3.2. Flight Phenology, SET and Heat Availability

Pheromone-based monitoring data published earlier for Ekaterinburg, covering the period 2009–2015 [24], are here updated with data for the period 2016–2019 (Table 1). The male flight median for Trans-Ural (eastern foothills of the Ural) populations (Ekaterinburg city, Sverdlovsk oblast) generally falls in the last two-thirds of July. Other northern populations, such as those of the Cis-Ural (western foothills of the Ural; Udmurt Republic) and West-Siberia (Tobolsk, Tyumen oblast and Kyshtovka, Novosibirsk oblast), display a male flight median within the same period. Thus, examination of male flight data across latitudes that span ~42° N to ~58° N in the northern Eurasian range (Table 1) shows that the median flight date typically falls within the second half of July, irrespective of latitude, despite a later egg hatch in the northern regions (up to a 60-day difference relative to southern regions). Although statistical analysis indicated that male flight occurred significantly later in northern than in central and southern localities (Kruskal–Wallis H-test: H (2, 109) = 60.31 p < 0.0001; Figure 5), presumably as a result of later spring warming in the north, the median dates of male flight remained in the range of ~7 to 21 July.
Typically, males emerge earlier in the season than females [1]. While pupation dates of males tend to be 4 to 5 days earlier than those of females, the latter go through the pupal stage 1 to 3 days faster than males. As a result, the difference in emergence time between males and females is about 2 days, in both laboratory cultures and wild populations [45]. According to Thompson et al. [46], the differences in the duration of the development period of males and females till the adult stage in North American populations range from 5 to 13 days, depending on the rearing temperature and origin. According to Limbu et al. [37], for Eurasian populations that have reached 50% of adult emergence, the difference in SET between males and females is about 40 degree-days, which at an 8–9 °C threshold and a 20–25 °C rearing temperature, takes 2 to 4 days. Thus, male flight dates can be used to estimate the date of completion of the adult stage in a given region and to assess the duration of embryo development prior to overwintering.
As is true of other arthropods, the development of the spongy moth is dependent on the amount of heat it receives during the summer season, and a minimum amount of heat accumulated during development is necessary for the successful completion of its life cycle. Thus, heat availability is an important parameter to assess the likelihood of spongy moth establishment in new regions located near the northern boundary of its range. In the vicinity of the northern edge of the spongy moth’s range, the long-term average heat availability during the growing season, based on a development threshold of 7 °C, varies between 1045 ± 47 degree-days (x ± se) in Khanty-Mansiysk (coordinates: 61°0′ N, 69°0′ E), 1042 ± 48 degree-days in Surgut (61°15′ N, 73°25′ E) and 1020 ± 48 degree-days in Nyzhnevartovsk (60°56′ N, 76°33′ E). However, equivalent values are higher (~1150 to 1350 degree-days) in northern areas where populations can reach outbreak proportions. More specifically, the average heat availability for Ekaterinburg was 1337 ± 89 degree-days, while it was 1132 ± 33 for Tobolsk and 1155 ± 45 for Kyshtovka (Table 2). According to the literature, early embryonic development in late summer requires at least 300 degree-days of SET for successful overwintering. Completion of full development in the next spring–summer period requires an additional ~930 and ~990 degree-days for males and females, respectively (at the lower development threshold of 7 °C). Based on these data, the full life cycle of the spongy moth requires about 1250–1300 degree-days for its completion [16,38]. Surprisingly, however, heat availability in the northern portions of the spongy moth’s range, where outbreaks can develop, is often below these values (Table 2). Nevertheless, populations in these regions seem stable and periodically form outbreaks.
Our data (Table 2) show a gradual south-to-north decline in the SET for Eurasian spongy moth populations. SET values reported here for the central portion of the Eurasian range (Volgograd) are comparable to those reported in the early literature [16,38]. In the southern regions (Alma-Ata and Bishkek), we see that the SET increases with the observed rise in heat availability, while the opposite is true for the northern regions. Thus, our data indicate that the developmental SET displays considerable plasticity in this species, varying as a function of regional heat availability.
The SET required for development from late embryo to imago varied significantly among northern, central and southern populations (Kruskal–Wallis, H (2, 109) = 67.20; p < 0.0001; Figure 6), indicating that northern populations require less heat than populations located further south to maintain the same growth rate.

4. Discussion

The present study raises questions as to what mechanism is responsible for the significantly reduced developmental period, up to the imago stage, reported here for spongy moths found in the northernmost portion of the species’ Eurasian range, in comparison to values obtained for populations in the central and southern regions. In a previous study, we found an increase in the rate of larval development, especially in younger instars, associated with a reduction in the summer–autumn SET, i.e., during early embryonic development and the forepart of diapause, before the onset of low temperatures [24]. Thus, when we experimentally lowered the SET for early embryonic development and diapause before overwintering (430 versus 1230 degree-days) in insects collected in the northern (Ekaterinburg) and central (Volgograd) populations of L. dispar’s range, we observed a decrease in the duration of larval development for the northern group in both males (44.1 ± 0.8 days vs. 53.7 ± 3.5 days) and females (48.3 ± 1.2 vs. 54.4 ± 1.2), which was mainly due to a reduction in the duration of younger instars (1–3). For the central population, a decrease in the duration of larval development was observed only in females (61.8 ± 1.7 vs. 67.9 ± 2.3).
This could be an adaptive feature of the northern populations, which often face a heat deficiency with respect to the summer–autumn SET, relative to the value that is necessary for successful overwintering (300 degree-days, based on Ilyinsky [16]). Indeed, estimates of the SET provided in Table 2 show that, in northern populations, the summer–autumn SET (i.e., for the period from egg laying until the onset of cold weather) is often lower than 300 degree-days, even when calculated based on the flight median (see value for Ekaterinburg, year 2014; Table 2). In southern regions, however, weather conditions are not a limiting factor for early embryonic development. A lowering of the developmental SET in populations near the northern boundary of the L. dispar range could either be the result of selective pressures favoring individuals with faster development or favoring individuals with greater developmental plasticity. The latter hypothesis is supported by our earlier experimental data showing that the larval developmental period can be modified by artificially changing the conditions of embryo development in an environmental chamber [24].
The above observations suggest that differences in the developmental rate may have a genetic basis, irrespective of whether these characters are fixed or are the result of greater plasticity. Based on the existing literature (e.g., Limbu et al. [37]), the thresholds and SET for larval development of spongy moth can vary significantly among laboratory rearings when insects have gone through different numbers of generations. Not surprisingly, phenological models developed based on the data often produce estimates that do not agree with pheromone-based records obtained through monitoring in Asian ports [47], where male flight can occur later than what the model predicts. Such discrepancies support the existence of genetic-based differences in development between initial wild populations and laboratory lines.
In North America, the northern edge of the spongy moth range is considered to be located at ~48–49° N [17,21,44] (confirmed by observations in the present study), which is considerably further south than the northern boundary of the Eurasian range. According to information summarized by Régnière and Sharov [32], the median date of male flight in the southern United States (Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina) tends to occur during the last three weeks of July, which fits well with predictions made by a phenological model based on SET calculations [48]. The long-term average heat availability calculated from data collected at the Chesterfield weather station (Virginia, 37°22′ N, 77°30′ W) was 2549 ± 38 degree-days (7 °C threshold), which is comparable with the heat availability in Astrakhan, Alma-Ata and Bishkek in Eurasia (2593 ± 35, 2535 ± 22 and 2669 ± 28 degree-days, respectively). In Bellingham, Washington (48°45′ N, 122°29′ W), closer to the northern boundary of the spongy moth’s range in North America, the observed median date of male flight (monitored in 1985–1986) fell during the last 3 weeks of August; this, again, generally agrees with the predictions of a phenological model. The average heat availability for that locality is 1462 ± 32 degree-days, which is considerably higher than at the sites where L. dispar pheromone monitoring was conducted in the northern regions of the Eurasian range, and where the median date of male flight usually occurs one month earlier, in the last third of July. It must be pointed out, however, that the later date of male flight in Bellingham, where the species is not considered to be established, is based on only two years of pheromone monitoring. Another study whose results are relevant to the issue at hand is one conducted in northern Minnesota [21], where male flight was monitored from 2005 to 2009, yielding a median date of male flight in the last 3 weeks of August, except for 2006, when it took place in the first third of August. Heat availability in Duluth, Minnesota (46°48′ N, 92°08′ W), was 1453 ± 42 degree-days, which, again, is higher than at the sites where we conducted our monitoring in the northern regions of the Eurasian range.
A comparison of our results (Figure 2) with previous observations in Canada [44] confirms the stable presence of L. dispar in the southern portions of Canada, from 1990 up to now. The northern boundary of the range runs from Charlo, New Brunswick (N 47°59′, W 66°19′), with an average heat availability of 1246 ± 71 degree-days, to Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec (48°25′ N; 79°03′ W), and Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario (46°31′ N, 84°21′ W), where the average heat availability is 1291 ± 22 and 1348 ± 38 degree-days, respectively. However, the relatively high number of individuals that we caught in trap #2 (Figure 2) suggests that the northern boundary of the range in Quebec could well be a few hundred km further north. Either the same or lower levels of heat availability are not unusual for the northern regions where we conducted our monitoring in Siberia, where L. dispar populations periodically reach outbreak levels. Outbreaks in Canada have been recorded south of the 47th parallel [44], where heat availabilities are >1400 degree-days (e.g., Sudbury, Ontario, 46°37′ N, 80°48′ W: 1438 ± 33 degree-days).
Based on the literature pertaining to L. dispar male flight in North America, there does not seem to be a significant reduction in the SET for development near the northern edge of the range, although some differences in the mass and rate of development of caterpillars have been reported [46,49], pointing to ongoing adaptive processes occurring in populations of that region.
As mentioned above, the finding of the reduction in the developmental SET among Asian spongy moth populations near the northern boundary of their range might be a genetically determined feature of these populations. In further support of this hypothesis is a recent nuclear-marker-based population genomics analysis of L. dispar across its entire geographic range [23], which shows that Siberian populations (corresponding approximately to the northern populations considered here) form a very distinct cluster from North American populations (i.e., high pairwise FST values). Since a reduction in the developmental SET near the northern edge of the spongy moth’s range is observed in both the European (Udmurtia) and Asian (Sverdlovsk, Tyumen and Novosibirsk oblasts) portions of the Eurasian range, we suggest that northern Eurasian populations display greater developmental plasticity in response to environmental factors than their North American counterparts, a trait that should be considered an important element of risk for rapid invasion in North America, in addition to the well-known female flight capability trait [50]. Thus, in assessing the threat posed by potentially invasive populations of L. dispar in North America, it is important to consider not only female flight capability [51] and host range [6], but also the potential for individuals to adapt to conditions of low heat availability, which could affect the rate of spread in the newly invaded environment (see also study by Ilyinykh and Krivets [27]). The ability of northern Eurasian populations to feed on conifers is the focus of a separate study by our group [52], demonstrating the clear potential for range expansion towards the taiga.

5. Conclusions

Pheromone-based monitoring of male flight near the northern boundary of L. dispar’s Eurasian range allowed us (i) to document the significant northward expansion of this species and (ii) to show that the median date of male flight in the northern portions of the range, although somewhat later than observed in regions located much further south, is not delayed to the extent one would expect from the significant reduction in the SET seen in northern populations. This partial synchronization of flight in different latitudinal portions of the range is associated with an acceleration of larval development of northern Eurasian populations. The reasons for this accelerated development are currently unknown, but both genetic and epigenetic factors should be considered.
Based on the available literature, there is no evidence of a similar plasticity in developmental rate along a latitudinal gradient among North American populations. Thus, we argue that this feature of spongy moths from northern Eurasia poses a significant invasive threat to North America in terms of enhanced risks for rapid northward range expansion.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by V.I.P., G.I.K., V.V.N., Y.B.A., S.V.P., M.E.Y., A.O.S., S.P., M.C. and V.V.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by V.I.P., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant #20-64-46011 for pheromone monitoring of northern border of range) and by the Federal Fundamental Scientific Research Programmes for 2021–2025 (AAAA-A17-117072810009-8, FWGS-2021-0003).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the national parks of the SÉPAQ (Aiguebelle, Boucherville, Frontenac, Jacques-Cartier, Mont-Mégantic, Mont-Orford, Mont-Tremblant, Mont-Saint-Bruno, Oka and Plaisance) and La Mauricie National Park (Federal Park) that participated in the capture of the spongy moths in the province of Québec, Canada (Figure 2).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leonard, D.E. Bioecology of the gypsy moth. In Gypsy Moth Research towards Integrated Pest Management; Doane, C.C., McManus, M.L., Eds.; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1981; pp. 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Myers, H.S. Synchrony in outbreaks of forest lepidoptera: A possible example of the Moran effect. Ecology 1998, 79, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Johnson, D.M.; Liebhold, A.M.; Bjørnstad, O.N.; Mcmanus, M.L. Circumpolar variation in periodicity and synchrony among gypsy moth populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soukhovolsky, V.G.; Ponomarev, V.I.; Sokolov, G.I.; Tarasova, O.V.; Krasnoperova, P.A. Gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L. in the South Urals: Patterns in population dynamics and modeling. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2016, 6, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martemyanov, V.; Bykov, R.; Demenkova, M.; Gninenko, Y.; Romancev, S.; Bolonin, I.; Mazunin, I.; Belousova, I.; Akhanaev, Y.; Pavlushin, S.; et al. Genetic evidence of broad spreading of Lymantria dispar in the West Siberian Plain. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Keena, M.A.; Richards, J.Y. Comparison of survival and development of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) populations from different geographic areas on North American conifers. Insects 2020, 11, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database; IUCN Species Survival Commission, Invasive Species Specialist Group: Auckland, New Zealand, 2001; Available online: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/pdf/100English.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  8. Liebhold, A.; Mastro, V.; Schaefer, P.W. Learning from the legacy of Leopold Trouvelot. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1989, 35, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giese, R.L.; Schneider, M.L. Cartographic comparisons of Eurasian gypsy moth distribution (Lymantria dispar L. Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Entomol. News 1979, 90, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mecellem, D.; Chakali, G. Biological and ecological characteristics of Gypsy Moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lep. Lymantriidae) in the gradation phase’s in Blidéen Atlas Forest (Algeria). Adv. Environ. Biol. 2016, 10, 192–199. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gninenko, Y.I.; Kavosi, M.R. Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera, Erebidae) outbreak in north Iran. For. Inf. 2016, 2, 81–89. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Ashimov, K.S. Dendrophilous Insects of Walnut-Fruit Forests of the Southwestern Tien Shan; Kyrgyz National Agrarian University: Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, 2005. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Klapwijk, M.J.; Csóka, G.; Hirka, A.; Björkman, C. Forest insects and climate change: Long-term trends in herbivore damage. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3, 4183–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kurenshchikov, D.K.; Ilyinykh, A.V. Gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) male flight features for the south of the Russian Far East. Mod. Probl. Sci. Educ. 2015, 4, 443–451. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Meshkova, V.L. Seasonal Development of Phyllophagous Insects; Planeta-Print: Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2009. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Ilyinskiy, A.I. Supervision, Accounting and Forecast of Mass Propagation of Needle- and Leaf-Eating Insects in the Forests of the USSR; Forest Industry: Moscow, Russia, 1965. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Gray, D.R. Age-dependent postdiapause development in the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) life stage model. Environ. Entomol. 2009, 38, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kauffman, B.W.; Clatterbuck, W.K.; Liebhold, A.M.; Coyle, D.R. Gypsy Moth in the Southeastern U.S.: Biology, Ecology and Forest Management Strategies; SREF-FH-008; Southern Regional Extension Forestry: Athens, GA, USA, 2017; 10p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gray, D.R. The gypsy moth life stage model: Landscapewide estimates of gypsy moth establishment using a multigenerational phenology model. Ecol. Model. 2004, 176, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Régnière, J.; Sharov, A.A. Simulating temperature-dependent ecological processes at the sub-continental scale: Male gypsy moth flight phenology as an example. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1999, 42, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tobin, P.C.; Cremers, K.T.; Hunt, L.; Parry, D. All quiet on the western front? Using phenological inference to detect the presence of a latent gypsy moth invasion in Northern Minnesota. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 3561–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Djoumad, A.; Nisole, A.; Zahiri, R.; Freschi, L.; Picq, S.; Gundersen-Rindal, D.E.; Sparks, M.; Dewar, K.; Stewart, D.; Maaroufi, D.; et al. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes of geographic variants of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, reveals a previously undescribed genotypic entity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Picq, S.; Yunke, W.; Martemyanov, V.V.; Pouliot, E.; Pfister, S.E.; Hamelin, R.; Cusson, M. Range-wide population genomics of the spongy moth, Lymantria dispar (Erebidae): Implications for biosurveillance, subspecies classification and phylogeography of a destructive moth. Evol. Appl. 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ponomarev, V.I.; Klobukov, G.I.; Napalkova, V.V. The dependence of the morphological and physiological indices of Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) postembryonic stages from temperature conditions during embryogenesis. Tomsk State Univ. J. Biol. 2016, 3, 107–127. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ermolaev, I.V.; Ponomarev, V.I.; Vasil’ev, A.A.; Kumaeva, M.S. Phytophagous insects associated with the pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) in the northeast of its distribution area. Entomol. Rev. 2021, 101, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yasyukevich, V.V.; Titkina, C.N.; Davidovich, E.A.; Yasyukevich, N.V. Changes in boundaries of gypsy moth and nun moth (Lymantria dispar and Lymantria monacha, Lymantriidae, Lepidoptera) ranges due to the global warming: A model approach. Zool. Zh. 2013, 92, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ilyinykh, A.V.; Krivets, S.A. The results of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) pheromone monitoring in southeast of West Siberia. Bull. SPbFTU 2011, 196, 45–53. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  28. Shapiro, M.; Bell, A.; Owens, C.D. In vivo mass production of gypsy moth nucleopolyhedrosis virus. In Gypsy Moth Research towards Integrated Pest Management; Doane, C.C., McManus, M.L., Eds.; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1981; pp. 633–657. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ponomarev, V.I.; Klobukov, G.I.; Napalkova, V.V.; Tyurin, M.V.; Martemyanov, V.V. Influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the duration of development of the spongy moth Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in the West Siberian population of different latitudinal origin. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2023, 16, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mastro, V.C. Evaluation of disparlure-baited traps. In Gypsy Moth Research towards Integrated Pest Management; Doane, C.C., McManus, M.L., Eds.; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1981; pp. 549–553. [Google Scholar]
  31. Frank, K.L.; Tobin, P.C.; Thistle, H.W.; Kalkstein, L.S. Interpretation of gypsy moth frontal advance using meteorology in a conditional algorithm. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 57, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Régnière, J.; Sharov, A.A. Phenology of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), male flight and the effect of moth dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1998, 41, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Johnson, P.C.; Mason, D.P.; Radke, S.L.; Tracewski, K.T. Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), egg eclosion: Degree-day accumulations. Environ. Entomol. 1983, 12, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pantyukhov, G.A. The influence of positive temperatures on various geographical populations of Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. and gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera, Orgyidae). Entomol. Rev. 1962, 41, 274–284. [Google Scholar]
  35. Carter, M.R.; Ravlin, F.W.; McManus, M.L. Effect of defoliation on gypsy moth phenology and capture of male moths in pheromone-baited traps. Environ. Entomol. 1992, 21, 1308–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vanhanen, H.; Veteli, T.O.; Päivinen, S.; Kellomäki, S.; Niemelä, P. Climate change and range shifts in two insect defoliators: Gypsy moth and nun moth—A model study. Silva Fenn. 2007, 41, 621–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Limbu, S.; Keena, M.; Chen, F.; Cook, G.; Nadel, H.; Hoover, K. Effects of temperature on development of Lymantria dispar asiatica and Lymantria dispar japonica (Lepidoptera: Erebidae). Environ. Entomol. 2017, 46, 1012–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kozhanchikov, I.V. Fauna of the USSR. Lepidoptera Insects. Tussock Moths (Orgyidae); Academy of Sciences USSR: Moscow, Russia, 1950. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Gray, D.R.; Ravlin, F.W.; Braine, J.A. Diapause in the gypsy moth: A model of inhibition and development. J. Insect Physiol. 2001, 47, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weather and Climate. Available online: http://www.pogodaiklimat.ru (accessed on 10 January 2022). (In Russian).
  41. Weather Schedule. Available online: https://rp5.ru/ (accessed on 10 January 2022). (In Russian).
  42. Historical Climate Data. Available online: https://climate.weather.gc.ca (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  43. National Weather Service. Available online: https://www.weather.gov (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  44. Régnière, J.; Nealis, V.; Porter, K. Climate suitability and management of the gypsy moth invasion into Canada. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Keena, M.A.; Odell, T.M. Effects of Laboratory Rearing on Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae); General Technical Report NE-181; Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service: Radnor, PA, USA, 1992; 23p.
  46. Thompson, L.M.; Faske, T.M.; Banahene, N.; Grim, D.; Agosta, S.J.; Parry, D.; Tobin, P.C.; Johnson, D.M.; Grayson, K.L. Variation in growth and developmental responses to supraoptimal temperatures near latitudinal range limits of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (L.), an expanding invasive species. Physiol. Entomol. 2017, 42, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Trotter, R.T.; Limbu, S.; Hoover, K.; Nadel, H.; Keena, M.A. Comparing Asian gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar asiatica (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) and L. dispar japonica] trap data from East Asian ports with lab parameterized phenology models: New tools and questions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2020, 113, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sheehan, K.A. User’s Guide for GMPHEN: Gypsy Moth Phenology Model; Technical Report NE–158; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Radnor, PA, USA, 1992; 29p.
  49. Thompson, L.M.; Powers, S.D.; Appolon, A.; Hafker, P.; Milner, L.; Parry, D.; Agosta, S.J.; Grayson, K.L. Climate-related geographical variation in performance traits across the invasion front of a widespread non-native insect. J. Biogeogr. 2021, 48, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Srivastava, V.; Griess, V.C.; Keena, M.A. Assessing the potential distribution of Asian gypsy moth in Canada: A comparison of two methodological approaches. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Srivastava, V.; Keena, M.A.; Maennicke, G.E.; Hamelin, R.C.; Griess, V.C. Potential differences and methods of determining gypsy moth female flight capabilities: Implications for the establishment and spread in novel habitats. Forests 2021, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soukhovolsky, V.; Tarasova, O.; Pavlushin, S.; Osokina, E.; Akhanaev, Y.; Kovalev, A.; Martemyanov, V. Economics of a feeding budget: A case of diversity of host plants for Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera) feeding on leaves and needles. Diversity 2023, 15, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in the northern portion of its range in Asia. Description of values is given in the upper right corner.
Figure 1. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in the northern portion of its range in Asia. Description of values is given in the upper right corner.
Insects 14 00276 g001
Figure 2. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in the northern portion of its range in North America. Description of values is given in the lower right corner.
Figure 2. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in the northern portion of its range in North America. Description of values is given in the lower right corner.
Insects 14 00276 g002
Figure 4. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in Western Siberia in 2009–2010, created using data from Ilyinykh and Krivets 2011 [27].
Figure 4. Results of pheromone monitoring of L. dispar in Western Siberia in 2009–2010, created using data from Ilyinykh and Krivets 2011 [27].
Insects 14 00276 g004
Figure 5. Median Julian date of L. dispar male flight for the localities flagged in Figure 3. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the localities being compared.
Figure 5. Median Julian date of L. dispar male flight for the localities flagged in Figure 3. Different letters indicate a significant difference between the localities being compared.
Insects 14 00276 g005
Figure 6. SET for development of L. dispar populations from the localities flagged in Figure 3, as calculated on the median date of male flight. Different letters indicate significant differences among the localities being compared.
Figure 6. SET for development of L. dispar populations from the localities flagged in Figure 3, as calculated on the median date of male flight. Different letters indicate significant differences among the localities being compared.
Insects 14 00276 g006
Table 1. Seasonal flight data for male spongy moths caught in pheromone traps at different latitudes in Eurasia.
Table 1. Seasonal flight data for male spongy moths caught in pheromone traps at different latitudes in Eurasia.
YearFlight DatesFlight Duration, DaysNumber of Males, Per Trap
StartEndMedian
58°11′ N–68°15′ E—Tyumen region, Tobolsk, Siberia
202012 July22 July16 July1165
202112 July12 August20 July3249
56°85′ N–53°92′ E—Republic of Udmurtia, Votkinsky district, biostation “Siva”, Ural 1
201415 July9 August2 August2620
20155 July5 August22 July3218
20167 July1 August12 July2612
56°50′ N–60°35′ E—Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg, Ural 2
200923 July10 August25 July18176
20103 July7 August22 July36182
201119 July12 August28 July2530
20123 July18 July11 July1617
201325 July14 August29 July21799
201431 July19 August9 August207
201516 July24 July23 July93
20168 July31 July20 July24575
201725 July28 August8 August3566
20181 August6 August2 August64
201915 July19 July17 July52
56°33′ N–76°37′ E—Novosibirsk region, Kyshtovka village, Siberia
2019- 312 August30 July~203399
20206 July26 July17 July20445
20215 July8 August15 July351166
202211 July14 August31 July334223
53°74′ N–78°00′ E—Novosibirsk region, Karasuk, Siberia
201310 July16 August29 July37585
20227 July4 August12 July281454
48°42′ N–44°30′ E—Volgograd region, Volgograd, Eastern Europe
20102 July31 July6 July3014
20118 July28 July15 July2146
20127 July27 July18 July21152
201419 June23 July4 July35654
46°20′ N–48°02′ E—Astrakhan region, Astrakhan, Eastern Europe
201128 June5 August9 July39814
201314 June29 July6 July45424
201418 June20 July1 July33478
43°15′ N–76°54′ E—Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata, Central Asia
20073 July3 August15 July31170
42°52′ N–76°34′ E—Republic of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Central Asia
20093 July8 August23 July37409
201225 June30 July24 July362956
201324 June5 August18 July43367
40°56′ N–E73°00′ E—Republic of Kyrgyzstan, Jalal-Abad, Central Asia
200427 June18 July6 July2157
200521 June24 July6 July33164
201711 June26 July23 June454498
1 Data from Ermolaev et al. [25]; 2 Pheromone monitoring was also conducted in Ekaterinburg in 2020 and 2021, but population levels were too low to be informative (only one individual caught in the last third of July); 3 564 males caught on the first day trap was inspected.
Table 2. Sum of effective temperatures (SET; degree-days) for the development of the spongy moth and seasonal heat availability at different latitudes in Eurasia (threshold: 7 °C).
Table 2. Sum of effective temperatures (SET; degree-days) for the development of the spongy moth and seasonal heat availability at different latitudes in Eurasia (threshold: 7 °C).
YearSET for Development to Imago StageSET
At Beginning of FlightAt End of FlightAt Flight MedianSummer–Autumn Embryo DevelopmentHeat Availability
At Flight MedianAt End of Flight
58°11′ N–68°15′ E—Tyumen region, Tobolsk (WMO id 28275 1)
20207058657715965021367
202171510177765172761293
56°85′ N–53°92′ E—Republic of Udmurtia, biostation “Siva” (WMO id 28413)
201475610149104613571371
201569810048505513971401
201668610667829046201686
56°50′ N–60°35′ E—Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg (WMO id 28440)
20097388927575494141306
201065911768975642851461
20117009898354492951284
20127819299007447151644
201382610678804913041371
20147639768682731651141
20157137867764114011187
20166879898487696281617
201765510418243471301171
20187668167774263871203
20196677236915375051228
56°33′ N–76°37′ E—Novosibirsk region, Kyshtovka village (WMO id 29405)
2019-8467094032651111
20206469238015474161348
20215639216695382861207
20226039658173562081173
53°74′ N–78°02′ E—Novosibirsk region, Karasuk (WMO id 29814)
201355410438164712441287
202273612119097104081619
48°42′ N–44°30′ E—Volgograd region, Volgograd (WMO id 34560)
20109741374110212969312305
20119361364111210207682132
20127381029887156414222451
2014787126495712479402204
46°20′ N–48°02′ E—Astrakhan region, Astrakhan (WMO id 34880)
20117881533108512437952328
20137921503119112479352438
201483414291194131810832512
43°15′ N–76°54′ E—Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata (WMO id 36870)
200710741534120311948632397
42°52′ N–76°34′ E—Republic of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek (WMO id 38353)
2009911153312379886922225
201210971721134212889092630
20138811604119512228132417
40°56′ N–E73°00′ E—Republic of Kyrgyzstan, Jalal-Abad (WMO id 38613)
2004117515441337167214653009
2005108017101350173913793089
201789816941114135719373051
1 Identification number of meteostation by World Meteorological Organization.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ponomarev, V.I.; Klobukov, G.I.; Napalkova, V.V.; Akhanaev, Y.B.; Pavlushin, S.V.; Yakimova, M.E.; Subbotina, A.O.; Picq, S.; Cusson, M.; Martemyanov, V.V. Phenological Features of the Spongy Moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), in the Northernmost Portions of Its Eurasian Range. Insects 2023, 14, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030276

AMA Style

Ponomarev VI, Klobukov GI, Napalkova VV, Akhanaev YB, Pavlushin SV, Yakimova ME, Subbotina AO, Picq S, Cusson M, Martemyanov VV. Phenological Features of the Spongy Moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), in the Northernmost Portions of Its Eurasian Range. Insects. 2023; 14(3):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ponomarev, Vasiliy I., Georgiy I. Klobukov, Viktoria V. Napalkova, Yuriy B. Akhanaev, Sergey V. Pavlushin, Maria E. Yakimova, Anna O. Subbotina, Sandrine Picq, Michel Cusson, and Vyacheslav V. Martemyanov. 2023. "Phenological Features of the Spongy Moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), in the Northernmost Portions of Its Eurasian Range" Insects 14, no. 3: 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop