Next Article in Journal
Cut to Disarm Plant Defence: A Unique Oviposition Behaviour in Rhynchites foveipennis (Coleoptera: Attelabidae)
Previous Article in Journal
The Transcriptomic Response of the Boll Weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), following Exposure to the Organophosphate Insecticide Malathion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Thermal Oviposition Performance of the Ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons Preying on Two-Spotted Spider Mites

by
Maryam Jafari
1,*,
Hossein Ranjbar Aghdam
2,
Abbas Ali Zamani
3,
Shila Goldasteh
1,
Ebrahim Soleyman-Nejadian
1 and
Peter Schausberger
4,*
1
Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak 6134937333, Iran
2
Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran 1475744741, Iran
3
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah 6718773654, Iran
4
Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(2), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020199
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 16 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study models the effects of temperature on age-dependent fecundity of the ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons, which is an important predator of herbivorous spider mites such as Tetranychus urticae. Based on the fecundity of S. gilvifrons fed on T. urticae, examined at six constant temperatures from 15 to 34 °C, we generated thermal performance curves by using four non-linear models (Enkegaard, Analytis, Bieri-1, and Bieri-2). The thermal performance models presented here can be used to determine the optimal temperature for mass-rearing, simulate daily egg production, and predict field occurrence patterns and seasonal population dynamics of this predator. The models constitute an essential step towards developing temperature-based simulation models of the population dynamics of S. gilvifrons interacting with its spider mite prey.

Abstract

The ladybird, Stethorus gilvifrons (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), is an important predator of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), in southeastern Europe and western and southwestern Asia, such as Iran, India, and Turkey. To enhance forecasting the occurrence and performance of this predator in natural control and improve its usage in biological control, we evaluated and compared four non-linear oviposition models, i.e., Enkegaard, Analytis, Bieri-1, and Bieri-2. The models were validated by using data of age-specific fecundity of female S. gilvifrons at six constant temperatures (15, 20, 25, 27, 30, and 34 °C). All four models provided good fit quality to age-dependent oviposition at 15 to 30 °C (R2 0.67 to 0.94; R2adj 0.63 to 0.94) but had a poor fit at 34 °C (R2 0.33 to 0.40; R2adj 0.17 to 0.34). Within temperatures, the best performing models were Bieri-1 (R2), Bieri-2 (R2adj), and Analytis (RSS) at 15 °C, Bieri-1 at 27 °C, and Analytis at 20, 25, and 30 °C. Analytis was the best suited model across the wide temperature range tested (from 15 to 30 °C). The models presented here allow for prediction of the population dynamics of S. gilvifrons in field and greenhouse crops in temperate and subtropical climates.

1. Introduction

The two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), which is a serious pest of numerous field and greenhouse crops, is notorious for its ability to develop resistance against synthetic chemical pesticides [1,2,3]. Attempts to control T. urticae using acaricides often fail, and thus, biological control using predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae [4,5], and predatory beetles of the family Coccinellidae [6,7] has been promoted. Within the Coccinellidae, several species of the genus Stethorus have been investigated for their potential in the control of spider mites [8,9], such as S. punctillum Weise [10,11,12], S. punctum (Le Conte) [13], S. madecassus Chazeau [14], S. pauperculus Weise [15], and S. gilvifrons (Mulsant) [16,17]. The latter species has been reported from several regions in Europe, Africa, and Asia [18], and was reported for the first time in Iran in 1961 [19]. The general biological characteristics of S. gilvifrons such as its functional response, life table characteristics, and feeding activity have been studied [20,21,22], but little information is available on the effects of temperature on S. gilvifrons [23,24,25] and no temperature-dependent oviposition models have been developed. Compared with other Stethorus spp., S. gilvifrons has a very good searching activity, a short developmental time, relatively high survivorship, moderate longevity, high fecundity, and, in consequence, a high intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm). Therefore, it holds promising potential for mass-rearing and periodic augmentative releases in open field and greenhouse crops [25,26,27,28].
Environmental temperature is a critical abiotic factor that fundamentally affects the biology and ecology of ectothermic organisms such as insects and mites, regulating their behavior, physiology, and life history [29,30,31]. Accordingly, in biological pest management, the estimation of the developmental rate, longevity, survivorship, fecundity, and thermal thresholds of both herbivorous pests and their natural enemies has received great attention. Such efforts are important not only to further our understanding of their population dynamics but also for the development and optimization of integrated and biological pest management programs [32]. One important aspect when assessing and modeling temperature effects on the life history traits of ectothermic organisms is the choice of temperature regimes. Targeting the same mean temperatures, regimes can be constant (or close to constant with low amplitude fluctuations) or abrupt stepwise or smooth gradual with rare or frequent changes between temperatures. Such choices should be based on accuracy–generalizability–comparability trade-offs. Regimes that closely mimic natural fluctuations, for example [33,34], are a favorable choice if the objective is to accurately predict phenology in a given locality or region; close to constant regimes are easier to standardize and thus favorable for comparing the thermal requirements of populations of different geographic and climatic origins and/or species and/or data from different studies (for review [35]).
In previous studies [25,36], we assessed the effect of temperature on the life history of S. gilvifrons [25] and simulated the thermal developmental trajectories using linear and non-linear models [36]. Here we aimed at describing the thermal oviposition performance of S. gilvifrons by using four non-linear models [37,38,39,40,41] and comparing their fit to experimentally observed fecundity data at six constant temperatures [25]. Such oviposition models can be used to simulate the daily, age-dependent egg production of this predator under variable temperature conditions, which can be utilized in predicting egg occurrence patterns, in developing S. gilvifrons population dynamics models, and in establishing effective biological control strategies for spider mites. Stethorus gilvifrons is a promising biocontrol agent of spider mites in both greenhouse and field crops because it is able to develop and reproduce at relatively low (15 °C) and high (34 °C) temperatures [25] and may thus be suitable for use during early, peak, and late seasons.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rearing and Experimental Conditions

The specimens of S. gilvifrons, which were used to found a laboratory population, were originally collected from two sugarcane fields (48°26′17.25″ E, 31°15′10.88″ N and 48°30′35.89″ E, 31°04′10.74″ N) (Amir-Kabir Agro-Industry Co.) located in Ahwaz region, Khuzestan province, Southwest of Iran. Individuals of the F2 generation of the field-sampled ladybirds were used in the experiment [25,33].
To establish a cohort, 20 S. gilvifrons individuals (males and females) were incubated at 27 °C on maize leaf discs (8 cm diameter) harboring mixed stages of T. urticae, resting on a moist cotton pad inside a transparent plastic container (19 × 14 × 4 cm). On the next day, newly laid eggs (<24 h old) of S. gilvifrons were collected and placed individually on maize leaf squares (4 × 4 cm) resting on moist cotton pads in plastic dishes (6 cm diameter). Both the plastic containers and plastic dishes were stored in growth chambers programmed at 15, 20, 25, 27, 30, and 34 °C (all ± 1 °C), 50 ± 5% R.H and a photoperiod of 16:8 h (L:D). The numbers per individual cohort (age < 24 h) at the starting point of the experiments were 200, 140, 120, 120, 120, and 120 eggs at the above temperatures [25,36]. Progress in development (hatching, molting, pupation, adult emergence) and survival were assessed every 24 h [23,36]. Due to juvenile survival varying with temperature [25], the number of adult females emerging at the above temperatures was 10, 20, 29, 33, 33, and 38 individuals. All emerged females were placed individually, together with a male, in a plastic container (19 × 14 × 4 cm) on new leaf squares containing mixed stages of spider mites as prey. During reproduction, the females were transferred daily to fresh leaf discs. The number of eggs laid was recorded daily until the female beetles died and their longevity (from adult emergence to natural death) was determined [25]. In case of male mortality, the dead male individual was removed and replaced by another similarly-aged male, taken from the laboratory rearing at the same temperature. Survival and fecundity of the females were recorded daily. Age-specific fecundity (mx) was calculated and used for modeling.

2.2. Non-Linear Models

Several non-linear models have been developed to describe the relationship between temperature and the developmental rate and/or fecundity of insects and mites [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Some of these models can be used for both developmental data and fecundity [41]. Among these, we selected the following four non-linear models to describe the relationship between temperature and age-dependent fecundity of S. gilvifrons.

2.3. Enkegaard Model

This non-linear model was suggested by [38] and used to fit fecundity data [38,40,41,45]. The equation of the Enkegaard model is:
r ( T ) = ( a + b × T ) × [ e ( ( c + d × T ) ) ]
where r(T) is the developmental rate or daily fecundity, T is temperature or female adult age, depending on fitted data, a, b, c, and d are empirical constants.

2.4. Bieri-1 Model

This equation was used to fit the data of fecundity [37,41,45]. The Bieri–1 model uses the following equation:
r ( T ) = [ a ( T x m a x ) ] [ b ( T x m i n ) ]
where r(T) is the developmental rate or fecundity, T is temperature or adult female age depending on the fitted data, xmax, xmin, a, and b are empirical constants (xmax, xmin represent the lower- and upper-temperature threshold or the days of beginning and ceasing oviposition).

2.5. Bieri-2 Model

This equation was used to fit the data on the developmental rate and fecundity by [7,41,45]. The Bieri–2 model uses the following equation:
r ( T ) = a × ( ( T x m i n ) b ( T x m i n ) )
where r(T) is considered as developmental rate or daily fecundity, T is the temperature for developmental rate or female adult age for daily fecundity, depending on the fitted data, xmin, a, and b are empirical constants.

2.6. Analytis Model

The Analytis model was first developed to determine the relationship between temperature and developmental time of phytopathogenic fungi and plant pests [46,47]. However, some authors used this model not only to describe development but also to determine the fecundity of insect pests and their natural enemies at different temperatures [40,41,44,45]. The expression of this model is:
r ( T ) = a × ( T x m i n ) n   × ( x max   T ) m
where r(T) is the developmental rate or fecundity, T is temperature or adult female age depending on the fitted data, and xmax, xmin, a, m, and n are empirical constants (xmax, xmin, represent the lower and the upper-thresholds for development or the first and the final age of oviposition).

2.7. Model Evaluation

All four non-linear models were assessed for goodness-of-fit to observed data [25] based on the following three statistical criteria:
  • The coefficient of determination (R2), where RSS is the residual sum of squares and TSS is the total sum of squares. A higher value of R2 indicates a better fit.
    R 2 = 1 R S S / T S S
  • The residual sum of squares (RSS): A lower value of RSS indicates a better fit. The R2 is not an appropriate criterion to discriminate between models with different numbers of parameters (models with more parameters usually provide a better fit).
  • The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj), where n is the number of observations, p is the number of model parameters, and R2 is the coefficient of determination. A higher value of R2adj indicates a better fit [44,45].
    R a d j 2 = 1 [ n 1 n p ] ( 1 R 2 )

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The effect of temperature on the life history traits of S. gilvifrons [25] were analyzed with the age-stage, two-sex life table [48,49] using the computer program TWO SEXMSChart [50]. The parameters of the non-linear regressions for fecundity were analyzed with the Marquardt algorithm [51] using the JMP (IN 4.lnk) and Excel (version 2007) programs. All graphs were plotted with SigmaPlot 12.3.

3. Results and Discussion

This study provides fundamental information on the thermal performance in age-dependent fecundity of a widespread predator of herbivorous spider mites, that is, the ladybird S. gilvifrons. The models were fitted to oviposition and longevity data observed at six constant temperatures ranging from 15 to 34 °C [25].
The experimental study [25] underlying the modeling performed here suggested that oviposition of S. gilvifrons, as is the case in most ectothermic arthropods, is affected by temperature in a non-linear fashion, with the total number of eggs per female at 15, 20, 25, 27, 30, and 34 °C amounting to 20.5, 133.1, 159.6, 158.6, 249.5, and 221.2 eggs, respectively. These data were higher than those reported by [23] (25.5, 47.1, 102.5, 145.2, 150.9, and 185.5 eggs) at 15 to 35 °C, and differ considerably from those reported by [52], with averages of 30.5, 52.8 and 39.8 eggs at 20, 25, and 30 °C. Within the range of 15 to 35 °C, fecundity of S. gilvifrons is relatively high in comparison with other Stethorus spp., with S. punctillum being at the lower end (6.6 to 46.8 eggs at 16 to 32°C) [11] and S. japonicas being at the upper end (620.0 to 736.2 eggs at 20 to 30 °C [53]. Fecundities of the latter species represent by far the highest oviposition rates reported for any Stethorus spp.
In the experimental study [25] underlying the modeling presented here, the longevity of female S. gilvifrons ranged from 87.1 to 32.0 d at 15 to 34 °C [25], which is much longer than the longevities reported for this species by [23] at 15 to 35 °C (17.4 to 8.8 d), and by [52] at 20 to 30 °C (35.2 to 10.2 d). The reported differences in fecundities and longevities of the same species at similar temperatures may be due to differences in host plant and prey quality [28], photoperiod [54], humidity [55], or the techniques used in rearing and/or experiments.
Most non-linear models (Enkegaard, Bieri-1, Bieri-2, and Analytis) used to simulate fecundity of S. gilvifrons in our study showed significant goodness-of-fit according to R2, R2adj, and RSS values at most temperatures (Table 1; Figure 1). However, the fit of the models differed considerably among and within temperatures. All four models were better fitted near the optimum temperature (at about 30 °C) than at the other temperatures, which parallels modeling fecundity of two coccinellid Nephus spp. [41]. At 34 °C, all models had poor goodness-of-fit; the Bieri-1 and Analytis models had the highest R2 and R2adj values, whereas the Enkegaard model had the poorest fit to data (Table 1). The best fitting model varied with temperature: the Bieri-1 model had the best fit at 15 and 27 °C, whereas the Analytis model had the best fit at 20, 25, and 30 °C.
The thermal performance models presented here can be used to simulate the daily, age-dependent egg production of S. gilvifrons under variable temperature conditions [56]. The high goodness-of-fit of the Bieri-1 and Analytis models at all temperatures except 34 °C indicates that these models adequately reflect the underlying biological processes of S. gilvifrons. Fluctuating temperatures may, but do not necessarily, result in different effects than constant temperatures in laboratory experiments, e.g., [57,58]; but see [59]. Due to Jensen’s inequality and typically non-linear thermal responses [35], such deviations occur primarily at temperatures close to and around the lower and upper thresholds but less so at the intermediate range [33,35]. Possible deviations also depend on the type of fluctuation. In fact, temperatures termed “constant” are usually also oscillating around the target mean by ±1, 2, or even more °C units, depending on the equipment and way of climate control (in our study it was the mean ±1 °C). Thus, in most laboratory settings “constant” temperatures are actually temperatures fluctuating at low amplitude around the mean. The amplitude and frequency of temperature changes, and smooth versus abrupt transition between temperatures are additional factors that may potentially affect the life history of the target organisms directly, by acting on its physiology and behavior, and/or indirectly via concurrent changes in diet, microclimate, humidity, etc. [35,57]. Notwithstanding accuracy trade-offs in predicting local/regional phenology, the review by [35] indicates that models based on close to constant temperatures are suitable and relevant for the planning and implementation of biological and integrated pest management programs. Thus, the fecundity models presented here can be useful for predicting the occurrence, population dynamics, phenology, and distribution patterns of S. gilvifrons under various environmental conditions and to estimate its establishment potential outside its native geographic range. Overall, our study suggests that, due to its thermal tolerance, S. gilvifrons can be considered a highly promising candidate for the biological control of spider mites such as T. urticae at a wide range of temperatures under field and greenhouse conditions [60,61,62].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.J. and H.R.A.; methodology: M.J. and H.R.A.; collected the data: M.J. and H.R.A.; analyzed the data and software: M.J. and H.R.A.; validation: H.R.A., S.G., A.A.Z. and E.S.-N.; formal analysis: M.J.; investigation: M.J., H.R.A., S.G., A.A.Z., E.S.-N. and P.S.; resources: M.J., and H.R.A.; data curation: M.J.; writing original draft: M.J.; writing review and editing: M.J., H.R.A., S.G., A.A.Z., E.S.-N. and P.S.; supervision and project administration: H.R.A.; funding acquisition: H.R.A. and P.S. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Sugarcane and Products Development Company and the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. Open access funding was provided by the University of Vienna.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the first author (M.J.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeppson, L.R.; Keifer, H.H.; Baker, E.W. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mossadegh, M.S.; Kocheili, F. A Semi Descriptive Checklist of Identified Species of Arthropods (Agricultural, Medical) and Other Pests from Khuzestan, Iran; Shahid Chamran University Press: Ahvaz, Iran, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Leeuwen, T.; Vontas, J.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Dermauw, W.; Tirry, L. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Helle, W.; Sabelis, M.W. Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies, and Control, Volume 1A; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  5. Knapp, M.; van Houten, Y.; van Baal, E.; Groot, T. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: Current status and future prospects. Acarologia 2018, 58, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mathur, L.M.L. Bionomics of Stethorus gilvifrons Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Madras Agric. J. 1969, 56, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Roy, M.; Brodeur, J.; Cloutier, C. Seasonal activity of the spider mite predators Stethorus punctillum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Neoseiulus fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in raspberry, two predators of Tetranychus mcdanieli (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Biol. Control 2005, 34, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McMurtry, J.A.; Huffaker, C.B.; Van de Vrie, M. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review. I. Tetranychid enemies: Their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia. 1970, 40, 331–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Roy, M.; Brodeur, J.; Cloutier, C. Effect of temperature on intrinsic rates of natural increase (rm) of a coccinellid and its spider mite prey. BioControl 2003, 48, 7–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Putman, W.L. The bionomics of Stethorus punctillum Weise (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Ontario. Can. Entomol. 1955, 87, 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Roy, M.; Brodeur, J.; Cloutier, C. Relationship between temperature and developmental rate of Stethorus punctillum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and its prey Tetranychus mcdanieli (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Environ. Èntomol. 2002, 31, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z. Lima bean–lady beetle interactions: Hooked trichomes affect survival of Stethorus punctillum larvae. BioControl 2011, 56, 5–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Houck, M.A. Prey preference in Stethorus punctum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ. Èntomol. 1986, 15, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chazeau, J. Developpement et fecondite de Stethorus madecassus Chazeau (Coleopteres, Coccinellidae) eleve en conditions exterieures dans le sud-ouest de Madagascar. Cah. ORSTOM Ser. Biol. 1974, 25, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kapur, A.P. On the Old-World species of the genus Stethorus Weise (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1948, 37, 297–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Haji-Zadeh, J.; Kamali, G.K.; Assadi, H.B. Investigations on the functional response and populations fluctuations of Stethorus gilvifrons on red spider mite, Panonychus ulmi (Koch) in Karaj vicinity [Iran]. Appl. Entomol. Phytopathol. 1993, 61, 32–34. (In Persian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Mehrkhou, F.; Fathipour, Y.; Talebi, A.A.; Kamali, K.; Naseri, B. Population density and spatial distribution patterns of Tetranychus urticae (Acari, Tetranychidae) and its predator Stethorus gilvifrons (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on different agricultural crops. J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 2008, 10, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  18. Biddinger, D.J.; Weber, D.C.; Hull, L.A. Coccinellidae as predators of mites: Stethorini in biological control. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 268–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Farahbakhsh, G. A Checklist of Important Insects and Other Enemies of Plants and Agricultural Products in Iran; Iranian Ministry of Agriculture: Tehran, Iran, 1961.
  20. Sarmah, M.; Bhattacharyya, B. Biology and feeding potential of Stethorus gilvifrons Mulsant (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) on tea red spider mite, Oligonychus coffeae Neitner. Shashpa 2002, 9, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  21. Afshari, M.; Mossadegh, S.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E.; Kamali, K. Geographical distribution and host plants of Stethorus gilvifrons (Mulsant) (Col.: Coccinellidae) and its biology under laboratory conditions in Khuzestan province. J. Agri. Sci. Nat. Res. 2007, 14, 201–210. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sohrabi, F.; Shishehbor, P. Functional and numerical responses of Stethorus gilvifrons Mulsant feeding on strawberry spider mite, Tetranychus turkestani Ugarov and Nikolski. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10, 4563–4566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Taghizadeh, R.; Fathipour, Y.; Kamali, K. Influence of temperature on life-table parameters of Stethorus gilvifrons (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Tetranychus urticae Koch. J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 132, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taghizadeh, R.; Fathipour, Y.; Kamali, K. Temperature-dependent development of acarophagous ladybird, Stethorus gilvifrons (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2008, 11, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jafari, M.; Goldasteh, S.; Ranjbar Aghdam, H.; Zamani, A.A.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E. Effect of temperature on two-sex life table parameters of Stethorus gilvifrons (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Entomol. Soc. Iran. 2020, 40, 65–82. (In Persian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Perumalsamy, K.; Selvasundaram, R.; Roobakkumar, A.; Rahman, V.J.; Muraleedharan, N. Life table and predatory efficiency of Stethorus gilvifrons (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), an important predator of the red spider mite, Oligonychus coffeae (Acari: Tetranychidae), infesting tea. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 50, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jafari, M.; Goldasteh, S.; Ranjbar Aghdam, H.; Zamani, A.A.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E. Effect of solitary and group rearing on demographic parameters of Stethorus gilvifrons (Col.: Coccinellidae) feeding on Tetranychus urticae. J. Entomol. Res. 2019, 11, 197–217. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jafari, M.; Goldasteh, S.; Ranjbar Aghdam, H.; Zamani, A.A.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E. Effects of prey species and host plants on development and life history of Stethorus gilvifrons (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2022, 24, 635–648. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cossins, A.R.; Bowler, K. Temperature Biology of Animals; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  30. Colinet, H.; Sinclair, B.J.; Vernon, P.; Renault, D. Insects in fluctuating thermal environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.H. Oviposition model of overwintered adult Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and mite phenology on the ground cover in apple orchards. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2003, 31, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Huffaker, C.B.; Berryman, A.; Turchin, P. Dynamics and regulation of insect populations. Ecol. Entomol. 1999, 2, 269–305. [Google Scholar]
  33. McCalla, K.A.; Keçeci, M.; Milosavljević, I.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hoddle, M.S. The influence of temperature variation on life history parameters and thermal performance curves of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasitoid of the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). J. Econ. Èntomol. 2019, 112, 1560–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Milosavljević, I.; McCalla, K.A.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; Hoddle, M.S. Effects of constant and fluctuating temperatures on development rates and longevity of Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Econ. Èntomol. 2019, 112, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Von Schmalensee, L.; Gunnarsdottir, K.H.; Näslund, J.; Gotthard, K.; Lehmann, P. Thermal performance under constant temperatures can accurately predict insect development times across naturally variable microclimates. Ecol. Lett. 2021, 24, 1633–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jafari, M.; Goldasteh, S.; Aghdam, H.R.; Zamani, A.A.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E.; Schausberger, P. Modeling thermal developmental trajectories and thermal requirements of the ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons. Insects 2023, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bieri, M.; Baumgartner, J.; Bianchi, G.; Delucchi, V.; Arx, R.V. Development and fecundity of pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) as affected by constant temperatures and by pea varieties. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol Ges. 1983, 56, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  38. Enkegaard, A. The poinsettia strain of the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), biological and demographic parameters on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) in relation to temperature. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1993, 83, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lanzoni, A.; Accinelli, G.; Bazzocchi, G.G.; Burgio, G. Biological traits and life table of the exotic Harmonia axyridis compared with Hippodamia variegata, and Adalia bipunctata (Col., Coccinellidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2004, 128, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kontodimas, D.C.; Milonas, P.G.; Stathas, G.J.; Economou, L.P.; Kavallieratos, N.G. Life table parameters of the pseudococcid predators Nephus includens and Nephus bisignatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2007, 104, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kontodimas, D.C. Nonlinear models for describing development and fecundity of the pseudococcid predators Nephus includens and Nephus bisignatus. Entomol. Hellenica 2012, 21, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Arbab, A.; Kontodimas, D.C.; Sahragard, A. Estimating development of Aphis pomi (De Geer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) using linear and nonlinear models. Environ. Èntomol. 2006, 35, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zamani, A.A.; Talebi, A.; Fathipour, Y.; Baniameri, V. Effect of temperature on life history of Aphidius colemani and Aphidius matricariae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), two parasitoids of Aphis gossypii and Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Èntomol. 2007, 36, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aghdam, H.R.; Fathipour, Y.; Radjabi, G.; Rezapanah, M. Temperature-dependent development and temperature thresholds of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Iran. Environ. Èntomol. 2009, 38, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aghdam, H.R.; Fathipour, Y.; Kontodimas, D.C. Evaluation of non-linear models to describe development and fertility of codling moth at constant temperatures. Entomol. Hell. 2011, 20, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Analytis, S. Obtaining of sub-models for modeling the entire life cycle of a pathogen/Über die Erlangung von Sub-Modellen, die zur Beschreibung eines gesamten Lebenszyklus eines Krankheitserregers dienen. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenschutz/J. Plant Dis. Prot. 1980, 87, 371–382. [Google Scholar]
  47. Analytis, S. Relationship between temperature and development times in phytopathogenic fungus and in plant pests: A mathematical model. J. Agric. Res. 1981, 5, 133–159. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chi, H.; Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. 1985, 24, 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988, 17, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chi, H. TWOSEX-MS Chart: A Computer Program for the Age-Stage, Two-Sex Life Table Analysis. 2017. Available online: http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/ (accessed on 16 September 2017).
  51. Marquardt, D.V. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 1963, 11, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aksit, T.; Cakmak, I.; Ozer, G. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on development and fecundity of an acarophagous ladybird beetle, Stethorus gilvifrons. Phytoparasitica 2007, 35, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mori, K.; Nozawa, M.; Arai, K.; Gotoh, T. Life-history traits of the acarophagous lady beetle, Stethorus japonicus at three constant temperatures. BioControl 2005, 50, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Tan, X.L.; Michaud, J.P.; Zhang, F.; Guo, X. Light intensity and wavelength influence development, reproduction and locomotor activity in the predatory flower bug Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). BioControl 2013, 58, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Emana, G.D. Comparative studies of the influence of relative humidity and temperature on the longevity and fecundity of the parasitoid, Cotesia flavipes. J. Insect Sci. 2007, 7, 19. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.H. Oviposition model of Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae). Ecol. Modell. 2003, 162, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tougeron, K.; Ferrais, L.; Renard, M.-E.; Hance, T. Effects of constant versus fluctuating temperatures on fitness indicators of the aphid Dysaphis plantaginea and the parasitoid Aphidius matricariae. Insects 2021, 12, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rismayani; Ullah, S.M.; Chi, H.; Gotoh, T. Impact of constant and fluctuating temperatures on population characteristics of Tetranychus pacificus (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hoskins, J.L.; Janion-Scheepers, C.; Ireland, E.; Monro, K.; Chown, S.L. Constant and fluctuating temperature acclimations have similar effects on phenotypic plasticity in springtails. J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 93, 102690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lee, J.H.; Ahn, J.J. Temperature effects on development, fecundity, and life table parameters of Amblyseius womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, T.V.; Shih, C.I.T. Development of Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha) and Euseius ovalis (Evans) feeding on four tetranychid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) and pollen. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2010, 13, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McMurtry, J.A.; De Moraes, G.J.; Sourassou, N.F. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 18, 297–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Fitting four non-linear models to observed age-specific fecundity (mx) of S. gilvifrons at six constant temperatures. Thin light lines and open circles represent the observed data [25].
Figure 1. Fitting four non-linear models to observed age-specific fecundity (mx) of S. gilvifrons at six constant temperatures. Thin light lines and open circles represent the observed data [25].
Insects 14 00199 g001aInsects 14 00199 g001b
Table 1. Goodness-of-fit of four non-linear models to fecundity of the ladybird S. gilvifrons observed at six constant temperatures (observed data from [25]).
Table 1. Goodness-of-fit of four non-linear models to fecundity of the ladybird S. gilvifrons observed at six constant temperatures (observed data from [25]).
ModelNParameters15 °C20 °C25 °C27 °C30 °C34 °C
Bieri-14a−0.1824−1.099−0.1881−1.2885−0.418−18.2343
b0.98440.98490.97260.97730.90940.9868
xmax99.1796.898184.566678.685044.485192.1040
xmin184.95309.2969100.8353221.489132.0370562.1977
R20.69350.88040.80550.81800.82510.3507
R2adj0.66640.87290.79690.80590.81320.2482
RSS(10−4)2.8421.8016.6568.8078.561136.86
Bieri-23a0.11210.60270.35091.18721.66604.2338
b1.0331.0501.04371.05601.08901.1448
xmin0.28142.47782.39661.68911.75235.8095
R20.69150.68780.72190.75250.76770.4052
R2adj0.67390.66560.71390.74180.75740.3457
RSS(10−4)2.87163.5325.47102.32123.335238.56
Analytis5a3.17 × 10−161.47 × 10−141.72 × 10−148.53 × 10−152.18 × 10−128.86 × 10−17
Dmin1.7993−4.1012−1.9677−0.30991.68131.8743
Dmax168.947181.0560126.9143111.814163.124766.1766
n6.48825.64695.72706.54326.14598.5172
m1.16493.20711.93271.64882.00612.2784
R20.67370.91520.80950.80140.94540.3349
R2adj0.63290.90800.79820.78330.94010.1784
RSS(10−4)2.752015.8916.3676.6424.11390.37
Enkegaard4a−0.8739−9.8291−5.4350−12.8136−19.7534−19.7533
b0.68203.96672.26597.585711.272412.7650
c1.76241.76241.76241.76241.76241.7624
d0.03330.04910.04280.05450.08530.0785
R20.69150.67860.72190.75250.76770.3921
R2adj0.66430.65860.70970.73600.75190.2961
RSS(10−4)2.8763.5325.47102.32123.33333.64
N: Number of model parameters, R2: Coefficient of determination, R2adj: Adjusted R2, RSS: Residual sum of squares.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jafari, M.; Aghdam, H.R.; Zamani, A.A.; Goldasteh, S.; Soleyman-Nejadian, E.; Schausberger, P. Thermal Oviposition Performance of the Ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons Preying on Two-Spotted Spider Mites. Insects 2023, 14, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020199

AMA Style

Jafari M, Aghdam HR, Zamani AA, Goldasteh S, Soleyman-Nejadian E, Schausberger P. Thermal Oviposition Performance of the Ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons Preying on Two-Spotted Spider Mites. Insects. 2023; 14(2):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jafari, Maryam, Hossein Ranjbar Aghdam, Abbas Ali Zamani, Shila Goldasteh, Ebrahim Soleyman-Nejadian, and Peter Schausberger. 2023. "Thermal Oviposition Performance of the Ladybird Stethorus gilvifrons Preying on Two-Spotted Spider Mites" Insects 14, no. 2: 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop