Next Article in Journal
Exclusion and Repulsion of Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Using Selected Coverings on High Tunnel Structures for Primocane Red Raspberry
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic-Phenomic Reciprocal Illumination: Desyopone hereon gen. et sp. nov., an Exceptional Aneuretine-like Fossil Ant from Ethiopian Amber (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae)
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Pest Management of Wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) and the Rhizosphere in Agroecosystems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predators or Herbivores: Cockroaches of Manipulatoridae Revisited with a New Genus from Cretaceous Myanmar Amber (Dictyoptera: Blattaria: Corydioidea)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/insects13090770
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Genus of Spittlebugs (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) from the Eocene of Central Tibetan Plateau †

by
Xiao-Ting Xu
1,2,
Jacek Szwedo
3,*,
Di-Ying Huang
4,
Wei-Yu-Dong Deng
5,
Martyna Obroślak
3,
Fei-Xiang Wu
6 and
Tao Su
1,2,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology and Museum of Amber Inclusions, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdańsk, 59, Wita Stwosza Street, PL80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
4
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
5
Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
6
Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
ZooBank LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:44413AF2-C1BE-4897-B2DD-10E2AB598FBC.
Insects 2022, 13(9), 770; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090770
Submission received: 1 August 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fossil Insects: From Carboniferous to Quaternary)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The superfamily Cercopoidea is commonly named as “spittlebugs”, as its nymphs excrete a spittle mass to protect themselves and hide from predators and parasites. Cosmoscartini (Cercopoidea: Cercopidae) is a large and brightly colored Old World tropical tribe, including 11 genera. A new genus Nangamostethos gen. nov. (type species: Nangamostethos tibetense sp. nov.) of Cosmoscartini is described from Niubao Formation, the late Eocene (ca. 39 million years ago) of central Tibetan Plateau (TP), China. Its placement is ensured by comparison with all the extant genera of the tribe Cosmoscartini. The new fossil represents one of the few fossil Cercopidae species described from Asia. It is likely that Nangamostethos was extinct from the TP due to the regional aridification and an overturn of plant taxa in the last 33 million years.

Abstract

The superfamily Cercopoidea is commonly named as “spittlebugs”, as its nymphs produce a spittle mass to protect themselves. Cosmoscartini (Cercopoidea: Cercopidae) is a large and brightly colored Old World tropical tribe, including 11 genera. A new genus Nangamostethos gen. nov. (type species: Nangamostethos tibetense sp. nov.) of Cosmoscartini is described from Niubao Formation, the late Eocene of central Tibetan Plateau (TP), China. Its placement is ensured by comparison with all the extant genera of the tribe Cosmoscartini. The new fossil represents one of few fossil Cercopidae species described from Asia. It is likely that Nangamostethos was extinct from the TP due to the regional aridification and an overturn of plant taxa in the late Paleogene.

1. Introduction

The members of the superfamily Cercopoidea (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha), commonly known as spittlebugs, are characterized by the conical and short hind coxa, body and wings clothed in fine setae, and the presence of one or two lateral spines and two rows of apical spines on the hind tibia [1,2]. Although spittlebugs are widespread all around the world, their species diversity centers are in the tropics, where approximately 70% of the described species can be found [3].
Cercopoidea comprises five extant families (Cercopidae, Aphrophoridae, Epipygidae, Clastopteridae, and Machaerotidae) and three extinct ones (Procercopidae, Sinoalidae, and Cercopionidae) [4,5]. Few comprehensive phylogenetic analyses have been attempted to date [3,6], which means that the monophyly of these families remains equivocal [3,5]. The family Cercopidae includes 178 genera and 1561 species [7], most closely related to the paraphyletic Aphrophoridae [6], which bear transverse compound eyes instead of the globose compound eyes of Cercopidae [8]. The fossil record of Cercopidae is large, with more than 40 species reported from the Paleocene to the Pleistocene in Eurasia and the Americas [9,10]. However, most of the record was attributed to the genera or even the family with relatively weak support. The reliable record of Cercopidae is more limited, and therefore needs a further revision. The oldest confirmed fossil known for the Cercopidae (Allocercopis punctatis Lin, 1997) dates back to the Cretaceous–Paleocene [11] and two dubious cercopid fossils were recorded from the Cretaceous [12,13].
Tegmen patterns in the subfamily Cercopinae often include red, orange, or yellow markings on a black background [14]. Those striking color patterns appear to represent warning coloration, which probably in conjunction with reflex bleeding (exuding hemolymph from rupture lines in pretarsal pads when attacked) acts to deter predators [15].
Most spittlebugs are oligo- or polyphagous [5,14,16]. Cercopids are xylem feeders and have an enlarged postclypeus to ingest plant fluids under negative pressure [5]. A high proportion of cercopids, in regard to abundance and species diversity, show a statistically significant preference for nitrogen-fixing host plants [17].
Herein, we describe a new genus Nangamostethos gen. nov. from the upper Eocene Niubao Formation at Kanggale Hill, Nima Basin, in the central Tibetan Plateau, China.

2. Materials and Methods

The three specimens of fossil cercopid in this study are preserved as carbon impressions on the surface of shales, collected from the Xiede section, northern Kanggale Hill, Nima Basin (31°58′23″N, 88°25′42″E, 4662 m a.m.s.l.; Figure 1).
The Nima Basin is a Cenozoic continental basin in the central Tibetan Plateau [19]. It is an east–west-trending elongated basin with an area of approximated 3000 km2, situated in the Bangong–Nujiang suture zone and formed by the Mesozoic collision of the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes [19,20,21]. The fossil-bearing strata comprise greyish-green mudstones and calcareous shales, interbedded with mudstones, sandstones, and limestones [22]. The Nima Basin is located to the west of the adjacent Lunpola Basin [19] (Figure 1A). According to the latest chronostratigraphic work with radiochronologic dating methods, the age of the fossil-bearing layer in Dayu, Lunpola Basin is ∼39 Ma [23]. We consider that Xiede and Dayu sites are age equivalent as the two localities share similar stratigraphic sequences, deposition fabric, and a wide range of fossils including insects, plant macrofossils, and vertebrates (e.g., Eoanabas, Wu et al., 2017 [24]; Cedrelospermum, Jia et al., 2018 [25]; Aquarius, Cai et al., 2019 [26], and Sabalites, Su et al., 2019 [27]).
The specimens were observed under a Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscope, and photographs were taken with a Canon 77D digital camera, a digital camera attached to a Zeiss Discovery V16 microscope, and a Smartzoom 5 digital camera. Specimens were immersed in 70% alcohol, which improves the contrast between the image and matrix and reveals more morphological details. The fossil insects were housed in the Paleoecology Collections, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China.
We followed the nomenclature of wing venation for all Paraneoptera [28] and Wang et al. [29] for the terminologies of the cercopoid head.

3. Results

Systematics
Family Cercopidae, Leach, 1815
Subfamily Cercopinae Leach, 1815
Tribe Cosmoscartini Schmidt, 1920
Genus Nangamostethos Xu et Szwedo, gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:77C90479-B171-4D10-BFB6-5A55026FB0FA
Type species Nangamostethos tibetense Xu et Szwedo, sp. nov.; here designated.
Etymology. From Tibetan ‘na ngamo’ (གནའ་སྔ་མོ in THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription; gna’ snga mo in Wylie transliteration) meaning ancient and Classic Greek ‘stethos’ (στήθος) meaning thorax. Gender: neuter.
Diagnosis. Externally similar to some species of Cosmoscarta Stål, 1869 and Phymatostetha Stål, 1870 by size, enlarged pronotum, and coloration with two distinct pale transverse bands and two pale spots at the base of corium and clavus. It differs from both genera by more basal branching of stem ScP + R (in Cosmoscarta and Phymatostetha stem ScP + R is forked more close to half of corium length); more clear part of CuA1 branch reaching branch MP3 + 4 at the border of corium and membrane (reticulate branches in Cosmoscarta and Phymatostetha); membrane with less distinct reticulate branches (distinct, irregular branches on membrane in Phymatostetha and Cosmoscarta); anterior margin of head in dorsal view with more angulate border of frontoclypeus (rounded and strongly produced in Phymatostetha and Cosmoscarta); median carina of frontoclypeus absent (as in Phymatostetha and Cosmoscarta); pronotum with median expansion at anterior margin (present in some Phymatostetha but less distinct); lateral angles of pronotum distinct (similar or even more expanded in Phymatostetha, less expanded and more rounded in Cosmoscarta); posterior margin of pronotum with distinct median incision (present but more shallow in Phymatostetha and absent in some Cosmoscarta); distinctly longer mesonotum, about 0.8–0.9 as long as pronotum in mid line (mesonotum about 0.5 times as long as pronotum in Phymatostetha and Cosmoscarta).
Nangamostethos tibetense Xu et Szwedo, sp. nov.
Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:26CA2296-D3C4-49B6-839B-EE72ADA1DA65
Etymology. Named after the Tibetan region where the type was found.
Materials. Holotype, specimen XDB3-1209 (a compression of a nearly complete adult, but with venation of the tegmen poorly preserved) and paratypes XDB3-0252, XDA2-0430 (part and counterpart) housed in the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China (XTBG).
Diagnosis. Body 11.10–12.03 mm long without tegmen; three longitudinal pale stripes on dark brown pronotum and scutellum; legs pale with dark banding; four oval or band-shaped pale markings on each dark brown tegmen; four apical cells in hind wings.
Description. Body length without tegmen about 11.10 mm in XDB3-1209 (Figure 2A), 11.88 mm in XDB3-0252 (Figure 2G), and 12.03 mm in XDA2-0430 (Figure 2H); tegmen 7.80 mm long and 3.00 mm wide in XDB3-1209, 9.27 mm long and 3.00 mm wide in XDB3-0252, 8.10 mm long and 3.21 wide in XDA2-0430. Hind tibia with one lateral spine, apical spines arranged in 2 rows, with 10–14 spines (Figure 2D and Figure 5B). The following measurements are based on the three specimens.
Coloration (Figure 2A,G,H, Figure 5A,C,D and Figure 6). Body and wings generally dark brown; three longitudinal pale stripes on pronotum and scutellum; legs pale with dark banding; two distinct transverse bands and two pale spots at the base on the corium and clavus on each tegmen. Abdomen dark brown.
Head (Figure 2B and Figure 3C). Head subtriangular, length about 1.17–1.57 mm in the midline, width 2.38–2.68 mm in dorsal view, narrower than pronotum, slightly wider than the anterior margin of scutellum; tylus subquadrate; compound eyes globular, about 0.71 mm wide; two ocelli on crown, divided by the central longitudinal ridge, separated from each other by approximately two ocelli diameter, closer to the compound eyes than the distance between one and the other; pedicel of antennae cylindrical, visible dorsally; frontoclypeus width about twice as long at the widest point, without median carina; labrum subtriangular, about 0.16 mm long, slightly swollen; lora (mandibulary plates) narrow, with upper angles reaching half of the frontocypeus length, lower angles reaching level of anteclypeus; maxillary plates narrow, genae narrow, subocular portions distinct. Rostrum (labium) with distinct longitudinal groove, length about 0.93 mm, width about 0.34 mm.
Thorax (Figure 2 and Figure 3C). Pronotum distinctly wider than head with compound eyes, about 2.26–2.78 mm long in mid line, about 3.63–4.05 mm wide at the widest part, subhexagonal, laterally expanded, without median carination; anterolateral margin straight or slightly concave, diverging posteriad, lateral angles merely apically rounded, at about half of pronotum length; posteriolateral margins converging, slightly concave, posterior margin narrower than anterior margin, with a shallow incision. Mesonotum triangular, elongate, length about 2.00–2.30 mm, width about 1.80 mm at base, about 0.8–0.9 as long as pronotum in midline, without protuberances. Prothoracic leg with procoxa length about 0.99–1.24 mm, width about 0.40 mm; protibia length about 1.15–1.47 mm, width about 0.32 mm; protarsus about 1.00 mm long with claw; tarsal claw asymmetrical; Mesothoracic leg with mesofemur length about 1.76–2.08 mm, width about 0.53 mm; mesotibia nearly as wide as protibia, about 1.2–1.8 times as wide as metatibia. Metathoracic leg (Figure 2D and Figure 5B) with metatibia slender, with one distinct lateral spine, in the distal half of the metatibia, apical teeth arranged in two straight rows, apical row without setae; metatarsus about 1.40–1.70 mm long with claw, basi- and midtarsomere armed with apical teeth, teeth arranged in curved rows, apical tarsomere slender; claw robust, hooked, sharp apically, subungual process not clearly visible.
Tegmen (Figure 2, Figure 4, and Figure 5) about 7.80–9.27 mm long, about 3.00 mm wide; covered with setae; broadest at about half of its length; costal margin curved at base then less curved towards wide anteroapical angle, apex round, posteroapical angle widely rounded, tornus short, claval margin merely arcuate; corium punctate, membrane with sparce, indistinct reticulation, appendix present, narrow. Basal cell about 6 times as long as wide, irregularly urceolate. Veins Pc + CP more distinct at base forming narrow ‘hypocosta’ reaching slightly posteriad of half of the tegmen length. Stem ScP + R + MP + CuA thickened at base, ScP emerged and shifted from common stem basad of half of basal cell length, re-entering stem R at level about half of the post-basal cell common stem MP + CuA. Stem ScP + R forked basad of half of the tegmen length; branch (ScP + RA arcuate, subparallel to anterior margin of tegmen, obsolete in terminal section; branch RP curved at base then subparallel costal margin to slightly shifted mediad, obsolete in terminal section. Short common stalk of MP + CuA closing basal cell slightly oblique; common stem MP + CuA shorter than stem R, forked at about basal ⅓ of tegmen length; stem MP curved and directed mediad, forked at about apical ¼ of tegmen length, basad of apex of clavus, at level of the line separating corium and membrane; branch MP1+2 forked very close to apical margin of tegmen, vein ending before reaching margin. Branch CuA curved at base then subparallel to claval line (CuP), forked merely basad of MP forking, basad of claval apex; branch CuA1 fused with MP3 + 4, evanescent in terminal section, not reaching margin; branch CuA2 reaching tornus slightly apicad of claval apex. Vein CuP straight, parallel to claval fold, delimiting clavus. Clavus long, with apex exceeding ¾ of tegmen length, claval vein Pcu slightly sigmoid, reaching A2 (claval margin) at distance slightly longer than the distance between apex of claval CuP and apex of CuA2; vein A1 arcuate, not very distinct, reaching margin at about the level of MP-CuA forking.
Hind wing (Figure 2C and Figure 4B) subtriangular, with wide appendix, delicately shagreened; stem ScP + R forked at about half of hind wing length, stem MP single, sinuate, stem CuA forked slightly apicad of stem ScP + R fork, terminal portions of CuA1 and CuA2 subparallel; terminal portion of CuP diverging from terminal CuA2; visible terminal portion of Pcu arcuate, diverging from CuP. Interradial apical cell triangularly elongate, longer than radial cell; radial cell subtrapezoid, wider near hind wing margin, closed basally with oblique veinlet rp-mp; medial cell long, basal closing with mp-cua; cubital cell elongate, about 1.5–3.5 times as long as wide; distance between terminal points CuA1 and CuA2 longer than distance between RP and MP as well as MP and CuA1.
Abdomen (Figure 2A,E,F) with sternites 3rd to 8th well visible. Male terminalia (XDB3-1209, Figure 2E): pygofer narrow, with expansions exceeding line of genital valve apical margin, genital valve (9th abdominal sternum) fused with pygofer, with median incision at posterior margin; subgenital plates elongated-triangular, not fused with each other, not fused with genital valve; anal tube narrow, exceeding apex of subgenital plates, anal style elongate. Female terminalia (XDB3-0252, Figure 2F): pygofer about half of the preserved gonoplac length; base of gonoplac slightly expanded, apex acutely rounded, reaching the level of the tip of anal style, anal tube subcylindrical and without process; anal style short and rounded.

4. Discussion

4.1. Taxonomic Remarks

Following the description of Cercopidae by Lallemand [30,31] and Schöbel and Carvalho [32], the new fossil falls in the Cercopidae because of the following characters: head narrower than pronotum, approximately as wide as anterior margin of scutellum; median ocellus absent; compound eyes globose; antennae arising in cavities below anterior margin of head, before the eyes; pronotum hexagonal, wider than long; hind legs with one or two lateral spines and rows of apical spines on the tibiae.
The most widely accepted classification divides Cercopidae into two subfamilies: the Old World Cercopinae and the New World Ischnorhininae (previously known as Tomaspidinae) [33,34], however, the Cercopinae was shown to be a paraphyletic group by the present phylogenetic analyses [3]. Hamilton [34,35] proposed to synonymize Aphrophoridae under Cercopidae, but this opinion is not universally accepted. The Old World Cercopinae is characterized by the either partially fused (in Cosmoscartinae) or entirely free subgenital plates, while the subgenital plates of the New World Ischnorhininae are completely fused to the pygofer [14,33]. In our Tibetan fossil, the subgenital plates are partially fused to the pygofer. Therefore, our fossil is assigned to the Cercopinae.
The fossil resembles the tribe Cosmoscartini mainly for the characters of the inflated and striated frontoclypeus, smoothly shifting from crown to face, without median carination, ocelli at almost the same distance to each other as their distance from the compound eyes and male genitalia with subgenital plates without an apical spine-like process [30,31,36]. Cosmoscartini comprises a large number of brightly colored Old World tropical taxa, including 11 genera [7,36]. Hamilton [8] proposed another grouping of Cosmoscartini, excluding Phymatostetha. He placed the latter together with two Neotropical genera in a newly created unit called ‘Phymatostethini’. Unfortunately, Phymatostethini’ must be treated as a nomen nudum, as a clear definition and formal taxonomic decision with concept and content were not provided.
The placement of the fossils represented here is ensured by comparison with all the extant genera of the tribe Cosmoscartini. Within Cosmoscartini, the genera Cosmoscarta, Ectemnonotum and Gynopygocarta are excluded because the posterior margins of the pronotum are straight (Figure 3B) [37,38,39], while in our fossil the posterior margin is slightly sinuated. Ectemnonotops and Homalostethus are different from the cercopid fossil in their rounded posterior margin of the pronotum [38]. The main character used to distinguish Oxymegaspis from our fossil is the acute scapular angles of the pronotum [40]. The genus Kanozata is excluded due to the comparatively small pronotum, scutellum narrowed in the middle, and tegmen significantly longer than the abdomen [41]. The two characters “scutellum narrowed in the middle” and “a large shallow dimple on its anterior half of scutellum” exclude affinities with Porpacella [30]. The shape and ratio of the tegmen, the very long clavus, and the lack of wrinkles on the lateral margins of pronotum exclude its placement in the genus Neoporpacella. In genus Gynopygoplax the CuA of the hind wing forks basad of the cross vein rp-mp, which is different from the fossil [31,42]. Some of the morphological characters of the newly described fossil place it close to Phymatostetha: ocelli slightly closer to each other than the compound eyes; pronotum with posterior margin and posterior lateral margins sinuated, scapular angles of the pronotum rounded; scutellum evenly tapering; legs of moderate length, posterior tibiae armed with one spine [31,43]. However the following combination of characters places the fossil in a separate entity within Cosmoscartini, as this tribe is currently understood: angulate border angulate border of frontoclypeus in dorsal view, anterior margin of pronotum protruded, posterior margin with distinct incision, long mesonotum (distinctly longer than half of the length of the pronotum in midline), more basal forking of ScP + R, long clavus, short tornus, and subtriangular shape of subgenital plates place the fossil separately within Cosmoscartini as this tribe is currently understood. Therefore, we describe a new genus and a new species Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. based on the unique characters mentioned above.

4.2. Biogeographic Implications

There is a large number of fossil record of Cercopoidea, comprising taxa from the Lower Jurassic to the Pleistocene [4,42,43,44]. However, the vast majority of taxa described in the 19th and 20th centuries are in need of urgent revision. Reliable record of Cercopidae is more limited, including a fossil from Ping Chau Island, Hong Kong, of age still disputable—Paleocene [11] or Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian-Valanginian) [43,45]; another reliable cercopid record reported from Paleocene/Eocene deposits of Isle of Mull, Scotland [46]; an inclusion in the Eocene Baltic amber [47]; and another imprint from terminal Eocene of Isle of Wight [48]. Any of these fossils are placed according to current tribal classification, and they are represented by isolated tegmina. Currently, the family Cercopidae is subdivided in two subfamilies, with 17 tribes, comprising about 170 genera [7]. The New World Ischnorhininae were recognized as a monophyletic unit [49], while monophyly of the Cercopinae should be tested [50]. The fossil record of Cercopidae from Asia is rare (Figure 7), one record from Paleocene deposits from southern China [11], one from the Eocene deposit of the Tibetan Plateau reported in this study, and two doubtful taxa from Miocene deposits of Kudia River, Primorski Krai, Russia [51,52]. Weak knowledge of previous fossil records and their phylogenetic relationships [3,50] precluded presentation of detailed models of their evolutionary scenarios. However, the findings of Cercopinae in the Eocene deposits of the Tibetan Plateau described herein gave a new insight on the complex history of the group.
Modern Cercopinae are distributed from temperate to tropical zones of the Old World, being present in a wide array of habitats, from open to dense forests. The Tibetan fossil coexists with a relatively high diversity grass community with palms and numerous other woody taxa, namely a subtropical open woodland ecosystem, with a dry bulb mean annual temperature of ~15.6 °C [53]. The Lunpola–Nima sediment depo-center, placed between the paleo-Gangdese and the paleo-Qiangtang (Tangulha) mountains [54,55] could be one of the areas of modern lineage diversification and a source of current diversity and disparity of the Cosmoscartini. Subsequent paleoclimatic changes [27,56,57], possibly as a response to Tibetan landscape evolution, affected insect population dynamics, and their geographic distribution. As ectotherms, insects are highly sensitive to ambient temperatures and may respond very quickly to temperature fluctuations [58,59]. The fossil cercopid described above, Nangamostethos gen. nov., inhabited the TP and possibly became extinct due to regional aridification and an overturn of plant taxa in the late Paleogene [53], whereas its modern congeners are widely distributed and diversified in South-Eastern Asia.
More phylogenetic investigations and an increase in knowledge and elaboration of fossil materials regarding spittlebugs are needed for a better understanding of the origin and evolution of the tribes and families of the superfamily Cercopoidea.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, J.S. and T.S.; investigation, X.-T.X., J.S. and D.-Y.H.; methodology, D.-Y.H.; resources, M.O.; supervision, T.S.; visualization, W.-Y.-D.D. and F.-X.W.; writing—original draft, X.-T.X.; writing—review and editing, X.-T.X., J.S., W.-Y.-D.D., M.O., F.-X.W. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS (XDB26000000); Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship Initiative (2021VCA0009); Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (2019QZKK0705); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41922010), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (Y2021105).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this study are presented in the manuscript and figures.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the three reviewers who kindly provided helpful suggestions for the manuscript; the Paleoecology Research Group in Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG) and the local villagers in the Tibetan region for fossil collecting on the Tibetan Plateau; Jian Huang, Ai Song, Shumei Xiao, and Weicheng Li for discussions and for providing assistance on map creation and data analysis; Cédric Del Rio for his helpful comments; Kaiqin Li for assistance in photographing the modern cercopid specimens of Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, CAS; the Public Technology Service Center of XTBG for help with imaging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paladini, A.; Carvalho, G.S.; Cavichioli, R.R. Taxonomic review of Sphenoclypeana and cladistic analysis of Ischnorhinini (Hemiptera, Cercopidae, Tomaspidinae). Zootaxa 2010, 2502, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dietrich, C.H. Keys to the families of Cicadomorpha and subfamilies and tribes of Cicadellidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Fla. Entomol. 2005, 88, 502–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cryan, J.R.; Svenson, G.J. Family-level relationships of the spittlebugs and froghoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cercopoidea). Syst. Entomol. 2010, 35, 393–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Szwedo, J. The unity, diversity and conformity of bugs (Hemiptera) through time. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 2018, 107, 109–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bartlett, C.R.; Deitz, L.L.; Dmitriev, D.A.; Sanborn, A.F.; Soulier-Perkins, A.; Wallace, M.S. The diversity of the true hoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). In Insect Biodiversity. Science and Society; Foottit, R.G., Adler, P., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2018; Volume 2, pp. 501–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cryan, J.R. Molecular phylogeny of Cicadomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea and Membracoidea): Adding evidence to the controversy. Syst. Entomol. 2005, 30, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soulier-Perkins, A. Cercopoidea Organised on Line. Available online: http://hemiptera-databases.org/Cool/ (accessed on 9 March 2022).
  8. Hamilton, K.G.A. Neotropical spittlebugs related to Neaenini (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) and the origins of subfamily Cercopinae. Zootaxa 2016, 4169, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Behrensmeyer, A.K.; Turner, A. Taxonomic Occurrences of Cercopoidea Recorded in the Paleobiology Database. Fossilworks. Available online: http://fossilworks.org. (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  10. Paleobiology Database. Cercopoidea; PaleoBioDB. Available online: https://paleobiodb.org/navigator/ (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  11. Lin, Q.B.; Lee, C.M. Early Tertiary insects from Peng Chau, Hong Kong. Palaeontol. Stratigr. Hong Kong 1997, 1, 185–199. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodie, P.B. A History of the Fossil Insects in the Secondary Rocks of England. Accompanied by a Particular Account of the Strata in Which They Occur, and of the Circumstances Connected with Their Preservation; J. van Voorst: London, UK, 1845; pp. 399–402. [Google Scholar]
  13. Coram, R.A.; Jepson, J.E. Fossil Insects of the Purbeck Limestone Group of Southern England: Palaeoentomology from the Dawn of the Cretaceous; Siri Scientific Press: Manchester, UK, 2012; Volume 3, p. 144. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carvalho, G.S.; Webb, M.D. Cercopid Spittle Bugs of the New World (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cercopidae); Pensoft: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2005; Volume 271. [Google Scholar]
  15. Peck, D.C. Reflex bleeding in froghoppers (Homoptera: Cercopidae): Variation in behavior and taxonomic distribution. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2000, 93, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hodkinson, I.D.; Casson, D. A lesser predilection for bugs: Hemiptera (Insecta) diversity in tropical rain forests. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1991, 43, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thompson, V. Spittlebug indicators of nitrogen-fixing plants. Los salivazos como indicadores de plantas fijadoras de nitrógeno. Ecol. Entomol. 1994, 19, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jarvis, A.; Reuter, H.; Nelson, A.; Guevara, E. Hole-Filled Seamless SRTM Data V4: International Centre For Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), 2008. Available online: https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org (accessed on 27 March 2021).
  19. Kapp, P.; DeCelles, P.G.; Gehrels, G.E.; Heizler, M.; Ding, L. Geological records of the Lhasa-Qiangtang and Indo-Asian collisions in the Nima area of central Tibet. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2007, 119, 917–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kapp, P.; Yin, A.; Harrison, T.M.; Ding, L. Cretaceous-Tertiary shortening, basin development, and volcanism in central Tibet. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2005, 117, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DeCelles, P.G.; Kapp, P.; Ding, L.; Gehrels, G.E. Late Cretaceous to middle Tertiary basin evolution in the central Tibetan Plateau: Changing environments in response to tectonic partitioning, aridification, and regional elevation gain. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2007, 119, 654–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fang, X.; Dupont-Nivet, G.; Wang, C.; Song, C.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, W.; Nie, J.; Zhang, T.; Mao, Z.; Chen, Y. Revised chronology of central Tibet uplift (Lunpola Basin). Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba7298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiong, Z.; Liu, X.; Ding, L.; Farnsworth, A.; Spicer, R.A.; Xu, Q.; Valdes, P.; He, S.; Zeng, D.; Wang, C. The rise and demise of the Paleogene central Tibetan valley. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabj0944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, F.; Miao, D.; Chang, M.; Shi, G.; Wang, N. Fossil climbing perch and associated plant megafossils indicate a warm and wet central Tibet during the late Oligocene. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jia, L.-B.; Su, T.; Huang, Y.; Wu, F.; Deng, T.; Zhou, Z.-K. First fossil record of Cedrelospermum (Ulmaceae) from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Implications for morphological evolution and biogeography. J. Syst. Evol. 2018, 57, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cai, C.; Huang, D.; Wu, F.; Zhao, M.; Wang, N. Tertiary water striders (Hemiptera, Gerromorpha, Gerridae) from the central Tibetan Plateau and their palaeobiogeographic implications. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 175, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, T.; Farnsworth, A.; Spicer, R.A.; Huang, J.; Wu, F.; Liu, J.; Li, S.; Xing, Y.; Huang, Y.; Deng, W. No high Tibetan Plateau until the Neogene. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nel, A.; Prokop, J.; Nel, P.; Grandcolas, P.; Huang, D.-Y.; Roques, P.; Guilbert, E.; Dostál, O.; Szwedo, J. Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects. J. Morphol. 2012, 273, 480–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, T.; Pan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, W. Morphology of the mouthparts of the spittlebug Philagra albinotata Uhler (Hemiptera: Cercopoidea: Aphrophoridae). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2015, 44, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lallemand, V. Révision des Cercopinae: (Hemiptera Homoptera), Première partie; Memoires, Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique: Bruxelles, Belgium, 1949; 2ème serie; Volume 32, pp. 1–193+IV plates. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lallemand, V.; Synave, H. Révision des Cercopinae: (Hemiptera Homoptera), Deuxième partie; Memoires, Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique: Bruxelles, Belgium, 1961; Volume 66, pp. 1–153+XL plates. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schöbel, C.; Carvalho, G.S. The “State of Art” of Mahanarva (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) research. An economically important New World spittlebug genus. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2021, 56, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fennah, R.G. Revisionary notes on the New World genera of cercopid froghoppers (Homoptera: Cercopoidea). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1968, 58, 165–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hamilton, K.G.A. A new family of froghoppers from the American tropics (Hemiptera: Cercopoidea: Epipygidae). Biodiversity 2001, 2, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hamilton, K.G.A. Revision of Neotropical aphrophorine spittlebugs, part 1: Ptyelini (Hemiptera, Cercopoidea). Zootaxa 2012, 3497, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liang, A.; Jiang, G.; Webb, M.D. Revision of the Oriental spittlebug genera Baibarana Matsumura and Telogmometopius Jacobi (Hemiptera: Cercopidae: Rhinaulacini). J. Nat. Hist. 2006, 40, 2071–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Distant, W.L. Rhynchota. Homoptera: Membracidae, Cercopidae, Jassidae & Heteroptera: Appendix. In Fauna Br. India Incl. Ceylon Burma; Lt.-Col., C.T., Ed.; Secretary of State for India in Council: London, UK; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 1908; Volume 4, pp. i–xv+1–501. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmidt, E. Neue Gattungen und Arten der Subfamilie Cercopinae Stål, ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cercopiden (Hemiptera-Homoptera). Arch. Naturgesch. 1910, 76, 53–112. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lallemand, V. Nouveaux cercopides de la presqu’île Malaise. J. Fed. Malay States Mus. 1930, 16, 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lallemand, V. Descriptions de quatre nouveaux Cercopidae (Rhynch., Homoptera). Treubia 1953, 22, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.-Y.; Dai, R.-H. Spittlebug genus Kanozata Matsumura (Hemiptera, Cercopoidea: Cercopidae) with a new distribution record of K. contermina (Distant) to China. Entomol. Fenn. 2018, 29, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schmidt, E. Neue und bekannte Gattungen und Arten der Subfamilie Cercopinae Stål des Indoaustralischen Faunengebietes, ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cercopiden. Hemiptera-Homoptera III. Stettin. Entomol. Ztg. 1911, 72, 52–129. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stål, C. Hemiptera insularum Philippinarum. Bidrag till Philippinska öarnes Hemipter-Fauna. Öfvers. Kongl. Vetensk.-Akad. Förh. 1870, 27, 607–776+IX plates. [Google Scholar]
  44. Metcalf, Z.P.; Wade, V. A catalogue of the fossil Homoptera (Homoptera: Auchenorhyncha). In General Catalogue of the Homoptera. A supplement to Fascicle I, Paper N° 2049; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1966; pp. 1–245. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, L.L.; Zhao, L.L.; Tian, M.Z.; Wu, F.D.; Zhang, X.J. Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous volcanism of Hong Kong: Insights from the Ping Chau Formation. Geosci. Front. 2019, 10, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zeuner, F.E. V.—The Eocene insects of the Ardtun Beds, Isle of Mull, Scotland. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1941, 7, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Germar, E.F.; Berendt, G.C. Die im Bernstein befindlichen Hemipteren und Orthopteren der Vorwelt. In Die im Bernstein befindlichen organischen Resten der Vorwelt; Nicolai Buchhandlung: Berlin, Germany, 1856; Volume 2, pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  48. Szwedo, J.; Drohojowska, J.; Popov, Y.A.; Simon, E.; Wegierek, P. Aphids, true hoppers, jumping plant-lice, scale insects, true bugs and whiteflies (Insecta: Hemiptera) from the Insect Limestone (latest Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 2019, 110, 331–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paladini, A.; Takiya, D.M.; Cavichioli, R.R.; Carvalho, G.S. Phylogeny and biogeography of Neotropical spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae: Ischnorhininae): Revised tribal classification based on morphological data. Syst. Entomol. 2015, 40, 82–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Crispolon, E.S., Jr.; Soulier-Perkins, A. A first attempt on the morphological phylogeny of Cercopinae (Hemiptera, Cercopidae). In Abstracts and Posters, Proceedings of the 16th International Auchenorrhyncha Congress and 12th International Workshop on Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Economic Significance, Nho Quan, Vietnam, 2–8 July 2019; Vietnam National Museum of Nature: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2019; p. 114. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cockerell, T.D.A. Tertiary insects from Kudia River, Maritime Province, Siberia. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1925, 68, 1–16, plates 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cockerell, T.D.A. LXXV.—Fossil insects in the British Museum. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1927, 20, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.; Gélin, U.; Spicer, R.A.; Wu, F.X.; Farnsworth, A.; Chen, P.R.; Del Rio, C.; Li, S.F.; Liu, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Rapid Eocene diversification of spiny plants in subtropical woodlands of central Tibet. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xia, G.; Zheng, D.; Krieg-Jacquier, R.; Fan, Q.; Chen, Y.; Nel, A. The oldest-known Lestidae (Odonata) from the late Eocene of Tibet: Palaeoclimatic implications. Geol. Mag. 2022, 159, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xue, W.; Najman, Y.; Hu, X.; Persano, C.; Stuart, F.M.; Li, W.; Ma, A.; Wang, Y. Late Cretaceous to Late Eocene exhumation in the Nima area, central Tibet: Implications for development of low relief topography of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics 2022, 41, e2021TC006989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Su, T.; Spicer, R.A.; Li, S.H.; Huang, J.; Sherlock, S.; Huang, Y.J.; Li, S.F.; Wang, L.; Jia, L.B.; Deng, W.Y.D.; et al. Uplift, climate and biotic changes at the Eocene–Oligocene transition in south-eastern Tibet. Nat. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. DeCelles, P.; Quade, J.; Kapp, P.; Fan, M.J.; Dettman, D.L.; Ding, L. High and dry in central Tibet during the Late Oligocene. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2007, 253, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Outhwaite, C.L.; McCann, P.; Newbold, T. Agriculture and climate change are reshaping insect biodiversity worldwide. Nature 2022, 605, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Robinet, C.; Roques, A. Direct impacts of recent climate warming on insect populations. Integr. Zool. 2010, 5, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 00770 g001 550
Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the fossil specimens in this study. (A) Localities of the Nima Basin and the adjacent Lunpola Basin in the central Tibetan Plateau. BNSZ, Bangong–Nujiang suture zone; JSSZ, Jinshajiang suture zone; LB, Lunpola Basin; NB, Nima Basin; YZSZ, Yalu–Zangbo suture zone. Map data provided by SRTM data V4 [18]. (B,C) The specimens were collected from fossil-bearing layers XDA2 and XDB3 in the Nima Basin, which are deposited in the same strata.
Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the fossil specimens in this study. (A) Localities of the Nima Basin and the adjacent Lunpola Basin in the central Tibetan Plateau. BNSZ, Bangong–Nujiang suture zone; JSSZ, Jinshajiang suture zone; LB, Lunpola Basin; NB, Nima Basin; YZSZ, Yalu–Zangbo suture zone. Map data provided by SRTM data V4 [18]. (B,C) The specimens were collected from fossil-bearing layers XDA2 and XDB3 in the Nima Basin, which are deposited in the same strata.
Insects 13 00770 g001
Insects 13 00770 g002 550
Figure 2. Photographs of the Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Body, XDB3-1209, holotype, male. (B) Enlargement of (A), showing details of the head. (C) Enlargement of the hind wing of XDB3-1209, showing details of the veins. (D) Enlargement of A, showing the details of the tip of the hind leg. (E) Enlargement of (A), showing the details of the male terminalia. (F) Enlargement of (G), showing the details of the female terminalia. (G) Body, XDB3-0252A, paratype, female. (H) Body, XDA2-0430A, paratype. At, anal tube; ce, compound eye; CuA, cubital anterior; cv, cross vein; MP, media posterior; o, ocelli; RP, radius posterior; sp, subgenital plate. The specimens were immersed into alcohol except in (B). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 2. Photographs of the Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Body, XDB3-1209, holotype, male. (B) Enlargement of (A), showing details of the head. (C) Enlargement of the hind wing of XDB3-1209, showing details of the veins. (D) Enlargement of A, showing the details of the tip of the hind leg. (E) Enlargement of (A), showing the details of the male terminalia. (F) Enlargement of (G), showing the details of the female terminalia. (G) Body, XDB3-0252A, paratype, female. (H) Body, XDA2-0430A, paratype. At, anal tube; ce, compound eye; CuA, cubital anterior; cv, cross vein; MP, media posterior; o, ocelli; RP, radius posterior; sp, subgenital plate. The specimens were immersed into alcohol except in (B). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Insects 13 00770 g002
Insects 13 00770 g003 550
Figure 3. Nangamostethos tibetense sp. nov. and some modern Cercopidae. (A,B) Phymatostetha dorsivitta, collection of Kunming Institute of Zoology (Collected from Xinping, Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, China on 12 August, 1978. Collector not recorded). (C) Head and thorax of XDB3-1209. The arrows in (B,C) indicate the differences between the fossil and Phymatostetha. Scale bars: 5 mm.
Figure 3. Nangamostethos tibetense sp. nov. and some modern Cercopidae. (A,B) Phymatostetha dorsivitta, collection of Kunming Institute of Zoology (Collected from Xinping, Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, China on 12 August, 1978. Collector not recorded). (C) Head and thorax of XDB3-1209. The arrows in (B,C) indicate the differences between the fossil and Phymatostetha. Scale bars: 5 mm.
Insects 13 00770 g003
Insects 13 00770 g004 550
Figure 4. Line drawings of wing venation of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Line drawing of the tegmen of XDA2-0430A. (B) Interpretive drawing of the hind wing based on XDB3-1209. A1, first anal vein; A2, second anal vein; ap1, interradial apical cell; ap2, radial cell; ap3, medial cell; ap4, cubital cell; CA, costa anterior; CP, costa posterior; CuA, cubital anterior; CuP, cubitus posterior; MP, media posterior; Pc, precosta; Pcu, postcubitus; RA, radius anterior; RP, radius posterior; ScP, subcosta posterior. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 4. Line drawings of wing venation of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Line drawing of the tegmen of XDA2-0430A. (B) Interpretive drawing of the hind wing based on XDB3-1209. A1, first anal vein; A2, second anal vein; ap1, interradial apical cell; ap2, radial cell; ap3, medial cell; ap4, cubital cell; CA, costa anterior; CP, costa posterior; CuA, cubital anterior; CuP, cubitus posterior; MP, media posterior; Pc, precosta; Pcu, postcubitus; RA, radius anterior; RP, radius posterior; ScP, subcosta posterior. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Insects 13 00770 g004
Insects 13 00770 g005 550
Figure 5. Line drawings of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) General habitus of XDB3-1209. (B) Interpretive drawing of the hind leg based on XDB3-1209. (C) General habitus of XDB3-0252A. (D) General habitus of XDA2-0430A. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 5. Line drawings of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) General habitus of XDB3-1209. (B) Interpretive drawing of the hind leg based on XDB3-1209. (C) General habitus of XDB3-0252A. (D) General habitus of XDA2-0430A. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Insects 13 00770 g005
Insects 13 00770 g006 550
Figure 6. Reconstruction of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Dorsal view. (B) Lateral view. Art by Fei-Xiang Wu.
Figure 6. Reconstruction of Nangamostethos tibetense gen. et sp. nov. (A) Dorsal view. (B) Lateral view. Art by Fei-Xiang Wu.
Insects 13 00770 g006
Insects 13 00770 g007 550
Figure 7. Localities of fossil taxa ascribed to Cercopidae and the modern relatives (note that the taxonomic placement of the fossil record presented here is in need of revision). Localities of fossil sites according to Fossilworks.org [9] and PaleoBioDB.org [10]; modern distribution of Phymatostetha and Cercopidae according to GBIF.org (doi: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.desftn; https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.fcfwj6 (accessed on 14 April 2022)); map data provided by Natural Earth II.
Figure 7. Localities of fossil taxa ascribed to Cercopidae and the modern relatives (note that the taxonomic placement of the fossil record presented here is in need of revision). Localities of fossil sites according to Fossilworks.org [9] and PaleoBioDB.org [10]; modern distribution of Phymatostetha and Cercopidae according to GBIF.org (doi: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.desftn; https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.fcfwj6 (accessed on 14 April 2022)); map data provided by Natural Earth II.
Insects 13 00770 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, X.-T.; Szwedo, J.; Huang, D.-Y.; Deng, W.-Y.-D.; Obroślak, M.; Wu, F.-X.; Su, T. A New Genus of Spittlebugs (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) from the Eocene of Central Tibetan Plateau. Insects 2022, 13, 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090770

AMA Style

Xu X-T, Szwedo J, Huang D-Y, Deng W-Y-D, Obroślak M, Wu F-X, Su T. A New Genus of Spittlebugs (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) from the Eocene of Central Tibetan Plateau. Insects. 2022; 13(9):770. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Xiao-Ting, Jacek Szwedo, Di-Ying Huang, Wei-Yu-Dong Deng, Martyna Obroślak, Fei-Xiang Wu, and Tao Su. 2022. "A New Genus of Spittlebugs (Hemiptera, Cercopidae) from the Eocene of Central Tibetan Plateau" Insects 13, no. 9: 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090770

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop