Next Article in Journal
Mediation Effects of Social Cognition on the Relationship between Neurocognition and Social Functioning in Major Depressive Disorder and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
A New Treatment Option in Incomplete Partition Type III: The Varese Bone–Air Stimulation (B.A.S.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/jpm13040682
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overweight/Obesity Increases the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients

by
Lihong Gu
,
Xiaochun Yin
,
Yang Cheng
,
Xixuan Wang
,
Ming Zhang
,
Xiaoping Zou
,
Lei Wang
,
Yuzheng Zhuge
* and
Feng Zhang
Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(4), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040682
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the prevalence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure in decompensated cirrhotic patients. A retrospective observational cohort study of 145 cirrhotic patients receiving TIPS was carried out in our department from 2017 to 2020. The relationships between BMI and clinical outcomes including OHE, as well as risk factors of developing post-TIPS OHE, were analyzed. BMI was categorized as normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23.0 kg/m2), underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 23.0 kg/m2). Among the 145 patients, 52 (35.9%) were overweight/obese and 50 (34%) had post-TIPS OHE. Overweight/obese patients more frequently had OHE compared with normal weight patients (OR: 2.754, 95% CI: 1.236–6.140; p = 0.013). Overweight/obesity (p = 0.013) and older age (p = 0.030) were independent risk factors for post-TIPS OHE according to the logistic regression analysis. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis suggested that overweight/obese patients had the highest cumulative incidence of OHE (log-rank p = 0.0118). In conclusion, overweight/obesity and older age may raise the risk of post-TIPS OHE in cirrhotic patients.

1. Introduction

Overweight/obesity is a growing epidemic worldwide which is associated with adverse health events and increased mortality [1,2]. Overweight/obesity has been regarded as a hazard for chronic liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis [3,4]. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was the most frequent first decompensating event in a prospective study of 1773 participants with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [5]. Moreover, overweight/obesity is an independent predictor for decompensation clinically (including variceal hemorrhage, HE, or refractory ascites) in cirrhotic patients [6]. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important treatment tool for clinical decompensations in cirrhosis. However, TIPS worsens or precipitates HE [7], which is the main drawback. Few studies have explored the relationship between obesity and the incidence of post-TIPS HE in cirrhotic patients.
HE is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that largely comprises cognitive and fine-motor impairment of varying severity [8]. According to the severity, covert HE is referred to minor or no symptoms but abnormal neuropsychological or neurophysiological examinations. Overt HE (OHE) includes grade II and higher grades according to the West Haven criteria, distinguished by disorientation, somnolence, and a coma-like state [9]. OHE adversely affects the quality of life, which disrupts personality, self-reliance, and daily living capability [10]. Moreover, OHE is connected with short survival in cirrhotic patients [11,12].
While the pathophysiology of HE is not entirely understood, ammonia and inflammation are considered two major pathogeneses of HE. The capacity of hepatocytes to eliminate ammonia is impaired in liver cirrhosis, and hyperammonemia ensues, leading to excess ammonia across the blood–brain barrier, the accumulation of intra-astrocytic glutamine, and low-grade cerebral oedema [13,14,15]. Inflammatory factors and hyperammonemia synergistically contribute to astrocytic and neuronal dysfunction, leading to alterations in synaptic plasticity and oscillatory networks; thus, HE-related neurologic symptoms occur [16,17]. However, no direct association between hyperammonemia and the degree of HE was observed [18]. Thus, predicting factors of post-TIPS OHE remain scarce for cirrhotic patients, and more risk factors should be involved.
Taken together, we hypothesized that overweight/obesity might be a predictor for post-TIPS OHE in cirrhotic patients. However, the aspect has not been adequately investigated so far, which was the objective of this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School approved the retrospective study, which followed the rules of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (protocol #: 2018-276-02). Patients lacking weight and height statistics were excluded from the present study. We retrospectively screened 155 consecutive patients aged 18 to 80 years old with decompensated liver cirrhosis for TIPS due to refractory ascites and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding from January 2017 to December 2020 from our prospectively established database. Written informed consent was acquired from all patients before TIPS. Ten patients were excluded due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The final sample thus included 145 participants.
BMI was valued by dividing weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. All participants were classified as normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23.0 kg/m2), underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 23.0 kg/m2) according to the WHO classification for Asian populations [19].

2.2. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Procedure

Employing a transjugular venous approach, the right or middle hepatic vein was catheterized as described previously [20]. The hepatic vein and portal vein were punctured through an intrahepatic tract. Then PPG was assessed during the procedure. A 6–8 mm diameter covered stent (Fluency, Bard, Murray Hill, NY, USA) combined with a bare metal stent (Luminexx, Bard, Murray Hill, NY, USA) or a Viatorr stent (Gore Viatorr, Gore&Associates, Newark, DE, USA) was deployed into the tract to support the parenchymal channel. A balloon catheter was used to dilate the stent. The length of the stent was determined with an opaque marked catheter. PPG was assessed again immediately after stent placement. The residual varices were embolized with coils or tissue-adhesive glue when apparent stomach and esophageal varices existed. Stent patency was evaluated by doppler ultrasonography or TIPS imaging 5 days after the insertion of TIPS.

2.3. Follow-Up

Patients were regularly followed through outpatient visits every month for the first 3 months after TIPS and then with an interval of 1–3 months via telephone and/or outpatient clinic until November 2022. During the follow-up, death, liver transplantation, variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, and post-TIPS OHE were recorded. The major endpoint was liver transplantation-free survival. A survival time was valued from the date that TIPS was performed.
During follow-up, the presence of OHE was diagnosed according to signs and symptoms such as mental abnormalities and neurological abnormalities [9]. The detection of asterixis and disorientation was regarded as a symbolic symptom of OHE. Psychometric testing for minimal HE was not conducted.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, NY, USA) was applied for data analysis. Continuous variables were presented as the median (interquartile range, IQR), and categorical variables were presented as the frequency (percentage). The difference in the continuous normal and nonparametric data among the three groups was evaluated via one-way ANOVA analysis and a Kruskal–Wallis test, respectively. The difference in the continuous normal and nonparametric data between the two groups was evaluated using an unpaired t test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. The categorical data were evaluated by a Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis was applied for survival probability curves, and the comparison was carried out by a log-rank test via Prism 8 (GraphPad Software) and R studio (version 4.2.1) and Survival and Survminer for Kaplan–Meier curves. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between BMI and OHE, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed by adjusting for age, gender, and Cr to identify whether BMI was an independent predictor of OHE. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were valued. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Baseline Characteristics

Overall, we screened 155 cirrhotic patients who underwent the TIPS procedure with BMI and follow-up statistics in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Ten patients were excluded due to the presence of HCC. Finally, a total of 145 participants were included in the present study (Figure 1). The median age of these participants was 58 years, ranging from 50 to 66, with 92 (63.4%) males. Table 1 overviews the patients’ baseline characteristics. Among these patients, 14 (9.7%) were underweight and 52 (35.9%) were overweight/obese. The median BMI was 21.09 (IQR, 19.84–21.97 kg/m2) in the normal weight group, 17.75 (IQR, 17.20–18.08 kg/m2) in the underweight group, and 24.98 (IQR, 23.88–26.49 kg/m2) in the overweight/obese group. Among all 145 patients, 109 (75.2%) received 8 mm stents, and the others received 6 mm stents. According to the BMI subgroup classification, the patients receiving 8 mm stents accounted for 85.7% (12/14) in the underweight group, 70.9% (56/79) in the normal group, and 78.8% (41/52) in the overweight/obese group, respectively. No marked difference was observed among the three groups (p = 0.370). The etiologies of cirrhosis involved virus (Hepatitis B or C) and others (alcoholism, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, or schistosomiasis cirrhosis). There was no difference among the three groups according to BMI classification with respect to age, gender, etiology, ascites, diabetes, hypertension, pre-TIPS OHE, the experience of splenectomy surgery, pre-TIPS portal thrombosis, laboratory tests, MELD score, CTP score/grade, stent diameter, or duration of follow-up (p > 0.05 for all).

3.2. Hemodynamic Index and Clinical Outcomes

Table 2 demonstrates the pre-TIPS and post-TIPS hemodynamic index, NH3, and post-TIPS clinical outcomes. The hemodynamic success of TIPS (final PPG ≤ 12 mmHg) was not achieved in 29 patients (20%). The median pre-TIPS PPG was 22 (IQR, 20–27 mmHg), which decreased to 9 (IQR, 6–12 mmHg) after the TIPS procedure. The overweight/obese group had significantly lower pre-TIPS PPG (20, IQR, 18–25 vs. 24, IQR, 20–28; p = 0.005) versus the normal weight group. No significant difference in pre-TIPS PPG between the normal weight group and underweight group (25, IQR, 22–27 vs. 24, IQR, 20–28; p = 0.622) was observed. No significant difference was observed among the three groups according to BMI classification with respect to post-TIPS hemodynamic index, including the PPG values (p = 0.780), the percentage of final PPG ≤ 12 mmHg (p = 0.832), the percentage of PPG drop (p = 0.548), the percentage of PPG drop ≥ 50% baseline (p = 0.250), or the percentage of good response to TIPS (p = 0.913).
The median pre-TIPS NH3 was 25.50 (IQR, 12.50–40.00 μmol/L), which markedly increased to 33.00 (IQR, 22.00–49.00 μmol/L) after the TIPS procedure (p = 0.003). According to the BMI subgroup classification, the NH3 levels significantly increased from 25.00 (IQR, 14.00–39.50) to 32.00 (IQR, 18.75–49.25) in the normal weight group after TIPS (p = 0.022), but no significant difference was observed between pre-TIPS and post-TIPS NH3 levels in underweight or overweight/obese patients (p = 0.403 and 0.077, respectively).
During a median follow-up period of 1224 (IQR, 1044–1443) days, 27/145 (19%) had variceal rebleeding, 17/145 (12%) had intrastent stenosis, and 15/145 (10%) died. Among the 15 death cases, 4 died of hepatic failure, 1 died of lung infections caused by hormones, 1 died of cerebral hemorrhage, 1 died of renal failure, 1 died of cardiac arrest, 3 died of multiple organ failure, 1 died of bleeding, and 3 died of HE. None of the 145 participants underwent liver transplantation. In our department, most patients who underwent liver transplantation had HCC and were excluded from the present cohort. Based on the Kaplan–Meier curve analysis, there were no marked differences in the cumulative survival rate, cumulative rebleeding-free survival rate, and cumulative intrastent stenosis-free survival rate among the normal weight group, underweight group, and overweight/obese group (log-rank p = 0.6092, 0.7113, and 0.6374, respectively) (Figure 2A–C).

3.3. Relationship between BMI and Post-TIPS OHE

Among 145 patients, 50 (34%) developed OHE after TIPS (Table 2). There was no significant difference regarding the prevalence of post-TIPS OHE between the normal weight group and the underweight group (20, 25% vs. 5, 36%; p = 0.514). The overweight/obese group had a markedly higher prevalence of post-TIPS OHE compared with the normal weight group (25, 48% vs. 20, 25%; p = 0.007), which was consistent with the outcome of the logistic regression (Table 3). Based on univariable analysis, four variables (age, male, BMI group, and Cr; p < 0.1 for all) were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis; age and overweight/obese were found to be independent predictors of post-TIPS OHE. Older patients had a higher risk of the prevalence of post-TIPS OHE compared with younger ones (OR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.004–1.080; p = 0.030). Overweight/obese patients had a higher hazard of having post-TIPS OHE compared with normal weight patients (OR: 2.754, 95% CI: 1.236–6.140; p = 0.013). The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis described that overweight/obese patients had the lowest OHE-free survival probability among the three groups, which means the highest cumulative prevalence of post-TIPS OHE (log-rank p = 0.0118) (Figure 2D).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between BMI and post-TIPS OHE in cirrhotic patients, and the data showed that overweight/obesity was an independent risk factor for OHE. Overweight/obese patients have a higher risk of the prevalence of post-TIPS OHE compared with normal weight patients. The mechanisms underlying the relationship between overweight/obesity and OHE remain unclear, and there are some underlying explanations.
First, in the setting of overweight/obesity, some vital body compositional alterations may occur to promote OHE. Total body adiposity is largely associated with fat deposition within muscle or myosteatosis, which impair the capability of skeletal tissue to metabolize ammonia, resulting in an increased risk of OHE [21,22]. The glutamine synthetase activity of muscle may compensate for the damaged ammonia detoxification in cirrhotic livers, in which case the blood ammonia further rises. Recently, the new concept of sarcopenic obesity identifies overweight/obesity with low skeletal muscle function and mass in patients with NAFLD and diabetes mellitus (DM) [23]. Several pathophysiological mechanisms, such as insulin resistance, oxidative stress, increased proinflammatory cytokines, and decreased physical activity, relate sarcopenia with overweight/obesity [24]. Increasing visceral fat causes inflammation, which contributes to sarcopenia [25]. In contrast, sarcopenia lessens physical activity, resulting in decreased energy expenditure and an increased risk of overweight/obesity, indicating a vicious cycle between overweight/obesity and sarcopenia. The improvement in sarcopenia and myosteatosis as well as subcutaneous adipose tissue has been reported to be associated with the amelioration of cognitive impairment [26]. Thus, overweight/obesity and sarcopenia synergistically promote the risk of OHE. In the present study, there was an increasing tendency of the pre-TIPS NH3 levels in the overweight/obese group (29.50, IQR, 16.25–40.50) relative to those in the normal weight (25.00, IQR, 14.00–39.50) or underweight groups (9.00, IQR, 9.00–49.50), suggesting the association between overweight/obesity and OHE. However, no significant difference in pre-TIPS NH3 levels was observed among these three groups. The significance might be limited by the sample size. Regarding the post-TIPS NH3, there was also an increasing tendency of the NH3 levels, the median post-TIPS NH3 levels in the underweight (32.50, IQR, 10.50–55.00) and normal weight groups (32.00, IQR, 18.75–49.25) were close, and the levels were higher in the overweight/obese group (38.00, IQR, 25.00–49.00). Though not statistically significant, the data suggested that overweight/obesity might aggravate the increased blood ammonia caused by the TIPS placement. Large-scale studies are required in the future.
Second, overweight/obesity is a well-established risk factor for NAFLD that can progress to cirrhosis. Though obesity and DM are related to higher risks of steatosis, no prior study had separated both risk factors for their relative impact. In a US cohort, liver steatosis is primarily associated with a higher BMI and more modestly associated with DM. Type 2 DM promotes advanced fibrosis among participants who are already overweight and obese [27]. Advanced fibrosis is a well-established predictor of future cirrhosis [28,29], suggesting overweight/obesity itself as a basic risk factor for cirrhosis that can be amplified by DM. Overweight/obesity triggers chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, along with the dysregulation of adipokines secretion, leading to the development of ectopic fat accumulation in the liver [30]. The increasing deposition of triglyceride in the liver alters the metabolism of lipid and glucose, which results in insulin resistance and increases the prevalence of hepatic steatosis [31]. Overweight/obesity may coexist with advanced liver diseases caused by other etiologies. Several studies have demonstrated that overweight/obesity negatively impacts cerebral and cognitive functions [32]. Not only advanced chronic liver diseases but even pre-cirrhotic stages of NAFLD can be associated with brain dysfunction and cognitive decline. Moreover, NAFLD is correlated with low-grade brain tissue inflammation and hypoxia in the presence of overweight/obesity, along with metabolic, cerebrovascular, and behavioral changes, suggesting the early stage of overweight/obesity-related encephalopathy [33].
Overweight/obesity is a well-established predictor for cirrhosis. A population-based study of over 10,000 individuals with a 5-year follow-up revealed that being overweight or obese correlated with an over 50% increased risk for death or hospitalization due to cirrhosis in the absence of previous clinical evidence of liver disease [34]. In addition, a 39-year follow-up study concluded that overweight in late adolescence raises the hazard of developing advanced liver diseases later in life [35]. Furthermore, the risk for decompensation gradually increased in overweight/obese patients with diagnosed cirrhosis compared with those who are of a normal weight [6]. Prior studies have revealed that the connection of the genetic variants with ALT levels and cirrhosis may be amplified by obesity [36,37,38]. In a recent work of multi-trait genome-wide association and gene–environment interaction research, 12 cirrhosis-related genetic variants were employed to generate a polygenic score. Their results showed that elevated alcohol consumption or BMI amplified the relationship between polygenic risk and cirrhosis [39]. Interventions targeting lifestyle factors such as overweight/obesity might ease the inherited predisposition towards cirrhosis. In another study, compared with obese participants, patients at an extreme polygenic risk with normal BMI had a lower hazard of developing advanced liver diseases, suggesting that individuals at a high polygenic risk of cirrhosis may survive from elevated genetic risk via weight loss, including lifestyle changes, bariatric surgery, or pharmacotherapy [36].
One challenge in treating overweight/obesity in cirrhotic patients is that the catabolism in cirrhosis may lead to significant muscle loss in the context of calorie restriction [40]. An RCT study demonstrated that the combined intervention of exercise, diet, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) supplementation reduced fat mass and improved muscle mass [41]. An adequate diet is essential for the prevention of neurological pathologies that come from systemic metabolic alterations [42]. Another work of research demonstrated that a 16-week intervention of diet management (reduced energy and moderate protein) and exercise could achieve weight loss and a portal pressure drop in overweight/obese cirrhotic patients [43]. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that BMI is an effective screening index for the development of post-TIPS OHE in cirrhotic patients, and an early tailored diet and exercise intervention for these patients might be beneficial.
Many risk factors have been revealed to be connected with HE. Predisposing risk factors such as MELD score, hyponatremia, serum bilirubin, and albumin and precipitating risk factors such as DM, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and a more advanced age can predict HE [22,44,45]. In recent years, DM has been discovered as a potential risk factor for HE development, including post-TIPS OHE [46]. However, in the present study, the association between DM and post-TIPS OHE was not observed (OR: 1.992, 95% CI: 0.831–4.773; p = 0.122). We speculated that this was limited by the small sample size.
We also found that older age was an independent risk factor for post-TIPS OHE (OR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.004–1.080; p = 0.030), which was consistent with the results reported by previous studies [20]. Age-related neurocognitive changes and body compositional changes such as myosteatosis and sarcopenia can both contribute to a high risk for the development of OHE in older age [47]. Age and BMI may interact together for the prevalence of OHE. Aging might aggravate the overweight/obesity-related chronic inflammatory state in cirrhotic livers. An intestinal flora imbalance and constipation, which can trigger OHE, are more prevalent in the elderly.
This study had several limitations. First, this was a single-center study, and a validation cohort was not conducted externally to verify our findings. Second, due to the inherent limitations of retrospective research, BMI data were lacking in some severe patients due to an emergency operation, probably leading to a selection bias. This is because they were usually bedridden when admitted, leading to the loss of height or weight data. Third, neither adipose tissue distribution nor muscle mass were evaluated. Fourth, the study only included patients with OHE, and no neuropsychological test for subclinical HE was carried out, which might underestimate the prevalence of HE.
In conclusion, both overweight/obesity and older age were independently connected with post-TIPS OHE in cirrhotic patients. In overweight/obese cirrhotic patients, the incidence of post-TIPS OHE was markedly higher, so more attention should be paid to the body composition improvement of these patients. In the future, prospective large-scale studies are required to determine whether interventions focusing on weight control or body composition improvement have a preventive effect on OHE in overweight/obese cirrhotic patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G., X.Y., Y.Z. and F.Z.; Data curation, L.G., X.Y., Y.C. and X.W.; Formal analysis, L.G., Y.Z. and F.Z.; Funding acquisition, F.Z.; Investigation, L.G., X.Y., Y.C. and X.W.; Methodology, M.Z., X.Z., L.W., Y.Z. and F.Z.; Project administration, M.Z., Y.Z. and F.Z.; Resources, X.Z. and L.W.; Software, L.W.; Supervision, M.Z., Y.Z. and F.Z.; Validation, L.G., X.Y., Y.C., X.W. and X.Z.; Visualization, L.G. and X.Y.; Writing—original draft, L.G. and X.Y.; Writing—review & editing, Y.Z. and F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Nanjing Health Science, Technology Development Special Fund project-Key project (NO. ZKX19015), Outstanding Youth Fund project (JQX20005), and funding for Clinical Trails from the Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University (2022-LCYJ-MS-13).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The information and data of the study population were extracted from the Hospital Information System. The datasets are not publicly available because the individual privacy of the participants should be protected. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the nurse Qin Yin from the Department of Gastroenterology in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital for helping with the patient follow-up.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation; World Health Organization Technical Report Series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Janssen, I.; Ardern, C.I. Physical inactivity, excess adiposity and premature mortality. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2003, 4, 257–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hourigan, L.F.; Macdonald, G.A.; Purdie, D.; Whitehall, V.H.; Shorthouse, C.; Clouston, A.; Powell, E.E. Fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C correlates significantly with body mass index and steatosis. Hepatology 1999, 29, 1215–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ratziu, V.; Giral, P.; Charlotte, F.; Bruckert, E.; Thibault, V.; Theodorou, I.; Khalil, L.; Turpin, G.; Opolon, P.; Poynard, T. Liver fibrosis in overweight patients. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sanyal, A.J.; Van Natta, M.L.; Clark, J.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Diehl, A.; Dasarathy, S.; Loomba, R.; Chalasani, N.; Kowdley, K.; Hameed, B.; et al. Prospective Study of Outcomes in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1559–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Berzigotti, A.; Garcia-Tsao, G.; Bosch, J.; Grace, N.D.; Burroughs, A.K.; Morillas, R.; Escorsell, A.; Garcia-Pagan, J.C.; Patch, D.; Matloff, D.S.; et al. Obesity is an independent risk factor for clinical decompensation in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2011, 54, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tripathi, D.; Stanley, A.J.; Hayes, P.C.; Travis, S.; Armstrong, M.J.; Tsochatzis, E.A.; Rowe, I.A.; Roslund, N.; Ireland, H.; Lomax, M.; et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Gut 2020, 69, 1173–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haussinger, D.; Dhiman, R.K.; Felipo, V.; Gorg, B.; Jalan, R.; Kircheis, G.; Merli, M.; Montagnese, S.; Romero-Gomez, M.; Schnitzler, A.; et al. Hepatic encephalopathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2022, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vilstrup, H.; Amodio, P.; Bajaj, J.; Cordoba, J.; Ferenci, P.; Mullen, K.D.; Weissenborn, K.; Wong, P. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology 2014, 60, 715–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lauridsen, M.M.; Jepsen, P.; Wernberg, C.W.; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, O.B.; Bajaj, J.S.; Vilstrup, H. Validation of a Simple Quality-of-Life Score for Identification of Minimal and Prediction of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy. Hepatol. Commun. 2020, 4, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bustamante, J.; Rimola, A.; Ventura, P.J.; Navasa, M.; Cirera, I.; Reggiardo, V.; Rodés, J. Prognostic significance of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 1999, 30, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cordoba, J.; Ventura-Cots, M.; Simón-Talero, M.; Amorós, À.; Pavesi, M.; Vilstrup, H.; Angeli, P.; Domenicali, M.; Ginés, P.; Bernardi, M.; et al. Characteristics, risk factors, and mortality of cirrhotic patients hospitalized for hepatic encephalopathy with and without acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Häussinger, D.; Kircheis, G.; Fischer, R.; Schliess, F.; vom Dahl, S. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: A clinical manifestation of astrocyte swelling and low-grade cerebral edema? J. Hepatol. 2000, 32, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ott, P.; Larsen, F.S. Blood-brain barrier permeability to ammonia in liver failure: A critical reappraisal. Neurochem. Int. 2004, 44, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Frieg, B.; Görg, B.; Gohlke, H.; Häussinger, D. Glutamine synthetase as a central element in hepatic glutamine and ammonia metabolism: Novel aspects. Biol. Chem. 2021, 402, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Coltart, I.; Tranah, T.H.; Shawcross, D.L. Inflammation and hepatic encephalopathy. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 536, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shawcross, D.L.; Davies, N.A.; Williams, R.; Jalan, R. Systemic inflammatory response exacerbates the neuropsychological effects of induced hyperammonemia in cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2004, 40, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rose, C.F.; Amodio, P.; Bajaj, J.S.; Dhiman, R.K.; Montagnese, S.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D.; Vilstrup, H.; Jalan, R. Hepatic encephalopathy: Novel insights into classification, pathophysiology and therapy. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1526–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. World Health Organization. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004, 363, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yin, X.; Zhang, F.; Xiao, J.; Wang, Y.; He, Q.; Zhu, H.; Leng, X.; Zou, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhuge, Y. Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of hepatic encephalopathy after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 31, 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhanji, R.A.; Moctezuma-Velazquez, C.; Duarte-Rojo, A.; Ebadi, M.; Ghosh, S.; Rose, C.; Montano-Loza, A.J. Myosteatosis and sarcopenia are associated with hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatol. Int. 2018, 12, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nardelli, S.; Lattanzi, B.; Merli, M.; Farcomeni, A.; Gioia, S.; Ridola, L.; Riggio, O. Muscle Alterations Are Associated with Minimal and Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Hepatology 2019, 70, 1704–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barazzoni, R.; Bischoff, S.; Boirie, Y.; Busetto, L.; Cederholm, T.; Dicker, D.; Toplak, H.; Van Gossum, A.; Yumuk, V.; Vettor, R. Sarcopenic Obesity: Time to Meet the Challenge. Obes. Facts 2018, 11, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Choi, K.M. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2016, 31, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gregor, M.F.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 415–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gioia, S.; Ridola, L.; Cristofaro, L.; Merli, M.; Faccioli, J.; Riggio, O.; Nardelli, S. The improvement in body composition including subcutaneous and visceral fat reduces ammonia and hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 2021, 41, 2965–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Barb, D.; Repetto, E.M.; Stokes, M.E.; Shankar, S.S.; Cusi, K. Type 2 diabetes mellitus increases the risk of hepatic fibrosis in individuals with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obesity 2021, 29, 1950–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anstee, Q.M.; Lawitz, E.J.; Alkhouri, N.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Romero-Gomez, M.; Okanoue, T.; Trauner, M.; Kersey, K.; Li, G.; Han, L.; et al. Noninvasive Tests Accurately Identify Advanced Fibrosis due to NASH: Baseline Data from the STELLAR Trials. Hepatology 2019, 70, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Younossi, Z.M.; Stepanova, M.; Rafiq, N.; Henry, L.; Loomba, R.; Makhlouf, H.; Goodman, Z. Nonalcoholic steatofibrosis independently predicts mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. Commun. 2017, 1, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kalyani, R.R.; Corriere, M.; Ferrucci, L. Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: The effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adler, M.; Schaffner, F. Fatty liver hepatitis and cirrhosis in obese patients. Am. J. Med. 1979, 67, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kanoski, S.E.; Davidson, T.L. Different patterns of memory impairments accompany short- and longer-term maintenance on a high-energy diet. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2010, 36, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hadjihambi, A.; Konstantinou, C.; Klohs, J.; Monsorno, K.; Le Guennec, A.; Donnelly, C.; Cox, I.J.; Kusumbe, A.; Hosford, P.S.; Soffientini, U.; et al. Partial MCT1 invalidation protects against diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the associated brain dysfunction. J. Hepatol. 2023, 78, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ioannou, G.N.; Weiss, N.S.; Kowdley, K.V.; Dominitz, J.A. Is obesity a risk factor for cirrhosis-related death or hospitalization? A population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 2003, 125, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hagström, H.; Stål, P.; Hultcrantz, R.; Hemmingsson, T.; Andreasson, A. Overweight in late adolescence predicts development of severe liver disease later in life: A 39 years follow-up study. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stender, S.; Kozlitina, J.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Tybjærg-Hansen, A.; Hobbs, H.H.; Cohen, J.C. Adiposity amplifies the genetic risk of fatty liver disease conferred by multiple loci. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Romeo, S.; Sentinelli, F.; Dash, S.; Yeo, G.S.H.; Savage, D.B.; Leonetti, F.; Capoccia, D.; Incani, M.; Maglio, C.; Iacovino, M.; et al. Morbid obesity exposes the association between PNPLA3 I148M (rs738409) and indices of hepatic injury in individuals of European descent. Int. J. Obes. 2010, 34, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Giudice, E.M.d.; Grandone, A.; Cirillo, G.; Santoro, N.; Amato, A.; Brienza, C.; Savarese, P.; Marzuillo, P.; Perrone, L. The association of PNPLA3 variants with liver enzymes in childhood obesity is driven by the interaction with abdominal fat. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Emdin, C.A.; Haas, M.; Ajmera, V.; Simon, T.G.; Homburger, J.; Neben, C.; Jiang, L.; Wei, W.-Q.; Feng, Q.; Zhou, A.; et al. Association of Genetic Variation with Cirrhosis: A Multi-Trait Genome-Wide Association and Gene-Environment Interaction Study. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 1620–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Johnston, H.E.; Takefala, T.G.; Kelly, J.T.; Keating, S.E.; Coombes, J.S.; Macdonald, G.A.; Hickman, I.J.; Mayr, H.L. The Effect of Diet and Exercise Interventions on Body Composition in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hernández-Conde, M.; Llop, E.; Gómez-Pimpollo, L.; Fernández Carrillo, C.; Rodríguez, L.; Van Den Brule, E.; Perelló, C.; López-Gómez, M.; Abad, J.; Martínez-Porras, J.L.; et al. Adding Branched-Chain Amino Acids to an Enhanced Standard-of-Care Treatment Improves Muscle Mass of Cirrhotic Patients with Sarcopenia: A Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 116, 2241–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Estrada, J.A.; Contreras, I. Nutritional Modulation of Immune and Central Nervous System Homeostasis: The Role of Diet in Development of Neuroinflammation and Neurological Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Berzigotti, A.; Albillos, A.; Villanueva, C.; Genescá, J.; Ardevol, A.; Augustín, S.; Calleja, J.L.; Bañares, R.; García-Pagán, J.C.; Mesonero, F.; et al. Effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention program on portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and obesity: The SportDiet study. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jepsen, P.; Watson, H.; Andersen, P.K.; Vilstrup, H. Diabetes as a risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis patients. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gil-Gómez, A.; Ampuero, J.; Rojas, Á.; Gallego-Durán, R.; Muñoz-Hernández, R.; Rico, M.C.; Millán, R.; García-Lozano, R.; Francés, R.; Soriano, G.; et al. Development and Validation of a Clinical-Genetic Risk Score to Predict Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 116, 1238–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gairing, S.J.; Schleicher, E.M.; Labenz, C. Diabetes mellitus—Risk factor and potential future target for hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis? Metab. Brain Dis. 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Louissaint, J.; Deutsch-Link, S.; Tapper, E.B. Changing Epidemiology of Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, S1–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jpm 13 00682 g001 550
Figure 1. Patient flow chart. BMI, body mass index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
Figure 1. Patient flow chart. BMI, body mass index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
Jpm 13 00682 g001
Jpm 13 00682 g002 550
Figure 2. Outcomes after TIPS in patients via the Kaplan–Meier method. (A) The cumulative survival probability among the normal weight group, underweight group, and overweight/obese group. (B) The cumulative rebleeding-free survival probability among the three groups. (C) The cumulative intrastent stenosis-free survival probability among the three groups. (D) The cumulative OHE-free survival probability among the three groups. OHE, overt hepatic encephalopathy.
Figure 2. Outcomes after TIPS in patients via the Kaplan–Meier method. (A) The cumulative survival probability among the normal weight group, underweight group, and overweight/obese group. (B) The cumulative rebleeding-free survival probability among the three groups. (C) The cumulative intrastent stenosis-free survival probability among the three groups. (D) The cumulative OHE-free survival probability among the three groups. OHE, overt hepatic encephalopathy.
Jpm 13 00682 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of patients just before the TIPS procedure.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients just before the TIPS procedure.
Variables Total
(n = 145)		Underweight
(n = 14)		Normal Weight
(n = 79)		Overweight/Obese
(n = 52)		p Value
Age (years)58 (50–66)52.5 (47.5–58)58 (51–66)60.5 (49.5–66.8)0.468
Gender (male) 92 (63.4%)10 (71.4%)46 (58.2%)36 (69.2%)0.357
BMI (kg/m2)21.95 (20.05–24.04)17.75 (17.20–18.08)21.09 (19.84–21.97)24.98 (23.88–26.49)<0.001
Etiology (virus/others)73/7210/438/4125/270.252
Ascites * (no/light/medium/heavy)10/35/32/670/1/2/105/18/20/365/16/10/210.342
Diabetes25 (17.2%)2 (14.3%)11 (13.9%)12 (23.1%)0.413
Hypertension13 (9.0%)1 (7.1%)7 (8.9%)5 (9.6%)>0.999
Pre-TIPS OHE1 (0.7%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (1.9%)0.455
Spleen121 (83.4%)11 (78.6%)66 (83.5%)44 (84.6%)0.864
Portal thrombosis53 (36.6%)4 (28.6%)29 (36.7%)20 (38.5%)0.792
PT (s)14.1 (13.0–15.1)14.5 (14.1–15.6)14.2 (12.7–15.1)13.8 (13.0–15.0)0.386
INR1.24 (1.14–1.34)1.28 (1.23–1.38)1.24 (1.11–1.33)1.22 (1.14–1.34)0.295
Fib (g/L)1.7 (1.4–2.2)1.5 (1.2–1.7)1.8 (1.5–2.3)1.7 (1.5–2.3)0.190
ALT (U/L)18.80 (13.65–26.50)16.75 (10.90–26.80)19.9 (13.8–34.3)18.5 (13.3–24.9)0.352
AST (U/L)25.0 (20.2–35.1)21.4 (16.3–38.5)24.9 (20.5–37.0)27.2 (21.1–31.4)0.339
TB (μmol/L)15.5 (10.9–22.8)15.2 (8.4–21.5)15.2 (10.3–21.9)16.2 (11.7–23.7)0.698
ALB (g/L)34.20 (31.50–37.05)33.20 (30.25–37.15)34.30 (31.60–36.90)33.95 (31.25–37.38)0.885
Cr (μmol/L)59 (50–71)65 (53–78)60 (48–71)58 (51–65)0.408
WBC (*10^9/L)2.50 (1.80–4.30)1.95 (1.48–3.75)2.45 (1.68–4.33)2.70 (2.00–4.60)0.228
PLT (*10^9/L)65.0 (40.5–112.0)46.0 (39.8–66.8)63.0 (40.0–102.0)76.5 (41.0–124.0)0.185
MELD score9 (8–11)10 (9–12)9 (8–11)10 (8–11)0.527
CTP score7 (6–8)7 (6–8)7 (6–7)7 (6–8)0.490
CTP class (A/B/C)56/88/15/9/027/52/024/27/10.333
Patients received 8 mm stents109 (75.2%)12 (85.7%)56 (70.9%)41 (78.8%)0.370
Duration of follow-up (day)1224 (1044–1443)1099 (923–1404)1230 (1051–1443)1200 (1034–1470)0.597
Data are median (interquartile range) or frequency (percentage). * Ascites: Light: patients usually have abdominal distension; the ascites can only be detected by ultrasound examination, with a depth under 3 cm. Medium: patients usually have moderate and symmetrical abdominal distension, with a depth from 3 to 10 cm. Heavy: patients have significant bloating. Detected by ultrasound; ascites occupy the entire abdominal cavity, with a depth over 10 cm. ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; Cr, creatinine; CTP, Child–Turcotte–Pugh; Fib, fibrinogen; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; OHE, overt hepatic encephalopathy; PLT, platelet count; PT, prothrombin time; TB, total bilirubin; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; WBC, white blood cell.
Table
Table 2. Hemodynamic index and clinical outcomes according to BMI subgroup classification.
Table 2. Hemodynamic index and clinical outcomes according to BMI subgroup classification.
Total
(n = 145)		Underweight
(n = 14)		Normal Weight
(n = 79)		Overweight/Obese (n = 52)p Value
Hemodynamic index
Pre-TIPS PPG (mmHg)22 (20–27)25 (22–27)24 (20–28)20 (18–25)0.005
Post-TIPS PPG (mmHg)9 (6–12)10 (6–12)9 (5–12)8 (6–11)0.780
Final PPG ≤ 12 mmHg116 (80%)11 (79%)62 (78%)43 (83%)0.832
Percentage of PPG drop (%)60 (46–75)61 (55–77)61 (50–75)57 (45–73)0.548
PPG drop ≥ 50% baseline104 (72%)11 (79%)60 (76%)33 (63%)0.250
Good response to TIPS *121 (83%)12 (86%)65 (82%)44 (85%)0.913
Pre-TIPS NH3 (μmol/L)25.50 (12.50–40.00)9.00 (9.00–49.50)25.00 (14.00–39.50)29.50 (16.25–40.50)0.483
Post-TIPS NH3 (μmol/L)33.00 (22.00–49.00)32.50 (10.50–55.00)32.00 (18.75–49.25)38.00 (25.00–49.00)0.537
Outcomes
Variceal rebleeding27 (19%)3 (21%)16 (20%)8 (15%)0.752
Intrastent stenosis17 (12%)2 (14%)10 (13%)5 (10%)0.827
OHE50 (34%)5 (36%)20 (25%)25 (48%)0.027
Death15 (10%)1 (7%)10 (13%)4 (8%)0.605
Data are the median (interquartile range) or frequency (percentage). * Good response to TIPS, 50% drop in PPG or to values ≤12 mmHg. OHE, overt hepatic encephalopathy; PPG, portal pressure gradient; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
Table
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for post-TIPS OHE.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for post-TIPS OHE.
Univariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Age1.040 (1.006–1.075)0.0201.041 (1.004–1.080)0.030
Male2.070 (0.976–4.390)0.0581.859 (0.797–4.337)0.151
BMI
  Normal weight
  Underweight1.639 (0.491–5.469)0.4221.749 (0.485–6.301)0.393
  Overweight/obese2.731 (1.298–5.746)0.0082.754 (1.236–6.140)0.013
Etiology (virus)1.414 (0.710–2.815)0.324
Diabetes1.992 (0.831–4.773)0.122
Hypertension1.208 (0.374–3.908)0.752
Spleen1.063 (0.421–2.688)0.897
Portal thrombosis0.964 (0.473–1.966)0.920
PT (s)0.902 (0.726–1.120)0.350
INR0.291 (0.030–2.796)0.285
Fib (g/L)1.331 (0.739–2.398)0.341
TB (μmmol/L)1.001 (0.972–1.032)0.922
ALB (g/L)0.993 (0.912–1.082)0.878
Cr (μmol/L)1.016 (1.001–1.031)0.0331.014 (0.998–1.029)0.079
WBC (*10^9/L)1.100 (0.947–1.277)0.213
PLT (*10^9/L)1.001 (0.997–1.005)0.777
MELD score1.075 (0.944–1.224)0.277
CTP score1.090 (0.810–1.466)0.570
Ascites
  No
  Light2.667 (0.492–14.461)0.256
  Medium2.095 (0.378–11.615)0.397
  Heavy2.091 (0.410–10.666)0.375
ALB, albumin; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; Cr, creatinine; CTP, Child–Turcotte–Pugh; Fib, fibrinogen; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; OR, odds ratio; PLT, platelet count; PT, prothrombin time; TB, total bilirubin; WBC, white blood cell.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gu, L.; Yin, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, M.; Zou, X.; Wang, L.; Zhuge, Y.; Zhang, F. Overweight/Obesity Increases the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040682

AMA Style

Gu L, Yin X, Cheng Y, Wang X, Zhang M, Zou X, Wang L, Zhuge Y, Zhang F. Overweight/Obesity Increases the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13(4):682. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gu, Lihong, Xiaochun Yin, Yang Cheng, Xixuan Wang, Ming Zhang, Xiaoping Zou, Lei Wang, Yuzheng Zhuge, and Feng Zhang. 2023. "Overweight/Obesity Increases the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients" Journal of Personalized Medicine 13, no. 4: 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop