Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
Next Article in Special Issue
Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Prebiotic Intervention with Polyphenols Extracted from European Black Elderberry—Sustained Expansion of Akkermansia spp.
Previous Article in Journal
Blood Biomarkers and Metabolomic Profiling for the Early Diagnosis of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dendrimers, an Emerging Opportunity in Personalized Medicine?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Polymorphisms Predict Hepatotoxicity in Azathioprine-Treated Patients with Autoimmune Diseases

1
Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
2
Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
3
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 30010, Taiwan
4
Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
5
Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine & Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
6
Department of Pharmacy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
7
Department of Medical Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
8
College of Business and Management, Ling Tung University, Taichung 408284, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091399
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 28 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized and Precision Medicine 2022)

Abstract

:
Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) is the rate-limiting enzyme in Azathioprine (AZA) metabolization. Although studies have discussed the association between the TPMT polymorphisms and myelosuppression, the data about the relationship between TPMT genotypes and hepatoxicity in Asian patients remain limited. This study investigated the correlation between TPMT polymorphisms and AZA-related hepatotoxicity. This study enrolled the patients who had prior exposure to AZA from the Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH)-Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative (TPMI) cohort. Genetic variants were determined using a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Participants were accordingly categorized into normal metabolizer (NM) and non-normal metabolizer (non-NM) groups. From the TCVGH-TPMI cohort, we included 50 TPMT non-NM patients, including 1 poor metabolizer (PM), 49 intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 1000 NM patients. The non-NM genotype was associated with hepatotoxicity compared with the NM genotype (hazard ratio (HR): 3.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.83–8.10). In the non-NM group, the 3-year cumulative incidence of hepatotoxicity was higher than that in the NM group at 8.5% in the first year and 18.6% in the second and third years (p < 0.001). A TPMT non-NM genotype was associated with the occurrence of hepatotoxicity following AZA therapy. Preemptive testing helps individualize AZA therapy by minimizing the risk of hepatotoxicity.

1. Introduction

Azathioprine (AZA) is a valuable steroid-sparing immunosuppressant that is broadly used for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1,2,3], severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [4,5,6,7], autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) [8], dermatomyositis (DM)/polymyositis, pemphigus [9], and post-transplant rejection. Azathioprine is a prodrug. Initially, AZA is metabolized to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) by glutathione S-transferase (GST). Three competitive enzymatic pathways metabolize 6-MP. First, xanthine oxidase (XO) catalyzes 6-MP to thiouric acid, an inactive metabolite. Second, thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT), methylates 6-MP into 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). Third, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) converts 6-MP into 6-thioinosine monophosphate (6-TIMP). Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) dehydrogenizes 6-TIMP into 6-thioxanthosine monophosphate (6-TXMP). Subsequently, guanosine monophosphate synthetase (GMPS) metabolizes 6-TXMP to 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGNs). 6TGNs, the primary active metabolites, integrate into DNA and RNA molecules to generate cytotoxic and therapeutic effects [10,11]. Patients with intermediate TPMT activity show 50% more 6-TGNs than those with normal or high TPMT activity. Low or absent TPMT activity can lead to further accumulation of 6-TGNs. Deficient enzyme activity may increase AZA-related side effects. AZA-related side effects include myelosuppression, which occurs in 3–17% of the patients [12,13], hepatotoxicity in up to 10% of patients [14], gastrointestinal adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), and hair loss.
Genetic polymorphisms of the TMPT gene have been studied extensively [15]. In the Caucasian population, approximately 4–11% of individuals have intermediate TPMT activity, while approximately 1 in 300 (0.3%) have very low or absent TPMT activity [16,17]. In the Asian population, the frequency of TPMT gene mutations is approximately 1.5–3%. TPMT polymorphisms were significantly associated with AZA-induced bone marrow toxicity [18,19,20]. Two meta-analyses by Liu et al. [19,20] reported the incidence of the TPMT polymorphisms was not associated with AZA-induced hepatotoxicity in patients with autoimmune diseases and IBD. However, the populations in these studies discussing AZA-induced hepatotoxicity were mainly Caucasian. The enrolled Asian population was limited. We may need a larger Asian population to evaluate the association between the incidence of AZA-induced hepatotoxicity and TPMT polymorphisms.
This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate whether there is a relationship between TPMT polymorphisms and the incidence of AZA-related hepatotoxicity.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This retrospective case-control study was performed in a single medical center in Taiwan with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (SF19153A). Each participant offered written informed consent before study participation. This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Study Population

The study participants were from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative (TPMI), which collected information and specimens from Taiwanese volunteers from 15 hospitals throughout the nation. The tertiary referral medical center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH), contributed to the majority of the TPMI cohort. A total of 43,035 patients who were >20 years old were enrolled in the TPMI study from June 2019 to August 2021. A total of 2128 patients with present or previous exposure to AZA were selected. Patients who had not yet started therapy at the time of laboratory analysis were excluded. We excluded patients without a white blood cell (WBC) count, those without alanine transaminase (ALT) data, and those with a cancer diagnosis before taking AZA.

2.3. Data Collection

The date of AZA prescription was defined as index day. Clinical data after the index day, including age, gender, azathioprine dosage, first biochemistry profile, use of other immunosuppressive agents, comorbidities, and AZA prescription department were collected from the electric health record.
Comorbidities diagnosed once during hospitalization or at least twice in the outpatient department and six months before and after AZA prescription were included. These included hepatitis B (International classification of diseases (ICD) 10/9: B16, B18.0–B18.1, B19.10–B19.11/070.2–070.3), SLE (M32/710), Sjogren’s syndrome (M35/710.2), DM(M33.0–33.1, M33.9, M36.0/710.3), polymyositis (M33.2/710.4), pemphigus (L10.0–10.9/694.4), RA (M05.7–M05.9, M06.0, M06.2–M06.3, M06.8–M06.9, M08/714), systemic sclerosis (SSc) (M34/710.1), mixed connective tissue disease (M35.1/710.8), vasculitis (M30.0, M31.0, M31.3-M31.7/446.0, 446.2, 446.4–446.5, 446.7), pemphigoid (L12.1–12.9, K05.11/694.5–694.6), Behcet’s disease (M35.2/136.1), and IBD (K50, K51, K52.9/555.0–555.9, 556.0–556.9, 558.9).
Following the AZA therapy index day, the first onset time of leukopenia and hepatotoxicity was analyzed. Leukopenia was defined as a WBC count ≤ 4000/uL. Hepatotoxicity was defined as an ALT level ≥ 150 U/L. The AZA prescription division was also analyzed and included the divisions of immunology and rheumatology (IMRH), nephrology (NEPH), neurology (NEUR), dermatology (DERM), chest medicine (CM), cardiology (CV), gastroenterology and hepatology (GI), hematology (HEMA), metabolism, endocrinology and nutrition (META), gastrointestinal surgery (GS), Thoracic Surgery (CS), colorectal surgery (CRS), otolaryngology (ENT), ophthalmology (OPH), and pediatrics (PENP).

2.4. TMPT Genotyping

Genotyping was performed using the Taiwan Biobank (TWB, established in 2012) version 2 array [21], a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array designed for the Taiwanese population by choosing optimized SNPs for imputation from the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the Taiwan Biobank participants. The TWBv2 array straightly genotypes more than 100,000 functional variants. The SNPs rs1142345 representing TPMT alleles *3A or *3C were analyzed. Alleles *3A and *3C were the common inactivating alleles in East Asia, accounting for 98% of all no-function alleles [22]. Genotyping tests including these variants are likely to be informative for the TPMT phenotype. A patient carrying one allele with the rs1142345 variant was reported as *1/*3 and was defined as intermediate metabolizer (IM). The patient carrying two alleles with the rs1142345 variant was reported as *3/*3 and was defined as a poor metabolizer (PM). According to genotyping, the patients were classified into TPMT normal metabolizers (NMs) and non-normal metabolizers (non-NMs), which included IMs and PMs.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as either numbers (percentages) or as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as the median (interquartile range). Comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages and were compared using the chi-square test. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze which factors are related to hepatotoxicity with adjustment for covariates (TPMT genotype, age, gender, AZA dosage, other medication (methotrexate (MTX)), and comorbidity of hepatitis B). Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine differences in cumulative incidence of hepatotoxicity between the TPMT non-NM and NM groups. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) version 22.0.

3. Results

3.1. Study Patient Flow

Of the 43,035 patients enrolled in the TPMI, 2128 patients with AZA exposure were selected (Figure 1). A total of 628 patients without a WBC count, without ALT data, or with a cancer diagnosis before taking AZA were excluded. The TPMT non-NM and NM groups were matched by age and gender. There were 50 TPMT non-NM patients, including 49 IMs and 1 PM, and 1000 TPMT NM patients among the AZA users.

3.2. Demographics of the Selected Patients

The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Patients were classified into TPMT non-normal metabolizer (non-NM) (n = 50) and normal metabolizer (NM) (n = 1000) groups. Age, gender, AZA dosage, post-AZA treatment first mean WBC count and ALT, and AZA prescription division were similar among the TPMT non-NM and NM groups. In terms of comorbidities, more patients had hepatitis B in the TPMT non-NM group than in the NM group.

3.3. TPMT Phenotypes and Risks of Hepatotoxicity and Leukopenia

The average dosage of AZA was not different between the TPMT non-NM and NM groups. However, more than half of the patients took less than 25 mg daily. A hepatotoxicity event was defined by an ALT level of more than 150 U/L, which showed no difference between the TPMT non-NM and NM groups. However, the onset time of hepatotoxicity was shorter in the TPMT non-NM group compared with the TPMT NM group (Table 2). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to evaluate the independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity following AZA treatment. Among 1050 AZA users, male gender (hazard ratio (HR): 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–2.91), non-NM genotype (HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.83–8.10), and MTX use (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03–2.57) were associated with hepatotoxicity compared with the NM genotype. Age, AZA dosage, and hepatitis B carrier status were not associated with hepatotoxicity (Table 3). The cumulative incidence of hepatoxicity was significantly higher in the first three years in the TPMP non-NM group than in the NM group (p < 0.001). In the TPMP non-NM group, the 1-year cumulative incidence rate was 8.5%, the 2-year cumulative incidence rate was 18.6%, and the 3-year cumulative incidence rate was 18.6% (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

This was a hospital-wide retrospective case-control study. The patients were selected from the TPMI cohort in which the TPMT gene status was tested. We enrolled all AZA users. Among 1050 AZA users, the non-NM genotype, male gender, and MTX usage were independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity. The cumulative incidence of hepatoxicity was significantly higher in the first three years in the TPMT non-NM group than in the NM group. Our result shows that pre-emptive TPMT genotyping before starting AZA therapy may minimize the risk of hepatotoxicity.
Two meta-analyses by Liu et al. [19,20] reported that the incidence of TPMT polymorphisms was not associated with AZA-induced hepatotoxicity in patients with autoimmune diseases and IBD. Unlike the previous studies, our study revealed an association between TPMT polymorphisms and thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity. First, our study design was different from those of the previous studies. We classified patients by TPMT genotyping before evaluating hepatotoxicity events. However, the earlier studies classified patients with hepatotoxicity events before assessing the TPMT genotype. Our study showed no difference in the first hepatotoxicity events between the TPMT non-NM and the NM groups. However, as the onset time of hepatotoxicity was considered and eliminating the interaction effect of variables by Cox regression analysis, the TPMT non-NM group was more prominent. Our study design was closer to the prospective concept. Second, our study population was different. Our patients had various autoimmune diseases, but the previous studies mainly analyzed patients with IBD. The subjects in the earlier studies discussing AZA-induced hepatotoxicity were primarily Caucasians. The Asian population was limited, but our study population was all Asians and was larger. As genetic testing is becoming less expensive and more accessible, pre-emptive TPMT testing is suggested in Asians to prevent post-AZA hepatotoxicity.
Previous studies revealed a significant association between TPMT polymorphisms and bone marrow toxicity. However, in our study, this was not noted. The previous studies primarily discussed Caucasians with IBD. The median dose of AZA in the previous studies was more than 1–2 mg/kg/day [23,24,25,26,27,28]. In contrast, our study enrolled patients with various autoimmune diseases, particularly SLE and SS. Our average AZA dosage was 36.4 mg in the TPMT non-NM group and 39.6 mg in the TPMT NM group. Approximately 90% of patients took less than 50 mg per day. We followed the AZA treatment strategy of starting with a lower dose and increasing the dose at a slow pace. Such a strategy seemed to keep the patients safe from myelosuppression even in those with the TPMT non-NM genotype. However, our study results show that taking AZA for a longer duration still has risks of hepatotoxicity.
In addition to the TPMT genotype, methotrexate usage and male gender were independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity. Clinical studies have widely reported the hepatotoxicity of MTX [29]. According to the FAERS database, females were less likely to develop liver injury than males [30]. A cross-sectional community study in Taiwan revealed that hepatitis with an elevated ALT was more common in men than in women [31]. According to our research, male patients with the TPMP non-NM genotype using MTX would have the highest risk of hepatotoxicity. These patients may take benefit from pre-emptive genotyping. This finding provides insights into the potential utilization of pharmacogenomics in individualized medical care.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the study design was retrospective. Missing data were inevitable. After three years of observation, the cumulative incidence of hepatotoxicity related to the TMPT non-NM genotype was noted. However, it is impossible to define a causal relationship between AZA and hepatotoxicity. The result was still significant. Second, we may have underestimated the number of cases of hepatotoxicity. There are three types of AZA-related hepatotoxicity: hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed. However, we only enrolled patients with hepatocellular-type hepatotoxicity. According to research by Siramolpiwat et al., the AZA-related hepatotoxicity type was predominantly a mixed type [32]. Evaluating only the ALT level may not miss patients with mixed-type hepatotoxicity. Thus, our hepatotoxicity event number was still reliable. Third, we only discussed the TMPT genotype. In addition to the TPMT genotype, our study did not discuss many other genetic polymorphisms, such as nucleoside diphosphate-liked moiety X motif 15 (NUDT15). NUDT15 was reported to be associated with more frequent adverse events than TPMT polymorphisms in the Asian population [33]. Further studies are needed to verify our results.

5. Conclusions

This hospital-wide retrospective case-control study supported the hypothesis that the TPMT non-NM genotype is associated with hepatotoxicity following AZA therapy. Pre-emptive testing for TPMT polymorphisms could help to individualize AZA therapy by minimizing the risk of hepatotoxicity, especially in male patients taking MTX.

Author Contributions

H.-S.S. was involved in the conceptualization of this study, methodology, original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. Y.-M.C. was involved in the conceptualization of this study, methodology, data generation, curation, resource acquisition, original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. Y.-J.L. was involved in the methodology, data analysis, and review and editing of the manuscript editing. C.-Y.W. was involved in the methodology, data analysis, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. J.-P.C. was involved in data curation, statistical analysis, and reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. H.-J.L. was involved in the data analysis. W.-T.H. was involved in the conceptualization of this study, methodology, data generation, curation, resource acquisition, original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. W.-N.H. was involved in interpreting the results, resource acquisition, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. Y.-H.C. participated in the study design, methodology, data interpretation, resource acquisition, and reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Academia Sinica 40-05-GMM and AS-GC-110-MD02.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (SF19153A).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants and investigators of the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Pego-Reigosa, J.M.; Cobo-Ibáñez, T.; Calvo-Alén, J.; Loza-Santamaría, E.; Rahman, A.; Muñoz-Fernández, S.; Rúa-Figueroa, Í. Efficacy and Safety of Nonbiologic Immunosuppressants in the Treatment of Nonrenal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Care Res. 2013, 65, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bertsias, G.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Boletis, J.; Bombardieri, S.; Cervera, R.; Dostal, C.; Font, J.; Gilboe, I.M.; Houssiau, F.; Huizinga, T.; et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 67, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Østensen, M.; Khamashta, M.; Lockshin, M.; Parke, A.; Brucato, A.; Carp, H.; Doria, A.; Rai, R.; Meroni, P.; Cetin, I.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ran, Z.; Wu, K.; Matsuoka, K.; Jeen, Y.T.; Wei, S.C.; Ahuja, V.; Chen, M.; Hu, P.J.; Andoh, A.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Asian Organization for Crohn’s and Colitis and Asia Pacific Association of Gastroenterology practice recommendations for medical management and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 36, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lichtenstein, G.R.; Loftus, E.V.; Isaacs, K.L.; Regueiro, M.D.; Gerson, L.B.; Sands, B.E. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 113, 481–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gomollón, F.; Dignass, A.; Annese, V.; Tilg, H.; Van Assche, G.; Lindsay, J.O.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Cullen, G.J.; Daperno, M.; Kucharzik, T.; et al. 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2017, 11, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Harbord, M.; Eliakim, R.; Bettenworth, D.; Karmiris, K.; Katsanos, K.; Kopylov, U.; Kucharzik, T.; Molnár, T.; Raine, T.; Sebastian, S.; et al. Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 2: Current Management. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2017, 11, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mack, C.L.; Adams, D.; Assis, D.N.; Kerkar, N.; Manns, M.P.; Mayo, M.J.; Vierling, J.M.; Alsawas, M.; Murad, M.H.; Czaja, A.J. Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Adults and Children: 2019 Practice Guidance and Guidelines From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2019, 72, 671–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Joly, P.; Horvath, B.; Patsatsi, A.; Uzun, S.; Bech, R.; Beissert, S.; Bergman, R.; Bernard, P.; Borradori, L.; Caproni, M.; et al. Updated S2K guidelines on the management of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus initiated by the european academy of dermatology and venereology (EADV). J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, 1900–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chouchana, L.; Narjoz, C.; Beaune, P.; Loriot, M.A.; Roblin, X. Review article: The benefits of pharmacogenetics for improving thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 35, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lennard, L. The clinical pharmacology of 6-mercaptopurine. Eur. J. Clin. Pharm. 1992, 43, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ngo, S.; Sauvetre, G.; Vittecoq, O.; Lévesque, H.; Marie, I. Azathioprine-associated severe myelosuppression: Indication of routine determination of thiopurine S-methyltransferase variant? Rev. Med. Int. 2011, 32, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boonsrirat, U.; Angsuthum, S.; Vannaprasaht, S.; Kongpunvijit, J.; Hirankarn, N.; Tassaneeyakul, W.; Avihingsanon, Y. Azathioprine-induced fatal myelosuppression in systemic lupus erythematosus patient carrying TPMT*3C polymorphism. Lupus 2008, 17, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bastida, G.; Nos, P.; Aguas, M.; Beltrán, B.; Rubín, A.; Dasí, F.; Ponce, J. Incidence, risk factors and clinical course of thiopurine-induced liver injury in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharm. 2005, 22, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Appell, M.L.; Berg, J.; Duley, J.; Evans, W.E.; Kennedy, M.A.; Lennard, L.; Marinaki, T.; McLeod, H.L.; Relling, M.V.; Schaeffeler, E.; et al. Nomenclature for alleles of the thiopurine methyltransferase gene. Pharm. Genom. 2013, 23, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Engen, R.M.; Marsh, S.; Van Booven, D.J.; McLeod, H.L. Ethnic differences in pharmacogenetically relevant genes. Curr. Drug Targets 2006, 7, 1641–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Corominas, H.; Domènech, M.; del Río, E.; Gich, I.; Domingo, P.; Baiget, M. Frequency of thiopurine S-methyltransferase alleles in different ethnic groups living in Spain. Med. Clin. 2006, 126, 410–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, X.W.; Zheng, Q.; Zhu, M.M.; Tong, J.L.; Ran, Z.H. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphisms and thiopurine toxicity in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 3187–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, H.-Q.; Li, Y.-C.; Shi, D.-C.; Huang, J.-F.; Huang, Q.; Fu, W.-L. Association between Thiopurine S-methyltransferase Polymorphisms and Thiopurine-Induced Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.-P.; Xu, H.-Q.; Li, M.; Yang, X.; Yu, S.; Fu, W.-L.; Huang, Q. Association between Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Polymorphisms and Azathioprine-Induced Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wei, C.-Y.; Yang, J.-H.; Yeh, E.-C.; Tsai, M.-F.; Kao, H.-J.; Lo, C.-Z.; Chang, L.-P.; Lin, W.-J.; Hsieh, F.-J.; Belsare, S.; et al. Genetic profiles of 103,106 individuals in the Taiwan Biobank provide insights into the health and history of Han Chinese. NPJ Genom. Med. 2021, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Relling, M.V.; Schwab, M.; Whirl-Carrillo, M.; Suarez-Kurtz, G.; Pui, C.H.; Stein, C.M.; Moyer, A.M.; Evans, W.E.; Klein, T.E.; Antillon-Klussmann, F.G.; et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Thiopurine Dosing Based on TPMT and NUDT15 Genotypes: 2018 Update. Clin. Pharm. 2018, 105, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ansari, A.; Arenas, M.; Greenfield, S.M.; Morris, D.; Lindsay, J.; Gilshenan, K.; Smith, M.; Lewis, C.; Marinaki, A.; Duley, J.; et al. Prospective evaluation of the pharmacogenetics of azathioprine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 28, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Palmieri, O.; Latiano, A.; Bossa, F.; Vecchi, M.; D’Incà, R.; Guagnozzi, D.; Tonelli, F.; Cucchiara, S.; Valvano, M.R.; Latiano, T.; et al. Sequential evaluation of thiopurine methyltransferase, inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase, and HPRT1 genes polymorphisms to explain thiopurines’ toxicity and efficacy. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 26, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schwab, M.; Schäffeler, E.; Marx, C.; Fischer, C.; Lang, T.; Behrens, C.; Gregor, M.; Eichelbaum, M.; Zanger, U.M.; Kaskas, B.A. Azathioprine therapy and adverse drug reactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Impact of thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 2002, 12, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Winter, J.W.; Gaffney, D.; Shapiro, D.; Spooner, R.J.; Marinaki, A.M.; Sanderson, J.D.; Mills, P.R. Assessment of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme activity is superior to genotype in predicting myelosuppression following azathioprine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 25, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wroblova, K.; Kolorz, M.; Batovsky, M.; Zboril, V.; Suchankova, J.; Bartos, M.; Ulicny, B.; Pav, I.; Bartosova, L. Gene Polymorphisms Involved in Manifestation of Leucopenia, Digestive Intolerance, and Pancreatitis in Azathioprine-Treated Patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 2394–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zabala-Fernández, W.; Barreiro-de Acosta, M.; Echarri, A.; Carpio, D.; Lorenzo, A.; Castro, J.; Martínez-Ares, D.; Pereira, S.; Martin-Granizo, I.; Corton, M.; et al. A pharmacogenetics study of TPMT and ITPA genes detects a relationship with side effects and clinical response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving Azathioprine. J. Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011, 20, 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ezhilarasan, D. Hepatotoxic potentials of methotrexate: Understanding the possible toxicological molecular mechanisms. Toxicology 2021, 458, 152840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rana, P.; Aleo, M.D.; Wen, X.; Kogut, S. Hepatotoxicity reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system database: A comparison of drugs that cause injury via mitochondrial or other mechanisms. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 3857–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C.H.; Huang, M.H.; Yang, J.C.; Nien, C.K.; Yang, C.C.; Yeh, Y.H.; Yueh, S.K. Prevalence and etiology of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase level in an adult population in Taiwan. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Siramolpiwat, S.; Sakonlaya, D. Clinical and histologic features of Azathioprine-induced hepatotoxicity. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 52, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jena, A.; Jha, D.K.; Kumar, M.P.; Kasudhan, K.S.; Kumar, A.; Sarwal, D.; Mishra, S.; Singh, A.K.; Bhatia, P.; Patil, A.; et al. Prevalence of polymorphisms in thiopurine metabolism and association with adverse outcomes: A South Asian region-specific systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharm. 2021, 14, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Patient enrollment flowchart. % 1. Exclude patients without WBC count and ALT data; 2. Exclude patients with a diagnosis of cancer before taking AZA. & Match by age and sex at 1:20. TPMI, Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative; TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer; IM, intermediate metabolizer; PM, poor metabolizer; WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AZA, azathioprine.
Figure 1. Patient enrollment flowchart. % 1. Exclude patients without WBC count and ALT data; 2. Exclude patients with a diagnosis of cancer before taking AZA. & Match by age and sex at 1:20. TPMI, Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative; TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer; IM, intermediate metabolizer; PM, poor metabolizer; WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AZA, azathioprine.
Jpm 12 01399 g001
Figure 2. Three-year cumulative incidence of hepatotoxicity between the TMPT non-NM and NM groups. TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer.
Figure 2. Three-year cumulative incidence of hepatotoxicity between the TMPT non-NM and NM groups. TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer.
Jpm 12 01399 g002
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in the TPMP non-NM and NM groups.
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in the TPMP non-NM and NM groups.
VariableTPMT Non-NM (n = 50)TPMT NM (n = 1000)p-Value
Age51.5 ± 11.751.4 ± 11.60.95
Gender
Female43 (86.0)858 (85.8)0.97
Male7 (14.0)142 (14.2)
AZA dose (mg)36.4 ± 17.939.6 ± 23.470.35
Biochemistry
WBC count (U/L)3920 (3600–5400)3900 (3500–5660)0.73
ALT (U/L)13.5 (11–27)13 (10–21)0.16
Medication
MTX6 (12.0)125 (12.5)0.92
Cyclophosphamide5 (10.0)137 (13.7)0.46
Comorbidity
Hepatitis B6 (12.0)36 (3.6)0.01
SLE30 (60.0)647 (64.7)0.50
SS24 (48.0)456 (45.6)0.74
DM and polymyositis7 (14.0)129 (12.9)0.82
Pemphigus3 (6.0)25 (2.5)0.14
Other autoimmune diseases ^12 (24.0)244 (24.4)0.95
Division
IMRH42 (84)864 (86.4)0.52
NEPH5 (10)59 (5.9)
NEUR2 (4)24 (2.4)
DERM0 (0)27 (2.7)
Others &1 (2)26 (2.6)
Data are expressed as n (%) or the mean ± SD or the median (interquartile range). ^ Other autoimmune diseases: RA, MCTD, vasculitis, SSc, Behcet’s disease, IBD. & Other divisions: CM, CV, GI, HEMA, META, GS, CS, CRS, ENT, OPH, PNEP. TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer; AZA, azathioprine; WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; MTX, methotrexate; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SS, Sjogren’s syndrome; DM, dermatomyositis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; SSc, systemic sclerosis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IMRH, immunology and rheumatology; NEPH, nephrology; NEUR, neurology; DERM, dermatology; CM, chest medicine; CV, cardiology; GI, gastroenterology and hepatology; HEMA, hematology; META, metabolism, endocrinology, and nutrition; GS, gastrointestinal surgery; CS, thoracic surgery; CRS, colorectal surgery; ENT, otolaryngology; OPH, ophthalmology; PENP, pediatrics.
Table 2. Outcome post-AZA treatment.
Table 2. Outcome post-AZA treatment.
VariableTPMT non-NM
(n = 50)
TPMT NM
(n = 1000)
p-Value
AZA dose (mg)
≤2527 (54.0)563 (56.3)0.21
25–5021 (42.0)333 (33.3)
>502 (4.0)104 (10.4)
Outcome postAZA exposure
Leukopenia ^ cases28 (59.5)611 (63.3)0.60
Hepatitis & cases10 (20.0)150 (15.0)0.33
Lowest WBC (U/L)4375 (3210–5420)4200 (3150–5390)0.52
Highest ALT (U/L)38 (22–84)39 (26–73)0.68
Onset of leukopenia ^ (days)1359.3 ± 1709.71597.3 ± 1606.60.44
Onset of hepatitis & (days)676.3 ± 837.92395.8 ± 1911.0<0.0001
Data are expressed as n (%) or the mean ± SD or the median (interquartile range). ^ WBC count ≤ 4000 (U/L). & ALT level ≥ 150 (U/L). TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer; AZA, azathioprine; WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase.
Table 3. Cox regression analysis of risk factors for hepatotoxicity following AZA treatment.
Table 3. Cox regression analysis of risk factors for hepatotoxicity following AZA treatment.
Hepatotoxicity ^p-Value
HR95% CI
Age0.990.98–1.010.60
Gender (reference female)1.771.07–2.910.03
TPMT non-NM genotype3.851.83–8.100.0004
AZA dose (mg)1.001.00–1.010.31
MTX1.621.03–2.570.04
Hepatitis B carrier1.180.40–3.480.76
^ Development of an ALT level ≥ 150 U/L after AZA treatment. ALT, alanine transaminase; TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase; NM, normal metabolizer; AZA, azathioprine; MTX, methotrexate; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheu, H.-S.; Chen, Y.-M.; Liao, Y.-J.; Wei, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-P.; Lin, H.-J.; Hung, W.-T.; Huang, W.-N.; Chen, Y.-H. Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Polymorphisms Predict Hepatotoxicity in Azathioprine-Treated Patients with Autoimmune Diseases. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091399

AMA Style

Sheu H-S, Chen Y-M, Liao Y-J, Wei C-Y, Chen J-P, Lin H-J, Hung W-T, Huang W-N, Chen Y-H. Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Polymorphisms Predict Hepatotoxicity in Azathioprine-Treated Patients with Autoimmune Diseases. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(9):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sheu, Heh-Shiang, Yi-Ming Chen, Yi-Ju Liao, Chia-Yi Wei, Jun-Peng Chen, Hsueh-Ju Lin, Wei-Ting Hung, Wen-Nan Huang, and Yi-Hsing Chen. 2022. "Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase Polymorphisms Predict Hepatotoxicity in Azathioprine-Treated Patients with Autoimmune Diseases" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 9: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop