Next Article in Journal
Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis in Women with Osteoporosis Using VEGFA Gene Polymorphisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Measurement of Breast Tumors Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Images
Previous Article in Journal
Towards a Responsible Transition to Learning Healthcare Systems in Precision Medicine: Ethical Points to Consider
Previous Article in Special Issue
Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation (PERSPECTIVE I&I)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Toward a Population-Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Approach? The Needs and Concerns of Healthcare Providers

J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(6), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060540
by Jolyane Blouin-Bougie 1,*, Nabil Amara 1 and Jacques Simard 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(6), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060540
Submission received: 3 May 2021 / Revised: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 5 June 2021 / Published: 10 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study explores important issues around the implementation of risk-based screening. It is well written and findings will be of interest to readers. I have several minor suggestions:

  1. Reduce the number of acronyms (especially, HP, PQDCS, KM).
  2. Please add more information about the limitations related to the timing of data collection. The authors mention that it's been a few years; please me more precise: the data are now over 5 years old. Describe the ways in which qualitative data may have changed and provide citations/evidence for your hypotheses.

Author Response

Please see the attachement. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review. Below please find my comments. 

  1. The interview only based on 15 interviews. It is not clear if saturation has been reached.
  2. Specific numbers of respondents should be included instead of just saying "most respondents" or "majority".
  3. Suggest authors to seek English editor's help. The wording and sentence structure made it hard to comprehend the text from time to time. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop