Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap—Initial Clinical Evaluation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Stevens, L.A.; McGrath, M.H.; Druss, R.G.; Kister, S.J.; Gump, F.E.; Forde, K.A. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1984, 73, 627–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, D.; Kaciulyte, J.; Torto, F.L.; Mori, F.L.R.; Barellini, L.; Fausto, A.; Fanelli, B.; Greco, M.; Ribuffo, D.; Marcasciano, M. “To Pre or Not to Pre”: Introduction of a Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score to Help Surgeons Solving the Decision-Making Dilemma. Retrospective Results of a Multicenter Experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 147, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheflan, M.; Colwell, A.S. Tissue reinforcement in implant- based breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2014, 2, e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onesti, M.G.; Maruccia, M.; Di Taranto, G.; Albano, A.; Soda, G.; Ballesio, L.; Scuderi, N.; Onesti, M.G.; Maruccia, M.; Di Taranto, G.; et al. Clinical, histological, and ultrasound follow-up of breast reconstruction with one-stage muscle-sparing “wrap” technique: A single-center experience. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2017, 70, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocco, N.; Rispoli, C.; Moja, L.; Amato, B.; Iannone, L.; Testa, S.; Spano, A.; Catanuto, G.; Accurso, A.; Nava, M.B. Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 5, CD010895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serra-Renom, J.M.; Fontdevila, J.; Monner, J.; Benito, J. Mammary reconstruction using tissue expander and partial detachment of the pectoralis major muscle to expand the lower breast quadrants. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2004, 53, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, G.L. One stage breast reconstruction following pro- phylactic mastectomy for ptotic breasts: The inferior dermal flap and implant. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2012, 65, 1204–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salzberg, C.A. Focus on technique: One-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 130, 95S–103S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holle, J.; Pierini, A. Breast reconstruction with an external oblique abdominis muscle turnover flap and a bipedicled abdominal skin flap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1984, 73, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isken, T.; Onyedi, M.; Izmirli, H.; Alagoz, S.; Katz, R. Abdominal fascial flaps for providing total implant coverage in one-stage breast reconstruction: An autologous solution. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2009, 33, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruant-Rodier, C.; Chiriac, S.; Baratte, A.; Dissaux, C.; Bodin, F. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap combined with implant in breast reconstruction: The technique of the dorsal bra. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2015, 61, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salzberg, C.A. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann. Plast. Surg. 2006, 57, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorkin, M.; Qi, J.; Kim, H.M.; Hamill, J.B.; Kozlow, J.H.; Pusic, A.L.; Wilkins, E.G. Acellular Dermal Matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: A multicenter assessment of risks and benefits. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017, 140, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chun, Y.S.; Verma, K.; Rosen, H.; Lipsitz, S.; Morris, D.; Kenney, P.; Eriksson, E. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010, 125, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, A.S.; Kao, H.K.; Reish, R.G.; Hergrueter, C.A.; May, J.W., Jr.; Guo, L. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011, 127, 1755–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultman, C.S.; Daiza, S. Skin sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: Review of incidence, management, and outcome. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2003, 50, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saint-Cyr, M.; Dauwe, P.; Wong, C.; Thakar, H.; Nagarkar, P.; Rohrich, R.J. Use of the serratus anterior fascia flap for expander coverage in breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010, 125, 1057–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.H.; Chun, Y.S.; Park, H.K.; Kim, Y.W.; Cheon, Y.W. Dual Coverage of the Inferior Pole with Conjoined Fascial Flap and Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with a Prosthetic Implant. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2018, 42, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seth, A.K.; Hirsch, E.M.; Kim, J.Y.S.; Fine, N.A. Outcomes after elevation of serratus anterior fascia during prosthetic breast reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2017, 78, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bordoni, D.; Cadenelli, P.; Rocco, N.; Tessone, A.; Falco, G.; Magalotti, C. Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap Versus Muscular Flap for Expander Coverage in Two-stage Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: Early Post-operative Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2016, 41, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gossner, J. Sonography in capsular contracture after breast augmentation: Value of established criteria, new techniques and directions for research. J. Ultrasound 2016, 20, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alani, H.A.; Balalaa, N. Complete tissue expander coverage by musculo-fascial flaps in immediate breast mound reconstruction after mastectomy. J. Plast. Surg. Hand. Surg. 2013, 47, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.W.; Kim, Y.J.; Kong, J.S.; Cheon, Y.W. Use of the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, and external oblique fascial flap for immediate one-stage breast reconstruction with implant. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2014, 38, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura, O.D.; Marcello, G.A. Anatomic and physiologic advantages of totally subfascial breast implants. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2005, 29, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganott, M.A.; Harris, K.M.; Ilkhanipour, Z.S.; Costa-Greco, M.A. Augmention mammoplasty: Normal abnormal findings with mammography, U.S. Radiographics 1992, 12, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zahavi, A.; Sklair, M.L.; Ad-El, D.D. Capsular contracture of the breast: Working towards a better classification system using clinical and radiological assessment. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2006, 57, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribuffo, D.; Berna, G.; De Vita, R.; Di Benedetto, G.; Cigna, E.; Greco, M.; Valdatta, L.; Onesti, M.G.; Lo Torto, F.; Marcasciano, M.; et al. Dual-Plane Retro-pectoral Versus Pre-pectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction: An Italian Multicenter Experience. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2021, 45, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, D.; Lo Torto, F.; Marcasciano, M.; Barellini, L.; Frattaroli, J.M.; Turriziani, G.; Ribuffo, D. Breast Animation Deformity: A Retrospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported Breast-Q Outcomes. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2021, 86, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barellini, L.; Marcasciano, M.; Torto, F.L.; Fausto, A.; Ribuffo, D.; Casella, D. Intraoperative Ultrasound and Oncoplastic Combined Approach: An Additional Tool for the Oncoplastic Surgeon to Obtain Tumor-Free Margins in Breast Conservative Surgery-A 2-Year Single-Center Prospective Study. Clin. Breast Cancer 2020, 20, e290–e294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcasciano, M.; Frattaroli, J.; Mori, F.L.R.; Torto, F.L.; Fioramonti, P.; Cavalieri, E.; Kaciulyte, J.; Greco, M.; Casella, D.; Ribuffo, D. The New Trend of Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2019, 43, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcasciano, M.; Kaciulyte, J.; Marcasciano, F.; Torto, F.L.; Ribuffo, D.; Casella, D. “No Drain, No Gain”: Simultaneous Seroma Drainage and Tissue Expansion in Pre-pectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2019, 43, 1118–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casella, D.; Di Taranto, G.; Marcasciano, M.; Sordi, S.; Kothari, A.; Kovacs, T.; Torto, F.L.; Cigna, E.; Ribuffo, D.; Calabrese, C. Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop® Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. Breast 2018, 39, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torto, F.L.; Parisi, P.; Casella, D.; Di Taranto, G.; Cigna, E.; Ribuffo, D. Impact of Evolving Radiation Therapy Techniques on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 141, 182e–183e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torto, F.L.; Vaia, N.; Casella, D.; Marcasciano, M.; Cigna, E.; Ribuffo, D. Delaying implant-based mammary reconstruction after radiotherapy does not decrease capsular contracture: An in vitro study. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2018, 71, 28–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torto, F.L.; Cigna, E.; Kaciulyte, J.; Casella, D.; Marcasciano, M.; Ribuffo, D. National Breast Reconstruction Utilization in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2017, 33, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribuffo, D.; Torto, F.L.; Atzeni, M.; Serratore, F. The effects of postmastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015, 135, 445e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarallo, M.; Cigna, E.; Fino, P.; Torto, F.L.; Scuderi, N. La terapia chirurgica della gigantomastia [Macromastia surgical therapy]. Ann Ital Chir. 2011, 82, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
- De Haan, A.; Toor, A.; Hage, J.J.; Veeger, H.E.; Woerdeman, L.A. Function of the pectoralis major muscle after combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction by subpectoral implantation of a prosthesis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2007, 59, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Losken, A. Early result using sterilized acellular human dermis (newform) in postmastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 123, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knabben, L.; Kanagalingam, G.; Imboden, S.; Günthert, A.R. Acellular Dermal Matrix (Permacol®) for Heterologous Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience and a Review of the Literature. Front. Med. 2017, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parvizi, D.; Haas, F.; Peintinger, F.; Hubmer, M.; Rappl, T.; Koch, H.; Schintler, M.; Spendel, S.; Kamolz, L.-P.; Wurzer, P.; et al. First Experience Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound to Evaluate Vascularisation of Acellular Dermal Matrices after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Breast J. 2014, 20, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ballesio, L.; Casinelli, A.; Gigli, S.; Boldrini, C.; Giuseppe, D.T.; Albano, A.; Onesti, M.G.; Di Taranto, G.; Laura, B.; Alice, C.; et al. Postsurgical Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients with Prosthesis in Acellular Dermal Matrix: Results from Monocentric Experience. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buck, D.W.; Heyer, K.; Wayne, J.D.; Yeldandi, A.; Kim, J.Y.S. Diagnostic Dilemma: Acellular Dermis Mimicking a Breast Mass after Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 124, 174e–176e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.S. Ultrasonography findings of alloderm® used in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: A case report and literature review. Iran J. Radiol. 2016, 13, e38252. [Google Scholar]
Patients Demographics | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Age | BMI | Smoking | Mastectomy | CHT and RT | Drains Time | Follow-Up | Complications |
1 | 57 | 28 | - | SSM | / | 18 | 15 | - |
2 | 41 | 26.5 | - | SSM | / | 12 | 15 | - |
3 | 38 | 23 | - | SSM | CHT | 11 | 15 | - |
4 | 44 | 23.51 | - | SSM | NEO + RT | 17 | 15 | - |
5 | 45 | 24 | - | NSM | NEO | 19 | 16 | - |
6 | 43 | 28 | - | SSM | NEO | 25 | 15 | seroma |
7 | 56 | 25 | - | SSM | NEO | 15 | 22 | - |
8 | 53 | 39 | - | SSM | / | 30 | 15 | seroma |
9 | 49 | 24 | + | SSM | / | 9 | 15 | - |
10 | 62 | 25 | - | SSM | NEO | 14 | 22 | hematoma |
11 | 59 | 18.75 | + | SSM | NEO | 11 | 12 | - |
12 | 59 | 19 | + | SSM | NEO | 15 | 12 | - |
13 | 42 | 39 | - | SSM | NEO + RT | 22 | 21 | - |
14 | 37 | 23 | + | SSM | NEO | 16 | 20 | - |
15 | 37 | 21 | - | NSM | NEO | 10 | 19 | - |
16 | 44 | 20 | + | SSM | / | 9 | 12 | - |
17 | 50 | 27.55 | + | SSM | NEO | 13 | 21 | - |
SSM | 11 | - | ||||||
18 | 52 | 17.48 | + | SSM | NEO | 15 | 23 | - |
SSM | 13 | - |
US Measurements | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | T-US (Months) | Skin + sc (mm) | SF + Capsule (mm) | TOT | US Evidences |
1 | 4 | 6.8 | 7 | 13.8 | PPF 20 × 11 mm |
2 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 15 | PPF 37 × 4 mm |
3 | 4 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 15 | PPF 11 × 3 mm |
4 | 4 | 7.7 | 10.3 | 18 | PPF 27 × 4 mm |
5 | 5 | 11.6 | 4.4 | 16 | PPF 17 × 3 mm |
6 | 4 | 13 | 9 | 22 | PPF 4 mm |
7 | 11 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 16 | - |
8 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 13 | PPF 1 mm |
9 | 6 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 15 | PPF 28 × 13 mm |
10 | 14 | 6.6 | 10.4 | 17 | PPF 19 × 0.5 mm |
11 | 1 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 15 | - |
12 | 4 | 6.6 | 5.4 | 12 | - |
13 | 10 | 20 | 4 | 24 | - |
14 | 8 | 6.1 | 3.9 | 10 | - |
15 | 11 | 8.3 | 5.7 | 14 | - |
16 | 4 | 8.8 | 11.2 | 20 | - |
17 | 10 | 12.2 | 3.8 | 16 | - |
18 | 10 | 12.5 | 3.5 | 16 | - |
19 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 12 | PPF 18 × 5 mm |
20 | 15 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 12 | PPF 30 × 17 mm |
Pain Intensity after Surgery on the VAS Scale | ||
---|---|---|
No. | VAS I Day | VAS III Day |
1 | 5 | 2 |
2 | 6 | 3 |
3 | 3 | 1 |
4 | 2 | 1 |
5 | 5 | 2 |
6 | 2 | 3 |
7 | 4 | 2 |
8 | 4 | 1 |
9 | 6 | 1 |
10 | 5 | 2 |
11 | 4 | 2 |
12 | 2 | 2 |
13 | 4 | 1 |
14 | 3 | 3 |
15 | 6 | 4 |
16 | 5 | 2 |
17 | 3 | 3 |
18 | 3 | 1 |
MEAN | 4 | 2 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tarallo, M.; Lo Torto, F.; Ricci, F.; Dicorato, P.; Mori, F.L.R.; Vinci, F.; Parisi, P.; Greco, M.; De Masi, C.; La Manna, A.R.; et al. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap—Initial Clinical Evaluation. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111142
Tarallo M, Lo Torto F, Ricci F, Dicorato P, Mori FLR, Vinci F, Parisi P, Greco M, De Masi C, La Manna AR, et al. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap—Initial Clinical Evaluation. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021; 11(11):1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111142
Chicago/Turabian StyleTarallo, Mauro, Federico Lo Torto, Fabio Ricci, Paolo Dicorato, Francesco Luca Rocco Mori, Federica Vinci, Paola Parisi, Manfredi Greco, Carlo De Masi, Alessandra Rita La Manna, and et al. 2021. "Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap—Initial Clinical Evaluation" Journal of Personalized Medicine 11, no. 11: 1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111142