Next Article in Journal
Ultrasound Imaging for Diaphragm Function in a Population of Healthy Infants: A Short Observational Report
Previous Article in Journal
DDPM: A Dengue Disease Prediction and Diagnosis Model Using Sentiment Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/diagnostics13061094
Review Report
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of a Positive Biofire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel Result on Clinical Management and Outcomes

Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061094
by David Carmon 1,†, Hanan Rohana 1,2,†, Maya Azrad 1,2 and Avi Peretz 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Muhammad Qasim
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061094
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I guess the presented paper contain some significantly important data. However, the conclusion needs to be improved to elaborate more the interest to the scientific community and the benefits from using Biofire® FilmArray® over other methods. 

 

Author Response

Attached

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The current article (diagnostics-2236408) highlighted the use of FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel analysis for more accurate and quick diagnosis of pathogens associated gastrointestinal diseases which could enhanced clinical management and outcome of GI diseases. Though the study is interesting for scientific community and general public but the following comments should be properly addressed.

Comments:

  • Page 2, line 81: age 0-100 may be changed to age 0-100 Years.
  • Page 2, line 82:  Poriya, Israel may be added to Tzafon Medical Center.
  • What was the inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of patients?
  • Figure 3: The X-axis may be labelled as Age (yr).
  • The spelling of G. lambila may corrected to G. lamblia throughout the manuscript.
  • Table 1: The author refers to which Chronic Disease and vaccination? For better understanding of the readers the Chronic Disease and vaccination should be defined in the table foot note.
  • Table 2: Acute complications may be defined.
  • The limitation of the study should be properly described in the discussion part.

Author Response

Attached

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop