Next Article in Journal
Circulating Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Potential Application in Resource-Limited Settings
Previous Article in Journal
Discriminatory Ability and Clinical Utility of the AJCC7 and AJCC8 Staging Systems for Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Setting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Can Measurement of Ultrasonic Echo Intensity Predict Physical Frailty in Older Adults?

1
Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(4), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040675
Submission received: 16 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 11 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Echo intensity (EI) of the tongue in ultrasonography is an easy and quantitative assessment of tongue function. Elucidating the relationship between EI and frailty, is expected to aid in the early detection of frailty and oral hypofunction in older adults. We assessed tongue function and frailty in older outpatients visiting a hospital. The subjects were 101 individuals aged 65 or older (35 men and 66 women, mean age 76.4 ± 7.0 years). Tongue pressure and EI were measured as assessments of tongue function and grip strength, and Kihon Checklist (KCL) scores were measured as assessments of frailty. In women, a significant correlation was not found between the mean EI and grip strength, whereas a significant correlation was noted between each score of the KCL and the mean EI; the scores increased as the mean EI increased. A significant positive correlation was found between tongue pressure and grip strength, but no significant correlation was observed between tongue pressure and the KCL scores. In men, no significant correlation was found between tongue assessments and frailty, except for a significant positive correlation between tongue pressure and grip strength. The results of this study suggest that EI of the tongue is positively associated with physical frailty in women and may be useful for early detection of physical frailty status.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the increase in the number of older adults requiring long-term care has become a major social problem in Europe, the United States, and East Asia, particularly Japan. Many of the conditions requiring long-term care are considered to be preceded by a state of “frailty [1]”. Frailty is defined as a state in which motor and cognitive functions deteriorate with age. The coexistence of multiple chronic diseases impairs daily living functions, resulting in the emergence of physical, mental, and social frailty [2,3]. However, daily living functions can be improved and raised with appropriate intervention and support, meaning a state between a healthy state and a state of care that requires support in daily living. Early detection of frailty as a reversible condition and countermeasure against frailty before it becomes an irreversible condition requiring long-term care would lead to a decrease in the time required for long-term care and an extension of healthy life expectancy [4].
A decline in oral function (oral hypofunction) is supposed to occur before frailty [5,6]. This refers to a lower chewing ability, greater tooth loss, an inability to move the tongue skillfully, lower tongue strength, difficulty eating hard foods, and choking easily. Tongue function plays a particularly important role in oral function, and the diagnostic criteria for oral hypofunction include decreased tongue pressure and tongue motor function. These assessments are based on the self-effort behaviors of the patient; therefore, measuring them in patients with dementia or higher brain dysfunction is difficult. Tongue pressure measurement is also difficult in edentulous jaw patients and complete denture wearers because the probe for measuring tongue pressure is grasped by the anterior teeth.
In this study, we focused on the echo intensity (EI) of the tongue upon ultrasonography for an easy and quantitative assessment of tongue function. EI has been reported to indicate changes in muscle quality, as higher levels of EI are associated with an increase in fatty and fibrous tissues in the muscle. Recently, EI has been used as an objective biomarker of age-related changes and disease progression, such as increases in fatty infiltration and fibrosis [7,8]. We also found a relationship between EI and tongue pressure, i.e., the EI of the tongue tends to be higher in patients with lower tongue pressure [9].
Although many reports have shown a relationship between frailty and oral hypofunction, including low tongue pressure [10,11,12], few reports have directly demonstrated a relationship between frailty and the EI of the tongue. Elucidating the relationship between EI and frailty, which is easy to measure and assess, is expected to aid in the early detection of frailty and oral hypofunction. Therefore, in this study, based on the hypothesis that the assessment of tongue function, particularly the echo intensity of the tongue, predicts physical frailty, we aimed to assess tongue function and frailty in older outpatients visiting a hospital.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The subjects who visited the Dental Division of Tokushima University Hospital for maintenance between January 2021 and July 2021 and could participate in this study were consecutively included appropriately. Exclusion criteria included individuals who could not follow the instructions of the examiner, who were not competent in the measurements because of serious systemic diseases, and who had maxillofacial defect prostheses. The subjects totaled 101 individuals aged 65 or older (35 men and 66 women, mean age 76.4 ± 7.0 years). Age, sex, and body mass index were recorded using a height and weight meter (Tsutsumi, Tokyo, Japan) as basic characteristics.
This study was approved by the Clinical Research Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Tokushima University Hospital (Approval No. 3880) and was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Measurements were carried out after the patients were provided with a sufficient explanation about the study, and their consent was obtained with a signature.

2.2. Tongue Assessment

2.2.1. Echo Intensity of the Tongue

The EI of the tongue was measured using ultrasonography (Vscan with Dual Probe; GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) according to our previous study [9]. The subjects were seated in a dental chair with the headrest adjusted so that the Frankfurt plane was horizontal to the floor, and the head and back were secured to the backrest to prevent body movement. The ultrasound probe (frequency, 4.0–8.0 MHz; contact face size, 9 × 25 mm; mechanical index, 0.4; thermal index, 0.1) was positioned perpendicular to the Frankfurt plane and in the middle of the bilateral second premolars (Figure 1). The patients were instructed to swallow saliva and take the mandibular rest position. Still images were recorded when the tongue was in a stable position. The distance from the mylohyoid muscle surface to the dorsal surface of the tongue was measured in still images, and the mean EI was measured in 40 pixels wide area across the axis of distance measurement (Figure 1). Image analysis software (ImageJ; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to analyze the EI on the ultrasound images, and tongue quality was evaluated in the range of 8 bits (0 [black] to 255 [white]). One trained examiner measured ultrasound images three times, measuring the mean EI for each image without prior information. The mean of three measurements was used as a representative value.

2.2.2. Tongue Pressure

Tongue pressure was measured using a JMS tongue pressure measurement device (JMS, Hiroshima, Japan). The measurement was performed after calibration outside the oral cavity and by placing a tongue pressure probe between the tongue and palate. The rigid ring of the tongue pressure probe was lightly held with the incisors, and the participants were instructed to raise their tongue with maximum force against the palate for 7 s (Figure 2). The displayed maximum pressure measured using the digital tongue pressure measurement device was recorded. Each measurement was performed thrice, with a break, and the mean value was used as the representative value.

2.3. Frailty Assessment

2.3.1. Kihon Checklist

The Kihon Checklist (KCL), commonly used in medical and nursing practice in Japan [13], was used as a subjective assessment of frailty. KCL consists of 25 questions (Table 1), with responses restricted to either “yes” or “no”. In this study, the total score (number of applicable questions, #1–25), lifestyle score (number of applicable questions, #1–20), and physical function score (number of applicable questions, #6–10) were evaluated.

2.3.2. Grip Strength

Grip strength was measured using a grip strength meter (MP-HBM03-BK; Tokyo, Japan) as an objective frailty assessment. It was measured once on each side, and the mean value was recorded as grip strength.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to analyze differences in age, tongue pressure, mean EI, KCL, and grip strength between men and women. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between tongue assessments (tongue pressure and EI) and frailty (KCL score and grip strength). SPSS®® (version 25.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses, and the risk rate was set at a significance level of less than 5%.

3. Results

Table 2 shows the summary of measurements. The subjects were 35 men (mean age 76.3 ± 7.4 years) and 66 women (mean age 76.4 ± 6.8 years). Significant differences were not found in age between men and women.
The mean EI of the tongue was 33.7 ± 6.6 in men. It was 38.9 ± 6.1 in women, which was significantly higher. Tongue pressure was 29.4 ± 9.5 kPa in men and 31.0 ± 8.0 kPa in women. No significant differences were found in tongue pressure between men and women. Many subjects showed no decline in tongue muscle strength.
Regarding frailty assessment, grip strength was 32.5 ± 6.1 kgf in men and 19.7 ± 4.8 kgf in women. Grip strength was significantly higher in men than in women. Although grip strength in both men and women was lower than the Japanese average by generation, many subjects showed higher grip strength than the criterion for frailty, which is less than 28 kgf for men and 18 kgf for women. The subject group was speculated to include many who had muscle strength just starting to decline.
In the KCL, the total score was 5.8 ± 3.7 in men and 6.1 ± 4.0 in women. The lifestyle score was 4.8 ± 2.9 in men and 4.9 ± 3.1 in women, and the physical function score was 1.1 ± 1.0 in men and 1.7 ± 1.5 in women. The physical function score in women was higher than that in men, but no significant difference was found in the other scores between men and women.
Table 3 shows the relationship between tongue function and frailty according to sex. In women, a significant correlation was not found between the mean EI and grip strength, whereas a significant correlation was noted between each score of the KCL and the mean EI (total score, ρ = 0.383; lifestyle score, ρ = 0.398; physical score, ρ = 0.293); the scores increased as the mean EI increased. A significant positive correlation was found between tongue pressure and grip strength (ρ = 0.250), but no significant correlation was observed between tongue pressure and each score of the KCL. In men, no significant correlation was found between tongue assessments and frailty, except for a significant positive correlation between tongue pressure and grip strength (ρ = 0.404).

4. Discussion

In Japan, the social environment is dramatically changing with the rise of the super-aged society. Medical and nursing care costs are increasing due to extended life span, and the lack of care workers is a serious problem. Older adults need to remain physically and mentally healthy to live independently. Early detection of frailty, the prodromal state of the need for nursing care, and the extension of healthy life expectancy are important.
A decline in oral function is generally predicted to begin before the stage of frailty [12]. Tongue function, which is related to mastication, swallowing, and articulation, is particularly important in oral function and closely related to the function of daily living in older people [14,15,16]. Tongue pressure and oral diadochokinesis assess tongue function in older adults [5]. Previous studies reported a significant correlation between tongue pressure and grip strength, which is one of the criteria for frailty [17,18,19], and the measurement of tongue pressure is suggested to be effective for assessing frailty. EI measurement from ultrasound images of the tongue was effective, as a significant correlation was found between the EI of the tongue and tongue pressure, and it was less stressful than the tongue pressure measurement [9].
Grip strength as an objective assessment and KCL as a subjective assessment were used to assess frailty. Grip strength is used in both Fried’s definition of frailty [2] and the definition of sarcopenia [20] and is a simple and easy objective test. The KCL is a commonly used screening questionnaire for the comprehensive assessment of frailty in Japan, and its reliability and validity have been documented [21,22]. The 25 questions in the KCL are classified into seven domains: lifestyle of daily living, physical function, nutrition, oral function, socialization, cognitive function, and depressed mood. Some items are significantly affected by environmental and psychological factors. Therefore, the total score and the scores of two domains (lifestyle and physical function) were used to assess physical frailty in this study.
Most of the subjects who participated in this study were relatively healthy older adults who could visit hospitals by themselves and undergo the assessments of body mass index, tongue pressure, grip strength, and KCL scores. Because of their relatively good health and independent function, the participants were considered an appropriate patient group to evaluate whether tongue function assessments can predict frailty.
In the male group, no relationship was observed between tongue assessment and frailty. In the female group, EI was significantly associated with the three KCL scores, and tongue pressure was significantly associated with grip strength. Regarding the relationship between grip strength as an objective assessment of frailty and KCL scores as a subjective assessment of frailty, no significant relationship was found in men, whereas significant in women for all three measures, especially for motor function scores. According to the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare’s National Survey of Basic Living Conditions in Japan, women requiring nursing care is likely due to frailty, joint failure, and fall-related fractures, suggesting that muscle and bone-related decline is more likely to affect women [23].
Skeletal muscle studies have reported that qualitative decline precedes muscle mass loss in patients with hip osteoarthritis [24] and that age-related changes in muscle quality occur at an earlier age than the loss of muscle quantity in community-dwelling older people [25]. Qualitative decline precedes muscle mass loss and functional decline in this group. Therefore, it is expected that qualitative assessment of changes in muscle function predicts changes in muscle. It is reported that tongue thickness was linearly associated with tongue pressure [26]. Our previous study also showed that the EI decreased with increased tongue thickness [9]. An EI was associated with a subjective symptom of frailty, and tongue pressure was associated with an objective sign of grip strength. It is suggested that the EI would increase in the early stage of the frailty process while tongue pressure would decrease.
The present study is a cross-sectional observational study. The sample subjects were motivated, comparatively healthy older individuals. Study limitations include a sampling size difference between men and women, which could produce some sampling bias. In addition, only the grip strength was used as a diagnostic criterion of physical frailty. These limitations must be considered when interpreting this result. However, our findings show that an increase in EI, which would indicate a decline in tongue function, is a greater predictor than decreased tongue pressure for the onset of physical frailty, indicating a high likelihood that EI of the tongue predicts physical frailty. Further, 106 subjects were required as the sample size by a prespecified test; 101 subjects consented to the study within the study period. The power of the post-hoc test was 0.86, which was appropriate for the sample size. Since this study was a cross-sectional study without a multivariate analysis, a longitudinal study is needed to determine that the EI of the tongue is a predictor of frailty.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that EI of the tongue is positively associated with physical frailty in women and may be useful for early detection of physical frailty status.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.I.; methodology, Y.T., K.F., K.N. and T.I.; validation, Y.T., K.F. and H.S.; formal analysis, Y.T., K.F. and H.S.; investigation, Y.T., K.F. and H.S.; data curation, Y.T., T.G., K.N. and T.I.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.T.; writing—review and editing, K.N. and T.I.; supervision, K.N. and T.I.; project administration, Y.T. and K.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokushima University Hospital (protocol code: No. 3880 and date of approval: 21 December 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abellan van Kan, G.; Rolland, Y.; Bergman, H.; Morley, J.E.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Vellas, B. The I.A.N.A Task Force on Frailty Assessment of Older People in Clinical Practice. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2008, 12, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jürschik, P.; Nunin, C.; Botigué, T.; Escobar, M.A.; Lavedán, A.; Viladrosa, M. Prevalence of Frailty and Factors Associated with Frailty in the Elderly Population of Lleida, Spain: The Fralle Survey. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2012, 55, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, C.Y.; Gan, P.; How, C.H. Approach to Frailty in the Elderly in Primary Care and the Community. Singap. Med. J. 2018, 59, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Minakuchi, S.; Tsuga, K.; Ikebe, K.; Ueda, T.; Tamura, F.; Nagao, K.; Furuya, J.; Matsuo, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Kanazawa, M.; et al. Oral Hypofunction in the Older Population: Position Paper of the Japanese Society of Gerodontology in 2016. Gerodontology 2018, 35, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matsuo, K.; Taniguchi, H.; Nakagawa, K.; Kanazawa, M.; Furuya, J.; Tsuga, K.; Ikebe, K.; Ueda, T.; Tamura, F.; Nagao, K.; et al. Relationships between Deterioration of Oral Functions and Nutritional Status in Elderly Patients in an Acute Hospital. Ronen Shika Igaku 2016, 31, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mirón Mombiela, R.; Facal de Castro, F.; Moreno, P.; Borras, C. Ultrasonic Echo Intensity as a New Noninvasive in Vivo Biomarker of Frailty. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017, 65, 2685–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Puthucheary, Z.A.; Phadke, R.; Rawal, J.; McPhail, M.J.; Sidhu, P.S.; Rowlerson, A.; Moxham, J.; Harridge, S.; Hart, N.; Montgomery, H.E. Qualitative Ultrasound in Acute Critical Illness Muscle Wasting. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tagami, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Goto, T.; Suito, H.; Nagao, K.; Ichikawa, T. Measurement of Ultrasonic Echo Intensity Predicts the Mass and Strength of the Tongue Muscles in the Elderly. J. Oral Sci. 2022, 64, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castrejón-Pérez, R.C.; Jiménez-Corona, A.; Bernabé, E.; Villa-Romero, A.R.; Arrivé, E.; Dartigues, J.F.; Gutiérrez-Robledo, L.M.; Borges-Yáñez, S.A. Oral Disease and 3-Year Incidence of Frailty in Mexican Older Adults. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017, 72, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iwasaki, M.; Yoshihara, A.; Sato, N.; Sato, M.; Minagawa, K.; Shimada, M.; Nishimuta, M.; Ansai, T.; Yoshitake, Y.; Ono, T.; et al. A 5-Year Longitudinal Study of Association of Maximum Bite Force with Development of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J. Oral Rehabil. 2018, 45, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tanaka, T.; Takahashi, K.; Hirano, H.; Kikutani, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Ohara, Y.; Furuya, H.; Tetsuo, T.; Akishita, M.; Iijima, K. Oral Frailty as a Risk Factor for Physical Frailty and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Elderly. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2018, 73, 1661–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Satake, S. Kihon checklist and frailty. Jpn. J. Geriatr. 2018, 55, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kikutani, T.; Tamura, F.; Nishiwaki, K.; Kodama, M.; Suda, M.; Fukui, T.; Takahashi, N.; Yoshida, M.; Akagawa, Y.; Kimura, M. Oral Motor Function and Masticatory Performance in the Community-Dwelling Elderly. Odontology 2009, 97, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Youmans, S.R.; Stierwalt, J.A. Measures of Tongue Function Related to Normal Swallowing. Dysphagia 2006, 21, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hiltunen, K.; Saarela, R.K.T.; Kautiainen, H.; Roitto, H.M.; Pitkälä, K.H.; Mäntylä, P. Relationship between Fried’s frailty phenotype and oral frailty in long-term care residents. Age Ageing 2021, 50, 2133–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kobuchi, R.; Okuno, K.; Kusunoki, T.; Inoue, T.; Takahashi, K. The Relationship between Sarcopenia and Oral Sarcopenia in Elderly People. J. Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakai, K.; Nakayama, E.; Tohara, H.; Maeda, T.; Sugimoto, M.; Takehisa, T.; Takehisa, Y.; Ueda, K. Tongue Strength Is Associated with Grip Strength and Nutritional Status in Older Adult Inpatients of a Rehabilitation Hospital. Dysphagia 2017, 32, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wakasugi, Y.; Tohara, H.; Machida, N.; Nakane, A.; Minakuchi, S. Can Grip Strength and/or Walking Speed Be Simple Indicators of the Deterioration in Tongue Pressure and Jaw Opening Force in Older Individuals? Gerodontology 2017, 34, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Sayer, A.A. Sarcopenia. Lancet 2019, 393, 2636–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Satake, S.; Senda, K.; Hong, Y.J.; Miura, H.; Endo, H.; Sakurai, T.; Kondo, I.; Toba, K. Validity of the Kihon Checklist for Assessing Frailty Status. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2016, 16, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ogawa, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Nishi, M.; Fukaya, T.; Kim, M.; Amano, H.; Lee, S.; Watanabe, N.; Shinkai, S. The validity of the “Kihon Check-list” as an index of frailty and its biomarkers and inflammatory markers in elderly people. Jpn. J. Geriatr. 2011, 48, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ahmed, T.; French, S.D.; Belanger, E.; Guerra, R.O.; Zunzunegui, M.V.; Auais, M. Gender Differences in Trajectories of Lower Extremity Function in Older Adults: Findings from the International Mobility in Aging Study. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019, 20, 1199–1205.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fukumoto, Y.; Ikezoe, T.; Tateuchi, H.; Tsukagoshi, R.; Akiyama, H.; So, K.; Kuroda, Y.; Yoneyama, T.; Ichihashi, N. Muscle Mass and Composition of the Hip, Thigh and Abdominal Muscles in Women with and without Hip Osteoarthritis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012, 38, 1540–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fukumoto, Y.; Ikezoe, T.; Yamada, Y.; Tsukagoshi, R.; Nakamura, M.; Takagi, Y.; Kimura, M.; Ichihashi, N. Age-Related Ultrasound Changes in Muscle Quantity and Quality in Women. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015, 41, 3013–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakamori, M.; Imamura, E.; Fukuta, M.; Tachiyama, K.; Kamimura, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Matsushima, H.; Ogawa, K.; Nishino, M.; Hirata, A.; et al. Tongue thickness measured by ultrasonography is associated with tongue pressure in the Japanese elderly. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Echo intensity measurement of tongue using ultrasonography. Probe and head position (left), and measurement of echo image (right).
Figure 1. Echo intensity measurement of tongue using ultrasonography. Probe and head position (left), and measurement of echo image (right).
Diagnostics 13 00675 g001
Figure 2. JMS tongue pressure measurement device (top), and measurements of tongue pressure (bottom).
Figure 2. JMS tongue pressure measurement device (top), and measurements of tongue pressure (bottom).
Diagnostics 13 00675 g002
Table 1. Kihon Checklist (top) and its seven domains (bottom).
Table 1. Kihon Checklist (top) and its seven domains (bottom).
No.QuestionAnswer
1Do you go out by bus or train by yourself?0. Yes1. No
2Do you go shopping to buy your daily necessities by yourself?0. Yes1. No
3Do you manage your own deposits and savings at the bank?0. Yes1. No
4Do you sometimes visit your friends?0. Yes1. No
5Do you tum to your family or friends for advice?0. Yes1. No
6Do you normally climb stairs without using handrails or walls for support?0. Yes1. No
7Do you normally stand up from a chair without any aids?0. Yes1. No
8Do you normally walk continuously for 15 min?0. Yes1. No
9Have you experienced a fall in the past year?1. Yes0. No
10Do you have a fear of falling while walking?1. Yes0. No
11Have you lost 2 kg or more in the past 6 months?1. Yes0. No
12Height: cm, weight: kg, BMI: kg/m2 If BMI is less than 18.5, this item is scored1. Yes0. No
13Do you have any difficulties eating tough foods compared to 6 months ago?1. Yes0. No
14Have you choked on your tea or soup recently?1. Yes0. No
15Do you often experience having a dry mouth?1. Yes0. No
16Do you go out at least once a week?0. Yes1. No
17Do you go out less frequently compared to last year?1. Yes0. No
18Do your family or your friends point out your memory loss?E.g., “You always ask the same question over and over again.”1. Yes0. No
19Do you make a call by looking up phone numbers?0. Yes1. No
20Do you find yourself not knowing today’s date?1. Yes0. No
21In the last two weeks have you felt a lack of fulfilment in your daily life?1. Yes0. No
22In the last two weeks have you felt a lack of joy when doing the things you used to enjoy?1. Yes0. No
23In the last two weeks have you felt any difficulty in doing what you could do easily before?1. Yes0. No
24In the last two weeks have you felt helpless?1. Yes0. No
25In the last two weeks have you felt tired without a reason?1. Yes0.No
DomainsRelevant QuestionsCut-Off Point with/without Each Risk
Lifestyle#1–20Ten or more negative answers
Physical function#6–10Three or more negative answers
Nutrition#11, #12Negative answers to both questions
Oral function#13, #14, #15Two or more negative answers
Socialization#16, #17An answer of “No” to #16
Cognitive function#18, #19, #20One or more negative answers
Depressive mood#21–25Two or more negative answers
Table 2. Assessment results of tongue function and frailty (means ± standard deviations).
Table 2. Assessment results of tongue function and frailty (means ± standard deviations).
VariableMen
(n = 35)
Women
(n = 66)
p-Value
Age (years)76.3 ± 7.476.4 ± 6.80.957
BMI23.4 ± 2.522.9 ± 3.30.544
Grip strength (kgf)32.5 ± 6.119.7 ± 4.8p < 0.01 *
Tongue pressure (kPa)29.4 ± 9.531.0 ± 8.00.420
Echo intensity33.7 ± 6.538.9 ± 6.2p < 0.01 *
Kihon Checklist
Total score5.8 ± 3.76.1 ± 4.00.909
Lifestyle score4.8 ± 2.94.9 ± 3.10.906
Physical function score1.1 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.50.060
* p-value < 0.05.
Table 3. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Spearman’s rho) between assessments of tongue function and frailty.
Table 3. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Spearman’s rho) between assessments of tongue function and frailty.
Frail ConditionGrip StrengthKihon Checklist
Tongue Function Total ScoreLifestyle ScorePhysical Function Score
Women
Tongue pressure 0.250 * −0.134 −0.171 −0.154
Echo intensity −0.060 0.383 ** 0.398 ** 0.293 *
Men
Tongue pressure 0.404 * −0.219 −0.259 −0.042
Echo intensity −0.169 0.092 0.060 −0.097
* p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tagami, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Goto, T.; Suito, H.; Nagao, K.; Ichikawa, T. Can Measurement of Ultrasonic Echo Intensity Predict Physical Frailty in Older Adults? Diagnostics 2023, 13, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040675

AMA Style

Tagami Y, Fujimoto K, Goto T, Suito H, Nagao K, Ichikawa T. Can Measurement of Ultrasonic Echo Intensity Predict Physical Frailty in Older Adults? Diagnostics. 2023; 13(4):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tagami, Yoshihiro, Keiko Fujimoto, Takaharu Goto, Hideki Suito, Kan Nagao, and Tetsuo Ichikawa. 2023. "Can Measurement of Ultrasonic Echo Intensity Predict Physical Frailty in Older Adults?" Diagnostics 13, no. 4: 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop