Next Article in Journal
Reference Interval for the Axis-Shield Clinical Chemistry Heparin-Binding Protein Assay
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue on “Advances in Skin Lesion Image Analysis Using Machine Learning Approaches”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy and Safety of Deep Sedation and Anaesthesia for Complex Endoscopic Procedures—A Narrative Review
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

A Differential Diagnosis of Unusual Gastric Ulcer

Diagnostics 2022, 12(8), 1929; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081929
by Soo-Yoon Sung 1, Hyun Ho Choi 2,* and Kyung Jin Seo 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2022, 12(8), 1929; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081929
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 4 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 10 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Figure 1 is a typical endoscopic image of gastric lymphoma. Metastatic cancer from other organ is the sole differential diagnosis in this case. No endoscopy experts diagnose this image as peptic ulcer. The authors should reconsider the title as it is misleading.   

Author Response

Reviewer 1

Figure 1 is a typical endoscopic image of gastric lymphoma. Metastatic cancer from other organ is the sole differential diagnosis in this case. No endoscopy experts diagnose this image as peptic ulcer. The authors should reconsider the title as it is misleading.

 

Response> Thank you for your sensible comments. We agree that the title may be misleading. According to your recommendation, we revised our title as follows:

A differential diagnosis of unusual gastric ulcer

Reviewer 2 Report

Please consider introducing a new paragraph after the text ref figure 2 (… - cell (GCB) subtype.  Starting with: Further laboratory….

Author Response

Reviewer 2

Please consider introducing a new paragraph after the text ref figure 2 (… - cell (GCB) subtype.  Starting with: Further laboratory….

Response> Thank you for your kind comments. We revised paragraph according to your advice:

 The immunohistochemistry results were CD20-positive (Figue 2b), CD10-positive (Figure 2c) and Ki-67 of 90% (Figure 2d), consistent with DLBCL, germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype.

  Further laboratory testing showed that HIV Ag/Ab was positive.

Back to TopTop