Next Article in Journal
Detecting Abnormal Axillary Lymph Nodes on Mammograms Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphological Parameters of the Hip Joint and Its Relation to Gender, Joint Side and Age—A CT-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
IBD Monitor: Romanian National Mobile Application for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Personalized Treatment and Monitoring
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/diagnostics12061346
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Analysis of the Tibial Slope in 720 Adult Knee Joints

by
Marc-Pascal Meier
1,*,
Yara Hochrein
1,
Dominik Saul
1,2,
Mark-Tilmann Seitz
1,
Friederike Sophie Klockner
1,
Wolfgang Lehmann
1 and
Thelonius Hawellek
1
1
Department for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
2
Kogod Center on Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061346
Submission received: 24 April 2022 / Revised: 24 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 28 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The tibial slope (TS) defines the posterior inclination of the tibial plateau (TP). The “individual physiological” TS plays a crucial role in knee-joint stability and should be taken into account in knee-joint surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the specific morphology of the TS for the medial (med) and lateral (lat) TP in relation to patient characteristics and the measurement method. Methods: In this retrospective study, MRI images of knee joints from 720 patients (mean age: 49.9 years [±17.14]) were analysed. The TS was assessed using two established methods according to Hudek (TSH) and Karimi (TSK) for the med and lat TP and gender/side specificity was analysed. Results: TSH for the med and lat TP showed significantly (p < 0.001) different values compared to TSK (TSKmed: 2.6° (±3.7), TSHmed: 4.8° (±3.5); TSKlat: 3.0° (±4.0), TSHlat: 5.2° (±3.9)). The angles of the lat TP were significantly higher than those of the med TP (TSK: p < 0.001; TSH: p = 0.002). Females showed a higher med and lat TS compared to males (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The measurement method has an influence on the values of the TS in knee-joint MRIs. The TS is significantly different for the med and lat TP regardless of the measurement method. There are gender-specific differences for the TS.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The morphology of the knee joint is highly complex [1,2,3,4]. Functional relationships between bone and ligaments are not comprehensively characterized [5,6,7]. In this context, the physiological kinematics of the knee joint is a subject of current scientific studies because they have an enormous impact on functional outcome after knee-joint surgery [5,6]. Especially important in this regard is the tibial slope (TS) [6,8]. The TS defines the posterior inclination angle of the tibial plateau [5,9,10] and has a significant influence on tibial translation and knee-joint stability [7,10,11]. Therefore, the TS is important for knee-joint-preservation as well as knee-joint-replacement surgery [8,12,13].
Surgical treatments such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or unicondylar (UKA) and total (TKA) knee arthroplasty can change the TS and have an impact on knee biomechanics [14,15,16]. Recent studies have even shown a relationship between the TS and injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) [17,18]. The authors pointed out that a TS of more than 12° is a crucial risk factor for ACL ruptures and failure of ACL reconstruction [13,18]. In general, there is a consensus that the “individual physiological” TS should be surgically reconstructed at the best possible rate [5,12,19,20]. In the case of insufficient reconstruction, a deficit of knee-joint flexion can occur [20,21]. Subsequently, exact preoperative planning is necessary [8,12,22].
In order to achieve this, a physiological reference is required for the preoperative planning [23,24,25]. The current literature indicates a highly variable intra-individual TS [7,22,26]. However, the reference values are based on different imaging procedures and measurement methods [5,26,27]. The measurement of the TS in the lateral radiographs of the knee has been described to be limited, because the determination can only be performed on the basis of a single radiological projection [5,27]. On one hand, no assumption can be made about the differences between the medial (med) and lateral (lat) TS [22,27,28], and on the other hand, the anatomical tibial axis cannot be precisely defined [27,29]. In order to achieve the most accurate and compartmentalised assessment of the TS, cross-sectional images in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) are recommended [30,31,32,33,34,35].
In the current literature, there are only a few studies investigating TS in an asymptomatic radiological collective using cross-sectional imaging, analysing possible side-, age- and gender-specific differences [7,36].
In summary, it can be concluded that according to the current state of research, there are not enough studies available to define valid physiological reference values or reference intervals of the TS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the specific morphology of the TS for the med and lat tibial plateau (TP) in relation to patient characteristics (joint side, age and gender) and the approved measurement methods to Karimi et al. [37] and Hudek et al. [38]. Furthermore, possible differences of the TS between healthy and pathological knee joints should be analysed. This should establish a reference for physiologically measured values of the TS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Between 2007 and 2020, a total of n = 5627 patients underwent a knee-joint MRI in the Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology of University Medical Center Goettingen. These MRIs were reviewed retrospectively. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 720 patients were included in the final analysis. The study collective was divided into six age groups (21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70 and >70 years). In order to achieve a homogeneous age distribution, n = 120 patients were examined in each group in an unfiltered ascending order. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (IRB number 35/7/20) and performed in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Without exception, the evaluated MRIs were taken as part of routine diagnostics because of clinical symptoms, such as knee pain of unknown origin or in case of suspicion of traumatic injuries. All MRIs were assessed by a senior radiologist and YH, MPM and TH to exclude structural injuries or heavy joint degeneration.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

All examinations accessible via PACS system (Picture Archiving and Communication System) between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2020 were initially included in the study. Out of these, all patients older than 20 years were included. All MRI scans were performed on patients to assess knee-joint pathologies. Only patients with a Kellgren/Lawrence score [39] less than 3 were classified as “healthy knee joint” (HKJ). Patients with Kellgren/Lawrence Score of 3 or 4 were classified as “pathological knee joint” (PKJ). All MRIs were examined by the internal radiology department as part of the clinical diagnostic procedure. Every report was re-evaluated by MPM, YH and TH in a blinded fashion.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

All patients with fractures, dysplasia or tumours were excluded. Patients who had undergone osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis were likewise excluded. Similarly, the data did not include patients who had any other implants after knee-joint-preservation surgery. Patients with injuries of the cruciate ligaments, collateral ligaments, quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon or with a state after patellar luxation were also excluded. Low-quality MRIs (based on only a few gates), were excluded. In addition, all MRIs with imaging artefacts were ruled out.

2.4. MRI Analysis, Parameters and Methods of Measurement

All measurements were taken via the PACS system (Picture Archiving and Communication System). Software from GE Healthcare called CentricityTM Universal Viewer was used (RA1000, edition 2019, Buckinghamshire, Great Britain). The osteoarthritis score of each knee joint was classified according to Kellgren/Lawrence (KL), in order to group patients as KJH or KJD. The TS was measured on the medial and lateral knee-joint surface according to Karimi et al. (TSKmed and TSKlat) [37] and Hudek et al. (TSHmed and TSHlat) [38]. As a reference for determining the inclination of the tibial plateau, Karimi et al. described the dorsal tibial bone cortex and Hudek et al. the tibial-shaft axis. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the principle of the measurement methodology.

2.5. Statistics

For the statistical comparison of TSK and TSH, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. The analysis was performed separately for the medial and lateral articular surfaces between the TSK and TSH. To investigate possible differences between the medial and lateral knee-joint sections, for each TSK and TSH, a paired t-test was established. For side- and gender-specific analyses of TSKmed, TSKlat, TSHmed and TSHlat, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. Likewise, the Mann–Whitney U test was implemented for comparison of HKJ and PKJ for all assessed TS parameters. In order to detect possible inter-relationships between the different TS parameters and patient age, a Spearman correlation was set. Overall, mean ± standard deviation is stated. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 9.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA), SPSS Statistics software version 27.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 2016, Redmond, USA). Significant differences are marked with asterisks (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Population

In this study, 360 males (50%) and 360 females (50%) were analysed. Likewise, the number of left and right knees was equal. The mean age of the study population was 49.9 years (±17.14). All results are summarised in Table 1.

3.2. Differences between TSK and TSH

The analysis of medial knee-joint compartment showed a significant difference between TSK and TSH (p < 0.001). The mean TSKmed was 2.6° (±3.7), while the mean TSHmed was 4.8° (±3.5). Likewise, the measured values of TSH on the lateral joint surface were on average larger than that of TSK (TSKlat: 3.0° (±4.0); TSHlat: 5.2° (±3.9). The difference was significant (p < 0.001). All results are summarised in Table 1.

3.3. Differences between Medial and Lateral Knee-Joint Surface

The mean medial TSK (2.6° (±3.7)) was significantly (p < 0.001) less than the mean lateral TSK (3.0° [±4.0]). Simultaneously, the analysis showed a significant difference between TSHmed and TSHlat (p = 0.002). The mean TSHmed value was 4.8° (±3.5), while the mean TSHlat was 5.2° (±3.9). All results are summarised in Table 2.

3.4. Analysis of Gender Specific Differences

Significantly larger TS values were found in female knee joints. The mean TSKmed of the included men was 2.0° (±3.9), while women had a mean TSKmed of 3.2° (±3.4). The TSKmed values differed significantly (p < 0.001). In the case of TSKlat, a mean of 2.5° (±3.9) was found in male knees and a mean of 3.6° (±3.9) in female knees (p < 0.001). Moreover, the TSHmed of analysed men (4.0° [±3.4]) was significantly smaller than that of analysed women (5.6° [±3.4], p < 0.001). Likewise, for the mean TSHlat, a significant (p < 0.001) difference was detected between male knee joints (4.4° [±3.8]) and female knee joints (6.0° [±3.8]. All results are summarised in Table 2.

3.5. Analysis of Side Specific Differences

No investigation of any TS parameter showed a side-depending significant difference. TSKmed was 2.6° (±3.7) for the left as well as the right knee joint (p = 0.815). The mean TSKlat was 3.0° (±3.8) in the left knees and 3.0° (±4.1) in the right knees (p = 0.920). On both sides, a mean TSHmed of 4.8° was measured. There was no significant side difference (p = 0.837). In left knee joint, a TSHlat of 5.2° (±3.8) was found, while in right knee joint, a mean TSHlat of 5.1° (±4.0) was detected. The difference was not significant (p = 0.335). All results are summarised in Table 2.

3.6. Comparison of HKJ and PKJ

No significant difference was found between the TSKmed of HKJ and PKJ (p = 0.693). In both groups, the mean TSHmed was 2.6° (±3.7). The analysis showed a significantly smaller TSKlat in HKJ (2.8° (±3.9)) than in PKJ (3.4° (±4.0), p = 0.032). Likewise, as seen in TSKmed, the analysis of TSHmed was not significantly different between the groups (HKJ: 4.8° (±3.5); PKJ: 4.8° (±3.5); p = 0.885). The mean TSHlat (4.9° (±3.9)) of HKJ was smaller than of PKJ (5.5° (±3.9), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.091). All results are summarised in Table 2.

3.7. Age-Dependent Correlation Analysis of TS Parameters

Between patient age and TSKmed, no significant correlation was found (rS = 0.05; p = 0.15). In addition, no significant correlation was detected for TSKlat and age (rS = 0.02; p = 0.63). There was a significant correlation between age and TSHmed (rS = −0.1; p = 0.01) as well as age and TSHlat (rS = −0.11; p < 0.01). The correlation strength according to Spearman was weak. All results are summarised in Figure 3.

4. Discussion

The TS is of enormous importance for the biomechanics of the knee joint, especially for tibial translation and general knee-joint stability [7,10,11]. Subsequently, the TS is of major relevance for both knee-joint-preservation and knee-joint-replacement surgical therapy of knee-joint pathologies [8,12,13]. Therefore, it is necessary to radiologically record the TS in the best possible way and to create valid reference values in order to reconstruct the physiological TS in the best manner on the basis of these data [23,24,25]. In order to be able to exactly record both the medial and lateral TS, we examined MRIs in the present study to establish reference values for future therapeutic applicability.
A comparison of the measurement methods according to Karimi et al. and Hudek et al. revealed significantly higher measurement values using the Hudek method in both joint compartments. These results support the current state of research, which shows a large discrepancy between the different measurement methods [7,22,26,40]. Naendrup et al. retrospectively analysed radiological images of 20 patients who underwent revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament [40]. As these patients had radiographs as well as CTs and MRIs, a comparison was made between the measurement methods according to Dejour et al. [10] and Utzschneider et al. [22] on the basis of lateral radiographs, as well as Hudek [38] et al. and Hashemi et al. [41] on the basis of MRI and CT examinations. In addition, a comparison was made with the measurement method according to Zhang et al. [31] using 3D CT reconstructions. The authors demonstrated a mean difference of 5.4° for the medial TS and 4.9° for the lateral TS. In comparison to our study, these differences were even larger (difference between TSK and TSH: medial, 2.2°; lateral, 3.2°). In clinical practice, the exact measurement methodology of the TS must be documented, as different measurement methods produce discrepant results and are not comparable with each other.
The measurement of the TS in lateral radiography is limited. Especially, differences between the medial and lateral knee-joint compartment are not exactly assessable a priori [5,27,40]. Our study demonstrated a significantly higher TS on the lateral articular surface, independent of the measurement method that was used. The difference was 0.4° for each TSK and TSH. Jahn et al. retrospectively examined images of 81 patients to compare measurements of medial and lateral TS between radiographs and MRI [42]. The authors pointed out that in an exactly lateral radiograph, the medial and lateral TS can obtain reproducible measurements. Comparable to our results, Jahn et al. found significantly higher measurement values for the lateral TS (medial: 3.7° (±3.3); lateral: 5.7° (±3.7); difference: 2°) in MRI imaging. However, the evaluations of the X-ray images yielded larger values for the medial TS (medial: 8.7° (±3.6); lateral: 7.9° (±3.4)). In contrast, Naendrup et al. found consistently larger measured values for the lateral TS within the scope of the investigated measurement methods based on MRI and CT scans. For example, the evaluations of the 3D reconstructions showed a medial TS of 7.8° (±4.7), compared to a lateral TS of 8.5° (±4.6). In summary, there are differences between the medial and lateral TS. As cross-sectional imaging can be used to exactly determine the lateral and medial knee-joint compartments, this examination method should be attributed to a higher accuracy than the determination on the basis of X-rays. According to the results of the presented study, the physiological lateral TS tends to be larger than the medial TS.
Ni et al. [43] showed in their study, that there is a significant difference in the determination of the TS between scans with and without images of the complete anatomical tibial axis. The authors measured average TS values using the anatomic axis 15.9° (±3.7) and 14.1° (±3.7) at full-length and half-length in true lateral tibial radiographs. Considering these results, a comparison between measurements of the TS in MRI with an incompletely imaged tibial-shaft axis and measurements in CT with a fully imaged axis would be highly interesting.
The results of our study indicate that the TS for the medial articular surface as well as for the lateral surface seems to be higher in female than in male knees, independent of the measurement method. Bao et al. recruited eight healthy volunteers to capture the TS by CT reconstruction [44]. Likewise, they found higher measurement values for the medial and lateral TS in female knee joints, but the results only differed significantly for the medial TS (male: 6.30° (±2.43); female: 7.22° (±2.24)). Contrasting results are provided by the study of Pangaud et al. [7]. The authors reviewed 378 patients with a CT-based modelling and analytics system (SOMA; Stryker). They found a significantly higher TS in male (6.5°, (6.2–6.8)) patients compared to female patients (6.0°, (5.8–6.3)). According to current data, the gender-dependent nature of TS shows an inhomogeneous situation. It can be stated that the TS seems to differ between men and women. The extent to which physiologically higher values are present in one gender compared to the other cannot be conclusively clarified. Using two measurement methods, the present study suggests a stronger dorsal inclination of the tibial plateau in female knee joints.
According to our results, there do not seem to be side-dependent differences in the TS. Likewise, Bao et al. found no significant difference for left and right knees, independent of joint compartment. It can be concluded from this that regardless of whether in knee-joint-preservation or replacement therapy, the TS of the opposite side can be used as a physiological reference and the reconstruction can be planned preoperatively on the basis of this healthy knee-joint side.
To our knowledge there is no study comparing the TS between patients with and without osteoarthritis of the knee joint. According to the present study, osteoarthritic changes of the TS seem to develop primarily in the lateral articular surface. As only the TSKlat shows significant differences between HKJ and PKJ, no clear relationships between osteoarthritic changes of the knee joint and changes of the TS can be defined.
With regard to an age dependency of the tibial slope, we only find significant correlations for TSH. However, the respective effect size is low. To our knowledge, there is no comparative study in the current literature that investigates an age dependency of TS. Consequently, it must be concluded that there are little to no correlations between patient age and tibial slope.
The results of the present study are of major importance for both joint-preserving and joint-replacing surgical therapy of knee-joint pathologies. In general, there is a consensus that the “individual physiological” TS should be respected and surgically reconstructed at the best possible rate [5,12,19,20]. In the case of insufficient reconstruction, a deficit of knee-joint flexion can occur [20,21]. An increased TS widens the flexion gap, improves the leverage of the quadriceps and reduces the patellar contact pressure. However, it can also weaken the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) [45]. That can result in an increased attrition of the polyethylene inlay in knee-joint arthroplasty [45]. A reduction in the tibial slope can negatively affect the postoperative range of motion. It also leads to stress peaks on the anterior part of the tibial plateau [45]. In addition, a decreased TS seems to be a risk factor for primary injuries of the PCL [46] and a TS of 12° and more is associated with a higher risk for ACL injuries after reconstruction [13].
These aspects indicate that the reconstruction of a physiological TS is very important. The results of the present study should be considered as an important reference for TS reconstruction in a physiological manner in knee-joint-preserving and replacing therapy.

5. Limitations

A limitation of the study is that there was no comparison of the MRI scans with the related X-ray imaging because many of the included patients were only examined via MRI and not via X-ray. A comparison between the different modalities seems useful. The present study could thereby have made an even better comparison with the results of other authors.

6. Conclusions

In the present study, the MRIs of 720 patients were investigated to examine the TS in the medial and lateral knee-joint compartment. We proved that the respective measurement methodology has a significant influence on the measured values of the TS. In clinical practice, the measurement method used should be precisely defined for better comparability. Furthermore, significant differences between the medial and lateral TS were demonstrated.
For the TS, gender-specific differences were detected. Furthermore, higher values for the TS in female than in male knees were found. Joint side had no influence on the TS. There were significant correlations between age and TSH. However, the respective effect size was low. For the first time osteoarthritic changes were analysed in comparison to the TS. We detected a correlation between degenerative changes and the TS only in the lateral joint compartment. To support this thesis, further studies are necessary. In summary, the results of the present study shed new light on the TS and help to better understand the knee joint. Therefore, these results should be considered in the joint-preserving and replacing surgical therapy of knee-joint pathologies in order to reconstruct a physiological TS in the best possible way.

Author Contributions

M.-P.M. and T.H. designed the study. M.-P.M. and Y.H. performed all experimental procedures. Data analysis was carried out by M.-P.M., T.H. and Y.H. M.-P.M. and T.H. wrote the manuscript. M.-P.M., D.S., Y.H., M.-T.S., F.S.K., W.L. and T.H. critically revised it for important intellectual content. All authors have approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the University of Goettingen.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Goettingen (IRB number 35/7/20) on date of approval was 16 July 2020 and performed in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

The data collection was carried out purely retrospectively on the basis of the electronic files of the patients from the Clinic for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery and the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), so that there was no voluntariness. The project-specific "informed consent" is not required, as obtaining consent is considered disproportionate. The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee of the University of Goettingen owing to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cerveri, P.; Belfatto, A.; Manzotti, A. Representative 3D shape of the distal femur, modes of variation and relationship with abnormality of the trochlear region. J. Biomech. 2019, 94, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Macri, E.M.; Neogi, T.; Tolstykh, I.; Widjajahakim, R.; Lewis, C.E.; Torner, J.C.; Nevitt, M.C.; Roux, M.; Stefanik, J.J. Relation of Patellofemoral Joint Alignment, Morphology, and Radiographic Osteoarthritis to Frequent Anterior Knee Pain: Data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2020, 72, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, T.K.; Phillips, M.; Bhandari, M.; Watson, J.; Malhotra, R. What Differences in Morphologic Features of the Knee Exist Among Patients of Various Races? A Systematic Review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2017, 475, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Duren, D.L.; Sherwood, R.J.; Czerwinski, S.A.; Chumlea, W.C.; Lee, M.; Demerath, E.W.; Sun, S.S.; Siervogel, R.M.; Towne, B. Genetic Architecture of Knee Radiographic Joint Space in Healthy Young Adults. Hum. Biol. 2008, 80, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gwinner, C.; Weiler, A.; Plachel, F. Normalwerte—Wie bestimme ich den tibialen Slope richtig? Arthroskopie 2021, 34, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hinterwimmer, S.; Feucht, M. Biomechanik der Sagittalebene des Kniegelenks. Arthroskopie 2021, 34, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pangaud, C.; Laumonerie, P.; Dagneaux, L.; LiArno, S.; Wellings, P.; Faizan, A.; Sharma, A.; Ollivier, M. Measurement of the Posterior Tibial Slope Depends on Ethnicity, Sex, and Lower Limb Alignment: A Computed Tomography Analysis of 378 Healthy Participants. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2020, 8, 2325967119895258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Plachel, F.; Kirschbaum, S.; Perka, C.F.; Gwinner, C. Stellenwert des tibialen Slopes in der primären Knietotalendoprothetik. Arthroskopie 2021, 34, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Boer, J.J.; Blankevoort, L.; Kingma, I.; Vorster, W. In vitro study of inter-individual variation in posterior slope in the knee joint. Clin. Biomech. 2009, 24, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dejour, H.; Bonnin, M. Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol. 1994, 76, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marriott, K.; Birmingham, T.B.; Kean, C.O.; Hui, C.; Jenkyn, T.R.; Giffin, J.R. Five-year changes in gait biomechanics after concomitant high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Am. J. Sports Med. 2015, 43, 2277–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dickschas, J. Korrekturosteotomie bei posttraumatischen Slope-Veränderungen. Arthroskopie 2021, 34, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Webb, J.M.; Salmon, L.J.; Leclerc, E.; Pinczewski, L.A.; Roe, J.P. Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient. Am. J. Sports Med. 2013, 41, 2800–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. El-Azab, H.; Glabgly, P.; Paul, J.; Imhoff, A.B.; Hinterwimmer, S. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A radiological study on 100 patients. Am. J. Sports Med. 2010, 38, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Veizi, E.; Firat, A.; Tecimel, O.; Cepni, S.; Subasi, I.Ö.; Kilcarslan, K. The Change in Posterior Tibial Slope after Cementless Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2021, 36, 1784–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barrett, W.P.; Mason, J.B.; Moskal, J.T.; Dalury, D.F.; Oliashirazi, A.; Fisher, D.A. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2011, 26, 1273–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Todd, M.M.S.; Lalliss, M.S.; Garcia, E.S.; DeBerardino, T.; Cameron, K.L. The relationship between posterior tibial slope and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am. J. Sports Med. 2010, 38, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brandon, M.L.; Haynes, P.T.; Bonamo, J.R.; Flynn, M.I.; Barrett, G.R.; Sherman, M.F. The association between posterior-inferior tibial slope and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Arthroscopy 2006, 22, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jenny, J.Y. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J. Arthroplast. 2005, 20, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, G.; Tan, J.H.; Sng, B.Y.; Awiszus, F.; Lohmann, C.H.; Nathan, S.S. Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximise post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilised total knee replacements. Bone Jt. J. 2013, 95, 1354–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, K.-H.; Bin, S.-I.; Kim, J.-M. The Correlation between Posterior Tibial Slope and Maximal Angle of Flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2012, 24, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Utzschneider, S.; Goettinger, M.; Weber, P.; Horng, A.; Glaser, C.; Jansson, V.; Müller, P.E. Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011, 19, 1643–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Koh, Y.-G.; Nam, J.-H.; Chung, H.-S.; Kim, H.-J.; Chun, H.-J.; Kang, K.-T. Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019, 27, 1628–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, K.; Cavaignac, E.; Xu, W.; Cheng, Q.; Telmon, N.; Huang, W. Morphometric evaluation of the knee in Chinese population reveals sexual dimorphism and age-related differences. Int. Orthop. 2018, 42, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pinskerova, V.; Nemec, K.; Landor, I. Gender differences in the morphology of the trochlea and the distal femur. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014, 22, 2342–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gwinner, C.; Fuchs, M.; Sentuerk, U.; Perka, C.F.; Walter, T.C.; Schatka, I.; Rogasch, J.M.M. Assessment of the tibial slope is highly dependent on the type and accuracy of the preceding acquisition. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2019, 139, 1691–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hoch, A.; Jud, L.; Roth, T.; Vlachopoulos, L.; Fürnstahl, P.; Fucentese, S.F. A real 3D measurement technique for the tibial slope: Differentiation between different articular surfaces and comparison to radiographic slope measurement. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 26, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Faschingbauer, M.; Sgroi, M.; Juchems, M.; Reichel, H.; Kappe, T. Can the tibial slope be measured on lateral knee radiographs? Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2014, 22, 3163–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haddad, B.; Konan, S.; Mannan, K.; Scott, G. Evaluation of the posterior tibial slope on MR images in different population groups using the tibial proximal anatomical axis. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2012, 78, 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  30. Amirtharaj, M.J.; Hardy, B.M.; Kent, R.N.; Nawabi, D.H.; Wickiewicz, T.L.; Pearle, A.D.; Imhauser, C.W. Automated, accurate, and three-dimensional method for calculating sagittal slope of the tibial plateau. J. Biomech. 2018, 79, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Qiang, M.; Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Jiang, Y.; Jia, X. Comparison between three-dimensional CT and conventional radiography in proximal tibia morphology. Medicine 2018, 97, e11632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ho, J.P.Y.; Merican, A.M.; Hashim, M.S.; Abbas, A.A.; Chan, C.K.; Mohamad, J.A. Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of the Posterior Tibial Slope in 100 Knees. J. Arthroplast. 2017, 32, 3176–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amerinatanzi, A.; Summers, R.K.; Ahmadi, K.; Goel, V.K.; Hewett, T.E.; Nyman, E. Automated Measurement of Patient-Specific Tibial Slopes from MRI. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Amerinatanzi, A.; Summers, R.; Ahmadi, K.; Goel, V.K.; Hewett, T.E.; Nyman, E. A novel 3D approach for determination of frontal and coronal plane tibial slopes from MR imaging. Knee 2017, 24, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Saxena, V.; Anari, J.B.; Ruutiainen, A.T.; Voleti, P.B.; Stephenson, J.W.; Lee, G.-C. Tibial component considerations in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A 3D MRI evaluation of proximal tibial anatomy. Knee 2016, 23, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Weinberg, D.S.; Williamson, D.F.K.; Gebhart, J.J.; Knapik, D.M.; Voos, J.E. Differences in Medial and Lateral Posterior Tibial Slope: An Osteological Review of 1090 Tibiae Comparing Age, Sex, and Race. Am. J. Sports Med. 2017, 45, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karimi, E.; Norouzian, M.; Birjandinejad, A.; Zandi, R.; Makhmalbaf, H. Measurement of Posterior Tibial Slope Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 2017, 5, 435–439. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hudek, R.; Schmutz, S.; Regenfelder, F.; Fuchs, B.; Koch, P.P. Novel measurement technique of the tibial slope on conventional MRI. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009, 467, 2066–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kellgren, J.H.; Lawrence, J.S. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1957, 16, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Naendrup, J.-H.; Drouven, S.F.; Shaikh, H.S.; Jaecker, V.; Offerhaus, C.; Shafizadeh, S.T.; Pfeiffer, T.R. High variability of tibial slope measurement methods in daily clinical practice: Comparisons between measurements on lateral radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Knee 2020, 27, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Marouane, H.; Shirazi-Adl, A.; Hashemi, J. Quantification of the role of tibial posterior slope in knee joint mechanics and ACL force in simulated gait. J. Biomech. 2015, 48, 1899–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jahn, R.; Cooper, J.D.; Juhan, T.; Kang, H.P.; Bolia, I.K.; Gamradt, S.C.; Hatch, G.F.; Weber, A.E. Reliability of Plain Radiographs Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Measure Tibial Slope in Sports Medicine Patients: Can They Be Used Interchangeably? Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2021, 9, 23259671211033882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ni, Q.-K.; Song, G.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-J.; Zheng, T.; Cao, Y.-W.; Zhang, H. Posterior tibial slope measurements based on the full-length tibial anatomic axis are significantly increased compared to those based on the half-length tibial anatomic axis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2022, 30, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bao, L.; Rong, S.; Shi, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Measurement of femoral posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope in normal knees based on 3D reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wittenberg, S.; Sentuerk, U.; Renner, L.; Weynandt, C.; Perka, C.F.; Gwinner, C. Bedeutung des tibialen Slopes in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde 2019, 49, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bernhardson, A.S.; DePhillipo, N.N.; Daney, B.T.; Kennedy, M.I.; Aman, Z.S.; LaPrade, R.F. Posterior Tibial Slope and Risk of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Am. J. Sports Med. 2019, 47, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 12 01346 g001a 550Diagnostics 12 01346 g001b 550
Figure 1. Exemplary depiction of the measurements of the tibial slope according to Karimi et al. [37] for medial (TSKmed, (b)) and lateral (TSKlat, (c)) knee-joint surface: The measurements of TSK were performed in sagittal view of the knee joint in MRIs. To determine the right position of the dorsal tibial bone cortex for each TSKmed and TSKlat, a reference line was set in the best available image (a). Based on this reference line, the dorsal inclination angle of the tibial plateau was determined in the medial (TSKmed, (b)) and lateral (TSKlat, (c)) joint sections.
Figure 1. Exemplary depiction of the measurements of the tibial slope according to Karimi et al. [37] for medial (TSKmed, (b)) and lateral (TSKlat, (c)) knee-joint surface: The measurements of TSK were performed in sagittal view of the knee joint in MRIs. To determine the right position of the dorsal tibial bone cortex for each TSKmed and TSKlat, a reference line was set in the best available image (a). Based on this reference line, the dorsal inclination angle of the tibial plateau was determined in the medial (TSKmed, (b)) and lateral (TSKlat, (c)) joint sections.
Diagnostics 12 01346 g001aDiagnostics 12 01346 g001b
Diagnostics 12 01346 g002a 550Diagnostics 12 01346 g002b 550
Figure 2. Exemplary depiction of the measurements of the tibial slope according to Hudek et al. [38] for medial (TSHmed, (b)) and lateral (TSHlat, (c)) knee-joint surface: The measurements of TSH were performed in sagittal view of the knee joint in MRIs. To determine the right position of tibial-shaft axis for each TSHmed and TSHlat, a reference line was set in the best available image. To detect the tibial-shaft axis as accurate as possible, two virtual circle stencils were used (a). The reference structures were the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the intercondyloid eminence (IE). Based on this reference line, the inclination angle of the tibial plateau was determined in the medial (TSHmed, (b)) and lateral (TSHlat, (c)) joint sections.
Figure 2. Exemplary depiction of the measurements of the tibial slope according to Hudek et al. [38] for medial (TSHmed, (b)) and lateral (TSHlat, (c)) knee-joint surface: The measurements of TSH were performed in sagittal view of the knee joint in MRIs. To determine the right position of tibial-shaft axis for each TSHmed and TSHlat, a reference line was set in the best available image. To detect the tibial-shaft axis as accurate as possible, two virtual circle stencils were used (a). The reference structures were the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the intercondyloid eminence (IE). Based on this reference line, the inclination angle of the tibial plateau was determined in the medial (TSHmed, (b)) and lateral (TSHlat, (c)) joint sections.
Diagnostics 12 01346 g002aDiagnostics 12 01346 g002b
Diagnostics 12 01346 g003a 550Diagnostics 12 01346 g003b 550Diagnostics 12 01346 g003c 550
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between patients’ age and TSKmed, TSKlat, TSHmed and TSHlat: There was no significant Spearman correlation between TSKmed (a)/TSKlat (b) and patient age (TSKmed: rS = 0.05; p = 0.15; TSKlat: rS = 0.02; p = 0.63). The analysis detected a significant correlation of TSHmed (c) and TSHlat (d) with patient age. A rS of −0.1 (p = 0.01) was found in the case of TSHmed and a rS of −0.11 (p < 0.01) in the case of TSHlat.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between patients’ age and TSKmed, TSKlat, TSHmed and TSHlat: There was no significant Spearman correlation between TSKmed (a)/TSKlat (b) and patient age (TSKmed: rS = 0.05; p = 0.15; TSKlat: rS = 0.02; p = 0.63). The analysis detected a significant correlation of TSHmed (c) and TSHlat (d) with patient age. A rS of −0.1 (p = 0.01) was found in the case of TSHmed and a rS of −0.11 (p < 0.01) in the case of TSHlat.
Diagnostics 12 01346 g003aDiagnostics 12 01346 g003bDiagnostics 12 01346 g003c
Table
Table 1. Analysis of differences between TSK and TSH as well as between medial and lateral articular surface (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01).
Table 1. Analysis of differences between TSK and TSH as well as between medial and lateral articular surface (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01).
TSK (n = 720)TSH (n = 720)p-Value
medial[°]2.6 (±3.7)4.8 (±3.5)<0.001 ***1
lateral[°]3.0 (±4.0)5.2 (±3.9)<0.001 ***1
medial (n = 720)lateral (n = 720)p-value
TSK[°]2.6 (±3.7)3.0 (±4.0)<0.001 ***2
TSH[°]4.8 (±3.5)5.2 (±3.9)0.002 **2
1 Mann–Whitney U test, 2 Paired t-test.
Table
Table 2. Gender- and side-specific analysis of TSKmed, TSKlat, TSHmed and TSHlat and comparison between HJK and PKJ (*** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05).
Table 2. Gender- and side-specific analysis of TSKmed, TSKlat, TSHmed and TSHlat and comparison between HJK and PKJ (*** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05).
Males (n = 360)Females (n = 360)p-Value
TSKmed[°]2.0 (±3.9)3.2 (±3.4)<0.001 ***1
TSKlat[°]2.5 (±3.9)3.6 (±3.9)<0.001 ***1
TSHmed[°]4.0 (±3.4)5.6 (±3.4)<0.001 ***1
TSHlat[°]4.4 (±3.8)6.0 (±3.8)<0.001 ***1
left (n = 360)right (n = 360)p-value
TSKmed[°]2.6 (±3.7)2.6 (±3.7)0.815 1
TSKlat[°]3.0 (±3.8)3.0 (±4.1)0.920 1
TSHmed[°]4.8 (±3.5)4.8 (±3.4)0.837 1
TSHlat[°]5.2 (±3.8)5.1 (±4.0)0.335 1
HKJ (n = 409)PKJ (n = 311)p-value
TSKmed[°]2.6 (±3.7)2.6 (±3.7)0.693 1
TSKlat[°]2.8 (±3.9)3.4 (±4.0)0.032 *1
TSHmed[°]4.8 (±3.5)4.8 (±3.5)0.885 1
TSHlat[°]4.9 (±3.9)5.5 (±3.9)0.091 1
1 Mann–Whitney U test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meier, M.-P.; Hochrein, Y.; Saul, D.; Seitz, M.-T.; Klockner, F.S.; Lehmann, W.; Hawellek, T. Morphological Analysis of the Tibial Slope in 720 Adult Knee Joints. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061346

AMA Style

Meier M-P, Hochrein Y, Saul D, Seitz M-T, Klockner FS, Lehmann W, Hawellek T. Morphological Analysis of the Tibial Slope in 720 Adult Knee Joints. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(6):1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meier, Marc-Pascal, Yara Hochrein, Dominik Saul, Mark-Tilmann Seitz, Friederike Sophie Klockner, Wolfgang Lehmann, and Thelonius Hawellek. 2022. "Morphological Analysis of the Tibial Slope in 720 Adult Knee Joints" Diagnostics 12, no. 6: 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop