Myelin-Weighted Imaging Presents Reduced Apparent Myelin Water in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease
by
, ,
Seung-Hyun Lim
1, 
Jiyoon Lee
2,
Sumin Jung
2,
Bokyung Kim
1,
Hak Young Rhee
3,4,
Se-Hong Oh
5,
Soonchan Park
4,
Ah Rang Cho
4,6,
Chang-Woo Ryu
1,4 and
Geon-Ho Jahng
1,4,* 1
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Undergraduate School, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Korea
3
Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea
4
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyung Hee Dae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
5
Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Korea
6
Department of Psychiatry, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020446
Submission received: 22 December 2021
/
Revised: 27 January 2022
/
Accepted: 6 February 2022
/
Published: 9 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Diagnostic Medical Imaging)
Abstract
:The purpose of this study was to investigate myelin loss in both AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients with a new myelin water mapping technique within reasonable scan time and evaluate the clinical relevance of the apparent myelin water fraction (MWF) values by assessing the relationship between decreases in myelin water and the degree of memory decline or aging. Twenty-nine individuals were assigned to the cognitively normal (CN) elderly group, 32 participants were assigned to the MCI group, and 31 patients were assigned to the AD group. A 3D visualization of the short transverse relaxation time component (ViSTa)-gradient and spin-echo (GraSE) sequence was developed to map apparent MWF. Then, the MWF values were compared between the three participant groups and was evaluated the relationship with the degree of memory loss. The AD group showed a reduced apparent MWF compared to the CN and MCI groups. The largest AUC (area under the curve) value was in the corpus callosum and used to classify the CN and AD groups using the apparent MWF. The ViSTa-GraSE sequence can be a useful tool to map the MWF in a reasonable scan time. Combining the MWF in the corpus callosum with the detection of atrophy in the hippocampus can be valuable for group classification.
1. Introduction
In a nervous system, a neuron is a cell that sends signals to other cells through fragile and thin axons while a glial cell forms a membranous sheath called myelin, which surrounds and eventually insulates, axons [1]. The oligodendrocytes and schwann cells are specialized glial cells that produce the myelin sheaths of the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system, respectively. The Oligodendrocytes myelinate multiple axons in the central nervous system, while Schwann cells myelinate a single axon in the peripheral nervous system. Myelinated axons appear as spiral wrappings of the myelin sheath. Demyelination is the condition in which preexisting myelin sheaths are damaged without axonal damage. It can result from various medical conditions such as viral infection, inflammatory process, metabolic dysfunctions. [2,3]. Myelin loss can cause nerve dysfunction by slowing or stopping nerve conduction through the axons. Myelin proteins are reduced with age [4] and further reduced in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [5,6,7]. In addition, myelin pathology contributes to the decline of cognitive characteristics in patients with AD [8]. Previous biological studies in AD brains reported that decreased myelin basic protein, myelin proteolipid protein, and cholesterol levels in white matter [7,9] and the focal loss of myelin were associated with amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques in the gray matter [10] and the white matter [11] of AD patients. Therefore, the investigation of demyelination in the AD brain could be helpful in understanding AD. Developing an imaging biomarker, which could indicate myelin loss, would have important clinical implications for the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases.
Several methods have been introduced to map the myelin water fraction (MWF) using MRI [12]. Most methods have been based on the measurement of T2 or T2* relaxation using a multi-echo sequence to fit multi-exponential relaxation times [13,14,15,16,17]. There are drawbacks to the multi-components fitting methods, including a long scan time (10~30 min) to obtain multi-echo images and unreliability to fit a short component due to noise. Therefore, those fitting methods may be inapplicable to clinical routine studies, especially in AD patients. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, reduce the scan time, and ignore fitting errors, a T1-based method called the visualization of short transverse relaxation time component (ViSTa) was introduced [18,19,20]. ViSTa suppresses long T1 signals from cerebrospinal fluid and white matter and gray matter using optimized double-inversion times. Therefore, the signal from a short T1 component in the white matter can be detected using a ViSTa preparation period. The previous multi-component fitting methods can be used to map MWF quantitatively, but the ViSTa-based method can map the apparent MWF. Therefore, in this paper, the term apparent MWF was used.
Since some studies reported myelin changes in AD patients, we thought that it is important to develop an imaging technique to map myelin changes in the brain within a reasonable imaging time in clinics, especially in AD patients who experience continuous subtle movements due to the inability to follow orders. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate myelin loss in participants with AD and amnestic MCI compared to cognitively normal (CN) elderly individuals using a whole-brain MWF map and (2) to investigate the clinical relevance of the apparent MWF by assessing the relationship between reductions in myelin water and the degree of memory loss.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
Our Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this cross-sectional prospective study. Informed consent was obtained from the participants. The participants provided a detailed medical history and underwent a neurologic examination, standard neuropsychological testing, and MRI scanning. A standard neuropsychological test, the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery [21] from the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for global cognitive ability was used to evaluate cognitive function. Based on the results of the neuropsychological examination and MRI findings, the participants were categorized into three groups. First, according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association, patients with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores of 0.5, 1, or 2 were classified as mild and probable AD. [21]. Secondly, the participants with amnestic MCI were also included according to the Petersen criteria [22]. Finally, elderly CN participants were included from healthy volunteers with no medical history of a neurological disease. This study included a total of 105 participants. Among them, 13 participants were excluded from the subsequent analysis. Therefore, the remaining 92 participants were allocated to the CN elderly (n = 29), the amnestic MCI (n = 32), and the AD (n = 31) groups. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the participants.
2.2. MRI Acquisition
To calculate the MWF value in each voxel, two whole-brain images were acquired using a 3D gradient and spin-echo (GraSE) sequence [23] with and without the ViSTa preparation [18,19] using a 32-channel sensitivity-encoding (SENSE) array coil. At first, the GraSE sequence was run with the ViSTa preparation part. Two inversion times (TI) of 742 ms and 222 ms were used for suppressing the long T1 components and fat signals. The following imaging parameters were used: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) =1160/11 ms, flip angle (FA) = 90°, acquisition matrix = 112 × 89, acquisition voxel size = 2 × 2 × 5 mm, reconstruction matrix size = 1 × 1 × 5 mm, slice oversampling factor = 1.5, SENSE factor = 2 for the phase reduction direction and 1 for the slice reduction direction, turbo spin-echo (TSE) factor = 9 with low-high k-space profile order, echo-planar imaging (EPI) factor = 3, number of slices = 25, number of average = 2, fat suppression = SPIR, and imaging orientation = transverse with a right-left fold-over direction. The scan time was 2 min 35 s. In the ViSTa-GraSE sequence, one-echo images were acquired, which was different from other myelin water imaging methods. Second, the GraSE sequence was run again with the same imaging parameters, but without using the ViSTa preparation part for acquiring a reference image to quantify the apparent MWF in each voxel. The scan time was only 28 s.
The sagittal structural 3D T1-weighted (3D T1W) images were acquired for image registration and brain tissue segmentation. At the same time, the turbo field echo sequence which is similar to the magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of the gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence were also acquired. The following parameters were applied: TR = 8.1 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, FA = 8°, field-of-view (FOV) = 236 × 236 mm2, and voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3. Finally, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were acquired to evaluate any brain abnormalities. The imaging parameters of the T2-weighted images were as follows: TR/TE = 3786/80 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm, acquisition matrix size = 460 × 368, and FOV = 179 × 230, obtained in the coronal direction. The imaging parameters of the FLAIR were as follows: TR/TI = 11,000/2800 ms, TE = 125 ms, acquisition voxel size (MPS) = 0.65 × 0.96 × 3.00 mm, slice thickness = 3 mm, slice gap = 0.3 mm, and number of slices = 45, obtained in the transverse direction. MRI was performed using a 3.0 Tesla MRI system (Ingenia, Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands).
2.3. Post-Processing for Mapping MWF
We performed the following steps using Statistical Parametric Mapping version 12 (SPM12) software (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/ (accessed on 20 August 2020)). To create the apparent MWF map, the ViSTa-GraSE image and the corresponding reference image were co-registered to minimize the motion between the scans. The apparent MWF map for each voxel was created from the ViSTa-GraSE image divided by the reference image and multiplied by 100% and a scaling factor. The scaling factor was 0.763561 which was considered to be the difference of TR and TE for the ViSTa-GraSE image and the corresponding reference image and the exponential signal decay effects with T1 and T2* relaxation times. [19]. Then, to evaluate the difference in the apparent MWF map within the three groups, the 3D T1W image and the reference image for each subject were co-registered. As a result, the MWF map was also co-registered. Then, the 3D T1W image was segmented into gray matter and white matter using the CAT12 tool (http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/ (accessed on 24 September 2020)) to obtain brain tissue information and was spatially normalized to the standard dementia brain template generated by our lab [24]. The apparent MWF map was normalized into the dementia standard template using the deformation field information of the 3D T1W. Finally, Gaussian smoothing using a full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of 10 × 10 ×10 mm3 was performed for the voxel-based statistical analysis of all maps, including the gray matter and white matter volumes.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.4.1. Demographic Data and Clinical Outcome Scores
The demographic data and clinical outcome scores were compared between the three participant groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare age and MMSE scores between the participant groups. Sex was compared using the chi-squared test.
2.4.2. Voxel-Based Analysis of Apparent MWF Maps
We performed two voxel-based analyses. First, the voxel-based full factorial ANCOVA test was used for group comparisons of the apparent MWF maps with participants’ age as a covariate. In addition, the same analyses were performed for both gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter volume (WMV) with participants’ total intracranial volume (TIV), age, and sex as covariates. Second, voxel-based multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the apparent MWF maps and age without using any covariate, and between the MWF maps and the MMSE scores with participant’s age as a covariate. In addition, the same analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the apparent GMV and WMV maps and age with participant’s TIV and sex as covariates, and between the GMV and WMV maps and the MMSE scores with participants’ TIV, sex, and age as covariates. A significance level of α = 0.001 was applied with correction for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method and clusters with at least 100 contiguous voxels.
2.4.3. Region-of-Interest (ROI)-Based Analysis of Apparent MWF Values
The ROIs were defined in the areas of the corpus callosum, cingulate gyrus, cingulum, hippocampus, middle temporal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, pons, precuneus, and thalamus based on the results of the voxel-based analysis and based on the knowledge of the affected locations in AD patients. The atlas-based ROIs were defined using wfu_pickatlas software (http://fmri.wfubmc.edu/software/PickAtlas (accessed on 7 September 2021)). The apparent MWF, GMV, and WMV values were extracted from the selected ROIs.
We performed the following statistical analyses using the ROI data. First, an ANOVA test was performed to evaluate the differences in ROI values between the three participant groups. If there was any significant difference between the groups, then the Scheffe multiple comparison test was used as the post hoc test. Second, Pearson’s correlation coefficient test was performed to analyze the degree of association between the ROI values and participants’ age. Furthermore, we performed a partial correlation analysis between the ROI values and MMSE scores with adjustment for participants’ age. Because of the negative correlation between MWF and age, we analyzed the partial correlation with an adjusted age. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the differences between the two groups for each ROI value, including the apparent MWF, GMV, and WMV. The additional ROC curve analysis was also performed to evaluate the improvement in the group classification by adding brain tissue volumes to the apparent MWF value. For the ROI analysis, α < 0.05 was used to determine the significance level. The statistical analysis was performed using the Medcalc (MedCalc Software, Acacialaan, Ostend, Belgium) statistical program.
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
Age (F = 1.586, p = 0.210) was not significantly different between the participant groups, but the MMSE score (F = 63.375, p < 0.001) was significantly different between AD and other groups, as expected. Sex (χ2 < 3.673, p > 0.055) did not differ significantly between the three participant groups. The results of the statistical analysis of the participant’s demographic data and the neuropsychologic tests are summarized in Table 1.
3.2. Voxel-Based Analysis of Apparent MWF Maps
Figure 1 shows the representative maps of the apparent MWF with and without using color, 3D T1W, GMV, and WMV obtained from one elderly CN participant (72-year-old female), one MCI (72-year-old female) participant, and one AD (73-year-old female) participant. The apparent MWF signal was nicely depicted around the white matter areas. A gross signal drop in the apparent MWF signal was observed in the AD group compared to the CN group in the white matter.
Figure 2 shows the results of the voxel-based ANCOVA analysis of the apparent MWF, GMV, and WMV maps among the three participant groups. The apparent MWF was reduced in the AD group at most of the brain areas included in the cingulate gyrus, the temporal lobe, and the parietal lobe compared to the CN and MCI groups. Both GMV and WMV were also decreased in the AD group. In addition, those values were decreased in the MCI group compared to the CN group. The detailed locations of the significant differences between the participant groups are listed in Supplementary Table S1 for the apparent MWF, Table S2 for GMV, and Table S3 for WMV.
The red color indicates greater measures in the participant group, indicated in each comparison.
Figure 3 shows the results of voxel-based multiple regression analysis of the apparent MWF, GMV, and WMV maps using the age of all participants. MWF was decreased with increasing age at most of the brain areas. Both GMV and WMV were also decreased with increasing age. However, we did not find any association between MWF, GMV, and WMV and the MMSE scores in the voxel-based analysis using the whole cohort. In addition, we did not find any association between MWF and the MMSE scores in each participant group. The detailed locations of the significantly associated areas are listed in Supplementary Table S4 for the apparent MWF, Table S5 for GMV, and Table S6 for WMV.
The significant negative associations between the MRI measures and age are shown in blue color.
3.3. ROI-Based Analysis of the Apparent MWF Maps
ANOVA tests: Table 2 summarizes the mean values with standard deviations for the apparent MWF, GMV, and WMV for each ROI. The apparent MWF values in all ROIs were significantly different between the three participant groups (F > 4, p < 0.009). The MWF values in all ROIs were decreased in the AD group compared to the CN and MCI groups but were not significantly different between the CN and MCI groups, which was the same as the result of the voxel-based comparison. Both GMV and WMV in all ROIs were also significantly decreased in the AD group compared to the CN and MCI groups.
3.3.1. Correlation with Age and MMSE Scores
Table 3 lists the results of the correlation analysis between the MRI measures and age or MMSE scores in all ROIs. The apparent MWF values in all ROIs were significantly negatively correlated with age (Figure 4). Both the GMV and WMV values were also significantly negatively correlated with age. With adjustment for age, the apparent MWF values were significantly positively correlated with the MMSE scores in most ROIs, except for the cingulum and middle temporal gyrus (Table 3 and Figure 5). In addition, both the GMV and WMV values were also significantly positively correlated with the MMSE scores.
3.3.2. ROC Curve Analyses
The ROC curve analysis results for each MRI measure in each ROI are summarized in Supplementary Table S7. The apparent MWF values in all ROIs significantly differed between the CN and AD groups and between the MCI and AD groups. For classification between the CN and AD groups, the largest AUC for each MRI measure was 0.799 in carpus callosum for MWF, 0.883 in the hippocampus for GMV, and 0.860 in the hippocampus for WMV. For classification between the MCI and AD groups, the largest AUC for each MRI measure was 0.799 in the carpus callosum for MWF, 0.771 in the hippocampus for GMV, and 0.740 in the hippocampus for WMV. The AUC value was lower in differentiating MCI from AD for all three MRI measures compared with that for classification between other groups. We selected MWF in the carpus callosum and GMV and WMV in the hippocampus for evaluating the added value of MWF.
Table 4 lists the results of the ROC curve analysis to evaluate adding MWF to the GMV and/or WMV values for group classification. To differentiate between the AD patients and the CN participants, the largest AUC was seen by adding all three MRI measures (AUC = 0.905), and the second-largest AUC was seen by adding MWF to GMV (AUC = 0.898) or to WMV (AUC = 0.891). To differentiate between the AD patients and the MCI participants, the largest AUC was seen by adding all three MRI measures (AUC = 0.812), and the second-largest AUC was seen by adding MWF to GMV (AUC = 0.803) or to WMV (AUC = 0.794). The addition of the MWF value of the corpus callosum areas and the GMV values of the hippocampus (SE = 86, SP = 80, AUC = 0.883) slightly improved the discrimination between the CN and AD groups (SE = 93, SP = 77, AUC = 0.898). However, there were no significant differences of ROC areas in any parameter combinations.
4. Discussion
4.1. Apparent MWF Signals in AD
A new 3D ViSTa-GraSE sequence was employed to evaluate the routine clinical application of the apparent MWF in AD patients who usually have difficulty keeping their heads motionless during an MRI scan. The results showed that the MWF was significantly reduced in the AD group compared to the CN and MCI groups and decreased with disease severity (Table 2). The MWF values provided high AUC values in the corpus callosum (SE = 86, SP = 67, AUC = 0.799) to differentiate the AD patients from the CN participants (Supplementary Materials Table S7). Furthermore, the addition of the MWF value of the corpus callosum areas and the GMV values of the hippocampus (SE = 86, SP = 80, AUC = 0.883) slightly improved the discrimination between the CN and AD groups (SE = 93, SP = 77, AUC = 0.898) (Table 4). Therefore, the MWF of the corpus callosum area along with the detection of atrophy of the hippocampus can be valuable for improving the classification of individuals.
This study showed a significant reduction in the MWF in AD patients compared to the CN participants. Previous imaging studies with a T2-based multi-echo sequence also demonstrated substantially decreased MWF values in AD patients including the medial temporal lobes, parietal lobes, splenium, and genu of the corpus callosum, and the WM surrounding the frontal and posterior aspect of the lateral ventricles [25,26,27,28]. Previous postmortem studies also showed that MCI and AD patients showed more severe myelin damage than healthy elders due to unsuccessful repair processes [6,7,11,29,30,31,32,33]. AD patients showed decreased myelin basic protein and myelin proteolipid protein, as well as a significant reduction in white matter cholesterol levels [7,9]. The results of the current study confirm the findings of older ones, not the other way. Moreover, since a previous study showed that the greatest degree of demyelination occurred at the plaque core in both human AD and mouse model [10], future studies scanning both VisTa-GraSE and amyloid and/or tau PET are recommended to verify the association of MWF reduction and depositions of Aβ and/or phosphorylated tau in AD.
4.2. Apparent MWF Signals Correlate with MMSE Scores and/or Age
The apparent MWF value was decreased with increasing age in all ROIs (Table 3). This is consistent with the age-related changes recently observed in healthy subjects using a T2-based multi-echo sequence [25,26,28]. The previous study showed that myelin was increased up to around 40 years and then gradually decreased with increasing age.
Although the voxel-based analysis did not show any association between MWF and MMSE scores, the ROI-based analysis showed that the apparent MWF value in most ROIs was significantly reduced as the MMSE scores decreased, except cingulum and middle temporal gyrus (Table 3). A previous study also showed positive relationships between MWF and MMSE scores [34], indicating that the memory impairment in aging, MCI, and AD patients was related to myelin breakdown [29,35,36]. Furthermore, neuronal AD pathology, which is characterized by neuronal and axonal dysfunction, could alter the amount of myelin produced by oligodendrocytes. Therefore, the positive relationship between MWF and MMSE can be explained by disease progression. The MWF imaging biomarker can be used to track the dynamic changes of the brain myelin as cognition declines.
4.3. Limitations
This study had several limitations. First, we did not directly compare the MWF maps with those obtained with the multi-echo T2 relaxation fitting method. Furthermore, we did not compare the results with the autopsy results. In addition, the MWF maps obtained with ViSTa have not yet been histologically validated in AD patients. Therefore, further studies should be performed before being routinely used in clinics. Second, this study was performed as a cross-sectional study. Therefore, a longitudinal study is recommended to evaluate the rate of demyelination in AD patients. Consequently, the number of participants in each group was small and, therefore, future studies are required with larger sample sizes.
5. Conclusions
The 3D ViSTa-GRASE sequence provided a good MWF map in a reasonable scan time to evaluate myelin loss in AD patients. MWF was significantly reduced in AD patients compared to the CN participants in most of the white matter areas, especially in the corpus callosum in the brain, indicating the presence of widespread demyelination in AD patients. In addition, MWF was significantly correlated with memory loss. Consequently, for evaluating demyelination and predicting treatment outcomes in AD, MWF could serve as a potential imaging biomarker. The differentiation of AD patients from the CN participants using both GMV and MWF was high, indicating its potential for clinical use. MWF in the corpus callosum areas with atrophy detection in the hippocampus can be valuable for improving the classification of individuals as a promising imaging biomarker.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics12020446/s1, Table S1: Results of the voxel-based comparisons of apparent MWF among the three participant groups, Table S2: Results of the voxel-based comparisons of GMV among the three participant groups, Table S3: Results of the voxel-based comparisons of WMV among the three participant groups, Table S4: Results of the voxel-based multiple regression analyses between apparent myelin water fraction (MWF) and ages in all participant groups, Table S5: Results of the voxel-based multiple regression analyses between gray matter volume (GMV) and ages in all participant groups, Table S6: Results of the voxel-based multiple regression analyses between white matter volume (WMV) and ages in all participant groups, Table S7: Results of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of MRI measures at the specific brain areas.
Author Contributions
Data acquisition, S.-H.L., S.J., J.L. and B.K.; formal analysis, S.-H.L., S.J., J.L. and B.K.; visualization, S.-H.L., S.J., J.L. and B.K.; writing—original draft, S.-H.L., S.J., J.L. and B.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.L., S.J., J.L., B.K., S.-H.O., H.Y.R., A.R.C., S.P., C.-W.R. and G.-H.J.; methodology, S.-H.O., H.Y.R., A.R.C., S.P., C.-W.R. and G.-H.J.; validation, S.-H.O.; patient recruitment, H.Y.R. and A.R.C.; imaging interpretation, S.P. and C.-W.R.; conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, and supervision, G.-H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (No. 2020R1A2C1004749, G.-H.J.), Republic of Korea.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Our Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this cross-sectional prospective study (IRB No. khnmc 2019-07-007) (27 August 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be provided upon request.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate Narae Lee (Kyung Hee Medical Science Research Institute, Seoul, Korea) for advice on the statistical analyses.
Conflicts of Interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- Susuki, K. Myelin: A Specialized Membrane for Cell Communication. Nat. Educ. 2010, 3, 59. [Google Scholar]
- Hulshagen, L.; Krysko, O.; Bottelbergs, A.; Huyghe, S.; Klein, R.; Van Veldhoven, P.P.; De Deyn, P.P.; D’Hooge, R.; Hartmann, D.; Baes, M. Absence of functional peroxisomes from mouse CNS causes dysmyelination and axon degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 4015–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farooqui, A.A.; Horrocks, L.A.; Farooqui, T. Modulation of inflammation in brain: A matter of fat. J. Neurochem. 2007, 101, 577–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartzokis, G.; Sultzer, D.; Lu, P.H.; Nuechterlein, K.H.; Mintz, J.; Cummings, J.L. Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: Implications for cortical “disconnection” in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2004, 25, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bartzokis, G.; Lu, P.H.; Mintz, J. Quantifying age-related myelin breakdown with MRI: Novel therapeutic targets for preventing cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2004, 6, S53–S59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, X.; Holtzman, D.M.; McKeel, D.W., Jr.; Kelley, J.; Morris, J.C. Substantial sulfatide deficiency and ceramide elevation in very early Alzheimer’s disease: Potential role in disease pathogenesis. J. Neurochem. 2002, 82, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roher, A.E.; Weiss, N.; Kokjohn, T.A.; Kuo, Y.M.; Kalback, W.; Anthony, J.; Watson, D.; Luehrs, D.C.; Sue, L.; Walker, D.; et al. Increased A beta peptides and reduced cholesterol and myelin proteins characterize white matter degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 11080–11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, J.M.; Church, J.A.; Johnson, D.K.; Xiong, C.; Marcus, D.; Fotenos, A.F.; Snyder, A.Z.; Morris, J.C.; Buckner, R.L. White matter lesions are prevalent but differentially related with cognition in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 2005, 62, 1870–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svennerholm, L.; Gottfries, C.G. Membrane lipids, selectively diminished in Alzheimer brains, suggest synapse loss as a primary event in early-onset form (type I) and demyelination in late-onset form (type II). J. Neurochem. 1994, 62, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitew, S.; Kirkcaldie, M.T.; Halliday, G.M.; Shepherd, C.E.; Vickers, J.C.; Dickson, T.C. Focal demyelination in Alzheimer’s disease and transgenic mouse models. Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 119, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stricker, N.H.; Schweinsburg, B.C.; Delano-Wood, L.; Wierenga, C.E.; Bangen, K.J.; Haaland, K.Y.; Frank, L.R.; Salmon, D.P.; Bondi, M.W. Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer’s disease supports retrogenesis. Neuroimage 2009, 45, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alonso-Ortiz, E.; Levesque, I.R.; Pike, G.B. MRI-based myelin water imaging: A technical review. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015, 73, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, Y.P.; Chu, R.; Hwang, D.; Brown, M.S.; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B.K.; Singel, D.; Simon, J.H. Fast multislice mapping of the myelin water fraction using multicompartment analysis of T2* decay at 3T: A preliminary postmortem study. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 58, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, D.; Kim, D.H.; Du, Y.P. In vivo multi-slice mapping of myelin water content using T2* decay. Neuroimage 2010, 52, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenz, C.; Klarhofer, M.; Scheffler, K. Feasibility of in vivo myelin water imaging using 3D multigradient-echo pulse sequences. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012, 68, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, T.D.; Wisnieff, C.; Cooper, M.A.; Kumar, D.; Raj, A.; Spincemaille, P.; Wang, Y.; Vartanian, T.; Gauthier, S.A. T2 prep three-dimensional spiral imaging with efficient whole brain coverage for myelin water quantification at 1.5 tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012, 67, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasloski, T.; Rauscher, A.; MacKay, A.L.; Hodgson, M.; Vavasour, I.M.; Laule, C.; Madler, B. Rapid whole cerebrum myelin water imaging using a 3D GRASE sequence. Neuroimage 2012, 63, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Lee, H.M.; Oh, S.H.; Lee, J. Probing signal phase in direct visualization of short transverse relaxation time component (ViSTa). Magn. Reson. Med. 2015, 74, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oh, S.H.; Bilello, M.; Schindler, M.; Markowitz, C.E.; Detre, J.A.; Lee, J. Direct visualization of short transverse relaxation time component (ViSTa). Neuroimage 2013, 83, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Z.; Bilgic, B.; He, H.; Tong, Q.; Sun, Y.; Du, Y.; Setsompop, K.; Zhong, J. Wave-CAIPI ViSTa: Highly accelerated whole-brain direct myelin water imaging with zero-padding reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018, 80, 1061–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, H.J.; Chin, J.; Park, A.; Lee, B.H.; Suh, M.K.; Seo, S.W.; Na, D.L. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): A useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Petersen, R.C.; Doody, R.; Kurz, A.; Mohs, R.C.; Morris, J.C.; Rabins, P.V.; Ritchie, K.; Rossor, M.; Thal, L.; Winblad, B. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch. Neurol. 2001, 58, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, H.; Jones, C.K.; van Zijl, P.C.; Barker, P.B.; Zhou, J. Fast 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of the human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 64, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Guo, X.Y.; Chang, Y.; Kim, Y.; Rhee, H.Y.; Cho, A.R.; Park, S.; Ryu, C.W.; San Lee, J.; Lee, K.M.; Shin, W.; et al. Development and evaluation of a T1 standard brain template for Alzheimer disease. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2021, 11, 2224–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouhrara, M.; Reiter, D.A.; Bergeron, C.M.; Zukley, L.M.; Ferrucci, L.; Resnick, S.M.; Spencer, R.G. Evidence of demyelination in mild cognitive impairment and dementia using a direct and specific magnetic resonance imaging measure of myelin content. Alzheimers Dement. 2018, 14, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, D.C., 3rd; Hurley, S.A.; Kecskemeti, S.R.; O’Grady, J.P.; Canda, C.; Davenport-Sis, N.J.; Carlsson, C.M.; Zetterberg, H.; Blennow, K.; Asthana, S.; et al. Association of Amyloid Pathology with Myelin Alteration in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavroulakis, E.; Simos, P.G.; Kalaitzakis, G.; Maris, T.G.; Karageorgou, D.; Zaganas, I.; Panagiotakis, S.; Basta, M.; Vgontzas, A.; Papadaki, E. Myelin content changes in probable Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: Associations with age and severity of neuropsychiatric impairment. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018, 47, 1359–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ota, M.; Sato, N.; Kimura, Y.; Shigemoto, Y.; Kunugi, H.; Matsuda, H. Changes of Myelin Organization in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Shown by q-Space Myelin Map Imaging. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. Extra 2019, 9, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartzokis, G.; Cummings, J.L.; Sultzer, D.; Henderson, V.W.; Nuechterlein, K.H.; Mintz, J. White matter structural integrity in healthy aging adults and patients with Alzheimer disease: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch. Neurol. 2003, 60, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chalmers, K.; Wilcock, G.; Love, S. Contributors to white matter damage in the frontal lobe in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2005, 31, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chia, L.S.; Thompson, J.E.; Moscarello, M.A. X-ray diffraction evidence for myelin disorder in brain from humans with Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1984, 775, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Englund, E.; Brun, A. White matter changes in dementia of Alzheimer’s type: The difference in vulnerability between cell compartments. Histopathology 1990, 16, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leow, A.D.; Yanovsky, I.; Parikshak, N.; Hua, X.; Lee, S.; Toga, A.W.; Jack, C.R., Jr.; Bernstein, M.A.; Britson, P.J.; Gunter, J.L.; et al. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: A one-year follow up study using tensor-based morphometry correlating degenerative rates, biomarkers and cognition. Neuroimage 2009, 45, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carmeli, C.; Donati, A.; Antille, V.; Viceic, D.; Ghika, J.; von Gunten, A.; Clarke, S.; Meuli, R.; Frackowiak, R.S.; Knyazeva, M.G. Demyelination in mild cognitive impairment suggests progression path to Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bartzokis, G.; Lu, P.H.; Tingus, K.; Mendez, M.F.; Richard, A.; Peters, D.G.; Oluwadara, B.; Barrall, K.A.; Finn, J.P.; Villablanca, P.; et al. Lifespan trajectory of myelin integrity and maximum motor speed. Neurobiol. Aging 2010, 31, 1554–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bartzokis, G.; Beckson, M.; Lu, P.H.; Nuechterlein, K.H.; Edwards, N.; Mintz, J. Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2001, 58, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Representative maps of the three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W), gray matter volume (GMV), white matter volume (WMV), and apparent myelin water fraction (MWF) with and without color code.
Figure 1.
Representative maps of the three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted (T1W), gray matter volume (GMV), white matter volume (WMV), and apparent myelin water fraction (MWF) with and without color code.
Figure 2.
Results of voxel-based ANCOVA analysis of the maps of the apparent myelin water fraction (MWF), gray matter volume (GMV), and white matter volume (WMV) in the three participant groups of cognitively normal (CN) elderly individuals, participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
Figure 2.
Results of voxel-based ANCOVA analysis of the maps of the apparent myelin water fraction (MWF), gray matter volume (GMV), and white matter volume (WMV) in the three participant groups of cognitively normal (CN) elderly individuals, participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
Figure 3.
Results of the voxel-based multiple regression analysis between the all-participant maps of the apparent myelin water fraction (MWF), gray matter volume (GMV), and white matter volume (WMV).
Figure 3.
Results of the voxel-based multiple regression analysis between the all-participant maps of the apparent myelin water fraction (MWF), gray matter volume (GMV), and white matter volume (WMV).
Figure 4.
Results of the correlation analysis between the apparent MWF values in the specific brain areas and age.
Figure 4.
Results of the correlation analysis between the apparent MWF values in the specific brain areas and age.
Figure 5.
Results of the correlation analysis between the apparent MWF values in the specific brain areas and MMSE scores.
Figure 5.
Results of the correlation analysis between the apparent MWF values in the specific brain areas and MMSE scores.
Table 1.
Summary of the statistical results of the demographic data.
| Group | CN(1) | MCI(2) | AD(3) | Statistical Tests (Post Hoc) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants | 29 | 32 | 31 | 92 (total) |
| Demographic data and neuropsychologic test | ||||
| Age (year) * | 73.00 ± 5.01 | 74.31 ± 5.02 | 75.42 ± 5.71 | F = 1.586/p = 0.210 |
| Sex # (male/female) | 13/16 (M:44.8% F:55.2%) | 11/21 (M:34.4% F:65.6%) | 5/26 (M:16.13% F:83.87%) | χ2 < 3.673/p > 0.055 |
| MMSE * (/30) | 27.93 ± 2.02 | 26.53 ± 1.90 | 19.39 ± 4.74 | F = 63.375/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| CDR(range) | 0 (0–0.5) | 0.5 (0.5) | 1 (0.5–2) | N/A |
The data are listed as the mean ± standard deviation for the continuous variables. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores are presented as the median (range) values. * ANOVA test (F/p values*) comparing the continuous variables between the three groups. After the ANOVA test, the Scheffé post hoc test was performed and the results reflect the significant difference between the three subject groups (1, 2, 3), between the CN and AD groups (1, 3), between the CN and MCI groups (1, 2), and between MCI and AD group (2, 3). # p-value by the chi-squared test.
Table 2.
Results of comparisons of MRI measures between the three participant groups in specific brain areas.
Table 2.
Results of comparisons of MRI measures between the three participant groups in specific brain areas.
| ROI | MRI Measures | CN(1) | MCI(2) | AD(3) | ANOVA, F/p-Value * (Post Hoc) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus callosum | MWF | 10.60 ± 7.80 | 10.31 ± 1.65 | 8.59 ± 1.70 | F = 12.204/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.12 ± 0.013 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | F = 2.982/p = 0.056 | |
| WMV | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | F = 9.711/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| Cingulate gyrus | MWF | 9.34 ± 1.60 | 9.10 ± 1.55 | 7.88 ± 1.81 | F = 6.718/p = 0.002 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | F = 6.044/p = 0.003 (1,3) | |
| WMV | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | F = 12.562/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| Cingulum | MWF | 7.88 ± 1.29 | 7.66 ± 1.17 | 6.92 ± 1.42 | F = 4.673/p = 0.012 (1, 3) |
| GMV | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | F = 9.970/p < 0.001 (1, 2), (1, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | F = 12.661/p < 0.001 (1, 2, 3) | |
| Hippocampus | MWF | 6.83 ± 1.18 | 6.56 ± 1.19 | 5.64 ± 1.19 | F = 8.269/p = 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | F = 20.880/p < 0.001 (1, 2, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | F = 16.568/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| Middle temporal gyrus | MWF | 6.18 ± 1.05 | 5.78 ± 1.09 | 5.21 ± 1.05 | F = 6.250/p = 0.003 (1, 3) |
| GMV | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | F = 13.417/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | F = 13.223/p < 0.001 (1, 3),(2, 3) | |
| Parahippocampal gyrus | MWF | 5.35 ± 1.08 | 4.97 ± 0.95 | 4.34 ± 0.97 | F = 7.914/p = 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | F = 18.772/p < 0.001 (1, 2, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | F = 16.048/p < 0.001 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| Pons | MWF | 9.74 ± 1.60 | 9.46 ± 1.36 | 8.47 ± 0.48 | F = 6.143/p = 0.003 (1, 3), (2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.04 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | F = 6.778/p = 0.002 (1, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | F = 4.878/p = 0.010 (1, 3) | |
| Precuneus | MWF | 6.99 ± 1.23 | 6.49 ± 1.32 | 5.68 ± 1.35 | F = 7.712/p = 0.001 (1, 3) |
| GMV | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | F = 7.488/p = 0.001 (1, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | F = 13.292/p < 0.001 (1, 2), (1, 3) | |
| Thalamus | MWF | 7.11 ± 1.09 | 6.98 ± 1.21 | 6.07 ± 1.31 | F = 6.617/p = 0.002 (1, 3),(2, 3) |
| GMV | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | F = 4.516/p = 0.014 (1, 3), (2, 3) | |
| WMV | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | F = 4.017/p = 0.021 (1, 3) |
The data are listed as the mean ± standard deviation. The units are % for MWF and cm3 for both the GMV and the WMV.The ANOVA test (F/p values *) was performed to compare the MRI measures between the three participant groups with the Scheffé post hoc test. The results of the post hoc tests are listed as the significant difference between the three subject groups (1, 2, 3), between the CN and AD groups (1, 3), between the CN and MCI groups (1, 2), and between the MCI and AD groups (2, 3).
Table 3.
Results of correlation analysis between MRI measures in specific brain areas and age or MMSE scores.
Table 3.
Results of correlation analysis between MRI measures in specific brain areas and age or MMSE scores.
| ROI | Regressors | MWF | GMV | WMV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus callosum | Age | −0.565 | <0.0001 | −0.178 | 0.0905 | −0.361 | 0.0004 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.349 | 0.0007 | 0.281 | 0.0069 | 0.338 | 0.0011 | |
| Cingulate gyrus | Age | −0.537 | <0.0001 | −0.400 | 0.0001 | −0.467 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.235 | 0.0248 | 0.276 | 0.0081 | 0.365 | 0.0004 | |
| Cingulum | Age | −0.481 | <0.0001 | −0.474 | <0.0001 | −0.459 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.151 | 0.1519 | 0.367 | 0.0004 | 0.353 | 0.0006 | |
| Hippocampus | Age | −0.429 | <0.0001 | −0.545 | <0.0001 | −0.468 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.251 | 0.0165 | 0.539 | <0.0001 | 0.421 | <0.0001 | |
| Middle temporal gyrus | Age | −0.462 | <0.0001 | −0.429 | <0.0001 | −0.446 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.186 | 0.0771 | 0.442 | <0.0001 | 0.322 | 0.0019 | |
| Parahippocampal gyrus | Age | −0.371 | 0.0003 | −0.546 | <0.0001 | −0.456 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.248 | 0.0179 | 0.544 | <0.0001 | 0.423 | <0.0001 | |
| Pons | Age | −0.321 | 0.0018 | −0.355 | 0.0005 | −0.218 | 0.0366 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.252 | 0.0161 | 0.367 | 0.0003 | 0.305 | 0.0032 | |
| Precuneus | Age | −0.481 | <0.0001 | −0.517 | <0.0001 | −0.496 | <0.0001 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.263 | 0.0117 | 0.424 | <0.0001 | 0.406 | 0.0001 | |
| Thalamus | Age | −0.487 | <0.0001 | −0.417 | <0.0001 | −0.204 | 0.0509 |
| *adjMMSE | 0.234 | 0.0257 | 0.242 | 0.0209 | 0.262 | 0.0122 | |
The data are listed as Pearson’s correlation coefficient with p-values, except for *adjMMSE which are results of partial correlation analysis between MMSE scores and MRI measures with adjustment for age. MWF, apparent myelin water fraction; GMV, gray matter volume; WMV, white matter volume; ROI, region-of-interest; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.
Table 4.
Results of the added value analyses of MRI measures using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for group classification.
Table 4.
Results of the added value analyses of MRI measures using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for group classification.
| MRI Measures | CN vs. MCI | CN vs. AD | MCI vs. AD | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | SP | AUC | p | SE | SP | AUC | p | SE | SP | AUC | p | |
| Hippo GMV | 50.00 | 82.76 | 0.691 | 0.0058 | 86.21 | 80.65 | 0.883 | <0.0001 | 61.29 | 84.37 | 0.771 | <0.0001 |
| Hippo WMV | 71.87 | 65.52 | 0.659 | 0.0260 | 93.10 | 70.97 | 0.860 | <0.0001 | 77.42 | 68.75 | 0.740 | 0.0001 |
| CC MWF | 75.00 | 41.38 | 0.517 | 0.8222 | 86.21 | 67.74 | 0.799 | <0.0001 | 70.97 | 84.37 | 0.779 | <0.0001 |
| GMV + MWF | 50.00 | 82.76 | 0.691 | 0.0056 | 93.10 | 77.42 | 0.898 | <0.0001 | 70.97 | 87.50 | 0.803 | <0.0001 |
| GMV + WMV | 84.37 | 55.17 | 0.690 | 0.0063 | 89.66 | 77.42 | 0.888 | <0.0001 | 67.74 | 81.25 | 0.779 | <0.0001 |
| WMV + MWF | 71.87 | 62.07 | 0.650 | 0.0367 | 96.55 | 70.97 | 0.891 | <0.0001 | 70.97 | 81.25 | 0.794 | <0.0001 |
| GMV + WMV + MWF | 84.37 | 55.17 | 0.690 | 0.0063 | 96.55 | 77.42 | 0.905 | <0.0001 | 70.97 | 84.37 | 0.812 | <0.0001 |
Data are listed as results of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with Sensitivity (SE), Specificity (SP), area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the p-value. MRI measure values were obtained from hippocampus (Hippo) for gray matter volume (GMV), hippocampus (Hippo) for white matter volume (WMV), and corpus callosum (CC) for myelin water fraction (MWF) based on the ROC analysis of each MRI measure at each brain area (Supplementary Table S7).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lim, S.-H.; Lee, J.; Jung, S.; Kim, B.; Rhee, H.Y.; Oh, S.-H.; Park, S.; Cho, A.R.; Ryu, C.-W.; Jahng, G.-H. Myelin-Weighted Imaging Presents Reduced Apparent Myelin Water in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020446
AMA Style
Lim S-H, Lee J, Jung S, Kim B, Rhee HY, Oh S-H, Park S, Cho AR, Ryu C-W, Jahng G-H. Myelin-Weighted Imaging Presents Reduced Apparent Myelin Water in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(2):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020446
Chicago/Turabian StyleLim, Seung-Hyun, Jiyoon Lee, Sumin Jung, Bokyung Kim, Hak Young Rhee, Se-Hong Oh, Soonchan Park, Ah Rang Cho, Chang-Woo Ryu, and Geon-Ho Jahng. 2022. "Myelin-Weighted Imaging Presents Reduced Apparent Myelin Water in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease" Diagnostics 12, no. 2: 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020446
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
