Next Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Self-Collected Nasal and Oral Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Utility of Integrated PET/MRI for the Primary Diagnostic Work-Up of Patients with Ewing Sarcoma: Preliminary Results
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a Time of COVID-19
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/diagnostics12102277
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Diagnostics 2020, 10(10), 839.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Go et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-Onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839

by
Hidetoshi Go
†,
Nobuhiko Nagano
†,
Daichi Katayama
,
Takuya Akimoto
,
Takayuki Imaizumi
,
Ryoji Aoki
,
Midori Hijikata
,
Ayako Seimiya
,
Ryota Kato
,
Aya Okahashi
and
Ichiro Morioka
*,†
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(10), 2277; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102277
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
In the original publication [1], there were some mistakes. The symbols in Figure 2 were (d), (e), (f), not (a), (b), (c). Accordingly, in the legend of Figure 2, (a–c) was corrected to (d–f) and (b) was corrected to (e). In addition, the reference Chiesa et al. (1988) [20] was corrected to Chiesa et al. (1998) [20].
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Go, H.; Nagano, N.; Katayama, D.; Akimoto, T.; Imaizumi, T.; Aoki, R.; Hijikata, M.; Seimiya, A.; Kato, R.; Okahashi, A.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Diagnostics 12 02277 g002 550
Figure 2. Serum PCT levels of term infants in the confirmed and non-infection groups. Serum PCT reference curves (d–f) are the serum PCT reference curves published by Fukuzumi et al. [17], Chiesa et al. (1998) [20] and Chiesa et al. (2011) [19]. Since the reference curve (e) was only available for neonates aged up to 48 h [20], two infants who were admitted and underwent blood sample collection from 48 to 72 h of age were excluded. Solid and dotted lines indicate the 50th and 95th percentile lines, respectively. ● represents a PCT value for an infant with confirmed infection; × represents a PCT value for a non-infected infant. PCT, procalcitonin.
Figure 2. Serum PCT levels of term infants in the confirmed and non-infection groups. Serum PCT reference curves (d–f) are the serum PCT reference curves published by Fukuzumi et al. [17], Chiesa et al. (1998) [20] and Chiesa et al. (2011) [19]. Since the reference curve (e) was only available for neonates aged up to 48 h [20], two infants who were admitted and underwent blood sample collection from 48 to 72 h of age were excluded. Solid and dotted lines indicate the 50th and 95th percentile lines, respectively. ● represents a PCT value for an infant with confirmed infection; × represents a PCT value for a non-infected infant. PCT, procalcitonin.
Diagnostics 12 02277 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Go, H.; Nagano, N.; Katayama, D.; Akimoto, T.; Imaizumi, T.; Aoki, R.; Hijikata, M.; Seimiya, A.; Kato, R.; Okahashi, A.; et al. Correction: Go et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-Onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102277

AMA Style

Go H, Nagano N, Katayama D, Akimoto T, Imaizumi T, Aoki R, Hijikata M, Seimiya A, Kato R, Okahashi A, et al. Correction: Go et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-Onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(10):2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Go, Hidetoshi, Nobuhiko Nagano, Daichi Katayama, Takuya Akimoto, Takayuki Imaizumi, Ryoji Aoki, Midori Hijikata, Ayako Seimiya, Ryota Kato, Aya Okahashi, and et al. 2022. "Correction: Go et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Early-Onset Neonatal Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin Reference Curves. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 839" Diagnostics 12, no. 10: 2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop