Next Article in Journal
Spectroscopic and Theoretical Analysis of the Interaction between Plasma Proteins and Phthalimide Analogs with Potential Medical Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Extracts of Brocchia cinerea (Delile) Vis Exhibit In Vivo Wound Healing, Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Activities, and Other In Vitro Therapeutic Effects
Previous Article in Journal
EDTA and IAA Ameliorates Phytoextraction Potential and Growth of Sunflower by Mitigating Cu-Induced Morphological and Biochemical Injuries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pharmacological Activities of Mogrol: Potential Phytochemical against Different Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Discovery and Anticancer Activity of the Plagiochilins from the Liverwort Genus Plagiochila

by
Christian Bailly
1,2,3
1
Institut de Chimie Pharmaceutique Albert Lespagnol (ICPAL), Faculté de Pharmacie, University of Lille, 3 rue du Professeur Laguesse, F-59006 Lille, France
2
CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
3
OncoWitan, Consulting Scientific Office, Wasquehal, F-59290 Lille, France
Life 2023, 13(3), 758; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030758
Submission received: 16 January 2023 / Revised: 4 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Derived Natural Products and Their Biomedical Properties)

Abstract

:
The present analysis retraces the discovery of plagiochilins A-to-W, a series of seco-aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes isolated from diverse leafy liverworts of the genus Plagiochila. Between 1978, with the first isolation of the leader product plagiochilin A from P. yokogurensis, and 2005, with the characterization of plagiochilin X from P. asplenioides, a set of 24 plagiochilins and several derivatives (plagiochilide, plagiochilal A-B) has been isolated and characterized. Analogue compounds recently described are also evoked, such as the plagiochianins and plagicosins. All these compounds have been little studied from a pharmacological viewpoint. However, plagiochilins A and C have revealed marked antiproliferative activities against cultured cancer cells. Plagiochilin A functions as an inhibitor of the termination phase of cytokinesis: the membrane abscission stage. This unique, innovative mechanism of action, coupled with its marked anticancer action, notably against prostate cancer cells, make plagiochilin A an interesting lead molecule for the development of novel anticancer agents. There are known options to increase its potency, as deduced from structure–activity relationships. The analysis shed light on this family of bryophyte species and the little-known group of bioactive terpenoid plagiochilins. Plagiochilin A and derivatives shall be further exploited for the design of novel anticancer targeting the cytokinesis pathway.

1. Introduction

Bryophytes are non-vascular plants which include thalloid and leafy liverworts, mosses and hornworts. These three lineages form a unique part of the vegetation. They are small-sized, structurally simple diversified plants able to adapt to most ecosystems on Earth [1,2]. Bryophytes and tracheophytes (non-vascular and vascular plants, respectively) derive from an ancestral land plant and diverged during the Cambrian, some 500 million years ago [3]. Bryophytes are collectively divided into three main groups: Bryophyta (mosses), Marchantiophyta (liverworts) and Anthocerotophyta (hornworts). They represent the second-largest group of land plants after angiosperms. Liverworts are particularly abundant, with some 7300 extant species [4]. The first representations of liverworts date from late antiquity [5].
Leafy (or scaly) liverworts are particularly abundant and diversified (order: Jungermanniales). They grow commonly on moist soil or damp rocks (such as thallose liverworts). In 2016, a worldwide checklist for liverworts and hornworts included 7486 species in 398 genera representing 92 families from the two phyla [6]. The genus Plagiochila (Plagiochilaceae) represents one of the largest groups of leafy liverworts, with more than 500 species distributed worldwide and a broad geographical amplitude, mostly in the humid tropics [7]. World Flora Online refers to 556 accepted names of Plagiochila species and more than 950 species including synonyms and unchecked species [8]. Another recent study refers to 1600 validly published Plagiochila names [9].
Despite their number and high adaptative capacities, the medicinal use of bryophytes remains relatively limited, probably because of their small size, lack of conspicuous organs such as colored fruits and flowers, and the difficulty of identification. There are, however, species with medicinal properties, such as Conocephalum conicum (L.) Dumort., Polytrichum commune and Marchantia chenopoda L. [10]. In the genus Plagiochila, a few species have also been used ethnomedicinally, such as P. beddomei Steph. used in the form of paste by tribe Melghat Region (India) for treating skin diseases [11,12] and P. disticha (Lehm. & Lindenb.) Lindenb used traditionally in Peru to treat rheumatism or to regulate menstruation [13].
Diverse bioactive products have been isolated from Plagiochila species, including antitumor agents [14], antifungal molecules [15,16], insecticidal compounds [17] and antimicrobial products [18]. Most of the isolated bioactive compounds are terpenoids such as the antifungal products plagicosins A-N, or alkaloids such as plagiochianins A-B from the Chinese liverworts P. fruticosa Mitt. and P. duthiana Steph., respectively [18,19]. However, the leading product isolated from Plagiochila species is without doubt the sesquiterpenoid plagiochilin A, first isolated from several Plagiochila species in the 1970s, together with its congeners plagiochilins B and C, and precursors plagiochilide and plagiochilal [20]. Over the past 43 years, different analogues have been isolated leading to a series of 24 derivatives, designated plagiochilins A-to-X, and related compounds (Figure 1). The present review deals the identification of these compounds and their pharmacological properties. Information about their mechanism of action is often very limited, but important observations have been made, leading to the identification of potential targets for some of these compounds, in particular for the leader product plagiochilin A (Figure 2).
Several scientific databases (mostly PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus) and internet search engines (Google, Bing) were used to execute a systematic search of the existing literature, considering all publications published up until January 2023, without any language restriction. Databases were queried using specific keywords such as “bryophytes”, “Plagiochila”, “natural products”, “aromadendrane”, and “plagiochilin”. The articles were searched using a Boolean logic operator (and/or/not) combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. The relevance of the collected articles was determined (individual expertise), and then the data were extracted and analyzed.

2. Discoveries of the Plagiochilins

It all started in 1978 (Figure 1) when Asakawa and coworkers reported the isolation of the sesquiterpene plagiochilin A from P. yokogurensis Stephani, as the epoxide counterpart of plagiochilide (Figure 3) [21]. The two products with a seco-aromadendrane skeleton have been found also in P. fruticosa [22]. The aromadendrene scaffold is not rare in plants. Aromadendrene is an antibacterial product found in the medicinal plant Lophostemon suaveolens [23] and in the common hop (Humulus lupulus ‘Nordbrau’) [24], for example. However, epoxide derivatives with an aromadendrene scaffold are quite rare. A compound designated aromadendrene oxide (an epoxide derivative) has been isolated from the plants Tetradenia riparia (Hochst.) Codd, (Lamiaceae) and Kickxia aegyptiaca (L.) N. (Plantaginaceae) and shown to display antibacterial effects [25,26]. The 2,3-seco-aromadendrane unit is typical of Plagiochila species (Figure 3). The terpenoids plagiochilin A from P. yokogurensis and plagicosin G from P. fruticosa [18], and the alkaloids plagiochianins A and B from P. duthiana are all seco-aromadendrane derivatives [19] (Figure 3).
Following the isolation of plagiochilin A from P. yokogurensis, Asakawa and coworkers discovered a variety of seco-aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids from several Plagiochila species, including plagiochilins C, D, E and F in P. asplenioides, plagiochilins A and C in P. semidecurrens [27] and related products in other Plagiochila species, such as P. fructicosa, P. ovalifolia, and P. porelloides [28]. Notably, they identified plagiochilins A and B from P. hattoriana [21] and from P. pulcherrima [29], followed with plagiochilin C from both P. ovalifolia and P. asplenioides. They also identified plagiochilins D, E and F from P. asplenioides, together with a few related compounds such as furanoplagiochilal, plagiochilal A-B and plaigiochilide [28] (Figure 3). Similarly, plagiochilins A and B have been identified from P. semidecurrens [30] and P. diversifolia [31]. Plagiochilin A was found also in P. elegans, together with isoplagiochilide [32].
The species P. porelloides has afforded 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpene esters derived from plagiochilin D [33]. Seco-aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids are considered as chemosystematic markers in the Plagiochilaceae [34]. In the early 1980s, studies were essentially concerned with the isolation of the compounds and their structural characterization. Nevertheless, the insecticidal activity of plagiochilin A was evidenced early on, notably its capacity to inhibit the feeding of the army worm Spodoptera exempta (Fabricius, 1775) [35]. Plagiochilin A exhibits a strong pungent taste; it can be converted into plagiochilal B and furanoplagiochilal upon exposure to human saliva [36].
Plagiochilin G was isolated subsequently from P. ovalifolia, together with plagiochilins H and I from P. yokogurensis [37]. Plagiochilin H is a close analogue of plagiochilin C, whereas plagiochilins G and I are structurally close to plagiochilins A-B (Figure 2). P. ovalifolia provides a rich source of seco-aromadendrane sesquiterpenoids, notably ester derivatives of plagiochilin A endowed with cytotoxic properties [38]. From this species, the isolation and structural characterization of plagiochilins C and N were reported, together with the derivative acetoxyisoplagiochilide [39,40]. Later, a total synthesis of plagiochilin N was proposed from the natural precursor santonin, a common anthelmintic sesquiterpene lactone readily available [41] (Figure 3). It is a long and difficult synthesis (16 steps), useful to confirm the stereochemistry of plagiochilin N [42] (Figure 4). Plagiochilin N is the only compound in the series for which a total synthesis has been proposed. All the other plagiochilins are natural products. There is a need for efficient syntheses of compounds related to plagiochilin A. Plagiochilins J and K have been isolated from P. fruticosa in 1991, together with the sesquiterpene dialdehyde plagiochilal B which is considered as the precursor for these two plagiochilins [43]. Plagiochilins L and M were described four years later, but they derive from a totally distinct liverwort species, Heteroscyphus planus, which is however chemically similar to Plagiochila species. It contained also plagiochilin C. Plagiochila and Heteroscyphus belong to two families of the same sub-order (Lophocoleineae). The presence of these compounds may be more widespread between the species. The two compounds L and M bear the seco-aromadendrane skeleton typical of the product family [44]. Plagiochilin M has been isolated also from the andine species Plagiochila tabinensis Steph. [45].
Then, five other plagiochilins (O-P-Q-R-S) were discovered from a diethyl ether extract of the Colombian liverwort P. cristata (O-P-Q), from the P. ericicola (R) and from a dichloromethane extract prepared from an axenic culture of P. adianthoides (S) [46]. Plagiochilin P can also be found in P. asplenioides [47]. The species P. cristata and P. ericicola also contained plagiochilins C and H which are both structurally close to plagiochilin O, whereas plagiochilin R is a close analogue to plagiochilin B (Figure 2). Plagiochilins T and U were disclosed two years later, isolated from a specimen of P. carringtonii collected in Scotland [48]. They correspond to C-13 oxidation products derived from plagiochilin C (Figure 1). This particular Plagiochila species, a leafy liverwort officially named Plagiochila carringtonii (Balf. ex Carrington) Grolle (commonly called Carrington’s Featherwort) is well distributed in Scotland and Ireland [49]. It is distinct from the species P. atlantica also abundant in the West of Scotland and which was shown to contain plagiochilin C and a structurally close product designated atlanticol (Figure 3) [50] (not to be confused with another product also called atlanticol, an alkaloid from the Rutaceae Spiranthera atlantica [51]). Compound plagiochilin V has been rarely mentioned. It is cited in a single publication about the species P. porelloides from Changbai mountain in China [52]. This species has been used to isolate 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type esters derived from plagiochilin D [32]. It has been used recently as a model to study desiccation tolerance [53]. To our knowledge, the chemical structure of plagiochilin V, proposed 25 years ago, has not been confirmed. The series ends up with plagiochilins W-X, both isolated from a sample of P. asplenioides collected in Germany, together with the acetylated hemiacetal plagiochilin H [54].
Altogether, the plagiochilins represent a series of 24 natural products isolated from diverse Plagiochila species between 1978 and 2005 [55,56,57]. A few other 2,3-seco-aromadendrane derivatives were isolated subsequently but named differently, such as plagicosin G with a phenylpropanoyloxy side chain (Figure 3), isolated from P. fruticosa [18]. The majority of these plagiochilin compounds has been structurally characterized, but pharmacologically neglected. In rare cases, individual properties have been reported, as described below.

3. Pharmacological Properties and Mechanism of Action of the Plagiochilins

3.1. Pharmacological Properties of Plagiochilins A and C

The pharmacological effects of the plagiochilins have been rarely investigated. Nevertheless, a few types of bioactivities have been reported with plagiochilins A and C. The data in Table 1 illustrate the potential of the two compounds, but there is no systematic study comparing activities of all compounds, or activities of a given compound across multiple indications or pathologies. Initially, it was shown that plagiochilin A displays a modest antifeedant action against the armyworm Spodoptera exempta Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) which is an episodic migratory pest of cereal crops in sub-Saharan Africa. The level of activity is quite modest [35]. Another study has investigated the insecticidal activity of natural products isolated from P. diversifolia, but in that case the only plagiochilin tested was plagiochilin B and no activity was reported. In this case, a marked insecticidal action was observed with another epoxide-containing compound called fusicogigantone B, a fusicoccane-type diterpenoid [31]. Both fusicogigantones A and B, isolated from P. bursata and P. diversifolia, respectively, have been shown to inhibit the growth of another species of Lepidoptera (Spodoptera frugiperda) [17,31]. Plagiochilin A was shown to display a noticeable antiprotozoal activity, reducing the growth of the amastigote form of Leishmania amazonensis, with an IC50 value of 7.1 µM. However, the level of activity is quite modest compared to that of the control drug amphotericin B (IC50 = 0.13 µM). In the same study, no activity was observed against the fungus Mycobacterium tuberculosis [13].
In a more interesting way, plagiochilin A was characterized as an antiproliferative agent, reducing the growth of different cultured cancer cell lines. Both plagiochilins A and C display marked antiproliferative activities and there are known options to further increase their anticancer potency. An option is to introduce a methoxy group at position C-3, as observed with the derivative methoxyplagiochilin A2 which has been shown to be more potent than plagiochilin C against H460 lung cancer cells (IC50 = 6.7 and 13.1 µM, respectively) [58]. Another option is to introduce a side chain at the C-14/C-15 position, either an octanoyl side chain or a dodecadienoate side chain, for example. In both cases, the resulting compounds were found to be 60 times more potent against P-388 leukemia cells than the parent compound plagiochilin A [38]. The extraordinary potency of plagiochilin A-15-yl n-octanoate (Figure 3) raises questions (solubility, stability) and opens perspectives. The octanoate moiety may serve only as a “lipophilic carrier” (bioavailability enhancement), and may not be directly implicated in the target interaction. Novel C-12/C-13-substituted derivatives of plagiochilin A should be designed.
Plagiochilin A exhibits antiproliferative activities against different types of cancer cells. The growth inhibition GI50 values ranged from 1.4 to 6.8 µM with a range of tumor cell lines, including prostate (DU145), breast (MCF-7), lung (HT-29) and leukemia (K562) cells for example [13]. The level of activity against DU145 prostate cancer cell is interesting (GI50 = 1.4 µM) because it is superior to that observed with the reference anticancer drug fludarabine phosphate (GI50 = 3.0 µM). The sensitivity of prostate cancer cells toward plagiochilin A warranted further investigation. In 2018, Bates and coworkers analyzed the effect of plagiochilin A on the cell cycle progression of DU145 cells and their capacity to complete cytokinesis, the part of the cell division process during which the cytoplasm of a single eukaryotic cell divides into two daughter cells. Interestingly, it was observed that the compound (at 5 µM for 24–48 h) could block cell division by preventing completion of cytokinesis, and thereby inducing cell death [59]. The treated DU145 cells accumulated at the G2/M phase, notably cells still connected with intercellular bridges, corresponding to a late cytokinesis stage, the so-called membrane abscission stage (stained with an α-anti-tubulin antibody). The compound induced specific mitotic figures and reduced significantly the number and size of DU145 cell colonies. The failure of the cells to complete cytokinesis triggered apoptosis [59]. Altogether, these data indicated that plagiochilin A exerts an effect on the cytoskeleton, with a rearrangement of α-tubulin characteristic of cytokinetic membrane abscission, which is a spatially and temporally regulated process [59] (Figure 5).

3.2. Hypothesized Mechanism of Action of Plagiochilin A

The mechanics implicated in the regulation of abscission is relatively well-known. This process leads to the physical cut of the intercellular bridge which connects two daughter cells and concludes cell division. The process is tightly regulated in cells, with intervention of multiple protein effectors including different kinases (e.g., PLK4, Aurora B) and proteins containing microtubule-interacting and trafficking (MIT) domains [60,61,62]. The process opens perspectives to comprehend the mechanism of action of plagiochilin A. the compound may target MIT-containing proteins, or more directly it may associate with alpha-tubulin during mitosis, for example. There exist small molecules which induced cytokinesis failure at the point of abscission, such as a series of dynamin GTPase inhibitors called dynoles [63,64]. These products induce apoptosis following cytokinesis failure, as observed with plagiochilin A. Therefore, we can imagine that the natural product acts as an inhibitor of termination of cytokinesis (abscission) by blocking one or several proteins implicated in the process, or by directly altering the microtubule-organizing center which recruits α- and β-tubulins for microtubule nucleation. In this context, one of the potential mechanisms could be a direct binding of the compound to α-tubulin, in particular to the pironetin-binding site which is known to accommodate compounds bearing a dihydro-pyrone moiety [65,66]. This moiety can be found in plagiochilin Q, for example, and recently, we have shown that natural products with a 5,6-dihydro-α-pyrone unit (cryptoconcatones) can function as α-tubulin-binding agents [67]. Based on these considerations, we have initiated binding studies of plagiochilins to α-tubulin and the first information obtained by molecular docking look interesting. For the docking analysis, the high-resolution crystal structure of the reference product pironetin (a dihydropyrone derivative with an α,β-unsaturated lactone acting as a plant growth regulator) bound to α/β-tubulin dimer was used as a template (PDB: 5FNV) and the binding of plagiochilin A to the pironetin site was modeled. Apparently, plagiochilin A could form stable complexes with α-tubulin, via binding to the pironetin site, as represented in Figure 6. These are preliminary, but promising information. We are now comparing various plagiochilins for their capacity to bind to α-tubulin, using molecular modeling. The mechanism whereby plagiochilin A specifically blocks abscission warrant further investigation. The compound is an atypical inhibitor of cytokinesis. The panoply of plagiochilins shall be further exploited to identify the best inhibitors and to delineate the structure–activity relationships in the series. The modeling analysis shall help also to delineate the mechanism of action of other aromadendrane derivatives, such as the related natural products hanegokedial, ovalifolienal, ovalifolienalone (from P. semidecurrens) and others [30,68].

4. Discussion

Bryophytes are known to produce bioactive compounds with a broad range of therapeutic potential [69]. For example, extracts prepared from a range of mosses and liverworts have been screened recently for their anti-inflammatory properties. Two particular species, Dicranum majus Sm. And Thuidium delicatulum (Hedw.) Schimp., were found to inhibit production of nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Raw 264.7 murine macrophages [70]. In this study, an extract of Plagiochila asplenioides (L.) Dumort. Was tested but it did not show a marked activity. Other bryophyte extracts have revealed antioxidant and/or antimicrobial activities [71,72]. The use of extracts from Plagiochila species is relatively rare. However, there are noticeable exceptions, for example, the use of methanol extract of the liverwort Plagiochila beddomei Steph. which has revealed marked antimicrobial activities against a wide group of bacteria and fungi, including the pathogen Candida albicans (MIC = 0.75 mg/mL). The extract contained flavonoids, saponins, tannins and phenols [11,12,73]. In most cases, bioactivities with bryophytic extracts have been attributed to the presence of flavonoids, terpenoids or alkaloids, such as macrocyclic bibenzyls and bis(bibenzyls), and many sesqui- and diterpenoids [74,75,76,77,78,79]. However, Plagiochila species and plagiochilins are rarely evoked.
The different Plagiochila species mentioned here produce 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes, chiefly the cytotoxic product plagiochilin A [56,80]. This compound is considered as being responsible for the pungent and bitter taste of Plagiochila liverworts, at least in part [80]. However, it is also a robust anticancer agent, insufficiently considered despite its very innovative mechanism of action as a late-stage cytokinesis inhibitor. Whether the compound target α-tubulin or other proteins implicated in membrane abscission remains to be determined experimentally. However, whatever the exact target, the mode of action of the compound is particularly attractive and inspiring. There are not many products acting at the abscission checkpoint, and it is probably the only natural product known to regulate cytokinetic abscission. Plagiochilin A could serve as a useful tool to dissect the abscission mechanism which is a multi-step process which influences cell fate and tissue growth [81,82]. There is a need for pharmacological tools to dissect the mechanism of abscission of nascent daughter cells, to stop or halt the process and to study the implication of specific protein complexes and cellular structures, such as midbody proteins and the midbody organelle [83]. There is a rearrangement of α-tubulin and actin, and important cytoskeleton modification during abscission. The process can be modulated with the use of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors [84], actin polymerization inhibitors [85], and various kinase inhibitors [86]. New tools are needed to dissect the process, notably to help understanding the function of the residual midbody remnant generated at the end of the process and which affects cell fate and tumorigenesis [87]. Plagiochilin A has the capacity to induce an accumulation of cancer cells (at least DU145 prostate cancer cells) connected by intercellular bridges, probably via a selective action on the sequential assembly of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery [59]. The compound affords a useful tool to dissect the process, to study ESCRT assembly and regulation. In parallel, the use of high-content phenotypic screens focused on cytokinesis would be useful to further identify the targets of the compound and the fine tuning of its mechanism of action [88].
Plagiochilin A deserves further studies as an anticancer agent owing to its mechanism of action and its level of activity. It could be a useful starting point to elaborate more potent analogues because there are strategies to enhance the antiproliferative potency of plagiochilin A, notably via C-12/C-13 substitution [38]. There are also many naturally occurring derivatives (plagiochilins, plagiochilide, plagiochilal, and others) which could be exploited to determine structure–activity relationships. Moreover, the chemical diversity of the natural products can be enhanced upon biotransformation with microorganisms. For example, plagiochilide can be chemically modified to afford 12-hydroxyplagiochilide and plagiochilide-12-oic acid in the presence of the fungus Aspergillus niger [22]. The difficulty is to obtain the compounds. There is a possibility to produce biomass under laboratory conditions through bryo-reactors and molecular farming (thus decreasing pressure for natural populations) [89], but the subsequent purification of natural products would not be an easy ride. Axenic cultures of Plagiochilla have been developed in rare cases only, notably for P. arctica Bryhn and Kaal. [90].
Apart from plagiochilin N for which a total synthesis has been reported [40], the other compounds have to be isolated from plants or novel syntheses have to be designed for these compounds. An alternative option is to access the related compound called aromadendrene oxide 2 (AO2) which is an analogue of plagiochilin A (Figure 3). This sesquiterpene can be found in essential oils from different plants [25,91,92]. The compound has been shown to induce apoptosis of skin epidermoid A431 cancer cells, via activation of the mitochondrial pathway [93,94]. Its activity further supports the interest for plagiochilin A and more globally the use of the 2,3-secoaromadendrane as a template to design novel anticancer agents. There are other 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids of interest, with an unknown mechanism of action, such as the two products psilosamuiensins A and B isolated from the broth of the psychoactive fungus Psilocybe samuiensis [95]. This family of terpenoids with a 2,3-secoaromadendrane scaffold should be investigated further as a source of anticancer agents. More generally, this work also underlines the interest of bryophytes as a source of bioactive compounds, and anticancer agents in particular. In recent years, different bryophytes species have revealed marked antitumor effects, including a capacity to kill chemo-resistant cancer stem cells [71,96]. The use and study of bryophytes, in particular liverworts (Hepaticae or hepatics), shall be encouraged [97,98]. Liverworts lack roots, seeds, fruit and flowers, but they do not lack major interest as a source of bioactive compounds. It is time to get these simple, single cellular plants back into the limelight, and in particular the Plagiochila group of leafy liverworts which can offer an array of captivating compounds.

5. Conclusions

The analysis shed light on a little-known family of 24 terpenoids designated plagiochilins A-to-W, isolated from various Plagiochila species. Leafy liverworts of the genus Plagiochila produce a variety of seco-aromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes, among which plagiochilin A is a lead product endowed with marked antiproliferative activities against cancer cells. This epoxide-containing natural product functions has been characterized as an inhibitor of the termination phase of cytokinetic abscission, a somewhat unique action at the origin of its capacity to delay cell cycle progression and to induce cell death. This atypical mechanism of action makes plagiochilin A an interesting tool to study the abscission process and a lead compound to design more potent analogues. There are known options to increase the potency of the compound. Preliminary structure–activity relationships have been delineated in the plagiochilin series. The Plagiochila genus of briophytes deserves further studies as a source of bioactive compounds.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The in silico molecular modeling presented in Figure 6 was kindly performed by Gérard Vergoten (University of Lille, Inserm U995, Lille, France). His contribution is greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Q.H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Jiao, Y.N.; Xu, B.; Chen, Z.D. Diversity, phylogeny, and adaptation of bryophytes: Insights from genomic and transcriptomic data. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4306–4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kulshrestha, S.; Jibran, R.; van Klink, J.W.; Zhou, Y.; Brummell, D.A.; Albert, N.W.; Schwinn, K.E.; Chagné, D.; Landi, M.; Bowman, J.L.; et al. Stress, senescence, and specialized metabolites in bryophytes. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4396–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harris, B.J.; Clark, J.W.; Schrempf, D.; Szöllősi, G.J.; Donoghue, P.C.J.; Hetherington, A.M.; Williams, T.A. Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 6, 1634–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dong, S.; Yu, J.; Zhang, L.; Goffinet, B.; Liu, Y. Phylotranscriptomics of liverworts: Revisiting the backbone phylogeny and ancestral gene duplications. Ann. Bot. 2022, 130, 951–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bowman, J.L. A Brief History of Marchantia from Greece to Genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 210–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Söderström, L.; Hagborg, A.; von Konrat, M.; Bartholomew-Began, S.; Bell, D.; Briscoe, L.; Brown, E.; Cargill, D.C.; Costa, D.P.; Crandall-Stotler, B.J.; et al. World checklist of hornworts and liverworts. PhytoKeys 2016, 59, 1–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Heinrichs, J.; Hentschel, J.; Feldberg, K.; Bombosch, A.; Schneider, H. Phylogenetic biogeography and taxonomy of disjunctly distributed bryophytes. J. Syst. Evol. 2009, 47, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. The World Flora Online (WFO). Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org (accessed on 13 January 2023).
  9. Renner, M.A.M. The typification of Australasian Plagiochila species (Plagiochilaceae: Jungermanniidae): A review with Recommendations. N. Z. J. Bot. 2021, 59, 323–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Drobnik, J.; Stebel, A. Four Centuries of Medicinal Mosses and Liverworts in European Ethnopharmacy and Scientific Pharmacy: A Review. Plants 2021, 10, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Manoj, G.S.; Murugan, K. Wound healing activity of methanolic and aqueous extracts of Plagiochila beddomei Steph. thallus in rat model. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2012, 50, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
  12. Manoj, G.S.; Murugan, K. Phenolic profiles, antimicrobial and antioxidant potentiality of methanolic extract of a liverwort, Plagiochila beddomei Steph. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2012, 3, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  13. Aponte, J.C.; Yang, H.; Vaisberg, A.J.; Castillo, D.; Málaga, E.; Verástegui, M.; Casson, L.K.; Stivers, N.; Bates, P.J.; Rojas, R.; et al. Cytotoxic and anti-infective sesquiterpenes present in Plagiochila disticha (Plagiochilaceae) and Ambrosia peruviana (Asteraceae). Planta Med. 2010, 76, 705–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Morita, H.; Tomizawa, Y.; Tsuchiya, T.; Hirasawa, Y.; Hashimoto, T.; Asakawa, Y. Antimitotic activity of two macrocyclic bis(bibenzyls), isoplagiochins A and B from the Liverwort Plagiochila fruticosa. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lorimer, S.D.; Perry, N.B.; Tangney, R.S. An antifungal bibenzyl from the New Zealand liverwort, Plagiochila stephensoniana. Bioactivity-directed isolation, synthesis, and analysis. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 1444–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lorimer, S.D.; Perry, N.B. Antifungal hydroxy-acetophenones from the New Zealand liverwort, Plagiochila fasciculata. Planta Med. 1994, 60, 386–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ramírez, M.; Kamiya, N.; Popich, S.; Asakawa, Y.; Bardón, A. Insecticidal constituents from the argentine liverwort Plagiochila bursata. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiao, Y.N.; Jin, X.Y.; Zhou, J.C.; Zhang, J.Z.; Chang, W.Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Ren, Z.J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Yuan, S.Z.; et al. Terpenoids from the Liverwort Plagiochila fruticosa and Their Antivirulence Activity against Candida albicans. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1766–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, J.J.; Zhang, J.Z.; Zhu, R.X.; Li, Y.; Qiao, Y.N.; Gao, Y.; Jin, X.Y.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J.C.; Lou, H.X. Plagiochianins A and B, Two ent-2,3-seco-Aromadendrane Derivatives from the Liverwort Plagiochila duthiana. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6550–6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Asakawa, Y.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T. Plagiochilide et plagiochilin a, secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes de la mousse, plagiochila yokogurensis (plagiochilaceae). Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 1553–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asakawa, Y.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T. La plagiochilin a et la plagiochilin b, les sesquiterpenes du type secoaromadendrane de la mousse, Plagiochila hattoriana. Phytochemistry 1978, 17, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Furusawa, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Noma, Y.; Asakawa, Y. Biotransformation of aristolane- and 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids having a 1,1-dimethylcyclopropane ring by Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata, mucor species, and Aspergillus niger. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Naz, T.; Packer, J.; Yin, P.; Brophy, J.J.; Wohlmuth, H.; Renshaw, D.E.; Smith, J.; Elders, Y.C.; Vemulpad, S.R.; Jamie, J.F. Bioactivity and chemical characterisation of Lophostemon suaveolens—An endemic Australian Aboriginal traditional medicinal plant. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Paguet, A.S.; Siah, A.; Lefèvre, G.; Moureu, S.; Cadalen, T.; Samaillie, J.; Michels, F.; Deracinois, B.; Flahaut, C.; Alves Dos Santos, H.; et al. Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France. Phytochemistry 2023, 205, 113508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. de Melo, N.I.; de Carvalho, C.E.; Fracarolli, L.; Cunha, W.R.; Veneziani, R.C.; Martins, C.H.; Crotti, A.E. Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Tetradenia riparia (Hochst.) Codd. (Lamiaceae) against cariogenic bacteria. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 46, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Abd-ElGawad, A.M.; El-Amier, Y.A.; Bonanomi, G.; Gendy, A.E.G.E.; Elgorban, A.M.; Alamery, S.F.; Elshamy, A.I. Chemical Composition of Kickxia aegyptiaca Essential Oil and Its Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. Plants 2022, 11, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Asakawa, Y.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T.; Suire, C. Plagiochilins C, D, E and F, four novel secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpene hemiacetals from Plagiochila asplenioides and Plagiochila semidecurrens. Phytochemistry 1979, 18, 1355–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asakawa, Y.; Inoue, H.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T. Sesquiterpenoids of fourteen Plagiochila species. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 623–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fukuyama, Y.; Toyota, M.; Asakawa, Y. Ent-kaurene diterpene from the liverwort Plagiochila pulcherrima. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 1425–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsuo, A.; Atsumi, K.; Nakayama, M. Structures of ent-2,3-Secoalloaromadendrane Sesquiterpenoids, which have plant growth inhibitory Activity, from Plagiochila semidecurrens (Liverwort). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1981, 1, 2816–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramírez, M.; Kamiya, N.; Popich, S.; Asakawa, Y.; Bardón, A. Constituents of the Argentine Liverwort Plagiochila diversifolia and Their Insecticidal Activities. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, S.J.; Wu, C.L. Isoplagiochilide from the liverwort Plagiochila elegans. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 1439–1440. [Google Scholar]
  33. Toyota, M.; Nakamura, I.; Huneck, S.; Asakawa, Y. Sesquiterpene esters from the liverwort Plagiochila porelloides. Phytochemistry 1994, 37, 1091–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Asakawa, Y. Chemosystematics of the hepaticae. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 623–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Asakawa, Y.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T.; Kubo, I.; Nakanishi, K. Insect antifeedant secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes from Plagiochila species. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 2147–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hashimoto, T.; Tanaka, H.; Asakawa, Y. Stereostructure of plagiochilin A and conversion of plagiochilin A and stearoylvelutinal into hot-tasting compounds by human saliva. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 1542–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Asakawa, Y.; Toyota, M.; Takemoto, T. Three ent-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpene hemiacetals and a bicyclogermacrene from Plagiochila ovalifolia and Plagiochila yokogurensis. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 2141–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Toyota, M.; Tanimura, K.; Asakawa, Y. Cytotoxic 2,3-secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenoids from the liverwort Plagiochila ovalifolia. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 462–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nagashima, F.; Tanaka, H.; Toyota, M.; Hashimoto, T. Sesqui- and diterpenoids from Plagiochila species. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nagashima, F.; Tanaka, H.; Toyota, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Tori, M.; Asakawa, Y. 2,3-Secoaromadendrane-, Aromadendrane and Maaliane-Type Sesquiterpenoids from Liverwort. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1995, 7, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Birladeanu, L. The stories of santonin and santonic acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blay, G.; Cardona, L.; García, B.; Lahoz, L.; Pedro, J.R. Synthesis of plagiochilin N from santonin. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7700–7705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fukuyama, Y.; Asakawa, Y. Neurotrophic secoaromadendrane-type sesquiterpenes from the liverwort Plagiochila fruticosa. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 4061–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hashimoto, T.; Nakamura, I.; Tori, M.; Takaoka, S.; Asakawa, Y. Epi-neoverrucosane- and ent-clerodane-type diterpenoids and ent-2,3-secoaromadendrane- and calamenene-type sesquiterpenoids from the liverwort heteroscyphus planus. Phytochemistry 1995, 38, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Heinrichs, J.; Anton, H.; Holz, I.; Grolle, R. The andine Plagiochila tabinensis Steph. and the identity of Acrobolbus laceratus R.M. Schust. (Hepaticae). Nova Hedwig. 2001, 73, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Valcic, S.; Zapp, J.; Becker, H. Plagiochilins and other sesquiterpenoids from Plagiochila (Hepaticae). Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kraut, L.; Mues, R. The First Biflavone Found in Liverworts and Other Phenolics and Terpenoids from Chandonanthus hirtellus ssp. giganteus and Plagiochila asplenioides. Z. Naturforsch. 1999, 54, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rycroft, D.S.; Cole, W.J.; Lamont, Y.M. Plagiochilins T and U, 2,3-secoaromadendranes from the liverwort Plagiochila carringtonii from Scotland. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rycroft, D.S. Plagiochila carringtonii: Carrington’s Featherwort. In Mosses and Liverworts of Britain and Ireland: A Field Guide; Atherton, I., Bosanquet, S.D.S., Lawley, M., Eds.; British Bryological Society: Middlewich, UK, 2010; p. 197. ISBN 9780956131010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rycroft, D.S.; Cole, W.J. Atlanticol, an epoxybicyclogermacrenol from the liverwort Plagiochila atlanticaF. Rose. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1641–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodrigues e Rocha, M.; da Cunha, C.P.; Filho, R.B.; Vieira, I.J. A Novel Alkaloid Isolated from Spiranthera atlantica (Rutaceae). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 393–395. [Google Scholar]
  52. Söderström, L.; Rycroft, D.S.; Cole, W.J.; Wei, S. Plagiochila porelloides (Plagiochilaceae, Hepaticae) from Changbai Moutain, new to China, with chemical characterization and chromosome measurements. Bryothera 1999, 5, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
  53. Silva-E-Costa, J.D.C.; Luizi-Ponzo, A.P.; McLetchie, D.N. Sex Differences in Desiccation Tolerance Varies by Colony in the Mesic Liverwort Plagiochila porelloides. Plants 2022, 11, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Adio, A.M.; König, W.A. Sesquiterpene constituents from the essential oil of the liverwort Plagiochila asplenioides. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Asakawa, Y. Phytochemistry of Bryophytes. In Phytochemicals in Human Health Protection, Nutrition, and Plant Defense; Recent Advances in Phytochemistry; Romeo, J.T., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999; Volume 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Asakawa, Y.; Ludwiczuk, A.; Nagashima, F. Phytochemical and biological studies of bryophytes. Phytochemistry 2013, 91, 52–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ludwiczuk, A.; Asakawa, Y. Bryophytes as a source of bioactive volatile terpenoids—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 132, 110649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, S.; Liu, S.S.; Lin, Z.M.; Li, R.J.; Wang, X.N.; Zhou, J.C.; Lou, H.X. Terpenoids from the Chinese liverwort Plagiochila pulcherrima and their cytotoxic effects. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 15, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stivers, N.S.; Islam, A.; Reyes-Reyes, E.M.; Casson, L.K.; Aponte, J.C.; Vaisberg, A.J.; Hammond, G.B.; Bates, P.J. Plagiochilin A Inhibits Cytokinetic Abscission and Induces Cell Death. Molecules 2018, 23, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Andrade, V.; Echard, A. Mechanics and regulation of cytokinetic abscission. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 1046617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sechi, S.; Piergentili, R.; Giansanti, M.G. Minor Kinases with Major Roles in Cytokinesis Regulation. Cells 2022, 11, 3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wenzel, D.M.; Mackay, D.R.; Skalicky, J.J.; Paine, E.L.; Miller, M.S.; Ullman, K.S.; Sundquist, W.I. Comprehensive analysis of the human ESCRT-III-MIT domain interactome reveals new cofactors for cytokinetic abscission. Elife 2022, 11, e77779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chircop, M.; Perera, S.; Mariana, A.; Lau, H.; Ma, M.P.; Gilbert, J.; Jones, N.C.; Gordon, C.P.; Young, K.A.; Morokoff, A.; et al. Inhibition of dynamin by dynole 34-2 induces cell death following cytokinesis failure in cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tremblay, C.S.; Chiu, S.K.; Saw, J.; McCalmont, H.; Litalien, V.; Boyle, J.; Sonderegger, S.E.; Chau, N.; Evans, K.; Cerruti, L.; et al. Small molecule inhibition of Dynamin-dependent endocytosis targets multiple niche signals and impairs leukemia stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Huang, D.S.; Wong, H.L.; Georg, G.I. Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of C4- and C5-Modified Analogues of the α,β-Unsaturated Lactone of Pironetin. ChemMedChem 2017, 12, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Coulup, S.K.; Georg, G.I. Revisiting microtubule targeting agents: α-Tubulin and the pironetin binding site as unexplored targets for cancer therapeutics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vergoten, G.; Bailly, C. Molecular Docking of Cryptoconcatones to α-Tubulin and Related Pironetin Analogues. Plants 2023, 12, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Durán-Peña, M.J.; Botubol Ares, J.M.; Hanson, J.R.; Collado, I.G.; Hernández-Galán, R. Biological activity of natural sesquiterpenoids containing a gem-dimethylcyclopropane unit. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 1236–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sabovljević, M.S.; Sabovljević, A.D.; Ikram, N.K.K.; Peramuna, A.; Bae, H.; Simonsen, H.T. Bryophytes—An emerging source for herbal remedies and chemical production. (Special Issue 4: Evolving trends in plant-based drug discovery). Plant Genet. Resour. Charact. Util. 2016, 14, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Marques, R.V.; Sestito, S.E.; Bourgaud, F.; Miguel, S.; Cailotto, F.; Reboul, P.; Jouzeau, J.Y.; Rahuel-Clermont, S.; Boschi-Muller, S.; Simonsen, H.T.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Bryophytes Extracts in LPS-Stimulated RAW264.7 Murine Macrophages. Molecules 2022, 27, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vollár, M.; Gyovai, A.; Szűcs, P.; Zupkó, I.; Marschall, M.; Csupor-Löffler, B.; Bérdi, P.; Vecsernyés, A.; Csorba, A.; Liktor-Busa, E.; et al. Antiproliferative and Antimicrobial Activities of Selected Bryophytes. Molecules 2018, 23, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wolski, G.J.; Sadowska, B.; Fol, M.; Podsędek, A.; Kajszczak, D.; Kobylińska, A. Cytotoxicity, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of mosses obtained from open habitats. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Manoj, G.S.; Murugan, K. Wound healing potential of aqueous and methnolic extracts of Plagiochila beddomei Steph.—A briophyte. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4, 222–227. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nandy, S.; Dey, A. Bibenzyls and bisbybenzyls of bryophytic origin as promising source of novel therapeutics: Pharmacology, synthesis and structure-activity. Daru 2020, 28, 701–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Métoyer, B.; Benatrehina, A.; Rakotondraibe, L.H.; Thouvenot, L.; Asakawa, Y.; Nour, M.; Raharivelomanana, P. Dimeric and esterified sesquiterpenes from the liverwort Chiastocaulon caledonicum. Phytochemistry 2020, 179, 112495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, X.; Qian, L.; Qiao, Y.; Jin, X.; Zhou, J.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Lou, H. Cembrane-type diterpenoids from the Chinese liverwort Chandonanthus birmensis. Phytochemistry 2022, 203, 113376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Asakawa, Y.; Nagashima, F.; Ludwiczuk, A. Distribution of Bibenzyls, Prenyl Bibenzyls, Bis-bibenzyls, and Terpenoids in the Liverwort Genus Radula. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 756–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Asakawa, Y.; Ludwiczuk, A.; Novakovic, M.; Bukvicki, D.; Anchang, K.Y. Bis-bibenzyls, Bibenzyls, and Terpenoids in 33 Genera of the Marchantiophyta (Liverworts): Structures, Synthesis, and Bioactivity. J. Nat. Prod. 2022, 85, 729–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kirisanth, A.; Nafas, M.N.M.; Dissanayake, R.K.; Wijayabandara, J. Antimicrobial and Alpha-Amylase Inhibitory Activities of Organic Extracts of Selected Sri Lankan Bryophytes. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 3479851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Asakawa, Y.; Nagashima, F.; Hashimoto, T.; Toyota, M.; Ludwiczuk, A.; Komala, I.; Ito, T.; Yagi, Y. Pungent and bitter, cytotoxic and antiviral terpenoids from some bryophytes and inedible fungi. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mierzwa, B.; Gerlich, D.W. Cytokinetic abscission: Molecular mechanisms and temporal control. Dev. Cell 2014, 31, 525–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. McNeely, K.C.; Dwyer, N.D. Cytokinetic Abscission Regulation in Neural Stem Cells and Tissue Development. Curr. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 7, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Halcrow, E.F.J.; Mazza, R.; Diversi, A.; Enright, A.; D’Avino, P.P. Midbody Proteins Display Distinct Dynamics during Cytokinesis. Cells 2022, 11, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chatterjee, N.; Wang, W.L.; Conklin, T.; Chittur, S.; Tenniswood, M. Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulate miRNA and mRNA expression, block metaphase, and induce apoptosis in inflammatory breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2013, 14, 658–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Gill, M.R.; Jarman, P.J.; Hearnden, V.; Fairbanks, S.D.; Bassetto, M.; Maib, H.; Palmer, J.; Ayscough, K.R.; Thomas, J.A.; Smythe, C. A Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complex Disrupts Actin Cytoskeleton Assembly and Blocks Cytokinesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202117449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Petsalaki, E.; Zachos, G. An ATM-Chk2-INCENP pathway activates the abscission checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, e202008029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sardina, F.; Monteonofrio, L.; Ferrara, M.; Magi, F.; Soddu, S.; Rinaldo, C. HIPK2 Is Required for Midbody Remnant Removal Through Autophagy-Mediated Degradation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 572094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Boullé, M.; Davignon, L.; Nabhane Saïd Halidi, K.; Guez, S.; Giraud, E.; Hollenstein, M.; Agou, F. High-Content RNAi Phenotypic Screening Unveils the Involvement of Human Ubiquitin-Related Enzymes in Late Cytokinesis. Cells 2022, 11, 3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sabovljević, M.S.; Ćosić, M.V.; Jadranin, B.Z.; Pantović, J.P.; Giba, Z.S.; Vujičić, M.M.; Sabovljević, A.D. The Conservation Physiology of Bryophytes. Plants 2022, 11, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Basile, D.V.; Lin, J.J.; Varner, J.E. The metabolism of exogenous hydroxyproline by gametophytes of Plagiochila arctica Bryhn et Kaal. (Hepaticae). Planta 1988, 175, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ugur, A.; Sarac, N.; Duru, M.E. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Senecio sandrasicus on antibiotic resistant staphylococci. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Silva, E.A.J.; Estevam, E.B.B.; Silva, T.S.; Nicolella, H.D.; Furtado, R.A.; Alves, C.C.F.; Souchie, E.L.; Martins, C.H.G.; Tavares, D.C.; Barbosa, L.C.A.; et al. Antibacterial and antiproliferative activities of the fresh leaf essential oil of Psidium guajava L. (Myrtaceae). Braz. J. Biol. 2019, 79, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Pavithra, P.S.; Mehta, A.; Verma, R.S. Aromadendrene oxide 2, induces apoptosis in skin epidermoid cancer cells through ROS mediated mitochondrial pathway. Life Sci. 2018, 197, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pavithra, P.S.; Mehta, A.; Verma, R.S. Synergistic interaction of β-caryophyllene with aromadendrene oxide 2 and phytol induces apoptosis on skin epidermoid cancer cells. Phytomedicine 2018, 47, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Pornpakakul, S.; Suwancharoen, S.; Petsom, A.; Roengsumran, S.; Muangsin, N.; Chaichit, N.; Piapukiew, J.; Sihanonth, P.; Allen, J.W. A new sesquiterpenoid metabolite from Psilocybe samuiensis. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 11, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Özerkan, D.; Erol, A.; Altuner, E.M.; Canlı, K.; Kuruca, D.S. Some Bryophytes Trigger Cytotoxicity of Stem Cell-like Population in 5-Fluorouracil Resistant Colon Cancer Cells. Nutr. Cancer 2022, 74, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chandra, S.; Chandra, D.; Barh, A.; Pandey, R.K.; Sharma, I.P. Bryophytes: Hoard of remedies, an ethno-medicinal review. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2016, 7, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Commisso, M.; Guarino, F.; Marchi, L.; Muto, A.; Piro, A.; Degola, F. Bryo-Activities: A Review on How Bryophytes Are Contributing to the Arsenal of Natural Bioactive Compounds against Fungi. Plants 2021, 10, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. History of plagiochilins discovery. The 24 plagiochilins (A–W) have been identified and structurally characterized aver a period of 30 years. They are produced by several Plagiochila species, such as those indicated (a non-exhaustive list).
Figure 1. History of plagiochilins discovery. The 24 plagiochilins (A–W) have been identified and structurally characterized aver a period of 30 years. They are produced by several Plagiochila species, such as those indicated (a non-exhaustive list).
Life 13 00758 g001
Figure 2. Structures of the 24 plagiochilins (A-to-W).
Figure 2. Structures of the 24 plagiochilins (A-to-W).
Life 13 00758 g002
Figure 3. Structures of the aromadendrane and 2,3-seco-aromadendrane scaffolds (with the numbering scheme), and other products isolated from Plagiochila species and structurally related to the plagiochilins.
Figure 3. Structures of the aromadendrane and 2,3-seco-aromadendrane scaffolds (with the numbering scheme), and other products isolated from Plagiochila species and structurally related to the plagiochilins.
Life 13 00758 g003
Figure 4. The total synthesis of plagiochilin N has been achieved from sesquiterpene lactone santonin (in fact from O-acetylisophotosantonin (2), obtained by photochemical rearrangement of santonin). The total synthesis included 16 steps. Only selected key intermediates are shown here. See [42] for the detailed synthesis which confirmed the stereochemistry of the compound.
Figure 4. The total synthesis of plagiochilin N has been achieved from sesquiterpene lactone santonin (in fact from O-acetylisophotosantonin (2), obtained by photochemical rearrangement of santonin). The total synthesis included 16 steps. Only selected key intermediates are shown here. See [42] for the detailed synthesis which confirmed the stereochemistry of the compound.
Life 13 00758 g004
Figure 5. Mechanism of action of plagiochilin A (Plg-A). (a) The cell division process, to illustrate DU145 prostate cancer cells undergoing mitosis. Prior to cell division, at the telophase stage of mitosis, the two cells are connected by an intercellular bridge (with a central midbody). Plg-A inhibits cell division by preventing completion of cytokinesis, particularly at the final abscission stage. (b) Inhibition of the late stage of cytokinesis leads to cell cycle arrest (G2/M) and subsequently to inhibition of cell colony formation and induction of cell death [59].
Figure 5. Mechanism of action of plagiochilin A (Plg-A). (a) The cell division process, to illustrate DU145 prostate cancer cells undergoing mitosis. Prior to cell division, at the telophase stage of mitosis, the two cells are connected by an intercellular bridge (with a central midbody). Plg-A inhibits cell division by preventing completion of cytokinesis, particularly at the final abscission stage. (b) Inhibition of the late stage of cytokinesis leads to cell cycle arrest (G2/M) and subsequently to inhibition of cell colony formation and induction of cell death [59].
Life 13 00758 g005
Figure 6. Molecular model of plagiochilin A (Plg-A) bound to the pironetin site of α-tubulin (PDB: 5FNV). (a) Plg-A fits into a central, deep cavity of the protein. (b) Ribbon model of α-tubulin with bound Plg-A, with α-helices (in red) and β-sheets (in cyan). (c) A close-up view of Plg-A inserted into the binding cavity, with the solvent-accessible surface (SAS) surrounding the drug binding zone (color code indicated). (d) Binding map contacts for Plg-A bound to α-tubulin (color code indicated). The docking model was kindly provided by Prof. Gérard Vergoten (University of Lille, France). The docking analysis was performed as recently described [65].
Figure 6. Molecular model of plagiochilin A (Plg-A) bound to the pironetin site of α-tubulin (PDB: 5FNV). (a) Plg-A fits into a central, deep cavity of the protein. (b) Ribbon model of α-tubulin with bound Plg-A, with α-helices (in red) and β-sheets (in cyan). (c) A close-up view of Plg-A inserted into the binding cavity, with the solvent-accessible surface (SAS) surrounding the drug binding zone (color code indicated). (d) Binding map contacts for Plg-A bound to α-tubulin (color code indicated). The docking model was kindly provided by Prof. Gérard Vergoten (University of Lille, France). The docking analysis was performed as recently described [65].
Life 13 00758 g006
Table 1. Bioactivities reported with plagiochilins.
Table 1. Bioactivities reported with plagiochilins.
CompoundsBioactivitiesTests/SpeciesEnd PointsRef.
Plagiochilin AAntifeedantAfrican armyworm Spodoptera exemptaActivity observed at 1–10 ng/cm2[35]
Plagiochilin AAntiparasiticLeishmania amazonensis axenic amastigotesIC50 = 7.1 µM[13]
Plagiochilin AAntiparasiticTrypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotesMIC = 14.5 µM[13]
Plagiochilin AAnti-
proliferative
P-388 murine leukemia cellsIC50 = 3.0 µg/mL[38]
Plagiochilin AAnti-
proliferative
A172 glioblastoma cellsIC50 = 19.4 µM.[56]
Plagiochilin-A-15-yl n-octanoateAnti-
proliferative
P-388 murine leukemia cellsIC50 = 0.05 µg/mL[38]
Plagiochilin CAntiplateletInhibition of arachidonate-induced rabbit platelet aggregation95% and 45% inhibition at 100 and 50 µg/mL, respectively.[32]
Plagiochilin CAnti-
proliferative
A172 glioblastoma cellsIC50 = 4.3 µM[58]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bailly, C. Discovery and Anticancer Activity of the Plagiochilins from the Liverwort Genus Plagiochila. Life 2023, 13, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030758

AMA Style

Bailly C. Discovery and Anticancer Activity of the Plagiochilins from the Liverwort Genus Plagiochila. Life. 2023; 13(3):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bailly, Christian. 2023. "Discovery and Anticancer Activity of the Plagiochilins from the Liverwort Genus Plagiochila" Life 13, no. 3: 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030758

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop