Next Article in Journal
Potential Use of CTCs as Biomarkers in Renal Cancer Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Follow-Up of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM) Refractory to Medical Management: A Multicenter Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Proliferation and Survival by Rosemary Extract Is Associated with Activation of ERK and AMPK
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insecticidal and Antifungal Activities of Chemically-Characterized Essential Oils from the Leaves of Withania frutescens L.

by
El Moussaoui Abdelfattah
1,
Allali Aimad
2,
Mohammed Bourhia
3,*,
Khalid Chebbac
4,
Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah
5,
Walid Soufan
6,
Hiba-Allah Nafidi
7,
Mourad A. M. Aboul-Soud
8,
Lahcen Ouahmane
3 and
Amina Bari
1
1
Laboratory of Biotechnology, Environment, Agrifood and Health, Faculty of Science, University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez 30050, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Animal and Plant Production, and Agro-Industry, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, BP 133, Kenitra 14000, Morocco
3
Laboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Agro-Sciences and Environment (BioMAgE), Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh 40000, Morocco
4
Laboratory of Biotechnology Conservation and Valorisation of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences Dhar ElMahraz, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdallah University, Fez 30000, Morocco
5
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, 11 P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 2325 University Street, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
8
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010088
Submission received: 17 December 2021 / Revised: 1 January 2022 / Accepted: 6 January 2022 / Published: 8 January 2022

Abstract

:
The current study was conducted to investigate antifungal and insecticidal activities of essential oil extracted from the Moroccan Withania frutescens L. (EOW), and their chemical composition was profiled. To achieve this goal, EOW was extracted by the hydro-distillation method and their phytochemical constituents were characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses (GC-MS). Insecticidal activity was evaluated by use of four tests: contact toxicity, inhalation toxicity, and repellent tests. Antifungal activity was evaluated on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceris (F. oxysporum) using different concentrations of EOW. GC/MS analysis revealed that EOW was rich in carvacrol (31.87%), thymol (30.08%), and camphor (9.13%). At a 1-µL/L dose, EOW exhibited mortality rates of 23.13 ± 1.07% and 24.41 ± 1.21% against Callosobruchus maculatus (C.maculatus) by inhalation and contact, respectively. Notably, EOW dose of 20 μL/L caused significant mortality rates of 95.1 ± 3.5% and 76.69 ± 1.71% by inhalation and contact, respectively. EOW exhibited an inhibitory effect on mycelial growth against the tested fungi F. oxysporum of 100% and 93.5 ± 1.1% for the 9 and 4.5 mg/mL doses, respectively. The reduced mycelial growth rate for F. oxysporum was recorded to be 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm/h for the EOW doses of 2.25 and 4.5 mg/mL, respectively. The outcome of the present work showed that EOW has a promising antifungal and insecticidal activity, and it can therefore be employed as a natural alternative insecticidal and mycocidal agent to replace the chemically-synthesized ones.

1. Introduction

Despite being small, pulse crops represent significant members of the legume family, which includes more than 1800 species. Peas, beans, lentils, chickpeas, and faba beans are examples of pulses, the seeds of which are primarily consumed as food. Pulses are unsurpassed nutritionally-rich vegetable foods in terms of dietary protein content and contain amino acids essential for human nutrition. It is thus fitting that pulses can replace the dietary protein deficiency of animal origin. Some pulses represent a natural source of micronutrients such as vitamins (A, B, C, etc.), trace elements, and mineral salts indispensable for sustaining healthy body functions [1]. However, pulse crops are very often characterized by low and unstable yields during the harvest periods because of their sensitivity to abiotic constraints (cold, heat, soil degradation), biotic constraints (diseases and insect pests), and the rarity of resistant varieties to such constraints [2].
Yield instability is mostly recorded in crops due to the implication of different environmental factors such as abiotic and biotic constraints. In addition, pulses along with legumes may be subject to damage as a result of poor storage conditions. Fungi, molds, and insect pests make post-harvest storage difficult and cause yield loss through a direct decrease in weight and nutritional qualities of the product [3,4]. Post-harvest losses caused by insect pests during storage have been reported to be a growing problem in Africa, leading to the loss of more than 30% of stored dry food products [5].
Callosobruchus maculatus (C. maculatus) belongs to the cosmopolitan insect pests attacking crops of leguminous plants [6]. The existence of this insect in leguminous stocks may cause a great loss because of its rapid multiplication in warehouses. In this sense, it was reported that C. maculatus can affect more than 50% of stock during a few months along with damage to the organoleptic characteristics of products [7,8].
Fusarium oxysporum (F. oxysporum) is the most destructive disease of the chickpea crop with huge annual yield losses [9]. For instance, the loses due to this fungal strain reached 12–15% in Spain [10], 40% in Tunisia [11], and 10–50% in Pakistan [12]. Fusarium can damage the crop when conditions are favorable for its development [11].
Faced with the threat posed by these insects and fungi, their control is essentially based on the use of chemical insecticides, especially fumigants whose repercussions can be harmful to human health and the biological balance of the ecosystem. The use of chemical insecticides is associated with some serious shortcomings as it is known to cause prominent hazardous non-target toxicity, environmental pollution and can lead to the development resistant strains or superbugs. The search for natural, eco-friendly, and innovative pest-control strategies is justified [13].
In this context, the use of medicinal plants with an insecticidal effect is becoming increasingly important throughout the world due to their eco-friendly charecteristics. Plants are exploited in several forms to limit post-harvest losses either as a crude plant or through its derivatives such as powders, essential oils, plant oils, or even purified compounds. W. frutescens L. is an annual woody medicinal plant that belong to Magnoliophyta division, class Magnoliopsida, order Solanales, family Solanaceae, and genera Withania. This genus is indigenous to North Africa, South Asia, Western Asia, Southern Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Canary Islands [14]. Chemical analysis of crude extracts prepared from W. frutescens revealed the presence of several potentially bioactive phytoconstituents including polyphenols, tannins, mucilage, terpenoids, flavonoids, and saponins. Previous ethnopharmacological surveys reported the use of W. frutescens in controlling disease, namely: tuberculosis, neurodegenerative, conjunctivitis, and cancer [15,16]. Similarity, scientific reports showed that W. frutescens possesses several useful medicinalproperties including antifungal, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and wound healing [17]. However, reports on the medicinal properties of EOW are lacking.The present study was therefore initiated to investigate the chemical composition, antifungal, and bio-insecticidal effects of EOW against F. oxysporum and adult C. maculatus.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

W. frutescens was harvested at the end of March 2019 from the surrounding area of Fez-Morocco. The botanical identification was carried out by Amina Bari (Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco). Next, plant specimens were deposited at the herbarium of the University under the voucher number BPRN-69WF. Leaves of W. frutescens were dried in the shade for 10 days before being ground into powder prior to extartcion.

2.1.1. Extraction of EOW

In the present work, the essential oil was obtained from leaves of W. frutescens (Figure 1) by the hydro-distillation method using a Clevenger apparatus for 2 h. EOW was dried with anhydrous sodium before being filtered and stored in darkness at 4 °C until further use. The yield of EOW was calculated using the following Formula (1):
YHE = MHE/MD × 100
where YHE is the yield of essential oil (%), MHE is the mass of the EO (g), and MD is the mass of dry plant matter (g)

2.1.2. Gas Chromatography—Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID)

The extracted oil was diluted with hexane (1:10 dilution) before using 1 µL for chromatographic characterization. A trace gas ghromatograph (GC) equipped with a with HP-5MS non-polar fused silica capillary column (60 m, 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 µm) was used to fulfill analysis. The system was programmed with an oven temperature of 50 °C/2 min to 280 C at 5 °C/min, whereas the final temperature was held for 10 min. The injection was done with split mode, ratios 1:20; nitrogen (N2) carrier gas, flow rate 1 mL/min. Injector temperatures were set to 250 and 280 °C for the detector (flame ionization detector, FID) [18].

2.1.3. Analysis of the Chemical Composition of EOW by GC/MS

The phytochemical identification of different chemical compounds contained in EOW was carried out by GC-MS. In this sense, the essential oils were analyzed using a Thermo Fischer capillary model coupled with the mass spectrometer system. A non-polar HP-5MS capillary fused silica column with 60 m, 0.32 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness was used to achieve analysis. The operating condition of the GC-MS analysis included an initial temperature of 40 °C/2 min, and a speed of 2 °C/min with a final temperature of 260 °C/10 min; meanwhile, the injector temperature was 250 °C. Further, helium was used as a carrier gas with 1 mL/min. EOW was diluted in hexane with a dilution ratio (10:100). Next, 1 µL was injected with fractional injection and ionization mode. The sweep mass range was m/z 40–650, the ion source temperature 200 °C, ionization energy 70 eV, and interface line temperature 300 °C. The characterization of chemicals was done by determining their retention indices (RI) referring to those of a serial n-alkane counterpart (C8-C20) [19].

2.2. Insecticidal Activity of EOW

2.2.1. Breeding of insects

C. maculatus used for EOW insecticidal activity testing was acclimatized under the following laboratory conditions: 25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 10:14 h (light/dark). All experiments were performed under the same conditions. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) indigenous to Morocco lands was used for testing.

2.2.2. Toxicity of EOW against Callosobruchus Maculatus

Toxicity by Contact

In the present work, 100 g of chickpeas were used for testing purposes. To achieve this goal, grains were infested by five pairs of insects (male and female) of 0–48 h packed in plastic containers (1 μL) tightly closed. Next, EOW was added to the sample at concentrations ranging from 1 to 20 μL/100 g before being shacked for two minutes. Untreated grains confined with C. maculatus were used as control. After 48 h of treatment, C. maculatus mortality was assessed. Eggs deposited in the grains were counted at 12 days post-treatment, whereas emerged insects were counted regularly at 28 days. The observed mortality rate was corrected by Abbott’s formula [20,21]:
Pc = 100 × Po Pt 100 Pt
where Pc is the percentage corrected mortality, Po is the observed mortality in the trial and Pt is the observed mortality in the control.
The percentage decrease in the number of eggs and adults emerged in each concentration of EOW was calculated using the following formula:
PR = NC NT CN × 100
where PR is the percent oviposition or decrease in emerged insects, NC is the number of eggs or insects hatched in the control, and NT is the number of eggs or insects hatched in the treatment.

Toxicity by Inhalation

In glass jars of 1-L volume, small masses of the cotton were suspended with a thread attached to the inside of the lid. EOW doses of 1, 5, 10, and 20 μL were dropped into the cotton using a micropipette. Next, ten C. maculatus (male and female) whose ages ranged from 0 to 48 h were placed into jars with different concertation of oil. For each dose, three replicates were performed. The comparison was made with a control sample (cotton without test solutions). The observed mortality rate was corrected by the formula [21]:
Pc = 100 × P 0 Pt 100 Pt
where Pc is the percentage corrected mortality, Po is the observed mortality in the trial, and Pt is the observed mortality in the control.

Repulsion Test

The repellent effect of EOW on C. maculatus adults was evaluated using the preferential area method on filter paper. Briefly, 9-cm diameter discs prepared from filter paper were used for this purpose. Discs were uniformly immersed with 0.5 mL of EOW at different doses (1, 5, 10, and 20 µL/mL) corresponding to 0.016; 0.079; 0.157; and 0.315 µL/disc per disc. Discs immersed with a similar volume of acetone were used for control. Next, the Petri dishes were closed with Parafilm before being incubated for 30 min. The number of bruchids present on the half of the disc treated with EOW was counted against the number on the untreated part. Three replicates for each experiment were conducted under the same environmental conditions as the insect rearing.
The percentage of repulsion (PR) was calculated according to the following formula [22]:
PR = NC NT NC + NT × 100
where PR is the percent repellency (%), NC is the number of insects in the control area and NT is the number of insects in the treatment area.

2.3. Antifungal Activity of EOW

In the present work, the direct contact method was used to investigate the antifungal effect of the essential oil extracted from the aerial part (leaves) of W. frutescens.

2.3.1. Preparation of the Suspension Cultures

In the present work, Fusarium oxysporum (BMFS19) was kindly provided by the Lab of Biotechnology (Faculty of Science, Fez, Morocco). Next, spores of 5 days cultures were seeded on the Petri dishes including one milliliter of sterile physiological water. Next, the obtained suspension was estimated by measuring the optical density (OD) using a spectrophotometer at 630 nm before being adjusted to obtain a suspension with 107 spores/mL [23].

2.3.2. Preparation of Culture Media and Incubation of Petri Dishes

Media were prepared by mixing different concentrations (v/v) of EOW and 0.2% agar and potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Table 1). The obtained solution was autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min [24,25]. Next, 10 µL of spore inoculum were seeded onto the Petri dishes except for the control medium. Thereafter, the Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm before being incubated for 6 days at a temperature of about 26.5°C [23,24].

2.3.3. Evaluation of Mycelial Growth

The evolution of the mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum was carried out each day by measuring the diameter of the mycelial colony taking into consideration the controlled growth. In this sense, the growth inhibition rate (IY) was calculated according to the following formula [23,24].
IY = Dt Ds Dt × 100
where Dt is the diameter of colonies without EO and Ds is the diameter of colonies after being treated with EO.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of EOW against the studied fungal was effectuated according to the previously reported protocols [26,27]. Briefly, Petri dishes with concentrations that showed a complete absence of mycelial growth were selected to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

Determination of the Mycelial Growth Rate (MG)

The mycelial growth rate of each concentration was determined by the formula [28]:
Cs = ( D 1 / T 1 ) + ( D 2 D 1 ) / T 2 ) + + ( Dn D ( n 1 ) / Tn )
where Dn is the diameter of growth measured each day in millimeters and Tn is the time expressed in days.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical ananlysis was conducted with one-way ANOVA and the reults obtained are expressed as means plus standard deviations. In addition, Tukey’s test was used as post hoc test for multiple comparions. Significant values were considered when P was less than 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of EOW Composition by GC/MS

The phytochemicals identified in EOW by GC/MS are summarized in Figure 2 and Table 2. The extraction yield of EOW was about 0.28%, which is reasonable relative to species among Solanaceas [18]. This yield is comparable to some plants that are industrially-exploited as a source of essential oils such as Latin rosa L.(0.1–0.35%), Salvia rosmarinus L. (1–2.5%), Mentha piperita L. (0.5–1%), Citrus Aurantium L. (0.5–1%), Lavandula angustifolia L. (0.8–2.8%), Pimpinella anisum L. (1–3%), and Thymus vulgaris L.(2–2.75%) [29]. In addition, the chemical composition of EOW contained certain chemicals that were also reported in similar studies on the chemical composition of plants; such as pulegone compounds [30,31,32].
The difference in the extraction yield between plants can be ascribed for the implication of different environmental factors [33]. The findings of the chemical analysis revealed that the studied EOW was notably composed of many potentially active phytochemicals such as Carvacrol (31.87%), Thymol (30.076%), and Camphor (9.13%). Taken together, our results were found to be consistent with previous reports [18], which demonstrated the presence of Camphor, Thymol, and Carvacrol as major chemical consituents of EOW [18].

3.2. Insecticidal Activity

In the present work, different dosages of EOW (0.1, 5, 10, and 20 μL/L air volume) were used to determine its toxicity against C. maculatus by use of ihalation test, as previosuly described in erlier work [34]. Adult mortality of C. maculatus was recorded every 24 h for four days, and the findings are given in Figure 3.
Results revealed that the lowest concentration (1 μL/L air volume.) of EOW resulted in 23.13 ± 1.07% and 24.41 ± 1.21% mortality in adult C.maculatus by inhalation and contact, respectively, 96 h post-exposure (Figure 3). The highest concentration (20 μL/L air volume) caused mortality rate of 95.1 ± 3.5% and 76.69 ± 1.71% by inhalation and contact, respectively. By contrast, no insect mortalities were observed in the control. LC50 value obtained for inhalation test was determined to be 13.28 ± 2.62 μL/L air volume, which is lower than that obtained with contact test (18.41 ± 1.29 μL/L).
In the bioassay, egg laying of C. maculatus occurred within 24 hrs of mating and the number of eggs laid varied according to applied doses of EOW. A significant dose-dependent reduction in egg-laying behavior, where a maximum reduction of 81.26 ± 2.01%, was recorded with the 20 µL EOW/L air volume (Figure 4B). It was evident that EOW caused significant reduction in the viability rate of eggs relative to the control, reaching 84.0 ± 2.65% with the maximum dose of 20 µL EOW/L (Figure 4A). Taken together, our results were found to be consistent with those reported elsewhere [34]; whereby essential oil isolated from Mentha pulegium L. resuted in adverse effects on the egg-laying behavior of C. maculatus.
The results represented here showed that the EOW under investigation exhibited strongly repellent activity against C. maculatus with a rate of 95.12 ± 3.42%, in dose-dependent manner (Figure 5). Therefore, the potential of EOW as a valuable source of ecofriendly insecticidal agents against C. maculatus has been confirmed. It is evident that pest control strategies relying upon the use of chemically-synthesized products have been associated with alarmingly growing environmental concerns. Therefore, it is primitive to switch to pest-control products of natural origin such as plant-derived essential oils; which could be a game-changer in fighting pests due to their powerful insecticidal activityagainst different larval stages [35]. One major advantage of using natural essential oils extracted from plants is their wide safety margins as they are characterized as being environmentally friendly insecticides and are considered a valuable source for the development of novel natural bioactive agents as an effective alternative to synthetic ones [36].
Several studies have documented the beneficial action of essential oils on reducing longevity of pest species in stored grains including C. maculatus. Because of their high volatility, essential oils along with their constituents, particularly monoterpenes, exert insecticidal effects and disrupt insect growth at different life stages [28,29,30]. Efficacy of essential oils varies according to their phytochemical profiles and the target insect, e.g., bean sprout, is more sensitive to phenolic monoterpenes [36,37,38,39]. Indeed, monoterpene mixtures are neurotoxic agents acting on different targets. For example, it has been reported that slinalool caused a reduction in the amplitude and frequency of the action potential, whereby leads to a reduction in the post-hyperpolarization phase that follows the transmission of the nerve impulse. By contrast, estragol has been reported to exhibit more specific reduction in the post-hyperpolarization phase. The simultaneous action of the two compounds caused paralysis and eventually the death of the insects [39]. On the other hand, the effect of essential oils on reproduction is the result of both an inhibition of oogenesis and an increase in the retention of eggs in females lateral oviducts. In this context, previous studies have reported the modifications in the environment surrounding the oviposition sites can lead to inhibition of oogenesis and retention of eggs in oviducts [32,33].

3.3. Antifungal Activity of EOW

The mycelial growth of the studied fungal strain F. oxysporum was significant in the absence of EOW, resulting in mycelial diameter of 60 mm (Figure 6a). However, this growth was strongly inhibited in the presence of EOW in a dose-dependent manner (0.28 to 9 mg/mL). Mycelial growth was evaluated as a function of both time and EOW concentration tested by measuring the diameter of fungal mycelium (Figure 6b). Figure 6 clearly shows a dose-dependent significant inhibition of mycelial growth in the presence of EOW compared to the negative control (0 mg/mL). Concerning the kinetics of mycelial growth, it was noticed that mycelial growth differed according to the concertation applied, such that the lowest EOW concentrations (2.28 and 4.5 mg/mL) permitted mycelial growth, which had gradually started from the second day of incubation. However, total inhibition of mycelial growth was recorded with EOW maximum concentration of 9 mg/mL (Figure 6c). From this figure, it can be seen that the absence of essential oil allowed mycelial growth from the first day of incubation compared to the control (Figure 6c). Therefore, it can be concluded that EOW has a potent fungistatic effect in a dose-dependent manner. Fungal inhibition rates of EOW are represented in Figure 6d, depictingthe evaluation of the inhibition percentage of the studied essential oil. A significant inhibitory activity leading to a maximal fungicidal effect (100% total inhibition) was observed at the EOW concentration of 9 mg/mL (Figure 6d). Hence, it can be concluded that EOW strongly controlled F. oxysporum mycelial growth rate exhibiting both fungistatic and fungicidal potencies that were dependent on the concentration used. For example, it was noticed that the inhibition of F. oxysporum growth rate increased with increasing oil concentration so that a total growth rate inhibition was recorded for the maximum EOW concentration of 9 mg/mL. Thus, the obtained results unequivocally confirm that the essential oil under investigation exhibits effective growth-control potencies against F. oxysporum in a dose-dependent fashion. Based on the investigated parameters in the current study, such as mycelial growth, mycelial growth kinetics, inhibition rates, and mycelial growth rate, we can confirm that EOW has strong antifungal activity against F. oxysporum.
This observed strong fungicidal activity exerted by EOW against the studied fungal strain cloud be ascribed for its chemical constituents, particularly thymol, which was detected by GC-MS. These results were corroborated by those reported in earlier studies [18,27], which showed that thymol and carvacrol are among the most active compounds in essential oils against microbes [18,27]. These two molecules have a very broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and are naturally-present in the essential oils of most plant species [40,41,42,43]. The mechanism-of-action whereby these natural compounds kill fungi has been investigated elsewhere [44,45,46]. Essential oils rich in phenolic compounds have been reported to cause phenol toxicity against fungi is by the inactivation of fungal enzymes that have SH group in their active sites [44,45,46]. Phenolic terpenes are also involved by binding to the amine and hydroxylamine groups of microbial membrane proteins, causing alteration of permeability, and eventually leading to leakage of intracellular constituents [47,48,49,50].

4. Conclusions

The use of natural aromatic products derived from medicinal plants as fungal and pest control strategies can have several valuable advantages over current synthetic products. The outcome of the present work suggests that EOW has powerful insecticidal and antifungal activities, which could be explained by its richness in potentially bioactive compounds such as carvacrol and thymol. Further detailed investigations on the ecofriendly essential oil extracted from Moroccan W. frutescens, in terms of toxicity against non-target organisms along with testing its purified compounds, are highly warrented.

Author Contributions

E.M.A., A.A., M.B.: writing—original draft, reviewing, and editing. K.C., formal analysis. L.O., A.B.: supervision and data validation. A.M.S., W.S., H.-A.N., M.A.M.A.-S.: validation, reviewing, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This Research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/390), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data reported here is available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/390), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that their no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frénot, M.; Vierling, E. Biochimie Des Aliments: Diététique Du Sujet Bien Portant; DOIN, CRDP d’Aquita…; Doin: Bordeaux, France, 2001; ISBN 978-2-86617-383-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudoin, J. Contribution Des Ressources Phytogénétiques à La Sélection Variétale de Légumineuses Alimentaires Tropicales. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2001, 5, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  3. Colas, G. Traité d’Entomologie Appliquée a l’Agriculture; Publié Sous La Direction de A.S. Balachowsky, Professeur Au Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Chef de Service à l’Institut Pasteur. Bull. Société Entomol. Fr. 1962, 67, 224–225. [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, M.J.; Day, A.W. Fungal Melanins: A Review. Can. J. Microbiol. 1998, 44, 1115–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berner, D.K.; Ikie, F.O.; Aigbokhan, E.I. Some Control Measures for Striga hermonthica Utilizing Critical Infection Period on Maize and Sorghum. In Maize Research for Stress Environments, Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, Harare, Zimbabwe, 28 March–1 April 1994; CIMMYT: El Batan, Mexico, 1995; pp. 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sathyaseelan, V.; Baskaran, V.; Mohan, S. Efficacy of Some Indigenous Pesticidal Plants against Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on Green Gram. J. Entomol. 2008, 5, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Caswell, G.H. A Review of the Work Done in the Entomology Section of the Institute for Agricultural Research on the Pests of Stored Grain. Samaru Misc. Pap. 1980, 99, 12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ouedraogo, A.P.; Sou, S.; Sanon, A.; Monge, J.P.; Huignard, J.; Tran, B.; Crdland, P.F. Influence of Temperature and Humidity on Population of Callosobruchus Maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and Its Parasitoid Dinarmus Basalis (Pteromalidae) in Two Climatic Zones of Burkina Faso. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1996, 86, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mayer, M.S.; Tullu, A.; Simon, C.J.; Kumar, J.; Kaiser, W.J.; Kraft, J.M.; Muehlbauer, F.J. Development of a DNA Marker for Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Chickpea. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 1625–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Landa, B.B.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. Integrated Management of Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea with Sowing Date, Host Resistance, and Biological Control. Phytopathology 2004, 94, 946–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Hau, B.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. Yield Loss in Chickpeas in Relation to Development of Fusarium Wilt Epidemics. Phytopathology 2000, 90, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Khan, I.A.; Alam, S.S.; Jabbar, A. Standardization of Medium for the Production of Maximum Phytotoxic Activity by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2001, 4, 1374–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nzelu, C.O.; Okonkwo, N.J. Evaluation of Melon Seed Oil Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, for the Protection of Cowpea Vigna Unguiculata Seeds against Callosobruchus Maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Int. Adv. Res. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. ISO 2007, 3, 3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mirjalili, M.H.; Moyano, E.; Bonfill, M.; Cusido, R.M.; Palazón, J. Steroidal Lactones from Withania Somnifera, an Ancient Plant for Novel Medicine. Molecules 2009, 14, 2373–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. De Broe, M.E.; Gharbi, M.B.; Elseviers, M. Maremar, Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease, How to Avoid over-Diagnosis and under-Diagnosis. Nephrol. Ther. 2016, 12, S57–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bellakhdar, J. The Traditional Moroccan Pharmacopoeia: Ancient Arabic Medicine and Popular Knowledge; Ibis Press: Paris, France, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  17. EL Moussaoui, A.; Bourhia, M.; Jawhari, F.Z.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Ullah, R.; Bari, A.; Majid Mahmood, H.; Sohaib, M.; Serhii, B.; Rozhenko, A. Chemical Profiling, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activity against Drug-Resistant Microbes of Essential Oil from Withania frutescens L. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bourhia, M.; Bouothmany, K.; Bakrim, H.; Hadrach, S.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alzahrani, A.; Khalil Alyahya, H.; Albadr, N.A.; Gmouh, S.; Laglaoui, A. Chemical Profiling, Antioxidant, Antiproliferative, and Antibacterial Potentials of Chemically Characterized Extract of Citrullus colocynthis L. Seeds. Separations 2021, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. El Atki, Y.; Aouam, I.; El Kamari, F.; Taroq, A.; Lyoussi, B.; Oumokhtar, B.; Abdellaoui, A. Phytochemistry, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Two Moroccan Teucrium polium L. Subspecies: Preventive Approach against Nosocomial Infections. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 13, 3866–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dutra, K.d.A.; de Oliveira, J.V.; Navarro, D.M.d.A.F.; Barbosa, D.R.e.S.; Santos, J.P.O. Control of Callosobruchus maculatus (FABR.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) in Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP. with Essential Oils from Four Citrus spp. Plants. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 68, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abbott, W.S. A Method of Computing the Effectiveness of an Insecticide. J. Écon. Entomol. 1987, 3, 302–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zandi-Sohani, N.; Hojjati, M.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A. Insecticidal and Repellent Activities of the Essential Oil of Callistemon citrinus (Myrtaceae) Against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2013, 42, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Remmal, A.; Bouchikhi, T.; Rhayour, K.; Ettayebi, M.; Tantaoui-Elaraki, A. Improved Method for the Determination of Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils in Agar Medium. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1993, 5, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saghrouchni, H.; El Barnossi, A.; Tanghort, M.; Remmal, A. Chami Fouzia Study the Effect of Carvacrol, Eugenol and Thymol on Fusariums Sp Responsible for Lolium Perenne Fusariosis. Eco. Environ. Cons. 2020, 20, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar]
  25. El Ajjouri, M.; Satrani, B.; Ghanmi, M.; Aafi, A.; Farah, A.; Rahouti, M.; Amarti, F.; Aberchane, M. Activité Antifongique Des Huiles Essentielles de Thymus Bleicherianus Pomel et Thymus capitatus (L.) Hoffm. & Link Contre Les Champignons de Pourriture Du Bois d’œuvre. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2008, 12, 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  26. Akrout, A.; Fadili, K.; Amalich, S.; Dedianhoua, S.K.N.; Bouachrine, M.; Mahjoubi, M.; Mohamed, A.E.H.H.; El-Sayed, M.A.; Hegazy, M.E.; Helaly, S.E.; et al. Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Artemisia Herba-Alba. Ann. Rech. Maroc. 2014, 41, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Voda, K.; Boh, B.; Vrtačnik, M.; Pohleven, F. Effect of the Antifungal Activity of Oxygenated Aromatic Essential Oil Compounds on the White-Rot Trametes Versicolor and the Brown-Rot Coniophora Puteana. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003, 51, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cahagnier, B.; Richard-Molard, D. Analyse Mycologique in Moisissures Des Aliments Peu Hydratés, Ed.; Tec & Doc: Paris, France, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chebbac, K.; Moussaoui, A.E.; Bourhia, M.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alzahrani, A.; Guemmouh, R. Chemical Analysis and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils from Artemisia negrei L. against Drug-Resistant Microbes. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 2021, 5902851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zekri, N.; Amalich, S.; Boughdad, A.; El Belghiti, M.A.; Zair, T. Phytochemical Study and Insecticidal Activity of Mentha pulegium L. Oils from Morocco against Sitophilus Oryzae. Mediterr. J. Chem. 2013, 2, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lamiri, A.; Lhaloui, S.; Benjilali, B.; Berrada, M. Insecticidal Effects of Essential Oils against Hessian Fly, Mayetiola Destructor (Say). Field Crops Res. 2001, 71, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chraibi, M.; Farah, A.; Lebrazi, S.; El Amine, O.; Houssaini, M.I.; Fikri-Benbrahim, K. Antimycobacterial Natural Products from Moroccan Medicinal Plants: Chemical Composition, Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal Profile of Thymus Satureioides and Mentha Pulegium Essential Oils. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 6, 836–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. El Moussaoui, A.; Bourhia, M.; Jawhari, F.Z.; Khalis, H.; Chedadi, M.; Agour, A.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Alzahrani, A.; Alyahya, H.K.; Alotaibi, A.; et al. Responses of Withania frutescens (L.) Pauquy (Solanaceae) Growing in the Mediterranean Area to Changes in the Environmental Conditions: An Approach of Adaptation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 666005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aimad, A.; Sanae, R.; Anas, F.; Abdelfattah, E.M.; Bourhia, M.; Mohammad Salamatullah, A.; Alzahrani, A.; Alyahya, H.K.; Albadr, N.A.; Abdelkrim, A. Chemical Characterization and Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Insecticidal Properties of Essential Oil from Mentha pulegium L. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 2021, 1108133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Larry, P. Pedigo Entomology and Pest Management, 6th ed.; Pedigo, L.P., Rice, M.E., Eds.; Waveland Press: Iowa, IA, UAS, 2014; ISBN 978-1478622857. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ikbal, C.; Pavela, R. Essential Oils as Active Ingredients of Botanical Insecticides against Aphids. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 971–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Weaver, D.K.; Dunkel, F.V.; Ntezurubanza, L.; Jackson, L.L.; Stock, D.T. The Efficacy of Linalool, a Major Component of Freshly-Milled Ocimum Canum Sims (Lamiaceae), for Protection against Postharvest Damage by Certain Stored Product Coleoptera. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1991, 27, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Regnault-Roger, C.; Hamraoui, A. Inhibition of Reproduction of Acanthoscelides Obtectus Say (Coleoptera), a Kidney Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris) Bruchid, by Aromatic Essential Oils. Crop Prot. 1994, 13, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Regnault-Roger, C.; Vincent, C.; Arnason, J.T. Essential Oils in Insect Control: Low-Risk Products in a High-Stakes World. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huignard, J. Analyse Experimentale de Certains Stimuli Externs Influencant Ovogenese Chez Acanthoscelides Obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) In L Influence Des Stimuli Externs Sur La Gametogenese Des Insects, Coll Intern. CNRS 1969, 357–380. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pouzat, J. Host Plant Chemosensory Influence on Oogenesis in the Bean Weevil, Acanthoscelides Obtectus, (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1978, 24, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Crespo, M.E.; Jimenez, J.; Gomis, E.; Navarro, C. Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oil of Thymus Serpylloides Subspecies Gadorensis. Microbios 1990, 61, 248–249. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cosentino, S.; Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Pisano, B.; Satta, M.; Mascia, V.; Arzedi, E.; Palmas, F. In-Vitro Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Composition of Sardinian Thymus Essential Oils. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 29, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Farag, R.S.; Daw, Z.Y.; Hewedi, F.M.; El-Baroty, G.S.A. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Egyptian Spice Essential Oils. J. Food Prot. 1989, 52, 665–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Celimene, C.C.; Micales, J.A.; Ferge, L.; Young, R.A. Efficacy of Pinosylvins against White-Rot and Brown-Rot Fungi. Holzforschung 1999, 53, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cowan, M.M. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Juven, B.J.; Kanner, J.; Schved, F.; Weisslowicz, H. Factors That Interact with the Antibacterial Action of Thyme Essential Oil and Its Active Constituents. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1994, 76, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ultee, A.; Kets, E.P.W.; Smid, E.J. Mechanisms of Action of Carvacrol on the Food-Borne Pathogen Bacillus Cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Knowles, J.R.; Roller, S.; Murray, D.B.; Naidu, A.S. Antimicrobial Action of Carvacrol at Different Stages of Dual-Species Biofilm Development by Staphylococcus Aureus and Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. López-Malo, A.; Alzamora, S.M.; Palou, E. Aspergillus Flavus Growth in the Presence of Chemical Preservatives and Naturally Occurring Antimicrobial Compounds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 99, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Leaves of Withania frutescens L. used for essential oil extraction.
Figure 1. Leaves of Withania frutescens L. used for essential oil extraction.
Life 12 00088 g001
Figure 2. Chromatography profile of EOW identified by GCMS.
Figure 2. Chromatography profile of EOW identified by GCMS.
Life 12 00088 g002
Figure 3. Mean percentage mortality of C. maculatus adults exposed to increasing doses (µL/L) of essential oils extracted from Withania (EOW) by inhalation (A) and by contact (B) as a function of increasing duration (h) of exposure (insects-EOW).
Figure 3. Mean percentage mortality of C. maculatus adults exposed to increasing doses (µL/L) of essential oils extracted from Withania (EOW) by inhalation (A) and by contact (B) as a function of increasing duration (h) of exposure (insects-EOW).
Life 12 00088 g003
Figure 4. Effects EOW on C. maculatus emergence. C. maculatus exposed to EOW by inhalation (A) and by contact (B).
Figure 4. Effects EOW on C. maculatus emergence. C. maculatus exposed to EOW by inhalation (A) and by contact (B).
Life 12 00088 g004
Figure 5. Repellent activity of different concentrations of EOW against C. maculates. Class a (0.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 20%); Class b (20.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 40%); Class c (40.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 60%; Class d (60.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 80%; Class e (80.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 100%.
Figure 5. Repellent activity of different concentrations of EOW against C. maculates. Class a (0.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 20%); Class b (20.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 40%); Class c (40.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 60%; Class d (60.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 80%; Class e (80.1 ≤ repellency ≤ 100%.
Life 12 00088 g005
Figure 6. Results of the antifungal activity of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. (a) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp mecylium; (b) Phograph of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp; (c) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp growth kinetics; (d) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp growth speed and inhibition rate.
Figure 6. Results of the antifungal activity of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. (a) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp mecylium; (b) Phograph of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp; (c) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp growth kinetics; (d) Effect of EOW on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp growth speed and inhibition rate.
Life 12 00088 g006aLife 12 00088 g006b
Table 1. Preparation of the culture medium.
Table 1. Preparation of the culture medium.
MediumPDA (mL)EOW (mL)Agar 0.2% (mL)Concentration (mL)
Control40.000.00.00
136.000.40003.60001/100
238.000.20001.80001/200
339.000.10000.90001/400
439.500.05000.45001/800
539.750.02500.22501/1600
639.750.01250.11251/3200
Table 2. Phytochemical composition of EOW identified by GCMS.
Table 2. Phytochemical composition of EOW identified by GCMS.
Peak R.T (min)NameFormulaArea (%)RIChemical Structure
16.70CampheneC10H164.42946 Life 12 00088 i001
26.811,8-CineoleC10H18O6.931031 Life 12 00088 i002
37.47FenchoneC10H16O4.431086 Life 12 00088 i003
47.63α-ThujoneC10H16O2.881102 Life 12 00088 i004
57.74β-ThujoneC10H16O1.531114 Life 12 00088 i005
68.09CamphorC10H16O9.131146 Life 12 00088 i006
78.95PulegoneC10H16O5.371237 Life 12 00088 i007
89.28ThymolC10H14O30.081290 Life 12 00088 i008
99.39CarvacrolC10H14O31.871299 Life 12 00088 i009
1010.03Piperitenone oxideC10H14O23.371368 Life 12 00088 i010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelfattah, E.M.; Aimad, A.; Bourhia, M.; Chebbac, K.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Soufan, W.; Nafidi, H.-A.; Aboul-Soud, M.A.M.; Ouahmane, L.; Bari, A. Insecticidal and Antifungal Activities of Chemically-Characterized Essential Oils from the Leaves of Withania frutescens L. Life 2022, 12, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010088

AMA Style

Abdelfattah EM, Aimad A, Bourhia M, Chebbac K, Salamatullah AM, Soufan W, Nafidi H-A, Aboul-Soud MAM, Ouahmane L, Bari A. Insecticidal and Antifungal Activities of Chemically-Characterized Essential Oils from the Leaves of Withania frutescens L. Life. 2022; 12(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelfattah, El Moussaoui, Allali Aimad, Mohammed Bourhia, Khalid Chebbac, Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah, Walid Soufan, Hiba-Allah Nafidi, Mourad A. M. Aboul-Soud, Lahcen Ouahmane, and Amina Bari. 2022. "Insecticidal and Antifungal Activities of Chemically-Characterized Essential Oils from the Leaves of Withania frutescens L." Life 12, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop