Next Article in Journal
A Discrete Characterization of the Solvability of Equilibrium Problems and Its Application to Game Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Pricing of Credit Risk Derivatives with Stochastic Interest Rate
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm Based on Fusion Gravity Balance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fixed Point Results in Generalized Menger Probabilistic Metric Spaces with Applications to Decomposable Measures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determinantal Expressions, Identities, Concavity, Maclaurin Power Series Expansions for van der Pol Numbers, Bernoulli Numbers, and Cotangent

1
School of Basic Sciences, Zhengzhou University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450044, China
2
School of Mathematics and Informatics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
3
Independent Researcher, Dallas, TX 75252-8024, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(7), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070665
Submission received: 6 June 2023 / Revised: 2 July 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023

Abstract

:
In this paper, basing on the generating function for the van der Pol numbers, utilizing the Maclaurin power series expansion and two power series expressions of a function involving the cotangent function, and by virtue of the Wronski formula and a derivative formula for the ratio of two differentiable functions, the authors derive four determinantal expressions for the van der Pol numbers, discover two identities for the Bernoulli numbers and the van der Pol numbers, prove the increasing property and concavity of a function involving the cotangent function, and establish two alternative Maclaurin power series expansions of a function involving the cotangent function. The coefficients of the Maclaurin power series expansions are expressed in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants whose elements contain the Bernoulli numbers and binomial coefficients.

1. Motivations

In [1] (p. 235), see also Section 1 in [2], the sequence of rational numbers V k for k 0 was defined by means of
x 3 6 x ( e x + 1 ) 12 ( e x 1 ) = k = 0 V k x k k ! = 1 x 2 + x 2 10 x 3 120 x 4 8400 + x 5 16 , 800 + x 6 756 , 000 x 7 1 , 512 , 000 37 x 8 2 , 328 , 480 , 000 .
The first few values of V k for 0 k 8 are
V 0 = 1 , V 1 = 1 2 , V 2 = 1 5 , V 3 = 1 20 , V 4 = 1 350 , V 5 = 1 140 , V 6 = 1 1050 , V 7 = 1 300 , V 8 = 37 57 , 750 .
Let J ν ( z ) denote the Bessel function and
σ 2 k ( ν ) = m = 1 1 j ν , m 2 k , k 1 ,
where j ν , m are the zeros of J ν ( z ) z ν . Then,
σ 2 k 3 2 = ( 1 ) k 1 3 × 2 2 k 1 ( 2 k ) ! V 2 k , k > 1 .
The van der Pol numbers V k are also related to the Bernoulli numbers B k for k 0 via the relation
σ 2 k 1 2 = ( 1 ) k 1 2 2 k 1 ( 2 k ) ! B 2 k , k 1 ,
where the Bernoulli numbers B k for k 0 are generated by
z e z 1 = k = 0 B k z k k ! = 1 z 2 + k = 1 B 2 k z 2 k ( 2 k ) ! , | z | < 2 π .
The Rayleigh function σ k ( ν ) for k > 1 has an alternative notation
ζ ν ( k ) = m = 1 1 j ν , m k , k > 1 .
This is also called the Bessel zeta function in [3] and was originally introduced and studied in papers [4,5,6,7]. In paper [8], the authors derived closed-form expressions of the Bessel zeta function ζ ν ( 2 k ) for k 1 in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants.
At the site https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4447783 (accessed on 27 May 2023), a question was asked: is there an explicit formula for the Maclaurin expansion of the function x 2 1 x cot x around the origin x = 0 ? At the site https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4449466 (accessed on 5 June 2023), an answer to this question was given. We now quote this answer as follows.
Using Bessel functions, we find
x 2 1 x cot x = 3 x J 5 / 2 ( x ) J 3 / 2 ( x ) = 3 2 + x J 3 / 2 ( x ) J 3 / 2 ( x ) = 3 2 x 2 k = 1 1 1 x / j 3 / 2 , k 2 2 = 3 2 x 2 k = 1 n = 0 1 j 3 / 2 , k 2 n x 2 n = 3 2 x 2 n = 0 k = 1 1 j 3 / 2 , k 2 n x 2 n = 3 2 x 2 n = 0 σ 2 n 3 2 x 2 n ,
where j 3 / 2 , k denotes the kth positive zero of J 3 / 2 and σ n is the Rayleigh function of order n. If n 1 , we can write
σ 2 n 3 2 = ( 1 ) n 1 3 × 2 2 n 1 V 2 n ( 2 n ) ! ,
where V n is the nth van der Pol number. See paper [2] for the properties of these numbers, including recurrence relations. In particular, the generating function is Equation (d) in Section 1.
In [2] (Sections 1 and 6), we find the series expansion
z 2 1 z cot z = 3 z 2 5 + 3 k = 2 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k V 2 k z 2 k ( 2 k ) !
by defining z 2 1 z cot z to be 3 at z = 0 . According to the discussion in [2] (Section 6), the Maclaurin power series expansion (3) has a finite positive radius of convergence, and this radius of convergence, denoted by R, is located between 4 π 3 and 3 π 2 . In fact, the number R is the first positive zero of the equation tan x x = 0 .
Let
G ( x ) = { x 2 1 x cot x , 0 < | x | < R ; 3 , x = 0 .
It is clear that the function G ( x ) is even on ( R , R ) .
In [9] (p. 75, Entry 4.3.70), it was listed that
cot z = 1 z k = 1 ( 1 ) k 1 2 2 k ( 2 k ) ! B 2 k z 2 k 1 , | z | < π .
Hence, we have
G ( x ) = 1 k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | x 2 k , 0 < | x | < R .
On the other hand,
G ( x ) = x 2 sin x sin x x cos x = 1 2 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! x 2 k , | x | < R .
In this paper, basing on the generating function (1) for the van der Pol numbers V n , on the Maclaurin power series expansion (3) of the function G ( z ) , and on the expressions in (5) and (6) of the function G ( x ) , by virtue of Wronski’s formula in [10] (p. 17, Theorem 1.3), and in view of a derivative formula for the ratio of two differentiable functions, we will derive four determinantal expressions for the van der Pol numbers V n and V 2 k , discover two identities for the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k and the van der Pol numbers V 2 k , prove the increasing property and concavity of the function G ( x ) , and establish two alternative Maclaurin power series expansions of the function G ( x ) , whose coefficients are expressed in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants in which the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k and binomial coefficients are involved.

2. Lemmas

For smoothly solving the above two problems, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 1 
(Wronski’s formula [10] (p. 17, Theorem 1.3)). If a 0 0 and
P ( x ) = a 0 + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 +
is a formal series, then the coefficients of the reciprocal series
1 P ( x ) = b 0 + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 +
are given by
b r = ( 1 ) r a 0 r + 1 a 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 3 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 0 0 a r 2 a r 3 a r 4 a r 5 a 1 a 0 0 a r 1 a r 2 a r 3 a r 4 a 2 a 1 a 0 a r a r 1 a r 2 a r 3 a 3 a 2 a 1 , r N .
Lemma 2 
([11] (p. 40, Exercise 5)). Let u ( x ) and v ( x ) 0 be two n-time differentiable functions on an interval I for a given integer n 0 . Then, the nth derivative of the ratio u ( x ) v ( x ) is
d n d x n u ( x ) v ( x ) = ( 1 ) n W ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) ( x ) v n + 1 ( x ) , n 0 ,
where the matrix
W ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) ( x ) = U ( n + 1 ) × 1 ( x ) V ( n + 1 ) × n ( x ) ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) ,
the matrix U ( n + 1 ) × 1 ( x ) is an ( n + 1 ) × 1 matrix whose elements satisfy u k , 1 ( x ) = u ( k 1 ) ( x ) for 1 k n + 1 , the matrix V ( n + 1 ) × n ( x ) is an ( n + 1 ) × n matrix whose elements are
v , j ( x ) = 1 j 1 v ( j ) ( x ) , j 0 0 , j < 0
for 1 n + 1 and 1 j n , and the notation | W ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) ( x ) | denotes the determinant of the ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) matrix W ( n + 1 ) × ( n + 1 ) ( x ) .

3. A Relation and Two Identities for van der Pol and Bernoulli Numbers

In this section, by comparing the power series expansion (3) and two expressions (5) and (6), we derive a relation and two identities for van der Pol numbers V 2 k and the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k .
Theorem 1. 
For k 2 , we have
V 2 k = ( 2 k ) ! 3 4 k a 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 3 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 0 0 a k 2 a k 3 a k 4 a k 5 a 1 a 0 0 a k 1 a k 2 a k 3 a k 4 a 2 a 1 a 0 a k a k 1 a k 2 a k 3 a 3 a 2 a 1 ,
where
a k = 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | , k 0 .
Proof. 
Comparing the series expansion (3) and Expression (5), we find that
3 1 5 x 2 + 3 k = 2 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k ( 2 k ) ! V 2 k x 2 k k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | x 2 k = 1 .
Applying Formula (7) in Lemma 1 and rearranging yield Formula (9). □
Remark 1. 
When k = 4 , we have
V 8 = 8 ! 3 4 4 a 1 a 0 0 0 a 2 a 1 a 0 0 a 3 a 2 a 1 a 0 a 4 a 3 a 2 a 1 = 8 ! 3 4 4 1 45 1 3 0 0 2 945 1 45 1 3 0 1 4725 2 945 1 45 1 3 2 93555 1 4725 2 945 1 45 = 37 57750 .
When k = 3 , we have
V 6 = 6 ! 3 4 3 a 1 a 0 0 a 2 a 1 a 0 a 3 a 2 a 1 = 6 ! 3 4 3 1 45 1 3 0 2 945 1 45 1 3 1 4725 2 945 1 45 = 1 1050 .
When k = 2 , we have
V 4 = 4 ! 3 4 2 a 1 a 0 a 2 a 1 = 4 ! 3 4 2 1 45 1 3 2 945 1 45 = 1 350 .
These three values are congruent to the corresponding ones in (2).
Theorem 2. 
For k 0 , we have
j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 2 j 2 k + 3 2 j + 2 | B 2 j + 2 | = k + 1 2 .
Proof. 
From Expressions (5) and (6), it follows that
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! x 2 k = 1 2 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | x 2 k = 1 2 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 3 ) ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k + 3 2 j + 2 2 2 j + 2 | B 2 j + 2 | x 2 k .
Accordingly, we obtain
( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! = 1 2 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 3 ) ! j = 0 k ( 1 ) j 2 k + 3 2 j + 2 2 2 j + 2 | B 2 j + 2 | , k 0 ,
which can be simplified as the identity (10). □
Theorem 3. 
For k 2 , we have
j = 2 k ( k j + 1 ) 2 2 j 2 k + 3 2 j V 2 j = 4 15 k ( k 2 1 ) .
Proof. 
Considering the series expansion (3) and Expression (6), we arrive at
k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k = 2 3 1 5 x 2 + 3 k = 2 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k ( 2 k ) ! V 2 k x 2 k k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! x 2 k = 2 k = 0 ( 1 ) k 3 ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! + 1 5 k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! + 3 j = 2 k k j + 1 ( 2 j ) ! ( 2 k 2 j + 3 ) ! 2 2 j V 2 j x 2 k .
This means that
1 ( 2 k + 1 ) ! = 2 3 ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! + 1 5 k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! + 3 j = 2 k k j + 1 ( 2 j ) ! ( 2 k 2 j + 3 ) ! 2 2 j V 2 j ,
which can be rewritten as identity (11). The proof of Theorem 3 is complete. □

4. A Determinantal Expression of van der Pol Numbers

In [12] (Theorem 2.7), an explicit formula of the van der Pol numbers V n for n 0 was given by
V n = k = 0 n k ! ( n + 2 k ) ! n k q = 0 n k 3 k q ( n k q ) ! n k q n + 2 k n k q × = 0 k 12 k p = 0 n + 2 k ( n + 2 k p ) ! n + 2 k p S ( p + , ) p + × s = 0 k k s ( 6 ) s ( n p + 2 + 2 s ) ! β = 1 s s β β n p + 2 + 2 s ,
where S ( p , q ) for p q 0 denotes the Stirling numbers of the second kind and
z n = k = 0 n 1 ( z k ) = z ( z 1 ) ( z n + 1 ) , n N 1 , n = 0
is the nth falling factorial of z C .
In this section, by virtue of Lemma 2, we deduce an alternative formula of the van der Pol numbers V n in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants.
Theorem 4. 
For n 1 , the van der Pol numbers V n can be expressed by the determinant
V n = ( 1 ) n 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 0 1 5 3 1 3 10 3 2 1 2 0 4 0 1 7 4 1 1 5 4 2 3 10 0 n 2 0 6 n ( n + 1 ) n 2 1 6 ( n 1 ) n n 2 2 6 ( n 2 ) ( n 1 ) 0 n 1 0 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 1 1 6 n ( n + 1 ) n 1 2 6 ( n 1 ) n n 1 n 1 n 0 6 ( n + 2 ) ( n + 3 ) n 1 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 2 6 n ( n + 1 ) n n 1 1 2 = ( 1 ) n v i , j n × n ,
where
v i , j = { 0 , 3 i + 2 j n ; i j 1 6 ( i j + 3 ) ( i j + 4 ) , n i + 2 > j 1 .
Proof. 
The generating function in (1) of the van der Pol numbers V k can be written as
x 3 6 x ( e x + 1 ) 12 ( e x 1 ) = 1 6 1 k = 0 k + 1 ( k + 3 ) ! x k .
Therefore, by virtue of the derivative Formula (8), we obtain
V n = lim x 0 x 3 6 x ( e x + 1 ) 12 ( e x 1 ) ( n ) = lim x 0 1 k = 0 6 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 3 ) ! x k ( n ) = ( 1 ) n 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 1 5 3 1 3 10 3 2 1 2 0 0 1 7 4 1 1 5 4 2 3 10 0 0 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 1 1 6 n ( n + 1 ) n 1 2 6 ( n 1 ) n n 1 n 1 0 6 ( n + 2 ) ( n + 3 ) n 1 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 2 6 n ( n + 1 ) n n 1 1 2 = ( 1 ) n 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 0 1 5 3 1 3 10 3 2 1 2 0 4 0 1 7 4 1 1 5 4 2 3 10 0 n 2 0 6 n ( n + 1 ) n 2 1 6 ( n 1 ) n n 2 2 6 ( n 2 ) ( n 1 ) 0 n 1 0 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 1 1 6 n ( n + 1 ) n 1 2 6 ( n 1 ) n n 1 n 1 n 0 6 ( n + 2 ) ( n + 3 ) n 1 6 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n 2 6 n ( n + 1 ) n n 1 1 2 = ( 1 ) n v i , j n × n
for n 1 . The proof of Theorem 4 is thus complete. □
Remark 2. 
It is obvious that the determinantal expression (13) is more beautiful, symmetric, and computable than the explicit expression (12) of the van der Pol numbers V n .
Remark 3. 
By the determinantal expression (13), we can compute
V 4 = ( 1 ) 4 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 3 0 1 5 3 1 3 10 3 2 1 2 3 3 4 0 1 7 4 1 1 5 4 2 3 10 4 3 1 2 = 1 350 , V 3 = ( 1 ) 3 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 0 1 5 3 1 3 10 3 2 1 2 = 1 20 , V 2 = ( 1 ) 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 3 10 2 1 1 2 = 1 5 , V 1 = ( 1 ) 1 1 0 1 2 = 1 2 .
These values of V k for 1 k 4 coincide with the corresponding ones in (2).

5. Decreasing Property and Concavity

In this section, we discuss the decreasing property and concavity of the even function G ( x ) defined by (4).
Theorem 5. 
The even function G ( x ) defined by (4) is decreasing on [ 0 , R ) [ 0 , π ] and is concave on [ 0 , π ] [ 0 , R ) .
Proof. 
From Expression (5), it is easy to see that the even function G ( x ) is decreasing on ( 0 , R ) .
Considering the first equality in (6) and directly differentiating give
G ( x ) = x 2 sin x sin x x cos x = x [ x sin ( 2 x ) + 2 cos ( 2 x ) + 2 x 2 2 ] 2 ( sin x x cos x ) 2
and
G ( x ) = sin ( 3 x ) ( 4 x 4 12 x 2 + 3 ) sin x 8 x 3 cos x 2 ( sin x x cos x ) 3 .
Let
h ( x ) = sin ( 3 x ) ( 4 x 4 12 x 2 + 3 ) sin x 8 x 3 cos x .
The function h ( x ) can be expanded to
h ( x ) = x 9 j = 0 ( 1 ) j 3 2 j + 9 ( 64 j 4 + 896 j 3 + 4640 j 2 + 10 , 552 j + 8931 ) ( 2 j + 9 ) ! x 2 j .
Let
T j = 3 2 j + 9 ( 64 j 4 + 896 j 3 + 4640 j 2 + 10 , 552 j + 8931 ) ( 2 j + 9 ) ! , j 0 .
Then
h ( x ) = x 9 j = 0 T 2 j T 2 j + 1 x 2 x 4 j = x 9 j = 0 T 2 j + 1 T 2 j T 2 j + 1 x 2 x 4 j .
By induction, we can verify that
3 2 j + 9 > 64 j 4 + 896 j 3 + 4640 j 2 + 10 , 552 j + 8931 , j 0 .
This means that T j > 0 for j 0 .
In order to prove that the inequality
T 2 j T 2 j + 1 > 3 π 2 2 = 22.2 > π 2 = 9.8
holds for j 0 , it suffices to show T 2 j > 25 T 2 j + 1 for j 0 , which is equivalent to
3 4 j + 9 ( 16 j 2 + 84 j 115 ) > 16 , 384 j 6 + 200 , 704 j 5 + 986 , 112 j 4 + 2 , 454 , 784 j 3 + 3 , 186 , 032 j 2 + 1 , 932 , 844 j + 355 , 335 , j 0 .
For j 2 , it is sufficient to prove that
3 4 j + 9 > 16 , 384 j 6 + 200 , 704 j 5 + 9 , 861 , 12 j 4 + 2 , 454 , 784 j 3 + 3 , 186 , 032 j 2 + 1 , 932 , 844 j + 355 , 335 16 j 2 + 84 j 115 ,
which can be verified by induction on j 2 . In short, Inequality (15) holds for j 2 .
Let
Y ( y ) = j = 0 1 T 2 j + 1 T 2 j T 2 j + 1 y y 2 j = j = 0 3 ( 1 ) j T j y j = 713 y 3 65 , 488 , 500 + y 2 4050 2 y 525 + 4 135 , 0 y π 2 .
Differentiating gives
Y ( y ) = 713 y 2 21 , 829 , 500 + y 2025 2 525 and Y ( y ) = 1 2025 713 y 10 , 914 , 750 .
The second derivative Y ( y ) is decreasing and has a zero 10 , 914 , 750 713 × 2025 = 5390 713 . The first derivative Y ( y ) has a maximum
Y 5390 713 = 19 , 637 10 , 106 , 775 .
Thus, the first derivative Y ( y ) is negative and the function Y ( y ) is decreasing. Since
Y π 2 = 4 135 2 π 2 525 + π 4 4050 713 π 6 65 , 488 , 500 = 0.0056 ,
the function Y ( y ) is positive on [ 0 , π 2 ] .
Combining the above arguments, we conclude that the function h ( x ) is positive on ( 0 , π ] . Then, the second derivative G ( x ) is negative on ( 0 , π ) . Hence, the function G ( x ) is concave on [ 0 , π ] . □
Remark 4. 
We guess that the function h ( x ) defined in (14) is positive, and even increasing, on the interval 0 , 3 π 2 ( 0 , R ] . If this guess were true, then the even function G ( x ) would be concave on [ 0 , R ) 0 , 3 π 2 .
Remark 5. 
We note that a concave function must be a logarithmically concave function, but not conversely. However, a logarithmically convex function must be a convex function, but not conversely.

6. Power Series Expansions

In this section, basing on (5) and (6) and utilizing the derivative Formula (8) in Lemma 2, we derive two Maclaurin power series expansions of the function G ( x ) defined by (4) in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants. These two Maclaurin power series expansions are different from (3) in form.
Theorem 6. 
For m 0 , let
E m = 2 2 m + 1 2 m + 1 | B 2 m + 2 | m + 1
and
D 2 m = 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 45 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 1 2 45 0 3 3 1 3 0 16 315 0 4 2 2 45 0 0 E m 1 0 2 m 2 2 E m 2 0 0 0 2 m 1 1 E m 1 0 2 m 1 3 E m 2 2 m 1 2 m 1 1 3 E m 0 2 m 2 E m 1 0 0 = e i , j ( 2 m ) × ( 2 m )
with the convention D 0 = 1 , where
e i , j = { 0 , 2 m j > i + 1 2 ; 0 , 2 m 2 i j = 2 k 0 ; i j 1 E ( i j + 1 ) / 2 , 2 m 1 i j = 2 k 1 1 .
Then the function G ( x ) defined in (4) can be expanded to
G ( x ) = m = 0 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = 3 x 2 5 x 4 175 2 x 6 7875 37 x 8 3 , 031 , 875 .
Proof. 
Since the function G ( x ) is even, its odd order derivative G ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 0 ) = 0 for m 0 .
Let u ( x ) = 1 and
v ( x ) = k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | x 2 k ,
which are both even functions. Then
v ( n ) ( 0 ) = lim x 0 k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | 2 k n x 2 k n = { 0 , n = 2 m + 1 2 2 m + 1 2 m + 1 | B 2 m + 2 | m + 1 , n = 2 m
for m 0 . Applying the derivative Formula (8) to Expression (5) leads to
G ( 2 m ) ( 0 ) = lim x 0 1 k = 0 2 2 k + 2 ( 2 k + 2 ) ! | B 2 k + 2 | x 2 k ( 2 m ) = 1 E 0 2 m + 1 1 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 E 0 0 0 0 2 0 E 1 0 2 2 E 0 0 0 0 3 1 E 1 0 0 0 4 0 E 2 0 4 2 E 1 0 0 2 m 2 0 E m 1 0 2 m 2 2 E m 2 0 0 0 2 m 1 1 E m 1 0 2 m 1 2 m 1 E 0 0 2 m 0 E m 0 2 m 2 E m 1 0 = 3 2 m + 1 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 45 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 1 2 45 0 3 3 1 3 0 16 315 0 4 2 2 45 0 0 E m 1 0 2 m 2 2 E m 2 0 0 0 2 m 1 1 E m 1 0 2 m 1 3 E m 2 2 m 1 2 m 1 1 3 E m 0 2 m 2 E m 1 0 0 = 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m .
Consequently, the Maclaurin power series expansion is
G ( x ) = n = 0 G ( n ) ( 0 ) x n n ! = m = 0 G ( 2 m ) ( 0 ) x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = m = 0 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! .
The proof of Theorem 6 is complete. □
Remark 6. 
When m = 2 and m = 1 , we obtain
D 4 = 0 1 1 E 0 0 0 2 0 E 1 0 2 2 E 0 0 0 3 1 E 1 0 3 3 E 0 4 0 E 2 0 4 2 E 1 0 = 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 2 0 2 45 0 2 2 1 3 0 0 3 1 2 45 0 3 3 1 3 4 0 16 315 0 4 2 2 45 0 = 8 14 , 175
and
D 2 = 0 1 1 E 0 2 0 E 1 0 = 0 1 1 1 3 2 0 2 45 0 = 2 135 .
Accordingly, we have
G ( x ) = 3 D 0 + 3 3 D 2 x 2 2 ! + 3 5 D 4 x 4 4 ! + m = 3 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = 3 x 2 5 x 4 175 + m = 3 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! ,
which coincides with the first three terms in the series expansions (3) and (16).
Remark 7. 
Comparing the series expansions (3) and (16) reveals
3 k = 2 ( 1 ) k 2 2 k V 2 k x 2 k ( 2 k ) ! = m = 2 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! .
As a result, we deduce the relation
V 2 k = ( 1 ) k 3 2 2 k D 2 k , k 2 ,
which is different to the determinantal expression (9).
Theorem 7. 
The function G ( x ) defined in (4) can be expanded into
G ( x ) = m = 0 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m + 1 x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = 3 x 2 5 x 4 175 2 x 6 7875 37 x 8 3 , 031 , 875 ,
where the determinants
D 2 m + 1 = d i , j ( 2 m + 1 ) × ( 2 m + 1 )
and the elements of the determinants D 2 m + 1 are
d i , j = { ( 1 ) ( i 1 ) / 2 [ 1 + ( 1 ) i 1 ] 2 i , 1 i 2 m + 1 , j = 1 ; i 1 j 2 ( 1 ) ( i j + 1 ) / 2 [ 1 + ( 1 ) i j + 1 ] 2 ( i j + 2 ) ( i j + 4 ) , 1 i 2 m + 1 , 2 j 2 m + 1 .
Proof. 
Let
u ( x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k and v ( x ) = 2 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! x 2 k .
Differentiating results in
u ( 2 m ) ( 0 ) = lim x 0 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! 2 k 2 m x 2 k 2 m = ( 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ! 2 m 2 m = ( 1 ) m 2 m + 1 , v ( 2 m ) ( 0 ) = 2 lim x 0 k = 0 ( 1 ) k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) ! 2 k 2 m x 2 k 2 m = ( 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 2 m + 3 ) , u ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 0 ) = 0 , v 2 m + 1 ( 0 ) = 0
for m 0 . Applying the derivative Formula (8) to Expression (6) leads to
G ( 2 m ) ( 0 ) 3 2 m + 1 = 1 1 1 · 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 · 3 0 1 3 1 3 · 5 0 2 2 1 1 · 3 0 0 3 1 1 3 · 5 0 1 5 1 5 · 7 0 4 2 1 3 · 5 0 0 2 m 1 1 ( 1 ) m 1 ( 2 m 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) 0 ( 1 ) m 2 m + 1 ( 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 2 m + 3 ) 0 2 m 2 ( 1 ) m 1 ( 2 m 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 m 1 2 m 5 1 5 · 7 0 2 m 1 2 m 3 1 3 · 5 0 2 m 1 2 m 1 1 1 · 3 0 2 m 2 m 4 1 5 · 7 0 2 m 2 m 2 1 3 · 5 0 = D 2 m + 1
for m 0 . Consequently, we have the series expansion
G ( x ) = m = 0 G ( 2 m ) x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! = m = 0 3 2 m + 1 D 2 m + 1 x 2 m ( 2 m ) ! .
The proof of Theorem 7 is complete. □
Remark 8. 
Comparing the series expansions (16) and (18), we acquire the relation
D 2 m = D 2 m + 1 , m 0 .
We note that the elements of D 2 m contain products of the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k and binomial coefficients, while the elements of D 2 m + 1 just contain products of common fractions and binomial coefficients.
Can one verify relation (19) by a linear algebraic operation?
Remark 9. 
The determinants D 2 m and D 2 m + 1 are both connected with the van der Pol numbers V 2 k via the relation (17) and
V 2 k = ( 1 ) k 3 2 2 k D 2 k + 1 , k 2 .
Remark 10. 
When m = 2 and m = 1 , we acquire
D 5 = 1 1 1 · 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 · 3 0 0 1 3 1 3 · 5 0 2 2 1 1 · 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 · 5 0 2 2 1 1 · 3 1 5 1 5 · 7 0 4 2 1 3 · 5 0 = 8 14 , 175
and
D 3 = 1 1 1 · 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 · 3 1 3 1 3 · 5 0 = 2 135 .
Therefore, the relation (19) is confirmed for m = 1 , 2 .

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we established the following results.
  • Three determinantal expressions (9), (17), and (20) for the van der Pol numbers V 2 k with k 2 were derived in Theorem 1 and Remarks 7 and 9.
  • An identity (10) for the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k with k 1 was deduced in Theorem 2.
  • An identity (11) for the van der Pol numbers V 2 k with k 1 was acquired in Theorem 3.
  • A determinantal expression (13) for the van der Pol numbers V n with n 1 was presented in Theorem 4.
  • The even function G ( x ) defined by (4) was proven in Theorem 5 to be decreasing in [ 0 , R ) [ 0 , π ] and to be concave in [ 0 , π ] [ 0 , R ) .
  • Two Maclaurin power series expansions ((16) and (18)) of the function G ( x ) , whose coefficients are expressed in terms of specific Hessenberg determinants with elements containing the Bernoulli numbers B 2 k , were discovered in Theorems 6 and 7.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, Z.-Y.S., B.-N.G. and F.Q. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their positive recommendation and high assessment of the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. van der Pol, B. Smoothing and “unsmoothing”. In Probability and Related Topics in Physical Sciences; Kac, M., Ed.; Amer Mathematical Society: New York, NY, USA, 1957; pp. 223–235. [Google Scholar]
  2. Howard, F.T. Properties of the van der Pol numbers and polynomials. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1973, 260, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moll, V.H.; Vignat, C. On polynomials connected to powers of Bessel functions. Int. J. Number Theory 2014, 10, 1245–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kishore, N. A structure of the Rayleigh polynomial. Duke Math. J. 1964, 31, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kishore, N. Binary property of the Rayleigh polynomial. Duke Math. J. 1965, 32, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kishore, N. Congruence properties of the Rayleigh functions and polynomials. Duke Math. J. 1968, 35, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kishore, N. The Rayleigh polynomial. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1964, 15, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hong, Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Determinantal expressions and recursive relations for the Bessel zeta function and for a sequence originating from a series expansion of the power of modified Bessel function of the first kind. CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 129, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55, Reprint of the 1972 edition; Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  10. Henrici, P. Applied and Computational Complex Analysis; Volume 1, Pure and Applied Mathematics; Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons]: New York, NY, USA; London, UK; Sydney, Australia, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourbaki, N. Elements of Mathematics: Functions of a Real Variable: Elementary Theory; Translated from the 1976 French original by Philip Spain; Elements of Mathematics (Berlin); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qi, F.; Niu, D.-W.; Lim, D.; Yao, Y.-H. Special values of the Bell polynomials of the second kind for some sequences and functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2020, 491, 124382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Z.-Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Determinantal Expressions, Identities, Concavity, Maclaurin Power Series Expansions for van der Pol Numbers, Bernoulli Numbers, and Cotangent. Axioms 2023, 12, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070665

AMA Style

Sun Z-Y, Guo B-N, Qi F. Determinantal Expressions, Identities, Concavity, Maclaurin Power Series Expansions for van der Pol Numbers, Bernoulli Numbers, and Cotangent. Axioms. 2023; 12(7):665. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Zhen-Ying, Bai-Ni Guo, and Feng Qi. 2023. "Determinantal Expressions, Identities, Concavity, Maclaurin Power Series Expansions for van der Pol Numbers, Bernoulli Numbers, and Cotangent" Axioms 12, no. 7: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop