Next Article in Journal
Hadamard Compositions of Gelfond–Leont’ev Derivatives
Next Article in Special Issue
Piecewise Fractional Jacobi Polynomial Approximations for Volterra Integro-Differential Equations with Weakly Singular Kernels
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Order Approximate Solution for the Nonlinear 3D Volterra Integral Equations with Uniform Accuracy
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Spectral Vectorial Differential Equation of Generalized Hermite Polynomials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Degenerate Fubini-Type Polynomials and Numbers, Degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli Polynomials and Numbers, and Degenerate Apostol–Euler Polynomials and Numbers

1
College of Mathematics and Physics, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao 028043, China
2
Department of Mathematics, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Turkey
3
Institute of Mathematics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
4
Independent Researcher, Dallas, TX 75252-8024, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2022, 11(9), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090477
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Revised: 7 September 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 17 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthogonal Polynomials, Special Functions and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, by introducing degenerate Fubini-type polynomials, with the help of the Faà di Bruno formula and some properties of partial Bell polynomials, the authors provide several new explicit formulas and recurrence relations for Fubini-type polynomials and numbers, associate the newly defined degenerate Fubini-type polynomials with degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials of order α . These results enable one to present additional relations for some degenerate special polynomials and numbers.

1. Motivations

For z C , higher-order Bernoulli polynomials B n ( α ) ( z ) and higher-order Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z ) of degree n in α are defined in [1] by means of the generating functions
w e w 1 α e z w = n = 0 B n ( α ) ( z ) w n n !
and
2 e w + 1 α e z w = n = 0 E n ( α ) ( z ) w n n !
respectively. For α = 1 , the quantities B n ( α ) ( z ) and E n ( α ) ( z ) become the classical Bernoulli polynomials B n ( z ) and Euler polynomials E n ( z ) , which are defined by means of the generating functions
e z w e w 1 = n = 0 B n ( z ) w n n ! , | w | < 2 π
and
2 e z w e w + 1 = n = 0 E n ( z ) w n n ! , | w | < π
respectively, where z C . In particular, the rational numbers B n = B n ( 0 ) and integers E n = 2 n E n 1 2 are called classical Bernoulli numbers and Euler numbers, respectively.
Generalized Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials B n ( α ) ( z , γ ) were defined in [2,3,4] by Luo and Srivastava by means of the generating function
w γ e w 1 α e z w = n = 0 B n ( α ) ( z , γ ) w n n !
for z , γ C and
| w | < { 2 π , γ = 1 ; | ln γ | , γ 1 .
Generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) for z , γ C were defined in [5] by means of the generating function
2 γ e w + 1 α e z w = n = 0 E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) w n n !
for 1 γ = 1 and
| w | < { π , γ = 1 ; | ln ( γ ) | , γ 1 .
The ideas for these generalizations originated from the paper [6].
For z C and τ C { 0 } , Carlitz defined [7] degenerate Bernoulli polynomials B n ( z , τ ) and degenerate Euler polynomials E n ( z , τ ) by
w ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ 1 ( 1 + τ w ) z / τ = n = 0 B n ( z , τ ) w n n !
and
2 ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ + 1 ( 1 + τ w ) z / τ = n = 0 E n ( z , τ ) w n n ! .
When z = 0 , these quantities are respectively called degenerate Bernoulli and Euler numbers.
For z , γ C and τ C { 0 } , the degenerate versions of the Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and the Apostol–Euler polynomials of order α were introduced in [8] by
w γ ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ 1 α ( 1 + τ w ) z / τ = n = 0 B n ( α ) ( z , τ , γ ) w n n !
and
2 γ ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ + 1 α ( 1 + τ w ) z / τ = n = 0 E n ( α ) ( z , τ , γ ) w n n !
respectively. Since lim τ 0 ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ = e w , when τ 0 and α = γ = 1 , the Equations (1) and (2) reduce to the generating functions for classical Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, respectively.
For further and detailed features of the polynomials above, interested readers can consult the studies [5,9,10,11,12,13,14] and related references therein.
In this paper, we focus on Kılar and Simsek’s recent study [15], in which a family of Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) for z C were introduced as
2 α ( 2 e w ) 2 α e z w = n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z ) w n n ! , α N 0 , | w | < ln 2 .
In particular, the quantities a n ( α ) ( 0 ) = a n ( α ) are called the Fubini-type numbers. The two authors connected these polynomials and numbers with other celebrated polynomials and numbers such as the Apostol–Bernoulli numbers, the Frobenius–Euler numbers and the Stirling numbers via generating function methods and functional equations. Very recently, Srivastava and Kızılateş extended in [16] Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) to parametric kind families of Fubini-type polynomials by considering two special generating functions and obtained many relations concerning these and other parametric special polynomials and numbers. As emphasized therein, Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) are special case of generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) . Concretely speaking, the identity E n ( 2 α ) z , 1 2 = 2 3 α a n ( α ) ( z ) is valid. Further investigations on Fubini type polynomials and numbers can be found in [17,18,19,20,21], and plenty of references cited therein.
On the other hand, the last two authors of this paper and several other mathematicians have studied a number of explicit formulas, recursive formulas, and closed-form formulas for some significant polynomials and numbers by applying the Faà di Bruno Formula (6) shown below, employing some properties of partial Bell polynomials (or the Bell polynomials of the second kind), and utilizing a general derivative formula for a ratio of two differentiable functions. See, for example, the papers [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and related references therein.
In this paper, for z C and τ C \ { 0 } , we introduce a degenerate version of Fubini-type polynomials as follows:
2 α [ 2 ( 1 + τ w ) 1 / τ ] 2 α ( 1 + τ w ) z / τ = n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) w n n ! .
Note that, for z = 0 , the quantities a n ( α ) ( 0 , τ ) = a n ( α ) ( τ ) are called degenerate Fubini-type numbers. If τ 0 , then these quantities reduce to Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) , as mentioned above.
In parallel with the conclusion given in [16] (Remark 4), we infer a relation
a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) = 1 2 3 α E n ( 2 α ) z , τ , 1 2
between degenerate Fubini-type polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials of the order α .
In this paper, with the help of the Faà di Bruno Formula (6) and some properties of partial Bell polynomials, we derive some new explicit formulas, closed-form formulas, and recurrence relations for degenerate Fubini-type polynomials and numbers and for Fubini-type polynomials and numbers. Moreover, we provide the relationship between degenerate Fubini-type polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials of the order α .

2. Necessary Lemmamas

In order to prove our main results, we recall several Lemmamas below.
Lemma 1
([34] (pp. 134 and 139)). The Bell polynomials of the second kind, or say, partial Bell polynomials, denoted by B n , k ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n k + 1 ) for n k 0 , are defined by
B n , k ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n k + 1 ) = 1 i n k + 1 i { 0 } N i = 1 n k + 1 i i = n i = 1 n k + 1 i = k n ! i = 1 n k + 1 i ! i = 1 n k + 1 w i i ! i
The Faà di Bruno formula can be described in terms of the Bell polynomials of the second kind B n , k ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n k + 1 ) by
d n d t n f h ( t ) = k = 0 n f ( k ) ( h ( t ) ) B n , k h ( t ) , h ( t ) , , h ( n k + 1 ) ( t ) .
Lemma 2
([34] (p. 135)). For n k 0 , we have
B n , k a b x 1 , a b 2 w 2 , , a b n k + 1 w n k + 1 = a k b n B n , k ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n k + 1 ) ,
where a and b are any complex numbers.
Lemma 3
([34] (pp. 135 and 206)). For n k 0 , we have
B n , k ( 1 , 1 , , 1 ) = S ( n , k ) ,
where S ( n , k ) stands for the Stirling numbers of the second kind, which can be analytically generated by
( e t 1 ) k k ! = n = k S ( n , k ) t n n ! .
Lemma 4
([35] (Remark 7)). For n k 0 , we have
B n , k 1 , 1 μ , ( 1 μ ) ( 1 2 μ ) , , = 0 n k ( 1 μ ) = { ( 1 ) k μ n n ! k ! = 0 k ( 1 ) k / μ n , μ 0 S ( n , k ) , μ = 0
and
B n , k ( λ 1 , λ 2 , , λ n k + 1 ) = ( 1 ) k n ! k ! = 0 k ( 1 ) k λ n
for n k N 0 and λ , μ C , where
z k = = 0 k 1 ( z ) = z ( z 1 ) ( z k + 1 ) , k N 1 , k = 0
is called the falling factorial of the number z C and
w z = { Γ ( w + 1 ) Γ ( z + 1 ) Γ ( w z + 1 ) , w N , z , w z N 0 , w N , z N or w z N w z z ! , w N , z N 0 w w z ( w z ) ! , w , z N , w z N 0 0 , w , z N , w z N , w N , z Z
for the classical Euler gamma function
Γ ( w ) = lim m m ! m w k = 0 m ( w + k ) , w C { 0 , 1 , 2 , } .

3. Explicit and Closed-Form Formulas and Recurrence Relations

In this section, among other things, we provide some computational formulas for degenerate Fubini-type numbers, present some explicit formulas and recursive relations for Fubini-type polynomials and numbers, and consequently derive some closed-form formulas and recursive relations for degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials of the order α .
Theorem 1.
For n N , degenerate Fubini-type numbers can be computed by
a n ( α ) ( z ) = z ( n 1 ) ! k = 0 n ( 2 α ) k k ! = 0 k ( 1 ) k z 1 n 1 ,
where the rising factorial
( w ) n = = 0 n 1 ( w + ) = w ( w + 1 ) ( w + n 1 ) , n 1 1 , n = 0
is also called the Pochhammer symbol or shifted factorial. Consequently, for the special case of degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , z , γ ) , we have
E n ( 2 α ) 0 , z , 1 2 = z ( n 1 ) ! 2 3 α k = 1 n 2 α k k ! = 1 k ( 1 ) k z 1 n 1 .
Proof. 
Applying f ( u ) = ( 2 u ) 2 α and u = g ( t ) = ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ to the Faà di Bruno Formula (6) and making use of the identities (7) and (9) or (10), we find
d n 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ 2 α d t n = k = 0 n d k ( 2 u ) 2 α d u k B n , k ( ( 1 + τ t ) ( 1 τ ) / τ , ( 1 τ ) ( 1 + τ t ) ( 1 2 τ ) / τ , , ( 1 τ ) ( 1 2 τ ) [ 1 ( n k ) τ ] ( 1 + τ t ) [ 1 ( n k + 1 ) τ ] / τ ) = k = 0 n 2 α k ( 2 u ) 2 α k B n , k ( ( 1 + τ t ) ( 1 τ ) / τ , ( 1 τ ) ( 1 + τ t ) ( 1 2 τ ) / τ , , ( 1 τ ) ( 1 2 τ ) [ 1 ( n k ) τ ] ( 1 + τ t ) [ 1 ( n k + 1 ) τ ] / τ ) k = 0 n 2 α k B n , k 1 , 1 τ , , ( 1 τ ) ( 1 2 τ ) [ 1 ( n k ) τ ] = τ ( n 1 ) ! k = 0 n ( 2 α ) k k ! = 0 k ( 1 ) k τ 1 n 1
as t 0 and u 1 . Considering the generating function for degenerate Fubini-type numbers, that is, for x = 0 in Equation (4), completes the proof of (13).
From the relation (5), the identity (14) follows. □
Theorem 2.
Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) possess the explicit formula
a n ( α ) ( z ) = 2 α k = 0 n n k i = 0 k ( 2 α ) i S ( k , i ) z n k ,
where S ( n , k ) represents the Stirling numbers of the second kind.
Fubini-type numbers a n ( α ) can be computed by
a n ( α ) = 2 α i = 0 n ( 2 α ) i S ( n , i ) .
Generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) can be expressed as
E n ( 2 α ) z , 1 2 = 2 4 α k = 0 n n k i = 0 k ( 2 α ) i S ( k , i ) z n k .
Proof. 
From the Formulas (6)–(8), it follows that
d k 2 e t 2 α d t k = i = 0 k 2 α i 2 e t 2 α i B k , i ( e t , e t , , e t ) = i = 0 k 2 α i 2 e t 2 α i ( 1 ) i e t i B k , i ( 1 , 1 , , 1 ) i = 0 k ( 2 α ) i S ( k , i ) , t 0 .
It is obvious that d k d t k ( e z t ) = z k e z t z k as t 0 . Using Leibnitz’s formula for the nth derivative of the product of two functions, we obtain
lim t 0 d n d t n 2 α ( 2 e t ) 2 α e z t = 2 α k = 0 n n k i = 0 k ( 2 α ) i S ( k , i ) z n k .
Considering the generating function in (3), we acquire the Formula (15) for a n ( α ) ( z ) .
For z = 0 in (15), we immediately arrive at the identity (16).
The Equation (17) can be verified from the relation (5) between Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) and generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) . The proof is, therefore, complete. □
Theorem 3.
Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z ) satisfy the recurrence relation
k = 0 n n k i = 0 n k ( 2 α ) i S ( n k , i ) a k ( α ) ( z ) = 2 α z n .
In particular, Fubini-type numbers a n ( α ) satisfy
k = 0 n n k i = 0 n k ( 2 α ) i S ( n k , i ) a k ( α ) = 0 .
Generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials E n ( α ) ( z , γ ) possess the recurrence relation
k = 0 n n k i = 0 n k ( 2 α ) i S ( n k , i ) E k ( 2 α ) z , 1 2 = 2 4 α z n .
Proof. 
Since
2 e t 2 α 2 α ( 2 e t ) 2 α e z t = 2 α e z t ,
by remembering the generating function of Fubini-type polynomials (3) and by proceeding as in the proof of (18), differentiating n times with respect to t on both sides deduces
k = 0 n n k d n k d t n k 2 e t 2 α d k d t k 2 α ( 2 e t ) 2 α e z t = k = 0 n n k i = 0 n k 2 α i 2 e t 2 α i ( 1 ) i e t i S ( n k , i ) d k d u k 2 α ( 2 e t ) 2 α e z t k = 0 n n k i = 0 n k ( 2 α ) i S ( n k , i ) a k ( α ) ( z ) , t 0 = 2 α z n .
The first required result is thus proved.
Further setting z = 0 in the first result immediately yields Equation (19).
The Formula (20) can be straightforwardly derived by the same manipulation, as in proofs of previous theorems. □
Theorem 4.
The relation
a n 2 α ( α ) ( z , τ ) = B n ( 2 α ) z , τ , 1 2 2 α n 2 α
holds true, where B n ( α ) ( z , τ , γ ) stands for degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials of order α defined by (1).
Proof. 
When putting γ = 1 2 and replacing α by 2 α in (1), we have
n = 0 B n ( 2 α ) z , τ , 1 2 t n n ! = t 1 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ 1 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ = 2 α t 2 α n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! = 2 α n = 2 α a n 2 α ( α ) ( z , τ ) t n ( n 2 α ) ! = 2 α n = 0 n 2 α a n 2 α ( α ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! ,
which completes the proof. □
We now are in a position to conclude our study in this paper with the following two recurrence relations for degenerate Fubini-type polynomials by applying the generating function methods.
Theorem 5.
For n 0 , we have
a n ( α ) ( z + 1 , τ ) = 2 a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) 2 a n ( α 1 / 2 ) ( z , τ ) .
Proof. 
From the generating function in (4), we have
n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z + 1 ; τ ) a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! = 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ 1 = 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α 1 1 + 1 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ = 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α 2 2 α 1 / 2 ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 ( α 1 / 2 ) = n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! 2 n = 0 a n ( α 1 / 2 ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! = n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) 2 a n ( α 1 / 2 ) ( z , τ ) t n n ! .
Comparing the coefficients of the terms t n n ! completes the proof. □
Theorem 6.
For n 0 , degenerate Fubini-type polynomials a n ( α ) ( z , τ ) satisfy the recurrence relation
a n + 1 ( α ) ( z 1 + z 2 + τ , τ ) = ( z 1 + z 2 + τ ) a n ( α ) ( z 1 + z 2 , τ ) + 2 α a n ( α + 1 / 2 ) ( z 1 + z 2 + 1 , τ ) .
In particular, we have
a n + 1 ( α ) ( w ) = w a n ( α ) ( w ) + 2 α a n ( α + 1 / 2 ) ( w + 1 ) .
Proof. 
Differentiating on both sides of (4) with respect to t yields
d d t 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) z / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α = 2 α z ( 1 + τ t ) ( z τ ) / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α + 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) ( z τ + 1 ) / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α + 1 .
Replacing z by z 1 + z 2 + τ and evaluating the terms on both sides of (24) separately lead to
d d t 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) ( z 1 + z 2 + τ ) / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α = n = 0 a n + 1 ( α ) ( z 1 + z 2 + τ , τ ) t n n ! ,
( z 1 + z 2 + τ ) 2 α ( 1 + τ t ) ( z 1 + z 2 ) / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 α = ( z 1 + z 2 + τ ) n = 0 a n ( α ) ( z 1 + z 2 , τ ) t n n ! ,
and
2 α 2 α + 1 / 2 ( 1 + τ t ) ( z 1 + z 2 + 1 ) / τ [ 2 ( 1 + τ t ) 1 / τ ] 2 ( α + 1 / 2 ) = 2 α n = 0 a n ( α + 1 / 2 ) ( z 1 + z 2 + 1 , τ ) t n n ! .
Substituting (25)–(27) into (24) gives the Formula (22).
Letting τ 0 and taking z 1 + z 2 = w in (22) enables us to derive the Formula (23) for Fubini-type polynomials. The proof is complete. □
Remark 1.
From the relations (5) and (21), the counterpart identities in Theorems 5 and 6 can be presented for degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials of the order α.
Remark 2.
We note that, in recent years, the last two authors and their coauthors have investigated several other degenerate polynomials and numbers in the papers [36,37].

4. Conclusions

In our recent study, we introduced and dealt with degenerate versions of Fubini-type polynomials. Utilizing the Faà di Bruno Formula (6), employing some properties of partial Bell polynomials, such as (7)–(10), and using generating function methods, we derived several new explicit formulas, closed-form formulas, and recurrence relations for degenerate Fubini-type polynomials and numbers and for Fubini-type polynomials and numbers, defined by Kılar and Simsek in [15]. Furthermore, by associating degenerate Fubini-type polynomials with degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Euler polynomials of the order α , we presented some identities for these polynomials and numbers.
In the future, a relation involving degenerate Fubini-type polynomials and degenerate Apostol–Genocchi polynomials of order α , defined by [8] (Equation 2.6), could be given and further relations could be obtained by similar methods used in this paper.
This paper is a revised version of the arXiv preprint [38].

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, S.J., M.C.D. and F.Q. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12061033), by the Research Program of Science and Technology at Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (Grants No. NJZY20119), and by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (Grant No. 2019MS01007), China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nörlund, N.E. Vorlesungen über Differenzenrechnung; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1924. [Google Scholar]
  2. Luo, Q.-M. On the Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2004, 2, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Luo, Q.-M.; Srivastava, H.M. Some generalizations of the Apostol–Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 308, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, Q.-M.; Srivastava, H.M. Some relationships between the Apostol–Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler polynomials. Comput. Math. Appl. 2006, 51, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, Q.-M. Apostol–Euler polynomials of higher order and Gaussian hypergeometric functions. Taiwan. J. Math. 2006, 10, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Generalization of Bernoulli polynomials. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 33, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlitz, L. Degenerate Stirling Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers. Utilitas Math. 1979, 15, 51–88. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan, S.; Nahid, T.; Riyasat, M. On degenerate Apostol-type polynomials and applications. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2019, 25, 509–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dere, R.; Simsek, Y.; Srivastava, H.M. A unified presentation of three families of generalized Apostol type polynomials based upon the theory of the umbral calculus and the umbral algebra. J. Number Theory 2013, 133, 3245–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ðorđević, G.B.; Milovanović, G.V. Special Classes of Polynomials; University of Niš, Faculty of Technology: Leskovac, Serbia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. He, Y.; Araci, S.; Srivastava, H.M. Some new formulas for the products of the Apostol type polynomials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 2016, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, Y.; Araci, S.; Srivastava, H.M.; Acikgöz, M. Some new identities for the Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials and the Apostol–Genocchi polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 262, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, D.-Q.; Srivastava, H.M. Some series identities involving the generalized Apostol type and related polynomials. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62, 3591–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ozdemir, G.; Simsek, Y.; Milovanović, G.V. Generating functions for special polynomials and numbers including Apostol-type and Humbert-type polynomials. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kılar, N.; Simsek, Y. A new family of Fubini type numbers and polynomials associated with Apostol–Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2017, 54, 1605–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Srivastava, H.M.; Kızılateş, C. A parametric kind of the Fubini-type polynomials. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 2019, 113, 3253–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kargın, L. Some formulae for products of geometric polynomials with applications. J. Integer Seq. 2017, 20, 4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kılar, N.; Simsek, Y. Identities and relations for Fubini type numbers and polynomials via generating functions and p-adic integral approach. Publ. Inst. Math. 2019, 106, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, H.-I.; Park, J.-W. Two variable higher-order Fubini polynomials. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2018, 55, 975–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharma, S.K.; Khan, W.A.; Ryoo, C.S. A parametric kind of the degenerate Fubini numbers and polynomials. Mathematics 2020, 8, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Su, D.-D.; He, Y. Some identities for the two variable Fubini polynomials. Mathematics 2019, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dağlı, M.C. A new recursive formula arising from a determinantal expression for weighted Delannoy numbers. Turkish J. Math. 2021, 45, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dağlı, M.C. Closed formulas and determinantal expressions for higher-order Bernoulli and Euler polynomials in terms of Stirling numbers. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 2021, 115, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dağlı, M.C. Explicit, determinantal, recursive formulas and relations of the Peters polynomials and numbers. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2022, 45, 2582–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dai, L.; Pan, H. Closed forms for degenerate Bernoulli polynomials. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2020, 101, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hong, Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Determinantal expressions and recursive relations for the Bessel zeta function and for a sequence originating from a series expansion of the power of modified Bessel function of the first kind. CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 129, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, S.; Kim, M.-S. Two closed forms for the Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials. Ramanujan J. 2018, 46, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, S.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Partial Bell polynomials, falling and rising factorials, Stirling numbers, and combinatorial identities. CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2022, 132, 781–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qi, F.; Guo, B.-N. Explicit formulas for special values of the Bell polynomials of the second kind and for the Euler numbers and polynomials. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, F.; Guo, B.-N. Some determinantal expressions and recurrence relations of the Bernoulli polynomials. Mathematics 2016, 4, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qi, F.; Lim, D.; Guo, B.-N. Explicit formulas and identities for the Bell polynomials and a sequence of polynomials applied to differential equations. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 2019, 113, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qi, F.; Niu, D.-W.; Guo, B.-N. Some identities for a sequence of unnamed polynomials connected with the Bell polynomials. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Math. RACSAM 2019, 113, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Dağlı, M.C.; Liu, X.-M.; Qi, F. Explicit, determinantal, and recurrent formulas of generalized Eulerian polynomials. Axioms 2021, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions; Revised and Enlarged Edition; D. Reidel Publishing Co.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, B.-N.; Lim, D.; Qi, F. Maclaurin’s series expansions for positive integer powers of inverse (hyperbolic) sine and tangent functions, closed-form formula of specific partial Bell polynomials, and series representation of generalized logsine function. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2022, 17. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, F.; Dağlı, M.C.; Lim, D. Several explicit formulas for (degenerate) Narumi and Cauchy polynomials and numbers. Open Math. 2021, 19, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, L.; Chen, X.-Y.; Dağlı, M.C.; Qi, F. On degenerate array type polynomials. CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2022, 131, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dağlı, M.C. Degenerate Fubini-type polynomials associated with degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli and Apostol-Euler polynomials of order α. arXiv 2021, arXiv:arXiv:2104.08833. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, S.; Dağli, M.C.; Qi, F. Degenerate Fubini-Type Polynomials and Numbers, Degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli Polynomials and Numbers, and Degenerate Apostol–Euler Polynomials and Numbers. Axioms 2022, 11, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090477

AMA Style

Jin S, Dağli MC, Qi F. Degenerate Fubini-Type Polynomials and Numbers, Degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli Polynomials and Numbers, and Degenerate Apostol–Euler Polynomials and Numbers. Axioms. 2022; 11(9):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Siqintuya, Muhammet Cihat Dağli, and Feng Qi. 2022. "Degenerate Fubini-Type Polynomials and Numbers, Degenerate Apostol–Bernoulli Polynomials and Numbers, and Degenerate Apostol–Euler Polynomials and Numbers" Axioms 11, no. 9: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop