Next Article in Journal
Accelerating Copper Leaching from Sulfide Ores in Acid-Nitrate-Chloride Media Using Agglomeration and Curing as Pretreatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Geochronology of Magmatism and Mineralization in the Dongbulage Mo-Polymetallic Deposit, Northeast China: Implications for the Timing of Mineralization and Ore Genesis
Previous Article in Journal
Tsikourasite, Mo3Ni2P1+x (x < 0.25), a New Phosphide from the Chromitite of the Othrys Ophiolite, Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mineralogy and Garnet Sm–Nd Dating for the Hongshan Skarn Deposit in the Zhongdian Area, SW China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Thermal and Dynamic Process of Core → Mantle → Crust and the Metallogenesis of Guojiadian Mantle Branch in Northwestern Jiaodong

College of Resources, Key Laboratory of Regional Geology and Mineralization, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(4), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9040249
Submission received: 12 March 2019 / Revised: 17 April 2019 / Accepted: 18 April 2019 / Published: 24 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymetallic Metallogenic System)

Abstract

:
The Jiaodong gold mineral province, with an overall endowment estimated as >3000 t, located at the eastern segment of the North China Craton (NCC), ranks as the greatest source of Au in China. The structural evolution, magmatic activity and metallogenesis during the Mesozoic played important roles in the large scale regional gold, silver and polymetallic mineralization in this area; among them, the intensive activation of fault structures is the most important factor for metallogenesis. This study takes the regional deep faults as main thread to discuss the controlling role of faults in large scale metallogenesis. The Jiaojia fault and Sanshandao faults in the northwest margin of the Guojiadian mantle branch not only are dominant migration channels for hydrothermal fluid but are very important favorable spaces for ore-forming and ore-hosting during the formation of world-class super large gold deposits in this area. The deep metallogenic process can be summarized as involving intensive Earth’s core, mantle and crust activity → magmatism → uplifting of metamorphic complex → detachment of cover rocks → formation of mantle branch → penetration of hydrothermal fluid along deep faults → concentration of metallogenic materials → formation of super large deposits.

1. Introduction

The Early Cretaceous’ extensive magmatism and gold mineralization of the Jiaodong Peninsula, on the eastern part of the North China Craton (NCC) defining China’s largest gold province, has attracted considerable attention over the last decades [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. For example, Song et al. [13] summarized the deep ore prospecting results from the gold deposits in northwestern Jiaodong and discovered middle-shallow gold deposits conjunct as a whole in the deep ore. Especially for Jiaojia and Sanshandao metallogenic fracture zones, proven gold reserves have reached 1200 t and 1000 t respectively, which form two significant metallogenic belts of Jiaodong gold province.
Large-scale mineralization and its origin continue to be problematic and controversial. Based on their structural setting, mineralization style, and ore fluid geochemistry, they have been classified as (1) the orogenic gold deposit [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], (2) considered as world-class gold deposits as a class of unique “Jiaodong-type” gold deposits; [2,9,24], (3) the ”decratonic gold deposits” [25], and the anorogenic gold deposit (e.g., intrusion-related gold deposit) [26]. Although the genesis of ore deposits is still under debate, most scholars hold that the gold deposits in these areas were caught up within the zone of a series of tectonic disturbances and over a highly perturbed mantle, according to mantle-crust movements [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to following issues for a new prospective:
(1)
Distribution and migration of Earth’s core, mantle and crust materials.
(2)
The formation and evolution of mantle plume.
(3)
The anti-gravity migration of metallogenic elements.
(4)
The concentration and positioning of metallogenic materials.
Above all, this contribution focuses on the relation between Cretaceous regional crust-mantle-core movement in Jiaodong and dynamic mechanism of large-scale gold mineralization based on successional researches and practices. Furthermore, this study mainly discusses the constraints of formation and the multiple evolutions of the mantle plume and its effects on regional gold metallogenesis.

2. Regional Geological and Metallogenetic Setting

Intensive crustal movement occurred in north China during the middle and late Mesozoic. Tancheng–Lujiang deep fault, which is called the Yisu fault in this area, also showed intensive activation. It is characterized by great horizontal and vertical extension and made great impact on multiple periods of structural movement, intensive magmatism and large scale metallogenesis [2,16,19,30,32,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
The regional distribution and classification of rocks or strata often reflect the regional tectonic setting; it can be used to deduce the evolution process of regional structures. This region is located within the southeastern margin of the NCC, which is a block dominated by 3.8–2.5 Ga Archean rock units, that were significantly reworked during orogenies. The region witnessed migration and collision between the NCC and Yangtze Craton, and were temporally related to Early Cretaceous major mantle-plume activity.
Based on the summary report of the regional geological survey for Shandong province (2000), intensive structural movements and metallogenesis took place during the Cretaceous. The strata of the Cretaceous can be divided into four groups from bottom to top, which include the Laiyang group, the Qingshan group, the Dasheng group and the Wangshi group.
The Laiyang group in the lower part is composed of continental facies clastic rocks with some fold deformation, and the depression center is in the Laiyang and Zhucheng areas. The Qingshan group is a set of volcanic rocks and pyroclastic sedimentary rocks, which can be divided into three sections based on its lithology. The first and third sections are mainly composed of widely spread intermediate and acid intrusive rocks; the second section is composed of pyroclastic rocks that are obviously controlled in fracturing zones.
The Wangshi group is mainly distributed in the eastern Shandong stratigraphic division and is composed of red terrestrial clastic rocks. It generally is 2000–3000 m in thickness, the maximum is up to 3500–4000 m. In the Qingdao-Laiyang area, it interbeds with many basalt, andesite and andesitic turf, covered by thin layers of marl. Its thickness varies between 496 m and 1600 m. Both the Qingshan group and the Dasheng group belong to the middle Cretaceous, the former refers to the Qingshan group volcanic rock or intrusive rock, the later specially refers to the clastic rocks in northwestern Jiaodong. The thickness of Cretaceous volcanic-sedimentary formation in Shandong is close to, or even exceeds the thickness of sedimentary-volcanic formation (over 100 Ma) of the middle-late Proterozoic in the Jixian group.
Generally, lower and upper systems of Cretaceous rock are made up of clastic rocks, and the middle system is made up of volcanic rocks in this area. The sedimentary basin is associated with small extension and deep depression, and the dominant rocks are volcanic rocks and intrusive rocks, which demonstrates the intensive magmatic activity in that period. This is caused by the upwelling of the mantle plume and the rapid splitting and depression of the upper crust (Figure 1). At the same time, large scale gold mineralization took place, which is called “explosive metallogenesis” by some geologists [35].

3. Ore-Controlling Factors and Enlightenment of Current Prospecting Works

More than 100 large gold deposits (>20 t) and hundreds of middle-sized (5–20 t) and smaller (<5 t) gold deposits have been discovered. In northwestern Jiaodong in Shandong, which makes this area the third largest gold metallogenic area in the world. Sanshandao and Jiaojia gold deposits have become world class giant gold deposits (Table 1). Since 2017, proven gold reserves in the mining segment of north Sanshandao sea area have reached 470 t, among them, the Shaling mining segment has submitted 389 t of gold reserves [14].
The Jiaojia and Sanshandao giant gold deposits are distributed along the Jiaojia and Sanshandao fault belts, respectively. Two fault belts are nearly parallel on the surface and vertically decline in opposite direction with the stepped fault plane. Ore bodies are thickened in gently declined sections, are enriched in turning points and intersected parts of the diamond lattice faults [14,15]. Ore bodies are mainly hosted in Pre-Cambrian metamorphic rocks and Jurassic-Cretaceous terrestrial clastic rocks that have no metallogenic specificity.

3.1. The Spatial Distribution of Main Gold Ore Bodies

The ore bodies show regular distributions in Sanshandao and Jiaojia fault belts. Two gently declined ore-hosting fault benches have been exposed in both deposits. Based on the study of the spatial pattern of regional ore-controlling faults, the Jiaojia fault is the main detachment zone in the northwest margin of the Guojiadian mantle branch. The Sanshandao fault is an opposite listric fault in the hanging wall of the Jiaojia fault [45]. The relationship between the two faults, based on dynamic analysis, is that the Jiaojia fault is a backbone fault and the Sanshandao fault is a derived fault, which should be terminated on the Jiaojia fault and shows a “y-letter” spatial pattern.
The dip of main ore bodies in the Jiaojia giant deposit are same as those of the Jiaojia backbone fault. Ore bodies dip toward the northwest, and pitch toward the southwest at a 25°–30° pitch angle. The dip direction of main ore bodies in the Sanshandao giant deposit is the same as that of the Sanshandao fault. Ore bodies in the Sanshandao giant deposit dip toward the southeast, and pitch toward the northeast, the minimum pitch angle is about 35°. Both faults were sinistral strike-slip faults during the main metallogenic period; the pitch direction of the ore bodies is controlled by the strike-slip direction of the faults.

3.2. Rock-Controlling and Ore-Controlling Character of Fault Structures

There are continuously distributed 5–40 cm thick fault gouges on the main fault planes of the Jiaojia and Sanshandao faults. Most ore bodies are in the fracturing zone below the fault gouge. It is indicated that the fault gouge plays the role of a barrier layer, which makes the major ore bodies constrained below the fault gouge. Ore hosting rocks show zoning of fracturing and alteration, and they usually develop a beresitization cataclasite zone, beresitization granitic cataclasite zone, beresitization granite zone and a potassic-altered granite zone. The mineralization intensity is varied across different zones, and the major ore bodies are hosted in the altered zones [14,15].
Gold ore bodies in northwestern Jiaodong are obviously controlled by fault structures. Horizontally, the Jiaojia giant gold deposit formed in the turning part of the Jiaojia fault, which is the turning point from the South-North (SN) direction (Xuchunyuan-Sizhuang section) to the North 22.5°East-North 45°East (NNE-NE) direction (Sizhuang-Gaojiazhuangzi section). Vertically, the fault plane shows wave-shaped extension along the declined direction. The gently declined sections are usually taken as expanding spaces for the concentration of metallogenic materials. Moreover, many branch faults are developed in the foot wall of the backbone fault. The mineralization enrichment zone of the Sanshandao giant gold deposit is also in the turning part of the Sanshandao fault, which is the turn point from 80° strike (south Xinli section) to 40° strike (Sanshandao-Xinli section).

3.3. The Constraint of the Backbone Faults on Ore Formation and Ore Controlling

Diamond lattice faults are recognized based on their different orientations and overprinting relationships, and Au mineralization occurs mainly as vein and breccia in the faults, where the regional deep fault—Jiaojia fault intersects with secondary faults (e.g., the Wangershan, the Hexi, the Houjia and the Qiujia fault). Additionally, The Sanshandao fault is a transitional part of NNE (NE) and NEE trending regional deep faults, and it controls the spatial distribution of major ore-bodies in the Changshang, Xinli and Sanshandao deposits (Figure 1).
It is obvious that ore-bodies are mainly controlled by a few ore-controlling structures. More than 180 mineralization zones have been delineated in the Shaling gold deposit with approximately 77 being economic with 389 t Au. However, the #1 and #2 are the largest ore-bodies with a 300 t gold reserve, those ore-bodies are up to >2000 m long and 1.06–125.64 m thickness.
Horizontally, the thick part of the ore body is at the southeast part of the ore body (Figure 2a). The thickness of the ore vein shows an alternative thick and thin pattern. The ore veins are branched as finger-like veins, which might be caused by the explosive hydraulic cracking of hydrothermal fluid. The grade from single engineering ore body varies between 1.00–11.37 ppm. The Au grade of bonanzas (>5 ppm) are located in the southeast part of the ore-bodies, and they also show a finger-like pattern, they are likely due to a combination of cryptoexplosion, where can be a diffusion center of ore-forming fluid. Hence, it is worthwhile to notice that some large thick ore-bodies and high grade ore-bodies in the main vein group might be caused by the pulsation cryptoexplosive metallogenesis of hydrothermal fluid.
Based on the analysis of metallogenesis of hydrothermal gold deposits, only few are mineralized in the mineralization zone, although most faults can be developed. The variation of physical and chemical conditions in deep zones can drive the ore-bearing hydrothermal fluid to migrate from deep earth to shallow crust, and some strata or rocks may stop or obstruct the migration of the hydrothermal fluid. Once the hydraulic cracking penetrates into a regional fracturing zone, the hydrothermal fluid would rapidly penetrate into the main structural zone. Because of the rapid decline of hydrodynamic pressure, the penetration of hydrothermal fluid into other secondary fractures is relatively weak, and the metallogenesis also is weak in these fractures.
Generally, if an ore concentration area develops wide migration channels for fluid, the ore-bodies will be thicker and of high grade. When hydrothermal fluid rapidly penetrates into some main fractures, penetration of hydrothermal fluid into other faults would greatly decrease because of the variation of the physicochemical conditions of the fluid. For this reason, the reserve of main ore bodies in a deposit may occupy more than 50% of the deposit reserve, even more than 90% of the deposit reserve. In the Jiaojia, Lingnan and Taishang gold deposits, gold grade isoline is positively correlated with the thickness of the ore vein [57,58]. The closer to the fluid cryptoexplosive point, the higher the gold grade (Figure 3). This ore-forming and ore-controlling character of structure also exists in the Xiaoqinling, North Hebei and East Hebei gold deposit concentration districts.

3.4. Physicochemical Conditions of Metallogenesis

Homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions from Jiaodong gold deposits is in the range of 120–420 °C [9], most of them are concentrated in 230–320 °C [59], which is close to the metallogenic temperature of epithermal gold deposits (generally <300 °C) in the Pacific rim metallogenic belt. So, some scholars believe that Jiaodong gold deposits belong to epithermal gold deposits [60].
The ore bodies No. I-1 and No. I-2 in the Shaling gold deposit have great vertical extension. In adjacent ore districts, ore bodies also vertically extend over 2 km, which greatly exceeds the metallogenic depth of epithermal gold deposits (<1 km). It is indicated that the metallogenic condition of Jiaodong gold deposits are obviously different from that of epithermal deposits. In recent years, many researchers also believed that the Jiaodong gold deposit is different from other known gold deposits [12,15].
Compared with previous low-temperature hydrothermal gold deposits, the spatial distribution, magnitude and physicochemical conditions (such as Temperature (T), Pressure (P), Potential of Hydrogen (Ph), Oxidation-Reduction Potential (Eh)) of Jiaodong gold deposits obviously exceed the scope of known epithermal deposits, especially for the Jiaodong middle to deep gold deposits represented by the Shaling gold deposit prospected in the past two years.
In previous studies on metallogenesis, geologists believed that regional large faults play the role of conducting ore-forming materials, and secondary faults are ore-hosting structures. More and more studies indicate that main faults usually control main ore bodies in many deposits [34]. Main faults can both conduct ore-forming materials and host ore bodies. Whether or not faults are hosting ore bodies does not depend on the scale of fault but depends on physicochemical conditions. When ore-bearing hydrothermal fluid passes through a main fault, if the physicochemical condition can not satisfy the crystallization of ore-forming materials, hydrothermal fluid would continue to migrate. In that case, main faults only play the role of ore-conducting structures; if the main faults were elevated to shallow crust with a lower P-T condition, hydrothermal fluid would have crystallized and stopped migrating before it reached shallow crust. In that case, main faults are neither ore-conducting structures nor ore-hosting structures. So, the metallogenesis of main faults does not depend on its magnitude but depends on geologic condition.

4. Mantle-Crust Evolution and the Structural Movement of Metallogenic Districts

Many geologic factors have an impact on gold mineralization [12,61,62,63]. Magmatic activity is the important expression of structure movement. During a period of intensive crust movement, large scale of volcanic activity or/and igneous intrusions are developed, which are accompanied with different types of metallogenesis.
Since Wilson [64] and Morgan [65] put forward the theory of hot spots and mantle plumes successively, the study of the vertical motion of the earth has been gradually strengthened [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73] and many scholars believe that the formation of polymetallic deposits is related to mantle plumes [74,75,76,77,78,79]. But it is obvious that the scale of a mantle plume is too large for explaining the formation process of a specific deposit or ore field. The mantle branch structure which was first put forward by Professor Niu in 1996 [80,81,82,83,84,85], is the third grade of structural units during multiple evolutions of mantle plumes and is mainly used to research ore-forming and the ore-controlling role of Au-Ag polymetallic ore fields. So, in this paper, the metallogenesis of gold deposits in the Northwest of Jiaodong are discussed from the perspective of a mantle branch structure.

4.1. Mantle Uplifting and the Formation of the Laiyang Sub-Mantle Plume

Magmatic activity can be divided into large structural cycles and small pulse periods. Large structural cycles are usually related with crust movement. For instance, the structural movement and magmatism during the Yanshanian movement are divided into four cycles, and then each cycle is divided into several periods. Dominated by the intensity of structural movement, magmatic activity can express as volcanic eruption or large scale of intrusion. Based on the time and intensity of a volcanic eruption and the time and scale of intrusion, it can be divided into several periods.
Magmatism often begins with basic-intermediate volcanic eruptions and ends with intermediate-acid eruption or intrusion. When the temperature and pressure of deep magma exceed the bearing capability of overlapped rocks, the magma would break through the rocks and bring out volcanic eruption. With the decrease of pressure, volcanic eruption would transform to intrusion [86].
During middle-late period of the Yanshanian movement, large scale magmatism occurred and a rift basin was developed in the Jiaodong area. Since the Cretaceous period, mantle magma under the Jiaolai basin showed significant upwelling, and the upper crust was rapidly extended to form the basin, which resulted in the formation of a typical sub-mantle plume. The main structural or sedimentary formation includes several geologic units: The Lower Cretaceous Laiyang group is composed of thick conglomerate, sandstone and argillaceous rocks (fluvio-lacustrine facies); The Middle-upper Cretaceous Qingshan group is composed of thick pyroclastic rocks interbedded with some terrigenous clastic rocks; the time of the Dasheng group is same as the Qingshan group, but it particularly refers to the fluvio-lacustrine sedimentary rocks in northwestern Jiaodong; The Late Cretaceous Wangshi group is made up of thick conglomerate and sandstone (fluvio-lacustrine facies). The basin takes Laiyang as its center, and it is characterized by rapid subsiding and rapid sediment accumulation. The palaeogeographic lithofacies of the whole Cretaceous can be divided into nine phases, and eight of them are in great depression. Total depression amplitude is up-to or even over 10,000 m (Table 2). Intermediate-basic dykes and intermediate-acid dykes are widely distributed in the sedimentary strata. The Guojiadian mantle branch, the Qipeng mantle branch and the Muru mantle branch are developed around the Laiyang sub-mantle plume. Generally speaking, the Qingshan period is the most intensive period of deep magmatism, and it is characterized by a short time, significant depression, intensive structure movement, thick volcanic material accumulation, a complex intrusive phase and varieties of dykes. Simultaneously, it is the most important period for metallogenesis.

4.2. Pulse Upwelling of Magma and the Formation of Mantle Branches

The density (specific gravity) of mantle magma is higher than that of crust rocks. Liguliform mantle magma can emplace into low-velocity and high-conductivity middle crust and make the sandwich structure of the crust intensively deformed. Decoupled lower crust would fall down in the form of residual structural blocks. Middle and upper crust would appear as a negative gravity anomaly caused by the emplacement of intermediate-acid magma, which results in the uplifting of igneous-metamorphic complexes and the formation of a mantle branch.
The igneous rocks in a mantle branch usually evolve from intermediate-basic to intermediate-acid. When liguliform mantle magma emplaces into middle crust, high temperature mantle magma (1300–1000 °C for ultra-basic and basic magma, [87]) would melt some middle-upper crust rocks and exchange solid or liquid materials with crust rocks, which forms mantle-crust magma with a percentage of gas-liquid solution. When the energy in magma chamber accumulates enough to break through overlapped rocks, the mantle-crust magma would explosively emplace toward upper crust. When the energy is released, magma emplacement stops and the magma chamber would begin next cycle to accumulate energy until the next magma emplacement takes place. This much likes the geothermal fountain in Yellow Stone of the USA in where energy accumulation and hot water eruptions are periodically repeated. Obviously, the periodical emplacement-heat melting produces igneous complex with multiple periods of pulsation intrusion. In the middle-late period of magmatism, intermediate-acid magma occupies the majority volume of the emplaced magma. Significant negative gravity anomalies drives the metamorphosed country rocks to uplift together with igneous rocks, accompanying the detachment of cover rocks toward the surrounding area. So far, the typical mantle branch structures are formed, it has an igneous-metamorphic complex core surrounded by ring-like cover rocks and a series of normal detachment faults. The combination of the Laiyang sub-mantle plume with the Guojiadain mantle branch in the west, the Qipeng mantle branch in the north and the Muru mantle branch in the east, perfectly reflects a kind of structural combination relationship.

4.3. The Spatial Pattern of the Mantle Branch

Mantle branch theory can be used to explain the multiple pulsation intrusion process and the spatial distribution of intrusive rocks during Yanshanian magmatism. The heat circulating driven by periodical magmatic activity brought out large scale gold mineralization.
There is the Guojiadain mantle branch, the Qipeng mantle branch and the Muru mantle branch around the Laiyang sun-mantle plume. Take the Guojiadian mantle branch as an example. It developed in the west of the Laiyang sub-mantle plume. Taking the “0-value” line of gravity anomaly as a division, the outer-ring is a positive gravity anomaly area in which the anomaly value increases away from the division line. The inner-ring is a negative gravity anomaly area. Gold deposits controlled by the mantle branch are distributed along the “0-value” line. It is indicated that gold deposits were mainly formed in major and secondary detachment zones around the mantle branch.

5. Multiple Evolutions of the Mantle Plume and the Metallogenesis of Mantle Branches

In the process of the Earth’s evolution, heavy elements were mainly concentrated in the core. Small amount of heavy elements (such as gold) can migrate to shallow crust through mantle plume → sub-mantle plume → mantle branch in the form of gas, gas-liquid mixture or ore-bearing hydrothermal fluid [88]. Under the impact of a regional tectonic stress field, they can penetrate into fracture zones and accumulate to form ore bodies with a variation of physicochemical conditions. The ore-forming materials mainly come from deep Earth.
Based on the non-exclusive character and the atomic structure model of gold, it is speculated that 99% gold is concentrated in the core. Gold is mixed with iron and nickel in a purple gas state within the core. In the process of intensive outer core convection and differential rotation of the core-mantle, the majority of gold gas accumulates in the core–mantle boundary (D“ layer) that is the boundary between the core and mantle. Once the dynamic balance of the core-mantle boundary was damaged by some astronomical or intraterrestrial agents, the liquid materials in the outer-core would pass through the core-mantle boundary and migrate up in the form of a mantle plume. As a component of mantle plumes, gold gas moves up in a state of anti-gravity migration. The initial mantle plume has a small diameter and it gradually increases during its upwelling process. When it comes to the boundary between lower mantle and upper mantle, the top head of the mantle plume would be enlarged to form a mushroom-like crown because of the restriction and obstruction of the boundary. When accumulated energy in the head of a mantle plume exceeds the bearing capability of the boundary, the upwelling mantle materials would penetrate the boundary to form several sub-mantle plumes. Similarly, at the top of upper mantle, sub-mantle plume experiences same process as the mantle plume, a series of mantle branches are formed, which constitutes the typical multiple evolution sequence of mantle plumes.
Accompanied with the multiple evolution of mantle plumes, parts of gaseous gold could transform into liquid to form gas-liquid mixture when it passes through the asthenosphere. Together with the mantle methane material (CH4), the gas-liquid mixed gold continues to migrate up with the evolution of the mantle plume [88]. In the process of upwelling of magma with a gas-liquid mixture along a deep fracture, two-thirds of the gaseous gold in mixture would enter into softened plastic country rocks, and one-third of the gaseous gold in gas-liquid mixture would experience differentiation with magmatic evolution. During the differentiation, liquid gold can directly crystallize into solid gold in near-surface freshwater environments. In surface salt water (sea water), gold migrates in a complex form, and it can aggregate into solid gold under the action of freshwater or bacteria. Table 3 shows the differential distribution of gold and silver in different spheres of the Earth.
Jiaodong gold deposits are characterized by their various deposit types, enormous gold reserves and rapid metallogenic process. It is necessary to study metallogensis and the metallogenic rule, conclude the metallogenic model and summarize metallogenic laws in order to guide a new round of gold prospecting works.

5.1. Heat Migration Ore-Conducting and Ore-Forming of Sub-Mantle Plumes

Traditional gold geological survey works pay much attention to looking for metamorphic rocks and granitic rocks with a high gold background value. Their theoretical idea for gold mineralization is that gold comes from the high background value country rocks and the gold is extracted from country rocks and accumulated into favorable structures as ore bodies under the impact of magmatism and structure movement. Based on the above idea, gold migration is from low P-T environments to high P-T environments and from low grade rocks to high grade rocks, this is difficult to realize in normal geological conditions [90].
From the viewpoint of the multiple evolutions of mantle plumes, heavy elements such as gold and silver mainly come from the boundary between the core and mantle. Through multiple evolutions of the mantle plume, they penetrate the major structural expanding zones of mantle branches in the shallow crust. In that case, ore prospecting work should follow the system of sub-mantle plume–mantle branch–structural expanding zone–ore-hosting fractures (Figure 4).
The sub-mantle plume is the secondary structure unit of a mantle plume, and it plays the role of connecting the lower mantle and the upper crust. It also is the pathway for magma to migrate from deep earth to shallow crust, and the main place for energy to accumulate and release. The pulsation of magmatic activity, energy release and accumulation, is much like the geothermal springs of Yellowstone Park in the USA. Intermittent igneous intrusion or eruptions produce multiple-phases of complexes. Early eruption and intrusion are dominated by intermediate-basic magmatic activity; late magmatic activity which evolves to intermediate-acid magma.
With the rapid uplifting of a sub-mantle plume, a large scale faulted subsidence basin rapidly forms above the top of the sub-mantle plume. The basin has a mirror symmetry relationship with the sub-mantle plume. Intense activity and large uplifting amplitudes of deep mantle magma are usually accompanied with a rapid fault basin development, large influence dimension and significant depression in the shallow crust. This shows a gravity equilibrium compensation in relation with deep mantle uplifting.
The Laiyang basin is a fault basin formed rapidly on the top of a sub-mantle plume. It developed in the Cretaceous and was widely spread in the Laiyang stratigraphic district which includes the Jiaolai basin and its surrounding elements. Sedimentary formation is composed of inland basin fluvio-lacustrine clastic rocks interbedded with terrestrial pyroclastic rocks that are overlapped non-conformingly on an ancient metamorphic basement. It is divided into the Laiyang group, the Qingshan group and the Wangshi group, from bottom to top [58]. The Laiyang group exhibits obvious horizontal variation and a differential diagenetic environment, and it is made up of terrestrial clastic rocks interbedded with some volcanic rocks. The Qingshan group is widely spread in the Jiaolai basin and its surrounding elements. It is a set of terrestrial volcanic rocks and pyroclastic rocks formed in a volcanic basin. The rock formation includes dactitic pyroclastic rocks → andisitic-basaltic andesitic lava and pyroclastic rocks → rheolitic pyroclastic rocks and lava → trachytitic andesitic lava interbedded with pyroclastic rocks, from bottom to top. Subvolcanic intrusions were developed in each period of volcanic activity. The Wangshi group is distributed in the Jiaolai basin and its western elements. It is mainly distributed in Laixi, Laiyang and Jiaozhou in the Jiaodong area, especially in Laiyang. It is much same as molasses formations made up by a set of red terrestrial clastic rocks interbedded with some volcanic rocks.
Overall, above mentioned sedimentary formation in the Laiyang basin indicates that intensive structural movement during the Cretaceous had wide distributions and deep extensions. At the same time, large scale of metallogenesis took place in that time.

5.2. The Ore-Forming and Ore-Controlling of Mantle Branches

Geodynamics indicate that upwelling mantle magma from sub-mantle plumes comes to the surface or shallow crust in the form of volcanic eruptions or intrusions. Constrained by regional structural stress fields, magmatic activity shows alternative variations of intense and weak, large volume and small volume, eruptions and intrusions. The uplifting and evolution of magmatic-metamorphic complexes results in a series of mantle branches.
The crust has an obvious sandwich structure, and different layers show different characters. The upper crust is shallow and cold; the lower crust is deep and rigid; the middle crust is heat softened layer. The regional ductile shearing zones in the crust constrain the structural movement and magmatism. The density (specify) of mantle magma is much higher than that of the middle crust. The existence of detachment zones in the crust makes it easy for the mantle magma intrude into detachment zone in a large tongue shape. Because the tongue-shaped mantle intrusion could detach the sandwich structure of the middle-lower crust, parts of residual crust blocks would drop into the mantle magma. Meanwhile, the upwelling of the mantle magma results in faulting and subsiding of the upper crust, forming a fault basin controlled by listric faults around the basin margin.
With the increase of depth, the temperature and pressure of crust increases gradually, which causes the deep crust rock to be softened. Intruded high temperature mantle magma (1300–1000 °C for ultra-basic and basic magma) would heat and melt some crust rocks to form magma chambers that are filled with mantle-crust magma with a percentage of gas-liquid solution. The periodical energy accumulation and release in the magma chamber causes pulse eruptions or intrusions. The country rocks of magma chamber are progressively heated, so the temperature for melting country rocks decreases and the crust material in magma gradually increases. So, igneous rocks usually show the evolution sequence of basic → intermediate-basic → intermediate-acid → acid.
When the intermediate-acid igneous rocks reach a certain volume in the magmatic complex, a negative gravity anomaly would drive metamorphic country rocks to uplift together with the magmatic rocks, forming the magmatic-metamorphic complex in the core of the mantle branch. The uplifting of magmatic-metamorphic complexes either provides a connection for a sub-mantle plume and mantle branch or creates a migration channel for deep ore-bearing fluid and favorable structural expanding spaces for metallogenesis.

5.3. Mantle Branch Metallogenesis and Its Main Types of Mineralization

As mentioned above, once the mantle plume evolution links the crust to deep source, especially to the core-mantle boundary, the source material in the D“ layer would migrate up through the mantle plume → sub-mantle plume → mantle branch and concentrate to form a deposit in a favorable structural expanding zone of the mantle branch. These favorable structural expanding spaces include the brittle-ductile detachment zone in the core of the mantle branch, the contact zone between intrusion and country rock, the contact zone between metamorphic complex and cover rocks, faults and joints formed in the process of mantle branch uplifting. Different structural spaces result in different structural metallogenic types.
The core of the Guojiadian mantle branch (Linglong-type gold deposit): It mainly refers to the vein ore bodies in the core uplifting zone between the Jiaojia fault and the Potouqing fault. Ore bodies are hosted in Linglong granite and some metamorphic rocks. Fractures are well developed within ore-bearing geological bodies between the Jiaojia fault and the Linglong fault. The deposit type belongs to structural fracture veins. Ore veins are densely developed, and their gold grade is high. It is a major ore-forming and ore-controlling structure type in Jiaodong [14].
Detachment zone in the northwest margin of a mantle branch (Jiaojia-type gold deposit): The Jiaojia fault is a dominant ore-forming and ore-controlling structure in the northwest margin of the Guojiadian magmatic-metamorphic core complex. The fault has both great horizontal extension and vertical extension. It not only is a regional ore-conducting structure, but an important ore-forming and ore-controlling structure. Deposits controlled by this fault are the most famous fracture alteration gold deposits in Jiaodong. Recent ore prospecting works indicate that the vertical extension of ore bodies is usually larger than their horizontal extension. Previous proved gold deposits such as the Shizhuang deposit, the Matang deposit, and the Jiaojia deposit connect as a whole deeper down, which forms an ultra-large gold deposit. Deep prospecting works indicate that ore bodies show stable extension along the fault, which provides great prospecting potential for this gold deposit [14].
Sanshandao reverse listric fault belt (Sanshandao-type gold deposit): Recently, prospecting works for the Sanshandao metallogenic zone have made much progress. Viewing from metallogenesis, it is an ultra-large fracture alteration gold deposit that is strictly dominated by a reverse listric fault [13,44]. The giant gold mineralization zones, named the Sanshandao giant gold deposit, have been delineated in Sanshandao with several larger gold ore-bodies, which are thought to be an independent deposit previously [15].
Peripheral faults of a mantle branch (Pengjiakuang-type gold deposit): Due to the rapid splitting of the Laiyang fault basin, the structural contact belts around the Laiyang fault basin are developed between the Guojiadian mantle branch and the Laiyang fault basin. A certain thickness of ore-bearing conglomerate has developed in the structural contact belts. Studies indicate that conglomerate distribution belts are usually weak structure belts for ore-forming and ore-controlling, and they easily form typical conglomerate-type gold deposits.
Mantle branches mainly form under a tectonic setting transformed from regional compression to regional extension. A core complex, marginal main detachment zones, hanging wall cover rocks and related fault structures are the components of the mantle branch. The detachment zones and related faults are usually taken as main structural expanding zones for metallogenesis. Studying the fault distribution and ore-bearing potential, metallogenesis, metallogenic modes and metallogenic rule of mantle branches is important for guiding the next round of ore prospecting.

6. Conclusions

The Jiaodong mineralization concentration area is characterized by its large metallogenic scale, deep ore body extension, high ore grade, variety of deposits and great resource potential.
(1)
The multiple evolutions of mantle plume break the restriction of earth spheres (core, mantle, crust) structure, and provide an important channel for deep ore-forming material to migrate up. The study on the multiple evolutions of mantle plume elaborates the migration mechanism of heavy elements migrating from the core to shallow crust.
(2)
In the process of mantle plume multiple evolutions initiated from core-mantle boundary (D″ layer), heavy elements (such as gold and silver) which sank into the core by gravity differentiation migrate up in the form of a gas-liquid state. They are concentrated to form ore bodies in the favorable structural expanding zones in mantle branch and different fractures. Ultra-large gold deposits with huge reserves can be formed.
(3)
Metallogenic material came from deep earth and accumulated as ore-bodies in favorable structural expanding zones. Generally speaking, a favorable fault is not necessary to form deposits, but ore-bearing fault structure is linked to the deep earth. Favorable fault structures can be either migration channels for metallogenic material or hosting places for ore bodies.
(4)
Structure movement, magmatism and metallogenesis are critical factors in the mineralization of large metal deposits. The structure movement is the most important factor in igneous activity related to gold metallogenic events. In the Jiaodong area, the main faults play both roles of fluid migration channels and ore-hosting places, forming large to ultra-large gold deposits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N. and C.C.; Methodology, S.N.; Formal analysis, A.S.; Investigation, S.N., C.C., J.Z., F.Z., F.W. and A.S; Data curation, F.Z.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.N. and J.Z.; Writing— Review and editing, C.C. and F.W.; Project administration, S.N.; Funding acquisition, S.N., C.C. and F.W.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Key laboratory of Ministry of Land and Resources for gold metallogenic process and resource utilization” and the “Key laboratory of Shandong for metallogenic process and resource utilization” (fund No. 2013001); A special fund project for the Public welfare industry, “Study on the scientific base of typical metal deposits in China” (fund No. 200911007); Graduate demonstration course of Hebei province “Plate tectonics and mantle branch structures”(fund No. KCJSX2018089), and Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Hebei GEO University (fund No. BQ2018032).

Acknowledgments

The latest research results from several scholars were consulted during the compilation of this paper. Special thanks are paid to leaders, experts and relevant technicians from the Shandong Institute of Geological Science, the Shandong Department of Land and Resources, the Shandong Bureau of Geological Mineral Resource Exploration and Development and Shandong Gold Group Co., Ltd. for their enthusiastic guidance and helps.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deng, J.; Yang, L.Q.; Li, R.H.; Groves, D.I.; Santosh, M.; Wang, Z.L.; Sai, S.X.; Wang, S.R. Regional structural control on the distribution of world-class gold deposits: An overview from the Giant Jiaodong Gold Province, China. Geol. J. 2019, 54, 378–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deng, J.; Wang, C.M.; Bagas, L.; Carranza, E.; Lu, Y.J. Cretaceous–Cenozoic tectonic history of the Jiaojia Fault and gold mineralization in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: Constraints from zircon U–Pb, illite K–Ar, and apatite fission track thermochronometry. Miner. Depos. 2015, 50, 987–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Deng, J.; Wang, Q.F. Gold mineralization in China: Metallogenic provinces, deposit types and tectonic framework. Gondwana Res. 2016, 36, 219–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.R.; Santosh, M. Geodynamics of heterogeneous gold miner-alization in the North China Craton and its relationship to lithospheric destruction. Gondwana Res. 2017, 50, 267–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mills, S.E.; Tomkins, A.G.; Weinberg, R.F.; Fan, H.R. Implications of pyrite geochemistry for gold mineralisation and remobilisation in the Jiaodong gold district, northeast China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 71, 150–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Groves, D.I.; Santosh, M. The giant Jiaodong gold province: The key to a unified model for orogenic gold deposits? Geosci. Front. 2016, 7, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goldfarb, R.J.; Santosh, M. The dilemma of the Jiaodong gold deposits: Are they unique? Geosci. Front. 2014, 5, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, L.Q.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, L.; Goldfarb, R.J.; Yuan, W.M.; Weinberg, R.F.; Zhang, R.Z. Thermochronologic constraints on evolution of the Linglong Metamorphic Core Complex and implications for gold mineralization: A case study from the Xiadian gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 72, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, L.Q.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, L.; Guo, L.N.; Song, M.C.; Zheng, X.L. Mesozoic gold metallogenic system of the Jiaodong gold province, eastern China. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2014, 30, 2447–2467, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, L.; Li, G.W.; Zheng, X.L.; An, P.; Chen, B.Y. 40Ar/39Ar and fission-track dating constraints on the tectonothermal history of the world-class Sanshandao gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2016, 32, 2465–2476, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  11. Song, M.C.; Song, Y.X.; Cui, S.X.; Jiang, H.L.; Yuan, W.H.; Wang, H.J. Characteristic comparison between shallow and deep-seated gold ore bodies in Jiaojia superlarge gold deposit, northwestern Shandong peninsula. Miner. Depos. 2011, 30, 923–932, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Song, M.C.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, P.J.; Yang, L.Q.; Liu, D.H.; Ding, Z.J.; Song, Y.X. Discovery and tectonic-magmatic background of superlarge gold deposit in offshore of northern Sanshandao, Shandong Peninsula, China. Acta Geolo. Sin. 2015, 89, 365–383, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Song, M.C. The relevant issues of deep gold deposit exploration in China. Gold Sci. Technol. 2017, 25, 1–2. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Song, Y.X.; Song, M.C.; Ding, Z.J.; Wei, X.F.; Xu, S.H.; Li, J.; Tan, X.F.; Li, S.Y.; Zhang, Z.L.; Jiao, X.M.; et al. Important progress of deep ore prospecting and metallogenic characteristics in Jiaodong gold deposit concentration area. Gold Sci. Technol. 2017, 25, 4–18, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Song, G.Z.; Yan, C.M.; Cao, J.; Guo, Z.F.; Bao, Z.Y.; Liu, G.D.; Li, S.; Fan, J.M.; Liu, C.J. Breakthrough and significance of exploration at depth more than 1000 m in Jiaojia metallogenic belt, Jiaodong: A case of Shaling mining area. Gold Sci. Technol. 2017, 25, 19–27, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldfarb, R.J.; Groves, D.I.; Gardoll, S. Orogenic gold and geologic time: A global synthesis. Ore Geol. Rev. 2001, 18, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goldfarb, R.J.; Baker, T.; Dube, B.; Groves, D.I.; Hart, C.J.R.; Gosselin, P. Distribution, character, and genesis of gold deposits in metamorphic terranes. In Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume; Hedenquist, J.W., Thompson, J.F.H., Goldfarb, R.J., Richards, J.P., Eds.; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2005; pp. 407–450. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldfarb, R.J.; Hart, C.; Davis, G. East Asian gold: deciphering the anomaly of Phanerozoic gold in Precambrian cratons. Econ. Geol. 2007, 102, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qiu, Y.M.; Groves, D.I.; Mcnaughton, N.J.; Wang, L.G.; Zhou, T.H. Nature, age, and tectonic setting of granitoid-hosted, orogenic gold deposits of the Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern North China craton, China. Miner. Depos. 2002, 37, 283–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mao, J.W.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, Z.H.; Yu, J.J.; Niu, B.G. Geodynamic settings of Mesozoic large-scale mineralization in North China and adjacent areas. Sci. China (Ser. D Earth Sci.) 2003, 46, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, T.H.; Lv, G.X. Tectonics, granitoids and Mesozoic gold deposits in East Shandong, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2000, 16, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, Z.J.; Sun, F.Y.; Liu, F.L.; Liu, J.H.; Peng, Q.M.; Ji, P.; Li, B.L.; Zhang, P.J. Mesozoic geodynamic evolution and metallogenic series of major metal deposits in Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2015, 31, 3045–3080, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, S.Y.; Dai, B.Z.; Jiang, Y.H.; Zhao, H.X.; Hou, M.L. Jiaodong and Xiaoqinling:two orogenic gold province formed in different tectonic settings. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2009, 25, 2727–2738, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, L.; Santosh, M.; Li, S.R. The “Jiaodong-type gold” deposits—Characteristics, origin and prospecting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 589–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, R.X.; Fan, H.R.; Li, J.W.; Meng, Q.R.; Li, S.R. Decratonic gold deposits. Chin. Sci. Geosci. 2015, 58, 1523–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhai, M.G.; Fan, H.R.; Yang, J.H.; Miao, L.C. Large-scale cluster in east Shandong: Anorogenic metallogenesis. Earth Sci. Front. 2004, 11, 85–98, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  27. Mao, J.W.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, H.M.; Pirajno, F.; Zhang, C.Q.; Wang, R.T. The relationship of mantle-derived fluids to gold metallogenesis in the Jiaodong Peninsula: Evidence from D–O–C–S isotope systematics. Ore Geol. Rev. 2008, 33, 361–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, F.Y.; Shi, Z.L.; Feng, B.Z. Gold Deposit Geology and Differential Diagenesis and Mineralisation of Mantle-derived C–H–O Fluids in Jiaodong Peninsula; Jilin People’s Publishing House: Changchun, China, 1995; p. 170, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  29. Mao, J.W.; Wang, Y.T.; Ding, T.P.; Chen, Y.C.; Wei, J.X.; Yin, J.Z. Dashuigou tellurium deposit in Sichuan Province, China—An example of mantle fluid evolving in mineralized process: Evidences from C, O, H, S isotopes. Resour. Geol. 2002, 52, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, X.H.; Yang, J.H.; Zhang, L.C. Metallogenesis of super-large gold deposits in Jiaodong region and deep processes of subcontinental lithosphere beneath North China Craton in Mesozoic. Sci. China (Ser. D Earth Sci.) 2003, 46, 14–25. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, J.M.; Ye, J.; Xu, J.H.; Sun, J.G.; Shen, K. C–O and Sr–Nd isotopic geochemistry of carbonate minerals from gold deposits in East Shandong, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2003, 19, 775–784, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan, H.R.; Zhai, M.G.; Xie, Y.H.; Yang, J.H. Ore-forming fluids associated with granite-hosted gold mineralisation at the San shandao deposit, Jiaodong gold province, China. Miner. Depos. 2003, 38, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, B.D.; Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Zhang, J.Z. Deep Sources of Ore-forming Materials and Mantle Branch Structure in Association with Metallogenesis; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 187–212. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Niu, S.Y.; Hu, H.B.; Sun, A.Q. Shandong Mantle Branch and Its Ore-Forming, Ore-Controlling, Ore-Prospecting; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 1–256. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Hua, R.M.; Mao, J.W. A preliminary discussion on the Mesozoic metallogenic explosion in east China. Miner. Depos. 1999, 18, 300–307, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  36. Lv, G.X.; Guo, T.; Shu, B.; Shen, Y.K.; Liu, D.J.; Zhou, G.F.; Ding, Y.X.; Wu, J.C.; Zhao, K.G.; Sun, Z.F.; et al. Study on the multi-level controlling rule for thctonic system in Jiaodong gold-centralized area. Geotecton. Metallog. 2007, 2, 193–204, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  37. Sun, A.Q.; Niu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.Z.; Chen, C.; Ma, B.J.; Wang, B.D.; Zhang, X.F.; Zhang, F.X.; Liu, C. Analysis on the ore-controlling of Guojialing mantle branch structure in northwest Shangdong. Gold Sci. Technol. 2012, 20, 1–7, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  38. Leech, M.L.; Webb, L.E. Is the HP–UHP Hong’an–Dabie–Sulu orogen a piercing point for offset on the Tan–Lu fault? J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 63, 112–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deng, J.; Yang, L.Q.; Sun, Z.S.; Wang, J.P.; Wang, Q.F.; Xin, H.B.; Li, X.J. Ametallogenic model of gold deposits of the Jiaodong granite–green-stone belt. Acta Geol. Sin. 2003, 77, 537–546. [Google Scholar]
  40. Deng, J.; Yang, L.Q.; Ge, L.S.; Wang, Q.F.; Zhang, J.; Gao, B.F.; Zhou, Y.H.; Jiang, S.Q. Research advances in the Mesozoic tectonic regimes during the formation of Jiaodong ore cluster area. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2006, 16, 777–784. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ling, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.J.; Liu, K.; Ge, M.H.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.M. Geochemistry, geochronology, and tectonic setting of Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in the northern segment of the Tan–Lu Fault region, northeast China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2017, 144, 303–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yan, G.H.; Cai, J.H.; Ren, K.X.; Mu, B.L.; Li, F.T.; Chu, Z.Y. Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic geochemistry of late-Mesozoic alkaline-rich intrusions from the Tan-lu Fault zone: Evidence of the magma source. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 1223–1236. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhu, G.; Liu, C.; Gu, C.C.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.J.; Su, N.; Xiao, S.Y. Oceanic plate subduction history in the western Pacific Ocean: Constraint from late Mesozoic evolution of the Tan-Lu Fault Zone. Sci. China (Earth Sci.) 2018, 6, 386–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.J.; Ding, Z.J.; Liu, D.H.; Zhang, P.J.; Zou, J.; Ma, B.; Luan, G.D. Exploration practice and prospecting results of super-large gold mine of Sanshandao norther sea area in Laizhou city, Shandong province. Gold Sci. Technol. 2016, 24, 1–10, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  45. Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Zhang, J.Z.; Ma, B.J.; Wang, B.D.; Chen, C.; Zhang, F.X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.F. Discussion on the deep ore-controlling structure in gold deposit concentrated area of Northwestern Jiaodong. Acta Geol. Sin. 2011, 85, 1094–1107, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  46. Song, M.C.; Song, Y.X.; Ding, Z.J.; Wei, X.F.; Sun, Z.L.; Song, G.Z.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhang, P.J.; Wang, Y.G. The discovery of the Jiaojia and the Sanshandao giant gold geposits in Jiaodong peninsula and Discussion on relevant issues. Geotecton. Metallog. 2019, 43, 92–110, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  47. Song, M.C. The main achievements and key theory and methods of deep-seated prospecting in the Jiaodong gold concentration, Shandong province. Geol. Bull. China 2015, 34, 1758–1771, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu, L.L. Characteristics of Ore-Controlling Structures and Distribution of Mineralization Intensity in the Sanshandao Gold Deposit, Jiaodong peninsula, China. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu, X.P.; Feng, T.; Deng, Q.H.; Lei, Y.X.; Wang, X. Geological characteristics and prospecting direction of Xiling gold deposit in northwest Jiaodong. Gold 2017, 38, 15–18, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, X.O.; Cawood, P.A.; Wilde, S.A.; Liu, R.Q.; Song, H.L.; Li, W.; Snee, L.W. Geology and timing of mineralization at the Cangshang gold deposit, north-western Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Miner. Depos. 2003, 38, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.W. Mesozoic large scale mineralization in Jiaodong gold deposits: Chronology and geodynamics setting. In Proceedings of the Petrology and Geodynamics Seminar of China, Haikou, China, 19–24 November 2004; pp. 97–100, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, L.G.; Qiu, Y.M.; McNaughton, N.J.; Groves, D.I.; Luo, Z.K.; Huang, J.Z.; Miao, L.C.; Liu, Y.K. Constraints on crustal evolution and gold metallogeny in the Northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula, China, from SHRIMP U–Pb zircon studies of granitoids. Ore Geol. Rev. 1998, 13, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, R.H. Ore-controlling model of the Jiaojia gold belt, Shandong province. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang, J.H.; Zhou, X.H.; Chen, L.H. Dating of gold mineralization for super-large tectonite-type gold deposits in northwestern Jiaodong peninsula and its implications for gold metallogeny. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2000, 16, 454–458, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, A.N. Study on ore-controlling regularity of Hexi fault and metallogenic regularities of gold deposits in Jiaodong. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  56. Hou, L.M.; Jiang, S.Y.; Jiang, Y.H.; Ling, H.F. S-Pb Isotope geochemistry and Rb-Sr geochronology of the Penglai gold field in the eastern Shandong province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 2525–2533, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  57. Song, M.C.; Cui, S.X.; Yi, P.H.; Xu, J.X.; Yuan, W.H.; Jiang, H.L. Prospecting and Metallogenetic Model of Deep Large-Superlarge Gold Deposit in the Gold Concentration Area of Northwest Jiaodong; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 1–339. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, S.X.; Liu, C.C.; An, Y.H.; Wang, W.C.; Huang, T.L.; Yang, C.H. Jiaodong Gold Deposit Geology; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2007; pp. 1–423. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  59. Sha, D.M.; Yuan, L.H. Thecharacteristics, distribution and prospect of epithermal gold deposits. Geol. Resour. 2003, 12, 115–124, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, Z.F.; Zhao, L.S.; Zhou, Q.M.; Xu, J.K. Physicochemical constrains on mineralization of epithermal gold deposits in Muping-Rushan mineralization zone, eastern Shandong Province, China. Acta Mineral. Sin. 1994, 14, 270–278, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  61. Ye, T.Z.; Xue, J.L. Geological research in the deep ore prospecting of metal deposit. Geol. China. 2007, 34, 855–869. [Google Scholar]
  62. Teng, J.W. Material-energy exchange within the Earth and resources and disasters. Earth Sci. Front. 2001, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  63. Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Liu, X.H.; Zhang, J.Z.; Zhang, F.X.; Chen, C.; Ma, B.J.; Hou, J.L. Structural characteristics and ore-controlling of Beibo gold deposit in Jiaodong. Gold Sci. Technol. 2016, 24, 1–7, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  64. Wilson, J.T. A possible origin of the Hawaiian Islands. Can. J. Phys. 1963, 41, 863–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Morgan, W.J. Deep mantle convection plumes and plate motions. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 1972, 56, 203–213. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, Z.C.; Wang, F.S.; Hao, Y.L. Picrites from the Emeishan Large Igneous Province: Evidence for the Mantle Plume Activity. Acta Metall. Sin. 2005, 24, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  67. Niu, Y.L. On the great plume debate. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2005, 50, 1537–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Davies, G.F. Mantle plumes, mantle stirring and hotspot chemistry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1990, 99, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hou, Z.Q.; Lu, J.R.; Lin, S.Z. The Axial Zone Consisting of Pyrolite and Eclogite in the Emei Mantle Plume: Major, Trace Element and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotope Evidence. Acta Geol. Sin. 2005, 79, 200–219, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  70. Boss, A.P.; Sack, I.S. Formation and growth of deep mantle plume. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1985, 80, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Anderson, D.L. The thermal state of the upper mantle; no role for mantle plumes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2000, 27, 3623–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. French, S.W.; Romanowicz, B. Broad plumes rooted at the base of the Earth’s mantle beneath major hotspots. Nature 2015, 525, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gerya, T.V.; Stern, R.J.; Baes, M.; Sobolev, S.V.; Whattam, S.A. Plate tectonics on the Earth triggered by plume-induced subduction initiation. Nature 2015, 527, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Caruso, S.; Fiorentini, M.L.; Hollis, S.P.; Laflamme, C.; Baumgartner, R.J.; Steadman, J.A.; Savard, D. The fluid evolution of the Nimbus Ag-Zn-(Au) deposit: An interplay between mantle plume and microbial activity. Precambrian Res. 2018, 317, 211–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dobretsov, N.L.; Borisenko, A.S.; Izokn, A.E.; Zhmodik, S.M. A thermochemical model of Eurasian Permo-Triassic mantle plumes as a basis for prediction and exploration for Cu-Ni-PGE and rare-metal ore deposits. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2010, 51, 903–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kuzmin, M.I.; Yarmolyuk, V.V. Mantle plumes of Central Asia (Northeast Asia) and their role in forming endogenous deposits. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2015, 55, 120–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Berzina, A.P.; Berzina, A.N.; Gimon, V.O. The Sora porphyry Cu-Mo deposit (Kuznetsk Alatau): Magmatism and effect of mantle plume on the development of ore-magmatic system. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2011, 52, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, D.H. Basic concept, classification, evolution of mantle plume and large scale mineralization- probe into Southwestern China. Earth Sci. Front. (China Univ. Geosci. Beijing) 2001, 8, 67–72, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  79. Xu, YG.; Wang, Y.; Wei, X.; He, B. Mantle plumerelated mineralization and their principal controlling factors. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2013, 29, 3307–3322, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  80. Niu, S.Y.; Cheng, G.S.; Zhang, J.Z.; Sun, A.Q.; Ma, B.J.; Zhang, F.X.; Wang, B.D.; Xu, M.; Wu, J.C.; Zhao, R.X.; et al. Study on the Metallogenetism of Sub-mantle Plume and Mantle Branches in the Gold Mineralization Concentration Area of Northwest Jiaodong Peninsula. Acta Geol. Sin. (Engl. Ed.) 2014, 88, 1409–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Niu, S.Y.; Hou, Q.L.; Hou, Z.Q.; Sun, A.Q.; Wang, B.D.; Li, H.Y.; Xu, C.S. Cascaded Evolution of Mantle Plumes and Metallogenesis of Core- and Mantle-derived Elements. Acta Geol. Sin. (Engl. Ed.) 2003, 77, 522–536. [Google Scholar]
  82. Niu, S.Y.; Guo, L.J.; Liu, J.M.; Shao, J.A.; Wang, B.D.; Hu, H.B.; Sun, A.Q.; Wang, S. Tectonic ore-controlling in the middle-southern segment of Da Hinggan Ling, Northeast China. Chin. J. Geochem. 2006, 25, 62–70. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wang, B.D.; Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Zhang, J.Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.E. Isotope tracers for deep-seated fluids and noble gases. Chin. J. Geochem. 2013, 32, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, B.D.; Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Li, H.Y. The isotopic composition of noble gases in gold deposits and the source of ore-forming materials in the region of North Hebei, China. Chin. J. Geochem. 2003, 22, 313–319. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chen, C.; Niu, S.Y.; Wang, Z.L.; Guo, Z.; Sun, A.Q.; Wang, B.D.; Gao, Y.C. Comparison between the Xishimen gold deposit the Shihu gold deposit in western Hebei analysis of the potential for ore exploration. Chin. J. Geochem. 2011, 30, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhu, G.; Liu, G.S.; Niu, M.L.; Song, C.Z.; Wang, D.X. Transcurrent movement and genesis of the Tan-Lu fault zone. Geol. Bull. China 2003, 22, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ye, J.L.; Huang, D.H.; Zhang, J.X. Introduction to Geology; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1996. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  88. Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Shao, A.G.; Wang, B.D.; Zhao, M.H.; Wang, L.F.; Jiang, W.; Xu, C.S. The Multiple Evolution of Mantle Plume and Its Mineralization; Seismological Press: Beijing, China, 2001; pp. 41–175. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  89. Huo, M.Y. A tomic structure model of gold and its mineralization model. In Gold Economics; Tu, G.C., Huo, M.Y., Eds.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1991; pp. 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  90. Niu, S.Y.; Sun, A.Q.; Wang, B.D. Mantle Plume and Natural Resources Environment; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2007; pp. 1–183, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geological map of the Sanshandao area. (a) Regional location map, from [1]; (b) geological map, modified after [44]; (c) geological structure sketch of A–B area).
Figure 1. Geological map of the Sanshandao area. (a) Regional location map, from [1]; (b) geological map, modified after [44]; (c) geological structure sketch of A–B area).
Minerals 09 00249 g001
Figure 2. (a) Thickness isoline (unit: m) and (b) grade isoline (unit: ppm) for ore body I-2 in the Shaling deposit (modified after [15]). Red lines indicate the branches and extension direction of isoline.
Figure 2. (a) Thickness isoline (unit: m) and (b) grade isoline (unit: ppm) for ore body I-2 in the Shaling deposit (modified after [15]). Red lines indicate the branches and extension direction of isoline.
Minerals 09 00249 g002
Figure 3. (a) Thickness isoline and (b) grade isoline of No.1 orebody in the Jiaojia gold deposit (from [57]).
Figure 3. (a) Thickness isoline and (b) grade isoline of No.1 orebody in the Jiaojia gold deposit (from [57]).
Minerals 09 00249 g003
Figure 4. Sub-mantle plume-mantle branch evolution and its metallogenesis: Mantle plume-sub-mantle plume mode (I) and Sub-mantle plume-mantle branch metallogenic mode (II).
Figure 4. Sub-mantle plume-mantle branch evolution and its metallogenesis: Mantle plume-sub-mantle plume mode (I) and Sub-mantle plume-mantle branch metallogenic mode (II).
Minerals 09 00249 g004
Table 1. Geological characteristics and metallogenic ages of typical Au deposits in northwestern Jiaodong.
Table 1. Geological characteristics and metallogenic ages of typical Au deposits in northwestern Jiaodong.
Ore DepositReserve and GradeWall Rocks and Intrusions and AgeOrebody and Main Metallic MineralsMetallogenic AgeReference
Sanshandao-Cangshang NE Ductile-Brittle Fracture Zone
Northern sea area of SanshandaoAu: 470 t,
4.23 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 140–160 Ma); Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 125–130 Ma)Large veins and large lenses locally; Disseminated, einlet-reticulated pyrite-sericite cataclastic rock type ore;
The main ore mineral in the ore is pyrite, followed by galena, Sphalerite, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite, limonite, magnetite, etc.
-[46,47]
SanshandaoAu: >20 t,
3.40 ppm
Jurassic granite
(zircon U-Pb 127 ± 2 Ma)
Flat or lenticular; Pyrite sericite type and gold-bearing pyrite sericite granitic cataclastic rock type; It is mainly pyrite, followed by arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.Altered Sericite Rb-Sr isochron age
117.6 ± 3.0 Ma
[48]
XilingAu: 383 t,
4.63 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 140–160 Ma);
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 125–130 Ma)
Large lenticular; Pyrite sericitized granitic cataclastic rocks type; pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.-[49]
XinliAu: 112 t,
2.78 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 140–160 Ma);
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 125–130 Ma)
Large vein-type orebodylenticular; Veinlet-disseminated pyrite-sericite cataclastic rocks type; pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.-
CangshangAu: 2 t, 4.93 ppmGuojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 127 ± 2 Ma)lamellar; Pyrite sericitized cataclastic rocks type;
pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.
Altered Sericite 40Ar–39Ar isochron age 121.3 ± 0.2 Ma[50]
Longkou-Laizhou NE Ductile-Brittle Fracture Zone
Jiaojia (deep)Au: 73 t,
4.91 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 153–160 Ma);
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 126–130 Ma)
Stratiform and vein; Pyrite sericitized cataclastic rocks type; Pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.Altered Sericite 40Ar–39Ar isochron age
120.5 ± 0.6 Ma;
120.1 ± 0.2 Ma;
120.2 ± 0.2Ma
[19,51,52]
XinchengAu: 12 t,
3.32 ppm
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 127 ± 2 Ma)Lamellar, branched, compound and dilated with shrinkage; Veinlet disseminated and reticulated ores; Pyrite, chalcopyrite and galena, etc.Altered Sericite 40Ar–39Ar isochron age 120.2–120.9 Ma;
Beresite Rb-Sr isochron age 116. 6 ± 5.3 Ma
[51,53,54]
HexiAu: 13 t,
6.64 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 153–160 Ma);
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 126–130 Ma)
Lenticular, bifurcated along strike; Reticulated pyrite sericitized granitic cataclastic rock type type; Metal minerals are mainly pyrite, natural gold and bismuth tellurite, followed by chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, silver-gold ore, gold-silver ore, pyrrhotite, porphyry and malachite, etc.Pyrite in ore Rb-Sr isochron age 112 Ma[55,56]
ShalingAu: 389 t,
2.92 ppm
Linglong gneissic granite, Guojiadian granite (zircon U-Pb 153–160 Ma);
Guojialing granodiorite (zircon U-Pb 126–130 Ma)
Lamellar, and veined, branched, compound, inflated and pinched Pyrite sericitized cataclastic rocks type; pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite, etc.-[15,46]
Table 2. Division and correlation of Cretaceous strata in Jiaodong
Table 2. Division and correlation of Cretaceous strata in Jiaodong
ChronostratigraphyLithostratigraphySequence StratigraphyBiota
Radioactive Dating (Ma)
Sedimentary
Environment
EraPeriodSeriesGroupFormationMemberGrade 2Grade 3System
MesozoicCretaceousUpper aeriesWangshi geoupJingangkouShijiatun basaltMs4Ksq7NLSTSkacrium-Phyrsa
Mollusk fauna
Restrictedbasin
HongtuyaProtosaunus
Dinosaur fauna
River
68–70Layeredvolcano
88 MaXIHadrosauridae
Dinosaur fauna
River
Middle seriesXingezhuangKsq6LESTViuikaruc-Skhacrium
Mollusk fauna
Yanjiestheria Estheria fauna
Shallow lake
LinjiazhuangXLLSTPsittacasaunue
Dinosaur fauna
River
Pingshan groupDasheng groupFanggezhuanMengtuan
Siqiangcun
Ms3IXLEST
LLST
90–100Volcanic basinLake
River
112 MaBamudi ShiqianzhuangTianjialou
Malanggou
Ksq4LESTYanjiestherla Estheria fauna 100–110Lake
Lower seriesLLST110–120River
DatulingVIIILESTLake
XiaodianLLSTRier
VII-120–126-
HoukuangVI
Laiyang groupMalianpoFajiaying-Ms2Ksq3-Marine algae
Bryozoon
Foraminiferan
-RestrictedgnlfRestrictedlake
ChengshanhouDncunQugezhuangVNLST Nakamuranaia Bivalvian faunaVolcanicbasin-
YangjiazhaungLongwangzhuangKsq2LCST-RiverShallow lake
ShuinanLCSLaiyang biotaDeep lake
ZhifengzhuangIVLEST--
LinsishanLLET
WawukuangKsq1LESTDeep lake
137 MaLLST-
Note: Ms—Marine flooding surface; NLST—Non-Lacustrine system tract; LEST—Lacustrine extension system tract; LLST—Lacustrine lowstand system tract; LCST—Lacustrine contraction system tract.
Table 3. Distribution of gold and silver in the earth’s layers [89].
Table 3. Distribution of gold and silver in the earth’s layers [89].
The Earth’s LayersMass Percentage of Crust-Mantle-Core (%)Distribution of GoldDistribution of Silver
Abundance ppbWeight Ratio
ppb
Volume Ratio
(%)
Abundance
ppb
Weight Ratio
ppb
Volume Ratio
(%)
Crust0.43.01.20.0042380.032.00.01005
Mantle68.11.068.10.2396255.03745.51.17495
Core31.5900.028,350.099.7561510,000.0315,000.098.81500
Earth100.0284.028,419.3100.000003188.0318,777.5100.00000

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, S.; Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, F.; Sun, A. The Thermal and Dynamic Process of Core → Mantle → Crust and the Metallogenesis of Guojiadian Mantle Branch in Northwestern Jiaodong. Minerals 2019, 9, 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9040249

AMA Style

Niu S, Chen C, Zhang J, Zhang F, Wang F, Sun A. The Thermal and Dynamic Process of Core → Mantle → Crust and the Metallogenesis of Guojiadian Mantle Branch in Northwestern Jiaodong. Minerals. 2019; 9(4):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9040249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Shuyin, Chao Chen, Jianzhen Zhang, Fuxiang Zhang, Fengxiang Wang, and Aiqun Sun. 2019. "The Thermal and Dynamic Process of Core → Mantle → Crust and the Metallogenesis of Guojiadian Mantle Branch in Northwestern Jiaodong" Minerals 9, no. 4: 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9040249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop