Next Article in Journal
Tectonic-Thermal Evolution of the Wadi El-Dahal Area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt: Constraints on the Suez Rift Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Compositional Signatures of Gold from Different Deposit Types in British Columbia, Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Structure and Properties of Water in a New Model of the 10-Å Phase: Classical and Ab Initio Atomistic Computational Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gold–Sulfide Mineralization in the Manitanyrd Region, Polar Urals, Russia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Palladian Gold: Chemical Composition, Minerals in Association, and Physicochemical Conditions of Formation at Different Types of Gold Deposits

by
Galina A. Palyanova
1,*,
Pavel S. Zhegunov
2,
Tatiana V. Beliaeva
1,
Valery V. Murzin
3,
Andrey A. Borovikov
1 and
Nikolay A. Goryachev
4
1
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademika Koptyuga Pr., 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Piipa Blvd. 9, 683006 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia
3
Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademika Vonsovskogo Street, 15, 620110 Ekaterinburg, Russia
4
North-East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Portovaya Street, 16, 685000 Magadan, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081019
Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 24 July 2023 / Accepted: 28 July 2023 / Published: 30 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Native Gold as a Specific Indicator Mineral for Gold Deposits)

Abstract

:
This paper reviews and summarizes the available information on the composition of palladian gold with various contents and sets of isomorphic impurities (Ag, Cu, Hg) at 50 deposits and ore occurrences with Au-Pd mineralization. It is revealed that Palladian gold is represented by the systems Au–Pd, Au–Pd–Hg, Au–Pd–Cu, and Au–Pd–Ag–Hg, but more frequently corresponds to Au–Pd–Ag, Au–Pd–Ag–Cu, and Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg. Objects with palladian gold belong to different types of gold deposits and to the deposits at which the main components of ores are PGE, Cr, Cu, Ni, V, and Ti. We propose a classification of the types of deposits with palladian gold: (1) PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes (two subtypes—(a) low-sulfide-grade (less than 2%–5% sulfides) Alaskan, and (b) high-sulfide-grade (more than 5% sulfides) Norilsk); (2) orogenic gold deposits (OG); (3) epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper deposits (EPGC); (4) iron oxide copper gold deposits (IOCG); (5) ferruginous quartzite deposits; (6) volcanic exhalation; and (7) gold-PGE placers of five subtypes corresponding to the types of 1–5 primary sources. Physicochemical conditions of the formation of palladian gold at some deposits of type 1 cover two areas—magmatic high-temperature and hydrothermal low-temperature. At the majority of deposits of types 2–4, its formation proceeds with the participation of hydrothermal fluids (300–60 °C) of various salinities (0.2–30 wt.% NaCl eq.). Palladian gold is mainly high-fineness (910‰–990‰), is less frequently medium-fineness, and contains Ag and Cu, but does not contain Hg at the deposits of types 1, 3, and 4. The only exception is the Au-Pd-Hg Itchayvayam ore occurrence (Kamchatka, Russia), for which two varieties of Pd,Hg-bearing native gold (fineness 816‰–960‰ and 580‰–660‰) are determined. Low-fineness palladian gold with the major content of Ag is typical of OGD deposits. Medium-fineness palladian gold occurs at ferruginous quartzite deposits and in volcanic exhalations. Hg, Ag, Cu-bearing high-fineness palladian gold is present mainly in placer deposits (type 7). The most common minerals in association with palladian gold are arsenides, stibioarsenides, sulfides, stannides, bismuthides, tellurides, and selenides of Pd and Pt. These are typical of deposit types 1 and 7. The minerals of Au, Ag, and Cu (tetra-auricupride, aurostibite, chalcopyrite, bornite, chalcocite, eucairite, etc.) are in association with palladian gold at OG, EPGC, and IOCG deposits. Hg minerals (cinnabar, tiemannite, coloradoite, potarite) are at some deposits (types 1, 2, 7-1, 7-4). Cu, Fe, and Pd oxides (tenorite, hematite, magnetite, PdO, (Pd,Cu)O) and Fe and Pd hydroxides (goethite, (Fe,Pd)OOH) occur at the deposits of the 3, 4, and 7 groups and indicate the highly oxidizing conditions of ore formation. The most common minerals among host minerals are quartz and muscovite, including fuchsite (Cr-Ms), chlorite, albite, K-feldspar, hornblende, and carbonates (calcite, siderite, etc.). The fineness, content, and set of impurities in palladian gold and minerals in association with it reflect the mineralogy of Au-Pd ores and allow them to be used as indicators for the deposit types.

1. Introduction

Pure native gold without impurities (fineness 1000‰) is rare in nature. It contains some elements in the form of isomorphic (isostructural, i.e., included in the crystal structure without changing it) impurities and mineral microinclusions. Depending on their concentration, impurity-elements may be classified as major (>10 wt.%), minor (1–10 wt.%), and trace (<1 wt.%). Native gold with only silver impurity (argentian gold or Ag-bearing gold) is most widely spread at gold deposits [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Some review papers report data on the varieties of native gold with copper (cuprian gold), mercury (gold amalgam or mercury gold), and palladium (palladian gold) impurities [1,2,9,10,11,12]. On the basis of the occurrence and concentration, Petrovskaya (1973) [1] referred Pd to rare poorly studied impurities, Hg to third-rate, Cu to secondary, and Ag to major elements. A great number of new data on the content of impurities in native gold appeared over the past five decades. All these four elements, depending on their content, can be referred to as major, minor, and trace impurities.
Native gold often contains microinclusions of ore minerals, silicates, oxides, carbonates, etc. Special attention during recent years has been paid to the study of the impurities and minerals in paragenesis with native gold, since these characteristics are important informative signs of deposits with different types of mineralization [8,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Effective criteria for forecasting and searching for gold deposits can be provided by a study of the mineralogical–geochemical composition of native gold.
Native gold containing palladium was called «porpecite» after the place where it was first discovered in 1798 in the Porpez region of Brazil in the deposits of itabirites (layered quartzites with magnetite and hematite). The name “porpecite” was not approved by the CNMNC MMA, since the Pd-bearing gold or palladian gold (Au,Pd) is a structural analog and is considered as a Pd-rich chemical variety of native gold (www.mindat.org, accessed on 15 January 2022). Palladian gold was found to contain Ag [19,20], Cu [21,22], and Hg [23,24,25], whereas Fe, Ni, Pt, Rh, and other impurities are rare [21,26,27].
The purpose of this work is to analyze data on the composition and minerals in the association of palladian gold with impurities (Ag, Cu, and Hg) from different deposits, and to summarize the T,P,X-conditions for the formation of Au-Pd mineralization and to classify the deposits. Analysis of literature data and the results of our research show that the great number of existing deposits with palladian gold require classification. Earlier, reviews were made on the composition of Au-Pd mineralization at endogenous [28] and placer deposits with native gold containing Pd and Ag [20]. Since that time, much data on new deposits with palladian gold have been published ([11], and cited references). New data on the compositions of palladian gold and its minerals in the association have been recently obtained by the authors of this paper for such deposits as Chudnoe [29], Volkovskoe [30], Ozernoe [31] (Urals, Russia), and Bleida Far West (Morocco) [32], and for the placers and ore occurrences of the mafic–ultramafic Itchayvayam massif (Kamchatka, Russia) [33], which differ from other deposits. In this paper, we present a review of the composition of palladian gold of the systems Au–Pd, Au–Pd–Ag, Au–Pd–Hg, and Au–Pd–Cu and the more complex systems Au–Pd–Ag–Cu, Au–Pd–Ag–Hg, Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg, etc.
The study of the composition of native gold is of great scientific and practical importance [14,34,35,36,37,38]. Native gold is a significant indicator mineral for Au-bearing deposits [12,14,39]. The composition of native gold is often used as a predictive tool in the study of the genesis of ore deposits and factors that determine the speciation of mineralization [12,40,41]. Chapman et al. (2021) [12], after analyzing the chemical composition of native gold, concluded that the concentrations of Cu, Hg, and Pd can be important indicators of different types of deposits. The level of concentrations and the ratios of various elements in individual gold particles can be responsible for the geochemical history and “prints” of ore-forming processes. Data on the variations in the concentrations of Pd and other elements (Ag, Cu, Hg) in native gold and specific features of the minerals in association and their occurrence in different types of rocks and ore-forming systems can be used for solving geological tasks that arise when promising gold-bearing areas are under study.

2. Geological Setting and Deposits with Palladian Gold

Palladium gold is present in the deposits of various geneses—magmatic, hydrothermal, and sedimentary-exogenous. The latter are the result of the transformation and differentiation of mineral matter of endogenous origin (magmatic or hydrothermal). Palladian gold often occurs in the placers, the sources for many of which have not been determined.
The deposits and ore occurrences with palladian gold are located in Canada, Brazil, England, Scotland, Poland, Spain, USA, Morocco, Guinea, and other countries [11,20,28]. The mindat.org database contains data on findings of palladian gold in Belgium, Germany, and Venezuela. More than twenty deposits and ore occurrences with palladian gold are known in Russia [11]. The geographical spread and geological–structural location of deposits with palladian gold are shown in Figure 1. They occur in different geological and dynamic settings—terranes, orogenic belts, and shields. According to dating assessments, the processes of formation of Au-Pd mineralization took place in the Archean, Proterozoic, Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic.

3. Methods

Impurity elements in native gold are determined using chemical, spectral, electron probe microanalyses (EPMA), inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The chemical and spectral methods as well as ICP-MS require a considerable amount of native gold and its purification from other minerals. Systematic studies of the typomorphism of native gold from different territories of Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, with the application of semi-quantitative ICP-MS analysis carried out in Russia [14,80], showed the presence of 70 chemical elements in it. The drawback of the chemical, spectral, and ICP-MS methods is the inability to separate isomorphic impurities and mineral microinclusions in native gold.
EPMA is used for quantitative analysis of the elemental composition of native gold at a micrometer scale. The detection sensitivity of many elements in the local electron raster microprobe analysis is limited by concentrations no less than 0.1–0.01 wt.%. A more complex composition of native gold can be detected by LA-ICP-MS, the sensitivity of which is considerably higher than that of EPMA. With the appearance of the LA-ICP-MS technique [81] for determining the composition of microelements in solid samples, data on micro- and trace elements in native gold were obtained [35,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. The laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer has high sensitivity and low detection levels required for measuring microelements in amounts up to ppb (1 per billion). One of the advantages of this technique is the possibility of cleaning the sample surface. LA-ICP-MS is widely used by foreign scientists to study the composition of gold and has not been used for studying gold in Russia yet. According to Chapman et al. (2023) [91], limits of detection (LODs) for Pd and Cu were typically around 900 ppm and 200 ppm, respectively, whilst the avoidance of spectral interference between the HgMα and AuMβ X-rays necessitated using the HgMβ X-ray line and the associated higher detection limit of 3000 ppm.
In the majority of studies, the chemical composition of native gold was investigated using EPMA, and less frequently, LA-ICP-MS. The concentration of elements Ag, Cu, Pd, and Hg in native gold is commonly measured using EPMA. The spectrum accumulation time in electron probe microanalysis is 20 or more—60–80 s. Macro-impurities in native gold are determined using SEM/EDS, which allows one to determine Ag, Cu, Pd, and Hg with detection limits of 100–1000 ppm.
We analyzed the samples of ores and individual gold grains with Pd-bearing gold from the Chudnoe, Volkovskoe, and Ozernoe deposits (Urals, Russia) and from placers and ore occurrences of the mafic–ultramafic Itchayvayam massif (Kamchatka, Russia) and Au-Pd Bleida Far West deposit (Morocco). Chemical analyses of native gold and other minerals were conducted at the Analytical Center for Multi-elemental and Isotope Research in the IGM SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) using a MIRA 3 LMU scanning electron microscope (Tescan Orsay Holding, Brno, Czech Republic) equipped with an X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) AZtec Energy XMax-50 (Oxford Instruments Nanoanalysis, Oxford, UK) (analysts Dr. N. Karmanov, M. Khlestov). The composition of native gold was studied at the following parameters: accelerating voltage was 20 kV and live spectrum acquisition time was 60 s (total area of spectra ~106 counts). The following X-rays were selected: K series for Fe, Cu, and As and L series for Pd, Ag, Sb, Au, and Hg. We used pure metals (Fe, Cu, Pd, Ag, Au) and InAs for As and HgTe for Hg as the standards. The detection limits (in wt.%) were 0.1 Fe, 0.15 Cu, 0.25 Pd, Ag, Sb, 0.3 As, 0.6 Au, and 0.8 Hg. The error in determining the main components with contents higher than 10 wt.% did not exceed 1 relative (rel.) %, and when the content of components ranged from 2 to 10 wt.%, the error was no higher than 6–8 rel. %. Close to the limit of detection, the error was 15–20 rel.%. In some cases, the spectrum acquisition time increased to 120 s, and the lower limits of determined contents and the random error of the analysis decreased about 1.4 times. This review is primarily based on the EPMA results. A significant amount of EPMA data was taken from the published literature.

4. Results

4.1. Composition, Fineness, and Mineral Associations of Palladian Gold

Palladian gold rarely consists of the binary Au-Pd system; it most frequently contains the ternary Au-Pd-Ag, Au-Pd-Cu, and Au-Pd-Hg, and even more complex systems Au-Pd-Ag-Cu, Au-Pd-Ag-Hg, and Au-Pd-Ag-Cu-Hg. Several varieties of palladian gold were found at many deposits. Along with palladian gold, Ag-bearing gold and other varieties of native gold are present at these deposits. Below, we present data on the composition of palladian gold in the binary (Au-Pd), ternary (Au-Pd-Ag, Au-Pd-Cu, Au-Pd-Hg), quaternary (Au-Pd-Ag-Hg, Au–Pd–Ag–Cu), and five-element (Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg) systems, as well as minerals in association and examples of deposits.
According to the “50 mole % rule” for the mineral nomenclature recommended by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (CNMMN) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) [92], the formula composition of palladian gold can be represented as Au1-xPdx, where x < 0.5 atomic part, when calculating the formula for 1 atomic unit. Au-Pd solid solutions with Ag, Cu, and Hg impurities can be present as Au1-x-y-z-dPdxAgyCuzHgd, where 0 < x (Pd atomic part in native gold) < 0.5; y, z, d in total ≤0.5 − x atomic parts; and 1 − x − y − z − d > x, y, z, d. The fineness of native gold is calculated by the equation (1000*Au/(Au + Pd + Me1 + Me2 + and so on), where Au, Pd, and other metals (Ag, Cu, Hg, Pt, Ni, Fe) are expressed as wt.%).
Terms used to characterize the amounts of gold in Au-Ag solid solutions—very high-fineness 999‰–951‰, high-fineness 950‰–900‰, medium-fineness 899‰–800‰, relatively low-fineness 799‰–700‰, and low-fineness gold 699‰–400‰; kustelite 399‰–100‰; silver <100‰—were proposed by Petrovskaya (1973) [1]. We used the same terms to characterize palladian gold. The compositions of solid solutions depend on the amounts of impurities of palladium, copper, mercury, and other metals, and the fineness intervals corresponding to native gold can change, which is determined by the atomic weight and the amount of the impurity element. According to the “50 mole % rule”, the fineness of palladian gold can be more than 649‰ (Au0.5Pd0.5), cuprian gold > 756‰ (Au0.5Cu0.5), argentian gold > 630‰ (Au0.5Ag0.5), and gold amalgam > 495‰ (Au0.5Hg0.5).
Mineral abbreviations used in the tables are taken from [93] albite (Ab), allanite (Aln), altaite (Alt, PbTe), anilite (Ani, Cu7S4), anyuiite (Any, AuPb2), apatite (Ap, Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH)), arsenopyrite (Apy, FeAsS), atheneite (Ah, (Pd,Hg)3As), atokite (Ato, (Pd,Pt)3Sn), auricupride (Auc, Cu3Au), aurostibite (Ausb, AuSb2), biotite (Bt), bohdanowiczite (Boh, AgBiSe), bornite (Bn, Cu5FeS4), braggite (Bg, (Pt,Pd,Ni)S), burangaite (Brg, (Na,Ca)(Fe2+,Mg)Al5(PO4)4(OH,O)6∙2H2O), calcite (Cal, CaCO3), carbonates (Carb), cerussite (Cer, PbCO3), chalcocite (Cc, Cu2S), chalcopyrite (Ccp, CuFeS2), chlorargyrite (Cag, AgCl), chlorites (Chl), clinopyroxenes (Cpx), chrisstanleyite (Csl, Ag2Pd3Se4), cinnabar (Cin, HgS), clausthalite (Cth, PbSe), coloradoite (Clr, HgTe), cooperite (Cpe, (Pt,Pd,Ni)S), empressite (Eps, AgTe), epidote (Ep), eucairite (Eca, AgCuSe), feldspar (Fsp), fischesserite (Fis, Ag3AuSe2), fuchsite (Cr-Ms), galena (Gn, PbS), goethite (Gth), gold (Au), gypsum (Gp), hematite (Hem, Fe2O3), hessite (Hes, Ag2Te), isoferroplatinum (Ifpt, Pt3Fe), isomertieite (Ism, Pd11Sb2As2); kaolinite (Kln), keithconnite (Kei, Pd3-xTe(x = 0.14 to 0.43)), K-feldspar (Kfs), kotulskite (Ktu, PdTe), magnetite (Mag, Fe3O4), merenskyite (Mrk, (Pd,Pt)(Te,Bi)2), mertieite-I (Met-I, Pd11(Sb,As)4), mertieite-II (Met-II, Pd8(Sb,As)3), monazite (Mnz, REE(PO4)), moncheite (Mon, (Pt,Pd)(Te,Bi)2), muscovite (Ms), naumannite (Nau, Ag2Se), oosterboschite (Oos, (Pd,Cu)7Se3), padmaite (Pdm, PdBiSe), palladium (Pd), palladoarsenide (Pda, Pd2As), palladseite (Pds, Pd17Se15), paolovite (Plv, Pd2Sn), pentlandite (Pn, (Fe,Ni)9S8), perite (Pe, PbBiClO2), platinum (Pt), plumbum (Pb), potarite (Ptr, PdHg), pyracmonite (Pyr, (NH4)3Fe(SO4)3), pyrite (Py, FeS2), pyrrhotite (Pyh, Fe1-xS (x = 0 to 0.17)), quartz (Qz), silver (Ag), skaergaardite (Skg, PdCu), sobolevskite (Sov, Pd(Bi,Te)), sperrylite (Spy, PtAs2), stannopalladinite (Spdn, (Pd,Cu)3Sn2), stibiopalladinite (Stpdn, Pd3Sb), sudburyite (Sdb, PdSb), sudovikovite (Svi, PtSe2), sylvanite (Syv, AgAuTe4), telluropalladinite (Tpdn, Pd9Te4), temagamite (Tem, Pd3HgTe3), tenorite (Tnr, CuO), tetra-auricupride (Taur, AuCu), tetraferroplatinum (Tfpt, PtFe), tiemannite (Tmn, HgSe), tourmaline (Tur), umangite (Um, Cu3Se2), vasilseverginite (Vas, Cu9O4(AsO4)2(SO4)2), vysokýite (Vys, U4+[AsO2(OH)2]4∙4H2O), and vysotskite (Vsk, (Pd,Ni)S).

4.1.1. Palladian Gold and Au-Pd System

Palladian gold of composition Au1-xPdx, where x ≤ 0.5 is atomic part Pd (<35.1 wt.%) without impurities, was discovered at several deposits and ore occurrences. As an example, Table 1 shows data for four objects: two endogenous—Krutoe ore occurrences in gabbro-dolerites of Pay-Khoy Ridge (Yugor peninsula, Arkhangelsk region, Russia) [51] and Uderei Au-Sb deposit (Yenisei Ridge, Russia) [49], and two placer ore occurrences—Lammermuir Hills (Scotland) [20] and the Chorokh river (Artvin district, Turkey) [60].
Palladian high-fineness gold (Pd content 3.7–5.1 wt.%, fineness 949‰–963‰) with inclusions of argentian gold (Ag content 7.47–15.3 wt.%, fineness 850‰–920‰, sizes from 2 to 100 µm) is intergrown with chalcopyrite in quartz veins and hornblende of gabbro-dolerites in the axial zone of the sill of the Pay-Khoy Ridge (Krutoe ore occurrence, Russia) [51]. Shaibekov et al. (2020) [51] reported that the early (magmatic) association of Au-Pd-Te mineralization is represented by the decomposition products of the ternary Ag—Au—Cu system (tetra-auricupride AuCu and Au-Ag-Cu phases containing Cu from 14.2 to 64.7 wt.% and Ag to 10.2 wt.%), antimonides and stibiotellurides of Pd, and arsenides of Pt (sudburyite, testibiopalladite, and sperrylite), whereas the late (hydrothermal) association, by the minerals of binary Au-Pd and Au-Ag systems, is represented by tellurides of Hg, Pb, and Ag.
Palladian gold from the Uderei deposit contains from 3.3 to 7.9 wt.% Pd and is high-fineness (920‰–970‰) [49]. It occurs in the intergrowth with argentian gold (Ag content from 2.1 to 24.2 wt.%, 760‰–980‰) or pure metal (1000‰). Both varieties of native gold occur in association with arsenopyrite, pyrite, and aurostibite. Gold–antimony ores from this deposit were found to contain grains of zinkenite, chalcostibite, ullmannite, galena, sphalerite, and cinnabar [49].
Native gold from the placers of the Chorokh river (Artvin district, Turkey) contains high concentrations of Pd (26.5–38.5 wt.%, Au0.58Pd0.42–Au0.45Pd0.55) and, hence, is lower-fineness (649‰–724‰) [60]. In palladian gold, microinclusions of native palladium (Pd0.95Au0.05) were detected. The composition of Au-Pd solid solutions with Pd concentrations of more than 35.1 wt.% (Au0.50Pd0.50–Pd0.55Au0.45) should be attributed to native palladium.
At the ore occurrences of Lammermuir Hills (Scotland) [20], palladian gold contains up to 5.8 wt.% Pd (Au0.9Pd0.1, 942‰) and occurs in association with Au-Cu intermetallic compounds—tetra-auricupride and Au3Cu without Pd impurities, as well as with aurostibite, bohdanowiczite, naumannite, umangite, tiemannite, merenskyite, pyrite, arsenopyrite, galena, and carbonates. Placer gold is heterogeneous and has the characteristics of endogenous and acquired exogenous genesis.
The set of minerals in association with palladian gold from the Uderei deposit (Russia) and placer ore occurrences of Lammermuir Hills (Scotland) are partially similar in that both objects contain aurostibite, arsenopyrite, galena, and argentian gold. Tetra-auricupride is present in paragenesis with palladian gold at the Krutoe ore occurrence (Russia) and the Lammermuir Hills deposit (Scotland), which suggests not only Au-Pd but also Cu-Pd mineralization.
It is worth noting the high concentrations of Pd (21.3 wt.%, Au2Pd) in gold particles from gray fumaroles and in andesite lavas (Q) of Ebeko volcano (Russia) [43] (Table 1). Au7Pd (928‰), Au3Pd (847‰), and Au2Pd (790‰) phases and Au-bearing palladium are present in the Au-Pd mineralization of the Serra Pelada deposit, Brazil [25]. The Au3Pd phase as small inclusions was identified in chromite from the Cedrolina Chromitite (Goiás State, Brazil) [75]. Pure gold and Au3Cu3Ni alloy were also found at the boundary between chromite and talc or in the silicate matrix of the chromitite ores.
The reported results show that Pd concentrations in gold in the absence of other impurities vary in a wide range from minor (3.3 wt.%, 970‰) up to Au0.50Pd0.50 (35.1 wt.%, 649‰). The compositions of this gold are arranged on the Au-Pd side of the ternary diagram of Au-Pd-Ag (Figure 2). This diagram also shows the compositions of palladian gold with and without Ag, which are widespread at other deposits (there are 24 of them; see capture in Figure 2). Summarized literature data on the compositions of palladian gold with the presence of Ag at these deposits are presented in Section 4.1.2.

4.1.2. Pd,Ag-Bearing Gold and Au-Pd-Ag System

Palladian gold with Ag impurity (Ag-bearing palladian gold or Pd, Ag-bearing gold) covers the range of solid solutions from Au to Au1-x-yPdxAgy, where y + x ≤ 0.5 atomic fraction, x ≠ 0, y ≠ 0, and 1 – x – y > x, y. As an example, Table 2 contains data on five deposits and occurrences with Ag-bearing palladian gold.
At the Au-Pd Brownstone deposit (England), native gold is present in a vertical quartz-calcite vein hosted by Devonian slates [20] and is represented by two generations (Ag < 0.5 wt.%): high-fineness gold (970‰–994‰) with low content of Pd < 2.4 wt.% (core) and lower-fineness gold (882‰–924‰) with a higher content of Pd up to 11.2 wt.% (border), in association with clausthalite, tiemannite, and eucairite. The low contents of Ag 1.1–4.8 and 0.2–1.9 and the high contents of Pd ≈ 7 wt.% and up to 14.2 wt.% are typical of native gold at the Au-Pd Stillwater (USA) and Hope’s Nose (England) deposits (Table 2), respectively. The trace and low contents of Pd < 0.15 and < 2.76 wt.% and high contents of Ag 21.4–22.6 wt.% and 10.9–19.7 are typical of native gold in ferruginous quartzites, accompanying metasomatites, and in the zones of increased sulfidation at the Au–Pd–Pt Lebedinskoye deposit [59] and in the ores of the Fedorova Tundra Pt-metal deposit (Russia) [58], respectively.
Minerals associated with Ag-bearing palladian gold in small calcite veins at the Cu-Ni-sulfide Hope’s Nose (England) are chrisstanleyite, clausthalite, fischesserite, chlorargyrite, oosterboschite, calcite, and cerussite [74]. Vysotskite, braggite, paolovite, and pentlandite are associated with Ag-bearing palladian gold at the Stillwater (USA) and Fedorova Tundra (Russia) deposits, respectively. Minor impurities Pt < 0.4, Ni < 0.05, and Fe 0.2–1.3 wt.% are present in Pd,Ag-bearing gold at the deposits Lebedinskoye [59] and Fedorova Tundra (Russia) [58].
Ag-bearing palladian gold has been found at such deposits as Norilsk-1, Talnakh [22], Baronskoe [55], Chudnoe, Nesterovskoe [53], Ozernoe [31], and Krutoe [51]; deposits of the Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex [58] in Russia; Corrego Bom Sucesso, Gongo Soco, Caue, and Serra Pelada in Brazil [25,77]; Bleïda Far West in Morocco [68]; and placers of the Ambositra region, Madagascar [70] and Zimnik Creek, Poland [64]. Native gold from these deposits is heterogenous and is represented by two or more varieties of Ag-bearing palladian gold—with Hg and (or) Cu impurities. Section 4.1.6 is devoted to these deposits.
The Au-Pd-Ag diagram (Figure 2) shows the compositions of Ag-bearing palladian gold, and other minerals and phases of this ternary system found in the ores of some deposits.
Ag-bearing palladian gold of the Au-Pd-Ag system depending on the Pd and Ag contents (Figure 2 and Figure 3) can be divided into three varieties:
(1)
Au-Pd solid solution in the absence of impurities (fineness > 649‰, LOD < Pd < 50 at.%). Such gold occurs at the following deposits: Uderei, Norilsk-1, Talnakh, Krutoe, Lebedinskoye, Ebeko volcano (Russia), Corrego Bom Sucesso, Caue iron mines (Brazil), and Serra Pelada, and alluvial placers of Ambositra region (Madagaskar), Chorokh river, Artvin district (Turkey), Lammermuir Hills (Scotland), and Brownstone (England), etc.
(2)
Au-Pd-Ag solid solutions with high Pd (10–48 at.%) and low Ag content <10 at.% (fineness > 850‰). Native gold of this composition was found at the deposits Stillwater, Montana (USA), Chudnoe (Russia), Serra Pelada, Corrego Bom Sucesso (Brazil), and Bleida Far West (Morocco).
(3)
Au-Ag-Pd solid solutions with a high Ag content (10–48 at.%) and a low Pd content <10 at.% (fineness > 630‰). Ag-rich palladian gold is present at the deposits of Talnakh, Baronskoe, Ozernoe, Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex, and Nesterovskoe (Russia); Gongo Soco, Caue (Brazil); Hope’s Nose, Brownstone (England); and placer Zimnik Creek (Poland). Native silver with low Pd (fineness < 630‰) is found at some of these deposits (for example, Talnakh and Ozernoe).

4.1.3. Pd,Cu-Bearing Gold and Au-Pd-Cu System

Palladian gold with Cu impurity (Cu-bearing palladian gold or Pd,Cu-bearing gold) has a composition covering the range of solid solutions from Au to Au1-x-zPdxCuz, where x + z ≤ 0.5 atomic part, z ≠ 0, x ≠ 0, and 1 − x − z > x, z. As an example, Table 3 shows data for two objects with native gold containing Pd and Cu: the Au-Pd-Cu ore occurrence of the Skaergaard massif (Greenland, Denmark) [73] and the placer deposit of the Ambositra region (Madagascar) [70].
Phases compositionally similar to Pd-Au3Cu and to Pd-tetra-auricupride in association with skaergaardite, bornite, chalcocite, chalcopyrite, kotulskite, palladoarsenide, vasilseverginite, and vysokýite occur at the Skaergaard layered ultramafic massif (Greenland, Denmark) [73]. In the Au-Cu-Pd-phases, the presence of Pt and Fe was observed (Table 3). Compounds close to stoichiometric (Au,Pd)3Cu are attributed to the Au3Cu phase containing on average 24.3 at.% Cu and 15.8 at.% Pd (n = 76). A more numerous (n = 132) group, referred to as (Au,Cu,Pd) alloys containing 31 at.% Cu and 8 at.% Pd, is closely related to the above group. In the grains with the decomposition structure of the solid solution, the matrix contains 32.8 at.% Cu and 8.3 at.% Pd, and lamellas (AuCu phase) contain 44.1 at.% Cu and 8.5 at.% Pd (n = 13) [73].
The Cu content in palladian gold from the placers in the Ambositra region (Madagaskar) is low and varies from 0.6 to 2.8 wt.%, and the Pd content ranges from 1.1 to 7.9 wt.%. Palladium was not detected in tetra-auricupride. In association with tetra-auricupride and Cu-bearing palladian gold, Ba-Kfsp, Ca-REE phosphates were found [70].
Compositions of Pd,Cu-bearing gold and other Au-Cu-Pd phases from different deposits are shown in the diagram of Au-Cu-Pd (Figure 4). Pd,Cu-bearing gold (Pd 3.3–10.3 wt.%, Cu 6.1–25 wt.%) rarely contains Ag up to 1.1 wt.% (900‰–700‰), Au3Cu, Pd-tetra-auricupride and Pd-auricupride, Pd-bearing gold without Ag, Cu, and Hg (970‰); and Pd sulfides, arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides, tellurides, stannides, plumbides, and germanides were found in chromitites of dunites from the Konder layered massif [44,45]. Cu,Pd-bearing gold and Pd-tetra-auricupride and Pd-auricupride are typical of such deposits as Norilsk-1, Talnakh, Konder, Chudnoe, Nesterovskoe, Ozernoe (Russia), Serra Pelada, Caue (Brazil), and Marathon (Canada) (Figure 4). At these deposits, such phases as Au–Cu with high Pd and, in places, Pt are widespread. Borisov (2005) [53] found that native gold from the Chudnoe deposit contains inclusions of the Au-Cu phases (Au3Cu, Au3Cu2, and Au2Cu) with minor Pd.
Pd-tetra-auricupride (Au,Pd)Cu and Pd-auricupride (Au,Pd)Cu3 are present in chromitites of the Korydallos Area in the Pindos Ophiolite Complex (NW Greece) [61,62]. The composition of Pd-tetra-auricupride is expressed by the formulae Cu0.53Au0.32Pd0.15 and Cu0.56Au0.25Pd0.19, and Pd-auricupride is expressed by the formula Cu0.72Au0.18Pd0.10.
Cu-bearing palladian gold of the Au-Pd-Cu system depending on the Pd and Cu contents (Figure 4 and Figure 5) can be divided into two varieties:
(1)
High- and medium-fineness Cu-bearing palladian gold with low Pd and Cu contents (<10 at.%) (820‰–960‰);
(2)
Low-fineness Cu-bearing palladian gold with a high Pd concentration (up to 30 at.%) and 10 at.% < Cu < 50 at.% (580‰–820‰).
The first group includes the Nesterovskoe (Russia), Serra Pelada, and Caue (Brazil) deposits, and placers of the Mataganya-Siguiri zone (Guinea). The second group includes Pd,Cu-bearing gold of the deposits Norilsk-1, Talnakh, Chudnoe, Nesterovskoe, Ozernoe, Konder (Russia), Marathon (Canada), Skaergaard (Denmark), and the placer of Ambositra region (Madagaskar). It is worth noting that the main phases in association with Pd,Cu-bearing gold most commonly are Pd-bearing Au-Cu intermetallic compounds—Pd-tetraauricupride, and Pd-auricupride, as well as Pd sulfides, arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides, and tellurides.
Cu-bearing palladian gold can also contain Ag and (or) Hg. Examples of such deposits are described in Section 4.1.6.

4.1.4. Pd,Hg-Bearing Gold and Au-Pd-Hg System

Palladian gold with Hg impurity (Hg-bearing palladian gold or Pd,Hg-bearing gold) includes palladian gold, covering the range of solid solutions from Au to Au1-x-dPdxHgd, where x + d ≤ 0.5 atomic part, x ≠ 0, d ≠ 0, and 1 − x − d > x, 1 − x − d > d. Several minerals are known in the Au-Pd-Hg system (https://www.mindat.org/min-51827.html, accessed on 15 January 2022): weishanite (Au,Hg(Ag)), aurihydrargyrumite (Au6Hg5), potarite (PdHg), gold, palladium, and mercury. The results of studies of Au-Pd-Hg mineralization from some deposits of noble metals showed the presence of binary and ternary phases: Au2Pd and Au3Pd [76]; Pd(Hg,Au) to Pd3Hg2 and (Pd,Au)3Hg2 [94]; Pd(Pt)AuHg, Au-rich potarite [95]. At the Herbeira massif (Spain), the Au-Pd-Hg phase contains Pd 53 wt.% [67] and has formula Pd0.7Au0.3Hg0.1, which corresponds to Au,Hg-bearing palladium.
Native gold with Pd and Hg impurities in the absence of Ag is quite rare. Table 4 shows data for two objects with Pd,Hg-bearing gold in the absence and presence of Ag in the Itchaivayam mafic–ultramafic massif (Russia) and Mataganya-Siguiri Zone (Guinea). In the weathering crusts of the Mataganya-Siguiri Zone (Guinea), native gold is represented by two varieties: (1) Hg-bearing high-fineness palladian gold with low contents of Pd~2.7 wt.% and Hg~0.1 wt.%, sometimes Pt up to 0.09 wt.%; (2) Ag,Hg-bearing middle-fineness palladian gold with a high content of Ag~5.5–12.5 and low contents of Pd~1.1–1.8 and Hg up to 0.24 wt.% [69].
Palladian gold from the placers that occur in the layered Itchayvayam platinum-bearing mafic–ultramafic massif (northern part of the Koryak–Kamchatka platinum-bearing belt, Russia), according to preliminary data, has varying compositions of Pd,Hg-bearing gold [42]. Au-Pd-Cu ore occurrences of this massif were found to contain high-fineness argentian gold and Au-Hg-Pd phases, which form thin veins in bornite and are in paragenesis with platinum group minerals [24,96].
We studied individual gold grains from the heavy concentrates of the Itchayvayam placers and watercourses draining and ore samples from the Barany outcrop of the Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic complex (Kamchatka) [33]. Gold grains contain substitution structures formed by Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold (Au0.59-0.52Pd0.24-0.25Hg0.17-0.23, 580‰–660‰) and high-fineness gold with minor contents of Pd and Hg (Au0.94-0.90Pd0.02-0.04Hg0.03, 910‰–960‰) (Figure 6). Potarite (PdHg) without and with impurities Au, Cu, and Ag; high-fineness gold with minor contents of Ag (Au0.91Ag0.09, 950‰) or also Pd and Hg (Au0.75Ag0.08Pd0.09Hg0.08–Au0.88Ag0.09Pd0.02Hg0.01, 820‰–930‰); and Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold with minor contents of Ag and Cd (Au0.51-0.55Pd0.25-0.22Hg0.21-0.16Ag0.03-0.06Cd0.01, fineness 580‰–630‰) were observed in the ore samples.
Figure 7 shows the composition of Pd,Hg-bearing gold and Au-Pd-Hg phases from the Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic massif, Chudnoe (Russia) and Herbeira massifs (Spain), and placers of the Mataganya-Siguiri zone (Guinea).
Palladian gold of the Au-Pd-Hg system is represented by two varieties (Figure 7 and Figure 8):
(1)
High- and medium-fineness gold with low Hg < 0.02 at.% (<5.2 wt.%) and low Pd contents <0.13 at.% (<8.5 wt.%) (fineness 820‰–960‰);
(2)
Low-fineness gold with a high content of Hg 13–27 at.% (13.6–27.8 wt.%) and high Pd ≈25 at.% (13.9–15.9 wt.%) (fineness 580‰–630‰).
Hg-bearing palladian gold of both varieties—low Pd, Hg (1) and high Pd, Hg (2) contents were found at the Itchayvayam deposit. Native gold in the Mataganya-Siguiri Zone (Guinea) placer is an example of ore occurrence with high-fineness Hg-bearing palladian gold (with low Pd and Hg contents) (1).
At some deposits, Pd,Hg-bearing gold has minor contents of Ag. As an example, in Table 4, we provide data on the composition of Pd,Hg,Ag-bearing gold from two alluvial placers related to sediments (conglomerates) and volcanic rocks—Zimnik Creek (Poland) and river Dart (England). The Hg content varies in the range of 0.07 to 13.9 wt.%, and the Ag content is lower at 2.2 wt.%. Native gold with Pd and Hg impurities and higher Ag contents is spread at many other deposits—Serra Pelada (Brazil) [97], Gongo Soco (Brazil) [78,98], Mayat river and Bol’shaya Kuonamka river (Russia) [47], and Dziwiszow (Poland) [65].
The compositions of palladian gold with Hg and Ag impurities cover the range of solid solutions from Au to Au1-x-y-dPdxAgyHgd, where x, y, d in total ≤ 0.5 atomic part, x ≠ 0, y ≠ 0, d ≠ 0, and 1 − x − y − d > x, y, d. Hg,Ag-bearing palladian gold is more widely distributed in nature than Pd,Hg-bearing gold (see Section 4.1.6).

4.1.5. Pd,Cu,Ag-Bearing Gold and Au–Pd–Ag–Cu System

Palladian gold with Cu and Ag impurities (Cu,Ag-bearing palladian gold or Pd,Cu,Ag-bearing gold) covers the range of solid solutions from Au to Au1-x-yPdxAgyCuz, where x, y, z in total ≤0.5 atomic part, x ≠ 0, y ≠ 0, z ≠ 0, and 1 − x − y − z > x, y, z. The group of deposits with Cu,Ag-bearing palladian gold is the most numerous group compared to other groups (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) and includes 18 objects among which there is only one placer deposit—Kuoyka river, basin of the Anabar river (Russia) (Table 5).
Au,Pd,Ag,Cu-solid solutions with Au >> Pd, Ag, Cu (>1 vol%), Au,Ag,Pd-solid solutions, argentian gold (Au > Ag), native silver (Ag >> Au), a Pd-bearing tetra-auricupride (Cu,Ag)(Au,Pd), and phase (Au,Pd,Ag)3Cu occur in the W Horizon mineralization of the Marathon Cu-PGE deposit, which is one of the highest grade PGE repositories in magmatic ore deposits worldwide [21]. The Marathon deposit is located within the Mesoproterozoic Coldwell Alkaline Complex in the Midcontinent rift of North America. The content of impurities in native gold from this deposit is very high and reaches 22.7 wt.% for Pd, Ag < 37.7 wt.% and Cu < 25.8 wt.%, which corresponds to a fineness of 516‰–835‰ (Table 5).
The Cauê iron mine, in the ltabira District of Brazil, contains a unique precious-metal-bearing mineral assemblage that includes palladian gold, pure gold, native palladium, palladseite, arsenopalladinite, and Pd-Cu oxide minerals. Palladian gold grains contain up to 19.2 wt.% Pd, while Cu is typically below 4.1 wt.% and rarely reaches 8.3 wt.%, and Ag does not exceed 1.1 wt.% (fineness 808‰–993‰) [77] (Table 5). Palladian gold from the Conceichao deposit in the same region of Brazil has lower concentrations of Pd (<3.2 wt.%) and minor contents of Ag, Cu (fineness 930‰–940‰) or Ag (fineness 980‰) (Table 5) in association with hematite, magnetite, pyrite, quartz, muscovite, mertieite-II, argentian gold (940‰–950‰), and kaolinite. Palladian gold from the Maquine deposit (Brazil) is characterized by lower contents of Pd, Cu, and also trace Pt, whereas the concentrations of Ag amount to 3.5–8.2 wt.% (fineness 900‰–948‰), and minerals in the association are hematite, goethite, quartz, sperrylite, stannopalladinite, and isomertieite.
Palladian gold from some Uralian deposits also has low contents Pd (in wt.%): Volkovskoe < 0.3, Khamitovskoe 0.5–0.9, Nesterovskoe < 2.8, Ozernoe < 3.8. Higher contents of Pd to 9 wt.% were detected in palladian gold from the Baronskoe, and to 12.1 wt.%—from the Serebryansky Kamen deposits (Table 5).
Noble metal mineralization at the Volkovskoe Cu-Fe-Ti-V deposit is concentrated in meso- and melanocratic taxite gabbro containing a dissemination of V-bearing titanomagnetite, chalcopyrite, and bornite. Palladian gold has low concentrations of Cu~0.3 wt.% and high concentrations of Ag from 8.4 to 16.2 wt.% (fineness 800‰–914‰) (Table 5) [30]. Among the minerals of noble metals in copper-sulfide (chalcopyrite, bornite, digenite) ores, there are also tellurides—merenskyite, hessite, and sylvanite, and platinum arsenide—sperrylite [55,99,100,101,102,103].
At the Baronskoe deposit, native gold is composed of Au-Ag, Au-Ag-Pd, Au-Pd-Cu, and Au-Pd-Ag-Cu solid solutions [55,104,105,106]. Au-Ag-Pd solid solutions (3.5–9 wt.% Pd, to 10 wt.% Ag) form inclusions in chalcopyrite, vysotskite, bornite, Pd tellurides, and arsenides. The Au-Pd-Cu solid solution (Au0.90Pd0.06Cu0.03) was found in the intergrowth with palladseite in olivine-magnetite gabbro. Ag,Cu-bearing palladian gold contains Pd 3.4–5.7 wt.%, Ag up to 10.6 wt.%, and Cu 0.6–1.9 wt.% (fineness 840‰–916‰) (Table 5) [55]. Au-Ag solid solutions occur in secondary silicates (serpentine, amphibole, chlorite) and do not contain Pd.
The Ozernoe deposit is known for Au-Ag-Cu solid solutions (to 6.5 wt.% Cu, 7–69 wt.% Ag) and Au-Cu intermetallic compounds (tetra-auricupride, auricupride), in which palladium up to 16.9 wt.% occurs sporadically [31,107,108]. Palladian gold with Cu and Ag impurities has a low fineness (690‰–700‰) (Table 5), and the majority of compositions of Au-Pd-Ag-Cu phases are similar to tetra-auricupride, auricupride, native copper, or silver. Olivine clinopyroxenites from this deposit contain impregnations of sulfides in an amount of no less than 0.5% (in separate zones to 1–3). Palladian gold is present in the cubanite–pentlandite–pyrrhotite–chalcopyrite (1) and bornite–chalcopyrite (2) mineral associations. The first association was found to contain minerals of Pt (native platinum, ferruginous platinum, braggite, sperrylite, and moncheite) and Pd (palladian copper, vysotskite, arsenopalladinite, mayakite, atheneite, isomertieite, stibiopalladinite, michenerite, merenskite, froodite, and palladian silver). In the second association, minerals of Pt (sperrylite), Pd (atheneite, mertieite, stibiopallandinite, kotulskite, tarkianite, sobolevskite, and froodite) and Ag (native silver and hessite) were found. According to Murzin et al. (2022) [31], the Pd content increases from <1.5 wt.% Pd in Au-Ag solid solution to 6 wt.% Pd in Au-Cu intermetallic compounds and to 16.2–16.9 wt.% Pd in Cu-Au-Ag-Pd solid solutions.
Native gold in copper-sulfide ores of the Serebryansky Kamen from gabbro of the Serebryansky massif is heterogeneous and corresponds to Au-Ag (fineness 760‰–970‰) and Au-Cu-Pd-Ag solid solutions with high Pd and lower contents of Cu and Ag (fineness 780‰) (Table 5) [54]. It forms inclusions in bornite and chalcopyrite and frequently occurs in association with Pd sulfides, arsenides, and tellurides.
The ore samples from the Central and Intermediate zones of the Au-Cu epithermal (porphyry) Bleida Far West deposit (Anti-Atlas, Morocco) contain high-fineness palladian gold with low concentrations of Pd and Ag in the absence of Cu, or with minor Cu 0.3–0.8 wt.% (912‰–993‰) [32,68]. Au-Pd-mineralization at this deposit contains no sulfides, and palladian gold occurs in association with mertieite, isomertieite, keitconnite, palladseite, merenskyite, kotulskite, sperrylite, hematite, calcite, quartz, barite, and chlorite (Table 5).
Various alloys of the Au–Ag, Au-Ag-Cu, and Au-Ag-Cu-Pd systems have been found in Cu–Ni–PGE ores from Norilsk and Talnakh deposits (Russia) [27,109]. The Au-Cu-Ag-Pd (Pt) phase is characterized by wide variations in Cu content from LOI up to 42 wt.% and Ag from LOI up to 37 wt.%, Pd from LOI to 14 wt.%, and occasionally Pt < 5 wt.%, which corresponds to Cu,Ag,Pd-bearing gold, (Au,Pd)3Cu, Pd-tetra-auricupride, Pd-auricupride, and Cu,Au,Pd-silver. They are in association with mertieite/isomertieite, keitconnite, palladseite, kotulskite, merenskyite, isoferroplatinum, vysotskite, hematite, calcite, quartz, barite, epidote, chlorite, etc. The fineness of Cu,Ag,Pd-bearing gold changes from 570 to 880 and from 950 to 975‰ for Norilsk-1 and is higher (980‰) for Talnakh (Table 5).
Au–Cu alloys with significant amounts of Pt, Pd, and Ag impurities were reported from platinum placers associated with the Konder alkaline–ultramafic complex, where abundant Au–Cu alloys intergrow with PGM (particularly Pt–Fe alloy) and show a range of compositions close to Au3Cu and AuCu along with a single Cu3Au grain [44,45,110]. The Pt and Pd concentrations in these alloys reach 11.8 and 10.3 wt.%.
The contents of Pd in Cu,Ag-bearing palladian gold at Pt-metal deposits of the Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex (Russia) change from 0.03 to 6.5 wt.%, Cu < 1.2 wt.%, Ag up to 16.2 wt.%, and the fineness increases from 830 to 970‰ [58]. In places, the presence of impurities of Fe and Ni was observed (Table 5). Native gold from the Kuoyka river (basin of the Anabar river, Russia) contains 3.43 wt.% Pd, whereas Ag and Cu concentrations are low at 0.4 wt.% (fineness 960‰) [47,48].
Figure 9 shows that Ag,Cu-bearing palladian gold of the Au-Pd-Ag-Cu system depending on the Pd, Ag, and Cu contents can be divided into several varieties:
(1)
High-fineness gold with low contents of Pd, Ag, and Cu < 10 at.% (900‰–970‰). The palladian gold of this composition was found in Conceichao and Maquine mines (Brazil), Nesterovskoe, Khamitovskoe, Kuoyka River (Russia), and Bleida Far West (Morocco).
(2)
Middle- and low-fineness gold with a high content of Ag 10–48 at.% and low contents of Pd and Cu < 10 at.%. Volkovskoe and Norilsk (Russia) are examples of deposits with such native gold.
(3)
Middle- and low-fineness with high contents of Pd 10–30 at.%, Cu 10–48 at.%, and Ag < 10 at.%. Marathon (Canada), Konder (Russia), and Caue iron mine (Brazil) are examples of deposits with native gold containing high concentrations of Pd and Cu, and low Ag.

4.1.6. Palladian Gold with Ag, Cu, Hg, and Other Metals

Palladian gold commonly contains impurities of all three elements—Ag, Cu, and Hg (Cu,Ag,Hg-bearing palladian gold or Pd,Cu,Ag,Hg-bearing gold) and has a heterogeneous structure and a variable composition of Au1-x-y-z-dPdxAgyCuzHgd. The Au-Pd-REE Chudnoe (Russia), Fe-oxide-Cu-Au Gongo Soco, Au–Pd–Pt Serra Pelada (Brazil), and Zechstein (Poland) deposits are examples of deposits with such palladian gold (Table 6). Pd,Cu,Ag,Hg-bearing gold is typical of some alluvial deposits: placers of the Mayat and Bol’shaya Kuonamka river basins (Anabar massif, northeast of the Siberian Platform, Russia), Dziwiszow (Poland), Whipsaw Creek, and Similkameen river (Canada) (Table 6).
Au-Pd-REE ores from the Chudnoe deposit contain palladian gold with various sets of impurity elements: (1) all 4 elements—Ag, Cu, Hg, and Pd; (2) 3 elements—Ag, Cu, Pd or Cu, Hg, and Pd [29]; (3) 2 elements—Hg (3.4–3.5 wt.%) and Pd (1.2–1.6 wt.%) [53]. The presence of Au-Ag (fineness 720‰–730‰) and Au-Ag-Cu-solid solutions (Ag 11.4–14.8 wt.%, Cu 1.4–4.6 wt.%, fineness 836‰–869‰) was also detected in these ores. The content of Ag in palladian gold varies in a wide range, but is no more than 13.4 wt.%, Cu < 7.6 wt.%, Hg < 3.5 wt.% [53], Pd < 2.8 wt.%, and fineness 829‰–986‰ (Table 6). High concentrations of Hg (36 wt.%) and Pd (15.2 wt.%), and low Cu in the absence of Ag were found in the ore samples collected from the surface in weathered material at the Chudnoe deposit [53]—in the composition, this is the Au-Hg phase with Pd and Cu impurities (Au0.41Hg0.31Pd0.25Cu0.03). The specific features of this deposit are an unusual association of Cu,Ag,Pd,Hg-bearing gold and palladium minerals (mertieite, isomertieite, atheneite, stillwaterite, and stibiopalladinite) with Cr-bearing muscovite (fuchsite) and REE mineral (allanite) in the absence of sulfides [29,112,113], and the low content of Hg in Cu,Ag,Pd-bearing gold is normally less than 1 wt.% (Table 6).
The Chudnoe deposit is the recharge source for the placer of the Al’kes-Vozh creek and, partly, for other placers downstream of the Balaban-Yu river. The presence of native gold with impurities of Pd (to 2 wt.%), Cu (to 5 wt.%), and Hg (to 0.6 wt.%) in the Al’kes-Vozh placer, as well as the presence of Pd minerals (mertieite, atheneite, stibiopalladinite) in gold grains, served as the basis for identifying a placer-forming type of gold mineralization in the Urals prior to the discovery of its endogenous source [52]. The occurrence of palladian gold in the Al’kes-Vozh placer is 81% and it gradually decreases to 13% in the Balban-Yu placers located below [115].
Ores from the Au–Pd–Pt Serra Pelada deposit (Brazil) contain up to 1 cm coarse-grained gold aggregates that occur in powdery, earthy weathered material [25]. They exhibit a delicate arborescent fabric and are coated by goethite. Four compositional types of palladian gold are recognized at this deposit: (1) “Au7Pd”, the most abundant Au–Pd alloy, hosts Pd arsenides (“guanglinite” and Sb-bearing “guanglinite”), Pd–Pt–Se and Pd–Se phases, sudovikovite, and palladseite; (2) Au–Pd–Hg alloy, characteristically with atheneite and rarely observed Pb-bearing Pd–Hg–Se and Pd–Bi–Se phases; (3) Pd-poor gold—isomertieite—Mn–Ba oxide assemblage; and (4) pure gold with trace Pd (>993‰) in goethite assemblage (Table 6). The Ag content in these types of palladian gold is lower than 0.4 wt.%. The Pd,Ag-poor gold assemblage possibly formed later than the Au–Pd–Hg–Ag alloy. In the ores of the Fe-oxide-Cu-Au Gongo Soco deposit (Brazil), palladian gold with Ag, Cu, and Hg impurities occurs in the form of nuggets, grains, and their aggregates in association with hematite. Gold grains have dark-color coatings composed of Pd–O particles and iron hydroxide. The palladian gold is characterized by a variable Pd content reaching up to 6 wt.% and sporadically observed Hg content up to 1 wt.% [97]. Pd,Hg-bearing gold at these deposits can also contain Cu and Ag impurities to 3 and more wt.% [78]. Palladian gold contains inclusions of platinum group minerals (PGMs): isomertieite, mertieite-II, chrisstanleyite, selenides Pd5(Hg,Sb,Ag)2Se6, and (Pd,Sb,Ag,Hg)5Se4.
Palladian gold (with minor content of Hg, Cu, Ag) in association with Pt minerals is found in the placers of the Mayat and Bol’shaya Kuonamka river basins (Anabar massif, northeast of the Siberian Platform) [116].
Figure 10 shows the dependences of the concentrations of elements in Pd-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au-Pd-Ag-Cu-Hg system (in at.%) at various deposits and ore occurrences (Table 6). Variations in the concentrations of impurities in native gold range from LOI up to 26 for Pd, <50 Ag, <18 Cu, and <6 Hg (in wt.%). According to Figure 10, the Ag,Cu,Hg-bearing palladian gold depending on the Pd, Ag, and Cu contents can be divided into several varieties:
(1)
High-fineness gold with low contents of Pd, Ag, Cu < 10 at.% and Hg < 5.7 at.% (900‰–970‰). The palladian gold of this composition is typical of the deposits Chudnoe (Russia), Serra Pelada and Gongo Soco (Brazil); and alluvial placers Dziwiszow (Poland), Whipsaw Creek, Similkameen River, and Friday Creek (Canada); and Mayat and Bol’shaya Kuonamka river basins (Russia).
(2)
Medium- and low-fineness gold with high Ag 10–48 at.% and low contents of Pd, Cu < 10 at.%, and Hg < 5.7 at.%. Chudnoe (Russia) and Zechstein (Poland) are examples of deposits with such Ag,Cu,Hg-bearing palladian gold.
(3)
Medium- and low-fineness gold with a high content of Pd 10–28 at.%, and low Cu and Ag < 10 at.% and Hg < 5.7 at.%. Serra Pelada (Brazil), Mayat river basin, and Chudnoe (Russia) are examples of deposits with native gold containing high concentrations of Pd and low Cu, Ag, and Hg.

5. Discussion

5.1. Types of Deposits with Palladian Gold

Native gold occurs in a wide range of gold deposit types and settings [1,2,5,6,7,8]. Impurity elements in native gold and minerals in association are indicators of geochemical and mineral types of deposits and regional geochemical conditions [13]. Petrovskaya (1973) [1] reported that the number and concentrations of impurity metals in native gold tend to increase at the deposits with a multistage formation of mineralization or with features of hybridism, and local and uneven changes in the composition of ore bodies with superimposed hydrothermal transformations.
The mechanism of formation of native gold is complex and depends on many factors. A wide range of impurity elements is associated with different geochemical environments in which the mobilization, transportation, and deposition of gold ore mineralization take place. The content of elements in native gold depends on their amounts in hydrothermal solutions, which are controlled by temperature, the presence of ligand elements—Cl, S, and Se and Te to a lesser degree—and also the pH of solutions and oxidation–reduction conditions [20,117]. Metals are largely derived from the mantle or crust by partial melting and fluid-related leaching. Ligands can be provided from the same sources, or from the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. Gold and impurity elements can be transported not only by hydrothermal solutions and supercritical fluids, but also by gas mixtures, as well as by sulfide, silicate, and carbonate melts. The spectrum of element impurities and mineral microinclusions often depends on the formational affiliation of the gold deposit, on its connection with any magmatic complex and post-ore processes, and also on the metallogenic features of the gold-bearing provinces.
In this review, based on the literature data and our own studies of the composition of palladian gold from numerous deposits with Au-Pd mineralization, we suggest the following classification of types (Table 7). The studied objects with palladian gold belong not only to gold deposits of different types but to deposits at which the main ore components are PGE, Cr, Cu, Ni, V, and Ti. In the proposed systematization, we do not claim innovations but report them based on materials from various authors for the convenience of presenting results. It includes the main types of PGE-deposits in mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes [118] within one type with two subtypes—low-sulfide-grade (less than 2%–5% sulfides) Alaskan (1a) and high-sulfide-grade (more than 5% sulfides) Norilsk (1b) (base on Naldrett, 2010 [119]), and gold deposits of 2–4 types: orogenic gold (OG) (type 2a,b), epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper (EPGC) (type 3), and iron oxide–copper–gold (IOCG) (type 4) [119,120,121,122,123] (Table 7). To these types, we added ferruginous quartzites (type 5), which were identified by Dill (2010) [118] within the frames of an independent type of PGE-deposits, and a new non-industrial type of volcanic exhalations (Kamchatka) (type 6), in which gold with Pd impurity was found (Table 1). An important role in the studied objects belongs to gold from placer alluvial deposits and occurrences, which we subdivided into four subtypes (7-1 … 7-4) in accordance with the profile of their primary sources and a special subtype of placers associated with horizons of conglomerates and weathering crusts in the cover of large cratons (7-5).
According to Figure 1, deposits with palladian gold occur in different geological and dynamic settings—terranes and orogenic belts and shields. Table 8 illustrates that palladian gold is found in the deposits related to different types of magmatism (but mainly with mafic–ultramafic) and in different periods. It is worth noting that the lacuna is more than a billion years old, coinciding with the so-called “dead billion” in the history of the Earth (1.7–0.7 Gya), when the stability conditions existed throughout the planet and a limited number of deposits formed, among which there were virtually no ore-bearing deposits (except IOCG type) [124].
Thus, the above-mentioned facts suggest that Au-Pd mineralization formed in different conditions and from different sources, from mantle riftogenic (oceanic), active margins, and island arcs (subduction) to orogenic accretion-collision and post orogenic (riftogenic).

5.2. Physicochemical Conditions for the Formation of Palladian Gold at Deposits of Different Types

Scarce data are available on the physicochemical conditions of the formation of palladian gold. We summarize the published information on the T,P,X-parameters of the formation of Au-Pd mineralization known for some types of deposits in Table 9.
Type 1—PGE-deposits in mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes. In Au-Pd ores at the Skaergaard massif, the formation of Au-Cu-Pd melts and Pd-tetra-auricupride is due to the decomposition of Au-Cu-Pd solid solutions at temperatures of 1200–1000 °C [73]. Au-Pd mineralization of the Volkovskoe and Baronskoe deposits has a hydrothermal-metasomatic genesis, was formed in the range of temperatures of 600–400 °C [55,106,139], and is related to superimposed metamorphic and metasomatic processes (occurrence of amphibole, serpentine, and chlorite) on olivine clinopyroxenites [107,108].
Data on fluid inclusion studies show that the crystallization of palladian gold in Cu-Ni-PGE ores of the Norilsk deposit proceeds with the participation of reduced hydrothermal fluids (CH4 ± C2H6, C2H2, and C3H8) at temperatures of 270–140 °C and salinities of 23.3–13.6 wt.% eq. NaCl [27].
Type 2—orogenic gold deposits. Au-Pd mineralization at the Chudnoe deposit (Russia) could have been formed by chloride fluids of low and medium salinity at temperatures from 105 to 230 °C and pressures from 0.05 to 1.15 kbar. The salinity of fluids varies from 20.1 to 0.2 wt.% NaCl eq. [29] (Table 9). Au-Pd and Au deposits of the Permian-Triassic basins in SW England (Thorverton) formed in the temperature range from 60 to 155 °C, and the salinity of fluids varied from 2 to 30 wt.% NaCl eq. [140,141]. In the ores from the Au-Pd Zechstein deposit (Poland), an association of palladian gold with chalcosine, digenite, and djurleite was detected, which limits its formation temperature to a range of 93 to 103 °C [63,142,148] (Table 9).
Type 3—epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper deposits. Hematite-quartz veins of the Au-Pd Bleida Far West deposit (Anti-Atlas, Morocco) formed at temperatures from 145 to 325 °C and fluid salinities from 6 to 33 wt.% NaCl eq. The gas phase of fluids included CO2, CH4, and N2 [68,143]. The Au-Pd mineralization at this deposit was formed in the temperature range from 80 to 132 °C with the participation of fluids with high salinity ranging from 18.8 to 29.6 wt.% eq. NaCl. The composition of fluids is dominated by NaCl and CaCl2. Quartz-hematite veins were formed at pressures from 0.76 to 31 kbar; during the formation of quartz veins with Cu-mineralization, the pressure changed from 0.63 to 0.51 kbar. EPMA analysis showed that the mineral-forming fluids contained Cl, Na, Ca, K, Mn, Ba, Sr, Fe, Cr, and S [32].
Type 4—iron oxide copper gold deposits. Hematite-quartz veins from the Au-Pd Gongo Soco mine (Brazil) formed at temperatures of 365–74 °C from fluids with salinities of 10–30 wt.% eq. NaCl. The composition of fluids is dominated by NaCl with MgCl2 impurities [78,146]. Au-Pd mineralization was formed later in the temperature range of 148–229 °C with the participation of medium-salinity fluids of 7.2 to 11.7 wt.% NaCl eq. (Table 9). Iron ores of the Conceichao mine (Brazil) formed at temperatures of 660–600 °C (according to Δ δ18O hematite/quartz). The deposition of Au-Pd mineralization took place later at lower temperatures (351–115 °C) with the participation of fluids of salinities from 3 to 20 wt.% NaCl eq. [79,147]. Hematite-quartz veins of the Serra Pelada deposit (Brazil) formed in the temperature range from 140 to 185 °C and fluid salinity range from 2.6 to 23.5 wt.% NaCl eq. The fluids contained chlorides Na > K > Ca ≥ Mg. The trapping temperature and salinity of fluid inclusions without and containing gold (50–500 ppb) in hematite are 155–185 °C and 4–6.5 wt.%, and 165–175 °C and 4.5–6 wt.%, respectively [144].
The physicochemical formation conditions of Pd-bearing gold in the ores of deposits of type 1 include two temperature ranges—magmatic high-temperature and hydrothermal low-temperature. In the former case, the formation of Pd-bearing gold takes place as a result of the decomposition of Au-Cu-Pd solid solutions at 1200–1000 °C. In the latter, Au-Pd alloys form with the participation of low-temperature hydrothermal fluids (270–140 °C) of medium salinity (13.6–23.3 wt.% NaCl eq.) (Figure 11A).
The physicochemical conditions of formation of palladian gold in the ores of deposits of types 2–4 are similar and correspond to the conditions of low-temperature hydrothermal ore formation (Figure 11B). At these deposits, Pd-bearing gold formed in the temperature interval of 300–60 °C, and the salinity of hydrothermal fluids ranges widely from 30 to 0.2 wt.% NaCl eq. (Figure 11A). Estimation of the ore formation pressure at Au-Pd deposits of types 2–4 is based on the results of studies of fluid inclusions in the minerals of early stages that preceded the formation of Pd-bearing gold, and the pressure varies from 1.7 to 0.05 kbar (Figure 11B).

5.3. Impurities, Fineness of Palladian Gold, and Minerals in the Association as Indicators of Deposit Types

The content of Ag, Cu, and Hg in palladian gold and minerals in association with it from deposits of various types has been studied by many researchers. Each of the deposits (Figure 1, Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7) for which the information was collected and analyzed is unique and has a specific composition of palladian gold and a set of minerals in the association. The heterogeneity of palladian gold forms either during primary crystallization or results from further modification under the effect of chemical and physical factors during subsequent residence in hypogene or surficial environments.
Figure 12a shows data on the palladian gold with various sets of impurities and other co-occurring phases of the Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg system. The Ag impurity was found in palladian gold at 36, Cu—at 32, and Hg—at 20 deposits. The palladian gold is represented by the systems Au–Pd, Au–Pd–Hg, Au–Pd–Cu, and Au–Pd–Ag–Hg, but more frequently corresponds to the Au–Pd–Ag, Au–Pd–Ag–Cu, and Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg. The variations in Ag content in Au–Pd–Ag–Cu solid solutions are considerable and cover the widest range of fineness from 160 to 993. At some deposits, the Pd content exceeds that of Ag and Cu, whereas at others, Cu dominates over Pd and Ag or Ag dominates over Pd and Cu. Low-fineness palladian gold is related to elevated contents of Pd, Ag, Cu, and Hg. At the Marathon deposit (Canada), the fineness of palladian gold is 663–835, and the content of Cu (and Ag) is higher than that of Pd (Table 6). At the Zechstein deposit (Poland), the fineness of palladian gold is low (576‰–795‰) and the content of Ag is higher than that of Pd, Cu, and Hg. The content of Pd is higher than those of Hg and Ag in native gold from the placers of the Dart river (England) (630‰–972‰). Talnakh ores contain palladian silver (160‰–210‰) (Table 5). Wide variations in the concentrations of all four elements and fineness (556‰–931‰) were revealed for palladian gold from placers of the Similkameen river (Canada) (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg) (Table 6 and Table 7). The low fineness of palladian gold is due to the high concentrations of Pd (Chorokh river, Turkey); or Pd and Hg (Itchayvayam (Russia); River Dart (England)); or Pd, Ag, and Cu (Norilsk-1, Talnakh, Ozernoe (Russia); Marathon (Canada); Skaergaard (Denmark)); or Pd, Ag, Cu, and Hg (Zechstein (Poland); Similkameen river (Canada)).
Figure 12b shows the variations in the fineness and impurity elements of palladian gold from deposits of various types (and subtypes) summarized in Table 7. Palladian gold most commonly occurs in the PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes (Table 7, type 1) and contains Ag and Cu impurities; occasionally minor Pt, Fe, and Ni; and does not contain Hg. This is mostly high-fineness gold, is less often medium-, and is rarely low-fineness. The only exception is the Au-Pd-Hg Itchayvayam ore occurrence (Kamchatka, Russia), for which two varieties of Pd,Hg-bearing gold—high- (low content of Pd and Hg) and low-fineness (high content of Pd and Hg) gold—were determined [33,42]. This type is most likely typical of territories with elevated background levels of Hg. It is in the northern part of Kamchatka that a great number of deposits and ore occurrences of the argillisite formation were discovered [149,150]. Ore objects are related to island arc terrigenous and volcanic-siliceous deposits of the Early and Late Cretaceous (terranes of the Olyutorskaya island arc in Figure 1). The Itchayvayam ore occurrence occurs in the deep fault zones and frequently accompanies the massifs of mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes. The elevated background levels of Hg seem to be because oceanic sediments contain high Hg concentrations compared to clarke. Enrichment of oceanic sediments with Hg could be a result of volcanic activity [150].
For orogenic gold (subtype 2a), epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper (type 3), and iron oxide copper gold (type 4) deposits, palladian gold is mainly high-fineness and contains Ag impurities or Cu too. Low-fineness palladian gold with a major content of Ag is typical of the Zechstein deposit (Poland) (subtype 2b). Palladian gold of medium fineness (780‰–790‰) with Ag, Pd, Pt, Ni, and Fe impurities occurs at the Au–Pd–Pt Lebedinskoye deposit (Russia) (type 5), and was also found in volcanic fumaroles of Ebeko volcano (Russia) (only Pd impurity) (type 6). High-fineness gold (910‰–970‰) with low contents of Pd, Ag, Cu, and Hg is spread over a great part of gold-PGE placers (type 7). Pd,Hg-rich low-fineness gold (630‰–770‰) has been found in some placers of the Chorokh river (Turkey) [60], the Dart river (England) [20], and weathering crusts at the Corrego Bom Sucesso (Brazil) [76].
Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 show the minerals that occur in association with palladian gold at the deposits with various types of Au-Pd mineralization. The number of minerals is about 90, apart from unnamed phases. Table 10 contains data on minerals in association with palladian gold from deposits of different types. Minerals (bold) are the most frequent phases. Mineral groups are presented by native metals and intermetallic compounds, oxides, hydroxides, and chalcogenides. Pd, Ag, Cu, and Hg metals that occur in native gold frequently form their minerals and are present in association with palladian gold. In Table 10, these minerals are listed separately by group.
Palladium minerals make up the largest group. Most common among them are arsenides, stibioarsenides, sulfides, stannides, bismuthides, tellurides, selenides, etc. (Table 10). In association with them, Pt minerals—sperrylite, braggite, sudovikovite, palladoarsenide, isoferroplatinum and tetraferroplatinum—are present. Pd and Pt minerals are typical of the deposits of types 1 and 7 (Table 7), which indicates their paragenetic relationship.
Gold and silver minerals frequently occur in association with palladian gold—these are Au-Ag-Cu solid solutions and Ag-Cu intermetallic compounds (tetra-auricupride, auricupride)—and more rare minerals are aurostibite, anyuiite, sylvanite, fischesserite, hessite, chlorargyrite, bohdanowiczite, naumannite, and eucairite. Au-Cu intermetallic compounds were found at more than ten deposits. Tetra-auricupride is spread at the deposits belonging to groups 1 and 7. Aurostibite is in association with palladian gold in the ores of the Uderei deposit (Russia) (type 2a) [49] and placer ore occurrences of Lammermuir Hills (Scotland) and River Dart (England) (type 7a,b) [20].
Copper minerals are represented by sulfides (chalcopyrite, bornite, chalcocite, anilite) and selenides (eucairite, umangite)—these are typical minerals at some deposits of mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes (type 1). Cu oxides (tenorite, (Pd,Cu)O) were found in exogenous deposits (type 7). The most widespread mercury mineral is potarite, whereas cinnabar, tiemannite, and coloradoite are rare. They were detected at some deposits of types 1, 2b, 7-1, and 7-4.
Fe oxides (hematite, magnetite) and Fe and Pd hydroxides (FeOOH, (Fe,Pd)OOH) are spread at the deposits of 3,4,7 groups and characterize highly oxidizing conditions of ore formation. Chalcogenides of Fe, Ni, and Pb (pentlandite, pyrrhotite, galena, clausthalite, altaite) occasionally occur in association with palladian gold at the deposits of type 1. Arsenopyrite in association with palladian gold was found only at the Uderei (Russia) [49] and Lammermuir Hills (Scotland) deposits [20]. Arsenic often occurs in arsenides and arsenoantimonides of Pd and Pt. Among host minerals containing palladian gold, the most common are quartz, muscovite, including fuchsite (Cr-Ms), chlorite, albite, K-feldspar, kaolinite, hornblende, and carbonates (calcite, siderite).
The above-listed minerals of Au, Pd, Cu, Ag, Hg, Pt, Fe, and Pb are formed together with palladian gold and influence its composition and redistribution of metals between fluids and solid phases. On the whole, minerals in association with palladian gold reflect the mineralogy of ores, which points out their use as indicators of the type of mineralization. PGE at elevated temperatures are typical chalcophiles, and have a high affinity with S, As, Te, Sb, and Bi. After post-magmatic fluid processing, a significant part of the native metals leave the high-temperature solid solutions, and various minerals of PGE, Au, and Ag are formed: native, sulfides, arsenides, tellurides, antimonides, bismuthides, etc.
An important area of research is works focused on studying the mechanism of the mobilization, transfer, and deposition of noble metals. It was proved that during crystallization, hot water fluids are generated, which migrate in the crust [151]. Metals can be transported by brines, altered meteoric water, and metamorphic and magmatogenic fluids. Their deposition from hydrothermal solutions takes place at temperatures from 500 to 100 °C. They can form their own minerals or occur in other minerals as isomorphic impurities. The ability of particular metals to occur in gold depends on their amount in the ore-forming system and the content of other elements with which they can form stable minerals in ore-forming conditions.
The question of the influence of the activity of elements (S, Te, Sb, As, Bi, etc.) that bind palladium into its own minerals on its ability to occur in native gold has not been resolved so far. The solution to this problem is complicated by the fact that hydrothermal fluids that formed Au-Pd mineralization simultaneously contain several of these elements, and native gold is found in parageneses with many minerals of Pd. The Baronskoe in the Middle Urals is an example of deposits at which palladian gold is in paragenesis with Pd sulfides, tellurides, sulfotellurides, arsenides, stibnides, and bismuthides. For this type of deposit, we managed to trace the variations in the contents of Pd in Ag-bearing gold with sulfides (vysotskite), tellurides (kotulskite, telluropalladinite), arsenides Pd and Pt, arsenotellurides (keitconite, As-keitconite), and As-Sb-Te minerals (Te-arsenopalladinite, Te-guanglinite, isomertieite). It was revealed that the occurrence of Pd, as well as Ag, is controlled mainly by the activity of S and Te, and the effect of the activity of As and Sb is negligible (Figure 13).
What do the Pd impurity and level of its concentrations in native gold indicate? What other isomorphic impurities along with Pd can be present in native gold? Which minerals occur in the intergrowth with palladian gold? At what deposits are Pd-bearing gold spread? What is the source of Pd and other accompanying impurities in native gold? What are the mechanisms and processes of mobilization, transfer, and joint deposition of these noble metals? In what physicochemical conditions and environments does Pd-bearing gold form? We tried to answer these and other questions in this paper. We will make attempts to answer many questions in the future. Impurities are a kind of fingerprint for minerals that make it possible to determine the composition and conditions of ore-forming medium. The composition of native gold is an important typomorphic characteristic of this indicator mineral, bearing fingerprints of formation conditions specific to each deposit. The knowledge of impurity elements in native gold and their content is important for identifying the ore formation to which gold mineralization belongs, for determining the source of placer ore occurrences, developing efficient criteria for forecasting, and searching gold and gold-bearing deposits. The minerals in association with native gold and the sequence of their formation reflecting the specific features of ore formations are the basis for ore-formational analysis [152]. The distribution of these associations determines the contours of deposits. Analysis of data on the deposits with palladian gold showed specific compositional features of the productive mineral associations from various types of deposits located on different continents and in different countries.
Construction of the quantitative genetic models of ore-forming processes at deposits with palladian gold requires thermodynamic data for solid solutions of various compositions. Estimation of the thermodynamic characteristics was performed only for some binary and ternary systems with gold [6,153,154,155,156], which makes it impossible to carry out this kind of work at this stage. Model calculations were made for the systems containing Au-Ag [4,6,7], Au-Ag-Hg [155], Au-Ag-Pd [156], Au-Ag-Cu [157], and Au-Ag-Cu-Hg [158]. The composition and set of impurities in palladian gold were found to be more diverse than it was thought to be. Most likely, very soon, it will be possible to confidently determine any region from which its samples were obtained from the composition of impurities in native gold.

6. Conclusions

(1)
Depending on the set of impurities, the following varieties of palladian gold are distinguished: Ag-, Cu-, Hg-, Ag,Cu-, Ag,Hg-, Cu,Hg-, and Ag,Cu,Hg-bearing palladian gold. Palladian gold may contain Pt, Fe, Ni, and Cd (in minor quantity).
(2)
A classification of types of deposits with palladian gold has been proposed: (1) PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes (two subtypes—(a) low-sulfide-grade (less than 2%–5% sulfides) Alaskan and (b) high-sulfide-grade (more than 5% sulfides) Norilsk); (2) orogenic gold deposits; (3) epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper deposits; (4) iron oxide copper gold deposit type; (5) ferruginous quartzite deposits; (6) volcanic exhalation; and (7) gold-PGE placers with five subtypes corresponding to the types of 1–5 primary sources.
(3)
Ag,Cu-bearing palladian gold is mainly high-fineness (910‰–990‰), is less frequently medium-fineness, and is rarely low-fineness and does not contain Hg at the deposits of PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes, epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper deposits, and iron oxide copper gold deposits (types 1, 3, 4). The only exception is the Au-Pd-Hg Itchayvayam ore occurrence (Kamchatka, Russia) (type 1d) with two varieties of Pd,Hg-bearing gold (high-fineness 816‰–960‰ and low-fineness 580‰–660‰). Low-fineness palladian gold with the major content of Ag is typical for OG deposit Zechstein (Poland) (type 2), whereas that with the major content of Pd is typical of the placers of the Chorokh river (Artvin district, Turkey) (type 7). Medium-fineness palladian gold with a high content of Pd occurs at deposits and in volcanic exhalations (types 5, 6). Hg,Ag,Cu-bearing high-fineness palladian gold is mainly present in placer deposits (type 7).
(4)
The most common minerals in association with palladian gold are Pd and Pt arsenides, stibioarsenides, sulfides, stannides, bismuthides, tellurides, and selenides. They are typical of deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes (types 1, 7). Au, Ag, and Cu minerals (tetra-auricupride, auricupride, aurostibite, chalcopyrite, bornite, sylvanite, hessite, naumannite, eucairite, etc.) occur in association with palladian gold at gold–copper deposits (types 2–4). Cu and Fe oxides (tenorite, hematite, magnetite, (Pd,Cu)O) and Fe and Pd hydroxides (goethite, (Fe,Pd)OOH) are spread at the deposits of 3,4,7 groups and indicate highly oxidizing conditions of ore formation. The most common of Hg minerals is potarite. The main host minerals of palladian gold are quartz, muscovite, including fuchsite (Cr-Ms), chlorite, albite, K-feldspar, kaolinite, hornblende, and carbonates (calcite, siderite).
(5)
Palladian gold from many deposits has a heterogeneous composition and occurs in two or more varieties, which suggests unstable deposition conditions, subsequent recrystallization processes, and a long history of formation. Physicochemical conditions of the formation of Pd-bearing gold at some deposits of one type cover two areas—magmatic high-temperature and hydrothermal low-temperature. At the majority of deposits of types 2–4, the formation of Pd-bearing gold proceeds with the participation of hydrothermal fluids (300–60 °C) of various salinities (0.2–30 wt.% NaCl eq.).
(6)
The fineness, impurity metals, and minerals in association with palladian gold reflect the mineralogy of Au-Pd ores and allow them to be used as indicators for types and subtypes of gold deposits.

7. Future Directions

In the studies of new objects, it is necessary to more thoroughly analyze the chemical composition of palladian gold and minerals in association with it. An important characteristic of palladian gold is the data on the composition of microinclusions obtained by LA-ICP-MS. However, the heterogeneity of its composition and the presence of mineral microinclusions must be taken into account for interpreting the obtained results.
A database of the deposits with palladian gold, as well as argentian, cuprian, and mercury gold must be created. Scarce data are known on the P,T,X-parameters of the formation of native gold of various compositions and sources of both gold and impurity elements (major, minor, and trace). Possible and important directions of further works are a study of different forms of transfer of Au, Pd, Ag, Cu, Hg, and other elements at different P,T,X-parameters of ore-forming conditions, obtaining thermodynamic characteristics of Au-Pd-Ag-Cu-Hg solid solutions and minerals of these elements and minerals in association with the aim to construct the genesis models of palladian gold and other varieties of native gold.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A.P.; methodology, G.A.P.; formal analysis, T.V.B., P.S.Z., G.A.P., and V.V.M.; investigation, G.A.P. and V.V.M.; data curation, T.V.B. and P.S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A.P., V.V.M., A.A.B., and N.A.G.; writing—review and editing, G.A.P., V.V.M., and N.A.G.; visualization, G.A.P., P.S.Z., T.V.B., and V.V.M.; supervision, G.A.P.; project administration, G.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 20-05-00393) and within the framework of the state assignment of Institutes: Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) (No. 122041400237-8); Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (No. 123011800011-2); Institute of Volcanology and Seismology of the Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (No. AAAA-A20-120121090011); and North-East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (No. 121031700301-5).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for polishing the English and the constructive and helpful corrections and comments that improved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petrovskaya, N.V. Native Gold; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1973; 348p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle, R.W. The geochemistry of gold and its deposits. Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. 1979, 280, 584. [Google Scholar]
  3. Morrison, G.W.; Rose, W.J.; Jaireth, S. Geological and geochemical controls on the silver content (fineness) of gold in gold-silver deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 1991, 6, 333–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gammons, C.H.; Williams-Jones, A.E. Hydrothermal geochemistry of electrum; thermodynamic constraints. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Konstantinov, M.M. Gold Provinces of the World; Scientific World: Moscow, Russia, 2006; 358p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Pal’yanova, G.A. Physicochemical modeling of the coupled behavior of gold and silver in hydrothermal processes: Gold fineness, Au/Ag ratios and their possible implications. Chem. Geol. 2008, 255, 399–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liang, Y.; Hoshino, K. Thermodynamic calculations of AuxAg1−x fluid equilibria and their applications for ore-forming conditions. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 52, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Savva, N.E.; Kravtsova, R.G.; Anisimova, G.S.; Palyanova, G.A. Typomorphism of native gold (Geological-industrial types of gold deposits in the North-East of Russia). Minerals 2022, 12, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spiridonov, E.; Yanakieva, D. Modern mineralogy of gold: Overview and new data. Archéosciences 2009, 33, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gas’kov, I.V. Major impurity elements in native gold and their association with gold mineralization settings in deposits of Asian fold belts. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2017, 58, 1080–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palyanova, G.A. Gold and silver minerals in sulfide ore. Geol. Ore Depos. 2020, 62, 383–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chapman, R.J.; Banks, D.A.; Styles, M.T.; Walshaw, R.D.; Piazolo, S.; Morgan, D.J.; Grimshaw, M.R.; Spence-Jones, C.P.; Matthews, T.J.; Borovinskaya, O. Chemical and physical heterogeneity within native gold: Implications for the design of gold particle studies. Miner. Depos. 2021, 56, 1563–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nikolaeva, L.A.; Gavrilov, A.M.; Nekrasova, A.N.; Yablokova, S.V.; Shatilova, L.V. Native Gold in Lode and Placer Deposits of Russia. Atlas; Krivtsov, A.I., Ed.; TsNIGRI: Moscow, Russia, 2003; 184p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nikolaeva, L.A.; Nekrasova, A.N.; Milyaev, S.A.; Yablokova, S.V.; Gavrilov, A.M. Geochemistry of native gold from deposits of various types. Geol. Ore Depos. 2013, 55, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chapman, R.J.; Leake, R.C.; Moles, N.R.; Earls, G.; Cooper, C.; Harrington, K.; Berzins, R. The application of microchemical analysis of gold grains to the understanding of complex local and regional gold mineralization: A case study in Ireland and Scotland. Econ. Geol. 2000, 95, 1753–1773. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chapman, R.J.; Moles, N.R.; Bluemel, B.; Walshaw, R.D. Detrital Gold as an Indicator Mineral; Geological Society, London, Special Publications: London, UK, 2022; Volume 516, pp. 313–336. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikiforova, Z. Internal structures of placer gold as an indicator of endogenous and exogenous processes. Minerals 2023, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lalomov, A.; Grigorieva, A.; Kotov, A.; Ivanova, L. Typomorphic features and source of native gold from the Sykhoi Log area placer deposits, Bodaibo gold-bearing district, Siberia, Russia. Minerals 2023, 13, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okrugin, A.V. Platinum-Bearing Placers of the Siberian Platform; Publishing House YaF SO RAN: Yakutsk, Russia, 2000; 184p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chapman, R.J.; Leake, R.C.; Bond, D.P.G.; Stedra, V.; Fairgrieve, B. Chemical and mineralogical signatures of gold formed in oxidizing chloride hydrothermal systems and their significance within populations of placer gold grains collected during reconnaissance. Econ. Geol. 2009, 104, 563–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ames, D.E.; Kjarsgaard, I.M.; McDonald, A.M.; Good, D.J. Insights into the extreme PGE enrichment of the W Horizon, Marathon Cu-Pd deposit, Coldwell Alkaline Complex, Canada: Platinum-group mineralogy, compositions and genetic implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 90, 723–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sluzhenikin, S.F. Platinum-copper-nickel and platinum ores of the Norilsk region and their ore mineralization. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010, 81, 1288–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Krivenko, A.P.; Tolstykh, N.D.; Veselovskiy, N.N.; Mayorova, O.N. Gold-bearing tellurides of PGE and palladium-bearing gold in gabbronorite of Panskiy massif in Kola peninsula. Dokl. USSR Acad. Sci. Earth Sci. Sect. 1991, 319, 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tolstykh, N.D.; Sidorov, E.; Laajoki, K.V.O.; Krivenko, A.P.; Podlipskiy, M. The association of platinum-group minerals in placers of the Pustaya river, Kkamchatka, Russia. Can. Mineral. 2000, 38, 1251–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cabral, A.R.; Lehmann, B.; Kwitco, R.; Cravo Costa, C.H. Palladium and platinum minerals from the Serra Pelada Au–Pd–Pt deposit, Carajás mineral province, Northern Brazil. Can. Mineral. 2002, 40, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Olivo, G.R.; Gauthier, M.; Bardoux, M. Palladian gold from the Caue iron mine, Itabira District, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mineral. Mag. 1994, 58, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sluzhenikin, S.F.; Mokhov, A.V. Gold and silver in PGE-Cu-Ni and PGE ores of the Noril’sk deposits, Russia. Miner. Depos. 2015, 50, 465–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Varajão, C.A.C.; Colin, F.; Vieillard, P.; Melfi, A.J.; Nahon, D. Early weathering of palladium gold under lateritic conditions, Maquiné Mine, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Appl. Geochem. 2000, 15, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Palyanova, G.; Murzin, V.; Borovikov, A.; Karmanov, N.; Kuznetsov, S. Native gold in the Chudnoe Au-Pd-REE deposit (Subpolar Urals, Russia): Composition, minerals in intergrowth and genesis. Minerals 2021, 11, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murzin, V.V.; Palyanova, G.A.; Anikina, E.V.; Moloshag, V.P. Mineralogy of noble metals (Au, Ag, Pd, Pt) in Volkovskoe Cu-Fe-Ti-V deposit (Middle Urals, Russia). Lithosphere 2021, 21, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murzin, V.; Palyanova, G.; Mayorova, T.; Beliaeva, T. The gold–palladium Ozernoe occurrence (Polar Urals, Russia): Mineralogy, conditions of formation, sources of ore matter and fluid. Minerals 2022, 12, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalinin, Y.A.; Borovikov, A.A.; Maacha, L.; Zuhair, M.; Palyanova, G.A.; Zhitova, L.M. Au-Pd mineralization and ore-forming fluids of the Bleida Far West deposit (Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Geol. Ore Depos. 2022, 64 (Suppl. 2), S236–S255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Palyanova, G.; Kutyrev, A.; Beliaeva, T.; Shilovskikh, V.; Zhegunov, P.; Zhitova, E.; Seryotkin, Y. Pd,Hg-rich gold and compounds of the Au-Pd-Hg system at the Itchayvayam mafic-ultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia) and other localities. Minerals 2023, 13, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Townley, B.K.; Hérail, G.; Maksaev, V.; Palacios, C.; Parseval, P.; Sepulveda, T.F.; Orellana, R.; Rivas, P.; Ulloa, C. Gold grain morphology and composition as an exploration tool: Application to gold exploration in covered areas. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2003, 3, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Watling, R.J.; Herbert, H.K.; Delev, D.; Abell, I.D. Gold fingerprinting by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta 1994, 49, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chapman, R.J.; Mortensen, J.K.; Allan, M.M.; Walshaw, R.D.; Bond, J.; MacWilliam, K. A New approach to characterizing deposit type using mineral inclusion assemblages in gold particles. Econ. Geol. 2022, 117, 361–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Petrella, L.; Thébaud, N.; Evans, K.; LaFlamme, C.; Occhipinti, S. The role of competitive fluid-rock interaction processes in the formation of high-grade gold deposits. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2021, 313, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, H.; Beaudoin, G.; Makvandi, S.; Jackson, S.E.; Huang, X. Multivariate statistical analysis of trace element compositions of native gold from orogenic gold deposits: Implication for mineral exploration. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 131, 104061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, H.; Beaudoin, G. Geochemical signatures in native gold derived from Au-bearing ore deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 132, 104066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McClenaghan, M.B.; Cabri, L.J. Review of gold and platinum group element (PGE) indicator minerals methods for surficial sediment sampling. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2011, 11, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oberthür, T. The fate of platinum-group minerals in the exogenic environment—From sulfide ores via oxidized ores into placers: Case studies Bushveld Complex, South Africa, and Great Dyke, Zimbabwe. Minerals 2018, 8, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sidorov, E.G.; Kutyrev, A.V.; Zhitova, E.S.; Chubarov, V.M.; Khanin, D.A. Origin of platinum-group mineral assemblages from placers in rivers draining from the Ural-Alaskan type Itchayvayamsky ultramafics, far east Russia. Can. Mineral. 2019, 57, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shevko, E.P.; Bortnikova, S.B.; Abrosimova, N.A.; Kamenetsky, V.S.; Bortnikova, S.P.; Panin, G.L.; Zelenski, M. Trace elements and minerals in fumarolic sulfur: The case of Ebeko volcano, Kuriles. Geofluids 2018, 2018, 4586363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nekrasov, I.Y.; Ivanov, V.V.; Lennikov, A.M.; Sapin, V.I.; Safronov, P.P.; Oktyabr’skii, R.A. Rare natural polycomponent alloys based on gold and copper from the platinum placer in the Konder alkaline-ultrabasic massif, southeastern Aldan shield, Russia. Geol. Ore Depos. 2001, 43, 406–417. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nekrasov, I.Y.; Lennikov, A.M.; Zalishchak, B.L.; Oktyabrsky, R.A.; Ivanov, V.V.; Sapin, V.I.; Taskaev, V.I. Compositional variations in platinum-group minerals and gold, Konder alkaline-ultrabasic massif, Aldan shield, Russia. Can. Mineral. 2005, 43, 637–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Svetlitskaya, T.V.; Nevolko, P.A.; Kolpakov, V.V.; Tolstykh, N.D. Native gold from the Inagli Pt-Au placer deposit (the Aldan Shield, Russia): Geochemical characteristics and implications for possible bedrock sources. Miner. Depos. 2018, 53, 323–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Okrugin, A.V.; Mazur, A.B.; Zemnuhov, A.L.; Popkov, P.A.; Sleptsov, S.V. The palladium gold-PGM association in the placers of the Anabar River basin, NE part of the Siberian platform, Russia. Otechestvennaya Geol. 2009, 5, 3–10. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  48. Okrugin, A.; Gerasimov, B. Paragenetic association of platinum and gold minerals in placers of the Anabar River in the Northeast of the Siberian Platform. Minerals 2023, 13, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rudashevsky, N.S.; Gorbunov, A.A.; Antonov, A.V.; Alikin, O.V.; Rudashevsky, V.N.; Bobrova, O.V. Palladian gold (Au, Pd) in gold and antimony ores of the Uderei deposit, Yenisei ridge. Proc. Fersman Sci. Sess. GI KSC RAS 2019, 16, 492–496. [Google Scholar]
  50. Spiridonov, E.M.; Serova, A.A.; Korotaeva, N.N.; Zhukov, N.N.; Kulagov, E.A.; Belyakov, S.N.; Kulikova, I.M.; Sereda, E.V.; Tushentsova, I.N. Genetic Pd, Pt, Au, Ag, and Rh mineralogy in Noril’sk sulfide ores. Geol. Ore Depos. 2015, 57, 402–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shaybekov, R.I.; Sokerina, N.V.; Isaenko, S.I.; Shanina, S.N.; Zykin, N.N. Gold-telluride-palladium mineralization, a new type of mineralization in gabbro-dolerites of the Pai-Khoi ridge (Yugor peninsula, Russia). Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2020, 61, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Malyugin, A.A.; Chervyakovsky, S.G.; Sazonov, V.N. A new placer-forming type of gold mineralization. Rep. Acad. Sci. USSR 1986, 288, 697–699. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  53. Borisov, A.V. Geological and Genetic Features of Au-Pd-REE Ore Occurrences in the Maldy-Nyrd Ridge (Subpolar Urals). Ph.D. Thesis, IGEM RAS, Moscow, Russia, 2005; p. 27. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  54. Mikhailov, V.V.; Stepanov, S.Y.; Petrov, S.V.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Kozlov, A.V.; Palamarchuk, R.S.; Abramova, V.D. New copper–precious metal occurrence in gabbro of the Serebryansky Kamen massif, Ural platinum belt, Northern Urals. Geol. Ore Depos. 2021, 63, 528–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anikina, E.V.; Alekseev, A.V. Mineral-geochemical characteristic of gold-palladium mineralization in the Volkovsky gabbro massif (Platiniferous Urals Belt). Litosphere 2010, 5, 75–100. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  56. Kovalev, S.G.; Chernikov, A.P.; Burdakov, A.V. First finding of native gold in chromites from rock massifs of Kraka (Southern Urals). Dokl. Earth Sci. 2007, 414, 526–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Makeev, A.B.; Filippov, V.N. Metallic films on natural diamond crystals (Ichet’yu Deposit, Middle Timan). Dokl. Earth Sci. 1999, 369, 1161–1165. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  58. Subbotin, V.V.; Gabov, D.A.; Korchagin, A.U.; Savchenko, E.E. Gold and silver in the composition of PGE ores of the Fedorov-Pana layered intrusive complex. Her. Kola Sci. Cent. RAS 2017, 1, 53–65, (In Russian with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  59. Chernyshov, N.M.; Korobkina, T.P. Peculiarities of distribution and forms of concentration of platinoids and gold in ferruginous quartzites of Lebedyan deposit of KMA. Bull. Voronezh State Univ. Ser. Geol. 2005, 1, 140–152. [Google Scholar]
  60. Generalov, M.E.; Pautov, L.A. Porpecite of Lieutenant Chernik. New Data Miner. 2018, 52, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kapsiotis, A.; Grammatikopoulos, T.A.; Tsikouras, B.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. Platinum-group mineral characterization in concentrates from high-grade PGE Al-rich chromitites of Korydallos Area in the Pindos Ophiolite Complex (NW Greece). Resour. Geol. 2010, 60, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kapsiotis, A.N. Origin of mantle peridotites from the Vourinos Ophiolite Complex, Greece, as deduced from Cr-spinel morphological and chemical variations. J. Geosci. 2013, 58, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kucha, H. Precious metal alloys and organic matter in the Zechstein copper deposits, Poland. TMPM Tschermaks Mineral. Und Petrogr. Mitteilungen 1981, 28, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wierchowiec, J.; Zieliński, K. Origin of placer gold and other heavy minerals from fluvial Cenozoic sediments in close proximity to rote Fäule-related Au mineralisation in the North Sudetic Trough, SW Poland. Geol. Q. 2017, 61, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Wierchowiec, J.; Mikulski, S.Z.; Zieliński, K. Supergene gold mineralization from exploited placer deposits at Dziwiszów in the Sudetes (NE Bohemian Massif, SW Poland). Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 131, 104049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Paar, W.H.; Roberts, A.C.; Criddle, A.J.; Topa, D. A new mineral, chrisstanleyite, Ag2Pd3Se4, from Hope’s Nose, Torquay, Devon, England. Mineral. Mag. 1998, 62, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moreno, T.; Prichard, H.M.; Lunar, R.; Monterrubio, S.; Fisher, P. Formation of a secondary platinum-group mineral assemblage in chromitites from the Herbeira ultramafic massif in Cabo Ortegal, NW Spain. Eur. J. Mineral. 1999, 11, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. El Ghorfi, M.; Oberthur, T.; Melcher, F.; Luders, V.; El Boukhari, A.; Maacha, L.; Ziadi, R.; Baoutoul, H. Gold-palladium mineralization at Bleida Far West, Bou Azzer-el Graara inlier, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Miner. Depos. 2006, 41, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bozhko, E.N. To the question about sources of gold-platinoid mineralization of the structural formational zone Mataganya-Siguiri (Guinea, West Africa). Bull. Voronezh Univer. 2005, 1, 193–203. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  70. Generalov, M.E.; Pautov, L.A. New occurrence of porpecite and mineralogy features of alluvial gold from the gold-bearing region of Ambositra, Madagascar. New Data Miner. 2012, 47, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  71. Chapman, R.J.; Mileham, T.J.; Allan, M.M.; Mortensen, J.K. A distinctive Pd-Hg signature in detrital gold derived from alkali Cu-Au porphyry systems. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 83, 84–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ames, D.E.; Kjarsgaard, I.M.; Good, D.; McDonald, A. Ore mineralogy of Cu-PGE mineralized gabbros, Coldwell Alkaline Complex, Midcontinent rift: Supporting databases, scanning electron microscope and mineral chemistry. Geol. Surv. Can. 2016, 52. Open File 8006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rudashevsky, N.S.; Rudashevsky, V.N.; Nielsen, T.F.D. Intermetallic compounds, copper and palladium alloys in Au–Pd ore of the Skaergaard pluton, Greenland. Geol. Ore Depos. 2015, 57, 674–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cabri, L.J.; Laflamme, J.H.G. Rhodium, platinum, and gold alloys from the Stillwater Complex. Can. Mineral. 1974, 12, 399–403. [Google Scholar]
  75. Portella, Y.D.M.; Zaccarini, F.; Luvizotto, G.L.; Garuti, G.; Bakker, R.J.; Angeli, N.; Thalhammer, O. The Cedrolina Chromitite, Goiás State, Brazil: A Metamorphic Puzzle. Minerals 2016, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Cabral, A.R.; Vymazalová, A.; Lehmann, B.; Tupinambá, M.; Haloda, J.; Laufek, F.; Vlček, V.; Kwitko-Ribeiro, R. Poorly crystalline Pd-Hg-Au intermetallic compounds from Córrego Bom Sucesso, Southern Serra Do Espinhaço, Brazil. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009, 21, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Olivo, G.R.; Gauthier, M.; Bardoux, M. Palladium-bearing gold deposit hosted by Proterozoic Lake Superior-type iron-formation at the Caue Iron Mine, Itabira District, Southern Sao Francisco Craton, Brazil: Geologic and structural controls. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cabral, A.R.; Lehmann, B.; Kwitko-Ribeiro, R.; Jones, R.D.; Rocha Filho, O.G. On the association of Pd-bearing gold, hematite and gypsum in an Ouro Preto nugget. Can. Mineral. 2003, 41, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Olivo, G.R.; Gauthier, M.; Williams-Jones, A.E.; Levesque, M. The Au-Pd mineralization at the Conceicao Iron Mine, Itabira District, Southern Sao Francisco Craton, Brazil: An example of a jacutinga-type deposit. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nikolaeva, L.A.; Yablokova, S.V. Typomorphic features of native gold and their use in geological exploration. Ores Met. 2007, 6, 41–57. [Google Scholar]
  81. Gray, A.L. Solid sample introduction by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analyst 1985, 110, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McCandless, T.E.; Baker, M.E.; Ruiz, J. Trace element analysis of natural gold by laser ablation ICP-MS: A combined external/internal standardisation approach. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 1997, 21, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Outridge, P.M.; Doherty, W.; Gregoire, D.C. Determination of trace elemental signatures in placer gold by laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry as a potential aid for gold exploration. J. Geochem. Explor. 1998, 60, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Penney, G. Fingerprinting Gold Using Laser Ablation Microprobe-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LAM-ICP-MS): An Exploration Tool. Honors Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada, 2001; 65p. unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  85. Brown, S.M.; Johnson, C.A.; Watling, R.J.; Premo, W.R. Constraints on the composition of ore fluids and implications for mineralizing events at the Cleo gold deposit, Eastern Goldfields Province, Western Australia. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 2003, 50, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chapman, R.J.; Mortensen, J.K. Application of microchemical characterization of placer gold grains to exploration for epithermal gold mineralization in regions of poor exposure. J. Geochem. Explor. 2006, 91, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. McInnes, M.; Greenough, J.D.; Fryer, B.J.; Wells, R. Trace elements in native gold by solution ICP-MS and their use in mineral exploration: A British Columbia example. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 1076–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ehser, A.; Borg, G.; Pernicka, E. Provenance of the gold of the Early Bronze Age Nebra Sky Disk, central Germany: Geochemical characterization of natural gold from Cornwall. Eur. J. Mineral. 2011, 23, 895–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Omang, B.O.; Suh, C.E.; Lehmann, B.; Vishiti, A.; Chombong, N.N.; Fon, A.N.; Egbe, J.A.; Shemang, E.M. Microchemical signature of alluvial gold from two contrasting terrains in Cameroon. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2015, 112, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gauert, C.; Schannor, M.; Hecht, L.; Radtke, M.; Reinholz, U. A comparison of in situ analytical methods for trace element measurement in gold samples from various South African gold deposits. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 2016, 40, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chapman, R.; Torvela, T.; Savastano, L. Insights into regional metallogeny from detailed compositional studies of alluvial gold: An example from the Loch Tay Area, Central Scotland. Minerals 2023, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nickel, E.H.; Grice, J.D. The IMA commision on new minerals and mineral names: Procedures and guidlines on mineral nomenclature, 1998. Mineral. Petrol. 1998, 64, 237–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Warr, L.N. IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineral. Mag. 2021, 85, 291–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fleet, M.E.; De Almeida, C.M.; Angeli, N. Botryoidal platinum, palladium and potarite from the Bom Sucesso stream, Minas Gerais, Brazil: Compositional zoning and origin. Can. Mineral. 2002, 40, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Makvandi, S.; Pagé, P.; Tremblay, J.; Girard, R. Exploration for platinum-group minerals in Till: A new approach to the recovery, counting, mineral identification and chemical characterization. Minerals 2021, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Razumny, A.V.; Sidorov, E.G.; Sandimirova, E.I. Copper-gold-palladuim mineralization in the concentric zoned massifs of the Koryaksky Upland. Vestn. KRAUNTS Earth Sci. 2004, 1, 75–80. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  97. Cabral, A.R.; Lehmann, B.; Kwitko, R.; Costa, C.C. The Serra Pelada Au-Pd-Pt deposit, Carajás mineral province, northern Brazil: Reconnaissance mineralogy and chemistry of very high grade palladian gold mineralization. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 1127–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cabral, A.R.; Lehmann, B.; Kwitko, R.; Jones, R.D. Palladian gold and palladium arsenide–antimonide minerals from Gongo Soco iron ore mine, Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Appl. Earth Sci. 2002, 111, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Murzin, V.V.; Moloshag, V.P.; Volchenko, Y.A. Paragenesis of precious metal minerals in copper-iron-vanadium ores of the Volkov type in the Urals. Dokl. AN SSSR 1988, 300, 1200–1202. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  100. Moloshag, V.P.; Korobeinikov, A.F. New Data on Platinoid Mineralization of Copper-Iron-Vanadium Ores. In Magmatic and Metamorphic Formations of the Urals and Their Metallogeny; Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2000; pp. 90–101. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  101. Poltavetc, Y.A.; Sazonov, V.N.; Poltavetc, Z.I.; Nechkin, G.S. Distribution of noble metals in ore mineral assemblages of the Volkovsky gabbroic pluton, Central Urals. Geochem. Int. 2006, 44, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Poltavetc, Y.A.; Poltavetc, Z.I.; Nechkin, G.S. Volkovsky deposit of titanomagnetite and copper- titanomagnetite ores with accompanying noble-metal mineralization, the Central Urals, Russia. Geol. Ore Depos. 2011, 53, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Volchenko, Y.A.; Koroteev, V.A.; Neustroeva, I.I.; Voronina, L.K. New gold-platinum-palladium ore occurrences in the palladium-bearing belt of the Urals. Tr. IGG UrO RAN 2007, 153, 214–220. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  104. Anikina, E.V.; Zaccarini, F.; Knauf, V.V.; Rusin, I.A.; Pushkarev, E.V.; Garouti, J. Palladium and gold minerals in the ores of the Baron ore occurrence, Volkovsky gabbro-diorite massif. Bull. Ural Dep. Rus. Mineral. Soc. 2005, 4, 5–25, (In Russian with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  105. Zoloev, K.K.; Volchenko, Y.A.; Koroteev, V.A.; Malakhov, I.A.; Mardirosyan, A.N.; Khrypov, V.N. Platinum-Metal Mineralization in the Geological Complexes of the Urals; Department of Natural Resources for the Ural Region: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2001; 199p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  106. Zaaccarini, F.; Anikina, E.; Pushkarev, E.I.; Rusin, I.; Garuti, G. Palladium and gold minerals from the Baronskoe-Kluevsky ore deposit (Volkovsky complex, Central Urals, Russia). Mineral. Petrol. 2004, 82, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kuznetsov, S.K.; Filippov, V.N.; Onishchenko, S.A.; Kotel’nikov, V.G. Copper-gold-palladium mineralization in ultrabasic rocks of the Polar Urals. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2007, 414, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pystin, A.M.; Potapov, I.L.; Pystina, Y.I.; Generalov, V.I.; Onishchenko, S.A.; Filippov, V.N.; Shloma, A.A.; Tereshko, V.V. Low-Sulfide Platinum-Metal Mineralization in the Polar Urals; Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2011; 150p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  109. Spiridonov, E.M.; Kulagov, E.A.; Kulikova, I.M. Pt-Pd tetra-auricupride and associated minerals in ores of the Norilsk-1 deposit. Geol. Ore Depos. 2003, 45, 232–241. [Google Scholar]
  110. Shcheka, G.G.; Lehmann, B.; Gierth, E.; Gömann, K.; Wallianos, A. Macrocrystals of Pt-Fe alloy from the Kondyor PGE placer deposit, Khabarovskiy kray, Russia: Trace-element content, mineral inclusions and reaction assemblages. Can. Mineral. 2004, 42, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Onishchenko, S.A.; Kuznetsov, S.K.; Tropnikov, E.M. Epigenetic alteration of cupreous gold in the Au-Ag-Cu-Pd exsolution texture. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2020, 492, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Onishchenko, S.A.; Kuznetsov, S.K. Exsolution in the Au-Ag-Cu system in a gold-rich area. Geochem. Int. 2022, 60, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Onishchenko, S.A.; Kuznetsov, S.K. Native gold of the Chudnoe gold–palladium deposit (Subpolar Urals, Russia). Geol. I Geofiz. 2023, 64, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gerasimov, B.B.; Nikiforova, Z.S.; Pavlov, V.I. Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of placer gold in the Bol'shaya Kuonamka river. Educ. Sci. Yakutsk Russ. 2014, 3, 74–78. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  115. Murzin, V.V.; Malyugin, A.A. Typomorphism of Gold in the Hypergenesis Zone (on the Example of the Urals); UNC AN USSR: Sverdlovsk, Russia, 1987; 96p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  116. Gerasimov, B.B.; Kravchenko, A.A. Ore occurrences of the Anabar placer area—Potential primary sources of gold. NEFU Bulletin. Earth Sci. 2020, 4, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  117. McQueen, K.G. Ore deposit types and their primary expressions. In Regolith Expression of Australian Ore Systems; Butt, C.R.M., Robertson, I.D.M., Scott, K.M., Cornelius, M., Eds.; CRC LEME: Bentley, WA, Australia, 2005; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  118. Dill, H.G. The “chessboard” classification scheme of mineral deposits: Mineralogy and geology from aluminum to zirconium. Earth Sci. Rev. 2010, 100, 1–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Groves, D.I.; Goldfarb, R.J.; Gebre-Mariam, M.; Hagemann, S.G.; Robert, F. Orogenic gold deposits: A proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types. Ore Geol. Rev. 1998, 13, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Naldrett, A.J. Secular Variation of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits and Their Source Magmas. Econ. Geol. 2010, 105, 669–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Goldfarb, R.J.; Groves, D.I.; Gardoll, I. Orogenic gold and geologic time: A global synthesis. Ore Geol. Rev. 2001, 18, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sillitoe, R.H. Porphyry copper systems. Econ. Geol. 2010, 105, 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Goldfarb, R.J.; Groves, D.I. Orogenic gold: Common or evolving fluid and metal sources through time. Lithos 2015, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Goryachev, N.A. Ore Deposits in the Earth’s History: A Tectonic and Metallogenic Essay; Dalnauka, IP Serdyuk O.A.: Vladivostok, Russia, 2021; 208p. [Google Scholar]
  125. Tegner, C.; Lesher, C.E.; Larsen, L.M.; Watt, W.S. Evidence from the rare-earth-element record of mantle melting for cooling of the Tertiary Iceland plume. Nature 1998, 395, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. McCallum, I.S. The Stillwater Complex, a review of the geology. In Stillwater Complex, Geology & Guide. Billings: 9th International Platinum Symposium; Cooper, R.W.L., Zientek, M.L., Boudreau, A.E., McCallum, I.S., Miller, J.D., Geraghty, E.P., Mooney, D.G., Eds.; Johnson Matthey: West Chester, PA, USA, 2002; pp. A1–A25. [Google Scholar]
  127. Bundtzen, T.K.; Sidorov, E.G.; Layer, P.W.; Chubarov, V.M. Geology, geochemistry, and new isotopic ages of selected PGE-Cr and PGE-Ni-Cu bearing mafic ultramafic complexes in the Farewell and Goodnews Bay terranes, Alaska, and Sredinny terrane, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia Far East. In Metallogeny of the Pacific Northwest: Proceedings of the Interim IAGOD Conference; Khanchuk, A.I., Gonevchuk, G.A., Mitrokhin, A.N., Simanenko, L.F., Cook, N.J., Seltmann, R., Eds.; IAGOD: Vladivostok, Russia, 2004; pp. 83–85. [Google Scholar]
  128. Pushkarev, E.V.; Morozova, A.V.; Khiller, V.V.; Glavatskykh, S.P.; Kamenetsky, V.S.; Rodemann, T. Ontogeny of ore Cr-spinel and composition of inclusions as indicators of the pneumatolytic–hydrothermal origin of PGM-bearing chromitites from Kondyor massif, the Aldan shield. Geol. Ore Depos. 2015, 57, 352–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Efimov, A.A.; Ronkin, Y.L.; Malich, K.N.; Lepikhina, G.A. New Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr (ID-TIMS) isotope data for apatite-phlogopite clinopyroxenites from the dunite core of the Konder massif, Aldan shield, Yakutia. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2012, 445, 956–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Popov, V.S.; Belyatsky, B.V. Sm-Nd age of dunite-clinopyroxenite-tylaite association of the Kytlym massif, the platinum belt of the Urals. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2006, 409, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fershtater, G.B.; Krasnobaev, A.A.; Borodina, N.S.; Bea, F.; Montero, P. Geodynamic settings and history of the Paleozoic intrusive magmatism of the Central and Southern Urals: Results of zircon dating. Geotectonics 2007, 41, 465–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Remizov, D.N.; Petrov, S.Y.; Kos’yanov, A.O.; Nosikov, M.V.; Sergeev, S.A.; Grigoriev, S.I. New age datings of gabbroides of the kershor complex (Polar Urals). Dokl. Earth Sci. 2010, 434, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Krasnobaev, A.A.; Fershtater, G.B.; Busharina, S.V. Character of zircon distribution in dunites of the South Urals (Sakharin and East Khabarnin massifs). Dokl. Earth Sci. 2009, 426, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Shaibekov, R.I. Age of the dolerite body of Mount Sopcha (Central Pai-Khoi). Bull. Inst. Geol. Komi Sci. Cent. Ural. Branch Russ. Acad. Sci. 2007, 3, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  135. Subbotin, V.V.; Korchagin, A.U.; Savchenko, E.E. Platinum-metal mineralization of the Fedorovo-Pansky ore cluster: Types of mineralization, mineral composition, features of genesis. Bull. Kola Sci. Cent. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1, 54–65. [Google Scholar]
  136. Schissel, D.; Tsvetkov, A.A.; Mitrofanov, F.P.; Korchagin, A.U. Basal platinum-group element mineralization in the Federov Pansky layered mafic intrusion, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 1657–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Nevolko, P.A.; Borisenko, A.S. Antimony mineralization in the gold-sulfide deposits of the Yenisei Ridge. Razved. I Okhrana Nedr. 2009, 2, 11–14. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  138. Moralev, G.V.; Borisov, A.V.; Surenkov, S.V.; Tarbaev, M.B.; Ponomarchuk, V.A. First 39Ar-40Ar datings on micas from the Chudnoe Au-Pd-REE occurrence, Near-Polar Urals. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2005, 400, 109–112. [Google Scholar]
  139. Volchenko, Y.A.; Koroteev, V.A.; Chashchukhin, I.S. Genetic types of chromite-platinoid mineralization in alpine-type complexes of mobile systems (on the example of the Urals). Proc. Inst. Geol. Geochem. 1998, 145, 190–193. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  140. Shepherd, T.J.; Bouch, J.E.; Gunn, A.G.; McKervey, J.A.; Naden, J.; Scrivener, R.C.; Styles, M.T.; Large, D.E. Permo–Triassic unconformity-related Au-Pd mineralisation, South Devon, UK: New insights and the European perspective. Miner. Depos. 2005, 40, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Scrivener, R.C.; Cooper, B.V.; George, M.C.; Shepherd, T.J. Gold-bearing carbonate veins in the Middle Devonian limestone of Hope’s Nose, Torquay. Proc. Ussher Soc. 1982, 5, 393. [Google Scholar]
  142. Keith, S.B.; Spieth, V.; Rasmussen, J.C. Zechstein-Kupferschiefer mineralization reconsidered as a product of ultra-deep hydrothermal, mud-brine volcanism. In Contributions to Mineralization; IntechOpen: Kirkuk, Iraq, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Barakat, A.; Marignac, C.; Boiron, M.-C.; Bouabdelli, M. Géomatériaux/Geomaterials (Métallogénie/Ore deposits) Caractérisation des paragenèses et des paléocirculations fluides dans l’indice d’or de Bleïda (Anti-Atlas, Maroc). Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2002, 334, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Berni, G.V.; Heinrich, C.A.; Walle, M.; Wall, V.J. Fluid geochemistry of the Serra Pelada Au-Pd-Pt deposit, Carajas, Brazil: Exceptional metal enrichment caused by deep reaching hydrothermal oxidation. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 111, 102991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cabral, A.R.; Lehmann, B.; Tupinambá, M.; Wiedenbeck, M.; Brauns, M. Geology, mineral chemistry and tourmaline B isotopes of the Córrego Bom Sucesso area, southern Serra do Espinhaço, Minas Gerais, Brazil: Implications for Au–Pd–Pt exploration in quartzitic terrain. J. Geochem. Explor. 2011, 110, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Romer, R.L.; Lüders, V.; Banks, D.A.; Schneider, J. U-Pb data of Au-Pd-Pt-bearing quartz-hematite veins, Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. In Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge; Mao, J., Bierlein, F.P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rosière, C.A.; Rios, F.J. The origin of hematite in high-grade iron ores based on infrared microscopy and fluid inclusion studies: The example of the Conceição mine, Quadrilátero ferrífero, Brazil. Econ. Geol. 2004, 99, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Piestrzyński, A.; Pieczonka, J.; Głuszek, A. Redbed-type gold mineralisation, Kupferschiefer, south-west Poland. Miner. Depos. 2002, 37, 512–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Razumny, A.V.; Sidorenko, V.I.; Sapozhnikova, L.P.; Krotova-Putintseva, A.E.; Lazareva, E.I.; Suprunenko, O.I.; Surikov, S.N.; Sidorov, M.D.; Sidorov, E.G.; Badredinov, Z.G.; et al. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation; Scale 1:1,000,000 (third generation); Series Koryaksko-Kurilskaya; Sheet P-59-Plowmen; Explanatory letter; Cartographic factory VSEGEI: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2019; 323p. [Google Scholar]
  150. Babkin, P.V.; Baranov, Y.E.; Vasiliev, V.I.; Demidova, N.G.; Kirikilitsa, S.I.; Kuznetsov, V.A.; Nikiforov, N.A.; Obolensky, A.A.; Ozerova, N.A.; Smirnov, V.I.; et al. Mercury Metallogeny; Smirnova, V.I., Kuznetsova, V.A., Fedorchuk, V.P., Eds.; Nedra: Moscow, Russia, 1976; 255p. [Google Scholar]
  151. Fontboté, L.; Kouzmanov, K.; Chiaradia, M.; Pokrovski, G.S. Sulfide minerals in hydrothermal deposits. Elements 2017, 13, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Nikolaeva, L.A.; Gavrilov, A.M.; Nekrasova, A.N.; Yablokova, S.V. Generalized indicative models of native gold at deposits of various ore-formational types. Ores Met. 2008, 3, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  153. Pal’yanova, G.A.; Shvarov, Y.V.; Shironosova, G.P.; Laptev, Y.V. Methodological approaches to the assessment of gold fineness during thermodynamic modeling of hydrothermal systems. Geochem. Int. 2005, 43, 1247–1251. [Google Scholar]
  154. Chudnenko, K.V.; Pal’yanova, G.A. Thermodynamic properties of solid solutions in the Ag-Au-Cu system. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2014, 55, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Chudnenko, K.V.; Pal’yanova, G.A.; Anisimova, G.S.; Moskvitin, S.G. Ag-Au-Hg solid solutions and physicochemical models of their formation in nature (Kyuchyus deposit as an example). Appl. Geochem. 2015, 55, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chudnenko, K.V. Thermodynamic properties of components in the Ag–Au–Pd system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 65, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chudnenko, K.V.; Palyanova, G.A. Thermodynamic modeling of native formation Cu-Ag-Au-Hg solid solutions. Appl. Geochem. 2016, 66, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Murzin, V.V.; Chudnenko, K.V.; Palyanova, G.A.; Varlamov, D.A.; Naumov, E.A.; Pirajno, F. Physicochemical model for the genesis of Cu-Ag-Au-Hg solid solutions and intermetallics in the rodingites of the Zolotaya Gora gold deposit (Urals, Russia). Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 93, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of deposits and ore occurrences with palladian gold, and other Au-Pd-Ag-Cu-Hg phases (Arabic numerals indicate deposits, Roman numerals indicate the age of main ore-hosted geological structures; the description is shown below). Eurasia: Russia 1–24—1. Itchayvayam complex [33,42]; 2. Ebeko volcano [43]; 3. Konder massif [44,45]; 4. Inagli Pt–Au placer deposit [46]; 5–7. placers of northern Yakutia [47,48]: 5. Mayat river, 6. Bol’shaya Kuonamka river, 7. Kuoyka river; 8. Uderei [49]; 9,10. Norilsk deposits: 9. Norilsk-1, 10. Talnakh [27,50]; 11. Krutoe, Pay-Khoy Range [51]; 12–19. Ural deposits: 12. Ozernoe [31], 13. Chudnoe and placer Alkes-Voss [29,52,53], 14. Nesterovskoe [53], 15. Serebryansky Kamen [54], 16. Baronskoe [55], 17. Volkovskoe [30], 18. Khamitovskoe [56], 19. Ichet’yu, Timan [57]; 20–23—Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex deposits [58]: 20. V. Chuarva, 21. C. Kamennik, 22. Y. Peshempakhk, 23. Fedorova Tundra; 24. Lebedinskoye [59]; 25. Chorokh river, Artvin district, Turkey [60]; 26. Korydallos, Greece [61,62]; 27–29. deposits of the Sudetes Mountains: 27. Zechstein [63], 28. Zimnik Creek [64], 29. Dziwiszów [65]; 30. Lammermuir Hills, Scotland [20]; 31–33. deposits of the south of England: 31. Hope’s Nose [66], 32. Dart river [20], 33. Brownstone [20]; 34. Herbeira massif, Spain [67]. Structures: I—Olyutorsky arc terrane, II—Kuril-Kamchatka volcanic belt, III—Aldan shield, IV—Siberian trap province, V—Yenisei ridge, VI—Ural accretionary fold belt (Variscan orogenic belt), VII—Timan folding system, VIII—Baltic Shield, IX—Eastern Pontides-Lesser Caucasus fold-thrust belt, X—Ophiolite belt of Greece, XI—Hercynides of the Sudetes (Variscan orogenic belt), XII—Caledonides of Scotland, XIII—Variscan orogenic belt of Britain, XIV—Central Iberian zone of the Iberian massif (Variscan orogenic belt). Africa: 1. Bleida Far West, Morocco [32,68]; 2. Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 3. Ambositra District, Madagascar [70]. Structures: I—Anti-Atlas fold belt, II—Kenema-Man shield and Baoule-Mossi domain (West African Craton), III—Precambrian shield of Madagascar. North America: 1–3. Deposits of Canada: 1. Friday Creek [71]; 2. Whipsaw Creek [71]; 3. Similkameen river [71]; 4. Marathon [21,72]; 5. Skaergaard massif, Greenland, Denmark [73]; 6. Stillwater, USA [74]. Structures: I—Intermontane terranes of British Columbia (North American Cordilleran orogenic belt), II—Wyoming province, III—Canadian shield, IV—Paleogene platobasalts of eastern Greenland. South America: Deposits of Brazil—1. Serra Pelada [25]; 2. Cedrolina Chromitite (Goiás State) [75]; 3. Corrego Bom [76]; 4–7. Itabira deposits: 4. Caue iron mine [26,77], 5. Gongo Soko [25,78], 6. Maquine [28], 7. Conceichao mine [79]. Structures: I—Central Brazilian shield, II—São Francisco craton.
Figure 1. Location of deposits and ore occurrences with palladian gold, and other Au-Pd-Ag-Cu-Hg phases (Arabic numerals indicate deposits, Roman numerals indicate the age of main ore-hosted geological structures; the description is shown below). Eurasia: Russia 1–24—1. Itchayvayam complex [33,42]; 2. Ebeko volcano [43]; 3. Konder massif [44,45]; 4. Inagli Pt–Au placer deposit [46]; 5–7. placers of northern Yakutia [47,48]: 5. Mayat river, 6. Bol’shaya Kuonamka river, 7. Kuoyka river; 8. Uderei [49]; 9,10. Norilsk deposits: 9. Norilsk-1, 10. Talnakh [27,50]; 11. Krutoe, Pay-Khoy Range [51]; 12–19. Ural deposits: 12. Ozernoe [31], 13. Chudnoe and placer Alkes-Voss [29,52,53], 14. Nesterovskoe [53], 15. Serebryansky Kamen [54], 16. Baronskoe [55], 17. Volkovskoe [30], 18. Khamitovskoe [56], 19. Ichet’yu, Timan [57]; 20–23—Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex deposits [58]: 20. V. Chuarva, 21. C. Kamennik, 22. Y. Peshempakhk, 23. Fedorova Tundra; 24. Lebedinskoye [59]; 25. Chorokh river, Artvin district, Turkey [60]; 26. Korydallos, Greece [61,62]; 27–29. deposits of the Sudetes Mountains: 27. Zechstein [63], 28. Zimnik Creek [64], 29. Dziwiszów [65]; 30. Lammermuir Hills, Scotland [20]; 31–33. deposits of the south of England: 31. Hope’s Nose [66], 32. Dart river [20], 33. Brownstone [20]; 34. Herbeira massif, Spain [67]. Structures: I—Olyutorsky arc terrane, II—Kuril-Kamchatka volcanic belt, III—Aldan shield, IV—Siberian trap province, V—Yenisei ridge, VI—Ural accretionary fold belt (Variscan orogenic belt), VII—Timan folding system, VIII—Baltic Shield, IX—Eastern Pontides-Lesser Caucasus fold-thrust belt, X—Ophiolite belt of Greece, XI—Hercynides of the Sudetes (Variscan orogenic belt), XII—Caledonides of Scotland, XIII—Variscan orogenic belt of Britain, XIV—Central Iberian zone of the Iberian massif (Variscan orogenic belt). Africa: 1. Bleida Far West, Morocco [32,68]; 2. Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 3. Ambositra District, Madagascar [70]. Structures: I—Anti-Atlas fold belt, II—Kenema-Man shield and Baoule-Mossi domain (West African Craton), III—Precambrian shield of Madagascar. North America: 1–3. Deposits of Canada: 1. Friday Creek [71]; 2. Whipsaw Creek [71]; 3. Similkameen river [71]; 4. Marathon [21,72]; 5. Skaergaard massif, Greenland, Denmark [73]; 6. Stillwater, USA [74]. Structures: I—Intermontane terranes of British Columbia (North American Cordilleran orogenic belt), II—Wyoming province, III—Canadian shield, IV—Paleogene platobasalts of eastern Greenland. South America: Deposits of Brazil—1. Serra Pelada [25]; 2. Cedrolina Chromitite (Goiás State) [75]; 3. Corrego Bom [76]; 4–7. Itabira deposits: 4. Caue iron mine [26,77], 5. Gongo Soko [25,78], 6. Maquine [28], 7. Conceichao mine [79]. Structures: I—Central Brazilian shield, II—São Francisco craton.
Minerals 13 01019 g001
Figure 2. Ag-bearing palladian gold and other phases of Au-Ag-Pd system (in at.%) at the various deposits and ore occurrences: 1. Itchayvayam [33]; Norilsk deposits—2. Norilsk-1, 3. Talnakh, [22]; Ural deposits—4. Baronskoe [55], 5. Chudnoe [53], 6. Nesterovskoe [53]; 7—deposits of the Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex [58]; 8—Ebeko Volcano, Kuriles [43]; 9—Stillwater, Montana, USA [74]; 10—Corrego Bom Sucesso, Brazil [76]; 11—Gongo Soco iron mine, Brazil [25]; 12—Serra Pelada, Brazil [25]; 13—Caue iron mine, Brazil [77]; 14—Cedrolina Chromitite (Goiás State, Brazil) [75]; 15—Bleïda Far West, Morocco [68]; 16—Ambositra District, Madagascar [70]; 17—Hope’s Nose, Devon, England [66]; 18—Brownstone, Devon, England [20]; 19—Lammermuir Hills, Scotland [20]; 20—placer gold of Zimnik Creek, Poland [64]; 21—Chorokh River, Artvin District, Turkey [60]; 22—Ozernoe [31]; 23—Uderei Au-Sb [49]; 24—Pay-Khoy [51]; 25—KMA (Lebedinskoye) [59]; 26—theoretical compositions of minerals corresponding to their ideal formulas. Shaded markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Figure 2. Ag-bearing palladian gold and other phases of Au-Ag-Pd system (in at.%) at the various deposits and ore occurrences: 1. Itchayvayam [33]; Norilsk deposits—2. Norilsk-1, 3. Talnakh, [22]; Ural deposits—4. Baronskoe [55], 5. Chudnoe [53], 6. Nesterovskoe [53]; 7—deposits of the Fedorovo-Pansky intrusive complex [58]; 8—Ebeko Volcano, Kuriles [43]; 9—Stillwater, Montana, USA [74]; 10—Corrego Bom Sucesso, Brazil [76]; 11—Gongo Soco iron mine, Brazil [25]; 12—Serra Pelada, Brazil [25]; 13—Caue iron mine, Brazil [77]; 14—Cedrolina Chromitite (Goiás State, Brazil) [75]; 15—Bleïda Far West, Morocco [68]; 16—Ambositra District, Madagascar [70]; 17—Hope’s Nose, Devon, England [66]; 18—Brownstone, Devon, England [20]; 19—Lammermuir Hills, Scotland [20]; 20—placer gold of Zimnik Creek, Poland [64]; 21—Chorokh River, Artvin District, Turkey [60]; 22—Ozernoe [31]; 23—Uderei Au-Sb [49]; 24—Pay-Khoy [51]; 25—KMA (Lebedinskoye) [59]; 26—theoretical compositions of minerals corresponding to their ideal formulas. Shaded markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Minerals 13 01019 g002
Figure 3. Dependences of the concentrations of Pd on Au (a) and Pd on Ag (b) in Pd-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au-Pd-Ag system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences. Symbols are the same as in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Dependences of the concentrations of Pd on Au (a) and Pd on Ag (b) in Pd-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au-Pd-Ag system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences. Symbols are the same as in Figure 2.
Minerals 13 01019 g003
Figure 4. Composition of Pd,Cu-bearing gold and Au-Pd-Cu phases (at.%) from various deposits and ore occurrences. Russian deposits (1–6): 1—Norilsk-1 [27]; 2—Talnakh [27]; 3—Chudnoe [53]; 4—Nesterovskoe [53]; 5—Ozernoe [31]; 6—massive Conder [44,45]; Worldwide deposits (7–14): 7—Serra Pelada, Brazil [25]; 8—Caue iron mine, Brazil [77]; 9—Ambositra region, Madagascar [70]; 10—Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 11—Marathon, Canada [72]; 12—Korydallos Area, Greece [61,62]; 13—Skaergaard intrusion [73]; 14—theoretical composition of minerals in the Cu-Au-Ag system. Shaded markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Figure 4. Composition of Pd,Cu-bearing gold and Au-Pd-Cu phases (at.%) from various deposits and ore occurrences. Russian deposits (1–6): 1—Norilsk-1 [27]; 2—Talnakh [27]; 3—Chudnoe [53]; 4—Nesterovskoe [53]; 5—Ozernoe [31]; 6—massive Conder [44,45]; Worldwide deposits (7–14): 7—Serra Pelada, Brazil [25]; 8—Caue iron mine, Brazil [77]; 9—Ambositra region, Madagascar [70]; 10—Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 11—Marathon, Canada [72]; 12—Korydallos Area, Greece [61,62]; 13—Skaergaard intrusion [73]; 14—theoretical composition of minerals in the Cu-Au-Ag system. Shaded markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Minerals 13 01019 g004
Figure 5. Dependences of the concentrations of Pd (a) and Cu (b) on Au in Pd,Cu-bearing gold and other minerals of the Au-Pd-Cu system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrence. Symbols are the same as in Figure 4.
Figure 5. Dependences of the concentrations of Pd (a) and Cu (b) on Au in Pd,Cu-bearing gold and other minerals of the Au-Pd-Cu system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrence. Symbols are the same as in Figure 4.
Minerals 13 01019 g005
Figure 6. Optical photo (in reflected light) (a) and SEM photo (BSE mode) of a gold grain (b), as well as SEM photo (BSE mode) of a gold fragment (green box in a,b) (c) with low-fineness Pd,Hg-rich gold (580‰–660‰) and high-fineness Pd,Hg-poor gold (910‰–960‰). Ore occurrence of the Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia).
Figure 6. Optical photo (in reflected light) (a) and SEM photo (BSE mode) of a gold grain (b), as well as SEM photo (BSE mode) of a gold fragment (green box in a,b) (c) with low-fineness Pd,Hg-rich gold (580‰–660‰) and high-fineness Pd,Hg-poor gold (910‰–960‰). Ore occurrence of the Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic complex (Kamchatka, Russia).
Minerals 13 01019 g006
Figure 7. Composition of Pd,Hg-bearing gold and Au-Pd-Hg phases (at.%) from various deposits and ore occurrences. Russian deposits (1, 2): 1—Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic massif, this study and after Sidorov [42]; 2—Chudnoe [53]; worldwide deposits (3, 4): 3—Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 4—Herbeira massif, Spain [67]; 5—theoretical composition of minerals of the Hg-Au-Pd system. Colored markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Figure 7. Composition of Pd,Hg-bearing gold and Au-Pd-Hg phases (at.%) from various deposits and ore occurrences. Russian deposits (1, 2): 1—Itchayvayam mafic–ultramafic massif, this study and after Sidorov [42]; 2—Chudnoe [53]; worldwide deposits (3, 4): 3—Mataganya-Siguiri zone, Guinea [69]; 4—Herbeira massif, Spain [67]; 5—theoretical composition of minerals of the Hg-Au-Pd system. Colored markers are endogenous, empty markers are exogenous deposits.
Minerals 13 01019 g007
Figure 8. Dependencies of the concentrations of Pd (a) and Hg (b) on Au in Pd,Hg-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au-Pd-Ag system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences. Symbols are the same as in Figure 7.
Figure 8. Dependencies of the concentrations of Pd (a) and Hg (b) on Au in Pd,Hg-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au-Pd-Ag system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences. Symbols are the same as in Figure 7.
Minerals 13 01019 g008
Figure 9. Dependences of the concentrations of Ag on Cu (a) and Pd on Au (b) in Pd,Ag-Cu-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au–Pd–Ag–Cu system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences (Table 5) (filled marker—endogenous, empty—exogenous): 1—Caue iron mine (Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil) [26,77]; 2—Maquine (Brazil) [28]; 3—Marathon (Canada) [21]; 4—Nesterovskoe (Polar Urals, Russia) [53]; 5—Ozernoe (Subpolar Ural, Russia) [31]; 6—Volkovskoe (Middle Urals, Russia) [30,55]; 7—Baronskoe (Middle Urals, Russia) [55]; 8—Serebryansky Kamen (Northern Urals, Russia) [54]; 9—Khamitovskoe (Yu.Ural, Russia) [56]; 10—Bleida Far West (Morocco) [32,68]; 11—Konder massif (Aldan, Russia) [44,45]; 12—Norilsk-1, 13—Talnakh (Russia) [27]; 14—Y. Peshempakhk (1), V. Chuarvy (2), S. Kamennik (3) (Russia) [58]; 15—Kuoyka River (Anabar river basin, Russia) [47,48]; 16—theoretical compositions of Au-Pd intermetallic compounds.
Figure 9. Dependences of the concentrations of Ag on Cu (a) and Pd on Au (b) in Pd,Ag-Cu-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au–Pd–Ag–Cu system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences (Table 5) (filled marker—endogenous, empty—exogenous): 1—Caue iron mine (Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil) [26,77]; 2—Maquine (Brazil) [28]; 3—Marathon (Canada) [21]; 4—Nesterovskoe (Polar Urals, Russia) [53]; 5—Ozernoe (Subpolar Ural, Russia) [31]; 6—Volkovskoe (Middle Urals, Russia) [30,55]; 7—Baronskoe (Middle Urals, Russia) [55]; 8—Serebryansky Kamen (Northern Urals, Russia) [54]; 9—Khamitovskoe (Yu.Ural, Russia) [56]; 10—Bleida Far West (Morocco) [32,68]; 11—Konder massif (Aldan, Russia) [44,45]; 12—Norilsk-1, 13—Talnakh (Russia) [27]; 14—Y. Peshempakhk (1), V. Chuarvy (2), S. Kamennik (3) (Russia) [58]; 15—Kuoyka River (Anabar river basin, Russia) [47,48]; 16—theoretical compositions of Au-Pd intermetallic compounds.
Minerals 13 01019 g009
Figure 10. Dependencies of the concentrations of Pd on Au (a), Pd on Cu (b), and Ag on Hg (c) in Pd-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences (Table 6) (filled marker—endogenous, empty—exogenous): 1—Chudnoe (Subpolar Urals, Russia) [29,53,112,113,114]; 2, 3—Serra Pelada (Brazil) [97]; 4—Gongo Soco (Brazil) [25,78]; 5—Zechstein (Poland) [63]; 6, 7—r.Mayat and r. Bol’shaya Kuonamka, Anabar river basin (Russia) [47,116]; 8—Dziwiszow (Poland) [65]; 9—Whipsaw Creek (Canada) [71]; 10—Similkameen river (Canada) [71]; 11—Friday Creek (Canada) [71]; 12—theoretical compositions of Au-Pd intermetallic compounds.
Figure 10. Dependencies of the concentrations of Pd on Au (a), Pd on Cu (b), and Ag on Hg (c) in Pd-bearing gold and other Pd-bearing minerals of the Au–Pd–Ag–Cu–Hg system (in at.%) in various deposits and ore occurrences (Table 6) (filled marker—endogenous, empty—exogenous): 1—Chudnoe (Subpolar Urals, Russia) [29,53,112,113,114]; 2, 3—Serra Pelada (Brazil) [97]; 4—Gongo Soco (Brazil) [25,78]; 5—Zechstein (Poland) [63]; 6, 7—r.Mayat and r. Bol’shaya Kuonamka, Anabar river basin (Russia) [47,116]; 8—Dziwiszow (Poland) [65]; 9—Whipsaw Creek (Canada) [71]; 10—Similkameen river (Canada) [71]; 11—Friday Creek (Canada) [71]; 12—theoretical compositions of Au-Pd intermetallic compounds.
Minerals 13 01019 g010
Figure 11. Homogenization temperature and salinity of fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite in association with palladian gold in ores from deposits of different types (A): 1c—Norilsk (a); 2—Chudnoe (Russia) (b) and Hope’s Nose, Thorverton (England) (c); 3—Bleida Far West (Morocco) (d); 4—Gongo Soko (e), Conceichao (f), and Serra Pelada (Brazil) (g). Probable P-T formation conditions (B) for the Au-Pd deposits of Chudnoe (b), Bleida Far West (d), and Serra Pelada (f).
Figure 11. Homogenization temperature and salinity of fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite in association with palladian gold in ores from deposits of different types (A): 1c—Norilsk (a); 2—Chudnoe (Russia) (b) and Hope’s Nose, Thorverton (England) (c); 3—Bleida Far West (Morocco) (d); 4—Gongo Soko (e), Conceichao (f), and Serra Pelada (Brazil) (g). Probable P-T formation conditions (B) for the Au-Pd deposits of Chudnoe (b), Bleida Far West (d), and Serra Pelada (f).
Minerals 13 01019 g011
Figure 12. Fineness intervals of palladian gold for deposits with Au-Pd mineralization (a) depending on the set and concentrations of impurities (Pd, Ag, Cu, Hg, …) in native gold (numerals on the right are the number of deposits) (b) for different types and subtypes of deposits.
Figure 12. Fineness intervals of palladian gold for deposits with Au-Pd mineralization (a) depending on the set and concentrations of impurities (Pd, Ag, Cu, Hg, …) in native gold (numerals on the right are the number of deposits) (b) for different types and subtypes of deposits.
Minerals 13 01019 g012
Figure 13. Ratios of Ag and Pd impurities in native gold in parageneses with Pd sulfides (S), tellurides (Te), arsenotellurides (As-Te), arsenides (As), and arseno-stibiotellurides (As-Sb-Te) at the Baronskoe deposit. Ag–Pd linear correlation trends are shown.
Figure 13. Ratios of Ag and Pd impurities in native gold in parageneses with Pd sulfides (S), tellurides (Te), arsenotellurides (As-Te), arsenides (As), and arseno-stibiotellurides (As-Sb-Te) at the Baronskoe deposit. Ag–Pd linear correlation trends are shown.
Minerals 13 01019 g013
Table 1. The composition of palladian gold (in absence of other impurities), its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Table 1. The composition of palladian gold (in absence of other impurities), its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Name of Deposit (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Endogenous deposits
Krutoe ore occurrence
(Yugor peninsula, Russia)
949–963/Pd 5.1, 3.7Qz, Pyh, Ccp, Clr, Alt, Eps, Au-Ag (850–920), Au-Cu-Ag, Au, Taur, Sdb, Spy, Tsp, Hes[51]
Uderei Au-Sb deposit
(Yenisei Ridge, Russia)
970–920/Pd 3.3–7.9Apy, Py, Au-Ag (760–980), Au, Ausb[49]
Ebeko volcano (Kuriles, Russia)787/Pd 21.3 (Au2Pd)S[43]
Exogenous deposits
Lammermuir Hills (Scotland)942/Pd 5.8Carb, Apy, Gn, Pe, Au3Cu, Taur, Ausb, Boh, Nau, Um, Tmn, Mrk[20]
Chorokh river (Artvin district, Turkey)649–724/Pd 26.5–38.5Pd, Pd4S[60]
Table 2. The composition of Ag-bearing palladian gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous deposits.
Table 2. The composition of Ag-bearing palladian gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous deposits.
Name of Deposit (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Brownstone (England)970–994 (core)/Pd 0.5–2.4, Ag 0.1–0.5
882–924 (border)/Pd 7.4–11.2, Ag 0.01–0.4
Cth, Tmn, Eca[20]
Hope’s Nose (England)854–997/Pd 0.2–14.2, Ag 0.2–1.9Csl, Cth, Fis, Cag, Oos, Cal, Cer[20,66]
Stillwater (USA)882–922/Pd 6.6–7.3, Ag 1.1–4.8Vsk, Bg[74]
Fedorova Tundra (Russia)770–870/Ag 10.9–19.7, Pd < 2.76, Fe < 0.19Plv, Pn[58]
Lebedinskoye (Russia)780–790/Ag 21.4–22.6, Pd < 0.15, Pt < 0.4, Ni < 0.05, Fe ≈ 1.2-[59]
Table 3. The composition of Cu-bearing palladian gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Table 3. The composition of Cu-bearing palladian gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Name of Deposit (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Skaergaard massif
(Greenland, Denmark)
689–913/Pd 1.3–14.7, Cu 13–19, Pt 0.12–3.6, Fe 0.4–1Pd-Taur, Pd-Aur, Skg, PdCu, Bn, Cc, Ccp, Ktu, Pda, Vys, Vas[73]
Ambositra region
(Madagascar)
918–978/Pd 1.1–7.9, Cu < 2.8Taur, Ba-Kfsp, Ca-REE phosphates[70]
Table 4. The composition of Pd,Hg and Pd,Hg,Ag-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Table 4. The composition of Pd,Hg and Pd,Hg,Ag-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Name of Deposit (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Endogenous deposits
Itchayvayam (Russia)816–960/Ag < 6.1, Pd < 5.2, Hg < 8.5Ep, Cpy, Ptr, Cpe, Tnr[33,42]
580–660/Pd 13.9–15.9, Hg 19.1–27.8, Ag < 1.7Ep, Cpy, Cu sulfate, Au
Exogenous deposits
Mataganya-Siguiri Zone (Guinea)960–970/Pd 2.6–2.8, Hg 0.07–0.11, Pt < 0.09Spy, Bg[69]
860–920/Pd 1.1–1.8, Hg < 0.24, Ag 5.5–12.5-
Zimnik Creek (Poland)core 980/Pd 0.01–0.95, Hg 0.36–0.96, Ag 0.15–1.93; border 990–1000/Ag<0.62, Pd<0.01Hem, Mag, Ap, Kln, Ms, Qz[64]
River Dart (England)630/Pd 22.7, Hg 13.6, Ag 2.2Au-Ag > 970, Ausb, Ptr, Skg, Stpdn, Carb[20]
Table 5. The composition of Pd,Cu,Ag-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Table 5. The composition of Pd,Cu,Ag-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Deposit Name (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Endogenous deposits
Caue (Itabira region, Brazil)800–918/Pd 0.9–19.2, Ag 0.1–1.1, Cu 0.04–4.1Qz, Fsp, Hem, Gth, Ms, Tur, Ap, Mnz, Carb, Pd-Cu-oxides, Pd[26,77]
Conceichao mine, - « -930–940/Pd 0.8–3.2, Ag 0.4–1, Cu 0.7–1, Fe 0.3–6.1
980/Pd 0.9, Ag 0.6
Hem, Mag, Py, Qz, Ms, Met-II, Au-Ag, Kln[79]
Maquine, - « -900–948/Ag 3.5–8.2, Pd 1.5–2.75, Cu 0.1–0.8, Pt ≈ 0.03Hem, Gth, Qz, Spy, Stpdn, Ism[28]
Marathon (Canada)516–835/Pd 0.5–22.7, Ag < 37.7, Cu 0.8–25.8Cpy, Bn, Brg, Ifp, Vas, Vys, Au, Ag, Taur[21]
Ozernoe (Ural, Russia)690–700/Cu, Ag > Pd < 3.8Chl, Cpx, Met-I, Stpdn, Py, Cpy, Bn, Mrk, Taur, Auc, Ag-Cu-Au[31]
Nesterovskoe (- « -)970/Pd 0.06–0.91, Ag 0.87–0.96, Cu < 2.01Qz, Ab, Cr-Ms, Aln, Met, Ah, Mon, Au3Cu[53]
Volkovskoe (- « -)1000Ti-Mag[30,55]
810–914/Ag 8.4–16.2, Pd ≤ 0.3, Cu 0.2–0.4Mrk, Kei, Syv, Hes, Spy
Baronskoe (- « -)840–940/Pd 3.5–9, Ag 1–10.6, Cu 0.6–1.9Brn, Ccp, Py, Cc, Dg, Vsk, Pd tellurides and arsenides[55]
916/Pd 4.3, Ag 1.6, Cu 2.5/Au0.90Pd0.06Cu0.03Pds
Serebryansky Kamen (-«-)783/Pd 12.1, Cu 7.5, Ag 2.1Bn, Vsk, Pd tellurides, Au-Ag (760–970)[54]
Khamitovskoe (- « -)880–920/Ag 7.6, 8.1, Cu 1.1, Pd 0.5, 0.9-[56]
Bleida Far West (Morocco)912–993/Pd 0.04–6.29, Ag 0.67–8.34, Cu < 3.1Pdm, Mrk, Met, Oos, Spy, Pds, Ktu, Taur, Hem, Cc, Ani, Mag, Gth, Kfs, Bt, Chl, Cal, Au-Ag (770–870) [32,68]
Konder Massif (Aldan, Russia)974/Pd 2.58Au3Cu, Pd-Taur, Pd-Aur, Pd sulfides, arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides, tellurides, stannides, plumbides, germanides[44,45]
700–900/Pd 3.3–10.3, Cu 6.1–25, Ag < 1.1
Norilsk-1 (Russia)570–880/Ag 6.8–42.1, Pd < 6.2, Cu < 1.5, Pt < 3.9Pd-Taur, Tfpt, Pyr, Pn[27]
950–975/Pd 2.22–2.89, Ag < 3.59, Cu < 0.15, Pt < 1.6-
Talnakh (- « -)160–210/Ag 70.1–82.9, Pd < 3, Cu < 1.5Pt-Ato, Spdn, Pd-Taur, Pb-Pol, Zvy, Ccp[27]
>980/Pd < 1.25, Cu < 0.54, Ag < 0.38
Yu. Peshempakhk (1),
V. Chuarvy (2),
S. Kamennik (3) (- « -)
(1) 960/Pd 1.90, Ag 0.46, Cu 1.25-[58]
(2) 830–970/Pd 1.44–3.48, Ag 0.78–1.69, Cu 0.23–0.25, Fe 0.2–0.36, Ni < 0.03-
(3) 833–920/Ag 1.5–16.2, Pd < 6.5, Cu < 0.6, Fe < 0.2Ktu, Pda, Met, Spy
Exogenous deposits
Kuoyka river (Anabar river basin, Russia)(20) 960/Pd 3.43, Ag 0.39, Cu 0.07-[47,48]
Table 6. The composition of Pd,Cu,Ag,Hg-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Table 6. The composition of Pd,Cu,Ag,Hg-bearing gold, its fineness (NAu), and minerals in association at endogenous and exogenous deposits.
Name of Deposit (Location)NAu ‰/Impurity wt.%Minerals in AssociationRef.
Endogenous deposits
Chudnoe (Ural, Russia)829–886/Ag 7.7–13.4, Pd 0.5–1.1, Cu 1.1–7.6Qz, Ab, Kfs, Cr-Ms, Ah, Taur, Au950[29,53,111,112,113]
839–866/Ag 11.9–12.5, Pd 0.5–0.8, Cu 1.7–2.5, Hg 0.6–1Qz, Ab, Kfs, Cr-Ms, U-Met, Taur, Au930
932–986/Ag < 5.64, Pd < 2.78, Cu < 2.78Au840-860
Serra Pelada (Brazil)920–930/Pd 6.9–7.8, Ag < 0.2, Cu < 0.1, Hg < 0.02, Fe < 0.05Pd, Pd-Au-Pt-As phase, Svi, Pds, Pd3As, Pd-oxide, Gth, Au990-996[97]
880–940/Pd 3.2–9.8, Ag < 0.3, Cu ≈ 0.7, Hg 0.3–1.5, Fe < 0.05Ah, Pd–Hg–Se and Pd–Bi–Se phases
965–975/Pd 1.6–2.4, Ag 0.4, Cu ≈ 0.6, Hg < 0.02, Fe < 0.1Ism, Mn–Ba oxide
993–997/Ag ≈ 0.3, Pd 0.04–0.1, Cu < 0.07, Fe 0.05–0.3Au7Pd, Gth
Gongo Soco (Brazil)880–890/Pd 5.9–6.1, Hg 0.9, Ag ≈ 2, Cu 0.1–2.7Hem, Gp, Ism, Met, Au-Ptr, (Pd,Cu)O, (Fe,Pd)OOH[25,78]
Zechstein (Poland)576–795/Ag 12.5–34, Pd 3–6.9, Cu 0.1–0.4, Hg 0.7–6.0, Pt 0.46–1.6, Ir < 0.8Cat, kerogen, Sov, Pb, Cth, Any, Pd[63]
Exogenous deposits
r.Mayat (1), r. Bol’shaya Kuonamka (2) (Anabar river basin, Russia)(1) 860–960/Pd 0.8–12.8, Hg < 0.3, Ag 0.9–2.8, Cu < 0.4Tpdn, Ktu[47,114]
(2) 910–970/Pd 0.7–7.5, Hg < 1.7, Ag 0.6–2.2, Cu 0.1–1.5Pt
Dziwiszow (Poland)centre 960–990/Pd < 0.5, Hg < 2.5, Ag 1.1–3, Cu < 0.1, Pt < 0.04Hem, Gth, Kln[65]
core 975–997/Pd < 1.4, Hg < 1.9, Ag 0.2–1.8, Cu < 0.1, Pt < 0.03
Whipsaw Creek (Canada)910–940/Pd ≈ 2.5, Hg 0.20–2.28, Ag 0.7–3, Cu 1.1–3.1Stpdn, Cc, Spy[71]
Similkameen river (- « -)970/Pd < 2.1, Hg 0.1–0.7, Cu 0.06–1.8, Ag 0.7Tem, Bn, Cc, Ccp, Cin, Pd-telluride, Pd-arsenoantimonide[71]
Friday Creek (- « -)930/Ag 3.97, Pd 1.94, Cu 0.55, Hg 0.32Bn, Cc[71]
Table 7. Types and subtypes of deposits with palladian gold, its fineness, and impurities.
Table 7. Types and subtypes of deposits with palladian gold, its fineness, and impurities.
TypeSubtype (Numbers)Deposits (Country)Fineness (Impurities)
1. PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexes1a Low-grade sulfide mineralization (includes chromitite and low-grade Cu, Ni) Skaergaard (Denmark)689–913 (Pd,Cu,Ag,Pt,Fe)
Stillwater (USA)882–922 (Pd,Ag)
Konder (Russia)974 (Pd), 700–900 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
Baronskoe (- “ -)840–940 (Pd,Ag > Cu)
Serebryansky Kamen (- “ -)783 (Pd > Cu > Ag)
Volkovskoe (- “ -)810–914 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
Ozernoe (- “ -)690–700 (Cu,Ag > Pd)
Khamitovskoe (- “ -)880–920 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
1 V. Chuarvy (- “ -),
2 S. Kamennik (- “ -),
3 Yu. Peshempakhk(- “ -),
4 Fedorova tundra (- “ -)
(1) 960 (Pd,Ag,Cu),
(2) 830–970 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Fe,Ni),
(3) 833–920 (Ag,Pd,Cu,Fe),
(4) 770–870 (Ag > Pd > Fe)
Itchayvayam (- “ -)816–960, 580–660 (Pd,Hg)
1b High-grade sulfide mineralization (includes high-grade Cu-Ni)Norilsk-1 (Russia)570–880, 950–975 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Pt)
Talnakh (- “ -)980–990, 160–210 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
Krutoe (- “ -)949–963 (Pd)
Marathon (Canada)663–835 (Cu,Ag > Pd or Cu > Pd)
Cedrolina (Brazil)847 (Au > Pd)
2. Orogenic gold deposits2a—OGD (Pd,Ag or Pd,Ag,Cu) (5)Uderei (Russia)920–970 (Pd)
Chudnoe (- “ -)840–990 (Pd,Ag or Pd,Ag,Cu)
Nesterovskoe (- “ -)955–970 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
Hope’s Nose (England)854–997 (Pd > >Ag)
Brownstone (- “ -)970–994, 882–924 (Pd > Ag)
2b Cu with OrganicZechstein (Poland)576–795 (Ag > Pd,Cu,Hg)
3. Epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper depositsalkaline rocks areasBleida Far West (Morocco)912–993 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
4. Iron Oxide Copper Gold deposits(5)Serra Pelada (Brazil)880–975 (Pd > Ag,Hg,Cu,Fe)
Gongo Soco (- “ -)821–967 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg)
Caue (- “ -)885–918 (Pd > Ag,Cu)
Conceichao (- “ -)930–940 (Pd > Ag,Cu)
Maquine (- “ -)899–941 (Pd,Ag,Cu)
5. Ferruginous quartzite deposits(1)Lebedinskoye (Russia)780–790 (Ag,Pd,Pt,Ni,Fe)
6. Volcanic exhalationfumarolesEbeko Volcano (- “ -)790 (Pd)
7. Gold-PGE placers1Pl
type 1 areas (2)
Chorokh river (Turkey)649–724 (Pd)
river Dart (England)630 (Pd > Hg >> Ag)
2Pl
type 2 areas (4)
Ambositra reg. (Madagascar)918–978 (Pd > Cu)
Lammermuir Hills (Scotland)942 (Pd)
Zimnik Creek (Poland)980–990 (Ag,Pd,Hg)
Dziwiszow (- “ -)960–997 (Pd,Ag,Hg,Cu,Pt)
3Pl
type 3 alkaline rocks areas (3)
Friday Creek (Canada)930 (Ag > Pd,Hg,Cu)
Whipsaw Creek (- “ -)910–940 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg)
Similkameen river (- “ -)970 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg)
4Pl
type 4 areas (1)
Corrego Bom Sucesso (Brazil)770–975 (Pd > Ag,Hg,Cu,Pt)
5Pl
type 5 craton placer areas (4)
Mayat river (Russia)860–960 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg)
Bol’shaya Kuonamka river (- “ -)910–970 (Pd,Ag,Cu,Hg)
Kuoyka river (- “ -)960 (Pd > Ag,Cu)
Mataganya-Siguiri (Guinea)920–970 (Pd > Hg,Ag,Pt)
Table 8. Structure, host rock, and mineralization age (Ma) of some endogenous deposits with palladian gold.
Table 8. Structure, host rock, and mineralization age (Ma) of some endogenous deposits with palladian gold.
TypeNameStructure (Craton)Host RockMaRef.
1a Low-grade sulfide mineralization (includes chromitite and low-grade Cu, Ni) Skaergaard, DenmarkEast Greenland volcanic province Mafic55[73,125]
Stillwater, USAWyoming Province (N. American)Mafic–ultramafic2700–2713[74,126]
ItchayvayamOlyutorsky arc terraneMafic–ultramafic60–74[42,127]
KonderAldan Shield (Siberian)Alkaline–ultramafic130–140[128,129]
BaronskoeUralian Orogenic beltMafic445–430[55,125]
Serebryansky Kamen- “-Mafic415–430[54,130]
Volkovskoe- “-Mafic445–430[30,131]
Ozernoe- “-Mafic–ultramafic445–455[31,132]
Khamitovskoe- “-Mafic–ultramafic587–215[56,133]
1b High-grade sulfide mineralization (includes high-grade Cu-Ni)Norilsk-1, TalnakhSiberian LIP (-“-)Mafic–ultramafic250[27,50]
KrutoePay-Khoy Fold BeltMafic330–370[51,134]
Fedorov-PanaBaltic Shield (East European)Mafic–ultramafic2501–2446[58,135,136]
Marathon, CanadaSuperior Province (-“-)Alkaline–mafic–ultramafic1100[21]
2 OGUdereiYenisey Fold BeltMetamorphic640–710[49,137]
Chudnoe, NesterovskoeUral Orogenic beltContact metasediments and felsic–mafic volcanites250–260[29,53,138]
3 EPGCBleida Far West,
Morocco
Anti Atlas orogenMafic (ophiolite association), felsic, metamorphic600–550 or 300–330[32,68]
4 IOCGGongo Soco, Caue,
Maquine
Atlantic shield (South American)Metasedimentary, metavolcanic2600–2400[25,26,28,77,78]
5 Ferruginous quartziteLebedinskoye(East European)Metamorphic2612–2050[59]
Table 9. T,P,X-conditions for the formation of Au-Pd mineralization with Pd-bearing gold according to the results of the study of fluid inclusions (FIs) (reference data).
Table 9. T,P,X-conditions for the formation of Au-Pd mineralization with Pd-bearing gold according to the results of the study of fluid inclusions (FIs) (reference data).
Type of DepositDeposit (Country)T°C; P kbar; wt.% eq. NaCl; FI CompositionRef.
PGE ore deposits related to mafic–ultramafic magmatic complexesAu-Pd ores of the Skaergaard massif; Norilsk-1,-2, Volkovskoe, Baronskoe (Russia)1200–1000;[27,55,106,139]
600–140; -; 23.3–13.6; NaCl
Orogenic gold depositsChudnoe (Russia); Au-Pd deposits in the Permian-Triassic basins (SW England); Zechstein (Poland)186–60; 0.5–1.15; 0.2–30;
Na, Ca, Cl
[29,63,140,141,142]
Epithermal (porphyry) gold–copper depositsBleida Far West (Morocco)132–80; 0.5–0.04; 1.7–33;
Na, Ca, Cl, CO2
[32,68,143]
Iron oxide copper gold deposits Serra Pelada, Carajas, Corrego Bom Susesso, Gongo Soco, Conceichao (Brazil)500–115; 1.2–1.7; 3–30;
Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cl, CO2
[25,78,79,144,145,146,147]
Table 10. Minerals in association with palladian gold from deposits of different types.
Table 10. Minerals in association with palladian gold from deposits of different types.
Mineral GroupsMineralsTypes of Deposits
Elements and intermetallicsPd, Pt, Cu, Ag, S, Taur, Auc, Skg, Tfpt, IfptTypes 1, 2a, 3, 7-2, 6
Pd mineralsAh, Met-I/II, Ism, Stpdn, Ktu, Tpdn, Tem, Pds, Ato, Spdn, Plv, Vsk, Mrk, Kei, Cpe, Mon, Csl, Oos, Sov, Pdm, PtrType 1
Minerals of Au and AgAusb, Any, Syv, Fis, Hes, Cag, Boh, Nau, Eca, Taur, AucTypes 2, 4, 7-1
Cu mineralsCcp, Bn, Cc, Ani, Eca, Um, Taur, AucTypes 1, 7-1
Hg mineralsCin, Tmn, Clr, PtrTypes 1b,d, 7-1, 7-4
Pt mineralsSpy, Bg, Svi, Pda, Ifpt, TfptType 1
Oxides, hydroxidesHem, Mgt, Tnr, (Pd,Cu)O, PdO, Gth, (Fe,Pd)OOHTypes 3, 4, 5, 7-2
Fe, Ni, Pb chalcogenidesPn, Pyh, Gn, Cth, AltType 1
Host mineralsQz, Ms (including fuchsite Cr-Ms), Chl, Ab, K-fs, Hbl, Tur, Carb (including Cat, Sid and other), S, KlnTypes 1–7
Note: The most common minerals are in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palyanova, G.A.; Zhegunov, P.S.; Beliaeva, T.V.; Murzin, V.V.; Borovikov, A.A.; Goryachev, N.A. Palladian Gold: Chemical Composition, Minerals in Association, and Physicochemical Conditions of Formation at Different Types of Gold Deposits. Minerals 2023, 13, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081019

AMA Style

Palyanova GA, Zhegunov PS, Beliaeva TV, Murzin VV, Borovikov AA, Goryachev NA. Palladian Gold: Chemical Composition, Minerals in Association, and Physicochemical Conditions of Formation at Different Types of Gold Deposits. Minerals. 2023; 13(8):1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palyanova, Galina A., Pavel S. Zhegunov, Tatiana V. Beliaeva, Valery V. Murzin, Andrey A. Borovikov, and Nikolay A. Goryachev. 2023. "Palladian Gold: Chemical Composition, Minerals in Association, and Physicochemical Conditions of Formation at Different Types of Gold Deposits" Minerals 13, no. 8: 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13081019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop