Machine Learning and EPCA Methods for Extracting Lithology–Alteration Multi-Source Geological Elements: A Case Study in the Mining Evaluation of Porphyry Copper Ores in the Gondwana Metallogenic Belt
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Geological Background of the Study Area
2.2. ASTER Images
2.3. Support Vector Machine
2.4. Spectral-Feature-Enhanced Principal Component Analysis
2.5. Alteration Interpolation Method
3. Results
3.1. Lithological Feature Classification Extraction
3.2. Alteration Information Extraction and Hierarchical Interpolation
3.2.1. Alteration Information Extraction
3.2.2. Alteration Interpolation
3.3. Integrated Copper Anomaly Monitoring Model
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Atienza, M.; Lufin, M.; Soto, J. Mining linkages in the Chilean copper supply network and regional economic development. Resour. Policy 2021, 70, 101154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreau, K.; Laamanen, C.; Bose, R.; Shang, H.; Scott, J. Environmental impact improvements due to introducing automation into underground copper mines. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2021, 31, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, M.; Kreuzer, O.P.; Nykänen, V.; Hronsky, J. Exploration information systems–A proposal for the future use of GIS in mineral exploration targeting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 111, 103005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kay, M.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Integrated interpolation methods for geophysical data: Applications to mineral exploration. Nat. Resour. Res. 2000, 9, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salem, S.M.; Arafa, S.A.; Ramadan, T.M.; Gammal, E. Exploration of copper deposits in Wadi El Regeita area, Southern Sinai, Egypt, with contribution of remote sensing and geophysical data. Arab. J. Geosci. 2013, 6, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjbar, H.; Shahriari, H.; Honarmand, M. Integration of ASTER and airborne geophysical data for exploration of copper mineralization. A case study of Sar Cheshmeh area. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–23 July 2004; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar]
- Mohebi, A.; Mirnejad, H.; Lentz, D.; Behzadi, M.; Dolati, A.; Kani, A.; Taghizadeh, H. Controls on porphyry Cu mineralization around Hanza Mountain, south-east of Iran: An analysis of structural evolution from remote sensing, geophysical, geochemical and geological data. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 69, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D.; Xu, Z.; Lu, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, H. 3D scene and geological modeling using integrated multi-source spatial data: Methodology, challenges, and suggestions. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 100, 103393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Wu, L.; Li, W.; Qiu, Q.; Zhong, X.; Hao, L.; Yuan, Z. A semi-automatic approach for generating geological profiles by integrating multi-source data. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 134, 104190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Ma, Z.; Li, R.; Song, Y.; Yan, C.; Qu, J.; Zhang, S. Integration of multi-source and multi-scale datasets for 3D structural modeling for subsurface exploration targeting, Luanchuan Mo-polymetallic district, China. J. Appl. Geophys. 2017, 139, 269–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirmard, H.; Farahbakhsh, E.; Müller, R.D.; Chandra, R. A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration. Remote Sens. Environ. 2022, 268, 112750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumakor-Dupey, N.K.; Arya, S. Machine Learning—A Review of Applications in Mineral Resource Estimation. Energies 2021, 14, 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Li, H.; Wu, K.; Chen, F.; Hu, Z. Data-driven predictive modelling of mineral prospectivity using machine learning and deep learning methods: A case study from southern Jiangxi Province, China. Minerals 2020, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Das, S. Delineation of groundwater potential zone in hard rock terrain in Gangajalghati block, Bankura district, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2017, 3, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, A.; Shen, R.; Li, Y.; Han, H.; Di, W.; Hagan, D. A methodology to generate integrated land cover data for land surface model by improving Dempster-Shafer theory. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Di, H.; Shafiq, M.A.; Yazeed, A.; Ghassan, A.R. Successful leveraging of image processing and machine learning in seismic structural interpretation: A review. Lead. Edge 2018, 37, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, A.X.; Wang, R.; Qiao, J.; Qin, C.; Chen, Y.; Jing, L.; Fei, D.; Yang, L.; Zhu, T. An expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and fuzzy logic. Geomorphology 2014, 214, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Searle, M.P.; Windley, B.F.; Coward, M.P.; Herren, E.; Rex, A.; Colchen, M. The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1987, 98, 678–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Gao, S.; Li, J.; Hu, Z.; Yang, L.; Hu, Z. Variation of molybdenum isotopes in molybdenite from porphyry and vein Mo deposits in the Gangdese metallogenic belt, Tibetan plateau and its implications. Miner. Depos. 2016, 51, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tafti, R.; Mortensen, J.K.; Lang, J.R.; Rebagliati, M.; Oliver, J.L. Jurassic U-Pb and Re-Os ages for the newly discovered Xietongmen Cu-Au porphyry district, Tibet, PRC: Implications for metallogenic epochs in the southern Gangdese belt. Econ. Geol. 2009, 104, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, Y.; Jin, S.; Comeau, M.J.; Becken, M.; Zhang, L.; Dong, H.; Wei, W.; Ye, G. Controls on the metallogenesis of the Lhasa–Mozugongka district, Gangdese Belt, Tibetan Plateau: Constraints on melt distribution and viscosity from the 3-D electrical structure of the lithosphere. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 145, 104881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Searle Michael, P.; Roberts, M.W.; Chung, S.; Lee, Y.; Li, K. Age and anatomy of the Gongga Shan batholith, eastern Tibetan Plateau, and its relationship to the active Xianshui-he fault. Geosphere 2016, 12, 948–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pour; Beiranvand, A.; Hashim, M.; Park, Y. Gondwana-Derived Terranes structural mapping using PALSAR remote sensing data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2018, 46, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaw, K.; Meffre, S.; Lai, C.K.; Clive.; Burrett.; Santosh, M. Tectonics and metallogeny of mainland Southeast Asia—A review and contribution. Gondwana Res. 2014, 26, 5–30. [Google Scholar]
- Kamona, A.F.; Günzel, A. Stratigraphy and base metal mineralization in the Otavi Mountain Land, Northern Namibia—A review and regional interpretation. Gondwana Res. 2007, 11, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toutin, T. ASTER DEMs for geomatic and geoscientific applications: A review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 1855–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gabr, S.; Ghulam, A.; Kusky, T. Detecting areas of high-potential gold mineralization using ASTER data. Ore Geol. Rev. 2010, 38, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, R.; Xia, J.; Sun, T.; Zhao, X.; Chao, J. ASTER and GF-5 satellite data for mapping hydrothermal alteration minerals in the longtoushan Pb-Zn deposit, SW China. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hearst, M.A.; Dumais, S.T.; Osuna, E.; Platt, J.; Schoikopf, B. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 1998, 13, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kecman, V. Support vector machines–an introduction. In Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, W.; Sun, J.; Zhang, L.; Cao, C.L.; Yang, Q. A support vector machine based naive Bayes algorithm for spam filtering. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 35th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 9–11 December 2016; IEEE: New York City, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Somvanshi, M.; Chavan, P.; Tambade, S.; Shinde, S.V. A review of machine learning techniques using decision tree and support vector machine. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India, 12–13 August 2016; IEEE: New York City, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, L.; Porwal, A.; Holden, E.J.; Cao, C.; Yang, Q. Towards automatic lithological classification from remote sensing data using support vector machines. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 45, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, S.; Şahin, E.K. Liquefaction prediction with robust machine learning algorithms (SVM, RF, and XGBoost) supported by genetic algorithm-based feature selection and parameter optimization from the perspective of data processing. Environ. Earth Sci. 2022, 81, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias Canedo, E.; Cordeiro Mendes, B. Software requirements classification using machine learning algorithms. Entropy 2020, 22, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbaszadeh, M.; Hezarkhani, A.; Soltani-Mohammadi, S. An SVM-based machine learning method for the separation of alteration zones in Sungun porphyry copper deposit. Geochemistry 2013, 73, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, M.; Tabatabaei, S.H.; Rikhtehgaran, R.; Pour, A.; Pradhan, B. Application of Dirichlet process and support vector machine techniques for mapping alteration zones associated with porphyry copper deposit using ASTER remote sensing imagery. Minerals 2021, 11, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadi, N.M.; Hezarkhani, A. Application of support vector machine for the separation of mineralised zones in the Takht-e-Gonbad porphyry deposit, SE Iran. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2018, 143, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salimi, A.; Ziaii, M.; Amiri, A.; Hosseinjanizadeh, M.; Karimpouli, S.; Moradkhani, M. Using a Feature Subset Selection method and Support Vector Machine to address curse of dimensionality and redundancy in Hyperion hyperspectral data classification. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2018, 21, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, U.E.; Topal, E. A new ore grade estimation using combine machine learning algorithms. Minerals 2020, 10, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, J.; Zheng, W.; Xie, G.; Lehmann, B.; Goldfarb, R. Recognition of a Middle–Late Jurassic arc-related porphyry copper belt along the southeast China coast: Geological characteristics and metallogenic implications. Geology 2021, 49, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Qiu, C.; Wang, L.; Feng, J.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y. Application of ASTER Remote Sensing Data to Porphyry Copper Exploration in the Gondwana Region. Minerals 2023, 13, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Pazner, M.; Duke, N. Lithologic and mineral information extraction for gold exploration using ASTER data in the south Chocolate Mountains (California). ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2007, 62, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, C.; Xu, B.; Hu, F.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y. Cu-polymetallic Deposit Prognosis in the Banggonghu-Nujiang Metallogenic Belt Based on ASTER Remote Sensing Alterration Information Extraction. Resour. Environ. Eng. 2016, 68, 65–82. [Google Scholar]
- Dodick, J.; Orion, N. Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 2003, 40, 415–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laubach, S.E.; Lander, R.H.; Criscenti, L.J.; Urai, L.; Pollyea, J.; Hooker, R.; Narr, J.; Evans, W.; Kerisit, M.; Olson, S.; et al. The role of chemistry in fracture pattern development and opportunities to advance interpretations of geological materials. Rev. Geophys. 2019, 57, 1065–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dolphin, G.; Dutchak, A.; Karchewski, B.; Copper, J. Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: Addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one. J. Geosci. Educ. 2019, 67, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rajesh, H.M. Application of remote sensing and GIS in mineral resource mapping-An overview. J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. 2004, 99, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gribov, A.; Krivoruchko, K. Empirical Bayesian kriging implementation and usage. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 722, 137290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senoro, D.B.; de Jesus KL, M.; Mendoza, L.C.; Apostol, E.; Escalona, K.; Chan, E. Groundwater quality monitoring using in-situ measurements and hybrid machine learning with empirical Bayesian kriging interpolation method. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Tao, H.; Zhao, D.; Li, H. Three-dimensional empirical Bayesian kriging for soil PAHs interpolation considering the vertical soil lithology. Catena 2022, 212, 106098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Classification Method | Overall Classification Accuracy | Kappa Coefficient | Calculation Time |
---|---|---|---|
Maximum Likelihood | 96.5717% | 0.9483 | 3 s |
Support vector machines | 97.6573% | 0.9806 | 50 s |
Neural Networks | 93.9738% | 0.8891 | 20 s |
Minimum Distance | 91.9555% | 0.7797 | 3 s |
Target Layer | Guideline Layer | Indicator Layer | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Weight of Evidence | Impact Factor | |||
Combined mineralization predictions | Associated with copper mineralization | Geological information | −0.165347 | Lithology |
0.435802 | Hydrothermal alteration | |||
Constructed information | −0.186623 | fracture zones | ||
0.051104 | DEM | |||
Associated with copper mining | Land Information | 0.229439 | NDVI | |
0.000473 | Land use |
Eigenvectors | B2/B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | −0.30295 | −0.33081 | −0.90442 | −0.05013 |
PC2 | −0.05282 | −0.11412 | 0.07628 | −0.00652 |
PC3 | −0.59625 | 0.65485 | 0.01581 | 0.00103 |
PC4 | −0.00032 | −0.00783 | −0.00450 | 0.97912 |
Eigenvectors | (B4 + B7)/B6 | B4 | B6 | B7 |
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | 0.77105 | 0.48917 | 0.08752 | 0.11926 |
PC2 | −0.51891 | −0.69928 | −0.12343 | −0.43836 |
PC3 | 0.20435 | 0.45268 | −0.72478 | −0.48112 |
PC4 | 0.30726 | −0.25021 | 0.66796 | −0.57311 |
Eigenvectors | (B6 + B9)/(B7 + B8) | B7 | B8 | B9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | −0.14972 | 0.37618 | −0.74561 | 0.53147 |
PC2 | 0.81783 | −0.09891 | −0.48174 | −0.28745 |
PC3 | 0.05863 | −0.03292 | 0.99149 | −0.11432 |
PC4 | −0.50498 | −0.90952 | −0.14328 | 0.07028 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Hou, M.; Wu, S.; Wang, L.; Feng, J.; Qiu, C. Machine Learning and EPCA Methods for Extracting Lithology–Alteration Multi-Source Geological Elements: A Case Study in the Mining Evaluation of Porphyry Copper Ores in the Gondwana Metallogenic Belt. Minerals 2023, 13, 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070858
Liu C, Liu X, Hou M, Wu S, Wang L, Feng J, Qiu C. Machine Learning and EPCA Methods for Extracting Lithology–Alteration Multi-Source Geological Elements: A Case Study in the Mining Evaluation of Porphyry Copper Ores in the Gondwana Metallogenic Belt. Minerals. 2023; 13(7):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070858
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Chunhui, Xingyu Liu, Man Hou, Sensen Wu, Luoqi Wang, Jie Feng, and Chunxia Qiu. 2023. "Machine Learning and EPCA Methods for Extracting Lithology–Alteration Multi-Source Geological Elements: A Case Study in the Mining Evaluation of Porphyry Copper Ores in the Gondwana Metallogenic Belt" Minerals 13, no. 7: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070858