Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Flotation Performance of Low-Rank Coal Using Environment-Friendly Vegetable Oil
Next Article in Special Issue
Late Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Great Xing’an Range, Northeast China: Constraints from Carboniferous Magmatic Rocks in the Wunuer Area
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Potential as a Tool to Monitor Redox Reactions at an Ore Body: A Sandbox Experiment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Geological Significance of Neoproterozoic Intrusive Rocks in the South Section of the Ailaoshan Orogenic Belt, SW China: Insights from Petrology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Petrogenesis of the Granitic Dykes in the Yangshan Gold Belt: Insights from Zircon U-Pb Chronology, Petrography, and In-Situ Hf Isotope Analysis

1
College of Earth Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
2
Research Center of Applied Geology, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(6), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060718
Submission received: 16 April 2023 / Revised: 18 May 2023 / Accepted: 21 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geochronology, Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Magmatic Rocks)

Abstract

:
The Yangshan gold belt is renowned for its igneous rock formations, particularly dykes that form in tectonically weak zones. Some of these rock formations exhibit a close spatial relationship with gold mineralization, and a tiny portion of the granitic dykes serve as gold ore bodies by themselves. In order to investigate the nature of granitic dykes and their association with gold mineralization, we conducted a comprehensive study consisting of zircon U-Pb chronology, petrography, and in situ Hf isotope analysis of 25 granitic dyke samples collected from east to west across the belt. According to LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results, the granitic dykes inherited zircon ages that are concentrated between 745.0 and 802.0 Ma, and magmatic intrusion ages that mainly fall between 201.0 and 213 Ma. Moreover, the granitic dykes display a calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline peraluminous series, which is relatively enriched in light over heavy REE, with moderate Eu anomalies. These dykes are rich in large-ion lithophile elements and poor in high-field-strength elements. The zircon Lu-Hf isotope data range from εHf(t) values of −1.5 to 0.1, mantle model (TDM1) ages range from 859 to 937 Ma, and crustal model (TDM2) ages range from 1111 to 1218 Ma. The granitic dykes found in the Yangshan gold belt were formed between 200 and 213 Ma ago, during a period of intracontinental extension following the late collision between the Yangtze plate and Qinling microplates. These dykes originated from the volcanic basement of the Mesoproterozoic Bikou Group, which was formed by the melting of the upper crust under the crustal thickening caused by the subduction and collision of the Qinling microplate. Subsequently, the dykes were transported along a tectonically weak zone, assimilating surrounding rocks and undergoing a transformation from “I”-type to “S”-type granite before finally evolving into granite with specific “A”-type characteristics. Our study provides new insights into the petrogenesis of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt, as well as the relationship between gold mineralization and magmatic activity, which has significant implications for mineral exploration and the geological understanding of gold mineralization in this region.

1. Introduction

The Yangshan gold belt is located in the Mian-Lue suture zone of the Western Qinling Orogen, which is situated between the western side of the Songpan-Ganzi terrane, the northern edge of the Yangtze Plate, and the southern edge of the Qinling microplates within the Wenxian arc-shaped tectonic system [1,2]. The Wenxian arc tectonic belt hosts several medium-to-large and super-large gold deposits, including Lian-hecun, Xinguan, Yangshan, Tangba, and Huachanggou, which are distributed along weak tectonic zones. Although there has been significant magmatic activity in both the Eastern Qinling Orogen and the Northern subbelt of the Western Qinling Orogen, Late Indosinian igneous rocks are almost absent in the western part of the Mian-Lue suture zone, except for a small amount in the Bikou terrane on the northern margin of the Yangtze plate. Instead, they are mostly present in vein-like or lens-like shapes or rock walls along regionally weak tectonic zones. Based on extensive exploration works comprising over 200,000 m of core drilling, more than 15,000 square meters of pits, 427,500 square meters of trenches, and surface verification, the granitic dykes in this area mainly consist of granodiorite, fine-grained granite, biotite granite, and granite-porphyry dykes, with only a few fine-grained dykes visible.
An analysis of drilling results from the Yangshan gold deposit indicates that approximately 15% of granitic dykes contain gold mineralization and some local rock bodies are gold ore bodies. Previous research on magmatic evolution and metallogenesis show a temporal-spatial coupling relationship between granitic dykes and gold mineralization.
Both surface and drill hole granitic dykes exhibit obvious alteration characteristics, with the degree of alteration being negatively correlated with the integrity of the dykes. The main types of observed alterations include silicification, sericitization, chloritization, kaolinization, and epidotization, with less carbonate alteration. Quartz veins and fine quartz veins are also commonly observed in granitic dyke cores, with some occurrences displaced due to thrusting or extensional deformation, indicating ongoing tectonic activity. While most granitic dykes develop joints (generally 15–20 m), some earlier formed dykes exhibit weak cleavage deformation, suggesting their crystallization period may still be at a late stage when regional metamorphism dominated cleavage formation. Based on previous zircon U-Pb dating results of magmatic rocks [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], dykes with weak cleavage have a crystallization age mainly distributed around 215–220 Ma, while the crystallization age of non-cleavage granite porphyry dykes is concentrated around 212 Ma. The crystallization age of fine-grained granite dykes and fine-grained rock dykes is concentrated between 210–200 Ma.
This paper establishes a correlation between the crystallization age of medium-fine granite porphyry dykes and the metallogenetic age of the Yangshan gold deposit by analyzing previous geochronological data. Studying these granite dykes can provide insight into the regional characteristics of gold mineralization and geological background. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically investigate the types, petrographic, geochronological, and geochemical characteristics of granite dykes in the area, and to constrain tectonic activity during the magmatic activity period. The results will shed light on the subduction-collision process for the Wenxian arc-shaped tectonic belt in the western part of the Mian-Lue suture zone and promote a better understanding of the genesis type for gold deposits within the Yangshan gold belt.

2. Regional Geology and Geology of Deposits

2.1. Regional Geology

The Yangshan gold belt is situated between the Yangtze Plate, the North China Plate, and the Songpan-Ganzi orogenic belt, creating an “inverted triangle” geotectonic position. The geographical coordinates are: East longitude: 104°29′30″–105°00′00″; North latitude: 33°00′30″–33°10′00″ (see Figure 1) [1,2,12,13,14,15,16]. The regional stratigraphy ranges from Mesoproterozoic to Quaternary, including the Mesoproterozoic Bikou Group, found in the southeastern part of the area in the Motianling thrust tectonic zone. This group is primarily composed of shallow metamorphic volcanic-sedimentary rocks consisting mainly of tuffs, dolomites, and sandstones. Devonian strata are widely exposed and consist of a series of giant thick shallow marine clastic mudstone-carbonate sedimentary rocks. Carboniferous crops outs are around the Wenxian arc tectonic zone and comprise a series of coastal shelf-phase carbonate sedimentary formations, mainly thick layered limestone. Rocks of Permian are located in the northwest and southwest of the region and consist of marine carbonate rocks and normal sedimentary clastic rocks, primarily composed of tuffs, dolomitic tuffs, and sandstones. The Triassic period is also represented in the study area and includes coastal and shallow marine terrestrial clastic rocks with a small amount of carbonate rocks, primarily sandstone and sandy shale. The Jurassic series is found in the Puziba-Qiaotou-Moba area and consists mainly of red sandy conglomerate sediment. In addition, there are large exposures of Cenozoic-Tertiary loess and Quaternary alluvial deposits [3,17,18].
Magmatic rocks are widely distributed as dykes but typically do not form large-scale outcrops due to the superposition of multiple tectonic-magmatic events in the West Qinling orogenic belt. Previous studies have found that these rocks are widely exposed yet scattered, mainly along regional fractures or plate boundaries parallel to regional tectonic lines, and obviously controlled by regional tectonics. They form diverse types, with different lithologies of extrusive and intrusive rocks exposed, including tonalite porphyry, fine crystalline granite porphyry, and granite porphyry. Their formation is mainly related to three stages: the Caledonian-Variscan period, the Indosinian period, and the Yanshan period. Late Indosinian and Early Yanshan magmatic rocks are closely related to the time-space distribution of the Yangshan gold belt, although the relationship between magma and mineralization remains controversial [3,17,18].
The studied area comprises four arc-shaped retrograde thrust tectonic belts arranged in a zigzag pattern from north to south, with intricate backward and oblique folding structures mainly at the top of the arcs [1,2]. Figure 1 illustrates the four retrograde thrust tectonic zones within the West Qinling orogenic belt: Xiahe-Lixian, Luqu-Chengxian, Diebu-Wudu, and Langmusi-Nanping, also arranged from north to south. The folded structures are the Lixian-Xiahe dip-slope structure, the Luqu-Chengxian dip-slope structure, and the Bailongjiang (Diebu-Zhouqu) dip-slope structure, in order from north to south [1,2].

2.2. Geology of Deposits

The Yangshan gold belt is situated in the western part of the Mian-lue suture zone, which is a southern segment of the West Qinling Orogens. It is located at the top and to the east of the arc of the Wenxian tectonic zone [12,13,14,15,16]. The gold belt covers approximately 30 km, from Tang-bugou in the west to Guzhen in the east, and comprises six sections (see Figure 2). Among these, the Anba section has the highest confirmed gold reserves, constituting about 73% of the total reserves in the Yangshan gold belt [19].
The Yangshan gold belt is structured by the Caopingliang-Getiaowan complex backslip and the Anchanghe-Guanyinba fault, with subsequent development of secondary faults, facies, lineaments, and associated structures. Ore bodies in the gold belt are mainly distributed on the two flanks of the Caopingliang complex dip, with the Anchanghe-Guanyinba fault and its secondary faults predominantly controlling their distribution [14,15]. The ore-bearing strata mainly consist of Devonian phyllites, fractured alteration rocks, some limestone, and a small number of dykes. Hydrothermal alteration includes silicification, sericitization, carbonatization, and the formation of kaolinite-montmorillonite, chlorite, and chlorite without any apparent zonation in space. Gold mineralization is most closely associated with silicification and sericitization [14,15].
The Yangshan gold belt hosts several medium felsic dykes, primarily composed of tonalite porphyry. Previously known as plagioclase granite porphyry, this paper adopts the IUGS igneous rock classification and refers to it as tonalite porphyry. Additionally, the belt contains fine-grained granite dykes, granite porphyry dykes, and tonalite porphyry dykes (see Figure 3). Table 1 summarizes the particular geological features of these dykes.
The dykes are primarily situated along a northwest-to-northeast direction within the deposit area, following the tectonic fault zone. These dykes range in width from half a meter to thirty meters and can span tens to hundreds of meters. The local wall rocks consist mainly of calcareous, carbonaceous, and calcareous phyllites from the Devonian Sanhekou Group. The contacts between the dykes and the wall rocks are predominantly intrusive, with some wall rocks displaying pyrometamorphism and contact metamorphism. The tonalite porphyry dykes, granite porphyry dykes, and fine-grained granitic dykes exhibit the strongest correlation with gold mineralization among the dyke types. These dykes host whole-rock gold mineralization with higher gold grades near the contact zone with the phyllite. In contrast, other dyke types such as quartz diorite dykes, biotite granite dykes, and granodiorite dykes display a weaker association with gold mineralization. Regarding age, the intermediate to felsic dykes exposed at the surface and in shallow caves within the Yangshan gold belt are primarily Late Triassic to Early Jurassic (209–171 Ma), with only a few instances of Early Cretaceous (116 Ma) and Eocene (51.2 Ma) zircon grain ages [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,17,18,20,21,22]. The age of the granite dykes falls within the onset of large-scale collisional granite formation in the West Qinling Orogeny (220–205 Ma). The detailed ages of granite dykes are shown in Table 2. The primary mineralization stage temperature is estimated to be between 300 and 210 °C [23], while the subsequent mineralization stage occurred between 288.3 and 271.3 °C [24]. The nature of the mineralizing hydrothermal fluid suggests that it was of medium to low temperature, implying that the mineralization took place slightly after regional metamorphism and magmatism.
The Yangshan gold belt’s dykes were formed during the Late Indosinian to Early Yanshan orogenic events, which represent the only period of mineralization in this belt. Thus, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive study of both mineralized and unmineralized granitic dykes encountered in drill holes and exposed at the surface. The goal of this study is to clarify the dykes’ geological background, origin, evolution, and geochemical characteristics. These results will assist in the ongoing exploration of mineralization in the region.

3. Sampling and Methods

3.1. Sampling

The Yangshan gold belt presents challenges for sample collection due to a thick loess layer and poor bedrock exposure. To address this, surface exposures at various locations were sampled, as well as granitic dykes encountered by drilling and trenching. A total of 25 samples were collected for zircon single mineral separation, out of which 9 samples were chosen for further analysis. Zircon LA-ICP-MS dating was performed on the selected 9 samples, whereas whole rock trace element analysis was conducted on all 25 samples. However, some single-grain zircons were too small to be analyzed reliably for Lu and Hf isotopes, so only two samples underwent in situ Lu-Hf isotopic testing.
Nine samples were collected for further analysis. The majority of these samples are tonalite porphyry, granite fine-crystalline dykes, and granite porphyry dykes. Specific information on the samples is provided in Table 3, while their distribution locations are shown in Figure 2. Hand specimens and microscopic photographs of the samples are illustrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.
The Zhangjiashan section sampling site contains medium- to fine-grained granite porphyry dykes with weak alteration, well-developed bedding rock joints, and a relatively fragmented structure. The samples collected from this field are gray-white to gray in color, with mottled and block-like structures, and are classified as granite porphyry dykes. The porphyritic crystals have a size of about 1.0–1.5 mm and mainly consist of plagioclase (40%) and quartz (30%). The matrix is primarily composed of quartz and plagioclase (30%). The dykes exhibit kaolinization and chloritization, but no pyritization was observed.
At the Guanyinba sampling site, granite dykes intrude fragmented and altered phyllite. The rock is gray-white granite porphyry with a mottled and block-like structure. Porphyritic crystals are primarily plagioclase (40%) and quartz (30%), distributed in a mottled pattern with a size of 1.5–2.0 mm. The matrix comprises quartz (15%), plagioclase (10%), and chlorite (5%). Chloritization is the primary alteration type. The dykes’ integrity is well preserved, showing its original shape. The contact surface with the underlying phyllite is arched at an average angle of about 40°. Gold mineralization is visible within and around the dykes, with Au grades of 14.9 g/t in the dyke and 8.29 g/t in the phyllite. The gold enrichment may be due to surface oxidation leaching of the primary ore, implying the possibility of magmatic-hydrothermal mineralization, but further evidence is required.
At the Anba sampling site, gray-green granitic porphyry dykes with a medium-fine grain and mottled structure occur. The porphyritic crystals have a grain size of approximately 1.0–1.0 mm and consist mainly of quartz (35%) and plagioclase (35%). The matrix contains quartz (10%) and feldspar (10%). Pyrite and arsenopyrite are present in the dyke. Pyrite is fine-grained and stellated, idiomorphic and hypidiomorphic, while arsenopyrite is silver-white, acicular, measuring about 0.5–2~3 mm in length, and idiomorphic. Visible gold mineralization has been observed in nearby drill holes.
At the Getiaowan section sampling site, outside the mine tunnel of Sancai Mining Company, lies a gray-green fine-grained dyke with a blocky texture and fine-grained structure. The main components of the dyke are quartz (65%), feldspar (30%), and dark mica (5%). Although the sample is well-preserved with no visible alteration, sporadic cubic particles of pyrite with a size of approximately 2.0–2.0 mm are dispersed throughout the dyke.
At the Nishan section sampling location, the two dykes exhibit remarkable similarities in their mottled structure and blocky texture. They predominantly display gray and gray-white colors. The porphyritic crystals mainly comprise plagioclase (35%) and quartz (30%), with an average grain size of approximately 1.5–2.0 mm. The dyke matrix primarily consists of quartz and plagioclase (30%), with a small fraction of thin, platelike dark minerals (5%) suspected to be biotite. Upon examination, the dykes appear to exhibit a high degree of structural integrity, devoid of apparent alteration or mineralization.
At the Guojiapo sampling location, fine-grained dykes of greyish green intrude into medium-fine-grained granite porphyry dykes. The former exhibits very-fine-grained and massive structures, consisting mainly of feldspar and quartz with evident dyke joints and no mineralization. In contrast, the gray to gray-brown medium-fine granitic porphyry dykes show a porphyry structure. The porphyritic crystals of plagioclase (40%) and quartz (35%) exhibit a porphyry grain size of approximately 1.5–2.0 mm, while the matrix consists mainly of quartz and plagioclase (20%) with minor dark minerals (5%). Although weakly altered, these dykes maintain a high degree of structural integrity and appear to intrude into the contact boundary of surrounding rocks, showing visible contact metamorphism phenomena in phyllite without apparent displacement of the contact boundary.
The Xin Guan sampling location exhibits granite dykes that intersect with carbonaceous phyllites and thin-bedded tuffs within the area. The dykes display significant deformation and kneading and have been truncated by late tectonic faulting activities. Granitic porphyry dykes at this site possess a gray-white to gray-brown coloration, medium to fine-grained texture, and massive structure. Porphyritic crystals are predominantly plagioclase (35%) and quartz (40%), with a grain size of about 1.5–2.0 mm. Furthermore, the matrix is primarily composed of plagioclase and quartz (30%), alongside some dark minerals (5%). The hand specimen is highly fragmented and altered, with kaolinization and chloritization being the dominant alteration processes. No discernible mineralization is evident.

3.2. Analytical Methods

In the laboratory of Guangzhou Tuoyan Testing Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China), zircon single mineral selection, target preparation, and cathodoluminescence (CL) photography were conducted using a high-vacuum scanning electron microscope (JSM-IT100) equipped with the GATAN MINICL system. Zircon LA-ICP-MS dating was performed in the laboratory of Wuhan SampleSolution Analytical Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) using an Agilent inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (Agilent 7900) and a coherent 193 nm excimer laser ablation system (GeoLas HD). Standard samples used for this analysis include NIST610 for trace element calibration, 91,500 for isotope ratio calibration, and GJ-1 for isotope ratio monitoring. ICPMS-DATACAL10.8 processing software was used, and laboratory cleanliness was maintained below the 1000 level. For quality control, the analysis sequence of the NIST610/2 91,500/2 GJ-1/6 samples (U-Pb age)/2 91,500/2 GJ-1/2 91500/NIST610) was employed. Details of the analytical conditions and procedures can be found in Liu et al. (2008, 2010) [25,26].
Whole-rock major and trace element analyses were carried out at the Guangzhou Tuoyan Testing Technology Co., Ltd. laboratory using an Agilent 720 ICP-MS. Detailed conditions and procedures for major and trace element analyses are given in Potts et al. (2005) [27].
In situ Hf isotope ratio analysis of zircon was performed using laser ablation multi-collector plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) at Wuhan SampleSolution Analytical Technology Co., Ltd. The laser ablation system used was Geolas HD and the MC-ICP-MS used was Neptune Plus. Details of the analytical conditions and procedures can be found in Hu et al. (2012a, 2012b) [28,29].
The εHf was calculated using the 176Lu decay constant of 1.865 × 10 y−11−1 [30] and present-day values for chondrites of 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282772 and 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0332 [31]. The single-stage Hf model age (tDM1) was calculated using the depleted mantle with present-day 176Hf/177Hf = 0.28325, 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0384, and the two-stage Hf model age (tDM2) was calculated using the upper crustal average 176Lu/177Hf = 0.015 [32].

4. Results

4.1. Zircon U-Pb Dating

Nine samples underwent zircon LA-ICP-MS dating, and the results are reported in Table 4 and Table A1. The majority of zircon grains exhibit oscillatory zonation, with some retaining ancient zircon cores in bright white and gray colors. Most zircon grains appear grayish-black. Zircon Th/U ratios indicate that 243 out of 245 grains have ratios greater than 0.4, which is typical of magmatic zircon grains [33]. The average size of zircon grains is around 100 μm with an aspect ratio of 2:1, except for sample ZK1798-01 where individual zircon grains range from 100 to 200 μm and have an aspect ratio between 2:1 and 4:1. Figure 5 shows the ages of typical zircon grains plotted against their age values.
Sample 21BS-001, from which 18 points were selected, yields concordant ages with a mean 206Pb/238U of 786.74 ± 3.68 Ma (2σ, mean square of weighted deviations [MSWD] = 27). Yields from the second set of points are concentrated in the Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic, indicating the time of initial zircon formation. The origin of the zircon grains is believed to be from either the Devonian wall rocks or the deep basement of the Bikou Group and the volcanic clastic rocks of the Bikou Group in the Neogene.
Sample 21NS01, from which 14 points were selected, yields concordant ages with a mean 206Pb/238U of 771.71 ± 3.68 Ma (2σ, mean square of weighted deviations [MSWD] = 18.7). The second group of ages falls mainly into the Paleozoic and Middle Proterozoic. This finding suggests that these zircon grains originally formed during those periods. It is possible that these zircon grains originated from either the Devonian peridotite or the deep basement of the Bikou Group and the Neoproterozoic volcanic clastic rocks of the Bikou Group.
Sample 21PZB01, from which 15 points were selected, yields concordant ages with a mean 206Pb/238U of 213.1 ± 1.6 Ma (2σ, mean square of weighted deviations [MSWD] = 0.2). This age is considered to represent the crystallization age of the dyke. Other ages are concentrated in the Paleozoic and Middle Proterozoic, indicating the inherited zircons from other magmatic rocks.
Sample 21XG01, from which 11 measurement points were selected, yields concordant ages with a mean 206Pb/238U of 801.97 ± 4.73 Ma (2σ, mean square of weighted deviations [MSWD] = 6.32). Other ages are concentrated in the Paleozoic and Mesoproterozoic, indicating the inherited zircons from other magmatic rocks. The zircon grains in this sample possibly originated from the Devonian wall rocks, the deep basement of the Bikou Group, or the Neoproterozoic volcanic clastic rocks of the Bikou Group. Eight points from sample 21ZJS01 give concordant ages, with a concordant mean 206Pb/238U of 210.49 ± 1.5 Ma (2σ, mean square of weighted deviations [MSWD] = 1.34). This age is considered to represent the crystallization age of the dyke. Other ages measured were concentrated in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, whereas a few others yield Triassic ages. These additional measurements represent the ages of zircon formation in metasedimentary and inherited igneous rocks from the wall rocks or the basement of the Bikou Group.
Sample 311-8-1 yielded 22 zircon grains, which mainly showed Mesoproterozoic, Neogene, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic ages. The Mesozoic ages, ranging from 211 to 215 Ma, represent the crystallization age of the granitic porphyry dykes. The remaining ages reflect zircon formation in the inherited magmatic rocks from the wall rocks or the basement of the Bikou Group. Sample 311-8-6 yielded 27 zircon grains, and the weighted average of 11 measurement points gives an age of 749.89 ± 2.48 Ma (n = 11/11), with an MSWD value of 49.6. Other ages are mainly Paleoproterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic, representing the age of inherited zircon formation from the wall rocks or the basement of the Bikou Group.
Among 30 zircon grains were examined from TC2101-02, most of the ages are the Mesoproterozoic, Neogene, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic. The crystallization age of the granitic porphyry dyke was determined by taking the weighted average of the three youngest data points, resulting in an age of 206.7 ± 1.2 Ma (n = 3/3). The remaining ages reflect zircon formation in metasedimentary and inherited igneous rocks from the peritectic rocks or the basement of the Bikou Group.
A total of 30 zircon grains from ZK1789-1 were selected for analysis. The weighted average of 25 measurement points yielded an age of 201.02 ± 0.42 Ma (n = 25/25), with an MSWD value of 24.9. This age represents the crystallization age of the granitic fine-crystal dyke. The remaining ages fall mainly into the Neogene and Mesozoic Triassic, and reflect zircon formation in metasedimentary and inherited magmatic rocks from the wall rocks or the Bikou Group basement.

4.2. Element Geochemistry

Nine granitic dyke outcrops were selected from west to east along the Anchanghe-Guanyinba ore control fracture zone in the Yangshan gold belt, and 25 samples were collected for major and trace element analysis. The data are reported in Table A2. The 25 samples were divided into ten groups by sampling location for data presentation and evaluation. Samples 21BS-02 and 21BS-03 are intrusive contact relations that are treated separately.
SiO2 contents range from 71.99% to 84.53% with an average of 76.29%. Other ranges are: Al2O3 10.09%–17.29%, K2O 2.12%–3.89%, Na2O 0.08%–4.59%, TiO2 0.02%–0.38%, CaO 0.43%–2.66%, and total iron as Fe2O3 0.43%–2.46%. The Rittman index (σ) varies between 0.30 and 1.87, indicating a calc-alkaline nature.
Based on lithological classification and SiO2-Na2O + K2O relations, almost all samples fall into the granite field (Figure 6a), some on the boundary between granodiorite and granite. A/CNK and A/NK values range from 1.47 to 3.84 and 1.68 to 5.39, respectively (Figure 6c). All samples are peraluminous with values above 1.1. These data suggest that the granitic dykes studied are ‘S-type’ igneous rocks with calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline characteristics (Figure 6b).
The total concentration of rare earth elements (ΣREEs) encompasses a wide range, from 16.17 to 96.69 ppm with a mean of 67.88 ppm. All samples show the enrichment of light REEs over heavy REEs. (La/Yb)N values range from 1.92 to 30.93. The chondrite-normalized REE patterns for a member of each group are shown in Figure 7a. The δEu (where δEu = Eu/(√Sm × Gd), chondrite-normalized values) range from 0.45 to 0.85, with the four granitic dykes (21BS02, 21BS03, 21SCKy02, and TC2101-03) exhibiting the most significant Eu anomalies. The overall REE distribution curves are similar to those of granitic rocks. The δCe (where δCe = Ce/(√La × Pr), chondrite-normalized values) range from 0.78 to 0.91 with a slight negative anomaly and an average value of 0.84. Two types of chondrite-normalized REE patterns can be identified in Figure 7a: (I) rocks with LREE enrichment, a small negative Eu anomaly, and low levels of HREEs, and (II) rocks with an inverted U-shaped pattern accompanied by a well-developed negative Eu anomaly. Additionally, rare earth elements in these samples are depleted relative to the continental crust, but the distribution pattern of light rare earth elements in some samples is similar to that of the upper and lower crust.
Primitive-mantle-normalized trace elements for a member of each of the ten groups are displayed in Figure 7b. They exhibit significant positive anomalies for Rb, Th, and U, indicating an enrichment of large-ion lithophile elements, and exhibit significant negative anomalies for Ti and P, indicating loss of high-field-strength elements. Additionally, trace elements in these samples are mostly depleted relative to the crust except for some elements (Rb, Ba, Th, U, K, Ta, and Nb).

4.3. Zircon Hf Isotope

Lu-Hf isotope analysis was conducted on 16 zircon samples (sites) from the 21PZB-01 and 21ZJS-01 specimens, and the data are presented in Table A3. All zircon sites have 176Lu/177Hf ratios within the range of 0.000286 to 0.001655, which preclude the significant accumulation of radiogenic Hf after their formation. Thus, the measured 176Hf/177Hf ratios signify the Hf isotopic composition at the time of zircon formation. εHf(t) values range from −1.5 to 0.1(t), and most of the test points are located near the evolution line of chondrites (Figure 8). The age range for the mantle model (TDM1) can be estimated to be 859–937 Ma, whereas the range of crustal model ages (TDM2) is 1111–1218 Ma.

5. Discussion

5.1. Petrogenesis

For this study, we have collected 25 samples from nine granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt. The samples were found to be high-potassium calc-alkaline granites, belonging to the peraluminous granite group with A/CNK values ranging from 1.47–3.84. These values indicate that they may be S-type igneous rocks, as all values are greater than 1.1. The Rb/Sr ratio has a mean value of 1.45 with a distribution range of 0.49–3.49, significantly higher than the global upper crustal mean of 0.32 [38]. Similarly, the Nd/Ta ratio had a mean value of 12.93 with a range of 1.32–22.98, partially higher than the global upper crustal mean of 12.0 [38]. Figure 7b shows positive anomalies of Rb, Ba, Th, U, K, and Ta, indicating the enrichment of crustal elements and suggesting that parts of the granitic dyke magmas are derived from upper crustal melting. The results are consistent with previous studies which suggest a close relationship between the granitic dykes and the stratigraphy of the Bikou Group [39]. Therefore, it can be concluded that most granitic dykes mainly originated from upper crustal melting. However, the strong depletion of Ti and P, as well as significant negative anomalies in Y and Yb, which formed in early-stage granite dykes, indicate that their sources were more likely to be derived from the melting of the lower crust and upper crust of the Bikou Group of the metamorphic volcanic basement, exhibiting characteristics of type I granites.
The granitic dykes exhibit δEu values ranging from 0.45 to 0.85, which indicate significant negative Eu anomalies. From their δEu values, the dykes can be separated into three groups, namely with values of 0.45–0.49 (five samples), 0.61–0.69 (six samples), and 0.70–0.85 (14 samples). Divalent Eu has the same ionic radius as Sr2+ and will be preferentially, over the trivalent REE, incorporated into calcic plagioclase and thus be rapidly depleted during fractional crystallization in the remaining melt.
During the initial stage of the Mianlue Ocean subduction collision, samples such as 21NS, 21PZB, 21SCKY, and 21BS03 fall within the I-type granite field, indicating that these samples possess I-type granite chemical characteristics (Figure 9d–e). However, due to the closure of the Mianlue Ocean, magma mixed with large amounts of crustal melt, causing samples such as 311-8, ZK1798, 21ZJS, and TC2101 to fall into the S-type granite field (Figure 9d). The feldspar or mica in these samples has been altered by hydrothermal fluids, as numerous feldspars observed under microscopic examination exhibit significant alteration to sericite, chlorite, and kaolinite, with visible feldspar remnants (Figure 4e,g). The water-rock interaction may be responsible for the extremely low Na content in these samples. Our samples indicate multi-stage and multi-period characteristics, pointing to a transition from syn-collisional or late-collisional to extensional environments. They demonstrate an evolution of granite types from I-type to S-type and then evolved into granite dykes with certain characteristics of A-type granite in the later stages.
During the inspection of thin sections under a petrographic microscope, small amounts of titanium-bearing minerals including ilmenite and titanite were found together with zircon and rutile in granite rock dykes. The samples collected were relatively fresh and unaltered. By utilizing major element and zirconium contents, we calculated the formation temperature of the granite dykes using a zircon saturation temperature thermometer [40]. Eight granitic rock samples (311-8-2, 311-2-4, 311-2-5, 311-2-8, 21ZJS03, 21ZJS04, 21ZJS05, and 21ZJS06) were formed between temperatures of 784 and 802 °C, possibly during the early stage of magmatic activity. Twelve additional granitic rock samples (ZK1798-2, ZK1798-3, ZK1798-4, 21NS02, 21NS03, 21NS04, 21PZB02, 21PZB03, 21XG02, 21XG03, and TC2101) were formed at an average temperature of 750 °C and temperatures ranging between 728 to 778 °C, indicating a time period of intense magmatic activity. Lastly, six fine-grained granite samples (21Scky02, 21Scky03, 21Scky04, 21BS02, and 21BS03) formed at temperatures ranging between 650 and 671 °C, which differs by more than 100 °C from the formation temperatures of other granite dykes, suggesting they were formed during the late stage of magmatic activity.
Figure 9. Discrimination diagrams of for the granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt [41,42]. (a) Nb(ppm) vs. 10000Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (b) (Na2O + K2O)/ CaO (wt.%) vs. 10000Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (c) (Na2O + K2O)/CaO (wt.%) vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) discrimination diagram; (d) Na2O (wt.%) vs. K2O (wt.%) discrimination diagram; (e) Zr (ppm) vs. SiO2 (wt.%) discrimination diagram. FG represents the differentiated felsic granite field; OGT represents undifferentiated S- and M-type granite fields.
Figure 9. Discrimination diagrams of for the granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt [41,42]. (a) Nb(ppm) vs. 10000Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (b) (Na2O + K2O)/ CaO (wt.%) vs. 10000Ga/Al discrimination diagram; (c) (Na2O + K2O)/CaO (wt.%) vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) discrimination diagram; (d) Na2O (wt.%) vs. K2O (wt.%) discrimination diagram; (e) Zr (ppm) vs. SiO2 (wt.%) discrimination diagram. FG represents the differentiated felsic granite field; OGT represents undifferentiated S- and M-type granite fields.
Minerals 13 00718 g009
In their study, Yang Guicai et al. (2016) [10] conducted isotopic analyses on granitic porphyry dykes in the Yangshan gold belt. They found that the origin of the granite can be traced back to collisionally thickened crustal material that underwent partial melting in the Bikou Group before being mixed with the Devonian lithologies during uplift. Our study has yielded similar results, but with some differences: the magma primarily originated from the less differentiated Bikou Group or Bikou Group metamorphosed volcanic basement, with some mixing from the Devonian surrounding rock. The dykes went through three stages of granite formation: I-type during the early stage, S-type during the middle stage, and granite with partial A-type characteristics during the late stage.
The Harker diagrams presented in Figure 10 illustrate that the concentrations of Ti, Fe, and P increase as the SiO2 content increases. Conversely, when the SiO2 content exceeds 76%, the values of Ti, Fe, and P in individual samples exhibit a decrease. Furthermore, Al, Ca, and Na + K demonstrate negligible changes with increasing SiO2 content. These observations suggest that granitic dykes within the Yangshan gold belt display distinct evolutionary trends, which may result from different magmatic sources or wall rock compositions. Fractional crystallization is unlikely to be the dominant process of magmatic evolution, as evidenced by their different evolutionary trends on Harker diagrams (Figure 10) and discrimination diagrams (Figure 9).
Previous studies have shown that the P2O5 content varies insignificantly or not at all with SiO2, indicating an S-type granitic character (Figure 10) [41,42,43,44,45]. Consistent with this, the P2O5 content of the 25 samples analyzed in this study vary insignificantly or not at all with SiO2, further supporting their S-type granitic characteristics. It is hypothesized that the source of the granitic dykes originated from the melting of upper crustal sedimentary rocks or the incorporation of upper crustal materials. Subduction collision-induced crustal thickening and the addition of deep metamorphic water may be the key factors for upper crustal melting in this stage of the region.
In conclusion, the geochemical data presented in this study suggest that the Yangshan gold belt contains not only “S”-type granite dykes but also several “I”-type granite dykes, and some granite dykes show also “A”-type geochemical characteristics. These anomalies exhibit elemental geochemistry similar to A-type granite dykes, potentially influenced and modified by water-rock reactions.

5.2. Igneous Age

Table 5 presents geochronological results of nine granitic dykes, indicating that four contain inherited zircons, the ages of which are concentrated between 745.0 Ma and 802.0 Ma. This time frame matches the convergence and rifting of the Rodinia supercontinent as well as the subduction of the Yangtze plate, leading to extensive magmatism in the Bikou Terrane region. This event includes the Bikou Terrane (846–776 Ma) and sedimentary rocks (745–910 Ma) of the Bikou Group [46,47], alongside magmatic rocks in the Bikou Terrane [48,49,50]. Prior research indicates that significant magmatic activity occurred in and around the Mian-lue tectonic zone during the Neoproterozoic and Mesozoic eras. The chronology of granitic dykes in this study demonstrates that the granitic magmatic rocks in the Yangshan gold belt were primarily derived from the crustal base melting of the Bikou Group. During transport and emplacement, this melting was accompanied by the assimilation and mixing of ancient Mesozoic sedimentary layers, resulting in additional inherited zircon grains between 250 and 500 Ma in the granitic dykes.
In this study, previous research on granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt was reviewed to determine their age range (Table 5). The average age of these dykes was found to be 213.1 Ma, with a range between 177 Ma and 220.4 Ma [8,10,21,22]. The present study places the ages of the granite porphyry dykes between 201.0 Ma and 213 Ma, which is consistent with previous research. Among these dykes, the youngest ones are fine-grained granitic dykes and quartz porphyries, formed between 209 and 177 Ma [8,22]. In contrast, the medium- and coarse-grained granitic porphyries and tonalite porphyry dykes were mainly formed in the Late Triassic period, from 220 to 210 Ma, indicating a deeper environment which was beneficial for mineral growth during the early stages of formation. This contrasts with fine-grained granitic rocks and quartz porphyries, which were formed later during the process of collisional orogenic uplift, taking advantage of the early magma transport channels. The later igneous ages are mixed due to the use of earlier magma transport channels.
Our study found that the ages of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt correlated with their proximity to the Wenxian arc tectonic zone. Dykes closer to this zone tend to be older, such as those found at Xinguan (223 Ma), Lianhecun (217–213 Ma), and Getiaowan (213–216 Ma). In contrast, dykes further away from the Wenxian arc zone tend to be younger, such as those found at Anba (209–215 Ma), Guanyinba (206 Ma), and Zhangjiashan (210 Ma). Zircon single-grain ages from the Yanshan period have even been observed in the granitic dykes of the Anba and Gejianwan sections.
This pattern is due to the location of the Yangshan gold belt in a tectonically weak zone controlled by the composite fracture zone of the Anchanghe-Guanyinba branch and the Getiaowan-Caopingliang complex backslope. The transition from an extrusional to an extensional-tensional environment provided a favorable transport channel for deep magma and late hydrothermal upwelling. During the Indosinian period, these tectonically weak zones led to the formation of granitic dykes intruded by fine-grained granite, and some of the Indosinian granite dykes were melted and assimilated by the heat of Yanshanian magma. This assimilation and mixing of the Indosinian and Yanshan magmas contributed to the age variations observed in the granitic dykes of the Yangshan gold belt.

5.3. Tectonic Evolution

We analyzed 25 samples of different lithologies from various sampling locations, which were distinguished into ten groups. The concentrations of major and trace elements were employed to differentiate the samples based on their tectonic position and petrogenetic type [51,52]. Figure 11a shows that the granitic porphyries consistently fall within the Slab failure field in the Nb-Y plot, while they form a cluster in the Syn-COLG and WPG ranges in the Ta-Yb plot (Figure 11b).
Zou et al. (2022) [53] conducted a study on the granitic batholiths in the West Qin-ling ZeKu area and summarized previous chronological and geochemical data in the West Qinling region. Their findings suggest that the magmatic rocks in the West Qinling orogenic belt were formed due to the subduction collision of the Yangtze plate with the Qinling microplates and share a consistent origin and evolutionary history. These data indicate that the Paleo-Tethys Ocean experienced northward subduction at 264–225 Ma, followed by land-land syn-collision at 225–215 Ma, and then underwent a post-collision period beginning at 215 Ma.
Located in the western part of the Mian-lue suture zone, the Yangshan gold belt’s age of the granitic dykes is concentrated between 220 and 200 Ma. This time frame is slightly later than that of the central portion of the Mian-lue suture zone due to the variation in the location of subduction collision between the Yangtze plate and the Qinling microplates. Therefore, the granitic dykes in this area share a similar geological background characterized by late collisional and post-collisional extrusion and extensional environments.
He et al. (2021) [50] examined granitic intrusions in the Bikou terrane and determined that they formed between 220 and 210 Ma in a post-collisional setting. Partial melting of the lower crust due to the injection of mafic magmas created felsic magma chambers that ultimately led to the development of Late Triassic granites found throughout the Bikou terrane. The geochemical characteristics of the granite intrusions indicate that the closure of the Mianlue Ocean caused the southwest escape of the Bikou terrane, resulting in weakened crust-mantle mixing and more mantle-derived materials being added to the northeastern Yangba pluton than to the southwestern margin of the Bikou terrane.
The granitic dykes are widely distributed in the study area. Based on zircon age, zircon Hf isotope analysis, and whole-rock major and trace element data of these dykes, it has been determined that they were generally formed during the Late Triassic period and are associated with the closure of the Mianlue Ocean, recording the features of Mianlue Ocean subduction collision with Qinling microplates and post-collision evolution. Combining previous research and the findings of this study, the age and tectonic geological background of the granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt can be divided into three stages (see Figure 12).
The first period was the subduction of the Mianlue Ocean that lasted from ~235–220 Ma (Figure 12a). At the end of this period, an oblique collision occurred between the two microplates from east to west, resulting in the Yangtze Plate’s oceanic crust and subduction zone’s accretionary wedge moving under the Qinling microplates. This movement caused some metamorphism in the lithosphere and mantle as well as the formation of mixtures of oceanic crust and upper crustal materials. These mixtures created medium- to coarse-grained granite dykes and bodies in the middle and deep crust with similar geochemical properties to I-type granites.
The second period, which lasted from ~220–210 Ma, was marked by the collision between the Yangtze Plate and the Qinling microplates (Figure 12b). During this period, the passive continental margin crust of the Yangtze Plate collided with the crust of the Qinling microplates, causing the rapid thickening of the Qinling microplates. The subducted plate ruptured, leading to large-scale heating and melting of the lower crust of the Qinling microplates. These melts mixed with some mafic upper mantle melts and formed a series of granite dykes and bodies along the tectonic weak zone. The granite intrusions accompanying the uplift of the Qinling microplates are medium- to fine-grained granite dykes, leaning mostly towards S-type granite characteristics.
The third period occurred from ~210–200 or 190 Ma and was characterized by post-collision continental extension (Figure 12c). During this period, the Yangtze Plate and Qinling microplates were in a geological background of strong compressive to extensional transition. Decompression melting of the upper crust took place, forming low-temperature granitic melts with high SiO2 content. These melts quickly penetrated the surrounding rocks, forming medium- to coarse-grained granite dykes or medium-grained granite intrusions along previous magma transport channels that rapidly cooled to form fine- to very-fine-grained granite dykes. Although some of the geochemical characteristics of the granitic dykes match those of A-type granite, due to the collision-extension transition period, their melting temperature was lower, and the source area consisted mainly of partially melted upper crust, which is different from typical A-type granite characteristics.
The granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt were formed in a geological setting characterized by co-collisional extrusion after the subduction of the Yangtze plate beneath the Qinling microplates. The stretching occurred during the stage that followed the collisional shift to intraplate extension. The geochemical properties of the granitic dykes indicate the tectonic continuity of the collision in the Mian-Lue suture zone and its subsequent intraplate extension. Therefore, it can be concluded that the granitic dykes were formed in a geological environment that underwent subduction, co-collisional extrusion, and stretching.

5.4. Implications for the Genesis of Ore Deposits

The Yangshan gold belt hosts significant gold deposits, with the Yangshan deposit being the most notable with inferred resources of nearly 400 tons. However, there is ongoing debate over its genesis due to multiple tectonic changes and the effects of the Qinling orogeny. Orogenic, Carlin, and Carlin-like models are the dominant hypotheses, but their reconciliation is challenging. In our study, we have analyzed granitic dykes closely associated with mineralization to constrain the metallogenic age of the deposit. The previous 40Ar-39Ar dating of sericite/muscovite closely associated with gold obtained a mineralization age of 211–203 Ma [11]. Results show that the age of gold mineralization is consistent with the emplacement age of continental collision granitic dykes, which suggests that the metallogenic geological setting changed from subduction collision to the extension stage during the intracontinental orogenic period. Previous studies suggest that deep fluids or material and subduction zone accretionary wedge devolatilization might have contributed to the formation of orogenic gold deposits [54,55]. This paper proposes that deep material was transported along fractures to form gold ore bodies during the Yangshan gold belt transition from extrusion to extension. This scenario is in agreement with the geological background and characteristics of orogenic gold deposit formation.

6. Conclusions

(1) LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results from granitic dykes reveal a concentration of inherited zircon ages, ranging from 745.0 Ma to 802.0 Ma, with some scattered Paleo-Mesozoic ages. This pattern suggests that the magma originated from basal melts of the Bikou Group and assimilated a modest proportion of surrounding rocks. The intrusion ages of this magmatic event cluster between 201.0 Ma and 213 Ma, indicating that the melts intruded during the late stage of collision between the Yangzte and Qinling microplates, marking the transition to an extensional environment.
(2) The granitic dykes have calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline characteristics, are peraluminous, have moderate Eu anomalies (0.45–0.85), and are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements as well as Th and U, but are deficient in Ti and P. These granites are relatively enriched in light rare earth elements with (La/Yb) N ranging from 1.92 to 30.9 with a mean of 18.91) and relatively poor in heavy rare earth elements. We assign them as belonging to the late syn-collisional to post-collisional extensional environmental tectonic evolution.
(3) Major and trace element and Hf isotope analyses of the granitic dykes indicate that their source area was the volcanic rock basement of the Mesoproterozoic Bikou Group. During the thickening of the subducted Qinling microplate crust, the upper crust of the Bikou Group melted and migrated along the structurally weak zone, mixing and assimilating the surrounding rocks to form numerous granitic dykes. The tectonic and geological environment evolved from initial oceanic continental subduction to continental collision, ultimately transforming into intracontinental extension. The granite type also changed from the initial “I”-type to “S”-type, and finally evolved into granite with “A”-type characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y. and J.L.; Data curation, C.L. and W.W.; Formal analysis, Z.Y. and Y.H.; Investigation, Z.Y. and J.L.; Methodology, T.X. and Y.H.; Software, C.L. and Y.Z.; Writing—original draft, Z.Y.; Writing—review & editing, Z.Y. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Applied Geology Research Center of the China Geological Survey (No. DD20220971 and No. DD20191028).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Appendix A tables.

Acknowledgments

For assistance during fieldwork, we thank the Yangshan Project Team. The recommendations and advice of Li Jing Xiang were profitable in interpreting the data. We also thank the teachers in Wuhan Samplesolution and Guang-zhou for their help in the process of experiment and data processing. The modification suggestions and recommendations, which made by anonymous reviewers, have been of great help in improving and enhancing this article. We sincerely appreciate the efforts of the reviewers of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS dating data of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Table A1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS dating data of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Measurement Points Number232Th238U232Th/U238Isotope RatioIsotope Age Values (Ma)
ppm207Pb±2σ207Pb±2σ206Pb±2σ208Pb±2σ238U207Pb±2σ207Pb±2σ206Pb±2σ208Pb±2σ
206Pb235U238U232Th232Th206Pb235U238U232Th
21BS-001, Medium-Coarse-Grained Granite Dyke, Weighted Mean of 18 Points = 786.74 ± 1.88|3.68|20.58 Ma (n = 18/18) MSWD = 27.0, p(x2) = 0 (Excluding Points 04, 08, 18–23, 26–27, 29–30)
21BS-001-01321143.600.07040.00571.31900.10620.13630.00330.04320.00303.6799940167854478241985558
21BS-001-0289981.100.07210.00701.35430.12260.13790.00470.04090.00231.1229989194869538332781145
21BS-001-034003900.970.06730.00311.26330.05740.13610.00210.04230.00130.992185697829268231283724
21BS-001-044014001.000.17660.005511.61620.35980.47640.00670.15220.00381.0198262152257429251129286466
21BS-001-05901211.340.06670.00781.24870.15010.13570.00530.03950.00221.3702829246823688203078344
21BS-001-06122780.640.06750.00761.19150.12300.12870.00440.03750.00200.6659854236797577802574539
21BS-001-073576691.870.06630.00261.23890.04980.13530.00230.04000.00131.908981782818238181379325
21BS-001-082223051.370.15740.00479.32090.26950.42880.00660.11830.00321.4007242950237027230030226058
21BS-001-0951430.860.06330.01581.05800.22510.12500.00740.03760.00340.87727185527331117594274667
21BS-001-102061690.820.06470.00481.09720.08140.12390.00310.04040.00190.8476765159752397531880038
21BS-001-114364371.000.06460.00431.07630.06880.12100.00240.03720.00121.0264761143742347361473823
21BS-001-125562900.520.06840.00681.12920.10770.12070.00450.03820.00150.5380880206767517352675829
21BS-001-134243130.740.06920.00381.20110.06390.12600.00220.04070.00130.7685906113801297651380725
21BS-001-14971521.580.07630.00581.34720.09830.12930.00310.04180.00211.62011102152866437841882840
21BS-001-152872270.790.07200.00491.19550.08560.12030.00320.03760.00140.8043987141798407321874727
21BS-001-162614341.660.06600.00311.26990.06140.13920.00240.04340.00141.677480798832278401486027
21BS-001-173465951.720.06750.00291.26560.05450.13580.00260.04270.00151.743085489830248211584429
21BS-001-184603950.860.05670.00390.52660.03720.06730.00150.02090.00070.868648015843025420941814
21BS-001-19115520121.740.08570.00262.67630.08580.22550.00360.06620.00181.7420133159132224131119129633
21BS-001-20109166415.280.07020.00221.41250.04600.14540.00220.04500.001915.708893358894198751288936
21BS-001-213525841.660.17740.004811.36870.37060.46200.00770.12690.00381.7285262945255430244834241668
21BS-001-225258561.630.07620.00441.00160.05740.09550.00160.03660.00151.6570110011170529588972730
21BS-001-2314217710.540.08150.00720.76810.07240.06760.00110.02460.00120.5685123317357942422749224
21BS-001-2446010232.230.06800.00251.26950.04910.13520.00220.04140.00132.248887877832228181282024
21BS-001-251622461.520.06830.00431.13770.07060.12140.00290.04000.00181.5868880130771347391779335
21BS-001-264556261.370.11140.00344.93620.16150.32060.00530.09800.00251.3931183354180828179326188946
21BS-001-273755271.410.12030.00365.15980.16880.31050.00570.09970.00271.4582196152184628174328192049
21BS-001-285634550.810.06710.00361.10760.05690.11990.00200.03850.00130.8254839113757277301276424
21BS-001-291561721.100.11960.00425.62530.20800.34060.00620.10100.00291.1217195063192032189030194654
21BS-001-3056310651.890.16280.00468.28680.23660.36810.00450.11090.00281.9321248548226326202021212551
21NS01, medium-coarse-grained plagioclase granite porphyry dyke, weighted mean of 14 points = 771.71 ± 1.88|3.68|17.56 Ma (n = 14/14) MSWD = 18.7,p(x2) = 0 (excluding points 01, 04–05, 8–9, 11, 13, 20, 22–23, 26)
21NS01-011169064.680.11050.00324.56820.13490.29900.00450.10770.009672.96241809521743251686222068176
21NS01-021662011.210.06600.00501.07760.08170.11860.00250.03720.00141.2175806164742407221573827
21NS01-031501931.280.06640.00441.14930.07870.12550.00310.04110.00191.3025820139777377621881537
21NS01-041763481.980.16020.00479.52530.28450.43060.00640.12450.00342.0140245749239027230829237162
21NS01-054685191.110.06370.00370.87720.05680.09970.00330.03910.00101.1443731122639316131977620
21NS01-064444621.040.06620.00291.07440.04860.11760.00210.03750.00111.056081393741247171274522
21NS01-072022651.320.06620.00361.28940.07160.14150.00300.04230.00151.3598813115841328531783729
21NS01-082405102.130.13290.00405.21790.17790.28420.00630.09950.00272.2069213652185629161232191750
21NS01-098673240.370.12020.00406.03780.21210.36310.00630.10250.00270.3840195960198131199730197250
21NS01-102872430.850.06810.00391.21290.06940.12920.00250.04020.00140.8926872119807327831479627
21NS01-11184864993.520.33900.01071.67840.06570.03550.00060.10120.00373.63223658481000252254194869
21NS01-1216747450.450.06510.00251.10600.04130.12290.00170.03600.00080.456678982756207471071416
21NS01-1342311552.730.09110.00253.27580.09880.26020.00470.07520.00202.7744144854147523149124146638
21NS01-141441831.270.06760.00421.23450.07400.13300.00280.04120.00171.3086857130816348051681733
21NS01-15164940.570.07130.00741.22860.11000.12850.00330.04030.00160.5916966213814507791979831
21NS01-161501090.730.06930.00611.26620.10440.13560.00420.04160.00170.7849907179831478202482433
21NS01-171562171.390.06800.00391.24480.07400.13290.00300.03970.00151.4179878121821338041778729
21NS01-183753710.990.06860.00351.21690.05670.12930.00220.03880.00111.0547887106808267841276921
21NS01-1968910781.570.06580.00231.26090.05040.13850.00260.04230.00131.618880074828238361583826
21NS01-203403401.000.07160.00391.26260.06460.12830.00230.03880.00121.0027976111829297781377024
21NS01-219878390.850.06530.00241.16370.04420.12920.00210.03860.00110.898078379784217831276621
21NS01-2211579970.860.07030.00361.06140.04830.11010.00220.03660.00110.8780939105735246731372722
21NS01-232927022.410.10940.00501.20530.05530.08080.00240.05500.00192.41531791838032550114108336
21NS01-243672800.760.06850.00401.25150.07240.13300.00290.04070.00130.7841885122824338051780625
21NS01-257667641.000.06760.00331.22980.06920.13120.00250.04020.00161.0205857106814327941479631
21NS01-2668215452.270.20500.01191.34400.05060.05060.00280.06490.00232.58072878948652231817127144
21PZB01, medium-coarse-grained plagioclase granite porphyry dyke, weighted mean of 15 points = 213.1 ± 0.7|1.6 Ma (n = 15/15) MSWD = 0.2, p(x2) = 1.0 (excluding points 01, 8–9, 11, 13, 15–16, 20, 23–25)
21PZB-01-013142700.860.06580.00451.18560.07920.13060.00330.03920.00170.86571200144794377911977833
21PZB-01-023658392.300.05040.00440.23380.01930.03360.00080.01090.00062.243321325421316213521913
21PZB-01-032254171.850.05260.00680.24050.02700.03370.00120.01080.00081.884032226121922214821617
21PZB-01-045037851.560.05270.00490.24350.02290.03370.00110.01090.00061.545131720822119214721913
21PZB-01-0587727433.130.05190.00380.24000.01880.03370.00140.01100.00073.044528017021815214922114
21PZB-01-065157031.370.05360.00740.24540.03150.03350.00130.01050.00061.340435431822326212821013
21PZB-01-073188102.550.04740.00510.21430.02160.03320.00090.01110.00082.49567823119718210522317
21PZB-01-08143849253.420.65570.02269.45510.34310.10470.00270.57800.01863.4257463750238333642169220238
21PZB-01-0935611353.180.21530.03210.92620.12140.03400.00220.05140.00702.7655294524266664215141014134
21PZB-01-1052411452.190.05230.00610.23940.02720.03340.00110.01160.00082.141929826821822212723315
21PZB-01-1174410251.380.05390.00500.24680.02110.03380.00090.01040.00061.420136921122417214620912
21PZB-01-122956982.370.05310.00460.29680.02660.04040.00110.01330.00082.329133220026421255726817
21PZB-01-1370429524.190.05120.00310.23850.01490.03370.00070.01050.00054.136725013921712214421211
21PZB-01-14287681072.820.67830.02099.07300.28380.09660.00150.46810.02082.896646874723452959497761286
21PZB-01-153086782.200.05380.00590.24730.02490.03390.00100.01080.00082.165136524822420215621815
21PZB-01-1693914241.520.05080.00390.23480.01850.03340.00070.01080.00051.507023221221415212521711
21PZB-01-17126136602.900.28920.02481.79670.20310.04280.00290.09220.00992.95443414135104474270181782184
21PZB-01-18114736823.210.05090.00270.23790.01390.03370.00080.01070.00053.166723512421711214521510
21PZB-01-1946615813.390.10480.01480.52600.07480.03630.00090.02640.00263.3239171025842950230552652
21PZB-01-20120441883.480.05000.00250.23370.01290.03370.00080.01060.00053.42691951142131121452149
21PZB-01-21108425462.350.05490.00390.25460.01830.03350.00070.01110.00062.290540916123015213422312
21PZB-01-2283615491.850.05260.00480.24350.02250.03360.00080.01060.00061.836832221122118213521212
21PZB-01-233252780.860.07310.00501.36720.09690.13650.00380.03970.00170.86961017140875428252278733
21PZB-01-2490714351.580.05920.00490.27420.02150.03380.00080.01160.00051.545057618124617214523411
21PZB-01-2563116362.590.35920.06203.14340.58000.06330.00300.13700.02352.512637472651443142396182595418
21XG01, medium and coarse grained granite porphyry dyke, weighted mean of 15 points = 801.97 ± 2.41|4.73|13.72 Ma (n = 10/11) MSWD = 6.32, p(c2) = 0.0000000053 (excluding points 01, 04, 8–9, 11, 13, 15–16, 20, 22–23, 26)
21XG01-014628181.770.11140.00402.75240.15610.17890.00820.07550.00251.8671182259134342106145147247
21XG01-021722371.380.06970.00411.29720.07460.13550.00280.04400.00161.4200920121844338191687032
21XG01-032513821.520.07090.00301.30600.05850.13390.00290.04530.00181.554595487848268101789535
21XG01-041692601.540.06880.00421.12920.06850.11920.00260.04150.00191.5981894128767337261582337
21XG01-05931481.600.06870.00561.16620.09160.12510.00330.04050.00231.6364889170785437601980245
21XG01-063078992.930.10640.00414.16010.17150.28390.00710.08890.00282.9870173965166634161136172153
21XG01-072813911.390.06870.00341.23030.06580.12960.00240.04010.00141.4052889103814307861479427
21XG01-0811157690.690.05780.00270.65960.03010.08310.00140.02560.00070.703052010251418515951013
21XG01-09109210911.000.07050.00221.30910.03930.13480.00200.04380.00101.040694465850178151186619
21XG01-102182311.060.07200.00481.29310.08850.13060.00320.04100.00151.0411987131843397911881130
21XG01-1135219065.410.10440.00840.60290.06050.04020.00140.06440.01027.292917061544793825491262193
21XG01-122123141.480.06920.00461.29530.09460.13490.00260.04500.00241.4978906137844428161588946
21XG01-13771011.310.07090.00661.26360.11550.13070.00340.04370.00231.3239954197830527921986445
21XG01-14111915681.400.08400.00400.73720.03390.06390.00140.02960.00101.462412929456120400859020
21XG01-15115417601.530.18880.01803.08080.32860.11490.00200.09640.01031.57952732158142882701121861190
21XG01-162184211.930.06980.00341.39710.06350.14570.00270.04570.00171.9954924100888278771590332
21XG01-1769911811.690.08870.00262.88770.09340.23560.00470.07050.00181.6852139857137924136424137834
21XG01-18103613021.260.12870.00426.44280.24040.36110.00710.10800.00361.2907208057203833198733207466
21XG01-193417152.090.23780.006617.03160.48330.51710.00720.15050.00382.1631310544293727268730283366
21XG01-203080.271.28530.3021327.1028217.05992.56762.43756.54245.77930.0242errorerror58826728199440440,84015,487
21XG01-211321401.060.07490.00701.29250.11300.12640.00370.04290.00211.08331065189842507672184940
21XG01-22106513931.310.14160.00463.02150.09970.15400.00200.08020.00211.325022475614132592311155939
21XG01-233505171.480.29160.03455.06470.74070.12240.00530.15160.02181.556234281851830124744312853382
21XG01-2438717464.510.07920.00380.37590.01710.03440.00060.02190.00145.222911779932413218443828
21XG01-254965551.120.07000.00341.27160.05850.13190.00220.04030.00131.134492997833267991279925
21XG01-2657710441.810.17120.01451.81420.14980.08530.00540.06480.00371.8967256914310515452832126970
21XG01-2771033034.650.08530.00470.40170.02260.03410.00060.02420.00154.7166132110834316216448330
21XG01-282702841.050.13305940.0129242.69333430.32470970.13778430.00409840.06751530.00627391.07160612139171132789832231321119
21XG01-2974114511.960.08120920.00293261.31049550.04602470.11699280.00195240.04761130.0020472.0046696122871850207131194039
21ZJS01, medium-coarse-grained granite dyke, weighted mean of 8 points = 210.49 ± 0.76|1.50 Ma (n = 8/8) MSWD = 1.34, p(c2) = 0.23 (excluding points 01, 05, 7–16, 19–20, 23–26)
21ZJS01-011351841.360.07280.00401.36040.07210.13650.00300.04380.00171.38521007108872318251786733
21ZJS01-021723902.270.04700.00540.21680.02280.03390.00090.01140.00072.33385025219919215622913
21ZJS01-0376611521.500.04770.00270.21620.01210.03300.00060.01010.00041.5446871301991020942048
21ZJS01-042295132.240.05240.00480.23370.02140.03250.00080.01050.00062.303930220721318206521212
21ZJS01-052439003.700.09920.00630.42430.02510.03120.00080.02410.00113.7701161011835918198548221
21ZJS01-062793851.380.05380.00500.24340.02130.03300.00080.01050.00051.402436121122117209521110
21ZJS01-072512460.980.06870.00361.23680.06340.13090.00260.04000.00150.9920900103817297931579328
21ZJS01-0844618534.150.11470.00700.44300.02500.02820.00050.02730.00154.3160187611137218179354530
21ZJS01-093087612.470.07730.00410.38960.01910.03680.00080.01670.00082.5175113110633414233533515
21ZJS01-103955881.490.08960.00431.01350.04980.08210.00210.04320.00151.6198141793711255091385529
21ZJS01-1171629104.060.10960.01030.42420.03880.02840.00050.02570.00254.0454179217235928180351350
21ZJS01-122901900.660.07050.00481.19780.08110.12390.00290.03950.00130.6695944141800377531778325
21ZJS01-133814431.160.06370.00351.06670.05950.12170.00270.03780.00121.1898731123737297401575024
21ZJS01-143073741.220.06520.00391.17790.07960.13070.00350.04160.00181.2260789126790377922082534
21ZJS01-15603325.560.05530.00530.28480.02630.03750.00090.01990.00175.806543321825421238639934
21ZJS01-164186751.610.06450.00241.16780.04290.13130.00220.04060.00121.635676780786207951380423
21ZJS01-1759310711.810.05300.00360.24480.01710.03330.00070.01070.00041.83923281542221421142148
21ZJS01-184868251.700.05190.00410.23340.01750.03280.00070.01040.00051.776428317721314208421010
21ZJS01-1968419752.890.10500.00450.53620.02190.03700.00060.03020.00112.970717147943614234460122
21ZJS01-203192190.690.07010.00451.21190.08040.12520.00300.03880.00130.6846932132806377601776826
21ZJS01-2162717022.710.05030.00260.23250.01150.03350.00060.01020.00042.7219209119212921242057
21ZJS01-2241814803.540.05110.00330.23610.01520.03350.00060.01140.00063.758225614421512212422812
21ZJS01-2366523853.590.22740.01471.56640.14300.04760.00220.11120.01134.0409303510395757299132131205
21ZJS01-243496121.750.05950.00490.26890.02320.03270.00070.01130.00071.802758518024219207422714
21ZJS01-2575318752.490.13570.01300.57150.04780.03150.00100.02700.00212.7753217316845931200653841
21ZJS01-262642520.950.06430.00381.07380.06400.12140.00300.03820.00120.9533752119741317391775824
311-8-1, granite porphyry dyke, weighted mean of 2 points = 213.3 ± 7 Ma (n = 2/2)
311-8-1-011472131.440.07220.00671.27750.12140.12930.00530.04270.00261.4319992190836547843084550
311-8-1-0251612492.420.05460.00350.44330.02760.05900.00120.01820.00082.463439413837319369736517
311-8-1-031132652.340.07480.00711.31680.13310.12930.00690.04590.00312.42581065191853587843990860
311-8-1-0470313121.870.05280.00330.40710.02680.05590.00160.01850.00112.0765320143347193511037121
311-8-1-0583825062.990.10390.01050.39480.02700.03030.00170.02260.00143.01721695188338201931045228
311-8-1-066565110.780.06520.00500.99420.07730.11130.00390.03560.00180.7923783194701396802270635
311-8-1-07151642282.790.11430.02130.55000.18660.03190.00380.03010.00892.9485186934244512220324599174
311-8-1-084548301.830.07720.00780.50730.05100.04800.00150.02450.00222.7009112620241734302948943
311-8-1-0995816371.710.05470.00380.40520.03250.05340.00150.01780.00112.131446715634523335935721
311-8-1-102576332.460.06410.00401.13760.06920.12930.00310.04210.00222.4999746131771337841783442
311-8-1-11402722230.550.13460.00682.95940.15450.16040.00560.06290.00270.606421598813974095931123350
311-8-1-12183740252.190.05540.00540.23150.02340.03030.00080.01020.00062.216342821821119192520511
311-8-1-133848812.300.07380.00371.67090.08390.16410.00350.05160.00202.33271037729983298019101739
311-8-1-14114915881.380.05520.00360.39040.02650.05140.00140.01670.00081.659942015133519323833516
311-8-1-153617472.070.06360.01010.46000.08300.05150.00170.02010.00312.1785728341384583241040361
311-8-1-1695915281.590.05080.00370.35370.02370.05070.00140.01610.00071.657123216830818319832314
311-8-1-17140632562.320.05310.00360.23600.01620.03220.00090.01110.00062.539334515721513204622413
311-8-1-1899427762.790.11880.01520.53450.06630.03300.00110.02670.00342.9192193922543544209753267
311-8-1-198135790.710.07770.00541.20960.07720.11290.00230.03720.00160.77501140140805356901373932
311-8-1-20105133273.160.14370.02700.88380.32010.03960.00860.14920.08584.838422723306431732505328121508
311-8-1-21315071592.270.34160.098711.86967.08770.12470.04760.39790.19244.32993670457259455975727367712782
311-8-1-22129733182.560.08330.01320.45410.11120.03620.00360.01770.00282.51681276314380782292235656
311-8-6, granite porphyry dyke, weighted mean of 11 points = 749.89 ± 2.48|4.86|38.91 Ma (n = 11/11) MSWD = 49.6, p(c2) = 0 (excluding points 01, 05, 7–16, 19–20, 23–25)
311-8-6-011966973.560.12570.00376.20440.19680.35640.00590.10490.00353.6155203956200528196528201664
311-8-6-0256781.390.06900.00751.23360.12850.13180.00380.04140.00261.4129898228816587982282050
311-8-6-032735411.980.06880.00291.32240.05350.13940.00250.04320.00132.004189485856238421485426
311-8-6-041791640.910.06570.00511.08070.08060.12030.00290.03620.00140.9326798162744397321772028
311-8-6-054264371.030.06570.00351.08520.06000.12040.00350.03790.00121.0600798111746297332075223
311-8-6-06166621421.290.15940.00641.55390.06290.07070.00150.04610.00141.341224496895225440991126
311-8-6-07150234562.300.16540.00900.85570.04550.03750.00060.03510.00162.351625229762825237469831
311-8-6-083453891.130.06890.00381.04510.05660.11030.00230.03780.00121.1833896115726286751475023
311-8-6-092572020.790.06460.00520.95340.07220.10780.00260.03830.00110.8199761169680386601575922
311-8-6-106044950.820.11040.00314.70320.13750.30750.00430.08890.00210.8354180652176825172821172138
311-8-6-115444810.880.06630.00261.20620.04610.13160.00230.04060.00110.899381781803217971380322
311-8-6-12156461073.910.10880.00570.38040.01830.02560.00060.02170.00114.346517899632713163443421
311-8-6-132241830.820.06630.00811.01040.10850.11180.00420.03620.00190.8293815225709556832471938
311-8-6-148099561.180.18010.01401.75710.08140.07760.00400.06770.00521.3993265312910303048224132499
311-8-6-1586111491.330.07860.00291.32310.04200.12260.00230.04450.00101.3643116273856187451388020
311-8-6-162922720.930.07410.00571.37630.09780.13540.00340.04420.00190.94671044155879428191987436
311-8-6-175698431.480.06510.00301.16110.05340.12900.00220.03860.00111.507378996782257821276521
311-8-6-182884051.410.08630.00511.22110.06530.10450.00340.04570.00141.40541346113810306412090428
311-8-6-191932461.270.06900.00461.18640.07290.12630.00300.04250.00161.3065898138794347671784031
311-8-6-206909811.420.18030.01891.00760.06640.04490.00180.03930.00321.57882655174708342831177861
311-8-6-214906001.220.07490.00391.17280.07380.11330.00460.03820.00121.23701066101788346922775724
311-8-6-2264620293.140.12300.00890.70620.03590.04290.00120.04140.00153.1861200012954221271782129
311-8-6-2340410482.590.16660.00781.10940.05640.04950.00240.05760.00222.51312523787582731115113241
311-8-6-2467210351.540.06990.00340.82620.04920.08470.00270.03300.00141.5759926106612275241665627
311-8-6-253034901.620.14460.01601.17620.07740.07120.00590.05110.00321.788122841917903644336100862
311-8-6-261791240.690.07220.00551.33120.09820.13560.00410.04470.00190.7098991156859438202488436
311-8-6-273505911.690.15980.00449.41850.27720.42610.00710.11970.00301.7429245448238027228832228653
TC2101-02, granite porphyry dyke, 3-site weighted mean = 206.7 ± 1.2|2.8|31.5 Ma (n = 3) MSWD = 14, p(c2) = 0.000001 (contains 15, 21, 29)
TC2101-02-01344214,6074.240.53150.01322.03600.05750.02760.00040.14960.00374.25104331361128191762281965
TC2101-02-02555122,5834.070.36940.00850.60310.01640.01180.00020.04280.00124.12573791354791076184724
TC2101-02-03121170255.800.14790.00520.53420.01560.02650.00080.04520.00115.891523215943510169589322
TC2101-02-0490169527.720.31560.01431.44850.04520.03400.00090.18320.00567.7910355070909192156340195
TC2101-02-05809525,6203.170.49460.01300.84370.02420.01230.00020.04680.00133.20614225396211379192525
TC2101-02-06537217,5613.270.44560.01041.26230.03780.02050.00050.07250.00213.3213407235829171313141439
TC2101-02-07692617,7352.560.34020.00760.77890.02250.01650.00030.03510.00102.617536643458513106269720
TC2101-02-08548920,2713.690.36650.00950.76330.02010.01520.00040.04900.00143.84323777385761297296826
TC2101-02-09553820,6733.730.52810.01251.24320.02800.01710.00030.08320.00213.9037432240820131092161639
TC2101-02-102715862.160.06400.00330.80400.04160.09100.00150.03600.00132.299074311159923562971525
TC2101-02-11686418,3922.680.26270.00780.46130.01410.01270.00020.02080.00062.76123265463851081141711
TC2101-02-12116737093.180.43370.01082.49780.06850.04160.00060.14110.00603.332640304212712026342668106
TC2101-02-13615018,8083.060.43700.01370.87790.02420.01460.00020.04750.00103.16394042476401393293819
TC2101-02-14197099125.030.18010.00510.54360.01680.02200.00060.04330.00175.352026544844111140485733
TC2101-02-153026982.310.05290.00390.24100.01710.03320.00070.01050.00052.372532816821914210421210
TC2101-02-16347814,3364.120.35250.01070.98160.02650.02030.00040.07120.00224.3614371846694141293139041
TC2101-02-17418912,9973.100.33170.00810.94900.02600.02070.00030.04880.00163.149236253767814132296330
TC2101-02-18329413,4194.070.39690.01891.06080.03430.01970.00040.07380.00234.1730389772734171263143943
TC2101-02-1936718655.080.14990.01570.60450.07020.02890.00100.05020.00715.31912346180480441836990136
TC2101-02-2035411453.240.11470.00820.40960.02510.02650.00070.02390.00163.5663187613034918168447831
TC2101-02-214618141.770.05120.00420.23590.01860.03350.00070.01110.00041.82782561862151521342238
TC2101-02-22474515,8613.340.30430.00930.69840.02530.01660.00030.03960.00173.472934924753815106278534
TC2101-02-23548615,0412.740.22780.00900.44410.02060.01420.00060.02070.00102.95923037633731491441419
TC2101-02-2487612521.430.05260.00360.22670.01520.03120.00060.00980.00041.44473221572071319841978
TC2101-02-25324291632.830.26180.01150.50510.01340.01450.00070.02430.00073.0139325869415993448613
TC2101-02-26205170233.420.24090.01430.99820.04370.03040.00080.05680.00153.7256312894703221935111628
TC2101-02-27159755563.480.12060.00530.49310.02020.02970.00050.02620.00103.617219657940714188352219
TC2101-02-28197172133.660.10930.00410.27930.01000.01860.00050.01390.00043.6104178869250811932788
TC2101-02-2989332093.590.05870.00300.24050.01210.02970.00050.01180.00043.58955541132191018832389
TC2101-02-30324194832.930.22010.01040.55700.01710.01900.00090.02690.00083.050429817645011121653616
ZK1798-1, granitic fine-grained rock, weighted mean of 25 points = 201.02 ± 0.42|0.83|4.37 Ma (n = 25/25) MSWD = 24.9, p(c2) = 0 (excluding points 04, 22, 28, 29)
ZK1798-1-01110744314.000.12460.02131.24760.46070.04630.00700.04150.01563.7503203330782220829243821303
ZK1798-1-0286939974.600.05500.00330.25160.01500.03300.00070.01060.00054.680040913322812209421310
ZK1798-1-03132866264.990.05430.00430.22590.01810.03000.00060.01050.00075.053038317820715190421115
ZK1798-1-30184787244.720.05130.00260.20800.01160.02920.00080.00990.00064.823525411719210185519912
ZK1798-1-04117962715.320.05610.00280.26580.01350.03420.00060.01260.00055.360945411323911217425311
ZK1798-1-05140675655.380.05180.00230.23990.01100.03340.00060.01100.00045.5545280102218921242219
ZK1798-1-06121061815.110.05360.00330.22940.01340.03090.00070.01060.00065.156735413921011196521211
ZK1798-1-07104255105.290.05100.00260.23090.01230.03270.00080.01050.00055.324723911721110207521110
ZK1798-1-08117652564.470.05490.00710.22120.02400.02940.00070.01060.00084.611840929420320187421316
ZK1798-1-0987738644.410.05150.00290.24030.01420.03360.00070.01120.00054.541026112621912213422611
ZK1798-1-10165980004.820.05220.00210.20410.00940.02820.00080.00940.00044.880129588189817951887
ZK1798-1-11168079194.710.05530.00340.22680.01310.02960.00060.01070.00074.769043314420811188421613
ZK1798-1-12112152394.680.05460.00270.24640.01210.03260.00070.01100.00054.734239411322410207422011
ZK1798-1-13137263404.620.05500.00290.24440.01400.03200.00070.01150.00084.722540911922211203423116
ZK1798-1-14145463734.380.05280.00210.24050.01050.03280.00060.01100.00054.4738320912199208422110
ZK1798-1-15101443284.270.05400.00360.24240.01650.03230.00060.01150.00094.374037215022013205423118
ZK1798-1-16144368524.750.05050.00240.22420.01080.03210.00060.01040.00054.79522171092059203421010
ZK1798-1-17104745604.360.05340.00330.23390.01390.03170.00060.01060.00064.418034613421311201421411
ZK1798-1-18130558134.450.05340.00350.23560.01700.03170.00060.01120.00094.596634614621514201422518
ZK1798-1-19131758854.470.06640.00390.27300.01580.02980.00050.01450.00094.530282011924513189329119
ZK1798-1-20173071104.110.05460.00260.20210.01210.02680.00110.00890.00064.206639410718710170717911
ZK1798-1-2186543455.020.05200.00250.24440.01230.03400.00070.01060.00055.088928711122210215421410
ZK1798-1-22310411,7523.790.07150.00620.26460.04360.02540.00180.01140.00143.8850972180238351621122929
ZK1798-1-2394947715.030.05200.00270.24290.01410.03360.00070.01150.00075.093528315022112213423114
ZK1798-1-24135565064.800.05000.00260.22100.01150.03190.00070.01040.00054.872819511620310203420911
ZK1798-1-25136561464.500.05630.00300.24190.01370.03100.00070.01200.00074.584846512322011197524214
ZK1798-1-26147672344.900.05230.00310.22000.01330.03030.00060.01020.00045.04722981312021119342069
ZK1798-1-27161570844.390.05540.00510.23810.02070.03120.00070.01160.00134.449042820621717198423226
ZK1798-1-28139861944.430.06390.00360.27950.01740.03140.00070.01480.00094.483473911925014199429618
ZK1798-1-29152567444.420.05850.00420.23980.01700.02950.00060.01130.00084.527655015721814188422715
Table A2. Major (wt%) and trace (ppm) elemental test data of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Table A2. Major (wt%) and trace (ppm) elemental test data of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Sample Number311-8-2311-8-4311-8-5311-8-821ZJS0321ZJS0421ZJS0521ZJS06ZK1798-2ZK1798-3ZK1798-421NS0221NS0321NS0421PZb-0221PZb-0321SCKy0221SCKy0321SCKy0421BS0221BS0321XG0221XG03TC2101-03TC2101-04
SiO2%75.1174.8974.4774.7275.6773.8873.1875.9484.1784.5384.1274.5675.1273.3471.9972.4276.0876.7276.7178.2581.5272.5974.4376.5576.28
TiO2%0.260.280.290.290.340.370.380.370.070.060.060.220.220.230.360.370.030.030.030.020.020.260.260.230.22
Al2O3%16.4116.8217.1316.7916.2816.9317.2915.8310.4010.0910.4115.0415.2116.0115.6616.0614.0313.3113.5814.9610.6415.8214.7014.9315.09
Fe2O3-T%1.861.882.092.102.292.442.462.100.720.700.721.431.601.482.372.270.430.480.470.560.481.871.801.481.95
MnO%0.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.040.020.020.020.020.020.030.040.030.030.030.030.050.040.030.030.030.05
MgO%0.770.650.720.670.280.310.330.270.160.160.170.430.450.450.790.640.090.080.090.130.030.480.290.220.24
CaO%1.260.901.281.061.551.862.001.270.430.430.461.250.791.251.801.320.911.141.022.341.042.352.131.932.66
Na2O%0.130.120.080.100.090.100.110.140.870.720.754.543.394.593.082.734.354.274.220.104.013.293.680.270.42
K2O%3.473.513.093.363.073.563.713.892.802.962.962.142.782.213.373.653.523.633.513.162.122.962.293.752.82
P2O5%0.090.090.090.090.100.120.110.090.030.040.040.080.080.080.110.110.020.030.020.010.010.080.080.070.07
LOI%4.434.205.024.574.624.795.003.812.832.652.652.882.652.703.483.121.511.751.674.202.113.963.724.324.95
Total99.4099.1699.2899.2299.7099.6199.6199.9399.6899.7099.7299.7299.6699.6899.5899.6199.5099.7399.6999.5999.9199.7399.6899.4699.80
NK3.603.633.183.463.163.663.824.023.673.683.716.686.176.806.446.397.877.907.733.266.146.255.964.023.24
CNK4.864.524.464.524.705.525.825.294.104.114.177.936.968.058.257.708.789.048.755.607.178.608.095.955.90
A/CNK3.383.723.843.713.463.062.972.992.532.452.491.902.191.991.902.081.601.471.552.671.481.841.822.512.56
A/NK4.564.645.394.855.154.634.533.932.832.742.812.252.462.352.432.511.781.681.764.591.732.532.463.724.66
Li41.0066.9086.0041.1043.5040.0042.0033.1038.0026.8027.8013.7010.3012.3047.0062.2047.9048.3049.7019.3013.3047.60214.00115.0078.20
Be3.003.353.402.962.803.173.223.283.163.163.184.044.174.153.153.424.514.915.145.394.513.503.364.224.68
Sc4.063.293.503.543.201.003.883.062.242.492.465.514.745.655.895.884.624.604.452.544.486.155.343.172.35
V17.0019.2018.9018.6023.3025.3025.2024.900.960.750.7913.0013.4014.2025.6025.600.310.310.260.300.3218.3017.6014.2012.90
Cr7.079.129.489.624.456.604.535.583.292.570.7410.209.9310.505.1210.701.266.951.792.555.6913.0012.807.278.78
Co3.654.274.104.083.143.623.583.160.370.370.341.502.871.744.083.420.370.420.340.340.332.453.462.432.10
Ni2.163.002.802.432.373.183.652.720.64ndnd4.596.334.623.144.111.375.351.051.602.184.314.463.724.35
Cu6.7913.9014.6010.809.7912.9013.006.094.615.334.4010.6014.5011.7011.0017.000.500.950.780.811.0912.1012.905.945.73
Zn46.4046.1047.8052.3053.4053.8055.8045.7041.0037.1042.4032.0043.0034.0060.8061.5042.7048.2045.2024.7021.9041.0045.6052.8052.50
Ga20.6020.8020.7020.8020.1021.8022.2021.7018.0018.3018.4020.6021.0021.4020.8022.2022.3021.7023.0023.7021.4020.0019.8022.8022.00
As2490.04430.03430.04370.019.7021.5019.7034.703.362.531.855.3015.304.186.367.127.128.112.7516.5074.4022.7026.0082.107.51
Rb182.00180.00146.00170.00137.00156.00161.00168.00127.00141.00142.00107.00123.00114.00123.00138.00201.00206.00201.00185.00110.00131.00102.00196.00162.00
Sr96.4094.00134.0079.40124.00184.00217.00206.0089.2076.5077.60209.00119.00233.00213.00125.0064.1085.3085.80181.0076.20210.00210.0056.7079.30
Y7.757.148.027.898.188.659.048.016.637.037.208.108.008.489.189.8011.4011.5011.6013.7010.407.888.1310.6011.40
Zr91.9099.8097.6099.10109.00127.00119.00118.0049.9048.6050.0093.0097.0097.50131.00124.0032.6031.4035.1026.8027.30103.00107.0076.9073.10
Nb6.757.187.397.466.589.517.717.279.269.159.158.628.728.857.158.4711.3010.7011.1013.9012.807.207.3810.009.39
Cs21.5027.3019.4025.409.9810.109.8010.108.758.178.328.879.828.407.137.2510.8010.7010.7019.306.8614.3014.3014.3021.40
Ba514.00563.00495.00496.00348.00424.00441.00569.00430.00401.00405.00276.00264.00293.00675.00941.00427.00480.00521.0091.3043.10231.00474.00297.00244.00
La19.0020.9019.8021.9020.3021.1021.9019.4014.1011.9011.1021.3021.3021.5019.6022.907.597.499.142.361.9719.5019.8010.0010.60
Ce30.4034.0032.1038.8032.7033.8035.1031.0023.4020.0018.6034.8034.2035.2032.0039.6013.5013.3016.204.293.3432.3032.2016.8017.70
Pr3.854.384.074.504.184.294.513.913.082.622.414.464.464.454.094.811.821.792.170.660.544.124.192.212.38
Nd13.6015.9014.7016.1015.1015.7016.6013.9011.409.819.2016.0016.1015.9014.9017.606.796.818.082.972.4614.9015.108.569.28
Sm2.803.383.223.312.973.113.232.752.942.712.613.363.473.382.943.492.312.402.491.701.343.113.202.252.57
Eu0.690.770.870.780.720.770.780.710.650.530.530.710.730.730.760.750.360.380.370.310.250.720.710.490.67
Gd2.432.572.902.662.472.632.692.322.582.542.452.922.942.962.482.952.482.532.492.351.892.612.662.312.68
Tb0.340.330.390.350.340.350.370.330.350.360.350.400.410.400.350.400.420.430.420.430.340.360.360.370.41
Dy1.551.461.691.581.631.681.761.561.571.661.651.751.781.871.731.922.232.272.242.501.981.621.672.022.19
Ho0.250.240.260.260.280.290.300.270.230.230.240.260.260.270.330.320.350.360.350.410.330.260.260.330.36
Er0.700.670.710.720.790.830.870.770.570.590.590.670.670.700.870.920.890.900.911.050.830.700.720.900.95
Tm0.090.090.090.100.110.110.120.110.070.070.070.080.080.090.120.130.120.120.130.150.120.090.100.120.14
Yb0.570.560.580.600.690.710.740.680.410.420.430.490.520.520.770.790.740.730.760.880.690.580.600.760.81
Lu0.080.080.080.080.100.100.110.100.060.060.060.070.070.070.110.110.100.100.100.120.090.080.090.110.11
Hf2.522.632.672.723.093.393.343.261.991.962.002.782.892.933.703.631.861.751.951.951.982.983.122.732.35
Ta0.760.780.870.860.660.900.730.681.231.131.101.181.181.240.721.202.011.962.091.841.860.830.891.231.08
Tl0.830.840.680.800.610.680.740.790.640.670.670.480.620.520.590.650.950.970.920.940.610.770.830.940.73
Pb13.6021.6020.5023.1019.0015.9012.508.6934.5030.9027.7021.5026.2020.4024.8024.2025.7030.8029.7013.5022.5022.2020.9034.3038.50
Th7.727.597.468.257.316.757.796.926.946.326.458.178.198.767.808.547.777.919.194.313.827.838.186.796.45
U3.893.904.034.162.792.162.832.794.535.356.194.444.194.653.473.6610.9015.507.592.632.702.782.853.402.73
ΣREE76.3485.3281.4791.7482.3685.4789.0677.8061.4153.4950.2987.2786.9988.0481.0496.6939.7139.6045.8620.1716.1780.9481.6647.2250.85
LREE70.3479.3374.7685.3975.9778.7782.1271.6755.5747.5744.4580.6380.2681.1674.2989.1532.3732.1738.4512.299.9074.6575.2040.3143.20
HREE6.005.996.716.356.406.706.946.135.845.925.846.646.736.896.757.547.347.447.407.886.276.296.466.917.65
LREE/HREE11.7313.2511.1513.4511.8711.7611.8311.699.528.037.6112.1411.9211.7911.0011.824.414.335.201.561.5811.8711.655.835.65
LaN /YbN23.9927.0124.4026.1821.0721.4121.2620.5924.5520.3718.6930.9329.5529.4318.2120.827.347.348.581.922.0424.1623.839.499.34
δEu0.790.770.850.780.790.800.780.840.710.610.630.670.680.690.840.700.450.460.450.470.490.750.720.650.77
δCe0.820.830.830.910.820.820.820.820.830.840.840.830.820.840.830.880.860.860.860.830.780.840.820.840.83
Table A3. Zircon Hf isotope analytical data of granitic dyke samples from the Yangshan gold belt.
Table A3. Zircon Hf isotope analytical data of granitic dyke samples from the Yangshan gold belt.
Sample No.t (Ma)176Hf/177 Hf176Lu/177 Hf176Yb/177 HfεHf (0)εHf (t)TDM1 (Ma)TDM2 (Ma)fLu/Hf
Granitic dyke 21PZB-01
21PZB-01-02213.3060.2826020.0000170.0012860.0000030.0350720.000115−6.00.8−1.50.89271201−0.96
21PZB-01-03213.5590.2826050.0000160.0009750.0000040.0249870.000078−5.90.8−1.40.89161194−0.97
21PZB-01-04213.7980.2826120.0000170.0011470.0000100.0323810.000246−5.70.8−1.10.89101181−0.97
21PZB-01-06212.2350.2826040.0000170.0009170.0000210.0247530.000541−5.90.8−1.40.89151195−0.97
21PZB-01-07210.4870.2826130.0000170.0015140.0000200.0399530.000478−5.60.8−1.20.89171183−0.95
21PZB-01-10211.7650.2826330.0000230.0009610.0000100.0263250.000283−4.91.0−0.41.08761139−0.97
21PZB-01-11214.3130.2826190.0000170.0009910.0000120.0266520.000447−5.40.8−0.80.88951164−0.97
21PZB-01-15214.6800.2825930.0000210.0011510.0000070.0316770.000292−6.30.9−1.80.99371218−0.97
21PZB-01-16212.0150.2826230.0000180.0016360.0000080.0439330.000224−5.30.8−0.90.89061164−0.95
21PZB-01-20213.8520.2826490.0000210.0016100.0000060.0505330.000209−4.40.90.10.98681111−0.95
21PZB-01-22212.7940.2826180.0000200.0016550.0000090.0474320.000189−5.40.9−1.00.99131172−0.95
Granitic dyke 21ZJS-01
21ZJS-01-02214.6260.2826250.0000160.0007360.0000060.0197650.000243−5.20.8−0.60.88811151−0.98
21ZJS-01-03209.3790.2826270.0000180.0013130.0000120.0364920.000408−5.10.8−0.70.88921154−0.96
21ZJS-01-04206.2470.2826340.0000140.0002860.0000040.0089830.000180−4.90.7−0.40.78591134−0.99
21ZJS-01-17211.4460.2826300.0000180.0011500.0000340.0310730.000988−5.00.8−0.50.88841146−0.97
21ZJS-01-18208.0670.2826260.0000180.0010720.0000090.0297650.000269−5.20.8−0.80.88881155−0.97
Footnotes: εHf (0) = ((176Hf/177Hf)s/(176Hf/177Hf) CHUR,0 − 1) × 10,000; εHf(t) = ((176Hf/177Hf)s − (176Lu/177Hf)s × (eλt − 1))/(((176Hf/177Hf)CHUR,0 − (176 Lu/177 Hf)CHUR × (eλt − 1)) − 1) × 10,000; TDM1 = 1/λ × ln [1 + ((176Hf/177Hf)s − (176Hf/177Hf) DM)/((176Lu/177Hf)s − (176Lu/177Hf) DM)]. TDM2 = TDM1 − (TDM1 − t) ((fcc − fs)/(fcc − fDM)). fLu/Hf = (176Lu/177Hf) s/(176Lu/177Hf) CHUR − 1.

References

  1. Dong, Y.-P.; Zhang, G.-W.; Neubauer, E.; Liu, X.-M.; Genser, J.; Hauzenberger, C. Tectonic evolution of the Qinling orogen, China: Review and synthesis. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2011, 41, 213–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, Y.-P.; Santosh, M. Tectonic architecture and multiple orogeny of the Qinling Orogenic Belt, Central China. Gondwana Res. 2016, 29, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, D. Specification of Geological Map I48E018011 1:50,000 in the Area of Buziba; Gansu Geological Survey Bureau No. 3; Geological Survey Institute: Lanzhou, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. Qi, J.-Z.; Yuan, S.-S.; Liu, Z.-J.; Liu, D.-Y.; Wang, Y.-B.; Li, Z.-H.; Guo, J.-H.; Sun, B. U-Pb SHRIMP Dating of Zircon from Quartz Veins of the Yangshan Gold Deposit in Gansu Province and Its Geological Significance. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 443–451. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qi, J.-Z.; Li, L.; Yuan, S.-S.; Liu, Z.-J.; Liu, D.-Y.; Wang, Y.-B.; Li, Z.-H. A Shrimp U–Pb chro-nological study of zircons from quartz veins of Yangshan gold deposit, Gansu Province. Miner. Depos. 2005, 24, 141–150, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  6. Qi, J.-Z.; Yang, G.-C.; Li, L.; Fan, Y.-X.; Liu, W. Isotope geochemistry, chronology and genesis of the Yangshan gold deposit Gansu. Geol. China 2006, 33, 1345–1353, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  7. Yan, F.-Z.; Li, Q.-Z. Yangshan Gold Deposit: The Largest Carlin and Carlin-like Type Gold Deposit in China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2008, 82, 804–810. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lei, S.-B. Tectonic and Magmatic Constraints on Mineralization and Gold Prospecting of Yangshan Gold Belt, Gansu Province. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2011. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, L.-Q.; Ji, X.-Z.; Santosh, M.; Li, N.; Zhang, Z.-C.; Yu, J.-Y. Detrital zircon u–pb ages, hf isotope, and geochemistry of devonian chert from the mianlue suture: Implications for tectonic evolution of the Qinling orogen. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 113, 589–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, G.-C.; Yuan, S.-S.; Ge, L.-S.; Wang, Z.-H.; Qi, J.-Z.; Yan, J.-P.; Zhao, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Li, P. Petrogenesis of Granites in Yangshan Gold Deposit, Gansu Province: Evidence from Geochemical Characteristics, Sr-Nd-Pb Isotope and Geochronology. Geotecton. Metallog. 2016, 40, 739–752, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo, Y.-Y. Indochinese Orogenic Gold Mineralization Deposits in the Southern Belt of the West Qinling, Central China. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2016. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, L.-Q.; Deng, J.; Li, N.; Zhangn, C.; Ji, X.-Z.; Yu, J.-Y. Isotopic characteristics of gold deposits in the Yangshan Gold Belt, West Qinling, central China: Implications for fluid and metal sources and ore genesis. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 168, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, J.-L.; Sun, W.-D.; Li, Y.-L.; Zhu, S.-Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.-L.; Zhai, W. An xps study on the valence states of arsenic in arsenian pyrite: Implications for au deposition mechanism of the yang-shan carlin-type gold deposit, western qinling belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 62, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, J.-L.; Sun, W.-D.; Zhu, S.-Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.-L.; Zhai, W. Mineralogical study of sediment-hosted gold deposits in the Yangshan ore field, Western Qinling Orogen, Central China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014, 85, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, J.-L.; Li, J.; Sun, W.-D.; Zhao, J.; Zhai, W.; Huang, Y.; Song, M.-C.; Ni, S.J.; Xiang, Q.R.; Zhang, J.C.; et al. Source of ore-forming fluids of the Yangshan gold field, western Qinling orogen, China: Evidence from microthermometry, noble gas isotopes and in situ sulfur isotopes of Au-carrying pyrite. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 105, 404–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, N.; Deng, J.; Yang, L.-Q.; Groves, D.L.; Liu, X.-W.; Dai, W.-G. Constraints on depositional conditions and ore-fluid source for orogenic gold districts in the West Qinling Orogen, China: Implications from sulfide assemblages and their trace-element geochemistry. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 102, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, R.S. Geological Geochemistry Characteristics and Genesis of the Yangshan Gold Deposit, Gansu Province, China. Ph.D. Thesis, Peking University, Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, L.-Q.; Deng, J.; Dilek, Y.; Qiu, K.-F.; Ji, X.-Z.; Li, N.; Taylor, R.-D.; Yu, J.-Y. Structure, geochronology, and petrogenesis of the late triassic puziba granitoid dikes in the mianlue suture zone, Qinling orogen, China. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2015, 127, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.-H.; Xiong, T.; Gou, Z.-Y.; Li, H.; Wang, L. LA-ICP-MS fission track thermochronology of apatite in the Yangshan gold ore belt, southern margin of West Qinling. Acta Geol. Sin. 2022, 96, 3849–3866, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun, S.H. Geological and geochemical signature of Carlin-like gold deposit in the north Sichuan-South Gansu area. Collect. Geol. Explor. 2005, 20, 8–14, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Z.-H. Coupling Relationship between Large-Scale Mineralization and Major Geological Event in the Yangshan Gold Ore Belt, Gansu Province. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2018. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo, Y.-P. Magmatism and Resource Prospects of Getiaowan Mine Section of Yangshan Gold Belt, Wenxian, Gansu. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 2020. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, J.; Chen, Y.-J.; Li, Q.-Z.; Lai, Y.; Yang, R.-S.; Mao, S.-D. Fluid inclusion geochemistry and genetic type of the Yangshan gold deposit, Gansu, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 2144–2154, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, N.; Zhang, Z.-C.; Liu, X.-W.; Liu, J. The relationship between disseminated gold mineralization and vein-type gold-antimony mineralization: Example from the Yangshan gold belt, West Qinling. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2018, 34, 1312–1326, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, Y.-S.; Hu, Z.-C.; Gao, S.; Günther, D.; Xu, J.; Gao, C.-G.; Chen, H.-H. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol. 2008, 257, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.-S.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.-C.; Gao, C.-G.; Zong, K.-Q.; Wang, D.-B. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons of mantle xenoliths. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Potts, P.-J.; Kane, J.-S. International Association of Geoanalysts Certificate of Analysis: Certified Reference Material OU-6 (Penrhyn Slate). Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2010, 29, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, Z.-C.; Liu, Y.-S.; Gao, S.; Xiao, S.-Q.; Zhao, L.-S.; Günther, D.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Zong, K.-Q. A “wire” signal smoothing device for laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis. Spectrochim. Acta Part B Atom. Spectrosc. 2012, 78, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, Z.-C.; Liu, Y.-S.; Gao, S.; Liu, W.-G.; Zhang, W.; Tong, X.-R.; Lin, L.; Zong, K.-Q.; Li, M.; Chen, H.-H.; et al. Improved in situ Hf isotope ratio analysis of zircon using newly designed X skimmer cone and Jet sample cone in combination with the addition of nitrogen by laser ablation multiple collector ICP-MS. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2012, 27, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scherer, E.; Munker, C.; Mezger, K. Calibration of the lutetium-hafnium clock. Science 2001, 293, 683–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Albarède, F.; Blichert-Toft, J. The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle-crust system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1997, 148, 243–258. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vervoort, J.-D.; Blichert-Toft, J. Evolution of the depleted mantle: Hf isotope evidence from juvenile rock through time. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 533–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hoskin, P.; Schaltegger, U. The Composition of Zircon and Igneous and Metamorphic Petrogenesis. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2003, 53, 27–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Middlemost, E. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rollinson, H. Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation; Longman Scientific and Technical: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 1–352. [Google Scholar]
  36. Maniar, P.D.; Piccoli, P.M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. GSA Bull. 1989, 101, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, S.-S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taylor, S.R.; Mclennan, S.M. The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution; An Examination of the Geochemical Record Preserved in Sedimentary Rock; Blackwell Scientific Publication: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1985; pp. 1–328. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, H.-J.; Mao, S.-D.; Zhao, C.-H.; Yang, R.-S. Element and Sr-Nb-Pb isotope geochemistry of ganite-porphyry dykes in the Yangshan gold belt, western Qinling Orogen. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 1101–1111, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferry, J.M.; Watson, E.B. New thermodynamic models and revised calibrations for the Ti-in-zircon and Zr-in-rutile thermometers. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2007, 154, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Whalen, J.B.; Currie, K.L.; Chappell, B.W. A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987, 95, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Collins, W.J.; Beams, S.D.; White, A.J.R.; Chappell, B.W. Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to southeastern Australia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1982, 80, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chappell, B.W. Aluminium saturation in I- and S-type granites and the characterization of fractionated haplogranites. Lithosphere 1999, 46, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, F.-Y.; Jahn, B.-M.; Wilde, S.A.; Lo, C.-H.; Yui, T.-F.; Lin, Q.; Ge, W.-C.; Sun, D.-Y. Highly fractionated I-type granites in NE China (II): Isotopic geochemistry and implications for crustal growth in the Phanerozoic. Lithosphere 2003, 67, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, X.-H.; Li, Z.-X.; Li, W.-X.; Ying, L.; Yuan, C.; Wei, G.; Qi, C. U–Pb zircon, geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of Jurassic I- and A-type granites from central Guangdong, China: A major igneous event in response to foundering of a subducted flat-slab? Lithosphere 2007, 96, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, Q.-R.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Hanson, A.D.; Druschke, P.A.; Zhen, Y.; Liu, D.-Y.; Jian, P.; Song, B.; Wang, T.; Jiang, C.F. Shrimp Age and Geochemistry of the Bikou Volcanic Terrane: Implications for Neoproterozoic Tectonics on the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Craton. Acta Geol. Sin. (Engl. Ed.) 2003, 77, 479–490. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yan, Q.-R.; Hanson, A.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Druschke, P.; Yan, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, D.-Y.; Song, B.; Jian, P.; Zhou, H.; et al. Neoproterozoic Subduction and Rifting on the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Plate, China: Implications for Rodinia Reconstruction. Int. Geol. Rev. 2004, 46, 817–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiao, L.; Zhang, H.-F.; Ni, P.-Z.; Xiang, H.; Liu, X.-M. ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geo- chronology of early Neoproterozoic mafic-intermediate intrusions from NW margin of the Yangtze Block, South China: Implication for tectonic evolution. Precambrian Res. 2007, 154, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, L.-Q.; Deng, J.; Qiu, K.-F.; Ji, X.-Z.; Santosh, M.; Song, K.-R.; Song, Y.-H.; Geng, J.-Z.; Zhang, C.; Hua, B. Magma mixing and crust-mantle interaction in the Triassic monzogranites of Bikou Terrane, central China: Constraints from petrology, geochemistry, and zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic systematics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 98, 320–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, D.-Y.; Qiu, K.-F.; Santosh, M.; Yu, H.-C.; Long, Z.-Y.; Wang, J.-Y. Inhomogeneous crust-mantle interaction and Triassic tectonic escape of a Proterozoic microplate: A tale of the Bikou Terrane. Lithosphere Int. J. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2021, 396–397, 106227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Whalen, J.B.; Hildebrand, R.S. Trace element discrimination of arc, slab failure, and a-type granitic rocks. Lithosphere 2019, 348–349, 105179. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pearce, J.A.; Harris, N.B.W.; Tindle, A.G. Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rock. J. Petrol. 1984, 25, 956–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zou, F.-H.; Wu, C.-L.; Gao, D.; Deng, L.-H.; Gao, Y.-H. Triassic granites in the West Qinling Orogen, China: Implications for the Early Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Paleo-Tethys ocean. Int. Geol. Rev. 2022, 65, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, Q.-F.; Deng, J.; Zhao, H.-S.; Yang, L.; Ma, Q.-Y.; Li, H.-J. Review on Orogenic Gold Deposits. Earth Sci. 2019, 44, 2155–2186, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, N.; Yang, L.-Q.; Groves, D.I.; Li, H.-X.; Yin, C. Tectonic and district to deposit-scale structural controls on the Ge’erke orogenic gold deposit within the Dashui-Zhongqu district, West Qinling belt, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 120, 103436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the West Qinling Orogen, showing the distribution of major crustal blocks, fault systems, and Mesozoic granitoids [16]. CCO, Central China Orogen; M, Mianlue; NCB, North China Block; SCB, South China Block; SCS, South China Sea; TLF, Tancheng–Lujiang Fault. (a): Tectonic overviews showing the position of West Qinling Orogen. (b): Schematic map showing the tectonic setting and distribution of gold deposits in West Qinling.
Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the West Qinling Orogen, showing the distribution of major crustal blocks, fault systems, and Mesozoic granitoids [16]. CCO, Central China Orogen; M, Mianlue; NCB, North China Block; SCB, South China Block; SCS, South China Sea; TLF, Tancheng–Lujiang Fault. (a): Tectonic overviews showing the position of West Qinling Orogen. (b): Schematic map showing the tectonic setting and distribution of gold deposits in West Qinling.
Minerals 13 00718 g001
Figure 2. Simplified regional geology and deposit geology of the Yangshan gold belt (modified according to [7]).
Figure 2. Simplified regional geology and deposit geology of the Yangshan gold belt (modified according to [7]).
Minerals 13 00718 g002
Figure 3. Granite dyke outcrops, dyke specimens, and mineralization photographs in the Yangshan gold belt. (a) a fine grained granitic dyke (b) intruded into a medium-coarse-grained tonalite porphyry dyke (c), field photo, Tangbugou, Nishan ore section; (b) a fine-grained granitoid dyke, with greenish joint development, no mineralization, Tangbugou, Nishan ore block; (c) a tonalite porphyry dyke with plagioclase phenocrysts, about 2–2 mm in size, the main components being plagioclase, quartz, a small number of dark minerals, no mineralization, Tangbugou, Nishan ore section; (d) a fine-grained granitoid dyke, pale gray-green, with biotite grains, the sizes of which are about 2–2 mm, distributed in the fine-grained matrix, Sancai Mining Company, Getiaowan ore section; (e) a granite porphyry dyke, no obvious phenocryst, sericite, silicification and alteration developed, see sparse disseminated fine-grained pyrite, arsenopyrite, some particles are large, crack development, drill hole ZK4501, Gaoloushan ore section; (f) a granite porphyry dyke with a small amount of plagioclase phenocrysts, about 1.5–1.5 mm, sericitization and silicification developed, and stellated pyrite particles can be seen, with a size of 0.5–0.5 mm; (g) a tonalite porphyry dyke with a significant number of plagioclase phenocrysts, about 2–2 mm in size, showing signs of sericitization and silicification with stellated pyrite grains of about 0.5–0.5 mm in size, was found in drill-core ZK4501 of the Gaoloushan ore section; (h) a tonalite porphyry dyke with stellated pyrite mineralization, yellow-white and cube and pentagonal dodecahedron with idiomorphic and hypidiomorphic appearance, containing particles about 0.05 mm in size, was observed in drill hole ZK4501 of Gaoloushan ore zone; (i) a granite porphyry dyke with stibnite vein distribution along with fracture quartz veinlets, measuring 3 mm wide and 10 cm long, and with pyrite and arsenopyrite mineralization with star-like distribution was observed at No. 311 vein of Anba ore section at Mingjindong; (j) a highly silicified and sericitized granite porphyry dyke with pyrite grains with stellated distribution, measuring about 1.5–1.5 mm and being idiomorphic and hypidiomorphic, showing pentagonal octahedron appearance, was found at No. 311 vein of Anba ore body in Mingjindong; (k) a gold mineralized granite porphyry dyke in which the gold is mainly distributed in the quartz veinlets, measuring about 0.01 mm to 0.1 mm in size, showing golden luster and associated with stibnite was observed at No. 311 vein of Anba ore section in Mingjindong; (l) a granite porphyry dyke containing stibnite mineralization, having a smoky gray color, distributed in quartz dykes in a long strip about 0.1–0.3 mm in size, was found in No. 311 vein of Anba ore section in Mingjindong. Pl—plagioclase; Qtz—quartz; Bt—biotite; Stn—stibnite; Py—pyrite; Au—gold.
Figure 3. Granite dyke outcrops, dyke specimens, and mineralization photographs in the Yangshan gold belt. (a) a fine grained granitic dyke (b) intruded into a medium-coarse-grained tonalite porphyry dyke (c), field photo, Tangbugou, Nishan ore section; (b) a fine-grained granitoid dyke, with greenish joint development, no mineralization, Tangbugou, Nishan ore block; (c) a tonalite porphyry dyke with plagioclase phenocrysts, about 2–2 mm in size, the main components being plagioclase, quartz, a small number of dark minerals, no mineralization, Tangbugou, Nishan ore section; (d) a fine-grained granitoid dyke, pale gray-green, with biotite grains, the sizes of which are about 2–2 mm, distributed in the fine-grained matrix, Sancai Mining Company, Getiaowan ore section; (e) a granite porphyry dyke, no obvious phenocryst, sericite, silicification and alteration developed, see sparse disseminated fine-grained pyrite, arsenopyrite, some particles are large, crack development, drill hole ZK4501, Gaoloushan ore section; (f) a granite porphyry dyke with a small amount of plagioclase phenocrysts, about 1.5–1.5 mm, sericitization and silicification developed, and stellated pyrite particles can be seen, with a size of 0.5–0.5 mm; (g) a tonalite porphyry dyke with a significant number of plagioclase phenocrysts, about 2–2 mm in size, showing signs of sericitization and silicification with stellated pyrite grains of about 0.5–0.5 mm in size, was found in drill-core ZK4501 of the Gaoloushan ore section; (h) a tonalite porphyry dyke with stellated pyrite mineralization, yellow-white and cube and pentagonal dodecahedron with idiomorphic and hypidiomorphic appearance, containing particles about 0.05 mm in size, was observed in drill hole ZK4501 of Gaoloushan ore zone; (i) a granite porphyry dyke with stibnite vein distribution along with fracture quartz veinlets, measuring 3 mm wide and 10 cm long, and with pyrite and arsenopyrite mineralization with star-like distribution was observed at No. 311 vein of Anba ore section at Mingjindong; (j) a highly silicified and sericitized granite porphyry dyke with pyrite grains with stellated distribution, measuring about 1.5–1.5 mm and being idiomorphic and hypidiomorphic, showing pentagonal octahedron appearance, was found at No. 311 vein of Anba ore body in Mingjindong; (k) a gold mineralized granite porphyry dyke in which the gold is mainly distributed in the quartz veinlets, measuring about 0.01 mm to 0.1 mm in size, showing golden luster and associated with stibnite was observed at No. 311 vein of Anba ore section in Mingjindong; (l) a granite porphyry dyke containing stibnite mineralization, having a smoky gray color, distributed in quartz dykes in a long strip about 0.1–0.3 mm in size, was found in No. 311 vein of Anba ore section in Mingjindong. Pl—plagioclase; Qtz—quartz; Bt—biotite; Stn—stibnite; Py—pyrite; Au—gold.
Minerals 13 00718 g003
Figure 4. Petrographic microphotographs of granite dykes. Samples include: (a) 21SCKY03, a fine-grained dyke composed of granite with small quantities of plagioclase phenocrystal, quartz, and carbonate, showing visible arsenopyrite mineralization under crossed polarizers; (b) TC2101-04, a granite porphyry containing quartz porphyry and biotite, visible under parallel polarizers; (c) feldspar, quartz, biotite porphyry in ZK6901 granite-porphyry, visible under crossed polarizers; (d) calcite vein in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01, visible under crossed polarizers; (e) feldspar porphyry in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01 replaced by argillite, visible under crossed polarizers; (f) feldspar and carbonate porphyry in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01, visible under parallel polarizers; (g) feldspar porphyry in granite porphyry ZK6903-02 replaced by clay minerals, visible under parallel polarizers; (h) apatite in granite porphyry TC2101-04, visible under crossed polarizers; (i) quartz porphyry in granite porphyry TC2101-04, visible under crossed polarizers. The abbreviations used for minerals are Pl—feldspar, Qtz—quartz, Mus—muscovite, Cal—calcite, Bt—biotite, Apa—apatite.
Figure 4. Petrographic microphotographs of granite dykes. Samples include: (a) 21SCKY03, a fine-grained dyke composed of granite with small quantities of plagioclase phenocrystal, quartz, and carbonate, showing visible arsenopyrite mineralization under crossed polarizers; (b) TC2101-04, a granite porphyry containing quartz porphyry and biotite, visible under parallel polarizers; (c) feldspar, quartz, biotite porphyry in ZK6901 granite-porphyry, visible under crossed polarizers; (d) calcite vein in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01, visible under crossed polarizers; (e) feldspar porphyry in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01 replaced by argillite, visible under crossed polarizers; (f) feldspar and carbonate porphyry in granite-porphyry ZK6903-01, visible under parallel polarizers; (g) feldspar porphyry in granite porphyry ZK6903-02 replaced by clay minerals, visible under parallel polarizers; (h) apatite in granite porphyry TC2101-04, visible under crossed polarizers; (i) quartz porphyry in granite porphyry TC2101-04, visible under crossed polarizers. The abbreviations used for minerals are Pl—feldspar, Qtz—quartz, Mus—muscovite, Cal—calcite, Bt—biotite, Apa—apatite.
Minerals 13 00718 g004
Figure 5. Zircon crystal morphology, U-Pb ages, εHf (t) values (ad); concordia diagrams (eh).
Figure 5. Zircon crystal morphology, U-Pb ages, εHf (t) values (ad); concordia diagrams (eh).
Minerals 13 00718 g005
Figure 6. (Na2O + K2O) vs. SiO2 (a), after Middlemost, 1994) [34]; K2O vs. SiO2 (b), after Rollinson, 1993) [35]; A/CNK vs. A/NK (c), [36]). (a), Ir: Irvine boundary, with alkaline above and subalkaline below. 1—olivine gabbro; 2a—syenogabbro; 2b—gabbro; 3—gabbro–diorite; 4—diorite; 5—granodiorite; 6—granite; 8—alkali–gabbro; 9—alkali–gabbroicdiorite; 10—syenodiorite; 11—quartz monzonite; 12—syenite; 13—feldspathoid gabbro; 14—feldspathoid monzonite diorite; 15—feldspathoid monzonitic syenite; 16—feldspathoid syenite; 17—foidite pluton; 18—leucite rock.
Figure 6. (Na2O + K2O) vs. SiO2 (a), after Middlemost, 1994) [34]; K2O vs. SiO2 (b), after Rollinson, 1993) [35]; A/CNK vs. A/NK (c), [36]). (a), Ir: Irvine boundary, with alkaline above and subalkaline below. 1—olivine gabbro; 2a—syenogabbro; 2b—gabbro; 3—gabbro–diorite; 4—diorite; 5—granodiorite; 6—granite; 8—alkali–gabbro; 9—alkali–gabbroicdiorite; 10—syenodiorite; 11—quartz monzonite; 12—syenite; 13—feldspathoid gabbro; 14—feldspathoid monzonite diorite; 15—feldspathoid monzonitic syenite; 16—feldspathoid syenite; 17—foidite pluton; 18—leucite rock.
Minerals 13 00718 g006
Figure 7. (a) Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns, (b) Primitive mantle–normalized spider diagram (chondrite(C1); primary mantle data is taken from Sun et al. (1989) [37], continental crust, upper crust, lower crust data is taken from Taylor et al. (1985) [38]).
Figure 7. (a) Chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns, (b) Primitive mantle–normalized spider diagram (chondrite(C1); primary mantle data is taken from Sun et al. (1989) [37], continental crust, upper crust, lower crust data is taken from Taylor et al. (1985) [38]).
Minerals 13 00718 g007
Figure 8. (a) a frequency diagram of εHf (t); (b), the Zircon U-Pb ages versus εHf (t) values.
Figure 8. (a) a frequency diagram of εHf (t); (b), the Zircon U-Pb ages versus εHf (t) values.
Minerals 13 00718 g008
Figure 10. Harker diagrams of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt (refer to Figure 9 for legend).
Figure 10. Harker diagrams of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt (refer to Figure 9 for legend).
Minerals 13 00718 g010
Figure 11. Illustration of tectonic setting of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt. ((a) according to Whalen et al., 2019 [51]; (b) according to Pearce et al., 1984 [52]). Abbreviations: WPG, within plate granite; syn-COLG, syn-collision granite; VAG, volcanic arc granite; ORG, ocean ridge granite.
Figure 11. Illustration of tectonic setting of granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt. ((a) according to Whalen et al., 2019 [51]; (b) according to Pearce et al., 1984 [52]). Abbreviations: WPG, within plate granite; syn-COLG, syn-collision granite; VAG, volcanic arc granite; ORG, ocean ridge granite.
Minerals 13 00718 g011
Figure 12. Schematic cartoon of the tectonic-magmatic evolution from 235 to 190 Ma in the Yangshan gold belt (modified according to [50]). (a) the subduction of the Mianlue Ocean that lasted from ~235–220 Ma; (b) the collision between the Yangtze Plate and the Qinling microplates from ~220–210 Ma;(c) the post-collision continental extension from ~210–200 or 190 Ma. NQB—North Qinling Blet, SQB—South Qinling Blet, NCB—North China Block, SCLM—Subcontinent lithospheric mantle.
Figure 12. Schematic cartoon of the tectonic-magmatic evolution from 235 to 190 Ma in the Yangshan gold belt (modified according to [50]). (a) the subduction of the Mianlue Ocean that lasted from ~235–220 Ma; (b) the collision between the Yangtze Plate and the Qinling microplates from ~220–210 Ma;(c) the post-collision continental extension from ~210–200 or 190 Ma. NQB—North Qinling Blet, SQB—South Qinling Blet, NCB—North China Block, SCLM—Subcontinent lithospheric mantle.
Minerals 13 00718 g012
Table 1. Geological characteristics of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt [8].
Table 1. Geological characteristics of granitic dykes in the Yangshan gold belt [8].
Rock NameDistribution RangeScaleBrief DescriptionPetrographic Characteristics
Tonalite porphyry dykesThe most widespread, from Lianhe Village to Tangbugou to Zhangjiashan.Usually a few meters to tens of meters wide, tens to hundreds of meters long.The dykes are mostly intruded ininto Devonian and Triassic lithologies, often along or obliquely across the strata, and mostly in or near the fault zone. Multiple dykes often form a complex vein zone that has an intrusive contact relationship with the surrounding rock. The surrounding rock has often been experienced pyrometamorphism and contact metamorphism, the size of mineral particles in the dykes from coarse to fine., and local dykes have weak schistosity.The tonalite porphyry is grayish white to light flesh red, the phenocryst composition is mainly plagioclase, their shape is elongated to platy, the grain size is generally 0.5–2 mm, about 45%; quartz, with grain size of 0. 5–1 mm, about 30%, and recrystallization; potassium feldspar, about 10%; dark minerals such as biotite and amphibole are mostly altered to sericite. The accessory minerals include magnetite, zircon, apatite, etc.
Quartz mica porphyry dykesSouth of Gaojia Mountain, Guanyin Dam, Getiaowan and other places.Small, with a width of one or two meters and a length of several meters to tens of meters.The dykes intrude into Devonian strata controlled by fault zones and distributed in or near fault zones.The rocks are porphyritic, and the phenocrysts are biotite and quartz, which make up 5–10% of the total. Matrix particles are relatively small. Under the microscope, it is mainly plagioclase, potassium feldspar and quartz.
Granite porphyry dykesLianhe Village, Shiji Dam and other places.Small, about 10 m wide and several meters to hundreds of meters long.The dykes are mainly in Carboniferous and Triassic strata, and locally the Devonian strata of the Sanhekou Group can be seen.The fresh surface of the rock is grayish white, and the weathered surface is yellow-red brown, with granitic porphyritic structure. Feldspar phenocrysts, about 5%, with a grain size of 0.15–0.5 mm, and a few up to 2 mm, mainly plagioclase; quartz phenocrysts, about 4%, the dissolution is rounded, with wavy extinction, a small amount of muscovite phenocrysts; the matrix is felsic, mainly quartz, and less feldspar.
Fine-grained granite dykesGuojiapo, Tangbugou, Getiaowan and other places.The width is less than two meters and the length is less than two hundred meters.It is often associated with the tonalite porphyry dykes, intruding or cutting through the tonalite porphyry dykes, and forming a contact metamorphism.The rock is bright green, the mineral composition is mainly plagioclase with elongated or platy shapes, the grain size is generally 0.2–0.5 mm, about 35%; quartz, with grain size of 0.2–0.5 mm, about 35%, and recrystallization; the content of potassium feldspar is less, about 20%; dark minerals are mostly altered to sericite, and the false appearance of these dark minerals can be seen locally. The accessory minerals include magnetite, zircon, apatite, etc.
Table 2. Previous results of dating granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Table 2. Previous results of dating granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
PeriodTesting Method and AgeRock TypeProbable Geological SignificanceReferences
Late Indosinian periodZircon U-Pb age (224.5~207 Ma)Tonalite porphyry, fine-grained granite, quartz porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[8]
Monazite U-Th-Pb age (220 ± 3 Ma)Tonalite porphyry dykesThe upper limit of crystallization age[17]
K-Ar age (196~174 Ma)Intermediate-acid dykesThe crystallization age[3]
K-Ar age (209~171 Ma)Tonalite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[4]
Rb-Sr Isochron age (199.28 ± 42.79 Ma)Granite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[20]
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age (217~211 Ma)Granite dykesThe crystallization age[9]
Muscovite 40Ar-39 Ar Plateau age (220.4~211.1 Ma)Granite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[10]
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age (202~190 Ma)Granite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age (215.3~210.8 Ma)Granite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[21]
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age (216.5~214.8 Ma)Tonalite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[22]
Yanshan periodZircon U-Pb age (114.6~118.1 Ma)Fine-grained tonalite dykesThe crystallization age[15]
Zircon in quartz veinlets U-Pb age (195.4~200.9 Ma)Captureing zircons from late Triassic and early Jurassic tonalite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[5]
Zircon in quartz veinlets U-Pb age
(126.9 ± 3.2 Ma)
Capturing zircons from Cretaceous concealed magmatic rockThe crystallization age[5]
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age
(177.7 ± 2.9 Ma)
Tonalite porphyry dykesThe crystallization age[22]
Himalayan periodZircon in quartz veinlets U-Pb age
(51.2 ± 1.3 Ma)
Capturing zircons from the Tertiary concealed magmatic rockThe crystallization age[5]
Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age
(49.5 ± 1.8 Ma)
Fine-grained tonalite dykesThe crystallization age[22]
Table 3. Sampling localities and description of samples investigated in this study.
Table 3. Sampling localities and description of samples investigated in this study.
Ore BlockSampling LocationSample NumberField NamingSample Description
ZhangjiashanN: 33.080592°
E: 104.782187°
H = 1829.68 m
21ZJS01Granite porphyry dykesPyrite mineralization and minor alteration
GuanyinbaN: 33°3′21″
E: 104°38′44″
H = 1273.8 m
TC2101Granite porphyry dykesGranite porphyry dykes, relatively fresh, no obvious alteration, gray-green, joint development of multiple groups
AnbaN: 33°3′14″
E: 104°38′44″
H = 1735.9 m
311-8-1Granite porphyry dykesPyrite mineralization, arsenopyrite mineralization, quartz vein gold mineralization
AnbaN: 33°3′14″
E: 104°38′44″
H = 1735.9 m
311-8-6Granite porphyry dykesPyrite mineralization, arsenopyrite mineralization, quartz vein gold mineralization
Anba ZK1798-1Granite porphyry dykesPyritization, almost unchanged
GetiaowanN: 33°3′29″
E: 104°37′28″
H = 1126.6 m
21SCKY01Fine-grained dykesCoarse mica flake and pyrite mineralization were observed, but no obvious alteration was observed
NishanN: 33°3′35″
E: 104°37′8″
H = 1266.5 m
21PZB01Granite porphyry dykesMedium-coarse grained granite porphyry, large-grained pyrite
N: 33°3′28″
E: 104°38′25″
H = 1673.3 m
21NS01Granite porphyry dykesMedium-coarse grained granite porphyry, plagioclase porphyry, no mineralogical alteration
GuojiapoN: 33°1′27″
E: 104°29′35″
H = 1535.8 m
BS2101Granite porphyry dykesThe medium-coarse grained granite dyke was intruded by fine-grained granite
XiguanN: 33°3′46″
E: 104°26′49″
H = 1273.8 m
XG2101Granite porphyry dykesThe granite porphyry dykes were more broken and strongly altered, and no mineralization was observed
Table 4. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb age of the Yangshan gold belt.
Table 4. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb age of the Yangshan gold belt.
Sample No.LithologyAge (Ma)Geological Significance
21BS-001Medium-coarse grained granite dyke786.74 ± 3.68 Ma (n = 18/18) MSWD = 27.0, p(x2) = 0Inherited zircon age
21NS01Medium-coarse grained plagioclase granite porphyry dyke771.71 ± 3.68 Ma (n = 14/14) MSWD = 18.7, p(x2) = 0Inherited zircon age
21PZB01Medium-coarse grained plagioclase granite porphyry dyke213.1 ± 1.6 Ma (n = 15/15) MSWD = 0.2, p(x2) = 1.0Crystallization age of granite dykes
21XG01Medium-coarse grained granite dyke801.97 ± 4.73 Ma (n = 10/11) MSWD = 6.32, p(x2) = 0.0000000053Inherited zircon age
21ZJS01Medium-coarse grained granite vein210.49 ± 1.50 Ma (n = 8/8) MSWD = 1.34, p(x2) = 0.23Crystallization age of granite dykes
311-8-1Granite porphyry dykes213.3 ± 7 Ma (n = 2/2)Crystallization age of granite dykes
311-8-6Granite porphyry dykes749.89 ± 4.86 Ma (n = 11/11) MSWD = 49.6, p(x2) = 0Inherited zircon age
TC2101-02Granite porphyry dykes206.7 ± 2.8 Ma (n = 3/3) MSWD = 14, p(x2) = 0.000001Crystallization age of granite dykes
ZK1798-1Fine-grained granitic dykes201.02 ± 0.83 Ma (n = 25/25) MSWD = 24.9, p(x2) = 0Crystallization age of granite dykes
Table 5. Results of dating granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
Table 5. Results of dating granite dykes in the Yangshan gold belt.
NoLithologySample NoSampling LocationAge (Ma)Analytical MethodLiterature
1Granite porphyryLPD1Lianhecun217.82.8SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb[8]
2Granite porphyryLCK2Lianhecun212.73.4SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
3Fine-grained dykesGCK1Guojiapo209.96.4SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
4Plagioclase granite porphyryH01Anba215.93.1SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
5Plagioclase granite porphyryTC439Anba115.81.6SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
6Quartz porphyryZK2596Anba209.61.6SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
7Plagioclase granite porphyryN2Nishan2073SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
8Granite porphyryC01Gaojiashan211.11.8Muscovite 40Ar-39Ar[10]
9Granite porphyry14Y92Gaojiashan220.41.5Muscovite 40Ar-39Ar
10Granite porphyryAB01Puzhiba213.40.7LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb[21]
11Granite porphyryGTW02Puzhiba215.32.3LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
12Granite porphyryAB02Puzhiba210.84LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
13Granite porphyryGTW01Puzhiba213.30.6LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
14Granite porphyry21PZB-1Puzhiba213.10.7LA-ICPMS Zircon U-PbThis article
15Granite porphyry21ZJS01Puzhiba210.4976LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
16Ore-bearing quartz dykesPD4-1Anba190.82.440Ar-39Ar Isochron age[6]
17Ore-bearing quartz dykesYMAnba195.5–200.9 SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb
126.93.2
51.21.3
18Tonalite porphyry dykes19GTW002Getiaowan216.52.4LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb[22]
19Tonalite porphyry dykes19GTW003Getiaowan214.81.2LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
20Fine-grained dykes19GTW001Getiaowan (YM621)177.81.5LA-ICPMS Zircon U-Pb
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Z.; Li, J.; Xiong, T.; Huang, Y.; Lamu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, W. Petrogenesis of the Granitic Dykes in the Yangshan Gold Belt: Insights from Zircon U-Pb Chronology, Petrography, and In-Situ Hf Isotope Analysis. Minerals 2023, 13, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060718

AMA Style

Yang Z, Li J, Xiong T, Huang Y, Lamu C, Zhao Y, Wei W. Petrogenesis of the Granitic Dykes in the Yangshan Gold Belt: Insights from Zircon U-Pb Chronology, Petrography, and In-Situ Hf Isotope Analysis. Minerals. 2023; 13(6):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Zhonghu, Jianzhong Li, Tao Xiong, Yong Huang, Ciren Lamu, Yang Zhao, and Wei Wei. 2023. "Petrogenesis of the Granitic Dykes in the Yangshan Gold Belt: Insights from Zircon U-Pb Chronology, Petrography, and In-Situ Hf Isotope Analysis" Minerals 13, no. 6: 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop