Investigation of Dealumination in Phosphate-Based Geopolymer Formation Process: Factor Screening and Optimization
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Manuscript Number: minerals-1877088
Title: Screening and optimization of factors influencing dealumination process during phosphate based geopolymers formation, using Plackett–Burman and central composite designs
Reviewer’s comments:
This manuscript is a meaningful and interesting topic. The logical writing structure and rich test results are eye-catching. By using Plackett–Burman and central composite designs, the authors achieve two objectives: the first one is presented in screening the last different factors that can influence dealumination process in phosphate based geopolymers composite formation. The second one is the optimization of the significant factors to determine the optimum values of each factor. However, there are still several improvements as follows.
(1) Line 6-10, if affiliations of three authors are identical, please list one.
(2) Line 26, “P/Al molar ratio = 2.0 curing temperature ≈ 70 °C and curing time = 4.76 h.”, missing comma. Please correct into “P/Al molar ratio = 2.0, curing temperature ≈ 70 °C, and curing time = 4.76 h.”
(3) Line 34, “It ‘is” should be corrected into “It is”.
(4) In the Abstract, please add the content about experimental method.
(5) Line 84, the subtitle “2.1. Materials and preparation” is unable to cover related content due to the presence of characterization method.
(6) All equations need to be indicated in the text with the relevant serial numbers. Such as: “Equation (1),…, Equation (5), Equation (6), Equation (7)”. Also, please unify the expressions, such as: Eq.2, Equation 2, or Equation (2)?.
(7) In all Equations and contexts, the variables are italicized.
(8) Line 252, there are no high pixels for Figure 4. Please redraw the figure.
(9) Another, Line 2-4, the title needs to be concise and condensed.
Author Response
Please see the attachement
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
In this study, phosphate based geopolymers obtained from two aluminosilicate precursors with different mineralogical composition are investigated. Nine factors influencing geoplymer was explored using P-B design, the research is interesting, and it is recommended to be accepted after minor revision.
1. In the introduction, some of the latest literatures on phosphoric acid-base geopolymer should be cited to replace some old references. Please see, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123947
2. The contents of section 3.1 should be placed in the part of test materials, which is the basic materials and not the test results,
Author Response
Please see the attachement.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
-We live now in a climate emergency so its most strange that the authors have not start the paper by mentioning exactly that. It seems that they are not aware about the words of a Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford authored a paper where one can read the following:
“Let’s get this on the table right away, without mincing words. With regard to the climate crisis, yes, it’s time to panic”
Pierrehumbert, R., 2019. There is no Plan B for dealing with the climate crisis. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, pp.1-7.
So please start the introduction by draw a connection between environmental degradation and resource efficiency.
-The reference list has an unacceptable percentage of self-citations
- The literature review must be improved by citing important papers published in the field and not publications like the one by Davidovits that has no research record on phosphate based geopolymers. Check the following publications:
Wang, Y. S., Dai, J. G., Ding, Z., & Xu, W. T. (2017). Phosphate-based geopolymer: Formation mechanism and thermal stability. Materials Letters, 190, 209-212.
Dong, T., Xie, S., Wang, J., Chen, Z., & Liu, Q. (2020). Properties and characterization of a metakaolin phosphate acid–based geopolymer synthesized in a humid environment. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 56(1), 175-184.
Djobo, J. N. Y., & Stephan, D. (2022). The reaction of calcium during the formation of metakaolin phosphate geopolymer binder. Cement and Concrete Research, 106840.
- Page 2 line 80 “in the obtained biomaterials (geo-polymers)”
Comment: Why do authors claim that geopolymers are biomaterials ?
Author Response
Please see the attachement.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
The revised paper can be accepted