Research on Mechanisms of Improving Flotation Selectivity of Coal Slime by Adding Sodium Polyphosphate
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Material and Reagents
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Flotation Kinetics Experiments
2.2.2. Particle Size Measurements
2.2.3. SEM-EDS Analysis
2.2.4. AFM Interaction Force Measurements
2.2.5. TOC Measurements
2.2.6. Contact Angle Measurements
2.2.7. XPS Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Flotation Test Results
3.2. Dispersion Behavior of High-Ash Fine Slime
3.2.1. Laser Particle Size Analysis
3.2.2. SEM-EDS Analysis Results
3.2.3. Interaction Force between Hydrophilic Particles with SPP
3.3. Effect of Depressants on the Adsorption of Collector
3.3.1. Adsorption Capacity of the Collector
3.3.2. XPS Analysis Results
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- SPP had a negligible effect on combustible recovery, but it could significantly reduce the ash content of clean coal and improve the quality of clean coal. Compared with the test results of the blank group without SPP depressant, adding 1000 g/t SPP could decrease the ash content of clean coal by 2.39%, while combustible recovery decreased by only 0.8%.
- (2)
- SPP changed the electrical properties of gangue particles and facilitated their dispersion in pulp under a strong repulsive force. The coverage of high-ash fine slime on the surface of coarse coal was significantly reduced.
- (3)
- Active sites on the surface of gangue particles were preferentially adsorbed by SPP, which decreased the possibility of gangue particles being absorbed on coal. The reduction in the cover of the coal grain surface and an increase in the hydrophobic sites on the coal surface also contributed to an improved flotation performance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Z. Electrokinetic study of clay interactions with coal in flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2003, 68, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Xia, W. The Deashing of High-ash Coking Coal Fines by Flotation. Energy Sources Part A 2015, 37, 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, C.; Bu, X.; Xia, W.; Peng, Y.; Xie, G. Effect of slimes on the flotation recovery and kinetics of coal particles. Fuel 2018, 220, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubinstein, Y.; Linev, B.I.; Samoylova, E. Trends in Fine Coal Slimes Flotation. Mater. Sci. 2006, 4, 729–734. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X. Influence analysis of high ash fine mud on flotation cleaned coal quality. Coal Process. Compr. Util. 2017, 3, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Z.; Yin, W.; Yang, B.; Fu, Y.; Xue, J. Reduction of the slime contamination on fine coking coal by using the reverse-and-direct flotation process. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 579, 123681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, S.; Ma, L.; Huang, G.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Yan, D. Mechanism of the effect of fine coal with different densities on coarse coal flotation. J. China Coal Soc. 2016, 41, 1813–1819. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Wang, W. Review of Reducing Entrainment of High Ash Fine Slime to Concentrate in Flotation Process. DEStech Trans. Environ. Energy Earth Sci. 2017, 215, 6557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pawlik, M. Polymeric dispersants for coal–water slurries. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 266, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Liang, L.; Xie, G.; Peng, Y. The role of polyvinylpyrrolidone in the selective separation of coal from quartz and kaolinite minerals. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 626, 126948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Xu, D.; Chen, h.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, S. Influence of silicate on high-ash coal slime flotation. China Coal 2017, 43, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Hu, S.; Li, J.; Weng, L.; Wu, C.; Liu, K. Improvement on combustible matter recovery in coal slime flotation with the addition of sodium silicate. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 603, 125220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Song, S.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Ai, G. Elimination of the adverse effect of calcite slimes on the sulfidization flotation of malachite in the presence of water glass. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 563, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Jiao, F.; Qin, W.; Liu, W. Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite using xanthan gum as depressant. Miner. Eng. 2019, 138, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Laskowski, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, D. Synergistic effect of mineral surface constituents in dextrin adsorption. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1994, 42, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, X.; Evans, G.; Xie, G.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ni, C.; Ge, L. Removal of fine quartz from coal-series kaolin by flotation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 143, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firth, B.; Nicol, S. The influence of humic materials on the flotation of coal. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1981, 8, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.; Hobert, A. Fundamentals and Applications of Green Modifiers for Froth Flotation. Min. Met. Explor. 2022, 39, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, Z.; Cui, H. Influences of sodium hexametaphosphate on interactions of coal and clay particles in flotation. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2016, 1, 269–276. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y. Influences of phosphates on dispersion of fine alumin-silicate minerals. J. Cent. South Univ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 38, 238–244. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y. Research on test of scattered selective desliming of collophanite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2018, 47, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, W.; Guo, K.; Li, Z.; Pan, M. Effect of inorganic phosphate on flotation of high-ash coal slime. Coal Technol. 2016, 35, 310–313. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Y.; Ruan, C.; Zheng, H. Solution Chemistry Study of Salt-type Mineral Flotation Systems: Role of Inorganic Dispersants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; He, G.; Abudukade, D.; Li, K.; Guo, T.; Li, S.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, J.; Nie, S. Selective inhibition of sodium tripolyphosphate on calcite in the process of magnesite flotation. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 345, 117412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Hu, Y.; Sun, W.; Gao, Z.; Liu, R. Utilization of Sodium Hexametaphosphate for Separating Scheelite from Calcite and Fluorite Using an Anionic–Nonionic Collector. Minerals 2019, 9, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, D.; Edraki, M.; Berry, L. Investigating the settling behaviour of saline tailing suspensions using kaolinite, bentonite, and illite clay minerals. Powder Technol. 2018, 326, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drzymala, J. Evaluation and comparison of separation performance for varying feed composition and scattered separation results. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 75, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drzymala, J.; Ahmed, H.A.M. Mathematical equations for approximation of separation results using the Fuerstenau upgrading curves. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 76, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Gui, X.; Liu, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S. Flotation behavior of hard-to-separate and high-ash fine coal. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2016, 52, 703–717. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Lv, F.; Xia, Z.; Hao, X.; Wu, M. Comparison of Particle Size Distribution Measuring Results of Coal Slime between Laser Size Method and Sieving Method. China Powder Sci. Technol. 2014, 20, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Ji, Y.; Fan, L. Detection of graphene oxide particle size by laser particle size analyzer. Shaanxi Coal 2021, 40, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
- Xing, Y.; Xu, X.; Gui, X.; Cao, Y.; Xu, M. Effect of kaolinite and montmorillonite on fine coal flotation. Fuel 2017, 195, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Ren, H.; Yang, Z.; Liao, Y.; Wang, Y. Effect of mixing ratio on the adsorption behavior of low-rank coal surface using mixed collectors: Experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2021, 103, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Du, M.; Wang, S.; Liu, L. Determination of oxidation properties and flotation parameters of low-rank coal slimes. Powder Technol. 2019, 353, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Guo, F.; Xing, Y.; Gui, X. Interaction characteristics between diesel and coal with different hydrophilicity: Kinetic and force effects. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 232, 115958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, M.; Jin, W.; Cao, Y.; Gui, X. Role of DTAB and SDS in Bubble-Particle Attachment: AFM Force Measurement, Attachment Behaviour Visualization, and Contact Angle Study. Minerals 2018, 8, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Size (mm) | Weight (%) | Ash (%) | Cumulative Oversize | Cumulative Undersize | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight (%) | Ash (%) | Weight (%) | Ash (%) | |||
−0.500 + 0.250 | 0.37 | 6.57 | 0.37 | 6.57 | 100.00 | 25.30 |
−0.250 + 0.125 | 2.56 | 6.73 | 2.93 | 6.71 | 99.63 | 25.37 |
−0.125 + 0.074 | 11.74 | 8.54 | 14.67 | 8.17 | 97.07 | 25.86 |
−0.074 + 0.045 | 11.49 | 15.51 | 26.16 | 11.40 | 85.33 | 28.25 |
−0.045 | 73.84 | 30.23 | 100.00 | 25.30 | 73.84 | 30.23 |
Total | 100.00 | 25.30 |
Condition | D10 (μm) | D50 (μm) | D90 (μm) |
---|---|---|---|
None | 1.65 | 15.44 | 57.88 |
With SPP | 1.32 | 11.25 | 41.17 |
Sample | Name of Spectra | Element | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C (%) | O (%) | Al (%) | Si (%) | Ca (%) | ||
Raw coal | A | 82.71 | 13.14 | 0.59 | 0.44 | 0.19 |
B | 82.28 | 16.19 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 | |
C | 52.36 | 32.82 | 5.22 | 7.44 | 0.14 | |
D | 65.27 | 27.31 | 2.42 | 2.92 | 0 | |
E | 73.44 | 21.47 | 1.19 | 1.61 | 0.08 | |
F | 43.06 | 40.86 | 5.67 | 6.65 | 0.66 | |
Coal under the action of SPP | A | 83.69 | 12.45 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
B | 80.15 | 14.76 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.14 | |
C | 81.38 | 13.86 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.23 | |
D | 60.00 | 16.37 | 2.79 | 4.85 | 2.00 | |
E | 84.02 | 11.75 | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.11 | |
F | 79.40 | 9.83 | 1.20 | 0.46 | 0.42 |
Samples | C-C/C-H (%) | C-O (%) | C=O (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Raw coal-diesel oil | 66.93 | 25.79 | 7.28 |
Raw coal-diesel oil + SPP | 70.07 | 23.36 | 6.57 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; He, Q.; Xing, Y.; Bao, X.; Gui, X.; Wang, L. Research on Mechanisms of Improving Flotation Selectivity of Coal Slime by Adding Sodium Polyphosphate. Minerals 2022, 12, 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12111392
Wang Y, Zhou Y, He Q, Xing Y, Bao X, Gui X, Wang L. Research on Mechanisms of Improving Flotation Selectivity of Coal Slime by Adding Sodium Polyphosphate. Minerals. 2022; 12(11):1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12111392
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Yusai, Ying Zhou, Qi He, Yaowen Xing, Xicheng Bao, Xiahui Gui, and Lei Wang. 2022. "Research on Mechanisms of Improving Flotation Selectivity of Coal Slime by Adding Sodium Polyphosphate" Minerals 12, no. 11: 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12111392