Next Article in Journal
Zoisite-(Pb), a New Orthorhombic Epidote-Related Mineral from the Jakobsberg Mine, Värmland, Sweden, and Its Relationships with Hancockite
Next Article in Special Issue
Porphyry Copper: Revisiting Mineral Resource Assessment Predictions for the Andes
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of a Chromium-Bearing Carbon Steel Electric Arc Furnace Slag after Magnetic Separation to Determine the Potential for Iron and Chromium Recovery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rock-Forming (Biotite and Plagioclase) and Accessory (Zircon) Minerals Geochemistry as an Indicator of the Metal Fertility of Magmas by the Example of Au-Cu-Fe-Skarn Deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia

by
Yury O. Redin
1,
Anna A. Redina
1,*,
Viktor P. Mokrushnikov
1,
Alexandra V. Malyutina
1 and
Vladislav F. Dultsev
1,2
1
Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademika Koptyuga Avenue 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptuga Ave. 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(1), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010050
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 14 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 30 December 2021

Abstract

:
Many gold and gold-bearing complex deposits related to the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous magmatism are known in Eastern Transbaikalia. The largest deposits are the Lugokan, the Kultuma and the Bystrinsky. These deposits are in a paragenetic relationship with the Late Jurassic magmatic rocks of the Shakhtama complex. According to the available data, the total resources of gold in these three deposits are estimated to be approximately 443 tons: the Lugokan, Au~53 tons, Cu~302 thousand tons; the Kultuma, Au~121 tons, Cu~587 thousand tons, Fe~33 mln t; the Bystrinsky, Au~269 tons, Cu~2070 thousand tons, Fe~67 mln t. One of the main aims of this work was to reveal the criteria of fertility for the classical porphyry type, based on the specific geochemical features of rock-forming and accessory minerals. A comparison of the obtained results with other data on the large porphyry and skarn deposits of the world showed that the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky massif, specifically porphyry species dated 159.6–158.6 Ma, are potentially ore-bearing for the porphyry type mineralization. The magmatic rocks that widely occur at the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits are most close to the Fe-skarn deposits. The best indicators of the magma fertility for the porphyry rocks are Ce/Ce*, Eu/Eu*, Yb/Dy, (Ce/Nd)/Y in zircons. Thus, magmatic rocks characterized by Ce/Ce* > 100, Eu/Eu* > 0.4, Yb/Dy > 5.0 and (Ce/Nd)/Y > 0.01 may be classified as high fertile for the classical porphyry mineralization in Eastern Transbaikalia. The plagioclase and biotite chemistry data also showed that the magmatic rocks that occurred at the Bystrinsky deposit are the most fertile for the porphyry type mineralization. The magmatic rocks classified as ore-bearing porphyry type have Al* > 1 in plagioclase, high values of IV(F) and IV(F/Cl) and low ratios of X(F)/X(OH) in biotites. The assessment of the metal fertility of magmatic rocks is most effective in combination with data on both the composition of rock-forming and accessory minerals. The obtained data may be used to develop the methods of prediction and search for gold, copper and iron mineralization.

1. Introduction

Eastern Transbaikalia is the oldest gold region of Siberia and has remained the largest and most important gold source in Russia for more than 300 years. Many gold, complex gold, antimony, mercury and other deposits are known to be present within the boundaries of this region. Up to the present time, the deposits of great significance in resources and in gold mining have been the gold-sulfide-quartz deposits (the Darasun, Klyuchevsky, Itakinsky, Sredne-Golgotaysky, etc.) and gold-silver deposits (the Baley, Taseevo). Other genetics of gold deposits (gold-mercury in carbonate rocks, gold-sulfide in black shale, gold-sulfide-skarn, gold-copper-molybdenum-porphyry, etc.) have not received due appreciation yet and remain insufficiently studied with respect to geology and geochemistry, though some authors classify them as definite types [1]. During recent years, a significant increase in gold resources has been achieved due to the exploration and re-evaluation of gold-copper-iron-skarn deposits. The Au-Cu-Fe-skarn deposits occur mainly in the north-eastern and south-eastern parts of the Shilka-Argun interfluve. The largest deposits are the Bystrinsky, Kultuma and Lugokan. According to the available data, the total amount of gold in these three deposits is estimated at about 443 t: the Lugokan, Au~53 t, Cu~302 thousand t, the Kultuma, Au~121 t, Cu~587 thousand t, Fe~33 mln t; the Bystrinsky, Au~269 t, Cu~2070 thousand t, Fe~67 mln t [2]. Although the deposits had been studied for a long time by many researchers, the formation types of these deposits are discussible: some researchers consider these deposits as typical representatives of the skarn formation, while others relate them to the gold-copper-molybdenum-porphyry type or to the combined skarn-porphyry type.
Investigations aimed at the determination of the signs of fertility (ore-bearing potential) of the magmatic rocks producing porphyry deposits has been discussed in the international community in recent years. This area has been recognized worldwide and is abbreviated as PIMS (Porphyry indicator minerals). The major idea that forms the basis of this research area is in revelation and thorough investigation of the minerals that may be used for the search, determination and evaluation of the ore-bearing potential of porphyry systems. In a number of articles published within the recent decade, there are statistically justified data on the specific characteristics of definite minerals from ore-bearing rocks for different types of deposits. These minerals include zircon [3,4,5,6], plagioclase [7,8] and biotite [9,10]. One of the main aims of the present work is to establish the indicator features of rock-forming and accessory minerals, evaluating the metal fertility of hosting magmatic formations. The geochemical features of rock-forming and accessory minerals of magmatic rocks from large Fe-Cu-Au skarn deposits have been established for the first time over the representative set of data. These features demonstrated high efficiency in the determination of the fertile granitoids. Thus, obtained data may be used in the development of methods to predict and search for gold, copper and iron mineralization.

2. Geological Setting

The Au-Cu-Fe-skarn deposits are situated within the Aga-Borzinsky structural-formational zone of the Mongol-Okhotsk orogenic belt and are confined to the Gazimur regional tectonic zone (Figure 1). The Gazimur tectonic zone consists of a complicated system of conjugated faults of the smaller orders. With respect to the kinematics, the majority of the faults are overthrust and downcast structures. According to the data of previous investigations, the time of initiation for the main faults was Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous, corresponding to the collision and post-collision stages of the evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk orogenic belt [1]. The main features of the tectonic structure of the deposits studied are defined by a combination of widespread, folded and disjunctive deformations differing from each other in order and age. The ore-embedding rocks are Cambrian, Devonian terrigenous carbonate sediments and the Early Jurassic terrigenous sediments. The Bystrinsky, Kultuma and Lugokan massifs are composed mainly of monzonite, diorite, granodiorite and granodiorite-porphyries of the first and the second phases of the Shakhtama intrusive complex, as well as smaller bodies and dykes (quartz diorites, monzonites, quartz diorite porphyries, monzonite-, granosyenite- and granite-porphyries). Most of the endogenous deposits of nonferrous, rare and precious metals in Eastern Transbaikalia are considered by many researchers to be related to the magmatic rocks of the Shakhtama complex [1]. The formation of the magmatic rocks of the Shakhtama complex proceeded during Late Jurassic time within the interval of 161–155 Ma [11]. Petrographic and petrochemical studies of the rocks of the Shakhtama complex carried out either and demonstrated that these rocks are metaluminious, magnesian, high-potassic granitoids [12,13,14].

2.1. The Lugokan Deposit

The Lugokan deposit is confined to the similarly named massif of the Shakhtama complex. Host rocks are Lower Cambrian carbonate-terrigenous sediments (the Bystrinsky formation Є1bs). The deposit is situated at the intersection of differently-directed regional faults (the north-eastern Budyumkan and the northwestern Urivi-Dzhalir), which provided intense development of brittle deformations at the site. They occur as numerous zones of increased rock fracturing, breaking and brecciation. Mineralization is confined to skarns and, to a lesser extent, to carbonate rocks (subject to intense tectonic development), rarely to granodiorite-porphyries. The shapes of the ore bodies are blanket-, lens- and vein-like. Several types of ores are distinguished based on their mineral composition: magnetite (rather rare), scheelite-molybdenite (rare quartz veins in granodiorite-porphyries) and gold-sulfide (the most widespread type). Previous Ar-Ar studies showed that the formation of ore mineralization proceeded during the Late Jurassic time within the interval of 160–155 Ma; during the same time interval, the magmatic formations of the Shakhtama complex had widely occurred at the territory under investigation (the Ar-Ar age of biotite from granodiorite-porphyries of the Lugokan deposit is 154.7 ± 1.2 Ma) [14].
The Lugokan massif is composed mainly of granodiorite-porphyries of the second phase of the Shakhtama complex (Figure 2a,b). Most of the studied magmatic rocks have porphyry-like textures. Granodiorite-porphyries are represented by biotite and amphibole-biotite species. They contain disseminated plagioclase, quartz, biotite, amphibole and K-Na feldspar phenocrysts. The matrix contains quartz, K-Na feldspar, biotite and plagioclase. Accessory minerals are zircon, apatite; titanite and ilmenite are detected rather frequently, while magnetite occurs only rarely.

2.2. The Kultuma Deposit

The Kultuma deposit is confined to the similarly named massif of the Shakhtama complex, which breaks through the terrigenous carbonate sediments: Late Proterozoic (the Beletuy formation Vbl) and Lower Cambrian (the Bystrinsky (Є1bs) and Ernichenskaya (Є1-2er) formations). The main features of the tectonic structure of the deposit are determined by the combination of folds and faults of different scales and ages, which broadly occur within the deposit. The deposit is situated in the core part of the Kultuma-Ushumun anticline, which relates to the node of the intersection of the north-eastern Levo-Gazimur and north-western Bogdat-Boshagoch deep faults. Ore bodies at the Kultuma deposit have complicated shapes, bedded conformably with the anticlinal structures of the host terrigenous carbonate sediments. Ore bodies are represented by paste-like, vein-like and lens-like bodies. The major ore bodies are confined to skarns and located at different distances from the contact of magmatic rocks with the host terrigenous carbonate sediments. Several main ore types are distinguished on the basis of their mineral composition: magnetite, magnetite-sulfide, and sulfide.
The Kultuma massif forms a sill-like body, which is conformal with the layered and folded structure of the embedding frame. It is composed mainly of quartz monzodiorite-porphyries (Figure 2c,d) and monzodiotie-porphyries of the second phase of the Shakhtama complex. Most of the studied magmatic rocks have porphyritic-like textures. They are mainly represented by amphibole-biotite varieties. They contain disseminated phenocrysts represented by plagioclase, quartz, biotite, amphibole, rare pyroxene. The matrix contains plagioclase, quartz, K–Na feldspar, biotite and amphibole. Accessory minerals are apatite, titanite, zircon, and ilmenite, which occur rarely.

2.3. The Bystrinsky Deposit

This deposit is confined to the similarly named multiphase massif of the Shakhtama complex. Host rocks are Paleozoic carbonate terrigenous (the Bystrinsky (Є1bs) and Ildikan (D2il) formations) and Mesozoic terrigenous sediments (the Gosudarevsky formation, J1gs). A multistage system of folds and faults of different scales is expressed at the deposit as a series of extended (from north to south) long-living breaks and a complicated system of secondary faults of the smaller order. Ore bodies are confined to skarn at the contacts of intrusive rocks of the Shakhtama complex with terrigenous sedimentary rocks of the Ildikan and Bystrinsky formations. Most ore bodies are bedded subconformably with the contacts of intrusives. The shapes of the ore bodies are vein-, sheet- or lens-like. There are also thick (up to 10 m) quartz-carbonate veins, widespread in all terrigenous sediments that occur at the deposit, as well as among skarn and skarnified rocks. The thickness of ore bodies may vary from several meters to several ten meters. Several main ore types are distinguished based on their mineral composition: magnetite, magnetite-sulfide, and sulfide.
The Bystrinsky massif is composed of the large stock of the first phase (granodiorites, monzonites and diorites) and relatively small stock-like bodies of the second phase of the Shakhtama complex (granodiorite-, diorite-, monzonite-porphyries), with which the formation of ore mineralization is associated [17,18]. We studied both the magmatic rocks of the first phase those of the second phase of the Shakhtama complex. The rocks of the first phase include granodiorites (bs-8 sample), which are composed mainly of quartz, plagioclase, K-Na feldspar, and less frequently biotite (Figure 2e). Accessory minerals are apatite and zircon. The second phase includes monzonites, monzonite- and diorite-porphyries. In addition, a gradual transition from monzonite-porphyry (bs-2-109) to monzonites (bs-2-143.8) was detected within one borehole (bs-2) with an increase in the depth. Monzonites and monzonite-porphyries are represented by biotite and biotite-amphibole varieties. Monzonite-porphyries contain disseminated plagioclase, biotite, amphibole, and less frequently clinopyroxiene phenocrysts (Figure 2f). The matrix is composed of plagioclase, quartz, K-Na feldspar, biotite and amphibole. Monzonites are composed of plagioclase, quartz, K-Na feldspar, biotite, amphibole and less frequently clinopyroxene (Figure 2g). Accessory minerals are apatite, zircon, titanite, ilmenite, magnetite and rarely monazite. Diorite-porphyries are represented by biotite varieties and contain disseminated plagioclase, quartz, and biotite phenocrysts (Figure 2h). The matrix is composed of plagioclase, quartz, K-Na feldspar and biotite. Accessory minerals are apatite, zircon, magnetite and ilmenite. We determined the age (by means of LA-ICP-MS) of zircon grains from monzonites (bs-2-143.8) and monzonite-porphyries (bs-2-109). The weighted-average age 206Pb/238U of zircons from monzonites (Figure 3a) was determined as 158.65 ± 0.93 Ma (MSWD = 0.079, n = 10, sample bs-2-143.8). A close weighted-average age 206Pb/238U was also established for monzonite-porphyries: 159.6 ± 0.79 Ma (MSWD = 0.55, n = 14, sample bs-2-109), which is significant evidence to attribute monzonite and monzonite-porphyry to the same phase of intrusion.

3. Analytical Methods

For the analysis, plagioclase, biotite and zircon grains were selected from the author’s collection of samples. They were then placed in epoxy mountains. Spots suitable for analysis were selected from inclusion-free regions.
Mineral composition was determined using a J JEOL JXA-8100, CAMEBAX-Micro devices8100 (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Operating conditions were: 20 kV accelerating voltage, 15 nA beam current, and 10 s counting time.
The trace element composition of zircons was analyzed by laser-ablation mass spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma (LA-ICP-MS) on an Element XR (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a UV Nd:YAG New Wave Research UP 213 (New Wave Research, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) laser system. The cathodoluminescence images are received using the TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU JSM-6510LV (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) scanning electron microscope with the energy prefix from X-Max Oxford Instruments for microprobe analysis. The investigations were carried out at the Analytical Center for Multi-Elemental and Isotope Research Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science (Novosibirsk, Russia).

4. Results

4.1. Plagioclase Chemistry

Geochemical data are presented in Supplementary Table S1. We analyzed 321 plagioclase grains (Al2O3, K2O, Na2O, FeO, SiO2, MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO, TiO2); 38 analyses were then discarded for failing to cope with the requirements (the sum being 98 to 102 wt.%, while the sum of K2O + FeO < 1.2 wt.% [7]). Plagioclases from the Lugokan deposit are characterized by Si values ranging within 2.61–3.1 (apfu), Al 0.97–1.36, K 0.01–0.05, Na 0.61–0.94, Ca 0.06–0.51. Plagioclases from the Kultuma deposit have (apfu) Si values within the range of 2.64–2.95, Al 1.02–1.34, K 0.01–0.06, Na 0.54–0.98, Ca 0.02–0.36. Plagioclases from the Bystrinsky deposit have following values (apfu): for granodiorite Si 2.6–2.64, Al 1.32–1.37, K 0.00–0.016, Na 0.6–0.66, Ca 0.36–0.4; for diorite-porphyry Si 2.68–2.99, Al 1.01–1.33, K 0.00–0.05, Na 0.62–0.99, Ca 0.00–0.32; for monzonite Si 2.51–2.92, Al 1.09–1.48, K 0.00–0.03, Na 0.52–0.9, Ca 0.09–0.48; for monzonite-porphyry Si 2.65–2.95, Al 1.03–1.34, K 0.01–0.06, Na 0.62–0.97, Ca 0.02–0.34.
In all the studies plagioclases have contents of the anorthite component: plagioclases from the Lugokan deposit have An6-44 (average An28), from the Kultuma deposit—An2–35 (average An24) and from the Bystrinsky deposit—An35–39 (average An37) for granodiorite; An0–33 (average A25) for diorite-porphyry; An9–47 (average An34) for monzonite; An2–34 (average An26) for monzonite-porphyry. The extent of plagioclase alteration was evaluated using the discrimination chart in the coordinates of SiO2 versus CaO + Na2O + K2O wt.% [7]. The studied plagioclases fall between An and Ab. A few plagioclase samples from the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits display minor muscovite alteration (Figure 4).

4.2. Biotite Chemistry

Biotite chemistry can be used for deciphering the physicochemical attributes of the magmatic and hydrothermal components in the porphyry systems. In this regard, selected biotites from the Kultuma, Lugokan and Bystrinsky deposits were analyzed using EPMA, and thus obtained data are summarized in the Supplementary Table S2. A total of 657 electron microprobe analyses were performed on 28 samples; 179 of the analyses were discarded due to Total < 94 wt.%. Formula calculations for biotite were based on 22 oxygen atoms, and water contents were calculated by stoichiometry [19].
Biotites from the Lugokan deposit have values (apfu) Si 5.54–5.85, Al 2.26–2.48, FeOtotal 1.79–2.24, Ti 0.4–0.56, Mg 2.89–3.34, F 0.24–0.54. Biotites from the Kultuma deposit are characterized by following contents (apfu) for Si 5.42–5.92, Al 2.25-3.15, FeOtotal 1.59–2.32, Ti 0.25–0.55, Mg 2.72–3.46, F 0.14–0.87. Biotites from the Bystrinsky granodiorite have values (apfu) Si 5.26–5.34, Al 3.07–3.20, FeOtotal 3.32–3.49, Ti 0.33–0.39, Mg 1.44–1.55, F 0.09–0.2. For biotites from the Bystrinsky diorite-porphyry formula coefficients (apfu) are Si 5.62–5.72, Al 2.38–2.45, FeOtotal 1.59–1.77, Ti 0.35–0.47, Mg 3.5–3.77, F 0.13–0.27. Biotites from the Bystrinsky monzonite have values (apfu) Si 5.54–5.72, Al 2.38–2.57, FeOtotal 2.06–2.25, Ti 0.34–0.49, Mg 3–3.33, F 0.1–0.25. Biotites from the Bystrinsky monzonite-porphyry have values (apfu) Si 5.57–5.79, Al 2.36–2.56, FeOtotal 1.52–2.35, Ti 0.29–0.47, Mg 2.86–3.81, F 0.07–0.25.
The TiO2 × 10–FeOtotal + MnO–MgO ternary diagram is used to discriminate primary biotite from re-equilibrated and secondary biotite [20]. Plotting the samples of all deposits on this diagram shows that most of the biotite samples fall into (or nearby) the field of re-equilibrated biotite (Figure 5a). This means that the studied biotites kept their magmatic properties, and this makes it possible to study the physicochemical attribute of the porphyry system. Biotite compositions can reflect the composition of granitic magmas using MgO–FeO–Al2O3 ternary diagram [21]. The data for all biotites appear on the plot in the calc-alkaline orogenic field (Figure 5b).

4.3. Zircon Geochemistry

Zircon is a common accessory mineral of many magmatic rocks. Investigations of the geochemical composition of zircons produces very important information on the origin and features of parental magmas, as well as on the role of magma in the formation of ore deposits. In addition, zircon is a reliable indicator of the fertility of magmatic rocks [3,4,5,22,23,24,25,26,27].

4.3.1. The Lugokan Deposit

Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images
Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots are shown in Figure 6a. Most of the zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan massif (granodiorite-porphyry) are 105–178 μm long, with an aspect ratio of 1:3. Their texture is mainly bimodal, characterized by non-zoned or slightly zoned cores and clearly pronounced oscillatory zoning in the marginal parts of grains. Zircon grains are idiomorphic with a prismatic outlook and the shapes of oscillatory zoning are similar to crystal shapes.
Summing up the above considerations, we may conclude that the parameters of all the studied zircon samples from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan massif are characteristic of the zircons of magmatic origin.
Zircon trace elements
The content of rare and rare earth elements in the zircon samples is presented in Supplementary Table S3. Zircon grains were collected from seven samples of the granodiorite-porphyry of the Lugokan deposit. The total amount of zircon grains analyzed by means of LA-ICP-MS was 88, but 14 analyses were later discarded because they failed to meet the requirements: La > 1 ppm, Ti > 50 ppm and Ba > 8 ppm [5].
All the investigated zircon samples have similar chondrite-normalized REE patterns, characterized by HREE enrichments and LREE depletions with prominent positive Ce anomalies and weak negative Eu anomalies (Figure 6b). The REE content in the studied zircon samples is relatively low (ΣREE = 346–1334 ppm). Chondrite-normalized [28] REE patterns are characterized by rather steep rise from light to heavy REE, with the average value of the (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 100 (the ratio (Yb/Sm)N may be used to evaluate zircon enrichment with HREE [3]). The data obtained on REE distribution in the studied zircon samples are typical for zircon of magmatic origin [29].
A clearly pronounced positive Ce anomaly is detected and estimated from the Ce/Ce* ratio [30]. Zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan massif are characterized by the low values of Ce/Ce* ratio: from 2.1 to 127.7 (36.3 on average).
The Eu anomaly is calculated from the Eu/Eu* ratio. All the studied zircon samples are characterized by negative Eu anomalies. Zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan massif exhibit low values of the Eu/Eu* ratio: from 0.08 to 0.53 (0.27 on average).
Zircon crystallization temperatures were calculated using the Ti-in-zircon thermometer according to Watson et al. [31]. The estimated temperature of zircon crystallization from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan massif varies from 546 to 771 °C (645 °C on average).

4.3.2. The Kultuma Deposit

Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images
Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots are shown in Figure 7a. Most of the zircon grains from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma massif are 247–330 μm long, with an aspect ratio of 1:3. The texture of the grains is mainly bimodal, characterized by non-zoned or weakly zoned cores and clearly pronounced oscillatory zoning in grain margins. Zircon grains are idiomorphic, with a prismatic habit and oscillatory zoning is similar in shape to the shapes of crystals.
Summing up the above-mentioned data, we may conclude that the parameters of all the studied zircon grains from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma massif are characteristic of zircons of magmatic origin.
Zircon trace elements
The results of zircon trace element analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S3. Zircon grains were collected from 4 samples of the quartz monzodiorite-porphyry of the Kultuma deposit. The total number of zircon grains analyzed by means of LA-ICP-MS was 53, but 6 analyses were discarded later on.
All the investigated zircons have similar chondrite-normalized REE patterns, characterized by HREE enrichments and LREE depletions with prominent positive Ce anomalies and weak negative Eu anomalies (Figure 7b). The REE content in the studied zircon samples is relatively low (ΣREE = 398–954 ppm). The chondrite-normalized REE patterns are characterized by a rather steep rise from light REE to heavy ones, with the average value of the (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 72. The data obtained on the type and extent of REE distribution in the studied zircon samples are typical for the zircons of magmatic origin.
Zircon samples from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma massif are characterized by rather low values of the Ce/Ce* ratio: from 3.8 to 498.8 (100.1 on average) and rather low Eu/Eu*: from 0.12 to 0.38 (0.26 on average).
The estimated temperature of zircon crystallization from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma massif varies from 591 to 808 °C (640 °C on average).

4.3.3. The Bystrinsky Deposit

Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images
Almost all the studied zircon samples from the rocks of the Bystrinsky massif are characterized by similar length and aspect ratios: 165–384 µm, 1:2, 1:1.5 (monzonite-porphyry, Figure 8a,c), 170–278 µm, 1:2 (diorite-porphyry, Figure 8e), 188–346 µm, 1:3 (granodiorite, Figure 8g). The textures of the grains are bimodal, characterized by non-zoned or weakly zoned cores and clearly pronounced oscillatory zoning in the marginal parts; zircon grains are idiomorphic, with a prismatic habit, and oscillatory zoning is similar in shape with the crystal shapes. An exception is monzonite-porphyry (sample No. Bs-1-33.1), with practically isometric grains (the aspect ratio is 1:1.5), with the marginal parts substantially darker than the xenocryst zircon cores (which implies the low U content in the core part, in comparison with the rim). At the same time, zircon grains from monzonites (sample No. Bs-2-143.8) are similar to the above-described ones in the aspect ratio (1:1.5) but differ sharply in the texture because they have weakly pronounced xenocryst zircon cores and oscillatory zoning.
Summing up the data presented above, we may conclude that the parameters of all the studied zircon samples from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky massif are characteristic of the zircons of magmatic origin.
Zircon trace elements
The trace element composition of zircon grains under investigation is listed in the Supplementary Table S3. Zircon grains were separated from six samples of the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit. The total amount of zircon grains analyzed by means of LA-ICP-MS was 78, but 5 analyses were excluded later. The rocks are represented by granodiorite, monazite, monzonite- and diorite-porphyry and of the Bystrinsky massif.
All the investigated zircon grains have similar chondrite-normalized REE patterns, characterized by HREE enrichment and LREE depletion with prominent positive Ce anomalies and moderately negative Eu anomalies. The REE content (ΣREE) in the studied zircon grains from monzonite-porphyry is 328 to 1613 ppm. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns are shown in Figure 8b,d (samples: Bs-200, Bs-2-109 и Bs-1-33.1); they are characterized by a rather steep rise from light REE to heavy ones, with the average value of (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 157. The REE content in zircon grains from monzonite varies from 372 to 1198 ppm. The REE patterns (Figure 8d) are also characterized by a rather steep rise from medium-weight REE to heavy ones, with the average (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 67. The REE content in zircon grains from diorite-porphyry varies from 206 to 493 ppm. The REE patterns (Figure 8f) are also characterized by a rather steep rise from medium-weight REE to heavy ones, with the average (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 127. Unlike for these samples, zircon grains from granodiorite are characterized by slightly higher REE content: from 450 to 912 ppm (Figure 8h). However, at the same time, they exhibit similar REE patterns, with the average value of (Yb/Sm)N ratio equal to 157. The data obtained on the type and extent of REE distribution in the studied zircon grains are typical for the zircons of magmatic origin.
Zircon grains from monzonite-porphyry are characterized by higher (compared to the samples from the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits) values of Ce/Ce* ratio, which are within the range from 8.5 to 567.7 (175.2 on average). The largest Ce/Ce* values (from 25.8 to 567.9, 280.9 on average) were detected for zircon grains from the monzonite-porphyry sample No. Bs-200. Similar values of the Ce/Ce* ratio were determined for zircon grains from other samples of monzonite-porphyry (samples: Bs-2-109 и Bs-1-33.1) and monzonite (sample: Bs-2-143.8). Zircon grains from diorite-porphyry and granodiorite of the Bystrinsky massif are also characterized by close Ce/Ce* values, which are 9.7 to 268.9 (176.5 on average) for diorite-porphyry and from 94.0 to 278.3 (191.6 on average) for granodiorite.
Zircon grains from monzonite-porphyry are characterized by both relatively high values of Eu/Eu* ratio and relatively low ones. The highest Eu/Eu* ratios were established for monzonite-porphyry sample No. Bs-2-109: from 0.43 to 0.76 (0.63 on average) and sample No. Bs-200: from 0.48 to 0.73 (0.63 on average). Lower Eu/Eu* values were detected for monzonite-porphyry sample No. Bs-1-33.1 from 0.23 to 0.65 (0.43 on average). The low Eu/Eu* values were also detected for granodiorite: from 0.14 to 0.33 (0.22 on average) and monzonite: from 0.24 to 0.36 (0.29 on average). In contrast, diorite-porphyry from the Bystrinsky massif is characterized by higher Eu/Eu* values: from 0.40 to 0.71 (0.60 on average).
The estimated temperatures of zircon crystallization from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky massif varies from 554 to 837 °C (637 °C on average) for monzonite-porphyry, from 674 to 765 °C (718 °C on average) for monzonite, from 578 to 680 °C (639 °C on average) for diorite-porphyry, and from 675 to 715 °C (693 °C on average) for granodiorite.

5. Discussion

5.1. Plagioclase Mineral Geochemistry as an Indicator for Magmatic Fertility

Plagioclase crystallized from the fertile magmas (enriched with fluids and ore components) contains excessive aluminum compared to the stoichiometric composition of the minerals of albite NaAlSi3O8–anorthite CaAl2Si3O8 series. Plagioclase from the ore-bearing magmatic rocks contains significant amounts of the AlAl3SiO8 or xSi4O8 (up to 3 mol.%). Fertile magmas make almost the entire series from albite to anorthite crystallize, but with Al in excess. To divide magmatic rocks into potentially ore-bearing and ore-free (barren) ones, the discrimination diagram An%–Al/(Ca + Na + K) was used [7] (Figure 9, Table 1). For comparison, the data over other Au-Pb-Zn deposits (the Antiinsky and Lugiinsky) related to the magmatic rocks of the Shakhtama complex are also shown. It is observed that the plots fitting into the area of ore-bearing (fertile) magmatic rocks (Figure 9): the Bystrinsky deposit—77% of plots (their total number is 115), the Kultuma deposit—45% (60 total), the Lugokan deposit—11% (108 total), the Antiinsky deposit—0% (28 total) and the Lugiinsky deposit—0% (29 total).

5.2. Biotite Mineral Geochemistry

It is known that 70–90% of the F in muscovite- and fluorite-free granitoid rocks is contained in biotite, with the remainder in apatite, amphibole and titanite [32,33,34]. The Cl content of biotite is considerably less than the F content because the ionic radius of Cl- in biotite is 1.81 Å, which is significantly larger than either F- (1.31 Å) or OH- (1.38 Å). Therefore Cl = OH exchange is less frequent than F = OH exchange [35]. Munoz (1984) noted that the degree of halogen substitution of the hydroxyl group depends on the Mg/Fe ratio. Biotites with a high Mg/Fe ratio are likely to contain more fluorine and the ones with a low Mg/Fe ratio—more chlorine. The values of IV(F), IV(Cl), and IV(F/Cl) (Table 1) are used for a relative assessment of the degree of biotite halogen enrichment.
The diagram of IV(F/Cl) versus IV(F) shows that the biotites of the Bystrinsky deposit exhibit the highest values of these characteristics (Figure 10a). It indicates the lowest degree of fluorine enrichment of biotite (0.14–0.58 wt.%, average 0.35 wt.%) and a relatively low F/Cl ratio (0.72–2.19, average 1.47). The distribution areas of biotite composition of the Kultuma and Lugokan deposits overlap significantly, which indicates a similar halogen composition of biotites. The fluorine concentrations are 0.29–1.82 wt.% (average 0.79 wt.%) for Kultuma biotites and 0.49–1.13 wt.% (average 0.72 wt.%) for Lugokan ones. The ratios of F/Cl are 0.82–83.61 (average 8.4) and 1.2–8.67 (average 3.81) for Kultuma and Lugokan biotites, respectively. Biotites from the Au-polymetallic deposits have parameters similar to the studied deposits: F concentration in Antiinsky biotites varies from 0.39 to 1.01 wt.% (average 0.5 wt.%), F/Cl ratios range from 1.82 to 5.85 (average 2.68); Lugiinsky biotites contain from 0.81 to 1.65 wt.% (average 1.09 wt.%) F and are characterized by the F/Cl ratio within the range of 4.04–24.58 (average 11.27).
The Log(XF/XOH) versus Log(XMg/XFe) diagram for biotites suggests magma source rocks and melting processes involved because almost the whole F present in the continental crust resides in granitoids and their metamorphic counterparts [35]. Depending on the presence of hydrous or anhydrous minerals in rocks, fluorine may be a compatible or incompatible element [38]. Ague and Brimhall [36], Ague and Brimhall [37] investigated the relation of Mg/Fe and F/OH ratios of magmatic biotite and the degree of contamination of the mantle and crustal sources. The rocks containing biotite with Log(XMg/XFe) > −0.21 are classified as oxidized and are divided into three subgroups based upon increasing F/OH: (1) weakly contaminated I-type; (2) moderately contaminated I-type; and (3) strongly contaminated I-type.
The plot of Log(XF/XOH) versus Log(XMg/XFe) of the biotites indicates that the studied rocks from all three deposits are categorized as oxidized ones (Log(XMg/XFe): from 0.07 to 0.32 with an average of 0.22 for Kultuma, between 0.12 and 0.27 with an average 0.17 for Lugokan, from 0.13 to 0.40 with an average 0.29 for Bystrinsky (Figure 10b). This diagram also clearly classified the values of the Bystrinsky biotites by the degree of contamination with the continental crust as weakly contaminated I-type. (Log(XF/XOH) −1.76 to −1.12, average −1.37). The biotites of the Kultuma and Lugokan deposits are localized in the field of moderately contaminated I-type (Kultuma Log(XF/XOH) −1.44 to −0.55, average −1; Lugokan Log(XF/XOH) −1.19 to −0.8, average −1.02). This distribution probably indicates a greater contribution from the continental crust into the formation of the Kultuma and Lugokan deposits, as well as a predominantly mantle-based source for the Bystrinsky deposit. Plots of magmatic rocks of the Au-polymetallic deposits from Eastern Transbaikalia fall into the area of oxidized moderately contaminated I-type. The Antiinsky biotites are characterized by the Log(XMg/XFe) from 0.1 to 0.21 (average 0.14) and Log(XF/XOH) −1.3 to −0.84 (average −1.2). The biotites from the Lugiinsky deposit are characterized by Log(XMg/XFe) 0.13–0.27 (average 0.2) and Log(XF/XOH) −0.98 to −0.62 (average −0.84).
The numerical characteristics of the axes of the diagrams are given in Table 1.

5.3. Zircon Mineral Geochemistry as an Indicator for Magmatic Fertility

The data on zircon chemical composition (Ce/Ce*, Eu/Eu*, Yb/Dy, (Ce/Nd)/Y) are currently coming into a broad application for determining magmatic rock fertility. In particular, it was established that the values of Ce and Eu anomalies vary depending on ƒO2 in the melt, and the rocks with potentially high fertility for the porphyry type of mineralization have high Ce/Ce* and Eu/Eu* values [6,22,39,40,41]. For comparison, we analyzed the data on the content of rare and rare earth elements in zircon grains from different skarn and porphyry deposits of the world [5,6,42,43]. The results were plotted as a diagram of Ce/Ce* versus Eu/Eu*, and the data on porphyry (Figure 11a–c) and skarn (Figure 11d–f) deposits were plotted separately. We see that zircons crystallized from relatively oxidized magmas should be characterized by the higher Ce/Ce* and Eu/Eu* values than zircons from the reduced magmas. It is observed in Figure 11a–d that zircons from the Lugokan deposit are characterized by the lowest Ce/Ce* values. Relatively low Ce/Ce* values were also determined for zircons from the Kultuma deposit, while both relatively high and relatively low Ce/Ce* values were determined for the Bystrinsky deposit. The high Ce/Ce* values obtained for zircon grains from some samples of the Bystrinsky deposit are comparable with the values for other porphyry and Cu-Au-Fe skarn deposits.
The Eu/Eu* values can also be used to evaluate the fertility of magmatic rocks. The low Eu/Eu* values are characteristic of less oxidized conditions, while Eu/Eu* > 0.4 is characteristic of the porphyry system with the highest oxidation state. Relatively low Eu/Eu* values are characteristic of zircons from the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits. Unlike them, zircon from the Bystrinsky deposit is characterized both by relatively high values comparable with those for porphyry and Cu-Au-Fe skarn deposits and by relatively low values.
It is well known that the high content of magmatic water is a characteristic sign of fertility of many porphyry magmas. Now, it has been established by many researchers that the Eu/Eu* and Yb/Dy ratios in zircon may serve as an indirect indicator of the content of magmatic water [5,6]. For comparison, we also analyzed the data on porphyry and skarn deposits. It is observed in Figure 11b that a major part of plots of zircon from different porphyry deposits is characterized by the higher values of Eu/Eu* and Yb/Dy ratios in comparison with zircon from the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits. A similar trend is observed also for the Tongshankou Cu-Mo-skarn deposit and for the Tonglushan Cu-Au-Fe-skarn deposit (Figure 11e), while Fe-skarn Lingxiang and Chengchao deposits are characterized by lower values of both the Eu/Eu* and Yb/Dy ratios, close to those of zircon from the Lugokan and the Kultuma deposits. Unlike them, zircon from the Bystrinsky deposit exhibit both higher Eu/Eu* and Yb/Dy ratios, comparable with porphyry and skarn deposits, and low values, comparable with Fe-skarn deposits.
Another indicator of magma fertility is the value of (Ce/Nd)/Y in zircons. Thus, zircon from ore-bearing magmas is characterized by (Ce/Nd)/Y > 0.01. To distinguish between potential ore-bearing and barren magmatic rocks, the diagram plotted as Eu/Eu* versus (Ce/Nd)/Y is used. It is observed at the Figure 11c, f that the highest ore-bearing potential show zircon from the Bystrinsky deposit, while zircon from the Lugokan and Kultuma deposits fit into the ore-free region. At the same time, zircon grains from the Kultuma deposit are generally characterized by the higher (Ce/Nd)/Y values (>0.01) than zircon grains from the Lugokan deposit.
To summarize, we may conclude that the magmatic rocks that occurred at the Lugokan and the Kultuma deposits were formed at relatively reductive conditions and initially contained small amounts of magmatic water. Quite the contrary, a major part of magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit were formed under oxidative conditions and initially contained a relatively larger amount of magmatic water. Estimation of the ore-bearing potential of magmatic rocks on the basis of zircon geochemistry (Ce/Ce*, Eu/Eu*, Yb/Dy, (Ce/Nd)/Y) showed that the highest fertility for the classical porphyry type of mineralization have magmatic rocks occurred at the Bystrinsky deposit.
Brief data on the zircon geochemistry is given in Table 2.

5.4. Mineral Geothermobarometer

Biotite can be used as a geothermometer for graphitic, peraluminous metapelites equilibrated at approximately 4–6 kbar and containing ilmenite or rutile [44]. The calculated Ti-surface is curved in a way that for any given Mg2+/(Mg2+ + Fe2+) value, Ti content increases as a function of temperature. Temperature can be calculated following:
T = {[ln(Ti) − a − c (XMg)3]/b}0.333
where T is in degree Celsius, Ti is the number of Ti (apfu) recalculated based on 22 atoms of oxygen, a = −2.3594, b = 4.6482 × 10–9 and c = −1.7283. The formula is calibrated for XMg = 0.275 to 1.00, Ti = 0.04–0.60 apfu, and T = 480–800 °C. The precision of the geothermometer is estimated to vary between ±12 °C and ±24 °C at higher to lower temperatures, respectively [44]. Calculation of the exchange temperature for the magmatic biotite in the study follows the above equation. However, application of the thermometer for lithologies other than its calibration may be hampered by the absence of graphite, presence of the other Ti-saturating phase (ilmenite, titanite or rutile) and quartz, and lower aluminum saturation index (metaluminous). The thermometer, however, might work for peraluminous granites. For example, Rezaei and Zarasvandi [45] showed that thermometer would overestimate the temperature if biotite grained from the porphyry deposits. The majority of our samples is metaluminous and contains other Ti-bearing mineral phases and no graphite. As a result, the estimated values may not be a true representation of exchange temperature among our samples.
Watson et al. [31] determined the concentration of titanium in zircon depending on the temperature of formation and activity of TiO2. We have obtained the crystallization temperatures of zircon, calculated using the Ti in-zircon thermometer without making corrections for reduced oxide activities (e.g., TiO2 or SiO2), or variable pressure. The calculation was carried out according to the equation:
T°(C)zircon = ((5080 ± 30)/((6.01 ± 0.03) − Log (Ti)) − 273,
where Ti is the established (by the LA-ICP-MS method) titanium content in zircon (ppm). The precision of the Ti in-zircon thermometer is estimated at ±10 °C (over most of the temperature range of interest: 400–1000 °C).
Calculated temperatures are 728–768 °C (747 °C) by biotite and 546–771 °C (645 °C) by zircon for Lugokan granodiorite-porphyry. The quartz monzodiorite-porphyry of the Kultuma deposit have temperatures 679–782 °C (734 °C) by biotite and 591–808 °C (640 °C) by zircon. For the Bystrinsky deposit the temperatures are closer: granodiorite 649–676 °C (668 °C) by biotite and 675–715 °C (693 °C) by zircon; diorite-porphyry 732–764 °C (746 °C) by biotite and 578–680 °C (639 °C) by zircon; monzonite 706–746 °C (723 °C) by biotite and 674–765 °C (718 °C) by zircon; monzonite-porphyry 671–754 °C (721 °C) by biotite and 554–837 °C (637 °C) by zircon. Comparing the Ti-in-biotite thermometer and the Ti-in-zircon thermometer [31], it is clear that the Ti-in-biotite thermometer slightly overestimates the temperatures. The only exception is the granodiorites (peraluminium) developed at the Bystrinsky deposit, which showed similar crystallization temperatures according to both the Ti-in-biotite thermometer and the Ti-in-zircon thermometer. Therefore, data on Ti-in-zircon thermometers are more reliable for estimating the crystallization temperature of igneous rocks.
The pressure estimated using the total Al content in biotite by [46] was calculated by the formula:
P(Kb) = 3.03 × (2) TAl − 6.33 (±0.33)
where TAl is based on 22 atoms of oxygen. The results are 0.5–1.2 kbar (0.8 kbar) for Lugokan granodiorite-porphyry and 0.5–1.8 kbar (1.2 kbar) for Kultuma quartz monzodiorite-porphyry. Bystrinsky granodiorite has the highest values 3–3.4 kbar (3.2 kbar). Similar estimates were obtained for other rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit: diorite-porphyry 0.9–1.1 kbar (1 kbar), monzonite 0.9–1.4 kbar (1.2 kbar), monzonite-porphyry 0.8–1.4 kbar (1.2 kbar).

6. Conclusions

Geochemistry of the rock-forming and accessory minerals displayed a high efficiency in determining magmatic rock fertility by the example of Au-Cu-Fe-skarn deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia.
  • Investigation of zircon geochemistry showed that the best parameters for the prediction of the fertile magmatic rocks are Ce/Ce*, Eu/Eu*, Yb/Dy, (Ce/Nd)/Y. An increase in the values of Ce/Ce* Eu/Eu*, Yb/Dy, (Ce/Nd)/Y from the Lugokan deposit to the Kultuma and Bystrinsky deposits coincides with the resources of these three deposits increasing. The most fertile magmatic rocks at the Bystrinsky deposit are porphyry rocks of the Shakhtama complex second phase (159.6–158.6 Ma), which are composed of monzonite- and diorite-porphyries. The magmatic rocks characterized by the high ore-bearing potential for the classical porphyry type of mineralization in Eastern Transbaikalia have Ce/Ce* > 100, Eu/Eu* > 0.4, Yb/Dy > 5.0 and (Ce/Nd)/Y > 0.01 values.
  • Estimation of the magmatic rock fertility based on plagioclase chemistry also demonstrated that the highest ore-bearing potential for the porphyry type is inherent of the magmatic rocks that occurred at the Bystrinsky deposit. The extent of potential ore content may be assessed relying on the number of points on the analysis data in the An%−Al/(Ca + Na + K) diagram fitting in the fertile area. Al* in combination with data on the chemical composition of biotite and zircon is the most effective.
  • The halogen composition of biotite may be evidence of the ore-bearing potential (fertility) of magmatic rocks. The used parameters IV(F), IV(F/Cl), X(F)/X(OH) allows us to establish the criteria for the Au-Cu-Fe-skarn systems of Eastern Transbaikalia. The Bystrinsky deposit, with the highest ore resources among the studied deposits, is characterized by the values: IV (F) > 2.2, IV (F/Cl) > 6.5, X (F)/X (OH) < −1.2, while lower IV(F) and IV(F/Cl) values along with higher X(F)/X(OH) ratios are typical for the Kultuma and Lugokan deposits. It may be stated that magmatic rocks with biotite distinguished by higher IV(F) and IV(F/Cl) values along with lower X(F)/X(OH) ratios may be ore-bearing for the porphyry type.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min12010050/s1, Table S1. Plagioclase composition; Table S2. Biotite composition; Table S3. Zircon geochemistry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.O.R.; methodology Y.O.R.; investigation V.P.M., A.V.M. and V.F.D.; visualization V.P.M. and V.F.D.; writing—original draft preparation Y.O.R., A.A.R. and V.P.M.; writing—review and editing Y.O.R., A.A.R., V.F.D. and V.P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was carried out with the financial support of the project of the Russian Federation represented by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No. 13.1902.21.0018 (agreement 075-15-2020-802).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spiridonov, A.M.; Zorina, L.D.; Kitaev, N.A. Gold-Bearing Ore-Magmatic Systems of Transbaikalia; GEO Academic Publishing House: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2006; 291p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Nornickel. Available online: https://www.nornickel.ru/investors/disclosure/annual-reports/#2008 (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  3. Belousova, E.; Griffin, W.L.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Fisher, N.L. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 143, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, P.; Hattori, K.; Pan, H.; Jackson, S.; Seitmuratova, E. Oxidation condition and metal fertility of granitic magmas: Zircon trace-element data from porphyry Cu deposits in the central Asian orogenic belt. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 1861–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, Y.J.; Loucks, R.R.; Fiorentini, M.; McCuaig, T.C.; Evans, N.J.; Yang, Z.M.; Hou, Z.Q.; Kirkland, C.L.; Parra-Avila, L.A.; Kobussen, A. Zircon compositions as a pathfinder for porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits. Soc. Econ. Geol. Spec. Publ. 2016, 19, 329–347. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wen, G.; Zhou, R.-J.; Li, J.-W.; Chang, J.; Hu, H.; Yan, D.-R.; Wei, K.-T.; Jin, S.-G. Skarn metallogeny through zircon record: An example from the Daye Cu-Au-Fe-Mo district, eastern China. Lithos 2020, 378–379, 105807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Williamson, B.J.; Herrington, R.J.; Morris, A. Porphyry copper enrichment linked to excess aluminum in plagioclase. Nature Geosci. 2016, 9, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Williamson, B.J.; Hodgkinson, M.; Imai, A.; Takahasgi, R.; Armstrong, R.N.; Herrington, R.J. Testing the plagioclase discriminator on the GEOROC database to identify porphyry-fertile magmatic systems in Japan. Resour. Geol. 2018, 68, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Selby, D.; Nesbitt, B.E. Chemical composition of biotite from the Casino porphyry Cu-Au-Mo mineralization, Yukon, Canada: Evaluation of magmatic and hydrothermal fluid chemistry. Chem. Geol. 2000, 171, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azadbakht, Z.; Lentz, D.R.; McFarlane, C.R.M.; Whalen, J.B. Using magmatic biotite chemistry to differentiate barren and mineralized Silurian–Devonian granitoids of New Brunswick, Canada. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2020, 175, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berzina, A.P.; Berzina, A.N.; Gimon, V.O.; Nikolaeva, I.V.; Krymskiy, R.S.; Larionov, A.N.; Serov, P.A. The Shakhtama porphyry Mo ore-magmatic system (Eastern Transbaikalia): Age, sources and genetic features. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2013, 54, 587–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Redin, Y.O.; Redina, A.A.; Mokrushnikov, V.P.; Dultsev, V.F. Antinsky ore occurrence as an example of ore-forming systems related to reduced intrusions (Eastern Transbaikalia). Bull. Tomsk Polyt. Univ. Geo Ass. Engin. 2018, 329, 17–29, (in Russian with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Redin, Y.O.; Mokrushnikov, V.P.; Redina, A.A.; Nevolko, P.A.; Kolpakov, V.V. Gold-Copper-Iron-Skarn Deposits of East Transbaikalia: Types, Mineral Composition, Age and Formation Conditions. In Ore-Magmatic Systems. Magmatizm, Metallogeny, and Tectonics of North Asia; IGM SB RAS: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2018; pp. 83–90. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Redin, Y.O.; Redina, A.A.; Prokopiev, I.R.; Dultsev, V.F.; Kirillov, M.V.; Mokrushnikov, V.P. The Lugokanskoe Au-Cu skarn deposit (Eastern Transbaikalia): Mineral composition, age, and formation conditions. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2020, 61, 174–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zorin, Y.A.; Belinchenko, V.G.; Rutshtein, I.G.; Zorina, L.D.; Spiridonov, A.M. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongol–Okhotsk belt and tectonic position of gold occurrence in Transbaikalia. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 1998, 39, 1578–1586. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zorin, Y.A.; Zorina, L.D.; Spiridonov, A.M.; Rutshtein, I.G. Geodynamic setting of gold deposits in the Transbaikal region (Eastern Siberia, Russia). Ore Geol. Rev. 2001, 17, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kovalenker, V.A.; Abramov, S.S.; Kiseleva, G.D.; Krylova, T.L.; Yazykova, Y.I.; Bortnikov, N.S. The large Bystrinskoe Cu-Au-Fe deposit (Eastern Trans-Baikal Region): Russia’s first example of a skarn-porphyry ore-forming system related to adakite. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2016, 468, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kovalenker, V.A.; Trubkin, N.V.; Abramova, V.D.; Plotinskaya, O.Y.; Kiseleva, G.D.; Borisovskii, S.E.; Yazykova, Y.I. Typomorphic characteristics of molybdenite from the Bystrinsky Cu-Au porphyry-skarn deposit, Eastern Transbaikal region, Russia. Geol. Ore Depos. 2018, 60, 62–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, C.; Holtz, C.; Ma, C.Q.; Wolff, P.E.; Li, X.Y. Tracing the evolution and distribution of F and Cl in plutonic systems from volatile-bearing minerals: A case study from the Liujiawa pluton (Dabie orogeny, China). Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2012, 164, 859–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nachit, H.; Ibhi, A.; Abia, E.H.; Ohoud, M.B. Discrimination between primary magmatic biotites, reequilibrated biotites and neoformed biotites. C. R. Geosci. 2005, 337, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdel-Rahman, A.F.M. Nature of biotites from alkaline, calc-alkaline, and peraluminous magmas. J. Petrol. 1994, 35, 525–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ballard, J.R.; Palin, M.J.; Campbel, L.H. Relative oxidation states of magmas inferred from Ce(IV)/Ce(III) in zircon: Application to porphyry copper deposits of northern Chile. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 144, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gardiner, N.J.; Hawkesworth, C.J.; Robb, L.J.; Whitehouse, M.J.; Roberts, N.M.W.; Kirkland, C.L.; Evans, N.J.; Naturhistoriska, R.; Enheten, F.G. Contrasting granite metallogeny through the zircon record: A case study from Myanmar. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 748–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jin, X.Y.; Li, J.W.; Hofstra, A.H.; Sui, J.X. Magmatic-hydrothermal origin of the early Triassic Laodou lode gold deposit in the Xiahe-Herzuo district, West Qinling orogen, China: Implications for gold metallogeny. Mineral. Depos. 2017, 52, 883–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, R.G.; Dilles, J.H.; Tosdal, R.M.; Wooden, J.L.; Mazdab, F.K. Magmatic evolution of granodiorite intrusions at the el Salvador porphyry copper deposit, Chile, based on trace element composition and U/Pb age of zircons. Econ. Geol. 2017, 112, 245–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shu, Q.H.; Chang, Z.S.; Lai, Y.; Hu, X.; Wu, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhai, D.G.; Zhang, C. Zircon trace elements and magma fertility: Insights from porphyry (-skarn) Mo deposits in NE China. Mineral. Depos. 2019, 54, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhong, S.; Feng, C.; Seltmann, R.; Li, D.; Dai, Z. Geochemical contrasts between Late Triassic ore-bearing and barren intrusions in the Weibao Cu-Pb-Zn deposit, East Kunlun Mountains, NW China: Constraints from accessory minerals (zircon and apatite). Mineral. Depos. 2018, 53, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. McDonough, W.F.; Sun, S.S. The composition of the Earth. Chem. Geol. 1995, 120, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoskin, P.W.O.; Schaltegger, U. The composition of Zircon and Igneous and Metamorphic Petrogenessis. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2003, 53, 27–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhong, S.; Seltmann, R.; Qu, H.; Song, Y. Characterization of the zircon Ce anomaly for estimation of oxidation state of magmas: A revised Ce/Ce* method. Mineral. Petrol. 2019, 113, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Watson, E.B.; Wark, D.A.; Thomas, J.B. Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 2006, 151, 413–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grabezkev, A.I.; Vigorova, V.G.; Chanshukina, V.A. Behavior of fluorine during crystallization of granites (in connection with validation of the criteria of granite specialization). Geochem. Int. 1979, 16, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
  33. Speer, J.A. Micas in igneous rocks. Rev. Mineral. 1984, 13, 299–356. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, W.; Lentz, D.R.; Thorne, K.G.; McFarlane, C. Geochemical characteristics of biotite from felsic intrusive rocks around the Sisson Brook W-Mo-Cu deposit, west-central New Brunswick: An indicator halogen and oxygen fugacity of magmatic systems. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 77, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Munoz, J.L. F-OH and Cl-OH exchange in micas with applications to hydrothermal ore deposits. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 1984, 13, 469–493. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ague, J.J.; Brimhall, G.H. Regional variations in bulk chemistry, mineralogy, and the compositions of mafic and accessory minerals in the batholiths of California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1988, 100, 891–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ague, J.J.; Brimhall, G.H. Magmatic arc asymmetry and distribution of anomalous plutonic belts in the batholiths of California: Effects of assimilation, crustal thickness, and depth of crystallization. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1988, 100, 912–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Salet, R. Fluorine as a tool in the petrogenesis of quartz-bearing magmatic associations of an improved F-OH biotite-apatite thermometer gird. Lithos 2000, 50, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Burnham, A.D.; Berry, A.J. An experimental study of trace element partitioning between zircon and melt as a function of oxygen fugacity. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 95, 196–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Trail, D.; Bruce Watson, E.; Tailby, N.D. Ce and Eu anomalies in zircon as proxies for the oxidation state of magmas. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 97, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dilles, J.H.; Kent, A.J.R.; Wooden, J.L.; Tosdal, R.M.; Koleszar, A.; Lee, R.G.; Farmer, L.P. Zircon compositional evidence for sulfur-degassing from ore-forming arc magmas. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pizarro, H.; Campos, E.; Bouzari, F.; Rousse, S.; Bissig, T.; Gregoire, M.; Riquelme, R. Porphyry indicator zircons (PIZs): Application to exploration of porphyry copper deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 126, 103771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Munoz, M.; Charrier, R.; Fanning, C.M.; Maksaev, V.; Deckart, K. Zircon trace element and O-Hf isotope analyses of mineralized intrusion from EL Teniente ore deposit, Chilean Andes: Constraints on the source and magmatic evolution of porphyry Cu-Mo related magmas. J. Petrol. 2012, 53, 1091–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Henry, D.J.; Guidotti, C.V.; Thomson, J.A. The Ti-saturation surface for low-to-medium pressure metapelitic biotites: Implications for geothermometry and Ti-substitution mechanisms. Am. Min. 2005, 90, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rezaei, M.; Zarasvandi, A. Titanium-in-biotite thermometry in porphyry copper systems: Challenges to application of the thermometer. Resour. Geol. 2019, 70, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Uchida, E.; Endo, S.; Makino, M. Relationship between solidification depth of granitic rocks and formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Resour. Geol. 2007, 57, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Regional tectonic map of the Eastern Transbaikalia (simplified from [15,16]).
Figure 1. Regional tectonic map of the Eastern Transbaikalia (simplified from [15,16]).
Minerals 12 00050 g001
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs showing in the petrographic characteristics of the Shakhtama Complex granitoids in the Lugokan, Kultuma and Bystrinsky deposits. Lugokan massif: (a,b)—granodiorite-porphyry; Kultuma massif: (c,d)—quartz monzodiorite-porphyry; Bystrinsky massif: (e)—granodiorite (bs-8), (f)—monzonite-porphyry (bs-200), (g)—monzonite (bs-2-143.8), (h)—diorite-porphyry (bs-3-141.8). Bt—biotite; Qz—quartz; Pl—plagioclase; Kfs—K-feldspar; Cpx—clinopyroxene; Amp—amphibole.
Figure 2. Representative photomicrographs showing in the petrographic characteristics of the Shakhtama Complex granitoids in the Lugokan, Kultuma and Bystrinsky deposits. Lugokan massif: (a,b)—granodiorite-porphyry; Kultuma massif: (c,d)—quartz monzodiorite-porphyry; Bystrinsky massif: (e)—granodiorite (bs-8), (f)—monzonite-porphyry (bs-200), (g)—monzonite (bs-2-143.8), (h)—diorite-porphyry (bs-3-141.8). Bt—biotite; Qz—quartz; Pl—plagioclase; Kfs—K-feldspar; Cpx—clinopyroxene; Amp—amphibole.
Minerals 12 00050 g002aMinerals 12 00050 g002b
Figure 3. Concordia diagrams of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data for the monzonite (a) and monzonite-porphyry (b) of the Bystrinsky massif.
Figure 3. Concordia diagrams of LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb data for the monzonite (a) and monzonite-porphyry (b) of the Bystrinsky massif.
Minerals 12 00050 g003
Figure 4. SiO2 versus CaO + Na2O + K2O wt.% showing the trajectories towards common plagioclase alteration phases [7].
Figure 4. SiO2 versus CaO + Na2O + K2O wt.% showing the trajectories towards common plagioclase alteration phases [7].
Minerals 12 00050 g004
Figure 5. Chemical composition diagrams of biotite: (a)—ternary TiO2-(FeOt + MnO)-MgO diagram [16]; (b)—tectonic setting discrimination diagram based on FeOt-MgO-Al2O3 [17].
Figure 5. Chemical composition diagrams of biotite: (a)—ternary TiO2-(FeOt + MnO)-MgO diagram [16]; (b)—tectonic setting discrimination diagram based on FeOt-MgO-Al2O3 [17].
Minerals 12 00050 g005
Figure 6. (a)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan deposit; (b)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan deposit.
Figure 6. (a)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan deposit; (b)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Lugokan deposit.
Minerals 12 00050 g006
Figure 7. (a)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma deposit; (b)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma deposit.
Figure 7. (a)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma deposit; (b)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Kultuma deposit.
Minerals 12 00050 g007
Figure 8. (a,c,e,g)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit: (a,c)—monzonite and monzonite-porphyry, (e)—diorite-porphyry, (g)—granodiorite-porphyry; (b,d,f,h)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit: (b,d)—monzonite and monzonite-porphyry, (f)—diorite-porphyry, (h)—granodiorite.
Figure 8. (a,c,e,g)—Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains with laser spots (red circles) from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit: (a,c)—monzonite and monzonite-porphyry, (e)—diorite-porphyry, (g)—granodiorite-porphyry; (b,d,f,h)—chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the magmatic rocks of the Bystrinsky deposit: (b,d)—monzonite and monzonite-porphyry, (f)—diorite-porphyry, (h)—granodiorite.
Minerals 12 00050 g008
Figure 9. Discrimination diagram to distinguish ore-bearing (fertile) magmatic rocks from barren ones. (a)—summary diagram for the deposits of Eastern Transbaikalia and the World; (b)—plagioclase plots for the Bystrinsky deposit; (c)—plagioclase plots for the Kultuma deposit; (d)—plagioclase plots for the Lugokan deposit.
Figure 9. Discrimination diagram to distinguish ore-bearing (fertile) magmatic rocks from barren ones. (a)—summary diagram for the deposits of Eastern Transbaikalia and the World; (b)—plagioclase plots for the Bystrinsky deposit; (c)—plagioclase plots for the Kultuma deposit; (d)—plagioclase plots for the Lugokan deposit.
Minerals 12 00050 g009
Figure 10. Chemical composition diagrams of biotite: (a)—intercept value IV(F) versus IV(F/Cl) showing the halogen content of biotite, fields of porphyry Cu, Sn-W-Be and porphyry Mo are from [35]; (b)—log(XMg/XFe) versus Log (XF/XOH), field boundaries are from [36,37].
Figure 10. Chemical composition diagrams of biotite: (a)—intercept value IV(F) versus IV(F/Cl) showing the halogen content of biotite, fields of porphyry Cu, Sn-W-Be and porphyry Mo are from [35]; (b)—log(XMg/XFe) versus Log (XF/XOH), field boundaries are from [36,37].
Minerals 12 00050 g010
Figure 11. Plot of zircon (a,d)—Ce/Ce* versus Eu/Eu*; (b,e)—Eu/Eu* versus Yb/Dy; (c,f)—Eu/Eu* versus (Ce/Nd)/Y.
Figure 11. Plot of zircon (a,d)—Ce/Ce* versus Eu/Eu*; (b,e)—Eu/Eu* versus Yb/Dy; (c,f)—Eu/Eu* versus (Ce/Nd)/Y.
Minerals 12 00050 g011
Table 1. The main characteristics obtained from the plagioclase and biotite geochemistry.
Table 1. The main characteristics obtained from the plagioclase and biotite geochemistry.
DepositBystrinsky Kultuma Lugokan
RockMonzonite-Porp.MonzoniteDiorite-PorpGranodioriteQuartz-Monzodiorite-Porp.Granodiorit-Porp.
mineralplagioclase
median An%An26An33An25An37An24An28
Al* > 1 (analysis num.)27303202712
analysis number6149321560108
mineralbiotite
IV(F)min.2.182.122.161.611.481.72
max.2.82.52.451.812.42.14
median2.422.242.321.731.941.94
IV(F/Cl)min.4.946.336.725.84.935.79
max.7.176.797.066.036.676.66
median6.566.56.875.95.986.16
log(XMg/XFe)min.0.10.130.3−0.370.070.12
max.0.40.180.37−0.340.320.27
median0.290.160.33−0.360.220.17
log(XF/XOH)min.−1.76−1.59−1.45−1.44−1.44−1.19
max.−1.2−1.26−1.12−1.25−0.55−0.8
median−1.42−1.35−1.3−1.36−1−1.02
analysis number4431241127098
Table 2. The main characteristics obtained from the zircon geochemistry.
Table 2. The main characteristics obtained from the zircon geochemistry.
DepositBystrinsky Kultuma Lugokan
RockMonzonite-Porp.MonzoniteDiorite-PorpGranodioriteQuartz-Monzodiorite-Porp.Granodiorit-Porp.
Eu/Eu*min.0.210.250.40.150.130.08
max.0.760.360.710.340.380.53
median0.520.290.60.230.260.28
Ce/Ce*min.8.5657.799.78943.82.19
max.567.9220.66268.98278.34496.85127.8
median168.84122.75176.59191.65100.1436.8
(Ce/Nd)/Ymin.0.0040.0020.0220.0160.0060.002
max.0.1720.0310.1910.0670.0320.021
median0.050.0150.0880.0420.0160.009
Yb/Dymin.2.352.795.14.223.082.29
max.7.844.126.625.274.425.09
median5.423.515.794.933.594.11
T(°C) min.554674578675591546
max.837765680715808771
median637718639693640645
total REE (ppm)min.260372206450398346
max.161311984939129541334
median646709344594639710
analysis number381411104774
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Redin, Y.O.; Redina, A.A.; Mokrushnikov, V.P.; Malyutina, A.V.; Dultsev, V.F. Rock-Forming (Biotite and Plagioclase) and Accessory (Zircon) Minerals Geochemistry as an Indicator of the Metal Fertility of Magmas by the Example of Au-Cu-Fe-Skarn Deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia. Minerals 2022, 12, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010050

AMA Style

Redin YO, Redina AA, Mokrushnikov VP, Malyutina AV, Dultsev VF. Rock-Forming (Biotite and Plagioclase) and Accessory (Zircon) Minerals Geochemistry as an Indicator of the Metal Fertility of Magmas by the Example of Au-Cu-Fe-Skarn Deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia. Minerals. 2022; 12(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Redin, Yury O., Anna A. Redina, Viktor P. Mokrushnikov, Alexandra V. Malyutina, and Vladislav F. Dultsev. 2022. "Rock-Forming (Biotite and Plagioclase) and Accessory (Zircon) Minerals Geochemistry as an Indicator of the Metal Fertility of Magmas by the Example of Au-Cu-Fe-Skarn Deposits in Eastern Transbaikalia" Minerals 12, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop