Next Article in Journal
A Non-Convex Fractional-Order Differential Equation for Medical Image Restoration
Next Article in Special Issue
Number of Volatility Regimes in the Muscat Securities Market Index in Oman Using Markov-Switching GARCH Models
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum Chromodynamics of the Nucleon in Terms of Complex Probabilistic Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Actuarial Valuation and Hedging of Life Insurance Liabilities in the Presence of Stochastic Mortality Risk under the Locally Risk-Minimizing Hedging Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform Method in Probability Modeling

1
Department of Mathematics, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
2
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Gowa 92113, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2024, 16(3), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030257
Submission received: 23 January 2024 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 16 February 2024 / Published: 20 February 2024

Abstract

:
The Fourier transform plays a crucial role in statistics, applied mathematics, and engineering sciences. In this study, we give a definition of the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform, which is an extension of the two-dimensional Fourier transform. We present a new convolution theorem including this transformation. We study the characteristic function in the setting of quaternion algebra and obtain the essential properties. Based on this, we seek the expected value, variance, covariance, and their basic relations to the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform. We illustrate the results by giving examples to see how the obtained results differ from the classical case.

1. Introduction

The Fourier transformation is an important mathematical tool that has been widely utilized in many fields of scientific study, including signal analysis and image processing (see, for example, [1,2,3]). As a natural generalization of the two-dimensional Fourier transform (2DFT), the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (2DQFT) has attracted a significant amount of attention from many scholars in applied and theoretic aspects (see, for example, [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]). Various properties of the 2DQFT have been investigated in detail, such as linearity, modulation, the convolution theorem, partial derivatives, energy conservation, and uncertainty principles. These properties are amendments of the corresponding properties of the 2DFT.
On the other hand, the use of the classical Fourier transform in probability modeling is quite widespread. It is related to the characteristic function of any real-valued random variable to compute the moment, variance, covariance, distribution function, etc. In [14], the authors studied the representation of the characteristic function using the vector and the classical Fourier transform and then provided some examples related to the proposed characteristic function. A more general probability theory was investigated in [15] using the one-dimensional Clifford–Fourier transform. Distinct from the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform method in probability modeling [16], the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform method in quaternion probability modeling is more complicated. This work deals with an application of the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform method in quaternion probability modeling. It may be regarded as an extension and continuation of our previous work [16]. To arrive at the results, we first introduce the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (2DQFT) and state some of its useful properties. We explore the application of this considered transformation in probability modeling. In particular, we study the characteristic function in the setting of quaternion algebra and present its relation to the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transformation. Several properties of the quaternion characteristic function are also investigated in detail. We utilize the results to calculate the moments, variance, and covariance in the context of quaternion algebra. We provide several examples to verify how the obtained results differ from the classical case.
The material presented in this paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2, we shortly review the basic knowledge of quaternion algebra needed for the next section. In Section 3, we provide useful properties of the 2DQFT such as the inversion theorem and Parseval’s formula. We also establish a new form of the convolution theorem, including the 2DQFT in this part. In Section 4, we study the utility of the 2DQFT in probability modeling. Some conclusions are presented in Section 5.

2. Notations

A quaternions is an expansion of real and complex numbers to higher dimensions. The set of quaternions is denoted by H . A quaternion q can be written in the following form [17]
H = { q = q a + i q b + j q c + k q d : q a , q b , q c , q d R } ,
where imaginary numbers i , j , and k satisfy:
i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = ijk = 1 .
This equation will lead to
ij = ji = k , jk = kj = i , ki = ik = j .
The scalar part and vector part of quaternion q = q a + i q b + j q c + k q d are denoted by S c ( q ) = q a and V c ( q ) = q = i q b + j q c + k q d , respectively. Using Equations (2) and (3), we obtain the quaternion product q p as
q p = q a p a q · p + q a p + p a q + q × p ,
where
q · p = q b p b + q c p c + q d p d ,
and
q × p = i ( q c p d q d p c ) + j ( q d p b q b p d ) + k ( q b p c q c p d ) .
Similar to the complex case, the conjugate of quaternion q is defined by
q ¯ = q a i q b j q c k q d ,
which satisfies
q p ¯ = p ¯ q ¯ , p , q H .
It is obvious to see that from Equation (7), the quaternion conjugate changes the order of the quaternion product. Due to relation (6), we get the modulus as
| q | = q q ¯ = ( q a ) 2 + ( q b ) 2 + ( q c ) 2 + ( q d ) 2 .
It should be observed that the scalar part of any quaternion satisfies the symmetry property; that is,
S c ( r p q ) = S c ( p r q ) = S c ( q r p ) , p , q , r H .
This formula plays a key role in deriving some properties of the quaternion Fourier transform. Also, one can easily verify that
| S c ( q ) | | q | , | q 2 | = | q | 2 , | q p | = | q | | p | , and | q + p | | q | + | p | , p , q H .
Due to Equations (6), (8) and (10), we obtain the inverse of a non-zero quaternion q H by
q 1 = q ¯ | q 2 | .
When | q | = 1 , q is called a unit quaternion and when q a = 0 , q is called a pure quaternion.
We introduce the inner product for two functions f , g : R 2 H as
( f , g ) L 2 ( R 2 ; H ) = R 2 f ( x ) g ( x ) ¯ d x , d x = d x 1 d x 2 .
For f = g , we get
f L 2 ( R 2 ; H ) = R 2 | f ( x ) | 2 d x 1 2 .

3. Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform with Properties

In this section, we provide the definition of the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (2DQFT). We present useful facts such as Parseval’s formula and the convolution theorem, which will be used later on. More details regarding the properties of the 2DQFT have been presented in [6,7,11].
Definition 1.
The two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform of the function f L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) L 2 ( R 2 ; H ) is defined by
F H { f } ( ω ) = R 2 e i ω 1 x 1 f ( x ) e j ω 2 x 2 d x ,
for x , ω R 2 .
Observe that
| F H { f } ( ω ) | = R 2 e i ω 1 x 1 f ( x ) e j ω 2 x 2 d x R 2 e i ω 1 x 1 f ( x ) e j ω 2 x 2 d x = f L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) ,
which shows that | F H { f } ( ω ) | is bounded by the quaternion constant f L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) .
Further, the reconstruction formula related to the 2DQFT is calculated by the following.
Definition 2.
Let f L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) and F H { f } L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) . The inverse transform of the 2DQFT is obtained through
f ( x ) = 1 ( 2 π ) 2 R 2 e i ω 1 x 1 F H { f } ( ω ) e j ω 2 x 2 d ω .
Based on Definition 2, one may easily obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let the quaternion function f L 2 ( R 2 ; H ) . One obtains
R 2 | f ( x ) | 2 d x = 1 ( 2 π ) 2 R 2 F H { f } ( ω ) 2 d ω ,
which is often called the Plancherel formula for the 2DQFT.
One of the fundamental results of the 2DQFT is the convolution theorem. It is known that the form of the convolution theorem in the 2DQFT is more complicated compared with the convolution theorem of the FT (see [8] for more details). Let us introduce the convolution and correlation definitions and then establish a new version of the convolution theorem associated with the 2DQFT.
Definition 3.
Let two functions f , g L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) . The convolution operator of f and g is described by
( f g ) ( x ) = R 2 f ( y ) g ( x y ) d y .
With Definition 3 above, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 2.
For f , g in L 2 ( R 2 ; H ) , it holds that
F H { f g } ( ω ) = F H F H { f } ( ω ) ( g a + j g c ) ( ω ) + F H F H { f } ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) ( i g b + k g d ) ( ω ) .
In particular, we get
F H { f g } ( ω ) = F H F H { f } g ( ω ) ,
where, in this case, g is a real function.
Proof. 
According to Definition 3, we have
F H { f g } ( ω ) = R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 x 1 f ( y ) g ( x y ) e j ω 2 x 2 d y d x .
We change the variables to x y = z and get
F H { f g } ( ω ) = R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 ( y 1 + z 1 ) f ( y ) g ( z ) e j ω 2 ( y 2 + z 2 ) d y d z = R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 y 1 e i ω 1 z 1 f ( y ) g ( z ) e j ω 2 y 2 e j ω 2 z 2 d y d z = R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 y 1 e i ω 1 z 1 f ( y ) g a ( z ) + i g b ( z 1 , z 2 ) + j g c ( z ) + k g d ( z 1 , z 2 ) e j ω 2 y 2 e j ω 2 z 2 d y d z = R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 y 1 e i ω 1 z 1 f ( y ) e j ω 2 y 2 ( g a ( z ) + j g c ( z ) ) e j ω 2 z 2 d y d z + R 2 R 2 e i ω 1 y 1 e i ω 1 z 1 f ( y ) e j ω 2 y 2 ( i g b ( z ) + k g d ( z ) ) e j ω 2 z 2 d y d z = R 2 e i ω 1 z 1 F H { f } ( ω ) ( g a ( z ) + j g c ( z ) ) e j ω 2 z 2 d z + R 2 e i ω 1 z 1 F H { f } ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) ( i g b ( z ) + k g d ( z ) ) e j ω 2 z 2 d z = F H F H { f } ( ω ) ( g a + j g c ) ( ω ) + F H F H { f } ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) ( i g b + k g d ) ( ω ) ,
which is a new version of convolution theorem for the 2DQFT. □
Definition 4.
The correlation operator related to the 2DQFT for two quaternion functions f , g L 1 ( R 2 ; H ) is given by the integral
( f g ) ( x ) = R 2 f ( x + y ) g ( y ) ¯ d y .

4. Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform in Quaternion Probability

In [14,18], the authors studied the characteristic function in the setting of complex numbers. The authors of [16] presented the quaternion characteristic function using the one-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform. In this part, we study the use of the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform in quaternion probability, see Table 1. For this aim, we start with the following definition.
Definition 5.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be real two random variables. A quaternion-valued function f X ( x ) = f X a ( x ) + i f X b ( x ) + j f X c ( x ) + k f X d ( x ) is called the quaternion probability density function of X (compare to [19,20]) if
R 2 f X l ( x ) d x = 1 , f X l ( x ) 0 , x R 2 , l = a , b , c , d .
In this case, f X l ( x ) is a real probability density function. The quaternion cumulative distribution function is expressed as (compare to [18])
f X ( x 1 , x 2 ) = u v F X ( u , v ) | u = x 1 , v = x 2 .
Here, the quaternion probability P is related to F X of X 1 and X 2 given by
F X ( x 1 , x 2 ) = P ( X 1 x 1 , X 2 x 2 ) .
Definition 6
(Expected value). Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be any two real random variables with the quaternion probability density function f X ( x ) . The expected value of X 1 and X 2 is defined as
E [ X 1 X 2 ] = R 2 x 1 x 2 f X ( x ) d x .
The expected value of X 1 is given by
E [ X 1 ] = R 2 x 1 f X ( x ) d x ,
and the expected value of X 2 is defined as
E [ X 2 ] = R 2 x 2 f X ( x ) d x .
Now, write Equation (26) above as
E [ X 1 X 2 ] = R 2 x 1 x 2 ( f X a ( x ) + i f X b ( x ) + j f X c ( x ) + k f X d ( x ) ) d x = R 2 x 1 x 2 f X a ( x ) d x + i R 2 x 1 x 2 f X b ( x ) d x + j R 2 x 1 x 2 f X c ( x ) d x + k R 2 x 1 x 2 f X d ( x ) d x = E a [ X 1 X 2 ] + i E b [ X 1 X 2 ] + j E c [ X 1 X 2 ] + k E d [ X 1 X 2 ] ,
where
E l [ X 1 X 2 ] = R 2 x 1 x 2 f X l ( x ) d x , l = a , b , c , d
Let us illustrate the above results in the following example.
Example 1.
Let X 1 and X 2 have the quaternion probability density function in the form of
f ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 4 x 1 x 2 + 3 i x 1 2 + 3 j x 2 2 + k ( x 1 + x 2 ) , i f 0 < x 1 , x 2 < 1 0 , elsewhere .
Find the expected value of X 1 and X 2 .
Solution. 
It is easy to check that
R 2 f X l ( x ) d x = 1 , l = a , b , c , d .
Now, the expected value of X 1 is
E [ X 1 ] = 0 1 0 1 x 1 4 x 1 x 2 + 3 i x 1 2 + 3 j x 2 2 + k ( x 1 + x 2 ) d x 1 d x 2 = 2 3 + 3 4 i + 1 2 j + 7 12 k .
The expected value of X 2 is
E [ X 2 ] = 0 1 0 1 x 2 4 x 1 x 2 + 3 i x 1 2 + 3 j x 2 2 + k ( x 1 + x 2 ) d x 1 d x 2 = 2 3 + 1 2 i + 3 4 j + 7 12 k .
The expected value of X 1 X 2 is
E [ X 1 X 2 ] = 0 1 0 1 x 1 x 2 4 x 1 x 2 + 3 i x 1 2 + 3 j x 2 2 + k ( x 1 + x 2 ) d x 1 d x 2 = 4 9 + 3 8 i + 3 8 j + 1 3 k .
From Equations (33)–(35), it is straightforward to see that
E i [ X 1 X 2 ] = E i [ X 1 ] E i [ X 2 ] , i = a , b , c .
The product of E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] is
E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] = 2 3 + 3 4 i + 1 2 j + 7 12 k 2 3 + 1 2 i + 3 4 j + 7 12 k = 4 9 3 8 1 2 49 144 + 2 6 + 6 12 + 7 24 7 12 i + 2 3 21 48 2 6 + 7 24 j + 14 36 3 4 1 4 + 14 36 k = 31 48 + 11 16 i + 11 16 j + 1 13 144 k .
Definition 7.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be real random variables with the quaternion probability density function f X ( x ) . The characteristic function of X 1 and X 2 , ϕ X : R 2 H , is defined by the formula
ϕ X ( t ) = E [ e i t 1 X 1 e j t 2 X 2 ] = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x .
Based on Equation (38), the generalization of the characteristic function in higher dimensions is given by the following.
Remark 1.
Assume f L 2 ( R 2 n ; H ) , n N . The definition of the n-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform of the function f is given by
F H { f } ( u , v ) = R 2 n e i u · x f ( x , y ) e j v · y d x d y
for u , v , x , y , R n . Moreover, the generalization of the characteristic function of X = ( X 1 , X 2 , X n ) , ϕ X : R 2 n H , is given by the formula
ϕ X ( u , v ) = R 2 n e i u · x f X ( x , y ) e j v · y d x d y .
Theorem 3.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be real random variables. If the quaternion probability density function related to the quaternion characteristic function ϕ X satisfies
R 2 | f X ( x ) | < ,
then ϕ X is uniformly continuous.
Proof. 
Simple computations yield
| ϕ X ( t + h ) ϕ X ( t ) | = | R 2 e i x 1 ( t 1 + h 1 ) f X ( x ) e j x 2 ( t 2 + h 2 ) e i x 1 t 1 f X ( x ) e j x 2 t 2 d x | = | R 2 e i x 1 t 1 e i x 1 h 1 f X ( x ) e j x 2 h 2 f X ( x ) e j x 2 t 2 d x | R 2 | e i x 1 h 1 f X ( x ) e j x 2 h 2 f X ( x ) | d x .
Invoking the triangle inequality for quaternion (10) gives
| ϕ X ( t + h ) ϕ X ( t ) | R 2 | e i x 1 h 1 f X ( x ) e j x 2 h 2 | + | f X ( x ) | d x = 2 R 2 | f X ( x ) | d x .
Using the dominated convergence theorem implies that | ϕ X ( t + h ) ϕ X ( t ) | 0 when h 0 and so, ϕ X is uniformly continuous. □
Theorem 4.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be real random variables. If X 1 and X 2 are independent and the quaternion probability density function f X ( x ) factorizes as
f X ( x ) = f X 1 ( x 1 ) f X 2 ( x 2 ) ,
then
ϕ X ( t ) = ϕ X 1 ( t 1 ) ϕ X 2 ( t 2 )
Proof. 
In fact, we have
ϕ X ( t ) = E [ e i t 1 X 1 e j t 2 X 2 ] = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X 1 ( x 1 ) f X 2 ( x 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x .
If we assume that f X 2 is a real-valued function, the above relation changes to
ϕ X ( t ) = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X 1 ( x 1 ) f X 2 ( x 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X 1 ( x 1 ) e j t 2 x 2 f X 2 ( x 2 ) d x ,
and the proof is complete. □
Relation (38) above may be expressed in the form
ϕ X ( t ) = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X a ( x ) + i f X b ( x ) + j f X c ( x ) + k f X d ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X a ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x + i R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X b ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x + j R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X c ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x + k R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X d ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = ϕ X a ( t ) + i ϕ X b ( t ) + j ϕ X c ( t 1 , t 2 ) + k ϕ X d ( t 1 , t 2 ) ,
where
ϕ X l ( t ) = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X l ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x , l = a , b , c , d .
Proposition 1.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be real random variables. Then, one gets
1
ϕ X l ( 0 ) = 1 , ϕ X ( 0 ) = 1 .
2
| ϕ X l ( t ) | 1 , | ϕ X ( t ) | | 1 | = 4 , l = a , b , c , d
where 
1 = ( 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) = 1 + i + j + k .
Proof. 
According to relations (23) and (44), it is straightforward to see that
ϕ X l ( 0 ) = R 2 f X l ( x ) d x = 1 ,
and
ϕ X ( 0 ) = R 2 f X ( x ) d x = R 2 f X a + i f X b + j f X c + k f X d d x = R 2 f X a d x + i R 2 f X b d x + j R 2 f X c d x + k R 2 f X d d x = 1 .
On the other hand, we have
| ϕ X l ( t ) | = | R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X l ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x | R 2 | e i t 1 x 1 f X l ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 | d x = R 2 | f X l ( x ) | d x = R 2 f X l ( x ) d x = 1 .
We also find
| ϕ X ( t ) | = | R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x | R 2 | f X ( x ) | d x .
Applying (10) and (23) results in
| ϕ X ( t ) | = | R 2 e i t 1 x 1 ( f X a ( x ) + i f X b ( x ) + j f X c ( x ) + k f X d ( x ) ) e j t 2 x 2 d x | R 2 | f X a ( x ) | d x + R 2 | i f X b ( x ) | d x + R 2 | j f X c ( x ) | d x + R 2 | k f X d ( x ) | d x = R 2 | f X a ( x ) | d x + R 2 | f X b ( x ) | d x + R 2 | f X c ( x ) | d x + R 2 | f X d ( x ) | d x = R 2 f X a ( x ) d x + R 2 f X b ( x ) d x + R 2 f X c ( x ) d x + R 2 f X d ( x ) d x = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4 ,
and the proof is complete. □
Definition 8.
The quaternion probability density function f X ( x ) can be recovered from the characteristic function using the formula
f X ( x ) = 1 ( 2 π ) 2 R 2 e i t 1 x 1 ϕ X ( t ) e j t 2 x 2 d t .
Let us now compute the quaternion characteristic function of Example 1. It follows from Equation (38) that
ϕ X 1 , X 2 ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 0 1 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 4 x 1 x 2 + 3 i x 1 2 + 3 j x 2 2 + k ( x 1 + x 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 = 0 1 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 ( 4 x 1 x 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 + 0 1 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 ( 3 i x 1 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 + 0 1 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 ( 3 j x 2 2 ) e j t 2 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 + 0 1 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 ( k ( x 1 + x 2 ) ) e j t 2 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 = 4 0 1 x 1 e i t 1 x 1 d x 1 0 1 x 2 e j t 2 x 2 d x 2 + 3 i 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 x 1 2 d x 1 0 1 e j t 2 x 2 d x 2 + 3 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 d x 1 j 0 1 x 2 2 e j t 2 x 2 d x 2 + 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 x 1 d x 1 k 0 1 e j t 2 x 2 d x 2 + 0 1 e i t 1 x 1 d x 1 k 0 1 x 2 e j t 2 x 2 d x 2 .
Further, we get
ϕ X 1 , X 2 ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 4 e i t 1 i t 1 + e i t 1 1 t 1 2 e j t 2 j t 2 + e j t 2 1 t 2 2 + 3 i e i t 1 i t 1 + 2 e i t 1 t 1 2 2 e i t 1 2 i t 1 3 e j t 2 1 j t 2 + 3 j e i t 1 1 i t 1 e j t 2 j t 2 + 2 e j t 2 j t 2 2 e j t 2 2 j t 2 + k e i t 1 i t 1 + e i t 1 1 t 1 2 e j t 2 1 j t 2 = 4 t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) i t 1 2 t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) j t 1 2 + 3 i t 1 2 e i t 1 + i t 1 2 e i t 1 2 e i t 1 + 2 i t 1 3 e j t 2 1 j t 2 + 3 j e i t 1 1 i t 1 t 2 2 e j t 2 + j t 2 2 e j t 2 2 e j t 2 + 2 j t 2 3 + k t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) i t 1 2 e j t 2 1 j t 2 + k e i t 1 1 i t 1 t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) j t 2 2 .
Equation (48) may be further simplified to
ϕ X 1 , X 2 ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 4 t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) k t 1 2 t 2 2 + 3 i t 1 2 e i t 1 + i t 1 2 e i t 1 2 e i t 1 + 2 e j t 2 1 k t 1 3 t 2 + 3 j e i t 1 1 t 2 2 e j t 2 + 2 j t 2 2 e j t 2 2 e j t 2 + 2 k t 1 t 2 3 + k t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) e j t 2 1 k t 1 2 t 2 + k e i t 1 1 t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) k t 1 t 2 2
We finally arrive at
ϕ X 1 , X 2 ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 4 k t 1 2 t 2 2 t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) + 1 k t 1 3 t 2 3 i 2 + e i t 1 ( t 1 2 + 2 i t 1 2 ) e j t 2 1 + 1 k t 1 t 2 3 3 j 2 + e j t 2 ( t 2 2 + 2 j t 2 2 ) e i t 1 1 + 1 t 1 2 t 2 t 1 e i t 1 + i ( e i t 1 1 ) ( e j t 2 1 ) + 1 t 1 t 2 2 ( e i t 1 1 ) t 2 e j t 2 + j ( e j t 2 1 ) .
As an immediate consequence of Definition 8, the following result can be found.
Theorem 5.
Assume that the quaternion characteristic functions ϕ X and ψ X of the random variables X are defined by
ϕ X ( t ) = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x , ψ X ( x ) = R 2 e i t 1 x 1 g X ( t ) e j t 2 x 2 d t .
Assume that f X is a real probability density function; then, one gets
R 2 g X ( t ) e i t 1 y 1 ϕ X ( t ) e j t 2 y 2 d t = R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X a ( x y ) d x + i R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X b ( x y ) d x + j R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X c ( y x ) d x + k R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X d ( y x ) d x .
Proof. 
By virtue of the quaternion characteristic function defined in (38), we obtain
e i t 1 y 1 ϕ X ( t ) e j t 2 y 2 = e i t 1 y 1 R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x e j t 2 y 2 = R 2 e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) f X ( x ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d x .
Multiplying both sides of relation (52) by g X ( t ) and then integrating with respect to d t , we see that
R 2 g X ( t ) e i t 1 y 1 ϕ X ( t ) e j t 2 y 2 d t = R 2 g X ( t ) R 2 e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) f X ( x ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d x d t = R 2 R 2 g X a ( t ) + i g X b ( t ) + j g X c ( t ) + k g X d ( t ) e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) f X ( x ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d x d t = R 2 R 2 g X a ( t ) + i g X b ( t ) + j g X c ( t ) + k g X d ( t ) e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) f X ( x ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d x d t .
Fubini’s theorem allows us to obtain
R 2 g X ( t ) e i t 1 y 1 ϕ X ( t ) e j t 2 y 2 d t = R 2 R 2 f X ( x ) e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) g X a ( t ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d t + i f X ( x ) R 2 e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) g X b ( t ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d t d x + R 2 j f X ( x ) R 2 e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) g X c ( t ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d t + k f X ( x ) R 2 e i t 1 ( x 1 y 1 ) g X d ( t ) e j t 2 ( x 2 y 2 ) d t d x = R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X a ( x y ) + i f X ( x ) ψ X b ( x y ) d x + R 2 j f X ( x ) ψ X c ( y x ) + k f X ( x ) ψ X d ( y x ) d x = R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X a ( x y ) d x + i R 2 f X ( x ) ψ X b ( x y ) d x + j R 2 f X ( d x ) ψ X c ( y x ) d x + k R 2 f X ( d x ) ψ X d ( y x ) d x .
This is the desired result. □
Based on Equation (26), we may define the (n + m)th moment of real random variables X 1 and X 2 as
E X 1 m X 2 n = R 2 x 1 n x 2 m f X ( x ) d x , n , m = 1 , 2 , 3 , ,
provided the integral exists. It is obvious that for n = 1 , m = 0 and n = 0 , m = 1 in (53), we obtain
μ 1 = E X 1 = R 2 x 1 f X ( x ) d x ,
and
μ 2 = E X 2 = R 2 x 2 f X ( x ) d x .
Theorem 6.
If X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) are real random variables, then there exist ( n + m ) th continuous derivatives for the quaternion characteristic function ϕ X ( t ) described by the formula
m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( t ) = i m R 2 x 1 m e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) x 2 n e j t 2 x 2 d x j n .
In addition,
E X 1 n X 2 m = i m m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( 0 ) j n .
Proof. 
For m = 1 and n = 0 , direct calculations reveal that
t 1 ϕ X ( t ) = t 1 R 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = R 2 t 1 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = R 2 ( i x 1 ) e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x .
In view of relation (58), we obtain
2 t 1 2 ϕ X ( t ) = t 1 R 2 ( i x 1 ) e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x = i 2 R 2 x 1 2 e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) e j t 2 x 2 d x .
This implies that
m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( t ) = i m R 2 x 1 m e i t 1 x 1 f X ( x ) x 2 n e j t 2 x 2 d x j n .
Applying Equation (53) gives
m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( 0 ) = i m R 2 x 1 m f X ( x ) x 2 n d x j n .
Hence,
i m m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( 0 ) j n = R 2 x 1 m f X ( x ) x 2 n d x ,
thus, the proof of the theorem is completed. □
Let us now introduce the definition of the quaternion covariance of real random variables X 1 and X 2 .
Definition 9.
Let X = ( X 1 , X 2 ) be any real random variables. The covariance of X 1 and X 2 in the quaternion setting is given by
C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = E ( X 1 E [ X 1 ] ) ( X 2 E [ X 2 ] ¯ ) = E ( X 1 E [ X 1 ] ) ( X 2 E [ X 2 ] ¯ ) = E ( X 1 X 2 X 1 E [ X 2 ] ¯ E [ X 1 ] X 2 + E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] ¯ = E X 1 X 2 E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] ¯ E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] + E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] ¯ = E X 1 X 2 E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] .
According to (62), we obtain
C o v ( X 2 , X 1 ) = E [ X 2 X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 1 ] = E [ X 1 X 2 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 1 ]
In general, since E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 1 ] , then C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) C o v ( X 2 , X 1 ) . Due to (62), we get
V a r ( X 1 ) = σ 1 = E X 1 X 1 E [ X 1 ] E [ X 1 ] = E X 1 2 E [ X 1 ] 2 .
which is the quaternion variance of real random variable X 1 .
From Example 1, we get
C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = E X 1 X 2 E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] = 4 9 + 3 8 i + 3 8 j + 1 3 k 31 48 + 11 16 i + 11 16 j + 1 13 144 k = 1 13 144 5 16 i + 5 16 j 109 144 k ,
and
| C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) | = 157 144 2 + 5 16 2 + 5 16 2 + 109 144 2 = 10145 5184 = 1 72 10145 .
It can be obtained that the quaternion covariance C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) of real random variables X 1 and X 2 in terms of the quaternion characteristic function is
C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = i 1 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j 1 i t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j = i 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j i t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) j .
Remark 2.
Due to Equation (63), one gets
C o v ( X 2 , X 1 ) = i 1 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j 1 i 1 t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) = i 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) k t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) .
The following example illustrates the use of the results mentioned above.
Example 2.
The random variables X 1 and X 2 have a probability density function of the form
f ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 1 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | e ( x 1 | μ 1 | ) 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 e ( x 2 | μ 2 | ) 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 .
where μ 1 and μ 2 are defined by Equations (54) and (55). Find the quaternion variance of X 1 and X 2 .
Solution. 
It follows from Equation (38) that
ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 1 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R 2 e i t 1 x 1 e ( x 1 | μ 1 | ) 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 e ( x 2 | μ 2 | ) 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 e j t 2 x 2 d x .
Changing the variables to x 1 | μ 1 | = y 1 and x 2 | μ 2 | = y 2 , it is easily seen that
ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = 1 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R 2 e i t 1 ( | μ 1 | + y 1 ) e y 1 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 e y 2 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 e j t 2 ( | μ 2 | + y 2 ) d y 1 d y 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R e y 1 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 + i t 1 y 1 d y 1 R e y 2 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 + j t 2 y 2 d y 2 .
We further obtain
ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R e 1 2 | σ 1 | 2 ( y 1 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 y 1 ) d y 1 R e 1 2 | σ 2 | 2 ( y 2 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 y 2 ) d y 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R e 1 2 | σ 1 | 2 y 1 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 d y 1 R e 1 2 σ 2 2 y 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 d y 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | R e | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 e 1 2 σ 1 2 y 1 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 d y 1 R e | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 e 1 2 | σ 2 | 2 y 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 d y 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | e | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 R e 1 2 | σ 1 | 2 y 1 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 2 d y 1 R e 1 2 | σ 2 | 2 y 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 d y 2 e | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 2 2 | σ 2 | 2 .
Substituting u 1 = y 1 | σ 1 | 2 i t 1 and u 2 = y 2 | σ 2 | 2 j t 2 yields
ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | e | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 e | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 R e 1 2 | σ 1 | 2 u 1 2 d u 1 R e 1 2 | σ 2 | 2 u 2 2 d u 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | e j t 2 | μ 2 | 2 π | σ 1 | | σ 2 | e | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 e | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 2 π | σ 1 | 2 2 π | σ 2 | 2 = e i t 1 | μ 1 | | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 e j t 2 | μ 2 | | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 .
Therefore,
t 1 ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = i | μ 1 | t 1 | σ 1 | 2 e i t 1 | μ 1 | | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 e j t 2 | μ 2 | | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 t 2 ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = e i t 1 | μ 1 | | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 j | μ 2 | t 2 | σ 2 | 2 e j t 2 | μ 2 | | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = i | μ 1 | t 1 | σ 1 | 2 e i t 1 | μ 1 | | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 j | μ 2 | t 2 | σ 2 | 2 e j t 2 | μ 2 | | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 2 t 1 2 ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = i | μ 1 | t 1 | σ 1 | 2 2 | σ 1 | 2 e i t 1 | μ 1 | | σ 1 | 2 t 1 2 2 e j t 2 | μ 2 | | σ 2 | 2 t 2 2 2 2 t 2 2 ϕ X ( t 1 , t 2 ) = i | m | t | σ | 2 3 3 | σ | 2 ( i | m | t | σ | 2 ) e i t | m | | σ | 2 t 2 2 .
Due to Equation (67), we obtain
C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = i 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j i t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j = i ( i | μ 1 | j | μ 2 | ) j i 2 | μ 1 | j | μ 2 | j = i 2 j 2 | μ 1 | | μ 2 | | μ 2 | | μ 1 | = | μ 1 | | μ 2 | | μ 2 | | μ 1 | = 0 .
Remark 3.
According to Equation (68), one has
C o v ( X 2 , X 1 ) = i 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) k t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) = i 2 j 2 | μ 1 | | μ 2 | j | μ 2 | ki | μ 1 | = | μ 1 | | μ 2 | + | μ 2 | | μ 1 | = 2 | μ 1 | | μ 2 | .
This example shows that C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) in Equation (62) is different from C o v ( X 2 , X 1 ) in Equation (63).
The above results are summarized in Table 2.

5. Conclusions and Future Works

In this paper, we have introduced the two-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform (2DQFT) and investigated a new convolution theorem related to this transformation. We demonstrated its utility in quaternion probability modeling and obtained some results that differ from classical probability modeling.
All works reported in this paper are only preliminary results. There are many issues that can be studied through further research. For instance, instead of the continuous quaternion Fourier transform, the discrete quaternion Fourier transform [21,22] may be implemented in the construction of the discrete characteristic function, discrete expectation, and so on. In addition, the generalization of the n-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform allows us to define the characteristic function, expectation, etc., in higher dimensions. Also, in a forthcoming paper, we will investigate the use of two-dimensional quaternion differential equations to solve quaternion-valued differential equations like the quaternion Laplace transform [23].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; Formal analysis, M.B.; Funding acquisition, N.N.; Investigation, A.R.; Methodology, N.N.; Resources, A.R.; Validation and Writing—original draft, N.N. and A.R.; Writing—review and editing, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the referee for the valuable comments which help to the improve the presentation of paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bracewell, R. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications; McGraw Hill: Boston, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mallat, S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Athanasios, P. Signal Analysis; McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  4. Grigoryan, A.M.; Jenkinson, J.; Agaian, S.S. Quaternion Fourier transform based alpha-rooting method for color image measurement and enhancement. Signal Process. 2015, 109, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhatti, U.A.; Yuan, L.; Yu, Z.; Li, J.; Nawaz, S.A.; Mehmood, A.; Zhang, K. New watermarking algorithm utilizing quaternion Fourier transform with advanced scrambling and secure encryption. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 13367–13387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hitzer, E. The quaternion domain Fourier transform and its properties. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2016, 26, 969–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hitzer, E. Quaternion Fourier transform on quaternion fields and generalizations. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2007, 17, 497–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bahri, M.; Ashino, R.; Vaillancourt, R. Convolution theorems for quaternion Fourier transform: Properties and applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 162769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bihan, L.; Sangwine, S.J. Quaternionic spectral analysis of non-stationary improper complex signals. In Quaternion and Clifford Fourier Transform and Wavelets; Hitzer, E., Sangwine, S.J., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grigoryan, A.M.; Agaian, S. Tensor transform-based quaternion fourier transform algorithm. Inf. Sci. 2015, 320, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hitzer, E. Quaternionic Wiener-Khinchine theorems and spectral representation of convolution with steerable two-sided quaternion Fourier transform. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2017, 27, 1313–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, D.; Kou, K.I. Plancherel theorem and quaternion Fourier transform for square integrable functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2018, 64, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Assefa, D.; Masinha, L.; Tiampo, K.F.; Rasmussen, H.; Abdella, K. Local quaternion Fourier transform and color image texture analysis. Signal Process. 2009, 90, 1825–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Richter, W.-D. On the vector representation of characteristic functions. Stats 2023, 6, 1072–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fahlaoui, S.; Monaim, H. General one-dimensional Clifford Fourier transform and applications to probability theory. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo II 2024, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ekasasmita, W.; Bahri, M.; Bachtiar, N.; Rahim, A.; Nur, M. One-dimensional quaternion Fourier transform with application to probability theory. Symmetry 2023, 15, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Morais, J.; Georgiev, S.; Sprösig, W. Real Quaternion Calculus Handbook; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Olhede, S.C. On probability density functions for complex variables. IEEE Trans. Inf. 2006, 52, 1213–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Loots, M.T. The Development of the Quaternion Normal Distribution. Master’s Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Brémaud, R. Fourier Analysis and Stochastic Processes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. Majorkowska-Mech, D.; Cariow, A. One-dimensional quaternion discrete Fourier transform and an approach to its fast computation. Electronics 2023, 12, 4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bahri, M.; Azis, M.I.; Firman; Lande, C. Discrete double-sided quaternionic Fourier transform and application. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2009, 1341, 062001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bau, M.A.; Bahri, M.; Bachtiar, N.; Busrah, S.N.; Nur, M. One-dimensional quaternion Laplace transform: Properties and its application to quaternion-valued differential equations. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2023, 8, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Comparison of one-dimensional quaternion probability and two-dimensional quaternion probability.
Table 1. Comparison of one-dimensional quaternion probability and two-dimensional quaternion probability.
PropertyOne-Dimensional Quaternion ProbabilityTwo-Dimensional Quaternion Probability
Characteristic Function ϕ X ( t ) = ϕ X a ( t ) + i ϕ X b ( t ) + j ϕ X c ( t ) + k ϕ X d ( t ) ϕ X ( t ) = ϕ X a ( t ) + i ϕ X b ( t ) + j ϕ X c ( t 1 , t 2 ) + k ϕ X d ( t 1 , t 2 )
Moments E [ X k ] = d k d t k ϕ X ( 0 ) ( i ) k E X 1 n X 2 m = i m m + n t 1 m t 2 n ϕ X ( 0 ) j n
Variance, Covariance v a r ( X ) = d 2 d t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) ( i ) 2 d 2 d t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) ( i ) 2 C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = i 2 t 1 t 2 ϕ X ( 0 ) j i t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) t 1 ϕ X ( 0 ) j 2
Table 2. Comparison of quaternion probability and classical probability.
Table 2. Comparison of quaternion probability and classical probability.
Quaternion ProbabilityClassical Probability
C o v ( x 1 , x 2 ) C o v ( x 2 , x 1 ) C o v ( X 1 , X 2 ) = C o v ( X 2 , X 1 )
E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 2 ] E [ X 1 ] E [ X 1 ] E [ X 2 ] = E [ X 2 ] E [ X 1 ]
R 2 f ( x ) d x = 1 R 2 f ( x ) d x = 1
| ϕ X ( t ) | | 1 | = 4 | ϕ X ( t ) | 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nurwahidah, N.; Bahri, M.; Rahim, A. Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform Method in Probability Modeling. Symmetry 2024, 16, 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030257

AMA Style

Nurwahidah N, Bahri M, Rahim A. Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform Method in Probability Modeling. Symmetry. 2024; 16(3):257. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nurwahidah, Nurwahidah, Mawardi Bahri, and Amran Rahim. 2024. "Two-Dimensional Quaternion Fourier Transform Method in Probability Modeling" Symmetry 16, no. 3: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop