Next Article in Journal
Prevention of Wave Propagation via Circular Arrangement of Seismic Metamaterials Formed with Concrete Piles
Next Article in Special Issue
Some Analysis of the Coefficient-Related Problems for Functions of Bounded Turning Associated with a Symmetric Image Domain
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Local Structure, and Magnetic Properties of Polycrystalline and Single-Crystalline Ce2Pt6Al15
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of the Symmetric Quantum-Difference Operator for New Subclasses of Meromorphic Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s Theorem in the Poincaré Ball Model of Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry

Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA
Symmetry 2023, 15(8), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081487
Submission received: 21 June 2023 / Revised: 10 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Geometric Functions and Mathematical Analysis II)

Abstract

:
Ptolemy’s theorem in Euclidean geometry, named after the Greek astronomer and mathematician Claudius Ptolemy, is well known. We translate Ptolemy’s theorem from analytic Euclidean geometry into the Poincaré ball model of analytic hyperbolic geometry, which is based on the Möbius addition and its associated symmetry gyrogroup. The translation of Ptolemy’s theorem from Euclidean geometry into hyperbolic geometry is achieved by means of hyperbolic trigonometry, called gyrotrigonometry, to which the Poincaré ball model gives rise, and by means of the duality of trigonometry and gyrotrigonometry.

1. Introduction

Analytic hyperbolic geometry represents the study of hyperbolic geometry by Lobachevsky and Bolyai; it has been studied analytically since 1988 [1], in full analogy with the analytical study of Euclidean geometry [1,2,3]. In the analytical study of hyperbolic geometry, the Einstein addition and Möbius addition capture analogies with the vector addition, as follows:
(1)
The vector addition admits scalar multiplication, giving rise to vector spaces which, in turn, form the algebraic setting for analytic Euclidean geometry. In full analogy,
(2)
The Einstein addition, which pertains to relativistically admissible velocities, also permits scalar multiplication, giving rise to Einstein gyrovector spaces, which, in turn, form the algebraic setting for the Klein ball model of analytic hyperbolic geometry [1,2,3,4,5]. Accordingly, the Klein model of hyperbolic geometry is also known as the relativistic model of hyperbolic geometry [6,7]. Furthermore, in full analogy,
(3)
The Möbius addition [8] admits scalar multiplication, giving rise to Möbius gyrovector spaces, which, in turn, form the algebraic setting for the Poincaré ball model of analytic hyperbolic geometry [1,2,3,4].
In the same way that the Euclidean vector plane admits trigonometry, each Einstein gyrovector plane and Möbius gyrovector plane admits hyperbolic trigonometry, called gyrotrigonometry.
Ptolemy’s theorem in Euclidean plane geometry, named after the Greek astronomer and mathematician Claudius Ptolemy, is well known.
(1)
In [6], we presented the well-known proof of Ptolemy’s theorem in terms of the standard trigonometry of analytic Euclidean plane geometry. In particular, the associated law of cosines was employed.
(2)
In full analogy, in [6], we discovered the hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem in the Klein (relativistic) model of analytic hyperbolic plane geometry. The proof of the resulting hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem is obtained by means of the gyrotrigonometry that the Klein model of analytic hyperbolic geometry admits. In particular, the associated law of gyrocosines was employed.
(3)
In full analogy, in this article, we discover the hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré ball model of analytic hyperbolic plane geometry. The proof of the resulting hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem is obtained by means of the gyrotrigonometry that the Poincaré model of analytic hyperbolic geometry admits. In particular, the associated law of gyrocosines is employed.
Finally, we present an elegant application of the hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem to gyrodiametric gyrotriangles, which results in a Pythagorean-like identity.
For a fruitful reading of this article, familiarity with Ref. [6] is recommended, where important background information about gyrogroups, gyrovector spaces, and gyrotrigonometry is reviewed. In particular, the duality of trigonometry–gyrotrigonometry is reviewed and illustrated.

2. Möbius Addition and Scalar Multiplication

Let s > 0 be any positive constant and let R n = ( R n , + , · ) be the Euclidean n-space, n N , endowed with the common vector addition, +, and inner product, ·, and let R s n be the s-ball given by
R s n = { v R n : v < s } .
Möbius addition is a binary operation, ⊕, in the s-ball R s n , given by
u v = ( 1 + 2 s 2 u · v + 1 s 2 v 2 ) u + ( 1 1 s 2 u 2 ) v 1 + 2 s 2 u · v + 1 s 4 u 2 v 2
where · and · are the inner product and the norm that the ball R s n inherits from its ambient space R n [8].
Note that in the Euclidean limit, s , the s-ball R s n expands to the whole of its ambient space R n , and Möbius addition tends to the common vector addition, u + v , in R n .
Möbius addition in R s n , n 2 , is neither commutative nor associative. Hence, the pair ( R s n , ) does not form a group. However, it forms a gyrocommutative gyrogroup as shown, for instance, in [2,3]. A gyrogroup is a group-like structure, a prominent concrete example of which is given by the Einstein addition of relativistically admissible velocities, studied, for instance, in [2,3,6]. The elegant road from Möbius to gyrogroups is revealed in [8].
The definition of gyrogroups, some of which are gyrocommutative, is presented, for instance, in [2,3,5,6]. Gyrogroups form a natural generalization of groups [9], giving rise to useful applications, such as in [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Möbius addition, ⊕, admits scalar multiplication, ⊗, turning Möbius gyrogroups into Möbius gyrovector spaces ( R s n , , ) . Möbius scalar multiplication is given by ([1] Section 3.6), ([2] Section 8.12), ([3], Section 6.14)
r v = s 1 + v s r 1 v s r 1 + v s r + 1 v s r v v = s tanh ( r tanh 1 v s ) v v
where r R , v R s n , v 0 ; and r 0 = 0 .
Gyrovector spaces are naturally generalized vector spaces, the definition of which is presented, for instance, in [2,3,6].
The resulting (i) Möbius gyrovector spaces form the algebraic setting for the Cartesian Poincaré ball model of analytic hyperbolic geometry, just as (ii) Einstein gyrovector spaces form the algebraic setting for the Cartesian Klein ball model of analytic hyperbolic geometry, just as (iii) vector spaces form the algebraic setting for the standard Cartesian model of analytic Euclidean geometry [1]. Interesting applications of gyrovector spaces are found, for instance, in [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Thus, the notions of gyrogroups and gyrovector spaces preserve the flavor of their classical counterparts, groups, and vector spaces [1]. In particular, in the same way that groups are linked to symmetry in geometry, gyrogroups are linked to symmetry in gyrogeometry. In this paper, the gyro-counterpart of Euclidean geometry is the Poincaré model of hyperbolic geometry.
Gyrovector planes admit hyperbolic trigonometry, called gyrotrigonometry, just as vector planes admit common trigonometry. The law of gyrocosines in the gyrotrigonometry of the Klein model of hyperbolic geometry is employed in [6] for the proof of Ptolemy’s theorem in the Klein model. Similarly, the law of gyrocosines in the gyrotrigonometry of the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry is employed in this article for the proof of Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré model.

3. Gyrotrigonometry in Möbius Gyrovector Planes and Its Law of Gyrocosines

Möbius addition and scalar multiplication allow Möbius gyrolines to be expressed analytically in a way that is fully analogous to lines in analytic Euclidean geometry. The unique Euclidean line that passes through two distinct points, A , B R n , is given analytically by
A + ( A + B ) t ,
t R . In full analogy, the unique Möbius gyroline that passes through two distinct points, A , B R s n , in a Möbius gyrovector space ( R s n , , ) , is given analytically by
A ( A B ) t ,
t R , where A = A is depicted in Figure 1 for n = 2 .
A Möbius gyroline (5) is a circular arc that approaches the boundary of the s-ball R s n orthogonally. It passes at point A when t = 0 , and at point B when t = 1 , and it forms a geodesic in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry [4].
The gyrosegment  A B that links the two distinct points A , B R s n is given by (5) with 0 t 1 . The gyrolength of a gyrosegment A B is
| A B | h : = A B ,
A , B R s n , just as the length of a segment A B is
| A B | e : = A + B ,
A , B R n .
A gyrotriangle A B C whose gyrosides are the gyrosegments A B , B C , and A C in R s n , along with its gyroangles, is depicted in Figure 2. The gyrolengths of the gyrosides of gyrotriangle A B C are
a : = | B C | h = B C b : = | A C | h = A C c : = | A B | h = A B ,
as shown in Figure 2.
Gyrotrigonometry in Möbius gyrovector spaces is studied, for instance, in ([3] Section 8.5). In gyrotrigonometry, the gyrocosine of a gyroangle α = B A C , shown in Figure 2, is given by
cos α = A B A B · A C A C ,
just as in trigonometry, the cosine of an angle, α , in the Euclidean counterpart of Figure 2, is given by
cos α = A + B A + B · A + C A + C .
Accordingly, viewing cos α trigonometrically yields (10), while viewing cos α gyrotrigonometrically yields (9). The resulting trigonometry–gyrotrigonometry duality is illustrated in ([6] Section 11). The usefulness of the analogies that (5) and (4) share suggests that the analogies that (9) and (10) share will prove useful as well. We will see in this article that this is, indeed, the case.
An important trigonometric identity that we will view gyrotrigonometrically is
sin α 2 sin γ 2 + sin β 2 sin δ 2 = sin α + β 2 sin β + γ 2
for any α , β , γ R , where δ = 2 π ( α + β + γ ) . Identity (11) can be realized not only trigonometrically (i) in the Euclidean plane, but also gyrotrigonometrically (ii) in the Einstein gyrovector plane, and (iii) in the Möbius gyrovector plane. These three distinct realizations of (11) are consistent, owing to the duality of trigonometry and gyrotrigonometry, as explained in [6].
Indeed, (i) realizing (11) in trigonometry gives rise to Ptolemy’s theorem in Euclidean geometry, as shown in [6]; (ii) realizing (11) in Einstein gyrotrigonometry gives rise to Ptolemy’s theorem in the Klein ball (relativistic) model of hyperbolic geometry, as shown in [6]; and (iii) realizing (11) in Möbius gyrotrigonometry gives rise to Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry, as we will see in Section 4.
Having the gyrotriangle notation in Figure 2, we are now in the position to state the law of gyrocosines in a Möbius gyrovector plane, verified in ([2] Section 8.4) and ([3] Section 8.5).
Theorem 1
(The law of gyrocosines in Möbius gyrovector spaces). Let A B C be a gyrotriangle in a Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s n , , ) with vertices A , B , C R s 2 , side gyrolengths 0 < a , b , c < s , and gyroangles α , β , γ , as shown in Figure 2. Then, the gyrosides and gyroangles of the gyrotriangle satisfy the law of gyrocosines
c 2 = a 2 + b 2 2 a b cos γ 1 + a s 2 b s 2 2 a s b s cos γ
and, equivalently,
cos γ = a 2 + b 2 c 2 a s 2 b s 2 c 2 2 a b ( 1 c s 2 )
where a s = a / s , b s = b / s , c s = c / s , with similar relations involving the other gyrosides and gyroangles of the gyrotriangle.
Note that in the Euclidean limit, s , the law of gyrocosines (12) descends to the law of cosines,
c 2 = a 2 + b 2 2 a b cos γ
as expected. Also, note that in the context of Euclidean geometry, cos γ in (14) is viewed trigonometrically, as in (10), while in the context of hyperbolic geometry, cos γ in (12) and (13) is viewed gyrotrigonometrically, as in (9) and Figure 2.

4. Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré Ball Model of Hyperbolic Geometry

Applying the law of gyrocosines (13) to the O-gyrovertex gyroangle α = A O B of gyrotriangle A B O , shown in Figure 3, yields
cos α = 2 r 2 | A B | h 2 r 4 s 4 | A B | h 2 2 r 2 ( 1 | A B | h 2 s 2 ) ,
noting that a , b , c , and γ in (13) are, respectively, realized in (15) by r , r , | A B | h , and α .
We now employ the trigonometric (and, hence, gyrotrigonometric) identity sin 2 ( α / 2 ) = ( 1 cos α ) / 2 , obtaining from (15) the equation
sin 2 α 2 = 1 cos α 2 = ( s 2 r 2 ) 2 4 s 2 r 2 ( s 2 | A B | h 2 ) | A B | h 2
so that, finally,
sin α 2 = s 2 r 2 2 s r s 2 | A B | h 2 | A B | h = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | A B | h | A B | h
where r s = r / s , and where γ | A B | h is the Lorentz gamma factor of | A B | h , given by
γ | A B | h = 1 1 | A B | h 2 s 2 .
Repeating the result in (17) for the six O-gyrovertex gyrotriangle gyroangles α , β , γ , δ , α + β , and β + γ in Figure 3 yields the following six equations:
sin α 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | A B | h | A B | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | A B | g sin β 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | B C | h | B C | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | B C | g sin γ 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | C D | h | C D | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | C D | g sin δ 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | A D | h | A D | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | A D | g sin α + β 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | A C | h | A C | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | A C | g sin β + γ 2 = 1 r s 2 2 r γ | B D | h | B D | h = : 1 r s 2 2 r | B D | g
where
| A B | g = γ | A B | h | A B | h
and so forth. We call | A B | g the g-modified gyrolength of gyroside A B , and so forth.
Substituting (19) into the gyrotrigonometric identity (11) yields the result (21) of Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry.
Theorem 2
(Ptolemy’s theorem in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry). Let A B C D be a gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral, shown in Figure 3. Then, the product of the g-modified gyrodiagonals equals the sum of the products of the g-modified opposite gyrosides; that is
| A B | g | C D | g + | A D | g | B C | g = | A C | g | B D | g .
Clearly, in the Euclidean limit, s , the hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem (21) descends to its Euclidean counterpart, studied in [6].

5. Gyrodiametric Gyrotriangles

Definition 1.
A gyrotriangle is gyrodiametric if one of its gyrosides coincides with a gyrodiameter of its circumgyrocircle.
In Euclidean geometry, a diametric triangle is right-angled, with the angle opposite to the diametric side being π / 2 . In contrast, non-Euclidean gyrodiametric gyrotriangles are not right-gyroangled; however, they obey a Pythagorean-like identity, as Theorem 3 asserts.
Definition 2.
A gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral is gyrodiametric if its gyrodiagonals intersect at its circumgyrocenter, as shown in Figure 4.
A gyrodiametric gyroquadrilateral A B C D , shown in Figure 4, gives rise to two gyrodiametric gyrotriangles, A B C and A D C . In the notation shown in Figure 4, we clearly have
α = γ β = δ α + β = β + γ .
Hence, by (19), the equations in (22) yield, respectively, the equations
| A B | g = | C D | g | B C | g = | A D | g | A C | g = | B D | g .
Hence, it follows from (21) that
| A B | g 2 + | B C | g 2 = | A C | g 2
where | A B | g , | B C | g , and | A C | g are the g-modified gyrolengths of the gyrosides of the gyrodiametric gyrotriangle A B C , as shown in Figure 4.
Formalizing the result in (24), we proved the following theorem, where we use the notation in Figure 4.
Theorem 3
(Gyrodiametric Gyrotriangle Pythagorean-like Equation). Let A B C be a gyrodiametric gyrotriangle in a Möbius gyrovector space ( R s n , , ) , where A C is the gyrodiametric gyroside. Then, the gyrotriangle gyrosides obey the Pythagorean-like equation
| A B | g 2 + | B C | g 2 = | A C | g 2
where
| A B | g = γ | A B | h | A B | h | A B | h = A B .

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ungar, A.A. A Gyrovector Space Approach to Hyperbolic Geometry; Morgan & Claypool Pub.: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ungar, A.A. Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry: Mathematical Foundations And Applications; World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ungar, A.A. Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry and Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, 2nd ed.; World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ungar, A.A. Gyrovector spaces and their differential geometry. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2005, 10, 791–834. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ungar, A.A. Hyperbolic Triangle Centers: The Special Relativistic Approach; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ungar, A.A. Ptolemy’s theorem in the relativistic model of analytic hyperbolic geometry. Symmetry 2023, 15, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ungar, A.A. Hyperbolic trigonometry in the Einstein relativistic velocity model of hyperbolic geometry. Comput. Math. Appl. 2000, 40, 313–332. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ungar, A.A. From Möbius to gyrogroups. Amer. Math. Mon. 2008, 115, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suksumran, T. The algebra of gyrogroups: Cayley’s theorem, Lagrange’s theorem and isomorphism theorems. In Essays in Mathematics and Its Applications: In Honor of Vladimir Arnold; Rassias, T.M., Pardalos, P.M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 369–437. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferreira, M. Factorizations of Möbius gyrogroups. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 2009, 19, 303–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ferreira, M.; Ren, G. Möbius gyrogroups: A Clifford algebra approach. J. Algebra 2011, 328, 230–253. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferreira, M. Gyrogroups in projective hyperbolic Clifford analysis. In Hypercomplex Analysis and Applications; Trends Math.; Birkhäuser/Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 61–80. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferreira, M. Harmonic analysis on the Einstein gyrogroup. J. Geom. Symmetry Phys. 2014, 35, 21–60. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferreira, M. Harmonic Analysis on the Möbius Gyrogroup. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 2015, 21, 281–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ferreira, M. Harmonic analysis on the proper velocity gyrogroup. Banach J. Math. Anal. 2017, 11, 21–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferreira, M.; Suksumran, T. Orthogonal gyrodecompositions of real inner product gyrogroups. Symmetry 2020, 12, 941. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira, M. Gyroharmonic analysis on relativistic gyrogroups. Math. Interdiscip. Res. 2016, 1, 69–109. [Google Scholar]
  18. Honma, T.; Hatori, O. A gyrogeometric mean in the einstein gyrogroup. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1333. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wattanapan, J.; Atiponrat, W.; Suksumran, T. Embedding of strongly topological gyrogroups in path-connected and locally path-connected gyrogroups. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1817. [Google Scholar]
  20. Suksumran, T. On metric structures of normed gyrogroups. In Mathematical Analysis and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 154, pp. 529–542. [Google Scholar]
  21. Suksumran, T. Two theorems on direct products of gyrogroups. AIMS Math. 2023, 8, 6278–6287. [Google Scholar]
  22. Suksumran, T. On Schreier graphs of gyrogroup actions. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2022, 226, 107134. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahdavi, S.; Ashrafi, A.R.; Salahshour, M.A. Normal subgyrogroups of certain gyrogroups. Quasigroups Relat. Syst. 2022, 30, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, P.; Shen, R. On topological gyrogroups. Filomat 2023, 37, 5087–5093. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, J.; Liang, Q. Extensions of some topological properties in topological gyrogroups. Topol. Appl. 2022, 322, 108328. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lal, R.; Kakkar, V. Gyrogroups associated with groups. Comm. Algebra 2022, 50, 524–537. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bao, M.; Lin, F. Feathered gyrogroups and gyrogroups with countable pseudocharacter. Filomat 2019, 33, 5113–5124. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bao, M.; Lin, F. Submetrizability of strongly topological gyrogroups. Houst. J. Math. 2021, 47, 427–443. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, S. Ordered gyrovector spaces. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, S. Distributivity on the gyrovector spaces. Kyungpook Math. J. 2015, 55, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, S. Gyrovector spaces on the open convex cone of positive definite matrices. Math. Interdisc. Res. 2016, 1, 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  32. Watanabe, K. A confirmation by hand calculation that the Möbius ball is a gyrovector space. Nihonkai Math. J. 2016, 27, 99–115. [Google Scholar]
  33. Watanabe, K. Orthogonal gyroexpansion in Möbius gyrovector spaces. J. Funct. Spaces 2017, 13, 1518254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Watanabe, K. Continuous quasi gyrolinear functionals on möbius gyrovector spaces. J. Funct. Spaces 2020, 2020, 1950727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Watanabe, K. On quasi gyrolinear maps between möbius gyrovector spaces induced from finite matrices. Symmetry 2021, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abe, T.; Watanabe, K. Finitely generated gyrovector subspaces and orthogonal gyrodecomposition in the Möbius gyrovector space. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 449, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abe, T.; Hatori, O. Generalized gyrovector spaces and a Mazur-Ulam theorem. Publ. Math. Debr. 2015, 87, 393–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hatori, O. Extension of isometries in generalized gyrovector spaces of the positive cones. In Problems and Recent Methods in Operator Theory; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2017; Volume 687, pp. 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hatori, O. Examples and applications of generalized gyrovector spaces. Results Math. 2017, 71, 295–317. [Google Scholar]
  40. Demirel, O. The first sharp gyrotriangle inequality in Möbius gyrovector space (D,⊕,⊗). Forum Geom. 2017, 17, 439–447. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. In the gyroformalism of analytic hyperbolic geometry, expressions that describe hyperbolic geometric objects take graceful forms analogous to their Euclidean counterparts. This is illustrated here, where the unique gyroline in a Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) through two given points A , B R s 2 is shown. When the gyroline parameter t R runs from to , the point P ( t ) = A ( A B ) t runs over the gyroline L A B . In particular, at “time” t = 0 , the point is at P ( 0 ) = A , and, owing to the left cancellation law of Möbius addition, at “time” t = 1 , the point is at P ( 1 ) = B . The Möbius gyroline equation is shown in the box. The analogies it shares with the Euclidean straight line equation in the vector space approach and Euclidean geometry are obvious.
Figure 1. In the gyroformalism of analytic hyperbolic geometry, expressions that describe hyperbolic geometric objects take graceful forms analogous to their Euclidean counterparts. This is illustrated here, where the unique gyroline in a Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) through two given points A , B R s 2 is shown. When the gyroline parameter t R runs from to , the point P ( t ) = A ( A B ) t runs over the gyroline L A B . In particular, at “time” t = 0 , the point is at P ( 0 ) = A , and, owing to the left cancellation law of Möbius addition, at “time” t = 1 , the point is at P ( 1 ) = B . The Möbius gyroline equation is shown in the box. The analogies it shares with the Euclidean straight line equation in the vector space approach and Euclidean geometry are obvious.
Symmetry 15 01487 g001
Figure 2. A gyrotriangle A B C in the Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) , along with its (i) gyrovertices A , B , C , (ii) gyroside gyrolengths a , b , c , and (iii) gyroangles α , β , γ and their gyrocosines.
Figure 2. A gyrotriangle A B C in the Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) , along with its (i) gyrovertices A , B , C , (ii) gyroside gyrolengths a , b , c , and (iii) gyroangles α , β , γ and their gyrocosines.
Symmetry 15 01487 g002
Figure 3. Ptolemy’s theorem in the hyperbolic plane regulated by the Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) . A gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral A B C D inscribed in its circumgyrocircle gyrocentered at its circumgyrocenter O, with gyroradius r = O A = O B = O C = O D is shown. The O-gyrovertex gyroangles α , β , γ , and δ satisfy the following equation: α + β + γ + δ = 2 π . The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem is fully analogous to its Euclidean counterpart, asserting that | A B | g | C D | g + | A D | g | B C | g = | A C | g | B D | g , where | A B | g , ect., is defined by (20) along with (6).
Figure 3. Ptolemy’s theorem in the hyperbolic plane regulated by the Möbius gyrovector plane ( R s 2 , , ) . A gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral A B C D inscribed in its circumgyrocircle gyrocentered at its circumgyrocenter O, with gyroradius r = O A = O B = O C = O D is shown. The O-gyrovertex gyroangles α , β , γ , and δ satisfy the following equation: α + β + γ + δ = 2 π . The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s theorem is fully analogous to its Euclidean counterpart, asserting that | A B | g | C D | g + | A D | g | B C | g = | A C | g | B D | g , where | A B | g , ect., is defined by (20) along with (6).
Symmetry 15 01487 g003
Figure 4. A gyrodiametric gyroquadrilateral in a Möbius gyrovector plane. The gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral A B C D of Figure 3 is depicted here in the special position where the two gyrodiagonals, A C and B D , intersect at the gyroquadrilateral circumgyrocenter O, resulting in the two gyrodiametric gyrotriangles, A B C and A D C . The common gyroside, A C , of these gyrotriangles is a gyrodiameter of the gyroquadrilateral circumgyrocircle. The Pythagorean-like formula that the g-modified gyroside gyrolengths of a gyrodiametric gyrotriangle obey in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry is shown.
Figure 4. A gyrodiametric gyroquadrilateral in a Möbius gyrovector plane. The gyrocyclic gyroquadrilateral A B C D of Figure 3 is depicted here in the special position where the two gyrodiagonals, A C and B D , intersect at the gyroquadrilateral circumgyrocenter O, resulting in the two gyrodiametric gyrotriangles, A B C and A D C . The common gyroside, A C , of these gyrotriangles is a gyrodiameter of the gyroquadrilateral circumgyrocircle. The Pythagorean-like formula that the g-modified gyroside gyrolengths of a gyrodiametric gyrotriangle obey in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic geometry is shown.
Symmetry 15 01487 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ungar, A.A. The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s Theorem in the Poincaré Ball Model of Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081487

AMA Style

Ungar AA. The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s Theorem in the Poincaré Ball Model of Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry. Symmetry. 2023; 15(8):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ungar, Abraham A. 2023. "The Hyperbolic Ptolemy’s Theorem in the Poincaré Ball Model of Analytic Hyperbolic Geometry" Symmetry 15, no. 8: 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15081487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop