Next Article in Journal
Timelike Ruled Surfaces with Stationary Disteli-Axis
Next Article in Special Issue
On Disks Enclosed by Smooth Jordan Curves
Previous Article in Journal
Forward Greedy Searching to κ-Reduct Based on Granular Ball
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ricci Soliton of CR-Warped Product Manifolds and Their Classifications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surfaces with Constant Negative Curvature

by
Semra Kaya Nurkan
and
İbrahim Gürgil
*,†
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Usak University, TR-64200 Usak, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2023, 15(5), 997; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15050997
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry/Asymmetry: Differential Geometry and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we have considered surfaces with constant negative Gaussian curvature in the simply isotropic 3-Space by defined Sauer and Strubeckerr. Firstly, we have studied the isotropic I I -flat, isotropic minimal and isotropic I I -minimal, the constant second Gaussian curvature, and the constant mean curvature of surfaces with constant negative curvature (SCNC) in the simply isotropic 3-space. Surfaces with symmetry are obtained when the mean curvatures are equal. Further, we have investigated the constant Casorati, the tangential and the amalgamatic curvatures of SCNC.

1. Introduction

Constant curvature for surfaces was one of the top subjects regarding differential geometry in the 19th century (see [1,2]). Surfaces with curvature K = 1 are denoted as K -surfaces, and this topic is one of the main studies in differential geometry. The hyperbolic plane’s intrinsic geometry is provided on K -surfaces with a model [3,4] and the pseudosphere is the oldest known example of that geometry [5,6].
One of the most substantial problems in differential geometry is to construct a surface with constant negative Gaussian curvature in Euclidean space. From a known surface with K = 1 [7], the Bäcklund’s theorem provides a geometrical method to build a family of surfaces with Gaussian curvature. For the Gaussian K -surfaces, Bäcklund transformation is given by Tian [8]. For pseudospherical surfaces, Bäcklund transformation can be limited to a transformation on space curves [9]. Many studies have been conducted in other spaces, such as Minkowski space [10,11]. K -surfaces in an isotropic 3-space were studied extensively by K.Strubeckerr, as in [12,13,14]. Decu and Verstraelen defined isotropic Casorati curvature [15]. Suceava investigated the tangential and amalgamatic curvatures in Euclidean 3-space [16].
Casorati proposed the Casorati curvature over Gauss and mean curvatures since this correlates better with the general intuition of curvature [16,17]. Human/computer vision and geometry are investigated using Casorati curvature [18,19]. The idea behind the amalgamatic curvature is to expand the ratio τ κ to the higher dimensions [20]. This idea can be traced back to papers [21,22], with the improvements provided in [23,24]. A recent application can be found in [16]. An important development for the invariant curvature is studied in [25] and named tangential curvature [16].
In this paper, we present the Gaussian, the second Gaussian, the mean, the second mean, the Casorati, the tangential and the amalgamatic curvatures of surfaces with a constant negative curvature defined by K.Strubeckerr and V.R.Sauer. The symmetry on the surfaces can be seen in the figures below.

2. Preliminaries

An absolute figure is an ordered triple ( w , f 1 , f 2 ) consisting of an absolute plane w with f 1 and f 2 , which are its two complex–conjugate straight lines from the projective three-space P ( R 3 ) . These are required to define the simply isotropic space I 3 1 , which is a Cayley–Klein space. x 0 = 0 give the absolute plane w and x 0 = x 1 + i x 2 = 0 , x 0 = x 1 i x 2 = 0 are the absolute lines f 1 , f 2 . They are called the homogeneous coordinates or projective coordinates in P ( R 3 ) [26]. Homogeneous coordinates played an important role in capturing the projection of a 3D view for use in monitors, T.V., etc. [27] Further information about Cayley–Klein spaces can be acquired from [28].
The absolute point F ( 0 : 0 : 0 : 1 ) is defined as the crossing node of these two lines. A motion in I 3 1 is a given with corresponding coordinates, as x = x 1 x 0 , y = x 2 x 0 , z = x 3 x 0 can be found at [26] and given as
x = c 1 + x cos α y sin α y = c 2 + x sin α + y cos α z = c 3 + c 4 x + c 5 y + z ,
where c 1 , c 2 , c 3 , c 4 , c 5 , α R . These are named isotropic congruence transformations [26]. Isotropic congruence transformations looks like Euclidean motions (combination of a translation and a rotation) in the projection onto the xy-plane. This projection is named as a “top view” [29,30,31]. The combination of a Euclidean motion in the xy-plane and affine transformation with shearing along the z-direction is called an isotropic motion [32].
The equation
d s 2 = d x 2 + d y 2
is defined as the metric of I 3 1 . Let U = ( u 1 , u 2 , u 3 ) and V = ( v 1 , v 2 , v 3 ) be vectors in I 3 1 ; then, the inner product of U and V is defined as,
< U , V > i = u 3 v 3 if u 1 , 2 = 0 and v 1 , 2 = 0 u 1 v 1 + u 2 v 2 if otherwise
This metric is induced by the absolute figure. If a line is not parallel to the z-direction, it is called non-isotropic; otherwise, it is isotropic. Isotropic planes are the planes that contain an isotropic line. Consider a C r -surface M , r 1 , in I 3 1 parameterized by
M : x ( u , v ) = x ( u , v ) , y ( u , v ) , z ( u , v ) .
Let an arbitrary surface in I 3 1 be called M . If a surface has no isotropic tangent planes, then it is called an admissible surface. The first and second forms I and II , called fundamental forms, of M , have the coefficients E , F , G and L , N , M , respectively, which can be easily stated with the induced matrix, given by [32] as,
I = E d u 2 + 2 F d u d v + G d v 2 , I I = L d u 2 + 2 M d u d v + N d v 2 ,
where (with δ = E G F 2 )
E = < x u , x u > i , F = < x u , x v > i , G = < x v , x v > i , L = d e t ( x u , x v , x u u ) δ , M = d e t ( x u , x v , x u v ) δ , N = d e t ( x u , x v , x v v ) δ .
Then, K and H , the isotropic Gaussian curvature and mean curvature, can be defined as
K = k 1 k 2 = L N M 2 E G F 2 , 2 H = k 1 + k 2 = E N 2 F M + G L E G F 2 ,
where k 1 , k 2 are principal curvatures.Therefore, the extrema of the normal curvatures, k 1 and k 2 , are determined with the non-isotropic section of the surface. Here, when K = 0 , and H = 0 , the surfaces M are called, respectively, isotropic flat and isotropic minimal [26]. Isotropic II -flat and isotropic II -minimal are named after the moment when a non-developable surface’s second Gaussian curvature and second mean curvature are zero, respectively. The second Gaussian curvature K II of M is given by
K II = 1 L N M 2 2 L u u 2 + M u v N v v 2 L u 2 M u L v 2 M v N u 2 L M N v 2 M N 0 L v 2 N u 2 L v 2 L M N u 2 M N .
The second mean curvature for a surface in simply isotropic 3-space is given by [15]
H II = H 1 2 L N M 2 i , j = 1 2 u i L N M 2 L i j u i ln K ,
where u 1 = u , u 2 = v and L i j is the inverse of the matrix L i j of the second fundamental form [33]. The isotropic Casorati curvature is defined by
C = k 1 2 + k 2 2 2 = 2 H 2 K
The tangential curvature and the amalgamatic curvature are given by
τ = k 1 k 2 1 + 1 + k 1 2 1 + k 2 2 k 1 + k 2 = K 1 + K 1 2 + 4 H 2 H ,
A = 2 k 1 k 2 k 1 + k 2 = K H ,
respectively [16].

3. Curvatures of SCNC in I 3 1

In this chapter, we provide the curvatures of SCNC in I 3 1 . The general form of SCNC can be derived as follows. Let x be a surface with
x ( u , v ) = ( x 1 ( u , v ) , x 2 ( u , v ) , x 3 ( u , v ) )
when we have
x 1 ( u , v ) = f 1 + g 1
x 2 ( u , v ) = f 2 + g 2
where f 1 g 2 f 2 g 1 0 with f 1 , f 2 and g 1 , g 2 are twice continuous differentiable functions of u and v, respectively. The parametric curves are asymptotic if and only if the two conditions
f 1 f 2 x 3 u g 1 g 2 x 3 v f 1 f 2 x 3 u u = 0 , f 1 f 2 x 3 u g 1 g 2 x 3 v g 1 g 2 x 3 v v = 0
are fulfilled. From the above equations with f 1 g 2 f 2 g 1 0 condition, the existence of two functions a ( u , v ) and b ( u , v ) can be uniquely determined by x 3 ( u , v ) , which satisfy the equations
x 3 u = a f 1 + b f 2 , x 3 v = a g 1 + b g 2 ,
x 3 u u = a f 1 + b f 2 , x 3 v v = a g 1 + b g 2 .
By solving these equations, we can obtained
a u v = b u v = 0 , a = Φ 1 ( u ) + Ψ 2 ( v ) , b = Φ 2 ( u ) + Ψ 2 ( v ) .
For the arbitrary functions Φ 1 , Φ 2 , Ψ 1 , Ψ 2 , from the solution of the previous equation, we obtain,
Φ 1 f 1 + Φ 2 f 2 = 0 , Ψ 1 g 1 + Ψ 1 g 2 = 0 ,
results in
Φ 1 = Λ ( u ) f 2 , Φ 2 = Λ ( u ) f 1 , Ψ 1 = M ( v ) g 2 , Ψ 2 = M ( v ) g 1 .
Then,
x 3 u v = M ( v ) ( g 2 f 1 g 1 f 2 ) ,
x 3 v u = Λ ( u ) ( g 1 f 2 g 2 f 1 )
by choosing
Λ ( u ) = M ( v ) = c o n s t . = k 1
we obtain
a = k 1 ( f 2 g 2 ) + k 2 , b = k 1 ( f 1 g 1 ) + k 3
by using these in the equations,
x 3 u = k 1 ( f 1 f 2 f 1 f 2 ) + k 1 ( f 2 g 1 f 1 g 2 ) + k 2 f 1 + k 3 f 2 ,
x 3 v = k 1 ( g 2 g 1 g 1 g 2 ) + k 1 ( g 1 f 2 g 2 f 1 ) + k 2 g 1 + k 3 g 2 .
The integrability condition x 3 u v = x 3 v u is fulfilled and, from integration, results in x 3 = k 1 { ( f 2 g 1 f 1 g 2 ) + ( f 1 f 2 f 1 f 2 ) d u + ( g 2 g 1 g 1 g 2 ) d v } + k 2 ( f 1 + g 1 ) + k 3 ( f 2 + g 2 ) + k 4 , from this, k 1 = 1 , k 2 = k 3 = k 4 = 0 , we can obtained x ( u , v ) = ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) as
x ( u , v ) = f 1 + g 1 , f 2 + g 2 , f 2 g 1 f 1 g 2 + f 1 f 2 f 2 f 1 d u + g 1 g 2 g 2 g 1 d v
where f 1 , f 2 , f are functions of u and g 1 , g 2 , g are functions of v [12,34]. The isotropic curvature K and the mean curvature H of the surface (8) is given by
K = 1 , H = f 1 g 1 + f 2 g 2 f 2 g 1 f 1 g 2 .
Assume the mean curvature of (8) is constant. Then,
H 0 = f 1 g 1 + f 2 g 2 f 2 g 1 f 1 g 2 ,
where H 0 R . If we use the separation of variables method, the mean curvature and the mean curvature H 0 0 R if and only if
f 2 f 1 = g 1 + H 0 g 2 H 0 g 1 g 2 ,
where u , v are independent variables and both sides of the Equation (10) are constant. If we show that this constant is equal to p, we can obtain
f 2 f 1 = p = g 1 + H 0 g 2 H 0 g 1 g 2 .
Hence, we can write
f 1 = c 1 + f 2 p f 2 = c 2 + p f 1 g 1 = c 3 + H 0 + p g 2 H 0 p 1 g 2 = c 4 + H 0 p 1 g 1 H 0 + p ,
where c i R .
If the surface (8) is isotropic minimal, then, from (10), we have
f 1 g 1 + f 2 g 2 = 0
and as a result of the solution of this equation,
f 1 = c 1 + p f 2 f 2 = c 2 + f 1 p g 1 = c 3 g 2 p g 2 = c 4 p g 2 .
Figure 1 and Figure 2 are drawn for Equation (12); their functions are shown in their respective figures.
If we choose
f 1 = u f 2 = f g 1 = v g 2 = g ,
the surface (8) turns into the following form
x ( u , v ) = u + v , f + g , 2 f g + v u f + g .
The Figure 3 with symmetry is drawn for (14) as an example where the constants c 2 , c 4 , H 0 and p are from Equation (12) and f 1 , g 1 are from (13) [12,13,14].
Let us consider that the surface (14). Then, using the surface (14), the coefficients of the first and the second fundamental forms are given by
E = 1 + f 2 , G = 1 + g 2 , F = 1 + f g ,
and
L = 0 , N = 0 , M = f g ,
respectively. The isotropic Gaussian curvature K , K II and the mean curvatures H , H II , the isotropic Casorati curvature, the tangential curvature and the amalgamatic curvature of the surface (14) are given by
K = 1 , K II = f g f g 3 ,
H = H II = 1 + f g f g ,
C = 1 + 2 1 + f g 2 f g 2 ,
τ = 1 + f 2 1 + g 2 1 + f g ,
A = 1 + f 2 1 + g 2 1 + f g ,
respectively. Let us assume that the surface (14) has a constant mean curvature. Then,
1 + f g f g = H 0 ,
where H 0 R . If we use the separation of variables method, the mean curvature H 0 is a constant but 0, if and only if
1 H 0 f H 0 + f = p 1 = g ,
where p 1 0 R . We can easily obtain
f = c 1 + u c 2 + u 2 2 1 + H 0 p 1 H 0 p 1 g = c 3 + v c 4 + p 1 v 2 2 ,
where c i R .
We can obtain the next Figure 4 by choosing c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 and p 1 = 2 at (24) and by using (14).
Suppose that the mean curvature H of the constant negative curvature surface vanishes identically; then, from (22), we have
1 + f g = 0 .
Here, u and v are independent variables, so each side of (25) is equal to a constant, called p 2 . Hence, the two equations are
1 f = p 2 = g .
With appropriate solutions to these differential equations, we have
f = c 1 + u c 2 u 2 2 p 2 g = c 3 + v c 4 + p 2 v 2 2 ,
where c i R .
Thus, we have the following results:
Theorem 1.
Let M be the isotropic surface (14) with the constant isotropic mean curvature H 0 in I 3 1 . Then, the functions f and g are given by (24).
Theorem 2.
Let M be the isotropic surface (14) with zero isotropic mean curvature (isotropic minimal H 0 ) in I 3 1 . Then, the functions f and g are given by (27).
Theorem 3.
If the isotropic surface parametrized by (14) in I 3 1 has K II = 0 , then
f = c 1 + c 2 u + c 3 u 2 g = c 4 + c 5 v + c 6 v 2 ,
and if K II is a non-zero constant,
f = 4 2 u + c 7 c 2 u + c 7 3 p u c 8 u + 2 c 7 6 c 2 + c 9 + u c 10 g = c 11 + v c 12 p v 2 2 ,
where c i , p R where c 2 0 and c 2 ( u + c 7 ) R + .
Proof. 
From (14), we have
f g f g 3 = c ,
where c R .
If K II = 0 , from the solution of the Equation (29), we have
f g = 0 .
By solving (30), the functions f and g are obtained as follows
f = c 1 + c 2 u + c 3 u 2 g = c 4 + c 5 v + c 6 v 2 ,
where c i R .
When we choose the constants at (28) as c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = c 4 = c 5 = c 6 = 1 , we can obtain the figure with two different intervals as Figure 5.
Now, suppose that the second Gaussian curvature K II = c is a non-zero constant. The partial derivative of (29) with respect to u gives
g 3 f 2 f g + f I V = 0 .
Therefore, either, i.e., g = 0 or
3 f 2 f g + f I V = 0 .
If g = 0 , then we have
g = c 1 + c 2 v + c 3 v 2 ,
where c i R . If 3 f 2 f g + f I V = 0 , then we have
g = 3 f 2 f f I V f I V .
By solving (33), we find
f = 4 2 u + c 1 c 2 u + c 1 3 p 3 u c 2 u + 2 c 1 6 c 2 + c 3 + u c 4 g = c 5 + v c 6 p 3 v 2 2 ,
where c i , p 3 R , where c 2 0 and c 2 ( u + c 7 ) R .
As we choose c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = c 4 = c 5 = c 6 = p 3 = 1 and H 0 = 5 / 2 , we can obtain the Figure 6, shown from two different angles. □
Now, we consider the isotropic surface (14) in I 3 1 as satisfying C = 2 H 2 K as constant. From (21), we have
1 + 2 1 + f g 2 f g 2 = C 0 ,
where C 0 R . Taking the partial derivative of (35) with respect to u gives
( 1 + C 0 ) g + f ( 1 C 0 + 2 g 2 ) f = 0 .
If f = 0 , then we have
f = c 1 + c 2 u + c 3 u 2 ,
where c i R . If ( 1 + C 0 ) g + f ( 1 C 0 + 2 g 2 ) = 0 , then we have
f = c 4 + c 5 u p 4 u 2 2 g = c 6 + c 7 v + 1 + C 0 1 + C 0 2 + 8 p 4 2 C 0 1 v 2 8 p 4 ,
where c i , p 4 0 , C 0 R , where 1 + C 0 2 + 8 p 4 2 C 0 1 is positive.
c 4 = c 5 = c 6 = c 7 = p 4 = 1 and C 0 = 5 / 2 are chosen for a Figure 7 at Equation (38).
If the surface (14) has zero Casorati curvature ( C = 0 ), then, by using a similar technique for the solution, we have
f = c 4 + c 5 u + p 5 u 2 2 g = c 6 + c 7 v + 1 + 1 8 p 5 2 v 2 8 p 5 ,
where c i , p 5 R .
c 4 = c 5 = c 6 = c 7 = 1 and p 5 = 0.35 values are provided for the Figure 8 at Equation (39).
Let us assume that the isotropic surface (14) has a constant tangential curvature. Then from (22), we have
τ 0 = 1 + f 2 1 + g 2 1 + f g ,
where τ 0 R . By solving (22) we can find
f = c 1 + c 2 u + c 3 u 2 f = c 4 + c 5 u + p 6 u 2 2 g = c 7 ± v c 8 + v p 6 τ 0 2 + 4 p 6 2 + 4 τ 0 2 p 6 2 + τ 0 4 ,
where c i , p 6 R where 4 p 6 2 + 4 τ 0 2 p 6 2 + τ 0 4 0
Figure 9 for (41) is constructed with the constants c 4 = c 5 = c 6 = c 7 = c 8 = 1 , p 6 = 0.8 and τ 0 = 1 .
If the (14) has the constant amalgamatic curvature. Then, from (40), we obtain
A 0 = 1 + f 2 1 + g 2 1 + f g ,
where A 0 R . By solving (42), we find
f = c 1 + c 2 u + p 7 u 2 2 g = c 3 + c 4 v v 2 2 p 7 + A 0 2 p 7 A 0 2 ,
where c i , p 7 R with p 7 A 0 2 0 .
The Figure 10 is for Equation (43), where the constants are c 1 = c 2 = c 3 = c 4 = A 0 = 1 and p 7 = 0.8 .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.N. and İ.G.; methodology, S.K.N. and İ.G.; software, İ.G.; validation, S.K.N. and İ.G.; formal analysis, S.K.N. and İ.G.; investigation, S.K.N. and İ.G.; resources, S.K.N. and İ.G.; data curation, S.K.N. and İ.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.N.; writing—review and editing, S.K.N. and İ.G.; visualization, S.K.N. and İ.G.; supervision, S.K.N.; project administration, S.K.N. and İ.G.; funding acquisition, S.K.N. and İ.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bianchi, L. Lezioni di Geometria Differenziale; Ecole Bibliotheque: Pisa, Italy, 1902. [Google Scholar]
  2. Darboux, G. Lecons sur la Theorie Generate des Surfaces et les Applications Geometriques du Calcul Infinitesimal; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1887–1896; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pinkall, U. Designing Cylinders with Constant Negative Curvature. In Discrete Differential Geometry. Oberwolfach Seminars; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2008; Volume 38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bobenko, A.; Pinkall, U.J. Discrete surfaces with constant negative Gaussian curvature and the Hirota equation. Differ. Geom. 1996, 43, 527–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Melko, M.; Sterling, I. Application of soliton theory to the construction of pseudospherical surfaces in R3. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 1993, 11, 65–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cieslinski, J.L. Pseudospherical surfaces on time scales: A geometric definition and the spectral approach. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2007, 40, 12525–12538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aldossary, M.T. Bäcklund’s Theorem for Spacelike Surfaces in Minkowski 3-Space. OSR J. Math. 2013, 5, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tian, C. Bäcklund transformations for surfaces with K = −1 in R 2,1. J. Geom. Phys. 1997, 22, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Erdoğdu, M.; Özdemir, M. On Bäcklund Transformation Between Timelike Curves in Minkowski Space-Time. SDU J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2018, 22, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, Y.H.; Yoon, D.W. Classification of ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-spaces. J. Geom. Phys. 2004, 49, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. López, R. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski Space. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2014, 7, 44–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Strubeckerr, K. Theorie der flachentreuen Abbildungen der Ebene, Contributions to Geometry. In Proceedings of the Geometry-Symposium, Siegen, Germany, 28 June–1 July 1978. [Google Scholar]
  13. Strubeckerr, K. Die Flächen konstanter Relativkrümmung K = rts2. Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes II. Math. Z. 1942, 47, 743–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Strubecker, K. Die Flächen, deren Asymptotenlinien ein Quasi-Rückungsnetz bilden. Sitzungsberichte 1952, 12, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  15. Decu, S.; Verstraelen, L. A note on the isotropical Geometry of production surfaces. Kragujev. J. Math. 2013, 37, 217–220. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brubaker, N.D.; Camero, J.; Rocha, O.R.; Suceava, B.D. A ladder of curvatures in the geometry of surfaces. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2018, 11, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  17. Casorati, F. Mesure de la courbure des surfaces suivant l’idée commune. Acta Math. 1890, 14, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koenderink, J.J. Shadows of Shapes; De Clootcrans Press: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Verstraelen, L. Geometry of submanifolds I. The first Casorati curvature indicatrices. Kragujev. J. Math. 2013, 37, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Conley, C.; Etnyre, R.; Gardener, B.; Odom, L.H.; Suceava, B.D. New Curvature Inequalities for Hypersurfaces in the Euclidean Ambient Space. Taiwan. J. Math. 2013, 17, 885–895. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/taiwjmath.17.3.885 (accessed on 12 April 2023). [CrossRef]
  21. Weingarten, J. Uber eine Klasse aufeinander abwickelbarer Flachen. J. F’Ur Die Reine Angew. Math. 1861, 59, 382–393. [Google Scholar]
  22. Weingarten, J. Uber die Flachen, derer Normalen eine gegebene Flache beruhren. J. Fur Die Reine Angew. Math. 1863, 62, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hartman, P.; Wintner, A. Umbilical points and W-surfaces. Am. J. Math. 1954, 76, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chern, S.S. On special W-surfaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1955, 6, 783–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, B.Y. Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry, δ-Invariants and Applications; World Scientific: Singapore, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Šipuš, Ž.M. Translation surfaces of constant curvatures in a simply isotropic space. Period Math. Hung. 2014, 68, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sangwine, S.J. Perspectives on Color Image Processing by Linear Vector Methods Using Projective Geometric Transformations. In Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 175, pp. 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Onishchik, A.L.; Sulanke, R. Projective and Cayley-Klein Geometries; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pottmann, H.; Grohs, P.; Mitra, N.J. Laguerre minimal surfaces, isotropic geometry and linear elasticity. Adv. Comput. Math. 2009, 31, 391–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pottmann, H.; Liu, Y. Discrete Surfaces in Isotropic Geometry. Mathematics of Surfaces XII; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 341–363. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon, D.W.; Lee, J.W. Linear Weingarten Helicoidal Surfaces in Isotropic Space. Symmetry 2016, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lone, M.S.; Karacan, M.K. Dual Translation Surfaces in the Three Dimensional Simply Isotropic Space. Tamkang J. Math. 2018, 49, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Güler, E.; Vanli, A.T. On The Mean, Gauss, The Second Gaussian and The Second Mean Curvature of The Helicoidal Surfaces with Light-Like Axis in R 1 3 . Tsukuba J. Math. 2008, 32, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sauer, V.R. Infinitesimale Verbiegung der Flächen, deren Asymptotenlinien ein Quasi-Rückungsnetz bilden. Sitz. Ber. Math. Naturw. Kl. Bayr. Akad. Wiss. 1950, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. f 1 = sin u and g 1 = cos v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Figure 1. f 1 = sin u and g 1 = cos v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g001
Figure 2. f 1 = e u and g 1 = e v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Figure 2. f 1 = e u and g 1 = e v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g002
Figure 3. f 1 = u and g 1 = v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Figure 3. f 1 = u and g 1 = v with c 2 = c 4 = 1 , H 0 = 5 / 2 , p = 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g003
Figure 4. f = 1 + u + 6 u 2 and g = 1 + v + v 2 .
Figure 4. f = 1 + u + 6 u 2 and g = 1 + v + v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g004
Figure 5. f = 1 + u + u 2 and g = 1 + v + v 2 .
Figure 5. f = 1 + u + u 2 and g = 1 + v + v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g005
Figure 6. f = 1 + u 1 6 ( 4 2 ( 1 + u ) 3 2 + 3 u ( 2 + u ) ) g = 1 + v v 2 2 .
Figure 6. f = 1 + u 1 6 ( 4 2 ( 1 + u ) 3 2 + 3 u ( 2 + u ) ) g = 1 + v v 2 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g006
Figure 7. f = 1 + u u 2 / 2 and g = 1 + v + 1 / 8 ( 7 / 2 97 / 2 ) v 2 .
Figure 7. f = 1 + u u 2 / 2 and g = 1 + v + 1 / 8 ( 7 / 2 97 / 2 ) v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g007
Figure 8. f = 1 + u 0.175 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 0.306635 v 2 .
Figure 8. f = 1 + u 0.175 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 0.306635 v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g008
Figure 9. f = 1 + u + 0.4 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 0.4 v 2 .
Figure 9. f = 1 + u + 0.4 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 0.4 v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g009
Figure 10. f = 1 + u + 0.4 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 1.08333 v 2 .
Figure 10. f = 1 + u + 0.4 u 2 and g = 1 + v + 1.08333 v 2 .
Symmetry 15 00997 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nurkan, S.K.; Gürgil, İ. Surfaces with Constant Negative Curvature. Symmetry 2023, 15, 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15050997

AMA Style

Nurkan SK, Gürgil İ. Surfaces with Constant Negative Curvature. Symmetry. 2023; 15(5):997. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15050997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nurkan, Semra Kaya, and İbrahim Gürgil. 2023. "Surfaces with Constant Negative Curvature" Symmetry 15, no. 5: 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15050997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop