Next Article in Journal
Regular and Intra-Regular Ternary Semirings in Terms of m-Polar Fuzzy Ideals
Next Article in Special Issue
Approximate and Exact Solutions in the Sense of Conformable Derivatives of Quantum Mechanics Models Using a Novel Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
On the Alternative SOR-like Iteration Method for Solving Absolute Value Equations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potentials from the Polynomial Solutions of the Confluent Heun Equation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Application of Poisson Distribution Series on Harmonic Classes of Analytic Functions

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
2
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(3), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030590
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023

Abstract

:
Many authors have obtained some inclusion properties of certain subclasses of univalent and functions associated with distribution series, such as Pascal distribution, Binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, Mittag–Leffler-type Poisson distribution, and Geometric distribution. In the present paper, we obtain some inclusion relations of the harmonic class H ( α , δ ) with the classes S H * of starlike harmonic functions and K H of convex harmonic functions, also for the harmonic classes TN H β and TR H β associated with the operator Υ defined by applying certain convolution operator regarding Poisson distribution series. Several consequences and corollaries of the main results are also obtained.

1. Introduction

The focus of this paper is on harmonic analytic functions associated with a convolution operator defined using Poisson distribution series. Connecting certain classes of analytic functions with operators in studies for obtaining properties of the investigated classes follows a line of research popular in geometric function theory. Recently, harmonic classes of analytic functions have been defined and studied for obtaining coefficient estimates and inclusion relations. A generalized linear operator is applied in [1] for defining a new subclass of univalent functions and obtaining some geometrical properties. In [2], two new families of harmonic meromorphically functions are introduced using a certain generalized convolution q-operator and investigations regarding inclusion properties are conducted. A q-derivative operator is used for defining and researching a new class of harmonic functions in [3] and a new class of harmonic functions involving Janowski functions is defined in [4] using symmetric Sălăgean q-differential operator. Studies involving the concept of subordination and Ruscheweyh derivative are performed on a new class of harmonic functions related to starlike harmonic functions and harmonic convex functions in [5]. The concept of subordination is also used for defining the q-analogue of a new subclass of univalent harmonic functions in [6]. The dual concept of superordination is associated with harmonic complex-valued functions in [7]. Special functions continue to be used for the research on harmonic functions, such as hypergeometric functions [8,9,10].
The presentation of the results obtained in this paper begins by describing the classes of harmonic functions used for the study.
A continuous complex valued function f = U + i V defined in a simply connected complex domain D is said to be harmonic in D if both U and V are real harmonic in D . In any simply connected domain we can write f = w + v ¯ , where w and v are analytic in D . We call w the analytic part and v the co-analytic part of f. A necessary and sufficient for f to be locally univalent and sense preserving in D is that w ( z )   > v ( z ) in D .
Let H be the family of all harmonic functions of the form f = w + v ¯ , where
w ( ζ ) = ζ + s = 2 a s ζ s , v ( ζ ) = s = 1 b s ζ s , b 1 < 1 .
are analytic in the open unit disk E = ζ : ζ < 1 . Furthermore, let S H denote the family of functions f = w + v that are harmonic univalent and sense preserving in E.
In 1984, Clunie and Sheil-Small [11] studied the class S H and its geometric subclasses and obtained some coefficient bounds. This paper opened the way for a prolific research involving harmonic functions. Numerous results related on S H and on harmonic functions one may refer to some papers where it was studied harmonic univalent functions with negative coefficients [12], subclasses of harmonic univalent functions [13], starlike harmonic functions [14], Noshiro-type harmonic univalent functions [15], harmonic mappings [16], harmonic univalent functions [17], Planar harmonic mappings [18], harmonic functions with negative coefficients defined by the Dziok–Srivastava operator [19], uniformly harmonic β -starlike functions of complex order [20], and harmonic mappings of bounded boundary rotation [21,22].
Consider the subclass S H 0 of S H as
S H 0 = f = w + v ¯ S H : v 0 = b 1 = 0 ,
first studied in [11].
A sense-preserving harmonic mapping f S H 0 is in the class S * if the range f ( E ) is starlike with respect to the origin. A function f S H * is called a harmonic starlike mapping in E. Additionally, a function f defined in E is included in the class K H if f S H 0 and if f ( E ) is a convex domain. A function f K H is called convex harmonic in E. Analytically, we have
f S H * iff a r g θ f r e i θ 0 ,
and
f K H iff θ a r g a r g θ f r e i θ 0 ,
ζ = r e i θ E , 0 r 1 , 0 θ 2 π .
These classes and their properties are described in [15].
Let T H be the class of functions in S H that may be expressed as f = w + v , where
w ζ = ζ s = 2 a s ζ s v ζ = s = 1 b s ζ s b 1 < 1 .
For 0 β < 1 , let
N H β = f H : Re f ζ ζ β , ζ = r e i θ E ,
and
R H β = f H : Re f ζ ζ β , ζ = r e i θ E
where
ζ = θ ζ = r e i θ , ζ = θ ζ , f ζ = θ f r e i θ , f = θ f ζ .
Define
TN H β = N H β T H and TR H β = R H β T H .
The classes T H ,   N H β ,   T N H β ,   R H β and TR H β were defined and studied in [12,23].
Sokòl et al. [24] defined and studied the class H ( α , δ ) of functions of the form (1) that satisfy the condition
R e w ( ζ ) + v ( ζ ) + 3 α ζ ( w ( ζ ) + v ( ζ ) ) + α ζ 3 ( w ( ζ ) + v ( ζ ) ) > δ ,
for some α 0 and 0 δ < 1 . In particular, for α = 0 , we obtain the class H ( δ ) which satisfy the condition
Re w ( ζ ) + v ( ζ ) > δ .
A discrete random variable X is said to have a Poisson distribution, with parameter m if it has a probability mass function given by
Pr ( X = κ ) = e m κ ! m κ , κ = 0 , 1 , 2 ,
and m is the parameter of the distribution.
Very recently, Porwal [25] (see also, [26,27]) defined a Poisson distribution series as
G m , ζ = ζ + s = 2 m s 1 s 1 ! e m ζ s ,
where m is called the parameter.
Now, for ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 , Porwal and Srivastava [28] introduced the operator Υ ( ε 1 , ε 2 ) for f ( ζ ) S H as
Υ ( f ) = Υ ( ε 1 , ε 2 ) f ( ζ ) = G ( ε 1 , ζ ) w ( ζ ) + G ( ε 2 , ζ ) v ( ζ ) ¯ = Φ ( ζ ) + Ψ ( ζ ) ¯ ,
where
Φ ( ζ ) = ζ + s = 2 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! e ε 1 a s ζ s , Ψ ( ζ ) = b 1 ζ + s = 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! e ε 2 b s ζ s .
for f = w + v ¯ in H .
Following the work of Porwal and Srivastava [28] (see also, [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]), and by applying the convolution operator Υ , we obtain some inclusion relations of the harmonic classes H ( α , δ ) ,   S H * ,   K H ,   TN H ( β ) and TR H ( β ) .

2. Preliminary Lemmas

Before starting and proving our main results, we need several lemmas to be used in the sequel.
Lemma 1
([24]). Consider f = w + v ¯ , where w and v are given by (1) and suppose that α 0 ,   0 δ < 1 and
s = 2 s [ 1 + α s 2 1 ] a s + s = 1 s [ 1 + α s 2 1 ] b s 1 δ .
then f H ( α , δ ) .
When f H ( α , δ ) , then
a s 1 δ s [ 1 + α s 2 1 ] , s 2 ,
and
b s 1 δ s [ 1 + α s 2 1 ] , s 1 .
Lemma 2
([15]). Consider f = w + v ¯ , where w and v are given by (2) and assume that 0 β < 1 . Then f TN H ( β ) if, and only if,
s = 2 s | a s | + s = 1 s | b s | 1 β .
When f TN H ( β ) , then
| a s | 1 β s , s 2 ,
and
| b s | 1 β s , s 1 .
Lemma 3
([23]). Consider f = w + v ¯ , where w and v are given by (2), and assume that 0 β < 1 . Then f TR H ( β ) if, and only if,
s = 2 s 2 | a s | + s = 1 s 2 | b s | 1 β .
When f TR H ( β ) , then
| a s |     1 β s 2 , s 2
and
| b s |     1 β s 2 , s 1 .
Lemma 4
([11]). If f = w + v S H * , where w and v are given by (1) with b 1 = 0 , then
| a s |     ( 2 s + 1 ) ( s + 1 ) 6 a n d | b s | ( 2 s 1 ) ( s 1 ) 6 .
Lemma 5
([11]). If f = w + v K H , where w and v are given by (1) with b 1 = 0 , then
| a s |     s + 1 2 a n d | b s | s 1 2 .
For convenience throughout in the sequel, we use the following notations:
s = 2 t s 1 s 1 ! = e t 1
and
s = j t s 1 s j ! = t j 1 e t , j 2 .

3. Inclusion Relations of the Class H ( α , δ )

In this section we will prove the inclusion relations of the harmonic class H ( α , δ ) with the classes S H * and K H associated of the operator Υ defined by (3).
Theorem 1.
Let ε 1 ,   ε 2 > 0 ,   α 0 and δ [ 0 , 1 ) . If
2 α ε 1 5 + ε 2 5 + 3 α 11 ε 1 4 + 9 ε 2 4 + ( 159 α + 2 ) ε 1 3 + 246 α + 15 ε 1 2 + 90 α + 24 ε 1 + 6 1 e ε 1 + 99 α + 2 ε 2 3 + 102 α + 9 ε 2 2 + 18 α + 6 ε 2 6 1 δ ,
then
Υ ( S H * ) H ( α , δ ) .
Proof. 
Let f = w + v S H * so that w and v are given by (1) with b 1 = 0 . We have to show that Υ ( f ) = Φ + Ψ H ( α , δ ) , where Φ and Ψ are analytic functions in E defined by (4) with b 1 = 0 . In view of Lemma 1, we need to prove that
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 δ ,
where
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) = s = 2 s 1 + α s 2 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! a s + s = 2 s 1 + α s 2 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! b s .
Using the inequalities (14) of Lemma 4, we obtain
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 6 s = 2 ( 2 s + 1 ) ( s + 1 ) s + α s s 2 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! + s = 2 ( 2 s 1 ) ( s 1 ) s + α s s 2 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! = 1 6 s = 2 2 α s 5 + 3 α s 4 + 2 α s 3 + 3 3 α s 2 + 1 α s e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! + s = 2 2 α s 5 3 α s 4 + 2 α s 3 + 3 α 3 s 2 + 1 α s e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! .
Writing
s = ( s 1 ) + 1 ,
s 2 = ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 3 ( s 1 ) + 1 ,
s 3 = ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) + 6 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 7 ( s 1 ) + 1 ,
s 4 = ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) + 10 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) + 25 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 15 ( s 1 ) + 1 ,
and
s 5 = ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) ( s 5 ) + 15 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) + 65 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) + 90 ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 31 ( s 1 ) + 1 ,
in (18), we have
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 6 s = 2 [ 2 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) ( s 5 ) +
33 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) + 159 α + 2 s 1 s 2 ( s 3 ) +
246 α + 15 s 1 s 2 + 90 α + 24 s 1 + 6 ] e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 !
+ s = 2 [ 2 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 ) ( s 5 ) + 27 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) ( s 3 ) ( s 4 )
+ 99 α + 2 s 1 s 2 ( s 3 ) + 102 α + 9 s 1 s 2
+ 18 α + 6 s 1 ] e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 !
= 1 6 2 α s = 6 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 6 ! + 33 α s = 5 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 5 ! + 159 α + 2 s = 4 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 4 !
+ 246 α + 15 s = 3 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 3 ! + 90 α + 24 s = 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 2 ! + 6 s = 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 !
+ 2 α s = 6 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 6 ! + 27 α s = 5 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 5 ! + 99 α + 2 s = 4 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 4 !
+ 102 α + 9 s = 3 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 3 ! + 18 α + 6 s = 2 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 2 !
= 1 6 2 α ε 1 5 + 33 α ε 1 4 + ( 159 α + 2 ) ε 1 3 + 246 α + 15 ε 1 2 + 90 α + 24 ε 1 + 6 1 e ε 1
2 α ε 2 5 + 27 α ε 2 4 + 99 α + 2 ε 2 3 + 102 α + 9 ε 2 2 + 18 α + 6 ε 2 .
The last relation is bounded above by 1 δ if condition (16) holds.
Theorem 2.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 , α 0 , and δ [ 0 , 1 ) . If
α ε 1 4 + ε 2 4 + 11 α ε 1 3 + 30 α + 1 ε 1 2 + 18 α + 4 ε 1 + 2 1 e ε 1 + α ε 2 4 + 9 α ε 2 3 + 18 α + 1 ε 2 2 + 6 α + 2 ε 2 2 1 δ ,
then
Υ ( K H ) H ( α , δ ) .
Proof. 
Let f = w + v K H so that w and v are given by (1) with b 1 = 0 . We have to prove that Υ ( f ) = Φ + Ψ H ( α , δ ) , where Φ and Ψ are analytic functions in E defined by (4) with b 1 = 0 . We have to show, in view of Lemma 1, that
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 δ ,
where Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) as given in (17). Using the inequalities (15) of Lemma 5, we obtain
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 2 s = 2 s + 1 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! + s = 2 s 1 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! = 1 2 s = 2 α s 4 + α s 3 + 1 α s 2 + 1 α s e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! + s = 2 α s 4 α s 3 + 1 α s 2 + α 1 s e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! .
Using the Equations (19)–(22) in (25), we have
Q ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 2 s = 2 [ α s 1 s 2 s 3 s 4 + 11 α s 1 s 2 s 3 +
30 α + 1 s 1 s 2 + 18 α + 4 s 1 + 2 ] e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 !
+ 1 2 s = 2 [ α s 1 s 2 s 3 s 4 + 9 α s 1 s 2 s 3 +
18 α + 1 s 1 s 2 + 6 α + 2 s 1 ] e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 !
= 1 2 α s = 5 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 5 ! + 11 α s = 4 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 4 ! + 30 α + 1 s = 3 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 3 !
+ 18 α + 4 s = 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 2 ! + 2 s = 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! + α s = 5 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 5 ! +
9 α s = 4 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 4 ! + 18 α + 1 s = 3 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 3 ! + 6 α + 2 s = 2 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 2 !
= 1 2 α ε 1 4 + 11 α ε 1 3 + 30 α + 1 ε 1 2 + 18 α + 4 ε 1 + 2 1 e ε 1 +
α ε 2 4 + 9 α ε 2 3 + 18 α + 1 ε 2 2 + 6 α + 2 ε 2 .
The last relation is bounded above by 1 δ if condition (24) holds.
Next, we determine the connection between the classes TN H ( β ) and H ( α , δ ) .
Theorem 3.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 , α 0 and δ , β [ 0 , 1 ) . If
( 1 β ) [ α ε 1 2 + ε 2 2 + 3 α ε 1 + ε 2 e ε 1 + e ε 2 + 2 ] 1 δ b 1 ,
then
Υ ( TN H ( β ) ) H ( α , δ ) .
Proof. 
Let f = w + v TN H ( β ) so that w and v are given by (2). Using Lemma 1, we have to prove that L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 δ , where
L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) = s = 2 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 ! a s + | b 1 | + s = 2 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! b s .
Using the inequalities (9) and (10) of Lemma 2, it follows that
L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) ( 1 β ) s = 2 1 α + α s 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 !
+ s = 2 1 α + α s 2 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! + b 1
= ( 1 β ) s = 2 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 3 α ( s 1 ) + 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 s 1 !
+ s = 2 α ( s 1 ) ( s 2 ) + 3 α ( s 1 ) + 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 s 1 ! + b 1
= 1 β α ε 1 2 + ε 2 2 + 3 α ε 1 + ε 2 e ε 1 + e ε 2 + 2 + b 1 1 δ ,
by the given hypothesis, which completes the proof of Theorem 3. □
Next, we find the relationship between the classes TR H ( β ) and H ( α , δ ) .
Theorem 4.
Let ε 1 ,   ε 2 > 0 ,   α 0 and δ , β [ 0 , 1 ) . If
( 1 β ) α ( ε 1 + ε 2 ) + α 2 e ε 1 e ε 2 + 1 ε 1 ( 1 e ε 1 ε 1 e ε 1 ) +
1 ε 2 ( 1 e ε 2 ε 2 e ε 2 ) 1 δ b 1 ,
then
Υ ( TR H ( β ) ) H ( α , δ ) .
Proof. 
Applying Lemma 1, we need only to show that L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 δ , where L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) as given in (26). Using the inequalities (12) and (13) of Lemma 3, it follows that
L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) = s = 2 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! a s
+ | b 1 | + s = 2 s + α s s 2 1 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! b s
( 1 β ) s = 2 α s + 1 α s e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 ( s 1 ) !
+ s = 2 α s + 1 α s e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! + | b 1 |
= ( 1 β ) s = 2 α e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 ( s 2 ) ! + s = 2 α e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! + s = 0 1 α s + 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s + 1 ( s + 1 ) !
+ s = 2 α e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 ( s 2 ) ! + s = 2 α e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! + s = 0 1 α s + 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s + 1 ( s + 1 ) ! + | b 1 |
= ( 1 β ) α ε 1 + α 1 e ε 1 + 1 ε 1 ( 1 e ε 1 ε 1 e ε 1 )
+ α ε 2 + α 1 e ε 2 + 1 ε 2 ( 1 e ε 2 ε 2 e ε 2 ) + | b 1 | 1 δ ,
by given hypothesis. □
Theorem 5.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 , α 0 and δ [ 0 , 1 ) . If
e ε 1 + e ε 2 1 + | b 1 | 1 δ ,
then
Υ ( H ( α , δ ) ) H ( α , δ ) .
Proof. 
Using the inequalities (6) and (7) of Lemma 1, we obtain
L ( ε 1 , ε 2 , α ) 1 δ s = 2 e ε 1 ε 1 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! + s = 2 e ε 2 ε 2 s 1 ( s 1 ) ! + b 1
= 1 δ 1 e ε 1 + 1 e ε 2 + | b 1 |
= 1 δ [ 2 e ε 1 e ε 2 ] + | b 1 | 1 δ ,
by the given condition (7). □

4. Corollaries and Consequences

By specializing the parameter α = 0 in main results, we obtain the following special cases for the subclass H ( δ ) .
Corollary 1.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 and δ [ 0 , 1 ) . If
2 ε 1 3 + 15 ε 1 2 + 24 ε 1 + 2 ε 2 3 + 9 ε 2 2 + 6 ε 2 + 6 1 e ε 1 6 1 δ ,
then
Υ ( S H * ) H ( δ ) .
Corollary 2.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 and δ [ 0 , 1 ) . If
ε 1 2 + 4 ε 1 + 2 1 e ε 1 + ε 2 2 + 2 ε 2 2 1 δ ,
then
Υ ( K H ) H ( δ ) .
Corollary 3.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 and δ , β [ 0 , 1 ) . If
( 1 β ) 2 e ε 1 e ε 2 1 δ | b 1 | ,
then
Υ ( TN H ( β ) ) H ( δ ) .
Corollary 4.
Let ε 1 , ε 2 > 0 and δ , β [ 0 , 1 ) . If
( 1 β ) 1 ε 1 ( 1 e ε 1 ε 1 e ε 1 ) + 1 ε 2 ( 1 e ε 2 ε 2 e ε 2 ) 1 δ | b 1 | ,
then
Υ ( TR H ( β ) ) H ( δ ) .

5. Conclusions

This paper deals with the applications of the Poisson distribution on some subclasses of harmonic functions. The main scope of this paper is to find some inclusion relations of the harmonic class H ( α , δ ) with the classes S H * of starlike harmonic functions and K H of convex harmonic functions, also for the harmonic classes TN H β and TR H β associated with the operator Υ defined by Poisson distribution series. Further by specializing the parameter α = 0 , several consequences of the main results are mentioned.
Making use of the operator Υ researchers could be inspired to find new inclusion relations for new harmonic classes of analytic functions with the classes S H * , K H ,   TN H β and TR H β .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.F.; methodology, B.F.; software, B.F. and A.A.L.; validation, B.F. and A.A.L.; formal analysis, B.F. and A.A.L.; investigation, B.F.; resources, B.F.; data curation, B.F.; writing—original draft preparation, B.F.; writing—review and editing, B.F. and A.A.L.; visualization, A.A.L.; supervision, B.F.; project administration, B.F.; funding acquisition, A.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication of this research was partially supported by University of Oradea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yousef, A.T.; Salleh, Z. On a Harmonic Univalent Subclass of Functions Involving a Generalized Linear Operator. Axioms 2020, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Srivastava, H.M.; Arif, M.; Raza, M. Convolution properties of meromorphically harmonic functions defined by a generalized convolution q-derivative operator. AIMS Math 2021, 6, 5869–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, N.; Khan, S.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, B. A Class of k-Symmetric Harmonic Functions Involving a Certain q-Derivative Operator. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khan, M.F.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Aloraini, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, S. Applications of Symmetric Quantum Calculus to the Class of Harmonic Functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dziok, J. Classes of harmonic functions associated with Ruscheweyh derivatives. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. Mat. 2019, 113, 13151329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bayram, H. q-Analogue of a New Subclass of Harmonic Univalent Functions Associated with Subordination. Symmetry 2022, 14, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oros, G.I. Best Subordinant for Differential Superordinations of Harmonic Complex-Valued Functions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Janaby, H.F.; Ghanim, F. A subclass of Noor-type harmonic p-valent functions based on hypergeometric functions. Kragujev. J. Math. 2021, 45, 499519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hameed, M.I.; Shihab, B.N.; Jassim, K.A. An application of subclasses of Goodman-Sălăgean-type harmonic univalent functions involving hypergeometric function. AIP Conf. Proc. 2022, 2398, 060012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alsoboh, A.; Darus, M. On subclasses of harmonic univalent functions defined by Jackson (p,q)-derivative. J. Math. Anal. 2019, 10, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  11. Clunie, J.; Sheil-Small, T. Harmonic univalent functions. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fen. 1984, 9, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Silverman, H. Harmonic univalent function with negative coefficients. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 220, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Silverman, H.; Silvia, E.M. Subclasses of harmonic univalent functions. N. Zeal. J. Math. 1999, 28, 275–284. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jahangiri, J.M. Harmonic functions starlike in the unit disk. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1999, 235, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ahuja, O.P.; Jahangiri, J.M. Noshiro-type harmonic univalent functions. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2002, 6, 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  16. Duren, P. Harmonic Mappings in the Plane; Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; Volume 156. [Google Scholar]
  17. Frasin, B.A. Comprehensive family of harmonic univalent functions. SUT J. Math. 2006, 42, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ponnusamy, S.; Rasila, A. Planar harmonic mappings. RMS Math. Newsl. 2007, 17, 40–57. [Google Scholar]
  19. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Vijaya, K.; Frasin, B.A. A subclass of harmonic functions with negative coefficients defined by Dziok-Srivastava operator. Tamkang J. Math. 2011, 42, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Frasin, B.A.; Magesh, N. Certain subclasses of uniformly harmonic β-starlike functions of complex order. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2013, 58, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  21. Aydogan, M.; Bshouty, D.; Lyzzaik, A.; Sakar, F.M. On the shears of univalent harmonic mappings. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2019, 13, 2853–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bshouty, D.; Lyzzaik, A.; Sakar, F.M. Harmonic mappings of bounded boundary rotation. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2018, 146, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahuja, O.P.; Jahangiri, J.M. A subclass of harmonic univalent functions. J. Nat. Geom. 2001, 20, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sokol, J.; Ibrahim, R.W.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Al-Janaby, H.F. Inequalities of harmonic univalent functions with connections of hypergeometric functions. Open Math. 2015, 13, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Porwal, S. An application of a Poisson distribution series on certain analytic functions. J. Complex Anal. 2014, 2014, 984135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frasin, B.A.; Gharaibeh, M.M. Subclass of analytic functions associated with Poisson distribution series. Afr. Mat. 2020, 31, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Vijaya, K.; Porwal, S. Some inclusion results of certain subclass of analytic functions associated with Poisson distribution series. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2016, 45, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Porwal, S.; Srivastava, D. Some connections between various subclasses of planar harmonic mappings involving poisson distribution series. Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2018, 6, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahuja, O.P. Connections between various subclasses of planar harmonic mappings involving hypergeometric functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 198, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Porwal, S. Some connections between various subclasses of planar harmonic mappings involving generalized Bessel functions. Afr. Mat. 2015, 26, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Porwal, S. Connections between various subclasses of planar harmonic mappings involving generalized Bessel functions. Thai J. Math. 2015, 33, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  32. Porwal, S.; Dixit, K.K. An application of hypergeometric functions on harmonic univalent functions. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 2, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  33. Porwal, S.; Srivastava, D. Harmonic starlikeness and convexity of integral operators generated by Poisson distribution series. Math. Morav. 2017, 21, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sharma, A.K.; Porwal, S.; Dixit, K.K. Class mappings properties of convolutions involving certain univalent functions associated with hypergeometric functions. Electronic J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 1, 326–333. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yalçın, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Vijaya, K. Inclusion results on subclasses of harmonic univalent functions associated with Pascal distribution series. Palestine J. Math. 2022, 11, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ya ş ar, E. Harmonic k-Uniformly Convex, k-Starlike Mappings and Pascal Distribution Series. Math. Sci. Appl.-Notes 2020, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El-Ashwah, R.M.; Kota, W.Y. Connections between various subclasses of uniformly harmonic starlike mappings and Poisson distribution series. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 3, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frasin, B.; Alb Lupaş, A. An Application of Poisson Distribution Series on Harmonic Classes of Analytic Functions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030590

AMA Style

Frasin B, Alb Lupaş A. An Application of Poisson Distribution Series on Harmonic Classes of Analytic Functions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(3):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frasin, Basem, and Alina Alb Lupaş. 2023. "An Application of Poisson Distribution Series on Harmonic Classes of Analytic Functions" Symmetry 15, no. 3: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop