Next Article in Journal
Exponential Stability for Second-Order Neutral Stochastic Systems Involving Impulses and State-Dependent Delay
Previous Article in Journal
Computing Topological Descriptors of Prime Ideal Sum Graphs of Commutative Rings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Secure Registration Protocol for the Internet of Drones Using Blockchain and Physical Unclonable Function Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bi-Unitary Superperfect Polynomials over 𝔽2 with at Most Two Irreducible Factors

1
Department of Mathematics and Physics, School of Arts and Sciences, The International University of Beirut, Saida P.O. Box 146404, Lebanon
2
Department of Mathematics, College of Basic Education, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait City 70654, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(12), 2134; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122134
Submission received: 15 October 2023 / Revised: 23 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asymmetric and Symmetric Study on Number Theory and Cryptography)

Abstract

:
A divisor B of a nonzero polynomial A, defined over the prime field of two elements, is unitary (resp. bi-unitary) if g c d ( B , A / B ) = 1 (resp. g c d u ( B , A / B ) = 1 ) , where g c d u ( B , A / B ) denotes the greatest common unitary divisor of B and A / B . We denote by σ * * ( A ) the sum of all bi-unitary monic divisors of A . A polynomial A is called a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 if the sum of all bi-unitary monic divisors of σ * * ( A ) equals A . In this paper, we give all bi-unitary superperfect polynomials divisible by one or two irreducible polynomials over F 2 . We prove the nonexistence of odd bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 .

1. Introduction

Let n and k be positive integers, and let σ ( n ) (resp. σ * ( n ) ) denote the sum of positive (resp. unitary) divisors of the integer n. A divisor d of n is unitary if d and n / d are coprime. We call the number n a k-superperfect number if σ k ( n ) = σ ( σ ( . . . ( σ ( k - times n ) ) ) ) = 2 n . When k = 1 , n is called a perfect number. An integer M = 2 p 1 , where p is a prime number, is called a Mersenne number. It is also well known that an even integer n is perfect if and only if n = M ( M + 1 ) / 2 for some Mersenne prime number M. Suryanarayana [1] considered k-superperfect numbers in the case k = 2 . Numbers of the form 2 p 1 (p is prime) are 2-superperfect if 2 p 1 1 is a Mersenne prime. It is not known if there are odd k-superperfect numbers. Sitaramaiah and Subbarao [2] studied the unitary superperfect numbers, with the integers n satisfying σ * 2 ( n ) = σ * ( σ * ( n ) ) = 2 n . They found all unitary superperfect numbers below 10 8 . The first unitary superperfect numbers are 2 , 9 , 165 , and 238. A positive integer n has a bi-unitary divisor, d, if the greatest common unitary divisor of d and n / d is equal to 1. The arithmetic function σ * * ( n ) denotes the sum of positive bi-unitary divisors of the integer n. Wall [3] proved that there are only three bi-unitary perfect numbers ( σ * * ( n ) = 2 n ) , namely, 6, 60, and 90. Yamada [4] proved that 2 and 9 are the only bi-unitary superperfect numbers, that is, σ * * 2 ( n ) = 2 n if and only if n { 2 , 9 } .
Here, let A be a nonzero polynomial over the prime field F 2 . We say that A is a splitting polynomial if it can be factored completely into linear factors over F 2 . A divisor B of A is unitary (resp. bi-unitary) if g c d ( B , A / B ) = 1 (resp. g c d u ( B , A / B ) = 1 ) , where g c d u ( A , A / B ) denotes the greatest common unitary divisor of B and A / B . We denote by σ the sum of the monic divisors B of A , that is, σ ( A ) = B A B . σ * ( A ) (resp. σ * * ( A ) ) represents the sum of all unitary (resp. bi-unitary) monic divisors of A . Note that all the functions σ , σ * , and σ * * are multiplicative and degree-preserving.
We say that a polynomial A is an even polynomial if it has a linear factor in F 2 [ x ] ; otherwise, it is an odd polynomial. A polynomial M of the form 1 + x a ( x + 1 ) b is called Mersenne. The first five Mersenne polynomials over F 2 are M 1 = 1 + x + x 2 , M 2 = 1 + x + x 3 , M 3 = 1 + x 2 + x 3 , M 4 = 1 + x + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 , and M 5 = 1 + x 3 + x 4 . Note that all these polynomials are irreducible, so we call them Mersenne primes.
Notations: We use the following notations throughout the article:
  • N (resp. N * ) represents the set of non-negative (resp. positive) integers.
  • deg ( A ) denotes the degree of the polynomial A .
  • A ¯ is the polynomial obtained from A with x replaced by x + 1 , that is, A ¯ ( x ) = A ( x + 1 ) .
  • P and Q are distinct irreducible non-constant polynomials.
  • P i and Q j are distinct odd irreducible non-constant polynomials.
Let ω ( A ) denote the number of distinct irreducible monic polynomials that divide A. The notion of a perfect polynomial over F 2 was introduced first by Canaday [5]. A polynomial A is perfect if σ ( A ) = A . Canaday studied the case of even perfect polynomials with ω ( A ) 3 . In the past few years, Gallardo and Rahavandrainy [6,7,8] showed the non-existence of odd perfect polynomials over F 2 with either ω ( A ) = 3 or with ω ( A ) 9 in the case where all exponents of the irreducible factors of A are equal to 2. A polynomial A is said to be a unitary (resp. a bi-unitary) perfect if σ * ( A ) = A (resp. σ * * ( A ) = A ). Furthermore, A is called a unitary (resp. a bi-unitary) superperfect if σ * 2 ( A ) = σ * ( σ * ( A ) ) = A (resp. σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * ( σ * * ( A ) ) = A ) .
Note that the function σ * * 2 is degree-preserving but not multiplicative, and this is the main challenge in this work. Thus, working on bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 is not an easy task especially when A is divisible by more than two irreducible factors.
In this paper, we prove the non-existence of odd bi-unitary superperfect polynomials A when A is divisible by at least two irreducible factors (Corollary 4). We give a complete classification for all bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 that are divisible by at most two distinct irreducible factors (Theorems 1 and 2). Bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 that are neither unitary perfect nor bi-unitary perfect are found. The polynomials x 4 ( x + 1 ) 4 , x 9 ( x + 1 ) 9 , x 9 ( x + 1 ) 13 , and x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 d 1 , d is a positive integer, are examples of bi-unitary superperfect polynomials that are neither unitary perfect nor bi-unitary perfect.
Our main results are given in the following theorems:
Theorem 1. 
Let A be a bi-unitary superperfect over F 2 such that ω ( A ) = 1 ; then, A , A ¯ { x 2 , x 2 d 1 } , where d N * .
Theorem 2. 
Let A be a bi-unitary superperfect over F 2 such that ω ( A ) = 2 ; then, A , A ¯ { x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 , x 4 ( x + 1 ) 4 , x 9 ( x + 1 ) 9 , x 9 ( x + 1 ) 13 , x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 d 1 , x 2 d 1 1 ( x + 1 ) 2 d 2 1 } , where d , d 1 , d 2 N * .

2. Previous Work

Many researchers studied the unitary perfect polynomials over F 2 . In their works [7,8], the authors listed the unitary perfect polynomials over F 2 , where ω ( A ) does not exceed 4. They listed others that are divisible by x ( x + 1 ) M , where M is a Mersenne polynomial, raised to certain powers. They proved that the only unitary perfect polynomials over F 2 of the form A = x a ( x + 1 ) b i = 1 M i and h i = 2 n i , n i N * are those of the form B 2 n or B ¯ 2 n , where
B x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 2 , x 3 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1 , x 5 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 4 if ω ( A ) 3 , x 7 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 2 M 3 , x 5 ( x + 1 ) 6 M 1 2 M 4 , x 5 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 4 M 5 , x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7 M 2 2 M 3 2 if ω ( A ) = 4 , x 7 ( x + 1 ) 6 M 2 1 M 2 M 3 , x 7 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 2 M 3 M 5 if ω ( A ) = 5 .
In [9], Beard found many bi-unitary perfect polynomials over F p d , some of which are neither perfect nor unitary perfect. Beard showed that the only bi-unitary perfect polynomials over F 2 with exactly two prime factors are x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 and x 2 n 1 ( x + 1 ) 2 n 1 , for any n N * (Theorem 5 in [9]). He conjectured a characterization of the bi-unitary perfect polynomials, which splits over F p when p > 2 . Beard also gave examples of non-splitting bi-unitary perfect polynomials over F p when p { 2 , 3 , 5 } . Rahavandrainy [10] gave all bi-unitary perfect polynomials over the prime field F 2 , with at most four irreducible factors (Lemmas 7 and 8).
Gallardo and Rahavandrainy [11] classified some unitary superperfect polynomials with a small number of prime divisors under some conditions on the number of prime factors of σ * ( A ) . They proved that A F 2 [ x ] is a unitary superperfect polynomial if
A x 2 n ( x + 1 ) 2 m , x 3 · 2 n ( x + 1 ) 3 · 2 m , x 3 ( x + 1 ) 5 , x ( x + 1 ) 5 , x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7 if ω ( A ) = 2 , x 2 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 , x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 a , x ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 a , x ( x + 1 ) 5 ( x 3 + x 2 + 1 ) if ω ( A ) = 3 .
For some m, n N * and a { 1 , 2 } .

3. Preliminaries

The following two lemmas are helpful.
Lemma 1. 
Let A be a polynomial in F 2 [ x ] ; then, σ * A 2 n = σ * A 2 n and n is a non-negative integer.
Proof. 
The result follows since σ * is multiplicative and σ * ( p 2 n ) = 1 + p 2 n = ( 1 + p ) 2 n = σ * ( p ) 2 n . □
Lemma 2. 
If A is a unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 , then A 2 n is also a unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 for all non-negative integers n.
Proof. 
Let A be a unitary superperfect, and let B = σ * A . By Lemma 1, we have σ * 2 A 2 n = σ * σ * A 2 n = σ * B 2 n = σ * B 2 n = σ * σ * A 2 n = A 2 n . □
Lemma 3 
(Lemma 2.4 in [11]). Let A be a polynomial in F 2 [ x ] .
(1) 
If P is an odd prime factor of A , then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * A .
(2) 
If x ( x + 1 ) divides A , then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * A .
(3) 
If A is unitary superperfect that has an odd prime factor, then x ( x + 1 ) divides A .
The following results are needed, and they are a result of Beard’s [9] and Rahavandrainy’s [10] works.
Lemma 4 
(Theorem 1 and its Corollary in [9]). If A is a non-constant bi-unitary perfect polynomial, then x ( x + 1 ) divides A and ω ( A ) 2 .
Proposition 1 
(Lemma 2.2 in [10]).
(1) 
σ * * ( P 2 a + 1 ) = σ ( P 2 a + 1 ) .
(2) 
σ * * ( P 2 a ) = ( 1 + P a + 1 ) σ ( P a 1 ) = ( 1 + P ) σ ( P a ) σ ( P a 1 ) .
The table in Section 7 shows some values of σ * * ( A ) when A is a power of the first five Merssene primes.
Corollary 1. 
If a is a positive integer, then
(1) 
1+x divides σ * * ( x a ) .
(2) 
x divides σ * * ( 1 + x ) a .
Proof. 
An immediate result of Proposition 1. □
Corollary 2 
(Corollary 2.3 in [10]). Let T F 2 [ x ] be irreducible. Then,
(i) 
If a { 4 r , 4 r + 2 } , where 2 r 1 or 2 r + 1 is of the form 2 α u 1 , u odd, then σ * * ( P a ) = ( 1 + P ) 2 α · σ ( P 2 r ) · ( σ ( P u 1 ) ) 2 α , gcd ( σ ( P 2 r ) , σ ( P u 1 ) ) = 1 .
(ii) 
If a = 2 α u 1 is odd, with u odd, then σ * * ( P a ) = ( 1 + P ) 2 α 1 · ( σ ( P u 1 ) ) 2 α .
The proof of the below proposition follows from Proposition 1 and the binomial formula.
Proposition 2. 
Let the polynomial M i be the Mersenne prime and Q j be an irreducible polynomial over F 2 , and let a , c N * . If α j N , then
(1) 
x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( M i c ) .
(2) 
σ * * ( M 1 c ) = x a ( x + 1 ) a Π j Q j α j .
(3) 
σ * * ( M 2 c ) = x a ( x + 1 ) 2 a Π j Q j α j .
(4) 
σ * * ( M 3 c ) = x 2 a ( x + 1 ) a Π j Q j α j .
(5) 
σ * * ( M 4 c ) = x a ( x + 1 ) 3 a Π j Q j α j .
(6) 
σ * * ( M 5 c ) = x 3 a ( x + 1 ) a Π j Q j α j .
Proposition 3 
(Corollary 2.4 in [10]).
(1) 
σ * * ( x a ) splits over F 2 if and only if a = 2 or a = 2 d 1 , for some d N * .
(2) 
σ * * ( P c ) splits over F 2 if and only if P is Mersenne and c = 2 or c = 2 d 1 for some d N * .
Lemma 5 summarizes key results taken from Canaday’s paper [5].
Lemma 5. 
Let T be irreducible in F 2 [ x ] and let n , m N .
(i) 
If T is a Mersenne prime and if T = T * , then T { M 1 , M 4 } .
(ii) 
If σ ( x 2 n ) = P Q and P = σ ( ( x + 1 ) 2 m ) , then 2 n = 8 , 2 m = 2 , P = M 1 , and Q = P ( x 3 ) = 1 + x 3 + x 6 .
(iii) 
If any irreducible factor of σ ( x 2 n ) is a Mersenne prime, then 2 n 6 .
(iv) 
If σ ( x 2 n ) is a Mersenne prime, then 2 n { 2 , 4 } .
Lemma 6 
(Lemma 2.6 in [12]). Let m N * and M be a Mersenne prime. Then, σ ( x 2 m ) , σ ( ( x + 1 ) 2 m ) , and σ ( M 2 m ) are all odd and square-free.

4. Bi-Unitary Superperfect Polynomials

Recall that A is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial in F 2 [ x ] if σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * ( σ * * ( A ) ) = A . The polynomial A = x 4 ( 1 + x ) 4 is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 .
The following polynomials are considered over F 2 :
C = 1 + x + x 4 , B 1 = x 3 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 , B 2 = x 3 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 2 , B 3 = x 4 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 2 , B 4 = x 6 ( x + 1 ) 6 M 1 2 , B 5 = x 4 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 3 , B 6 = x 7 ( x + 1 ) 8 M 5 , B 7 = x 7 ( x + 1 ) 9 M 5 2 , B 8 = x 8 ( x + 1 ) 8 M 4 M 5 , B 9 = x 8 ( x + 1 ) 9 M 4 M 5 2 , B 10 = x 7 ( x + 1 ) 10 M 1 2 M 5 , B 11 = x 7 ( x + 1 ) 13 M 2 2 M 3 2 , B 12 = x 9 ( x + 1 ) 9 M 4 2 M 5 2 , B 13 = x 14 ( x + 1 ) 14 M 2 2 M 3 2 , R 1 = x 4 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 4 C , R 2 = x 4 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 5 C 2 .
The proof of the following lemmas follow directly.
Proposition 4. 
If A is a bi-unitary perfect polynomial over F 2 , then A is also a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial.
Proposition 5. 
If A is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 , then B = σ * * ( A ) is also a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial.
Rahavandrainy (Lemma 2.6 in [10]) proved that if A is a bi-unitary perfect polynomial over F 2 , where A = A 1 A 2 such that g c d ( A 1 , A 2 ) = 1 , then A 1 is a bi-unitary perfect polynomial if and only if A 2 is a bi-unitary perfect polynomial. Rahavandrainy’s previous result is not valid in the case of bi-unitary superperfect polynomials because the bi-unitary superperfect polynomial A = x 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 ( 1 + x + x 2 ) 2 is a counterexample over F 2 . In fact, A 1 = x 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 is a bi-unitary superperfect, but A 2 = ( 1 + x + x 2 ) 2 is not a bi-unitary superperfect.
Lemma 7 
(Theorem 1.1 in [10]). Let A F 2 [ x ] be a bi-unitary perfect polynomial such that ω ( A ) = 3 . Then, A , A ¯ { B j : j 7 } .
Lemma 8 
(Theorem 1.2 in [10]). Let A F 2 [ x ] be a bi-unitary perfect polynomial such that ω ( A ) = 4 . Then A , A ¯ { B j : 8 j 13 } { R 1 , R 2 } .
Proposition 6. 
If A ( x ) is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 , then so is A ¯ ( x ) .
Lemma 9. 
x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( P a ) , a is a positive integer.
Proof. 
Since P is odd, then P ( 0 ) = P ( 1 ) = 1 . If a = 2 n + 1 , then σ * * ( P 2 n + 1 ) ( 0 ) = 1 + P ( 0 ) + + P 2 n + 1 ( 0 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) - times = 1 + 2 n + 1 = 0 . If a = 2 n , then 1 + P n + 1 ( 0 ) = 0 . Thus, x divides σ * * ( P a ) for every a N . Similarly, x + 1 divides σ * * ( P a ) . Hence, x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( P a ) . □
Lemma 10. 
Let A be a polynomial in F 2 [ x ] .
(1) 
If P is an odd prime factor of A , then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * A .
(2) 
If x ( x + 1 ) divides A , then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * A .
Proof. 
(1)
We write A = P a B , where a N * and B F 2 [ x ] such that g c d ( P , B ) = 1 . However, 1 + P divides σ * * A , and the result follows since x ( x + 1 ) divides 1 + P .
(2)
In a similar manner, we write A = x a ( x + 1 ) b B , where a , b N * .
Corollary 3. 
If A F 2 [ x ] and ω ( A ) 2 , then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( A ) .
Proof. 
Let ω ( A ) 2 . If x ( x + 1 ) divides A, then Corollary 1 is completed. If x ( x + 1 ) does not divide A, then A is divisible by an irreducible polynomial P { x , 1 + x } , and the result follows using Lemma 9. □
Corollary 4. 
Let A be a polynomial in F 2 [ x ] with ω ( A ) 2 . If A is a bi-unitary superperfect, then x ( x + 1 ) divides A .
Proof. 
Let A = σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * ( B ) , where B = σ * * ( A ) . Since ω ( A ) 2 , then either P or x ( x + 1 ) divides A. In both cases, x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( A ) = B (Lemma 10). Thus, x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( B ) = σ * * 2 ( A ) . □
The below corollary follows directly from Corollary 4.
Corollary 5. 
If A = P a Q b and a , b N * . is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 , then A = x a ( x + 1 ) b .
The following lemma is similar to Proposition 3.
Lemma 11. 
Let a , b N * , then
(1) 
If a is even; then, σ * * 2 ( x a ) and σ * * 2 ( ( x + 1 ) a ) splits over F 2 if and only if a 2 , 4 , 10 , 12 .
(2) 
If a is odd, then σ * * 2 ( x a ) and σ * * 2 ( ( x + 1 ) a ) splits over F 2 if and only if a 5 , 9 , 13 , 2 d 1 for some d N * .
Proof. 
(1)
If σ * * ( x a ) splits, a = 2 (Proposition 3) and σ * * 2 ( x a ) = ( x + 1 ) 2 . Suppose that σ * * ( x a ) does not split with a = 4 r , 2 r 1 = 2 α u 1 , (resp. a = 4 r + 2 , 2 r + 1 = 2 α u 1 ), u is odd, r 1 . However, σ * * 2 ( x a ) = σ * * ( 1 + x ) 2 α · σ ( x 2 r ) · σ ( x u 1 ) 2 α ; thus, σ * * ( 1 + x ) 2 α must split. Hence, α = 1 , and since σ ( x 2 r ) is odd and square-free (Lemma 6), then σ ( x 2 r ) has a Mersenne factor. Thus, 2 r 6 and, hence, u 3 .
(2)
Assume a = 2 α u 1 , with u is odd. If σ * * ( x a ) splits, then a = 2 d 1 , d is positive (Proposition 3). If σ * * ( x a ) does not split, then a 2 d 1 and since σ * * 2 ( x a ) = x 2 α 1 · σ * * σ ( x u 1 ) 2 α splits, u > 1 . Again, using Lemma 6, σ ( x 2 r ) has a Mersenne factor. Thus, u 1 6 and, hence, u 3 , 5 , 7 . For u = 3 , σ * * 2 ( x a ) = x 2 α 1 · σ * * σ ( x 2 ) 2 α = x 2 α 1 · σ * * M 1 2 α . Hence, α = 1 and the same result is obtained when u 5 , 7 .
The same proof is performed for σ * * 2 ( ( x + 1 ) a ) , and the proof is complete. □
Lemma 12. 
Let a and b have the form 2 n 1 , where n N * , and let the polynomial A = 1 + x a ( x + 1 ) b be Mersenne prime over F 2 ; then, σ * * 2 ( A ) = x b ( x + 1 ) a .
Proof. 
Let a = 2 n 1 1 and b = 2 n 2 1 ; then,
σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * 2 1 + x a ( x + 1 ) b = σ * * ( σ ( 1 + x a ( x + 1 ) b ) = σ * * x a ( x + 1 ) b = x b ( x + 1 ) a .

5. Proof of Theorem 1

We consider the polynomial A = P a and a N * . We prove that σ * * ( A ) cannot have more than one prime factor when A is a prime power.
Proposition 7. 
If A { x , x + 1 } and σ * * 2 ( A a ) splits over F 2 , then A is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial.
Proof. 
Follows from part (1) of Lemma 11. □
Proposition 8. 
Assume P is odd, then A = P α F 2 [ x ] is not a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial.
Proof. 
Assume A = P a is a bi-unitary superperfect. Since P divides A, then x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * ( A ) , and using Lemma 10, we have that x ( x + 1 ) divides σ * * 2 ( A ) = P a , a contradiction. □
In particular, if M is a Mersenne prime polynomial over F 2 , then M c (c is a positive integer) is never a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial.
Corollary 6. 
Let a N * and let A = P a be a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial over F 2 ; then, P x , x + 1 .
It is clear from the preceding two corollaries that a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial must be even.
Lemma 13. 
Let A be a polynomial over F 2 with ω ( A ) = 1 ; then, A is a bi-unitary superperfect polynomial if and only if A , A ¯ { x 2 , x 2 d 1 } , where d N * .
Proof. 
Using Corollary 6, A = x α or x + 1 α . Assume A = x α and α = 2 m ; then, σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * x m + 1 + 1 x m 1 x 1 . Both x m + 1 + 1 and x m + 1 split over F 2 only when m = 1 . Thus, σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * x 2 + 1 = x 2 . If α = 2 m + 1 , then σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * x 2 ( m + 1 ) 1 x 1 . The expression x 2 ( m + 1 ) + 1 splits over F 2 when 2 m + 2 = 2 d , d N * . Then, σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * x 2 d 1 x 1 = A = x 2 d 1 . The sufficient condition follows via direct computation, and the result follows since if A is a bi-unitary superperfect, then so is A ¯ . □

6. Proof of Theorem 2

We consider the polynomial A = P a Q b and a , b N * . Note that A = x 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 and A = x 2 α 1 ( 1 + x ) 2 α 1 are bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 , as shown Proposition 4 and Theorem 5 in [9].
Proposition 9 
(Lemma 3.1 in [10]). If the polynomial σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) does not split, then ( a 3 or b 3 ) and ( a 2 n 1 or b 2 m 1 for any n , m 1 ) .
Lemma 14. 
Let a , b , d N * . The polynomial A = x a ( x + 1 ) b is a bi-unitary superperfect over F 2 if and only if one of the following is true.
(1) 
If a and b are odd and σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) splits, then a and b are of the form 2 d 1 .
(2) 
If a and b are odd and σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) does not split, then ( a , b ) { ( 9 , 9 ) , ( 9 , 13 ) , ( 13 , 9 ) } .
(3) 
If a and b are even, then a = b { 2 , 4 } .
(4) 
If a and b are of opposite parity, then ( a , b ) 2 , 2 d 1 , 2 d 1 , 2 .
Proof. 
(1)
If a = 2 m + 1 and b = 2 n + 1 , then σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * σ * * ( x a ) ( 1 + x ) b . However, σ * * ( x 2 m + 1 ) and σ * * ( x + 1 ) 2 n + 1 split over F 2 when 2 m + 1 and 2 n + 1 are of the form 2 d 1 (Proposition 3).
(2)
If a = 2 α u 1 and b = 2 β v 1 , u , v are odd. We have u > 1 and v > 1 since σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) does not split. σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) = σ * * ( 1 + x ) 2 α 1 σ ( x u 1 ) 2 α x 2 β 1 σ x + 1 v 1 2 β . Using Proposition 9 ( u 1 3 and α = 1 ) or ( v 1 3 and β = 1 ) . Furthermore, σ x u 1 and σ x + 1 v 1 does not split since σ * * ( x a ( x + 1 ) b ) does not split. Thus, there exist Merssene primes M (resp. M ) that divides σ x u 1 (resp. σ x + 1 v 1 . Hence, ( u 1 6 ) or ( v 1 6 ) , and we have that u , v 5 , 7 . If u = v = 5 , then a = b = 9 . If u = 5 and v = 7 , then a = 9 and b = 13 . If u = v = 7 , then a = b = 13 is dismissed.
(3)
If a , b even, then a { 4 r , 4 r + 2 } such that 2 r 1 , 2 r + 1 is of the form 2 α u 1 , where u is odd and b { 4 r , 4 r + 2 } such that 2 r 1 , 2 r + 1 is of the form 2 β vs. −1, v odd. Thus,
σ * * ( A ) = ( 1 + x ) 2 α 1 σ ( x 2 r ) σ ( x u 1 ) 2 α x 2 β 1 σ x + 1 2 r σ x + 1 v 1 2 β .
If σ ( x 2 r ) , σ x + 1 2 r , σ ( x u 1 ) , and σ x + 1 v 1 are Mersenne, then 2 r , 2 r , u 1 , v 1 { 2 , 4 } . Thus, a = b = 4 . If σ ( x 2 r ) , σ ( x u 1 ) , σ x + 1 2 r and σ x + 1 v 1 are not Mersenne, then r , r , u 1 , v 1 > 2 and ω ( σ * * 2 ( A ) ) > 2 , a contradiction. For a = b = 2 , A is bi-unitary perfect; hence, A is a bi-unitary superperfect.
(4)
Now, let a = 2 m + 1 and b = 2 n . Since σ * * x + 1 2 n splits over F 2 only when n = 1 , then σ * * 2 ( A ) = σ * * σ * * ( x 2 m + 1 ) σ * * ( x + 1 ) 2 . However, σ * * ( x 2 m + 1 ) splits over F 2 if 2 m + 1 is of the form 2 d 1 . If a = 2 m and b = 2 n + 1 , then a = 2 and b = 2 d 1 . The sufficient condition can be easily verified.
The proof of Theorem 2 is now complete.

7. Some Values of σ * * ( A ) and σ * * 2 ( A )

For convenience of readers, we list the below table (Table 1) that consists of the values of σ * * ( A ) and σ * * 2 ( A ) for A { x a , ( x + 1 ) a , M i b } , where 1 a 13 , 1 b 7 . We consider the polynomials C 1 = x 4 + x + 1 , C 2 = x 6 + x 5 + x 4 + x 2 + 1 , C 3 = x 6 + x 5 + x 4 + x + 1 , and C 4 = x 10 + x 9 + x 8 + x 7 + x 2 + x + 1 .

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, we proved the non-existence of odd bi-unitary superperfect polynomials and provided a classification for bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 based on their irreducible factors. In particular, we showed that a non-constant bi-unitary superperfect polynomial A over F 2 can be divisible by one irreducible polynomial x or x + 1 with exponent 2 or 2 n 1 for a positive integer n. Furthermore, we showed that the only bi-unitary superperfect polynomials over F 2 with exactly two irreducible factors are of the form x a ( x + 1 ) b with a , b { 2 , 4 , 9 , 13 , 2 d 1 } , d is a positive integer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C.; methodology, H.C.; formal analysis, H.C., D.M. and Y.A.; investigation, H.C.; data curation, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C., D.M. and Y.A.; writing—review and editing, H.C., D.M. and Y.A.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, H.C.; project administration, H.C.; funding acquisition, Y.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their sincere appreciation to the editors and referees for their invaluable feedback and contributions, which have greatly enriched the quality and impact of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Suryanarayana, D. Super Perfect Numbers. Elem. Der Math. 1969, 24, 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sitaramaiah, V.; Subbarao, M. On the Equation σ**(n)) = 2n. Util. Math. 1998, 53, 101–124. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wall, C. Bi-unitary perfect numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1972, 33, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yamada, T. 2 and 9 are the only biunitary superperfect numbers. Ann. Univ. Sci. Bp. 2018, 48, 247–256. [Google Scholar]
  5. Canaday, E.F. The sum of the divisors of a polynomial. Duke Math. J. 1941, 8, 721–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gallardo, L.H.; Rahavandrainy, O. Odd perfect polynomials over F2. J. Théorie Nombres Bordx. 2007, 19, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gallardo, L.H.; Rahavandrainy, O. On even (unitary) perfect polynomials over F2. Finite Fields Their Appl. 2012, 18, 920–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gallardo, L.H.; Rahavandrainy, O. All unitary perfect polynomials over F2 with at most four distinct irreducible factors. J. Symb. Comput. 2012, 47, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beard, J.T. Bi-unitary perfect polynomials over GF(g). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1987, 149, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rahavandrainy, O. All bi-unitary perfect polynomials over F2 with at most four irreducible factors. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2205.08392. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallardo, L.H.; Rahavandrainy, O. Unitary superperfect binary polynomials. In Proceedings of the Finite Fields: Theory and Applications: Theory and Applications: Ninth International Conference on Finite Fields and Applications, Dublin, Ireland, 13–17 July 2009; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2010; Volume 518, p. 155. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallardo, L.H.; Rahavandrainy, O. Characterization of Sporadic perfect polynomials over F2. Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 2016, 55, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. A { x a , ( x + 1 ) a , M a } .
Table 1. A { x a , ( x + 1 ) a , M a } .
Aa σ * * σ * * 2
x a 1x x + 1
2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2
3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3
4 x 2 M 1 x ( x + 1 ) 3
5 x M 1 2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 3
6 x 4 M 1 x ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7
8 x 4 M 5 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
9 x M 5 2 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 3
10 x 2 M 1 2 M 5 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 5
11 x 3 M 1 4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 5 C 1
12 x 2 M 1 2 M 2 M 3 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 7
13 x M 2 2 M 3 2 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 7
................................................................
( 1 + x ) a 1x x + 1
2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2
3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3
4 x 2 M 1 x ( x + 1 ) 3
5 x M 1 2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 3
6 x 4 M 1 x ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7
8 x 4 M 5 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
9 x M 5 2 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 3
10 x 2 M 1 2 M 5 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 5
11 x 3 M 1 4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 5 C 1
12 x 2 M 1 2 M 2 M 3 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 7
13 x M 2 2 M 3 2 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 7
................................................................
M 1 a 1 x ( x + 1 ) x ( x + 1 )
2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2
3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3
4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 C 1 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
5 x ( x + 1 ) C 1 2 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 2
6 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 4 C 1 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 3
7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 7
................................................................
M 2 a 1 x ( x + 1 ) 2 x 2 ( x + 1 )
2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1
3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 6 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1
4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 M 5 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1
5 x ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1 2 M 5 2 x 10 ( x + 1 ) 5
6 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 8 M 1 M 5 x 8 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 M 5
7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 14 x 8 ( x + 1 ) 7 M 2 M 3
M 3 a 1 x 2 ( x + 1 ) x ( x + 1 ) 2
2 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1
3 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1
4 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1 M 4 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 6 M 1
5 x 2 ( x + 1 ) M 1 2 M 4 2 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 10
6 x 8 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 M 4 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 8 M 1 M 4
7 x 14 ( x + 1 ) 7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 8 M 2 M 3
................................................................
M 4 a 1 x ( x + 1 ) 3 x 3 ( x + 1 )
2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 6 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1
3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) 9 x ( x + 1 ) 3 M 5 2
4 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 6 M 1 C 2 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 M 2
5 x ( x + 1 ) 3 M 1 2 C 2 2 x 9 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 2 2
6 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 12 M 1 C 2 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 3 M 2 2 M 3
7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) 21 x ( x + 1 ) 7
C 4 2
................................................................
( M 5 ) a 1 x 3 ( x + 1 ) x ( x + 1 ) 3
2 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 2 x 2 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1
3 x 9 ( x + 1 ) 3 x 3 ( x + 1 ) M 4 2
4 x 6 ( x + 1 ) 2 M 1 C 3 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 7 M 1 M 3
5 x 3 ( x + 1 ) M 1 2 C 3 2 x 5 ( x + 1 ) 9 M 3 2
6 x 12 ( x + 1 ) 4 M 1 C 3 x 4 ( x + 1 ) 5 M 1 3 M 2 M 3 2
7 x 21 ( x + 1 ) 7 x 7 ( x + 1 ) σ x 10 2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chehade, H.; Miari, D.; Alkhezi, Y. Bi-Unitary Superperfect Polynomials over 𝔽2 with at Most Two Irreducible Factors. Symmetry 2023, 15, 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122134

AMA Style

Chehade H, Miari D, Alkhezi Y. Bi-Unitary Superperfect Polynomials over 𝔽2 with at Most Two Irreducible Factors. Symmetry. 2023; 15(12):2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chehade, Haissam, Domoo Miari, and Yousuf Alkhezi. 2023. "Bi-Unitary Superperfect Polynomials over 𝔽2 with at Most Two Irreducible Factors" Symmetry 15, no. 12: 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15122134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop