Next Article in Journal
Graph Coloring via Clique Search with Symmetry Breaking
Next Article in Special Issue
Symmetry Reductions, Cte Method and Interaction Solutions for Sharma-Tasso-Olver-Burgers Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Fekete–Szegö Inequalities for a New Subclass of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with Gegenbauer Polynomials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Second-Order Approximate Equations of the Large-Scale Atmospheric Motion Equations and Symmetry Analysis for the Basic Equations of Atmospheric Motion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Zero Order of an Extended Temme Integral

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(8), 1573; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14081573
Submission received: 3 July 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Integrable Systems: Theory and Application)

Abstract

:
A new three-dimensional integral containing f ( x , y , z ) I v ( x α ) is derived where I v ( x α ) is the Modified Bessel Function of the first kind and the integral is taken over the infinite cubic space 0 < x < , 0 < y < , 0 < z < . The integral is not easily evaluated for complex ranges of the parameters. A representation in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function, polylogarithm function and Riemann zeta functions are evaluated. This representation yields triple integral representations in terms of fundamental constants that can be derived. Almost all Lerch functions have an asymmetrical zero distribution.
MSC:
Primary 30E20; 33-01; 33-03; 33-04

1. Introduction

In the work by Temme [1], a double integral containing the modified Bessel function has been computed and asymptotics derived. In this present paper, the authors extend the work previously published by Temme and derive a triple Integral containing the Modified Bessel function of the first kind I ν ( y α ) in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function. The integral formula is then used to derive special cases in terms of other special functions and fundamental constants. In this paper, we will derive the triple definite integral given by:
R + 3 x m v 1 z 2 v m y ( ( m 1 ) ν ) 1 e b z α x I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v 1 2 log k a x y ν p + q y ν z d x d y d z
where the parameters k , a , p , q , v , m C are general complex numbers, such that 0 < R e ( m ) < 1 , π < I m ( m ) < π , R e ( α ) > 0 and R e ( ν ) > 1 / 2 . This definite integral will be used to derive special cases in terms of special functions and fundamental constants. The derivations follow the method used by us in [2]. This method involves using a form of the generalized Cauchy’s integral formula given by:
y k Γ ( k + 1 ) = 1 2 π i C e w y w k + 1 d w .
where C is, in general, an open contour in the complex plane where the bilinear concomitant has the same value at the end points of the contour. We then multiply both sides by a function of x, y, and z, then take a definite triple integral of both sides. This yields a definite integral in terms of a contour integral. Then, we multiply both sides of Equation (2) by another function of y and take the infinite sum of both sides such that the contour integral of both equations are the same.

2. Definite Integral of the Contour Integral

Here, we use the method in [2]. The variable of integration in the contour integral is r = w + m . The cut and contour are in the first quadrant of the complex r-plane. The cut approaches the origin from the interior of the first quadrant and the contour goes round the origin with zero radius and is on opposite sides of the cut. Using a generalization of Cauchy’s integral formula we form the triple integral by replacing y by:
log a x y ν p + q y ν z
and multiplying by
x m v 1 z 2 v m y ( ( m 1 ) ν ) 1 e b z α x I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v 1 2
followed by taking the definite integral with respect to x [ 0 , ) , y [ 0 , ) and z [ 0 , ) to obtain:
1 Γ ( k + 1 ) R + 3 x m v 1 z 2 v m y ( ( m 1 ) ν ) 1 e b z α x I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v 1 2 log k a x y ν p + q y ν z d x d y d z = 1 2 π i R + 3 C a w w k 1 e b z α x x m v + w 1 z m + 2 v w y ( ν ( m + w 1 ) ) 1 I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v + w 1 2 d w d x d y d z = 1 2 π i C R + 3 a w w k 1 e b z α x x m v + w 1 z m + 2 v w y ( ν ( m + w 1 ) ) 1 I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v + w 1 2 d x d y d z d w = 1 2 π i C π a w w k 1 Γ v 1 2 2 m + v w csc ( π ( m + w ) ) b m 2 v + w 1 ν p q m w + 1 p m v + w 1 2 α m + v w d w
from Equation (3.13.2.2) in [3] and Equations (3.241.4) and (3.326.2) in [4] where R e ( v ) < R e ( w + m ) < 1 / 2 , R e ( α ) > 0 and using the reflection Formula (8.334.3) in [4] for the Gamma function. We are able to switch the order of integration over x, y, and z using Fubini’s theorem for multiple integrals page 178 in [5], since the integrand is of bounded measure over the space C × [ 0 , ) × [ 0 , ) × [ 0 , ) .

3. The Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function and Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral

In this section we use Equation (2) to derive the contour integral representations for the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function.

3.1. The Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function

The Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function (25.14) in [6,7] has a series representation given by:
Φ ( z , s , v ) = n = 0 ( v + n ) s z n
where | z | < 1 , v 0 , 1 , 2 , and is continued analytically by its integral representation given by:
Φ ( z , s , v ) = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e v t 1 z e t d t = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e ( v 1 ) t e t z d t
where R e ( v ) > 0 , and either | z | 1 , z 1 , R e ( s ) > 0 , or z = 1 , R e ( s ) > 1 .

3.2. Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral

Using Equation (2) and replacing y by
log ( a ) log ( α ) + log ( b ) log p q + log ( p ) + i π ( 2 y + 1 ) log ( 2 )
then multiplying both sides by
i π 2 m + v + 1 e i π m ( 2 y + 1 ) Γ v 1 2 b m 2 v 1 p q 1 m p m v 1 2 α v m ν
taking the infinite sum over y [ 0 , ) and simplifying in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function we obtain
i π k + 1 2 e 1 2 i π ( k + 2 m ) Γ v 1 2 b m 2 v 1 2 k m + v + 1 p q 1 m p m v 1 2 α v m ν Γ ( k + 1 ) Φ e 2 i m π , k , i log ( a ) i log ( b ) i log ( p ) + i log 2 p q + i log ( α ) + π 2 π = 1 2 π i y = 0 C i π a w w k 1 Γ v 1 2 2 m + v w + 1 e i π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) b m 2 v + w 1 ν p q m w + 1 p m v + w 1 2 α m + v w d w = 1 2 π i C i π a w w k 1 Γ v 1 2 2 m + v w + 1 b m 2 v + w 1 ν p q m w + 1 p m v + w 1 2 α m + v w · y = 0 e i π ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) d w = 1 2 π i C π a w w k 1 Γ v 1 2 2 m + v w csc ( π ( m + w ) ) b m 2 v + w 1 ν p q m w + 1 p m v + w 1 2 α m + v w d w
from Equation (1.232.2) in [4] where I m ( w + m ) > 0 in order for the sum to converge.

4. Definite Integral in Terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function

Theorem 1.
For all 0 < R e ( m ) < 1 , π < I m ( m ) < π , 1 / 2 < R e ( ν ) then,
R + 3 x m v 1 z 2 v m y ( ( m 1 ) ν ) 1 e b z α x I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v 1 2 log k a x y ν p + q y ν z d x d y d z = i π k + 1 2 e 1 2 i π ( k + 2 m ) Γ v 1 2 b m 2 v 1 2 k m + v + 1 p q 1 m p m v 1 2 α v m ν Φ e 2 i m π , k , i log ( a ) i log ( b ) i log ( p ) + i log 2 p q + i log ( α ) + π 2 π
Proof. 
The right-hand sides of relations (3) and (6) are identical; hence, the left-hand sides of the same are identical too. Simplifying with the Gamma function yields the desired conclusion. □
Example 1.
The degenerate case.
R + 3 x m v 1 z 2 v m y m ν + ν 1 e b z α x I v ( x α ) p + q y ν m v 1 2 d x d y d z = π 2 v m csc ( π m ) Γ v 1 2 b m 2 v 1 p q 1 m p m v 1 2 α v m ν
Proof. 
Use Equation (7) and set k = 0 and simplify using entry (2) in Table below (64:12:7) in [8]. □
Example 2.
The polylogarithm function L i n ( z ) .
R + 3 e x 2 z x m v 1 z 2 v m y m ν + ν 1 I v ( x ) y ν + 1 2 m v 1 2 log k x y ν + 2 2 z d x d y d z = i 2 k 1 2 π k + 1 2 e 1 2 i π ( k 2 m ) Γ v 1 2 L i k e 2 i m π ν
Proof. 
Use Equation (7) and set a = 1 , b = 2 , p = 1 / 2 , q = 1 / 2 , α = 1 simplify using Equation (64:12:2) in [8]. □
Example 3.
The Riemann zeta function ζ ( s ) .
R + 3 x v 1 2 z 2 v 1 2 e x 2 z y ν 2 1 I v ( x ) y ν + 1 2 v log k x y ν + 2 2 z d x d y d z = 2 k 1 2 2 k + 1 1 e i π k 2 π k + 1 2 ζ ( k ) Γ v 1 2 ν
Proof. 
Use Equation (9) and set m = 1 / 2 and simplify using Equation (25.12.10) in [6]. □
Example 4.
The constant log ( 2 ) .
R + 3 x v 1 2 z 2 v 1 2 e x 2 z y ν 2 1 I v ( x ) y ν + 1 2 v log x y ν + 2 2 z d x d y d z = i log ( 2 ) Γ v 1 2 2 2 π ν
Proof. 
Use Equation (10) and apply l’Hopital’s rule as k 1 and simplify using Equation (25.4.1) in [6]. □
Example 5.
Apery’s constant ζ ( 3 ) .
R + 3 x v 1 2 z 2 v 1 2 e x 2 z y ν 2 1 I v ( x ) y ν + 1 2 v log 3 x y ν + 2 2 z d x d y d z = 3 i ζ ( 3 ) Γ v 1 2 32 2 π 5 / 2 ν
Proof. 
Use Equation (10) and set k = 3 and simplify. □

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have presented a novel method for deriving a new triple integral transform containing the modified Bessel function along with some interesting definite integrals using contour integration. The results presented were numerically verified for both real and imaginary and complex values of the parameters in the integrals using Mathematica by Wolfram.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R.; methodology, R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R. and A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by NSERC Canada under grant 504070.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Temme, N.M. A Double Integral Containing the Modified Bessel Function: Asymptotics and Computation. Math. Comput. 1986, 47, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Method for Evaluating Definite Integrals in Terms of Special Functions with Examples. Int. Math. Forum 2020, 15, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I.; Savischenko, N.V. Handbook of Mellin Transforms; Taylor & Francis, Chapman and Hall/CRC: Abingdon, UK, 2019; 607p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 6th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gelca, R.; Andreescu, T. Putnam and Beyond, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Olver, F.W.J.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. (Eds.) NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions; U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Washington, DC, USA; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; With 1 CD-ROM (Windows, Macintosh and UNIX). MR 2723248 (2012a:33001). [Google Scholar]
  7. Laurincikas, A.; Garunkstis, R. The Lerch Zeta-Function; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Oldham, K.B.; Myland, J.C.; Spanier, J. An Atlas of Functions: With Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Non-Zero Order of an Extended Temme Integral. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14081573

AMA Style

Reynolds R, Stauffer A. Non-Zero Order of an Extended Temme Integral. Symmetry. 2022; 14(8):1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14081573

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reynolds, Robert, and Allan Stauffer. 2022. "Non-Zero Order of an Extended Temme Integral" Symmetry 14, no. 8: 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14081573

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop