Next Article in Journal
Interaction of Hadronic Dark Matter with Nucleons and Leptons
Next Article in Special Issue
Oscillation Criteria for First Order Differential Equations with Non-Monotone Delays
Previous Article in Journal
Algebraic Inverses on Lie Algebra Comultiplications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Finite Difference Approximation Method for a Space Fractional Convection–Diffusion Equation with Variable Coefficients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Noether Symmetries of a Generalized Coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock System with Central Symmetry

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Botswana, Private Bag 22, Gaborone, Republic of Botswana
2
Department of Mathematical Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X 2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
3
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of South Africa, Unisa 0003, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2020, 12(4), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040566
Submission received: 20 February 2020 / Revised: 13 March 2020 / Accepted: 20 March 2020 / Published: 5 April 2020

Abstract

:
In this paper we carry out a complete Noether symmetry analysis of a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry. It is shown that several cases transpire for which the Noether symmetries exist. Moreover, we derive conservation laws connected with the admitted Noether symmetries. Furthermore, we fleetingly discuss the physical interpretation of the these conserved vectors.

1. Introduction

In 2017 [1], the authors studied both Lie and Noether symmetries of a Lane-Emden-Klein-Fock system with central symmetry with power functions namely,
u t t u r r n r u r + γ v q r n = 0 , v t t v r r n r v r + α u p r n = 0 ,
where p , n , γ , α , q are non-zero constants. In fact, when n = 2 , γ = α = 1 , system (1) becomes
u t t u r r 2 r u r + v q r 2 = 0 , v t t v r r 2 r v r + u p r 2 = 0 .
System (2) has been studied in [2] for both Lie and Noether symmetries together with the associated conservation laws.
Systems of this type occur in several physical phenomena, see, for example, Refs. [1,2,3,4] and references therein. These type of system can also be viewed as a natural extension of the famous two-component generalization of the nonlinear wave equation, viz,
u t t u r r m r u r u p = 0 ,
with the real-valued function u = u ( t , r ) , and p representing the interaction power while the independent variables ( t , r ) symbolize time and radial coordinates respectively in m 0 dimensions [4].
In 2019 [5], the authors studied the generalization of system (1) where the power functions v q and u p are replaced with arbitrary elements namely, h ( v ) and g ( u ) respectively. Thus system (1) becomes
u t t u r r n r u r + h ( v ) r n = 0 , v t t v r r n r v r + g ( u ) r n = 0 .
It is worth mentioning that, if the parameter n = 0 in system (1), then system (1) reduces to the Lane-Emden system
u x x + u y y + v p = 0 , v x x + v y y + u q = 0 ,
under the complex transformation ( x , y , u , v ) ( t , i r , u , v ) , where p and q are non-zero constants. This system has been extensively studied for its Noether and Lie symmetries [6]. Furthermore, if the parameter n = 0 , in system (4), then system (4) transforms to a generalized Lane-Emden system
u x x + u y y + h ( v ) = 0 , v x x + v y y + g ( u ) = 0 ,
under the aforementioned complex transformation. In [7], authors applied the classical symmetry method to investigate the symmetries of system (6).
In [5], the authors applied the method of modern group analysis to study a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry (4). Motivated by the recent results in [5], we study the aforemention system (4). To the authors’ knowledge, the method of Noether symmetry analysis has not been used in the study of a generalized Lane-Emden-Klein-Fock system with central symmetry (4). Thus in this paper, we aim to compensate for this absence by carrying out a complete Noether symmetry classification of system (4) and derive the connected conservation laws of system (4). Since system (4), has a Lagrangian structure, thus the knowledge of Noether theorem [8] gives us an elegant way to construct conservation of system (4).
The structure of this paper is as follows. Firstly, we seek to establish the admitted Noether symmetries of a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry (4) associated with the standard Lagrangian. Next, in Section 2, conservation laws connected with the admitted Noether symmetries are derived. Concluding remarks are summarised in Section 3.

2. Complete Noether Symmetries Analysis

Several authors have done much work on Noether classification for a system of PDEs. See for example [6,7,9]. Here we perform a complete Noether symmetry analysis of system (4) with respect to the standard Lagrangian. System (4) has a Lagrangian structure. This prompts the following Lemma.
Lemma 1.
The generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry (4) establishes the Euler-Lagrange equations with the functional
J ( u , v ) = 0 0 L ( t , r , u , v , u t , v t , u r , v r ) d t d r ,
where
L = 1 n r n u t v t r n u r v r h ( v ) d v g ( u ) d u .
is the connected function of Lagrange.
Proof. 
The insertion of L in the Euler-Lagrange equations [6,9] gives
δ L δ u = L u D t L u t D r L u r , = g ( u ) n 1 n D t ( r n v t ) 1 n D r ( r n v r ) , = g ( u ) n r n n v t t 1 n ( n r n 1 v r r n v r r ) , = v t t v r r n ̑ r v r + r n = 0 , δ L δ v = L v D t L v t D r L v r , = h ( v ) n 1 n D t ( r n u t ) 1 n D r ( r n u r ) , = h ( v ) n r n n u t t 1 n ( n r n 1 u r r n u r r ) , = u t t u r r n r u r + h ( v ) r n = 0 ,
Hence this complete the proof. □
Let x = ( x 1 , , x n ) be n independent variables and u = ( u 1 , , u m ) m dependent variables. An operator (the sum over repeated indices is presupposed)
X = ξ i ( x , u ) x i + η α ( x , u ) u α
is called Noether point symmetry generator of the coupled system (4) connected to the Lagrangian L in (7) if the Killing-type equation,
X ( 1 ) L + D i ( ξ i ) L = D i A i ,
holds for some point-dependent potential terms A = ( A i ) where A i = A i ( t , r , u , v ) , i = 1 , 2 . We now revisit the celebrated Noether Theorem [6,8], that is, corresponding to each Noether symmetry, there exist a vector T = ( T i ) with components
T i = ξ i L + L δ u i j ( η j u s j ξ s ) A i ,
which is a conserved vector of system (4). The solution of (9) leads to overdetermining systems of PDEs. Solving the resulting systems of PDEs prompts the following results.
τ = a ( t , r ) , ξ = b ( t , r ) , η 1 = d v ( t , r , v ) u n r b u + k ( t , r ) , η 2 = d ( t , r , v ) , A 1 = r n n d t u + r n n k t v + s ( t , r ) , A 2 = r n n d r u r n n k r v + w ( t , r ) ,
( d v u k ) g ( u ) + n r b u g ( u ) d f ( v ) ( b r + a t ) h ( v ) d v + g ( u ) d u = r n ( d t t d r r ) u + r n ( k t t k r r ) v n r n 1 ( d r u + k r v ) + n ( s t + w r ) .
A complete analysis of Equation (11) yields the following results.
Theorem 1.
Suppose n 0 , h ( v ) a n d g ( u ) are arbitrary functions, then the Noether generator of a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry (4) and the associated conservation laws are given by (12)
X 1 = t , A i = 0 , T 1 1 = r n n u t v t r n n u r v r 1 n h ( v ) d v 1 n g ( u ) d u , T 1 2 = r n n u t v r + r n n u r v t .
Theorem 2.
Let the elements h ( v ) = α v + β , g ( u ) = γ u + λ , with α , γ , β , λ are constants, α , γ 0 and n arbitrary. Then the Noether symmetries of system (4) and the connected conserved vectors are (12) and
X 2 = k ( t , r ) u + f ( t , r ) v , A 1 = r n n u f t + r n n u k t , A 2 = r n n u f r r n n u k r , w i t h k t t k r r n r k r + α r n f = 0 , f t t f r r n r f r + γ r n k = 0 , T 2 1 = r n n f u t + r n n k v t r n n u f t r n n v k t , T 2 2 = r n n u f r + r n n v k r r n n f u r r n n k v r .
Theorem 3.
Suppose that h ( v ) = γ v q , g ( u ) = α u p , α , γ 0 . Then the Noether operators of system (4) and the associated conservation laws are as follows;
(i) if n = 2 ( q + p + 2 ) ( p + 1 ) ( q + 1 ) p , q 0 , ± 1 , then we have (12) and
X 2 = t t + r r 2 p + 1 u u 2 q + 1 v v , A i = 0 , T 2 1 = t r n n ( u t v t + u r v r ) 1 n ( p + 1 ) ( α t u p + 1 + 2 r n u v t ) 1 n ( q + 1 ) ( γ t v q + 1 + 2 r n u t v ) r n + 1 n ( v t u r + u t v r ) , T 2 2 = r n + 1 n ( u t v t + u r v r ) 1 n ( p + 1 ) ( α r u p + 1 2 r n u v r ) 1 n ( q + 1 ) ( γ r v q + 1 2 r n u r v ) + t r n n ( v t u r + u t v r ) .
(ii) if p = q = 1 , γ = α , n arbitrary. Here we get the generic case (12) and
X 3 = u u v v , A i = 0 , T 3 1 = r n n ( u v t u t v ) , T 3 2 = r n n ( u r v u v r ) .
It should be noted that in any other case one recovers (12). It should also be observed that when p = q = 1 , this falls into Theorem 2.
Theorem 4.
Let the elements h ( v ) = α v p , g ( u ) = γ e m u , α , γ , m 0 , p 1 . Then the Noether generators of system (4) and the corresponding conservation laws are;
(i) if n = 2 p + 1 , γ = α , n , m arbitrary. Here the generic case (12) extends by one Noether generator with the associated conservation laws;
X 2 = t m ( p + 1 ) t + r m ( p + 1 ) r + 2 ( p + 1 ) u 2 m v v , A i = 0 , T 2 1 = r n n m t u r v r r n n m t u t v t m α n ( p + 1 ) t v p + 1 + γ t n e m u + 2 r n n v t m r n + 1 n u r v t m r n v u t m r n + 1 n v r u t , T 2 2 = r n + 1 n m u t v t + r n + 1 n m u r v r m α n ( p + 1 ) r v p + 1 + γ n r e m u 2 r n n v r + r n n m t u t v r + r n m v u r + r n n m t v t u r .
It should be noted that in any other case one recovers (12). This analysis will also be encountered in Theorem 5.
Theorem 5.
Suppose that h ( v ) = α e λ v , g ( u ) = γ u q , q , γ , α 0 . Then the Noether operators of system (4) and the associated conserved vectors are;
(i) if n = 2 q + 1 , γ = α , n , λ arbitrary. In this case, the generic case (12) enlarges by one operator with the following conserved vectors;
X 2 = t λ ( q + 1 ) t + r λ ( q + 1 ) r + 2 ( q + 1 ) u 2 λ v v , A i = 0 , T 2 1 = r n n λ t u r v r r n n λ t u t v t γ λ n ( q + 1 ) t u p + 1 + α t n e λ v + 2 r n n u t λ r n + 1 n u r v t λ r n u v t λ r n + 1 n v r u t , T 2 2 = r n + 1 n λ u t v t + r n + 1 n λ u r v r λ γ n ( q + 1 ) r u q + 1 + α n r e λ v 2 r n n u r + r n n λ t v t u r + r n λ u v r + r n n λ t u t v r .
It should be observed that in any other case one recovers (12).
The aforementioned theorems can be proved by inserting the values of X i , n, h ( v ) and g ( u ) into Equation (11) and these will satisfy Equation (11). Moreover, substituting these values into Equation (10) one obtains the associated T i . These T i then satisfy the divergence condition.
Remark 1.
It is worth mentioning that for any case that do not fall in Theorems 2–5, the Noether algebra is one-dimentional and is generated by X 1 . It should be noted that Theorem 2 cannot be directly obtained as a consequence of the results of [1], since the functions h ( v ) and g ( u ) are not linear, but affine functions, hence these give some new results. In addition, Theorems 4 and 5 exploit new forms of h ( v ) and g ( u ) which also lead to some new results. The cases when h ( v ) and g ( u ) are constants are discarded.

3. Concluding Remarks

A complete Noether symmetry classification of the generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry (4) was carried out. Several functional forms of the elements h ( v ) and g ( u ) which resulted in Noether point symmetries were derived. Thereafter, conservation laws connected to the Noether point symmetries were obtained. Conservation laws are of undisputed significance. From the mathematical point of view, when analyzed, they can be employed to detect integrability. Although conservation laws are useful in the analysis of solutions of differential equations, we will exclude this analysis for our future work. The results of the problem under study were motivated by the recent work in [1]. However, the results derived therein were not complete since the function h ( v ) and g ( u ) were only considered to be power functions. However, in the present work, the function h ( v ) and g ( u ) were consider to be arbitrary, and this resulted in some new and more general results. The authors thank the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve the paper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M., Conceptualization, S.O.M., Conceptualization, A.R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Muatjetjeja, B. Coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry: Symmetries and Conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 2017, 263, 8322–8328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Freire, I.L.; Muatjetjeja, B. Symmetry analysis of a Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 2018, 11, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Muatjetjeja, B.; Mogorosi, T.E. Variational principle and conservation laws of a generalized hyperbolic Lane-Emden system. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2018, 13, 121002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mogorosi, T.E.; Freire, I.L.; Muatjetjeja, B.; Khalique, C.M. Group anylsis of a hyperbolic Lane-Emden system. Appl. Math. Comput. 2017, 292, 156–164. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mbusi, S.O.; Muatjetjeja, B.; Adem, A.R. Lie group classification of a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry. Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory 2019, 19, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bozhkov, Y.; Freire, I.L. Symmetry analysis of the bidimensional Lane-Emden system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 388, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Muatjetjeja, B.; Khalique, C.M. Conservation laws for a generalized coupled bidimensional Lane-Emden system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 2013, 18, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Noether, E. Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1918, 2, 235–257. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bozhkov, Y.; Martins, A.C.G. Lie point symmetries of the Lane-Emden system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 294, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muatjetjeja, B.; Mbusi, S.O.; Adem, A.R. Noether Symmetries of a Generalized Coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock System with Central Symmetry. Symmetry 2020, 12, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040566

AMA Style

Muatjetjeja B, Mbusi SO, Adem AR. Noether Symmetries of a Generalized Coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock System with Central Symmetry. Symmetry. 2020; 12(4):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muatjetjeja, B., S. O. Mbusi, and A. R. Adem. 2020. "Noether Symmetries of a Generalized Coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock System with Central Symmetry" Symmetry 12, no. 4: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop