Next Article in Journal
Land Subsidence Susceptibility Mapping Using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and Machine Learning Models in a Semiarid Region of Iran
Next Article in Special Issue
Periphery and Integrated Planning: Coping with Rural and Touristic Challenges across Scales in the German Wadden Sea Region
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Morphology Optimization of Rural Planning Based on Space of Flow: An Empirical Study of Zepan Village in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Agricultural Intensification Reduces the Portfolio of Wetland Ecosystem Services: European Danube River Lowlands as a Global Biodiversity Hotspot
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba

by
R. Y. Alarcón Borges
1,*,
Ofelia Pérez Montero
1,
Rogelio García Tejera
1,
María Teresa Durand Silveira
2,
José Celeiro Montoya
3,
Dayniel Hernández Mestre
4,
Jorge Mesa Vazquez
1,
Carlos Mestanza-Ramon
5,6,
Diego Hernandez-Guzmán
7 and
Celene B. Milanes
8,9,*
1
Multidisciplinary Study Center of Coastal Zones (CEMZOC), Universidad de Oriente, Las Americas Avenue s/n, Santiago de Cuba 90400, Cuba
2
Provincial Delegation Water Resources, Santiago de Cuba 90400, Cuba
3
State Forest Service, Provincial Delegation of the Ministry of Agriculture, Santiago de Cuba 90400, Cuba
4
Instituto de Geografía Tropical, La Habana, Cuba Calle F, No. 302 esq. 13, Plaza de La Revolución, La Habana 10400, Cuba
5
Research Group YASUNI-SDC, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Sede Orellana, El Coca 220001, Ecuador
6
Instituto Superior Tecnológico Universitario Oriente, La Joya de los Sachas 220101, Ecuador
7
Law Department, Universidad de la Costa, Villavicencio Headquarters, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
8
GeMarc Research Group, Civil and Environmental Department, Universidad de la Costa, Street 58 # 55–66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
9
Coiba Scientific Station (Coiba AIP), City of Knowledge, Clayton, Panama City 0801, Panama
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(4), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040842
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Revised: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 6 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversifying Forest Landscape Management Approaches)

Abstract

:
The protection of forest cover in Cuba is a state priority. It is part of the state plan to deal with climate change. The purpose of this paper is to assess the legal risks associated with the protection of forest cover, which is essential to ensure the sustainability of hydrological watershed management in Cuba. The qualitative method of social research was followed. Techniques of content analysis, semi-structured interviews, and legal exegetics were applied. Geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing techniques were also used to triangulate data and results. This article provided a robust analytical framework for generating innovative laws for land planning through a three-phase methodological design associated with configuring, interpreting, and applying tools for stopping deforestation processes based on watershed management. As a result, it was demonstrated that limitations reveal a deficient legal application with risk in the river basin, and a significant causal relationship between institutions and communities. Furthermore, the study indicated that although there are legal norms that regulate the protection of forest cover in the studied basin, its vulnerabilities generate uncertainty about the foreseeable results in management of forest cover. It is recommended that the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins include the design of legal risk indicators for forest cover management into the sub-plan for forest area increase. These recommendations constitute a set of related actions to improve the sustainability of the above-mentioned management.

1. Introduction

Deforestation is one of the seven major environmental problems and has become an important component of sustainable forest management [1]. This phenomenon has led to major changes in the structure and function of river basins [2]. As an anthropogenic process, deforestation leads to the loss of biodiversity, reduces water retention and filtration capabilities, increases carbon emissions, expedites climate change, and has negative impacts on human well-being. For instance, forest depletion is an important factor in climate change, as it is responsible for direct CO2 emissions from land use and land-use change, accounting for 12% of all emissions [3,4].
The importance of deforestation and watershed forest depletion must not be overlooked. Forests play a crucial role in maintaining water stability by participating in various components of the water cycle. It is recommended that the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins include the design of legal risk indicators for forest cover management into the sub-plan for forest area increase [1,4]. These recommendations constitute a set of related actions to improve the sustainability of the above-mentioned management. They also influence flow regulation processes [5]. Several authors agree that the regulation of water yield in a watershed depends on the type, characteristics, and quantity of vegetation cover present [4,5,6].
Added to the above are parameters that are responsible for global changes [7,8,9,10,11,12]; which significantly affect the vegetation cover of watersheds and disrupt their environmental sustainability; such as changes in climatic conditions [13], changes in the ecosystem, and biodiversity [14], changes in the landscape and its fragmentation [15,16,17,18], as well as the impact of urban growth [16,19,20].
In this context, how the state expresses efforts to protect vegetation cover through legal norms becomes relevant [21,22]. Also relevant is how it granted the hierarchy of standards, and the issuer of these legal norms gives them a binding force to influence the treatment of deforestation.
In Cuba, sustainable forest management is legally expressed through Law No. 85 of 21 July 1998, which focuses primarily on forest cover, and omits the ontology of a healthy forest ecosystem. In addition to this legislation, a series of resolutions have been implemented by governmental institutions to complement and reinforce the legal protection of forest cover, following the dynamics set forth by the aforementioned law. In Cuba, the protection of vegetation cover has, as a central axis of its legal protection, Law No. 85/1998. As part of the complementarity to this legislation, a set of governmental institutional resolutions guarantee this protection. According to forest dynamics, 31.15% of the national land surface is covered, which makes up the forest patrimony [23]. Different landholders administer this; the most representative are the agroforestry companies, the national flora and fauna companies, and the agricultural and livestock companies.
As part of the country’s environmental policy, a State Plan was designed to face climate change (Task Vida) [24], which aims to care for and conserve forest cover. Task number five of this plan develops strategic, institutional, legal, or organizational measures, investments, and other expenditures to guide reforestation towards maximum soil and water protection in quantity and quality. All of this is in congruence with the National Environmental Strategy (2021–2025) where it is expressly stated that deforestation is an environmental problem in the country [25].
The Cuban archipelago has recognized 642 surface basins larger than 5 km2 [26]. These basins occupy an area of 8 1143 km2, with a variation of the fluvial network from 0.20 to 4.0 km/km2. Of these, 11 are watersheds of national interest and 51 of provincial interest [24]. This classification of national and provincial interests is due to the economic, social, and environmental importance of their integrated management at these levels, applying the principles and instruments of sustainable development for their use, integral and rational exploitation to meet the demands of the economy and society, as well as the conservation and protection of the environment [27].
The San Juan River is among the watersheds of provincial interest in Cuba [27]. This watershed contains a rich forest cover. There is currently a growing interest in understanding the legal dimensions that hinder the protection of the forest cover of this watershed, and others in the country that present the same situation. Limitations in management increase the legal risk [21,22,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].
Scientific studies define the effects of deforestation on watersheds and its impact on their sustainability [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Although it is important to consider the legal aspects and associated risks of protecting forest ecosystems, only a limited number of studies have attempted to incorporate these factors into the watershed management process. Although it is important to consider the legal aspects and associated risks of protecting forest ecosystems, only a limited number of studies have attempted to incorporate these factors into the watershed management process [18,19,20].
This research defines legal risk as the probability of affecting watershed planning and management processes due to non-compliance or lack of compliance with current legislation. It is associated with the impossibility of demanding compliance with legal norms, generating adverse effects on watershed management processes, as well as the risk of regulatory change by the competent governmental authorities at the local, national, or international scales of enforcement, in a way that adversely affects this management [28].
The legal risk grows with uncertainty about applicable laws and legal regulations. Therefore, it includes legal enforceability [45,46,47,48], the legality of management instruments [49], exposure to unanticipated changes in laws and legal regulations [50], the existence of an obsolete legal and regulatory framework, inflexibility and the presence of gaps, antinomies, and ambiguous legal concepts [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].
The inefficient use of normative referrals [61,62,63], and the existence of forwarding chains [64], which generally cause linguistic or communicative, legal-formal, pragmatic, teleological, and ethical prejudice [54], affect the medium- and long-term ecological, economic, and social sustainability of the watershed.
The main purpose of this article is to analyze the legal risks associated with the protection of forest areas, in order to promote the sustainable management of Cuban hydrological basins. The research was driven by a fundamental question: how can legal risks associated with laws and regulations related to forest protection ensure their appropriate integration into forest resource management, using the case study of the San Juan River Basin?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

San Juan River Basin is located in Santiago de Cuba (19°58.0′ N; 75°49.4′ W), at the east of the Cuban archipelago (Figure 1). The study area has 138.3 km2 of superficies, with an approximate average superficial hyper-annual flow of 30.1 hm3 and 12.4 hm3 of groundwater.
It is bordered to the north by the heights of Boniato, to the south by the coastal plateaus and the Caribbean Sea, to the east by the heights of Ochoa and Las Guasimas, and to the west by the heights of Puerto Pelado and the city of Santiago de Cuba, flowing into the area known as Aguadores. Four mixed political-administrative districts (urban and rural) affect the basin. It is made up of a shallow basin and a subway basin, with the latter classified as a free, unconsolidated aquifer. Its forest cover index for 2016 was 33.34% [26,28,30] as an ecosystem under the protection of provincial interest [26,27]. The river basin has 23 settlements and a population of 170,000 inhabitants, about 40% of which is urban [23]. The main tributary flows into the Aguadores Pass in the Caribbean Sea, and its main tributaries are the rivers Seco, Zacatecas, Maisí, Cocal, and Soledad. It is made up of superficial and underground basins [30]. (See Figure 2).
According to the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins, the study area has the following environmental problems: (1) Drought. (2) Contamination of the water due to lack of sewerage. (3) Contamination of surface water from the presence of industrial, service, and residential activities; oil spills, and generation of dangerous waste (pneumatic, and bacterial, among others). (4) Degradation of the land. (5) Inadequate use of areas for cultivation. (6) The proliferation of vectors through the flawed system of final disposal of residuals. (7) Contamination of the river essentially by a significant anthropogenic development. (8) Salinization of water through saline intrusion in the dry season. The eight problems mentioned derive from the necessity to conduct relevant research into Cuban river basins [26,27,28].

2.2. Methods

This research is exploratory and is based on the principles of integrated watershed and coastal zone management [65]. The qualitative methods of social analysis, remote sensing, and geographic information systems were used. The techniques used in the three phases of the work are graphed and detailed below (see Figure 2).

2.3. Phase I. Study of Legal Norms Regarding Forest Cover in River Basins and Their Application in Cuba

2.3.1. Analysis of Documents

Qualitative analysis of documents [66,67] has been used to analyze technical reports [68] verified in the Provincial Delegation of Hydraulic Resources of Santiago de Cuba, and the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins of Santiago de Cuba. This review process involved three sets of tasks: (1) Compiling policies related to integrated management in the Provincial River Basin Council from 2014 to 2020, to ensure a census of its dynamics related to deforestation; (2) Identification of the spectrum of policy objectives through qualitative induction as conventional content analysis, text reading, etc.; (3) Description of the attributes and trends of integrated management policies regarding the object of study.

2.3.2. Legal Exegetical Method

This method was used to diagnose the technical-legal quality of current deforestation-related legislation, both from a formal and substantive point of view. The diagnosis focused on designing, reforming, or updating legal norms, identifying gaps, antinomies, vagueness, ambiguities of concepts, normative remissions, and their non-compliance in the Cuban legal system. An illustrative table was made containing all the legislations’ consulted objectives of these legal frameworks, sectors, and application scale. Subsequently, technical analysis of the legislation is developed according to Villabella [69] and Sánchez [70].

2.4. Phase II. Evaluation of the Forest Cover of the San Juan River Basin

Multi-date, remote-sensed data supported the methodology applied to assess the river basin area changes. Using satellite images, it was possible to identify, calculate, and monitor the forest cover of the San Juan Basin, and the surfaces affected by erosion and anthropogenic processes.
Images were analyzed, corresponding to the years 2014 to 2020. Other tools used in this study were remote sensing, the GIS, and photo interpretation as an interface for both. The importance of these tools in managing the river basin of reference was revealed. Landsat, 8 Level 1 with OLI/TIRS sensor, was used, with 30 m spatial resolution acquired through the Earth Explorer platform of the Geologic Service of the United States—United States Geological Survey USGS (http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/; accessed on 25 January 2021; USGS, 2020). The radiometric quantification was 12 bits. (See Table 1). The images were pre-processed, transforming to reflectance values. Likewise, the spatial data set has been geo-referenced in WGS84 (World Geodetic System 1984) Reference System and cartographic projection UTM zone 18 (UTM, 2020).
Twelve detailed field visits were made to the river basin forests investigated in this study to determine actual predominant plant species, their distribution, their conditions, and the typology of anthropogenic activities such as road emplacement, expansion of urbanized areas, disposal of waste materials, and illegal logging, among others, and their effects on the environment.

2.4.1. Visual Analysis

This investigation used the following band combinations for each year analyzed on 5/4/3. Infrared. This combination highlights roads and bodies of water, and has good sensitivity to green vegetation. 7/6/4. False urban color. This type of combination identifies urban areas differently from vegetation and forest.
The methodological scheme for visual classification maps was considered [71,72]. The five stages of this process were: (a) Collection and evaluation of satellite information. (b) Union of bands. (c) Evaluation and selection of satellite information under two criteria: (i) A low percentage of cloud cover for each scene; (ii) Review of image quality in the sector of the study area. (d) Designing the mosaic of satellite images. Generated by QGIS. (e) Geometric correction through geo-referencing.

2.4.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

This was used to reduce the number of variables introduced into the geo-information without losing a significant part of it [72], which allows a smaller dimensionality and projection of the “without forest cover” type areas, thus allowing a more accurate visual analysis, for each of the years analyzed [73]. In this research, its use is justified as an enhancement before the visual interpretation that was carried out.

2.4.3. Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin (SCP)

Under raster processing, an automatic workflow occurs. Under synchronized level of component analysis, the Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin (SCP), the data shown in the results are obtained, containing deforested and forest areas in km2 [74].

2.5. Phase III. Recommendations to Minimize the Legal Risk of Forest Cover in the River Basins and Their Integration into Decision Making

Semi-structured interviews [75] were conducted with 11 members of the Provincial Watershed Council of Santiago de Cuba, seven members of the State Forestry Service of that province, three members of the Provincial Delegation of Water Resources, two members of the Provincial Delegation of CITMA, eight researchers from the Center for Multidisciplinary Studies of Coastal Areas of the University of Oriente, and three judges of the Economic Chamber of the Provincial Court of Santiago de Cuba with competence until 2020 in environmental issues. The interviews were conducted in two working sessions. They aimed first to identify the levels of knowledge on legislation associated with the ecological sphere in Cuba, specifically in forestry, and then to determine the expressions of legal risk for protecting forest cover in the San Juan Basin. The second session focused on gathering their proposals to mitigate the effects of the manifestations of the identified legal risks.

3. Results

3.1. Legal and Institutional Manifestations of the Legal Protection of Forest Cover in Cuba

The forest is a renewable natural resource of the nation which provides economic, environmental, social, and cultural goods and services, susceptible to being used rationally, without detriment to its regulatory and protective qualities of the environment, which is the inheritance of all the people. The content analysis identified 15 binding legal norms, described in Table 2 and Appendix C.
It has been observed that the legal protection of forest cover has been strengthened through the legal framework, which currently includes 15 applicable rules in the country. These regulations include four laws, four decrees-law, three decrees, three resolutions, and one technical standard. Of the 15 laws, 9 were enacted in the 1990s and the remaining 6 in the 21st century.
As shown in Appendix A, the profuse legislation guarantees the right enshrined in Article 75 of the Constitution. This recognizes the right of all people to enjoy a healthy and balanced environment, being the state responsible for protecting the environment and natural resources. It recognizes the close linkage of the state with the sustainable development of the economy and society, to make human life more rational and ensure the survival, welfare, and security of present and future generations [76].
Under the guidelines of the forestry framework legislation, the protection, growth, and sustainable development of the nation’s forest heritage are promoted. At the same time, reforestation for economic, protective, or social purposes is encouraged, and its efforts are to conserve the biological diversity of resources associated with forest ecosystems.
Integrating this legislation with watershed management strengthened the water system through legal protection as the driving force of the watershed. Land use planning is the main instrument of the permanent planning process for the sustainable use of its natural resources. The legal framework described above lays the foundations for actions aimed at conserving, protecting, or preventing deterioration.
At the institutional level, the National Watershed Council is responsible for coordinating, controlling, and promoting the implementation of integrated watershed management. They have a work subprogram aimed at increasing the forest area. The Ministry of Agriculture is directly responsible for this. This is the agency in charge of directing, executing, protecting, and overseeing forest resource increase and sustainable development.
This Council is composed of a president, a vice president, a secretary, and permanent members for the fulfillment of its functions. The president of the National Institute of Hydraulic Resources presides over it. To satisfy the legislation in its area of competence, it is in charge of, among other functions, controlling the increase in forested area in the hydrographic basins. Another function is to recommend, coordinate, and evaluate integrated management programs to be implemented in the basins, which combine the sustainable use of natural resources with economic and social activities.

3.2. Legal Aspects That Reveal Legal Risk in the River Basin Management Legal System

The review of the legal framework for the protection of forest cover and the surveys identified the following aspects of the legislation that could pose a legal risk to the legal order of the watershed:
A.
Regarding legal enforceability, the principal cause of their existence is non-compliance with the provisions, technical regulations, and recommendations of the State Forest Service. This has led to the filing of infringement proceedings, mainly related to infringements of the conditions on:
  • Forests and forest management: conduct such as authorizing and carrying out silvicultural management other than the law was observed. Other actions such as not preparing and submitting for approval forest management projects. Failure to comply with the forestation and reforestation program in the mandatory areas established by law. Also observed were behaviors associated with the construction of housing and facilities, the promotion of crops, and the carrying out of earthworks not permitted in forest strips. As well as not complying with the technical regulations of the State Forest Service; carrying out clearing work without the express authorization established in the law.
  • The Forestry Registry: failure to comply with the provisions issued by the Forestry Registry.
  • Protection and conservation: non-compliance with phytosanitary technical norms to prevent and combat tree pests and diseases; failure to carry out sanitary felling of burned, plagued, or diseased trees; grazing of large or small livestock belonging to them, or in their custody, without the corresponding authorization from the State Forest Service; and failure to request an initial evaluation by the Ministry of Agriculture to obtain permission or approval for any work or investment that could affect the forest patrimony.
  • Fire prevention and extinguishing: failure to comply with preventive fire control and extinguishing measures and rehabilitation of affected areas; and failure to prepare or keep the forest fire protection plan up to date.
The primary measure applied is an administrative fine.
It is essential to point out that, even though the law itself—Decree No. 268 of 8 September 1999—leaves open the possibility of claiming civil liability for damages caused to the forest patrimony by the infringing conduct, it is not used, and there is an absence of proceedings of this nature in the competent courts. They made no use of it, and there is an absence of processes of this nature in the competent courts.
B.
The legality of management instruments: the forest framework legislation (Law No. 85 of 21 July 1998) certainly establishes forest management instruments, namely: forest management; afforestation and reforestation; forest harvesting and industry; contracts and other legal acts on forest patrimony; and forest conservation and protection. However, the main legal violations are related to silvicultural management other than those established in the law and its regulations. In addition to implementing management instruments without complying with all the requirements specified in the legislation, the cause of the infringement was conducted.
C.
Exposure to unanticipated changes in laws and legal regulations: some authors are currently working on strategic topics that will allow us to move towards sustainable forestry development. These are the achievements of forest management, the fulfillment of the ‘life task’ and, within it, the reforestation program of the watersheds. First, more significant legislative development is necessary to establish mechanisms allowing updated and quality forestry information based on scientific criteria and methodologies. A greater legal profusion of incentives for protection and reforestation is required, indispensable for managing existing natural forests, restoring and rehabilitating degraded areas, and establishing forest plantations. It is a challenge to strengthen further forest certification as a legal instrument for environmental management, and a guarantor of the principle of sustainability. Finally, to further develop the legal evaluation of ecological effects on the forest’s heritage.
D.
Existence of a legal regulatory framework that is outdated, inflexible, and with gaps, antinomies, and ambiguous legal concepts:
All the legislation that is identified as part of the protection of the forest cover in the watersheds must be updated according to the foundations of the Constitution of the Republic of Cuba, approved on 10 April 2019; and the legislative schedule that has been approved and is being fulfilled rapidly; which has brought as a consequence the improvement of our model of society and state, which undoubtedly influences the legal dynamics of the entire Cuban legal system in force. It is illustrated with two examples:
  • The contraventions legislation—Decree No. 268 of 8 September 1999, and Decree-Law No. 200 of 22 December 1999—do not contain the modifications that the Cuban monetary system, which was updated in the year 2020, has undergone.
  • Legislation: Law No. 81 of 11 July 1997. Environmental Law; Law No. 85 of 21 July 1998. Forestry Law: has not updated the structural system of the state, which, since the Constitution itself is its organic part, has made substantial modifications to that system. In addition, the Magna Carta is notably lacking in developing a plan of guarantees of rights that must be designed according to the specificities of both framework legislations, fundamentally concerning the right to enjoy a healthy and balanced environment.
Likewise, the following cases of ambiguity have been identified in the legal framework referring to the object of study:
  • Excessive use of the gerund. Examples: prevailing, fulfilling, having, pursuing, respecting. In all cases, the use of the gerund has an illative value. In other words, the gerund does not express a circumstance that marks the action of the main verb, but is used to link autonomous events.
  • Cumulative tendency to use adverbs. Examples: generally, fundamentally, permanently, only, jointly, legally, independently, totally, duly, economically, orderly, biologically, socially, systematically, integrally, properly, scientifically, previously, equally, personally, significantly, am-environmentally, exceptionally, gratuitously, continuously, partially, accidentally, potentially, indirectly, sensibly, rationally, currently.
  • There is a set of terms in the legislation with extensive vagueness. Their indeterminacy affects the scope of application of the concept: official character, effective operation, positive results, prudent time frame, periodic meetings, usual ebb and flow of the tides, justified reasons, sustained increase in the values of the forest resource, irrational logging, environmentally sound criteria.
E.
Use of normative referrals. Its main manifestations are: Forestry Law, technical standards in force, methodology established by the Forestry Directorate, Cuban standards, foreign investment law, forestry management projects or management plans, and methods based on the Forest Ranger Corps. These normative referrals are external, dynamic, and in a block (Table 3).
The analysis of documents revealed the dynamics of management policies related to deforestation in the basin of reference in the period studied (Table 4).
Finally, the analysis of documents also revealed the following significant violations of forestry regulations in the watershed under study. These are silvicultural management other than those established by law and failure to comply with the provisions, technical rules, and recommendations of the State Forestry Service. Again, legal entities predominantly committed these behaviors.

3.3. The Causal Relationship between the Legal Limitations and the Damages Embodies the Legal Risk

In relation to legal risks and their effects, it is necessary to highlight the consequences that they have expressed in damage to the legal dynamics, with consequent repercussions in the legal relationship protected in the legislation [54]. See Figure 3 and Table 5.
According to the results of the survey, 97 percent of respondents said that Cuba’s legal and regulatory framework related to forest cover is outdated. Law No. 85 of 21 July 1998 is the main legal regulation and does not contain the latest standards for healthy forest ecosystems. Furthermore, there is a lack of legal harmonization with the new Law No. 150 on natural resources and environmental systems. The application of the ecosystem approach as a fundamental strategy for national integrated natural resource management has not been recognized. There is a lack of systematic utilization of modern remote sensing techniques and geographic information systems such as QGIS, ArcGIS, GLOBALMAPPER, MAPINFO, and AUTOCAD forest management [55].
A figure of 90% of respondents indicated non-compliance with the regulations issued by the forest registry, especially with regard to phytosanitary regulations. In addition, 89 of the respondents believe that current forest management practices deviate from legal requirements. This is partly due to outdated forest laws, which do not cover silviculture practices such as conversion of lowland forests to middle forests, selective logging, and extensive and intensive silviculture. In addition, the law does not recognize the processing of forest management-related information through artificial intelligence-based storage mechanisms [56].
As part of the legal loopholes and their main effects, two important consequences have been identified. These are contraventional behaviors, and the violation of guarantees associated with legal requirements. According to the respondents, the main legal infringements are related to:
  • Construction of houses, facilities, expansion of crops, and unauthorized change in land use in forest belt;
  • Logging in forest areas;
  • Failure to comply with afforestation and reforestation programs in areas that are mandated by law;
  • Land clearing not expressly authorized by law;
  • Grazing livestock, large and small, in forest areas without corresponding permits;
  • Non-permanent use of forest land for agroforestry, tourism or recreational purposes without the approval of the State Forest Service;
  • Use of fire in and around forested areas without authorization from the Ranger Service, or, even if authorized, without observing established safety measures;
  • Failure to implement preventive measures for fire control and fire suppression, and restoration of affected areas as ordered by the competent authorities.

3.4. The Case Study on Deforestation in the San Juan Basin (2014–2020)

The application of the Remote Sensing method and the use of GIS led to the following results. Landsat 8 Level 1 type images of the San Juan River Basin were obtained (Figure 4), along with the delimitation of the study areas in QGIS (QGIS, 2020) (Appendix A).
Combining bands 5/4/3 and 7/6/4, the vegetation cover of the urban areas in the basin under study was obtained. The first combination provided the plant biomass. Infrared, red, and green channels were combined. The result yielded a false-color composition, whereby the vegetation is seen in red, and the areas devoid of vegetation are seen in blue and brown.
The increase in deforestation in the basin is present from the central area outwards, around the main axis, which we can call eccentric. This growth pattern occurs in the area corresponding to the urban city, bordering the roads and central infrastructure. Deforestation decreases as we move away from population centers.
Bands 7/6/4 show urban areas. They combine shortwave infrared channels 1 and 2, thus distinguishing and improving the reading of soil moisture and vegetation and the slopes of vegetation. Magenta hues are urban areas. The olive green to bright green ones are the forest areas.
The principal component analysis obtained in Appendix B was decisive for dimensionality and data volume reduction. In addition, this analysis led to minimizing loss of information, and enhanced spectral contrast in the basin under study.
Figure 5 shows the visual classification of deforestation in the river basin by the years analyzed. The resulting images take on exaggerated colors. However, these are not randomly reassigned but retain their initial tonality. This allows the association of each one to the same physical characteristics of the initial area. The vegetative vigor or presence of vegetation in the study area emerges as a new main component.
The visual classification allowed us to segment the images and interpret them from the organization of the homogeneous spectral data. These maps, and their cartographic precision, show a construction of the mosaic of pictures of the behavior and dynamics of deforestation due to the reduction of radiometric distortion.
The combination of 5/4/3 (infrared) and 7/6/4 (false-urban colors) bands produced a visual classification capable of identifying deforested areas (Table 6 and Table 7). For visual classification, three categories were identified: water, urbanization, and forest. The urbanization category was considered an area of deforestation, as it has been observed that activities related to urbanization, such as settlements, roads and crops, are the main cause of this phenomenon. It should be noted that the area of deforestation due to other causes is also included in this category (Table 6). Variations in values can be attributed to variations in the phenomena themselves, as well as specific features of the images used, such as the presence of clouds and shadows.
The information presented in Table 7 is derived from the calculation of the area of the vector layer after the annual visual classification. These figures represent the change in the area of deforestation in square kilometers between successive years.
Table 6 and Table 7 show that the most severe deforestation periods occurred in 2015–2016 and 2017–2018, resulting in losses of (−)7.79 km2 and 8.18 km2, respectively. The main factor driving deforestation in both periods was the expansion of human settlements.
It is estimated that during 2015–2016, deforestation affected about 19.8 km2, which is about 14.31% of the study area. At the same time, the unsupervised classification allowed us to recognize the spectral classes of the images and their reduction autonomously and interactively, depending on the interpretation of the results obtained. This is evidenced in the same way that the years of most significant deforestation were 2015–2016 and 2017–2018.
The results indicated are consistent with the reports in the national Cuban scientific literature [3,24,25,26], where it is referenced that in these years, there were evidenced affectations and variations to the forest cover. Exacerbating the previous causes was a decrease in young plantations, and low quality of the plantations that did not achieve adequate technical parameters to establish a plantation by the third year. A figure of 90% of those interviewed highlighted this aspect because it impacts the legal enforceability of forest management in the watershed.

4. Discussion

The current Cuban Constitution recognizes the protection of the environment and the country’s natural resources in Article 75 [77]. In this sense, the Cuban state has promulgated legal norms in forest coverage and watershed management. This allows for consolidating the material conditionality of this right. There is complete correspondence with the international trend [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87] of recognizing the legal protection of this coverage due to its importance to the balance of nature and its ecological, social, and economic multifunctionality, guaranteeing its sustainability.
The primary cause of the observed increase in deforestation within the analyzed watershed is the expansion of urban areas, which is consistent with the reports of the Provincial Council of Watersheds in Santiago de Cuba. These reports indicate that the rapid expansion of human settlements, the majority of which are informal or irregular in nature, is the driving force behind this increase [88].
The main reason for the increase in deforestation observed within the analyzed watershed was the expansion of urban areas, which is consistent with the report of the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins of the Province of Santiago de Cuba [30,67]. These reports suggest that the driving force behind this growth is the rapid expansion of human settlements, much of which is informal or irregular.
Illegal logging of wood and non-wood forest products also has an effect, leading to soil erosion in the study area. To a lesser extent, forest fires are associated with land delivery to usufructuaries by Decree-Law No. 259/2008, “on the delivery of idle lands in usufruct,” as well as in the process of organizing agricultural areas. Fire is used to renew idle lands and clear new areas for farming activities.
Similarly, the spaces reserved for discretion, and the overlapping of regulatory powers between the different agencies responsible for law enforcement have an impact. It is generating uncertainties about the foreseeable results in managing forest cover in the watershed that are consistent with the current legislation’s application. This aspect is weighted by its influence in Sodik [89], specifically for marine pollution, but 97% have remarked on it in this study.
The findings in this study are consistent with reports in the Cuban scientific literature [90], which describe changes in forest cover over the same period. In addition to the previously identified reasons, the literature highlights the reduction of plantation seedlings and the insufficient establishment of technical parameters for successful plantation establishment after the third year of growth [88].
Studies [91] have focused on the failures of legal regulations in specific coastal scenarios and the political instability of regulatory laws [92,93,94,95,96]. However, the scientific findings of this result show that the causes that generate deficiencies in legal norms are analyzed for the first time from the perspective of legal risk, at least for Cuba.
Authors such as McCormick [97], Whalley [98], and Tsui [99] have suggested an approach to legal risk from the perspective of how much the application of the rule of law affects profitability, applying the analysis to corporate and judicial matters. However, the view proposed in this article reveals that there are dimensions that strengthen the ontology of legal risk and are outlined in the probability of affecting watershed planning and management processes, based on the direct possibility of losses due to non-compliance (or imperfection) of legislation affecting watershed management or the impossibility of enforcing compliance with legal requirements for proper watershed management; or as a risk of regulatory change by the competent (governmental) authorities (local, national or international) of the regulations in a way that adversely affects this management [28].
The scientific path followed in this study indicated the need for a strategic law enforcement policy to significantly reduce deforestation [100,101,102]. This will allow the identification of the legal vulnerabilities that determine legal risk, and the creation of an analytical framework to generate innovative legal strategies associated with the results, interpretation, and application of laws to curb deforestation processes in watershed management.
Finally, the identification of legal limitations has been an essential component in revealing that their principal effects are concentrated in two aspects that hinder the development of an integrated policy for the protection of forest cover in watersheds. These are the proliferation of contraventional conducts, and the violation of the guarantees associated with the formal and material requirements of legality.
Such effects become weaknesses that complicate, annul, or weaken reforestation policy, generating inconsistencies [91] in implementing solutions from watershed management process [28].
The results obtained in other relevant previous works [91] coincide with some of the aspects analyzed in the present study, namely the shortcomings of the legislative and legal framework in coastal areas, and the application of forestry legislation to comply with the reduction of forestry emissions. However, the proposal revealed critical legal implications. From the point of view of legal innovation, it is a good proposal for making informed decisions on legal risks, such as prioritizing relevant actions to protect forest cover in the watershed management process.
Legal risk assessment is very useful in the decision-making process of watershed management [38,39,40]. Without identifying legal loopholes, it is not easy to identify issues related to the legal protection of forest cover. Without a systematic form of decision making, binding provisions cannot be developed to mitigate or reduce the impact of deforestation [10,12,14]. The legal risk analysis provides direction to provincial council members of the Hydrological Basin Commissions and allows legal risk information to be incorporated into their government decision making.
In other words, the risk-informed decision-making process of integrated forest cover management affects the sustainability of watershed management.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

This research integrates the legal dimensions and risks related to protecting vegetation cover in the watershed management process. Using the principles of integrated watershed and coastal zone management, three phases of work were designed to address the legal risks under reference. The results indicate that legal limitations reveal legal trouble in the legal system of the basin, with an important causal relationship between those and the damages that the legal risk embodies. This last result helps informed decisions to be made in the watershed management process. This study is generally novel in its approach, and its results are essential in the Cuban context.
It is of great value in highlighting the significance of identifying the legal constraints for assessing risk in a legal environment for the legal fabric of forest cover.
The proposed approach can incorporate the assessment of different socio-economic conditions affecting the reference ecosystem. Furthermore, due to the interdisciplinary nature of the article, new nodes of scientific research on the role of the institutional-legal subsystem in the hydrological basin management process are revealed. For example, assessing the relationship between legal risk and ecosystem protection; integrating and detecting legal risk in innovative decision making in hydrological watershed management; and legal innovation strategies for the sustainability of watershed management processes.
The framework presented here can also be applied to determining legal risks to ecosystems such as mangroves, estuaries, swamps, and mountain ecosystems.
In view of the fact that the legal risk assessment of forest cover protection in the Cuban watershed requires comprehensive measures and is a dynamic management process, the following recommendations are made to the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins:
  • When managing Cuban hydrological watersheds through subprograms, it is recommended to include: increase in forest area; and design of legal risk management indicators for forest cover management.
  • Identify legal risks and their causation.
  • Identify responsible parties and their level of responsibility (civil, administrative setting, and criminal).
  • Design relevant measures to deal with or reduce legal risks.
  • Strengthen the integration of the main bodies of the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins, and comprehensively deal with legal risks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Y.A.B., O.P.M. and C.B.M.; methodology, R.Y.A.B. and O.P.M.; software, D.H.M. and R.G.T.; validation, R.Y.A.B. and O.P.M.; formal analysis, R.Y.A.B., O.P.M. and J.M.V.; investigation, R.Y.A.B., O.P.M., R.G.T., M.T.D.S., J.C.M., D.H.M., C.B.M., D.H.-G. and C.M.-R. writing—original draft preparation, R.Y.A.B., O.P.M. and C.B.M.; writing—review and editing, R.Y.A.B., O.P.M., C.B.M. and D.H.M.; visualization, C.B.M.; supervision, C.B.M., R.Y.A.B. and O.P.M.; project administration, R.Y.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Partial financial support for this research was provided to OGFPI trough Project PN.212.LH.012.018, named “Adaptive governance to climate change in Cuba’s coastal municipalities”, coordinated by Universidad de Oriente in Santiago de Cuba. The last author C.B.M., is grateful for Universidad de la Costa funding given to her research project Índex INV.1106-01-006-15 entitled “Analysis of the Latin Americancoastal policies in the context of governance”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable. The study did not involve humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

Data are confidential.

Acknowledgments

Second and last authors, are grateful for Stephen Olsen.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Satellite Band Composition Obtained.
Figure A1. Satellite Band Composition Obtained.
Land 12 00842 g0a1
Figure A2. Satellite Band Composition Obtained.
Figure A2. Satellite Band Composition Obtained.
Land 12 00842 g0a2

Appendix B

Figure A3. Analysis of the Main Components for the Projection of Areas Type “Without Forest Cover” (Caption: Color Green Represents Vegetation Remains while Coloring Magenta Urban Areas).
Figure A3. Analysis of the Main Components for the Projection of Areas Type “Without Forest Cover” (Caption: Color Green Represents Vegetation Remains while Coloring Magenta Urban Areas).
Land 12 00842 g0a3

Appendix C

Table A1. Detailed Description of the Goals, Sectors, and Scales of Application of the Laws.
Table A1. Detailed Description of the Goals, Sectors, and Scales of Application of the Laws.
Cuban Policies Applied by the National Council of Hydrographic BasinsGoalSector of ApplicationScale
Law No. 81 of 11 July 1997. Environmental Law. National Assembly of People’s Power.To create a legal context that favors the projection and development of socioeconomic activities in ways that are compatible with environmental protection; to establish the principles that guide the actions of natural and legal persons in environmental matters, including coordination mechanisms between the different bodies and agencies for efficient management; to promote citizen participation in the protection of the environment and sustainable development; to develop citizen awareness of environmental problems, integrating education, dissemination, and environmental information; to regulate the development of environmental evaluation, control, and surveillance activities; to promote the care of human health, the improvement of the quality of life, and the improvement of the environment in general.Natural and juridical persons, Cuban and foreign, following the provisions of this Law.National
Law No. 124 of 14 July 2017. Water Law. National Assembly of People’s Power.It regulates the integrated and sustainable management of terrestrial waters found within the earth’s crust or above it, regardless of their physical, chemical, or bacteriological composition, in the space that makes up the emerged part of the national territory limited by the coastline.Natural and juridical persons, Cuban and foreign, following the provisions of this Law.National
Law No. 85 of 21 July 1998. Forestry Law. National Assembly of People’s Power.Establish the principles and general regulations for the protection, increase, and sustainable development of the nation’s forest heritage; control forest heritage resources through established regulations and competent bodies and agencies; promote and encourage reforestation for economic, protective or social purposes, as well as silvicultural management in plantations and natural forests; to conserve the biological diversity resources associated with forest ecosystems; to protect forests against deforestation, irrational logging, forest fires, free grazing, pests and diseases, as well as other actions that may affect them; to regulate the multiple and sustainable use of the forest heritage and to promote the rational use of non-timber forest products.Natural and juridical persons, Cuban and foreign, following the provisions of this Law.National
Law No. 113 of 23 July 2012. Tax System Law.It establishes the taxes, principles, norms, and general procedures on which the Tax System of the Republic of Cuba is based.Natural and juridical persons, Cuban and foreign, per this law’s provisions for each tax.National
Decree Law No. 200 of 22 December 1999. Contraventions in Environmental Matters. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.Establish applicable contraventions in environmental matters.Natural or juridical person, national or foreign, who violates the environmental legislation in force.National
Decree No. 337 of 5 September 2017. Regulation of law no. 124 on land waters.The protection, safety and conservation of the water infrastructure; the execution of the investment process for water infrastructure works; the preparation of technical standards governing land water management; the granting of concessions and authorizations related to land water management; the annual, medium-, and long-term planning of land waters and their control; the provision of public water supply and drinking water, sanitary sewerage and storm sewerage services; and the composition and functions of river basin councils.Water Resources Institute.National
Resolution No. 330 of 7 September 1999. Regulation of the Forestry Law.Technical, regulatory, functional, and methodological direction of the State Forest Service.State Forest Service.National
Decree Law No. 212 of 8 August 2000. Coastal Zone Management. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.Establish provisions for the delimitation, protection and sustainable use of the coastal and its protection zones.The maritime-terrestrial strip of variable width, where the interaction of land, sea and atmosphere occurs through natural processes.National
Decree Law No. 201 of 23 December 1999. On the National System of Protected Areas. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.To establish the legal regime related to the National System of Protected Areas.Protected areas.National
Decree Law No. 190 of 28 January 1999. On biosafety. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.To establish the general precepts that regulate the use, research, testing, production, import, and export of biological agents and their products, organisms, and fragments thereof with genetic information, as well as the release into the environment of biological agents, organisms, and fragments thereof with genetic data.Agencies of the Central Administration of the State that have facilities and release areas.National
Decree No. 268 of 8 September 1999. Contraventions of forestry regulations. Council of MinistersIt establishes the applicable contraventions in forestry matters.Natural persons, national or foreign.National
Decree No. 327 of 11 October 2014. Regulation of the investment process. Ministry of Economy and Planning.Regulates the essential elements of the investment process.Ministry of Economy and PlanningNational
Joint Resolution of 23 February 1996. Ministry of Agriculture. National Institute of Water Resources.Elaboration of projects for hydro-regulating forest strips around reservoirs and riverbeds.Ministry of Agriculture. National Institute of Hydraulic Resources.National
Resolution No. 52 of 7 August 2007. Regulations of the National Council, Territorial Councils, and specific watershed councils. National Institute of Hydraulic Resources.Put into effect the Regulations of the National Council, the Territorial Councils, and the specific River Basin Councils.National Institute of Hydraulic Resources.National, Provincial and Territorial
Cuban Standard NC: 93-01-206. 26 April 1996. Forest strips of the protection zones of reservoirs and riverbeds.To arrange to prepare projects for hydro-regulating forest strips around reservoirs and riverbeds.Ministry of Agriculture. National Institute of Hydraulic Resources.National

References

  1. Sostenible, F. Directrices Básicas Comunes de Gestión Forestal Sostenible. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el reto Demográfico. España. 2022. Available online: https://bit.ly/3mT5Rvb (accessed on 10 March 2022).
  2. Un Biodiversity Conference—Fifteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP-15) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Declaration from the High-Level Segment of the UN Biodiversity Conference. 2020. Available online: https://bit.ly/35Udh8S (accessed on 14 October 2021).
  3. FAO. El Estado de los Bosques del Mundo—Las vías Forestales Hacia el Desarrollo Sostenible. En Fao (Números 978-92-5-130715-1). Available online: http://bit.ly/3m8jxSX (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  4. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report 2021: The Heat Is On—A World of Climate Promises Not Yet Delivered. Nairobi. Available online: https://bit.ly/3slP5UB (accessed on 24 November 2021).
  5. Bennett, A.F. Enlazando el Paisaje. El Papel de los Corredores y la Conectividad en la Conservación de la Vida Silvestre. Available online: https://bit.ly/34G0dDN (accessed on 14 December 2022).
  6. Poveda, G.; Mesa, O. Efectos hidrológicos de la deforestación. Energética 1995, 16, 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kafy, A.; Islam, M.; Sikdar, M.S.; Ashrafi, T.J.; Faisal, A.A.; Islam, M.A.; Al Rakib, A.; Khan, M.H.H.; Sarker, M.H.S.; Ali, M.Y. Remote Sensing-Based Approach to Identify the Influence of Land Use/Land Cover Change on the Urban Thermal Environment: A Case Study in Chattogram City, Bangladesh. In Re-Envisioning Remote Sensing Applications: Perspective from Developing Countries; Singh, R., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2021; pp. 216–237. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Kuang, W.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Yan, C.; Yu, D.; Wu, S.; et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. J. Geogr. Sci. 2010, 20, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martínez, S.; Mollicone, D. From Land Cover to Land Use: A Methodology to Assess Land Use from Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1024–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nath, B.; Niu, Z.; Singh, R.P. Land Use and Land Cover Changes, and Environment and Risk Evaluation of Dujiangyan City (SW China) Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tendaupenyu, P.; Magadza, C.H.D.; Murwira, A. Changes in land use/landcover patterns and human population growth in the Lake Chivero catchment, Zimbabwe. Geocarto Int. 2017, 32, 797–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tiwari, M.K.; Saxena, A. Change detection of land use/landcover pattern in an around Mandideep and Obedullaganj area, using remote sensing and GIS. Int. J. Technol. Eng. Syst. 2011, 2, 398–402. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tasser, E.; Leitinger, G.; Tappeiner, U. Climate change versus land-use change—What affects the mountain landscapes more? Land Use Policy 2017, 60, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schirpke, U.; Kohler, M.; Leitinger, G.; Fontana, V.; Tasser, E.; Tappeiner, U. Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Liu, G. Characterizing Spatiotemporal Pattern of Land Use Change and Its Driving Force Based on GIS and Landscape Analysis Techniques in Tianjin during 2000–2015. Sustainability 2017, 9, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nath, B.; Wang, Z.; Ge, Y.; Islam, K.; Singh, R.P.; Niu, Z. Land Use and Land Cover Change Modeling and Future Potential Landscape Risk Assessment Using Markov-CA Model and Analytical Hierarchy Process. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nurwanda, A.; Zain, A.F.M.; Rustiadi, E. Analysis of land cover changes and land- scape fragmentation in Batanghari Regency, Jambi Province. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 227, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Belete, F.; Maryo, M.; Teka, A. Land use/land cover dynamics and perception of the local communities in Bita district, south western Ethiopia. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sewnet, A. Land use/cover change at Infraz watershed by using GIS and remote sensing techniques, northwestern Ethiopia. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2015, 14, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Asmamaw, D.K. A critical review of integrated river basin management in the upper Blue Nile river basin: The case of Ethiopia. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2015, 13, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Novellie, P.; Biggs, H.; Roux, D. National laws and policies can enable or confound adaptive governance: Examples from South African national parks. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 66, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wenta, J.; McDonald, J. The role of law and legal systems in climate change adaptation policy. In Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información (ONEI). Anuario Estadístico de Cuba. La Habana. Available online: https://bit.ly/3B3tapb (accessed on 14 November 2021).
  24. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente (CITMA). Plan de Estado para el Enfrentamiento al Cambio Climático. Available online: https://www.citma.gob.cu/tarea-vida-4/ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  25. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente (CITMA). Estrategia Ambiental Nacional (CITMA). Available online: https://www.citma.gob.cu/estrategia-ambiental-nacional/ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  26. Mario, J.; Fernández, G. La Gestión de Cuencas Hidrográficas en Cuba. La Habana; Instituto Nacional de Recursos Hidráulicos: La Habana, Cuba, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ministerio de Justicia. De la República de Cuba. 2017(029), 70–71. 2017. Available online: https://www.gacetaoficial.gob.cu/sites/default/files/goc-2017-ex51.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  28. Alarcón, R.Y.; Durán, M.T.; García, R.; Pérez, O. Paradigmas jurídicos sobre gestión integrada de cuencas hidrográficas: Desafíos a partir del caso del río san juan, Santiago de Cuba. Rev. Volunt. Hidráulica 2019, 129, 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  29. Roux, D.J.; Novellie, P.; Smit, I.P.; de Kraker, J.; Mc Culloch-Jones, S.; Dziba, L.E.; Freitag, S.; Pienaar, D.J. Appraising strategic adaptive management as a process of organizational learning. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 301, 113920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Batista, C.M.; Planas, J.A.; Pelot, R.; Núñez, J.R. A new methodology incorporating public participation within Cuba’s ICZM program. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 186, 105101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iles, A.T. Adaptive management: Making environmental law and policy more dynamic, experimentalist and learning. Environ. Plan. Law J. 1996, 13, 288–308. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruhl, J.B. Regulation by adaptive management—Is it possible? Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 2005, 7, 21–57. [Google Scholar]
  33. Garmestani, A.S.; Allen, C.R.; Ruhl, J.B.; Holling, C.S. The Integration of Social-Ecological Resilience and Law; Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit—Staff Publications: Lincoln, NE, USA, 2014; 144p. [Google Scholar]
  34. Garmestani, A.S.; Allen, C.R. Adaptive management of social-ecological systems: The path forward. In Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 255–262. [Google Scholar]
  35. Frohlich, M.F.; Jacobson, P.C.; Smith, F.T. The relationship between adaptive management of social-ecological systems and law: A systematic review. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Benson, M.H.; Garmestani, A.S. Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrating adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 1420–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Fischman, R.L.; Ruhl, J. Judging adaptive management practices of U.S. agencies. Conserv. Biol. 2015, 30, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Craig, R.K.; Ruhl, J.B.; Brown, E.D.; Williams, B.K. A proposal for amending administrative law to facilitate adaptive management. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 074018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Craig, R.K.; Ruhl, J.B. Designing administrative law for adaptive management. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2014, 67, 1–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Green, O.O.; Garmestani, A.S.; Allen, C.R.; Gunderson, L.H.; Ruhl, J.; Arnold, C.A.; Graham, N.A.; Cosens, B.; Angeler, D.G.; Chaffin, B.C.; et al. Barriers and bridges to the integration of social–ecological resilience and law. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 13, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Frohlich, M.F.; Smith, T.F.; Jacobson, C.; Fidelman, P.; Carter, R.W.; Baldwin, C. Towards Adaptive Coastal Management: Lessons from a “Legal Storm” in Byron Shire, Australia. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2019, 179, 104909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jurjonas, M.; Seekamp, E. A common before the sea: Climate justice considerations for coastal zone management. Clim. Dev. 2020, 12, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fuentes, M.M.P.B.; Chambers, L.; Chin, A.; Dann, P.; Dobbs, K.; Marsh, H.; Poloczanska, E.S.; Maison, K.; Turner, M.; Pressey, R.L. Adaptive management of marine mega-fauna in a changing climate. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 2014, 21, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garmestani, A.; Ruhl, J.B.; Chaffin, B.C.; Craig, R.K.; van Rijswick, H.F.M.W.; Angeler, D.G.; Folke, C.; Gunderson, L.; Twidwell, D.; Allen, C.R. Untapped capacity for resilience in environmental law. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 19899–19904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Boix, R.J. De nuevo sobre el principio de legalidad. Rev. Gen. De Derecho 1987, 512, 2289–2304. [Google Scholar]
  46. Frosini, V. La Letra y el Espíritu de la Ley; Ariel: Barcelona, Spain, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pérez Luño, A.E. La Seguridad Jurídica: Una Garantía del Derecho y la Justicia; Boletín de la Facultad de Derecho Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 2000; p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nino, C.S. Introducción al Análisis del Derecho; Editorial Ariel: Barcelona, Spain, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mata Barranco, N.J. Protección Penal del Medio Ambiente y Accesoriedad Administrativa. Tratamiento Penal de Comportamientos Perjudiciales para el Ambiente Amparados en una Autorización Administrativa Ilícita; Cedecs: Barcelona, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ruiz Manero, J. Jurisdicción y Normas; Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: Madrid, Spain, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  51. Alchourrón, C.E.; Bulygin, E. Sobre la Existencia de las Normas Jurídicas, Cuadernos de Metodología y Filosofía del Derecho; Universidad de Carabobo: Valencia, Venezuela, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  52. Alchourrón, C.E.; Bulygin, E. Definiciones y Normas, en Análisis Lógico y Derecho; Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: Madrid, Spain, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  53. Manuel, A. Introducción al Derecho; Editorial Barcanova: Barcelona, Spain, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  54. Manuel, A. Contribución para Una Teoría de la Legislación. DOXA, n.º 6, pp. 385–403, nov. 1989. Available online: https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1989.6.21 (accessed on 6 June 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Figueredo, J.L.; Ramón, A.M.; Barrero, H. Multitemporal analysis of vegetation cover change in the management area “Los Números” Guisa, Granma. Rev. Cuba. Cienc. For. 2020, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  56. Szewrański, S.; Chruściński, J.; van Hoof, J.; Kazak, J.K.; Świąder, M.; Tokarczyk-Dorociak, K.; Żmuda, R. A Location Intelligence System for the Assessment of Pluvial Flooding Risk and the Identification of Storm Water Pollutant Sources from Roads in Suburbanised Areas. Water 2018, 10, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Manuel, A. Las Razones del Derecho; Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: Madrid, Spain, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  58. Manuel, A. Tras la Justicia; Editorial Ariel: Barcelona, Spain, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  59. Atienza, M.; Ruiz, M.J. Las Piezas del Derecho. Teoría de los Enunciados Jurídicos; Ariel: Barcelona, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  60. Norberto, B. Teoría General del Derecho; Editorial Temis: Bogotá, Colombia, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  61. Bulygin, E. Normas, Proposiciones Normativas y Enunciados Jurídicos, en Análisis Lógico y Derecho; Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: Madrid, Spain, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  62. Von, W.G. Normas de Orden Superior, en VVAA, El Lenguaje del Derecho. Homenaje a Genaro R. Carrió; Editorial Abe-ledo-Perrot: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mestre, D.E. Límites Constitucionales de las Remisiones Normativas en Materia Penal, Anuario de Derecho Penal y Ciencias Penales. 1988; pp. 503–527. Available online: https://bit.ly/3zy0nsQ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  64. Salvador, C.P. Definiciones y Remisiones, en la Calidad de las Leyes; Parlamento Vasco: Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  65. García, A.M. Remisiones Normativas, Leyes Penales en Blanco y Estructura de la Norma Penal. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, XVI, 1992–1993. Available online: https://bit.ly/3MmDfW0 (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  66. Grupo de Estudios de Técnica Legislativa (GRETEL). La Forma de las Leyes: 10 Estudios de Técnica Legislativa; Bosch: Barcelona, Spain, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cabrera, H.J.A.; Arellano, A.M.; Rey, S.O.; Martínez, G.A.; García, M.A.; Fernández, M.; Pérez, R.; Pérez, M.O.; Milanés, B.C.; García, T.R.; et al. Manejo Costero Integrado en Cuba: Avances y Retos en la Etapa 2009–2019. Rev. Costas 2019, 1, 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  68. Berelson, B. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, Ill; The Free Press: Sydney, Australia, 1952. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hall, D.M.; Steiner, R. Policy content analysis: Qualitative method for analyzing sub-national insect pollinator legislation. Methodsx 2020, 7, 100787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Fischer, R.; Hargita, Y.; Günter, S. Insights from the ground level? A content analysis review of multi-national REDD+ studies since 2010. For. Policy Econ. 2016, 66, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Villabella, C. Los Métodos en la Investigación Jurídica. Algunas Precisiones. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 933. Available online: https://bit.ly/3nMREk2 (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  72. Sánchez, R. Algunas Consideraciones Sobre el Método Exegético. Método de las Ciencias Sociales. Barcelona, Ariel. Available online: https://bit.ly/2GngFMO (accessed on 13 May 2021).
  73. QGIS User Guide. Versión 3.4. Available online: https://bit.ly/33ctGRk (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  74. Chuvieco, E. Fundamentos de Teledetección Espacial; Ediciones RIALP: Madrid, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  75. Bartholomew, D.J. Principal Components Analysis; International Encyclopedia of Education: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 374–377. [Google Scholar]
  76. Congedo, L. Semi-automatic classification plugin documentation. Release 2016, 4, 29. [Google Scholar]
  77. Gaceta Oficial de la República. Constitución de la República de Cuba. Available online: https://bit.ly/3zwfvHj (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  78. Sampieri, R.; Fernández, C.C.; Baptista, L.P. Metodología De La Investigación, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hill: Mexico City, Mexico, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  79. Busch, J.; Ferretti, G.K. What drives deforestation and what stops it? A metaanalysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2017, 11, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Lambin, E.F.; Meyfroidt, P.; Walker, N.F.; Wunder, S.; Rueda, X.; Blackman, A.; Börner, J.; Cerutti, P.O.; Dietsch, T.; Jungmann, L.; et al. Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lambin, E.F.; Gibbs, H.K.; Heilmayr, R.; Carlson, K.M.; Fleck, L.C.; Garrett, R.D.; le Polain de Waroux, Y.; McDermott, C.L.; McLaughlin, D.; Newton, P.; et al. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. MoEF. The State of Indonesia’s Forests; Ministry of Environment and Forestry: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mueller, B. The Fiscal Imperative and the Role of Public Prosecutors in Brazilian Environmental Policy. Law Policy 2009, 32, 104–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ostermann, S.L. Rule of Law against the Odds: Overcoming Poverty and the High Cost of Compliance in the Developing World. Law Policy 2016, 38, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pandit, K.; Bevilacqua, E.; Mountrakis, G.; Malmsheimer, R.W. Spatial analysis of forest crimes in Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri. J. Geospat. Appl. Nat. Resour. 2016, 1, 39–53. [Google Scholar]
  86. Schielein, J.; Börner, J. Recent transformations of land-use and land-cover dynamics across different deforestation frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 2018, 76, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Silva, E.; Kaimowitz, D.; Bojanic, A.; Ekoko, F.; Manurung, T.; Pavez, I. Making the Law of the Jungle: The Reform of Forest Legislation in Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Indonesia. Glob. Environ. Politics 2002, 2, 63–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arima, E.Y.; Barreto, P.; Araújo, E.; Soares-Filho, B. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy 2014, 41, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. FAO. Estado y Tendencias de la Ordenación Forestal en 17 Países de América Latina por Consultores Forestales Asociados de Honduras (FORESTA). Available online: https://bit.ly/3oEqb1i (accessed on 17 December 2020).
  90. INRH. Actas del Consejo Provincial de Cuencas Hidrográficas de Santiago de Cuba. 2021. Available online: https://www.hidro.gob.cu/es (accessed on 26 June 2021).
  91. Sodik, D.M. Marine Pollution in Indonesia and the Regulatory Framework. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law 2020, 36, 114–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Labrador, L.O.; Mercadet, P.A.; Álvarez, B.A. Situación de los Bosque de Cuba; 2017 Boletín No. 1; Dirección Forestal Flora y Fauna Silvestre del Misterio de la Agricultura, MINAGRI (Ministerio de la Agricultura): La Habana, Cuba, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  93. Neal, W.J.; Pilkey, O.H.; Cooper, J.A.G.; Longo, N.J. Why coastal regulations fail. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018, 156, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pilkey, O.H. NC Coastal Policies Must Adjust to Sea-level Rise. The News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, USA. Available online: https://bit.ly/3gD0zOc (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  95. Cooper, J.; McKenna, J. Social justice in coastal erosion management: The temporal and spatial dimensions. Geoforum 2008, 39, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Beachapedia. State of the Beach/State Reports/NC/Shoreline Structures. 2016. Available online: https://bit.ly/35YuoGF (accessed on 11 December 2020).
  97. Gibbs, M.T. Why is coastal retreat so hard to implement? Understanding the political risk of coastal adaptation pathways. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2016, 130, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hibbs, M. Commission Approves New Sandbag Rules. Coastal Review Online. 2016. Available online: https://bit.ly/3uGO6RN (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  99. McCormick, R. Legal Risk in the Financial Markets; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010; 491p. [Google Scholar]
  100. Whalley, M.; Guzelian, C. The Legal Risk Management Handbook. An International Guide to Protect Your Business from Legal Loss; KoganPage: London, UK, 2016; 232p. [Google Scholar]
  101. Tsui, Tat Chee, Experience from the Anti-Monopoly Law Decision in China (Cost and Benefit of Rule of Law) (1 April 2013). The Network: Business at Berkeley Law (Apr/ May 2013). Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2260965 (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  102. Tacconi, L.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Maryudi, A. Law enforcement and deforestation: Lessons for Indonesia from Brazil. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 108, 101943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the studied San Juan River Basin. Caption: orange represents different kinds of urban and rural settlement.
Figure 1. Location of the studied San Juan River Basin. Caption: orange represents different kinds of urban and rural settlement.
Land 12 00842 g001
Figure 2. Methodological framework of this research.
Figure 2. Methodological framework of this research.
Land 12 00842 g002
Figure 3. Levels of incidence of demonstrations according to interviewees.
Figure 3. Levels of incidence of demonstrations according to interviewees.
Land 12 00842 g003
Figure 4. Landsat type images obtained of San Juan River Basin.
Figure 4. Landsat type images obtained of San Juan River Basin.
Land 12 00842 g004
Figure 5. Visual classification of deforestation by years. (a) Year 2014. (b) Year 2015 (c) Year 2016; (d) Year 2017; (e) Year 2018; (f) Year 2019; (g) Year 2020.
Figure 5. Visual classification of deforestation by years. (a) Year 2014. (b) Year 2015 (c) Year 2016; (d) Year 2017; (e) Year 2018; (f) Year 2019; (g) Year 2020.
Land 12 00842 g005
Table 1. Details of Landsat satellite imagery downloaded.
Table 1. Details of Landsat satellite imagery downloaded.
NoDate of ImageSatellite/SensorReference System
123 February 2014Landsat 8 Level 1 (OLI-TIRS)WGS84/UTM zone 18N
225 January 2015
31 April 2016
415 February 2017
52 February 2018
64 January 2019
727 March 2020
Table 2. Legal norms identified on forest cover in watersheds in Cuba.
Table 2. Legal norms identified on forest cover in watersheds in Cuba.
Name of the Legal RuleApproval DateType of Legal Standard/Level of ManagementApproving State Body or Agency
Joint Resolution (unnumbered)23 February 1996Resolution/NationalThe Ministry of Agriculture. National Institute of Water Resources
Law No. 81 of the Environment11 July 1997Law/NationalNational Assembly of the People’s Power.
Law No. 85 Forestry21 July 1998Law/NationalNational Assembly of the People’s Power.
Resolution No. 330. Regulation of the Forestry Law7 September 1999Resolution/NationalRegulation Ministry of Agriculture.
Decree-Law No. 268. Contraventions of forestry regulations.8 September 1999.Decree of the Council of Ministers/NationalDecree-Law No. 268. Contraventions of forestry regulations.
Decree-Law No. 200. Contraventions in environmental matters22 December 1999Decree-Law/NationalThe Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment.
Decree-Law No. 201. On the National System of Protected Areas.23 December 1999.Decree-Law/NationalSystem of Protected Areas.
Decree-Law No. 190. On biosecurity.28 January 1999.Decree-Law/NationalThe Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment.
Decree-Law No. 212. Coastal Zone Management.8 August 2000.Decree-Law/NationalThe Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment.
Resolution No. 52. Of the National Council, the Territorial Councils, and the specific watershed councils.7 August 2007.Regulations/National/Provincial and TerritorialNational Council, the Territorial Councils, and the specific watershed councils.
Law No. 113. On the Tax System23 July 2012Law/NationalThe National Assembly of the People’s Power.
Decree No. 327. On the Investment Process.11 October 2014.Regulation/NationalThe Ministry of Economy and Planning
Law No. 124.14 July 2017.Law/NationalNational Assembly of People’s Power.
Decree No. 337. Regulation of Law No. 124 on terrestrial waters.5 September 2017.Regulation/NationalCouncil of Ministers
Cuban Standard
NC: 93-01-206 Forest strips of protection zones for reservoirs and riverbeds.
26 April 1996Technical standard/NationalNational Institute of Hydraulic Resources.
Source: Modified from the Official Gazette of the Republic of Cuba (www.gacetaoficial.cu); accessed on 20 January 2021.
Table 3. Classification of legal risk manifestations and associated behaviors from the interviews.
Table 3. Classification of legal risk manifestations and associated behaviors from the interviews.
Manifestation of Legal RiskConduct Associated with the ManifestationPrincipal Impact
The legal enforceabilityFailure to comply with the provisions issued by the Forestry Registry.
Failure to comply with phytosanitary technical standards.
They are failing to submit for approval forest management projects.
The areas have a forestation and reforestation program.
Failure to comply with preventive fire control and extinguishing measures.
Illegalities
The legality of management instrumentsThe constant use of silvicultural management methods differs from those established in the legislation.Illegalities
Exposure to unanticipated changes in laws and legal regulationsIt does not provide practices associated with sustainable forestry development for forestry legislation.Illegalities
Existence of a legal, regulatory framework that is outdated, inflexible, and with gaps, antinomies, and ambiguous legal concepts.Existence of vague legal concepts and ambiguous and imprecise terms.
Legal norms that are not adapted to the current reality.
It is associated with legality requirements in legal norms.
Use of standard referralsReferral to various legal provisions or methodological documents of the State Forest Service, which have levels of legal outdatedness.It is associated with legality requirements in legal norms.
Table 4. Dynamics of management policies related to deforestation in the San Juan River Basin.
Table 4. Dynamics of management policies related to deforestation in the San Juan River Basin.
Types of policies designed and implemented by the Provincial Council of Hydrographic Basins Administrative policies36
Technical policies56
Educational policies8
Environmental policies12
Community Outreach policies8
Institutional policies28
Total148
Main goals
  • Comply with the afforestation indexes of the basin under an integrated management approach.
Main trends observed
  • Existence of an institutional desire to preserve the basin.
  • Carry out concrete actions (investments, information, and training) to preserve the forest cover.
  • Search for international agreements and financing contributing to preserving the basin’s forest cover.
  • Achieve more excellent territorial governance, community participation, training, and involvement.
  • The forest volume estimation method for forest cover calculation is insufficient due to its marked subjective nature.
Table 5. Relationships between legal limitations according to damage and effects.
Table 5. Relationships between legal limitations according to damage and effects.
Legal LimitationsDamagesEffects
Legal enforceabilityLegal-formal
Ethical
Contravention behaviors
The legality of management instrumentsLegal-formal
Ethical
Contravention behaviors
Exposure to unanticipated changes in laws and legal regulationsPragmatic
Teleological
Contravention behaviors
The legal regulatory framework is outdated, inflexible, and with gaps, antinomies, ambiguous legal conceptsLinguistic or communicative legal-formalInfringement of the guarantees associated with the formal and material requirements of legality.
Use of regulatory referralsLegal-formalInfringement of the guarantees associated with the formal and material requirements of legality.
Table 6. Visual classification: variation in deforested and forest covered areas per year (km²).
Table 6. Visual classification: variation in deforested and forest covered areas per year (km²).
2014201520162017201820192020
km²%km²%km²%km²%km²%km²%km²%
Water1.100.781.330.940.650.461.100.781.200.851.360.971.180.83
Urban30.5421.6237.7926.7530.6721.7234.6724.5526.3918.6832.6923.1429.0520.56
Forest109.6177.60102.1472.31109.9377.83105.4874.67113.6580.46107.2075.89111.0378.60
Total141.25100.00141.25100.00141.25100.00141.25100.00141.25100.00141.25100.00141.25100.00
Table 7. Indexes of deforested areas observed (km2).
Table 7. Indexes of deforested areas observed (km2).
PeriodsInitial (km²)Final (km²)Difference (km²)
2014–201531.6439.117.48
2015–201639.1131.32−7.79
2016–201731.3235.774.45
2017–201835.7727.60−8.18
2018–201927.6034.056.46
2019–202034.0530.22−3.83
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alarcón Borges, R.Y.; Pérez Montero, O.; Tejera, R.G.; Silveira, M.T.D.; Montoya, J.C.; Hernández Mestre, D.; Vazquez, J.M.; Mestanza-Ramon, C.; Hernandez-Guzmán, D.; Milanes, C.B. Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba. Land 2023, 12, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040842

AMA Style

Alarcón Borges RY, Pérez Montero O, Tejera RG, Silveira MTD, Montoya JC, Hernández Mestre D, Vazquez JM, Mestanza-Ramon C, Hernandez-Guzmán D, Milanes CB. Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba. Land. 2023; 12(4):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alarcón Borges, R. Y., Ofelia Pérez Montero, Rogelio García Tejera, María Teresa Durand Silveira, José Celeiro Montoya, Dayniel Hernández Mestre, Jorge Mesa Vazquez, Carlos Mestanza-Ramon, Diego Hernandez-Guzmán, and Celene B. Milanes. 2023. "Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba" Land 12, no. 4: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop