Next Article in Journal
Transfer Patterns and Drivers of Embodied Agricultural Land within China: Based on Multi-Regional Decomposition Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Restoration and Conservation of Priority Areas of Caatinga’s Semi-Arid Forest Remnants Can Support Connectivity within an Agricultural Landscape
Previous Article in Journal
The Production of Pastoral Space: Modeling Spatial Occupation of Grazing Land for Environmental Impact Assessment Using Structural Equation Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Native Plant Production in Chile. Is It Possible to Achieve Restoration Goals by 2035?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Irrigation Regime for Woody Species Potentially Suitable for Effective and Sustainable Afforestation in the Desert Region of Mongolia

by
Ser-Oddamba Byambadorj
1,2,
Byung Bae Park
1,*,
Jonathan O. Hernandez
1,3,
Narantugs Dulamsuren
2,
Zoljargal Sainbuyan
2,
Oyuntugs Altantugs
2,
Khulan Sharavdorj
4,
In Kyeong Seong
2,5 and
Nyam-Osor Batkhuu
2,*
1
Department of Environment and Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2
Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 14201, Mongolia
3
Department of Forest Biological Sciences, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines, Los Baños 4031, Philippines
4
Crop Ecology Laboratory, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
5
Korea-Mongolian Joint “Green Belt” plantation project, Ulaanbaatar 14210, Mongolia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2021, 10(2), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020212
Submission received: 2 February 2021 / Revised: 13 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 20 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Landscape Restoration: Strategies, Challenges, and Impacts)

Abstract

:
Long-term studies on plant response mechanisms to different irrigation regimes will provide a better understanding of the survivability and establishment of plant communities in a desert environment. Thus, across 10 years, we regularly investigated the effects of the rainfall (control), rainfall + 4 L h−1, rainfall + 8 L h−1, and rainfall + 12 L h−1 irrigation regimes on the growth and leaf morpho-physiology of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., Ulmus pumila L., Elaeagnus moorcroftii Wall. ex Schltdl., and Hippophae rhamnoides L. to suggest an optimal irrigation regime for each woody species for effective and sustainable afforestation in Mongolia. We measured the root collar diameter (RCD), annual height growth, survivability, leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA), leaf biomass (LB), total chlorophyll concentration, and predawn (ψp) and midday (ψm) leaf water potentials across the treatments and species. Results showed that trees grown at 12 L h−1 grew taller per year and generally resulted in a higher SLA, but generally resulted in a lower survival rate compared with those in the other treatments in all species. Total chlorophyll content was higher in trees grown under 4 and/or 8 L h−1, particularly for T. ramosissima and E. moorcroftii. Lastly, leaf water potentials were found more negative for trees subjected to 4 L h−1, especially in T. ramosissima and U. pumila, but still resulted in a higher survival rate and LB compared with 12 L h−1. H. rhamnoides showed higher survivability at 8 and/or 12 L h−1 than at 4 L h−1. Therefore, we suggest 4 L h−1 to be the optimal irrigation regime for irrigating T. ramosissima, U. pumila and E. moorcroftii, and 8 and/or 12 L h−1 for H. rhamnoides. Our findings are relevant to ensuring the sustainability of afforestation programs in arid and semiarid landscapes in Mongolia.

1. Introduction

Drought and desertification are among the major ecological problems in arid and semiarid regions around the world [1,2]. As a response to these problems and compliance to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, an increasing number of projects have been implemented worldwide to increase the vegetation cover, such as a series of global afforestation and ecological restoration projects [3,4]. However, water limitation is a major impediment to the establishment of plant communities through afforestation initiatives in arid and semiarid environments with short-lived and erratic rainfall events. Early survival of tree-seedlings is often negatively affected by water shortage in drylands, resulting in reduced total plant biomass production [5,6,7]. A recent study showed that the duration of drought days equated to the seedling survival in the first year of forest establishment in northern Mongolia [8]. Scientists believe that this situation will be exacerbated by the increasing global temperature and frequency/severity of droughts due to climate change [9,10]. Further, issues on unsustainable consumption of groundwater resources are co-occurring with afforestation and ecological restoration projects in arid regions [2]. For example, increased evapotranspiration, consumption, and extraction of groundwater resources has already been linked to increased vegetation cover, especially in the initial stages of afforestation [11,12]. Afforestation efforts in arid and semiarid areas, thus, face a greater challenge in ensuring the higher survival rate and growth of the newly planted seedlings during the early stage of the forest establishment, while sustainably extracting groundwater resources. Therefore, the adaptation and response mechanisms of plants to different watering regimes and investigation on the optimal irrigation regime for effective and sustainable afforestation in arid and semiarid zones have recently received much attention [13,14,15].
Some plants have evolved morpho-physiological mechanisms (e.g., thickened leaves, reduced leaf size) that enable them to survive and flourish in areas with adverse ecological conditions (e.g., drought) [16,17,18,19]. Physiologically, a photoinhibitory effect has long been attributed to a significant reduction in the total chlorophyll content of two xerophytic shrubs, and this effect further resulted in the limitation on carbon assimilation [20]. The authors further reported that the photosynthetic rate of the species decreased as the leaf water potential (ψ) decreased significantly from −0.2 to −2.1 MPa. Several studies have shown that drought-tolerant species remain turgid even at more negative water potentials and the critical physiological processes can still normally function, including photosynthetic gas exchange and leaf hydraulic conductance [21,22,23]. Further, leaf morpho-physiological traits mentioned above vary with gradients of rainfall or water availability depending on plant taxa and life-history traits [24,25]. Thus, further studies on the responses of leaf morpho-physiological traits to irrigation variability are needed for many woody species thriving in arid and semiarid habitats, such as Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., Ulmus pumila L., Elaeagnus moorcroftii Wall. ex Schltdl., and Hippophae rhamnoides L. These species are some of the commonly used woody species in afforestation and reforestation projects in arid and semiarid environments [26,27,28,29,30]. Therefore, it is necessary to study their morpho-physiological responses to varying water/irrigation levels to better understand their suitability to afforestation programs in arid and semiarid regions, such as Mongolia.
Ecologically, Mongolia is a typical forest-poor arid and semiarid region in Asia, characterized by low precipitation and highly fragile landscapes [31]. While it is an important part of the global biomes, the country suffers from serious desertification that makes success of afforestation or ecological restoration projects a great challenge. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported that the annual air temperature in Mongolia has increased by about 1.6 °C and the droughts encompassing 50% of the country could happen every 4–5 years, which are attributed to global warming and climate change [32]. These adverse situations explained the higher mortality rate (40%) observed from the annual reforestation of 4000 ha year−1 of degraded lands in the country [32]. The FAO further attributed the low survival rate of seedlings, not only to the harsh environment, but also to the poor quality of seedlings, inadequate site preparation, and poor planting designs. Further, despite the serious problem on water shortage in the country, a very limited number of studies dealing with growth and morpho-physiological responses of trees to irrigation regimes have already been conducted to date. Therefore, studies such as ours are of high significance to Mongolia, or the other arid regions, for effective optimization of an irrigation regime for sustainable afforestation projects.
In this study, we established 16 experimental plots at the Korea–Mongolia joint “Green Belt” plantation in Dalanzadgad soum, Umnugobi province, Mongolia to (1) investigate the effect of the different irrigation regimes on the growth and leaf morpho-physiological responses of four contrasting tree species planted in the desert region of Mongolia; (2) determine the irrigation regime which resulted in better plant survivability and plant growth; (3) determine the leaf morpho-physiological responses or stress indicators that are highly responsive to irrigation regimes. Based on the adverse ecological condition of an arid environment, we hypothesized that (1) a higher amount of irrigation + rainfall treatments would exhibit higher survival rate, height and root collar diameter (RCD) growth, and a slower decline in water potential compared with the rainfall alone or control treatment in all species; (2) the morpho-physiological responses are similar across treatments regardless of species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The study was conducted at the Korea–Mongolia joint “Green Belt” plantation established in Dalanzadgad soum, Umnugobi province, Mongolia. It is about 575 km south of Ulaanbaatar (43°36′12.74″ N, 104°21′22.25″ E), with an elevation of 1468 m above sea level (Figure 1). The area is a desert-steppe characterized by grassland plains or mainly feather grass-onion community with pea shrubs. The dominant species (i.e., 59.7%) includes Oxytropis aciphylla Ldb., Convolvulus ammanii Desr., Peganium nigellastrum Bge, and annual plants, such as Artemisia pectinata Pall., Chenopodium aristatum L., Eragrostis minor Host., Enneapogon desvauxii P. Beauv. [33,34]. These species are growing in the area in association with Allium polyrrhizum Turcz. ex Rgl, A. mongolicum Rgl, Stipa gobica Roshev., and S. glareosa P. Smirn. The vegetative season usually starts at the onset of the summer rains in May or June and stops at the end of September, with the first frost events [35]. During the growing season months, the mean temperature was 19.2 °C and the mean precipitation was 28–200 mm based on our observation using the HOBO climate data logger (Figure 2). The highest mean temperature (i.e., 23.1 °C) and precipitation (i.e., 130 mm) were detected in July, while the lowest mean temperature (i.e., 14.9 °C) and precipitation (i.e., 0 mm) during the growing season were in May and September, respectively (Figure 2). Throughout the year, the mean annual temperature and precipitation were 5.7 °C and 100–150 mm, respectively (Figure S1).
The soil in the study site is classified as Gobi brown soil (Calcisol), which is generally low in organic content, stony, sandy loamy, and high in carbonate content. The occurrence of soil with variable properties in topsoil thickness, presence of stones or gravels, and carbon content is also evident within the experimental site [34].

2.2. Experimental Design

We used two-year-old nursery-grown seedlings of four different woody species, namely, Tamarix ramosissima Ldb., Ulmus pumila L., Elaeagnus moorcroftii Wall. ex Schlecht., and Hippophae rhamnoides L. The initial root collar diameter (RCD) and the height of the 576 seedlings of the four species were measured (Table 1). Thereafter, they were planted into previously prepared round holes (60-70 cm deep, 50-60 cm diameter), corresponding to different irrigation regimes. All seedlings were first irrigated using the same amount of water regardless of the treatments for 1 month during the acclimatization period. Thereafter, drip irrigation treatments were then applied using the four different irrigation regimes: rainfall (control), rainfall + 84 mm tree−1 yr−1 (4 L h−1), rainfall + 168 mm tree−1 yr−1 (8 L h−1), rainfall + 252 mm tree−1 yr−1 (12 L h−1). The 5-h duration of watering was done twice a week for the entire vegetative season (May to mid-September). Irrigation was supplied to individual trees with two types of drip-emitters (Emitter with CNL Compensating Non-Leakage (CNL) Button Dripper), which was placed 10 cm from the stem of each species. For the for 4 and 8 L h−1 treatments, we used drip-emitters capable of emitting 4 L (0.5 mm m−2) and 8 L (1.0 mm m−2) of water, respectively. These two drip-emitters were combined to emit 12 L (1.5 mm m−2) of water for the 12 L h−1 treatment. The irrigation hose system was connected to a water tank with a capacity of 50 tons.
Sixteen plots (25 × 12.5 m) were established following a 4-m distance between trees and a 2-m distance between rows. There were a total of 36 seedlings planted in each plot [29,34]. Further, replacement of dead seedlings in control plots was done in spring 2010 due to high mortality rate [36]. We made sure that the seedlings used for replacement were healthy and had similar height and RCD growth compared with the original seedlings.

2.3. Growth Measurements

The annual RCD and height were regularly measured every end of each vegetative season (i.e., September) for 10 years (i.e., 2009–2019). The RCD was measured at 5 cm above the base of the stem using a digital Vernier caliper, while the height was determined by measuring the length of the highest shoot from the base of the stem of each seedling of each species. At the end of the experimental period, relative growth rate (i.e., RGR = Growth 2–Growth 1/Time 2–Time 1) across treatments was computed for each species based on the height and RCD values relative to those at initial planting.

2.4. Measurements of Morpho-Physiological Responses

In this study, 720 healthy and fully expanded leaves (i.e., 20 leaves × 3 replicates × 3 treatments × 4 species) were used in the determination of leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA), and leaf biomass (LB). Leaf samples were sealed in plastic bags and stored in a cold container to avoid water loss during transport until further processing in the laboratory. The leaves were photo-scanned using an HP LaserJet scanner (M1132 MFP, Idaho, USA) with a 600 dpi resolution. The LA of the samples was then analyzed using the ImageJ processing software, following the procedure in Schneider et al. [37]. In the case of scale-like leaves T. ramosissima¸ we detached the leaf samples from the stem very carefully and followed the same measurement and analysis procedure with that of the other species.
We measured the LB and SLA by weighing the leaves using the high precision electronic scale (d = 0.001 g, Discovery Semi-Micro and Analytical Balance, Ohaus Corp., Switzerland) after oven drying in a convection oven (OF-11E, Jeio Tech., Republic of Korea) at 65 °C for 3 days. The SLA was expressed as the ratio between LA and leaf dry mass (LDM) (cm2 g−1) following the procedure and equation (i.e., SLA = LA (cm2)/LDM (mg)) in Li et al. [38].
A total of 36 trees (i.e., 3 trees × 3 replicates × 4 species) were randomly selected, from which 1–5 healthy, fully expanded and sun-exposed leaves were collected for chlorophyll content analysis. Leaf samples were first stored in an ice-cooled box until further analysis in the laboratory. Following the procedure in Kousar et al. [39], a known amount of leaf tissue (0.10 g) was ground and then suspended in 10 mL of 80% acetone, mixed well and kept at 4 °C overnight in the dark. The solution was centrifuged (5000 rmp, 2 min) and the supernatant was obtained. Thereafter, the absorbance was read at 663 and 646 nm in Spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S UV-Vis Thermo Fisher Science Inc, Madison, WI, USA). The total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a and b concentrations were calculated based on the equation used in Lichtenthaler and Wellburn and Wellburn [40,41], that is:
Chlorophyll a (Ca, µg/mL) = 12.21 A663 − 2.81 A646
Chlorophyll b (Cb, µg/mL) = 20.13 A646 − 5.03 A663
Total chlorophyll (Ca+b, µg/mL) = Ca + Cb
Chlorophyll a/b ratio = Ca/Cb
Predawn (ψp) and midday (ψm) leaf water potentials (MPa) were determined using a pressure chamber (Model 1505D EXP, PMS Instrument Company, Albany, OR, USA) in fully expanded sun-exposed apical leaves (c.a., 1.5 m above the ground), following the procedures in Scholander et al. [42]. Here the ψp and ψm were assumed to represent the daily maximum of turgor condition and the daily minimum of turgor condition, respectively. Randomly, we selected three healthy trees, which were replicated three times, from each treatment and species for ψ measurement.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) package [43]. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA) was carried out to evaluate the significant difference in the treatment effects on height and RCD growth across time for each species. One-way ANOVA was run for each species to determine the effects of different irrigation treatments on the other parameters measured. Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) was used to evaluate multiple comparisons among the treatments. The graphs were produced using the SigmaPlot software [44].

3. Results

3.1. Survival Rate across Irrigation Treatments

As expected, trees at irrigation + rainfall treatments showed a significantly higher survival rate compared with control in the last growing season, but the rate significantly varied by treatment in all species (Figure 3). All trees at rainfall alone treatment (control) showed 100% mortality. Generally, trees grown under 12 L h−1 had the lowest survival rate, while the highest was observed from those under 4 and/or 8 L h−1 for T. ramosissima (4 L h−1 > 8 L h−1 > 12 L h−1), U. pumila (8 L h−1 > 4 L h−1 > 12 L h−1), and E. moorcroftii (4 L h−1 > 12 L h−1 > 8 L h−1). Survival rates of T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii ranged from 92% to 94% on average across the treatments. H. rhamnoides seedlings had only an average of <80% survival rate after the treatments.

3.2. Root Collar Diameter (RCD) and Height Growth

The effect of the irrigation treatments on the annual RCD growth of T. ramosissima and U. pumila was generally similar across growing seasons (Table S1, Figure 4). In the case of E. moorcroftii and H. rhamnoides, significant treatment effects on RCD were first detected in the second to third growing seasons (Table S1, Figure 4). The pattern of effects of the treatments on annual height growth were generally consistent across years (2009–2019), such that 4 and/or 8 L h−1 treatments had lower annual height growth compared with that of 12 L h−1 in all species, except for U. pumila.
At the end of the experiment, there were significant species, treatment, and species × treatment effects on the RCD growth (Figure 4, Tables S2 and S3). The RCD growth was generally similar across the treatments for T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii, while that for H. rhamnoides was significantly higher at both 8 and 12 L h−1 compared with 4 L h−1. The height growth also varied significantly across treatments, except for T. ramosissima in 2019 (Figure 4, Tables S2 and S3). Generally, 8 and 12 L h−1 had a similar higher effect on height growth compared with 4 L h−1, especially in E. moorcroftii, and H. rhamnoides.
The relative RCD growth increments were similar across the irrigation treatments in T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii, but it varied significantly for H. rhamnoides, i.e., 8 and 12 L h−1 had a similar higher effect than that of 4 L h−1 (Figure 5). In contrast, the relative height varied considerably across the treatments in all species, such that trees planted at 12 L h−1 showed the highest values (i.e., 0.10–0.13 cm day−1).

3.3. Leaf Area and Biomass and Specific Leaf Area across Irrigation Treatments

The leaf area (LA) was not statistically different across the treatments, except in U. pumila (Figure 6a). In this species, the effect of 12 L h−1 was significantly greater than that of 8 or 4 L h−1. The pattern of the effect of the irrigation treatments on specific leaf area (SLA) was generally similar in all species, i.e., 12 L h−1 resulted in the highest SLA (range: 53.34–104.48 cm2 g−1) among the three treatments (range: 16.84–99.99 cm2 g−1) (Figure 6b).

3.4. Changes in Leaf Water Potential across Irrigation Treatments

Generally, the irrigation treatments significantly affected the predawn (Ψp) and midday (Ψm) leaf water potential of the species, but the significance of the effects differed by month (Table 2). The leaf Ψp of 4 L h−1 of T. ramosissima and U. pumila was found to be the lowest (i.e., more negative) in June (−0.673 MPa) and September (−1.064 MPa), respectively. In contrast, the highest leaf Ψp was observed at 12 L h−1 among the treatments in the said species and months, that is, −0.380 MPa for T. ramosissima and −0.618 MPa for U. pumila. In terms of leaf Ψm, 4 L h−1 generally decreased significantly in August for T. ramosissima and July and September for U. pumila. Overall, both Ψp and Ψm tended to decrease progressively from June to August in all species. The hottest month in the study area is July, and our study revealed that the effects of irrigation treatments on Ψp during this month were similar across the treatments in almost all species (Figure 7; Table 2).

3.5. Variation in Chlorophyll Content

As shown in Figure 8a, a significant variation in the total chlorophyll content was detected across the treatments in some species, particularly in T. ramosissima (i.e., 8 L h−1 > 4 L h−1 > 12 L h−1) and E. moorcroftii (i.e., 4 L h−1 > 8 L h−1 = 12 L h−1). Respectively, these two species were also the ones with the lowest (range: 6.53–8.45 µg mL−1) and highest (range: 11.50–16.71 µg mL−1) total chlorophyll content among the four species in all the treatments. The chlorophyll a/b ratio also varied considerably across the treatments, except in T. ramosissima (Figure 8b). Generally, trees under 12 L h−1 had a higher chlorophyll a/b ratio compared with the other treatments.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Different Levels of Irrigation on Plant Survivability and Growth of Four Contrasting Species

As expected, trees grown in rainfall alone treatment (control) would have the highest mortality rate compared with those in rainfall + irrigation treatments, which support the report of Zhang et al. [2] that millions of newly planted trees in arid and semiarid areas in Mongolia could hardly survive due to adverse ecological conditions, particularly water shortage or short-lived rainfall events. Dying of newly germinated seedlings has long been observed in revegetation activities in arid and semiarid regions [45]. Here we found that survival rate was generally higher in trees grown in 4 and/or 8 L h−1 compared with that in 12 L h−1, except for H. rhamnoides which tended to survive better in 8 and/or 12 L h−1 than in 4 L h−1 treatment. This suggests that these four species can respond to varying water availability, consistent with the results of the previous studies [46,47,48].
In terms of growth performance, we showed that when trees underwent different irrigation regimes, all showed increments in height and RCD, although the observed RCD growth was generally similar across the treatments and years. This result is expected because, in general, height is more responsive to fluctuations in resource availability, increases more rapidly than RCD when a tree is young, and tends to slow down with age based on the hydraulic limitation hypothesis [49,50]. This implies that the growth pattern of the three species conforms to the general pattern of trees growing in normal conditions. Therefore, results further imply that a normal growth pattern for the three species can already be achieved by supplying only 4 L h−1 for the three species.
The relative height varied significantly across the treatments in most of the studied species, i.e., trees planted at 12 L h−1 tended to grow taller than those at the other treatments. Although they grew taller, trees under 12 L h−1 had relatively lower survival rate compared with the other irrigation regimes, and this is evident throughout the growing seasons. These results can be explained by life-history theory, which states that plants grown or adapted to the low-resource environment tend to exhibit low phenotypic plasticity, thereby growing slowly even if the ideal resource supply is available because they divert resources to other functions, particularly storage and defense [51]. Consequently, trees grown under 4 L h−1 regime may have conserved resources under limited water supply, which may have resulted in higher survival rate at the expense of vegetative growth, whereas trees grown under 12 L h−1 may have invested more on the vegetative growth rather than on storage and mechanical functions under high-water availability condition. Ryan and Yoder [50] had long concluded that plants in resource-poor environments (e.g., a lower amount of water) have greater hydraulic resistance for a given tree height than plants in resource-rich environments. Moreover, trees of T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii grown under 4 L h−1 have shown increases in height in as early as first growing season, but generally declined starting from 2016, which could indicate that they have traded their present growth investment to increased longevity and future reproductive capacity as they grow with age. This gradual decline in height growth seems to be favorable for tree survival of these three species even with low amount of water supply because slow shoot growth requires less amount of water, thereby decreasing transpiration rate. The result could also exemplify the dormancy in growth, which is a characteristic typical of plants growing in arid regions, such as the xerophytes or drought evaders [52,53].

4.2. Responses of Morpho-Physiological Traits of Four Contrasting Species to Different Irrigation Regimes

In this study, the LA of the broad-leaved U. pumila varied significantly across the irrigation treatments, i.e., 8 or 4 L h−1 had significantly lower LA compared with 12 L h−1. This result is consistent with the study of Liu and Dickmann [54] who found that a lower amount of soil water resulted in a decreased number of expanded leaves. The authors cited that the drought-induced decrease in LA was merely due to reduced rates of cell division and cell enlargement [19]. Trees under 8 or 4 L h−1, however, have shown higher survival rate compared with those in 12 L h−1. From a physiological viewpoint, such a result can be due to minimization of water loss by transpiration and risk of xylem embolism in leaves. The present study, therefore, suggests that the LA growth of U. pumila may be highly dependent on water availability. Here we also found that the LA of the shrub species (T. ramosissima, E. moorcroftii, and H. rhamnoides) did not vary significantly across the irrigation treatments, implying that these species may have a wide adaptability to water variability or fluctuations. Further, these shrubs may have a similar magnitude of phenotypic plasticity to varying irrigation regimes, resulting in similar LA across the treatments. Here all the species we used are commonly found tree species in arid and semiarid environments and have already adapted to harsh conditions [26,30]. Consequently, we could logically speculate that these species may have responded plastically to variable irrigation levels, by either reducing or increasing their total leaf area depending on the irrigation level and environmental conditions. Thus, our result agrees with the general strategies of plants in arid and semiarid habitats to cope with severe environmental pressures or oligotrophic conditions [55,56,57].
Here, a higher amount of irrigation resulted in higher SLA, particularly trees grown under 12 L h−1. Urban and Restrepo-Diaz [58] reported a similar result, that is, leaves of well-watered trees expand at a much faster rate and tend to have higher SLA compared with those leaves produced during a period of limited water supply. SLA is a good proxy of plant growth because it can determine how much new leaf area to be allocated for each unit of biomass produced. Thus, high-SLA leaves will usually enhance plant growth; however, studies have shown that high SLA may trade-off plant longevity and tolerance to abiotic stress [59,60,61]. Consequently, this could be another explanation to the observed lowest survival rate of trees grown under 12 L h−1, particularly for T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii. This result can be further supported by the result on LB, i.e., 8 and/or 4 L h−1 generally resulted in higher LB compared with 12 L h−1 in all species (Figure S2), which is expected because of the higher survival rate of trees in the former treatments than those in the latter treatment. The reduction in plant leaf biomass of trees grown under 12L h−1 may have been due to lower leaf mass growth or higher SLA, which means a lower allocation of biomass to thicker leaves or mechanical leaf tissues. Leaf mass, a leaf morphological trait, has already been regarded as a good indicator of carbon gain, leaf chemical composition, photosynthesis rate, and resource acquisition rate [62,63]. Moreover, several studies have shown a strong positive correlation of leaf mechanical strength and stiffness with leaf mass growth across different species and communities [64,65,66]. This assumption can be supported by our result on total chlorophyll content, that is, 4 and/or 8 L h−1 had significantly higher chlorophyll content than 12 L h−1, particularly in T. ramosissima and E. moorcroftii. Studies have shown that thicker leaves generally have higher chlorophyll and N contents and photosynthetic enzymes per unit leaf area, thereby improving the net photosynthetic rate [67,68]. Therefore, leaves of trees grown at 4 and/or 8 L h−1 may be thicker than those in 12 L h−1, containing higher chlorophyll concentration or probably photosynthetic enzymes. It has long been reported that thicker leaves are associated with water deficits [69].
Lastly, the observed generally higher survival rate and LB and lower SLA (or higher leaf mass) at 4L h−1 compared with 12 and/or 8 L h−1 for almost all species are reflective of the ubiquitous characteristic of plants typical of drylands. In our study, the Ψp and Ψm leaf water potentials were found the lowest (i.e., more negative) for trees subjected to 4 L h−1 treatment, especially in T. ramosissima and U. pumila during the summer season, and this may have enabled the species to increase their photosynthesis rate amid decreasing Ψ. Model calculations have illustrated that decreasing leaf water potential, can reduce the transpiration rate by lowering the vapor pressure of water and can increase the solubility of CO2, thereby leading to increased leaf CO2 assimilation rate [70]. The author further noted that the plant water use efficiency (WUE) was enhanced up to 10% at a leaf water potential of −2 MPa.

4.3. Optimal Irrigation Regime for Each Woody Species Potentially Suitable for Effective and Sustainable Afforestation in Mongolia

In our study, it was revealed that 4 L h−1, which is an irrigation regime with the lowest amount of water among the treatments, was found to be the most appropriate irrigation regime for watering the seedlings of T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii, with 92%−94% survival rate. In the case of H. rhamnoides, we found that the irrigation regime suitable for the species are/is 8 and/or 12 L h−1, with <80% survival rate, which partly agrees with the study of Tian et al. [71]. Here we showed that 12 L h−1 generally did not result in a higher survival rate and better plant growth for most of the studied species. Our result is, therefore, relevant to ensuring the sustainability of afforestation programs in arid and semiarid landscapes in Mongolia, by carefully determining the appropriate amount of water to be supplied to the newly planted seedlings. Amid climate change, water is becoming increasingly scarce in Mongolia, and this scarcity is also becoming a critical impediment to afforestation efforts in the country, in which millions of newly planted seedlings struggle to survive [2,12]. In the initial stages of afforestation, water to be used for irrigation is normally sourced from groundwater, which could make the availability of water in the afforestation sites even more scarce. Several studies have also shown that successful afforestation projects could increase the consumption of groundwater resources due to increased vegetation cover and extraction of water from the ground [2,11,12]. Consequently, we could also say that consumption of groundwater resources in afforestation sites can be managed sustainably in the long term when trees have fully grown by knowing the optimal irrigation needs of each studied species, thereby ensuring the sustainability of afforestation programs in arid and semiarid areas in Mongolia.
In terms of the tree species potentially suitable to the arid condition, we found that the three species, T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii under the 4 L h−1 irrigation regime have shown some leaf morpho-physiological responses that are indicative of plant characteristics growing in arid and semiarid habitats. A decrease in LA and SLA and the ability to recover from water deficit has already been reported for T. ramosissima as a rapid response to altered water availability [72]. The authors further implied that the observed trait in T. ramosissima may also facilitate the proliferation of the species in zones characterized by frequent groundwater fluctuations. A recent transcriptomic study has also detected distinct differential gene expression in flaccid leaves of T. ramosissima in response to water deficit [73]. Studies have also investigated the response of U. pumila to the different water table and drought stress treatments and reported some morpho-physiological traits that may provide advantages to the species in arid and semiarid zones (e.g., [74,75]). Specifically, the study of Xiongwen [76] showed that among the water table treatments (i.e., underwater, 3, 9, 15, and 22 cm distance from the soil surface to the water surface), U. pumila sapling grown under 9-cm and 15-cm treatments had higher net photosynthesis rate and increment in stem height than 3-cm, and 22-cm treatments, which partially agrees with our results. Lastly, the suitability of E. mosorcroftii to 4 L h−1 irrigation regime agrees with the study of Sun et al. [77] who reported a positive response of E. angustifolia, a synonym of E. moorcroftii, to heavy drought stress treatment.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, different irrigation regimes positively and negatively influenced the survivability, growth, and leaf morpho-physiology of the studied species, particularly T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii. Among the four treatments, 4 L h−1 irrigation regime showed to be the most effective irrigation regime because it generally resulted in the positive effect on most of the parameters measured in T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii, whereas the 8 and/or 12 L h−1 showed to be the most suitable for H. rhamnoides. Here we presented that higher amount of irrigation level generally did not result in better plant survival and growth performance, and most of the morpho-physiological traits were generally unresponsive to irrigation treatments, particularly in T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii. The morpho-physiological traits that were found responsive to varying irrigation regimes were SLA, total chlorophyll content, and leaf water potential (Ψ), to which the higher survival rate of trees grown at 4 L h−1 could be attributed. Under 4 L h−1 irrigation regime, T. ramosissima, U. pumila, and E. moorcroftii have shown growth and morpho-physiological traits, which are considered typical characteristics of plants growing in xeric environments. Therefore, a constant application of the 4 L h−1 irrigation regime could be employed to enhance and ensure the high survivability and growth performance of trees in the on-going and future afforestation efforts in Mongolia using the three potentially feasible tree species that were identified. Our findings are conducive to effective and sustainable afforestation in Mongolia, while also sustainably managing groundwater resources.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/212/s1, Figure S1: Mean annual temperature in the experimental site obtained from the period of January to December (2000-2019); Figure S2: Leaf biomass (LB) of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments; Table S1: Annual root collar diameter growth (RCD) and height of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across treatments measured from 2009 to 2019; Table S2: p values estimated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for RCD and height growth across treatments and species; Table S3: Repeated measures analysis of variance for transformed heights and RCD from all measurement dates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.-O.B., S.-O.B.; methodology, N.-O.B., S.-O.B.; software and data analysis, S.-O.B.; data collection, S.-O.B., N.D., Z.S., O.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-O.B., K.S.; writing—review and editing, N.-O.B., B.B.P., J.O.H.; supervision, N.-O.B., B.B.P.; funding acquisition, N.-O.B., I.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Mongolia-Korea Joint “Green Belt” Plantation Project and R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2020232B10-2021-0001) provided by the Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used is primarily reflected in the article. Other relevant data is available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology, National University of Mongolia for their help in field survey and plant material collections.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ye, G.; Ma, Y.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, X. Transcriptomic analysis of drought stress responses of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis) by RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, X.; Xu, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Balance of water supply and consumption during ecological restoration in arid regions of Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Environ. 2021, 186, 104406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chasek, P.; Akhtar-Schuster, M.; Orr, B.J.; Luise, A.; Rakoto Ratsimba, H.; Safriel, U. Land degradation neutrality: The science-policy interface from the UNCCD to national implementation. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 92, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, H.; Du, Z. Vegetation and soil wind erosion dynamics of sandstorm control programs in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of northern China. Front. Earth Sci. 2019, 13, 430–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Asbjornsen, H.; Goldsmith, G.R.; Alvarado-Barrientos, M.S.; Rebel, K.; Van Osch, F.P.; Rietkerk, M.; Chen, J.; Gotsch, S.; Tobón, C.; Geissert, D.R.; et al. Ecohydrological advances and applications in plant-water relations research: A review. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 4, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farooq, M.; Gogoi, N.; Barthakur, S.; Baroowa, B.; Bharadwaj, N.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Siddique, K.H.M. Drought Stress in Grain Legumes during Reproduction and Grain Filling. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2017, 203, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Padilla, F.M.; Pugnaire, F.I. Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sukhbaatar, G.; Ganbaatar, B.; Jamsran, T.; Purevragchaa, B.; Nachin, B.; Gradel, A. Assessment of early survival and growth of planted Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings under extreme continental climate conditions of northern Mongolia. J. For. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sussmilch, F.C.; McAdam, S.A.M. Surviving a dry future: Abscisic acid (ABA)-mediated plant mechanisms for conserving water under low humidity. Plants 2017, 6, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Wairiu, M. Land degradation and sustainable land management practices in Pacific Island Countries. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2017, 17, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cao, S.; Zhang, J.; Chen, L.; Zhao, T. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China, and lessons for other developing countries. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 183, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, N.; Buckley, T.N.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Luo, Z.; Wang, H.; Sterling, N.; Guan, H. Improvement of a simplified process-based model for estimating transpiration under water-limited conditions. Hydrol. Process. 2019, 33, 1670–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stropp, J.; dos Santos, I.M.; Correia, R.A.; dos Santos, J.G.; Silva, T.L.P.; dos Santos, J.W.; Ladle, R.J.; Malhado, A.C.M. Drier climate shifts leaf morphology in Amazonian trees. Oecologia 2017, 185, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y. Adaptation of dominant species to drought in the inner mongolia grassland – species level and functional type level analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karamouz, M.; Mohammadpour, P.; Mahmoodzadeh, D. Assessment of Sustainability in Water Supply-Demand Considering Uncertainties. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 3761–3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hernandez, J.O.; Quimado, M.O.; Fernando, E.S.; Pulan, D.E.; Malabrigo, P.L.; Maldia, L.S.J. Functional traits of stem and leaf of Wrightia candollei S. Vidal. Philipp. J. Sci. 2019, 148, 307–314. [Google Scholar]
  17. Eziz, A.; Yan, Z.; Tian, D.; Han, W.; Tang, Z.; Fang, J. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 11002–11010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cutler, J.M.; Rains, D.W.; Loomis, R.S. The Importance of Cell Size in the Water Relations of Plants. Physiol. Plant. 1977, 40, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dale, J.E. The Control of Leaf Expansion. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1988, 39, 267–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tezara, W.; Marín, O.; Rengifo, E.; Martínez, D.; Herrera, A. Photosynthesis and photoinhibition in two xerophytic shrubs during drought. Photosynthetica 2005, 43, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maréchaux, I.; Bartlett, M.K.; Sack, L.; Baraloto, C.; Engel, J.; Joetzjer, E.; Chave, J. Drought tolerance as predicted by leaf water potential at turgor loss point varies strongly across species within an Amazonian forest. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29, 1268–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Scoffoni, C.; McKown, A.D.; Rawls, M.; Sack, L. Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status: Quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Leuschner, C.; Wedde, P.; Lübbe, T. The relation between pressure–volume curve traits and stomatal regulation of water potential in five temperate broadleaf tree species. Ann. For. Sci. 2019, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mclean, E.H.; Prober, S.M.; Stock, W.D.; Steane, D.A.; Potts, B.M.; Vaillancourt, R.E.; Byrne, M. Plasticity of functional traits varies clinally along a rainfall gradient in Eucalyptus tricarpa. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1440–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Warren, C.R.; Tausz, M.; Adams, M.A. Does rainfall explain variation in leaf morphology and physiology among populations of red ironbark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon subsp. tricarpa) grown in a common garden? Tree Physiol. 2005, 25, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Park, G.E.; Lee, D.K.; Kim, K.W.; Batkhuu, N.O.; Tsogtbaatar, J.; Zhu, J.J.; Jin, Y.; Park, P.S.; Hyun, J.O.; Kim, H.S. Morphological characteristics and water-use efficiency of siberian elm trees (Ulmus pumila L.) within arid regions of northeast asia. Forests 2016, 7, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cho, S.; Ser-Oddamba, B.; Batkhuu, N.-O.; Seok Kim, H. Comparison of water use efficiency and biomass production in 10-year-old Populus sibirica and Ulmus pumila plantations in Lun soum, Mongolia. Forest Sci. Technol. 2019, 15, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Byambadorj, S.O.; Chiatante, D.; Akhmadi, K.; Lunten, J.; Ochirbat, B.; Park, B.B.; Scippa, G.S.; Montagnoli, A.; Nyam-Osor, B. The effect of different watering regimes and fertilizer addition on the growth of tree species used to afforest the semi-arid steppe of Mongolia. Plant Biosyst. 2020, 154, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ser-Oddamba, B.; Khaulenbek, A.; Janchivdorj, L.; Batkhishig, O.; Park, B.B.; Batkhuu, N.-O. The effect of different watering regimes on the growth of trees and shrubs in desert regions of Mongolia. Mong. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 18, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, B.; Wang, R.; Xiao, H.; Cao, Q.; Liu, T. Spatio-temporal variations of soil water content and salinity around individual Tamarix ramosissima in a semi-arid saline region of the upper Yellow River, northwest China. J. Arid Land 2018, 10, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, A.; Liang, C. Historical landscape dynamics of Inner Mongolia: Patterns, drivers, and impacts. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 30, 1579–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ykhanbai, H. Mongolia Forestry Outlook Study. 2010. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/am616e/am616e.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2019).
  33. Wesche, K.; Miehe, S.; Miehe, G. Plant communities of the Gobi Gurvan Sayhan National Park (South Gobi Aymak, Mongolia). Candollea 2005, 60, 149–205. [Google Scholar]
  34. Batkhuu, N.-O.; Khaulenbek, A.; Bayasgalan, D.; Batkhishig, O.; Janchivdorj, L.; Tsagaantsooj, N.; Ser-Oddamba, B. Mongolia-Korea Joint “Green Belt” Project Research Report; Art soft LLC: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 2012.
  35. NAMEM The National Agency for Meteorology and Environmental Monitoring of Mongolia. Weather Data. Available online: http://namem.gov.mn/eng/?p=56 (accessed on 2 October 2019).
  36. Thompson, J.R.; Schultz, R.C. Root system morphology of Quercus rubra L. planting stock and 3-year field performance in Iowa. New For. 1995, 9, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.; Johnson, D.A.; Su, Y.; Cui, J.; Zhang, T. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content of plants growing in sand dunes. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 2005, 46, 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kousar, M.; Suresh, G.B.; Lavanya, G.R.; Grard, A. Studies of chlorophyll content by different methods in Black Gram. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 2, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wellburn, A.R. The Spectral Determination of Chlorophylls a and b, as well as Total Carotenoids, Using Various Solvents with Spectrophotometers of Different Resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 144, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Scholander, P.F.; Hammel, H.T.; Hemmingsen, E.A.; Bradstreet, E.D. Hydrostatic Pressure and Osmotic Potential in Leaves of Mangroves and Some Other Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1964, 52, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. SAS Institute Inc SAS Software 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2014; pp. 1–25.
  44. Systat Software, I. Sigma Plot Version 12.5; Systat Softw. Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, G.; Liang, X.; Feng, B. The regeneration niches of sand desert plants I. The studies of seed germination Artemisia ordosica, Caragana korshinskii, Hedysarum scoparivm. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sin. 1995, 15, 102–105. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alizadeh, A.; Alizade, V.; Nassery, L.; Eivazi, A. Effect of Drought Stress on apple dwarf rootstocks. Tech. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2011, 1, 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ibrahim, Y.M.; Saeed, A.B.; Widaa, A.; Elamin, M. Effect of Irrigation Water Management on Growth of Date Palm offshoots (Phoenix dactylifera) under the River Nile State Conditions. Univ. Khartoum J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 20, 275–285. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wahba, S.A.; Rahman, S.I.A.; Tayel, M.Y.; Matyn, M.A. Soil moisture, salinity, water use efficiency and sunflower growth as influenced by irrigation, bitumen mulch and plant density. Soil Technol. 1990, 3, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hérault, B.; Bachelot, B.; Poorter, L.; Rossi, V.; Bongers, F.; Chave, J.; Paine, C.E.T.; Wagner, F.; Baraloto, C. Functional traits shape ontogenetic growth trajectories of rain forest tree species. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 1431–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ryan, M.G.; Yoder, B.J. Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth: What keeps trees from growing beyond a certain height? Bioscience 1997, 47, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ferreira, W.N.; De Lacerda, C.F.; Da Costa, R.C.; Filho, S.M. Effect of water stress on seedling growth in two species with different abundances: The importance of Stress Resistance Syndrome in seasonally dry tropical forest. Acta Bot. Brasilica 2015, 29, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zeng, Y.J.; Wang, Y.R.; Zhang, J.M. Is reduced seed germination due to water limitation a special survival strategy used by xerophytes in arid dunes? J. Arid Environ. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hernandez, J.O.; Quimado, M.O.; Fernando, E.S.; Province, B. Xerophytic characteristics of Tectona philippinensis Benth. & Hook.f. Philipp. J. Sci. 2016, 145, 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu, Z.; Dickmann, D.I. Abscisic acid accumulation in leaves of two contrasting hybrid poplar clones affected by nitrogen fertilization plus cyclic flooding and soil drying. Tree Physiol. 1992, 11, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lázaro-Nogal, A.; Matesanz, S.; Godoy, A.; Pérez-Trautman, F.; Gianoli, E.; Valladares, F. Environmental heterogeneity leads to higher plasticity in dry-edge populations of a semi-arid Chilean shrub: Insights into climate change responses. J. Ecol. 2015, 103, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sardans, J.; Peñuelas, J. Plant-soil interactions in Mediterranean forest and shrublands: Impacts of climatic change. Plant Soil 2013, 365, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wierzchos, J.; de los Ríos, A.; Ascaso, C. Microorganisms in desert rocks: The edge of life on Earth. Int. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Urban, L.; Restrepo-Diaz, H. Influences of Abiotic Factors in Growth and Development. Ref. Modul. Life Sci. 2009, 29, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Niinemets, Ü. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 2001, 82, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ordoñez, J.C.; Van Bodegom, P.M.; Witte, J.P.M.; Bartholomeus, R.P.; Van Dobben, H.F.; Aerts, R. Leaf habit and woodiness regulate different leaf economy traits at a given nutrient supply. Ecology 2010, 91, 3218–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Veneklaas, E.J.; Santos Silva, M.P.R.M.; Den Ouden, F. Determinants of growth rate in Ficus benjamina L. compared to related faster-growing woody and herbaceous species. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2002, 93, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De La Riva, E.G.; Olmo, M.; Poorter, H.; Ubera, J.L.; Villar, R. Leaf mass per area (LMA) and its relationship with leaf structure and anatomy in 34 mediterranean woody species along a water availability gradient. PLoS ONE 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Weraduwage, S.M.; Chen, J.; Anozie, F.C.; Morales, A.; Weise, S.E.; Sharkey, T.D. The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Onoda, Y.; Westoby, M.; Adler, P.B.; Choong, A.M.F.; Clissold, F.J.; Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Díaz, S.; Dominy, N.J.; Elgart, A.; Enrico, L.; et al. Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Read, J.; Sanson, G.D.; De Garine-Wichatitsky, M.; Jaffré, T. Sclerophylly in two contrasting tropical environments: Low nutrients vs. low rainfall. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93, 1601–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Méndez-Alonzo, R.; Ewers, F.W.; Sack, L. Ecological variation in leaf biomechanics and its scaling with tissue structure across three mediterranean-climate plant communities. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 544–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Jinwen, L.; Jingping, Y.; Dongsheng, L.; Pinpin, F.; Tiantai, G.; Changshui, G.; Wenyue, C. Chlorophyll meter’s estimate of weight-based nitrogen concentration in rice leaf is influenced by leaf thickness. Plant Prod. Sci. 2011, 14, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peng, S. Single-leaf and canopy photosynthesis of rice. Stud. Plant Sci. 2000, 7, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Evans, J.R.; Poorter, H. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vesala, T.; Sevanto, S.; Grönholm, T.; Salmon, Y.; Nikinmaa, E.; Hari, P.; Hölttä, T. Effect of leaf water potential on internal humidity and CO2 dissolution: Reverse transpiration and improved water use efficiency under negative pressure. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tian, L.; Wu, W.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, D.; Yu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q. The ecosystem effects of sand-binding shrub Hippophae rhamnoides in alpine semi-arid desert in the Northeastern Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Land 2019, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Li, J.; Yu, B.; Zhao, C.; Nowak, R.S.; Zhao, Z.; Sheng, Y.; Li, J. Physiological and morphological responses of Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica to altered groundwater availability. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Swaminathan, P.; Ohrtman, M.; Carinder, A.; Deuja, A.; Wang, C.; Gaskin, J.; Fennell, A.; Clay, S. Water deficit transcriptomic responses differ in the invasive Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima established in the southern and northern United States. Plants 2020, 9, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Babushkina, E.A.; Zhirnova, D.F.; Belokopytova, L.V.; Tychkov, I.I.; Vaganov, E.A.; Krutovsky, K.V. Response of Four Tree Species to Changing Climate in a Moisture-Limited Area of South Siberia. Forests 2019, 10, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Dulamsuren, C.; Hauck, M.; Bader, M.; Osokhjargal, D.; Oyungerel, S.; Nyambayar, S.; Runge, M.; Leuschner, C. Water relations and photosynthetic performance in Larix sibirica growing in the forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Xiongwen, C. Ecophysiological and Growth Responses of Elm, Ulmus pumila, to Different Water Tables. J. Biol. Sci. 2005, 5, 813–819. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sun, J.K.; Zhang, W.H.; Lu, Z.H.; Liu, X.C. Effects of drought stress on gas exchange characteristics and protective enzyme activities in Elaeagnus angustifolia and Grewia. biloba G. Don var. parviflora seedlings. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecol. Sin. 2009, 29, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Location and (b) close-up aerial photo of the experimental site within the Green belt plantation in Dalanzadgad soum, Umnugobi province, Mongolia.
Figure 1. (a) Location and (b) close-up aerial photo of the experimental site within the Green belt plantation in Dalanzadgad soum, Umnugobi province, Mongolia.
Land 10 00212 g001
Figure 2. Mean monthly air temperature (solid line) and precipitation (broken, dotted line) in the experimental site during the growing season (i.e., May–September 2009–2019).
Figure 2. Mean monthly air temperature (solid line) and precipitation (broken, dotted line) in the experimental site during the growing season (i.e., May–September 2009–2019).
Land 10 00212 g002
Figure 3. Survival rate of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (i.e., control, 12, 8, and 4 L h−1) measured in 2019. The control had 100% mortality rate in all species. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05.
Figure 3. Survival rate of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (i.e., control, 12, 8, and 4 L h−1) measured in 2019. The control had 100% mortality rate in all species. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05.
Land 10 00212 g003
Figure 4. Annual growth pattern of plant height (cm) and root collar diameter (RCD, cm) of (a,b) Tamarix ramosissima, (c,d) Ulmus pumila, (e,f) Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and (g,h) Hippophae rhamnoides across irrigation treatments (12, 8, and 4 L h−1). Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 4. Annual growth pattern of plant height (cm) and root collar diameter (RCD, cm) of (a,b) Tamarix ramosissima, (c,d) Ulmus pumila, (e,f) Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and (g,h) Hippophae rhamnoides across irrigation treatments (12, 8, and 4 L h−1). Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Land 10 00212 g004
Figure 5. (a) Relative height growth rate (cm day−1) and (b) relative root collar diameter growth rate (cm day−1) of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured from the period of 2009–2019 growing seasons. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 5. (a) Relative height growth rate (cm day−1) and (b) relative root collar diameter growth rate (cm day−1) of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured from the period of 2009–2019 growing seasons. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Land 10 00212 g005
Figure 6. (a) Leaf area (LA) and (b) specific leaf area (SLA) of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 6. (a) Leaf area (LA) and (b) specific leaf area (SLA) of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Land 10 00212 g006
Figure 7. Diurnal variation in leaf water potential (Ψ) of (a) Tamarix ramosissima, (b) Ulmus pumila, (c) Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and (d) Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, and 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 7. Diurnal variation in leaf water potential (Ψ) of (a) Tamarix ramosissima, (b) Ulmus pumila, (c) Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and (d) Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, and 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Land 10 00212 g007
Figure 8. (a) Total chlorophyll content and (b) chlorophyll a/b ratio of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 8. (a) Total chlorophyll content and (b) chlorophyll a/b ratio of Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments (12, 8, 4 L h−1) measured in July 2016. Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Land 10 00212 g008
Table 1. The initial age and growth of the tree species used in the experiment.
Table 1. The initial age and growth of the tree species used in the experiment.
SpeciesAge (Year)Height
(cm)
RCD
(mm)
Root Length
(cm)
Tamarix ramosissima283.67.734.5
Ulmus pumila251.44.437.2
Elaeagnus moorcroftii252.15.333.5
Hippophae rhamnoides239.43.821.9
Table 2. Seasonal variation of the predawn (ψp) and midday (ψm) leaf water potentials in Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments measured in 2016. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05.
Table 2. Seasonal variation of the predawn (ψp) and midday (ψm) leaf water potentials in Tamarix ramosissima, Ulmus pumila, Elaeagnus moorcroftii, and Hippophae rhamnoides across different irrigation treatments measured in 2016. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05.
Species TreatmentJuneJulyAugustSeptember
Tamarix ramosissimaψp12 L h−1−0.38 a−0.91 a−0.77 a−0.98 a
8 L h−1−0.45 ab−1.81 a−0.84 a−0.94 a
4 L h−1−0.67 b−1.79 a−1.12 a−0.67 a
ψm12 L h−1−1.05 a−1.91 a−1.28 a−2.38 a
8 L h−1−1.23 a−2.08 a−1.45 a−1.84 a
4 L h−1−1.76 a−2.33 a−2.59 b−1.84 a
Ulmus pumilaψp12 L h−1−0.31 a−1.07 a−0.39 a−0.61 a
8 L h−1−0.39 a−0.84 a−1.01 a−0.96 ab
4 L h−1−0.51 a−1.25 a−0.56 a−1.06 b
ψm12 L h−1−1.62 ab−2.13 a−2.52 a−1.88 a
8 L h−1−1.89 b−2.37 ab−1.97 a−1.86 a
4 L h−1−1.29 a−2.45 b−2.13 a−2.64 b
Elaeagnus moorcroftiiψp12 L h−1−0.27 a−1.26 a−0.27 a−0.31 a
8 L h−1−0.37 a−1.17 a−0.37 a−0.79 a
4 L h−1−0.40 a−1.25 a−0.40 a−0.71 a
ψm12 L h−1−1.20 a−1.84 a−0.99 a−1.91 a
8 L h−1−1.35 a−2.51 a−1.11 a−2.23 a
4 L h−1−1.09 a−2.09 a−1.09 a−2.46 a
Hippophae rhamnoidesψp12 L h−1−0.24 a−0.42 a−0.49 a−0.22 a
8 L h−1−0.36 a−0.71 a−0.71 a−0.35 a
4 L h−1−0.51 a−0.51 a−0.46 a−0.54 a
ψm12 L h−1−0.97 a−0.71 a−1.18 a−1.68 a
8 L h−1−0.80 a−1.41 b−1.36 a−2.31 a
4 L h−1−1.64 a−0.95 a−1.57 a−2.37 a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Byambadorj, S.-O.; Park, B.B.; Hernandez, J.O.; Dulamsuren, N.; Sainbuyan, Z.; Altantugs, O.; Sharavdorj, K.; Seong, I.K.; Batkhuu, N.-O. Optimal Irrigation Regime for Woody Species Potentially Suitable for Effective and Sustainable Afforestation in the Desert Region of Mongolia. Land 2021, 10, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020212

AMA Style

Byambadorj S-O, Park BB, Hernandez JO, Dulamsuren N, Sainbuyan Z, Altantugs O, Sharavdorj K, Seong IK, Batkhuu N-O. Optimal Irrigation Regime for Woody Species Potentially Suitable for Effective and Sustainable Afforestation in the Desert Region of Mongolia. Land. 2021; 10(2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Byambadorj, Ser-Oddamba, Byung Bae Park, Jonathan O. Hernandez, Narantugs Dulamsuren, Zoljargal Sainbuyan, Oyuntugs Altantugs, Khulan Sharavdorj, In Kyeong Seong, and Nyam-Osor Batkhuu. 2021. "Optimal Irrigation Regime for Woody Species Potentially Suitable for Effective and Sustainable Afforestation in the Desert Region of Mongolia" Land 10, no. 2: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop