Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization, Expression Profile, and A 21-bp Indel within the ASB9 Gene and Its Associations with Chicken Production Traits
Previous Article in Journal
Tempo and Mode of Genome Structure Evolution in Insects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020338
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Factors Implicated in the Investigation of Possible Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

by
Grace Kuang
,
Rebecca Salowe
and
Joan O’Brien
*
Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020338
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) are diseases of primary global neurodegeneration with complex pathophysiologies. Throughout the published literature, researchers have highlighted similarities associated with various aspects of both diseases. In light of the increasing number of findings reporting resemblance between the two neurodegenerative processes, scientists have grown interested in possible underlying connections between AD and POAG. In the search for explanations to fundamental mechanisms, a multitude of genes have been studied in each condition, with overlap in the genes of interest between AD and POAG. Greater understanding of genetic factors can drive the research process of identifying relationships and elucidating common pathways of disease. These connections can then be utilized to advance research as well as to generate new clinical applications. Notably, AD and glaucoma are currently diseases with irreversible consequences that often lack effective therapies. An established genetic connection between AD and POAG would serve as the basis for development of gene or pathway targeted strategies relevant to both diseases. Such a clinical application could be of immense benefit to researchers, clinicians, and patients alike. This paper aims to summarize the genetic associations between AD and POAG, describe common underlying mechanisms, discuss potential areas of application, and organize the findings in a review.

1. Introduction

Both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) are diseases of high prevalence and disease burden. AD is the world’s leading cause of cognitive impairment with a worldwide prevalence estimated to be more than 24 million people [1]. Meanwhile, glaucoma is the world’s leading cause of irreversible blindness and approximately 57.5 million people are affected by POAG across the world [2]. Despite emphasized awareness and decades of dedicated research efforts, these two diseases still appear to present more questions than answers. Researchers continue to seek to understand their genetic underpinnings, pathophysiologies, distinct subtypes, and improved therapeutics.
As more research is published in both fields, scientists have taken note of the many similarities reported between these two disorders. Both are diseases of latent onset, progressive global neurodegeneration that leads to debilitating neurologic impairments. They are also now both understood to be heterogeneous collections of diseases with incompletely delineated subtypes [3,4]. Increasing age is the most prominent predisposing risk factor for both diseases, and they share several other risk factors, including ethnicity, history of systemic disease, and family history [1,2,5,6,7].
Beneath these clinical similarities, deeper levels of association have also been previously identified in molecular studies. AD and POAG are postulated to share several commonalities in molecular dysregulation, including disruptions in synaptic function, cellular signaling, axonal transport, and neuronal communication [8]. Other overlapping neurodegenerative pathways include microglia-induced neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity [9]. In recent years, vascular studies have also demonstrated evidence of microvascular dysfunction in both AD and POAG [10]. Moreover, histopathologic and imaging studies have shown similar neuronal degeneration and abnormal protein accumulation patterns in both patient populations, including extracellular abnormal β-amyloid plaques, intracellular phosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles, loss of the retinal nerve fiber layer, and reduced brain tissue volumes [11,12,13].
The presence of a considerable number of associations between features at every level of disease is suggestive of related genetics influencing these two conditions. Exploration into shared genetics can supply explanations for the resultant similarities noted in these previously published studies, as well as provide clearer insight into the plethora of unanswered questions across both fields. Knowledge gained in one field could be applied to the other, thereby expediting the research and discovery process.
Recognition of the integral genetic factors influencing disease pathogenesis could also be instrumental in improving clinical management. Current treatment options for both POAG and AD are relatively limited. Both diseases offer no cure at this time, and available treatments address symptom management and complication prevention. POAG treatment regimens center around lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), which is the major modifiable risk factor for POAG. These include medications such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs, and surgical techniques such as trabeculectomies and stent placements [14]. Even in the setting of adequate IOP reduction, approximately 30% of patients experience continued visual decline [15]. Traditional AD therapy only includes pharmacologic agents that aim to improve symptoms of cognitive dysfunction (i.e., acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist) [16]. As traditional treatment options operate by preserving the remaining healthy nerve cell integrity, earlier screening based on genetic information could indicate earlier initiation of treatment for the evaluated disease as well as preclinical monitoring for the corresponding disease. In recent years, novel drugs targeting integral processes of disease pathology, such as reversal of β-amyloid plaques, have become approved for clinical application. The current research direction aims to expand treatment targets to involve more etiologies of disease, such as vascular dysfunction and molecular dysregulation [17]. A common goal in AD and POAG therapy research is the development of nerve cell replacement techniques that can replace already lost neuronal function. Greater understanding of genetic contributions to pathophysiology is also crucial for the next step of gene and pathway-based therapies and other strategies with an overarching goal of more effective treatment and improved patient outcomes.
Overlaps in the common pathologic pathways and targets of therapeutic actions in AD and POAG are portrayed in Figure 1.
Following immense research efforts, 75 risk loci have been associated with AD and 127 risk loci have been associated with POAG [13,21,22]. Researchers utilizing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data have found multiple protein-coding genes associated with both AD and POAG [21,22]. This review will discuss these previously identified overlapping genes, select additional genes of particular research interest, and the impact that an established genetic connection would have on multiple areas of disease management.

2. Overview of Alzheimer’s Disease and Glaucoma

2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurological disease of global cognitive impairment characterized by latent onset, progressive dementia. Dementia refers to a heterogenous syndrome of cognitive decline that is out of proportion to normal biological processes and interferes with functioning [23,24]. Many conditions feature dementia, but AD is the most common cause accounting for 60–70% of all cases [25]. AD risk increases exponentially beginning at 65 years of age, and most cases of AD are late-onset AD (LOAD) that occur after 65 years of age. However, approximately 5% of patients may have early-onset AD (EOAD) prior to 65 years of age [26].
The timeline of AD follows an asymptomatic preclinical phase that can last multiple decades prior to symptom onset, a mild phase marked by limited cognitive impairment, and a final stage of dementia. Although memory decline is the most well-known feature of dementias, patients with AD can present with cognitive decline in a wide range of areas, including memory, behavioral, visuospatial, and language impairments [26]. AD is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning other known classes of dementia (e.g., vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, etc.) must be excluded prior to diagnosis. This rule-out process of AD diagnosis highlights the vague diagnostic criteria and clinical workup of the disease. Diagnosis is difficult to establish as there are currently no definitive diagnostic tests, biomarkers, or imaging studies. Clinical diagnosis can be made utilizing multiple neuropsychological tools, such as cognitive interviews, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, but confirmative diagnosis is only possible following postmortem brain examination [27].
Typical features seen in the brains of patients with AD include moderate atrophy of multiple cortical structures, especially the hippocampus and temporal lobes, with associated temporal horn enlargement [28]. Abnormal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) results in pathogenic β-amyloid protein. Rather than undergoing normal processes of degradation, β-amyloid protein forms aggregates of extracellular deposits called senile plaques that concentrate around cerebral vasculature and in gray matter. This deposition leads to neuronal dysfunction, proinflammatory responses, and neurotoxicity [29]. Increased β-amyloid protein concentrations also induce the formation of intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau neurofibrillary tangles, which is another classic pathologic feature of AD [29].

2.2. Glaucoma

Glaucoma is an ophthalmic disease characterized by a loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) resulting in optic degenerative neuropathy. Patients with glaucoma typically experience elevated intraocular pressures and progressive loss of peripheral to central vision. Similar to dementias, glaucoma is also a heterogenous collection of diseases. The most common cause of glaucoma is primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG), in which disease pathogenesis cannot be fully explained by an anatomical abnormality, such as in closed-angle glaucoma. Another subset of glaucoma is normal tension glaucoma (NTG), in which symptoms occur in a setting of normal intraocular pressure (IOP) [2].
Patients with glaucoma typically complain of gradual loss of vision that begins peripherally and gradually migrates toward the center of vision. Due to the insidious nature of peripheral visual impairment, most patients do not notice when symptoms first arise. Peripheral fields can be tested on ophthalmic examination, but sensitivity of the exam in early stages of disease is unclear [30]. In cases of POAG with IOP elevations, IOPs can be measured with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) device or other secondary device. The generally accepted normal values of IOP lie in the range of 12 to 21 mmHg, and values outside of this range may indicate need for further evaluation and management. However, it is important to note that IOP is not an absolute diagnostic biomarker for glaucoma. Individuals may suffer from symptomatic NTG in the setting of normal IOP. The opposite can also be true in situations where individuals have multiple recorded elevated IOPs but no symptoms of glaucoma (this condition is termed ocular hypertension) [31]. Another feature heavily utilized in clinical and research settings is cupping or notching of the optic nerve. RGC loss from the surrounding neural rim of the optic nerve leads to an increased or irregular appearance of the center cup that is progressively devoid of neuroretinal tissue, increasing the cup-to-disc ratio.
Traditionally, glaucoma was attributed solely to increased IOP in the ocular system. This force exerts mechanical pressures on the optic nerve head that eventually leads to axonal structural damage and neural cell degeneration [32]. Intraoperative and postoperative imaging studies of ocular structures following open-angle glaucoma surgical treatment have demonstrated that morphological improvements (e.g., Schlemm canal diameter and anterior chamber angle) coincide with IOP reductions and likely improved subsequent outcomes [33,34]. However, IOP elevation is unlikely to be the only etiology, as demonstrated by cases of NTG in which IOP levels are within stable normal ranges. Additionally, disease progression has been found to occur in a significant proportion of patients (10–45%) despite IOP decrease through medical and surgical interventions [13,35]. As a result, multiple other etiologies have been explored in recent years, including primary RGC loss, microglial activation, vascular ischemia, cellular stress, and global neurotoxicity [21,35].

3. Background of Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Glaucoma

Prior to consideration of similar pathologies, a connection between the eyes and the brain can be identified from the early beginnings of organ development. In approximately the third week of gestation, the forebrain neuroectoderm develops two bilateral indentations in the neural plate that are called optic grooves. As the neural plate closes into the neural tube, these optic grooves continue to extend outwards, growing into optic vesicles anchored to the forebrain by elongated optic stalks. Ultimately, the optic vesicle’s neuroectoderm differentiates into the ocular nervous system, and the corresponding optic stalk becomes the optic nerve that directly connects the brain to the eye [35]. Considering their common embryologic origin, it would be reasonable to expect sustained likeness in the mature organ systems as well as in their disease pathologies.
Indeed, several molecular and histologic similarities have been described in the representative neurodegenerative diseases of each organ system—AD and POAG. Studies in patients with AD who undergo ophthalmological examination have found decreases in the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, RGC loss, and increased optic nerve cup-to-disc ratio [36,37,38,39]. All of these features are classic manifestations of glaucoma. These findings strongly suggest that neurodegeneration in the central nervous system also affects and can be visualized in retinal neurons. Studies in glaucoma have also found that glaucomatous neurodegeneration is not limited to the eye. Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in patients with POAG showed evidence of global neurodegeneration throughout the brain with reduced volumes in all structures of the central visual system as well as broader neural structures [12,32,39].
In experimental models, abnormal β-amyloid protein deposition and tauopathy were significantly increased in the lateral geniculate nucleus of rhesus monkey models with glaucoma [40]. Researchers have observed increased caspase-induced abnormal processing of amyloid precursor protein and β-amyloid protein in RGCs of rate models with chronic ocular hypertension [41]. Other common pathways include the insulin receptor pathway thought to be involved in neuronal growth, differentiation, and functioning [42]. Reduced insulin receptor expression is associated with AD, and increased insulin resistance is also associated with IOP elevation [43,44]. Another pathway found to contribute to both disease pathologies involves vascular dysfunction. AD models have demonstrated vascular fragility in capillaries, arterioles, and large arteries such as the Circle of Willis [17]. Vessel damage can result from a variety of factors, including age-related angiogenic decline, decrease in vessel caliber, inefficient cell signaling, and impaired vasodilation [17]. These factors as well as many others ultimately lead to reduced cerebral blood flow, which has been shown to directly correlate with cognitive impairment [45]. Populations of POAG patients have also demonstrated microvascular dysfunction and deficiencies in endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatory responses [46,47]. Retinal microvascular dysfunction was found in both mild AD and POAG patients as demonstrated by alterations in retinal artery reactivity when compared to healthy controls [10].
Despite numerous studies demonstrating similarities throughout disease presentation, a connection between AD and POAG has yet to be established due to conflicting evidence in the literature. Several population-based studies have demonstrated mixed associations between AD and POAG diagnoses in study cohorts. Some studies have shown that patients with POAG have significantly increased risk of dementia when compared to controls without POAG [48,49,50]. On the other hand, other studies did not identify POAG as a risk factor for AD [51,52,53,54].
Of note, a prominent limitation to population-based studies of association between POAG and AD is the reliability of diagnostic information. Most population-based cohort association studies utilize medical records and insurance claims to extract data in study methodology. However, these may not be accurate reflections of true disease prevalence. In a meta-analysis of 23 studies across the world screening for undiagnosed dementia, the overall rate of undetected dementia was approximately 61.7% [55]. In glaucoma population studies, researchers have found that approximately 90% of individuals worldwide and 50% of individuals in developed countries are unaware that they have glaucoma [56,57]. Both AD and POAG are difficult to diagnose due to delayed symptom presentations, variable presentations especially in the early stages of disease, and lack of standardized diagnostic protocols [58]. Another barrier to accurate association studies includes presently undifferentiated subtypes of both diseases. Cohort studies that found no or negative overall associations between POAG and AD found that older age of glaucoma diagnosis and the normal tension glaucoma subtype were associated with dementia [48,51,56,57]. These findings suggest that different subtypes of both AD and POAG may be significantly associated if stratified appropriately.
The literature is currently undecided as to whether a connection exists between AD and POAG. The finding of common genetic connections and molecular pathways could contribute to the establishment of shared connections. Knowledge of genetic contributions could also fortify studies of association through screening for undiagnosed affected individuals, providing genetic tests to aid diagnosis, and clarifying subtypes of these diseases.

4. Genetic Factors Relevant to Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Using publicly available online GWAS datasets in AD and glaucoma, Zheng et al. (2022) identified 49 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 11 risk loci associated with AD and glaucoma (AGBL2, CELF1, FAM180B, MTCH2, MYBPC3, NDUFS3, PSMC3, PTPMT1, RAPSN, SLC39A13, and SPI1) [22]. In another review using GWAS datasets from 21 studies, Gharahkhani et al. (2021) identified 3 risk loci associated with AD and POAG (MAPT, CADM2, and APP) [21]. The exact mechanisms of actions for many of these genes remain unclear. Features of currently known gene loci, pathogenic mutations, their molecular pathways, and possible connections to disease pathogenesis based on present literature are described. Previously identified shared genes implicated in the investigation of possible connections between AD and POAG are organized in Table 1.
Many shared gene loci reside within the genomic region of chromosome 11p11.2, including AGBL2, SPI1, CELF1, FAM180B, MTCH2, MYBPC3, NDUFS3, PSMC3, PTPMT1, RAPSN, and SLC39A13. This chromosome 11 cluster was found to be associated with increased IOP as well as increased risk for POAG [59].
Numerous risk loci involved in a large variety of molecular processes have been identified. Investigation into the pathways that these genes take part in has led to increased recognition of the complexity and multitude of disease etiologies. Some genes of interest have demonstrated integral roles in microtubule structure and function. Microtubules, comprised of repeating tubulin subunits, form tracks within neuronal axons along which molecules necessary for neurocognitive function are shipped during axonal transport [76]. Previous studies in animals and humans have demonstrated that the axonal transport system in AD is defective, resulting in bottleneck accumulation of products within axonal swellings, proteolytic processing of β-amyloid precursor protein, and abnormal hyperphosphorylation of microtubule-associated tau protein [77]. Microtubule disruption has also been mentioned as part of glaucoma pathogenesis, as animal models have demonstrated microtubule deficiency prior to RGC loss [74].
Other genes have been shown to play integral roles in macrophage proliferation and activation via enhanced macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) [62]. In AD, deposits of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles and extracellular β-amyloid plaques trigger microglial recruitment for abnormal protein clearance. However, the prolonged proinflammatory effects accompanying this microglial response can lead to neuronal death and exacerbate neurologic dysfunction [61]. Specific variants of pertinent genes resulting in increased expression have been associated with an earlier onset of AD and increased expression of other AD risk genes [63]. Microglia-mediated inflammatory retinal neuron damage has also been seen in experimental glaucoma models, and inhibition of certain aspects of microglial activation has demonstrated neuroprotective effects [9].
The ε4 allele of the Apolipoprotein E gene (APOE4) is considered an established risk factor for AD. APOE4 has been demonstrated to produce neurons with decreased synaptic function, astrocytes with impaired lipid metabolism, and microglia with reduced β-amyloid phagocytosis [80]. It has also been shown to contribute to the vascular dysfunction etiology through disruptions in the blood–brain barrier, which was previously shown to be associated with early cognitive decline [81,82]. However, research surrounding APOE4 is inconsistent regarding its impacts on POAG. Several meta-analyses in Asian populations have suggested that APOE4 leads to similar accelerated neurodegeneration in POAG, whereas other metanalyses concluded that APOE4 is not associated with glaucoma [42]. A recent study utilizing a large, combined dataset demonstrated that APOE4 may be protective in POAG through increasing retinal microglial resiliency to neurodegenerative responses [83,84].

5. Implications of Genetic Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Glaucoma

Presently, patients with AD and glaucoma often suffer from delayed diagnoses and ineffective therapies. Studies in AD populations have shown that patterns of abnormal structural changes and neurodegeneration can occur more than a decade prior to symptom onset [85]. This corresponds with the estimates that 61.7% of patients with dementia and 50–90% patients with glaucoma are undiagnosed [55,56,57]. As a result of the markedly delayed recognition of disease, patients will have undergone years of irreversible neurodegeneration prior to clinic presentation, evaluation, and treatment.
Identification of pertinent genes would introduce the opportunity for asymptomatic screening and counseling in high-risk populations. As currently available therapeutics are only targeted towards symptoms, complications, and attenuating the progression of disease, early diagnosis and treatment are imperative to improve patient outcomes. This would allow for early initiation of currently available therapeutics to preserve residual healthy neurons prior to irreversible neurodegeneration, leading to slower disease progression and better patient outcomes. Genetic testing following symptom presentation of one disease could lead to identification of common pathogenic variants. This would indicate early preclinical screening and monitoring of the other disease before symptom onset. It is important to note that testing and screening of genetic factors may need to take ethnic population and common ancestry into consideration. Various ethnic groups are affected by AD and POAG differently due to anatomic characteristics, systemic conditions, and genetic predispositions. For example, in subgroup analyses of a large meta-analysis, APOE4 was significantly associated with risk of POAG in Asians but not in Caucasians [86]. In both POAG and AD, African Americans have been found to have a higher prevalence, more rapid progression of disease, and greater severity of disease as compared to their white peers [5,6]. Increased study focused on specific ethnic populations and their relation to the disease processes can help to further elucidate the impact of genetic contributions and potential for screenings, while ensuring the inclusion of the most affected populations in these future steps.
Furthermore, knowledge of the genetic underpinnings and contributory molecular pathways for disease pathogenesis would be the first step towards novel gene or pathway-based therapies. Presently employed treatment strategies only target disease symptoms, progression, and complications [25,87]. These include cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., donepezil, etc.) and glutamate regulators (e.g., memantine, etc.). In glaucoma, a variety of medications targeting different pathways of IOP management have been employed. These include beta-adrenergic antagonists (e.g., timolol, etc.), alpha-adrenergic agonists (e.g., brimonidine, etc.), cholinergic agonists (e.g., pilocarpine, etc.), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g., dorzolamide, etc.), prostaglandins (e.g., latanoprost, etc.), and others. Surgeries to lower intraocular pressure are also used.
There are currently no cures; thus, AD and glaucoma remain as irreversible diseases. The scientific community has long recognized the need for effective treatments that act upon the pathologic mechanisms of disease, and recent pharmacologic developments have been directed towards disease modifying therapeutics (DMT). In June 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted a landmark approval of the first drug to target the underlying pathologies of AD: aducanumab. Aducanumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets and clears pathogenic β-amyloid plaques. As more momentum is gained towards the development of DMTs, a step further from anti-pathologic therapies would be genetic or pathway specific therapies that directly impact pathogenesis at the molecular level rather than downstream presentations. While still in the early stages of development, gene therapies for AD and POAG have proven promising in animal studies, and clinical trials are currently ongoing [88,89]. Understanding genes with common roles between AD and POAG could accelerate this process of novel diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

6. Conclusions

Underlying connections between Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma remain to be firmly established, but multiple common genetic undercurrents identified between the two disease entities suggest related molecular pathways and pathophysiologies. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the precise mechanisms by which shared genetics manifest as disease similarities visualized in previous clinical studies. Greater understanding of the genetic associations between AD and POAG would drive collaboration and exchange of knowledge between these two fields of study as well as having potential application to understanding other forms of neurodegeneration. Furthermore, new points of entry into future developments of disease screening, management, and treatment could potentially be introduced. Interplay of knowledge between genetic research and clinical studies, AD and glaucoma, as well as current symptomatic strategies and novel disease modifying diagnostics and therapeutics is expected to yield findings beneficial to the scientific and general medical communities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.O.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; writing—review and editing, R.S.; supervision, J.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (#1RO1EY023557-01 to JMO) and Vision Research Core Grant (P30 EY001583). Funds also come from the F.M. Kirby Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, The UPenn Hospital Board of Women Visitors, The Paul and Evanina Bell Mackall Foundation Trust, and Regeneron Genetics Center. The Ophthalmology Department at the Perelman School of Medicine and the VA Hospital in Philadelphia, PA also provided support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mayeux, R.; Stern, Y. Epidemiology of Alzheimer Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a006239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Allison, K.; Patel, D.; Alabi, O. Epidemiology of Glaucoma: The Past, Present, and Predictions for the Future. Cureus 2020, 12, e11686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Casson, R.J.; Chidlow, G.; Wood, J.P.M.; Crowston, J.G.; Goldberg, I. Definition of glaucoma: Clinical and experimental concepts. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012, 40, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ferreira, D.; Nordberg, A.; Westman, E. Biological subtypes of Alzheimer disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2020, 94, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lennon, J.C.; Aita, S.L.; Del Bene, V.A.; Rhoads, T.; Resch, Z.J.; Eloi, J.M.; Walker, K.A. Black and White individuals differ in dementia prevalence, risk factors, and symptomatic presentation. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2021, 18, 1461–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rudnicka, A.R.; Mt-Isa, S.; Owen, C.; Cook, D.; Ashby, D. Variations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Prevalence by Age, Gender, and Race: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 4254–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Allen, K.F.; Gaier, E.D.; Wiggs, J.L. Genetics of Primary Inherited Disorders of the Optic Nerve: Clinical Applications. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a017277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Chan, J.W.; Chan, N.C.; Sadun, A.A. Glaucoma as Neurodegeneration in the Brain. Eye Brain 2021, 13, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wei, X.; Cho, K.-S.; Thee, E.F.; Jager, M.J.; Chen, D.F. Neuroinflammation and microglia in glaucoma: Time for a paradigm shift. J. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 97, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mroczkowska, S.; Shokr, H.; Benavente-Pérez, A.; Negi, A.; Bentham, P.; Gherghel, D. Retinal Microvascular Dysfunction Occurs Early and Similarly in Mild Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary-Open Angle Glaucoma Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jones-Odeh, E.; Hammond, C.J. How strong is the relationship between glaucoma, the retinal nerve fibre layer, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis? Eye 2015, 29, 1270–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hernowo, A.T.; Boucard, C.C.; Jansonius, N.M.; Hooymans, J.M.M.; Cornelissen, F.W. Automated Morphometry of the Visual Pathway in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 2758–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bellenguez, C.; Küçükali, F.; Jansen, I.E.; Kleineidam, L.; Moreno-Grau, S.; Amin, N.; Naj, A.C.; Campos-Martin, R.; Grenier-Boley, B.; Andrade, V.; et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 412–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schuster, A.K.; Erb, C.; Hoffmann, E.M.; Dietlein, T.; Pfeiffer, N. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Glaucoma. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2020, 117, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Doucette, L.P.; Rasnitsyn, A.; Seifi, M.; Walter, M.A. The interactions of genes, age, and environment in glaucoma pathogenesis. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2015, 60, 310–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vaz, M.; Silvestre, S. Alzheimer’s disease: Recent treatment strategies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 887, 173554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Steinman, J.; Sun, H.-S.; Feng, Z.-P. Microvascular Alterations in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 618986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gogineni, A. Brain Showing Hallmarks of Alzheimer’s Disease (Plaques in Blue). Flickr. Available online: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nihgov/26709211161/ (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  19. National Institute on Aging, NIH. β-Amyloid Plaques and Tau in the Brain. Flickr. Available online: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nihgov/38686503251/ (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  20. Wang, J.; Li, T.; Sabel, B.A.; Chen, Z.; Wen, H.; Li, J.; Xie, X.; Yang, D.; Chen, W.; Wang, N.; et al. Structural brain alterations in primary open angle glaucoma: A 3T MRI study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gharahkhani, P.; Jorgenson, E.; Hysi, P.; Khawaja, A.P.; Pendergrass, S.; Han, X.; Ong, J.S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Segrè, A.V.; Rouhana, J.M.; et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Shang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Wu, G.; Xiao, Y.; Du, Z.; et al. Shared genetic architecture between the two neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 880576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Volicer, L.; McKee, A.; Hewitt, S. Dementia. Neurol. Clin. 2001, 19, 867–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gale, S.A.; Acar, D.; Daffner, K.R. Dementia. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hansson, O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mendez, M.F. Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease. Neurol. Clin. 2017, 35, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. De Ture, M.A.; Dickson, D.W. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2019, 14, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tiwari, S.; Atluri, V.; Kaushik, A.; Yndart, A.; Nair, M. Alzheimer’s Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5541–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Weller, J.; Budson, A. Current understanding of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and treatment. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Davis, B.M.; Crawley, L.; Pahlitzsch, M.; Javaid, F.; Cordeiro, M.F. Glaucoma: The retina and beyond. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 132, 807–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Havvas, I.; Papaconstantinou, D.; Moschos, M.M.; Theodossiadis, P.G.; Andreanos, V.; Ekatomatis, P.; Vergados, I.; Andreanos, D. Comparison of SWAP and SAP on the point of glaucoma conversion. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2013, 7, 1805–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lee, J.Y.; Jeong, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, E.Y.; Kim, Y.Y.; Ryu, T.; Cho, Z.-H.; Kim, Y.-B. An Investigation of Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Volume in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 3468–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baiocchi, S.; Mazzotta, C.; Sgheri, A.; Di Maggio, A.; Bagaglia, S.A.; Posarelli, M.; Ciompi, L.; Meduri, A.; Tosi, G.M. In vivo confocal microscopy: Qualitative investigation of the conjunctival and corneal surface in open angle glaucomatous patients undergoing the XEN-Gel implant, trabeculectomy or medical therapy. Eye Vis. 2020, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. FFrisina, R.; Meduri, A. Intraoperative real-time image-guided ab externo canaloplasty. Eye 2019, 33, 1510–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bales, T.R.; Lopez, M.J.; Clark, J. Embryology, Eye. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538480/ (accessed on 26 November 2022).
  36. Zabel, P.; Kałużny, J.J.; Wiłkość-Dębczyńska, M.; Gębska-Tołoczko, M.; Suwała, K.; Kucharski, R.; Araszkiewicz, A. Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Comparison of Eyes of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Preperimetric Glaucoma and Healthy Controls. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tsai, C.S.; Ritch, R.; Schwartz, B.; Lee, S.S.; Miller, N.R.; Chi, T.; Hsieh, F.Y. Optic Nerve Head and Nerve Fiber Layer in Alzheimer’s Disease. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1991, 109, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bevan, R.J.; Hughes, T.R.; Williams, P.A.; Good, M.A.; Morgan, B.P.; Morgan, J.E. Retinal ganglion cell degeneration correlates with hippocampal spine loss in experimental Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jiang, M.-M.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, X.-Y.; Shi, C.-Z.; Chen, J.; Huang, X.-H. Structural and functional brain changes in early- and mid-stage primary open-angle glaucoma using voxel-based morphometry and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Medicine 2017, 96, e6139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yan, Z.; Liao, H.; Chen, H.; Deng, S.; Jianxian, L.; Deng, C.; Lin, J.; Ge, J.; Zhuo, Y. Elevated Intraocular Pressure Induces Amyloid-β Deposition and Tauopathy in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in a Monkey Model of Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 5434–5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. McKinnon, S.J.; Lehman, D.M.; A Kerrigan-Baumrind, L.; A Merges, C.; Pease, M.; Kerrigan, D.F.; Ransom, N.L.; Tahzib, N.G.; Reitsamer, H.A.; Levkovitch-Verbin, H.; et al. Caspase activation and amyloid precursor protein cleavage in rat ocular hypertension. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sen, S.; Saxena, R.; Tripathi, M.; Vibha, D.; Dhiman, R. Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma: Overlaps and missing links. Eye 2020, 34, 1546–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Steen, E.; Terry, B.M.; Rivera, E.J.; Cannon, J.L.; Neely, T.R.; Tavares, R.; Xu, X.J.; Wands, J.R.; de la Monte, S.M. Impaired Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Expression and Signaling Mechanisms in Alzheimer’s Disease—Is this Type 3 Diabetes? J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2005, 7, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Oh, S.W.; Lee, S.; Park, C.; Kim, D.J. Elevated intraocular pressure is associated with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes/Metabolism Res. Rev. 2005, 21, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hernández, J.C.C.; Bracko, O.; Kersbergen, C.J.; Muse, V.; Haft-Javaherian, M.; Berg, M.; Park, L.; Vinarcsik, L.K.; Ivasyk, I.; Rivera, D.A.; et al. Neutrophil adhesion in brain capillaries reduces cortical blood flow and impairs memory function in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bukhari, S.M.I.; Yew, K.K.; Thambiraja, R.; Sulong, S.; Rasool, A.H.G.; Tajudin, L.-S.A. Microvascular endothelial function and primary open angle glaucoma. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 2019, 11, 2515841419868100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zabel, P.; Kaluzny, J.J.; Wilkosc-Debczynska, M.; Gebska-Toloczko, M.; Suwala, K.; Zabel, K.; Zaron, A.; Kucharski, R.; Araszkiewicz, A. Comparison of Retinal Microvasculature in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 3447–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Mullany, S.; Xiao, L.; Qassim, A.; Marshall, H.; Gharahkhani, P.; MacGregor, S.; Hassall, M.M.; Siggs, O.M.; Souzeau, E.; Craig, J.E. Normal-tension glaucoma is associated with cognitive impairment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 106, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Su, C.-W.; Lin, C.-C.; Kao, C.-H.; Chen, H.-Y. Association Between Glaucoma and the Risk of Dementia. Medicine 2016, 95, e2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xu, X.; Zou, J.; Geng, W.; Wang, A. Association between glaucoma and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of observational studies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, I.-C.; Wang, Y.-H.; Wang, T.-J.; Wang, I.-J.; Shen, Y.-D.; Chi, N.-F.; Chien, L.-N. Glaucoma, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Parkinson’s Disease: An 8-Year Population-Based Follow-Up Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kessing, L.V.; Lopez, A.G.; Andersen, P.K.; Kessing, S.V. No Increased Risk of Developing Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Glaucoma. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 16, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, W.; Lv, X.; Wu, G.; Zhou, X.; Tian, H.; Qu, X.; Sun, H.; He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; et al. Glaucoma Is Not Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease or Dementia: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 688551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Belamkar, A.V.; Mansukhani, S.A.; Savica, R.; Spiegel, M.R.; Hodge, D.O.; Sit, A.J. Incidence of Dementia in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma: A Population-based Study. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 30, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lang, L.; Clifford, A.; Wei, L.; Zhang, D.; Leung, D.; Augustine, G.; Danat, I.M.; Zhou, W.; Copeland, J.R.; Anstey, K.J.; et al. Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e011146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Leite, M.T.; Sakata, L.M.; Medeiros, F.A. Managing glaucoma in developing countries. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2011, 74, 83–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Topouzis, F.; Coleman, A.L.; Harris, A.; Koskosas, A.; Founti, P.; Gong, G.; Yu, F.; Anastasopoulos, E.; Pappas, T.; Wilson, M.R. Factors Associated with Undiagnosed Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Thessaloniki Eye Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 145, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bradford, A.; Kunik, M.E.; Schulz, P.; Williams, S.P.; Singh, H. Missed and Delayed Diagnosis of Dementia in Primary Care: Prevalence and Contributing Factors. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2009, 23, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hysi, P.G.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Springelkamp, H.; Macgregor, S.; Bailey, J.N.C.; Wojciechowski, R.; Vitart, V.; Nag, A.; Hewitt, A.W.; Höhn, R.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of multi-ancestry cohorts identifies new loci influencing intraocular pressure and susceptibility to glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Gallo, J.-M.; Spickett, C.M. The role of CELF proteins in neurological disorders. RNA Biol. 2010, 7, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Rustenhoven, J.; Smith, A.M.; Smyth, L.C.; Jansson, D.; Scotter, E.L.; Swanson, M.E.V.; Aalderink, M.; Coppieters, N.; Narayan, P.; Handley, R.; et al. PU.1 regulates Alzheimer’s disease-associated genes in primary human microglia. Mol. Neurodegener. 2018, 13, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Celada, A.; Borras, F.E.; Soler, C.; Lloberas, J.; Klemsz, M.; van Beveren, C.; McKercher, S.; Maki, R.A. The transcription factor PU.1 is involved in macrophage proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jones, R.E.; Andrews, R.; Holmans, P.; Hill, M.; Taylor, P.R. Modest changes in Spi1 dosage reveal the potential for altered microglial function as seen in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chiasseu, M.; Vargas, J.L.C.; Destroismaisons, L.; Velde, C.V.; Leclerc, N.; Di Polo, A. Tau Accumulation, Altered Phosphorylation, and Missorting Promote Neurodegeneration in Glaucoma. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5785–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Chi, H.; Yao, R.; Sun, C.; Leng, B.; Shen, T.; Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Li, M.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; et al. Blood Neuroexosomal Mitochondrial Proteins Predict Alzheimer Disease in Diabetes. Diabetes 2022, 71, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Strang, K.H.; Golde, T.E.; Giasson, B.I. MAPT Mutations, Tauopathy, and Mechanisms of Neurodegeneration. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 912–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kröll-Hermi, A.; Ebstein, F.; Stoetzel, C.; Geoffroy, V.; Schaefer, E.; Scheidecker, S.; Bär, S.; Takamiya, M.; Kawakami, K.; Zieba, B.A.; et al. Proteasome subunit PSMC3 variants cause neurosensory syndrome combining deafness and cataract due to proteotoxic stress. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e11861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shen, J.; Liu, X.; Yu, W.-M.; Liu, J.; Nibbelink, M.G.; Guo, C.; Finkel, T.; Qu, C.-K. A Critical Role of Mitochondrial Phosphatase Ptpmt1 in Embryogenesis Reveals a Mitochondrial Metabolic Stress-Induced Differentiation Checkpoint in Embryonic Stem Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 4902–4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Banwell, B.L.; Ohno, K.; Sieb, J.P.; Engel, A.G. Novel truncating RAPSN mutations causing congenital myasthenic syndrome responsive to 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2004, 14, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Jiang, T.; Yang, N.; Liu, D.; Zhao, H.; Xu, Z. Zinc transporter SLC39A13/ZIP13 facilitates the metastasis of human ovarian cancer cells via activating Src/FAK signaling pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Preman, P.; Alfonso-Triguero, M.; Alberdi, E.; Verkhratsky, A.; Arranz, A. Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease: Pathological Significance and Molecular Pathways. Cells 2021, 10, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Choquet, H.; Paylakhi, S.; Kneeland, S.C.; Thai, K.K.; Hoffmann, T.J.; Yin, J.; Kvale, M.N.; Banda, Y.; Tolman, N.G.; Williams, P.A.; et al. A multiethnic genome-wide association study of primary open-angle glaucoma identifies novel risk loci. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zagajewska, K.; Piątkowska, M.; Goryca, K.; Bałabas, A.; Kluska, A.; Paziewska, A.; Pośpiech, E.; Grabska-Liberek, I.; Hennig, E.E. GWAS links variants in neuronal development and actin remodeling related loci with pseudoexfoliation syndrome without glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 168, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sharoukhov, D.; Bucinca-Cupallari, F.; Lim, H. Microtubule Imaging Reveals Cytoskeletal Deficit Predisposing the Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons to Atrophy in DBA/2J. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 5292–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ruggiero, A.; Aloni, E.; Korkotian, E.; Zaltsman, Y.; Oni-Biton, E.; Kuperman, Y.; Tsoory, M.; Shachnai, L.; Levin-Zaidman, S.; Brenner, O.; et al. Loss of forebrain MTCH2 decreases mitochondria motility and calcium handling and impairs hippocampal-dependent cognitive functions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep44401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Berezniuk, I.; Lyons, P.J.; Sironi, J.J.; Xiao, H.; Setou, M.; Angeletti, R.H.; Ikegami, K.; Fricker, L.D. Cytosolic carboxypeptidase 5 removes α- and γ-linked glutamates from tubulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 30445–30453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Stokin, G.B.; Lillo, C.; Falzone, T.L.; Brusch, R.G.; Rockenstein, E.; Mount, S.L.; Raman, R.; Davies, P.; Masliah, E.; Williams, D.S.; et al. Axonopathy and Transport Deficits Early in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Science 2005, 307, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Guo, X.; Zhou, J.; Starr, C.; Mohns, E.J.; Li, Y.; Chen, E.P.; Yoon, Y.; Kellner, C.P.; Tanaka, K.; Wang, H.; et al. Preservation of vision after CaMKII-mediated protection of retinal ganglion cells. Cell 2021, 184, 4299–4314.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Katsumata, Y.; Nelson, P.T.; Estus, S.; Fardo, D.W. Translating Alzheimer’s disease–associated polymorphisms into functional candidates: A survey of IGAP genes and SNPs. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 74, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Lin, Y.-T.; Seo, J.; Gao, F.; Feldman, H.M.; Wen, H.-L.; Penney, J.; Cam, H.P.; Gjoneska, E.; Raja, W.K.; Cheng, J.; et al. APOE4 Causes Widespread Molecular and Cellular Alterations Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotypes in Human iPSC-Derived Brain Cell Types. Neuron 2018, 98, 1141–1154.e7, Correction in Neuron 2018, 98, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Nation, D.A.; Sweeney, M.D.; Montagne, A.; Sagare, A.P.; D’Orazio, L.M.; Pachicano, M.; Sepehrband, F.; Nelson, A.R.; Buennagel, D.P.; Harrington, M.G.; et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Montagne, A.; Nation, D.A.; Sagare, A.P.; Barisano, G.; Sweeney, M.D.; Chakhoyan, A.; Pachicano, M.; Joe, E.; Nelson, A.R.; D’Orazio, L.M.; et al. APOE4 leads to blood–brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature 2020, 581, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Margeta, M.A.; Yin, Z.; Madore, C.; Pitts, K.M.; Letcher, S.M.; Tang, J.; Jiang, S.; Gauthier, C.D.; Silveira, S.R.; Schroeder, C.M.; et al. Apolipoprotein E4 impairs the response of neurodegenerative retinal microglia and prevents neuronal loss in glaucoma. Immunity 2022, 55, 1627–1644.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Margeta, M.A.; Letcher, S.M.; Igo, R.P.; Bailey, J.N.C.; Pasquale, L.R.; Haines, J.L.; Butovsky, O.; Wiggs, J.L.; for the NEIGHBORHOOD consortium. Association of APOE With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suggests a Protective Effect for APOE ε4. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Beason-Held, L.L.; Goh, J.O.; An, Y.; Kraut, M.A.; O’Brien, R.J.; Ferrucci, L.; Resnick, S.M. Changes in Brain Function Occur Years before the Onset of Cognitive Impairment. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 18008–18014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Liao, R.; Ye, M.; Xu, X. An updated meta-analysis: Apolipoprotein E genotypes and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2014, 20, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Kumar, A.; Sidhu, J.; Goyal, A.; Tsao, J.W. Alzheimer Disease. In StatPearls; Updated 2022 Jun 5; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499922/ (accessed on 26 November 2022).
  88. Nilsson, P.; Iwata, N.; Muramatsu, S.-I.; Tjernberg, L.O.; Winblad, B.; Saido, T.C. Gene therapy in Alzheimer’s disease—Potential for disease modification. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 741–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Wiggs, J.L.; Pasquale, L.R. Genetics of glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, R21–R27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 00338 g001 550
Figure 1. Depiction of the pathologic commonalities between Alzheimer’s disease and primary open-angle glaucoma [18,19,20]. Aβ = amyloid beta; IOP = intraocular pressure.
Figure 1. Depiction of the pathologic commonalities between Alzheimer’s disease and primary open-angle glaucoma [18,19,20]. Aβ = amyloid beta; IOP = intraocular pressure.
Genes 14 00338 g001
Table
Table 1. Shared genes in studies of connection between Alzheimer’s disease and primary open-angle glaucoma [8,9,21,22,40,41,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
Table 1. Shared genes in studies of connection between Alzheimer’s disease and primary open-angle glaucoma [8,9,21,22,40,41,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
GeneNameLocationProtein ProductFunctionPathogenic MutationAssociation with ADAssociation with POAG
AGBL2ATP/GTP-binding protein-like 211p11.2Cytosolic carboxypeptidase 2 (CCP2) enzymeCatalyzes post-translational modification of ɑ-tubulin subunitrs11604825
rs11602395		Microtubular axonal transport alterationIOP elevation
MAPTMicrotubule associated protein tau17q21.31Microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT)Encodes tau proteins and other mRNA productsPost-translational alternative splicing and modificationTau structure isoform variations Misbalance in glaucomatous RGC axons
SPI1Spi-1 proto-oncogene11p11.2PU.1 erythroblast transformation specific (ETS) transcription factorPromotes gene expression of hematopoietic cell lineages28 SNP’sMicroglia activationMicroglia activation, IOP elevation
CELF1CUG triplet repeat, RNA binding protein 1 (CUGBP) embryonic lethal abnormal vision (Elav)-like family member 111p11.2CELF/BRUNOL proteinRegulates pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA expressionrs4752845
rs34958982
rs66749409
rs12798346
rs56400411		Alternative splicing of tau proteinIOP elevation
FAM180BFamily with sequence similarity 180 member B11p11.2Family with sequence similarity 180 member BPresently unknown functionrs11605348Expressed at higher levels in brainIOP elevation
MTCH2Mitochondrial carrier 211p11.2Solute carrierfamily 25 (SLC25) family nuclear-encoded mitochondrial transportersInvolved in apoptotic pathway via recruitment of Bcl-2 family BID proteinrs4752856
rs4752856
rs4752856		Disrupts mitochondrial motility, metabolism, and functionIOP elevation
MYBPC3Myosin binding protein C311p11.2Cardiac isoform of myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C)Regulates cardiac striated muscle contractionrs2856661May affect axonal growth and synaptic development IOP elevation
NDUFS3NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S311p11.2Iron-sulfur protein (IP) component in mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I)Involved in mitochondrial electron transport chain and cellular functionsrs2030166
rs2030166		Increased levels in early stages of mild cognitive impairmentIOP elevation
PSMC3Proteasome 26S subunit, ATPase 311p11.226S proteasomeInvolved in ubiquitin-proteasome degradation systemrs11600581Increased cellular proteotoxic stressIOP elevation
PTPMT1Protein tyrosine phosphatase mitochondrial 111p11.2Phosphatidylglycerophosphatase and protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1Involved in mitochondrial metabolic pathways and embryogenesisrs56400411
rs7945473		Mitochondrial dysfunctionIOP elevation
RAPSNReceptor associated protein of the synapse11p11.2Receptor-associated protein of the synapseAnchors postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptorsrs35705029Acetylcholine neurotransmitter signal alterationIOP elevation
SLC39A13Solute carrier family 39 member 1311p11.2Zinc transporter transmembrane proteinFacilitates zinc transport across membranesrs755554Disturbance of zinc homeostasisIOP elevation
CADM2Cell adhesion molecule 23p12.1Synaptic cell adhesion molecule 1 (SynCAM)Interacts with cytoskeletal proteins for cellular support and structurer71316816
rs13101042
rs2220243		Impaired synaptic adhesion and maintenanceExpressed almost exclusively in brain and retina and found to have altered expression throughout all stages of glaucoma
APPAmyloid beta precursor protein21q21.3Amyloid precursor protein (APP)Acts as a transmembrane cell surface receptor and regulates neuronal functionsrs59892895Abnormal cleavage forms β-amyloid plaquesIncreased abnormal expression in glaucoma models
APOEApolipoprotein E19q13.32Apolipoprotein EMaintains lipid metabolism and balance in circulatory and peripheral systemsε4 alleleIncreased risk for disease, increased amount of β-amyloid plaquesReduced risk for disease, decrease activation of microglia
AD = Alzheimer’s disease; POAG = primary open angle glaucoma; IOP = intraocular pressure; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; ATP = adenosine triphosphate; GTP = guanosine triphosphate; Bcl-2 = B-cell lymphoma 2; BID = BH3 interacting-domain death agonist; NADH = nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuang, G.; Salowe, R.; O’Brien, J. Genetic Factors Implicated in the Investigation of Possible Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Genes 2023, 14, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020338

AMA Style

Kuang G, Salowe R, O’Brien J. Genetic Factors Implicated in the Investigation of Possible Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Genes. 2023; 14(2):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuang, Grace, Rebecca Salowe, and Joan O’Brien. 2023. "Genetic Factors Implicated in the Investigation of Possible Connections between Alzheimer’s Disease and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma" Genes 14, no. 2: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop