Next Article in Journal
Collagen Network Formation in In Vitro Models of Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence of Sex Chromosomes in Fish of the Genus Ancistrus with a New Description of Multiple Sex Chromosomes in the Ecuadorian Endemic Ancistrus clementinae (Loricariidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/genes14020307
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of CYP24A1 Gene rs6127099 (A > T) Polymorphism with Lower Risk to COVID-19 Infection in Kazakhstan

by
Antonio Sarría-Santamera
1,*,
Kymbat Mukhtarova
1,
Ardak Baizhaxynova
1,
Kaznagul Kanatova
1,
Saule Zhumambayeva
2,
Ainur Akilzhanova
3 and
Azliyati Azizan
4
1
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Propedeutics of Children Disease, Astana Medical University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
3
National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
4
College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV 89014, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(2), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020307
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. Infection by SARS-CoV-2 causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is characterized by fever, cough, dyspnea, anosmia, and myalgia in many cases. There are discussions about the association of vitamin D levels with COVID-19 severity. However, views are conflicting. The aim of the study was to examine associations of vitamin D metabolism pathway gene polymorphisms with symptomless COVID-19 susceptibility in Kazakhstan. The case-control study examined the association between asymptomatic COVID-19 and vitamin D metabolism pathway gene polymorphisms in 185 participants, who previously reported not having COVID-19, were PCR negative at the moment of data collection, and were not vaccinated. A dominant mutation in rs6127099 (CYP24A1) was found to be protective of asymptomatic COVID-19. Additionally, the G allele of rs731236 TaqI (VDR), dominant mutation in rs10877012 (CYP27B1), recessive rs1544410 BsmI (VDR), and rs7041 (GC) are worth consideration since they were statistically significant in bivariate analysis, although their independent effect was not found in the adjusted multivariate logistic regression model.

1. Introduction

In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. Infection by SARS-CoV-2 causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is characterized by fever, cough, dyspnea, anosmia, and myalgia in many cases [1]. Severity varies from patient to patient, and there is no exact explanation for this phenomenon. Namely, in almost 80% of SARS-CoV-2 infected people, mild, and in 20%, severe symptoms are manifested. In half of the severe cases, fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) develops [2]. SARS-CoV-2 utilizes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors located in respiratory tracts to enter host cells. Failure to eliminate the virus at early stages by immune response leads to disease progression and potential adverse outcomes as lung inflammation and fibrosis occur [3].
There are significant controversies regarding the role of vitamin D in COVID-19 severity, controversies that are common to various health problems. Low levels of vitamin D have been associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection [4,5]. However, the benefits of vitamin D supplementation remain controversial: while some studies show a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 severity [6,7,8], others fail to find any associations [9].
Nevertheless, the role of vitamin D in immune function is a well-studied topic. Thus, although the situation with supplementation is not clear, there is consistent evidence of the relevance of vitamin D metabolism in the immune system. Vitamin D receptors (VDR) are present in immune cells such as antigen-presenting cells, T and B cells, and monocytes [10,11]. Jeng et al. [12] reported that vitamin D and vitamin D binding proteins (DBP encoded by the GC gene) were critically low in sepsis patients. Sufficient levels of DBP are necessary to recover 25OH vitamin D (25(OH)D3) loss in the urine [12].
Variations in vitamin D metabolism-associated human genes are found to be associated with varied susceptibility to diseases. For instance, the VDR gene is in chromosome 12 and has widely-studies polymorphisms at TaqI (rs731236), FokI (rs2228570), BsmI (rs1544410), and ApaI (rs7975232) restriction sites. TaqI, BsmI, and ApaI are in strong linkage-disequilibrium as all are located in the 3′ end of VDR. FokI, in turn, is in the start codon. Thus, all of them functionally affect VDR function [13]. Recently, Zeidan et al. [14] reported an association of FokI polymorphism with COVID-19 susceptibility.
There are also GC (group-specific component) single nucleotide polymorphisms rs4588 and rs7041 reported to affect the affinity of vitamin D binding proteins to vitamin D metabolites [15]. Also, studies reported an association of rs4588 and rs7041 genotypes with COVID-19 severity [15,16]. CYP24A1 encodes 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase enzyme that degrades 25(OH)D3 into 24.25(OH)2D3. Variant rs6013897 was shown to be associated with inflammatory reactions [17].
CYP27B1 and VDR are expressed in high levels in respiratory epithelial cells, and rs10877012 polymorphism is in the promoter region of the gene [18]. Thus, the polymorphism can affect the expression level of the protein. Polymorphisms in CYP27A1, CYP2R1, and CYP27B1 were reported to be associated with a variety of immune system function-related diseases such as multiple sclerosis, autoimmune thyroid diseases, viral infections, and type 1 diabetes mellitus [19]. Rs1800629 affects the transcription of the TNF-α gene. TNF-α promoter polymorphism rs1800629 is associated with susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 [20].
The aim of the study was to examine associations of vitamin D metabolism pathway genes polymorphisms that previous research has shown to be associated with suspected critical roles of vitamin D in susceptibility to COVID-19 infection in participants who reported not having been infected with COVID-19 in Kazakhstan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

The setting of this study was Olymp Laboratories in the city of Astana, Kazakhstan. From September 2021 to December 2021, conditionally healthy men and women above 18, who claim that they have never had COVID-19, were not vaccinated and were PCR negative at the moment of data collection, and who came for routine blood tests for any indication were invited to participate in this study. During the recruitment process, each participant was provided with a free PCR test, measurement of total IgM/IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and serum 25(OH)D3 levels measurement. Only participants with negative PCR were included in the study. Cases and controls were separated based on cut-off indexes (COI) provided by the Olymp Laboratories. The COI is determined by comparing samples to the positive control. The COI is derived from the ratio of sample signal vs. positive control signal. Samples with COI ≥ 1.0 of IgM/IgG levels were diagnosed as IgM/IgG positive and taken as asymptomatic cases, whereas those with total antibodies COI < 1.0 were interpreted as negative for IgM/IgG. Questionnaires were also provided by specially trained healthcare workers. Ethical approval was obtained from the Nazarbayev University Institutional Research Ethics Committee (422/11062021).

2.2. Questionnaire

The questionnaire consisted of three main parts:
  • Socio-demographic characteristics;
  • Previous Medical History;
  • The lifestyles of the participants.
Socio-demographic questions included information about age, sex, ethnicity, height, and weight. Participants were asked about their medical history of chronic diseases, such as stroke, cancer, diabetes, asthma, allergy, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and heart, lung, and kidney-related disorders. Moreover, questions about the absence and presence of COVID-like symptoms during the last six months and BCG vaccination were included in the questionnaire. Questions about participants’ lifestyles were related to their smoking status and alcohol use, and regular sports activities they do. Also, they were asked whether they worked/studied during the pandemic period.

2.3. Genotype Data

Whole blood samples of participants were de-identified and collected in EDTA-containing vacutainer tubes by medical personnel of Olymp laboratories.
DNA was extracted by use of Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitation and quality of DNA were ascertained using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Genotyping was performed using qualitative real-time PCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 384-well plates. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: polymerase activation at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (at 95 °C for 15 s) and annealing extension (at 60 °C for 1 min).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data cleaning was performed using Microsoft Excel. All statistical analysis was conducted using the Stata 14.2 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) statistical program and SNPStats online tool based on R [21].
Basic descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and mean values, were generated. To assess association with the outcome variable, Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical independent variables, and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used for continuous independent variables. To estimate the strength of the association between polymorphisms and COVID-19, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Demographic covariates were included in the adjusted model to adjust for their possible confounding effect on the outcome variable. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analysis were conducted.
Participants were divided into two groups: cases (with positive SARS-CoV2 antibodies indicating previous infections (COI ≥ 1), and which may be considered asymptomatic cases) and controls (with negative SARS-CoV2 antibodies (COI < 1) and PCR test).
All statistical tests were two-sided. Following the Bonferroni correction or multiple comparisons, p < 0.0046 was taken as significant for vitamin D metabolism pathway genetic associations analysis. A significance level (α) equal to 0.05 was chosen for descriptive statistics.
The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test and bivariate statistics for the different inheritance patterns were conducted as well.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

One hundred eighty-five participants were recruited for this study, but complete data for analysis was only available for 180. The sociodemographic data of study subjects are summarized in Table 1. 64.9% of cases and 56.5% of controls were females (p > 0.05). Age, BMI, and serum vitamin D levels were comparable in cases and controls (p > 0.05).

3.2. Association Study

Overall, 12 SNPs were genotyped. The analysis showed that rs7975232 ApaI (VDR) was not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p < 0.05) (Table 2).
Minor allele frequencies of 11 SNPs were compared (Figure 1). Rs731236 TaqI (VDR), rs1544410 BsmI (VDR), and rs6127099 (CYP24A1) had statistically significant differences in MAF (minor allele frequency) (p ≤ 0.05).
Associations between SNPs and genotypes (bivariate analysis) under additive, dominant and recessive models are summarized in Table 3. A recessive inheritance pattern is when two copies of a risk allele are necessary to cause an effect. In turn, the dominant mode of inheritance depicts situations when it is enough to have at least one copy of a mutated allele to cause an effect. In the additive inheritance pattern, the effect increases with each copy of the mutated allele.
From this, only rs6127099 (CYP24A1) was statistically significant based on both Bonferroni corrected and baseline p-values under the dominant mode of inheritance (p = 0.004). Namely, people with at least one copy of the mutant T allele in rs6127099 have 84% to 29% less symptomless COVID-19 than AA-genotyped participants. In the allelic model, the T allele was found to be associated with OR = 0.46 (0.28–0.76) of asymptomatic COVID-19.
Other SNPs were found to be significant at p = 0.05 level. Namely, VDR gene polymorphism at rs1544410 (BsmI) site revealed that people with CC genotype have OR = 0.44 95% CI (0.21–0.91) asymptomatic COVID-19 than those with TT and TC genotypes under the recessive mode of inheritance. Similarly, T > C allelic shift resulted in 0.49 (0.25–0.94) times the odds of asymptomatic COVID-19 vs. controls. Similarly, recessive rs7041 in the GC gene was statistically significant with OR = 0.37 (0.15–0.93) times the chance of COVID-19 in CC than in AA or AC carriers. The dominant mode of inheritance of rs10877012 polymorphism of CYP27B1 gene reported increased association of the T allele with asymptomatic COVID-19 with OR = 2.51 (1.05–5.99).
Collinear variables were not found. To identify confounders, logistic regression analysis was applied. No statistically significant association was found between demographic, clinical, and behavioral variables and asymptomatic COVD–19.
Overall, the odds of asymptomatic COVID-19 are 0.32 (0.15–0.68) times for CYP24A1 (rs6127099) in AT + TT genotyped participants in comparison with AA-genotyped people adjusted for age, male gender, and Kazakh ethnicity.
The allele-based model states that there are decreased odds of asymptomatic COVID-19 in rs6127099 T vs. A OR = 0.44 (0.26–0.74), adjusted for age, male gender, and Kazakh ethnicity. Stratifications based on gender (male vs. female) and age categories (less than 40 (<40); 40 and 59.9 (>=40 and <60); and 60 + (60<=) can be found in Supplemental Table S1.

3.3. Association of VDR, GC, and CYP24A1 Haplotypes with Asymptomatic COVID-19

Linkage disequilibrium showed a certain level of deviation from expected genotype frequencies in our sampling (D’ ≠ 0). Especially, it was prominent in combinations of rs731236 and rs1544410 of VDR (p = 0.000); rs7041 and rs4588 of GC (p = 0.000); and rs6013897 and rs6127099 of CYP24A1 (p = 0.000). This points to a possible mechanism of co-segregation at those sites.
From haplotype analysis (Table 4), the GGT haplotype of VDR (block 3) was found to be statistically significantly associated with asymptomatic COVID-19 susceptibility OR = 3.12 (1.07–9.10). Block 11 (G allele of rs731236 (TaqI) and T allele of rs1544410 (BsmI)) of VDR was found to be associated (p = 0.028) with increased odds of asymptomatic COVID-19 95% CI is between 1.1 and 4.61. Similarly, the G allele of FokI and the T allele of BsmI are associated with 2.90 (1.06–7.91) times of asymptomatic COVID odds vs. G and C alleles, respectively. Nevertheless, p-values here are above the adjusted p-value and thus can serve as a baseline for further research, but it is not conclusive in our sampling. In contrast, a statistically significant association (p < 0.0046) was identified in CYP24A1 haplotype TT (block 2). There is a decrease in odds ratio, OR = 0.37 (0.19–0.73), of asymptomatic COVID-19 in participants that confer the T allele in rs6013897 and the T allele in rs6127099 vs. TA haplotype.

4. Discussion

The case-control study examined the association between the presence of antibodies against COVID-19 and vitamin D metabolism pathway gene polymorphisms in 180 participants who previously reported not having COVID-19, who were PCR negative when data was collected, and were not vaccinated in Kazakhstan.
This study showed that a dominant mutation in rs6127099 (CYP24A1) appears to be associated with negative anti-COVID-19 antibodies. Additionally, potentially protective recessive rs1544410 BsmI of VDR gene and rs7041 of GC gene, and G allele of rs731236 TaqI (VDR) and dominant mutation in rs10877012 (CYP27B1) that can potentially increase the susceptibility of asymptomatic COVID-19 are worth considering since they were statistically significant in bivariate analysis.
A relevant finding of this work is the high number of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases identified. This high number of asymptomatic cases is a public health concern since those cases have the same risk of transmitting the infection [22]. Asymptomatic cases represent a substantial limitation to infection control measures. Moreover, the high proportion of asymptomatic cases may imply that the actual number of infections may be much higher than reported by public health authorities [23]. Both groups reported a high but not statistically significant proportion of COVID-like symptoms.
Nevertheless, at the individual patient level having asymptomatic COVID-19 without serious clinical complications can be somewhat more beneficial than having severe COVID-19-related symptoms. This can be explained by host genetic differences along with well-known advanced age, male sex, and chronic diseases [24].
Finally, although the results from this study reflect the lack of association of vitamin D levels with the risk of having or not having a previous COVID-19 infection, our work reveals the association of various genetic factors related to the metabolic pathways of vitamin D with the risk of asymptomatic infection.
Vitamin D has a significant role in the adaptive immune response. Namely, the adaptive immune system includes major players such as dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages that are essential for antigen presentation. They, in turn, activate antigen-recognizing T and B lymphocytes. 1,25(OH)2D3 is known to decrease the maturation of DCs. Furthermore, 1,25(OH)2D3 suppresses Th1 and Th17 development caused by reduced production of IL–12 and IL–23, IL–6, respectively. Noticeably, Th1 cells produce IFN–γ, IL–2, and Th17 cells produce IL–17. In turn, IFN–γ deficiency leads to the prevention of T-lymphocyte recruitment, and IL–2 deficiency leads to disturbed T-lymphocyte proliferation. Suppression of IL–12 leads to the development of Th2 cells that causes an increase of IL–4, IL–5, and IL–10 that, again, suppress Th1 development. Thus, the balance shifts towards more Th2 phenotype [11]. This means that the body avoids a prolonged inflammatory response and its damaging effects since it is known that there is increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL–1β, IL–6, TNF, IL–12, IFN–β, IFN–γ, IL–17 in COVID-19 [25]. Failing to shift from pro- to anti-inflammatory is linked with cytokine storms commonly observed in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Innate immunity is the first line of defense against any infection. In the case of COVID-19, innate immunity detects SARS-CoV-2 through pattern-recognition receptors (TLR1, TLR4, and TLR6) and activates downstream cascades to initiate viral clearance [25]. Vitamin D is known to decrease DC maturation, enhance macrophage differentiation, enhance bacterial killing, lowering cytokine levels and antigen presentation [26]. Once detected by Toll-like receptors (TLR), pathogen invasion induces expression of CYP27B1 and VDR, favoring the production of cathelicidin, which acts against bacteria, viruses, and fungi by primarily destabilizing microbial membranes from macrophages and neutrophils [10,12]. In addition, IFN–γ and IL–4 are also known to enhance the expression of CYP27B1.
CYP24A1 is responsible for the inactivation of active metabolites of vitamin D. Interestingly, CYP24A1 rs6127099 polymorphism is also known to be associated with elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations [27,28], which in turn leads to elevated calcium levels. The presence of CYP24A1 mutations has been linked with increased sensitivity to vitamin D [29]. Thus, these findings bring room for further investigations of the role of calcium in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lower calcium levels have been reported to be associated with COVID-19, and its severity [30,31,32] and COVID-19 infection has been suggested to occur in the context of marked hypovitaminosis D not adequately compensated by secondary hyperparathyroidism [33].
The kidney, acting as an endocrine gland, converts 25(OH)D3 by the action of the enzyme 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) to the active hormonal form 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], known as calcitriol. CYP27B1 is expressed in macrophages and dendritic T and B cells and is known to affect calcitriol levels [34]. Calcitriol then binds to VDR, a member of the nuclear receptor family, which is a receptor specific to vitamin D through which vitamin D exerts its function. VDR binds to the active form of intracellular vitamin D to interact with the nuclei of the target cells. Calcitriol signaling is crucial in bone metabolism as it is involved in calcium absorption, parathormone secretion, and, therefore, bone resorption and cellular differentiation, but it also has immunological functions as well as different functions in different body organs. VDR has many polymorphisms. TaqI is one of those VDR gene polymorphisms. Those polymorphisms have been associated with several health problems and may modulate vitamin D functions [35].
TaqI polymorphisms have also been identified to be associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection [36,37,38,39], showing rs731236 as significantly associated with a severe type of infection and association with ICU admission. Two studies in Iran did not find an association with TaqI, but they only included hospitalized cases [40,41].
It is complicated to compare our findings with other studies because, to date and to the best of our knowledge, there has been no genetic study conducted with participants who reported not having COVID-19 before. However, there are studies with conflicting findings about the role of serum vitamin D in COVID-19 infection. For instance, Bouillon and colleagues [42] reported that supplementation of vitamin D–replete individuals (baseline serum 25-OH vitamin D > 50 nmol/L) does not provide demonstrable health benefits. In contrast, Jain et al. [43] found that vitamin D level was significantly low in severe COVID-19 patients compared to asymptomatic COVID-19.
A possible hypothesis that explains why vitamin D deficiency is related to a defective immune response and, consequently, to higher mortality, while supplementation with vitamin D does not provide consistent benefit, is the existence of alterations in the complex activation and functioning mechanisms of vitamin D.
Keep in mind that the discrepancies between the higher risk associated with low vitamin D levels and lack of benefit vitamin D supplementation are not exclusive to SARS-CoV2 infection but have been identified in numerous health problems previously.
Alterations in adaptive immunity and vitamin D status can affect the prognosis of COVID-19 by affecting bone metabolism. Under inflammatory conditions, cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-6, and IL-1, can upregulate osteoclastogenesis and inhibit osteoblast activities. TNF is a key factor in bone loss and might synergize with the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) to induce osteoclastic bone resorption. Activated T and B cells serve as major sources of RANKL and TNF in inflammatory states [44].
The present data suggest that vitamin D metabolism may be associated with COVID-19 infection. However, in our study, 25(OH)D3 serum levels were not associated with differences in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The reasons for these discrepancies remain unclear, but it is well-known that 25(OH)D3 serum levels correlate poorly with calcitriol serum concentrations, and 25(OH)D3 serum levels are therefore not a suitable marker for bioactive vitamin D or vitamin D receptor signaling [45].
Thus, the lack of an association between 25(OH)D3 serum levels and antibodies may simply reflect the limited biological relevance of 25(OH)D3 serum levels. Unfortunately, there are no reliable methods to quantify serum levels of the bioactive vitamin D metabolite calcitriol, and most clinical trials assessing the vitamin D status of patients focus on the calcitriol precursor 25(OH)D3.
The study has several limitations. Firstly, the low sample size limits the power of this study to detect significant differences, meaning that results obtained here may be subject to type I error. However, it should not be forgotten that hypothesis testing for the statistical significance of any effect depends collectively on three intertwined parameters: the size of the effect, the sample size, and the variability present in the sample data. Although during the recruitment, we aimed to include as many participants as possible, there was not possible to increase the sample size.
Another limitation is that we cannot determine the accuracy of participants’ indications of not having been previously diagnosed with COVID-19. A related limitation is that we cannot clearly elucidate the existence of differences between cases in controls in exposure to COVID-19.
Also, to mention that our serological analysis did not differentiate IgM and IgG to detect early or later infections, but IgM–IgG combined antibody detection is a more reliable method, with greater specificity and sensitivity compared with single IgM or IgG tests [44]. Another relevant issue is the lack of a control group with participants who had clinically manifested COVID-19. The ethnic diversity and characteristics of the Kazakhstani population analyzed also make it complex to extrapolate results to other settings and populations. These findings may be valid for the specific variants which circulated in Kazakhstan before the study started (September 2021).
Our findings further elucidate genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 infections and may lead to the design of personalized preventive measures to decrease morbidity and mortality due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [18]. In future studies that analyze the role of vitamin D in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and other conditions, vitamin D levels have to be investigated in conjunction with the participants’ genetic profiles to further understand the possible protective effect role of vitamin D.

5. Conclusions

The study examined the role of socio-demographic, clinical, and individual genetic characteristics of the vitamin D metabolism pathway of unvaccinated, SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative, and self-claimed symptomless people in asymptomatic COVID-19 predisposition. In this study, we demonstrated that genetic variances in the vitamin D pathway might modulate susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19 infection. All in all, genetic associations with a dominant mutation in rs6127099 (CYP24A1) showed a reduced frequency with previous COVID-19 infection. However, the low sample size may represent that this study has limited power to detect the true association between genotypes and the presence of COVID-19 antibodies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14020307/s1, Table S1: Association of candidate SNPs with symptomless COVID-19. Genotype frequencies and inheritance patterns of selected SNPs stratified by gender and age categories.

Author Contributions

A.S.-S., A.A. (Azliyati Azizan), A.A. (Ainur Akilzhanova) and S.Z. designed and conceived the study. K.M., A.B. and K.K. performed sample collection and processed the clinical and questionnaire data. K.M. performed the laboratory experiments. K.M. analyzed the data. A.S.-S. and K.M. validated the data. K.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Nazarbayev University, grant number 021220CRP0822.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Nazarbayev University Institutional Research Ethics Committee (Astana, Kazakhstan) on 16 August 2021, after the full board review (422/11062021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish the anonymized data on their DNA and blood parameters in this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Because of ethical reasons data analyzed in this study is not available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lechien, J.R.; Chiesa-Estomba, C.M.; Hans, S.; Barillari, M.R.; Jouffe, L.; Saussez, S. Loss of smell and taste in 2013 European patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prasad, K.; Khatoon, F.; Rashid, S.; Ali, N.; AlAsmari, A.F.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Alqahtani, A.S.; Alqahtani, M.S.; Kumar, V. Targeting hub genes and pathways of innate immune response in COVID-19: A network biology perspective. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ebadi, M.; Montano-Loza, A.J. Perspective: Improving vitamin D status in the management of COVID-19. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 856–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dissanayake, H.A.; de Silva, N.L.; Sumanatilleke, M.; de Silva, S.D.N.; Gamage, K.K.K.; Dematapitiya, C.; Kuruppu, D.C.; Ranasinghe, P.; Pathmanathan, S.; Katulanda, P. Prognostic and therapeutic role of vitamin D in COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, 1484–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Campi, I.; Gennari, L.; Merlotti, D.; Mingiano, C.; Frosali, A.; Giovanelli, L.; Torlasco, C.; Pengo, M.F.; Heilbron, F.; Soranna, D.; et al. Vitamin D and COVID-19 severity and related mortality: A prospective study in Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Teama, M.A.E.M.; A Abdelhakam, D.; A Elmohamadi, M.; Badr, F.M. Vitamin D deficiency as a predictor of severity in patients with COVID-19 infection. Sci. Prog. 2021, 104, 00368504211036854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Speeckaert, M.M.; Delanghe, J.R. Vitamin D binding protein and its polymorphisms may explain the link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19. Sci. Prog. 2021, 104, 00368504211053510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ali, N. Role of vitamin D in preventing of COVID-19 infection, progression and severity. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pereira, M.; Dantas Damascena, A.; Galvão Azevedo, L.M.; de Almeida Oliveira, T.; da Mota Santana, J. Vitamin D deficiency aggravates COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prietl, B.; Treiber, G.; Pieber, T.R.; Amrein, K. Vitamin D and immune function. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2502–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D and immune function: Understanding common pathways. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2009, 7, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jeng, L.; Yamshchikov, A.V.; Judd, S.E.; Blumberg, H.M.; Martin, G.S.; Ziegler, T.R.; Tangpricha, V. Alterations in vitamin D status and anti-microbial peptide levels in patients in the intensive care unit with sepsis. J. Transl. Med. 2009, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Song, G.G.; Bae, S.C.; Lee, Y.H. Vitamin D receptor FokI, BsmI, and TaqI polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Z. Für Rheumatol. 2016, 75, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeidan, N.M.S.; El Lateef, H.M.A.; Selim, D.M.; Razek, S.A.; Abd-Elrehim, G.A.B.; Nashat, M.; ElGyar, N.; Waked, N.M.; Soliman, A.A.; Elhewala, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor FokI polymorphism as risk factors for COVID-19. Pediatr. Res. 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Karcioglu Batur, L.; Hekim, N. The role of DBP gene polymorphisms in the prevalence of new coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality rate. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1409–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Speeckaert, M.M.; Delanghe, J.R. The potential significance of vitamin D binding protein polymorphism in COVID-19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 109, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Brait, B.D.J.; Lima, S.P.d.S.; Aguiar, F.L.; Fernandes-Ferreira, R.; Oliveira-Brancati, C.I.F.; Ferraz, J.A.M.L.; Tenani, G.D.; Pinhel, M.A.D.S.; Assoni, L.C.P.; Nakahara, A.H.; et al. Genetic polymorphisms related to the vitamin D pathway in patients with cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ecancermedicalscience 2022, 16, 1383. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zacharioudaki, M.; Messaritakis, I.; Galanakis, E. Vitamin D receptor, vitamin D binding protein and CYP27B1 single nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to viral infections in infants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, J.J.; Fan, H.Z.; Tian, T.; Wu, M.P.; Xie, C.N.; Huang, P.; Yu, R.B.; Yi, H.G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Impact of CYP2R1, CYP27A1 and CYP27B1 genetic polymorphisms controlling vitamin D metabolism on susceptibility to hepatitis C virus infection in a high-risk Chinese population. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 2909–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fricke-Galindo, I.; Buendía-Roldán, I.; Ruiz, A.; Palacios, Y.; Pérez-Rubio, G.; Hernández-Zenteno, R.D.J.; Reyes-Melendres, F.; Zazueta-Márquez, A.; Alarcón-Dionet, A.; Guzmán-Vargas, J.; et al. TNFRSF1B and TNF Variants Are Associated With Differences in Levels of Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors in Patients With Severe COVID-19. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 226, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Solé, X.; Guinó, E.; Valls, J.; Iniesta, R.; Moreno, V. SNPStats: A web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1928–1929. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, S.; Ma, K. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sarría-Santamera, A.; Abdukadyrov, N.; Glushkova, N.; Peck, D.R.; Colet, P.; Yeskendir, A.; Asúnsolo, A.; Ortega, M.A. Towards an Accurate Estimation of COVID-19 Cases in Kazakhstan: Back-Casting and Capture–Recapture Approaches. Medicina 2022, 58, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. van der Made, C.I.; Netea, M.G.; van der Veerdonk, F.L.; Hoischen, A. Clinical implications of host genetic variation and susceptibility to severe or critical COVID-19. Genome Med. 2022, 14, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Diamond, M.S.; Kanneganti, T.D. Innate immunity: The first line of defense against SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Immunol. 2022, 23, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hewison, M. Vitamin D and the immune system: New perspectives on an old theme. Rheum. Dis. Clin. 2012, 38, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Robinson-Cohen, C.; Lutsey, P.L.; Kleber, M.E.; Nielson, C.M.; Mitchell, B.D.; Bis, J.C.; Eny, K.M.; Portas, L.; Eriksson, J.; Lorentzon, M.; et al. Genetic variants associated with circulating parathyroid hormone. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 1553–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Achilla, C.; Chorti, A.; Papavramidis, T.; Chatzikyriakidou, A. A pilot study of the association of rs6127099 polymorphism with primary hyperparathyroidism. Aristotle Biomed. J. 2021, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schlingmann, K.P.; Kaufmann, M.; Weber, S.; Irwin, A.; Goos, C.; John, U.; Misselwitz, J.; Klaus, G.; Kuwertz-Bröking, E.; Fehrenbach, H.; et al. Mutations in CYP24A1 and idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bennouar, S.; Cherif, A.B.; Kessira, A.; Bennouar, D.E.; Abdi, S. Vitamin D deficiency and low serum calcium as predictors of poor prognosis in patients with severe COVID-19. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2021, 40, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cappellini, F.; Brivio, R.; Casati, M.; Cavallero, A.; Contro, E.; Brambilla, P. Low levels of total and ionized calcium in blood of COVID-19 patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 2020, 58, e171–e173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deodatus, J.A.; Kooistra, S.A.; Kurstjens, S.; Mossink, J.C.L.; van Dijk, J.D.; Groeneveld, P.H.P.; van der Kolk, B.Y.M. Lower plasma calcium associated with COVID-19, but not with disease severity: A two-centre retrospective cohort study. Infect. Dis. 2022, 54, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. di Filippo, L.; Allora, A.; Locatelli, M.; Querini, P.R.; Frara, S.; Banfi, G.; Giustina, A. Hypocalcemia in COVID-19 is associated with low vitamin D levels and impaired compensatory PTH response. Endocrine 2021, 74, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. You, Y.; Yang, X.; Hung, D.; Yang, Q.; Wu, T.; Deng, M. Asymptomatic COVID-19 infection: Diagnosis, transmission, population characteristics. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Usategui-Martín, R.; De Luis-Román, D.A.; Fernández-Gómez, J.M.; Ruiz-Mambrilla, M.; Pérez-Castrillón, J.L. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms modify the response to Vitamin D supplementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peralta, E.M.; Rosales, Y.Z.; Mesa, T.C.; González, E.N.S.; Pérez, Y.H.; Torres, M.D.L.G.; Balbuena, H.R.; Teruel, B.M. TaqI polymorphism of the VDR gene: Aspects related to the clinical behavior of COVID-19 in Cuban patients. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2021, 22, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mamurova, B.; Akan, G.; Tuncel, G.; Mogol, E.; Evren, E.U.; Evren, H.; Suer, H.K.; Sanlidag, T.; Ergoren, M.C. A Strong Association between the VDR Gene Markers and SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Res. Sq. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Apaydin, T.; Polat, H.; Yazan, C.D.; Ilgin, C.; Elbasan, O.; Dashdamirova, S.; Bayram, F.; Tigen, E.T.; Unlu, O.; Tekin, A.F.; et al. Effects of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms on the prognosis of COVID-19. Clin. Endocrinol. 2022, 96, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fishchuk, L.; Rossokha, Z.; Pokhylko, V.; Cherniavska, Y.; Tsvirenko, S.; Kovtun, S.; Medvedieva, N.; Vershyhora, V.; Gorovenko, N. Modifying effects of TNF-α, IL-6 and VDR genes on the development risk and the course of COVID-19. Pilot study. Drug Metab. Pers. Ther. 2021, 37, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jafarpoor, A.; Jazayeri, S.M.; Bokharaei-Salim, F.; Ataei-Pirkooh, A.; Ghaziasadi, A.; Soltani, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Marvi, S.S.; Poortahmasebi, V.; Khorrami, S.M.S.; et al. VDR gene polymorphisms are associated with the increased susceptibility to COVID-19 among iranian population: A case-control study. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2022, 49, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abdollahzadeh, R.; Shushizadeh, M.H.; Barazandehrokh, M.; Choopani, S.; Azarnezhad, A.; Paknahad, S.; Pirhoushiaran, M.; Makani, S.Z.; Yeganeh, R.Z.; Al-Kateb, A.; et al. Association of Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and clinical/severe outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 96, 105098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bouillon, R.; Manousaki, D.; Rosen, C.; Trajanoska, K.; Rivadeneira, F.; Richards, J.B. The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: Evidence from human studies. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jain, A.; Chaurasia, R.; Sengar, N.S.; Singh, M.; Mahor, S.; Narain, S. Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bae, J.H.; Choe, H.J.; Holick, M.F.; Lim, S. Association of vitamin D status with COVID-19 and its severity. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2022, 23, 579–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rosen, C.J. Vitamin D insufficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 14 00307 g001 550
Figure 1. Minor allele frequencies (MAF) of genes of the vitamin D metabolic pathway.
Figure 1. Minor allele frequencies (MAF) of genes of the vitamin D metabolic pathway.
Genes 14 00307 g001
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of people with asymptomatic COVID-19 (COI ≥ 1) and healthy controls (COI < 1).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of people with asymptomatic COVID-19 (COI ≥ 1) and healthy controls (COI < 1).
VariablesCase (134)Control (46)Total (180)p-Value
Age41.49 ± 13.0943.09 ± 14.4141.89 ± 13.260.639
Gender 0.377
Male4735.1%2043.5%6737.2%
Female8764.9%2656.5%11362.8%
BMI24.5 ± 4.724.27 ± 3.8624.41 ± 4.440.868
BCG scar size5.7 ± 3.045.24 ± 2.715.58 ± 2.910.504
Vitamin D28.66 ± 15.328.34 ± 12.7728.58 ± 14.660.950
Ethnicity 0.580
Kazakh12190.3%4087%16189.4%
Other139.7%613%1910.6%
Heart disorder107.5%715.2%179.4%0.145
Stroke10.8%00.0%10.6%1.000
Cancer32.2%36.5%63.3%0.175
Diabetes64.5%36.5%995%0.695
Asthma43%00.0%42.2%0.574
Hypertension1813.4%919.6%2715%0.342
High cholesterol1813.4%48.7%2212.2%0.602
Chronic kidney disease1813.4%919.6%2715%0.342
Lung disorder139.7%24.3%158.3%0.361
Allergy5440.3%2043.5%7441.1%0.731
Alcohol6548.9%2247.8%8748.6%1.000
Sport6145.5%2554.3%8647.8%0.311
Self–reported COVID-like symptoms8764.9%3065.2%11765%1.000
Employment9168.4%3066.7%12158%0.855
Smoke5037.6%1226.1%6234.6%0.208
“COI” means “cut–off interval.” COI < 1 was interpreted as negative for IgM/IgG, and COI ≥ 1 was positive for IgM/IgG.
Table
Table 2. Genes of the vitamin D metabolic pathway and their SNPs selected for this study.
Table 2. Genes of the vitamin D metabolic pathway and their SNPs selected for this study.
GeneNameSNPFunctionMAF 1000GHWE p-Values
VDRVitamin D receptorrs731236 (TaqI)Intracellular hormone receptor that specifically binds 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) and mediates its effects0.2765581.00
rs1544410 (BsmI)0.2959270.57
rs2228570 (FokI)0.3284740.71
rs7975232 (ApaI)0.4846250.002 ¶
CYP27B11–α–hydroxylasers10877012Hydroxylation of 25(OH)D3 into 1,25(OH)2D30.3486420.76
CYP24A124–hydroxylasers6013897Mitochondrial enzyme responsible for inactivating vitamin D metabolites.
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration, catabolic enzyme for 1,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3		0.262381.00
rs61270990.3300720.54
GCVitamin D binding proteinrs7041Binding, solubilization, and transport of vitamin D and its metabolites0.3815890.76
rs45880.2078670.39
CYP2R1Vitamin D 25–hydroxylasers1074165The synthesis of bioactive vitamin D (vitamin D3→25D) (at C25 position).0.1224040.33
CYP27A1Sterol 27–hydroxylasers17470271The synthesis of bioactive vitamin D (vitamin D3 →25D) (at C24 and C27 positions).0.2529950.69
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor αrs1800629Potent inducer of CYP27B10.0902560.66
¶ denotes p < 0.05, Not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Table
Table 3. Association of candidate SNPs with symptomless COVID-19. Genotype frequencies and inheritance patterns of selected SNPs.
Table 3. Association of candidate SNPs with symptomless COVID-19. Genotype frequencies and inheritance patterns of selected SNPs.
ModelSNP [Gene]Case/ControlOR (95% CI)p-ValueAOR (95% CI)p-Value
rs731236 TaqI [VDR]
AdditiveAA74/34Reference Reference
AG50/121.91 (0.9–4.05)0.0891.97 (0.91–4.27)0.085
GG4/01 1
DominantAA74/34Reference Reference
AG + GG54/122.07 (0.98–4.36)0.0562.13 (0.99–4.6)0.053
RecessiveAA + AG124/46Reference Reference
GG4/01 1
AllelicA198/80Reference Reference
G58/121.95 (1.00–3.83)0.0511.98 (1.00–3.92)0.05
rs1544410 BsmI [VDR]
AdditiveTT4/0Reference Reference
TC57/132.13 (1.02–4.42)0.043 ¶2.23 (1.04–4.79)0.04 ¶
CC68/331 1
DominantTT4/0Reference Reference
TC + CC125/461 1
RecessiveTT + TC61/13Reference Reference
CC68/330.44 (0.21–0.91)0.027 ¶0.42 (0.2–0.9)0.025 ¶
AllelicT65/13Reference Reference
C193/790.49 (0.25–0.94)0.031 ¶0.48 (0.25–0.94)0.031 ¶
rs2228570 FokI [VDR]
AdditiveAA14/4Reference Reference
AG61/171.02 (0.3–3.52)0.9681 (0.29–3.51)0.995
GG56/250.64 (0.19–2.14)0.4690.6 (0.17–2.03)0.409
DominantAA14/4Reference Reference
AG + GG117/420.8 (0.25–2.55)0.7010.76 (0.23–2.48)0.652
RecessiveAA + AG75/21Reference Reference
GG56/250.63 (0.32–1.23)0.1760.59 (0.3–1.18)0.137
AllelicA89/25Reference Reference
G173/670.73 (0.43–1.23)0.2310.7 (0.41–1.19)0.186
rs6013897 [CYP24A1]
AdditiveAA3/1Reference Reference
AT34/130.87 (0.08–9.15)0.9090.83 (0.08–8.99)0.875
TT94/320.98 (0.1–9.75)0.9860.96 (0.09–9.83)0.972
DominantAA3/1Reference Reference
AT + TT128/450.95 (0.1–9.35)0.9640.92 (0.09–9.37)0.946
RecessiveAA + AT37/14Reference Reference
TT94/321.11(0.53–2.32)0.7781.14 (0.55–2.4)0.723
AllelicA40/15Reference Reference
T222/771.08 (0.57–2.07)0.8131.1 (0.57–2.11)0.769
rs6127099 [CYP24A1]
AdditiveAA68/13Reference Reference
AT49/250.37 (0.17–0.8)0.012 ¶0.35 (0.16–0.76)0.0092 ¶
TT8/70.22 (0.07–0.71)0.011 ¶0.2 (0.06–0.66)0.0092 ¶
DominantAA68/13Reference Reference
AT + TT57/320.34 (0.16–0.71)0.004 *0.32 (0.15–0.68)0.003 *
RecessiveAA + AT117/38Reference Reference
TT8/70.37 (0.13–1.09)0.0720.36 (0.12–1.07)0.067
AllelicA185/51Reference Reference
T65/390.46 (0.28–0.76)0.002 **0.44 (0.26–0.74)0.002 **
rs7041 [GC]
AdditiveAA52/15Reference Reference
AC65/210.89 (0.42–1.9)0.7690.92 (0.43–1.99)0.838
CC12/100.34 (0.13–0.96)0.041 ¶0.33 (0.12–0.92)0.033 ¶
DominantAA52/15Reference Reference
AC + CC77/310.72 (0.35–1.46)0.3570.72 (0.35–1.48)0.374
RecessiveAA + AC117/36Reference Reference
CC12/100.37 (0.15–0.93)0.034 ¶0.34 (0.13–0.87)0.025 ¶
AllelicA169/51Reference Reference
C89/410.66 (0.4–1.06)0.0870.65 (0.4–1.06)0.083
rs4588 [GC]
AdditiveGG58/26Reference Reference
GT55/161.54 (0.75–3.18)0.2421.61 (0.77–3.36)0.206
TT8/13.59 (0.43–30.17)0.2404.14 (0.48–36)0.197
DominantGG58/26Reference Reference
GT + TT63/171.66 (0.82–3.37)0.1601.75 (0.85–3.59)0.130
RecessiveGG + GT113/42Reference Reference
TT8/12.97 (0.36–24.5)0.3113.32 (0.39–28.03)0.270
AllelicG171/68Reference Reference
T71/181.57 (0.87–2.83)0.1341.64 (0.9–2.97)0.105
rs10877012 [CYP27B1]
AdditiveGG15/11Reference Reference
GT77/242.35 (0.95–5.8)0.0632.57 (1.02–6.49)0.046 ¶
TT36/92.93 (1.01–8.53)0.048 ¶3.13 (1.05–9.35)0.041 ¶
DominantGG15/11Reference Reference
GT + TT113/332.51 (1.05–5.99)0.038 ¶2.72 (1.11–6.65)0.028 ¶
RecessiveGG + GT92/35Reference Reference
TT36/91.52 (0.67–3.48)0.3201.51 (0.65–3.52)0.338
AllelicG107/46Reference Reference
T149/421.53 (0.94–2.48)0.0891.54 (0.94–2.53)0.084
rs1074165 [CYP2R1]
AdditiveGG89/30Reference Reference
GA34/150.76 (0.37–1.59)0.4730.79 (0.37–1.67)0.535
AA2/01 1
DominantGG89/30Reference Reference
GA + AA36/150.81 (0.39–1.68)0.5700.84 (0.4–1.76)0.641
RecessiveGG + GA123/45Reference Reference
AA2/01 1
AllelicG212/75Reference Reference
A38/150.9 (0.47–1.72)0.7420.92 (0.48–1.78)0.809
rs1747027 [CYP27A1]
AdditiveAA70/18Reference Reference
AT34/160.55 (0.25–1.2)0.1330.51 (0.22–1.17)0.111
TT9/21.16 (0.23–5.83)0.8600.89 (0.17–4.68)0.890
DominantAA70/18Reference Reference
AT + TT43/180.61 (0.29–1.31)0.2060.55 (0.25–1.23)0.146
RecessiveAA + AT104/34Reference Reference
TT9/21.47 (0.3–7.14)0.6321.2 (0.24–6.00)0.826
AllelicA174/52Reference Reference
T52/200.78 (0.43–1.42)0.4110.71 (0.38–1.32)0.280
rs1800629 [TNF-α]
AdditiveAA2/2Reference Reference
AG30/93.33 (0.41–27.13)0.2602.95 (0.33–26.5)0.333
GG95/352.71 (0.37–20.01)0.3272.43 (0.31–19.26)0.399
DominantAA2/2Reference Reference
AG + GG125/442.84 (0.39–20.78)0.3042.5 (0.32–19.75)0.385
RecessiveAA + AG32/11Reference Reference
GG95/350.93 (0.42–2.05)0.8630.94 (0.43–2.08)0.880
AllelicA34/13Reference Reference
G220/791.06 (0.53–2.12)0.8581.05 (0.53–2.11)0.885
* p < 0.0046; ** p < 0.0023; ¶ p < 0.05; ‘Reference’ indicates OR = 1; ‘UOR’ indicates Unadjusted OR; ‘AOR’ indicates Adjusted OR. The Adjusted logistic model contains age, gender, and Kazakh ethnicity in addition to genotype/allele data.
Table
Table 4. VDR, GC, and CYP24A1 haplotypes association with asymptomatic COVID-19.
Table 4. VDR, GC, and CYP24A1 haplotypes association with asymptomatic COVID-19.
Haplotype AnalysisLD Analysis
GeneBlockSNP1SNP2SNP3ControlCaseOr (95% CI)p-ValueD´LD p-Value
VDR rs731236 (TaqI)rs2228570 (FokI)rs1544410 (BsmI) --
1AGC0.64290.4764Reference
2AAC0.21580.27191.70 (0.86–3.34)0.13
3GGT0.07450.16033.12 (1.07–9.10)0.039 ¶
4GAT0.05590.06781.92 (0.53–6.86)0.32
5AGT0.01090.02373.38 (0.39–29.65)0.27
6AG-0.65420.5045Reference0.01950.7917
7AA-0.21530.26891.63 (0.83–3.18)0.16
8GG-0.0740.15582.82 (0.98–8.12)0.056
9GA-0.05640.07081.84 (0.52–6.45)0.34
10A-C0.85870.7481Reference0.99970.0000
11G-T0.13040.22832.25 (1.10–4.61)0.028 ¶
12A-T0.01090.02363.01 (0.35–25.97)0.32
13-GC0.63860.4807Reference0.05240.7169
14-AC0.22010.26751.61 (0.82–3.19)0.17
15-GT0.08960.17962.90 (1.06–7.91)0.039 ¶
16-AT0.05170.07222.20 (0.58–8.38)0.25
GC rs7041rs4588
1CG-0.44570.345Reference0.99920.0000
2AG-0.34650.36251.38 (0.78–2.42)0.27
3AT-0.20790.29251.94 (0.99–3.79)0.055
CYP24A1 rs6013897rs6127099
1TA-0.54640.694Reference0.64720.0000
2TT-0.29060.1540.37 (0.19–0.73)0.0045 *
3AT-0.14690.10780.58 (0.27–1.25)0.17
4AA-0.01620.04422.01 (0.24–17.03)0.52
* p < 0.0045; ¶ p < 0.05; ‘Reference’ indicates OR = 1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarría-Santamera, A.; Mukhtarova, K.; Baizhaxynova, A.; Kanatova, K.; Zhumambayeva, S.; Akilzhanova, A.; Azizan, A. Association of CYP24A1 Gene rs6127099 (A > T) Polymorphism with Lower Risk to COVID-19 Infection in Kazakhstan. Genes 2023, 14, 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020307

AMA Style

Sarría-Santamera A, Mukhtarova K, Baizhaxynova A, Kanatova K, Zhumambayeva S, Akilzhanova A, Azizan A. Association of CYP24A1 Gene rs6127099 (A > T) Polymorphism with Lower Risk to COVID-19 Infection in Kazakhstan. Genes. 2023; 14(2):307. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarría-Santamera, Antonio, Kymbat Mukhtarova, Ardak Baizhaxynova, Kaznagul Kanatova, Saule Zhumambayeva, Ainur Akilzhanova, and Azliyati Azizan. 2023. "Association of CYP24A1 Gene rs6127099 (A > T) Polymorphism with Lower Risk to COVID-19 Infection in Kazakhstan" Genes 14, no. 2: 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop