Next Article in Journal
Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss in a Romanian Population: Carrier Status and Frequent Variants in the GJB2 Gene
Previous Article in Journal
Are the Organellar Genomes Useful for Fine Scale Population Structure Analysis of Endangered Plants?—A Case Study of Pulsatilla patens (L.) Mill
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of MYB Transcription Factors Involving in Fruit Quality Regulation of Fragaria × ananassa Duch.

College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010068
Submission received: 19 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
The cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is an important horticultural crop. The economic values of strawberry cultivars are decided by their fruit qualities including taste, color and aroma. The important role of MYB transcription factors in fruit quality regulation is recognized increasingly with the identification of MYB genes involved in metabolism. A total of 407 MYB genes of F. × ananassa (FaMYBs) were identified in the genome-wide scale and named according to subgenome locations. The 407 FaMYBs were clustered into 36 groups based on phylogenetic analysis. According to synteny analysis, whole genome duplication and segmental duplication contributed over 90% of the expansion of the FaMYBs family. A total of 101 FaMYB loci with 1–6 alleles were identified by the homologous gene groups on homologous chromosomes. The differentially expressed FaMYB profiles of three cultivars with different fruit quality and fruit ripe processes provided the 8 candidate loci involved in fruit quality regulation. In this experiment, 7, 5, and 4 FaMYBs were screeded as candidate genes involved in the regulation of metabolism/transportation of anthocyanins, sugars or organic acids and 4-hydroxy-2, 5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone, respectively. These results pointed out the key FaMYBs for further functional analysis of gene regulation of strawberry fruit quality and would be helpful in the clarification on ofe roles of MYBs in the metabolism of fruit crops.

1. Introduction

MYB transcription factor (TF) family is one of the largest TF families of plants [1,2]. MYB TFs are named for the conserved DNA binding region in their structure, namely the MYB domain consisting of three conserved functional domains: DNA binding domain, transactivation domain and incomplete negative regulatory domain [1,3]. According to the number of MYB domains, plant MYB superfamily can be divided into 1R-MYB (MYB-related), 2R-MYB (R2R3), 3R-MYB (R1R2R3) and atypical MYB (4R-MYB and 5R-MYB) [1,3]. The most common members are R2R3-MYBs which play important roles in many physiological processes of plants, such as primary metabolism, secondary metabolism, morphogenesis and stress responses [3,4]. For horticultural plants, primary metabolism and secondary metabolism regulation functions of MYBs were given more attention due to the metabolism pathways involved in crop quality, such as color, flavor and nutrition of fruits or vegetables [5,6,7].
The anthocyanins, sugars, organic acids and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were the key metabolites that decided consumers’ evaluation of fruit flavor and health value [8,9,10]. Besides increasing fruit color, anthocyanins determined the flavor and antioxidation of fruit wine (such as grapes or apples) [7]. Dozens of MYBs involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway (part of phenylpropanoid metabolism) have been reported in apples, pears, peaches, grapes and so on. For example, AcMYB110a of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) [11], VvMYBA1 and VvMYBA2 of grape (Vitis vinifera) [12] and LcMYB1 of Litchi chinensis [13] regulated the anthocyanin concentration in the corresponding fruits. Silencing FaMYB1 of cultivated strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) increased fruit anthocyanin content, whereas FaMYB1 overexpression reduced the expression of the anthocyanidin synthase gene [14]. The strawberry flesh color was proven to be a monogenic character decided by the Mendelian separation of dominant MYB10 (wild allele) and recessive MYB10 (mutation allele) in cultivated strawberries and wild strawberries (Fragaria vesca) [15,16,17]. The organic acids and sugar affected the acidity and sweetness of fruit crops. FaMYB44.2 negatively regulated sugar accumulation in the development of strawberry fruits, then the competition of FaMYB10 to FaMYB44.2 recovered sucrose accumulation in ripening [18]. The important index of commercial citrus (Citrus sinensis), reduced citric acid content, is affected by P-ATPase proton pumps (CitPH1, CitPH5). CitPH1, CitPH5 and PH4 (MYB) are significantly reduced in acid-less citrus mutants [19]. The homologs of PH4 are involved in the activation of PH1 and PH5 of petunias. Both PH4 of petunias or citrus have been reported to activate the promoter of PH1 and PH5 in corresponding plants [20,21]. PH4 could be a key MYB of controlling citrus citric acid content [20]. Citric acid content of cultivated strawberries is positively regulated by FaMYB5 (homologous to PH4 of petunias) directly bound to the promoters of FaCS2 (citrate synthase), FaACO (aconitase) and FaGAD (glutamate decarboxylase) of the citric acid metabolism pathway [22]. In addition to the organic acids of primary metabolism, MYBs are also involved in phenolic acids of secondary metabolism. For example, AmMYB308/330 of Antirrhinum majus and SmMYB1/2/36/39 of Salvia miltiorrhiza increased/decreased the biosynthesis of corresponding phenolic acids [4,23]. VOCs, including aromatic ester, aromatic ketone, monoterpenes and so on, decide the fruit aromas [8,24]. MYBs involved in the regulation of the benzenoid/phenylpropanoid pathway have been characterized in floral volatiles of petunias and other ornamental plants, such as the well-known gene ODO1 [25,26]. The strawberry fruits include ethyl caproate, γ-monolactone and HDMF (4-hydroxy-2, 5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone) [8]. The HDMF biosynthesis was catalyzed by the quinone oxidoreductase of strawberries (FaQR). Recently, a study indicated FaMYB98 could activate FaQR by promotor binding, and the activation of FaQR was more significant by the complex of FaMYB98-FaERF#9 (ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR#9) [27]. Unlike ornamental plants, little is known about MYBs of fruit crops involved in fruit monoterpene regulation. FaMYB9 increased the ripening process and C6 volatile contents of fruits, and it could be a potential regulator of fruit monoterpene [28]. Recently, FaMYB63 proved to be a direct activator of FaEGS1 (eugenol synthase 1), FaEGS2, FaCAD1 (cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 1) of eugenol biosynthesis pathway and FaMYB10-FaEOBII (EMISSION OF BENZENOID II, R2R3-MYB) model regulating FaEGS1 and FaCAD1. MYB regulatory network of FaMYB63, FaMYB10 and FaEOBII play important roles in eugenol biosynthesis during strawberry fruit development [29,30].
The cultivated strawberry is a valuable horticultural crop due to its tasty berry. Because of its significant commercial value and certain health benefits, it is favored by producers and consumers around the world. The main producing areas include China, the United States, New Zealand and so on [31,32]. The commercial varieties of cultivated strawberries were selected from the octoploid strawberry (2n = 8X = 56) in the 18th century, namely the pineapple strawberry. The allo-octoploid made the breeding history of F. × ananassa too complicated to trace the diploid ancestors. Two supposed subgenome donors (Fragaria vesca and Fragaria iinumae) were accepted by most studies, and the other putative donors (Fragaria viridis and Fragaria nipponica) were debatable [33,34,35]. It is intuitive to distinguish homologous chromosomes (Fii1-7, Fve1-7, Fvi1-7 and Fni1-7) by naming subgenomes (Fii1, Fve1, Fvi1 and Fni1) with corresponding putative donors [33]. The conserved genome synteny among the subgenomes and F.vesca genome indicate the gene location or alleles of corresponding homologous chromosomes was highly colinear [36,37].
The strawberry varieties F. × ananassa × F. nilgerrensis ‘Tokun’ (TK), F. × ananassa ‘Benihoppe’ (BH) and F. × ananassa ‘Snow White’ (SW) with different fruit flavor characteristics were advantageous for fruit quality study [38,39]. BH, SW, and TK are three popular commercial varieties with different aroma characteristics. Our study of VOCs of 16 commercial varieties grouped BH, TK, and SW as fruity, peachy, and floral aroma types, respectively [38,40]. Besides peachy-like aromas, the unique taste of sweet with a hint of acid set TK apart from other common cultivars [39]. The organic acids should contribute to this special taste as well as sugars (sugar–acid ratio) [41]. Previous observation of several FaMYBs of fruit crops provides us a good reference for identification of FaMYB involved in fruit quality [15,18,28,42]. In this study, we identified the FaMYB family and assigned their alleles to the MYB loci named by reference genes of F. vesca. We aimed to screen FaMYB candidates involved in the fruit quality by phylogenetic analysis, sequence analysis and expression analysis. The results provide preferred FaMYBs involved in strawberry quality for the further genetics verification and could be helpful in understanding the roles of MYB in regulation fruit tastes, flavors or colors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification and Phylogenetic Analyses of FaMYB Family

The reference genome of F. × ananassa was collected from the Genome Database for Rosaceae (GDR, https://www.rosaceae.org/, accessed on 20 January 2022). Based on the hidden Markov model (HMM) of the MYB domain (PF00249 and PF13921, http://Pfam.sanger.ac.uk/, accessed on 10 May 2022), HMMER tool [43] predicted MYB domain-containing genes with a cutoff threshold value of E-5. Then, ambiguous candidates were rejected by detection of incomplete MYB domain using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 10 May 2022). The MYB family of F. vesca (FvMYBs) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMYBs) were collected from the PlantTFDB datebase (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 10 May 2022). Based on the alignment of protein sequences of FaMYBs and AtMYBs using MAFFT with default parameters (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 10 May 2022), a maximum-likelihood phylogeny (ML-tree) with the optimal amino acid substitution model (VT+F+R9) recommended by ModelGenerator [43] was constructed.

2.2. Synteny Analysis and Alleles Identification of FaMYBs

The homologous gene pairs of the F. × ananassa genome (E < 10−5, top 3 hits of BLASTP searches) were used to identify the syntenic regions using MCScanX [44]. The chromosome syntenic regions and homologous pairs were illustrated using the Advanced Circos tool of TBtools [45]. OrthoFinder [46] was used to identify the homologous gene groups among Fii, Fvi, Fve, Fvi subgenomes and genome of F. vesca with default parameters. The FaMYB alleles were identified from the syntenic regions of homologous chromosomes. A neighbor-join phylogeny (NJ-tree) of FaMYB and FvMYBs was built by MEGA 7 [47].

2.3. Gene Structure, Motif and Cis-Acting Elements Analyses of FaMYB Family

The top 10 conserved motifs of the representative FaMYB alleles were predicted by MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/, accessed on 15 June 2022) under classic parameters. The cis-acting elements were predicted from promoter regions (2000 bp upstream the start codon) by PlantCare (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 15 June 2022). The gene structure, motifs and motifs cis-acting elements were illustrated by the Gene structure view tool of TBtools [45].

2.4. Expression Analysis

Fruits of BH, TK and SW and 4 ripening stages of TK, that is, (i) the stage of green fruit (G), (ii) the stage of fruit turning green to white (GW), (iii) the stage of white fruit (W) and (iv) the stage of red fruit (R) were used as plant materials (Figure S1). The seven kinds of fruits were collected for transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq). The cultivation conditions of strawberries, the high throughput sequencing, the gene expression level TPM (transcripts per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) calculation and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) prediction followed the same methods as our previous study [40].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Lineages of FaMYB Family

From the genome of F. × ananassa, 407 FaMYB genes including 381 R2R3-MYBs, 16 R1R2R3-MYBs (3R-MYBs) and 10 R1R2R3R4-MYBs (4R-MYBs) were identified. All the 407 FaMYBs distributed on most chromosomes of the octaploid genome dispersedly and clustered partially on Chr2/5/6 of each subgenome (Figure S2, e.g., Fii2/5/6). FaMYBs were named by their subgenome locations including 106 FaMYBs -Fii (Fii subgenome), 102 FaMYBs-Fve (Fve subgenome), 101 FaMYBs-Fvi (Fvi subgenome) and 98 FaMYBs-Fni (Fni subgenome) (Table S2). ML-tree of AtMYBs (Table S2) and FaMYBs clustered into 16 groups (Figure 1, C1-C16). A total of14 groups (C2-C11, C13-C16) of 2R-MYBs corresponded to the lineages of AtMYBs (S1-S25, Table S1). For example, the C2 corresponded to the S25 of Arabidopsis [1,3]. C1 and C12 corresponded to unnamed clades of AtMYBs cladogram. C1 included a clade of 3R-MYBs and several AtMYBs which were ungrouped to any lineage. C12 corresponded to a parallel clade of S11/24/4/10 [1,3].

3.2. Gene Duplications and Alleles of FaMYBs

All FaMYBs were linked by 962 homologous gene pairs on the synteny blocks (Figure 2A). Gene duplication type predictions indicated that 372, 19, 6 and 10 FaMYBs belonged to WGD (whole genome duplication) or segmental duplication type, tandem duplication type, proximal replication type and transposition type, respectively (Tables S3 and S4). Most synteny blocks were located on the homologous chromosomes such as Fii1/Fni1/Fvi1/Fve1 and Fii6/Fni6/Fvi6/Fve6 (Figure 2A) and other synteny blocks were located on the same subgenome (Figure S2). WGD and segmental duplication contributed over 90% (372/407) to the expansion events of the FaMYB family. The segmental duplication contributed a lot to the expansion of FaMYBs on nonhomologous chromosomes. For example, 40 FaMYBs-Fii linked by 21 gene pairs (Figure S2, Table S5) of the Fii subgenome indicated segmental duplication events participated in at least 37% (40/106) of the FaMYBs-Fii expansion.
Identification of loci and classification of alleles would be helpful to concentrate on key MYB loci. According to the collinear FaMYBs (the color lines of Figure 2A), 94 groups of FaMYB allele candidates were identified. Orthofinder’s prediction of the homologous gene groups between F. × ananassa and F. vesca proved the 94 groups and found another 7 homologous gene groups including only one FaMYB (Table S6). All the 101 homologous gene groups were defined as MYB loci named by the gene ID of reference FveMYBs. Specially, F. vesca reference genes of 9 loci belonged to uncanonical MYB TF referring to PlantTFDB database and the 9 loci (Table S6, labled by #) were not included in the 101 MYB loci. Together, the NJ-tree illustrated the 101 FaMYB loci systematically (Figure 2B). Loci names were labeled on branches except the 68 ‘ideal’ loci with an allele at least on each homologous chromosome (collapsed nodes of Figure 2B). For example, ‘ideal’ loci mrna31098 (Table S6) included 4 alleles (gene name, FaMYB3-Fii1, FaMYB1-Fni1, FaMYB1-Fve1 and FaMYB8-Fvi1) on Fii1, Fvi1, Fve1 and Fni1.

3.3. The Gene Structures, Motifs, and Cis-Elements of FaMYBs

FaMYB proteins ranging from 124 AA (amino acid residues) to 1726 AA (Figure 3, Table S1) indicate significant sequence length divergence of FaMYB family. Considering the Fii was the most dominant subgenome, FaMYBs-Fii was selected as the representative allele of FaMYB loci to simplify sequence analysis. The top 10 enriched motifs (Figure S3) ranged from 11 AA (motif 4/5/6/9) to 50 AA (motif 8) (Table S7). FaMYBs-Fii within the same group exhibit similar motif composition. All FaMYBs-Fii containing motif1/3 overlapped with the MYB DNA-binding domain (Figure 3). It showed their importance for DNA-binding of MYB proteins. Motif2/5 was present in most R2R3-MYBs whereas motif 8 with unknown function was included only in 5 FaMYBs-Fii.
The gene structures of FaMYB-Fii (Figure 3) were diverse due to the differences of exon number. For example, five intron-less genes (FaMYB13-Fii2, FaMYB4-Fii1, FaMYB12-Fii2, FaMYB16-Fii6, FaMYB7-Fii) contained only one exon, whereas the exon number of FaMYB21-Fii6 was up to 28. In addition, FaMYB8-Fii6, FaMYB8-Fii2 and FaMYB821-Fii6 with long introns produced their longer gene length.
Twenty-six kinds of important cis-acting elements (CEs) were located in the promotors of FaMYBs-Fii (Figure S4). CEs related to plant hormones, stresses and light response were present at most sites (Table S8). A total of 272, 209, 76 and 66 responsive elements of jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, gibberellin and auxin were located on promotors of 67,73, 53 and 44 FaMYBs-Fii, respectively. The 739 light responsiveness elements of 101 FaMYBs-Fii, 229 anaerobic induction elements (AREs) ’AAACCA’ and 108 stress defence elements of 97 FaMYBs-Fii indicated most MYBs-Fii should be responsive to environment stresses or light. Among the above CEs, 111 MYB binding sites of 66 FaMYBs-Fii indicated there could be regulating networks within the MYB family.

3.4. Expression Analysis of FaMYBs

According to the DEGs prediction by RNA-seq (Table S9), 40 FaMYBs were differentially expressed (DE-FaMYBs) at least in one of the comparisons of cultivars (SW vs. TK, BH vs. TK and SW vs. BH, Figure 4A). And 65 DE-FaMYBs belonged to at least one of the three comparisons of ripening processes (GW-vs-G, W-vs-GW, R-vs-W, Figure 4B). Profiles of DE-FaMYBs (Figure 4A, Table S10) included 12 fruit quality controlling FaMYB candidates, 15 FaMYB homologous to involved in stress responsive or development regulation genes and 13 function unknown genes. The fruit quality controlling FaMYBs belonged to 3 MYB loci, that is, mrna31413 (FaMYB7-Fii1, FaMYB2-Fvi1, FaMYB6-Fni1) and mrna26289 (FaMYB14-Fvi2, FaMYB2-Fii2, FaMYB2-Fni2) an mrna24027 (FaMYB3-Fni1, FaMYB4-Fii1, FaMYB5-Fve1, FaMYB5-Fvi1, FaMYB6-Fvi1) and a MYB-related locus FvH4_3g45450.t1 (FaMYB13-Fii3). Further, another 7 fruit quality controlling candidates together with the above 12 candidates were significantly up-/down-regulated in the ripening processes of TK (Figure 4B and Table S11). The other DE-FaMYBs in the ripening processes were not discussed here, and their homologous function are listed in Table S11.
The upregulation along with the fruit ripening of FaMYB10 homologous locus mrna31413 include 3 alleles with a high abundance of ripe fruit. Interestingly, FaMYB7-Fii1 was more highly expressed than the other 2 alleles and reached a higher abundance in BH (red fruit, Figure S1) and a lower abundance in SW (white fruit, Figure S1). FaMYB44 homologous loci mrna26289, mrna24027 were downregulated, and mrna00185 (more homologous to FaMYB44.2, the green legend of Figure 4B) were up-regulated along with the fruit ripening. Additionally, the high abundant mrna26289 and low abundant mrna24027 showed an opposite expression pattern in TK. The PH4 homologous FvH4_3g45450.t1 up-regulated along with the fruit ripening except FaMYB12-Fni3 and only FaMYB13-Fii3 reaching a higher abundance in TK. mrna25685 homologous to AtMYB111 that involved in flavonol biosynthesis [48] and the 4 alleles (FaMYB7-Fvi5, FaMYB8-Fve5, FaMYB17-Fni5, FaMYB19-Fvi5) could play roles in fruit anthocyanidin biosynthesis [49]. Abundances of FaMYB7-Fvi5 and FaMYB8-Fve5 were negligible in SW and BH (TPM < 0.1) and increased to a certain degree only in ripe fruit (Figure 4B, column R).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Expansion and Naming of FaMYB

Although 407 FaMYBs was nearly 4 times the number of FveMYB (110), the gene number of each subgenome (106/102/101/98 FaMYBs-Fii/-Fve/-Fvi/-Fni) was identical generally to that of their diploid progenitor species. Gene duplication is the driving force of the expansion of gene families [50]. The continuous polyploidization events of F. × ananassa would accelerate its gene family expansions [51]. Unsurprising, the WGD and segmental duplication were the main factors of expansion of FaMYB family. A fewer number of FaMYB pairs were located on nonhomologous chromosomes compared with homologous chromosomes due to fewer synteny blocks (Table S3). This indicated rearrangement was not a high frequency event on synteny blocks of FaMYB. This result was in accordance with the observation of octoploid genome strong macro-synteny with diploid progenitor species [36]. Only 19 FaMYBs were duplicated tandemly. It indicated the FaMYB gene clusters on chromosomes (Figure S2) mainly derived from segmental duplication, not tandem duplication which is the common reason for gene clusters [52]. Compared with the 1 tandem duplication and 27 segmental duplications of 120 AtMYB [53], 3 tandem duplications and 40 segmental duplications of 102 FaMYBs of Fii subgenome showed a slightly higher duplication frequency of the FaMYB family. All these results suggested that the polyploidization processes decided the expansion of FaMYB family after divergence from a common ancestor of octoploid and diploid strawberries. Recent studies on genome assembling of a tetraploid strawberry (4n = 4x = 28) like Fragaria orientalis provide a transition reference genome for correlation analysis between family expansions and polyploidization [54].
Compared with the diploid wild strawberry (2n = 2X= 14), gene naming was more complex in octoploid strawberry (F. × ananassa) [42]. The conventional gene nomenclature of the gene family decided gene names by chromosome location orders or by corresponding homologous genes. It would not be applicable for a large gene family of polyploidy plants due to hundreds of members like FaMYBs [42,55]. Here we added a suffix to FaMYBs according to their subgenomes, and the naming would distinguish MYBs coming from same subgenome or homologous chromosomes intuitively. Without regard to alleles loss or gain, a gene locus should theoretically include 4 alleles of corresponding homologous chromosomes. Further, we assigned FaMYB alleles to corresponding loci labeled by ID of FveMYBs. The high-quality genomes and database resources of F. vesca (e.g., GDR or Phytozome databases) would be helpful to search and acquire genetic background information of corresponding FaMYB alleles.

4.2. FaMYB Candidates Involved in Fruit Quality

FaMYB candidates were screened from loci homologous to known MYBs based on the expression patterns of alleles. The loci of FaMYB10 [15,16], PH4 [21] or AtMYB111 [49] belonged to the C14 (S6) and C15 (S7), respectively (Figure 1). S4–S7 lineages were wildly involved in the phenylalanine metabolism including the anthocyanin and procyanidin synthesis [1,3]. FaMYB7-Fii1 could be the main contributor to red fruit color, more than the other 2 alleles due to its high abundance and high correlation with color difference of three cultivars (Figure S1) or fruit coloring processes. The latest resequencing study has identified that the AG insertion of FaMYB7-Fii1 would cause the loss promoter binding ability of FaUFGT (flavonol-O-glucosyltransferases), which is responsible for loss of anthocyanins accumulation [17]. Another allele (maker-Fvb1-3-augustus-gene-143.29-mRNA-1) was rejected as FaMYB TF due to its obvious short protein and incomplete MYB domain. Several natural variations of MYB10 (indels or transposon insertions of coding region) produced incomplete proteins without activation ability [15,16] or DNA binding ability [17]. Whether the putative short protein of maker-Fvb1-3-augustus-gene-143.29-mRNA-1 was produced by nonsynonymous mutation should be further checked by gene cloning [16,56]. FaMYB6-Fii5 was a supposed regulator involved in anthocyanidin regulation based on a previous study of the FaMYB family (FaMYB54) [42]. It is significantly upregulated in the fruits as compared with other vegetable organs of red-flower strawberries [42]. Our results also indicate this gene and its allele FaMYB12-Fni5 were significantly upregulated when the TW fruit turned red. AtMYB111 homologous genes FaMYB7-Fvi5 and FaMYB8-Fve5 were another two anthocyanidin regulation candidates. AtMYB111 controlled flavonol biosynthesis in all tissues. It was depressed by AtMYB112 (a positive regulator of anthocyanin formation) [57] and induced by heterologously expressed Brassica napus WRKY41-1 (a negative regulator of anthocyanin formation) [49]. These observations indicate AtMYB111 could be a negative regulator of fruit coloring. Interestingly, FaMYB7-Fvi5 and FaMYB8-Fve5 were only highly expressed in ripe TK fruits, which linked the two negative regulator candidates with the pink color of TK caused by lower anthocyanin accumulation (Figure S1).
Aside from the focus on fruit color, concern about sugar and acid metabolism, critical for fruit quality formation, are increasing. Three FaMYB44 loci belonged to the C5 (S22) which is only related to plant abiotic stress responses [3]. Unexpectedly, a recent study of TW identified 3 FaMYB44 genes (FaMYB44.1/.2/.3). FaMYB44.2 was a negative regulator of soluble sugar accumulation and malic acid content, whereas FaMYB44.1 was involved in fruit anthocyanin accumulation [18]. Though the expression of FaMYB44.2 locus (mrna00185) increased slightly along with ripening, which was also found in our RNA-seq profiles, the depression of sugar accumulation was reversed by competitive binding of MYB10 proteins. Together, it indicated that FaMYB44.2 should play a key role in the early development processes of fruit (not the ripening processes). FaMYB44.1 locus (mrna00185) indicated the regulation of fruit color was regulated by different MYBs (not only MYB10), and corresponding mechanisms need to be illuminated further. P-ATPases which could generate proton gradient were activated by PH4 of citrus to drive the transport of citrate into the vacuole. The positive regulator role of PH4 in citric acid content was increasingly recognized [19,20]. The only highly expressed FaMYB13-Fii3 in TK whose taste is more acid than SW and BH could be a key allele of acid transport in strawberries. Recent studies proved that FaMYB13-Fii3 (i.e., FaMYB5 of corresponding reference) would bind to FaCS2, FaACO and FaGAD promotors and increased/decreased citric acid accumulation in transient-overexpressing or -silencing strawberry fruits [22].
FaMYB98 was the only identified MYB involved in HDMF regulation by forming the regulation complex FaERF#9-FaMYB98 [27]. It’s worth noting that AtMYB98 and most members of corresponding lineage S25 were only recognized as MYBs involved in plant development [3]. The alleles of FaMYB98 locus (mrna28443) FaMYB1-Fii6, FaMYB12-Fni6, FaMYB1-Fve6 and FaMYB3-Fvi6 were significantly down-regulated in the beginning stage of ripening (GW vs. G, Table S2). The expression pattern was negatively correlated to HDMF accumulation in fruit and was in contradiction with the increase of FaERF#9 [27]. Whether the two proteins of FaERF#9-FaMYB98 complex were in a ratio of 1:1 or the expression level of the two genes were in same order of magnitude are still unknown. This could be a point for further study of the contradiction.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified 381 R2R3-MYB, 16 3R-MYB and 10 4R-MYBs from the F. × ananassa genome. Based on phylogenetic and homologous genes analyses, FaMYBs were arranged into 16 groups and 101 loci. Synteny analysis indicated WGD and segmental duplication explained most duplication events of FaMYBs. From 8 loci that were differentially expressed in comparisons of three cultivars (BH/SW/TK) or 4 ripening processes, 7, 5 and 4 FaMYBs were screened as candidate genes involved in the regulation of fruit colors, fruit sugar or acid and fruit aromas, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14010068/s1. Figure S1: Fruits of three strawberry cultivars ‘Benihopper’(BH), ‘Snow White’ (SW) and ‘Tokun’ (TK) and four ripening stages of TK, (i) the stage of green fruit (G), (ii) the stage of fruit turning green to white (GW), (iii) the stage of white fruit (W) and (iv) the stage of red fruit (R); Figure S2: The chromosome location of FaMYBs; Figure S3: Synteny analysis of Fii subgenome; Figure S4: Top 10 motifs predicted by MEME; Figure S5: The cis-acting elements in 2000 bp promotors of FaMYBs-Fii, Table S1: Gene information of FaMYBs; Table S2: Gene ID of FvMYBs and AtMYBs; Table S3: Types of gene duplication of FaMYBs by MCScanX; Table S4: Tandem duplication pairs of FaMYBs by MCScanX; Table S5: Homologous FaMYB pairs of Fii subgenome, Table S6: Loci and alleles of FaMYBs, Table S7: The conseved motifs of FaMYBs-Fii, Table S8: The cis-acting elements of FaMYBs-Fii by Plantcare, Table S9: TPM and differential expression of FaMYBs, Table S10: Expression profiles of FaMYBs in three cultivars, Table S11: Expression profiles of FaMYBs in fruit ripening processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and J.W.; methodology, J.W.; software, Y.Y. and J.W.; formal analysis, Y.Y. and J.W.; resources, H.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.S. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Start-up Fund for High-level Talents of Yangzhou University, grant number, 137011817.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material. The data presented in this study are available.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stracke, R.; Werber, M.; Weisshaar, B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martin, C.; Paz-Ares, J. MYB transcription factors in plants. Trends Genet. 1997, 13, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ma, D.; Constabel, C.P. MYB Repressors as Regulators of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bai, Q.; Huang, Y.; Shen, Y. The Physiological and Molecular Mechanism of Abscisic Acid in Regulation of Fleshy Fruit Ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 619953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, L.; Hu, B.; Qin, Y.; Hu, G.; Zhao, J. Advance of the negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis by MYB transcription factors. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 136, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Naing, A.H.; Kim, C.K. Roles of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in horticultural plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, J.W.; Ban, Z.J.; Lu, H.Y.; Li, D.; Poverenov, E.; Luo, Z.S.; Li, L. The aroma volatile repertoire in strawberry fruit: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4395–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Capocasa, F.; Diamanti, J.; Tulipani, S.; Battino, M.; Mezzetti, B. Breeding strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch) to increase fruit nutritional quality. Biofactors 2008, 34, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Basu, A.; Schell, J.; Scofield, R.H. Dietary fruits and arthritis. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Montefiori, M.; Brendolise, C.; Dare, A.P.; Lin-Wang, K.; Davies, K.M.; Hellens, R.P.; Allan, A.C. In the Solanaceae, a hierarchy of bHLHs confer distinct target specificity to the anthocyanin regulatory complex. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1427–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bustamante, L.; Sáez, V.; Hinrichsen, P.; Castro, M.H.; Vergara, C.; von Baer, D.; Mardones, C. Differences in Vvufgt and VvmybA1 Gene Expression Levels and Phenolic Composition in Table Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) ‘Red Globe’ and Its Somaclonal Variant ‘Pink Globe’. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2793–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lai, B.; Du, L.N.; Liu, R.; Hu, B.; Su, W.B.; Qin, Y.H.; Zhao, J.T.; Wang, H.C.; Hu, G.B. Two LcbHLH Transcription Factors Interacting with LcMYB1 in Regulating Late Structural Genes of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Nicotiana and Litchi chinensis During Anthocyanin Accumulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kadomura-Ishikawa, Y.; Miyawaki, K.; Takahashi, A.; Noji, S. RNAi-mediated silencing and overexpression of the FaMYB1 gene and its effect on anthocyanin accumulation in strawberry fruit. Biol. Plant. 2015, 59, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Medina-Puche, L.; Cumplido-Laso, G.; Amil-Ruiz, F.; Hoffmann, T.; Ring, L.; Rodríguez-Franco, A.; Caballero, J.L.; Schwab, W.; Muñoz-Blanco, J.; Blanco-Portales, R. MYB10 plays a major role in the regulation of flavonoid/phenylpropanoid metabolism during ripening of Fragaria × ananassa fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Castillejo, C.; Waurich, V.; Wagner, H.; Ramos, R.; Oiza, N.; Muñoz, P.; Triviño, J.C.; Caruana, J.; Liu, Z.; Cobo, N.; et al. Allelic Variation of MYB10 Is the Major Force Controlling Natural Variation in Skin and Flesh Color in Strawberry (Fragaria spp.) Fruit. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3723–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yuan, H.; Cai, W.; Chen, X.; Pang, F.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M. Heterozygous frameshift mutation in FaMYB10 is responsible for the natural formation of red and white-fleshed strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1027567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, L.; Mao, W.; Jia, M.; Xing, S.; Usman, A.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cao, M.; Dai, Z.; Zhang, K. FaMYB44.2, a transcriptional repressor, negatively regulates sucrose accumulation in strawberry receptacles through interplay with FaMYB10. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4805–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rao, M.J.; Zuo, H.; Xu, Q. Genomic insights into citrus domestication and its important agronomic traits. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strazzer, P.; Spelt, C.E.; Li, S.; Bliek, M.; Federici, C.T.; Roose, M.L.; Koes, R.; Quattrocchio, F.M. Hyperacidification of Citrus fruits by a vacuolar proton-pumping P-ATPase complex. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quattrocchio, F.; Verweij, W.; Kroon, A.; Spelt, C.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. PH4 of Petunia is an R2R3 MYB protein that activates vacuolar acidification through interactions with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors of the anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1274–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Yang, M.; Xie, X.; Sun, P.; Fang, C.; Zhao, J. R2R3-MYB transcription factor FaMYB5 is involved in citric acid metabolism in strawberry fruits. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 277, 153789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, J.; Osbourn, A.; Ma, P. MYB Transcription Factors as Regulators of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sater, H.M.; Bizzio, L.N.; Tieman, D.M.; Muñoz, P.D. A Review of the Fruit Volatiles Found in Blueberry and Other Vaccinium Species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5777–5786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Verdonk, J.C.; Haring, M.A.; van Tunen, A.J.; Schuurink, R.C. ODORANT1 regulates fragrance biosynthesis in petunia flowers. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1612–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bandeira Reidel, R.V.; Melai, B.; Cioni, P.; Flamini, G.; Pistelli, L. Aroma Profile of Rubus ulmifolius Flowers and Fruits During Different Ontogenetic Phases. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 1776–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Yang, X.; Grierson, D.; Jiang, G.; et al. An ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR-MYB Transcription Complex Regulates Furaneol Biosynthesis by Activating QUINONE OXIDOREDUCTASE Expression in Strawberry. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lu, H.; Luo, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, W.; Li, D.; Belwal, T.; Xu, Y.; Li, L. FaMYB9 is involved in the regulation of C6 volatile biosynthesis in strawberry. Plant Sci. 2020, 293, 110422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, S.; Shi, M.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Xie, X.; Zhang, L.; Sun, P.; Feng, H.; Xue, H.; Fang, C.; et al. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor FaMYB63 participates in regulation of eugenol production in strawberry. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 2146–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Medina-Puche, L.; Molina-Hidalgo, F.J.; Boersma, M.; Schuurink, R.C.; López-Vidriero, I.; Solano, R.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Caballero, J.L.; Blanco-Portales, R.; Muñoz-Blanco, J. An R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor Regulates Eugenol Production in Ripe Strawberry Fruit Receptacles. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 598–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, Z.; Hasing, T.; Johnson, T.S.; Garner, D.M.; Schwieterman, M.L.; Barbey, C.R.; Colquhoun, T.A.; Sims, C.A.; Resende, M.F.R.; Whitaker, V.M. Strawberry sweetness and consumer preference are enhanced by specific volatile compounds. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Staudt, G. Strawberry Biogeography, Genetics and Systematics. Acta Hortic. 2009, 842, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Edger, P.P.; Poorten, T.J.; VanBuren, R.; Hardigan, M.A.; Colle, M.; McKain, M.R.; Smith, R.D.; Teresi, S.J.; Nelson, A.D.L.; Wai, C.M.; et al. Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Feng, C.; Wang, J.; Harris, A.J.; Folta, K.M.; Zhao, M.; Kang, M. Tracing the Diploid Ancestry of the Cultivated Octoploid Strawberry. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Edger, P.P.; McKain, M.R.; Yocca, A.E.; Knapp, S.J.; Qiao, Q.; Zhang, T. Reply to: Revisiting the origin of octoploid strawberry. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hardigan, M.A.; Feldmann, M.J.; Lorant, A.; Bird, K.A.; Famula, R.; Acharya, C.; Cole, G.; Edger, P.P.; Knapp, S.J. Genome Synteny Has Been Conserved Among the Octoploid Progenitors of Cultivated Strawberry Over Millions of Years of Evolution. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Whitaker, V.M.; Knapp, S.J.; Hardigan, M.A.; Edger, P.P.; Slovin, J.P.; Bassil, N.V.; Hytönen, T.; Mackenzie, K.K.; Lee, S.; Jung, S.; et al. A roadmap for research in octoploid strawberry. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sheng, L.; Ni, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Gao, H. Characteristic-Aroma-Component-Based Evaluation and Classification of Strawberry Varieties by Aroma Type. Molecules 2021, 26, 6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noguchi, Y.; Muro, T.; Morishita, M. The possibility of using decaploid interspecific hybrids (Fragaria × Ananassa × F. nilgerrensis) as a parent for a new strawberry. Acta Hortic. 2009, 842, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sheng, L.; Ma, C.; Chen, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, J. Genome-Wide Screening of AP2 Transcription Factors Involving in Fruit Color and Aroma Regulation of Cultivated Strawberry. Genes 2021, 12, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Urün, I.; Attar, S.H.; Sönmez, D.A.; Gündeşli, M.A.; Ercişli, S.; Kafkas, N.E.; Bandić, L.M.; Duralija, B. Comparison of Polyphenol, Sugar, Organic Acid, Volatile Compounds, and Antioxidant Capacity of Commercially Grown Strawberry Cultivars in Turkey. Plants 2021, 10, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xue, L.; Lei, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of the R2R3-MYB Gene Family in Fragaria × ananassa and Its Function Identification During Anthocyanins Biosynthesis in Pink-Flowered Strawberry. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 702160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Potter, S.C.; Luciani, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Park, Y.; Lopez, R.; Finn, R.D. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W200–W204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Stracke, R.; Jahns, O.; Keck, M.; Tohge, T.; Niehaus, K.; Fernie, A.R.; Weisshaar, B. Analysis of Production of Flavonol Glycosides-dependent flavonol glycoside accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana plants reveals MYB11-, MYB12- and MYB111-independent flavonol glycoside accumulation. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 985–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duan, S.; Wang, J.; Gao, C.; Jin, C.; Li, D.; Peng, D.; Du, G.; Li, Y.; Chen, M. Functional characterization of a heterologously expressed Brassica napus WRKY41-1 transcription factor in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2018, 268, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Panchy, N.; Lehti-Shiu, M.; Shiu, S.H. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2294–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hong, S.; Lim, Y.P.; Kwon, S.Y.; Shin, A.Y.; Kim, Y.M. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Flowering-Time Genes; Insights on the Gene Family Expansion and Evolutionary Perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 702243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Reams, A.B.; Neidle, E.L. Selection for gene clustering by tandem duplication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 58, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hirakawa, H.; Shirasawa, K.; Kosugi, S.; Tashiro, K.; Nakayama, S.; Yamada, M.; Kohara, M.; Watanabe, A.; Kishida, Y.; Fujishiro, T.; et al. Dissection of the octoploid strawberry genome by deep sequencing of the genomes of Fragaria species. DNA Res. 2014, 21, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wei, Q.; Chen, R.; Wei, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Yin, X.; Xie, T. Genome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB family in wheat and functional characteristics of the abiotic stress responsive gene TaMYB344. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Dong, J.; Li, J.; Butelli, E.; Xue, Z.; et al. The control of red colour by a family of MYB transcription factors in octoploid strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruits. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1169–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lotkowska, M.E.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R.; Xue, G.P.; Balazadeh, S.; Mueller-Roeber, B. The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB112 Promotes Anthocyanin Formation during Salinity and under High Light Stress. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1862–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The maximum-likelihood phylogeny of MYB genes of Fragaria × ananassa (FaMYBs) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMYBs). Different groups are colored respectively. Numbers on branches are bootstrap values of 1000 replications. Gene IDs of AtMYBs are listed in Table S2.
Figure 1. The maximum-likelihood phylogeny of MYB genes of Fragaria × ananassa (FaMYBs) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMYBs). Different groups are colored respectively. Numbers on branches are bootstrap values of 1000 replications. Gene IDs of AtMYBs are listed in Table S2.
Genes 14 00068 g001
Figure 2. The FaMYB locus identification. (A) The synteny analysis of the F. ananassa genome. Syntenic blocks are linked by dark lines and FaMYB gene pairs are highlighted by different colors. The sub-genomes are labelled by Fve, Fii, Fni and Fvi according to sub-genome donors, respectively [33]. FaMYB loci are located on the scale plate of the chromosomal length in megabases (Mb). (B) The FaMYB locus illustration by neighbor–join phylogeny of FaMYBs and AtMYBs. The MYBs of F. vesca (FvMYBs) on branches indicated the loci names. The collapsed nodes are FaMYB loci including at least one allele of each homologous chromosome and loci name are shown in Table S6.
Figure 2. The FaMYB locus identification. (A) The synteny analysis of the F. ananassa genome. Syntenic blocks are linked by dark lines and FaMYB gene pairs are highlighted by different colors. The sub-genomes are labelled by Fve, Fii, Fni and Fvi according to sub-genome donors, respectively [33]. FaMYB loci are located on the scale plate of the chromosomal length in megabases (Mb). (B) The FaMYB locus illustration by neighbor–join phylogeny of FaMYBs and AtMYBs. The MYBs of F. vesca (FvMYBs) on branches indicated the loci names. The collapsed nodes are FaMYB loci including at least one allele of each homologous chromosome and loci name are shown in Table S6.
Genes 14 00068 g002
Figure 3. The NJ-tree (A), motifs (B) and gene structures (C) of MYBs of Fii subgenome (FaMYB-Fiis). Different groups of NJ-tree are colored, respectively. Top 10 conserved motifs are located on the amino acid residue scale plate of FaMYB-Fiis proteins. The introns (lines), exons of CDS (coding sequence) region in yellow and the UTR (untranslated region) in green are located on the nucleotide scale plate of genomic sequences.
Figure 3. The NJ-tree (A), motifs (B) and gene structures (C) of MYBs of Fii subgenome (FaMYB-Fiis). Different groups of NJ-tree are colored, respectively. Top 10 conserved motifs are located on the amino acid residue scale plate of FaMYB-Fiis proteins. The introns (lines), exons of CDS (coding sequence) region in yellow and the UTR (untranslated region) in green are located on the nucleotide scale plate of genomic sequences.
Genes 14 00068 g003
Figure 4. FaMYBs expression profiles of 3 strawberry cultivars (A) and 4 ripening processes (B). The rows represented FaMYBs. The strawberry cultivars ‘Benihoppe’ (BH), ‘Tokun’ (TK) and ‘Snow White’ (SW) and ripening processes of TK. (i) the stage of green fruit (G), (ii) the stage of fruit turning green to white (GW), (iii) the stage of white fruit (W) and (iv) the stage of red fruit (R) are labeled on the columns. Numbers in boxes are TPM (transcripts per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) values, and normalized TPM are converted to the gradient colors. FaMYBs of (B) are clustered by hierarchical clustering of Euclidean distance. FaMYBs homologous genes and corresponding function are marked by legends.
Figure 4. FaMYBs expression profiles of 3 strawberry cultivars (A) and 4 ripening processes (B). The rows represented FaMYBs. The strawberry cultivars ‘Benihoppe’ (BH), ‘Tokun’ (TK) and ‘Snow White’ (SW) and ripening processes of TK. (i) the stage of green fruit (G), (ii) the stage of fruit turning green to white (GW), (iii) the stage of white fruit (W) and (iv) the stage of red fruit (R) are labeled on the columns. Numbers in boxes are TPM (transcripts per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) values, and normalized TPM are converted to the gradient colors. FaMYBs of (B) are clustered by hierarchical clustering of Euclidean distance. FaMYBs homologous genes and corresponding function are marked by legends.
Genes 14 00068 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Yin, Y.; Gao, H.; Sheng, L. Identification of MYB Transcription Factors Involving in Fruit Quality Regulation of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Genes 2023, 14, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010068

AMA Style

Wang J, Yin Y, Gao H, Sheng L. Identification of MYB Transcription Factors Involving in Fruit Quality Regulation of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Genes. 2023; 14(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jianwen, Yujia Yin, Hongsheng Gao, and Lixia Sheng. 2023. "Identification of MYB Transcription Factors Involving in Fruit Quality Regulation of Fragaria × ananassa Duch." Genes 14, no. 1: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop