Next Article in Journal
Euarchontoglires Challenged by Incomplete Lineage Sorting
Next Article in Special Issue
Functions and Regulation of Meiotic HORMA-Domain Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Class I MHC Polymorphisms Associated with Type 2 Diabetes in the Mexican Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Loss, Gain, and Retention: Mechanisms Driving Late Prophase I Chromosome Remodeling for Accurate Meiotic Chromosome Segregation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Brief History of Drosophila (Female) Meiosis

by
Jessica E. Fellmeth
1 and
Kim S. McKim
2,*
1
Department of Biology, Millersville University, Millersville, PA 17551, USA
2
Waksman Institute and Department of Genetics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(5), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050775
Submission received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 16 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics)

Abstract

:
Drosophila has been a model system for meiosis since the discovery of nondisjunction. Subsequent studies have determined that crossing over is required for chromosome segregation, and identified proteins required for the pairing of chromosomes, initiating meiotic recombination, producing crossover events, and building a spindle to segregate the chromosomes. With a variety of genetic and cytological tools, Drosophila remains a model organism for the study of meiosis. This review focusses on meiosis in females because in male meiosis, the use of chiasmata to link homologous chromosomes has been replaced by a recombination-independent mechanism. Drosophila oocytes are also a good model for mammalian meiosis because of biological similarities such as long pauses between meiotic stages and the absence of centrosomes during the meiotic divisions.

1. Introduction

Crossing over is required for the segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I. This relationship has been demonstrated in Drosophila females in several ways, such as the increase in nondisjunction when crossing over is reduced [1,2]. Meiosis begins at around the time of oocyte specification, proceeds through the process of recombination, and ends with two rounds of divisions. This review focuses on female meiosis, because like most other organisms, it depends on the initiation and function of recombination. Meiosis in Drosophila males, in contrast, is fascinating because it shows it is possible to achieve accurate chromosome segregation with a completely different system of homolog interactions [3]. For more details and a comprehensive list of meiotic genes, the interested reader is referred to an extensive review of meiosis in female Drosophila including a compendium of most of the important genes [4].
Drosophila females are an excellent system to study meiosis because they combine powerful genetics and cell biology. Errors in meiosis can be measured using standard genetic crosses that detect sex chromosome aneuploidy, or FISH to detect the aneuploidy of all chromosomes. Classical mutants or RNAi (using shRNA) are used to knock out or knock down any gene during meiosis. Tissue-specific gene expression systems (UAS/GAL4) allow for germline-specific knockouts and the expression of mutants, which is important when the genes are essential. These tools also allow for short-term expression or knock down experiments, which facilitates investigations into when proteins are required and their dynamics. A large selection of antibodies or epitope-tagged transgenes are publicly available for the cytological examination of all meiotic stages.
The organization of the Drosophila ovary facilitates cytological studies because it allows for the isolation, observation and staging of oocytes. The ovary contains several ovarioles, which are strings of developing oocytes arranged in temporal order, with stem cells at one end, and mature oocytes at the other. Each ovariole is divided into two main sections. The first, the germarium, contains the stem cells and early meiotic prophase; the stages which are present in the fetal oocytes of mammals. The second, the vitellarium, contains oocytes arrested in late meiotic prophase and is mostly concerned with development and growth of the oocyte. At the end of the vitellarium, meiosis resumes with nuclear envelope breakdown and entry into prometaphase I. The mature oocyte arrests in metaphase I until ovulation occurs.

2. The Mitotic Region (Region 1)

At one end of the ovariole is region 1, which includes the germline stem cells (Figure 1). The presence of stem cells in the ovary is a significant difference compared to mammalian female meiosis, where a stem cell population is absent in the adult. An asymmetric division generates another stem cell and a cystoblast. This cystoblast then undergoes four incomplete mitotic divisions to generate a 16-cell cyst. The incomplete divisions result in all 16-cells of a cyst being connected by channels or “ring canals” [5].
It is unclear if events in region 1 and the mitotic cyst divisions are important for initiating meiosis. Meiotic cohesins function in these cells [6], homologous chromosome become paired [7] and synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins can be detected on the chromosomes [8,9]. As in most other model organisms, the signals controlling entry into female meiosis are poorly understood [10,11,12]. An important regulatory step is the concentration of transcripts into the oocytes, which depends on RNA binding proteins such as ORB [13] and Egalitarian [14] and interactions with BicD and the microtubules [15]. While two of the cells in the 16-cell cysts have four ring canals and simultaneously enter meiosis [16,17], one of these cells accumulates many transcripts, including some required for meiosis [18]. Concentrating these factors into the oocyte is required to maintain meiosis and specify the oocyte [19].

3. Meiotic Prophase (Regions 2–3)

Two cells in each cyst (“pro-oocytes) undergo premeiotic DNA replication [20] and then assemble the synaptonemal complex (SC), initiate double strand breaks (DSBs), and repair some of these as crossovers. This all occurs before the end of the germarium (Figure 1). The cytological aspects of meiotic progression were first described using electron microscopy along with an analysis of the first mutants to affect recombination nodule structure [16,21]. The SC initiates first at the centromeres [22,23] and forms without DSBs and possibly before them [24], which is a little unusual but not unique [25]. This conclusion was initially made by examining SC in recombination-defective mutants, but was later confirmed using an antibody to the phosphorylated variant of H2A (γH2AV) [26,27]. Conserved elements of SC assembly have been described, including the transverse protein C(3)G, other associated SC proteins [28,29,30] and two complexes of meiosis-specific cohesins [6,31,32]. Like other organisms, DSBs depend on the SPO11/TOPVIA orthologue MEI-W68 [33] and its TOPVIB partner MEI-P22 [34,35].
Drosophila has proved to be an excellent system to study the genetic controls on the distribution of crossing over [36,37]. Genes required for crossing over were originally classified as precondition or exchange genes, based on whether the mutants altered the distribution of crossing over [38]. Based on these genetic phenomena, it was proposed that precondition genes have a role in determining the location of crossover sites, while exchange genes execute the process. This proposal has turned out to be essentially correct [39,40,41]. The precondition genes include a complex of Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM) protein paralogs, the “mei-MCM” complex [42]. The exchange genes encode proteins such as XPF ortholog MEI-9 and MUS312 that are in the pathway that generates crossovers [43]. Similar to studies in other organisms, however, the generation of crossovers can occur by multiple pathways and involve antagonism with Blm helicase [41,42].
Studying chromosome rearrangements has revealed three structural features of meiotic recombination. First, the centromere effect of suppressing crossing over around the centromeric regions was discovered in Drosophila [44,45]. Second, the interchromosomal effect was the discovery that suppression of crossing over on one chromosome results in increased crossing over on other chromosomes [46]. This increase derives from a redistribution of crossovers among existing DSBs [47]. It has been proposed that the increased crossing over is the product of a checkpoint mechanism that detects rearrangement heterozygosity and causes a prolonged phase during which crossover sites can be established [48,49]. Third, the heterozygosity of chromosome rearrangement breakpoints suppresses crossing over at long distances. These observations have been interpreted as evidence for specialized sites that promote and regulate homologous chromosome interactions [50]. Pairing of homologous chromosomes is not disrupted in translocation [51] or inversion [52] heterozygotes, leading to the suggestion that meiotic crossing over depends on continuity of meiotic chromosome structure within large chromosomal domains.

4. The Long Pause (Stages 2–12)

Similarly to mammals, there is a long pause in meiotic prophase, between pachytene when recombination occurs and metaphase I when a meiotic spindle assembles. As the cyst leaves the germarium, the oocyte is selected and the other pro-oocyte becomes a nurse cell (Figure 1). The oocyte loses its SC, although some SC components remain associated with the centromeres [53]. During this time, the oocyte grows and acquires cytoplasm from the nurse cells. By stage 13, the entire cytoplasmic contents of the nurse cells are transported, or “dumped” into the oocyte (Figure 2).

5. Entry into the Meiotic Divisions (Stage 13–14)

Oocyte spindle assembly is acentrosomal in Drosophila, as in other animals, and was one of the first systems where this was studied genetically and cytologically. An important concept is that microtubules originating cytologically or cortically are recruited by the chromosomes [54]. Although centrioles lack [55] spindle pole components, including γ-tubulin, MSPS/XMAP215 and TACC are present and important for spindle organization [56,57,58].
In the absence of centrosomes, the chromosomes recruit microtubules (it is not known if they nucleate their growth). Given the size of the oocyte (400 µm × 100 µm), the mass of chromosomes (or “karyosome”) (5 µm) and the spindle (10 µm long) is quite small. Therefore, it is important for the oocyte to promote microtubule assembly around the chromosomes while inhibiting it in the rest of the cytoplasm. Indeed, the cytoplasm is rich in microtubules [59,60] and it is logical that the chromosomes have a primary role in controlling and initiating spindle assembly.
Two mechanisms promote spindle assembly around the oocyte chromosomes. First, microtubule-associated proteins in the cytoplasm are inhibited, at least in part by the 14-3-3 protein [61]. Second, the localization of the Chromosome Passenger complex (CPC) to the chromatin promotes spindle assembly [62,63,64], with a contribution from the Ran pathway [65]. Among the proteins activated by the CPC are multiple kinesin proteins that bundle microtubules. The Kinesin 6 Subito, which most likely interacts with the CPC, recruits γ-tubulin to nucleate microtubule assembly [66]. In addition, the CPC is required for the assembly of the kinetochore, which directly interacts with microtubules at the centromeres [67]. The kinetochore orchestrates meiosis-specific functions such as fusion of sister centromeres [68] and bi-orientation of homologous chromosomes (see below). How tension works in this process is not understood, and it is surprising that in the absence of tension, metaphase I arrest is bypassed, resulting in precocious anaphase (Figure 2) [69,70].
Centrosomes not only nucleate and recruit microtubules, as they also help to organize them into a bipolar spindle (Figure 2). Data from studies on the kinesin-6 Subito have shown this is an active process, rather than an intrinsic property of microtubules. Subito organizes a central spindle, which contains several proteins [71]. Subito recruits the CPC to the central spindle, and in the absence of these proteins, bi-orientation is defective [72,73]. Interactions between the central spindle and the actin network also appear to be important for bi-orientation [74]. An interesting possibility is that interactions between kinetochores and central spindle-associated CPC are required for the process of error correction [63,75]. Indeed, the presence of a robust central spindle may help to compensate for the absence of centrosomes.
Unlike mammals, the oocytes do not age as the mother does. This is because germ line stem cells are present in the adult female and produce a constant supply of new oocytes. Similarly to mammalian oocytes, however, there is a relatively long pause between prophase and metaphase. During this time, centromere and cohesion proteins must be maintained [76,77]. Meiotic cohesion is protected by PP2A [78] and the inhibition of Polo kinase [68,79]. By manipulating culture conditions and forcing females to hold their oocytes, it has been observed that aging mature oocytes causes an increase in chromosome segregation errors [77,80] and defects in meiotic spindle organization [81]. It has been proposed these defects are due to the levels of superoxide dismutase [82,83] or decreases in translation [81].
While chiasmata direct the segregation of most chromosomes, Drosophila females have a second system for chromosome segregation. Known as the achiasmate system, it is required for the segregation of the naturally achiasmate 4th chromosomes, as well as any other chromosomes that are achiasmate either by chance (so-called E0s) or because of heterozygosity for a balancer chromosome [84,85]. Although some of the genetics of achiasmate segregation is esoteric, this system clearly depends on microtubule-associated proteins. For example, NOD is a conserved kinesin 10 and one of the first proteins required for the achiasmate system to be identified [86]. Nonetheless, the role of the achiasmate system in normal Drosophila females has not been determined. Is it only required for the 4th chromosome and rare achiasmate chromosomes, or is it more intricately involved in the segregation of all chromosomes?

6. Exit from Meiosis and Fertilization (the Embryo)

The events that occur between metaphase I and fertilization are rapid. The oocyte is activated by their passage down the oviduct, independent of fertilization, and rapidly completes the two meiotic divisions [87,88,89]. Drosophila oocytes do not excise polar bodies. Instead, all four meiotic products align perpendicularly to the oocyte cortex [90,91]. The inner-most meiotic product fuses with the male pro-nucleus, while the remaining three female meiosis products fuse and form a single polar body that can persist for a long time [92].
There are interesting consequences of producing polar bodies in meiosis. For example, inversion heterozygotes may not have fertility defects because the crossover products, which generate chromosome rearrangements, end up in the polar bodies. The fact that only one meiotic product from female meiosis is fertilized has led to theories that there is competition between chromosomes, based on centromere strength, for inclusion in the zygote [93]. Unequal centromeres could interact with an asymmetric spindle to result in the biased retention of certain chromosomes in the zygote [94,95]. Genetic studies in Drosophila have generated evidence of asymmetric segregation that was influenced by “centromere strength” [96,97,98,99]. More recently, there is cytological evidence of an asymmetric spindle [100] and genetic data suggesting a centromere drive [101].

7. Summary

Drosophila has been a model system since the discovery of nondisjunction [102,103] the first meiotic mutant [104] and the first screens for meiotic mutants [105,106]. Now, with a variety of genetic and cytological tools as described above, Drosophila remains a model organism of choice for the study of meiosis.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, K.S.M. Writing—review and editing J.E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant number NIH/NIGMS GM101955.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baker, B.S.; Carpenter, A.T.C.; Esposito, M.S.; Esposito, R.E.; Sandler, L. The genetic control of meiosis. Ann. Rev. Genet. 1976, 10, 53–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hawley, R.S. Exchange and chromosomal segregation in eucaryotes. In Genetic Recombination; Kucherlapati, R., Smith, G., Eds.; American Society of Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1988; pp. 497–527. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, E.E.; He, Q.; McKee, B.D. How noncrossover homologs are conjoined and segregated in Drosophila male meiosis I: Stable but reversible homolog linkers require a novel Separase target protein. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hughes, S.E.; Miller, D.E.; Miller, A.L.; Hawley, R.S. Female Meiosis: Synapsis, Recombination, and Segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2018, 208, 875–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Roth, S.; Lynch, J.A. Symmetry breaking during Drosophila oogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a001891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gyuricza, M.R.; Manheimer, K.B.; Apte, V.; Krishnan, B.; Joyce, E.F.; McKee, B.D.; McKim, K.S. Dynamic and Stable Cohesins Regulate Synaptonemal Complex Assembly and Chromosome Segregation. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 1688–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Joyce, E.F.; Apostolopoulos, N.; Beliveau, B.J.; Wu, C.T. Germline Progenitors Escape the Widespread Phenomenon of Homolog Pairing during Drosophila Development. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1004013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Christophorou, N.; Rubin, T.; Huynh, J.-R. Synaptonemal Complex Components Promote Centromere Pairing in Pre-meiotic Germ Cells. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1004012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rubin, T.; Christophorou, N.; Huynh, J.-R. How to pre-pair chromosomes for meiosis. Cell Cycle 2016, 15, 609–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sou, I.F.; Pryce, R.M.; Tee, W.-W.; McClurg, U.L. Meiosis initiation: A story of two sexes in all creatures great and small. Biochem. J. 2021, 478, 3791–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wei, Y.; Reveal, B.; Reich, J.; Laursen, W.J.; Senger, S.; Akbar, T.; Iida-Jones, T.; Cai, W.; Jarnik, M.; Lilly, M.A. TORC1 regulators Iml1/GATOR1 and GATOR2 control meiotic entry and oocyte development in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E5670–E5677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. McCarthy, A.; Sarkar, K.; Martin, E.T.; Upadhyay, M.; Jang, S.; Williams, N.D.; Forni, P.E.; Buszczak, M.; Rangan, P. Msl3 promotes germline stem cell differentiation in female Drosophila. Development 2022, 149, dev199625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barr, J.; Gilmutdinov, R.; Wang, L.; Shidlovskii, Y.; Schedl, P. The Drosophila CPEB Protein Orb Specifies Oocyte Fate by a 3’UTR-Dependent Autoregulatory Loop. Genetics 2019, 213, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mach, J.M.; Lehmann, R. An Egalitarian-BicaudalD complex is essential for oocyte specification and axis determination in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Deng, W.; Lin, H. Asymmetric germ cell division and oocyte determination during Drosophila oogenesis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2001, 203, 93–138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Carpenter, A.T.C. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics 1979, 92, 511–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Carpenter, A.T.C. Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. I. Structure, arrangement, and temporal change of the synaptonemal complex in wild-type. Chromosoma 1975, 51, 157–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manheim, E.; McKim, K.S. The Synaptonemal Complex Component C(2)M Regulates Meiotic Crossing over in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Carpenter, A.T.C. Egalitarian and the choice of cell fates in Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Germline Dev. 1994, 182, 223–254. [Google Scholar]
  20. Carpenter, A.T.C. EM Autoradiographic evidence that DNA synthesis occurs at recombination nodules during meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. Chromosoma 1981, 83, 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carpenter, A.T.C. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 1979, 75, 259–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takeo, S.; Hawley, R.S. Rumors of its disassembly have been greatly exaggerated: The secret life of the synaptonemal complex at the centromeres. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tanneti, N.S.; Landy, K.; Joyce, E.F.; McKim, K.S. A Pathway for Synapsis Initiation during Zygotene in Drosophila Oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1852–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. McKim, K.S.; Green-Marroquin, B.L.; Sekelsky, J.J.; Chin, G.; Steinberg, C.; Khodosh, R.; Hawley, R.S. Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science 1998, 279, 876–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dernburg, A.F.; McDonald, K.; Moulder, G.; Barstead, R.; Dresser, M.; Villeneuve, A.M. Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 1998, 94, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mehrotra, S.; McKim, K.S. Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lake, C.M.; Holsclaw, J.K.; Bellendir, S.P.; Sekelsky, J.; Hawley, R.S. The development of a monoclonal antibody recognizing the Drosophila melanogaster phosphorylated histone H2A variant (γ-H2AV). G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2013, 3, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar]
  28. Page, S.L.; Hawley, R.S. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3130–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Collins, K.A.; Unruh, J.R.; Slaughter, B.D.; Yu, Z.; Lake, C.M.; Nielsen, R.J.; Box, K.S.; Miller, D.E.; Blumenstiel, J.P.; Perera, A.G.; et al. Corolla is a novel protein that contributes to the architecture of the synaptonemal complex of Drosophila. Genetics 2014, 198, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Page, S.L.; Khetani, R.S.; Lake, C.M.; Nielsen, R.J.; Jeffress, J.K.; Warren, W.D.; Bickel, S.E.; Hawley, R.S. Corona is required for higher-order assembly of transverse filaments into full-length synaptonemal complex in Drosophila oocytes. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Krishnan, B.; Thomas, S.E.; Yan, R.; Yamada, H.; Zhulin, I.B.; McKee, B.D. Sisters Unbound Is Required for Meiotic Centromeric Cohesion in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2014, 198, 947–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yan, R.; McKee, B.D. The Cohesion Protein SOLO Associates with SMC1 and Is Required for Synapsis, Recombination, Homolog Bias and Cohesion and Pairing of Centromeres in Drosophila Meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. McKim, K.S.; Hayashi-Hagihara, A. mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: Evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 2932–2942. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, H.; Jang, J.K.; Kato, N.; McKim, K.S. mei-P22 encodes a chromosome-associated protein required for the initiation of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2002, 162, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Robert, T.; Nore, A.; Brun, C.; Maffre, C.; Crimi, B.; Bourbon, H.M.; de Massy, B. The TopoVIB-Like protein family is required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation. Science 2016, 351, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Carpenter, A.T.C. Thoughts on Recombination nodules, meiotic recombination, and chiasmata. In Genetic Recombination; Kucherlapati, R., Smith, G., Eds.; American Society of Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1988; pp. 529–548. [Google Scholar]
  37. Baker, B.S.; Hall, J.C. Meiotic mutants: Genetic control of meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila; Ashburner, M., Novitski, E., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 351–434. [Google Scholar]
  38. Carpenter, A.T.C.; Baker, B.S. On the control of the distribution of meiotic exchange in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1982, 101, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yildiz, O.; Majumder, S.; Kramer, B.; Sekelsky, J.J. Drosophila MUS312 Interacts with the Nucleotide Excision Repair Endonuclease MEI-9 to Generate Meiotic Crossovers. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sekelsky, J.J.; McKim, K.S.; Chin, G.M.; Hawley, R.S. The Drosophila meiotic recombination gene mei-9 encodes a homologue of the yeast excision repair protein Rad1. Genetics 1995, 141, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kohl, K.P.; Jones, C.D.; Sekelsky, J. Evolution of an MCM complex in flies that promotes meiotic crossovers by blocking BLM helicase. Science 2012, 338, 1363–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hartmann, M.; Kohl, K.P.; Sekelsky, J.; Hatkevich, T. Meiotic MCM Proteins Promote and Inhibit Crossovers during Meiotic Recombination. Genetics 2019, 212, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Andersen, S.L.; Bergstralh, D.T.; Kohl, K.P.; LaRocque, J.R.; Moore, C.B.; Sekelsky, J. Drosophila MUS312 and the vertebrate ortholog BTBD12 interact with DNA structure-specific endonucleases in DNA repair and recombination. Mol. Cell 2009, 35, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hartmann, M.; Umbanhowar, J.; Sekelsky, J. Centromere-Proximal Meiotic Crossovers in Drosophila melanogaster Are Suppressed by Both Highly Repetitive Heterochromatin and Proximity to the Centromere. Genetics 2019, 213, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Beadle, G. A possible influence of the spindle fiber on crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1932, 18, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lucchesi, J.C.; Suzuki, D.T. The interchromosomal control of recombination. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1968, 2, 53–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Crown, K.N.; Miller, D.E.; Sekelsky, J.; Hawley, R.S. Local Inversion Heterozygosity Alters Recombination throughout the Genome. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 2984–2990.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Joyce, E.F.; McKim, K.S. Chromosome axis defects induce a checkpoint-mediated delay and interchromosomal effect on crossing over during Drosophila meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Joyce, E.F.; McKim, K.S. Drosophila PCH2 Is Required for a Pachytene Checkpoint That Monitors Double-Strand-Break-Independent Events Leading to Meiotic Crossover Formation. Genetics 2009, 181, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hawley, R.S. Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics 1980, 94, 625–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sherizen, D.; Jang, J.K.; Bhagat, R.; Kato, N.; McKim, K.S. Meiotic recombination in Drosophila females depends on chromosome continuity between genetically defined boundaries. Genetics 2005, 169, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gong, W.J.; McKim, K.S.; Hawley, R.S. All Paired Up with No Place to Go: Pairing, Synapsis, and DSB Formation in a Balancer Heterozygote. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1, e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Takeo, S.; Lake, C.M.; Morais-De-Sá, E.; Sunkel, C.E.; Hawley, R.S. Synaptonemal complex-dependent centromeric clustering and the initiation of synapsis in Drosophila oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1845–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Theurkauf, W.E.; Hawley, R.S. Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: Behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 116, 1167–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Matthies, H.J.; McDonald, H.B.; Goldstein, L.S.; Theurkauf, W.E. Anastral meiotic spindle morphogenesis: Role of the non-claret disjunctional kinesin-like protein. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 134, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cullen, C.F.; Ohkura, H. Msps protein is localized to acentrosomal poles to ensure bipolarity of Drosophila meiotic spindles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Costa, M.F.; Ohkura, H. The molecular architecture of the meiotic spindle is remodeled during metaphase arrest in oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 2854–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hughes, S.E.; Beeler, J.S.; Seat, A.; Slaughter, B.D.; Unruh, J.R.; Bauerly, E.; Matthies, J.G.; Hawley, R.S. Gamma-Tubulin is required foir bipolar spindle assembly and for proper kinetochore microtubule attachments during prometaphase in Drosophila oocytes. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Theurkauf, W.E. Microtubules and cytoplasmic organization during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 1994, 165, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hughes, S.E.; Hawley, R.S. Live Imaging of Meiosis I in Late-Stage Drosophila melanogaster Oocytes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1471, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  61. Beaven, R.; Bastos, R.N.; Spanos, C.; Romé, P.; Cullen, C.F.; Rappsilber, J.; Giet, R.; Goshima, G.; Ohkura, H. 14-3-3 regulation of Ncd reveals a new mechanism for targeting proteins to the spindle in oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2017, 216, 3029–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Colombié, N.; Cullen, C.F.; Brittle, A.L.; Jang, J.K.; Earnshaw, W.C.; Carmena, M.; McKim, K.; Ohkura, H. Dual roles of Incenp crucial to the assembly of the acentrosomal metaphase spindle in female meiosis. Development 2008, 135, 3239–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, L.-I.; DeFosse, T.; Jang, J.K.; Battaglia, R.A.; Wagner, V.F.; McKim, K.S. Borealin directs recruitment of the CPC to oocyte chromosomes and movement to the microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 2021, 220, e202006018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Radford, S.J.; Jang, J.K.; McKim, K.S. The Chromosomal Passenger Complex is required for Meiotic Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Bi-orientation. Genetics 2012, 192, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Cesario, J.; McKim, K.S. RanGTP is required for meiotic spindle organization and the initiation of embryonic development in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 3797–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Romé, P.; Ohkura, H. A novel microtubule nucleation pathway for meiotic spindle assembly in oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 3431–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Radford, S.; Hoang, T.L.; Głuszek, A.A.; Ohkura, H.; McKim, K.S. Lateral and End-On Kinetochore Attachments Are Coordinated to Achieve Bi-orientation in Drosophila Oocytes. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Wang, L.-I.; Das, A.; McKim, K.S. Sister centromere fusion during meiosis I depends on maintaining cohesins and destabilizing microtubule attachments. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jang, J.K.; Messina, L.; Erdman, M.B.; Arbel, T.; Hawley, R.S. Induction of metaphase arrest in Drosophila oocytes by chiasma-based kinetochore tension. Science 1995, 268, 1917–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. McKim, K.S.; Jang, J.K.; Theurkauf, W.E.; Hawley, R.S. Mechanical basis of meiotic metaphase arrest. Nature 1993, 362, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jang, J.K.; Rahman, T.; McKim, K.S. The kinesinlike protein Subito contributes to central spindle assembly and organization of the meiotic spindle in Drosophila oocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 4684–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Giunta, K.L.; Jang, J.K.; Manheim, E.; Subramanian, G.; McKim, K.S. Subito encodes a kinesin-like protein required for meiotic spindle pole formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2002, 160, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Das, A.; Cesario, J.; Hinman, A.M.; Jang, J.K.; McKim, K.S. Kinesin 6 Regulation in Drosophila Female Meiosis by the Non-conserved N- and C- Terminal Domains. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2018, 8, 1555–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Das, A.; Shah, S.J.; Fan, B.; Paik, D.; Disanto, D.J.; Hinman, A.M.; Cesario, J.M.; Battaglia, R.A.; Demos, N.; McKim, K.S. Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Segregation Requires Central Spindle Proteins in Drosophila Oocytes. Genetics 2016, 202, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McKim, K.S. Highway to hell-thy meiotic divisions: Chromosome passenger complex functions driven by microtubules: CPC interactions with both the chromosomes and microtubules are important for spindle assembly and function: CPC interactions with both the chromosomes and microtubules are important for spindle assembly and function. BioEssays 2022, 44, 2100202. [Google Scholar]
  76. Fellmeth, J.E.; McKim, K.S. Meiotic CENP-C is a shepherd: Bridging the space between the centromere and the kinetochore in time and space. Essays Biochem. 2020, 64, 251–261. [Google Scholar]
  77. Weng, K.A.; Jeffreys, C.A.; Bickel, S.E. Rejuvenation of Meiotic Cohesion in Oocytes during Prophase I Is Required for Chiasma Maintenance and Accurate Chromosome Segregation. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jang, J.K.; Gladstein, A.C.; Das, A.; Shapiro, J.G.; Sisco, Z.L.; McKim, K.S. Multiple pools of PP2A regulate spindle assembly, kinetochore attachments and cohesion in Drosophila oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2021, 134, jcs254037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bonner, A.M.; Hughes, S.E.; Hawley, R.S. Regulation of Polo Kinase by Matrimony Is Required for Cohesin Maintenance during Drosophila melanogaster Female Meiosis. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 715–722.e713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jeffreys, C.A.; Burrage, P.S.; Bickel, S.E. A model system for increased meiotic nondisjunction in older oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Greenblatt, E.J.; Obniski, R.; Mical, C.; Spradling, A.C. Prolonged ovarian storage of mature Drosophila oocytes dramatically increases meiotic spindle instability. Elife 2019, 8, e49455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Perkins, A.T.; Greig, M.M.; Sontakke, A.A.; Peloquin, A.S.; McPeek, M.A.; Bickel, S.E. Increased levels of superoxide dismutase suppress meiotic segregation errors in aging oocytes. Chromosoma 2019, 128, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Perkins, A.T.; Das, T.M.; Panzera, L.C.; Bickel, S.E. Oxidative stress in oocytes during midprophase induces premature loss of cohesion and chromosome segregation errors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6823–E6830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Hawley, R.S.; Theurkauf, W.E. Requiem for distributive segregation: Achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females. Trends Genet. 1993, 9, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Grell, R.F. Distributive Pairing. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila; Ashburner, M., Novitski, E., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang, P.; Knowles, B.A.; Goldstein, L.S.; Hawley, R.S. A kinesin-like protein required for distributive chromosome segregation in Drosophila. Cell 1990, 62, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Horner, V.L.; Wolfner, M.F. Mechanical stimulation by osmotic and hydrostatic pressure activates Drosophila oocytes in vitro in a calcium-dependent manner. Dev. Biol. 2008, 316, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Heifetz, Y.; Yu, J.; Wolfner, M.F. Ovulation triggers activation of Drosophila oocytes. Dev. Biol. 2001, 234, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kaneuchi, T.; Sartain, C.V.; Takeo, S.; Horner, V.L.; Buehner, N.A.; Aigaki, T.; Wolfner, M.F. Calcium waves occur as Drosophila oocytes activate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Bourouh, M.; Dhaliwal, R.; Rana, K.; Sinha, S.; Guo, Z.; Swan, A. Distinct and Overlapping Requirements for Cyclins A, B and B3 in Drosophila Female Meiosis. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2016, 6, 3711–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Riparbelli, M.G.; Callaini, G. The meiotic spindle of the Drosophila oocyte: The role of centrosomin and the central aster. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 2827–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Guo, Z.; Batiha, O.; Bourouh, M.; Fifield, E.; Swan, A. Role of Securin, Separase and Cohesins in female meiosis and polar body formation in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Kursel, L.E.; Malik, H.S. The cellular mechanisms and consequences of centromere drive. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 52, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Akera, T.; Trimm, E.; Lampson, M.A. Molecular Strategies of Meiotic Cheating by Selfish Centromeres. Cell 2019, 178, 1132–1144.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Akera, T.; Chmátal, L.; Trimm, E.; Yang, K.; Aonbangkhen, C.; Chenoweth, D.M.; Janke, C.; Schultz, R.M.; Lampson, M.A. Spindle asymmetry drives non-Mendelian chromosome segregation. Science 2017, 358, 668–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Mark, H.F.L.; Zimmering, S. Centromeric effect on the degree of nonrandom disjunction in the female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1977, 86, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zimmering, S. Genetic and cytogenetic aspects of altered segregation phenomena in Drosophila. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila Vol 1b; Ashburner, M., Novitski, E., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 569–613. [Google Scholar]
  98. Novitski, E. Genetic measures of centromere activity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1955, 45, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Novitski, E. Non-random disjunction in Drosophila. Genetics 1951, 36, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Radford, S.J.; Go, A.M.; McKim, K.S. Cooperation between Kinesin Motors Promotes Spindle Symmetry and Chromosome Organization in Oocytes. Genetics 2017, 205, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Wei, K.H.; Reddy, H.M.; Rathnam, C.; Lee, J.; Lin, D.; Ji, S.; Mason, J.M.; Clark, A.G.; Barbash, D.A. A Pooled Sequencing Approach Identifies a Candidate Meiotic Driver in Drosophila. Genetics 2017, 206, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Bridges, C.B. Non-disjunction as proof of the chromosome theory of heredity. Genetics 1916, 1, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bridges, C.B. Direct proof through non-disjunction that the sex-linked genes of Drosophila are borne by the X-chromosome. Science 1914, 40, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Gowen, M.S.; Gowen, J.W. Complete linkage in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 1922, 61, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Baker, B.S.; Carpenter, A.T. Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster. Genetics 1972, 71, 255–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sandler, L.; Lindsley, D.L.; Nicoletti, B.; Trippa, G. Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1968, 60, 525–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The early stages—meiotic prophase. (A) Germ cell development in the adult begins with stem cells located in the anterior tip of the germarium located in region 1. Four mitotic division in region 1 produce a 16-cell cyst, marked by the ORB protein in green. Surrounding the 16 cells cysts are somatic follicle cells. One of the two cells with four ring canals becomes specified as the oocyte and accumulates the most ORB protein, as well as many other RNAs and proteins, including those required for meiosis. The image also includes centromere staining (CID) in red, DNA in blue, and the scale bar is 10 um. (BD) Germarium showing appearance of SC and double strand breaks. The cohesin C(2)M is in red, SC transverse filament protein C(3)G in green and double strand break marker γH2AV in white. SC assembly initiates in region 2A, double strand breaks are observed shortly after, and by region 3 the DNA is repaired and crossovers have formed. The SC dissolves around stage 4 or 5.
Figure 1. The early stages—meiotic prophase. (A) Germ cell development in the adult begins with stem cells located in the anterior tip of the germarium located in region 1. Four mitotic division in region 1 produce a 16-cell cyst, marked by the ORB protein in green. Surrounding the 16 cells cysts are somatic follicle cells. One of the two cells with four ring canals becomes specified as the oocyte and accumulates the most ORB protein, as well as many other RNAs and proteins, including those required for meiosis. The image also includes centromere staining (CID) in red, DNA in blue, and the scale bar is 10 um. (BD) Germarium showing appearance of SC and double strand breaks. The cohesin C(2)M is in red, SC transverse filament protein C(3)G in green and double strand break marker γH2AV in white. SC assembly initiates in region 2A, double strand breaks are observed shortly after, and by region 3 the DNA is repaired and crossovers have formed. The SC dissolves around stage 4 or 5.
Genes 13 00775 g001
Figure 2. The latest stage, meiotic metaphase. In stages 13–14, the nuclear envelope breaks down and the meiotic spindle assembles. Meiosis arrests in metaphase I and progresses into anaphase I and meiosis II only when the oocyte passes through the oviduct on the way to being fertilized. In all images, the spindle is in green, the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) in red, centromeres in white, DNA in blue, and the scale bar is 5 µm. (A) A metaphase I spindle in a stage 14 oocyte. The inset shows that the central spindle proteins are organized in a microtubule-associated ring that goes around the chromosomes and is perpendicular to the spindle. (B) The CPC is required for spindle assembly. An oocyte expressing an shRNA for RNAi against INCENP causes the loss of all spindle microtubules. (C) In the absence of chiasma and tension, precocious anaphase is observed. This is an oocyte homozygous for a mei-P22 mutation, which eliminates all meiotic recombination.
Figure 2. The latest stage, meiotic metaphase. In stages 13–14, the nuclear envelope breaks down and the meiotic spindle assembles. Meiosis arrests in metaphase I and progresses into anaphase I and meiosis II only when the oocyte passes through the oviduct on the way to being fertilized. In all images, the spindle is in green, the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) in red, centromeres in white, DNA in blue, and the scale bar is 5 µm. (A) A metaphase I spindle in a stage 14 oocyte. The inset shows that the central spindle proteins are organized in a microtubule-associated ring that goes around the chromosomes and is perpendicular to the spindle. (B) The CPC is required for spindle assembly. An oocyte expressing an shRNA for RNAi against INCENP causes the loss of all spindle microtubules. (C) In the absence of chiasma and tension, precocious anaphase is observed. This is an oocyte homozygous for a mei-P22 mutation, which eliminates all meiotic recombination.
Genes 13 00775 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fellmeth, J.E.; McKim, K.S. A Brief History of Drosophila (Female) Meiosis. Genes 2022, 13, 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050775

AMA Style

Fellmeth JE, McKim KS. A Brief History of Drosophila (Female) Meiosis. Genes. 2022; 13(5):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050775

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fellmeth, Jessica E., and Kim S. McKim. 2022. "A Brief History of Drosophila (Female) Meiosis" Genes 13, no. 5: 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050775

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop