Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Transcription Factors Involved in the Synthesis of Ethyl Acetate in Aroma-Producing Yeast
Next Article in Special Issue
Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis Reveals the Origin of the Chakouyi Horse
Previous Article in Journal
A Compositional Heterogeneity Analysis of Mitochondrial Phylogenomics in Chalcidoidea Involving Two Newly Sequenced Mitogenomes of Eupelminae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unlocking Horse Y Chromosome Diversity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptional Specificity Analysis of Testis and Epididymis Tissues in Donkey

1
College of Life Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
Jiaozhou Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Jiaozhou 266300, China
3
College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
4
Key Laboratory of Animal Reproduction and Germplasm Enhancement in Universities of Shandong, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122339
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 8 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 11 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Equine Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Donkeys, with high economic value for meat, skin and milk production, are important livestock. However, the current insights into reproduction of donkeys are far from enough. To obtain a deeper understanding, the differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of transcriptomic data of testicular and epididymis tissues in donkeys were performed. In the result, there were 4313 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the two tissues, including 2047 enriched in testicular tissue and 2266 in epididymis tissue. WGCNA identified 1081 hub genes associated with testis development and 6110 genes with epididymal development. Next, the tissue-specific genes were identified with the above two methods, and the gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the epididymal-specific genes were associated with gonad development. On the other hand, the testis-specific genes were involved in the formation of sperm flagella, meiosis period, ciliary assembly, ciliary movement, etc. In addition, we found that eca-Mir-711 and eca-Mir-143 likely participated in regulating the development of epididymal tissue. Meanwhile, eca-Mir-429, eca-Mir-761, eca-Mir-200a, eca-Mir-191 and eca-Mir-200b potentially played an important role in regulating the development of testicular tissue. In short, these results will contribute to functional studies of the male reproductive trait in donkeys.

1. Introduction

Donkeys (Equus asinus), also called burro, ass or the domestic ass, belong to the equine family, and have been used as working animals for more than 5000 years. It has been reported by mitochondrial genomic analysis that the origin of the Chinese donkey has two branches, one originates from the Nubian wild ass, and the other is the Somali wild ass [1]. As one of the most common species used in agricultural production, the meat, skin and milk products in donkeys are of considerable commercial and economic value [2]. There are 40 million donkeys at least in the present world, mostly in underdeveloped countries, and they have always been indispensable livestock for people’s production and lives [3]. In view of the current situation, that the supply of donkey products is in short supply, it is extremely important to strengthen the conservation and breeding of donkeys, and to promote the research of their economic traits.
For the donkey species, the reproductive ability of male animals has a great impact on the development of the entire species. In-depth studies of its reproductive traits and good breeding work are necessary for the development of the entire industry. The production of sperm in mammals consists of three processes: differentiation and proliferation of spermatogonia, meiosis of spermatocytes and maturation of sperm [4]. Sperm production first begins from spermatogonia stem cells that produce spermatogonia in the seminiferous tubules, which then differentiate into primary spermatocytes. The secondary spermatogonia are formed after DNA replication and tetraploid meiosis, and finally spermatozoa are generated through chromatin condensation, acrosome formation, flagella formation and chromatin reduction. After maturation, spermatozoa are transferred to epididymis through the efferent duct for storage [5]. The whole process is controlled by the parallel and sequential action of numerous genes, and any abnormality in the expression of these genes can lead to spermatogenesis failure [6]. Studies have shown that the coiled-coil domain containing 136 (CCDC136), t-complex protein 11 (TCP11) and sperm autoantigenic protein 17 (SP17) genes are associated with spermatogenesis in male donkeys [7]. Among them, the testis-specific gene CCDC136 plays an important role in sperm acrosome formation and fertilization. In Ccdc136 knockout mice, sperm acrosomes are severely defective, resulting in reproductive disorders in males [8]. TCP11 interacts with outer dense fiber 1 (ODF1) and contributes to the formation of the unique morphology of the sperm tail [9]. In addition, the SP17 gene functions in regulating sperm maturation, capacitation and interaction with the zona pellucida of oocytes [10]. Importantly, research on donkey spermatogenesis is fairly scant.
Noteworthily, the study of miRNAs involved in testicular development and spermatogenesis in male livestock presently attracted much attention [11,12]. Several non-coding microRNAs also play key roles in the post-transcriptional regulation of mRNA processing during spermatogenesis, as evidenced by recent studies in mammalian testis [13]. In male donkeys, the target gene of miR-449a, COL6A2, plays a role in Sertoli cells and Leydig cells, thereby affecting spermatogenesis and testosterone production [14]. miR-221 can activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signal transduction pathway through its target gene ITGB1, which is involved in embryonic testis spinal cord formation [15]. Moreover, the let-7 family may play a key role in the proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia in horse [16]. Studies have shown that the inhibition of let-7 can block the proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia [16]. In equine epididymal epithelial cells, it has been shown that miRNA indirectly affects sperm motility through target genes [17]. However, the regulatory mechanism of miRNA in spermatogenesis still needs further investigation.
Owing to the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has been applied widely in biological research by constructing gene-scale transcriptional maps. It provides a new research strategy for analyzing gene functions and miRNA regulatory mechanisms. In this study, the combined method of comparative transcriptomics and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to pick out the tissue-specific genes and miRNAs which may play a regulatory effect during spermatogenesis, and provide the important clues of functional genes involving in male spermatogenesis of the donkey.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

To identify specific transcriptomic characteristics related to donkey reproduction in males, we searched for relevant data in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database with testicular tissue and epididymal tissue as qualifiers. Three sets of transcriptome data, including donkey testis and epididymis tissues, as well as horse testis tissue, were downloaded and a total of 65.6 Gb of raw data was obtained. Accession numbers were listed as follows: donkey testis, donkey epididymis [PRJNA512590, PRJNA431818] [7,18], horse testis [PRJNA509608, PRJNA395221] (Supplementary Table S1) [4,19].

2.2. Quality Control of Data

To ensure the consistency of the data analysis, the raw data were downloaded and proceeded following the same standard. Quality control was checked according to the report formed by FastQC (v0.11.8) [20]. FASTP (v0.23.1) software was performed to remove low-quality data, including sequencing adapters and unqualified data [21].

2.3. Genome Mapping and Calculation of Gene Expression Level

Subsequently, the high-quality data were aligned to the reference genome with STAR (v2.7.0f) [22] software, including the donkey reference genome (GCA_003033725.1) and the horse reference genome (GCA_002863925.1), and then we used FeatureCounts (v1.6.3) software for conducting reads counts [23]. As for miRNA data, we extracted the miRNA information from the reference genome, then the FeatureCounts software was employed to calculate miRNA count information.

2.4. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis

To gain the clustering information between samples, we normalized the data matrix using the rlog function of DESeq2 (R package, v1.36.0), then PCA was performed by using the plotPCA function [24]. In addition, we used a custom R script to perform a hierarchical clustering analysis and visualized it by the pheatmap (R package, v1.0.12).

2.5. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) and miRNAs

The DESeq2 was applied to screen DEGs between different tissues, including donkey testis, donkey epididymis and horse testis. The DEGs were determined by the criteria of “|Log2(fold change)| > 2 and p-adjust < 0.01” [24]. To obtain differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs), we used DESeq2 to compare the miRNAs counts with samples of two groups, “|Log2(fold change)| > 0.5 and p-value < 0.05” were considered as the criteria of DE-miRNAs, and the differential miRNA results were displayed using volcano plots [24].

2.6. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

The WGCNA was performed by using the WGCNA package (v1.71) [25]. In this part, the data of three tissues, including donkey testis, donkey epididymis and horse testis, were employed with a total of 16 samples. First, the FPKM was chosen to normalize gene expression levels. Next, we built a scale-free network with the BlockWiseModules function. Specifically, the parameters of ‘power = 5, MinModuleSize = 30 and MergeCutheight = 0.3′ were applied to determine gene modules. Further, the correlation between tissue specificity and gene modules was explored to find the hub genes, which are considered key nodes in modules and are highly interconnected. Here, we used the module membership (MM) and gene significance (GS) methods to evaluate hub genes in modules, with thresholds of MM > 0.8 and GS > 0.8 [26].

2.7. Construction of Tissue-Specific Regulatory Network

Based on the result of tissue-enriched genes (DEGs) and hub genes, the R package VennDiagram (v 1.7.3) was used to intersect these genes, and the genes in the overlapping part of the Venn diagrams were termed as tissue-specific expressed genes. Then the tissue-specific expressed genes were subjected to functional analysis, the terms related to reproduction were screened out, and finally the tissue-specific regulatory network graphs containing terms and their enriched genes were built by Cytoscape (v 3.9.1) [27].

2.8. Annotation of DEGs and DE-miRNAs, Prediction of DE-miRNAs Target Genes

To gain insight into the regulatory role of DEGs and DE-miRNAs in male donkey reproductive organs, we used TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_80/, accessed on 21 September 2022) and miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org/, accessed on 21 September 2022) software for the prediction of differential miRNA target genes. Due to the lack of donkey and horse target gene prediction databases, we used g:Profiler to convert donkey and horse gene IDs to homologous IDs of mice [28].

2.9. Functional Annotation Analysis of Genes

We performed Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses for DEGs, hub genes and DE-miRNAs target genes using KOBAS [29]. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. An Overview of Transcriptome Data with Reproductive Tissues in Donkey and Horse

To investigate the tissue-specific characteristics of the transcriptome in donkeys, we collected RNA-seq data from donkey testis and epididymis tissues, as well as horse testis tissue. Subsequently, followed by the data processing, the comparative analysis and WGCNA were applied to reveal the tissue-specific genes and miRNAs (Figure 1A). Firstly, the hierarchical clustering analysis showed that the sample repeatability was good, and the transcriptomic difference between testis and epididymis tissues in the two species was relatively more distinct than that of testis vs. epididymis tissues in the same species (Figure 1B). Meanwhile, the PCA suggested a distinct distance of data between the testis and epididymis in donkeys (Figure 1C), as it did for testis tissues between donkey and horse (Figure 1D). Moreover, compared with testis in donkeys, it indicated that the dispersion of epididymis data in donkeys is much larger than that of testis samples in the horses (Figure 1C,D).

3.2. Differential Expression Analysis of Transcriptomic Data

Here, the tissue-enriched genes were screened through differential expression analysis. In the result of comparative grouping between testis and epididymis tissues in donkeys, a total of 4313 DEGs were found, among which, 2047 DEGs (up-DEGs) were enriched in donkey testis tissue, and 2266 DEGs (down-DEGs) were enriched in donkey epididymis tissue (Figure 2A). In the result of testis tissue between donkey and horse, there were 1811 DEGs in total, of which 883 DEGs (up-DEGs) were enriched in the horses, and 928 DEGs (down-DEGs) were enriched in the donkey (Figure 2B). Next, the top 200 DEGs in each group were selected for GO analysis based on the value of |Log2(fold change)|. In terms of DEGs between testis and epididymis tissues in donkeys, we found 310 significant GO terms enriched in donkey testis tissue, and the top five enriched terms were mainly related to the processes of “integral component of membrane”, “membrane”, “sequence-specific double-stranded DNA binding”, “plasma membrane” and “G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway” (Figure 2C, Supplementary Table S2). In donkey epididymis, 539 significant GO terms were enriched, and the top five enriched terms were “extracellular region”, “extracellular space”, “sequence-specific DNA binding”, “sequence-specific double-stranded DNA binding” and “embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis” (Figure 2D, Supplementary Table S2). As for the DEGs of the testis between donkey and horse, 324 significant GO terms were enriched in the testis of the horse, and the top five enriched biological processes included “plasma membrane”, “integral component of membrane”, “membrane”, “extracellular region” and “negative regulation of translation” (Figure 2E, Supplementary Table S2). In donkey testis tissue, 391 significant GO terms were enriched, and the top five enriched terms were involved in the biological processes of “nucleus”, “protein binding”, “membrane”, “cytoplasm” and “integral component of membrane” (Figure 2F, Supplementary Table S2). Meanwhile, the genes enriched in the terms were also displayed.

3.3. WGCNA Identified the Tissue-Specific Module Genes in Donkey

To find tissue-specific genes associated with testis and epididymis in donkeys, we performed WGCNA using the FPKM matrices from all samples. With a soft threshold setting for a scale-free network of gene expression matrix, all the genes were divided into 14 modules, of which the turquoise had the most genes, reaching 9097, and the salmon had the least, with only 31 genes (Figure 3A). Meanwhile, it showed that some modules were correlated with tissue specificity, in particular, the turquoise module was related to donkey epididymis tissue, the brown module to donkey testis and the blue module to horse testis. Further, the hub genes in the modules were screened by MM > 0.8 and GS > 0.8. In the turquoise module, 6110 hub genes were identified. There were 1081 hub genes in the brown module; 2201 hub genes were included in the blue module (Figure 3A,B). With regard to the hub genes of the turquoise module, they were mainly related to the biological processes of “spermatogenesis”, “flagellated sperm motility”, “cilium assembly”, “meiotic cell cycle”, “sperm flagellum”, etc. (Figure 3C). In the brown module, the top five terms included “cilium assembly”, “spermatogenesis”, “sperm axoneme assembly”, “DNA methylation involved in gamete generation”, “sperm head”, etc. (Figure 3D). Finally, the hub genes in the blue module were most enriched in the terms of “spermatogenesis”, “cilium assembly”, “sperm flagellum”, “flagellated sperm motility”, “motile cilium”, etc. (Figure 3E).
To identify the tissue-specific genes, we combined the result of hub genes and enriched genes in tissues, and the overlapping genes were viewed as tissue-specific genes. We found 1459 tissue-specific genes in donkey epididymal tissue (Figure 4A), 363 tissue-specific genes in donkey testis tissue (Figure 4B) and 381 tissue-specific genes in horse testis tissue (Figure S1A). The tissue-specific genes were subjected to functional enrichment analysis. After that, we found 11 terms that were related to the function of epididymis tissue in the donkey. They were “male gonad development”, “male genitalia development”, “reproductive process”, “reproductive structure development”, “single fertilization”, “male genitalia morphogenesis”, “sperm ejaculation”, “sperm-egg recognition”, “fusion of sperm to egg plasma membrane involved in single fertilization”, “regulation of meiotic nuclear division” and “positive regulation of male gonad development”, and the genes enriched in the terms are listed (Figure 4C). In donkey testis tissue, 10 terms and a total of 24 tissue-specific genes were displayed including “cilium”, “cilium movement”, “motile cilium”, “sperm axoneme assembly”, “male meiosis I”, “sperm flagellum”, “cilium assembly”, “motile cilium assembly”, “homologous chromosome pairing at meiosis” and “flagellated sperm motility” (Figure 4D). In horse testis tissue, five terms and a total of 17 tissue-specific genes enriched in the processes of “sperm axoneme assembly”, “male meiotic nuclear division”, “single fertilization”, “spermatogenesis” and “male gonad development” (Figure S1B). In addition, we constructed a mixed pool of reproductive-related genes specifically expressed in the three tissues, and these genes were highly expressed in the corresponding tissues. (Figure 4E and Figure S1C).

3.4. The Identification of miRNAs Related to Tissue Specificity in Donkey

Further, the tissue-enriched miRNAs (TE-miRNAs) in donkeys were investigated. Through differential expression analysis, we obtained miRNAs enriched in donkey testis and epididymis tissues. It showed that 30 miRNAs (up-miRNAs) were significantly enriched in the testis tissue of donkeys, and 25 miRNAs (down-miRNAs) in epididymis tissue (Figure 5A). In the comparison of testis tissue between donkey and horse, we found a total of 39 TE-miRNAs, including 17 miRNAs (up-miRNAs) in horse and 22 miRNAs (down-miRNAs) in donkey (Figure 5B). In order to explore the regulatory role of miRNAs, we carried out target gene prediction of miRNAs. Due to the limitation of the database, only two miRNAs can be annotated with predicted target genes in donkey testis tissue, and six miRNAs in donkey epididymis tissue (Table 1). In terms of testis tissues between horse and donkey, 3 miRNAs were annotated in horse testis tissue and 10 miRNAs in donkey testis tissue (Table 2). Based on the TE-miRNAs in the tissues, we predicted 1516 target genes in the testis tissue of the donkey, 189 target genes in the epididymis of the donkey and 773 target genes in the testis of the horse (Supplementary Table S3). Then, the target genes of miRNAs in the testis of the donkey were obtained, with 2009 terms significantly (p-value < 0.05) enriched, and the top five enriched terms were “protein binding”, “cytoplasm”, “nucleus”, “membrane” and “cytosol” (Figure 5C, Supplementary Table S4). In donkey epididymis tissue, 684 terms were obtained (p-value < 0.05), and the top five enriched terms were mainly related to “protein binding”, “cytoplasm”, “nucleus”, “membrane” and “plasma membrane” (Figure 5D, Supplementary Table S4). In the comparison of testis tissue between horse and donkey, we obtained 1193 terms in horse testis tissue (p-value < 0.05), and the top five enriched terms were mainly related to “protein binding”, “membrane”, “nucleus”, “cytoplasm” and “plasma membrane” (Figure 5E, Supplementary Table S4). Further, we obtained 2490 pathways in donkey testis tissue (p-value < 0.05), they included “protein binding”, “cytoplasm”, “nucleus”, “membrane” and “nucleoplasm” (Figure 5F, Supplementary Table S4).
Importantly, we focused on the overlapping parts of miRNA target genes and tissue-specific genes for follow-up analysis, and the overlapping parts called key genes. The results showed that in donkey testis tissue, there were 25 key genes overlapped by testis-specific genes and targeted genes of miRNAs (Figure 6A), and they were regulated by miR-429-3p, miR-761, miR-200a-3p, miR-191-5p and miR-200b-3p (Supplementary Table S5). In addition, these genes were enriched in the pathways of “cell cycle”, “cellular senescence”, “microRNAs in cancer”, “bladder cancer”, “cocaine addiction”, “non-small cell lung cancer”, “melanoma”, “inositol phosphate metabolism”, “glioma”, “pancreatic cancer” and “chronic myeloid leukemia”, and the potential relationship of miRNA regulating these pathways via target genes (including CDC25A, CDK5R1, E2F3 and SYNJ1) was displayed in the Sankey diagram (Figure 6B). In donkey epididymis tissue, miR-143-3p, miR-711, miR-200b-3p, miR-761 and miR-429-3p regulated 18 genes (Figure 6C, Supplementary Table S5), and the genes were enriched in the pathway of “TGF-β signaling pathway”, “mucin type o-glycan biosynthesis” and “melanoma”, which may be regulated by miR-143-3p and miR-711 through BMP5, FGF7, GCNT1 and THSD4 (Figure 6D). In horse testis tissue, 10 key genes were uncovered by differential expression analysis and WGCNA (Figure S1D), which were regulated by miR-214-5P, miR-375-3p and miR-761 (Supplementary Table S5). miR-761 might be involved in multiple pathways through GABRA4, PLA2G12A and UGGT2, such as “α-linolenic acid metabolism”, “glycerophospholipid metabolism”, “pancreatic secretion”, “retrograde endocannabinoid signaling” and “protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum” (Figure S1E).

4. Discussion

Reproductive traits have always been a hotspot in the field of animal husbandry. As one of the most important livestock in the world, research focusing on the domestic donkeys still scant. In the present study, based on the transcriptome data, with the help of differential expression analysis and WGCNA, the tissue-specific expression genes and miRNA were deeply analyzed in the testis and epididymis of the donkey. At the same time, it revealed the potential regulatory relationship of miRNAs on some biological processes in the testis and epididymis. Our research screened numerous genes associated with reproductive tissue in male donkeys, which may provide important clues about candidate genes involved in the regulatory mechanism for reproductive traits of the donkey.
In our study, among the overlapping genes between testis tissue-enriched genes and hub genes in donkeys, three highly expressed genes in the spermatogenesis process were detected, including REC8, DNMT3L and FANCD2. During meiotic prophase, the rec8-dependent axis-loop structure is essential for linear element assembly, which plays an important role in the meiotic recombination process of homologous chromosomes [30]. The DNMT3L histone H3-binding domain (ADD) is required for spermatogenesis, and plays an important role in the DNA methylation of some genes during spermatogenesis, essential for spermatozoa maturation in males [31,32]. At the same time, we also found that DNAH1 and RSPH6A genes related to sperm motility in the testis. The DNAH1 gene is involved in the formation of the internal power arm of sperm, and its deletion can lead to decreased sperm motility and male infertility [33]. Rsph6a is essential for sperm flagella assembly and male fertility in mice. Studies have shown that after knocking out Rsph6a in mice, the axons of sperm flagella can be elongated, but mitochondria and fibrous sheaths are abnormally formed, and sperm flagella are severely defective [34]. During the transfer of sperm from the testis to the epididymis, we found two genes involved in this process, including CCNO and CEP164. The atypical cyclin (CCNO) is required for the generation of functional polyciliated cells in the efferent duct. In mice with mutations in the Ccno gene, the function of the efferent ducts is impaired, preventing sperm from entering the epididymis, and causing reproductive impairment [35]. The deletion of the distal appendage protein (CEP164) leads to the loss of multifunctional cilia in the efferent ducts and triggers sperm aggregation in efferent ducts, causing reproductive dysfunction [36].
In epididymal tissue-specific genes, we focused on “regulation of meiotic nuclear division”, “sperm-egg recognition” and “single fertilization”. In the process of “regulation of meiotic nuclear division”, we found CDH1 and PDE3A genes. E-cadherin (epithelial cadherin), encoded by the Cdh1 gene, which plays a role in gonad development, enables adhesion between germ cells and somatic cells to ensure proper signaling between somatic and germ cells, which is essential for germ cell survival [37]. The PDE3A is a member of the phosphodiesterase family, located in the post-acrosomal segment of the sperm head, and regulates the motility, capacitation and acrosome reaction of mammalian sperm through a signal transduction system [38,39]. In terms of sperm and egg recognition and combination, we found the CD9 and RNASE10 genes. Interaction of sperm surface proteins with CD9 or CD9-related oocyte proteins has the potential to trigger PTK2B activation at sperm binding sites, and PTK2B kinase activity plays an important role in actin remodeling at sperm binding sites and promotes sperm incorporation [40]. Epididymal protein Rnase10 is involved in the processing and stabilization of Adam3 protein (an adhesion protein of sperm to egg). In sperm serum, Rnase10 deficiency leads to the inability of sperm to recognize the egg [41].
In the follow-up study to explore the regulatory relationship between DE-miRNAs and tissue-specific expression of DEGs, we found two joint node genes in testis tissue, namely E2F3 and CDC25A (Cell division cycle 25A). In the study, the E2F3 gene is regulated by eca-miR-200a. It has been reported that E2F3 exists in the promoter region and plays a regulatory role in the process of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase. At the same time, it inhibits the production of fat by inhibiting the binding of CEBPA to the promoter of its target gene [42]. In addition, CDC25A is a key factor in regulating the cell cycle and is regulated by eca-miR-200a. Mutual feedback regulation between CDC25A and DYRK2 has important implications for genotoxic stress pathways, apoptosis and cell cycle regulation [43]. In epididymal tissue, four genes were demonstrated with miRNA roles, including BMP5, GCNT1, FGF7 and THSD4. Among them, BMP5, regulated by eca-miR-143, is a member of the TGF-β superfamily, and plays an important role in male reproductive function [44]. GCNT1, regulated by eca-miR-143, is induced by androgens in prostate cancer (PC) cells at the protein level, and the production of GCNT1 is important for the synthesis of cancer-associated O-glycans and contributes to PC cell viability [45]. FGF7 is regulated by eca-miR-143, and belongs to the FGF family; it has a wide range of activities in embryonic development and physiological functions in adults. [46]. THSD4 is regulated by eca-miR-711, and it may be a potential regulator of prostate cancer. It is involved in tumorigenesis and the development of various cancers, including breast, glioblastoma and esophageal cancer [47]. Actually, the role of miRNA in male reproductive development is worthy of deep exploration.
In the present study, the transcriptome data of donkey testis and epididymis tissues were employed to screen out the tissue-specific genes and TE-miRNAs, which provide important information for the potential regulatory mechanism of male reproductive traits in the donkey. At the same time, the horse transcriptome data were also collected for joint analysis and it aimed to identify the conserved genes in testicular tissue between donkey and horse species, which contributes to subsequent studies on functional genes. However, it is noted that certain limitations cannot be ignored in the results of the study. One is the influence of age and feeding conditions in conservation analysis. For large livestock, it is difficult to collect samples at the same age and under the same conditions of the breeding environment. Additionally, the transcriptome data used in the study are derived from different research projects, thus, it may weaken the reliability of results. The second issue is that the result of the study is mainly the analyses of transcriptome data and it is lack of experimental validation. Thus, we believe that it is necessary to further verify the conservation analysis between donkey and horse species, as well as the functional gene studies of the male reproductive traits in the donkey.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a gene-scale transcriptional map of male donkeys was constructed by using RNA sequencing data. Through the combination of comparative transcriptome analysis and WGCNA, the genes and miRNAs related to testicular and epididymis tissues were identified, which may be involved in the regulatory events during spermatogenesis, including sperm maturation and storage in the donkey. It provides data supporting functional gene studies of the male reproductive traits in male donkeys.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13122339/s1, Figure S1: An overview of transcriptome data with reproductive tissues in the horse. Table S1: Statistical information of transcriptome sequencing data in donkey and horse. Table S2: Functional analysis of DEGs in different tissues. Table S3: Target genes of DE-miRNAs in different tissues. Table S4: Functional analysis of target genes of DE-miRNAs in different tissues. Table S5: Regulatory relationship between miRNA and tissue key genes in different tissues.

Author Contributions

W.S., Y.S. and J.W. designed the study. M.Y., J.Y., K.Z., S.L. and J.G. collected the data. M.Y. analyzed the data and prepared draft figures and tables. M.Y. and X.Z. wrote the manuscript. W.S., J.W., X.Z. and F.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QC041), The Start-up Fund for High-level Talents of Qingdao Agricultural University (1122011), The Project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China (19221178) and Taishan Scholar Construction Foundation of Shandong Province (ts20190946), The Major Agricultural Application Technology Innovation Projects of Shandong Province (SD2019XM008) and The Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System of Shandong Province (SDAIT-27).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, X.Y.; Ning, T.; Adeola, A.C.; Li, J.; Esmailizadeh, A.; Lichoti, J.K.; Agwanda, B.R.; Isakova, J.; Aldashev, A.A.; Wu, S.F.; et al. Potential dual expansion of domesticated donkeys revealed by worldwide analysis on mitochondrial sequences. Zool. Res. 2020, 41, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seyiti, S.; Kelimu, A. Donkey Industry in China: Current Aspects, Suggestions and Future Challenges. J. Equine Vet. Sci 2021, 102, 103642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smith, D.G.; Pearson, R.A. A review of the factors affecting the survival of donkeys in semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2005, 37 (Suppl. 1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Li, B.; He, X.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, D.; Du, M.; Song, L.; Liu, Z.; Yin, Z.; Manglai, D. Transcriptome profiling of developing testes and spermatogenesis in the Mongolian horse. BMC Genet. 2020, 21, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hecht, N.B. Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioessays 1998, 20, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Visser, L.; Repping, S. Unravelling the genetics of spermatogenic failure. Reproduction 2010, 139, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, F.; Wang, J.P.; Li, Y.H.; Yang, C.H.; Zhang, R.T.; Wang, X.G.; Ju, Z.H.; Jiang, Q.; Huang, J.M.; Wang, C.F.; et al. Integrated analysis of mRNA and miRNA in testis and cauda epididymidis reveals candidate molecular markers associated with reproduction in Dezhou donkey. Livest. Sci. 2020, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Geng, Q.; Ni, L.; Ouyang, B.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J. A Novel Testis-Specific Gene, Ccdc136, Is Required for Acrosome Formation and Fertilization in Mice. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 23, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Jiang, M.; Li, C.; Yang, P.; Sun, H.; Tao, D.; Zhang, S.; Ma, Y. Human t-complex protein 11 (TCP11), a testis-specific gene product, is a potential determinant of the sperm morphology. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2011, 224, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chiriva-Internati, M.; Gagliano, N.; Donetti, E.; Costa, F.; Grizzi, F.; Franceschini, B.; Albani, E.; Levi-Setti, P.E.; Gioia, M.; Jenkins, M.; et al. Sperm protein 17 is expressed in the sperm fibrous sheath. J. Transl. Med. 2009, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fischer, D.; Laiho, A.; Gyenesei, A.; Sironen, A. Identification of Reproduction-Related Gene Polymorphisms Using Whole Transcriptome Sequencing in the Large White Pig Population. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. (Bethesda) 2015, 5, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Fang, C.; Shi, L.; Tan, J.; Xiong, Y.; Bin, F.; Li, C. Genome-wide differential expression of genes and small RNAs in testis of two different porcine breeds and at two different ages. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Noveski, P.; Popovska-Jankovic, K.; Kubelka-Sabit, K.; Filipovski, V.; Lazarevski, S.; Plaseski, T.; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D. MicroRNA expression profiles in testicular biopsies of patients with impaired spermatogenesis. Andrology 2016, 4, 1020–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bagchi, G.; Zhang, Y.; Waxman, D.J. Impact of methoxyacetic acid on mouse Leydig cell gene expression. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Uzumcu, M.; Westfall, S.D.; Dirks, K.A.; Skinner, M.K. Embryonic testis cord formation and mesonephric cell migration requires the phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67, 1927–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tong, M.H.; Mitchell, D.; Evanoff, R.; Griswold, M.D. Expression of Mirlet7 family microRNAs in response to retinoic acid-induced spermatogonial differentiation in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 85, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Twenter, H.; Klohonatz, K.; Davis, K.; Bass, L.; Coleman, S.J.; Bouma, G.J.; Bruemmer, J.E. Transfer of MicroRNAs From Epididymal Epithelium to Equine Spermatozoa. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 87, 102841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Miao, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, C. Transcriptome Atlas of 16 Donkey Tissues. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 682734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, H.; Dong, H.; Chen, Q.; Gao, Y.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Dang, R.; Lei, C. Transcriptomic Analysis of Testicular Gene Expression in Normal and Cryptorchid Horses. Animals 2020, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. de Sena Brandine, G.; Smith, A.D. Falco: High-speed FastQC emulation for quality control of sequencing data. F1000Research 2019, 8, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Langfelder, P.; Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhou, Z.; Bai, J.; Zhong, S.; Zhang, R.; Kang, K.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, M. Downregulation of ATP6V1A Involved in Alzheimer’s Disease via Synaptic Vesicle Cycle, Phagosome, and Oxidative Phosphorylation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 5555634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raudvere, U.; Kolberg, L.; Kuzmin, I.; Arak, T.; Adler, P.; Peterson, H.; Vilo, J. g:Profiler: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W191–W198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bu, D.; Luo, H.; Huo, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; He, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, J.; et al. KOBAS-i: Intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W317–W325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sakuno, T.; Tashiro, S.; Tanizawa, H.; Iwasaki, O.; Ding, D.Q.; Haraguchi, T.; Noma, K.I.; Hiraoka, Y. Rec8 Cohesin-mediated Axis-loop chromatin architecture is required for meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 3799–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, J.X.; Scott, M.B.; Pu, X.Y.; Zhou-Cun, A. Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DNMT3L and infertility with azoospermia in Chinese men. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2012, 24, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Vlachogiannis, G.; Niederhuth, C.E.; Tuna, S.; Stathopoulou, A.; Viiri, K.; de Rooij, D.G.; Jenner, R.G.; Schmitz, R.J.; Ooi, S.K.T. The Dnmt3L ADD Domain Controls Cytosine Methylation Establishment during Spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 944–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ben Khelifa, M.; Coutton, C.; Zouari, R.; Karaouzene, T.; Rendu, J.; Bidart, M.; Yassine, S.; Pierre, V.; Delaroche, J.; Hennebicq, S.; et al. Mutations in DNAH1, which encodes an inner arm heavy chain dynein, lead to male infertility from multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 94, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abbasi, F.; Miyata, H.; Shimada, K.; Morohoshi, A.; Nozawa, K.; Matsumura, T.; Xu, Z.; Pratiwi, P.; Ikawa, M. RSPH6A is required for sperm flagellum formation and male fertility in mice. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131, jcs221648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Terre, B.; Lewis, M.; Gil-Gomez, G.; Han, Z.; Lu, H.; Aguilera, M.; Prats, N.; Roy, S.; Zhao, H.; Stracker, T.H. Defects in efferent duct multiciliogenesis underlie male infertility in GEMC1-, MCIDAS- or CCNO-deficient mice. Development 2019, 146, dev162628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hoque, M.; Chen, D.; Hess, R.A.; Li, F.Q.; Takemaru, K.I. CEP164 is essential for efferent duct multiciliogenesis and male fertility. Reproduction 2021, 162, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piprek, R.P.; Kolasa, M.; Podkowa, D.; Kloc, M.; Kubiak, J.Z. Tissue-specific knockout of E-cadherin (Cdh1) in developing mouse gonads causes germ cells loss. Reproduction 2019, 158, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lefievre, L.; de Lamirande, E.; Gagnon, C. Presence of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases PDE1A, existing as a stable complex with calmodulin, and PDE3A in human spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Qin, C.; Yin, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Ding, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S. Genome-wide association study for semen traits of the bulls in Chinese Holstein. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.; Hong, X.; Kinsey, W.H. Sperm-oocyte signaling: The role of IZUMO1R and CD9 in PTK2B activation and actin remodeling at the sperm binding sitedagger. Biol. Reprod. 2021, 104, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Krutskikh, A.; Poliandri, A.; Cabrera-Sharp, V.; Dacheux, J.L.; Poutanen, M.; Huhtaniemi, I. Epididymal protein Rnase10 is required for post-testicular sperm maturation and male fertility. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 4198–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zaragoza, K.; Begay, V.; Schuetz, A.; Heinemann, U.; Leutz, A. Repression of transcriptional activity of C/EBPalpha by E2F-dimerization partner complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 2293–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lara-Chica, M.; Correa-Saez, A.; Jimenez-Izquierdo, R.; Garrido-Rodriguez, M.; Ponce, F.J.; Moreno, R.; Morrison, K.; Di Vona, C.; Arato, K.; Jimenez-Jimenez, C.; et al. A novel CDC25A/DYRK2 regulatory switch modulates cell cycle and survival. Cell Death Differ. 2022, 29, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ciller, I.M.; Palanisamy, S.K.; Ciller, U.A.; McFarlane, J.R. Postnatal expression of bone morphogenetic proteins and their receptors in the mouse testis. Physiol. Res. 2016, 65, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Munkley, J.; Vodak, D.; Livermore, K.E.; James, K.; Wilson, B.T.; Knight, B.; McCullagh, P.; McGrath, J.; Crundwell, M.; Harries, L.W.; et al. Glycosylation is an Androgen-Regulated Process Essential for Prostate Cancer Cell Viability. EBioMedicine 2016, 8, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, X.; Ibrahimi, O.A.; Olsen, S.K.; Umemori, H.; Mohammadi, M.; Ornitz, D.M. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 15694–15700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wu, J.; Li, X.; Luo, F.; Yan, J.; Yang, K. Screening key miRNAs and genes in prostate cancer by microarray analysis. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The gene expression landscape based on the transcriptome data of different tissues. (A) The research flow chart of collected transcriptome data in this study. (B) Hierarchical clustering of gene expression matrices for all samples including testis and epididymal tissues of the donkey, and horse testis tissue. (C) Principal component analysis (PCA) of donkey testis and epididymis tissues. (D) PCA of testis tissues between donkey and horse.
Figure 1. The gene expression landscape based on the transcriptome data of different tissues. (A) The research flow chart of collected transcriptome data in this study. (B) Hierarchical clustering of gene expression matrices for all samples including testis and epididymal tissues of the donkey, and horse testis tissue. (C) Principal component analysis (PCA) of donkey testis and epididymis tissues. (D) PCA of testis tissues between donkey and horse.
Genes 13 02339 g001
Figure 2. Identification of the tissue–enriched genes in donkeys and horses. (A) Volcano plot of DEGs between testis and epididymis tissues in the donkey. Red indicates up–regulated DEGs (up–DEGs); blue indicates down–regulated (down–DEGs). The marked genes are the top five selected by p-adjusted value. (B) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes in testis tissue between donkey and horse. Red indicates up–regulated DEGs (up–DEGs); blue indicates down–regulated DEGs (down–DEGs). The marked genes are the top five selected by p-adjusted value. (C) The inner circle shows the top five GO (biological process) terms for testis tissue–enriched genes in donkeys, and the outer circle shows the genes enriched in the terms. (D) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in donkey epididymis. (E) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in horse testis (F) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in donkey testis. The GO terms refer to the biological processes.
Figure 2. Identification of the tissue–enriched genes in donkeys and horses. (A) Volcano plot of DEGs between testis and epididymis tissues in the donkey. Red indicates up–regulated DEGs (up–DEGs); blue indicates down–regulated (down–DEGs). The marked genes are the top five selected by p-adjusted value. (B) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes in testis tissue between donkey and horse. Red indicates up–regulated DEGs (up–DEGs); blue indicates down–regulated DEGs (down–DEGs). The marked genes are the top five selected by p-adjusted value. (C) The inner circle shows the top five GO (biological process) terms for testis tissue–enriched genes in donkeys, and the outer circle shows the genes enriched in the terms. (D) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in donkey epididymis. (E) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in horse testis (F) The top five GO terms of tissue–enriched genes in donkey testis. The GO terms refer to the biological processes.
Genes 13 02339 g002
Figure 3. Weighted gene co–expression network analysis (WGCNA) of different tissues. (A) The histogram shows the number of genes in the modules identified by WGCNA; the right panel shows the number of genes in the modules and the left panel shows the number of hub genes. (B) Heatmap of module–tissue correlations. Red indicates a strong correlation and green indicates a weak correlation. (C) Bubble plots represent biological processes enriched by hub genes in donkey epididymal tissue. (D) Bubble diagram of biological process enriched by hub genes in donkey testis tissue. (E) Bubble diagram showing biological process enriched by hub genes in horse testis tissue.
Figure 3. Weighted gene co–expression network analysis (WGCNA) of different tissues. (A) The histogram shows the number of genes in the modules identified by WGCNA; the right panel shows the number of genes in the modules and the left panel shows the number of hub genes. (B) Heatmap of module–tissue correlations. Red indicates a strong correlation and green indicates a weak correlation. (C) Bubble plots represent biological processes enriched by hub genes in donkey epididymal tissue. (D) Bubble diagram of biological process enriched by hub genes in donkey testis tissue. (E) Bubble diagram showing biological process enriched by hub genes in horse testis tissue.
Genes 13 02339 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of tissue–specific expressed genes in the donkey. (A) Venn diagram of tissue–specific genes in donkey epididymal tissue. The overlap genes between tissue–enriched genes and hub genes in donkey epididymal tissue were called tissue–specific genes. (B) Venn diagram of tissue–specific genes in donkey testis tissue. (C) The inner circle shows GO (biological process) terms related to reproductive terms enriched by tissue–specific genes in donkey epididymal tissue, and the outer circle shows genes enriched in the terms. (D) The inner circle shows the GO (biological process) terms related to reproductive terms enriched by tissue–specific genes in donkey testis tissue, and the outer circle shows genes enriched in the terms. (E) The heat map shows the expression of tissue–specific genes in the testis and epididymal tissues of the donkey; red represents high expression and blue represents low expression.
Figure 4. Analysis of tissue–specific expressed genes in the donkey. (A) Venn diagram of tissue–specific genes in donkey epididymal tissue. The overlap genes between tissue–enriched genes and hub genes in donkey epididymal tissue were called tissue–specific genes. (B) Venn diagram of tissue–specific genes in donkey testis tissue. (C) The inner circle shows GO (biological process) terms related to reproductive terms enriched by tissue–specific genes in donkey epididymal tissue, and the outer circle shows genes enriched in the terms. (D) The inner circle shows the GO (biological process) terms related to reproductive terms enriched by tissue–specific genes in donkey testis tissue, and the outer circle shows genes enriched in the terms. (E) The heat map shows the expression of tissue–specific genes in the testis and epididymal tissues of the donkey; red represents high expression and blue represents low expression.
Genes 13 02339 g004
Figure 5. Functional analysis of tissue–specific miRNAs in testis and epididymis of the donkey. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs in testis and epididymis tissues of the donkey. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs in testis tissues of donkey and horse. (C) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey testis tissue. (D) The top five GO terms (biological processes) of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey epididymal tissue. (E) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in horse testis tissue. (F) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey testis tissue.
Figure 5. Functional analysis of tissue–specific miRNAs in testis and epididymis of the donkey. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs in testis and epididymis tissues of the donkey. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed miRNAs in testis tissues of donkey and horse. (C) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey testis tissue. (D) The top five GO terms (biological processes) of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey epididymal tissue. (E) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in horse testis tissue. (F) The top five GO (biological process) terms of targeted genes of miRNAs enriched in donkey testis tissue.
Genes 13 02339 g005
Figure 6. The regulatory analysis of miRNAs on pathways through tissue key genes in the donkey. (A) Venn diagram of key genes in donkey testis. The overlapping gene between target genes of tissue-enriched miRNAs and tissue–specific expressed genes in donkey testis were called donkey testis key genes. (B) Sankey diagram shows the KEGG pathway regulated by miRNAs through key genes in donkey testis. (C) Venn diagram of key genes in donkey epididymis. The overlapping genes between target genes of tissue-enriched miRNAs and tissue–specific expressed genes in donkey epididymis tissue were called donkey epididymis key genes. (D) Sankey diagram shows the KEGG pathway regulated by miRNA through key genes in donkey epididymis.
Figure 6. The regulatory analysis of miRNAs on pathways through tissue key genes in the donkey. (A) Venn diagram of key genes in donkey testis. The overlapping gene between target genes of tissue-enriched miRNAs and tissue–specific expressed genes in donkey testis were called donkey testis key genes. (B) Sankey diagram shows the KEGG pathway regulated by miRNAs through key genes in donkey testis. (C) Venn diagram of key genes in donkey epididymis. The overlapping genes between target genes of tissue-enriched miRNAs and tissue–specific expressed genes in donkey epididymis tissue were called donkey epididymis key genes. (D) Sankey diagram shows the KEGG pathway regulated by miRNA through key genes in donkey epididymis.
Genes 13 02339 g006
Table 1. Annotation of enriched-miRNAs in testis and epididymis tissues of donkey.
Table 1. Annotation of enriched-miRNAs in testis and epididymis tissues of donkey.
TypesEnriched_miRNAs
Testiseca-mir-711eca-mir-143
eca-mir-9182eca-mir-9092
eca-mir-8999eca-mir-8917
eca-mir-8914eca-mir-664
eca-mir-1902
Epididymiseca-mir-761eca-mir-429
eca-mir-375eca-mir-200b
eca-mir-3548eca-mir-191b
eca-mir-9141eca-mir-9120
eca-mir-9087eca-mir-9054
eca-mir-9032eca-mir-8990
eca-mir-8966eca-mir-632
eca-mir-1905ceca-mir-1842
eca-mir-1307
Table 2. Annotation of enriched-miRNAs in horse testis tissue and donkey testis tissue.
Table 2. Annotation of enriched-miRNAs in horse testis tissue and donkey testis tissue.
TypesEnriched_miRNAs
Horseeca-mir-375eca-mir-761eca-mir-214
eca-mir-1307eca-mir-8965eca-mir-1842
eca-mir-7035eca-mir-9063eca-mir-9146
eca-mir-1282eca-mir-9032eca-mir-9054
eca-mir-9010eca-mir-9056eca-mir-1892
eca-mir-9035eca-mir-9120
Donkeyeca-mir-149eca-mir-27beca-mir-24
eca-mir-155eca-mir-200beca-mir-145a
eca-mir-429eca-mir-143eca-mir-20a
eca-mir-200aeca-mir-324eca-mir-1905c
eca-mir-1291aeca-mir-1248eca-mir-9140
eca-mir-9141eca-mir-9102eca-mir-9055
eca-mir-9086eca-mir-9089-1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, M.; Zhang, X.; Yan, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, K.; Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Shen, W.; Wang, J. Transcriptional Specificity Analysis of Testis and Epididymis Tissues in Donkey. Genes 2022, 13, 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122339

AMA Style

Yu M, Zhang X, Yan J, Guo J, Zhang F, Zhu K, Liu S, Sun Y, Shen W, Wang J. Transcriptional Specificity Analysis of Testis and Epididymis Tissues in Donkey. Genes. 2022; 13(12):2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Mubin, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Jiamao Yan, Jianhua Guo, Fali Zhang, Kexin Zhu, Shuqin Liu, Yujiang Sun, Wei Shen, and Junjie Wang. 2022. "Transcriptional Specificity Analysis of Testis and Epididymis Tissues in Donkey" Genes 13, no. 12: 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop