Next Article in Journal
Sensory Reactivity Phenotype in Phelan–McDermid Syndrome Is Distinct from Idiopathic ASD
Next Article in Special Issue
GWAS Hits for Bilateral Convergent Strabismus with Exophthalmos in Holstein Cattle Using Imputed Sequence Level Genotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Skeletal Deformities in Osterix-Cre;Tgfbr2f/f Mice May Cause Postnatal Death
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meta-Analysis of Heifer Traits Identified Reproductive Pathways in Bos indicus Cattle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Genetic Analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies on Pathogen Resistance of Bos taurus and Bos indicus Cattle Breeds in Cameroon

1
Department of Comparative Zoology, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2
Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
3
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
Genes 2021, 12(7), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12070976
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 24 June 2021 / Published: 26 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Cattle)

Abstract

:
Autochthonous taurine and later introduced zebu cattle from Cameroon differ considerably in their resistance to endemic pathogens with little to no reports of the underlying genetic make-up. Breed history and habitat variations are reported to contribute significantly to this diversity worldwide, presumably in Cameroon as well, where locations diverge in climate, pasture, and prevalence of infectious agents. In order to investigate the genetic background, the genotypes of 685 individuals of different Cameroonian breeds were analysed by using the BovineSNP50v3 BeadChip. The variance components including heritability were estimated and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed. Phenotypes were obtained by parasitological screening and categorised in Tick-borne pathogens (TBP), gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), and onchocercosis (ONC). Estimated heritabilities were low for GIN and TBP (0.079 (se = 0.084) and 0.109 (se = 0.103) respectively) and moderate for ONC (0.216 (se = 0.094)). Further than revealing the quantitative nature of the traits, GWAS identified putative trait-associated genomic regions on five chromosomes, including the chromosomes 11 and 18 for GIN, 20 and 24 for TBP, and 12 for ONC. The results imply that breeding for resistant animals in the cattle population from Northern Cameroon might be possible for the studied pathogens; however, further research in this field using larger datasets will be required to improve the resistance towards pathogen infections, propose candidate genes or to infer biological pathways, as well as the genetic structures of African multi-breed populations.

1. Introduction

In cattle breeds, the genetic makeup has been shown to create different phenotypes related to their ability to sustain environmental pressure, including pathogens. Particularly in developing countries, many of the endemic pathogens considerably affect the cattle livestock industry [1], for instance endoparasitic infections caused by a single or mixture of gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) such as Toxocara, Strongyles, Strongyloides, and Trichuris [2,3]. These infections lead to losses in meat and milk production systems. Additionally, female infertility and rapid death in younger animals may occur after infection without warning signs [4]. The resistance to tick bites via immunogenic reactivity against compounds is in the tick salivary, and thus the likelihood to acquire tick transmissible microorganisms is reported to vary among different breeds of cattle [5,6]. This combination of ticks and transmissible diseases (tick-borne pathogens: TBP) is known to be a substantial drawback for the improvement of the livestock sector in sub-Saharan Africa. As an example, in many regions of Africa, the tick species Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is progressively invading new areas with published reports of displacing established populations of closely-related species [7].
Cameroon is a country situated in Central Africa and home to both autochthonous taurine (Bos taurus) and zebu (Bos indicus) cattle breeds, as well as to all agents of the above-mentioned infectious diseases. The respective distribution of those pathogens is thereby dependent on the climatic zone, habitat preference and vector abundance. The whole genomes of individuals of the investigated breeds have been recently published [8]. The latter study revealed hints of considerable breed admixture, possibly due to uncontrolled mating. To assess the possible exploitation of economically valuable phenotypic traits, heritability studies have been used all over the world evaluating which of the related traits may be targets for breeding improvement [9,10,11]. In Cameroon, heritability studies on cattle resistance to parasites have been done for ticks [12,13], but no clear genetic effect could be demonstrated. In the human host, substantial inter-individual variations of infection burden with the tissue-dwelling filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus were not explainable by exposure to parasite transmission, suggesting a substantial genetic predisposition [14]. In the cattle host, exposed but non-Onchocerca ochengi infected individuals have been described as putative immune [15], with no gene association study yet carried out. Although most species of the bovine Onchocerca (ONC) parasites have been reported non- or low-pathogenic [16], their importance mainly being a naturally occurring model for the closely-related human parasite. Traits associated with disease resistance have already been found to be heritable, with identified regions mapped by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), even if at times with low estimates [9,17].
The present study aims to investigate the genetic background of the resistance against pathogens by using the infection status of individuals with regard to vector-borne (TBP and ONC) and oral-faecal-transmitted (GIN) pathogens in cattle breeds from Cameroon.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

As large datasets are indispensable for reliable results in genomic studies [18], a pooled multi-breed dataset was examined. A total of 1260 cattle were examined, of which a subset of 719 (57%) was selected for genotyping analyses. Thirty-four samples did not meet the quality control criteria and were excluded for the analysis. The sample set originated from five districts in North Cameroon located in the provincial regions Adamawa, North and Far North where approximately 83% of the national cattle population is located [19], and consisted of 719 individuals from the Bos indicus breeds Fulani (n = 100) and Gudali (n = 372), as well as the autochthonous Bos taurus breeds Kapsiki (n = 137) and Namchi (n = 110). Additional information is available from [20,21]. The study data collection took place in both dry and rainy seasons of the year 2014. The sampling sites spanned across three different bioclimatic zones: the sub-humid Guinea savannah biotope of the Adamawa highlands, the semi-arid Sudan savannah in the North region, and the arid Sahel region in the region Far North (Figure 1). The regions were subdivided into five sites according to the availability of samples and the willingness of the owner to participate in the study. The number of individuals after/before quality control for each district, respectively, were: Vina (n = 123/125) and Faro et Deo (n = 105/128) in the Adamawa region; Faro (n = 106/110) and Mayo-Rey (n = 215/219) in the North region, and Mayo Tsanaga (n = 136/137) in the Far North region. The quality control ensured that individuals without reliable phenotypic records or more than 10% missing genotypes were discarded. The sample collections have been carried out with the consent of the regional state representatives and traditional authorities from each of the sampling areas. Furthermore, oral consent was given by the cattle owners, herdsmen (who also helped in restraining the animals), and with the participation and approval of the National Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) in Cameroon, which is the country’s government institution for animal health and livestock husbandry improvement.

2.2. Pathogen Identification and Phenotype Classification

DNA was extracted from blood, as previously reported [20]. Phenotypic information was obtained using molecular detection for TBP, faeces treated by flotation technique for GIN, and small skin biopsies from the inguinal region for ONC. Details of the TBP identification by molecular tool, distribution and biodiversity is given in Abanda et al. [20]. Isolated eggs of GIN were identified by the McMaster technique [23], Onchocerca spp. were investigated by intradermal nodule palpation [24] and isolation and identification of microfilariae of O. ochengi, O. gutturosa and O. armillata according to Wahl et al. [16] for ONC. All phenotypes were binary coded as 1 (infected) and 0 (not infected).

2.3. Genotyping

Genotyping was conducted using the Illumina BovineSNP50v3 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). After quality control, all annotated autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.05, no significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg-equilibrium (p < 0.001), and segregating in all of the breeds were favoured for downstream analyses. The final dataset contained the phenotypes of 608 to 685 animals depending on the trait and their genotype status of 35,195 SNPs (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis consisted of two major sections, the estimation of variance components, and the estimation of marker effects in order to infer marker-trait-association. Both were conducted using the software GCTA (version 1.91.7beta) [25]. Initially, all available fixed effects (sex, age, season_year, breed_site) were tested for significance (p < 0.05) to determine the effects to be included in the evaluation model. Since not all breeds were present at all sites, and samples were not taken in all seasons in each year, combined effects (breed_site and season_year) were considered. The heritabilities were calculated based on the estimated variance components using standard notations. For the variance component analyses, the following model was applied:
y = X b + g + e
where vector y contains the phenotypes of the individuals, b denotes the fixed effect breed_site (additionally age for the trait ONC), and X is the corresponding design matrix. g is the random genetic animal effect, with g   ~   N ( 0 , G σ g 2 ) and G being the genomic relationship matrix. The vector e includes the residuals, with e ~ N ( 0 , I σ e 2 ) ,   where I is the identity matrix. As the traits were binary coded, heritabilities were calculated on the observed, as well as on the unobserved liability scale ( λ ), and given assumed population prevalences of 0.8, 0.6 and 0.5 for the traits GIN, ONC, and TBP, respectively. Thereby, λ is obtained by linear transformation of the observed binary coded phenotype to an unobserved continuous scale. In order to estimate the level of association between the traits and the significant SNPs in GWAS, model 1 was extended towards:
y = X b + W u + g + e
Thereby, u denotes the fixed effect of the SNP to be tested and W the design matrix containing the number of 1-alleles. A leave-one-chromosome-out (loco) approach was applied to avoid a loss in mapping power by double-fitting the tested SNP. Due to the limitation of the sample size and the associated produced dataset, a Bonferroni corrected genome-wide significance level was too stringent to be applied, hence SNPs with p-values smaller than the threshold of p n o m i n a l = 5 × 10 5 were assumed to show nominal significant trait association. The genome-wide significance level was defined as p g e n o m e w i d e = 0.05 n , where n denotes the number of SNPs.

3. Results

Parasitological examinations representing phenotypic data are reported in Table 1 including the cattle breed, the pathogen considered, and the respective distribution according to the site of sampling for TBP, ONC, and GIN. The fixed effect breed_site had a significant impact on all traits whereas the age-effect was solely significant for ONC.
The estimated variance components, as well as heritabilities based on the observed and the liability scale are given in Table 2. Phenotypic variances with low standard errors were estimated ranging from 0.063 to 0.181. A high or low observed pathogen prevalence in the population came along with considerably smaller estimates. The greatest phenotypic variance was by far observed for ONC, for which the prevalence was rather close to an intermediate value. Analogous results could be observed for the estimated additive genetic variance resulting in low heritabilities on the observed scale for all traits but ONC ( h o b s . 2 = 0.216 ). The standard errors were generally large for the estimates of the additive genetic variance and the heritabilities. The heritability estimates were substantially higher when the estimation was based on the liability scale and resulted in moderate to high heritabilities for all investigated traits. However, the standard errors were large and even exceeded the estimates in the case of GIN.
Figure 2 displays the GWAS results for each of the studied traits. For all analysed traits, the majority of SNP effects were small; however, several regions harbouring SNPs with obviously larger effects were distributed across almost all chromosomes. Two SNPs on chromosome 11 and 18 exceeded the nominal significance threshold indicating putative trait-associated genomic regions for GIN (Figure 2A), and one on chromosome 12 for ONC (Figure 2B). For TBP (Figure 2C), one significant SNP was found on chromosome 20 and another one on chromosome 24. None of the reported outlying SNPs reported from the traits reached the genome-wide level of significance.

4. Discussion

As in many parts of the world, the distribution and phenotypic adaptation of cattle in Cameroon has been strongly influenced by herd migration history, climate, wildlife abundance, vector and pathogen occurrence, and food and water accessibility [26,27,28,29]. Our results showed that the fixed effect breed_site had a significant association with the acquisition of all investigated pathogens. This was expected because the studied sites’ climate differed widely from humid to sub-humid and arid conditions [29,30]. Further, genetic studies observed differences between Bos taurus and Bos indicus breeds and have shown that genetic variation plays a significant role in terms of an animal’s resistance towards parasites as reviewed by Mapholi et al. [31,32]. Given the present dataset, the effect of the breed and the site could not be distinguished due to the heterogeneous distribution of all breeds not present at every site. Consequently, breeds were not separately analysed as large datasets are needed to obtain reliable results in genomic studies, and pooling data being a suitable approach to increase the power in such studies and to strengthen the results [18]. The observed significance of the age effect in the acquisition of ONC can be explained by the cumulative character of the long-living parasite population over time. To prove that statement in the present study, we grouped all individuals according to their age (<3 years, >3 years) and calculated the prevalence of infection within these groups. Thereby, 73% of the individuals that were older than 3 years were infected, whereas younger individuals were less affected (46%). This evidence has been previously demonstrated in Gudali cattle from the Adamawa region in Cameroon [33]. Indeed, susceptible individuals grouped into early and late susceptible had increasing nodules and microfilarial loads with significant differences in the prepatency period [24,33] variable from male to female, but with no visible gender effect in our dataset.
The variance component estimation uncovered the susceptibility of individuals towards infections with the studied pathogens to be to some extent controlled by genetics. As expected for binary coded traits, a high or low observed pathogen prevalence in the population came along with considerably smaller variance component estimates [34]. Compared with the other traits, obviously larger variance component estimates could be presented for ONC, for which the pathogen prevalence was rather close to an intermediate observed prevalence. In agreement with [35], all heritabilities were substantially higher when the estimation was based on the liability scale since these also capture parts of non-additive genetic variance, particularly for traits where the prevalence is close to zero or unity [34]. The standard errors were generally large for the estimates of the additive genetic variance and the heritabilities, mainly since the number of individuals was limited and the multi-breed data structure was complex. The results imply that breeding might be possible to improve pathogen resistance in Cameroonian cattle for all three traits investigated here. However, as the variance components are population-specific parameters and are additionally influenced by the prevalence within a population [36], further studies using large representative datasets of the breeds are required to accurately determine the extent of the genetic variation or the response to selection within certain breeds. The visualised GWAS results (Figure 2) are characterised by numerous small and a few larger SNP effects across all chromosomes implying a quantitative trait nature for each of the traits. Several putatively trait-associated regions were identified for all of the traits. The region located on chromosome 24 having an impact on TBP has not been reported as an association signal elsewhere [37]. Generally, for all traits investigated, a relatively small number of neighbouring SNPs seems to be in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the significant SNPs, which in some cases led to single significant SNPs instead of clear peaks, i.e., clear association signals (see Figure 2). This might be attributed to the multi-breed dataset, for which a large effective population size can be assumed and hence LD decays fast [38,39]. Additionally, due to data filtering, the number of SNPs can be decreased in chromosomal regions where an increased number of SNPs do not segregate in all of the breeds. As a Bonferroni corrected genome-wide significance level is too stringent, especially when the tests are not independent, like in the present study, an additional nominal significance level was applied to detect regions with weak associations. Due to the limited statistical power resulting in a lack of genome-wide significant SNPs, post-GWAS analyses were not conducted. In order to actually map and discuss quantitative trait loci (QTL), larger sample sizes are required. Hence no further discussion of the association signals was intended here.
A plethora of constantly updated reports [17,40,41] of SNPs associated with TBP and GIN, as well as the heritability estimates between low to medium values in the present study (see Table 2) confirm the importance of genomics for livestock improvement. Even though this study has discovered findings of such potential, they should be interpreted with caution due to the large standard errors of the estimates. In future investigations, large-scale studies or meta-analyses might give a better insight into the architecture of the traits in future GWAS. Special attention should be payed to LD structures in multi-breed populations as investigated here because LD consistency is compromised across populations [42]. In summary, the results imply that breeding for resistant animals in the cattle population from Northern Cameroon might be possible for the studied pathogens. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that further research in this field using larger datasets will be worthwhile to improve the resistance towards pathogen infections and to infer the genetic structures of African multi-breed populations. The latter is of great importance because uncontrolled admixture is predominant in the breeds investigated [8]. In fact, individual herd performances of local adaptation and resistance to pathogens can greatly vary based on the management system and the level of introgressed genes. It is therefore recommended to conduct interdisciplinary studies where genetic parameters are supplemented with environmental factors, information of the husbandry system, and molecular-diagnostic analyses for local pathogens diversity and exposure, together with productivity determinants.

5. Conclusions

The present study is the first in-depth investigation of the genetic makeup towards pathogen resistance of the cattle population in Cameroon. For all the studied groups of endemic pathogens genetic determinants were found, but due to the combination of high population variability and the limited sample size, a clear association with the involved genes was not possible. Future genetic association studies should consider these circumstances already in their planning phase.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12070976/s1, Table S1: SNP profile of the analysed cattle generated by the Illumina Bovine SNP50v3 chip.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E., B.A., A.P. and A.R.; methodology, A.E., B.A., A.P., S.P., M.S. and H.I.; software, B.A., M.S., H.I. and S.P.; validation, A.E., B.A., M.S., H.I. and S.P.; formal analysis, H.I.; investigation, B.A. and A.P.; resources, A.E., B.A. and A.P.; data curation, A.E., B.A., M.S. and H.I.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, B.A., H.I.,M.S. and A.E.; visualization, A.E., M.S. and H.I.; supervision, A.E. and A.R.; project administration, A.E.; funding acquisition, A.E., B.A., A.P. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the joint RiSC program of the State Ministry of Science, Research and Arts Baden-Württemberg and the University of Tübingen (PSP-no. 4041002616). We are thankful for the use of de.NBI cloud and the support by the High Performance and Cloud Computing Group at the Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung of the University of Tübingen and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through grant no. 031 A535A. The sample collections and parasitological examinations were supported by the Otto Bayer Foundation (grant no. F-2013BS522) and the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant no. Re 1536/2-1). The research stays of B.A. and A.P. in Germany were supported by the Baden-Württemberg Foundation and additionally for B.A. the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, grant no. BA_A/12/97080). We acknowledge support on publication charges (APC) by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the National Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD) in Cameroon, which is the country’s government institution for animal health and livestock husbandry improvement. The sample where collected as regular screening for veterinary intervention and parasitological assessment. Veterinarians and experienced personal where involved. The presents research is the 4th of a series of four publications (3 already published) using the same individuals to reports the epidemiology of the screened pathogens in the targeted population where the Institutional Review Board Statement is equally stated. No ethical code number was granted to the inspection, as regularly undertaken for screening purposes.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article. For further enquiries contact the corresponding author here guimbangabanda@yahoo.fr.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Eisler, M.C.; Magona, J.W.; Revie, C.W. Diagnosis of Cattle Diseases Endemic to Sub-Saharan Africa: Evaluating a Low Cost Decision Support Tool in Use by Veterinary Personnel. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dimander, S.O.; Höglund, J.; Spörndly, E.; Waller, P.J. The impact of internal parasites on the productivity of young cattle organically reared on semi-natural pastures in Sweden. Vet. Parasitol. 2000, 90, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Skuce, P.J.; Morgan, E.R.; van Dijk, J.; Mitchell, M. Animal health aspects of adaptation to climate change: Beating the heat and parasites in a warming Europe. Animal 2013, 7, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lamy, E.; van Harten, S.; Sales-Baptista, E.; Guerra, M.M.M.; De Almeida, A.M. Factors Influencing Livestock Productivity. In Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; ISBN 9783642292057. [Google Scholar]
  5. Achukwi, M.D.; Tanya, V.N.; Messiné, O.; Njongmeta, L.M. Etude comparative de l’infestation des bovins Namchi (Bos taurus) et Goudali de Ngaoundéré (Bos indicus) par la tique adulte Amblyomma variegatum. Revue d’élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 2001, 54, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sahibi, H.; Rhalem, A.; Tikki, N. Comparison of effects of low and high tick infestations on acquired cattle tick resistance: Hyalomma marginatum marginatum. Parasite 1998, 5, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Silatsa, B.A.; Kuiate, J.-R.; Njiokou, F.; Simo, G.; Feussom, J.-M.K.; Tunrayo, A.; Amzati, G.S.; Bett, B.; Bishop, R.; Githaka, N.; et al. A countrywide molecular survey leads to a seminal identification of the invasive cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Cameroon, a decade after it was reported in Cote d’Ivoire. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. 2019, 10, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paguem, A.; Abanda, B.; Achukwi, M.D.; Baskaran, P.; Czemmel, S.; Renz, A.; Eisenbarth, A. Whole genome characterization of autochthonous Bos taurus brachyceros and introduced Bos indicus indicus cattle breeds in Cameroon regarding their adaptive phenotypic traits and pathogen resistance. BMC Genet. 2020, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Neto, L.R.P.; Jonsson, N.N.; D’Occhio, M.J.; Barendse, W. Molecular genetic approaches for identifying the basis of variation in resistance to tick infestation in cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 180, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raphaka, K.; Matika, O.; Sánchez-Molano, E.; Mrode, R.; Coffey, M.P.; Riggio, V.; Glass, E.J.; Woolliams, J.A.; Bishop, S.C.; Banos, G. Genomic regions underlying susceptibility to bovine tuberculosis in Holstein-Friesian cattle. BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kassahun, Y.; Mattiangeli, V.; Ameni, G.; Hailu, E.; Aseffa, A.; Young, D.B.; Hewinson, R.G.; Vordermeier, H.M.; Bradley, D.G. Admixture mapping of tuberculosis and pigmentation-related traits in an African—European hybrid cattle population. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stachurski, F.; Musonge, E.; Achu-Kwi, M.; Saliki, J. Impact of natural infestation of Amblyomma variegatum on the liveweight gain of male Gudali cattle in Adamawa (Cameroon). Vet. Parasitol. 1993, 49, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stachurski, F. Variability of cattle infestation by Amblyomma variegatum and its possible utilisation for tick control. Revue d’Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 1993, 46, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Timmann, C.; Van Der Kamp, E.; Kleensang, A.; König, I.R.; Thye, T.; Büttner, D.W.; Hamelmann, C.; Marfo, Y.; Vens, M.; Brattig, N.; et al. Human Genetic Resistance to Onchocerca volvulus: Evidence for Linkage to Chromosome 2p from an Autosome-Wide Scan. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tchakoute, V.L.; Graham, S.; Jensen, S.A.; Makepeace, B.L.; Nfon, C.K.; Njongmeta, L.M.; Lustigman, S.; Enyong, P.A.; Tanya, V.N.; Bianco, A.E.; et al. In a bovine model of onchocerciasis, protective immunity exists naturally, is absent in drug-cured hosts, and is induced by vaccination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5971–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wahl, G.; Achu-Kwi, M.D.; Mbah, D.; Dawa, O.; Renz, A. Bovine onchocercosis in North Cameroon. Vet. Parasitol. 1994, 52, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Becker, G.M.; Davenport, K.; Burke, J.M.; Lewis, R.M.; Miller, J.E.; Morgan, J.L.M.; Notter, D.R.; Murdoch, B.M. Genome-wide association study to identify genetic loci associated with gastrointestinal nematode resistance in Katahdin sheep. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schmid, M.; Bennewitz, J. Invited review: Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative traits in livestock—A selective review of statistical models and experimental designs. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2017, 60, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bokagne, F.; Bouba, M. “Évolution et Situation Actuelle de l’élevage au Cameroun” Report of the DVM; Ahmadu Bello University, MINEPIA: Yaoundê, Cameroon; 2005.
  20. Abanda, B.; Paguem, A.; Abdoulmoumini, M.; Kingsley, M.T.; Renz, A.; Eisenbarth, A. Molecular identification and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in zebu and taurine cattle in North Cameroon. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paguem, A.; Abanda, B.; Ndjonka, D.; Weber, J.S.; Ngomtcho, S.C.H.; Manchang, K.T.; Adoulmoumini, M.; Eisenbarth, A.; Renz, A.; Kelm, S.; et al. Widespread co-endemicity of Trypanosoma species infecting cattle in the Sudano-Sahelian and Guinea Savannah zones of Cameroon. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abanda, B. Tick-Borne Pathogens in African Cattle—Novel Molecular Tools for Diagnostics in Epizootiology and the Genetics of Resistance. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 17 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques; Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UK, 1986; p. 160.
  24. Achu-kwi, M.D.; Daiber, W.H.; Renz, A.; Wahl, G.; Wanji, S. Prepatency period and some aspects of the epizooti-ology of Onchocerca ochengi infestation in cattle in the Adamawa Plateau, Cameroon. Parasite 1994, 1 (Suppl. 1), S10–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, J.; Lee, S.H.; Goddard, M.E.; Visscher, P.M. GCTA: A Tool for Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chan, E.K.F.; Nagaraj, S.H.; Reverter-Gomez, T. The evolution of tropical adaptation: Comparing taurine and zebu cattle. Anim. Genet. 2010, 41, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ali, M.; Adem, A.; Chandranath, I.S.; Benedict, S.; Pathan, J.Y.; Nagelkerke, N.; Nyberg, F.; Lewis, L.K.; Yandle, T.G.; Nicholls, G.M.; et al. Responses to Dehydration in the One-Humped Camel and Effects of Blocking the Renin-Angiotensin System. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, R.; Zhang, X.M.; Campana, M.; Huang, J.P.; Chang, Z.H.; Qi, X.B.; Shi, H.; Su, B.; Zhang, R.F.; Lan, X.Y.; et al. Paternal origins of Chinese cattle. Anim. Genet. 2013, 44, 446–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bahbahani, H.; Tijjani, A.; Mukasa, C.; Wragg, D.; Almathen, F.; Nash, O.; Akpa, G.N.; Mbole-Kariuki, M.; Malla, S.; Woolhouse, M.; et al. Signatures of Selection for Environmental Adaptation and Zebu × Taurine Hybrid Fitness in East African Shorthorn Zebu. Front. Genet. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Bahbahani, H.; Salim, B.; Almathen, F.; Al Enezi, F.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Hanotte, O. Signatures of positive selection in African Butana and Kenana dairy zebu cattle. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mapholi, N.O.; Marufu, M.C.; Maiwashe, A.; Banga, C.B.; Muchenje, V.; MacNeil, M.D.; Chimonyo, M.; Dzama, K. Towards a genomics approach to tick (Acari: Ixodidae) control in cattle: A review. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yaro, M.; Munyard, K.; Stear, M.; Groth, D. Combatting African Animal Trypanosomiasis (AAT) in livestock: The potential role of trypanotolerance. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 225, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Achukwi, M.; Harnett, W.; Bradley, J.; Renz, A. Onchocerca ochengi acquisition in zebu Gudali cattle exposed to natural transmission: Parasite population dynamics and IgG antibody subclass responses to Ov10/Ov11 recombinant antigens. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 122, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dempster, E.R.; Lerner, I.M. Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 1950, 35, 212–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Snowder, G.D.; Van Vleck, L.D.; Cundiff, L.V.; Bennett, G. Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: Environmental, genetic, and economic factors. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lynch, M.; Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits; Sinauer As.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hu, Z.-L.; Park, C.A.; Reecy, J.M. Building a livestock genetic and genomic information knowledgebase through integrative developments of Animal QTLdb and CorrDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D701–D710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Thévenon, S.; Dayo, G.K.; Sylla, S.; Sidibe, I.; Berthier, D.; Legros, H.; Boichard, D.; Eggen, A.; Gautier, M. The extent of linkage disequilibrium in a large cattle population of western Africa and its consequences for association studies. Anim. Genet. 2007, 38, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Goddard, M.E.; Hayes, B.J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mapholi, N.; Maiwashe, A.; Matika, O.; Riggio, V.; Bishop, S.; MacNeil, M.; Banga, C.; Taylor, J.; Dzama, K. Genome-wide association study of tick resistance in South African Nguni cattle. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. 2016, 7, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kim, S.-J.; Ka, S.; Ha, J.-W.; Kim, J.; Yoo, D.; Kim, K.; Lee, H.-K.; Lim, D.; Cho, S.; Hanotte, O.; et al. Cattle genome-wide analysis reveals genetic signatures in trypanotolerant N’Dama. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Veroneze, R.; Bastiaansen, J.W.M.; Knol, E.F.; Guimarães, S.E.F.; Silva, F.F.; Harlizius, B.; Lopes, M.S.; Lopes, P.S. Linkage disequilibrium patterns and persistence of phase in purebred and crossbred pig (Sus scrofa) populations. BMC Genet. 2014, 15, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Sampling. The Vina and Faro et Deo sites are located in the Adamawa region, the Faro and the Mayo-Rey in the North region, and the Mayo Tsanaga in the Far North region. Ecological zones and climatic conditions of each of the sampling zones are shown. The coloured zones represent the sampling areas, the zones with stripes the national parks, and the red dots the sampling sites. Image adapted from [22].
Figure 1. Sampling. The Vina and Faro et Deo sites are located in the Adamawa region, the Faro and the Mayo-Rey in the North region, and the Mayo Tsanaga in the Far North region. Ecological zones and climatic conditions of each of the sampling zones are shown. The coloured zones represent the sampling areas, the zones with stripes the national parks, and the red dots the sampling sites. Image adapted from [22].
Genes 12 00976 g001
Figure 2. Manhattan plots for the investigated traits. The −log10-p-values of the SNP effects and their chromosomal positions are shown for the traits gastrointestinal nematodes (A), onchocercosis (B) and tick-borne pathogens (C). The horizontal bottom black line corresponds to a nominal significance level of p n o m i n a l = 5 × 10 5 , the top red line to the genome-wide significance level.
Figure 2. Manhattan plots for the investigated traits. The −log10-p-values of the SNP effects and their chromosomal positions are shown for the traits gastrointestinal nematodes (A), onchocercosis (B) and tick-borne pathogens (C). The horizontal bottom black line corresponds to a nominal significance level of p n o m i n a l = 5 × 10 5 , the top red line to the genome-wide significance level.
Genes 12 00976 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of phenotyped and genotyped dataset used in the analysis, including the sampling site and parasite burden.
Table 1. Characteristics of phenotyped and genotyped dataset used in the analysis, including the sampling site and parasite burden.
GIN 1 ONC 2TBP 3
SiteCattle BreednSpecies+NA-+NA-+NA-
Mayo TsanagaKapsiki136B. taurus11881011002613402
FaroNamchi106B. taurus800265215395011
Mayo ReyFulani26B. indicus250124022105
Gudali189B. indicus18801149238169020
VinaGudali123B. indicus117067574111607
Faro et DeoFulani68B. indicus4721916616701
Gudali37B. indicus26011111253601
TOTAL 242B. taurus198836162179229013
443B. indicus40323826076107409034
685 601107442277186638047
1 gastrointestinal nematodes, identified by McMaster faeces flotation: Toxocara spp., Strongyle spp., Strongyloides spp., Trichuris spp. 2 onchocercosis, identified by skin biopsies and/or palpation *: Onchocerca ochengi *, O. gutturosa, O. dukei, O. armillata. 3 tick-borne pathogens, identified by PCR: Anaplasma spp., Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., Theileria spp. +: tested positive; NA: test result not available; -: tested negative; * indicates palpation. All species marked with asterisk were detected by palpation. The rest only by skin biopsies.
Table 2. Population specific parameters of the investigated traits. The estimated phenotypic (VP) and additive genetic (VA) variance, the heritability estimated on the observed ( h o b s . 2 ) and liability scale ( h l i a b . 2 ) as well as their standard errors (in parentheses) are shown. The number of evaluated individuals (n) and the observed prevalence in the investigated population are given.
Table 2. Population specific parameters of the investigated traits. The estimated phenotypic (VP) and additive genetic (VA) variance, the heritability estimated on the observed ( h o b s . 2 ) and liability scale ( h l i a b . 2 ) as well as their standard errors (in parentheses) are shown. The number of evaluated individuals (n) and the observed prevalence in the investigated population are given.
Trait 1nPrevalence V P   ( SE ) V A   ( SE ) h o b s . 2   ( SE ) h l i a b . 2   ( SE )
GIN6750.8900.087 (0.005)0.006 (0.007)0.079 (0.084)0.265 (0.281)
ONC6080.6940.181 (0.011)0.039 (0.017)0.216 (0.094)0.393 (0.170)
TBP6850.9310.063 (0.003)0.007 (0.006)0.109 (0.103)0.666 (0.631)
1 gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), onchocercosis (ONC), tick-borne pathogens (TBP).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abanda, B.; Schmid, M.; Paguem, A.; Iffland, H.; Preuß, S.; Renz, A.; Eisenbarth, A. Genetic Analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies on Pathogen Resistance of Bos taurus and Bos indicus Cattle Breeds in Cameroon. Genes 2021, 12, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12070976

AMA Style

Abanda B, Schmid M, Paguem A, Iffland H, Preuß S, Renz A, Eisenbarth A. Genetic Analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies on Pathogen Resistance of Bos taurus and Bos indicus Cattle Breeds in Cameroon. Genes. 2021; 12(7):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12070976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abanda, Babette, Markus Schmid, Archile Paguem, Hanna Iffland, Siegfried Preuß, Alfons Renz, and Albert Eisenbarth. 2021. "Genetic Analyses and Genome-Wide Association Studies on Pathogen Resistance of Bos taurus and Bos indicus Cattle Breeds in Cameroon" Genes 12, no. 7: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12070976

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop