Next Article in Journal
New Insights on the Regulation of the Insulin-Degrading Enzyme: Role of microRNAs and RBPs
Next Article in Special Issue
Applications of CRISPR/Cas13-Based RNA Editing in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Food Reward Alterations during Obesity Are Associated with Inflammation in the Striatum in Mice: Beneficial Effects of Akkermansia muciniphila
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/cells11162535
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement of Bacterial Blight Resistance in Two Conventionally Cultivated Rice Varieties by Editing the Noncoding Region

by
Changyan Li
1,2,3,
Lei Zhou
1,3,
Bian Wu
1,3,
Sanhe Li
1,3,
Wenjun Zha
1,3,
Wei Li
2,
Zaihui Zhou
2,
Linfeng Yang
2,
Lei Shi
2,
Yongjun Lin
2,* and
Aiqing You
1,3,*
1
Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement, Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
2
College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(16), 2535; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162535
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 14 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Genome Editing: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in China)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
xa13 is a recessive pleiotropic gene that positively regulates rice disease resistance and negatively regulates rice fertility; thus, seriously restricting its rice breeding application. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology was used to delete the Xa13 gene promoter partial sequence, including the pathogenic bacteria-inducible expression element. Rice with the edited promoter region lost the ability for pathogen-induced gene expression without affecting background gene expression in leaves and anthers, resulting in disease resistance and normal yield. The study also screened a family of disease-resistant and normal fertile plants in which the target sequence was deleted and the exogenous transgene fragment isolated in the T1 generation (transgene-free line). Important agronomic traits of the T2 generation rice were examined. T2 generation rice with/without exogenous DNA showed no statistical differences compared to the wild type in heading stage, plant height, panicles per plant, panicle length, or seed setting rate in the field. Two important conventional rice varieties, namely Kongyu131 (KY131, Geng/japonica) and Huanghuazhan (HHZ, Xian/indica), were successfully transformed, and disease-resistant and fertile materials were obtained. Currently, these are the two important conventional rice varieties in China that can be used directly for production after improvement. Expression of the Xa13 gene in the leaves of transgenic rice (KY-PD and HHZ-PD) was not induced after pathogen infection, indicating that this method can be used universally and effectively to promote the practical application of xa13, a recessive disease-resistant pleiotropic gene, for rice bacterial blight resistance. Our study on the regulation of gene expression by editing noncoding regions of the genes provides a new idea for the development of molecular design breeding in the future.

1. Introduction

Gene-editing technology can delete, insert, or mutate target sites in a genome for the precise modification of genes. Since the 1990s, three generations of influential gene-editing techniques, including zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) [1], transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [2], and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) [3], were developed. All these methods initiate non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair by inducing double-strand breaks at the DNA target site. Error-prone NHEJ repairs often result in base insertions or deletions at the repair site, resulting in target gene mutations. ZFNs and TALENs require a sequence-specific DNA binding module designed for each target DNA sequence to determine specificity in the binding site of the genome, while DNA cleavage activity is achieved by Fok I endonuclease fusion of ZFN and TALEN complexes. On the contrary, CRISPR/Cas9 technology uses a synthetic sgRNA-oriented molecule to identify a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) with a (NGG)-specific DNA sequence, which is cleaved by the Cas9 protein. According to the research reports in various plant and animal models, CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology is easier to operate, and more scalable, efficient, and stable than ZFNs and TALENs [4].
Rice is one of the most important food crops in the world. Since the successful use of gene-editing in plants, a large number of genes have been edited in rice, including traits such as yield, quality, resistance, and plant-architecture [5,6,7,8].
Rice bacterial blight caused by Gram-negative strains of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) is the most harmful bacterial disease affecting rice production [9]. The xa13 gene is a cloned recessive bacterial blight resistance gene that also plays a key role in rice pollen development [10]. Analysis of the disease-resistance mechanism of the xa13 gene showed that after bacterial infection, the dominant Xa13 gene was activated and expressed which regulated the redistribution of sugar or copper ions leading to disease susceptibility [11,12]. RNAi-mediated constitutive silencing of the Xa13 gene increased the ability of rice to resist bacterial blight but caused pollen sterility and a decreased seed setting rate. When the recessive xa13 gene was mutated in the promoter region, the bacterial-blight-induced function was lost [10]. The 31-bp bacterial-blight-inducible element was verified in yeast and rice [13,14], and three different research groups have also obtained disease-resistant rice materials by editing this element [15,16,17].
Due to the evolution of pathogenic bacteria, a disease resistance gene often loses its resistance within 10 years of production. Compared to dominant genes, recessive resistance genes such as xa13 may confer new resistance mechanisms against physiological pathogens that target crops and act as important supplements to dominant resistance gene resources [18]. However, in traditional crossbreeding, the use of recessive genes requires simultaneous modification of multiple parents, which is both time-consuming and laborious. Additionally, RNAi-mediated normal constitutive gene-silencing or knockout of the Xa13 gene seriously affects rice pollen development and the seed setting rate. Though considered the most useful resistance gene in breeding, the unique mechanism of xa13 disease resistance greatly limits its application in actual crop production.
In this study, two sgRNAs (P1 and P2) were designed using CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology, and 149 nucleotides (including the 31 bp bacterial-blight-inducible element) were specifically deleted in the Xa13 gene promoter region of two important popularized conventional rice varieties, Kongyu131 (KY131, Geng/japonica) and Huanghuazhan (HHZ, Xian/indica). Deletion of the 149 bp promoter fragment aimed to eliminate the induction of Xa13 gene expression by bacterial blight without affecting anther development and rice fertility. The study also screened a family of disease-resistant and normal fertile plants in which the target sequence was deleted and the exogenous transgene fragment isolated in the T1 generation (transgene-free line). T2 generation transgenic plants with/without exogenous DNA showed no statistical differences in the main agronomic traits compared to the wild type. These findings proved that a successful deletion of the bacterial-blight-inducible element in the Xa13 promoter did not affect rice agronomic traits except for disease resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Selection of sgRNA Sites in the xa13 Gene Promoter

The Xa13/xa13 gene promoter and CDS sequences were obtained from Chu et al. [10]. The 31 bp promoter bacterial-blight-induced element was obtained from Romer [13,14]. Two Cas9 target sites were selected upstream and downstream of the bacterial-blight-induced element. Target sequences were P1: actatataaacactgagccatgg and P2: ggagagagggacagatctagagg (Figure 1A).

2.2. Cas9:P1+P2 Expression Vector Construction

Cas9:P1+P2 expression vector construction was performed according to the methods of Ma and Liu [19]. Based on P1 and P2 targets, four primers (P1U3-F, P1U3-R, P2U6a-F, and P2U6a-R) were designed for the Cas9:P1+P2 expression vector (Figure 1A). The primers used for Cas9:P1+P2 vector construction are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Transformation of Rice Expression Vector

The expression vectors were introduced into two rice varieties (KY131 and HHZ) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. The callus culture and genetic transformation procedures of Geng/japonica rice (KY131) and Xian/indica rice (HHZ) were based on the methods described by Hiei [20] and Lin [21], respectively.

2.4. Transgenic Materials

The Cas9:P1+P2 vector was introduced into the Geng/japonica rice (KY131) and Xian/indica rice (HHZ). Three strains of mutants (KY-PD1-3) completely spliced between the P1 and P2 target sites in 41 T0 hygromycin-positive transformed KY131 plants were found (Figure 1B). Four strains of mutants (HHZ-PD1-4) completely spliced between the P1 and P2 target sites in 50 strain T0 hygromycin-positive transformed HHZ plants were found (Figure 1D). The primers used for molecular detection of transgenic rice plants in this study are listed in Table 2.

2.5. PCR Detection of the Xa13 Promoter Editing Sites

The genomic DNA of rice leaves of T0 generation was extracted using the CTAB method. The specific primers PCX-F/R were used to amplify the DNA of individual plants by PCR, and the transgenic rice with Xa13 promoter editing were screened.
The PCR system was as follows: 10 × TaKaRa Taq (rTaq) buffer 2 μL, rice plant DNA 2 μL, forward primer 0.2 μM, reverse primer 0.2 μM, deoxyriboside triphosphate (dNTP) 10 s 0 μM, rTaq 0.2 μL, ddH2O added to 20 μL. PCR methods are as follows: 95 °C 2 min; 95 °C 30 s, 56 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s, 30 cycles; 72 °C 7 min. PCR products were detected by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis and mutated by Sanger method.

2.6. RT-PCR and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from anthers and leaves using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genome DNA was removed by DNase I (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Expression of Xa13 and gus was determined by RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. RT was performed using a transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), the RT-PCR was conducted using rTaqTM (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with a 9700 PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), the RT-PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gel, and the qRT-PCR was conducted using SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

2.7. Evaluation of Disease Resistance of Transgenic Rice Plants

We inoculated all the T0 transgenic plants in the field with the physiological race PXO99 of bacterial blight (using turbidimetric method to control the inoculum concentration between 900 million and 1.2 billion/mL) at the peak tillering stage. Each transgenic plant was inoculated with 5–6 leaves, inoculated by leaf-cutting method, and the length and area of lesions were investigated at 14 days after inoculation [22]. Data analysis was conducted with Duncan’s multiple testing in SPSS.

2.8. Evaluation of Fertility

When the T0 transgenic rice KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 were heading, the spikelets that were about to bloom were taken and placed in a centrifuge tube filled with 75% ethanol, and the samples were required to contain the upper, middle, and lower parts of the rice ear. Then, the anthers of spikelets were taken and placed on a glass slide carefully, 1 drop of I2-KI solution containing 0.1% (w/v) iodine and 1% (w/v) potassium iodide was added, then the anthers were crushed with tweezers, covered with a cover glass, and allowed to stand for 2–3 min for color development. Observations and recordings were taken using the microscope [23].

2.9. Examination of Resistance Inheritance and Cas9-Segregation in T1 Progeny

Cas9 PCR analysis was performed to determine the transgenic-free features of transgenic plants in T1 progeny (KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1). Two T1 lines were grown in the greenhouse. Then, the resistance test at T1 seedling stage was carried out in the greenhouse. PXO99 was inoculated by cutting leaves at the 5-leaf stage of the seedling stage, and the phenotype was investigated at 14 days after inoculation [23].

2.10. Growth Curve of PXO99

The leaves of T2 progeny of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 with/without Cas9 protein inoculated with bacterial blight were taken on 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 d, sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 min, then the leaves were ground with 2 mL sterilized distilled water, The bacterial solution was diluted in sequence and divided into 7 gradients of 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106, which were spread on potato medium plates for counting. The bacterial growth curve was made after counting the number of colonies [24].

3. Results

3.1. Cas9: P1+P2 Expression Vector Construction and Genotyping of Transgenic Plants

Based on the P1 and P2 targets of Cas9 in the Xa13 promoter, the Cas9: P1+P2 expression vector was constructed (Figure 1A). Promoter editing vector Cas9: P1+P2 was transformed for two important conventional rice varieties in China, KY131 (Geng) and HHZ (Xian). Comparison of the sequencing results of the edited Xa13 gene promoter regions of KY131 and HHZ showed the presence of one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and two base insertions. These sequence differences were not present in the bacterial-blight-inducible element or the two gRNA target fragments, and thus the constructed vector was used for transformation.
Three T0 lines of KY-PD1-3 with complete shear between targets P1 and P2 (Figure 1B) were obtained. Sequencing results showed that the editing sites of KY-PD1, KY-PD2, and KY-PD3 were consistent with all the samples repaired by the third and fourth bases upstream of the P1 and P2 PAM sites (Figure 1C).

3.2. Detection of Xa13 Gene Expression in Transgenic Rice

RT-PCR/qRT-PCR detection primers (X13-Qt1F/R) were employed to detect the expression of the Xa13 gene in the T0 generation of KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4.
The expression pattern of the Xa13 gene before and after inoculation of T0 transgenic plants with KY-PD and HHZ-PD leaves was examined using qRT-PCR. The results showed that after inoculation, the expression of the Xa13 gene in the wild-type KY131 and HHZ leaves was upregulated 40 and 18 times, respectively, while its expression had no significant change in the KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4 transgenic plants (Figure 2A, B).
RT-PCR results showed that the expression of the Xa13 gene in the wild-type KY131 and HHZ was lower in leaves but significantly increased after inoculation with PXO99. In addition, the Xa13 gene was also highly expressed in anthers. Expression of the Xa13 gene in leaves was low in the KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 samples and remained so after inoculation. Deletion of the 149 bp Xa13 promoter fragment in the KY-PD and HHZ-PD samples did not affect the high expression levels of Xa13 in anthers (Figure 2C, E).
These results demonstrated that KY-PD and HHZ-PD lacked the bacterial-blight-inducible element in the Xa13 gene promoter as the Xa13 gene in leaves was not induced by PXO99 infection and continued to maintain a low background expression level in leaves. However, the deletion of this element did not affect Xa13 gene expression in anthers.

3.3. Disease Resistance and Agronomic Traits of T0 Generation KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4

Wild-type KY131 was examined at 14 days after PXO99 inoculation. Average leaf lesion length and lesion area of the wild-type KY131 were 16.99 ± 4.63 cm and 62.46 ± 12.90% (n = 50, Table 3), respectively. In contrast, the T0 generation samples of KY-PD1-3 showed strong PXO99 resistance (Figure 3B) with lesion length and lesion area differing significantly from the wild-type KY131 (Table 3).
Although Xa13 mutants and RNAi-mediated constitutively silenced Xa13 transgenic plants showed enhanced disease resistance, pollen development was severely inhibited in them, resulting in sterile phenotypes [10,17]. Analysis of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 agronomic traits in the T0 plants of our study showed that they were not significantly different from the phenotype of the wild-type families (Figure 3A,C).
Staining tests showed that the anthers of KY-PD and HHZ-PD were stained with potassium iodide; thus, indicating normal anther development (Figure 3A,C). Additionally, KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4 showed no significant difference in the seed setting rates when compared between PD and the wild type (Table 3).

3.4. Screening of Cas9-Free Plants from the T1 Generation Single-Copy PD1 Family

Analyses of the agronomic traits of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 were not significantly different from the wild type (Figure 3A,C). Therefore, KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 were chosen for the following T1 generation analysis. At the seedling stage of the T1 generation plants of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1, PCR was performed on the Cas9 gene to report a negative family (transgenic-free).
Resistance of the T1 generation plants of the KY-PD1 family was identified at the seedling stage. The results showed that the percentage of control lesions in KY131 was approximately 49.85%, while it was below 15% in both Cas9-positive and transgene-free Cas9-negative T1 generation plants of the KY-PD1 family (red arrow). The results indicated that the leaf blight disease resistance of the KY-PD1 family was stable and inherited (Figure 4A). Six Cas9-negative KY-PD1 families (red arrows, transgene-free) were successfully isolated in 30 T1 generation KY-PD1 samples.

3.5. Investigation of Important Agronomic Traits in the T2 Generation of Transgene-Free PD1 Family and Identification of the Bacterial Growth Curve

KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 samples with/without exogenous DNA were used to map the bacterial growth curve after PXO99 infection. The results showed that the T2 generation plants (with/without exogenous DNA) of both PXO99 inoculated KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 showed lower growth rates and total bacterial counts compared to the wild type. This indicated that bacterial growth was inhibited in the KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 families after PXO99 inoculation due to the deletion of the bacterial-inducible element (Figure 5).
Important agronomic traits of the T2 generation plants belonging to the KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 families were examined (Table 4 and Table 5). T2 generation KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1 plants with/without exogenous DNA showed no statistical differences compared to the wild type in heading stage, plant height, panicles per plant, panicle length, or seed setting rate. This proved that the successful deletion of the bacterial-blight-inducible element in the Xa13 gene promoter did not affect rice agronomic traits except for disease resistance.
Promoter editing vector was successfully used in the present study to improve bacterial blight resistance in two conventionally cultivated rice varieties, KY131 (Geng) and HHZ (Xian). This method of editing the promoter region can be used universally and has great application potential in breeding disease-resistant rice, especially for conventional rice varieties.
Duncan’s multiple testing between KY-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA and KY131, a and b were ranks resolved by least significant difference (LSD) method at the 0.05 probability levels. A and B were ranks resolved by least significant difference (LSD) method at the 0.01 probability levels. Data in the same column with the same letter meant there was no significant difference between them.
Duncan’s multiple testing between HHZ-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA and HHZ, a and b were ranks resolved by least significant difference (LSD) method at the 0.05 probability levels. A and B were ranks resolved by least significant difference (LSD) method at the 0.01 probability levels. Data in the same column with the same letter meant there was no significant difference between them.

4. Discussion

4.1. Advantages and Limitations of Changing Target Gene Expression Pattern by Editing the Promoter Region

At present, most gene-editing target sites lie in the coding sequence (CDS) region. However, they lead to frameshift mutations or erroneous mRNA or protein. By editing a noncoding region, additional mRNA and protein production can be avoided. Additionally, certain pluripotent genes such as Xa13 cannot be used in the editing of the CDS region.
Rodriguez-Leal et al. used CRISPR/Cas9 to cause multiple site mutations of three yield-related gene promoters in tomato plants. This produced multiple sets of mutations leading to a series of continuous and unexpected mutant tomato plants. Series of continuous mutations provide a rich source of variations for breeding [25].
TALENs were used by two research groups to edit the promoter of the OsSWEET14 gene in rice to obtain disease-resistant rice phenotypes [26,27]. Elsewhere, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to edit the CsLOB gene promoter in citrus to produce disease-resistant citrus fruits [28,29]. In the above studies, single-target mutations were used for random repair, and as a result, a variety of different mutations or even different allele mutations in the same transgenic plant were obtained which shall be discussed in Section 4.2.
Our study proposed to delete the bacterial-blight-inducible element in the promoter region of the dominant disease-susceptibility gene Xa13 in rice to evade the ability of the Xa13 gene to be induced by the pathogen and display a disease-resistant phenotype. The results showed that the expression of Xa13 gene in the leaves of transgenic rice (KY-PD and HHZ-PD) was not induced after pathogen infection. Moreover, element deletion did not reduce Xa13 gene expression in anthers, and hence did not affect fertility and seed setting rates.
Theoretically, when a promoter element function is clear and the PAM site is appropriate, the gene expression pattern can be accurately changed by editing the promoter regulatory element of the gene. The biggest limiting factor in this technology is the selection of the PAM site. Hu et al. successfully verified the latest version of the xCas9 protein obtained by the directed evolution method in human cells. This protein has three PAM sites (NG, GAA, and GTA) compared to the currently used spCas9 protein, which has only one PAM locus (NGG). This greatly increases the selection range for editing targets [30]. If the xCas9 protein was found to have the same gene-editing function and efficiency in rice, the promoter deletion fragment in our study could have been strictly controlled to a shorter fragment size.
Recent research on the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) of the GGP2 gene in lettuce edited by the CRISPR/Cas9 system obtained high translation efficiency in the GGP2 gene, which in turn greatly increased vitamin C content in lettuce leaves [31].
Editing of the promoter regions simply changes the expression pattern of genes without producing frameshift mutations or erroneous mRNA or protein which ensures truly transgene-free material. Improvement in crop traits by editing noncoding regions will soon be of great importance in the future.

4.2. Advantages of CRISPR/cas9-Mediated Double-Target sgRNA Spot Deletion

Most cas9 gene knockouts are used for single-target random mutations, resulting in a small number of base deletions, insertions, mutations, or single-base mutations. It is possible to even have allele mutations of different genotypes in the same transgene plant [28,29]. In most cases, these mutations cannot be detected by PCR and require identification by large-scale sequencing, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Double sgRNA-mediated deletion mutation is relatively stable compared to the randomness of a single target-induced mutation (insertion, deletion, or mutation), and the mutation results are predictable. All seven homozygous mutated transgenic rice lines (KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4) obtained in this study showed similar results concerning the expected shear conditions. A double-sgRNA site-directed deletion mutation was used to select the target site in this study for the following reasons: (i) it was directed at DNA sequence deletion, (ii) it was easy to use PCR to identify whether the mutation site was a homozygous, heterozygous, or no deletion mutation, (iii) it greatly reduced the sequencing workload, and (iv) it improved the accuracy of selecting mutant plants.

4.3. Application of Recessive and Pleiotropic Gene xa13 in Rice Disease Resistance Breeding

The xa13 gene is a typical multi-effect gene with major recessive bacterial blight resistance that controls disease resistance and regulates pollen development in rice.
As the use of recessive resistance genes is inconvenient in rice breeding, breeders are more concerned with the application of dominant resistance genes. Therefore, it is crucial to make full use of recessive resistance genes in the long-term struggle between human-mediated plant production and pathogenic bacteria.
Breeding practices demonstrate that the xa13 gene is not only resistant to the Xoo strain PXO99, but most other Xoo strains as well. This calls for increased attention to the application of the recessive xa13 gene in breeding [32]. However, in conventional breeding, especially crossbreeding, the use of recessive genes is relatively time-consuming and laborious, which restricts the use of the xa13 gene in actual production.
To study the effective use of the recessive disease resistance gene xa13, a green tissue-specific expression promoter was used to drive an artificial microRNA (amiRNA) in our previous study which was introduced into the rice restorer ‘Minghui 63’ [23]. This successfully transformed the recessive disease resistance trait into a dominant trait. Thus, in hybrid crossbreeding practice, only one of the parents is required to be modified to prepare a disease-resistant hybrid seed. Additionally, the green tissue-specific promoter was used to limit the silencing of the Xa13 gene in the green tissue without affecting its expression in the anther, thereby avoiding a decline in fertility. This study effectively improved the application of the Xa13 gene in disease-resistant crossbreeding practice [23].
In addition to the above-mentioned regulation of Xa13 at the transcription level to achieve disease resistance, Xa13 can be edited at the genome level. In the present study, rice materials KY131 and HHZ with high resistance to bacterial blight and no effect on seed yield were obtained by editing the inducible expression elements of the susceptible Xa13 gene promoter. This proved that the proposed method has great potential in practical disease-resistant breeding applications, especially for conventional rice varieties.
Furthermore, unlike traditional RNAi silencing technology, which relies on the trans-acting effects of exogenously introduced fragments to play different roles, the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing technique can isolate a transgene-free plant in the offspring after successful editing of the target fragment. With a genetic background similar to natural mutants, crops modified with CRISPR/Cas9 can be readily accepted by the public, especially those edited at the gene promoter region by a technique that does not produce erroneous or additional mRNAs and proteins.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, a bacterial blight-inducible element was specifically deleted in the Xa13 gene promoter regions of two important conventional rice varieties, KY131 (Geng) and HHZ (Xian), by Cas9 with two sgRNAs. The deletion of the bacterial blight-inducible element aimed to prevent the induction of the Xa13 gene expression by bacterial blight with no effects on anther development and rice fertility. The proposed method of editing the promoter region was successful in improving the bacterial blight disease resistance of KY131 and HHZ and can be used universally in disease-resistant breeding applications, especially for conventional rice varieties. Regulating gene expression by editing noncoding regions of the genes provides a new idea for the development of molecular design breeding in the future

Author Contributions

A.Y., Y.L. and C.L. designed the research; C.L., L.Z., W.L., Z.Z., L.Y. and L.S. performed the research; C.L., B.W., S.L. and W.Z. analyzed the data; A.Y., Y.L. and C.L. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Program of Transgenic Variety Development of China (2020ZX08009-04B), the Science and Technology Major Program Hubei Province (2021ABA011), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31701399), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (PC2020035).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yaoguang Liu (South China Agricultural University) for providing the Cas9 vector. We are thankful for the Baichuan Followship, College of Life Science and Technology of Huazhong Agricultural University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Urnov, F.D.; Rebar, E.J.; Holmes, M.C.; Zhang, H.S.; Gregory, P.D. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Joung, J.K.; Sander, J.D. TALENs: A widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bassett, A.R.; Tibbit, C.; Ponting, C.P.; Liu, J.L. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Savic, N.; Schwank, G. Advances in therapeutic CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Transl Res. 2016, 168, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, W.; Zhou, H.; Bi, H.; Fromm, M.; Yang, B.; Weeks, D.P. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, C.; He, Y.; Ma, Y.; Hou, H.; Guo, X. Engineering Herbicide-Resistant Rice Plants through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homologous Recombination of Acetolactate Synthase. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, X.; Wu, S.; Xu, J.; Sui, C.; Wei, J. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in plant biology. Acta Pharm. Sin B. 2017, 7, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussain, B.; Lucas, S.J.; Budak, H. CRISPR/Cas9 in plants: At play in the genome and at work for crop improvement. Brief Funct Genomics. 2018, 17, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lim, S.H.; So, B.H.; Wang, J.C.; Song, E.S.; Park, Y.J.; Lee, B.M.; Kang, H.W. Functional analysis of pilQ gene in Xanthomanas oryzae pv. oryzae, bacterial blight pathogen of rice. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chu, Z.; Yuan, M.; Yao, J.; Ge, X.; Yuan, B.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Promoter mutations of an essential gene for pollen development result in disease resistance in rice. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yuan, M.; Chu, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, S. The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae overcomes rice defenses by regulating host copper redistribution. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3164–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schroeder, J.I.; Delhaize, E.; Frommer, W.B.; Guerinot, M.L.; Harrison, M.J.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Horie, T.; Sanders, D. Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production. Nature 2013, 497, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Romer, P.; Recht, S.; Strauss, T.; Elsaesser, J.; Schornack, S.; Boch, J.; Wang, S.; Lahaye, T. Promoter elements of rice susceptibility genes are bound and activated by specific TAL effectors from the bacterial blight pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. New Phytol. 2010, 187, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yuan, T.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. Characterization of Xanthomonas oryzae-responsive cis-acting element in the promoter of rice race-specific susceptibility gene Xa13. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Z.; Xu, X.; Gong, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, S. Engineering broad-spectrum bacterial blight resistance by simultaneously disrupting variable tale-binding elements of multiple susceptibility genes in rice. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oliva, R.; Ji, C.; Atienza-Grande, G.; Huguet-Tapia, J.C.; Yang, B. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.; Li, W.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, H.; Xie, C.; Lin, Y. A new rice breeding method: Crispr/cas9 system editing of the xa13 promoter to cultivate transgene-free bacterial blight-resistant rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mew, T.W.; Cruz, V.; Medalla, E.S. Changes in race frequency of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in response to rice cultivars planted in the Philippines. Plant Dis. 1992, 76, 1029–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, W.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, R.; Wang, B.; Liu, Y.G. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1274–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hiei, Y.; Ohta, S.; Komari, T.; Kumashiro, T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 1994, 6, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Y.J.; Zhang, Q. Optimising the tissue culture conditions for high efficiency transformation of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 23, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kauffman, H.E. An improved technique for evaluat-ing resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 1973, 57, 537–541. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, C.; Wei, J.; Lin, Y.; Chen, H. Gene silencing using the recessive rice bacterial blight resistance gene xa13 as a new paradigm in plant breeding. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q. Xa26, a gene conferring resistance toXanthomonas oryzaepv.oryzaein rice, encodes an LRR receptor kinase-like protein. Plant J. 2004, 37, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodriguez-Leal, D.; Lemmon, Z.H.; Man, J.; Bartlett, M.E.; Lippman, Z.B. Engineering Quantitative Trait Variation for Crop Improvement by Genome Editing. Cell 2017, 171, 470–480.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, T.; Liu, B.; Spalding, M.H.; Weeks, D.P.; Yang, B. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 390–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blanvillain-Baufume, S.; Reschke, M.; Sole, M.; Auguy, F.; Doucoure, H.; Szurek, B.; Meynard, D.; Szurek, B.; Koebnik, R. Targeted promoter editing for rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae reveals differential activities for SWEET14-inducing TAL effectors. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jia, H.; Orbovic, V.; Jones, J.B.; Wang, N. Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in Type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccDeltapthA4:dCsLOB1.3 infection. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, A.; Chen, S.; Lei, T.; Xu, L.; He, Y.; Wu, L.; Yao, L.; Zou, X. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, J.H.; Miller, S.M.; Geurts, M.H.; Tang, W.; Chen, L.; Sun, N.; Zeina, C.M.; Liu, D.R. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 2018, 556, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, H.; Si, X.; Ji, X.; Fan, R.; Liu, J.; Chen, K.; Wang, D. Genome editing of upstream open reading frames enables translational control in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hajira, S.K.; Sundaram, R.M.; Laha, G.S.; Yugander, A.; Balachandran, S.M.; Viraktamath, B.C.; Sujatha, K.; Rekha, G. A Single-Tube, Functional Marker-Based Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Major Bacterial Blight Resistance Genes Xa21, xa13 and xa5 in Rice. Rice Sci. 2016, 23, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 02535 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of promoter editing vector Cas9: P1+P2 and results of the editing of the Xa13 promoter mediated by Cas9: P1+P2 in two conventional rice varieties. (A) Schematic description of the wild-type Xa13 promoter. Two target sites (P1 and P2) were located in the promoter region upstream of the Xa13 CDS region. The 31 bp PXO99-inducible element was located entirely between the two target sites (P1 and P2). (B) PCR products amplified by primers PCX-F/R to detect the results of the Xa13 promoter edited with the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the T0 generation of KY131. Three transgenic rice materials (KY-PD1-3), which were completely cut between P1 and P2 by Cas9 protein, were obtained. (C) Sequences and chromatograms of the three transgenic plants (KY-PD1-3) after editing. All three transgenic plants (PD1-3) were perfectly connected and repaired after cutting at the two target sites without any base deletion or insertion. (D) PCR products amplified by primers PCX-F/R to detect the results of the Xa13 promoter edited with the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the T0 generation of HHZ. Four transgenic rice materials (HHZ-PD1-4), which were completely cut between P1 and P2 by the Cas9 protein, were obtained. (E) Sequences and chromatograms of the four transgenic plants (HHZ-PD1-4) after editing. All four transgenic plants (HHZ-PD1-4) were perfectly connected and repaired after cutting at the two target sites without any base deletion or insertion.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of promoter editing vector Cas9: P1+P2 and results of the editing of the Xa13 promoter mediated by Cas9: P1+P2 in two conventional rice varieties. (A) Schematic description of the wild-type Xa13 promoter. Two target sites (P1 and P2) were located in the promoter region upstream of the Xa13 CDS region. The 31 bp PXO99-inducible element was located entirely between the two target sites (P1 and P2). (B) PCR products amplified by primers PCX-F/R to detect the results of the Xa13 promoter edited with the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the T0 generation of KY131. Three transgenic rice materials (KY-PD1-3), which were completely cut between P1 and P2 by Cas9 protein, were obtained. (C) Sequences and chromatograms of the three transgenic plants (KY-PD1-3) after editing. All three transgenic plants (PD1-3) were perfectly connected and repaired after cutting at the two target sites without any base deletion or insertion. (D) PCR products amplified by primers PCX-F/R to detect the results of the Xa13 promoter edited with the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the T0 generation of HHZ. Four transgenic rice materials (HHZ-PD1-4), which were completely cut between P1 and P2 by the Cas9 protein, were obtained. (E) Sequences and chromatograms of the four transgenic plants (HHZ-PD1-4) after editing. All four transgenic plants (HHZ-PD1-4) were perfectly connected and repaired after cutting at the two target sites without any base deletion or insertion.
Cells 11 02535 g001
Cells 11 02535 g002 550
Figure 2. Detection of Xa13 gene expression in T0 transgenic rice KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves of transgenic rice KY-PD1-3 after PXO99 inoculation. Further detection of Xa13 expression by qRT-PCR after inoculation in all T0 generation lines of KY-PD1-3. After inoculation, expression of Xa13 was upregulated 40 times in the wild-type KY131, but not in transgenic rice KY-PD1-3. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves of transgenic rice HHZ-PD1-4 after PXO99 inoculation. After inoculation, expression of Xa13 was upregulated 19 times in the wild-type HHZ, but not in transgenic rice HHZ-PD1-4. (C) RT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves and anthers of transgenic rice KY-PD1 by primer X13-Qt1F/R. In the wild-type KY131 and transgenic rice KY-PD1, expression levels of the Xa13 gene were low in leaves but high in anthers. Expression of Xa13 was greatly induced after PXO99 inoculation (3 days) in the wild-type KY131 but was quite low in transgenic rice KY-PD1. (D) RT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves and anthers of transgenic rice HHZ-PD1 by primer X13-Qt1F/R. In the wild-type HHZ and transgenic rice HHZ-PD1, expression levels of the Xa13 gene were very low in leaves but quite high in anthers. Expression of Xa13 was greatly induced after PXO99 inoculation (3 days) in the wild-type HHZ but was quite low in transgenic rice HHZ-PD1.
Figure 2. Detection of Xa13 gene expression in T0 transgenic rice KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves of transgenic rice KY-PD1-3 after PXO99 inoculation. Further detection of Xa13 expression by qRT-PCR after inoculation in all T0 generation lines of KY-PD1-3. After inoculation, expression of Xa13 was upregulated 40 times in the wild-type KY131, but not in transgenic rice KY-PD1-3. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves of transgenic rice HHZ-PD1-4 after PXO99 inoculation. After inoculation, expression of Xa13 was upregulated 19 times in the wild-type HHZ, but not in transgenic rice HHZ-PD1-4. (C) RT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves and anthers of transgenic rice KY-PD1 by primer X13-Qt1F/R. In the wild-type KY131 and transgenic rice KY-PD1, expression levels of the Xa13 gene were low in leaves but high in anthers. Expression of Xa13 was greatly induced after PXO99 inoculation (3 days) in the wild-type KY131 but was quite low in transgenic rice KY-PD1. (D) RT-PCR analysis of Xa13 in the leaves and anthers of transgenic rice HHZ-PD1 by primer X13-Qt1F/R. In the wild-type HHZ and transgenic rice HHZ-PD1, expression levels of the Xa13 gene were very low in leaves but quite high in anthers. Expression of Xa13 was greatly induced after PXO99 inoculation (3 days) in the wild-type HHZ but was quite low in transgenic rice HHZ-PD1.
Cells 11 02535 g002
Cells 11 02535 g003 550
Figure 3. Agronomic traits, bacterial leaf blight resistance, and pollen fertility of wild-type and transgenic rice plants (KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1). (A) Agronomic traits and phenotype detection of the wild-type KY131 and transgenic rice KY-PD1. There was no significant difference between transgenic rice KY-PD1 and the wild type in terms of agronomic traits. Transgenic plants KY-PD1 showed similar pollen fertility to the wild-type KY131 after I2-KI staining of pollen. (B) Lesion length of the wild-type KY131 and transgenic plant KY-PD1-3 after 14 days of inoculation. Resistance of transgenic plants KY-PD1-3 was much higher than that of the wild-type KY131. (C) Agronomic traits and genotype detection of the wild-type HHZ and transgenic rice HHZ-PD1. There was no significant difference between transgenic rice HHZ-PD1 and the wild type in terms of agronomic traits. Transgenic plants HHZ-PD1 showed similar pollen fertility to the wild-type HHZ after I2-KI staining of pollen. (D) Lesion length of the wild-type HHZ and transgenic plant KY-PD1-3 after 14 days of inoculation. Resistance of transgenic plants HHZ-PD1-4 was much higher than that of the wild-type HHZ.
Figure 3. Agronomic traits, bacterial leaf blight resistance, and pollen fertility of wild-type and transgenic rice plants (KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1). (A) Agronomic traits and phenotype detection of the wild-type KY131 and transgenic rice KY-PD1. There was no significant difference between transgenic rice KY-PD1 and the wild type in terms of agronomic traits. Transgenic plants KY-PD1 showed similar pollen fertility to the wild-type KY131 after I2-KI staining of pollen. (B) Lesion length of the wild-type KY131 and transgenic plant KY-PD1-3 after 14 days of inoculation. Resistance of transgenic plants KY-PD1-3 was much higher than that of the wild-type KY131. (C) Agronomic traits and genotype detection of the wild-type HHZ and transgenic rice HHZ-PD1. There was no significant difference between transgenic rice HHZ-PD1 and the wild type in terms of agronomic traits. Transgenic plants HHZ-PD1 showed similar pollen fertility to the wild-type HHZ after I2-KI staining of pollen. (D) Lesion length of the wild-type HHZ and transgenic plant KY-PD1-3 after 14 days of inoculation. Resistance of transgenic plants HHZ-PD1-4 was much higher than that of the wild-type HHZ.
Cells 11 02535 g003
Cells 11 02535 g004a 550Cells 11 02535 g004b 550
Figure 4. Disease resistance and genotype identification test in T1 progeny of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1. (A) Average lesion area of each T1 plant was measured 14 days after PXO99 inoculation to evaluate disease resistance. Compared with KY131-WT, all T1 progeny of KY-PD1 showed good disease resistance to PXO99. Results of PCR by primers PCas9-F/R showed that 6 of the 30 T1 plants failed to detect the Cas9 sequence. (B) Average lesion area of each T1 plant was measured 14 days after PXO99 inoculation to evaluate disease resistance. Compared with HHZ-WT, all T1 progeny of HHZ-PD1 showed good disease resistance to PXO99. Results of PCR by primers PCas9-F/R showed that 4 of the 30 T1 plants failed to detect the Cas9 sequence. The red arrow indicates transgene-free T1 plants without exogenous Cas9-introduced fragment.
Figure 4. Disease resistance and genotype identification test in T1 progeny of KY-PD1 and HHZ-PD1. (A) Average lesion area of each T1 plant was measured 14 days after PXO99 inoculation to evaluate disease resistance. Compared with KY131-WT, all T1 progeny of KY-PD1 showed good disease resistance to PXO99. Results of PCR by primers PCas9-F/R showed that 6 of the 30 T1 plants failed to detect the Cas9 sequence. (B) Average lesion area of each T1 plant was measured 14 days after PXO99 inoculation to evaluate disease resistance. Compared with HHZ-WT, all T1 progeny of HHZ-PD1 showed good disease resistance to PXO99. Results of PCR by primers PCas9-F/R showed that 4 of the 30 T1 plants failed to detect the Cas9 sequence. The red arrow indicates transgene-free T1 plants without exogenous Cas9-introduced fragment.
Cells 11 02535 g004aCells 11 02535 g004b
Cells 11 02535 g005 550
Figure 5. Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in leaves of wild-type and transgenic rice with/without Cas9 in T2 progeny. (A) Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in the leaves of wild-type KY131, T2 transgenic line KY-PD1 with Cas9, and T2 transgenic line KY-PD1 without Cas9. The results revealed that both PXO99-inoculated KY-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA showed lower growth rates and total bacterial counts than the wild-type KY131. (B) Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in the leaves of wild-type HHZ, T2 transgenic line HHZ-PD1 with Cas9, and T2 transgenic line HHZ-PD1 without Cas9. The results revealed that both PXO99-inoculated HHZ-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA showed lower growth rates and total bacterial counts than the wild-type HHZ.
Figure 5. Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in leaves of wild-type and transgenic rice with/without Cas9 in T2 progeny. (A) Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in the leaves of wild-type KY131, T2 transgenic line KY-PD1 with Cas9, and T2 transgenic line KY-PD1 without Cas9. The results revealed that both PXO99-inoculated KY-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA showed lower growth rates and total bacterial counts than the wild-type KY131. (B) Bacterial growth analysis of Xoo strain PXO99 in the leaves of wild-type HHZ, T2 transgenic line HHZ-PD1 with Cas9, and T2 transgenic line HHZ-PD1 without Cas9. The results revealed that both PXO99-inoculated HHZ-PD1 with/without exogenous DNA showed lower growth rates and total bacterial counts than the wild-type HHZ.
Cells 11 02535 g005
Table
Table 1. List of the primers used for CRISPR-Cas9 expression vector construction.
Table 1. List of the primers used for CRISPR-Cas9 expression vector construction.
PrimerPrimer Sequence (5’-3’)Function
P2U6a-FGCCGgagagagggacagatctagvector construction
P2U6a-RAAACctagatctgtccctctctcvector construction
P1U3-FGGCActatataaacactgagccavector construction
P1U3-RAAACtggctcagtgtttatatagvector construction
gRctga-B2AGCGTGggtctcGtcagGGTCCATCCACTCCAAGCTCvector construction
Uctga-B2′TTCAGAggtctcTctgaCACTGGAATCGGCAGCAAAGGvector construction
gRcggt-BLAGCGTGggtctcGaccgACGCGTCCATCCACTCCAAGCTCvector construction
U-FCTCCGTTTTACCTGTGGAATCGvector construction
gRNA-RCGGAGGAAAATTCCATCCACvector construction
PT15’-TTCAGAggtctcTctcgACTAGTGGAATCGGCAGCAAAGG-3’/5’-AGCGTGggtctcGtcagGGTCCATCCACTCCAAGCTC-3’vector construction
PT2L5’-TTCAGAggtctcTctgaCACTGGAATCGGCAGCAAAGG-3’/5’-AGCGTGggtctcGaccgACGCGTCCATCCACTCCAAGCTC-3’vector construction
Table
Table 2. List of the primers used for molecular detection of transgenic rice.
Table 2. List of the primers used for molecular detection of transgenic rice.
PrimerPrimer Sequence (5’-3’)Function
PCX-FGCATCATTGTCCATGGTTGgenotype test
PCX-RGCTAGAGAGGAAGGCTTAAGgenotype test
GAPDH-FCTGCAACTCAGAAGACCGTTGqRT-PCR test
GAPDH-RCCTGTTGTCACCCTGGAAGTCqRT-PCR test
X13-Qt1FAGTCGACGGGAGGGTACAGqRT-PCR test
X13-Qt1RGACGAGGTAGAGGGTGGTGAqRT-PCR test
PCas9-FATGACTCTCTTACCTTCAgenotype test
PCas9-RTAGTTCTTCATCTTCTTGgenotype test
hpt-FAGAATCTCGTGCTTTCAGCTTCGAgenotype test
hpt-RTCAAGACCAATGCGGAGCATATACgenotype test
Table
Table 3. Disease resistance and agronomic traits of T0 generation KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4 plants.
Table 3. Disease resistance and agronomic traits of T0 generation KY-PD1-3 and HHZ-PD1-4 plants.
LinenLesion Length (cm) aLesion Area (%) aSeeding Setting Rate (%)
KY13150 b116.99 ± 4.6362.46 ± 12.9077.5 ± 10.3 c
KY-PD161.25 ± 0.535.32 ± 1.9374.6
KY-PD261.33 ± 0.686.46 ± 3.6767.4
KY-PD360.83 ± 0.523.00 ± 2.0881.1
HHZ50 b217.92 ± 4.7365.94 ±13.6089.6 ± 3.7 c
HHZ-PD161.75 ± 0.427.56 ± 1.6586.38
HHZ-PD261.58 ± 0.387.36 ± 2.3688.28
HHZ-PD361.50 ± 0.325.30 ± 1.6793.46
HHZ-PD462.00 ± 0.327.03 ± 1.4689.83
a Data are means ± standard deviation; b 50 leaf samples from 10 plants; c 10 plants.
Table
Table 4. Main agronomic traits of KY-PD1 in the T2 generation.
Table 4. Main agronomic traits of KY-PD1 in the T2 generation.
LinenHeading Stage (d)Plant Height (cm) Panicles per Plant Panicle Length (cm) Seeding Setting Rate (%)Yield per Plant (g)
KY1313064.40 ± 1.35aA81.73 ± 1.60aA9.73 ± 1.64aA19.32 ± 0.62aA79.25 ± 5.09aA20.44 ± 1.00aA
KY-PD1 transgenic lines3065.13 ± 1.65aA82.23 ± 1.41aA9.57 ± 1.61aA19.08 ± 0.48aA78.66 ± 5.65aA20.17 ± 0.91abA
KY-PD1 transgenic-free lines3065.13 ± 1.93aA82.17 ± 1.60aA10.13 ± 0.90aA19.01 ± 0.62aA79.13 ± 4.14aA20.72 ± 0.97bA
Table
Table 5. Main agronomic traits of HHZ-PD1 in T2 generation.
Table 5. Main agronomic traits of HHZ-PD1 in T2 generation.
LinenHeading Stage (d)Plant Height (cm) Panicles per Plant Panicle Length (cm) Seeding Setting Rate (%)Yield per Plant (g)
HHZ3093.60 ± 1.81aA101.90 ± 2.35aA16.67 ± 1.63aA22.42 ± 0.70aA84.71 ± 5.29aA36.26 ± 1.20aA
HHZ-PD1 transgenic lines3093.10 ± 2.87aA101.00 ± 2.79aA16.57 ± 1.61aA22.30 ± 0.46aA84.29 ± 5.64aA36.07 ± 0.81abA
HHZ-PD1 transgenic-free lines3092.27 ± 3.30aA101.57 ± 1.92aA16.93 ± 1.05aA22.25 ± 0.49aA85.01 ± 4.15aA36.65 ± 0.87bA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Zhou, L.; Wu, B.; Li, S.; Zha, W.; Li, W.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, L.; Shi, L.; Lin, Y.; et al. Improvement of Bacterial Blight Resistance in Two Conventionally Cultivated Rice Varieties by Editing the Noncoding Region. Cells 2022, 11, 2535. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162535

AMA Style

Li C, Zhou L, Wu B, Li S, Zha W, Li W, Zhou Z, Yang L, Shi L, Lin Y, et al. Improvement of Bacterial Blight Resistance in Two Conventionally Cultivated Rice Varieties by Editing the Noncoding Region. Cells. 2022; 11(16):2535. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162535

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Changyan, Lei Zhou, Bian Wu, Sanhe Li, Wenjun Zha, Wei Li, Zaihui Zhou, Linfeng Yang, Lei Shi, Yongjun Lin, and et al. 2022. "Improvement of Bacterial Blight Resistance in Two Conventionally Cultivated Rice Varieties by Editing the Noncoding Region" Cells 11, no. 16: 2535. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162535

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop